Edgar Filing: CODORUS VALLEY BANCORP INC

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from____________to______________

Commission file number: 0-15536


	CODORUS VALLEY BANCORP, INC.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


	Pennsylvania		23-2428543
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


	105 Leader Heights Road, P.O. Box 2887, York, Pennsylvania 17405
	(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)


	717-747-1519
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


	Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since the last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
	Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. On November 1, 2011, 4,171,105 shares of common stock, par value $2.50, were outstanding.

- 1 -

Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Form 10-Q Index


		Page #
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial statements (unaudited):
	Consolidated balance sheets	3
	Consolidated statements of income	4
	Consolidated statements of cash flows	5
	Consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity	6
	Notes to consolidated financial statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations	31

Item 3.	Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk	51

Item 4.	Controls and procedures	51

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal proceedings	51

Item 1A.	Risk factors	51

Item 2.	Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds	51

Item 3.	Defaults upon senior securities	51

Item 4.	Removed and Reserved	51

Item 5.	Other information	51

Item 6.	Exhibits	52

SIGNATURES		54

- 2 -

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Unaudited


(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Assets
Interest bearing deposits with banks	$	33,836		$	32,219
Cash and due from banks		12,738			8,050
Federal funds sold		0			3,000
Total cash and cash equivalents		46,574			43,269
Securities, available-for-sale		229,439			222,536
Restricted investment in bank stocks, at cost		3,822			4,067
Loans held for sale		2,966			4,990
Loans (net of deferred fees of $758 - 2011 and $713 - 2010)		685,785			640,849
Less-allowance for loan losses		(8,617	)		(7,626	)
Net loans		677,168			633,223
Premises and equipment, net		10,755			10,766
Other assets		43,126			38,481
Total assets	$	1,013,850		$	957,332
Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest bearing	$	75,274		$	65,642
Interest bearing		782,474			740,468
Total deposits		857,748			806,110
Short-term borrowings		11,979			6,763
Long-term debt		36,576			51,732
Junior subordinated debt		10,310			10,310
Other liabilities		6,071			5,878
Total liabilities		922,684			880,793

Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, par value $2.50 per share; $1,000 liquidation preference, 1,000,000 shares authorized; 25,000 Series B shares issued and outstanding - 2011 and 16,500 Series A - 2010		25,000			15,983
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,171,105 shares issued and outstanding - 2011 and 4,131,802 - 2010		10,428			10,330
Additional paid-in capital		37,183			37,290
Retained earnings		12,511			10,798
Accumulated other comprehensive income		6,044			2,138
Total shareholders’ equity		91,166			76,539
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,013,850		$	957,332

See accompanying notes.

- 3 -

Table of Contents

Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited


	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2011			2010		2011			2010
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	10,146		$	9,748	$	29,058		$	28,395
Investment securities:
Taxable		975			826		2,962			2,454
Tax-exempt		598			617		1,840			1,785
Dividends		2			2		6			6
Other		17			25		42			53
Total interest income		11,738			11,218		33,908			32,693
Interest expense
Deposits		2,817			2,884		8,491			8,494
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings		29			23		82			65
Long-term and junior subordinated debt		285			391		828			1,288
Total interest expense		3,131			3,298		9,401			9,847
Net interest income		8,607			7,920		24,507			22,846
Provision for loan losses		3,560			560		4,785			1,910
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		5,047			7,360		19,722			20,936
Noninterest income
Trust and investment services fees		384			348		1,124			1,067
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales		308			329		891			1,091
Service charges on deposit accounts		657			632		1,934			1,843
Income from bank owned life insurance		164			161		489			480
Other income		153			147		453			433
Gains on sales of loans held for sale		126			177		422			538
Gain (loss) on sales of securities		0			0		(25	)		108
Total noninterest income		1,792			1,794		5,288			5,560
Noninterest expense
Personnel		3,218			3,393		10,182			9,812
Occupancy of premises, net		501			465		1,485			1,459
Furniture and equipment		434			405		1,305			1,264
Postage, stationery and supplies		128			112		397			389
Professional and legal		205			121		480			365
Marketing and advertising		278			179		661			529
FDIC insurance		223			331		785			955
Debit card processing		169			156		488			436
Charitable donations		37			43		272			399
Foreclosed real estate including (gains) losses on sales		214			765		1,305			1,749
Impaired loan carrying costs		95			199		521			782
Other		815			772		2,406			2,128
Total noninterest expense		6,317			6,941		20,287			20,267
Income before income taxes		522			2,213		4,723			6,229
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(139	)		433		679			1,113
Net income		661			1,780		4,044			5,116
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion		657			245		1,148			735
Net income available to common shareholders	$	4		$	1,535	$	2,896		$	4,381
Net income per common share, basic	$	0.00		$	0.37	$	0.70		$	1.07
Net income per common share, diluted	$	0.00		$	0.37	$	0.69		$	1.07

See accompanying notes.

- 4 -

Table of Contents

Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited


	Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	4,044		$	5,116
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation/amortization		978			1,030
Net amortization of securities		1,060			761
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees and costs		(201	)		(263	)
Amortization of intangible assets		29			30
Provision for loan losses		4,785			1,910
Provision for losses on foreclosed real estate		388			722
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		(198	)		168
Amortization of investment in real estate partnership		436			421
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance investment		(489	)		(480	)
Originations of loans held for sale		(25,184	)		(33,456	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		27,630			30,350
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale		(422	)		(538	)
Loss on disposal of premises and equipment		0			8
Net loss (gain) on sales of securities available-for-sale		25			(108	)
Gain on sales of held for sale assets		0			(35	)
Net gain on sales of foreclosed real estate		(154	)		(110	)
Stock-based compensation expense		188			87
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable		322			(126	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(1,592	)		976
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(73	)		(19	)
Increase in other liabilities		273			3,525
Net cash provided by operating activities		11,845			9,969
Cash flows from investing activities
Securities, available-for-sale
Purchases		(34,296	)		(89,850	)
Maturities, repayments and calls		26,150			25,561
Sales		6,077			4,845
Redemption of restricted investment in bank stock		245			0
Net increase in loans made to customers		(50,414	)		(5,890	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(967	)		(713	)
Investment in life insurance		(7	)		(7	)
Investment in foreclosed real estate		(4,243	)		(8	)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate		728			7,802
Net cash used in investing activities		(56,727	)		(58,260	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase in demand and savings deposits		54,435			49,081
Net (decrease) increase in time deposits		(2,797	)		23,093
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		5,216			(1,403	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		15,000			0
Repayment of long-term debt		(30,156	)		(21,944	)
Cash dividends paid to preferred shareholders		(775	)		(619	)
Cash dividends paid to common shareholders		(1,078	)		(694	)
Redemption of preferred stock and common stock warrant		(17,027	)		0
Issuance of preferred stock		25,000			0
Issuance of common stock		369			173
Net cash provided by financing activities		48,187			47,687
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		3,305			(604	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		43,269			26,179
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	46,574		$	25,575

See accompanying notes.

- 5 -

Table of Contents

Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Unaudited


(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Preferred Stock			Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total

Balance, January 1, 2011	$	15,983		$	10,330	$	37,290		$	10,798		$	2,138	$	76,539
Comprehensive income:
Net income										4,044					4,044
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax:
Unrealized gains on securities, net													3,906		3,906
Total comprehensive income															7,950
Preferred stock discount accretion		478								(478	)				0
Common stock cash dividends ($0.26 per share)										(1,078	)				(1,078	)
Preferred stock dividends										(775	)				(775	)
Redemption of preferred stock and repurchase of common stock warrant		(16,461	)				(566	)							(17,027	)
Issuance of preferred stock		25,000													25,000
Stock-based compensation							188								188
Issuance of common stock:
19,291 shares under dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan					48		153								201
14,682 shares under stock option plan					37		89								126
5,330 shares under employee stock purchase plan					13		29								42

Balance, September 30, 2011	$	25,000		$	10,428	$	37,183		$	12,511		$	6,044	$	91,166

Balance, January 1, 2010	$	15,828		$	10,187	$	37,004		$	6,592		$	2,401	$	72,012
Comprehensive income:
Net income										5,116					5,116
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax:
Unrealized gains on securities, net													2,360		2,360
Total comprehensive income															7,476
Preferred stock discount accretion		116								(116	)				0
Common stock cash dividends ($0.17 per share)										(694	)				(694	)
Preferred stock dividends										(619	)				(619	)
Stock-based compensation							87								87
Issuance of common stock:
17,759 shares under dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan					44		92								136
7,932 shares under employee stock purchase plan					20		17								37

Balance, September 30, 2010	$	15,944		$	10,251	$	37,200		$	10,279		$	4,761	$	78,435

See accompanying notes.

- 6 -

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q, and FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 270. Accordingly, the interim financial statements do not include all of the financial information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition and results of operations for the reported periods, and are of a normal and recurring nature.

These consolidated statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned bank subsidiary, PeoplesBank, A Codorus Valley Company (PeoplesBank), and its wholly owned nonbank subsidiary, SYC Realty Company, Inc. (collectively referred to as Codorus Valley or the Corporation). PeoplesBank has four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Codorus Valley Financial Advisors, Inc., SYC Settlement Services, Inc. and two subsidiaries whose purpose is to temporarily hold foreclosed properties pending eventual liquidation. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The combined results of operations of the nonbank subsidiaries are not material to the consolidated financial statements.

The results of operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

In accordance with FASB ASC 855, the Corporation evaluated the events and transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2011, and through the date these financial statements were issued for items of potential recognition or disclosure.

Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies

Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances less amounts charged off, net of an allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Generally, loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) over the contractual life of the loan. The loan portfolio is segmented into commercial and consumer loans. Commercial loans consist of the following industry classes: builder & developer, commercial real estate investor, residential real estate investor, hotel/motel, wholesale & retail, agriculture, manufacturing and all other. Consumer loans consist of the following classes: residential mortgage, home equity and all other.

For all classes of loans, the accrual of interest is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either adequately guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Interest received on nonaccrual loans, including impaired loans, generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to the Corporation’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time, generally six months, and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments.

- 7 -

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents the Corporation’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. The Corporation performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Corporation’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific and general allocations and an unallocated component. The specific allocation relates to loans that are classified as impaired, generally substandard and nonaccrual loans. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the collateral value (or discounted cash flows or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general allocation component covers pools of loans by loan class including commercial loans not considered impaired, as well as smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate, home equity and other consumer loans. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these classes of loans, adjusted for qualitative (environmental) risk factors. Historical loss rates are based on a two year rolling average of net charge-offs. Qualitative risk factors that supplement historical losses in the evaluation of loan pools include:


	•	Changes in national and local economies and business conditions
	•	Changes in the value of collateral for collateral dependent loans
	•	Changes in the level of concentrations of credit
	•	Changes in the volume and severity of classified and past due loans
	•	Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio
	•	Changes in collection, charge-off, and recovery procedures
	•	Changes in underwriting standards and loan terms
	•	Changes in the quality of the loan review system
	•	Changes in the experience/ability of lending management and key lending staff
	•	Regulatory and legal regulations that could affect the level of credit losses
	•	Other pertinent environmental factors

Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on the Corporation’s best judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect the Corporation’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the loan portfolio.

- 8 -

Table of Contents

As disclosed in Note 5-Loans, the Corporation engages in commercial and consumer lending. Loans are made within the Corporation’s primary market area and surrounding areas, and include the purchase of whole loans or participation interests in loans from other financial institutions. Commercial related loans, which pose the greatest risk of loss to the Corporation, whether originated or purchased, are generally secured by real estate. Within the broad commercial loan segment, the builder & developer and commercial real estate investor loan classes generally present a higher level of risk than other commercial loan classifications. This increased risk is due to several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the effect of general economic conditions on income producing properties, unstable real estate prices and the dependency upon successful construction and sale or operation of the real estate project.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered in determining impairment include payment status and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. The Corporation determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Commercial loans that are collateral dependent and deemed impaired are generally evaluated for impairment loss based on the fair value of the collateral. For commercial loans that are not collateral dependent, the Corporation relies on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, to determine any impairment loss. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Corporation does not separately identify individual residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and other consumer loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are classified as troubled debt restructurings.

An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs (i.e., net realizable value). For commercial loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the most recent appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are generally discounted to provide for selling costs and other factors to determine an estimate of the net realizable value of the property.

For commercial loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower’s financial statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable aging or equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets.

Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the Corporation grants borrowers experiencing financial difficulties concessions that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring may involve a reduction of the debt, accrued interest or interest rate, or extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk. Non-accrual troubled debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for a reasonable period of time, generally six consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired.

- 9 -

Table of Contents

Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Corporation to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to the Corporation. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, the Corporation believes that the level of the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2011 is adequate.

Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed real estate, included in other assets, is comprised of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding, property that is acquired through acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure and property that has not yet been acquired but which is classified as an insubstance foreclosure. Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at fair value minus estimated costs to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Appraisals are generally used to determine fair value. After foreclosure, management reviews valuations at least quarterly and adjusts the asset to the lower of cost or fair value minus estimated costs to sell through a valuation allowance. Costs related to the improvement of foreclosed real estate are generally capitalized until the real estate reaches a saleable condition. Revenue and expense from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in expense. When a foreclosed real estate asset is ultimately sold, any gain or loss on the sale is included in the income statement as a component of noninterest expense. At September 30, 2011, foreclosed real estate, net of allowance, was $15,739,000, compared to $10,572,000 for December 31, 2010.

Per Common Share Computations

The weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding used for basic and diluted calculations are provided below:


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income available to common shareholders	$	4	$	1,535	$	2,896	$	4,381

Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)		4,167		4,097		4,152		4,086
Effect of dilutive stock options		39		9		45		4
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted)		4,206		4,106		4,197		4,090

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.00	$	0.37	$	0.70	$	1.07
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.00	$	0.37	$	0.69	$	1.07

Anti-dilutive stock options and common stock warrants excluded from the computation of earnings per share		88		421		88		427

- 10 -

Table of Contents

Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income and related tax effects are presented in the following table:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period	$	2,461		$	958		$	5,893		$	3,684
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in income		0			0			25			(108	)
Net unrealized gains		2,461			958			5,918			3,576
Tax effect		(837	)		(326	)		(2,012	)		(1,216	)
Net of tax amount	$	1,624		$	632		$	3,906		$	2,360

Cash Flow Information

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Corporation considers interest bearing deposits with banks, cash and due from banks, and federal funds sold to be cash and cash equivalents. Non-cash items for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 consisted of the transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate in the amount of $1,885,000. The increase in other liabilities includes accounts payable for investment in foreclosed real estate of $476,000. Comparatively, for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, non-cash items consisted of the transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate in the amount of $8,291,000 and the transfer of loans held for sale to investment in the amount of $160,000.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. The provisions of this Update amend FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to facilitate the continued alignment of U.S. GAAP with International Accounting Standards. The Update prohibits the presentation of the components of comprehensive income in the statement of shareholders’ equity. Reporting entities are allowed to present either: a statement of comprehensive income, which reports both net income and other comprehensive income; or separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. Under previous GAAP, all 3 presentations were acceptable. Regardless of the presentation selected, the reporting entity is required to present all reclassifications between other comprehensive and net income on the face of the new statement or statements. The provisions of this Update are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2011 for public entities. As the two remaining options for presentation existed prior to the issuance of this Update, early adoption is permitted. The Corporation is evaluating the impact of the Update on its consolidated financial statements.

- 11 -

Table of Contents

The FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S GAAP and IFRSs.” This Update amends FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, to bring U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements in line with International Accounting Standards. The Update clarifies existing guidance for items such as: the application of the highest and best use concept to non-financial assets and liabilities; the application of fair value measurement to financial instruments classified in a reporting entity’s stockholder’s equity; and disclosure requirements regarding quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of level 3 assets. The Update also creates an exception to Topic 820 for entities which carry financial instruments within a portfolio or group, under which the entity is now permitted to base the price used for fair valuation upon a price that would be received to sell the net asset position or transfer a net liability position in an orderly transaction. The Update also allows for the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement if the financial instrument is categorized in level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Lastly, the ASU contains new disclosure requirements regarding fair value amounts categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy such as: disclosure of the valuation process used; effects of and relationships between unobservable inputs; usage of nonfinancial assets for purposes other than their highest and best use when that is the basis of the disclosed fair value; and categorization by level of items disclosed at fair value, but not measured at fair value for financial statement purposes. This Update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Corporation is evaluating the impact of this Update on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Under the proposed roadmap, the Corporation may be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS as early as 2015. The SEC has indicated it will make a determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS. The Corporation is currently assessing the impact that this potential change would have on its consolidated financial statements, and it will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of IFRS.

Note 3-Securities

A summary of securities, available-for-sale at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is provided below:


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Estimated Fair Value
(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Estimated Fair Value

September 30, 2011
Debt securities:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	10,005	$	149	$	0		$	10,154
U.S. agency		29,612		1,140		0			30,752
U.S. agency mortgage-backed, residential		100,137		3,927		0			104,064
State and municipal		80,527		3,946		(4	)		84,469
Total debt securities	$	220,281	$	9,162	$	(4	)	$	229,439

December 31, 2010
Debt securities:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	8,014	$	126	$	0		$	8,140
U.S. agency		13,519		155		(31	)		13,643
U.S. agency mortgage-backed, residential		108,967		2,213		(827	)		110,353
State and municipal		88,796		2,079		(475	)		90,400
Total debt securities	$	219,296	$	4,573	$	(1,333	)	$	222,536

- 12 -

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities if call options on select debt issues are exercised in the future. Mortgage-backed securities are included in the maturity categories based on average expected life.


	Available-for-sale
*(dollars in thousands)*	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	12,228	$	12,331
Due after one year through five years		144,051		150,112
Due after five years through ten years		60,179		63,033
Due after ten years		3,823		3,963
Total debt securities	$	220,281	$	229,439

Gross realized gains and losses on sales of securities are shown below.


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011			2010

Realized gains	$	0	$	0	$	79		$	108
Realized losses		0		0		(104	)		0
Net gains (losses)	$	0	$	0	$	(25	)	$	108

Realized gains and losses from the sale of securities, available-for-sale are computed on the basis of specific identification of the adjusted cost of each security and are shown net as a separate line item in the income statement.

Securities, issued by agencies of the federal government, with a carrying value of $140,819,000 and $125,785,000 on September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged to secure public and trust deposits, repurchase agreements, other short-term borrowings and Federal Home Loan Bank debt.

The table below shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time, for securities, available-for-sale that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
*(dollars in thousands)*	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2011
Debt securities:
State and municipal	$	899	$	4	$	0	$	0	$	899	$	4
Total temporarily impaired debt securities	$	899	$	4	$	0	$	0	$	899	$	4

December 31, 2010
Debt securities:
U.S. agencies	$	4,969	$	31	$	0	$	0	$	4,969	$	31
U.S. agency mortgage-backed, residential		50,982		827		0		0		50,982		827
State and municipal		20,382		429		350		46		20,732		475
Total temporarily impaired debt securities	$	76,333	$	1,287	$	350	$	46	$	76,683	$	1,333

- 13 -

Table of Contents

At September 30, 2011, the unrealized losses of $4,000 within the less than 12 months category were attributable to two different municipal issues with one rated AA+ by Standard & Poor’s rating service and the other rated Aa2 by the Moody’s rating service.

Securities, available-for-sale are analyzed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The analysis considers, among other factors: 1) whether the Corporation has the intent to sell its securities prior to market recovery or maturity; 2) whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell its securities prior to market recovery or maturity; 3) default rates/history by security type; 4) third-party securities ratings; 5) third-party guarantees; 6) subordination; 7) payment delinquencies; 8) nature of the issuer; and 9) current financial news.

The Corporation believes that unrealized losses at September 30, 2011 were primarily the result of changes in market interest rates and that it has the ability to hold these investments for a time necessary to recover the amortized cost. To date, the Corporation has collected all interest and principal on its investment securities as scheduled. The Corporation believes that collection of the contractual principal and interest is probable and therefore, all impairment is considered to be temporary.

Note 4—Restricted Investment in Bank Stocks

Restricted stock represents required investments in the common stock of correspondent banks, consisting primarily of the common stock of Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB) and, to a lesser degree, Atlantic Central Bankers Bank (ACBB) and is carried at cost as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Under the FHLB’s Capital Plan, PeoplesBank is required to maintain a minimum member stock investment, both as a condition of becoming and remaining a member and as a condition of borrowing from the FHLB. In December 2008, the FHLB notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock as strategies to preserve its capital. During 2010, the FHLB partially lifted its restriction on capital stock repurchases.

The Corporation evaluates the restricted stock for impairment in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 942. The determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on an assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as: (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the issuer as compared to the capital stock amount for the issuer and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the issuer to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the issuer, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the issuer. The Corporation believes that no impairment charge was necessary related to the restricted stock during the periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Note 5—Loans

The table below provides the composition of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The portfolio is comprised of two segments, commercial and consumer loans. The commercial loan segment is disaggregated by industry class which allows us to monitor risk and performance. Those industries representing the largest dollar investment and most risk are listed separately. The other commercial loans category is comprised of a multitude of industries, including: health services, professional services, public administration, restaurant, service, transportation, finance, natural resources, recreation and religious organizations. The consumer related segment is comprised of residential mortgages, home equity and other consumer loans. The Corporation does not engage in sub-prime residential mortgage originations.

- 14 -

Table of Contents


(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Builder & developer	$	102,605	$	95,735
Commercial real estate investor		110,672		95,281
Residential real estate investor		60,559		55,930
Hotel/Motel		51,034		48,041
Wholesale & retail		56,750		44,963
Manufacturing		25,857		24,989
Agriculture		17,221		14,247
Other		129,741		136,198
Total commercial related loans		554,439		515,384
Residential mortgages		22,472		20,357
Home equity		58,366		56,294
Other		50,508		48,814
Total consumer related loans		131,346		125,465
Total loans	$	685,785	$	640,849

Note 6— Loan Quality

The Corporation’s internal risk rating system follows regulatory guidance as to risk classifications and definitions. Every approved loan is assigned a risk rating. Generally, risk ratings for commercial related loans and residential mortgages held for investment are determined by a formal evaluation of risk factors performed by the Corporation’s underwriting staff. For consumer loans, and commercial loans up to $750,000, the Corporation uses third-party credit scoring software models for risk rating purposes. The loan portfolio is monitored on a continuous basis by loan officers, loan review personnel and senior management. Adjustments of loan risk ratings are generally performed by the Special Asset Committee, which includes senior management. The Committee, which meets monthly, makes changes, as appropriate, to risk ratings when it becomes aware of credit events such as payment delinquency, cessation of a business or project, bankruptcy or death of the borrower, or changes in collateral value.

The Corporation uses ten risk ratings to grade loans. The first seven ratings, representing the lowest risk, are combined and given a “pass” rating. A pass rating is a satisfactory credit rating, which applies to a loan that is expected to perform in accordance with the loan agreement and has a low probability of loss. A loan rated “special mention” has a potential weakness which may, if not corrected, weaken the loan or inadequately protect the Corporation’s position at some future date. A loan rated “substandard” is inadequately protected by the current net worth or paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. A “substandard” loan has a well defined weakness or weaknesses that could jeopardize liquidation of the loan, which exposes the Corporation to loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. When circumstances indicate that collection of the loan is doubtful, the loan is risk rated “nonaccrual,” the accrual of interest income is discontinued, and any unpaid interest previously credited to income is reversed. Accordingly, the table below does not include the regulatory classification of “doubtful,” nor does it include the regulatory classification of “loss” because the Corporation promptly charges off loan losses.

- 15 -

Table of Contents

The table below presents a summary of loan risk ratings by loan class at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


(dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Nonaccrual		Total
September 30, 2011
Builder & developer	$	94,206	$	6,152	$	460	$	1,787	$	102,605
Commercial real estate investor		98,326		10,105		0		2,241		110,672
Residential real estate investor		58,362		1,623		0		574		60,559
Hotel/Motel		51,034		0		0		0		51,034
Wholesale & retail		50,580		2,198		1,405		2,567		56,750
Manufacturing		25,132		725		0		0		25,857
Agriculture		16,727		0		494		0		17,221
Other		115,296		8,385		2,088		3,972		129,741
Total commercial related loans		509,663		29,188		4,447		11,141		554,439
Residential mortgage		22,244		0		41		187		22,472
Home equity		58,068		90		188		20		58,366
Other		49,613		285		344		266		50,508
Total consumer related loans		129,925		375		573		473		131,346
Total loans	$	639,588	$	29,563	$	5,020	$	11,614	$	685,785

December 31, 2010
Builder & developer	$	84,409	$	2,647	$	453	$	8,226	$	95,735
Commercial real estate investor		85,420		9,534		148		179		95,281
Residential real estate investor		55,346		94		0		490		55,930
Hotel/Motel		48,041		0		0		0		48,041
Wholesale & retail		37,252		1,850		1,019		4,842		44,963
Manufacturing		24,989		0		0		0		24,989
Agriculture		13,747		0		500		0		14,247
Other		123,965		6,300		1,913		4,020		136,198
Total commercial related loans		473,169		20,425		4,033		17,757		515,384
Residential mortgage		20,109		0		43		205		20,357
Home equity		56,183		12		0		99		56,294
Other		47,933		418		0		463		48,814
Total consumer related loans		124,225		430		43		767		125,465
Total loans	$	597,394	$	20,855	$	4,076	$	18,524	$	640,849

- 16 -

Table of Contents

The table below presents a summary of impaired loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Generally, impaired loans are loans risk rated substandard and nonaccrual. An allowance is established for those individual loans that are commercial related and only those consumer related loans classified as troubled debt restructurings where the Corporation has doubt as to full recovery of the outstanding principal balance. The recorded investment represents outstanding unpaid principal loan balances adjusted for charge-offs.


	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
(dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
Impaired loans with no related allowance:
Builder & developer	$	1,983	$	2,883	$	0	$	8,260	$	8,260	$	0
Commercial real estate investor		2,078		2,078		0		0		0		0
Residential real estate investor		482		482		0		394		394		0
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		0
Wholesale & retail		3,972		6,247		0		1,019		1,019		0
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		0
Agriculture		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other commercial		5,180		5,180		0		5,219		5,219		0
Residential mortgage		228		384		0		248		294		0
Home equity		208		208		0		99		99		0
Other consumer		610		610		0		463		463		0
Total impaired loans with no related allowance	$	14,741	$	18,072	$	0	$	15,702	$	15,748	$	0

Impaired loans with a related allowance:
Builder & developer	$	264	$	264	$	147	$	419	$	419	$	25
Commercial real estate investor		163		263		25		327		427		185
Residential real estate investor		92		92		30		96		96		10
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		0
Wholesale & retail		0		0		0		4,842		4,842		675
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		0
Agriculture		494		494		100		500		500		100
Other commercial		880		880		120		714		714		200
Residential mortgage		0		0		0		0		0		0
Home equity		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other consumer		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total impaired loans with a related allowance	$	1,893	$	1,993	$	422	$	6,898	$	6,998	$	1,195

Total impaired loans:
Builder & developer	$	2,247	$	3,147	$	147	$	8,679	$	8,679	$	25
Commercial real estate investor		2,241		2,341		25		327		427		185
Residential real estate investor		574		574		30		490		490		10
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		0
Wholesale & retail		3,972		6,247		0		5,861		5,861		675
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		0
Agriculture		494		494		100		500		500		100
Other commercial		6,060		6,060		120		5,933		5,933		200
Residential mortgage		228		384		0		248		294		0
Home equity		208		208		0		99		99		0
Other consumer		610		610		0		463		463		0
Total impaired loans	$	16,634	$	20,065	$	422	$	22,600	$	22,746	$	1,195

- 17 -

Table of Contents

The table below presents a summary of average impaired loans and related interest income for three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.


	Three months ended September 30, 2011						Nine months ended September 30, 2011
(dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income		Cash Basis		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income		Cash Basis
Impaired loans with no related allowance:
Builder & developer	$	3,852	$	172	$	165	$	5,601	$	392	$	374
Commercial real estate investor		2,049		20		14		1,025		36		26
Residential real estate investor		483		1		0		438		2		0
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		0
Wholesale & retail		2,695		25		0		1,857		65		0
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		0
Agriculture		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other commercial		5,627		86		65		5,428		332		264
Residential mortgage		272		2		1		277		12		11
Home equity		208		1		0		134		2		0
Other consumer		664		10		5		576		29		14
Total impaired loans with no related allowance	$	15,850	$	317	$	250	$	15,336	$	870	$	689

Impaired loans with a related allowance:
Builder & developer	$	1,366	$	0	$	0	$	929	$	0	$	0
Commercial real estate investor		166		0		0		208		0		0
Residential real estate investor		92		0		0		94		0		0
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		0
Wholesale & retail		2,421		0		0		3,632		0		0
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		0
Agriculture		496		9		0		498		26		0
Other commercial		791		18		0		751		22		0
Residential mortgage		0		0		0		0		0		0
Home equity		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other consumer		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total impaired loans with a related allowance	$	5,332	$	27	$	0	$	6,112	$	48	$	0

Total impaired loans:
Builder & developer	$	5,218	$	172	$	165	$	6,530	$	392	$	374
Commercial real estate investor		2,215		20		14		1,233		36		26
Residential real estate investor		575		1		0		532		2		0
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		0
Wholesale & retail		5,116		25		0		5,489		65		0
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		0
Agriculture		496		9		0		498		26		0
Other commercial		6,418		104		65		6,179		354		264
Residential mortgage		272		2		1		277		12		11
Home equity		208		1		0		134		2		0
Other consumer		664		10		5		576		29		14
Total impaired loans	$	21,182	$	344	$	250	$	21,448	$	918	$	689

- 18 -

Table of Contents

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by using an aging schedule which shows the length of time a loan is past due. The table below presents a summary of past due accruing loans, nonaccrual loans and current loans by loan segment and class at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


(dollars in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days and Greater Past Due		Total Past Due Accruing		Nonaccrual		Current		Total Loans
September 30, 2011
Builder & developer	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	1,787	$	100,818	$	102,605
Commercial real estate investor		0		61		0		61		2,241		108,370		110,672
Residential real estate investor		0		0		0		0		574		59,985		60,559
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		51,034		51,034
Wholesale & retail		525		403		0		928		2,567		53,255		56,750
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		25,857		25,857
Agriculture		0		0		0		0		0		17,221		17,221
Other		110		785		0		895		3,972		124,874		129,741
Total commercial related loans		635		1,249		0		1,884		11,141		541,414		554,439
Residential mortgage		73		0		0		73		187		22,212		22,472
Home equity		39		154		0		193		20		58,153		58,366
Other		414		7		0		421		266		49,821		50,508
Total consumer related loans		526		161		0		687		473		130,186		131,346
Total loans	$	1,161	$	1,410	$	0	$	2,571	$	11,614	$	671,600	$	685,785

December 31, 2010
Builder & developer	$	33	$	370	$	0	$	403	$	8,226	$	87,106	$	95,735
Commercial real estate investor		0		0		0		0		179		95,102		95,281
Residential real estate investor		212		0		0		212		490		55,228		55,930
Hotel/Motel		0		0		0		0		0		48,041		48,041
Wholesale & retail		0		0		0		0		4,842		40,121		44,963
Manufacturing		0		0		0		0		0		24,989		24,989
Agriculture		0		0		0		0		0		14,247		14,247
Other		0		392		0		392		4,020		131,786		136,198
Total commercial related loans		245		762		0		1,007		17,757		496,620		515,384
Residential mortgage		0		409		0		409		205		19,743		20,357
Home equity		264		50		0		314		99		55,881		56,294
Other		304		43		197		544		463		47,807		48,814
Total consumer related loans		568		502		197		1,267		767		123,431		125,465
Total loans	$	813	$	1,264	$	197	$	2,274	$	18,524	$	620,051	$	640,849

- 19 -

Table of Contents

The table below shows loans whose terms have been modified under troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Loans classified as TDRs are designated impaired and arise when the Corporation grants borrowers experiencing financial difficulties concessions that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted to the commercial related loans below involved an extension of the maturity date or a below market interest rate relative to new debt with similar risk. Generally, commercial loans are secured by real estate. If repayment of the loan is determined to be collateral dependent the loan is evaluated for impairment loss based on the fair value of the collateral. For commercial loans that are not collateral dependent, the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, is used to determine any impairment loss. Since year ended December 31, 2010, there was no impairment loss recognized on any of the TDRs reported below. Moreover, these loans are all performing under their modified terms.

A nonaccrual TDR represents a nonaccrual loan, as previously defined, which includes an economic concession. Nonaccrual TDRs are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for at least six consecutive payments after the modification and future principal and interest payments are reasonably assured. In contrast, an accruing TDR represents a loan that at the time of the modification has a demonstrated history of payments and that management believes that future loan payments are reasonably assured under the modified terms.

Three months ended September 30, 2011:


(dollars in thousands)	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial related loans
nonaccrual		1	$	2,151	$	2,151
accruing		2	$	2,936	$	2,936
Consumer related loans
nonaccrual		0	$	0	$	0
accruing		0	$	0	$	0

		Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted
Commercial related loans		0	$	0
Consumer related loans		0	$	0

Nine months ended September 30, 2011:


(dollars in thousands)	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Commercial related loans
nonaccrual	1	$	2,151	$	2,151
accruing	2	$	2,936	$	2,936
Consumer related loans
nonaccrual	0	$	0	$	0
accruing	1	$	188	$	188

	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted:
Commercial related loans	0	$	0
Consumer related loans	0	$	0

- 20 -

Table of Contents

The table below shows the activity in and the composition of the allowance for loan losses by loan segment and class detail as of and for three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and in summary fashion for the same periods of 2010.

Three months ended September 30,:


(dollars in thousands)	Builder & developer			Commercial real estate investor			Residential real estate investor			Hotel/Motel			Wholesale & retail			Manufacturing			Agriculture			Other			Total commercial related
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, July 1,	$	2,376		$	1,897		$	588		$	397		$	938		$	151		$	189		$	1,159		$	7,695
Charge-offs		(900	)		0			0			0			(2,275	)		0			0			0			(3,175	)
Recoveries		0			0			0			0			1			0			0			2			3
Provisions		901			18			(109	)		9			3,090			4			3			(238	)		3,678
Balance, September 30,	$	2,377		$	1,915		$	479		$	406		$	1,754		$	155		$	192		$	923		$	8,201

(dollars in thousands)	Residential mortgage			Home equity			Other			Total consumer related			Unallocated			2011			2010
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, July 1,	$	73		$	155		$	184		$	412		$	244		$	8,351		$	6,366
Charge-offs		(85	)		0			(81	)		(166	)		0			(3,341	)		(331	)
Recoveries		0			0			44			44			0			47			7
Provisions		127			(47	)		42			122			(240	)		3,560			560
Balance, September 30,	$	115		$	108		$	189		$	412		$	4		$	8,617		$	6,602

Nine months ended September 30,:


(dollars in thousands)	Builder & developer			Commercial real estate investor			Residential real estate investor			Hotel/Motel			Wholesale & retail			Manufacturing			Agriculture			Other			Total commercial related
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, January 1,	$	1,561		$	1,887		$	698		$	345		$	843		$	155		$	175		$	1,123		$	6,787
Charge-offs		(933	)		0			0			0			(2,420	)		0			0			(40	)		(3,393	)
Recoveries		0			0			0			0			3			0			0			2			5
Provisions		1,749			28			(219	)		61			3,328			0			17			(162	)		4,802
Balance, September 30,	$	2,377		$	1,915		$	479		$	406		$	1,754		$	155		$	192		$	923		$	8,201

(dollars in thousands)	Residential mortgage			Home equity			Other			Total consumer related			Unallocated			2011			2010
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, January 1,	$	30		$	83		$	201		$	314		$	525		$	7,626		$	7,175
Charge-offs		(141	)		(144	)		(176	)		(461	)		0			(3,854	)		(2,580	)
Recoveries		0			8			47			55			0			60			97
Provisions		226			161			117			504			(521	)		4,785			1,910
Balance, September 30,	$	115		$	108		$	189		$	412		$	4		$	8,617		$	6,602

- 21 -

Table of Contents

The table below shows the allowance amount required for loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


September 30, 2011:

*(dollars in thousands)*	Builder & developer		Commercial real estate investor		Residential real estate investor		Hotel/Motel		Wholesale & retail		Manufacturing		Agriculture		Other		Total commercial related
Allowance for loan losses:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	147	$	25	$	30	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	100	$	120	$	422
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,230		1,890		449		406		1,754		155		92		803		7,779
Balance, September 30, 2011	$	2,377	$	1,915	$	479	$	406	$	1,754	$	155	$	192	$	923	$	8,201

Loans:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,247	$	2,241	$	574	$	0	$	3,972	$	0	$	494	$	6,060	$	15,588
Collectively evaluated for impairment		100,358		108,431		59,985		51,034		52,778		25,857		16,727		123,681		538,851
Balance, September 30, 2011	$	102,605	$	110,672	$	60,559	$	51,034	$	56,750	$	25,857	$	17,221	$	129,741	$	554,439


*(dollars in thousands)*	Residential mortgage		Home equity		Other		Total consumer related		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	422
Collectively evaluated for impairment		115		108		189		412		4		8,195
Balance, September 30, 2011	$	115	$	108	$	189	$	412	$	4	$	8,617

Loans:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0			$	15,588
Collectively evaluated for impairment		22,472		58,366		50,508		131,346				670,197
Balance, September 30, 2011	$	22,472	$	58,366	$	50,508	$	131,346			$	685,785

December 31, 2010:


*(dollars in thousands)*	Builder & developer		Commercial real estate investor		Residential real estate investor		Hotel/Motel		Wholesale & retail		Manufacturing		Agriculture		Other		Total commercial related
Allowance for loan losses:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	25	$	185	$	10	$	0	$	675	$	0	$	100	$	200	$	1,195
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,536		1,702		688		345		168		155		75		923		5,592
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	1,561	$	1,887	$	698	$	345	$	843	$	155	$	175	$	1,123	$	6,787

Loans:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	8,679	$	327	$	490	$	0	$	5,861	$	0	$	500	$	5,933	$	21,790
Collectively evaluated for impairment		87,056		94,954		55,440		48,041		39,102		24,989		13,747		130,265		493,594
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	95,735	$	95,281	$	55,930	$	48,041	$	44,963	$	24,989	$	14,247	$	136,198	$	515,384


*(dollars in thousands)*	Residential mortgage		Home equity		Other		Total consumer related		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	1,195
Collectively evaluated for impairment		30		83		201		314		525		6,431
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	30	$	83	$	201	$	314	$	525	$	7,626

Loans:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0			$	21,790
Collectively evaluated for impairment		20,357		56,294		48,814		125,465				619,059
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	20,357	$	56,294	$	48,814	$	125,465			$	640,849

- 22 -

Table of Contents

Note 7—Deposits

The composition of deposits was as follows:


(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Noninterest bearing demand	$	75,274	$	65,642
NOW		67,921		61,398
Money market		257,166		220,923
Savings		29,074		27,037
Time deposits less than $100,000		248,165		255,674
Time deposits $100,000 or more		180,148		175,436
Total deposits	$	857,748	$	806,110

Note 8—Long-term Debt

PeoplesBank’s long-term debt obligations to FHLB are primarily fixed rate instruments, which are secured by FHLB stock, U.S. agency mortgage backed securities and under a blanket collateral agreement, qualifying loan receivables, principally mortgage loans. A summary of long-term debt at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, is provided below.


(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
PeoplesBank’s obligations to FHLB:
Due January 2011, 2.06%	$	0	$	14,000
Due January 2011, 4.30%, amortizing		0		3,401
Due August 2011, 2.42%		0		12,000
Due January 2012, 2.34%		10,000		10,000
Due June 2012, 4.25%, amortizing		271		567
Due December 2012, 1.91%		5,000		5,000
Due May 2013, 3.46%, amortizing		958		1,371
Due December 2013, 2.39%		5,000		5,000
Due July 2014, 1.38%		5,000		0
Due July 2015, 1.90%		5,000		0
Due July 2016, 2.35%		5,000		0
		36,229		51,339
Capital lease obligation		347		393
Total long-term debt	$	36,576	$	51,732

Note 9—Regulatory Matters

Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on Codorus Valley’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators.

- 23 -

Table of Contents

Quantitative measures established by regulators to ensure capital adequacy require Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank to maintain minimum ratios, as set forth below, to total and Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to quarter-to-date average assets (leverage ratio). Management believes that Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank were well capitalized on September 30, 2011 based on regulatory capital guidelines.


	Actual					Minimum for Capital Adequacy					Well Capitalized Minimum*
*(dollars in thousands)*	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
*Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. (consolidated)*
at September 30, 2011
Capital ratios:
Tier 1 risk based	$	94,866		13.15	%	$	28,853		4.00	%		n/a		n/a
Total risk based		103,483		14.35			57,705		8.00			n/a		n/a
Leverage		94,866		9.53			39,819		4.00			n/a		n/a
at December 31, 2010
Capital ratios:
Tier 1 risk based	$	84,116		12.51	%	$	26,905		4.00	%		n/a		n/a
Total risk based		91,742		13.64			53,811		8.00			n/a		n/a
Leverage		84,116		8.81			38,194		4.00			n/a		n/a

PeoplesBank, A Codorus Valley Company
at September 30, 2011
Capital ratios:
Tier 1 risk based	$	91,982		12.80	%	$	28,744		4.00	%	$	43,116		6.00	%
Total risk based		100,599		14.00			57,488		8.00			71,860		10.00
Leverage		91,982		9.27			39,710		4.00			49,638		5.00
at December 31, 2010
Capital ratios:
Tier 1 risk based	$	81,292		12.13	%	$	26,805		4.00	%	$	40,207		6.00	%
Total risk based		88,918		13.27			53,610		8.00			67,012		10.00
Leverage		81,292		8.54			38,079		4.00			47,599		5.00

* To be well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions.

Note 10—Shareholders’ Equity

Preferred stock issued under the US Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund Program

On August 18, 2011, as part of the Treasury Small Business Lending Fund (SBLF) program, the Corporation entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (SBLF Purchase Agreement) with the United States Department of the Treasury (Treasury) pursuant to which the Corporation sold to the Treasury, for an aggregate purchase price of $25 million, 25,000 shares of senior non-cumulative, perpetual preferred stock, Series B, $1,000 liquidation value, $2.50 par value. The preferred stock was issued pursuant to the SBLF program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Lending Jobs Act of 2010 that was created to encourage lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less that $10 billion.

The SBLF Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital and will pay non-cumulative dividends quarterly on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning October 3, 2011. The dividend rate can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first 10 quarters during which the SBLF Preferred Stock is outstanding, based upon changes in the level of “Qualified Small Business Lending” or “QSBL” (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) by the Bank. Based upon the increase in the Bank’s level of QSBL over the baseline level calculated under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the dividend rate for the initial dividend period has been set at 5 percent. For the second through ninth calendar quarters, the dividend rate may be adjusted between one percent (1%) and five percent (5%) per annum to reflect the amount of change in the Bank’s level of QSBL. If the level of the Bank’s qualified small business loans declines so that the percentage increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline level is less than 10%, then the dividend rate payable on the SBLF Preferred Stock would increase. For the tenth calendar quarter through four and one half years after issuance, the dividend rate will be fixed at between one percent (1%) and seven percent (7%) based upon the increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline. After four and one half years from issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 9% (including a quarterly lending incentive fee of 0.5%).

- 24 -

Table of Contents

The SBLF Preferred Stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. In the event that the Corporation misses five dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the SBLF Preferred Stock will have the right, but not the obligation, to appoint a representative as an observer on the Company’s Board of Directors.

The terms of the SBLF Preferred Stock Agreement impose limits on the ability of the Company to pay dividends and repurchase shares of common stock. Under the terms of the SBLF Preferred Stock, no repurchases may be effected, and no dividends may be declared or paid on preferred shares ranking pari passu with the SBLF Preferred Stock, junior preferred shares, or other junior securities (including the common stock) during the current calendar quarter and for the next three calendar quarters following the failure to declare and pay dividends on the SBLF Preferred Stock, except that, in any such quarter in which the dividend is paid, dividend payments on shares ranking pari passu may be paid to the extent necessary to avoid any resulting material covenant breach by the Corporation.

Under the terms of the SBLF Preferred Stock Agreement, the Corporation may only declare and pay a dividend on the common stock or other stock junior to the SBLF Preferred Stock, or repurchase shares of any such class or series of stock, if, (i) full dividends on all outstanding shares of SBLF Preferred Stock for the most recently completed dividend period have been or are contemporaneously declared and paid and (ii) after payment of such dividend, the dollar amount of the Corporation’s Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Signing Date Tier 1 Capital, as defined by the Certificate of Designation with Respect to Shares of the Company fixing the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights of the SBLF Preferred Stock, excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the SBLF Preferred Stock (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the second anniversary of issuance and ending on the tenth anniversary, by 10% for each one percent increase in QSBL over the baseline level.

Proceeds from the SBLF program were used in part to redeem $16.5 million of outstanding Series A preferred stock issued in a prior period to the Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program (CPP) and to repurchase a related CPP common stock warrant as described below. The approximately $8 million of Tier 1 capital remaining from the SBLF transaction will be used primarily to support increased lending within the Corporation’s service area as required by the SBLF program.

Preferred stock and common stock warrant issued under the US Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program

On August 18, 2011, the Corporation entered into a repurchase letter agreement with the Treasury providing for the redemption of the CPP Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the SBLF Purchase Agreement, approximately $16,507,000 of the proceeds of the sale of the SBLF Preferred Stock was used to redeem the 16,500 shares of the Series A CPP Preferred Stock plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Upon redemption, the remaining $379,000 preferred stock discount was recorded as a reduction to third quarter net income available to common shareholders. Additionally, the additional paid-in-capital account was reduced by approximately $39,000 pertaining to issuance costs for the CPP Preferred Stock. As a result of the redemption, the Corporation is no longer subject to the restrictions imposed by the CPP.

On September 28, 2011, the Corporation repurchased the outstanding CPP common stock warrant for $526,604 from the US Treasury which was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in-capital.

- 25-

Table of Contents

Information about the CPP preferred stock and common stock warrant is disclosed in Note 11—Shareholders’ Equity in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Note 11—Contingent Liabilities

The Corporation is not aware of any material contingent liabilities as of September 30, 2011.

Note 12—Guarantees

Codorus Valley does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by PeoplesBank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Corporation generally holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Corporation had $11,752,000 of standby letters of credit outstanding on September 30, 2011, compared to $8,793,000 on December 31, 2010. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding letters of credit. The amount of the liability as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued, was not material. Many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon and therefore, generally do not present significant liquidity risk to the Corporation or PeoplesBank.

Note 13—Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The Corporation uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in sales transactions on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective period-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each period end.

Fair value measurement guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. Additional guidance is provided on determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased and on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed, and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with fair value measurement and disclosure guidance.

This guidance further clarifies that, when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The guidance provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

- 26 -

Table of Contents

Fair value and disclosure guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


	Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

	Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

	Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For financial assets measured at fair value, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


(dollars in thousands)	Total		(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs		(Level 3) Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2011
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	10,154	$	10,154	$	0	$	0
U.S. agency		30,752		0		30,752		0
U.S. agency mortgage- backed, residential		104,064		0		104,064		0
State and municipal		84,469		0		84,469		0
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans		1,471		0		0		1,471
Foreclosed real estate		13,930		0		0		13,930
December 31, 2010
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	8,140	$	8,140	$	0	$	0
U.S. agency		13,643		0		13,643		0
U.S. agency mortgage- backed, residential		110,353		0		110,353		0
State and municipal		90,400		0		90,400		0
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans		5,703		0		0		5,703
Foreclosed real estate		4,447		0		0		4,447

- 27 -

Table of Contents

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporation’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of certain assets and liabilities at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Cash and cash equivalents (carried at cost)
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

Securities, available-for-sale (carried at fair value)
The fair values of securities available-for-sale are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

Restricted investment in bank stocks (carried at cost)
The carrying amount of restricted investment in bank stocks approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

Loans held for sale (carried at lower of cost or fair value)
The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary-market prices. If no such quoted prices exist, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of loans held for sale exceeded their cost basis.

Loans (carried at cost)
Generally, for variable and adjustable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair value is based on carrying value. Fair values for other loans in the portfolio are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal.

Impaired loans (generally carried at fair value)
Impaired loans are those that are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310, in which the Corporation has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of the collateral supporting such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to require an increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when it is believed that the uncollectability of a loan is confirmed. These loans are included as Level 3 fair values, based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. At September 30, 2011, the fair value of loan balances with a specific reserve allowance was $1,471,000, net of a valuation allowance of $422,000, compared to $5,703,000, net of a valuation allowance of $1,195,000, at December 31, 2010.

- 28 -

Table of Contents

Foreclosed Real Estate (carried at lower of cost or fair value)
Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value of the property at the transfer date less estimated selling cost, which becomes the cost basis. Subsequently, foreclosed real estate is carried at the lower of its carrying value or the fair value less estimated selling cost. Fair value is usually determined based upon an independent third-party appraisal of the property or occasionally upon a recent sales offer. At September 30, 2011, the carrying value of foreclosed real estate with a valuation allowance was $13,930,000 ($15,884,000 less a $1,954,000 allowance). At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of foreclosed real estate with a valuation allowance was $4,447,000 ($6,013,000 less a $1,566,000 allowance).

Interest receivable and payable (carried at cost)
The carrying amount of interest receivable and interest payable approximates its fair value.

Deposits (carried at cost)
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., noninterest and interest bearing checking, money market and savings accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for variable rate time deposits that reprice frequently are based on carrying value. Fair values for fixed rate time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities of time deposits.

Short-term borrowings (carried at cost)
The carrying amount of short-term borrowings approximates their fair value.

Long-term debt (carried at cost)
Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices are obtained from this active market and represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

Junior subordinated debt (carried at cost)
The fair value of junior subordinated debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on market rates and spread characteristics currently offered on such debt with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments (disclosed at cost)
Fair values for the Corporation’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. These amounts were not considered to be material at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

- 29 -

Table of Contents

The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments were as follows at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
*(dollars in thousands)*	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	46,574	$	46,574	$	43,269	$	43,269
Securities, available-for-sale		229,439		229,439		222,536		222,536
Restricted investment in bank stocks		3,822		3,822		4,067		4,067
Loans held for sale		2,966		3,025		4,990		5,054
Loans, net		677,168		683,784		633,223		637,896
Interest receivable		3,268		3,268		3,590		3,590

Financial liabilities
Noninterest bearing demand, NOW, money market and savings deposits	$	429,435	$	429,435	$	375,000	$	375,000
Time deposits		428,313		437,224		431,110		438,907
Short-term borrowings		11,979		11,979		6,763		6,763
Long-term debt		36,576		37,244		51,732		52,294
Junior subordinated debt		10,310		3,598		10,310		4,330
Interest payable		614		614		687		687

Off-balance sheet instruments		0		0		0		0

- 30 -

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s discussion and analysis of the significant changes in the results of operations, capital resources and liquidity presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. (Codorus Valley or the Corporation), a bank holding company, and its wholly owned subsidiary, PeoplesBank, A Codorus Valley Company (PeoplesBank), are provided below. Codorus Valley’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations consist almost entirely of PeoplesBank’s financial condition and results of operations. Current performance does not guarantee, and may not be indicative of, similar performance in the future.

Forward-looking statements

Management of the Corporation has made forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. When words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates” or similar expressions occur in the Form 10-Q, management is making forward-looking statements.

Note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this report and in the documents that are incorporated by reference, could affect the future financial results of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, both individually and collectively, and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:


•	operating, legal and regulatory risks;
•	enacted financial reform legislation, e.g., Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which may have a significant impact on the Corporation’s business and results of operations;
•	a prolonged economic downturn;
•	an increase in nonperforming assets requiring loss provisions and the incurrence of carrying costs related to nonperforming assets;
•	declines in the market value of investment securities considered to be other than temporary;
•	the effects of and changes in the rate of FDIC premiums, including special assessments;
•	interest rate fluctuations which could increase our cost of funds or decrease our yield on earning assets and therefore reduce our net interest income;
•	future legislative or administrative changes to U.S. governmental capital programs;
•	unavailability of capital when needed or availability at less than favorable terms;
•	political and competitive forces affecting banking, securities, asset management and credit services businesses; and
•	the risk that management’s analysis of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful.

The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report.

Critical accounting policies

We have identified critical accounting policies for the Corporation to include allowance for loan losses, valuation of foreclosed real estate and evaluation of other than temporary impairment losses of securities. There were no material changes made to the critical accounting policies disclosed in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K in regards to application or related judgments and estimates used. A detailed disclosure pertaining to critical accounting policies is provided in Item 7 of the Corporation’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

- 31 -

Table of Contents

Three months ended September 30, 2011,
compared to three months ended September 30, 2010

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

During September 2011 the Corporation surpassed $1 billion in total assets. Growth in total assets has been organic and consistently above the Corporation’s peer group average. Also in September the Corporation’s principal subsidiary, PeoplesBank, opened its newest, and 18^th, full service financial center in the rapidly growing Westminster area of Carroll County, Maryland.

The Corporation earned net income available to common shareholders totaling $4,000 or $0.00 per share, basic and diluted, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011, compared to $1,535,000 or $0.37 per share, basic and diluted, for the same period of 2010. The $1,531,000 decrease in net income available to common shareholders was primarily the result of an increase in the provision for loan losses and a one-time $379,000 transaction to remove unamortized discount on the redemption of preferred stock as described later in this summary. The effect of these transactions more than offset the favorable effects of increased net interest income and decreased noninterest expense.

The $687,000 or 9 percent increase in net interest income for the third quarter of 2011, compared to the same quarter of 2010, was primarily the result of an increase in the average volume of interest earning assets, a decrease in the average rates paid on deposit products and a decrease in the volume of long-term debt. Net interest income (tax equivalent basis) as a percentage of interest earning assets (i.e., net interest margin) was 3.79 percent for the third quarter of 2011, compared to 3.75 percent for the third quarter of 2010.

The provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2011 totaled $3,560,000, representing a $3,000,000 increase, compared to the same quarter in 2010. During September 2011, the Corporation recorded losses totaling $3,175,000 on two commercial loan relationships which it disclosed in a Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2011 and a Form 8-K/A filed on November 10, 2011.

The $624,000 or 9 percent decrease in noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2011, compared to the third quarter of 2010 was due primarily to decreases in carrying costs for foreclosed real estate and impaired loans, and a decrease in personnel expense, principally a $252,000 adjustment to health care insurance accruals. A decrease in FDIC deposit insurance premiums, which resulted from the FDIC’s new assessment methodology, which became effective April 1, 2011, also contributed to the decrease in noninterest expense.

During the current quarter, the Corporation issued $25 million of preferred stock to the US Treasury (Treasury) under the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund Program (SBLF). Proceeds from the issuance were used in part to redeem $16.5 million of outstanding preferred stock issued in a prior period to the Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program (CPP/TARP), and to repurchase a related CPP common stock warrant for $527,000. The approximately $8 million of Tier 1 capital remaining from the SBLF transaction will be used primarily to support increased lending within our service area as required by the SBLF program. Additional information about these capital transactions is provided in the Shareholders’ Equity section of this report and in Form 8-K previously filed on August 24, 2011.

A more detailed analysis of the factors and trends affecting corporate earnings follows.

- 32 -

Table of Contents

INCOME STATEMENT ANALYSIS

Net interest income

Net interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011, was $8,607,000, an increase of $687,000 or 9 percent above the third quarter of 2010. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the average volume of interest earning assets, a decrease in the average rates paid on deposit products and a decrease in the average volume of long-term debt. Net interest income (tax equivalent basis) as a percentage of interest earning assets (i.e., net interest margin) was 3.79 percent for the third quarter of 2011 and 3.75 percent for the third quarter of 2010.

Interest earning assets averaged $939 million and yielded 5.11 percent (tax equivalent basis) for the current quarter, compared to $877 million and 5.24 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2010. The $62 million or 7 percent increase in average interest earning assets was due primarily to an increase in investment securities and loans, primarily commercial loans.

Total interest bearing liabilities averaged $835 million at an average rate of 1.49 percent for the current quarter, compared to $787 million and 1.66 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2010. The $48 million or 6 percent increase in average interest bearing liabilities reflected growth in all deposit categories, principally money market deposits. The decrease of interest expense on deposits was due to lower rates, which more than offset the increase in volume. The decrease of interest expense on long-term debt was due primarily to a decrease in volume, which resulted from maturing Federal Home Loan Bank loans that were selectively not refinanced.

- 33 -

Table of Contents

Table 1-Average Balances and Interest Rates (tax equivalent basis)


	Three months ended September 30,
	2011							2010
*(dollars in thousands)*	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate

Assets
Interest bearing deposits with banks	$	25,187	$	16		0.25	%	$	36,396	$	23		0.25	%
Federal funds sold		0		0		0.00			3,002		3		0.40
Investment securities:
Taxable		151,295		977		2.56			118,424		826		2.77
Tax-exempt		78,139		882		4.48			76,371		909		4.72
Total investment securities		229,434		1,859		3.21			194,795		1,735		3.53

Loans:
Taxable (1)		669,875		10,001		5.92			628,345		9,597		6.06
Tax-exempt		14,411		216		5.95			14,501		225		6.16
Total loans		684,286		10,217		5.92			642,846		9,822		6.06
Total earning assets		938,907		12,092		5.11			877,039		11,583		5.24
Other assets (2)		62,076							56,044
Total assets	$	1,000,983						$	933,083
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand	$	314,788	$	511		0.64	%	$	270,980	$	517		0.76	%
Savings		29,543		27		0.36			27,651		28		0.40
Time		428,168		2,279		2.11			416,503		2,339		2.23
Total interest bearing deposits		772,499		2,817		1.45			715,134		2,884		1.60
Short-term borrowings		11,724		29		0.98			9,219		23		0.99
Long-term debt and junior subordinated debt		51,063		285		2.21			62,513		390		2.48
Total interest bearing liabilities		835,286		3,131		1.49			786,866		3,297		1.66


Noninterest bearing deposits		73,553							63,473
Other liabilities		5,247							4,650
Shareholders’ equity		86,897							78,094


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,000,983						$	933,083
Net interest income			$	8,961						$	8,286
Net interest margin (3)						3.79	%						3.75	%


(1)	Average balance includes average nonperforming loans of $19,080,000 for 2011 and $13,068,000 for 2010. Interest includes net loan fees of $231,000 for 2011 and $249,000 for 2010.
(2)	Average balance includes average bank owned life insurance, foreclosed real estate and unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities.
(3)	Net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.

- 34 -

Table of Contents

Table 2-Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income (tax equivalent basis)


	Three months ended September 30, 2011 vs. 2010
	Increase (decrease) due to change in
*(dollars in thousands)*	Volume			Rate			Net

Interest Income
Interest bearing deposits with banks	$	(7	)	$	0		$	(7	)
Federal funds sold		(3	)		0			(3	)
Investment securities:
Taxable		229			(78	)		151
Tax-exempt		21			(48	)		(27	)
Loans:
Taxable		634			(230	)		404
Tax-exempt		(1	)		(8	)		(9	)
Total interest income		873			(364	)		509
Interest Expense
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand		84			(90	)		(6	)
Savings		2			(3	)		(1	)
Time		66			(126	)		(60	)
Short-term borrowings		5			1			6
Long-term debt		(71	)		(34	)		(105	)
Total interest expense		86			(252	)		(166	)
Net interest income	$	787		$	(112	)	$	675

Changes which are due to both volume and rate are allocated in proportion to their relationship to the amount of change attributed directly to volume or rate.

Provision for loan losses

For the three-month period ended September 30, 2011; the provision for loan losses was $3,560,000, compared to $560,000 for the same period of 2010. The current quarter provision largely replenished the allowance for the partial charge-off of two unrelated loans totaling $3,175,000 as reported by the Corporation in a Form 8-K filed October 3, 2011 and a Form 8-K/A filed on November 10, 2011. Information about loan quality is provided in the Nonperforming Assets section of this report on page 46.

Noninterest income

The following table presents the components of total noninterest income for the third quarter of 2011, compared to the third quarter of 2010. Total noninterest income for the current quarter was $1,792,000, which was approximately the same level as the third quarter of 2010.

- 35 -

Table of Contents

Table 3 - Noninterest income


	Three months ended September 30,				Change Increase (Decrease)
*(dollars in thousands)*	2011		2010		$			%
Trust and investment services fees	$	384	$	348	$	36			10	%
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales		308		329		(21	)		(6	)
Service charges on deposit accounts		657		632		25			4
Income from bank owned life insurance		164		161		3			2
Other income		153		147		6			4
Gain on sales of loans held for sale		126		177		(51	)		(29	)
Total noninterest income	$	1,792	$	1,794	$	(2	)		(0	)%

The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest income.

Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales—The decrease in income from the sale of mutual funds, annuities and insurance products by Codorus Valley Financial Advisors (CVFA), a subsidiary of PeoplesBank, was a result of the resignation of four registered representatives who left CVFA in February 2011. The decrease in revenue is expected to be largely offset by a decrease in operating expense, principally personnel costs. Accordingly, the net impact on CVFA’s earnings is expected to be immaterial.

Service charges on deposit accounts—The increase was due primarily to an increase in debit card revenue, which reflected an increase in the volume of transactions.

Price restrictions imposed by the federal government under the Durbin Interchange Amendment may significantly reduce debit card revenue (i.e., interchange fees) for PeoplesBank in future periods. While the legislation targeted larger banks with total assets of $10 billion on more, market forces in the future may not make a distinction between large and small banks. Further, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued final guidance in November 2010 for automated overdraft payment programs. This guidance, effective July 1, 2011, recommended that financial institutions establish policies that, among other things, limit the number of daily overdraft fees per customer, set a de minimis limit whereby small dollar transactions that overdraw an account are not charged an overdraft fee, and to take meaningful steps to counsel customers that have more than six overdrafts in a rolling twelve month period about less costly alternatives to overdraft protection. Implementation of the FDIC guidance resulted in a reduction of overdraft fees of approximately 5 percent for the third quarter, compared to the same quarter of 2010.

Gain on sales of loans held for sale—The decrease in gains from the sale of loans was due primarily to a decrease in the volume of mortgage loan sales. A decrease in pricing from secondary market sources also contributed to the decrease in gains. In spite of low market interest rates, current period mortgage loan activity is adversely affected by a decrease in refinancing activity (market saturation), the inability of some borrowers to qualify for loans or to sell their existing homes and the high level of unemployment.

Noninterest expense

The following table presents the components of total noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2011, compared to the third quarter of 2010. Total noninterest expense for the current quarter was $6,317,000, a decrease of $624,000 or 9 percent, compared to 2010 due primarily to decreases in carrying costs for foreclosed real estate and impaired loans, and FDIC insurance premiums.

- 36 -

Table of Contents

Table 4 - Noninterest expense


	Three months ended September 30,				Change Increase (Decrease)
*(dollars in thousands)*	2011		2010		$			%

Personnel	$	3,218	$	3,393	$	(175	)		(5	)%
Occupancy of premises, net		501		465		36			8
Furniture and equipment		434		405		29			7
Postage, stationery and supplies		128		112		16			14
Professional and legal		205		121		84			69
Marketing and advertising		278		179		99			55
FDIC insurance		223		331		(108	)		(33	)
Debit card processing		169		156		13			8
Charitable donations		37		43		(6	)		(14	)
Foreclosed real estate including (gains) losses on sales		214		765		(551	)		(72	)
Impaired loan carrying costs		95		199		(104	)		(52	)
Other		815		772		43			6
Total noninterest expense	$	6,317	$	6,941	$	(624	)		(9	)%

The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest expense.

Personnel—The decrease in personnel expense was primarily due to a $175,000 or 5 percent decrease in the cost of the Corporation’s self-funded employee health care insurance program. During September, a $252,000 accrual adjustment was recorded that reduced premium contributions to the level of estimated claims and administrative costs. The decrease in health care insurance cost more than offset a $70,000 or 3 percent increase in wage expense that resulted from normal business growth and additions to staff associated with the new financial center located in Westminster, Maryland, which opened for business in September of this year.

FDIC insurance—The decrease in FDIC insurance premiums was the result of a change by the FDIC in its assessment methodology. Effective April 1, 2011, the FDIC lowered assessment rates and applied them against average assets minus average tangible capital, instead of domestic deposits.

Foreclosed real estate including (gains) losses on sales—The Corporation experienced a $551,000 decrease in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the level reported for the third quarter of 2010. Included in the most recent quarter was the recognition of $310,000 of rental income from a real estate project. There was no comparable rental income to reduce foreclosed real estate expense in the third quarter of 2010. Additionally, the third quarter of 2010 included significant carrying costs associated with the development of the said real estate project that was recently completed and leased up. In the period ahead, rental income from the project is expected to more than offset operating costs until the project is sold. Typical carrying costs include insurance, maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, appraisals and legal fees.

Impaired loan carrying costs— The prolonged weakness in economic and business conditions may cause fluctuations in impaired loan carrying costs. Factors such as the number and size of the loans in the impaired loan portfolio, financial capacity of the borrower or guarantor and the value and liquidity of underlying collateral, can contribute to the variability of this expense from period to period. Carrying costs are the same as those described for foreclosed real estate.

- 37 -

Table of Contents

Income taxes

The income tax benefit for the third quarter of 2011 was $139,000 compared to a provision of $433,000 for the same period in 2010. The decrease in income taxes was primarily the result of the decrease in income before income taxes. For both periods, the Corporation’s statutory federal income tax rate was 34 percent. The Corporation’s effective income tax rate was negative for the third quarter of 2011, compared to approximately 20 percent for the third quarter of 2010. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate due to the impact of low-income housing credits and tax-exempt income, including income from bank owned life insurance.

Nine months ended September 30, 2011,
compared to nine months ended September 30, 2010

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The Corporation earned net income available to common shareholders of $2,896,000 or $0.70 per share, $0.69 diluted, for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, compared to $4,381,000 or $1.07 per share, $1.07 diluted, for the same period of 2010. The $1,485,000 or 34 percent decrease in net income available to common shareholders was primarily the result of an increase in the provision for loan losses, a decrease in noninterest income and a one-time $379,000 transaction to remove unamortized discount on the redemption of preferred stock as described later in this summary.

Net interest income increased $1,661,000 or 7 percent for the first nine months of 2011 compared to the level for the same period of 2010, due primarily to an increase in the average volume of interest earning assets, a decrease in the average volume of long-term debt and a decrease in the average rate paid on deposits. Net interest income (tax equivalent basis) as a percentage of interest earning assets (i.e., net interest margin) was 3.74 percent for the first nine months of both 2011 and 2010.

The provision for loan losses for the first nine months of 2011 totaled $4,785,000, representing a $2,875,000 or 151 percent increase, compared to the $1,910,000 recorded for the same period of 2010. During September 2011, the Corporation recorded losses totaling $3,175,000 on two unrelated commercial loan relationships which it disclosed in a Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2011 and in a Form 8-K/A filed on November 10, 2011. The provision for both periods remained elevated in comparison to the Corporation’s historic levels and was reflective of the risks and uncertainties associated with prolonged weakness in economic and business conditions, a relatively high level of unemployment and erosion of real estate values.

Total noninterest income decreased $272,000 or 5 percent for the first nine months of 2011 below the level for the same period of 2010 as a result of decreases in income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales and gains (losses) on sales of securities and loans held for sale. After removing the impact of gains (losses) from the sale of securities, core noninterest income for the first nine months of 2011 decreased $139,000 or 3 percent below the same period for 2010.

Total noninterest expense increased $20,000 or 0 percent for the first nine months of 2011 above the level for the same period of 2010. The personnel and other operating expense categories increased the most compared to the prior year. The decrease of $434,000 or 39 percent in provision for income tax expense for the first nine months of 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily the result of the decrease in income before income taxes.

Total assets were approximately $1.01 billion at September 30, 2011, an increase of $62 million or 7 percent above September 30, 2010. Compared to one year ago, asset growth occurred primarily in the commercial loan portfolio and, to a lesser degree, the consumer loan and overnight investment portfolios, which were funded by an increase in core deposits.

- 38 -

Table of Contents

During the third quarter of 2011 the Corporation issued $25 million of preferred stock to the US Treasury (Treasury) under the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund Program (SBLF). Proceeds from the issuance were used in part to redeem $16.5 million of outstanding preferred stock issued in a prior period to the Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program (CPP/TARP), and to repurchase a related CPP common stock warrant for $527,000. The approximately $8 million of Tier 1 capital remaining from the SBLF transaction will be used primarily to support increased lending within our service area. Additional information about these capital transactions is provided in the Shareholders’ Equity section of this report.

Net income (annualized) as a percentage of average shareholders’ equity (ROE) was 6.60 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to 9.03 percent for the same period of 2010. Net income (annualized) as a percentage of average total assets (ROA) was 0.55 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to 0.75 percent for the same period of 2010. The efficiency ratio (noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income plus noninterest income on a tax equivalent basis) was 64.91 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to 68.26 percent for the same period of 2010.

On September 30, 2011, the nonperforming assets ratio (nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and net foreclosed real estate) was 3.90 percent, compared to 4.50 percent at December 31, 2010 and 3.32 percent at September 30, 2010. The high level of the ratio continues to reflect the prolonged weakness in economic and business conditions, a relatively high level of unemployment and erosion of real estate values. Net loan charge-offs for the current nine month period totaled $3,794,000, compared to $2,483,000 for the same period of 2010. The Corporation’s annualized net loan charge-offs ratio was 0.77 percent at September 30, 2011, compared to 0.51 percent at September 30, 2010. Information regarding nonperforming assets is provided in the Risk Management section of this report, including Table 9—Nonperforming Assets. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, we believe that the level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2011. An analysis of the allowance is provided in Table 10—Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses.

Throughout the current period, Codorus Valley maintained a capital level well above minimum regulatory quantitative requirements. Currently, there are three federal regulatory definitions of capital that take the form of minimum ratios. As set forth in Note 9—Regulatory Matters, the Corporation and PeoplesBank were well capitalized on September 30, 2011.

A more detailed analysis of the factors and trends affecting corporate earnings follows.

INCOME STATEMENT ANALYSIS

Net interest income

Net interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, was $24,507,000, an increase of $1,661,000 or 7 percent above the same period of 2010. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the average volume of interest earning assets, a decrease in the average volume of long-term debt and a decrease in the average rate paid on deposits. Net interest income (tax equivalent basis) as a percentage of interest earning assets (i.e., net interest margin) was 3.74 percent for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010.

Interest earning assets averaged $916 million and yielded 5.11 percent (tax equivalent basis) for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $855 million and 5.28 percent, respectively, for the first nine months of 2010. The $61 million or 7 percent increase in average interest earning assets was due primarily to an increase in investment securities, followed by smaller increases in commercial and consumer loans. An increase in yield on floating rate commercial loans, which reflected the imposition of minimum (floor) interest rates, contributed to the increase in interest income.

- 39 -

Table of Contents

Total interest bearing liabilities averaged $817 million at an average rate of 1.54 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $770 million and 1.71 percent, respectively, for the same period of 2010. The $48 million or 6 percent increase in average interest bearing liabilities reflected growth in all deposit categories, which more than offset a decrease in long-term debt. Interest expense on deposits during the first nine months of 2011 was at the same level as 2010 as the favorable impact of low product rates and deposit mix largely offset the effect of the increase in average volume. Interest expense on long-term debt decreased significantly for the current nine-month period compared to 2010 due primarily to volume as maturing Federal Home Loan Bank loans, with relatively high interest rates, were selectively not refinanced.

Table 5-Average Balances and Interest Rates (tax equivalent basis)


	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011							2010
(dollars in thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate

Assets
Interest bearing deposits with banks	$	22,549	$	40		0.24	%	$	24,830	$	46		0.25	%
Federal funds sold		901		2		0.30			2,913		7		0.32
Investment securities:
Taxable		151,982		2,968		2.61			108,610		2,459		3.03
Tax-exempt		80,292		2,710		4.51			71,969		2,626		4.88
Total investment securities		232,274		5,678		3.27			180,579		5,085		3.76

Loans:
Taxable (1)		645,087		28,607		5.93			632,950		27,955		5.91
Tax-exempt		14,979		670		5.98			13,991		652		6.23
Total loans		660,066		29,277		5.93			646,941		28,607		5.91
Total earning assets		915,790		34,997		5.11			855,263		33,745		5.28
Other assets (2)		58,670							53,766
Total assets	$	974,460						$	909,029
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand	$	299,289	$	1,485		0.66	%	$	257,578	$	1,523		0.79	%
Savings		29,434		84		0.38			26,739		80		0.40
Time		429,738		6,922		2.15			408,717		6,892		2.25
Total interest bearing deposits		758,461		8,491		1.50			693,034		8,495		1.64
Short-term borrowings		11,069		82		0.99			8,752		65		0.99
Long-term debt and junior subordinated debt		47,694		828		2.32			67,846		1,287		2.54
Total interest bearing liabilities		817,224		9,401		1.54			769,632		9,847		1.71

Noninterest bearing deposits		70,235							59,056
Other liabilities		5,322							4,794
Shareholders’ equity		81,679							75,547

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	974,460						$	909,029
Net interest income			$	25,596						$	23,898
Net interest margin (3)						3.74	%						3.74	%


(1)	Average balance includes average nonperforming loans of $18,290,000 for 2011 and $18,645,000 for 2010. Interest includes net loan fees of $682,000 for 2011 and $765,000 for 2010.
(2)	Average balance includes average bank owned life insurance, foreclosed real estate and unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities.
(3)	Net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.

- 40 -

Table of Contents

Table 6-Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income (tax equivalent basis)


	Nine months ended September 30, 2011 vs. 2010
	Increase (decrease) due to change in
*(dollars in thousands)*	Volume			Rate			Net

Interest Income
Interest bearing deposits with banks	$	(4	)	$	(2	)	$	(6	)
Federal funds sold		(5	)		0			(5	)
Investment securities:
Taxable		982			(473	)		509
Tax-exempt		304			(220	)		84
Loans:
Taxable		536			116			652
Tax-exempt		46			(28	)		18
Total interest income		1,859			(607	)		1,252
Interest Expense
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand		247			(285	)		(38	)
Savings		8			(4	)		4
Time		354			(324	)		30
Short-term borrowings		17			0			17
Long-term debt		(382	)		(77	)		(459	)
Total interest expense		244			(690	)		(446	)
Net interest income	$	1,615		$	83		$	1,698

Changes which are due to both volume and rate are allocated in proportion to their relationship to the amount of change attributed directly to volume or rate.

Provision for loan losses

For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011; the provision for loan losses was $4,785,000, compared to $1,910,000 for the same period of 2010. The $2,875,000 or 151 percent increase in the current period provision reflected two unrelated partial loan charge-offs totaling $3,175,000 as reported on a Form 8-K filed October 3, 2011 and a Form 8-K/A filed on November 10, 2011. The provision for both periods remained elevated in comparison to the Corporation’s historic levels and was reflective of the risks and uncertainties associated with prolonged weakness in economic and business conditions, a relatively high level of unemployment and erosion of real estate values. These factors can adversely affect our borrowers’ ability to service their loans. Information about loan quality is provided in the Nonperforming Assets section of this report on page 46.

Noninterest income

The following table presents the components of total noninterest income for the first nine months of 2011, compared to the first nine months of 2010. After removing the impact of gains (losses) from the infrequent sale of investment securities, total noninterest income for the current nine-month period of 2011 decreased $139,000 or 3 percent below 2010. The decrease in core noninterest income was primarily the result of decreases in income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales and gains on the sale of loans, which is explained below.

- 41 -

Table of Contents

Table 7 - Noninterest income


	Nine months ended September 30,					Change Increase (Decrease)
(dollars in thousands)	2011			2010		$			%

Trust and investment services fees	$	1,124		$	1,067	$	57			5	%
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales		891			1,091		(200	)		(18	)
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,934			1,843		91			5
Income from bank owned life insurance		489			480		9			2
Other income		453			433		20			5
Gain on sales of loans held for sale		422			538		(116	)		(22	)
Gain (loss) on sales of securities		(25	)		108		(133	)		(123	)
Total noninterest income	$	5,288		$	5,560	$	(272	)		(5	)%

The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest income.

Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales—The decrease in income from the sale of mutual funds, annuities and insurance products by Codorus Valley Financial Advisors (CVFA), a subsidiary of PeoplesBank, was a result of the resignation of four registered representatives who left CVFA in February 2011. The decrease in revenue is expected to be largely offset by a decrease in operating expense, principally personnel costs. Accordingly, the net impact on CVFA’s earnings is expected to be immaterial.

Service charges on deposit accounts—The increase was due primarily to an increase in debit card revenue, which reflected an increase in the volume of transactions. Service charges on deposit accounts could decrease in the future as previously discussed in the most recent quarter-to-date section of this report.

Gains on sales of loans held for sale—The decrease in gains from the sale of mortgage loans was due primarily to decreases in pricing from secondary market sources and loan production. In spite of low market interest rates throughout 2011, mortgage loan activity has been adversely affected by a decrease in refinancing activity (market saturation), the inability of some borrowers to qualify for loans or sell their existing homes and the high level of unemployment.

Gain (loss) on sales of securities—The loss in the first nine months of 2011 reflected the sale of approximately $6 million (par value) of municipal securities that no longer met the Corporation’s criteria for investment. The 2010 period includes gains from the sale of U.S. agency mortgage-backed bonds, which supplemented earnings by taking advantage of low market interest rates.

Noninterest expense

The following table presents the components of total noninterest expense for the first nine months of 2011, compared to the first nine months of 2010. Total noninterest expense for 2011 was $20,287,000, an increase of $20,000 or less than one percent, compared to 2010 due primarily to increases in personnel and other operating expenses.

- 42 -

Table of Contents

Table 8 - Noninterest expense


	Nine months ended September 30,				Change Increase (Decrease)
*(dollars in thousands)*	2011		2010		$			%

Personnel	$	10,182	$	9,812	$	370			4	%
Occupancy of premises, net		1,485		1,459		26			2
Furniture and equipment		1,305		1,264		41			3
Postage, stationery and supplies		397		389		8			2
Professional and legal		480		365		115			32
Marketing and advertising		661		529		132			25
FDIC insurance		785		955		(170	)		(18	)
Debit card processing		488		436		52			12
Charitable donations		272		399		(127	)		(32	)
Foreclosed real estate including (gains) losses on sales		1,305		1,749		(444	)		(25	)
Impaired loan carrying costs		521		782		(261	)		(33	)
Other		2,406		2,128		278			13
Total noninterest expense	$	20,287	$	20,267	$	20			0	%

The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest expense.

Personnel—The increase in personnel expense was attributable to an increase in the wage expense component, which reflected normal business growth and additions to staff associated with the new financial center located in Westminster, Maryland, which opened for business in September of this year. Staff additions associated with private banking and compliance also contributed to the increase in wage expense. September’s $252,000 adjustment to employee health care insurance accruals, described in the most recent quarter-to-date noninterest expense section of this report, resulted in self-funded health care program costs that were comparable to the prior year. Employees have customarily reimbursed the Corporation for approximately 30 percent of the cost of health insurance.

FDIC insurance—The decrease in FDIC insurance premiums was the result of a change by the FDIC in its assessment methodology. Effective April 1, 2011, the FDIC lowered assessment rates and applied them against average assets minus average tangible capital, instead of domestic deposits.

Charitable donations—The level of charitable donations is based, in part, upon whether or not PeoplesBank can obtain related state tax credits if available from nonprofit organizations. The decrease in charitable donations for the first nine months of 2011 resulted from the inability of nonprofits to obtain associated state tax credits as a result of curtailment by the state to help manage its budget deficit. PeoplesBank uses tax credits from donations to reduce its Pennsylvania Shares Tax expense, included below in other expenses.

Foreclosed real estate including (gains) losses on sales—Foreclosed real estate costs remained elevated for both periods due to the level of carrying costs and impairment losses from deterioration of property values associated with specific properties as well as the size of the portfolio, which was reflective of prolonged weakness in economic and business conditions and the erosion of real estate values. Typical carrying costs include insurance, maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, appraisals and legal fees. Costs for the first nine months of 2011 included the recognition of loss provisions totaling $388,000 that pertained to three properties while the first nine months of 2010 included the recognition of a $722,000 loss provision for a specific property. The decrease in current period expense also reflected the recognition of $310,000 of rental income from a real estate project.

- 43 -

Table of Contents

Impaired loan carrying costs— The prolonged weakness in economic and business conditions may cause fluctuations in impaired loan carrying costs. Factors such as the number and size of the loans in the impaired loan portfolio, financial capacity of the borrower or guarantor and the value and liquidity of underlying collateral, contribute to the variability of this expense from period to period. Carrying costs are the same as those described for foreclosed real estate.

Other—The increase in other expense, which is comprised of many underlying expenses, was primarily the result of a $138,000 increase in Pennsylvania Shares Tax expense. Shares Tax in 2010 was relatively low due to the recognition of a greater level of tax credits that originated from an increase of charitable donations. Also included in other expense for the current period was a $65,000 expense associated with a client’s property held in the Wealth Management Division of PeoplesBank.

Income taxes

The provision for income taxes for the first nine months of 2011 was $679,000, compared to $1,113,000 for the same period in 2010. The decrease in income taxes was due to a decrease in income before income taxes. For both periods, the Corporation’s statutory federal income tax rate was 34 percent. The Corporation’s effective income tax rate was approximately 14 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to approximately 18 percent for the first nine months of 2010. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate due to the impact of low-income housing credits and tax-exempt income, including income from bank owned life insurance.

BALANCE SHEET REVIEW

Securities available-for-sale

At September 30, 2011, the fair value of securities available-for-sale totaled $229 million, compared to $223 million at December 31, 2010. Available funds were invested in fixed income securities to provide a return that exceeded the historically low yield on overnight investments.

Loans

On September 30, 2011, total loans, net of deferred fees, totaled $686 million, which was $45 million or 7 percent higher than year-end 2010 level. Most of the increase was due to a $39 million or 8 percent increase in commercial related loans followed by a $6 million or 5 percent increase in consumer related loans. Loan growth remains constrained as a result of prolonged weak economic conditions and the erosion of real estate values. The composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio at September 30, 2011, compared to December 31, 2010, is provided in Note 5—Loans.

Deposits

On September 30, 2011, deposits totaled $858 million, which was $52 million or 6 percent higher than the year-end 2010 level. The increase in total deposits occurred primarily within the demand, savings and money market categories while total time deposits decreased slightly. Deposit growth reflected our competitive rates and our clients’ apparent preference for the liquidity and safety of FDIC insured deposit products during this period of capital market volatility. The Corporation does not rely on brokered deposits to fund its operation. The composition of the Corporation’s deposit portfolio at September 30, 2011, is provided in Note 7—Deposits.

Long-term debt

On September 30, 2011, long-term debt totaled $37 million, which was $15 million or 29 percent below the year-end 2010 level. The decrease reflected Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances that matured and were selectively not refinanced. A listing of outstanding long-term debt obligations is provided in Note 8—Long-term Debt.

- 44 -

Table of Contents

Shareholders’ equity and capital adequacy

Shareholders’ equity, or capital, enables Codorus Valley to maintain asset growth and absorb losses. Total shareholders’ equity was approximately $91.2 million on September 30, 2011, an increase of approximately $15 million or 19 percent, compared to the level at December 31, 2010. The increase was caused primarily by the net capital addition of approximately $8 million from the issuance of preferred stock to the US Treasury (Treasury) under its Small Business Lending Fund Program (SBLF Program) as described below. Increases in retained earnings from profitable operations and in accumulated other comprehensive income from unrealized gains, net of federal income tax, on securities available-for-sale also contributed to the increase in shareholders’ equity.

Preferred stock issued to the US Treasury under its Small Business Lending Fund Program

On August 18, 2011, as part of the Treasury’s SBLF Program, the Corporation entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Treasury whereby the Corporation sold to the Treasury, for an aggregate purchase price of $25 million, 25,000 shares of non-cumulative, perpetual preferred stock, Series B, $1,000 liquidation value, $2.50 par value. The preferred stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. The stock was issued pursuant to the SBLF program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Lending Jobs Act of 2010 that was created to encourage lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less that $10 billion. The SBLF preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital and will pay non-cumulative dividends quarterly on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning October 3, 2011. The dividend rate is initially set at 5 percent, but can vary on a quarterly basis for a period of time to reflect the amount of change in qualified small business lending compared to a baseline amount. Information about SBLF program dividends and restrictions is provided in Note 10—Shareholders’ Equity of this report and in Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2011. The SBLF program provides an attractive opportunity to the Corporation to obtain Tier 1 capital, lower the preferred stock dividend rate and to remove restrictions associated with the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program/TARP (CPP).

Proceeds from the SBLF program were used in part to redeem $16.5 million of outstanding Series A preferred stock issued in a prior period to the Treasury under CPP and to repurchase a related CPP common stock warrant as described below. The approximately $8 million of Tier 1 capital remaining from the SBLF transaction will be used primarily to support increased lending within the Corporation’s service area.

Preferred stock and common stock warrant issued to the US Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program

On August 18, 2011, the Corporation entered into a repurchase letter agreement with the Treasury providing for the redemption of outstanding Series A CPP preferred stock. Pursuant to the SBLF Purchase Agreement, approximately $16,507,000 of the proceeds of the sale of the SBLF Preferred Stock was used to redeem the 16,500 shares of the Series A CPP preferred stock plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Upon redemption, the remaining $379,000 preferred stock discount was recorded as a reduction to third quarter net income available to common shareholders. As a result of the redemption, the Corporation is no longer subject to the restrictions imposed by the CPP.

On September 28, 2011, the Corporation repurchased the outstanding CPP common stock warrant for $526,604 from the Treasury which was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in-capital.

Information about the Series A CPP preferred stock and common stock warrant is disclosed in Note 11—Shareholders’ Equity in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

- 45 -

Table of Contents

Common stock dividends

The Corporation typically pays cash dividends on a quarterly basis. The Board of Directors determines the dividend rate after considering the Corporation’s capital requirements, current and projected net income, and other factors. On October 11, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per common share payable on November 8, 2011, to shareholders of record October 25, 2011. This dividend follows $0.09 per share dividends paid in August and May and an $0.08 per share dividend paid in February. Including the dividend that was just declared, cash dividends for 2011 will total $0.35 per share, representing an increase of $0.10 per share or 40 percent above 2010.

Minimum regulatory capital ratios

Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by banking regulators that involve quantitative guidelines and qualitative judgments. Quantitative measures established by regulators pertain to minimum capital ratios, as set forth in Note 9—Regulatory Matters, to the financial statements. We believe that Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank were well capitalized on September 30, 2011, based on regulatory capital guidelines.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Credit risk management

The Credit Risk Management section included in our 2010 Form 10-K provides a general overview of the Corporation’s credit risk management process and loan concentrations. Credit risk represents the possibility that a loan client, counterparty or issuer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms, posing one of the most significant risks to the Corporation.

Nonperforming assets

The following table presents asset categories posing the greatest risk of loss and related ratios. We generally place a loan on nonaccrual status and cease accruing interest income, i.e., recognize interest income on a cash basis as long as the loan is sufficiently collateralized, when loan payment performance is unsatisfactory and the loan is past due 90 days or more. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest represent loans that are contractually past due, but are well collateralized and in the process of collection. Foreclosed real estate represents real estate acquired to satisfy debts owed to PeoplesBank. The final category, troubled debt restructurings, pertains to loans whose terms have been modified to include a concession that we would not ordinarily consider due to the debtor’s financial difficulties. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring may involve a reduction of the debt, accrued interest or interest rate, or extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk. Troubled debt restructurings are evaluated for impairment if they have been restructured during the most recent calendar year, or if they cease to perform in accordance with the modified terms. The paragraphs below explain significant changes in the aforementioned categories for September 30, 2011, compared to December 31, 2010.

Nonperforming assets are reviewed by management on a monthly basis. We generally rely on appraisals performed by independent licensed appraisers to determine the value of collateral for impaired collateral-dependent loans. Generally, an appraisal is performed when: an account reaches 60 days past due, unless a certified appraisal was completed within the past six months; market values have changed significantly; the condition of the property has changed significantly; or the existing appraisal is outdated. In instances where the value of the collateral is less than the net carrying amount of the loan, a specific loss allowance is established for the difference by recording a loss provision to the income statement. When it is probable that some portion or all of the loan balance will not be collected, that amount is charged off as loss against the allowance. A loan is returned to interest accruing status when we determine that circumstances have improved to the extent that all of the principal and interest amounts contractually due are current for at least six consecutive payments and future payments are reasonably assured.

- 46 -

Table of Contents

Table 9-Nonperforming Assets


*(dollars in thousands)*	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010

Nonaccrual loans	$	5,809		$	14,844
Nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructurings		5,805			3,680
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due		0			197
Total nonperforming loans		11,614			18,721
Foreclosed real estate, net of allowance		15,739			10,572
Total nonperforming assets	$	27,353		$	29,293
Accruing troubled debt restructurings	$	3,124		$	0

Total period-end loans, net of deferred fees	$	685,785		$	640,849
Allowance for loan losses (ALL)	$	8,617		$	7,626
ALL as a % of total period-end loans		1.26	%		1.19	%
Annualized net charge-offs as a % of average total loans		0.77	%		0.39	%
ALL as a % of nonperforming loans		74.19	%		40.74	%
Nonperforming loans as a % of total period-end loans		1.69	%		2.92	%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total period-end loans and net foreclosed real estate		3.90	%		4.50	%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total period-end assets		2.70	%		3.06	%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total period-end shareholders’ equity		30.00	^%		38.27	%

The level of nonperforming assets was relatively high in comparison to the Corporation’s historic levels for both periods primarily as a result of prolonged weakened economic conditions and the corresponding effects it has had on our commercial borrowers.

Nonaccrual loans

On September 30, 2011, the nonaccrual loan portfolio balance totaled $11,614,000 and was comprised primarily of collateralized commercial loans. Comparatively, nonaccrual loans totaled $18,524,000 at year-end 2010. The decrease in nonaccrual loans reflected the reclassification of a $4,266,000 loan to performing status (disclosed in a Form 8-K previously filed on October 3, 2011), reclassification to the foreclosed real estate portfolio, loan charge-offs and payments by borrowers, which more than offset nonaccrual loan additions, principally loan numbers 3 and 4, described below. On September 30, 2011, the nonaccrual loan portfolio was comprised of twenty unrelated loan relationships with outstanding principal balances ranging in size from $14,000 to $3,632,000. Four unrelated commercial relationships, which represent 80 percent of the total nonaccrual loan portfolio balance, are described below.

We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at least quarterly and have established a loss allowance for selected loan relationships where the net realizable value of the collateral is insufficient to repay the loan. In this regard allowances, if applicable, are noted below within the description of the loan. Collection efforts, including modification of contractual terms for individual accounts based on prevailing market conditions and liquidation of collateral assets, are being employed to maximize recovery. Further provisions for loan losses may be required for nonaccrual loans as additional information becomes available or conditions change or as required by bank regulators.

- 47 -

Table of Contents

Loan no. 1— The outstanding principal balance of the loan relationship is $3,632,000. This account is collateralized by three acres of improved real estate located in a major commercial district, a small parcel of improved real estate and the assignment of a personal loan from a third-party whose payments are current. Based on recent appraisals of the real estate, we believe that the loan is adequately collateralized. The borrower is presently operating under a troubled debt restructuring and payments are current under that arrangement.

Loan no. 2— PeoplesBank owns a 62.5 percent participation interest in this loan relationship. The carrying value of the Bank’s principal at September 30, 2011, was $2,567,000, which reflected two partial charge-offs in September 2011 totaling $2,275,000 due to deterioration in value as reported on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2011 ($1,075,000 charge-off), and on Form 8-K/A filed on November 10, 2011 ($1,200,000 charge-off). The latter charge-off reflected the results of a public auction held November 3, 2011 of the real estate collateral supporting the loan. The collateral supporting this out of market loan is a 55 acre parcel of improved real estate, which has been subdivided and zoned commercial use. The Bank has additional collateral that can be liquidated to maximize recovery.

Loan no. 3—The outstanding principal balance of the loan relationship is $2,151,000, which is collateralized by real estate comprised of commercial rental properties. Based on a recent appraisal of the primary real estate collateralizing the relationship, we believe that the loans are adequately collateralized. The borrower is presently operating under a troubled debt restructuring.

Loan no. 4—The carrying value of the Bank’s principal at September 30, 2011, was $887,000, which reflected a $900,000 write-down in September due to deterioration in value as reported on SEC Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2011. A recent auction sale of equipment, which partially collateralized the loan, generated approximately $84,000, after expenses. Proceeds from the sale will be applied against the loan’s carrying value in the fourth quarter. The remaining collateral, in the form of real estate, which the Corporation acquired on October 6, 2011, will be reclassified to foreclosed real estate and listed for sale. A recent independent appraisal of the real estate suggests its value is adequate to recover the remaining carrying value.

Foreclosed real estate

On September 30, 2011, foreclosed real estate, net of allowance, totaled $15,739,000, compared to $10,572,000 at December 31, 2010. The increase was due primarily to the significant capital improvements made to property no. 1, identified below, and the addition of property no. 4, identified below, which was reclassified from the nonaccrual loans category. On September 30, 2011, the portfolio was comprised of seven unrelated accounts ranging in size from $193,000 to $8,025,000, which we are actively attempting to liquidate. If a valuation allowance for probable loss was established for a particular property it is so noted in the property description below. Further valuation allowances may be required on any foreclosed property as additional information becomes available or conditions change. Foreclosed real estate is included in the other assets category on the Corporation’s balance sheet. Five unrelated foreclosed real estate properties, which represent 96 percent of the total foreclosed real estate portfolio balance, are described below.

Property no. 1—The carrying amount of this office building property is $8,025,000, which is net of a $193,000 allowance for probable loss based on an independent appraisal less estimated selling costs. Shell and tenant capital improvements costing approximately $4,243,000 have been incurred since the beginning of the year. Tenant improvements, up to an agreed upon allowance, are reimbursable by the tenant as additional rent over the term of the lease. Capital improvements were largely completed by June 30, 2011. Additionally, pre-leasing expenses (net) totaling approximately $1,061,000 were also incurred since the beginning of the year for project management, repairs, legal, architectural, insurance and real estate taxes. A reputable tenant has signed a lease agreement to lease the majority of the building, and the recognition of rental income began in August 2011. The property is listed for sale. The value of the property is largely dependent upon the leasing assumptions, which are subject to adjustment.

- 48 -

Table of Contents

Property no. 2— The carrying amount of this property is $2,423,000, which is net of a $292,000 allowance for probable loss based on an independent appraisal less estimated selling costs. This account is collateralized by 137 approved residential building lots. Of this total, 28 lots are improved and under contract with a local builder to takedown by June 30, 2012.

Property no. 3— The carrying amount of this property is $2,024,000, which is net of a $1,274,000 allowance for probable loss based on an independent appraisal less estimated selling costs. This account is collateralized by 266 acres of unimproved land that is zoned for residential development. An engineer has been retained to create a development plan for the site.

Property no. 4—The carrying amount of this property is $1,617,000, which is collateralized by the borrower’s personal residence (presently listed for sale) and a 9.5 acre parcel of unimproved land (under contract of sale).

Property no. 5— PeoplesBank has a 64 percent interest in 42 improved lots within a 20.6 acre established residential subdivision, which represents the original collateral. The carrying value of PeoplesBank’s interest at September 30, 2011, was $1,035,000, which is net of a $100,000 allowance for probable loss. During June 2010, a purchase agreement was executed which permitted the buyer to develop and sell the lots over a two-year period. Since inception through October 2011, twelve lots have been sold.

Allowance for loan losses

Although the Corporation maintains sound credit policies, certain loans deteriorate and must be charged off as losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and is reduced by loan charge offs, net of recoveries. The allowance is based upon management’s continuous evaluation of the loan portfolio coupled with a formal review of adequacy on a quarterly basis, which is subject to review and approval by the Board.

The allowance for loan losses consists primarily of three components: specific allowances for individually impaired commercial loans; allowances calculated for pools of loans and an unallocated component; which reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the assumptions that underlie the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The Corporation uses an internal risk rating system to evaluate individual loans. Loans are segmented into industry groups or pools with similar characteristics, and an allowance for loan losses is allocated to each segment based on quantitative factors such as recent loss history (two-year rolling average of net charge-offs) and qualitative factors, such as the results of internal and external credit reviews, changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio, adequacy of collateral, general economic conditions and the local business outlook. Determining the level of the allowance for probable loan losses at any given period is difficult, particularly during deteriorating or uncertain economic periods. We must make estimates using assumptions and information which are often subjective and fluid. There is also the potential for adjustment to the allowance as a result of regulatory examinations.

The following table presents an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The allowance was $8,617,000 or 1.26 percent of total loans on September 30, 2011, compared to $6,602,000 or 1.03 percent, on September 30, 2010. During the most recent nine-month period, net charge-offs totaled $3,794,000, compared to $2,483,000 for the first nine months of 2010. The annualized net charge-off ratio was 0.77 percent for the current period compared to 0.51 percent one year ago. The provision for both periods remained elevated in comparison to the Corporation’s historic levels and was reflective of the risks and uncertainties associated with prolonged weakness in economic and business conditions, a relatively high level of unemployment and erosion of real estate values. These factors can adversely affect our borrowers’ ability to service their loans. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2011.

- 49 -

Table of Contents

Table 10 -Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses


*(dollars in thousands)*	2011			2010
Balance-January 1,	$	7,626		$	7,175
Provision charged to operating expense		4,785			1,910
Loans charged off:
Commercial, industrial and agricultural		3,393			1,484
Real estate - construction and land development		0			789
Real estate - residential and home equity		285			61
Consumer		176			246
Total loans charged off		3,854			2,580
Recoveries:
Commercial, industrial and agricultural		5			23
Real estate - residential and home equity		8			0
Consumer		47			74
Total recoveries		60			97
Net charge-offs		3,794			2,483
Balance-September 30,	$	8,617		$	6,602

Ratios:
Allowance for loan losses as a % of total period-end loans		1.26	%		1.03	%
Annualized net charge-offs as a % of average total loans		0.77	%		0.51	%
Allowance for loan losses as a % of nonperforming loans		74.19	%		53.14	%

Liquidity risk management

Maintaining adequate liquidity provides the Corporation with the ability to meet financial obligations to depositors, loan customers, employees, and shareholders on a timely and cost effective basis in the normal course of business. Additionally, it provides funds for growth and business opportunities as they arise. Liquidity is generated from transactions relating to both the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. The primary sources of asset liquidity are scheduled investment security maturities and cash inflows, funds received from customer loan payments, and asset sales. The primary sources of liability liquidity are deposit growth, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, included in this report, present the changes in cash from operating, investing and financing activities. At September 30, 2011, we believe that liquidity was adequate based upon the potential liquidation of unpledged available-for-sale securities with a fair value totaling approximately $86 million and available credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh totaling approximately $113 million. The Corporation’s loan-to-deposit ratio, which is used as a broad measure of liquidity, was approximately 80 percent at September 30, 2011, compared to 79 percent at December 31, 2010.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

The Corporation’s financial statements do not reflect various commitments that are made in the normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk. These commitments consist primarily of commitments to grant new loans, unfunded commitments under existing loan facilities, and letters of credit issued under the same standards as on-balance sheet instruments. Unused commitments on September 30, 2011, totaled $172 million and consisted of $141 million in unfunded commitments under existing loan facilities, $19 million to grant new loans and $12 million in letters of credit. Normally these commitments have fixed expiration dates or termination clauses and are for specific purposes. Accordingly, many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon and therefore, generally do not present significant liquidity risk to the Corporation or PeoplesBank.

- 50 -

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon the evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2011, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. The Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Corporation’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, that the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs, and inherent limitations that may not prevent fraud, particularly by collusion of two or more people or by management override of a control.

There has been no change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal proceedings
There are no legal proceedings pending against Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries which are expected to have a material impact upon the financial position and/or operating results of the Corporation. Management is not aware of any proceedings known or contemplated by government authorities.

Item 1A. Risk factors
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds
Nothing to report.

Item 3. Defaults upon senior securities
Nothing to report.

Item 4. Removed and reserved

Item 5. Other information
Nothing to report.

- 51 -

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit

3.1		Amended Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for September 30, 2010, filed with the Commission on November 15, 2010)

3.2		Amended By-laws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on November 15, 2007)

3.3		Certificate of Designations for the Series A Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on January 15, 2009)

3.4		Certificate of Designation of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 24, 2011)

4		Rights Agreement dated as of November 4, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for September 30, 2010, filed with Commission on November 15, 2010), as amended January 9, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for September 30, 2010, filed with the Commission on November 15, 2010), as further amended August 18, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 24, 2011)

4.1		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 9, 2009, between the Registrant and the United States Department of Treasury (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on January 15, 2009)

4.2		Warrant, dated January 9, 2009, to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on January 15, 2009)

4.3		Small Business Lending Fund- Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, between Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc and the Secretary of the Treasury, with respect to the issuance and sale of the SBLF Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 24, 2011)

4.4		Repurchase Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, between Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc and the United States Department of the Treasury, with respect to the repurchase and redemption of the CPP Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 24, 2011)

4.5		Warrant Letter Agreement, Dated September 28, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 29, 2011)

- 52 -

Table of Contents


10.1		Amendment to Employment Agreement with Larry J. Miller (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 11, 2011)

10.2		Amendment to Employment Agreement with Harry R. Swift (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 11, 2011)

10.3		Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of CVB Statutory Trust No. 2, dated as of June 28, 2006, among Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc., as sponsor, the Delaware and institutional trustee named therein, and the administrators named therein – filed herein.

10.4		Indenture, dated as of June 28, 2006, between Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc., as issuer, and the trustee named therein, relating to the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities due 2036 – filed herein.

10.5		Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2006, between Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. and guarantee trustee named therein – filed herein.

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

- 53 -

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned there unto duly authorized.


		Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
		(Registrant)

November 14, 2011		/s/ Larry J. Miller
Date		Larry J. Miller
		President & CEO
		(Principal Executive Officer)

November 14, 2011		/s/ Jann A. Weaver
Date		Jann A. Weaver
		Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

- 54 -