def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant þ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Stemcells, Inc.
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (02-02) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
STEMCELLS, INC.
3155 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be Held on May 10, 2005
To the Stockholders of STEMCELLS, INC.
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of StemCells, Inc. (StemCells or the
company) will be held on May 10, 2005 at
2 P.M. at 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304 for the
following purposes:
|
|
|
1. To elect Class II directors to serve until the 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders; |
|
|
2. To consider and vote upon a proposal to ratify the
selection of Grant Thornton LLP as independent public
accountants for the company for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005; and |
|
|
3. To transact any and all other business that may properly
come before the meeting. |
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on
March 31, 2005 as the record date for determining those
Stockholders who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
meeting. The stock transfer books will not be closed between the
record date and the date of the meeting.
Representation of at least a majority of all outstanding shares
of Common Stock of StemCells is required to constitute a quorum.
Accordingly, it is important that your shares be represented at
the meeting. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL
MEETING, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT
PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Your proxy may be revoked at
any time prior to the time it is voted.
Please read the proxy material carefully. Your vote is important
and the company appreciates your cooperation in considering and
acting on the matters presented.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
Iris Brest |
|
Secretary |
April 5, 2005
Palo Alto, California
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF
STEMCELLS, INC.
The enclosed form of proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board
of Directors of StemCells, Inc. (the company) for
use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual
Meeting) to be held on May 10, 2005 at 2 P.M. at
the companys headquarters at 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto,
California 94304. The cost of solicitation of proxies will be
borne by the company. Directors, officers and employees of the
company may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile or in person
for no additional compensation. The company will reimburse
banks, brokerage firms, and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by them in sending
proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
March 31, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. There were
62,498,244 shares of our Common Stock, $.01 par value
(the Common Stock), outstanding on March 22,
2005, each of which is entitled to one vote for each share on
the matters to be voted upon.
Shares of our Common Stock represented by proxies in the form
enclosed that are properly executed and returned to us and not
revoked will be voted as specified therein by the stockholder.
In the absence of contrary instructions, or in instances where
no specification is made, the shares will be voted FOR the
election as directors of the nominees as described herein under
Proposal Number 1 Election of
Directors, FOR ratification of the selection of
accountants as described herein under Proposal Number
2 Ratification of Selection of Independent Public
Accountants, and in the discretion of the named proxies,
as to any other matter that may properly come before the Annual
Meeting. Any stockholder signing and delivering a proxy may
revoke it at any time before it is voted by delivering to the
Secretary of the company a written revocation or a duly executed
proxy bearing a date later than the date of the proxy being
revoked. Any record stockholder attending the Annual Meeting in
person may revoke his or her proxy and vote his or her shares at
the Annual Meeting.
A copy of the companys Annual Report to Stockholders for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 will be mailed,
along with this Proxy Statement, on or about April 5, 2005
to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
QUORUM, REQUIRED VOTES, AND METHOD OF TABULATION
Consistent with Delaware law and under the companys
Amended and Restated By-laws, a majority of the shares entitled
to be cast on a particular matter, present in person or
represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum as to such matter.
The company will appoint election inspectors for the meeting to
count votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting.
Election of directors by stockholders shall be determined by a
plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote
at the election that are present in person or represented by
proxy. The approval of the proposal to ratify the selection of
accountants requires a majority of the votes properly cast to be
affirmative. The election inspectors will count shares
represented by proxies that withhold authority to vote for a
nominee for election as a director or that reflect abstentions
and broker non-votes (i.e., shares represented at
the meeting held by brokers or nominees as to which
(i) instructions have not been received from the beneficial
owners or persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker or
nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular
matter) only as shares that are present and entitled to vote on
the matter for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum,
but neither abstentions nor broker non-votes have any effect on
the outcome of voting on the election of directors or the
selection of accountants.
Management does not know of any matters to be presented at this
Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this Proxy
Statement and in the Notice accompanying this Proxy Statement.
If other matters should
properly come before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote
such matters in their discretion. Any stockholder has the right
to revoke his or her proxy at any time before it is voted.
SHARE OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of March 2,
2005 by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock,
(ii) each director and nominee for director,
(iii) each executive officer named in the Summary
Compensation Table and (iv) all executive officers and
directors of the company as a group. Except as otherwise
indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the Common
Stock listed below, based on information furnished by such
owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to
such shares, subject to community property laws where
applicable, and that there are no other affiliations among the
stockholders listed in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Class Beneficially | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner* |
|
Owned** | |
|
Owned*** | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ricardo Levy
|
|
|
72,165 |
(1) |
|
|
*** |
|
Roger M. Perlmutter
|
|
|
83,503 |
(2) |
|
|
*** |
|
John J. Schwartz
|
|
|
245,958 |
(3) |
|
|
*** |
|
Irving Weissman
|
|
|
1,728,933 |
(4) |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Eric H. Bjerkholt
|
|
|
6,666 |
(5) |
|
|
*** |
|
Ann Tsukamoto
|
|
|
235,271 |
(6) |
|
|
*** |
|
Martin McGlynn
|
|
|
683,656 |
(7) |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Judi Lum
|
|
|
276 |
(8) |
|
|
*** |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
|
|
|
3,056,428 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
The address of all persons listed in the table is
c/o StemCells, Inc., 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto,
California 94304. |
|
|
|
|
** |
All numbers are based on information obtained by questionnaire
or filings on Forms 13D or 13G received by the company. |
|
|
*** |
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
Includes 72,165 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(2) |
Includes 83,503 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(3) |
Includes 245,958 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(4) |
Includes 72,252 shares issuable upon exercise of warrant
and 560,292 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days. Includes 14,511 shares
held in trust for Dr. Weissmans children as to which
he disclaims beneficial ownership. |
|
(5) |
Includes 6,666 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(6) |
Includes 187,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days. Includes
21,437 shares included in Dr. Tsukamotos 401(k)
plan. Includes a total of 26,834 shares held in trusts for
the benefit of Dr. Tsukamoto and her family members,
including 4,000 shares owned by Dr. Tsukamotos
parents as to which she disclaims beneficial ownership. |
|
(7) |
Includes 667,707 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days. None of the option
shares granted Mr. McGlynn in 2004 have vested. Includes
15,949 shares included in Mr. McGlynns 401(k)
plan. |
|
(8) |
Includes 276 shares included in Ms. Lums 401(k)
plan. None of the option shares granted Ms. Lum in 2004
have vested. |
2
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES
During 2004, the Board of Directors was composed of
Mr. McGlynn and Drs. Levy, Perlmutter, Schwartz and
Weissman for the entire year. Eric Bjerkholt became a member of
the Board as of March 1, 2004. The independent members of
the Board, as defined by NASDAQ rules, are Mr. Bjerkholt
and Drs. Levy, Perlmutter and Schwartz. During 2004, the
Board had three standing committees the Compensation
and Stock Option Committee (the Compensation
Committee), the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee (the Corporate Governance Committee) and
the Audit Committee as well as the Single Member
Committee established under the companys 2001 and 2004
Equity Incentive Plans. All members of the Compensation
Committee, the Audit Committee, and the Corporate Governance
Committee are, and are required by the charters of the
respective committees to be, independent as defined by NASDAQ
rules.
The Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to a
written charter, a copy of which is available through the
companys website at www.stemcellsinc.com. It is composed
of Drs. Levy, Perlmutter and Schwartz, and held one meeting
in 2004. The Corporate Governance Committee considers the
experience, ability and character of potential nominees to serve
as directors, as well as particular skills or knowledge that may
be desirable in light of the companys position at any
time. At least one member of the Board must be a financial
expert (as defined in Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and NASDAQ rules). The Corporate Governance
Committee may identify potential candidates through any reliable
means available, including without limitation identification by
a search firm and recommendations of past or current members of
the Board from their knowledge of the industry and of the
company.
The Compensation Committee, which was composed of Drs. Schwartz
and Levy through March 28, 2004 and of Dr. Schwartz
and Mr. Bjerkholt for the remainder of 2004, held four
meetings in 2004 and made other decisions regarding executive
and other compensation by unanimous written consent. The
Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board and
the companys management concerning salaries in general,
determines executive compensation and, except as such decisions
have been delegated to the Single Member Committee, approves
incentive compensation for company employees and consultants.
Until March 28, 2004, the Audit Committee was composed of
Drs. Schwartz, Perlmutter and Levy. Since March 29,
2004, the Audit Committee has been composed of
Mr. Bjerkholt and Drs. Schwartz and Levy. The Audit
Committee held eight meetings during 2004. The Board of
Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee,
which was revised and restated at its meeting of March 11,
2004. The new charter of the Audit Committee is available
through the companys website at www.stemcellsinc.com. The
primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board
of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by
reviewing financial reports and other financial information
provided by the company to any governmental body or the public,
the companys systems of internal controls regarding
finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that management
and the Board have established, and the companys auditing,
accounting and financial processes generally. The Audit
Committee annually, and at such other times as it finds it
necessary, recommends to the Board of Directors the appointment
of a firm of independent auditors to audit the financial
statements of the company and meets with such personnel of the
company to review the scope and the results of the annual audit,
the amount of audit fees, the companys internal accounting
controls, the companys financial statements contained in
the companys Annual Report to Stockholders and other
related matters. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is
independent, and the Board has determined that
Mr. Bjerkholt is an audit committee financial
expert, as defined in SEC and NASDAQ rules.
Stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board of Directors
or with a particular director may send a letter to the Secretary
of the company at StemCells, Inc., 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto,
California 94304. Any communication should clearly specify that
it is intended to be made to the entire Board of Directors or to
one or more particular director(s).
The Secretary of the company will review all such correspondence
and forward to the Board of Directors a summary of all such
correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in the
opinion of the Secretary, deals with the functions of the Board
of Directors or committees thereof or that she otherwise
determines requires their attention. The Secretary maintains a
log of all correspondence received by the company that is
3
addressed to members of the Board of Directors, and any Director
may at any time review and request copies of any such
correspondence.
Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing
matters will immediately be brought to the attention of the
Chairman of the Audit Committee and handled in accordance with
established procedures, which are set out in the Audit
Committees Policy on Receipt, Retention and Treatment of
Complaints Regarding Accounting, Internal Controls and Auditing
Matters. A copy of the Policy is available on the companys
website, www.stemcellsinc.com.
The company does not have a policy on director attendance at
Annual Meetings of shareholders. At the 2004 Annual Meeting,
Chairman of the Board John Schwartz and director Martin McGlynn
were present.
Prior to 2001, non-employee directors received an annual
retainer of $18,000 payable quarterly, in addition to $1,500 for
each Board meeting attended ($500 for each meeting attended by
telephone) and $500 for each Committee meeting attended if not
contemporaneous with a Board meeting. In addition, upon
election, each such director also received an option to
purchase 20,000 shares of our Common Stock exercisable
at the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time of
grant, such shares vesting in equal portions over three years on
each anniversary of the grant date. In order to conserve cash
and demonstrate their continuing confidence in the
companys future, the directors unanimously adopted a
resolution revising their compensation arrangements as of
January 1, 2000, to provide that in lieu of cash, retainers
and meeting fees would be paid in the form of
immediately-vesting options to purchase shares of the our Common
Stock at below market prices ($0.25 per share). The number
of shares to be distributed to the directors was calculated
using the closing price of our Common Stock on the last business
day of the quarter, less the option price of $0.25 per
share. The Chairman of the Board received a retainer of $35,000
annually (in below-market options calculated as described
above), in addition to meeting payments and at-market options on
the same basis as other directors. On March 11, 2004, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board
unanimously decided, that no further below-market options be
granted to Directors or to employees, and all stipends and
attendance fees have been paid in cash throughout 2004. As of
April 1, 2001, the Board compensation policy provided for
an option on the third anniversary of the original appointment
of each re-elected director, such member received an option for
15,000 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at the fair
market value at the time of grant, vesting annually over three
years. These provisions were changed effective
September 20, 2004. Under the current compensation policy,
non-employee directors receive quarterly retainers of $4,500
($8,750 for the Chairman); the chairs of the standing committees
receive quarterly stipends of $1,000 (Audit Committee) or $500
(Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees). Non-employee
directors also receive $1,500 for each Board meeting, and $1,000
for each Standing Committee meeting, attended in person or by
videoconference ($500 for each meeting attended by telephone).
The initial option of 20,000 shares at market value
continues in effect, but non-employee directors also receive an
option for 10,000 shares on each anniversary of their
appointments, vesting one year after issuance. Directors are
reimbursed for their expenses in attending meetings of the Board
of Directors and meetings of committees of the Board of
Directors.
The Board of Directors of StemCells held four regular and two
special meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004; a meeting of the outside directors without the Chief
Executive Officer present was held at each of the regular
meetings of the Board except the first, when pressure of time
prevented it. Each of the Directors attended more than 75% of
the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the committees on
which they served.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The current executive officers of the company who are not also
directors of the company are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ann Tsukamoto, Ph.D.
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
Vice President, Research and Development |
|
Judi Lum
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance |
4
Ann Tsukamoto, Ph.D., joined the company in November 1997
as Senior Director, Scientific Operations, and was appointed
Vice President, Scientific Operations in June 1998 and Vice
President, Research and Development in February 2002. From 1989
until she joined StemCells, Dr. Tsukamoto was employed at
SyStemix, Inc., where she served in various research capacities
before transitioning to the position of Director of Clinical
Science. At SyStemix, Inc., Dr. Tsukamoto assisted in the
launch of its clinical research program for the hematopoietic
stem cell. She received her Ph.D. degree from the University of
California, Los Angeles and did postdoctoral research with
Dr. Harold Varmus at the University of California,
San Francisco. Dr. Tsukamoto is an inventor on six
issued U.S. Patents related to the human hematopoietic stem
cell.
Judi Lum joined the company in November 2004 as Chief Financial
Officer. From 1998 until she joined StemCells, Ms. Lum was
principal of E2 Consulting, advising startup companies and
non-profit organizations on strategic, financial and operational
issues, as well as providing interim CFO services to clients.
From 1996 to 1998, she served as Vice President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Inhale Therapeutic
Systems (currently Nektar Therapeutics), where she was
responsible for the finance and accounting department (including
planning, tax, treasury and SEC reporting) as well as the human
resources and IT departments, completing equity financings of
$75 million and debt financings of $15 million. Prior
to 1996, Ms. Lum served as Vice President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Soane
Technologies, Director of Corporate Development at GenPharm
International, Director of Finance at Raychem Corporation, and
in finance and operations management capacities at Advanced
Cardiovascular Systems. Ms. Lum received both her
Bachelors Degree in Economics and her Masters Degree
in Business Administration from Stanford University.
Martin McGlynn, President and CEO of the company, is its other
executive officer; Mr. McGlynn is a member of the Board of
Directors.
All executive officers of the company are elected annually and
serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
During 2004, none of our executive officers served on the board
of directors of any entities that had one or more executive
officers serve on our Compensation and Stock Option Committee.
No current or past executive officers or employees of the
Company serve on our Compensation and Stock Option Committee.
The following directors served on the Compensation and Stock
Option Committee in 2004: Drs. Schwartz and Levy.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Dr. Weissman, a member of the Board of Directors, was
retained in September 1997 to serve as a consultant to us.
Pursuant to his Consulting Agreement, Dr. Weissman has
agreed to provide consulting services to us and to serve on our
Scientific Advisory Board. We agreed to pay Dr. Weissman
$50,000 per year for his services and granted him an option
to purchase 500,000 shares of Common Stock for
$5.25 per share, of which 31,250 shares vested at the
date of grant. Originally, the remainder of the option would
have vested upon the occurrence of certain milestones related to
our stem cell research program and in the event of certain
changes of control. We agreed to amend the option on
October 27, 2000 so that the shares would become
exercisable over eight years from the original grant date or in
the event of certain changes of control. The option is currently
exercisable for 400,000 shares. We recorded a compensation
expense of $823,759 during the fourth quarter of 2000 as a
result of this change in the vested portion of the option. For
the year 2001 we recorded a compensation expense of $346,240.
For the year 2002, the effect of a lower stock price used in
valuing the options under the Black-Scholes method resulted in a
credit to compensation expense of $209,553. For the year 2003 we
recorded a compensation expense of $82,139. For the year 2004 we
have recorded a compensation expense of $152,481. The deferred
compensation expense associated with the unvested portion of the
grant was recorded as $39,377. We plan to revalue the options
using the Black-Scholes method on a quarterly basis and
recognize additional compensation expense accordingly. We also
agreed to nominate
5
Dr. Weissman for a position on the Board of Directors, and
he agreed to serve if elected. Since October 1, 2000, he
has been compensated for this service in the same manner and
amount as other non-employee members of the Board. The
Consulting Agreement contains confidentiality, noncompetition,
and assignment of invention provisions and is for a term of
fifteen years, subject to earlier termination by either party.
As of October 1, 2002, Dr. Weissman agreed that we
could pay the $50,000 annual consulting fee (which is payable
quarterly) either in cash or in below-market options to purchase
shares of our common stock, at our choice. From October 1,
2002 through January 1, 2004, we made the consulting
payments in options exercisable at $0.10 per share, the
number of shares being determined by dividing $12,500.00 by the
difference between ten cents and the average of the closing
price of our common stock on each of the twenty trading days
preceding the date on which payment is due. On March 11,
2004, the Board of Directors determined that no below-market
option grants should thereafter be made to directors or
employees, and Dr. Weissmans consulting fee has since
then been and will continue to be paid in cash.
In April 2000, we sold 750 shares of our 6% cumulative
convertible preferred stock plus a warrant to
purchase 37,500 shares of our Common Stock to each of
Dr. Weissman and Mr. Mark Levin, also a member of the
Board at the time, for $750,000, for a total of $1,500,000, on
terms more favorable to us than we were able to obtain from
outside investors. The shares were convertible at the option of
the holders into common stock at the initial conversion price of
$3.77 per share (based on the face value of the preferred
shares). The conversion price, the number of shares purchasable
under the warrant, and the exercise price of the warrant were
subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain equity
transactions. We valued the beneficial conversion feature
reflecting the April 13, 2000 commitment date and the most
beneficial per share discount available to the preferred
shareholders at $481,000; we treated that amount as a deemed
dividend as of the commitment date. The conversion price and
exercise price were reduced, and the number of warrant shares
increased, a number of times as a result of equity transactions,
as provided in the terms of the preferred shares. On
June 7, 2002, Mr. Levin converted his 750 shares
of 6% cumulative convertible preferred stock plus accumulated
dividends, at an effective conversion price of $1.94 per
share for 439,442 shares of common stock. On
October 4, 2002, the remaining 750 shares together
with accumulated dividends, which were held by
Dr. Weissman, converted automatically at the then-effective
conversion price of $1.07 to 812,802 shares of common
stock. On March 9, 2005, Mark Levin exercised his warrant,
which covered 72,252 shares at that date, for a cash
payment of $247,101.84 (at $3.42 per share, the
then-applicable exercise price.) Dr. Weissman still holds
his warrant, which currently covers 72,252 shares
exercisable at $3.42 per share; it will expire on
July 12, 2005.
Dr. Weissman is a member of the Board of Directors and
co-chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board of Cellerant
Therapeutics, Inc., a privately-owned biotechnology company that
is also a tenant in the building in which we are located.
(Cellerant was formerly known as Celtrans, LLC, and
Dr. Weissman was at one time its interim Chief Executive
Officer and a member of its Board of Managers.) Because our
premises include an animal facility with more capacity than we
currently require for our own use, we entered a space-sharing
agreement with Cellerant (then Celtrans) under which Cellerant
or, with our approval, a subtenant of Cellerant, may use part of
the animal facility. Under an amendment to the agreement, it was
in abeyance for a period that ended on December 31, 2004.
During 2004, under a separate agreement we supplied Cellerant
with other, more limited space in the animal facility and shared
access to our irradiator. As of January 1, 2005, the
original space sharing agreement is in effect and the separate
agreement is in effect only with respect to sharing of use and
costs of the irradiator.
6
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us to
our Chief Executive Officer, our Vice President, Research and
Development, and our Chief Financial Officer during the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002. No other
people served as executive officers during 2004.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary ($) | |
|
Bonus ($) | |
|
Compensation ($) | |
|
Awards ($) | |
|
Options (#) | |
|
Compensation ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Martin McGlynn
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
310,000 |
|
|
|
113,101 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
209,407 |
(4) |
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
272,250 |
|
|
|
71,500 |
(2) |
|
|
30,000 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
205,935 |
(5) |
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
286,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
241,629 |
(6) |
Ann Tsukamoto, Ph.D.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
58,636 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
9,180 |
(7) |
|
VP, Research and
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
190,448 |
|
|
|
30,010 |
(2) |
|
|
15,000 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,974 |
(7) |
|
Development
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
200,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
7,180 |
(7) |
Judi Lum
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
38,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168 |
(9) |
|
CFO and VP, Finance(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Awarded by the Board in February and March 2005 for performance
goals met in 2004. |
|
(2) |
Awarded by the Board in December 2003 for services rendered in
2003, but not paid until January 2004. |
|
(3) |
Special payment awarded by the Board in December 2003 for
services rendered in 2003, but not paid until January 2004. |
|
(4) |
Represents housing allowance of $201,407, and $8,000 of fair
market value of the company matching contributions of Common
Stock to Mr. McGlynns account in our 401(k) Plan. |
|
(5) |
Represents housing allowance of $201,406, and $4,529 of fair
market value of the company matching contributions of Common
Stock to Mr. McGlynns account in our 401(k) Plan. |
|
(6) |
Represents housing allowance and relocation expense of $185,629,
$50,000 as relocation bonus and $6,000 of fair market value of
the company matching contributions of Common Stock to
Mr. McGlynns account in our 401(k) Plan. |
|
(7) |
Represents $8,000, $3,794, and $6,000, the fair market value of
the company matching contributions of Common Stock to
Dr. Tsukamotos account in our 401(k) Plan for the
years 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively, plus $1,180 paid by the
company for term life insurance for Dr. Tsukamoto in each
such year. |
|
(8) |
Ms. Lum became CFO and VP, Finance, effective
November 8, 2004. |
|
(9) |
Represents the fair market value of the company matching
contributions of Common Stock to Ms. Lums account in
our 401(k) Plan for the year 2004. |
The following table provides information on option grants in
2004 to the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
Potential Realizable Value At | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of Total | |
|
|
|
Assumed Annual Rates of | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation for | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise of | |
|
|
|
Option Term(3) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Base Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted | |
|
Fiscal Year(1) | |
|
($/Share) (2) | |
|
Date | |
|
0% ($) | |
|
5% ($) | |
|
10% ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Martin McGlynn
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
|
9/2/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,773 |
|
|
|
853,449 |
|
Ann Tsukamoto, Ph.D.
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
|
9/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,497 |
|
|
|
548,646 |
|
Judi Lum
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
|
11/8/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
906,080 |
|
|
|
2,296,184 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The company granted options covering 1,751,000 shares of
Common Stock to employees in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. |
7
|
|
(2) |
The exercise price may be paid by delivery of already-owned
shares and tax withholding obligations related to exercise may
be paid by offset of the underlying shares, subject to certain
conditions. |
|
(3) |
As required by the Commissions rules on executive
compensation disclosure, the company has presented option values
based on arbitrary growth rates, and this disclosure is not
intended to forecast future appreciation, if any, in our stock
price. |
EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
Martin McGlynn joined the company as President and Chief
Executive Officer on January 15, 2001. Under the terms of
an agreement between Mr. McGlynn and us, Mr. McGlynn
is entitled to an annual base salary of $275,000 per year,
reviewable annually by the Board of Directors, and a bonus, in
the Boards sole discretion, of up to 25% of his base
salary. In December 2003, the Board set Mr. McGlynns
target bonus at 35% effective January 1, 2004.
Mr. McGlynn was granted an option to
purchase 400,000 shares of our Common Stock with an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common
Stock on the date of his employment, one fourth to vest on the
first anniversary of his employment and the remaining
three-fourths to vest in equal monthly installments during his
second through fourth years of employment. The agreement
provides that the Board may, in its sole discretion, grant
Mr. McGlynn a bonus option to purchase up to an additional
25,000 shares. The vesting under the option is subject to
acceleration in the event of certain changes of control. We also
agreed to pay Mr. McGlynn a $50,000 relocation bonus and to
reimburse him for relocation expenses, and have done so. The
agreement with Mr. McGlynn provides that if his employment
is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. McGlynn for
good reason, he will be entitled to severance payments equal to
one years base salary and he will receive healthcare
benefits under our plans for one year after termination. If
Mr. McGlynns employment is terminated as a result of
his disability, he will receive up to six months base
salary. By virtue of an amendment to the agreement made in
April, 2004, if a change in control or similar event occurs and
is followed by a material change in his duties, or if we
terminate his employment without cause within twelve months
following such an event, he will be entitled to severance
payments equal to a proportional part of his target bonus plus
two times his base salary and the reasonably projected cost of
continuing his healthcare benefits for two years plus a cash
gross up to reflect the reasonably projected tax
consequences of the healthcare-related payment. If we terminate
Mr. McGlynns employment for cause or if he resigns,
he will not be entitled to any severance or other benefits.
Dr. Ann Tsukamoto, Ph.D., joined the company in
November 1997 as Senior Director, Scientific Operations, was
appointed Vice President, Scientific Operations in June 1998,
and Vice President, Research and Development in February 2002.
Under her employment agreement, the company provides
Dr. Tsukamoto with $750,000 of term life insurance during
her employment. Dr. Tsukamotos base salary is no
longer controlled by a formal agreement. In December 2003, the
Board set Dr. Tsukamotos target bonus at 25%
effective January 1, 2004. Any bonus is in the Boards
sole discretion. Our agreement with Dr. Tsukamoto, as
amended in July 2000, provides that if her employment is
terminated by us without cause at any time, she will be entitled
to severance payments of current salary and benefits
continuation under COBRA for a period of twelve months after the
effective date of termination and to accelerated vesting of
time-based options granted under our 1992 Equity Incentive Plan.
If we terminate Dr. Tsukamotos employment for cause
or if she resigns, she will not be entitled to any severance or
other benefits.
Judi Lum joined the company in November 2004 as Chief Financial
Officer and Vice President, Finance. Ms. Lums base
salary is $215,000 under the terms of her agreement with the
company, with a target cash bonus of 20% of base salary. Any
bonus is in the Boards sole discretion. Ms. Lum was
also granted options to acquire 425,000 shares of our
common stock under her agreement, which will vest, subject to
her continued employment with us, over 48 months (1/4 on
the first anniversary of her employment and the remainder at the
rate of 1/48 per month during the next 36 months). By
virtue of action taken by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors on February 14, 2005, if
Ms. Lums employment is terminated by us without cause
at any time, she will be entitled to severance payments of
current salary and benefits continuation under COBRA for a
period of six months after the effective date of termination. If
we terminate Ms. Lums employment for cause or if she
resigns, she will not be entitled to any severance or other
benefits.
8
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the
Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities
related to the companys internal controls, financial
reporting, and audit functions. The Committee selects a firm of
independent auditor to audit the financial statements of the
company, oversees the independent auditors qualifications
and independence as well as its performance, and resolves
disagreements, if any, between management and the auditor
regarding financial reporting. The Committee assists the Board
in overseeing the preparation of the companys financial
statements, the companys compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, and the performance of the
companys internal audit function. The Audit Committee
annually meets with personnel of the company and the independent
auditor to review the scope and the results of the annual audit,
the amount of audit fees, the companys internal accounting
controls, the companys financial statements contained in
the companys Annual Report to Stockholders and other
related matters. In 2004, the Audit Committee also authorized
the engagement and exercised oversight over the work of a
consulting firm to assist the company in meeting its obligations
as an accelerated filer under Section 404 or the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management
the financial statements for fiscal year 2004 audited by Grant
Thornton LLP, the companys independent auditors, as well
as managements report on internal control over financial
reporting, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal Control Integrated
Framework. The Audit Committee has discussed with Grant Thornton
LLP various matters related to the financial statements,
including those matters required to be discussed by SAS 61
(Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU 380). The
Audit Committee has also discussed with Grant Thornton LLP its
report on internal control over financial reporting and its
report on managements assessment of internal control over
financial reporting, has received the written disclosures and
the letter from Grant Thornton LLP required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees), and has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP its
independence.
Based upon such review and discussions the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial
statements be included in the companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Eric Bjerkholt, Chairman
Ricardo B. Levy, Ph.D.
John J. Schwartz, Ph.D.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the
companys previous filings under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, that might incorporate future filings, including this
Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the following report and
the Performance Graph on page 12 shall not be incorporated
by reference into any such filings.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE
The company continues to use its best efforts to apply a
consistent philosophy of compensation for all employees,
including executive officers. This philosophy is based on the
premise that the achievements of the company result from the
coordinated efforts of all individuals working toward common
objectives within each of the then existing projects of the
companys respective business units. The company strives to
achieve those objectives through teamwork focused on meeting or
exceeding strategic, scientific and business goals and the
expectations of the companys shareholders.
9
Compensation Philosophy for Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
We compensate our Executive Officers through a combination of
base salary combined with periodic awards of cash bonuses and
stock options. Our Executive Officers also participate in the
companys benefits programs, which are made available to
all employees of the company. |
|
|
|
We are committed to a compensation program that helps attract
and retain the best people in the industry. To ensure that our
compensation is competitive, we regularly compare our
compensation levels with those companies we consider comparable
and set our compensation parameters based on this review. We use
the industry standard data from the Radford Biotechnology
Compensation Surveys and, from time to time, the advice of
consultants in evaluating our practice in the areas of base pay,
incentive pay, equity participation, and benefits. |
|
|
|
We reward our Executive Officers for performance. |
|
|
|
Executive Officers are rewarded based upon both individual
contribution and the performance of the company as a whole.
Corporate performance is evaluated by reviewing the extent to
which scientific, financial, business and strategic goals are
met. Individual performance is evaluated by reviewing the
individuals role in the achievement of corporate goals,
ability to deal with unforeseeable problems and seize
unforeseeable opportunities, and the degree to which teamwork
and company values are fostered by the individuals actions. |
In early stage biopharmaceutical companies, performance is best
judged by success in achievement of scientific and technical
milestones, product development progress (including progress
toward and through clinical trials), strategic human resources
development, capitalization and financing goals, and
commercialization goals.
We believe that all employees, including Executive Officers,
should understand and constructively participate in the
performance evaluation process, which operates as follows:
|
|
|
1. At the beginning of the performance cycle, the Chief
Executive Officer in conference with the companys
scientific leadership and other members of management proposes a
set of key objectives and goals for the year. These goals and
objectives are reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.
Progress toward the accomplishment of these goals is reviewed by
the Board of Directors from time to time and adjustments may be
made to the goals pursuant to such review. The Board also
establishes a bonus pool of cash and/or equity (stock options)
for achievement of the goals. The companys budget and its
conduct of affairs are, to a significant extent, driven by these
goals, as are the individual goals of each employee. |
|
|
2. At the end of the performance cycle, the Compensation
and Stock Option Committee determines whether and to what extent
the goals have been achieved and determines whether cash and/or
equity bonuses are warranted. To the extent that bonuses are
approved, all employees participate in accordance with
established guidelines. |
|
|
3. Managers evaluate the performance of employees reporting
to them, and performance is discussed with the Chief Executive
Officer. The evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer is
normally performed by the Compensation and Stock Option
Committee and reported to the Board, but may occasionally be
performed by the full Board in the first instance. |
|
|
4. The performance of other Executive Officers is discussed
with the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, which reviews
recommendations for compensation made (subject to their review
or to review by the full Board) by the Chief Executive Officer. |
Compensation Vehicles
The company uses a simple total compensation program consisting
of cash and equity-based compensation. Having a compensation
program that allows the company to successfully attract and
retain executive
10
officers permits it to enhance shareholder value, motivate
technological innovation and foster teamwork. The vehicles used
are:
Salary The company sets base salaries for
executive officers by reviewing the base salary for individuals
in competitive positions in the market and adjusting annually
with increases that reflect individual performance.
Annual Cash Bonus Executive officers and the
Chief Executive Officer, as well as all other employees, are
eligible to receive an annual cash bonus upon the attainment of
predetermined corporate objectives approved by the Compensation
and Stock Option Committee at the beginning of the year, with
progress against them reviewed at year-end to determine the
appropriate bonus payment. At full achievement of objectives,
the Chief Executive Officer would be targeted to receive a bonus
of 35% of his annual base salary; the Vice President, Research
and Development would be targeted to receive a bonus of 25% of
her annual base salary, and the Chief Financial Officer would be
targeted to receive a bonus of 20% of her annual base salary.
The amount actually paid in any one year may be more or less
than the targeted bonus based on over or under achievement of
objectives and the Board and Compensation and Stock Option
Committees discretion.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer
For fiscal year 2004, Mr. McGlynn earned $310,000 in base
salary and a bonus of $113,101 that was paid after the end of
the fiscal year. His base salary was set after considering his
achievements in 2003, his experience, and the salaries of the
chief executive officers of comparable companies. The bonus
awarded Mr. McGlynn reflects the Compensation
Committees assessment of the companys success in
attaining other objectives and Mr. McGlynns
contribution to that success, including his leadership role in
formulating and executing the Companys business strategy.
The Committee took particular note of Mr. McGlynns
achievement in regard to the raising of capital, which resulted
in an increase of over 200% in the companys cash position
at the end of 2004 compared to 2003.
|
|
|
Equity-Based Compensation |
Stock Option Program The purpose of our stock
option program is to provide additional incentives to all
employees including executive officers, to maximize shareholder
value. We believe strongly in the use of stock options because
they align employee interests directly with shareholder value.
The option program also utilizes vesting periods to encourage
executive officers to remain with the company and to encourage
long-term increases in company stock value. We grant stock
options to all employees upon hiring and have targets for annual
option grants to current employees as an incentive vehicle to
encourage employee equity participation in our future.
Although provided for under our incentive plans, we do not
currently use stock appreciation rights as a compensation
vehicle.
Compensation of Executive Officers
The executive officers of the company for 2004 were Martin
McGlynn, who served as the companys President and CEO, Ann
Tsukamoto, who served as Vice President, Research and
Development, and Judi Lum, who has served, since November 2004,
as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance. Their
compensation is described under Employment and Severance
Agreements above.
COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE
John J. Schwartz, Ph.D., Chairman
Eric Bjerkholt
11
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Note: The stock price performance shown on the graph below is
not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
The graph below compares the cumulative total returns on the
companys Common Stock with the cumulative total returns of
the Amex Biotechnology Stock Index and the S&P 500 Index for
the period from the companys initial public offering until
December 31, 2004. (1)
Comparison of Cumulative Total Returns on Common Stock of
StemCells, Inc.,
the Amex Biotechnology Stock Index and S&P 500 Index
for the Period From the companys Initial Public
Offering Until December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MAR |
|
|
DEC |
|
|
DEC |
|
|
DEC |
|
|
DEC |
|
|
DEC |
|
|
DEC | |
|
DEC | |
|
DEC | |
|
DEC | |
|
DEC | |
|
Dec | |
|
Dec | |
|
Dec | |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
93 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
96 |
|
|
97 | |
|
98 | |
|
99 | |
|
00 | |
|
01 | |
|
02 | |
|
03 | |
|
04 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
COMPANY
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
79.49 |
|
|
|
|
125.64 |
|
|
|
|
46.15 |
|
|
|
|
175.64 |
|
|
|
|
92.31 |
|
|
|
|
41.03 |
|
|
|
15.07 |
|
|
|
15.07 |
|
|
|
28.58 |
|
|
|
39.89 |
|
|
|
12.46 |
|
|
|
22.63 |
|
|
|
48.34 |
|
S&P 500 INDEX
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
110.41 |
|
|
|
|
121.53 |
|
|
|
|
119.88 |
|
|
|
|
160.48 |
|
|
|
|
192.99 |
|
|
|
|
252.84 |
|
|
|
263.53 |
|
|
|
314.99 |
|
|
|
323.71 |
|
|
|
281.49 |
|
|
|
215.72 |
|
|
|
272.62 |
|
|
|
297.14 |
|
AMEX BIOTECH STOCK INDEX
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
94.41 |
|
|
|
|
64.07 |
|
|
|
|
45.41 |
|
|
|
|
74.88 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
89.88 |
|
|
|
159.9 |
|
|
|
338.09 |
|
|
|
343.1 |
|
|
|
314.03 |
|
|
|
182.94 |
|
|
|
265.09 |
|
|
|
294.38 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on the closing price of the companys Common Stock on
the first day of trading on the NASDAQ National Market System.
Cumulative total returns assume reinvestment of all dividends
and a hypothetical investment of $100 on March 26, 1992. |
12
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL
YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table provides information about option exercises
in 2004 by the named executive officers and the value of such
officers unexercised options at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options at Fiscal Year | |
|
In-the- Money Options | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
|
|
End(1) (#) | |
|
at Fiscal Year End ($) | |
Name |
|
Exercise (#) | |
|
Value Realized ($) | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Martin McGlynn
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,957/551,043 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,928/$1,549,797 |
|
Ann Tsukamoto, Ph.D.
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,500/258,750 |
|
|
$ |
400,429/$717,113 |
|
Judi Lum
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0/425,000 |
|
|
$ |
0/$357,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
The closing price of the companys Common Stock on
December 31, 2004 (the last trading day of 2004) on the
NASDAQ National Market System was $4.23. The numbers shown
reflect the value of options accumulated over all years of
employment. |
PROPOSAL NUMBER 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The number of directors is currently fixed at six. Our Restated
Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws
provide for the classification of the Board of Directors into
three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, with the
term of office of one class expiring each year. Unless otherwise
instructed, the enclosed proxy will be voted to elect the
nominees named below, who are now Class II directors, as
Class II directors for a term of three years expiring at
the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. Proxies cannot be
voted for a greater number of persons than the number of
nominees named below. It is expected that the nominees will be
able to serve, but if any are unable to serve, the proxy will be
voted for a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the
Board of Directors. The nominees for election as Class II
directors and the incumbent Class I and III directors are
as follows:
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS CLASS II DIRECTORS
TERMS EXPIRE 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age | |
|
Position | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Irving Weissman, M.D.
|
|
Professor, Stanford University |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
Ricardo B. Levy, Ph.D.
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
Irving L. Weissman, M.D. was elected to the Board of
Directors of the company in September 1997. Dr. Weissman is
the Karel and Avice Beekhuis Professor of Cancer Biology,
Professor of Pathology and Professor of Developmental Biology at
Stanford University and is the Director of the new Stanford
Institute for Cancer/ Stem Cell Biology and Medicine, and
Director of the Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Dr. Weissman is a cofounder and was a member of the
Scientific Advisory Board of SyStemix, Inc, and is Director,
founder, and chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of
Cellerant, Inc. He has also served on the Scientific Advisory
Boards of Amgen Inc., Cellerant, DNAX and T-Cell Sciences, Inc.,
all of which are biotechnology companies. Dr. Weissman is a
member of the National Academy of Sciences and also serves as
Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board of the company.
Ricardo B. Levy, Ph.D., is Chairman of the Board of
Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc., and has been a member of its
Board of Directors since June 1995, when the company was formed
as a subsidiary of Catalytica, Inc. He also served as director
of Catalytica Pharmaceuticals Inc. from 1995 to 2000.
Dr. Levy was a founder of Catalytica, Inc. in 1974, serving
as Chief Operating Officer from 1974 until 1991 and President
and Chief Executive Officer until December 2000, when
Catalytica, Inc. and Catalytica Pharmaceuticals Inc.
13
were sold to DSM N.V. Before founding Catalytica, Inc.,
Dr. Levy was a founding member of Exxons chemical
physics research team, and prior to that served as Chief
Executive Officer of Sudamericana C.A. in Quito, Ecuador. He
currently also serves on the Board of Directors of Accelrys Inc.
(formerly Pharmacopeia, Inc.) and NovoDynamics, Inc.
Dr. Levy holds an M.S. from Princeton University, a Ph.D.
in chemical engineering from Stanford University and is an
alumnus of Harvard Universitys Executive Management
Program.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR
THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES DESCRIBED ABOVE
INCUMBENT CLASS I DIRECTORS TERMS EXPIRE
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age | |
|
Position | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
John J. Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
|
President, Quantum Strategies Management Company. |
|
|
70 |
|
|
Director, Chairman of the Board |
Eric H. Bjerkholt
|
|
Senior Vice President and CFO, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
John J. Schwartz, Ph.D., was elected to the Board of
Directors of the company in December 1998 and was elected
Chairman of the Board at the same time. He is the former
President and Chief Executive Officer of SyStemix, Inc.
Dr. Schwartz is currently President of Quantum Strategies
Management Company, a registered investment advisor located in
Palo Alto, California. Prior to his positions at SyStemix, he
served as Assistant Professor, Vice President and General
Counsel at Stanford University in California. Dr. Schwartz
was graduated from Harvard Law School in 1958 and received his
Ph.D. degree in physics from the University of Rochester in 1965.
Eric H. Bjerkholt was elected to the Board of Directors of the
company on March 1, 2004. He is Senior Vice President and
CFO of Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a small molecule
biopharmaceutical company in South San Francisco, CA.
Before joining Sunesis, Mr. Bjerkholt served as Senior Vice
President and CFO of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Previously, Mr. Bjerkholt co-founded LifeSpring Nutrition,
Inc., a privately held nutraceutical company, and served as its
CFO, and later as its President and CEO. From 1990 to 1997,
Mr. Bjerkholt was an investment banker at
J.P. Morgan & Co., Inc. Mr. Bjerkholt holds
an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a Cand. Oecon degree
in economics and econometrics from the University of Oslo,
Norway. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Round Table
Pizza, Inc. Mr. Bjerkholt is a Norwegian and French citizen
and a U.S. permanent resident.
INCUMBENT CLASS III DIRECTORS TERM EXPIRES
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age | |
|
Position | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Martin McGlynn
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, StemCells, Inc. |
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director, Executive Officer |
Roger Perlmutter, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
Executive Vice President, Research and Development, Amgen, Inc. |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
Martin M. McGlynn joined the company on January 15, 2001,
when he was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of
the company and of its wholly-owned subsidiary, StemCells
California, Inc. He was elected to the Board of Directors on
February 6, 2001. Mr. McGlynn began his career with
Becton Dickinson, Ireland Ltd., and spent 8 years in
manufacturing operations. He joined Abbott Labs in 1977 where he
held positions as General Manager, Abbott Ireland Ltd.,
President and General Manager of Abbott Canada Ltd. and Vice
President of Abbott International Ltd. In 1990, he joined the
BOC Group as President of Anaquest, Inc., a company focused on
anesthesia and acute care pharmaceuticals. From 1994 until he
joined the company, Mr. McGlynn was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Pharmadigm, Inc., a privately held company
in Salt Lake City, Utah, engaged in research and development in
the fields of inflammation and
14
genetic immunization. Mr. McGlynn is a native of Dublin,
Ireland. He received a Bachelor of Commerce degree from
University College, Dublin, Ireland in 1968, a diploma in
industrial engineering from the Irish Institute of Industrial
Engineering in 1970, and a diploma in production planning from
the University of Birmingham, England in 1971. He is a former
member of the Board of Directors of the Confederation of Irish
Industries and the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of
Canada.
Roger M. Perlmutter, M.D., Ph.D., was elected to the
Board of Directors in December 2000. Dr. Perlmutter is
Executive Vice President, Research and Development, of Amgen,
Inc., a position he has held since January 2001. Prior to
joining Amgen, he was Executive Vice President, Worldwide Basic
Research and Preclinical Development, Merck Research
Laboratories, a division of Merck & Co., Inc., a
position he had held since August 1999. He joined Merck in
February 1997 as Senior Vice President, Merck Research
Laboratories, from February 1997 to December 1998 and as
Executive Vice President from February 1999 to January 2001.
Prior to joining Merck, Dr. Perlmutter was a professor in
the Departments of Immunology, Biochemistry and Medicine at the
University of Washington from January 1991 to January 1997 and
served as chairman of the Department of Immunology at the
University of Washington from May 1989 to January 1997. He also
was an Investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute from
October 1991 to January 1997. Dr Perlmutter was a member of the
board of directors of The Irvington Institute for Immunological
Research from 1997 to 2001 and of the Institute for Systems
Biology since 1999. He is licensed to practice medicine in the
State of California and the State of Washington. He was
graduated from Reed College in 1973 and received his M.D. and
Ph.D. degrees from Washington University, St. Louis,
Missouri in 1979.
PROPOSAL NUMBER 2
Ratification of Selection of Independent Public
Accountants
The company is asking the stockholders to ratify the selection
of Grant Thornton LLP as the companys independent public
accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
represented and voting at the Annual Meeting will be required to
ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP.
In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment,
the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will consider it
as a direction to select other auditors for the subsequent year.
Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee of the
Board at its discretion could decide to terminate the engagement
of Grant Thornton LLP and engage another firm at any time if the
Committee determines that such a change would be necessary or
desirable in the best interests of the company and its
stockholders.
A representative of Grant Thornton LLP is expected to attend the
Annual Meeting and is not expected to make a statement, but will
be available to respond to appropriate questions and may make a
statement if such representative desires to do so.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR
THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE SELECTION OF GRANT THORNTON LLP
AS THE COMPANYS INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2005.
OTHER INFORMATION
Accounting Matters
The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit
Committee, has selected the independent accounting firm of Grant
Thornton LLP to audit the accounts of the company for the year
ending December 31, 2005, subject to the approval of our
shareholders.
The Audit Committee considered the tax compliance services
provided by Grant Thornton LLP, concluded that provision of such
services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the
independent
15
accountants, and approved the provision by Grant Thornton LLP of
tax compliance services with respect to the year ending
December 31, 2004.
The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for
pre-approving all services (audit and non-audit) performed by
our independent auditors. In accordance with such policies and
procedures, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all
audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent
auditors in order to assure that the provision of such services
is in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and
does not impair the auditors independence. Under the
policy, pre-approval is generally provided up to one year and
any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or
category of services and is subject to a specific budget. In
addition, the Audit Committee may pre-approve additional
services on a case-by-case basis. During 2004, all services
performed by our independent auditors were pre-approved.
The Audit Committee received the following information
concerning the fees of the independent accountants for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, has considered whether
the provision of these services is compatible with independence
of the independent accountants, and concluded that it is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
12/31/03 | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees (including review of 10-Qs and proxy filings)
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
129,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (Fees for auditing managements
assessment of internal controls)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
All Other Fees (i.e., review of other SEC filings)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
135,000 |
|
|
$ |
401,000 |
|
A representative of Grant Thornton LLP who audited the accounts
of the company for the year ended December 31, 2004 is
expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
will be afforded the opportunity to make a statement if he or
she desires to do so and is expected to be available to reply to
appropriate stockholder inquiries.
Stockholder Proposals
Stockholders who wish to present proposals for inclusion in the
Companys proxy materials for the 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders may do so by following the procedures prescribed in
Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. To be
eligible, the stockholder proposals must be received by the
Secretary of the Company on or before December 6, 2005.
Stockholders who wish to make a proposal at the 2006 annual
meeting, other than one that will be included in our proxy
materials, must notify us no later than February 19, 2006.
If a stockholder who wishes to present a proposal fails to
notify us by February 19, 2006, the proxies that management
solicits for the meeting will confer discretionary authority to
vote on the stockholders proposal if it is properly
brought before the meeting.
Stockholder Nominations of Directors
The Corporate Governance Committee will consider and evaluate up
to two candidates recommended by stockholders or groups of
stockholders that, individually or as a group, have beneficially
owned at least 5% of the companys common stock for at
least one year prior to the date the Nominating Stockholder
submits a candidate (a Nominating Stockholder) for
nomination for election as a director at any annual meeting of
stockholders in accordance with Board policy. The submission
must be in writing and delivered to StemCells, Inc., Attn:
Secretary, Board of Directors, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto,
California 94304, no later than December 16, 2005 for
nominees to be considered for nomination at the 2006 Annual
Meeting. Submissions must include the name, address and number
of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the Nominating
Stockholder, a representation the Nominating Stockholder meets
the requirements described above and will continue to meet them
through the date of the annual meeting, a description of all
arrangements or
16
understandings between or among the Nominating Stockholder (or
any participant in a Nominating Stockholder group) and the
candidate or any other person or entity regarding the candidate,
all information regarding the candidate that the company would
be required to disclose in a proxy statement under SEC rules,
including whether the candidate is independent or if not, a
description of the reasons why not, and representations by the
candidate regarding his or her performance of the duties of a
director. Full details may be obtained from the Secretary of the
Board of Directors at the address above. The Committee will
consider and evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders on
the same basis as candidates recommended by other sources.
In addition, the companys by-laws provide that a
stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at a
meeting may nominate persons for election as directors by giving
timely notice thereof in proper written form to the Secretary
accompanied by a petition signed by at least 100 record holders
of capital stock of the corporation which shows the class and
number of shares held by each person and which represent in the
aggregate 1% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote in the
election of directors. To be timely, notice by the stockholder
must be received at the principal executive offices not later
than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on
which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public
disclosure of such date was made. The requesting stockholder is
required to provide information with respect to the nominee(s)
for director similar to that described above, as more fully set
forth in the companys by-laws.
Form 10-K
The companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (without exhibits), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is available
without charge upon request by writing to StemCells, Inc. at
3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, Attention: Investor
Relations.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the
companys officers and directors, and persons who own more
than ten percent of a registered class of the companys
Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Officers, directors and
greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC
regulations to furnish to the company copies of all
Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and
intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements
for proxy statements with respect to two or more shareholders
sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement
addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly
referred to as householding, potentially provides
extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for
companies. The company and some brokers household proxy
materials, delivering a single proxy statement to multiple
shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions
have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have
received notice from your broker or us that they or we will be
householding materials to your address, householding will
continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke
your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate
in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy
statement, or if you are receiving multiple copies of the proxy
statement and wish to receive only one, please notify your
broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or us if
you hold registered shares. You can notify us by sending a
written request to StemCells, Inc., 3155 Porter Drive, Palo
Alto, CA 94304, Attention: Investor Relations.
17
Other Business
The Board of Directors knows of no business that will come
before the meeting for action except as described in the
accompanying Notice of Meeting. However, as to any such
business, the persons designated as proxies will have authority
to act in their discretion.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
Iris Brest |
|
Secretary |
March 25, 2005
18
PROXY
STEMCELLS, INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, MAY 10, 2005
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned stockholder, by completing this card, hereby appoints Martin McGlynn and Iris
Brest, or either of them with power of substitution to each, proxies of the undersigned to vote at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of StemCells, Inc. to be held on May 10, 2005 at 3155 Porter
Drive, Palo Alto, California at 2:00 p.m., local time, or at any adjournments thereof, all of the
shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of StemCells, Inc. that the undersigned would be
entitled to vote if personally present. The undersigned instructs such proxies or their substitutes
to act on the following matter as specified by the undersigned, and to vote in such manner as they
may determine on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
|
|
|
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
|
|
|
SEE REVERSE
SIDE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEMCELLS, INC.
C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08818-8694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL
|
|
ZSCS51 |
|
|
x |
Please mark
votes as in
this example. |
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner specified by the undersigned
stockholder(s). If no contrary direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of the
nominees for director named below and FOR proposal 2, and in the discretion of the named proxies as
to any other matter that may come before the meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF STEMCELLS, INC. RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED
BELOW AND A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 2.
1. |
To elect the following nominees as Class II directors: |
|
|
Nominees: |
(01) Irving Weissman, M.D.
(02) Ricardo Levy, Ph.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
WITHHELD FROM ALL NOMINEES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write that nominees name in the space provided above.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
2.
|
|
To ratify the selection of Grant
Thornton LLP as independent public
accountants of the company for the
fiscal year ending December 31,
2005.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
By my signature below, I confer to the named
proxies discretionary authority to vote upon such
other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any continuations and adjournments
thereof. |
|
|
|
MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE AT LEFT
|
|
o |
Note: Please sign exactly as name appears on this card.
All joint owners should sign. When signing as an
executor, administrator, attorney, or guardian or as a
custodian for a minor, please give full title as such.
If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name and
indicate the signers title. If a partner, sign in
partnership name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|