sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 17, 2006
Registration
No. 333-128750
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Complete Production Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
1389 |
|
72-1503959 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification
Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
11700 Old Katy Road, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77079
(281) 372-2300
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Joseph C. Winkler
Chief Executive Officer and President
11700 Old Katy Road, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77079
(281) 372-2300
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
|
|
Baker Botts L.L.P. |
First City Tower, Suite 2300
|
|
One Shell Plaza, 910 Louisiana Street |
Houston, Texas 77002
|
|
Houston, Texas 77002 |
(713) 758-2222
|
|
(713) 229-1234 |
Attn: Scott N. Wulfe
|
|
Attn: R. Joel Swanson |
Attn: Nicole E. Clark
|
|
Attn: Felix P. Phillips |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the
following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in
this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not
sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
MARCH 17, 2006
Shares
Complete Production Services, Inc.
Common Stock
We are
selling shares
of our common stock and the selling stockholders are
selling shares
of our common stock. Prior to this offering, there has been no
public market for our common stock. The initial public offering
price of our common stock is expected to be between
$ and
$ per
share. Our common stock has been approved for listing on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol CPX. We will
not receive any of the proceeds from the shares of common stock
sold by the selling stockholders.
The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum
of additional
shares from the selling stockholders to cover over-allotments of
shares.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting | |
|
Complete | |
|
Proceeds to | |
|
|
Price to | |
|
Discounts and | |
|
Production | |
|
Selling | |
|
|
Public | |
|
Commissions | |
|
Services | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Per Share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2006.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
Credit Suisse |
UBS Investment Bank |
Banc of America Securities
LLC
|
|
|
Johnson Rice & Company L.L.C. |
|
|
|
Pickering Energy Partners |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2006.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until ,
2006 (25 days after the commencement of the offering), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
Cautionary Note Regarding Industry and Market Data
This prospectus includes industry data and forecasts that we
obtained from publicly available information, industry
publications and surveys. Our forecasts are based upon
managements understanding of industry conditions. We
believe that the information included in this prospectus from
industry surveys, publications and forecasts is reliable.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The body of accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States is commonly referred to as GAAP.
A non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, as one that purports
to measure historical or future financial performance, financial
position or cash flows, but excludes or includes amounts that
would not be so adjusted in the most comparable GAAP measures.
In this prospectus, we disclose EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial
measure. EBITDA is calculated as net income before interest
expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and minority
interest. EBITDA is not a substitute for the GAAP measures of
earnings and cash flow. EBITDA is included in this prospectus
because our management considers it an important supplemental
measure of our performance and believes that it is frequently
used by securities analysts, investors and other interested
parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry, some of
which present EBITDA when reporting their results.
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This prospectus summary highlights information contained in
this prospectus. Before investing in our common stock, you
should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the
section entitled Risk Factors and our financial
statements and related notes, for a more detailed description of
our business and this offering. In this prospectus,
Complete, company, we,
us and our refer to Complete Production
Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except as otherwise
indicated. Please read Glossary of Selected Industry
Terms included in this prospectus for definitions of
certain terms that are commonly used in the oilfield services
industry. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to
dollars and $ in this prospectus are to,
and amounts are presented in, U.S. dollars. Unless the context
indicates otherwise, all information in this prospectus assumes
that the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment
option.
Our Company
We provide specialized services and products focused on helping
oil and gas companies develop hydrocarbon reserves, reduce costs
and enhance production. We focus on basins within North America
that we believe have attractive long-term potential for growth,
and we deliver targeted, value-added services and products
required by our customers within each specific basin. We believe
our range of services and products positions us to meet many
needs of our customers at the wellsite, from drilling and
completion through production and eventual abandonment. We
manage our operations from regional field service facilities
located throughout the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas,
Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas and Kansas, western Canada and
Mexico.
We seek to differentiate ourselves from our competitors through
our local leadership, basin-level expertise and the innovative
application of proprietary and other technologies. We deliver
solutions to our customers that we believe lower their costs and
increase their production in a safe and environmentally friendly
manner.
Our business is comprised of three segments:
Completion and Production Services. Through our
completion and production services segment, we establish,
maintain and enhance the flow of oil and gas throughout the life
of a well. This segment is divided into the following primary
service lines:
|
|
|
|
|
Intervention Services. Well intervention requires the use
of specialized equipment to perform an array of wellbore
services. Our fleet of intervention service equipment includes
coiled tubing units, pressure pumping units, nitrogen units,
well service rigs, snubbing units and a variety of support
equipment. Our intervention services provide customers with
innovative solutions to increase production of oil and gas. |
|
|
|
Downhole and Wellsite Services. Our downhole and wellsite
services include electric-line, slickline, production
optimization, production testing, rental and fishing services.
We also offer several proprietary services and products that we
believe create significant value for our customers. |
|
|
|
Fluid Handling. We provide a variety of services to help
our customers obtain, move, store and dispose of fluids that are
involved in the development and production of their reservoirs.
Through our fleet of specialized trucks, frac tanks and other
assets, we provide fluid transportation, heating, pumping and
disposal services for our customers. |
Drilling Services. Through our drilling services segment,
we provide services and equipment that initiate or stimulate oil
and gas production by providing land drilling, specialized rig
logistics and site preparation. Through this segment, we also
provide pressure control, drill string, pipe handling and other
equipment. Our drilling rigs currently operate exclusively in
the Barnett Shale region of north Texas.
Product Sales. Through our product sales segment, we
provide a variety of equipment used by oil and gas companies
throughout the lifecycle of their wells. Our current product
offering includes completion, flow control and artificial lift
equipment as well as tubular goods.
For further information on our company, please read
Business Our Company.
1
Our Industry
Our business depends on the level of exploration, development
and production expenditures made by our customers. These
expenditures are driven by the current and expected future
prices for oil and gas, and the perceived stability and
sustainability of those prices. Our business is primarily driven
by natural gas drilling activity in North America. We believe
the following two principal economic factors will positively
affect our industry in the coming years:
|
|
|
|
|
Higher demand for natural gas in North America. We
believe that natural gas will be in high demand in North America
over the next several years because of the growing popularity of
this clean-burning fuel. |
|
|
|
Constrained North American gas supply. Although the
demand for natural gas is projected to increase, supply is
likely to be constrained as North American natural gas basins
are becoming more mature and experiencing increased decline
rates. |
Higher demand for natural gas and a constrained gas supply have
resulted in higher prices and increased drilling activity. The
increase in prices and drilling activity are driving three
additional trends that we believe will benefit us:
|
|
|
Trend toward drilling and developing unconventional North
American natural gas resources. Due to the maturity of
conventional North American oil and gas reservoirs and their
accelerating production decline rates, unconventional oil and
gas resources will comprise an increasing proportion of future
North American oil and gas production. Unconventional resources
include tight sands, shales and coalbed methane. These resources
require more wells to be drilled and maintained, frequently on
tighter acreage spacing. The appropriate technology to recover
unconventional gas resources varies from region to region;
therefore, knowledge of local conditions and operating
procedures, and selection of the right technologies is key to
providing customers with appropriate solutions. |
|
|
The advent of the resource play. A resource
play is a term used to describe an accumulation of
hydrocarbons known to exist over a large area which, when
compared to a conventional play, has lower commercial
development risks and a lower average decline rate. Once
identified, resource plays have the potential to make a material
impact because of their size and low decline rates. The
application of appropriate technology and program execution are
important to obtain value from resource plays. |
|
|
Increasingly complex technologies. Increasing prices and
the development of unconventional oil and gas resources are
driving the need for complex, new technologies to help increase
recovery rates, lower production costs and accelerate field
development. We believe that the increasing complexity of
technology used in the oil and gas development process coupled
with limited engineering resources will require production
companies to increase their reliance on service companies to
assist them in developing and applying these technologies. |
While we believe that these trends will benefit us, our markets
may be adversely affected by industry conditions that are
largely beyond our control. Any prolonged substantial reduction
in oil and gas prices would likely affect oil and gas drilling
and production levels and therefore affect demand for the
services we provide. For more information on this and other
risks to our business and our industry, please read Risk
Factors Risks Related to Our Business and Our
Industry.
For further information on our industry, please read
Business Our Industry.
2
Our Business Strategy
Our goal is to build the leading oilfield services company
focused on the completion and production phases in the life of
an oil and gas well. We intend to capitalize on the emerging
trends in the North American marketplace through the execution
of a growth strategy that consists of the following components:
Expand and capitalize on local leadership and basin-level
expertise. A key component of our strategy is to build upon
our base of strong local leadership and basin-level expertise.
We have a significant presence in most of the key onshore
continental U.S. and Canadian gas plays we believe have the
potential for long-term growth. We intend to leverage our
existing market presence, strong local leadership, expertise and
customer relationships to expand our business within these gas
plays. We also intend to replicate this approach in new regions
by building and acquiring new businesses that have strong
regional management with extensive local knowledge.
Develop and deploy technical and operational solutions.
We are focused on developing and deploying technical services,
equipment and expertise that lower our customers costs.
Capitalize on organic and acquisition-related growth
opportunities. We believe there are numerous opportunities
to sell new services and products to customers in our current
geographic areas and to sell our current services and products
to customers in new geographic areas. We have a proven track
record of organic growth and successful acquisitions, and we
intend to continue using capital investments and acquisitions to
strategically expand our business.
Focus on execution and performance. We have established
and intend to develop further a culture of performance and
accountability. Senior management spends a significant portion
of its time ensuring that our customers receive the highest
quality of service.
Successful execution of our business strategy depends on our
ability to retain key personnel and to continue to employ a
sufficient number of skilled and qualified workers. The demand
for skilled workers is high, and the supply is limited. If we
are not able to retain key personnel and continue to employ a
sufficient number of skilled and qualified workers, our business
could be harmed. For more information on this and other risks to
our business and our industry, please read Risk
Factors Risks Related to Our Business and Our
Industry.
For further information on our business strategy, please read
Business Our Business Strategy.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our strategy
and capitalize on opportunities in the North American oil and
gas market based on the following competitive strengths:
Strong local leadership and basin-level expertise. We
operate our business with a focus on each regional basin
complemented by our local reputations. We believe our local and
regional businesses, some of which have been operating for more
than 50 years, provide us with a significant advantage over
many of our competitors. Our managers, sales engineers and field
operators have extensive expertise in their local geological
basins, understand the regional challenges our customers face
and have long-term relationships with many customers. We strive
to leverage this basin-level expertise to establish ourselves as
the preferred provider of our services in the basins in which we
operate.
Significant presence in major North American basins. We
operate in major oil and gas producing regions of the
U.S. Rocky Mountains, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas
and Kansas, western Canada and Mexico, with concentrations in
key resource play and unconventional basins.
Resource plays are expected to become increasingly important in
future North American oil and gas production as more
conventional resources enter later stages of the exploration
cycle. We believe we have an excellent position in highly active
markets such as the Barnett Shale region of north Texas.
Accelerating production and driving down development and
production costs are key goals for oil and gas operators in
these areas,
3
resulting in strong demand for our services and products. In
addition, our strong presence in these regions allows us to
build solid customer relationships and take advantage of
cross-selling opportunities.
Focus on complementary production and field development
services. Our breadth of service and product offerings well
positions us relative to our competitors. Our complementary
services encompass the entire lifecycle of a well from drilling
and completion, through production and eventual abandonment.
This suite of services and products gives us the opportunity to
cross-sell to our customer base and throughout our geographic
regions. Leveraging our strong local leadership and basin-level
expertise, we are able to offer expanded services and products
to existing customers or current services and products to new
customers.
Innovative approach to technical and operational
solutions. We develop and deploy services and products that
enable our customers to increase production rates, stem
production declines and reduce the costs of drilling, completion
and production. The significant expertise we have developed in
our areas of operation offers our customers customized
operational solutions to meet their particular needs.
Modern and active asset base. We have a modern and
well-maintained fleet of coiled tubing units, pressure pumping
equipment, wireline units, well service rigs, snubbing units,
fluid transports, frac tanks and other specialized equipment. We
believe our ongoing investment in our equipment allows us to
better serve the diverse and increasingly challenging needs of
our customer base. Our fleet is active with high utilization. We
believe our future expenditures will be used to capitalize on
growth opportunities within the areas we currently operate and
to build out new platforms obtained through targeted
acquisitions.
Experienced management team with proven track record.
Each executive officer and member of our key operational
management team has over 20 years of experience in the
oilfield services industry. We believe that their considerable
knowledge of and experience in our industry enhances our ability
to operate effectively throughout industry cycles. Our
management also has substantial experience in identifying,
completing and integrating acquisitions.
While we believe that these strengths differentiate us from our
competitors, the markets in which we operate are highly
competitive and have relatively few barriers to entry. We face
competition from large national and multi-national companies
that have greater resources and greater name recognition than we
do as well as from several smaller companies capable of
competing effectively on a regional basis. In addition, we may
face substantial competition from new entrants in the future.
For more information on these and other risks to our business
and our industry, please read Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry.
For further information on our competitive strengths, see
Business Our Competitive Strengths.
The Combination
Prior to 2001, SCF Partners, a private equity firm, began to
target investment opportunities in service-oriented companies in
the North American natural gas market with specific focus on the
production phase of the exploration and production cycle. On
May 22, 2001, SCF Partners, through
SCF-IV, L.P.
(SCF), formed Saber Energy Services, Inc.
(Saber), a new company, in connection with its
acquisition of two companies primarily focused on completion and
production related services in Louisiana. In July 2002, SCF
became the controlling stockholder of Integrated Production
Services, Ltd., a production enhancement company that, at the
time, focused its operation in Canada. In September 2002, Saber
acquired this company and changed its name to Integrated
Production Services, Inc. (IPS). Subsequently, IPS
began to grow organically and through several acquisitions, with
the ultimate objective of creating a technical leader in the
enhancement of natural gas production. In November 2003, SCF
formed another production services company, Complete Energy
Services, Inc. (CES), establishing a platform from
which to grow in the Barnett Shale region of north Texas.
Subsequently, through organic growth and several acquisitions,
CES extended its presence to the U.S. Rocky Mountain and
the Mid-Continent regions. In the summer of 2004, SCF formed
I.E. Miller Services, Inc. (IEM), which at the
4
time had a presence in Louisiana and Texas. During 2004, IPS and
IEM independently began to execute strategic initiatives to
establish a presence in both the Barnett Shale and
U.S. Rocky Mountain regions.
On September 12, 2005, IPS, CES and IEM were combined and
became Complete Production Services, Inc. in a transaction we
refer to as the Combination. We believe that
operational and financial benefits realized through the
Combination establish the foundation for long-term growth for
the combined company. Immediately after the Combination, SCF
held approximately 70% of our outstanding common stock. For
additional information regarding the Combination, see
Business The Combination.
How You Can Contact Us
Our principal executive offices are located at 11700 Old Katy
Road, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77079 and our telephone
number is
(281) 372-2300.
Our corporate website address is
www.completeproduction.com. The information contained in
or accessible from our corporate website is not part of this
prospectus.
5
The Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares. |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
shares. |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering |
|
shares. |
|
Common stock owned by the selling stockholders after the offering |
|
shares
( shares
if the underwriters over-allotment option is fully
exercised). |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of the shares
offered by us, after deducting estimated expenses and
underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately
$240 million. We plan to use $50 million of our net
proceeds from this offering to repay a portion of our term loan
facility, $5 million to repay seller financed notes and the
remainder to pay all outstanding balances under our revolving
credit facility and for general corporate purposes, which may
include cash payments made in connection with future
acquisitions. Affiliates of some of the underwriters of this
offering are lenders under our revolving credit facility and
therefore will receive a portion of the proceeds from this
offering that we use to repay indebtedness. In addition,
affiliates of the underwriters may have positions from time to
time in our term loan facility. We will not receive any of the
proceeds from the sale of any shares of our common stock by the
selling stockholders. See Use of Proceeds and
Underwriting. |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a
30-day option to
purchase a maximum
of additional
shares of our common stock at the initial public offering price
to cover over-allotments. |
|
|
NYSE symbol |
|
CPX |
|
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors included in this prospectus for a
discussion of factors that you should carefully consider before
deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. |
The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding
after the offering includes shares of restricted common stock
issued to officers and other employees under our stock incentive
plans (our stock incentive plans) that are subject
to vesting. As of December 31, 2005, there were
786,170 shares of restricted stock outstanding that remain
subject to vesting.
The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding
after the offering excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,512,444 shares issuable upon the exercise of options
outstanding as of December 31, 2005 under our stock
incentive plans; |
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,726,886 shares of common stock reserved
and available for future issuance as of December 31, 2005
under our stock incentive plans; and |
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of approximately 1,200,000 shares, which may
be issued as contingent consideration based on certain operating
results of companies previously acquired. |
|
6
Summary Consolidated Financial Data
The following table presents summary historical consolidated
financial and operating data for the periods shown. The summary
consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2001 and for
the year ended December 31, 2001, have been derived from
IPSs consolidated financial statements for such date and
period. The summary consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2002 and for the year ended December 31,
2002 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of IPS for such date and period. In addition, the
following summary consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005 have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements for those dates and
periods. The following information should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
financial statements and related notes included in this
prospectus.
On December 29, 2005, we effected a 2-for-1 split of common
stock. As a result, all common stock and per share data, as well
as data related to other securities including stock warrants,
restricted stock and stock options, have been adjusted
retroactively to give effect to this stock split for all periods
presented within this prospectus, except par value which
remained at $0.01 per share, resulting in an insignificant
reclassification between common stock and additional
paid-in-capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services
|
|
$ |
5,855 |
|
|
$ |
30,110 |
|
|
$ |
65,025 |
|
|
$ |
194,953 |
|
|
$ |
510,304 |
|
|
Drilling services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
44,474 |
|
|
|
129,117 |
|
|
Products sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,494 |
|
|
|
35,547 |
|
|
|
81,320 |
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
40,604 |
|
|
|
103,279 |
|
|
|
320,747 |
|
|
|
757,726 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and product expenses(1)
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
28,531 |
|
|
|
73,124 |
|
|
|
216,173 |
|
|
|
481,394 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
7,764 |
|
|
|
16,591 |
|
|
|
46,077 |
|
|
|
111,754 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
|
Write-off of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
|
36,881 |
|
|
|
112,423 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
24,461 |
|
Taxes
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
54,246 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
(661 |
) |
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
13,675 |
|
|
|
29,548 |
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
14,109 |
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
|
|
50,656 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Service and product expenses is the aggregate of service
expenses and product expenses. |
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
4,309 |
|
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
|
$ |
161,263 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
13,965 |
|
|
|
34,622 |
|
|
|
76,427 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
33,320 |
|
|
|
36,279 |
|
|
|
55,281 |
|
|
|
157,630 |
|
|
|
112,139 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(32,538 |
) |
|
|
(35,616 |
) |
|
|
(66,214 |
) |
|
|
(186,776 |
) |
|
|
(188,358 |
) |
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(3)
|
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
27,851 |
|
|
|
54,798 |
|
|
|
139,362 |
|
|
|
67,689 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
6,799 |
|
|
|
11,084 |
|
|
|
46,904 |
|
|
|
127,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,465 |
|
|
$ |
3,120 |
|
|
$ |
6,094 |
|
|
$ |
11,547 |
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
7,110 |
|
|
|
47,808 |
|
|
|
95,217 |
|
|
|
235,211 |
|
|
|
384,580 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
38,571 |
|
|
|
110,596 |
|
|
|
206,066 |
|
|
|
515,153 |
|
|
|
937,653 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
22,270 |
|
|
|
50,144 |
|
|
|
169,190 |
|
|
|
509,990 |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
34,550 |
|
|
|
65,262 |
|
|
|
97,956 |
|
|
|
172,080 |
|
|
|
250,761 |
|
|
|
(2) |
EBITDA consists of net income (loss) before interest expense,
taxes, depreciation and amortization and minority interest. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. EBITDA is included in
this prospectus because our management considers it an important
supplemental measure of our performance and believes that it is
frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other
interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our
industry, some of which present EBITDA when reporting their
results. We regularly evaluate our performance as compared to
other companies in our industry that have different financing
and capital structures and/or tax rates by using EBITDA. In
addition, we use EBITDA in evaluating acquisition targets.
Management also believes that EBITDA is a useful tool for
measuring our ability to meet our future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements, and EBITDA is
commonly used by us and our investors to measure our ability to
service indebtedness. EBITDA is not a substitute for the GAAP
measures of earnings or of cash flow and is not necessarily a
measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. In addition, it
should be noted that companies calculate EBITDA differently and,
therefore, EBITDA has material limitations as a performance
measure because it excludes interest expense, taxes,
depreciation and amortization and minority interest. The
following table reconciles EBITDA with our net income (loss). |
|
(3) |
Acquisitions, net of cash required, consists only of the cash
component of acquisitions. It does not include common stock and
notes issued for acquisitions, nor does it include other
non-cash assets issued for acquisitions. |
Reconciliation of EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
(661 |
) |
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
Plus: interest expense
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
24,461 |
|
Plus: tax expense
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
Plus: depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
Plus: minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
4,309 |
|
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
|
$ |
161,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors,
together with the other information contained in this
prospectus, before deciding to invest in our common stock. If
any of the following risks develop into actual events, our
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows could be materially adversely affected, the trading price
of shares of our common stock could decline, and you may lose
all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry
|
|
|
Our business depends on the oil and gas industry and
particularly on the level of activity for North American oil and
gas. Our markets may be adversely affected by industry
conditions that are beyond our control. |
We depend on our customers willingness to make operating
and capital expenditures to explore for, develop and produce oil
and gas in North America. If these expenditures decline, our
business will suffer. Our customers willingness to
explore, develop and produce depends largely upon prevailing
industry conditions that are influenced by numerous factors over
which management has no control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the supply of and demand for oil and gas; |
|
|
|
the level of prices, and expectations about future prices, of
oil and gas; |
|
|
|
the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering
oil and gas; |
|
|
|
the expected rates of declining current production; |
|
|
|
the discovery rates of new oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
|
available pipeline and other transportation capacity; |
|
|
|
weather conditions, including hurricanes that can affect oil and
gas operations over a wide area; |
|
|
|
domestic and worldwide economic conditions; |
|
|
|
political instability in oil and gas producing countries; |
|
|
|
technical advances affecting energy consumption; |
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels; |
|
|
|
the ability of oil and gas producers to raise equity capital and
debt financing; and |
|
|
|
merger and divestiture activity among oil and gas producers. |
The level of activity in the North American oil and gas
exploration and production industry is volatile. Expected trends
in oil and gas production activities may not continue and demand
for the services provided by us may not reflect the level of
activity in the industry. Any prolonged substantial reduction in
oil and gas prices would likely affect oil and gas production
levels and therefore affect demand for the services we provide.
A material decline in oil and gas prices or North American
activity levels could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. In addition, a decrease in the development rate of oil
and gas reserves in our market areas may also have an adverse
impact on our business, even in an environment of stronger oil
and gas prices.
|
|
|
Because the oil and gas industry is cyclical, our
operating results may fluctuate. |
Oil and gas prices are volatile. For example, over the last
three years, the WTI Cushing crude oil spot price has ranged
from a low of $25.24 per bbl on April 29, 2003 to a
high of $69.81 per bbl on August 24, 2005. The Henry
Hub natural gas spot price has ranged from $3.99 per mcf on
October 31, 2003 to $15.39 per mcf on
December 13, 2005. Until recently, these prices have
generally been at historically high levels. Gas prices have
recently declined substantially. The Henry Hub natural gas spot
price on March 1, 2006 was $6.62 per mcf. Oil prices have
also declined. The WTI Cushing crude oil spot price on
March 1,
9
2006 was $61.97. The increase in prices over the last few years
has caused oil and gas companies and drilling contractors to
change their strategies and expenditure levels, which has
benefited us. However, the recent decline in oil and gas prices
may result in a decrease in the expenditure levels of oil and
gas companies and drilling contractors which would in turn
adversely affect us. We have experienced in the past, and may
experience in the future, significant fluctuations in operating
results as a result of the reactions of our customers to changes
in oil and gas prices. We reported a loss in 2002, and our
income in 2005 was $53.9 million compared to
$13.9 million in 2004 and $1.5 million in 2003.
Substantially all of the service and rental revenue we earn is
based upon a charge for a relatively short period of time (an
hour, a day, a week) for the actual period of time the service
or rental is provided to our customer. By contracting services
on a short-term basis, we are exposed to the risks of a rapid
reduction in market price and utilization and volatility in our
revenues. Product sales are recorded when the actual sale occurs
and title or ownership passes to the customer and the product is
shipped or delivered to the customer.
|
|
|
There is potential for excess capacity in our
industry. |
Because oil and gas prices and drilling activity have been at
historically high levels, oilfield service companies have been
acquiring new equipment to meet their customers increasing
demand for services. If these levels of price and activity do
not continue, there is a potential for excess capacity in the
oilfield service industry. This could result in an increased
competitive environment for oilfield service companies, which
could lead to lower prices and utilization for our services and
could adversely affect our business.
|
|
|
We may be unable to employ a sufficient number of skilled
and qualified workers. |
The delivery of our services and products requires personnel
with specialized skills and experience who can perform
physically demanding work. As a result of the volatility of the
oilfield service industry and the demanding nature of the work,
workers may choose to pursue employment in fields that offer a
more desirable work environment at wage rates that are
competitive. Our ability to be productive and profitable will
depend upon our ability to employ and retain skilled workers. In
addition, our ability to expand our operations depends in part
on our ability to increase the size of our skilled labor force.
The demand for skilled workers is high, and the supply is
limited, particularly in the U.S. Rocky Mountain region,
which is one of our key regions. A significant increase in the
wages paid by competing employers could result in a reduction of
our skilled labor force, increases in the wage rates that we
must pay, or both. If either of these events were to occur, our
capacity and profitability could be diminished and our growth
potential could be impaired.
|
|
|
Our executive officers and certain key personnel are
critical to our business and these officers and key personnel
may not remain with us in the future. |
Our future success depends upon the continued service of our
executive officers and other key personnel. If we lose the
services of one or more of our executive officers or key
employees, our business, operating results and financial
condition could be harmed.
|
|
|
Our operating history may not be sufficient for investors
to evaluate our business and prospects. |
We are a recently combined company with a short combined
operating history. In addition, two of our combining companies,
IPS and CES, have grown significantly over the last few years
through acquisitions. This may make it more difficult for
investors to evaluate our business and prospects and to forecast
our future operating results. The historical combined financial
statements and the unaudited pro forma combined financial
statements included in this prospectus are based on the separate
businesses of IPS, CES and IEM for the periods prior to the
Combination. As a result, the historical and pro forma
information may not give you an accurate indication of what our
actual results would have been if the Combination had been
completed at the beginning of the periods presented or of what
our future results of
10
operations are likely to be. Our future results will depend on
our ability to efficiently manage our combined operations and
execute our business strategy.
|
|
|
We participate in a capital intensive business. We may not
be able to finance future growth of our operations or future
acquisitions. |
Historically, we have funded the growth of our operations and
our acquisitions from bank debt and private placement of shares
in addition to cash generated by our business. In the future, we
may not be able to continue to obtain sufficient bank debt at
competitive rates or complete equity and other debt financings.
If we do not generate sufficient cash from our business to fund
operations, our growth could be limited unless we are able to
obtain additional capital through equity or debt financings. Our
inability to grow as planned may reduce our chances of
maintaining and improving profitability.
|
|
|
Our inability to control the inherent risks of acquiring
and integrating businesses could adversely affect our
operations. |
We are a recently combined company and integrating our ongoing
businesses may be difficult. In particular, the integration of
businesses and operations that are located in disparate regions
of North America may prove difficult to achieve in a
cost-effective manner. The inability of management to
successfully integrate the combining companies could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial position. Moreover, we may not be able to cross sell
our services and penetrate new markets successfully and we may
not obtain the anticipated or desired benefits of the
Combination. In addition to the Combination, acquisitions have
been, and our management believes acquisitions will continue to
be, a key element of our business strategy. We may not be able
to identify and acquire acceptable acquisition candidates on
favorable terms in the future. We may be required to incur
substantial indebtedness to finance future acquisitions and also
may issue equity securities in connection with such
acquisitions. Such additional debt service requirements may
impose a significant burden on our results of operations and
financial condition. The issuance of additional equity
securities could result in significant dilution to stockholders.
Acquisitions may not perform as expected when the acquisition
was made and may be dilutive to our overall operating results.
Additional risks we will face include:
|
|
|
|
|
retaining and attracting key employees; |
|
|
|
retaining and attracting new customers; |
|
|
|
increased administrative burden; |
|
|
|
developing our sales and marketing capabilities; |
|
|
|
managing our growth effectively; |
|
|
|
integrating operations; |
|
|
|
operating a new line of business; and |
|
|
|
increased logistical problems common to large, expansive
operations. |
If we fail to manage these risks successfully, our business
could be harmed.
|
|
|
Our customer base is concentrated within the oil and gas
production industry and loss of a significant customer could
cause our revenue to decline substantially. |
Our top five customers accounted for approximately 22% of our
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005. Although none
of our customers in 2005 accounted for more than 10% of our
revenue, collectively, our top ten customers represented
approximately 34% of our revenue. It is likely that we will
continue to derive a significant portion of our revenue from a
relatively small number of customers in the future. If a major
customer decided not to continue to use our services, revenue
would decline and our operating results and financial condition
could be harmed.
11
|
|
|
Our indebtedness could restrict our operations and make us
more vulnerable to adverse economic conditions. |
At December 31, 2005, our long-term debt (excluding the
current portion) was $510 million and our
stockholders equity was $251 million. Our level of
indebtedness may adversely affect operations and limit our
growth, and we may have difficulty making debt service payments
on our indebtedness as such payments become due. Our level of
indebtedness may affect our operations in several ways,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our level of debt increases our vulnerability to general adverse
economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
the covenants that are contained in the agreements that govern
our indebtedness limit our ability to borrow funds, dispose of
assets, pay dividends and make certain investments; |
|
|
|
our debt covenants also affect our flexibility in planning for,
and reacting to, changes in the economy and in our industry; |
|
|
|
any failure to comply with the financial or other covenants of
our debt could result in an event of default, which could result
in some or all of our indebtedness becoming immediately due and
payable; |
|
|
|
our level of debt may impair our ability to obtain additional
financing in the future for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate
purposes; and |
|
|
|
our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to enable us to meet our obligations under our
indebtedness. |
The majority of our debt is structured under floating interest
rate terms. A one percentage point increase in the interest
rates on our $419 million of term debt outstanding as of
February 28, 2006 would cause a $4.2 million pre-tax
annual increase in interest expense.
|
|
|
Our business depends upon our ability to obtain key raw
materials and specialized equipment from suppliers. |
Should our current suppliers be unable to provide the necessary
raw materials or finished products (such as workover rigs or
fluid-handling equipment) or otherwise fail to deliver the
products timely and in the quantities required, any resulting
delays in the provision of services could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
We may not be able to provide services that meet the
specific needs of oil and gas exploration and production
companies at competitive prices. |
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and have
relatively few barriers to entry. The principal competitive
factors in our markets are price, product and service quality
and availability, responsiveness, experience, technology,
equipment quality and reputation for safety. We compete with
large national and multi-national companies that have longer
operating histories, greater financial, technical and other
resources and greater name recognition than we do. Several of
our competitors provide a broader array of services and have a
stronger presence in more geographic markets. In addition, we
compete with several smaller companies capable of competing
effectively on a regional or local basis. Our competitors may be
able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and
services and changes in customer requirements. Some contracts
are awarded on a bid basis, which further increases competition
based on price. As a result of competition, we may lose market
share or be unable to maintain or increase prices for our
present services or to acquire additional business
opportunities, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
12
|
|
|
Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the oil
and gas industry. |
Risks inherent to our industry, such as equipment defects,
vehicle accidents, explosions and uncontrollable flows of gas or
well fluids, can cause personal injury, loss of life, suspension
of operations, damage to formations, damage to facilities,
business interruption and damage to or destruction of property,
equipment and the environment. These risks could expose us to
substantial liability for personal injury, wrongful death,
property damage, loss of oil and gas production, pollution and
other environmental damages. The frequency and severity of such
incidents will affect operating costs, insurability and
relationships with customers, employees and regulators. In
particular, our customers may elect not to purchase our services
if they view our safety record as unacceptable, which could
cause us to lose substantial revenues. In addition, these risks
may be greater for us because we sometimes acquire companies
that have not allocated significant resources and management
focus to safety and have a poor safety record.
We work in a dangerous business. For example, in 2005, our
operations resulted in several fatalities. Many of the claims
filed against us arise from vehicle-related accidents that
result in the loss of life or serious bodily injury. Our safety
procedures may not always prevent such damages. Our insurance
coverage may be inadequate to cover our liabilities. In
addition, we may not be able to maintain adequate insurance in
the future at rates we consider reasonable and commercially
justifiable and insurance may not continue to be available on
terms as favorable as our current arrangements. The occurrence
of a significant uninsured claim, a claim in excess of the
insurance coverage limits maintained by us or a claim at a time
when we are not able to obtain liability insurance could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to conduct normal
business operations and on our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. Although our senior management is
committed to improving the Companys overall safety record,
they may not be successful in doing so.
|
|
|
If we become subject to product liability claims, it could
be time-consuming and costly to defend. |
Since our customers use our products or third party products
that we sell through our supply stores, errors, defects or other
performance problems could result in financial or other damages
to us. Our customers could seek damages from us for losses
associated with these errors, defects or other performance
problems. If successful, these claims could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial
condition. Our existing product liability insurance may not be
enough to cover the full amount of any loss we might suffer. A
product liability claim brought against us, even if
unsuccessful, could be time-consuming and costly to defend and
could harm our reputation.
|
|
|
We are subject to extensive and costly environmental laws
and regulations that may require us to take actions that will
adversely affect our results of operations. |
Our business is significantly affected by stringent and complex
foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations governing
the discharge of substances into the environment or otherwise
relating to environmental protection. As part of our business,
we handle, transport, and dispose of a variety of fluids and
substances used or produced by our customers in connection with
their oil and gas exploration and production activities. We also
generate and dispose of hazardous waste. The generation,
handling, transportation, and disposal of these fluids,
substances, and waste are regulated by a number of laws,
including the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act; the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act; the Clean Water Act; the Safe Drinking Water Act;
and analogous state laws. Failure to properly handle, transport,
or dispose of these materials or otherwise conduct our
operations in accordance with these and other environmental laws
could expose us to liability for governmental penalties, cleanup
costs associated with releases of such materials, damages to
natural resources, and other damages, as well as potentially
impair our ability to conduct our operations. We could be
exposed to liability for cleanup costs, natural resource damages
and other damages under these and other environmental laws as a
result of our conduct that was lawful at the time it occurred or
the conduct of, or conditions caused by, prior operators or
other third parties. Environmental laws and regulations have
changed in the past, and they are likely to change in the
future. If existing regulatory requirements or enforcement
policies change, we may be required to make significant
unanticipated capital and operating expenditures.
13
Any failure by us to comply with applicable environmental laws
and regulations may result in governmental authorities taking
actions against our business that could adversely impact our
operations and financial condition, including the:
|
|
|
|
|
issuance of administrative, civil and criminal penalties; |
|
|
|
denial or revocation of permits or other authorizations; |
|
|
|
imposition of limitations on our operations; and |
|
|
|
performance of site investigatory, remedial or other corrective
actions. |
The effect of environmental laws and regulations on our business
is discussed in greater detail under Business
Environmental Matters.
|
|
|
The nature of our industry subjects us to compliance with
other regulatory laws. |
Our business is significantly affected by state and federal laws
and other regulations relating to the oil and gas industry in
general, and more specifically with respect to health and
safety, waste management and the manufacture, storage, handling
and transportation of hazardous materials and by changes in and
the level of enforcement of such laws. The failure to comply
with these rules and regulations can result in substantial
penalties, revocation of permits, corrective action orders and
criminal prosecution. The regulatory burden on the oil and gas
industry increases our cost of doing business and, consequently,
affects our profitability. We may be subject to claims alleging
personal injury or property damage as a result of alleged
exposure to hazardous substances. It is impossible for
management to predict the cost or impact of such laws and
regulations on our future operations.
|
|
|
If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of
internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our
financial results or prevent fraud. |
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide
reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. If we
cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our
reputation and operating results would be harmed. Our efforts to
continue to develop and maintain internal controls may not be
successful, and we may be unable to maintain adequate controls
over our financial processes and reporting in the future,
including compliance with the obligations under Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any failure to develop or
maintain effective controls, or difficulties encountered in our
implementation or other effective improvement of our internal
controls, could harm our operating results.
|
|
|
A terrorist attack or armed conflict could harm our
business. |
Terrorist activities, anti-terrorist efforts and other armed
conflicts involving the United States or other countries
may adversely affect the United States and global economies and
could prevent us from meeting our financial and other
obligations. If any of these events occur, the resulting
political instability and societal disruption could reduce
overall demand for oil and gas, potentially putting downward
pressure on demand for our services and causing a reduction in
our revenues. Oil and gas related facilities could be direct
targets of terrorist attacks, and our operations could be
adversely impacted if infrastructure integral to our
customers operations is destroyed or damaged. Costs for
insurance and other security may increase as a result of these
threats, and some insurance coverage may become more difficult
to obtain, if available at all.
|
|
|
Conservation measures and technological advances could
reduce demand for oil and gas. |
Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements,
increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and gas,
technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation
devices could reduce demand for oil and gas. Management cannot
predict the impact of the changing demand for oil and gas
services and products, and any major changes may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
14
|
|
|
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates in Canada could
adversely affect our business. |
We have substantial operations in Canada. As a result,
fluctuations in currency exchange rates in Canada could
materially and adversely affect our business. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, our Canadian operations represented
approximately 14% of our revenue and 8% of our net income before
taxes and minority interest.
|
|
|
We are susceptible to seasonal earnings volatility due to
adverse weather conditions in Canada. |
Our operations are directly affected by seasonal differences in
weather in Canada. The level of activity in the Canadian
oilfield services industry declines significantly in the second
calendar quarter, when frost leaves the ground and many
secondary roads are temporarily rendered incapable of supporting
the weight of heavy equipment. The duration of this period is
referred to as spring breakup and has a direct
impact on our activity levels in Canada. The timing and duration
of spring breakup depend on weather patterns but
generally spring breakup occurs in April and May.
Additionally, if an unseasonably warm winter prevents sufficient
freezing, we may not be able to access wellsites and our
operating results and financial condition may, therefore, be
adversely affected. The demand for our services may also be
affected by the severity of the Canadian winters. In addition,
during excessively rainy periods, equipment moves may be
delayed, thereby adversely affecting operating results. The
volatility in weather and temperature in the Canadian oilfield
can therefore create unpredictability in activity and
utilization rates. As a result, full-year results are not likely
to be a direct multiple of any particular quarter or combination
of quarters.
|
|
|
Our operations in Mexico are subject to specific risks,
including dependence on Petróleos Mexicanos
(PEMEX) as the sole customer, exposure to
fluctuation in the Mexican peso and workforce
unionization. |
Our business in Mexico is substantially all performed for PEMEX
pursuant to multi-year
contracts. These contracts are generally two years in duration
and are subject to competitive bid for renewal. Any failure by
us to renew our contracts could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The PEMEX contracts provide that 70% to 80% of the value of our
billings under the contracts is charged to PEMEX in
U.S. dollars with the remainder billed in Mexican pesos.
The portion billed in U.S. dollars to PEMEX is converted to
pesos on the date of payment. Invoices are paid approximately
45 days after the invoice date. As such, we are exposed to
fluctuations in the value of the peso. A material decrease in
the value of the Mexican peso relative to the U.S. dollar
could negatively impact our revenues, cash flows and net income.
Our operations in Mexico are party to a collective labor
contract made effective as of October 1, 2003 between
Servicios Petrotec S.A. DE C.V., one of our subsidiaries, and
Unión Sindical de Trabajadores de la Industria
Metálica y Similares, the metal and similar industry
workers labor union. We have not experienced work stoppages in
the past but cannot guarantee that we will not experience work
stoppages in the future. A prolonged work stoppage could
negatively impact our revenues, cash flows and net income.
|
|
|
Our U.S. operations in the Gulf of Mexico are
adversely impacted by the hurricane season, which generally
occurs in the third calendar quarter. |
Hurricanes and the threat of hurricanes during this period will
often result in the shut-down of oil and gas operations in the
Gulf of Mexico as well as land operations within the hurricane
path. During a shut-down period, we are unable to access
wellsites and our services are also shut down. This situation
can therefore create unpredictability in activity and
utilization rates, which can have a material adverse impact on
our business, financial conditions, results of operations and
cash flows.
|
|
|
When rig counts are low, our rig relocation customers may
not have a need for our services. |
Many of the major U.S. onshore drilling services
contractors have significant capabilities to move their own
drilling rigs and related oilfield equipment and to erect rigs.
When regional rig counts are high, drilling services contractors
exceed their own capabilities and contract for additional
oilfield equipment hauling and rig erection capacity. Our rig
relocation business activity is highly correlated to the rig
count;
15
however, the correlation varies over the rig count range. As rig
count drops, some drilling services contractors reach a point
where all of their oilfield equipment hauling and rig erection
needs can be met by their own fleets. If one or more of our rig
relocation customers reach this tipping point, our
revenues attributable to rig relocation will decline much faster
than the corresponding overall decline in the rig count. This
non-linear relationship between our rig relocation business
activity and the rig count in the areas in which we have rig
relocation operations can increase significantly our earnings
volatility with respect to rig relocation.
|
|
|
Increasing trucking regulations may increase our costs and
negatively impact our results of operations. |
Among the services we provide, we operate as a motor carrier and
therefore are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department
of Transportation and by various state agencies. These
regulatory authorities exercise broad powers, governing
activities such as the authorization to engage in motor carrier
operations and regulatory safety. There are additional
regulations specifically relating to the trucking industry,
including testing and specification of equipment and product
handling requirements. The trucking industry is subject to
possible regulatory and legislative changes that may affect the
economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating
practices or by changing the demand for common or contract
carrier services or the cost of providing truckload services.
Some of these possible changes include increasingly stringent
environmental regulations, changes in the hours of service
regulations which govern the amount of time a driver may drive
in any specific period, onboard black box recorder devices or
limits on vehicle weight and size.
Interstate motor carrier operations are subject to safety
requirements prescribed by the U.S. Department of
Transportation. To a large degree, intrastate motor carrier
operations are subject to state safety regulations that mirror
federal regulations. Such matters as weight and dimension of
equipment are also subject to federal and state regulations.
From time to time, various legislative proposals are introduced,
including proposals to increase federal, state, or local taxes,
including taxes on motor fuels, which may increase our costs or
adversely impact the recruitment of drivers. We cannot predict
whether, or in what form, any increase in such taxes applicable
to us will be enacted.
Risks Related to Our Relationship with SCF
|
|
|
L.E. Simmons, through SCF, controls the outcome
of stockholder voting and may exercise this voting power in a
manner adverse to you. |
After the offering, SCF will own
approximately %
of our outstanding common stock and
approximately % of our outstanding
common stock if the over-allotment option is exercised in full.
L.E. Simmons is the sole owner of L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated, the ultimate general partner of SCF.
Accordingly, Mr. Simmons, through his ownership of the
ultimate general partner of SCF, will be in a position to
control the outcome of matters requiring a stockholder vote,
including the election of directors, adoption of amendments to
our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or approval of
transactions involving a change of control. The interests of
Mr. Simmons may differ from yours, and SCF may vote its
common stock in a manner that may adversely affect you.
|
|
|
SCFs ownership interest and provisions contained in
our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could discourage a
takeover attempt, which may reduce or eliminate the likelihood
of a change of control transaction and, therefore, your ability
to sell your shares for a premium. |
In addition to SCFs controlling position, provisions
contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, such
as a classified board, limitations on the removal of directors,
on stockholder proposals at meetings of stockholders and on
stockholder action by written consent and the inability of
stockholders to call special meetings, could make it more
difficult for a third party to acquire control of our company.
Our certificate of incorporation also authorizes our board of
directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval.
If our board of directors elects to issue preferred stock, it
could increase the
16
difficulty for a third party to acquire us, which may reduce or
eliminate your ability to sell your shares of common stock at a
premium. See Description of Our Capital Stock.
|
|
|
Two of our directors may have conflicts of interest
because they are affiliated with SCF. The resolution of these
conflicts of interest may not be in our or your best
interests. |
Two of our directors, David C. Baldwin and Andrew L. Waite, are
current officers of L.E. Simmons and Associates,
Incorporated, the ultimate general partner of SCF. This may
create conflicts of interest because these directors have
responsibilities to SCF and its owners. Their duties as officers
of L.E. Simmons and Associates, Incorporated may conflict
with their duties as directors of our company regarding business
dealings between SCF and us and other matters. The resolution of
these conflicts may not always be in our or your best interests.
|
|
|
We have renounced any interest in specified business
opportunities, and SCF and its director nominees on our board of
directors generally have no obligation to offer us those
opportunities. |
SCF has investments in other oilfield service companies that may
compete with us, and SCF and its affiliates, other than our
company, may invest in other such companies in the future. We
refer to SCF and its other affiliates and its portfolio
companies as the SCF group. Our certificate of incorporation
provides that, so long as we have a director or officer that is
affiliated with SCF (an SCF Nominee), we
renounce any interest or expectancy in any business opportunity
in which any member of the SCF group participates or
desires or seeks to participate in and that involves any aspect
of the energy equipment or services business or industry, other
than (i) any business opportunity that is brought to the
attention of an SCF Nominee solely in such persons
capacity as a director or officer of our company and with
respect to which no other member of the SCF group independently
receives notice or otherwise identifies such opportunity and
(ii) any business opportunity that is identified by the SCF
group solely through the disclosure of information by or on
behalf of our company. We are not prohibited from pursuing any
business opportunity with respect to which we have renounced any
interest.
Risks Related to this Offering
|
|
|
Future sales of shares of our common stock may affect
their market price and the future exercise of options may
depress our stock price and result in immediate and substantial
dilution. |
We cannot predict what effect, if any, future sales of shares of
our common stock, or the availability of shares for future sale,
will have on the market price of our common stock. Upon
completion of this offering, SCF will
own shares
of our common stock,
or %
of our outstanding common stock
(or shares
of our common stock,
or %,
if the over-allotment option is fully exercised) and our
existing stockholders (other than SCF) will
own shares
of our common stock,
or %
of our outstanding common stock
(or shares
of our common stock
or %
of our outstanding common stock if the over-allotment option is
fully exercised). We and our officers and directors and the
selling stockholders are subject to the
lock-up agreements
described in Underwriting for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus. Existing
stockholders are parties to a registration rights agreement
granting them certain demand and piggyback registrations in the
future. In addition, shares beneficially held for at least one
year will be eligible for sale in the public market pursuant to
Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act, subject to the
lock-up agreements.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market following our initial public offering, or the perception
that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market
price of our common stock and may make it more difficult for you
to sell your shares at a time and price that you deem
appropriate. Please read Shares Eligible for Future
Sale.
As soon as practicable after this offering, we intend to file
one or more registration statements with the SEC on
Form S-8 providing
for the registration of shares of our common stock issued or
reserved for issuance under our stock incentive plans. Subject
to the expiration of lock-ups that we and certain of our
stockholders have entered into and any applicable restrictions
or conditions contained in our stock
17
incentive plans, the shares registered under these registration
statements on
Form S-8 will be
available for resale immediately in the public market without
restriction.
|
|
|
Purchasers of common stock will experience immediate and
substantial dilution. |
Based on an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share, purchasers of our common stock in this offering will
experience an immediate and substantial dilution of
$ per
share in the net tangible book value per share of common stock
from the initial public offering price, and our pro forma net
tangible book value as of December 31, 2005, after giving
effect to this offering, would be
$ per
share. You will incur further dilution if outstanding options to
purchase common stock are exercised. In addition, our
certificate of incorporation allows us to issue significant
numbers of additional shares, including shares that may be
issued under our stock incentive plans. Please read
Dilution for a complete description of the
calculation of net tangible book value.
|
|
|
Because we have no current plans to pay dividends on our
common stock, investors must look solely to stock appreciation
for a return on their investment in us. |
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock
in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all
future earnings to fund the development and growth of our
business. Any payment of future dividends will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among
other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital
requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual
restrictions applying to the payment of dividends and other
considerations that the board of directors deems relevant.
Investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price
appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize
a return on their investment.
|
|
|
There has been no active trading market for our common
stock, and an active trading market may not develop. |
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. Our common stock has been approved for listing on
the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol
CPX. We do not know if an active trading market will
develop for our common stock or how the common stock will trade
in the future, which may make it more difficult for you to sell
your shares. Negotiations between the underwriters and us
determined the initial public offering price, which may not be
indicative of the price at which our common stock will trade
following the completion of this offering. You may not be able
to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering
price.
|
|
|
If our stock price fluctuates after the initial public
offering, you could lose a significant part of your
investment. |
In recent years, the stock market has experienced extreme price
and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant
effect on the market price of securities issued by many
companies for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of
these companies. The market price of our common stock could
similarly be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a
number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in securities analysts recommendations and their
estimates of our financial performance; |
|
|
|
the publics reaction to our press releases, announcements
and our filings with the SEC and those of our competitors; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in broader stock market prices and volumes,
particularly among securities of oil and gas service companies; |
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies; |
|
|
|
investor perception of our industry or our prospects; |
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel; |
|
|
|
commencement of or involvement in litigation; |
18
|
|
|
|
|
changes in environmental and other governmental regulations; |
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of strategic alliances,
significant contracts, new technologies, acquisitions,
commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
|
|
|
variations in our quarterly results of operations or cash flows
or those of other oil and gas service companies; |
|
|
|
revenue and operating results failing to meet the expectations
of securities analysts or investors in a particular quarter; |
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or pricing policies of our
competitors; |
|
|
|
future issuances and sales of our common stock; |
|
|
|
demand for and trading volume of our common stock; |
|
|
|
domestic and worldwide supplies and prices of and demand for oil
and gas; and |
|
|
|
changes in general conditions in the domestic and worldwide
economies, financial markets or the oil and gas industry. |
The realization of any of these risks and other factors beyond
our control could cause the market price of our common stock to
decline significantly. In particular, the market price of our
common stock may be influenced by variations in oil and gas
commodity prices, because demand for our services is closely
related to the prices of these commodities. This may cause our
stock price to fluctuate with these underlying commodity prices,
which are highly volatile.
19
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. We have
based these forward-looking statements largely on our current
expectations and projections about future events and financial
trends affecting the financial condition of our business. These
forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other things,
the risk factors discussed in this prospectus and other factors,
most of which are beyond our control.
The words believe, may,
will, estimate, continue,
anticipate, intend, plan,
expect and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than
statements of current or historical fact contained in this
prospectus are forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that the forward-looking statements
contained in this prospectus are based upon reasonable
assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances
discussed in this prospectus may not occur and actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the
forward-looking statements.
Important factors that may affect our expectations, estimates or
projections include:
|
|
|
|
|
a decline in or substantial volatility of oil and gas prices,
and any related changes in expenditures by our customers; |
|
|
|
the effects of future acquisitions on our business; |
|
|
|
changes in customer requirements in markets or industries we
serve; |
|
|
|
competition within our industry; |
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions; |
|
|
|
our access to current or future financing arrangements; |
|
|
|
our ability to replace or add workers at economic rates; |
|
|
|
environmental and other governmental regulations; and |
|
|
|
the effects of severe weather on our services centers or
equipment. |
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this
prospectus. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
20
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds from the sale
of shares
of common stock by us in this offering of approximately
$240 million, assuming an initial public offering price of
$ per
share and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses. A $1.00 increase
(decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this
offering by
$ million,
assuming no change in the number of shares offered by us as set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus and after deducting
the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not receive
any of the proceeds from any sale of shares of our common stock
by the selling stockholders.
We plan to use $50 million of our net proceeds from this
offering to repay a portion of our term loan facility,
$5 million to repay seller financed notes and the remainder
to pay all outstanding balances under our revolving credit
facility and for general corporate purposes, which may include
cash payments made in connection with future acquisitions. Our
current senior credit facility consists of a $130 million
U.S. revolver, a $30 million Canadian revolver and a term
loan facility of $420 million. As of February 28,
2006, we had $419 million of indebtedness outstanding under
the term loan portion of our senior credit facility. The current
term loan bears interest at either a base rate plus 1.75%, or
the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus
2.75%, and matures in September 2012. As of February 28,
2006, we had approximately $124.4 million in indebtedness
outstanding under our revolving credit facility. The revolving
credit facility bears interest at either a base rate plus an
applicable margin ranging between 0.25% and 1.75%, or LIBOR plus
an applicable margin between 1.25% and 2.75% in the case of U.S.
borrowings. In the case of borrowings under the Canadian
revolving credit facility, interest is based on the Canadian
Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus an
applicable margin ranging between 0.25% and 1.75%. Our
borrowings under the term loan and revolving credit facility
were used to refinance existing debt, to pay the Dividend as
described below and to provide for ongoing working capital and
general corporate purposes.
Please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Description of Our Indebtedness for a description of our
outstanding indebtedness and our senior credit facility
following this offering.
An affiliate of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and an
affiliate of UBS Securities LLC have each committed
$9 million (or approximately 7%) of our $130 million
U.S. revolver and therefore will receive a portion of the
proceeds from this offering that we use to repay our
U.S. revolver. In addition, affiliates of the underwriters
may have positions from time to time in our term loan facility.
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and UBS Securities LLC are
underwriters of this offering. Please read
Underwriting.
DIVIDEND POLICY
Immediately after the closing of the Combination, we paid a
dividend of $2.62 per share of our common stock or an
aggregate of approximately $147 million to our
stockholders. The term Dividend refers to this
payment. Other than the Dividend, we have not declared or paid
any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable
future. We currently intend to retain all future earnings to
fund the development and growth of our business. Any future
determination relating to our dividend policy will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our
results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements
and other factors deemed relevant by our board. We are also
currently restricted in our ability to pay dividends under our
senior credit facility.
21
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization at
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and |
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to give effect to this offering and the
application of our estimated net proceeds from this offering as
set forth under Use of Proceeds as if the offering
occurred on December 31, 2005. |
|
The information was derived from and is qualified by reference
to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. You should read this information in conjunction
with these consolidated financial statements,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Use of
Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
|
$ |
111,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(2)
|
|
$ |
85,112 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Term loan facility
|
|
|
418,950 |
|
|
|
368,950 |
|
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
11,881 |
|
|
|
6,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
515,943 |
|
|
|
375,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 55,531,510 shares issued and outstanding,
actual; shares
issued and outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital(1)
|
|
|
220,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, 35,570 shares at cost
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(3,803 |
) |
|
|
(3,803 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
16,540 |
|
|
|
16,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity(1)
|
|
|
250,761 |
|
|
|
490,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization(1)
|
|
$ |
766,704 |
|
|
$ |
866,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash
equivalents, additional
paid-in capital, total
stockholders equity and total capitalization
by $ million,
assuming no change in the number of shares offered by us as set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus and after deducting
the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us. |
|
|
|
(2) |
As of February 28, 2006, we had $124.4 million
outstanding under our revolving credit facility. |
|
22
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the public offering
price per share and the net tangible book value per share of the
common stock after this offering. Our unaudited consolidated net
tangible book value as of December 31, 2005 was
$(0.98) per share of common stock, after giving effect to
the Combination and the Dividend. Net tangible book value per
share represents the amount of the total tangible assets less
our total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of common
stock that are outstanding. After giving effect to the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share and after the deduction of underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses, the as adjusted net
tangible book value at December 31, 2005 would have been
$ million
or
$ per
share. This represents an immediate increase in such net
tangible book value of
$ per
share to existing stockholders and an immediate and substantial
dilution of
$ per
share to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering.
The following table illustrates this per share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase attributable to new public investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per share to new
investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) our net tangible book value by
$ million,
the net tangible book value per share, after giving effect to
this offering, by
$ per
share and the dilution in net tangible book value per share to
new investors in this offering by
$ per
share, assuming no change in the number of shares offered by us
as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
The following table summarizes, on an as adjusted basis set
forth above as of December 31, 2005, the total number of
shares of common stock owned by existing stockholders, the total
number of shares acquirable under outstanding options and the
total number of shares to be owned by new investors, the total
consideration paid or to be paid, and the average price per
share paid by our existing stockholders and to be paid by our
option holders and by new investors in this offering at
$ ,
the mid-point of the range of the initial public offering prices
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, calculated
before deduction of estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased(1) | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Average Price | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Existing stockholders(2)(3)
|
|
|
56,317,680 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
71,970,000 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
Option holders
|
|
|
3,512,444 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
19,037,446 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
New public investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The number of shares disclosed for the existing stockholders
includes shares
being sold by the selling stockholders in this offering. The
number of shares disclosed for the new investors does not
include
the shares
being purchased by the new investors from the selling
stockholders in this offering. |
|
|
(2) |
Includes 786,170 shares of restricted stock that are
subject to forfeiture restrictions as of December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
(3) |
The amount paid by the existing stockholders was calculated by
deducting from our common stock and additional paid-in capital
as of December 31, 2005 ($221.3 million) the following
amounts: (i) the amount of goodwill recognized in the
Combination ($93.8 million), (ii) the portion of the
Dividend paid in connection with the Combination that reduced
retained earnings ($51.8 million) and (iii) deferred
compensation ($3.8 million). |
|
23
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) total consideration paid or to
be paid by new investors and our option holders, total
consideration paid by all stockholders and the average price per
share paid by all stockholders by
$ million,
$ million,
$ million
and
$ ,
respectively, assuming no change in the number of shares offered
by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and
without deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
other expenses of the offering.
As of December 31, 2005, there were 56,317,680 shares
of our common stock outstanding, including 786,170 shares
of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture restrictions.
Sales by the selling stockholders in this offering will reduce
the number of shares of common stock held by existing
stockholders
to or
approximately %
of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after
this offering and will increase the number of shares of common
stock held by new investors
to shares
or
approximately %
of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after
this offering.
24
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
On September 12, 2005, we completed the Combination
transaction through which CES, IEM and IPS merged. To facilitate
this transaction, we borrowed funds through our bank refinancing
(the Financing), paid the Dividend to stockholders
and recorded goodwill associated with the acquisition of
minority interests (the MI Acquisition).
The following summary unaudited pro forma consolidated
statements of operations gives effect to the
MI Acquisition, the Financing and the payment of the
Dividend, assuming that the MI Acquisition, the Financing and
the payment of the Dividend were effected on January 1,
2004. From a balance sheet perspective, these transactions have
been reflected in our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005 included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The historical statement of operations information for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 are derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations
represent managements preliminary determination of
purchase accounting adjustments and are based on available
information and assumptions that management considers reasonable
under the circumstances. The purchase accounting estimate is
expected to be finalized within one year of the closing date of
the Combination. Consequently, the amounts reflected in the
unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations are
subject to change. Management does not expect that the
differences between the preliminary and final purchase price
allocation will have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations do
not purport to be indicative of the results that would have been
obtained had the transactions described above been completed on
the indicated dates or that may be obtained in the future.
The following information should be read together with our
historical consolidated financial statements and related notes
included within this prospectus.
25
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing | |
|
|
|
|
Complete | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
$ |
639,421 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
639,421 |
|
|
Product
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,726 |
|
Service expenses
|
|
|
393,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,856 |
|
Product expenses
|
|
|
87,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,538 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
111,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,754 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
Write-off of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
112,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,423 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
24,461 |
|
|
|
7,660 |
(a) |
|
|
32,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
87,962 |
|
|
|
(7,660 |
) |
|
|
80,302 |
|
Taxes
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
|
|
(2,681 |
)(b) |
|
|
31,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
54,246 |
|
|
|
(4,979 |
) |
|
|
49,267 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
$ |
(4,979 |
) |
|
$ |
48,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated
statements of operations.
26
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MI Acq. | |
|
Financing | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Complete | |
|
Note 2 | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
$ |
239,427 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
239,427 |
|
|
Product
|
|
|
81,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,747 |
|
Service expenses
|
|
|
157,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,540 |
|
Product expenses
|
|
|
58,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,633 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
46,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,077 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
36,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,881 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,095 |
(a) |
|
|
17,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
29,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,095 |
) |
|
|
19,315 |
|
Taxes
|
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,533 |
)(b) |
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,562 |
) |
|
|
12,027 |
|
Minority interest (see note 2)
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
(4,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
4,705 |
|
|
$ |
(6,562 |
) |
|
$ |
12,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
29,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,548 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated
statements of operations.
27
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of
Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except as noted)
|
|
1. |
Basis of Presentation: |
On September 12, 2005, Integrated Production Services, Inc.
(IPS) acquired Complete Energy Services, Inc.
(CES) and I.E. Miller Services, Inc.
(IEM) for stock. We refer to this transaction as the
Combination. The Combination was accounted for using
the continuity of interest method as described in note 1 of
the audited consolidated financial statements. Upon closing the
Combination, IPS changed its name to Complete Production
Services, Inc.
The accompanying pro forma consolidated statements of operations
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been
prepared by management in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for inclusion in a
registration statement on
Form S-1.
These pro forma consolidated statements of operations are not
necessarily indicative of the results that would have actually
occurred if the events reflected herein had been in effect on
the dates indicated or of the results that may occur in the
future.
These pro forma consolidated statements of operations are based
on our historical audited and unaudited consolidated financial
statements, and the pro forma adjustments and assumptions
outlined below. Accordingly, these pro forma consolidated
statements of operations should be read in conjunction with our
audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements
presented elsewhere in this prospectus.
The accounting policies used in the preparation of the pro forma
consolidated statements of operations are those disclosed in our
audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
The purchase method of accounting was used to reflect the
acquisition of the minority interests in CES and IEM as at
September 12, 2005. The purchase price of $12.32 per
share is intended to be the fair value of the shares owned by
the minority interests, which purchase price was based on an
estimate by a financial advisor engaged in connection with the
Combination. The financial advisor was not engaged to, and did
not, determine the actual value of such shares. Under this
accounting method, the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the assets and liabilities allocable to the
minority interests acquired has been reflected as goodwill. The
estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities are
preliminary and subject to change. The unaudited pro forma
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 has been adjusted for the effects of the
purchase accounting, as described below.
|
|
2. |
Income Attributable to Minority Interests: |
Minority interest in income for the year ended December 31,
2004 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CES | |
|
IEM | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
4,246 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
$ |
4,705 |
|
For a discussion of the purchase price allocation associated
with the Combination, see note 2(a) of the consolidated
financial statements at December 31, 2005.
28
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of
Operations (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except as noted)
(a) To adjust interest expense for amounts related to
borrowings of approximately $150 million to fund the
payment of a stockholder dividend and to reflect the impact on
deferred financing fees of our new term loan facility entered
into on September 12, 2005. The net adjustments were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Results | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Interest expense for new borrowings to fund dividend payment(1)
|
|
$ |
7,875 |
|
|
$ |
10,500 |
|
Add: amortization of term loan deferred financing fees(2)
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Less: deferred financing fees associated with previous debt
facilities(3)
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
(771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to interest expense
|
|
$ |
7,660 |
|
|
$ |
10,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
To record additional interest expense associated with borrowings
to fund our stockholder distribution of approximately
$150 million, assuming the borrowing occurred on
January 1, 2004. Interest was calculated at an assumed rate
of 7% for each period presented. |
|
|
(2) |
To record amortization expense associated with deferred
financing fees resulting from our term loan senior secured
financing facility entered into on September 12, 2005, as
if the new facility was entered into on January 1, 2004. |
|
|
|
(3) |
To add back amortization expense associated with deferred
financing fees related to our previous debt facilities, assuming
these facilities were retired with borrowings under our new term
loan senior secured financing facility on January 1, 2004. |
|
Our historical results include a write-off of $3.3 million
representing the unamortized portion of deferred financing fees
associated with our previous debt facilities which were retired
on September 12, 2005. These pro forma income statements
were not adjusted to eliminate the impact of this non-recurring
charge.
(b) To record the tax benefit associated with the interest
adjustments identified above at an assumed rate of 35%.
29
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial and operating data for the periods shown. The selected
consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2001 and for
the year ended December 31, 2001, have been derived from
IPSs consolidated financial statements for such date and
period. The selected consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2002 and for the year ended December 31,
2002 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of IPS for such date and period. In addition, the
following selected consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005 have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements for those dates and
periods. The following information should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
financial statements and related notes included in this
prospectus.
On December 29, 2005, we effected a 2-for-1 split of common
stock. As a result, all common stock and per share data, as well
as data related to other securities including stock warrants,
restricted stock and stock options, have been adjusted
retroactively to give effect to this stock split for all periods
presented within this prospectus, except par value which
remained at $0.01 per share, resulting in an insignificant
reclassification between common stock and additional
paid-in-capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services
|
|
$ |
5,855 |
|
|
$ |
30,110 |
|
|
$ |
65,025 |
|
|
$ |
194,953 |
|
|
$ |
510,304 |
|
|
Drilling services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
44,474 |
|
|
|
129,117 |
|
|
Products sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,494 |
|
|
|
35,547 |
|
|
|
81,320 |
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
40,604 |
|
|
|
103,279 |
|
|
|
320,747 |
|
|
|
757,726 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and product expenses(1)
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
28,531 |
|
|
|
73,124 |
|
|
|
216,173 |
|
|
|
481,394 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
7,764 |
|
|
|
16,591 |
|
|
|
46,077 |
|
|
|
111,754 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
|
Write-off of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
|
36,881 |
|
|
|
112,423 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
24,461 |
|
Taxes
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
54,246 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
(661 |
) |
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
13,675 |
|
|
|
29,548 |
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
14,109 |
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
|
|
50,656 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Service and product expenses is the aggregate of service
expenses and product expenses. |
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
4,309 |
|
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
|
$ |
161,263 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
13,965 |
|
|
|
34,622 |
|
|
|
76,427 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
33,320 |
|
|
|
36,279 |
|
|
|
55,281 |
|
|
|
157,630 |
|
|
|
112,139 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(32,538 |
) |
|
|
(35,616 |
) |
|
|
(66,214 |
) |
|
|
(186,776 |
) |
|
|
(188,358 |
) |
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(3)
|
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
27,851 |
|
|
|
54,798 |
|
|
|
139,362 |
|
|
|
67,689 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
6,799 |
|
|
|
11,084 |
|
|
|
46,904 |
|
|
|
127,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,465 |
|
|
$ |
3,120 |
|
|
$ |
6,094 |
|
|
$ |
11,547 |
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
7,110 |
|
|
|
47,808 |
|
|
|
95,217 |
|
|
|
235,211 |
|
|
|
384,580 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
38,571 |
|
|
|
110,596 |
|
|
|
206,066 |
|
|
|
515,153 |
|
|
|
937,653 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
22,270 |
|
|
|
50,144 |
|
|
|
169,190 |
|
|
|
509,990 |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
34,550 |
|
|
|
65,262 |
|
|
|
97,956 |
|
|
|
172,080 |
|
|
|
250,761 |
|
|
|
(2) |
EBITDA consists of net income (loss) before interest expense,
taxes, depreciation and amortization and minority interest. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. EBITDA is included in
this prospectus because our management considers it an important
supplemental measure of our performance and believes that it is
frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other
interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our
industry, some of which present EBITDA when reporting their
results. We regularly evaluate our performance as compared to
other companies in our industry that have different financing
and capital structures and/or tax rates by using EBITDA. In
addition, we use EBITDA in evaluating acquisition targets.
Management also believes that EBITDA is a useful tool for
measuring our ability to meet our future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements, and EBITDA is
commonly used by us and our investors to measure our ability to
service indebtedness. EBITDA is not a substitute for the GAAP
measures of earnings or of cash flow and is not necessarily a
measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. In addition, it
should be noted that companies calculate EBITDA differently and,
therefore, EBITDA has material limitations as a performance
measure because it excludes interest expense, taxes,
depreciation and amortization and minority interest. The
following table reconciles EBITDA with our net income (loss). |
|
(3) |
Acquisitions, net of cash required, consists only of the cash
component of acquisitions. It does not include common stock and
notes issued for acquisitions, nor does it include other
non-cash assets issued for acquisitions. |
Reconciliation of EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
(661 |
) |
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
Plus: interest expense
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
24,461 |
|
Plus: tax expense
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
Plus: depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
Plus: minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
4,309 |
|
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
|
$ |
161,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included within this prospectus. This discussion
contains forward-looking statements based on our current
expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us
and the oil and gas industry. These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties that may be outside of our
control. Our actual results could differ materially from those
indicated in these forward-looking statements. Factors that
could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are
not limited to: market prices for oil and gas, the level of oil
and gas drilling, economic and competitive conditions, capital
expenditures, regulatory changes and other uncertainties, as
well as those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this
prospectus, particularly in Risk Factors and
Forward-Looking Statements. In light of these risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events
discussed below may not occur. Except to the extent required by
law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes
available or other events occur in the future.
Overview
We provide specialized services and products focused on helping
oil and gas companies develop hydrocarbon reserves, reduce costs
and enhance production. We focus on basins within North America
that we believe have attractive long-term potential for growth,
and we deliver targeted, value-added services and products
required by our customers within each specific basin. We believe
our range of services and products positions us to meet many
needs of our customers at the wellsite, from drilling and
completion through production and eventual abandonment. We
manage our operations from regional field service facilities
located throughout the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas,
Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas and Kansas, western Canada and
Mexico.
On September 12, 2005, we completed the Combination (see
Business The Combination) of Complete
Energy Services, Inc. (CES), Integrated Production
Services, Inc. (IPS) and I.E. Miller, Inc.
(IEM). SCF-IV, L.P. (SCF) held a
majority interest in each of CES, IPS and IEM prior to the
Combination. Therefore, we accounted for the Combination using
the continuity of interests method (see note 1 of the
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements). The
consolidated financial statements and the discussions herein,
include the operating results of CES, IPS and IEM from the date
that each became controlled by SCF (November 7, 2003,
May 22, 2001 and August 26, 2004, respectively).
We operate in three business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Our completion and
production services segment includes: (1) intervention
services, which require the use of specialized equipment, such
as coiled tubing units, pressure pumping units, nitrogen units,
well service rigs and snubbing units, to perform various
wellbore services, (2) downhole and wellsite services, such
as wireline, production optimization, production testing and
rental and fishing services, and (3) fluid handling
services that are used to move, store and dispose of fluids that
are involved in the development and production of oil and gas
reservoirs. |
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Through our drilling services segment,
we provide land drilling, specialized rig logistics and site
preparation for oil and gas exploration and production companies. |
|
|
|
Product Sales. Through our product sales segment, we sell
oil and gas field equipment, including completion, flow control
and artificial lift equipment, as well as tubular goods. |
Substantially all of the service and rental revenue we earn is
based upon a charge for a relatively short period of time (an
hour, a day, a week) for the actual period of time the service
or rental is provided to our customer. By contracting services
on a short-term basis, we are exposed to the risks of a rapid
reduction in market prices and utilization and volatility in our
revenues. Product sales are recorded when
32
the actual sale occurs and title or ownership passes to the
customer and the product is shipped or delivered to the customer.
Our customers include large multi-national and independent oil
and gas producers, as well as smaller independent producers and
the major land-based drilling contractors in North America (see
Business Customers). The primary factor
influencing demand for our services and products is the level of
drilling and workover activity of our customers, which in turn,
depends on current and anticipated future oil and gas prices,
production depletion rates and the resultant levels of cash
flows generated and allocated by our customers to their drilling
and workover budgets. As a result, demand for our services and
products is cyclical, substantially depends on activity levels
in the North American oil and gas industry and is highly
sensitive to current and expected oil and natural gas prices.
The following tables summarize average North American drilling
and well service rig activity, as measured by Baker Hughes
Incorporated (BHI), and historical commodity prices
as provided by Bloomberg:
AVERAGE RIG COUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
BHI Rotary Rig Count: |
|
12/31/05 | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
12/31/03 | |
|
12/31/02 | |
|
12/31/01 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. Land
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
U.S. Offshore
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S.
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Mexico
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHI Workover Rig Count:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. and Canada
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: BHI (www.BakerHughes.com)
AVERAGE OIL AND GAS PRICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Average Daily Closing | |
|
Average Daily Closing | |
|
|
Henry Hub Spot Natural | |
|
WTI Cushing Spot Oil | |
Period |
|
Gas Prices ($/mcf) | |
|
Price ($/bbl) | |
| |
1/1/99 - 12/31/99
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
19.30 |
|
1/1/00 - 12/31/00
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
30.37 |
|
1/1/01 - 12/31/01
|
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
25.96 |
|
1/1/02 - 12/31/02
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
26.17 |
|
1/1/03 - 12/31/03
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
31.06 |
|
1/1/04 - 12/31/04
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
41.51 |
|
1/1/05 - 12/31/05
|
|
|
8.89 |
|
|
|
56.59 |
|
1/1/05 - 3/1/06
|
|
|
8.08 |
|
|
|
63.56 |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg NYMEX prices.
We consider the number of drilling and well service rig counts
to be an indication of spending by our customers in the oil and
gas industry for exploration and development of new and existing
hydrocarbon
33
reserves. These spending levels are a primary driver of our
business, and we believe that our customers tend to invest more
in these activities when oil and gas prices are at higher levels
or are increasing. We evaluate the utilization of our assets as
a measure of operating performance. This utilization can be
impacted by these and other external and internal factors. See
Risk Factors.
We generally charge for our services on a dayrate basis.
Depending on the specific service, a dayrate may include one or
more of these components: (1) a
set-up charge,
(2) an hourly service rate based on equipment and labor,
(3) an equipment rental charge, (4) a consumables
charge, and (5) a mileage and fuel charge. We generally
determine the rates charged through a competitive process on a
job-by-job basis.
Typically, work is performed on a call out basis,
whereby the customer requests services on a job-specific basis,
but does not guarantee work levels beyond the specific job bid.
For contract drilling services, fees are charged based on
standard dayrates or, to a lesser extent, as negotiated by
footage or through turnkey contracts. Product sales are
generated through our supply stores and through wholesale
distributors, using a purchase order process and a
pre-determined price book.
Outlook
Our growth strategy includes a focus on internal growth in our
current basins by adding additional like kind equipment,
expanding service and product offerings and, to a lesser extent,
by increasing equipment utilization. In addition, we identify
new basins in which to replicate this approach. We also augment
our internal growth through strategic acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal Capital Investment. Our internal expansion
activities generally consist of adding equipment and qualified
personnel in locations where we have established a presence. We
expect to grow our operations in each of these locations by
expanding services to current customers, attracting new
customers and hiring local personnel with local basin-level
expertise and leadership recognition. Depending on customer
demand, we will consider adding equipment to further increase
the capacity of services currently being provided and/or add
equipment to expand the services we provide. We invested
$185.2 million in equipment additions over the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005, which included
$120.6 million for the completion and production services
segment, $53.0 million for the drilling services segment
and $8.3 million for the product sales segment. We have
invested $3.3 million related to general corporate
operations over the same period. |
|
|
|
|
|
External Growth. We use strategic acquisitions as an
integral part of our growth strategy. We consider acquisitions
that will add to our service offerings in a current operating
area or that will expand our geographical footprint into a
targeted basin. We have completed several acquisitions in recent
years. These acquisitions affect our operating performance
period to period. Accordingly, comparisons of revenue and
operating results are not necessarily comparable and should not
be relied upon as indications of future performance. We have
invested an aggregate of $370.8 million in acquisitions
over the three-year period ended December 31, 2005,
excluding the acquisition of minority interests in CES and IEM
resulting from the Combination. |
|
Significant Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Production Services Ltd. On July 3, 2002,
we acquired Integrated Production Services Ltd., a western
Canada-based integrated well service company providing wireline,
production testing and production optimization services in
western Canada. This acquisition was completed through a series
of transactions, in which we paid $29.5 million in cash in
July 2002 and an additional $20.0 million in cash in
October 2002. This acquisition was an important addition to our
completion and production services segment, as it provided a
platform to expand our business into the Canadian oilfield
services market. We recorded $28.7 million of goodwill
related to this acquisition. |
|
|
|
BSI. On November 7, 2003, we acquired BSI Holdings
Management, LLC and BSI Holdings, L.P. and related parties
(BSI) for $50.1 million in cash, and issued
common stock totaling $8.5 million. This acquisition
provided us with a base of business in the Barnett Shale region
of north Texas. BSI is an integrated provider of drilling,
completion and production services in the oil |
34
|
|
|
|
|
and gas industry and sells various products used in the
production of oil and gas. We recorded $14.4 million of
goodwill related to this acquisition. |
|
|
|
I.E. Miller. On August 31, 2004, we acquired all the
outstanding membership interests of I.E. Miller of Eunice
(Texas) No. 2, L.L.C. and certain related entities
(I.E. Miller) for $13.6 million in cash and
issued common stock totaling $12.5 million. This
acquisition was an important addition to our drilling services
business, as I.E. Miller specializes in rig logistics. We
recorded $8.5 million of goodwill associated with this
acquisition. |
|
|
|
Hyland Enterprises, Inc. On September 3, 2004, we
acquired Hyland Enterprises, Inc., a Wyoming-based
fluid-handling and oilfield equipment rental company, for
$24.3 million in cash, including the repayment of debt.
This acquisition expanded our completion and production services
segment in the U.S. Rocky Mountain region. We recorded
$5.5 million of goodwill related to this acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Hamm Co. On October 14, 2004, we acquired Hamm and
Phillips Service Company, Inc. and certain other entities
(Hamm Co.), an Oklahoma-based fluid-handling,
well-servicing and oilfield equipment rental company, for
$48.1 million in cash, the issuance of common stock
totaling $37.0 million and certain additional acquisition
costs totaling $2.8 million. This acquisition expanded our
completion and production services segment into the
U.S. Mid-continent region and provided additional heavy
equipment hauling capability for the drilling services segment.
We recorded $33.8 million of goodwill related to this
acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
|
Parchman Energy Group, Inc. On February 11, 2005, we
acquired Parchman Energy Group, Inc. (Parchman) for
$9.8 million in cash, the issuance of common stock totaling
$16.9 million, the issuance of a subordinated note totaling
$5.0 million and the potential issuance of
1,000,000 shares of our common stock based upon certain
operating results. We expect that all 1,000,000 such shares of
our common stock will be issued in the first quarter of 2006. In
addition, we granted 344,664 shares of non-vested restricted
stock to former Parchman employees, of which 153,736 shares
vested on December 31, 2005. Parchman performs intervention
services and downhole services including coiled tubing,
production testing and wireline services, and operates from
locations in Texas, Louisiana and Mexico. We recorded
$20.3 million of goodwill related to this acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
|
Big Mac. On November 1, 2005, we acquired all of the
outstanding equity interests of the Big Mac group of companies
(Big Mac Transports, LLC, Big Mac Tank Trucks, LLC and Fugo
Services, LLC) for $40.8 million in cash. The Big Mac group
of companies (Big Mac) is based in McAlester,
Oklahoma, and provides fluid handling services primarily to
customers in eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas. Big
Macs principal assets consist of rolling stock and frac
tanks. The purchase price, which is subject to a post-closing
adjustment for actual working capital and reimbursable capital
expenditures as of the closing date, has not yet been finalized.
We recorded $23.7 million of goodwill in connection with
this acquisition. We have included the operating results of Big
Mac in the completion and production services business segment
from the date of acquisition. This acquisition provides a
platform to enter the eastern Oklahoma market and new
Fayetteville Shale play in Arkansas. |
|
In addition, we completed several other smaller acquisitions
during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
each of which has contributed to the expansion of our business
into new geographic regions or enhanced our service and product
offerings.
We have accounted for these acquisitions using the purchase
method of accounting, whereby the purchase price is allocated to
the fair value of net assets acquired, including intangibles and
property, plant and equipment at depreciated replacement costs
with the excess to goodwill, with the exception of the merger of
Integrated Production Services Ltd., and another predecessor
company in 2002, which was accounted for using the continuity of
interest method of accounting, a treatment similar to a pooling
of interests, and the Combination, which was also accounted for
using the continuity of interest accounting
35
method. Results of operations related to each of the acquired
companies have been included in our combined operations as of
the date of acquisition.
Marketing Environment
We operate in a highly competitive industry. Our competition
includes many large and small oilfield service companies. As
such, we price our services and products to remain competitive
in the markets in which we operate, adjusting our rates to
reflect current market conditions as necessary. We examine the
rate of utilization of our equipment as one measure of our
ability to compete in the current market environment.
Seasonality
We generally experience a decline in sales for our Canadian
operations during the second quarter of each year due to
seasonality, as weather conditions make oil and gas operations
in this region difficult during this period. Our Canadian
operations accounted for approximately 14% of total revenues
during the year ended December 31, 2005.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and provide a
basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets
and liabilities that are not readily available through open
market quotes. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed
periodically, and actual results may differ from those estimates
under different assumptions or conditions. We must use our
judgment related to uncertainties in order to make these
estimates and assumptions.
In the selection of our critical accounting policies, the
objective is to properly reflect our financial position and
results of operations for each reporting period in a consistent
manner that can be understood by the reader of our financial
statements. Our accounting policies and procedures are explained
in note 1 of the notes to the consolidated financial
statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus. We have
identified the following as the most critical accounting
policies which may have a significant effect on our reported
financial results.
|
|
|
|
|
Continuity of Interests Accounting. We applied the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141. Business
Combinations to account for the formation of Complete.
SFAS No. 141 permits us to account for the combination
of several predecessor companies using a method similar to a
pooling of interests if each is controlled by a common
stockholder. In connection with the Combination, we paid a
dividend to our stockholders of $2.62 per share and
adjusted the number of shares subject to, and exercise price of,
outstanding stock options and restricted shares in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 44. Accounting for Certain
Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an Interpretation of
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
No. 25. On September 12, 2005, we completed the
transaction, pursuant to which CES and IEM stockholders
exchanged all of their common stock for common stock of IPS. CES
stockholders received 19.704 shares of IPS common stock for
each share of CES common stock, and IEM stockholders received
19.410 shares of IPS common stock for each share of IEM
common stock. In connection with the Combination, IPS changed
its name to Complete Production Services, Inc. We acquired the
interests of the minority stockholders in these predecessor
companies as of the date of the consummation and accounted for
these transactions using the purchase method of accounting,
resulting in goodwill of $93.8 million, which represented
the excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of the
net assets acquired. |
36
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition. We recognize service revenue as
services are performed and when realized or earned. Revenue is
deemed to be realized or earned when we determine that the
following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services
have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable;
and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. These
services are generally provided over a relatively short period
of time pursuant to short-term contracts at pre-determined
day-rate fees, or on a
day-to-day basis.
Revenue and costs related to drilling contracts are recognized
as work progresses. Progress is measured as revenue is
recognized based upon day rate charges. For certain contracts,
we may receive lump-sum payments from our customers related to
the mobilization of rigs and other drilling equipment. Under
these arrangements, we defer revenues and the related cost of
services and recognize them over the term of the drilling
contract. Costs incurred to relocate rigs and other drilling
equipment to areas in which a contract has not been secured are
expensed as incurred. Revenues associated with product sales are
recorded when product title is transferred to the customer. |
|
|
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We evaluate potential
impairment of long-lived assets and intangibles, excluding
goodwill and other intangible assets without defined services
lives, when indicators of impairment are present, as defined in
SFAS No. 144. If such indicators are present, we
project the fair value of the assets by estimating the
undiscounted future cash in-flows to be derived from the
long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives,
as well as any salvage value. Then, we compare this fair value
estimate to the carrying value of the assets and determine
whether the assets are deemed to be impaired. For goodwill and
other intangible assets without defined service lives, we apply
the provisions of SFAS No. 142, which requires an
annual impairment test, whereby we estimate the fair value of
the asset by discounting future cash flows at our projected cost
of capital rate. If the fair value estimate is less than the
carrying value of the asset, an additional test is required
whereby we apply a purchase price analysis consistent with that
described in SFAS No. 141. If impairment is still
indicated, we would record an impairment loss in the current
reporting period for the amount by which the carrying value of
the intangible asset exceeds its projected fair value. Our
industry is highly cyclical and the estimate of future cash
flows requires the use of assumptions and our judgment. Periods
of prolonged down cycles in the industry could have a
significant impact on the carrying value of these assets and may
result in impairment charges. |
|
|
|
|
Stock Options. We have issued stock-based compensation to
certain employees, officers and directors in the form of stock
options. We account for these stock options by applying APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, which does not require us to recognize
compensation expense related to these employee stock options
when the exercise price of the option is at least equal to the
market value of the stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, we
have not recognized compensation expense related to our stock
options issued. We have, however, included potential common
shares associated with our stock option awards in the
calculation of diluted shares outstanding in order to determine
diluted earnings per share. For new stock-based compensation
grants after January 1, 2006, we will be required to
account for our stock-based compensation plans using the fair
value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payments. Accounting for these stock
options using the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123R will negatively impact our financial
position and results of operations, as it requires that the fair
value of stock options issued be estimated using a pricing
model, which requires the application of highly subjective
assumptions that have an inherent degree of uncertainty, and
requires us to expense the estimated fair value over the vesting
period of the related options. SFAS No. 123R will require us to
measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for
an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair
value of the award, with limited exceptions. We expect to incur
expenses related to our stock options for each reporting period
beginning on or after January 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of common stock for options granted was
estimated by management and/or our controlling stockholder, SCF,
using an internal valuation methodology. A market approach was |
37
generally used to estimate our enterprise value using estimates
of EBITDA multiplied by relevant market multiples, adjusted to
take into account particular characteristics of our businesses.
We used market multiples of publicly traded energy service
companies that we believed to be most comparable to our
businesses. Prior to the Combination in September 2005, the
valuation of common stock was based on the value of the common
stock of the specific predecessor company, which had made a
stock award. We did not obtain contemporaneous valuations by an
unrelated valuation specialist because we were focused on
internal growth and acquisitions and we had a good measure of
fair value as a result of the numerous acquisitions negotiated
at arms-length prices with third parties throughout the period,
which included stock consideration. In addition, we believed
that our management team and SCF had the appropriate expertise
and experience to perform such analyses; and we utilized
methodologies acknowledged in the applicable accounting
literature.
|
|
|
During the 12-month period ended December 31, 2005, we
granted stock options with the exercise prices as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Weighted-Average |
Grants Made |
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Intrinsic Value |
During Quarter Ended |
|
Options Granted | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
per Share | |
|
per Share |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
454,861 |
|
|
$ |
4.91 |
|
|
$ |
4.91 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
777,868 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
65,536 |
|
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
448,044 |
|
|
|
11.66 |
|
|
|
11.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on an assumed IPO price of
$ ,
the intrinsic value of all options outstanding as of
December 31, 2005 would have been
$ million. |
|
|
The principal reasons for the differences between the fair
value per share at the option grant date and the assumed IPO
price of
$ are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Combination, which closed on September 12, 2005,
substantially increased our geographic scope and breadth of
services, creating the potential for significant cross-selling
opportunities and integration of the operations of the combined
companies. Benefits of the Combination included increased market
penetration resulting in part from expansion of proprietary
production enhancement, product and service offerings into
existing and new geographic regions and leveraging brand name
and relationships in order to introduce additional products and
services into core markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Following the Combination, we believe we have been able
successfully to demonstrate the execution of our strategy as a
combined company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Combination, our three predecessor companies were
smaller private companies, the common stock of which was
illiquid due in part to restrictions on the transferability of
that stock, the lack of dividends and concentration of
ownership. We believe that larger companies with broader product
and service offerings generally trade at higher multiples of
their EBITDA or other relevant performance measures. |
|
|
|
|
The financing completed in connection with the Combination has
provided us improved liquidity for additional acquisitions and
capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
|
Our operating results generally improved throughout the year in
2005 due to acquisitions, price increases and improved demand
for our products and services. |
|
|
|
|
|
Our expectations for future performance for 2006 increased as
compared to 2005 due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions completed; |
|
|
|
|
|
increased forecasted demand from customers for drilling services
and completion and production services, particularly in the
Rocky Mountain and North Texas regions; |
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
price increases in several of our business lines, including
drilling services and intervention services; and |
|
|
|
|
|
improved forecasted operating results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are realizing the benefits of the acquisitions we made in
2004 and 2005, including the acquisition of Hamm Co. in October
2004, Parchman Energy Group, Inc. in February 2005 and Big Mac
in November 2005. These benefits include increased size,
geographic scope and breadth of services. |
|
|
|
|
|
We are realizing the benefits of organic growth resulting from
the capital expenditures of approximately $47 million in
2004 and approximately $127 million during 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
We will use a substantial portion of the net proceeds from this
offering to reduce existing outstanding debt. Please see
Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
|
|
Market prices of publicly traded energy service companies have
shown significant increases from January 1, 2005 due to
increases in demand for energy services caused, in part, by
increasing commodity prices. We believe that increased service
sector demand and prices will remain strong in the foreseeable
future. The Oil Service Sector Index increased from 119.38 at
the beginning of 2005 to 169.56 at September 12, 2005, the
date of the Combination, and to 190.59 at March 10, 2006.
This represents an increase of approximately 12% since
September 12, 2005 and an increase of approximately 60%
since January 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Bad Debts and Inventory Obsolescence. We
record trade accounts receivable at billed amounts, less an
allowance for bad debts. Inventory is recorded at cost, less an
allowance for obsolescence. To estimate these allowances,
management reviews the underlying details of these assets as
well as known trends in the marketplace, and applies historical
factors as a basis for recording these allowances. If market
conditions are less favorable than those projected by
management, or if our historical experience is materially
different from future experience, additional allowances may be
required. |
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment. We record property, plant
and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major
betterments to existing assets are capitalized, while repairs
and maintenance costs that do not extend the service lives of
our equipment are expensed. We determine the useful lives of our
depreciable assets based upon historical experience and the
judgment of our operating personnel. We generally depreciate the
historical cost of assets, less an estimate of the applicable
salvage value, on the straight-line basis over the applicable
useful lives, except office furniture and computers, which are
depreciated using the declining balance method. Upon disposition
or retirement of an asset, we record a gain or loss if the
proceeds from the transaction differ from the net book value of
the asset at the time of the disposition or retirement. If our
depreciation estimates are not correct, we may record a
disproportionate amount of gains or losses upon disposition of
these assets. We believe our estimates of useful lives are
materially correct. |
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes. Our income tax expense includes
income taxes related to the United States, Canada and other
foreign countries, including local, state and provincial income
taxes. We account for tax ramifications using
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
Under SFAS No. 109, we record deferred income tax
assets and liabilities based upon temporary differences between
the carrying amount and tax basis of our assets and liabilities
and measure tax expense using enacted tax rates and laws that
will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period of the change. Furthermore, SFAS No. 109
requires us to record a valuation allowance for any net deferred
income tax assets which we believe are likely to not be used
through future operations. As of December 31, 2005 and
2004, we had recorded a total valuation allowance of
$0.9 million related to certain deferred tax assets in
Canada. If our estimates and assumptions related to our deferred
tax |
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
position change in the future, we may be required to record
additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets
and our effective tax rate may increase, which could result in a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. As of December 31, 2005, no
deferred U.S. income taxes have been provided on the
approximately $1.7 million of undistributed earnings of
foreign subsidiaries in which we intend to indefinitely
reinvest. Upon distribution of these earnings in the form of
dividends or otherwise, we may be subject to U.S. income
taxes and foreign withholding taxes. |
The following table describes estimates, assumptions and methods
regarding critical accounting policies used to prepare our
consolidated financial statements. We consider an estimate to be
critical if it is subjective and if changes in the estimate
using different assumptions would result in a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Results/ |
Description |
|
Estimates/Assumptions Used |
|
Variability in Accounting |
|
Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
We recognize revenue when realizable and earned as services are
performed or as risk of ownership and physical possession passes
to the buyer. We defer unearned revenue until earned. Any
reimbursements of mobilization charges are amortized over the
contract involved. |
|
There is a risk that we may not record revenue in the proper
period. |
|
We did not record material adjustments resulting from revenue
recognition issues for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003. |
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
|
|
We evaluate the recoverability of assets periodically, but at
least annually for goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives, by reviewing operational performance and
expected cash flows. Our management estimates future cash flows
for this purpose and for intangible assets, discounts these cash
flows at an applicable rate. |
|
There is a risk that managements estimates of future
performance may not approximate actual performance or that rates
used for discounting cash flows are not consistent with the
actual discount rates. Our assets could be overstated if
impairment losses are not identified timely. |
|
We tested goodwill for impairment for each of the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, and management
determined that goodwill was not impaired. A significant decline
in expected future cash flow as a result of lower sales, could
result in an impairment charge. For example, an impairment of
10% of goodwill at December 31, 2005, would have resulted
in a decrease in operating income of $29.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. |
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Results/ |
Description |
|
Estimates/Assumptions Used |
|
Variability in Accounting |
|
Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Bad Debts and Obsolete Inventory
|
|
We estimate the recoverability of receivables and inventory on
an individual basis based upon historical experience and
managements judgment. |
|
There is a risk that management may not detect uncollectible
accounts or unsalvageable inventory in the correct accounting
period. |
|
Bad debt expense has been less than 2% of sales for each of the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. If bad debt
expense had increased by 1% of sales for the year ended
December 31, 2005, net income would have declined by
$4.7 million. Our obsolescence and other inventory reserves
as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have ranged from 4%
to 13%. Our obsolescence and other inventory reserves were
approximately 5% of inventory at December 31, 2005. A 1%
increase, from 5% to 6%, in inventory reserves at
December 31, 2005 would have decreased net income by
approximately $254,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Results/ |
Description |
|
Estimates/Assumptions Used |
|
Variability in Accounting |
|
Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
Our management estimates useful lives of depreciable equipment
and salvage values. The depreciation method used is generally
the straight-line method, except for furniture and office
equipment which is depreciated on an accelerated basis. |
|
GAAP permits various depreciation methods to recognize the use
of assets. Use of a different depreciation method or different
depreciable lives could result in materially different results.
The estimated useful lives are consistent with industry
averages. There is a risk that the assets useful life used
for our depreciation calculation will not approximate the actual
useful life of the asset. |
|
We evaluate property, plant and equipment for impairment when
there are indicators of impairment. There have been no
impairment charges related to our long-term assets during the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. Depreciation
and amortization expense for the year ended December 31,
2005 represented 13% of the average depreciable asset base for
that period. An increase in depreciation relative to the
depreciable base of 1%, from 13% to 14%, would have reduced net
income by approximately $2.2 million. |
Valuation Allowance for Income Taxes
|
|
We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 109 to account for
income taxes. Differences between depreciation methods used for
financial reporting purposes compared to tax purposes as well as
other items, including loss carry forwards and valuation
allowances against deferred tax assets, require
managements judgment related to the realizability of
deferred tax accounts. |
|
There is a risk that estimates related to the use of loss carry
forwards and the realizability of deferred tax accounts may be
incorrect, and that the result could materially impact our
financial position and results of operations. In addition,
future changes in tax laws could result in additional valuation
allowances. |
|
Historically, we have utilized net operating loss carry forwards
to partially offset current tax expense, and we have recorded a
valuation allowance to the extent we expect that our deferred
tax assets will not be utilized through future operations.
Deferred income tax assets totaled $5.3 million at
December 31, 2005, against which we recorded a valuation
allowance of $0.9 million, leaving a net deferred tax asset
of $4.4 million deemed realizable. Changes in our valuation
allowance would affect our net income on a dollar for dollar
basis. |
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Results/ |
Description |
|
Estimates/Assumptions Used |
|
Variability in Accounting |
|
Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
For years ended on or before December 31, 2005, we applied
the provisions of APB No. 25 to account for stock options
and estimate compensation expense that would be required to be
recognized under SFAS No. 123 for pro forma footnote
disclosures. The determination of the fair value of stock
options required subjective estimates of variables used in a
pricing model, including stock volatility, dividend rate,
risk-free interest rate and expected term of options. |
|
GAAP permits the use of various models to determine the fair
value of stock options and the variables used for the model are
highly subjective. The use of different assumptions or a
different model may have a material impact on our financial
disclosures. |
|
For years ended on or before December 31, 2005, we
determined the value of our stock options by applying the
minimum value method permitted by APB No. 25 and, in
connection with estimating compensation expense that would be
required to be recognized under SFAS No. 123, we used a
Black-Scholes model including assumptions for expected term
(ranging from 3 to 4.5 years as of December 31, 2005),
risk- free rate (based upon published rates for
U.S. Treasury notes with a similar term), zero dividend
rate and a volatility rate of zero. |
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth our results of operations,
including amounts expressed as a percentage of total revenue,
for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005/ | |
|
2005/ | |
|
2004/ | |
|
2004/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services
|
|
$ |
510,304 |
|
|
$ |
194,953 |
|
|
$ |
65,025 |
|
|
$ |
315,351 |
|
|
|
162 |
% |
|
$ |
129,928 |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
Drilling services
|
|
|
129,117 |
|
|
|
44,474 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
84,643 |
|
|
|
190 |
% |
|
|
41,767 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Product sales
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
81,320 |
|
|
|
35,547 |
|
|
|
36,985 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
45,773 |
|
|
|
129 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
757,726 |
|
|
$ |
320,747 |
|
|
$ |
103,279 |
|
|
$ |
436,979 |
|
|
|
136 |
% |
|
$ |
217,468 |
|
|
|
211 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services
|
|
$ |
119,171 |
|
|
$ |
38,349 |
|
|
$ |
9,134 |
|
|
$ |
80,822 |
|
|
|
211 |
% |
|
$ |
29,215 |
|
|
|
320 |
% |
Drilling services
|
|
|
44,393 |
|
|
|
10,093 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
34,300 |
|
|
|
340 |
% |
|
|
9,381 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Product sales
|
|
|
18,444 |
|
|
|
12,924 |
|
|
|
4,951 |
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
7,973 |
|
|
|
161 |
% |
Corporate
|
|
|
(20,745 |
) |
|
|
(2,869 |
) |
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
(17,876 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1,636 |
) |
|
|
133 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
161,263 |
|
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
|
$ |
102,766 |
|
|
|
176 |
% |
|
$ |
44,933 |
|
|
|
331 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
NM denotes not meaningful.
Corporate includes amounts related to corporate
personnel costs and other general expenses.
EBITDA consists of net income (loss) before interest
expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and minority
interest. EBITDA is a non-cash measure of performance. We use
EBITDA as the primary internal management measure for evaluating
performance and allocating additional resources. See the
discussion of EBITDA at note 2 to Selected
Consolidated Financial Data.
Our revenue and EBITDA results for the indicated periods
generally increased due to the contribution of companies
acquired and an increase in oilfield activity in North America
as a result of higher commodity prices throughout the applicable
periods.
For a reconciliation of EBITDA, please see Selected
Consolidated Financial Data Reconciliation of
EBITDA.
Below is a more detailed discussion of our operating results by
segment for these periods.
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2004
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by
136%, or $437.0 million, to $757.7 million from
$320.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
This increase by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Segment revenue
increased $315.4 million and resulted primarily from:
(1) the acquisition of Hyland Enterprises, Inc. in
September 2004, which contributed $62.4 million in 2005;
(2) the acquisition of Hamm Co. in October 2004, which
contributed incremental revenues of $69.9 million in 2005;
(3) the acquisition of Parchman in February 2005, which
contributed $59.6 million; (4) several other smaller
acquisitions in 2005, including Big Mac, which contributed
revenues to the 2005 results; and (5) an incremental
increase in revenues earned as a result of additional capital
investment in the well servicing, rental and fluid-handling
businesses, as well as improved market conditions including
favorable pricing for our services and products. |
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Segment revenue increased
$84.6 million, primarily related to an increase associated
with the acquisition of IEM in September 2004, which contributed
$65.2 million in revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $17.7 million in
revenues for the period from the acquisition date through
December 31, 2004. In addition, the segment benefited from
increased prices for our services and increased oilfield
activity, which provided incremental revenues of
$37.1 million, achieved in part through additional
investment in drilling rigs and drilling logistics equipment for
operations located in the Barnett Shale region of north Texas. |
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales. Segment revenue increased
$37.0 million, fueled by an incremental increase in supply
store sales of $24.2 million which includes the results of
several newly opened supply stores, and two additional stores
purchased during 2005, an increase in Canadian product sales,
primarily surface production equipment, improved sales in other
international locations and an increase in the sale of flow
control products. These increased product sales reflect the
overall improved market conditions. |
|
|
|
|
Service and Product Expenses |
Service and product expenses include labor costs associated with
the execution and support of our services, materials used in the
performance of those services and other costs directly related
to the support and maintenance of equipment. These expenses
increased 123%, or $265.2 million, for the year ended
December 31, 2005, to $481.4 million from
$216.2 million for the same period in 2004. As a percentage
of revenues, service and product expenses were 64% for 2005
compared to 67% for 2004. The decline in
44
service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue
reflected a favorable mix of services and products and improved
prices, as more revenue was earned in 2005 from higher margin
basins and related services in the United States, and increasing
customer demand for our services. By segment, service and
product expenses as a percentage of revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 were 63% and 65%, respectively,
for the completion and production services segment; 55% and 70%,
respectively, for the drilling services segment; and 74% and
72%, respectively, for the product sales segment.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of salaries and other related expenses for our administrative,
finance, information technology and human resource functions.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 143%, or
$65.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2005,
to $111.8 million from $46.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily due to
acquisitions, which provided additional headcount and general
expenses. In addition, as a result of the Combination, we
employed corporate officers and key members of management, paid
an incentive bonus in connection with the Combination and
expensed outside service costs related to the Combination of
$1.4 million. Additional costs were incurred in 2005 for
outside consulting services for accounting, tax and information
technology, and higher performance-based incentive bonus
accruals at December 31, 2005 compared to December 31,
2004. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and
administrative expenses were 15% and 14% for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
Write-off of Deferred Financing Fees |
We recorded a write-off of deferred financing fees of
$3.3 million during 2005 to expense unamortized deferred
costs associated with debt facilities which were repaid on
September 12, 2005 with borrowings under the new
$580.0 million term loan and revolving credit facility.
Unamortized deferred financing fees at December 31, 2005 of
$2.0 million related entirely to this new facility and are
being amortized over the term of the facility.
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 126%, or
$27.2 million, to $48.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, from $21.6 million during the same
period in 2004. The increase in depreciation and amortization
expense was the result of equipment and intangible assets
acquired through capital expenditures and purchase acquisitions.
As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization
expense was 6% and 7% for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Interest expense was $24.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, compared to $7.5 million for the
same period in 2004. The increase in interest expense was
attributable to an increase in the average amount of debt
outstanding as a result of acquisitions and capital expenditures
completed in 2004 and 2005. The weighted-average interest rate
outstanding increased from 6% at December 31, 2004 to 7% at
December 31, 2005. This increase related to borrowings
under variable interest rate facilities and a general increase
in the prime interest rate during 2005.
Tax expense is comprised of three components: capital and
franchise taxes, current income taxes and deferred income taxes.
The capital and franchise tax component is generally based on
our capital base and does not correlate to pretax income. The
current and deferred taxes added together provide an indication
of an effective rate of income tax.
Tax expense was 38.5% and 43.8% of pretax income for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
45
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by
211%, or $217.5 million, to $320.7 million from
$103.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
This increase by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Segment revenue
increased $129.9 million and resulted primarily from:
(1) the acquisition of BSI in late 2003, which contributed
$40.2 million of incremental revenues in 2004, of which
$20.9 million was derived from a full-years operation
in 2004 and $16.1 million was derived from investment in
capital equipment; (2) the acquisition of eleven smaller
companies throughout 2004 which contributed to 2004 revenue
totals but did not contribute to operating results in 2003; and
(3) a general increase in the use of our services
attributable to more favorable oilfield activity levels
associated with rising commodity prices. |
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Segment revenue increased
$41.8 million. Of this increase, $18.9 million was
provided through acquisitions, and more specifically, the
acquisition of BSI in late 2003, which contributed
$17.7 million of incremental revenues in 2004, and the Hamm
Co. acquisition completed in late 2004, which provided an
additional $1.2 million of drilling revenues. The remaining
revenue increase in 2004 relative to 2003 was due to additional
investment in drilling rigs for operations located in the
Barnett Shale region of north Texas. |
|
|
|
Product Sales. Segment revenue increased
$45.8 million, of which $31.2 million was derived from
the product sales component of BSIs acquisition and a
general increase in product sales from existing operations as a
result of improved market conditions in the oil and gas
industry, including higher international sales and, in
particular, sales of surface production equipment in Canada, and
increased sales of flow control equipment. |
|
|
|
Service and Product Expenses |
Service and product expenses increased by 196%, or
$143.0 million, for the year ended December 31, 2004,
to $216.2 million from $73.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of revenues,
service and product expenses were 67% in 2004 compared to 71% in
2003. The decline in service and product expenses as a
percentage of revenue reflected a favorable mix of products and
strong prices, as more revenue was earned in 2004 from higher
margin basins and related services in the United States, and
increasing customer demand for oilfield service providers
services. By segment, service and product expenses as a
percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003 were 65% and 70%, respectively, for the completion
and production services segment; 70% and 70%, respectively, for
the drilling services segment; and 72% and 73%, respectively,
for the product sales segment. Overall declines in service and
product expense as a percentage of revenues for the completion
and production services and product sales segments yielded
better operating margins.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004 increased by 178%, or $29.5 million,
to $46.1 million from $16.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily due to
additional headcount and general expenses added as a result of
acquisitions. Selling, general and administrative expense as a
percentage of revenues was 14% in 2004 as compared to 16% in
2003.
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 183%, or
$14.0 million, to $21.6 million, for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $7.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. We increased our property,
plant and equipment through acquisitions and capital
expenditures throughout the two years ended December 31,
2004, as gross book value increased to $268.8 million at
December 31, 2004
46
compared to $109.1 million at December 31, 2003. This
higher depreciable base resulted in an increase in depreciation
expense during these years. In addition, we acquired certain
intangible assets that were amortized in 2004 after the date of
acquisition. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and
amortization was 7% in 2004 and 2003.
Interest expense was $7.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $2.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in interest
expense was consistent with increased levels of bank debt used
to finance acquisitions and capital expenditures. We did not
experience any significant changes in interest rates for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Tax expense was 43.8% and 46.6% of pretax income for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These rates
reflected the mix of tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we
operated. In particular, in 2003 there was a Large
Corporations Tax and Capital Tax of approximately
$0.3 million that was payable under Canadian tax law.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures,
such as expanding our coiled tubing, wireline and production
testing fleets, building new drilling rigs, increasing and
replacing rental tool and well service rigs and snubbing units,
funding new product development and funding general working
capital needs. In addition, we need capital to fund strategic
business acquisitions. Our primary sources of funds have
historically been cash flow from operations, proceeds from
borrowings under bank credit facilities and the issuance of
equity securities, primarily associated with acquisitions. Upon
completion of this offering, we anticipate that we will rely on
cash generated from operations, borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, future debt offerings and future public equity
to satisfy our liquidity needs. We believe that funds from these
sources should be sufficient to meet both our short-term working
capital requirements and our long-term capital requirements. Our
ability to fund planned capital expenditures and to make
acquisitions will depend upon our future operating performance
and, more broadly, on the availability of equity and debt
financing, which will be affected by prevailing economic
conditions in our industry, and general financial, business and
other factors, some of which are beyond our control.
The following table summarizes cash flows by type for the
periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
76,427 |
|
|
$ |
34,622 |
|
|
$ |
13,965 |
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
112,139 |
|
|
|
157,630 |
|
|
|
55,281 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(188,358 |
) |
|
|
(186,776 |
) |
|
|
(66,214 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased
$41.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase
was primarily due to an increase in gross receipts as a result
of increased revenues. Our gross receipts increased during 2005
as demand for our services grew, resulting in more billable
hours and more favorable billing rates, while we expanded our
current business and entered new markets through acquisitions
and capital investment. For the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, cash flows from operating activities continued to
trend higher on this basis, as a result of growing our business
through acquisitions and investment in capital expenditures and
general improvements in activity levels and pricing. We expect
to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities for the
foreseeable future, and expect that new acquisitions will
provide incremental operating cash flows.
Net cash provided by financing activities declined
$45.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. This decline
reflects the use of cash generated by
47
operating activities to fund capital investment during 2005,
rather than the use of debt financing, the primary source of
funds for expansion during 2004 and 2003. Increases in
borrowings under our new term loan facility were offset by
repayments of long-term debt outstanding under prior facilities
and the payment of a one-time dividend to stockholders of
$146.9 million. For the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, net cash provided by financing activities increased as
we borrowed under existing credit arrangements and through
seller financing to finance our investment in capital
expenditures and acquisitions. Our long-term debt balances,
including current maturities, were $515.9 million,
$201.8 million and $67.7 million as of
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. We acquired
several companies in 2004 for a total use of cash of
$139.4 million, but fewer acquisitions during 2005 for a
total use of cash of $67.7 million. This decrease in cash
used for acquisitions was offset by an incremental increase in
capital equipment expenditures of $80.3 million in 2005
compared to 2004. Significant capital equipment expenditures in
2005 included drilling rigs, well services rigs, fluid-handling
equipment, rental equipment and coiled tubing equipment. For the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, cash used for
investing activities continued to increase as we invested in
long-term assets and made significant acquisitions. Significant
capital equipment expenditures in 2004 included drilling rigs,
well services rigs, fluid-handling equipment, rental equipment
and coiled tubing equipment. For 2003, capital equipment
expenditures primarily included drilling equipment and coiled
tubing equipment for operations in Texas. Funds used for
acquisitions totaled $139.4 million in 2004 and
$54.8 million in 2003. See Significant
Acquisitions above.
We expect to expend approximately $200 million for
investment in capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions,
during the year ended December 31, 2006. We believe that
our operating cash flows and borrowing capacity will be
sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months.
In addition to making investments in capital expenditures, we
also will continue to evaluate acquisitions of complementary
companies. We evaluate each acquisition based upon the
circumstances and our financing capabilities at that time.
On September 12, 2005, we paid a dividend of $2.62 per
share for an aggregate payment of approximately
$146.9 million to stockholders of record on that date. We
are also obligated to issue up to an aggregate of approximately
1,200,000 shares of our common stock as contingent
consideration based on certain operating results of the
companies we have previously acquired, and we have agreed to
make additional cash payments (up to $3.1 million) in
respect of such contingent shares ultimately issued in the
amount of the dividend that would have been paid on such shares
if those shares had been issued prior to the payment of the
dividend. We do not intend to pay dividends in the future, but
rather plan to reinvest such funds in our business. Furthermore,
our current term loan and revolving debt facility, which we
entered into on September 12, 2005, contains restrictive
debt covenants which preclude us from paying future dividends on
our common stock.
|
|
|
Description of Our Indebtedness |
Our credit facilities as of December 31, 2005 are described
in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements
(see notes 9 and 10 to the audited consolidated
financial statements).
On September 12, 2005, concurrently with the completion of
the Combination, we entered into a senior secured credit
facility (the Credit Agreement) with Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent,
and certain other financial institutions. The Credit Agreement
provides for a $130 million U.S. revolving credit
facility that will mature in 2010, a $30 million Canadian
revolving credit facility (with Integrated Production Services,
Ltd. as the borrower thereof) that will mature in 2010 and a
$420 million term loan credit facility that will mature in
2012. Subject to certain limitations, we have the ability to
increase, decrease or reallocate the commitments under the
various aforementioned credit
48
facilities. In addition, certain portions of the credit
facilities are available to be borrowed in U.S. Dollars,
Canadian Dollars, Pounds Sterling, Euros and other currencies
approved by the lenders.
Subject to certain limitations, we have the ability to elect how
interest under the Credit Agreement will be computed. Interest
under the Credit Agreement may be determined by reference to
(1) the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an
applicable margin between 1.25% and 2.75% per annum (with
the applicable margin depending upon our ratio of total debt to
EBITDA (as defined below)) for revolving advances and 2.75% for
term advances (or 2.5% if our debt ratings are upgraded by
either Moodys or Standard & Poors), or
(2) the Canadian Base Rate (i.e., the higher of the
Canadian banks prime rate or the CDOR rate plus 1.0%), in
the case of Canadian loans or the greater of the prime rate and
the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, in the case of
U.S. loans, plus an applicable margin between 0.25% and
1.75% per annum for revolving advances and 1.75% for term
advances (or 1.5% if our debt ratings are upgraded). Interest is
payable quarterly for base rate loans and at the end of
applicable interest periods for LIBOR loans, except that if the
interest period for a LIBOR loan is six months, interest will be
paid at the end of each three-month period.
The Credit Agreement also contains various covenants that limit
our and our subsidiaries ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
grant certain liens; |
|
|
|
make certain loans and investments; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
make distributions; |
|
|
|
make acquisitions; |
|
|
|
enter into operating leases; |
|
|
|
enter into hedging transactions; |
|
|
|
merge or consolidate; or |
|
|
|
engage in certain asset dispositions. |
Additionally, the Credit Agreement limits our and our
subsidiaries ability to incur additional indebtedness with
certain exceptions, including purchase money indebtedness and
indebtedness related to capital leases not to exceed 10% of our
consolidated net worth (i.e., the excess of our assets over the
sum of our liabilities plus the minority interests), unsecured
indebtedness of less than $300 million, and indebtedness
qualifying as permitted subordinated debt (e.g., certain
existing promissory notes issued as consideration in some of our
previous acquisitions).
The Credit Agreement contains covenants which, among other
things, require us and our subsidiaries, on a consolidated
basis, to maintain specified ratios or conditions as follows
(with such ratios tested at the end of each fiscal quarter):
|
|
|
|
|
consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 3.0
to 1.0; |
|
|
|
total debt to EBITDA (i.e., consolidated net income plus
interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other
non-cash charges) of not more than 4.25 to 1.0 through
September 30, 2006, 4.00 to 1.0 from December 31,
2006 through September 30, 2007, and 3.75 to 1.0
thereafter; and |
|
|
|
total senior secured debt to EBITDA of not more than 3.75
to 1.0 through March 31, 2006, 3.5 to 1.0 from
June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006, 3.25
to 1.0 from December 31, 2006 to September 30,
2007, 3.00 to 1.0 from December 31, 2007 through
September 30, 2008, and 2.50 to 1.0 thereafter. |
Concurrently with the completion of the Combination, we borrowed
approximately $450 million under the Credit Agreement as of
the closing of the Combination to: (i) finance the
Combination (including the
49
payment of the Dividend) and (ii) repay in full
indebtedness outstanding under our previous credit agreements.
Future borrowings under the revolving credit facilities under
the Credit Agreement are available for working capital and
general corporate purposes. The revolving facilities under the
Credit Agreement may be drawn on and repaid without restriction
so long as we are in compliance with the terms of the Credit
Agreement, including certain financial covenants, but the term
credit facility under the Credit Agreement may not be reborrowed
once repaid. We are required to repay the principal of the term
facility in quarterly installments equal to 0.25% of the
original principal amount thereof commencing December 31,
2005. The first required principal payment of $1.1 million
was made as of December 31, 2005.
Under the Credit Agreement, we are permitted to prepay certain
of our borrowings. In addition, the Credit Agreement requires us
to make prepayments in following situations:
|
|
|
|
|
If the outstanding borrowings made under the U.S. revolver
exceed the aggregate U.S. revolver commitments (the amounts
the applicable lenders have agreed to loan to us), or if the
outstanding borrowings made under the Canadian revolver exceed
the aggregate Canadian revolver commitments, then we must prepay
the excess amount(s), as applicable; |
|
|
|
Beginning on March 31, 2007, if our consolidated debt
exceeds our consolidated EBITDA by a ratio of 3.0 to 1.0 during
our fourth quarter, then on March 31 of the following year,
we must prepay the outstanding borrowings made under the
U.S. revolver and term loan. In addition, we must prepay an
amount of our Canadian outstanding borrowings equal to 50% of
our excess cash flow; |
|
|
|
We must make prepayments in the amount by which net condemnation
or insurance proceeds in respect of assets received during any
fiscal year exceed $3 million if these proceeds are not
used to repair or replace (or have not been contractually
committed to repair or replace) these assets within
365 days after the underlying or condemnation casualty
event. However, if an event of default (as defined below) has
occurred and is continuing, we are required to prepay 100% of
the proceeds not used as described in the previous sentence; |
|
|
|
If there are outstanding borrowings under our term loan and we
receive net proceeds for the sale of any debt (other than our
permitted debt) that along with the net proceeds from the
issuance of other debt exceed $5 million during any fiscal
year, then we must prepay 50% of the excess amount; |
|
|
|
|
If we receive net proceeds for the sale or issuance of equity,
subject to certain exceptions, that exceed $50 million
during any fiscal year, then we must prepay 50% of the excess
amount up to a maximum prepayment of $50 million in any
given fiscal year; or |
|
|
|
|
|
If any of our outstanding borrowings under our U.S. revolving
credit facility are denominated in a foreign currency that is
not accepted under the Credit Agreement, then we must prepay (or
convert the applicable advances into U.S. Dollars) these
borrowings. |
|
All of the obligations under the U.S. portion of Credit
Agreement are secured by first priority liens on substantially
all of the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries as well as a
pledge of approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier
foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, all of the obligations under
the U.S. portion of the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by
substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. All of the
obligations under the Canadian portions of the Credit Agreement
are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the
assets of all or certain of our subsidiaries. Additionally, all
of the obligations under the Canadian portions of the Credit
Agreement are guaranteed by us as well as all or certain of our
subsidiaries.
If an event of default exists under the Credit Agreement, the
lenders may accelerate the maturity of the obligations
outstanding under the Credit Agreement and exercise other rights
and remedies. Each of the following is an event of default:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay any principal when due or any interest, fees or
other amount within certain grace periods; |
50
|
|
|
|
|
breach of representations in the Credit Agreement or other loan
documents; |
|
|
|
failure to perform or otherwise comply with the covenants in the
Credit Agreement or other loan documents, subject, in certain
instances, to certain grace periods; |
|
|
|
default by us and any of our subsidiaries on the payment of any
other indebtedness in excess of $10.0 million, any other
event or condition shall occur or exist with respect to such
indebtedness beyond the applicable grace period if the effect of
such event or condition is to permit or cause the acceleration
of the indebtedness, or such indebtedness shall be declared due
and payable prior to its scheduled maturity; |
|
|
|
bankruptcy or insolvency events involving us or our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
the entry of one or more adverse judgments in excess of
$10.0 million (excluding applicable insurance proceeds)
against which enforcement proceedings are brought or that are
not stayed pending appeal; and |
|
|
|
the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the Credit
Agreement). |
At December 31, 2005, we had $504.1 million
outstanding under our term loan and revolving credit facility
and an additional $5.5 million of outstanding letters of
credit, leaving approximately $70.4 million available to be
drawn under the facility. Our weighted average interest rate on
outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2005 was
approximately 7.2%. For the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, our weighted average interest rates on
outstanding bank borrowings were approximately 6.7%, 6.0%
and 6.0%, respectively. At February 28, 2006, we had
$543.4 million outstanding under our term loan and
revolving credit facility and an additional $10.2 million
of outstanding letters of credit, leaving approximately
$26.4 million available to be drawn under the facility.
On January 3, 2006, we acquired substantially all of the
operating assets of Outpost Office Inc. (Outpost), a
Grand Junction, Colorado, oilfield equipment rental company. On
January 25, 2006, we acquired all the equity interests of
The Rosel Company (Rosel), a cased-hole and
open-hole electric-line business based in Liberal, Kansas, with
operations in Kansas and Oklahoma. The Rosel acquisition extends
our presence in the Mid-continent region and enhances our
completion and production services business. The operating
results of Outpost and Rosel will be included in the completion
and production services segment from the respective dates of
their acquisition. The aggregate purchase price for these two
acquisitions was approximately $20.4 million.
We entered into two separate agreements with customers of our
contract drilling operation in north Texas whereby the customers
advanced funds to us and we agreed to provide drilling services
in the future to these customers. We received advance payments
from these customers totaling $7.4 million. In connection
with these customer prepayments, we entered into an agreement
with a third party to construct two drilling rigs on our behalf
to commit to these customers drilling programs. The first
of the two rigs was completed in October 2005 for a total cost
of approximately $4.0 million. The second rig was completed
in January 2006 at a total cost of approximately
$4.0 million. We are accounting for the construction of
these rigs as capital expenditures and are depreciating the rigs
in a manner consistent with depreciation of our other drilling
rigs. The recognition of revenue commenced once the rigs began
drilling for each customer. Revenue is recognized as it is
earned based upon predetermined prices for each day the rig is
employed by the customer and in a manner that is consistent with
revenue recognition in our other contract drilling operations.
The rates charged to the customers are equal to or greater than
prevailing market rates. As revenues are earned, the prepayment
liability is offset by our billings to those customers. The
first rig began drilling operations in October 2005 and the
second rig began drilling operations in January 2006. We earned
and recognized approximately $1 million in revenues through
December 31, 2005 related to such rigs resulting in a
remaining current liability of approximately $6.4 million
as of
51
December 31, 2005. It is expected that the remaining
portion of deferred revenue will be earned and recognized as
revenue by December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
Outstanding Debt and Operating Lease Commitments |
The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations
as of December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007-2008 | |
|
2009-2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term debt, including capital (finance) lease obligations
|
|
$ |
505,892 |
|
|
$ |
5,309 |
|
|
$ |
9,121 |
|
|
$ |
93,512 |
|
|
$ |
397,950 |
|
|
Purchase obligations(1)
|
|
|
42,540 |
|
|
|
42,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
46,777 |
|
|
|
15,380 |
|
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
7,875 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
Other long-term obligations(2)
|
|
|
10,051 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
8,562 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
605,260 |
|
|
$ |
63,843 |
|
|
$ |
31,424 |
|
|
$ |
109,949 |
|
|
$ |
400,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Purchase obligations were pursuant to inventory and equipment
purchase orders outstanding as of December 31, 2005. We
have no significant purchase orders which extend beyond one year. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Other long-term obligations include amounts due under
subordinated note arrangements with maturity dates beginning in
2009 and loans relating to equipment purchases which mature at
various dates through December 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
We have entered into operating lease arrangements for our light
vehicle fleet, certain of our specialized equipment and for our
office and field operating locations in the normal course of
business. The terms of the facility leases range from monthly to
five years. The terms of the light vehicle leases range from
three to four years. The terms of the specialized equipment
leases range from two to six years. Annual payments pursuant to
these leases are included above in the table under
Outstanding Debt and Operating Lease
Commitments.
We have entered into purchase agreements with the former owners
of Double Jack and MGM as described in note 2 of our
audited consolidated financial statements. Pursuant to the
Double Jack purchase agreement, we agreed to pay contingent
consideration of up to $1.2 million based on certain
operating results of Double Jack. As of December 31, 2005,
we had paid $0.5 million of this contingent consideration
to the former stockholders of Double Jack. We expect to pay
$0.3 million of the contingent Double Jack consideration
based on operating results for the year ended December 31,
2005 and have accrued a liability for such amount as of
December 31, 2005. In addition, we may have to pay up to
$0.3 million of the contingent Double Jack consideration
based on operating results for the twelve months ending
March 31, 2006 for which no accrual has been made. In
addition, we have committed to issue 22,826 shares of our
restricted stock and pay approximately $0.1 million to
certain former employees of Double Jack who are now our
employees.
Pursuant to the MGM purchase agreement, we agreed to pay
contingent consideration of up to $3.8 million and
214,132 shares of our common stock based on certain
operating results of MGM. Based on operating results for the
year ended December 31, 2005, we expect to pay
approximately $2.9 million out of the potential
$3.8 million contingent payment, and we have accrued a
liability of approximately $2.9 million as of
December 31, 2005. In addition, we expect to issue
approximately 187,000 shares out of the maximum possible
214,132 shares. When these shares are issued, we will
recognize additional goodwill associated with this acquisition
in an amount equal to the then fair value of the shares issued
and our stockholders equity will also increase by the same
amount. We have also agreed to pay contingent consideration of
up to $0.5 million based on operating results of MGM for
the year ending December 31, 2006.
On February 11, 2005, we entered into an agreement and plan
of merger with Parchman, pursuant to which we purchased
Parchman. This agreement and plan of merger contains provisions
for the issuance of
52
up to an additional 1,000,000 shares of our common stock on
a contingent basis. In connection with the Combination, we have
agreed to pay cash consideration of up to $2.6 million to
the owners of these shares. We expect that we will issue all
1,000,000 shares in the first quarter of 2006 and pay the
full $2.6 million to these owners and have recorded a
liability of $2.6 million as of December 31, 2005.
When these shares are issued, we will recognize additional
goodwill associated with this acquisition in an amount equal to
the then fair value of the shares issued and our
stockholders equity will also increase by the same amount.
See note 20(b) of the accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements.
Other than the normal operating leases described above and the
contingent consideration that may be issued pursuant to purchase
agreements, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing
arrangements.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The demand, pricing and terms for oil and gas services provided
by us are largely dependent upon the level of activity for the
U.S. and Canadian gas industry. Industry conditions are
influenced by numerous factors over which we have no control,
including, but not limited to: the supply of and demand for oil
and gas; the level of prices, and expectations about future
prices, of oil and gas; the cost of exploring for, developing,
producing and delivering oil and gas; the expected rates of
declining current production; the discovery rates of new oil and
gas reserves; available pipeline and other transportation
capacity; weather conditions; domestic and worldwide economic
conditions; political instability in oil-producing countries;
technical advances affecting energy consumption; the price and
availability of alternative fuels; the ability of oil and gas
producers to raise equity capital and debt financing; and merger
and divestiture activity among oil and gas producers.
The level of activity in the U.S. and Canadian oil and gas
exploration and production industry is volatile. Expected trends
in oil and gas production activities may not continue and demand
for our services may not reflect the level of activity in the
industry. Any prolonged substantial reduction in oil and gas
prices would likely affect oil and gas production levels and
therefore affect demand for our services. A material decline in
oil and gas prices or U.S. and Canadian activity levels could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Recently,
demand for our services has been strong and we are currently
electing to continue our past practice of committing our
equipment on a short-term or
day-to-day basis rather
than entering into longer-term contracts.
As of December 31, 2005, approximately 14% of our revenues
and 12% of our long-term assets were denominated in Canadian
dollars, our functional currency in Canada. As a result, a
material decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative
to the U.S. dollar may negatively impact our revenues, cash
flows and net income. Each one percentage point change in the
value of the Canadian dollar impacts our revenues by
approximately $1.0 million per year. We do not currently
use hedges or forward contracts to offset this risk.
Our Mexican operation uses the U.S. dollar as its
functional currency and, as a result, all transactions and
translation gains and losses are recorded currently in the
financial statements. The balance sheet amounts are translated
into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at the end of the
month and the income statement amounts are translated at the
average exchange rate for the month. We estimate that a
hypothetical one percentage point change in the value of the
Mexican peso relative to the U.S. dollar would impact our
revenues by approximately $0.2 million. Currently, we
conduct a portion of our business in Mexico in the local
currency, the Mexican peso. The effects of currency fluctuations
on our Mexican operations are partly mitigated because the
majority of our local expenses are also denominated in the
Mexican peso.
All of our bank debt is structured under floating rate terms
and, as such, our interest expense is sensitive to fluctuations
in the prime rates in the U.S. and Canada. Based on the debt
structure in place as of December 31, 2005, a 1% increase
in interest rates would increase interest expense by
approximately $5.0 million per year and reduce operating
cash flows by approximately $3.1 million.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. SFAS No. 151 amends the
guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43,
Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the
53
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage), and
generally requires that these amounts be expensed in the period
that the cost arises, rather than being included in the cost of
inventory, thereby requiring that the allocation of fixed
production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on
normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151
becomes effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005, but earlier
application is permitted. We adopted SFAS No. 151 as of
January 1, 2006, with no material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets.
SFAS No. 153 amends current guidance related to the
exchange of nonmonetary assets as per APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, to
eliminate an exception that allowed exchange of similar
nonmonetary assets without determination of the fair value of
those assets, and replaced this provision with a general
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial
substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to
change significantly as a result of the exchange.
SFAS No. 153 becomes effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. We adopted SFAS No. 153 as of
January 1, 2006, with no material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, which revises
SFAS No. 123 and supercedes APB No. 25.
SFAS No. 123R will require us to measure the cost of
employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award,
with limited exceptions. The fair value of the award will be
remeasured at each reporting date through the settlement date,
with changes in fair value recognized as compensation expense of
the period. Entities should continue to use an option-pricing
model, adjusted for the unique characteristics of those
instruments, to determine fair value as of the grant date of the
stock options. SFAS No. 123R became effective for
public companies as of the beginning of the fiscal year after
June 15, 2005. We adopted SFAS No. 123R on
January 1, 2006. As permitted by SFAS No. 123R,
we will continue to account for stock-based compensation grants
issued prior to September 30, 2005, the date of our initial
public filing with the SEC, pursuant to the minimum value method
prescribed by APB No. 25 and will provide the required pro
forma disclosures. For grants issued between October 1,
2005 and December 31, 2005 (prior to adoption of
SFAS No. 123R), we will utilize the modified
prospective transition method to record expense associated with
these stock-based instruments and to provide the required pro
forma disclosures. For grants awarded on or after
January 1, 2006, we will utilize the prospective transition
method, whereby we will recognize expense associated with new
awards of stock-based compensation, as determined using a
Black-Scholes pricing model over the expected term of the
options. See note 12(e) of the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the
expected impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R on our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a Replacement of
APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.
SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application of
changes in accounting principle to prior periods financial
statements, rather than the use of the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle, unless impracticable. If
impracticable to determine the impact on prior periods, then the
new accounting principle should be applied to the balances of
assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest
period for which retrospective application is practicable, with
a corresponding adjustment to equity, unless impracticable for
all periods presented, in which case prospective treatment
should be applied. SFAS No. 154 applies to all
voluntary changes in accounting principle, as well as those
required by the issuance of new accounting pronouncements if no
specific transition guidance is provided. SFAS No. 154
does not change the previously-issued guidance for reporting a
change in accounting estimate or correction of an error.
SFAS No. 154 became effective for accounting changes
and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. We adopted SFAS No. 154 on
January 1, 2006, and will apply its provisions, as
applicable, to future reporting periods.
54
BUSINESS
Our Company
We provide specialized services and products focused on helping
oil and gas companies develop hydrocarbon reserves, reduce costs
and enhance production. We focus on basins within North America
that we believe have attractive long-term potential for growth,
and we deliver targeted, value-added services and products
required by our customers within each specific basin. We believe
our range of services and products positions us to meet many
needs of our customers at the wellsite, from drilling and
completion through production and eventual abandonment. The
following figure illustrates some of our services used during
the lifecycle of a well.
We seek to differentiate ourselves from our competitors through
our local leadership, our basin-level expertise and the
innovative application of proprietary and other technologies. We
deliver solutions to our customers that we believe lower their
costs and increase their production in a safe and
environmentally friendly manner.
We manage our operations from regional field service facilities
located throughout the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas,
Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas and Kansas, western Canada and
Mexico.
Our business is comprised of three segments:
Completion and Production Services. Through our
completion and production services segment, we establish,
maintain and enhance the flow of oil and gas throughout the life
of a well. This segment is divided into the following primary
service lines:
|
|
|
|
|
Intervention Services. Well intervention requires the use
of specialized equipment to perform an array of wellbore
services. Our fleet of intervention service equipment includes
coiled tubing units, pressure pumping units, nitrogen units,
well service rigs, snubbing units and a variety of support
equipment. Our intervention services provide customers with
innovative solutions to increase production of oil and gas. For
example, in the Barnett Shale region of north Texas we operate
advanced coiled tubing units that have electric-line conductors
within the units coiled tubing string. These specially
configured units can deploy perforating guns, logging tools and
plugs, without a separate electric-line unit in high inclination
and horizontal wells that are prevalent throughout
that basin. |
|
|
|
Downhole and Wellsite Services. Our downhole and wellsite
services include electric-line, slickline, production
optimization, production testing, rental and fishing services.
We also offer several proprietary services and products that we
believe create significant value for our customers. Examples of
these proprietary services and products include: (1) our
Green Flowback system, which permits the flow of gas to our
customers while performing drill-outs and flowback operations,
increasing production, accelerating time to production and
eliminating the need to flare gas, and (2) our patented
plunger lift system that, when combined with our diagnostic and
installation |
55
|
|
|
|
|
services, removes fluids from gas wells resulting in increased
production and the extension of the life of the well. |
|
|
|
Fluid Handling. We provide a variety of services to help
our customers obtain, move, store and dispose of fluids that are
involved in the development and production of their reservoirs.
Through our fleet of specialized trucks, frac tanks and other
assets, we provide fluid transportation, heating, pumping and
disposal services for our customers. |
Drilling Services. Through our drilling services segment,
we provide services and equipment that initiate or stimulate oil
and gas production by providing land drilling, specialized rig
logistics and site preparation. Through this segment, we also
provide pressure control, drill string, pipe handling and other
equipment. Our drilling rigs currently operate exclusively in
the Barnett Shale region of north Texas.
Product Sales. Through our product sales segment, we
provide a variety of equipment used by oil and gas companies
throughout the lifecycle of their wells. Our current product
offering includes completion, flow control and artificial lift
equipment as well as tubular goods. We sell products throughout
North America primarily through our supply stores and through
distributors on a wholesale basis. We also sell products through
agents in markets outside of North America.
Our Industry
Our business depends on the level of exploration, development
and production expenditures made by our customers. These
expenditures are driven by the current and expected future
prices for oil and gas, and the perceived stability and
sustainability of those prices. Our business is primarily driven
by natural gas drilling activity in North America. We believe
the following two principal economic factors will positively
affect our industry in the coming years:
|
|
|
|
|
Higher demand for natural gas in North America. We
believe that natural gas will be in high demand in North America
over the next several years because of the growing popularity of
this clean-burning fuel. According to the International Energy
Associations 2004 World Energy Outlook, natural gas demand
in North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) is projected
to grow by approximately 45% from 2002 to 2030. |
|
|
|
Constrained North American gas supply. Although the
demand for natural gas is projected to increase, supply is
likely to be constrained as North American natural gas basins
are becoming more mature and experiencing increased decline
rates. Even though the number of wells drilled in North America
has increased significantly in recent years, a corresponding
increase in domestic production has not occurred. As a result,
producers are required to increase drilling just to maintain
flat production. To supply the growing demand for natural gas,
the primary alternatives are to increase drilling, enhance
recovery rates or import LNG from overseas. To date minimal
increases have occurred, although many forecasts anticipate a
material increase of LNG imports. |
As a result of the above factors, we expect that there will
continue to be a tight supply of, and high demand for, natural
gas in North America. We believe this will continue to support
high natural gas prices and high levels of drilling activity.
56
As illustrated in the table below, 2005 marked the third
consecutive year of gas price increases and the fourth
consecutive year of oil price increases, with a 2005 average
daily closing Henry Hub spot price for natural gas of $8.89 per
mcf and a 2005 average daily closing WTI Cushing spot oil price
of $56.59 per bbl. Until recently, these prices have generally
been at historically high levels. Gas prices have recently
declined substantially. The Henry Hub natural gas spot price on
March 1, 2006 was $6.62 per mcf. Oil prices have also
declined. The WTI Cushing crude oil spot price on March 1,
2006 was $61.97. The number of drilling rigs under contract in
the United States and Canada has increased from 1,181 as of
January 3, 2003 to 2,222 as of March 10, 2006,
according to BHI. The number of well service rigs has increased
from 1,478 at the end of January 2003 to 2,356 at the end
of February 2006. The table below sets forth average daily
closing prices for the WTI Cushing spot oil price and the
average daily closing prices for the Henry Hub price for natural
gas since 1999:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily Closing |
|
Average Daily Closing |
|
|
Henry Hub Spot Natural |
|
WTI Cushing Spot Oil |
Period |
|
Gas Prices ($/mcf) |
|
Price ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/99 - 12/31/99
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
19.30 |
|
1/1/00 - 12/31/00
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
30.37 |
|
1/1/01 - 12/31/01
|
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
25.96 |
|
1/1/02 - 12/31/02
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
26.17 |
|
1/1/03 - 12/31/03
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
31.06 |
|
1/1/04 - 12/31/04
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
41.51 |
|
1/1/05 - 12/31/05
|
|
|
8.89 |
|
|
|
56.59 |
|
1/1/06 - 3/1/06
|
|
|
8.08 |
|
|
|
63.56 |
|
Source: Bloomberg NYMEX prices.
Higher demand for natural gas and a constrained gas supply have
resulted in higher prices and increased drilling activity. The
increase in prices and drilling activity are driving three
additional trends that we believe will benefit us:
|
|
|
Trend toward drilling and developing unconventional North
American natural gas resources. Due to the maturity of
conventional North American oil and gas reservoirs and their
accelerating production decline rates, unconventional oil and
gas resources will comprise an increasing proportion of future
North American oil and gas production. Unconventional resources
include tight sands, shales and coalbed methane. These resources
require more wells to be drilled and maintained, frequently on
tighter acreage spacing. The appropriate technology to recover
unconventional gas resources varies from region to region;
therefore, knowledge of local conditions and operating
procedures, and selection of the right technologies is key to
providing customers with appropriate solutions. |
|
|
The advent of the resource play. A resource
play is a term used to describe an accumulation of
hydrocarbons known to exist over a large area which, when
compared to a conventional play, has lower commercial
development risks and a lower average decline rate. Once
identified, resource plays have the potential to make a material
impact because of their size and low decline rates. The
application of appropriate technology and program execution are
important to obtain value from resource plays. Resource play
developments occur over long periods of time, well by well, in
large-scale developments that repeat common tasks in an
assembly-line fashion and capture economies of scale to drive
down costs. |
|
|
Increasingly complex technologies. Increasing prices and
the development of unconventional oil and gas resources are
driving the need for complex, new technologies to help increase
recovery rates, lower production costs and accelerate field
development. We believe that the increasing complexity of
technology used in the oil and gas development process coupled
with limited engineering resources will require production
companies to increase their reliance on service companies to
assist them in developing and applying these technologies. |
57
Our Business Strategy
Our goal is to build the leading oilfield services company
focused on the completion and production phases in the life of
an oil and gas well. We intend to capitalize on the emerging
trends in the North American marketplace through the execution
of a growth strategy that consists of the following components:
Expand and capitalize on local leadership and basin-level
expertise. A key component of our strategy is to build upon
our base of strong local leadership and basin-level expertise.
We have a significant presence in most of the key onshore
continental U.S. and Canadian gas plays we believe have the
potential for long-term growth. Our position in these basins
capitalizes on our strong local leadership that has accumulated
a valuable knowledge base and strong customer relationships. We
intend to leverage our existing market presence, expertise and
customer relationships to expand our business within these gas
plays. We also intend to replicate this approach in new regions
by building and acquiring new businesses that have strong
regional management with extensive local knowledge.
Develop and deploy technical and operational solutions.
We are focused on developing and deploying technical services,
equipment and expertise that lower our customers costs.
Capitalize on organic and acquisition-related growth
opportunities. We believe there are numerous opportunities
to sell new services and products to customers in our current
geographic areas and to sell our current services and products
to customers in new geographic areas. We have a proven track
record of organic growth and successful acquisitions, and we
intend to continue using capital investments and acquisitions to
strategically expand our business. We employ a rigorous
acquisition screening process and have developed comprehensive
post-acquisition integration capabilities designed to ensure
each acquisition is effectively assimilated. We use a returns
method for evaluating capital investment opportunities, and we
apply a disciplined approach to adding new equipment.
Focus on execution and performance. We have established
and intend to develop further a culture of performance and
accountability. Senior management spends a significant portion
of its time ensuring that our customers receive the highest
quality of service by focusing on the following:
|
|
|
|
|
clear business direction; |
|
|
|
thorough planning process; |
|
|
|
clearly defined targets and accountabilities; |
|
|
|
close performance monitoring; |
|
|
|
strong performance incentives for management and
employees; and |
|
|
|
effective communication. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our strategy
and capitalize on opportunities in the North American oil and
gas market based on the following competitive strengths:
Strong local leadership and basin-level expertise. We
operate our business with a focus on each regional basin
complemented by our local reputations. We believe our local and
regional businesses, some of which have been operating for more
than 50 years, provide us with a significant advantage over
many of our competitors. Our managers, sales engineers and field
operators have extensive expertise in their local geological
basins and understand the regional challenges our customers
face. We have long-term relationships with many customers, and
most of the services and products we offer are sold or
contracted at a local level, allowing our operations personnel
to bring their expertise to bear while selling services and
products to our customers. We strive to leverage this
basin-level expertise to establish ourselves as the preferred
provider of our services in the basins in which we operate.
58
Significant presence in major North American basins. We
operate in major oil and gas producing regions of the
U.S. Rocky Mountains, Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma,
western Canada and Mexico, with concentrations in key
resource play and unconventional basins. Resource
plays are expected to become increasingly important in future
North American oil and gas production as more conventional
resources enter later stages of the exploration cycle. We
believe we have an excellent position in highly active markets
such as the Barnett Shale region of north Texas. Each of these
markets is among the most active areas for exploration and
development of onshore oil and gas. Accelerating production and
driving down development and production costs are key goals for
oil and gas operators in these areas, resulting in strong demand
for our services and products. In addition, our strong presence
in these regions allows us to build solid customer relationships
and take advantage of cross-selling opportunities.
Focus on complementary production and field development
services. Our breadth of service and product offerings well
positions us relative to our competitors. Our services encompass
the entire lifecycle of a well from drilling and completion,
through production and eventual abandonment. We deliver
complementary services and products, which we may provide in
tandem or sequentially over the life of the well. This suite of
services and products gives us the opportunity to cross-sell to
our customer base and throughout our geographic regions.
Leveraging our strong local leadership and basin-level
expertise, we are able to offer expanded services and products
to existing customers or current services and products to new
customers.
Innovative approach to technical and operational
solutions. We develop and deploy services and products that
enable our customers to increase production rates, stem
production declines and reduce the costs of drilling, completion
and production. The significant expertise we have developed in
our areas of operation offers our customers customized
operational solutions to meet their particular needs. For
example, our Canadian operation provides highly skilled
personnel and a combination of heliportable and specialized
equipment that includes wireline (electric-line and slickline)
and production testing services that can work together and be
deployed quickly and efficiently in the harsh environment of the
Northwest Territories of Canada. Our ability to develop these
technical and operational solutions is possible due to our
understanding of applicable technology, our basin-level
expertise and our close local relationships with customers.
Modern and active asset base. We have a modern and
well-maintained fleet of coiled tubing units, pressure pumping
equipment, wireline units, well service rigs, snubbing units,
fluid transports, frac tanks and other specialized equipment. We
believe our ongoing investment in our equipment allows us to
better serve the diverse and increasingly challenging needs of
our customer base. New equipment is generally less costly to
maintain and operate on an annual basis and is more efficient
for our customers. Modern equipment reduces the downtime and
associated expenditures and enables the increased utilization of
our assets. Our fleet is active with high utilization. We
believe our future expenditures will be used to capitalize on
growth opportunities within the areas we currently operate and
to build out new platforms obtained through targeted
acquisitions.
Experienced management team with proven track record.
Each member of our operating management team has over
20 years of experience in the oilfield services industry.
We believe that their considerable knowledge of and experience
in our industry enhances our ability to operate effectively
throughout industry cycles. Our management also has substantial
experience in identifying, completing and integrating
acquisitions. In addition, our management supports local
leadership by developing corporate strategy, implementing
corporate governance procedures and overseeing a company-wide
safety program.
The Combination
Prior to 2001, SCF Partners, a private equity firm that focuses
on investments in the oilfield services segment of the energy
industry, began to target investment opportunities in service
oriented companies in the North American natural gas market with
specific focus on the production phase of the exploration and
production cycle. On May 22, 2001, SCF Partners through SCF
formed Saber, a new company, in connection with its acquisition
of two companies primarily focused on completion and production
related
59
services in Louisiana. In July 2002, SCF became the controlling
stockholder of Integrated Production Services, Ltd., a
production enhancement company that, at the time, focused its
operation in Canada. In September 2002, Saber acquired this
company and changed its name to Integrated Production Services,
Inc. Subsequently, IPS began to grow organically and through
several acquisitions, with the ultimate objective of creating a
technical leader in the enhancement of natural gas production.
In November 2003, SCF formed another production services
company, CES, establishing a platform from which to grow in the
Barnett Shale region of north Texas. Subsequently, through
organic growth and several acquisitions, CES extended its
presence to the U.S. Rocky Mountain and the Mid-continent
regions. In the summer of 2004, SCF formed IEM, which at the
time had a presence in Louisiana and Texas. During 2004, IPS and
IEM independently began to execute strategic initiatives to
establish a presence in both the Barnett Shale and
U.S. Rocky Mountain regions.
On September 12, 2005, IPS, CES and IEM were combined and
became Complete Production Services, Inc. in a transaction we
refer to as the Combination. In the Combination, IPS
served as the acquirer. Immediately after the Combination, SCF
held approximately 70% of our outstanding common stock, the
former CES stockholders (other than SCF) in the aggregate held
approximately 18.8% of our outstanding common stock, the former
IEM stockholders (other than SCF) in the aggregate held
approximately 2.4% of our outstanding common stock and the
former IPS stockholders (other than SCF) in the aggregate held
approximately 8.4% of our outstanding common stock.
We believe that operational and financial benefits realized
through the Combination enhance the growth potential and
establish the foundation for long-term growth for the combined
company.
Overview of Our Segments
We manage our business through three primary segments:
completion and production services, drilling services and
product sales. Within each of these segments, we perform
services and deliver products, as detailed in the table below.
However, significant regional growth opportunities remain. We
constantly monitor the North American market for
opportunities to expand our business by building our presence in
existing regions and expanding our services and products into
attractive, new regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Coast/ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central & | |
|
Eastern | |
|
DJ | |
|
Western | |
|
|
|
North | |
|
Canadian | |
|
|
|
|
South | |
|
South | |
|
East | |
|
North | |
|
Western | |
|
Oklahoma & | |
|
Basin | |
|
Slope | |
|
|
|
Rockies | |
|
Sedimentary | |
Product/Service Offering |
|
Mexico | |
|
Louisiana | |
|
Texas | |
|
Texas | |
|
Texas | |
|
Oklahoma | |
|
Arkansas | |
|
(CO) | |
|
(CO & UT) | |
|
Wyoming | |
|
(MT & ND) | |
|
Basin | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Completion and Production Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coiled Tubing
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snubbing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric-line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
Slickline
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
Production Optimization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
Production Testing
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
Rental Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure Testing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluid Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply Stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Enhancement Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
denotes a service or product currently offered by us in this
area. |
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services (67% of Revenue for the
Year Ended December 31, 2005) |
Through our completion and production services segment, we
establish, maintain and enhance the flow of oil and gas
throughout the life of a well. This segment is divided into
intervention services, downhole and wellsite services and fluid
handling.
60
We use our intervention assets, which include coiled tubing
units, pressure pumping equipment, nitrogen units, well service
rigs and snubbing units to perform three major types of services
for our customers:
|
|
|
|
|
Completion Services. As newly drilled oil and gas wells
are prepared for production, our operations may include
selectively perforating the well casing to access producing
zones, stimulating and testing these zones and installing
downhole equipment. We provide intervention services and
products to assist in the performance of these services. The
completion process typically lasts from a few days to several
weeks, depending on the nature and type of the completion. Oil
and gas producers use our intervention services to complete
their wells because we have well trained employees, the
experience necessary to perform such services and a strong
record for safety and reliability. |
|
|
|
Workover Services. Producing oil and gas wells
occasionally require major repairs or modifications, called
workovers. These services include extensions of
existing wells to drain new formations either through deepening
wellbores to new zones or by drilling horizontal lateral
wellbores to improve reservoir drainage patterns. In less
extensive workovers, we provide services and products to seal
off depleted zones in existing wellbores and access previously
bypassed productive zones. Other workover services which we
provide include: major subsurface repairs, such as casing repair
or replacement; recovery of tubing and removal of foreign
objects in the wellbore; repairing downhole equipment failures;
plugging back the bottom of a well to reduce the amount of water
being produced; cleaning out and recompleting a well if
production has declined; and repairing leaks in the tubing and
casing. |
|
|
|
Maintenance Services. Maintenance services are required
throughout the life of most producing oil and gas wells to
ensure efficient and continuous operation. We provide services
that include mechanical repairs necessary to maintain production
from the well, such as repairing inoperable pumping equipment or
replacing defective tubing, and removing debris from the well.
Other services include pulling rods, tubing, pumps and other
downhole equipment out of the wellbore to identify and repair a
production problem. |
The key intervention assets we use to perform the above services
are as follows:
|
|
|
Coiled Tubing and Pressure Pumping Units |
We are one of the leading providers of coiled tubing services in
North America. As of February 15, 2006, we operated a
fleet of 32 coiled tubing units and 31 pressure
pumping units, as well as 18 nitrogen units. We use these
assets to perform a variety of wellbore applications, including
foam washing, acidizing, displacing, cementing, gravel packing,
plug drilling, fishing and jetting. Coiled tubing is a key
segment of the well service industry today, which allows
operators to continue production during service operations
without shutting down the well, reducing the risk of formation
damage. The growth in deep well and horizontal drilling has
increased the market for coiled tubing. We have developed
innovative equipment configurations to capitalize on emerging
market opportunities. For example, in the Barnett Shale region
of north Texas, we have introduced advanced coiled tubing units
that have electric-line conductors within the units coiled
tubing string. These specially configured units provide
electric-line and coiled tubing controls in one fully integrated
package, and allow us to deploy perforating guns, logging tools
and plugs in high inclination wells for our customers. We
provide coiled tubing and pressure pumping services primarily in
Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Mexico and
offshore in the Gulf of Mexico.
As of February 15, 2006, we owned and operated a fleet of
112 well service rigs, including 63 units that are
either recently constructed or have been rebuilt over the past
five years. We believe we have a leading market position in the
Barnett Shale region of north Texas and in some of the most
active regions
61
of the U.S. Rocky Mountains. As of February 15, 2006,
we also operated 33 swabbing units, 11 of which are highly
customized hydraulic units which we use to diagnose and
remediate gas well production problems. We provide well service
rig operations in Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Montana,
North Dakota, Oklahoma and Texas. These rigs are used to
perform a variety of completion, workover and maintenance
services, such as installations, completions, assisting with
perforating, removing defective equipment and sidetracking wells.
As of February 15, 2006, we operated a fleet of
10 snubbing units, four of which are rig assist units.
Snubbing services use specialized hydraulic well service units
that permit an operator to repair damaged casing, production
tubing and downhole production equipment in high-pressure,
live-well environments. A snubbing unit makes it
possible to remove and replace downhole equipment while
maintaining pressure in the well. Applications for snubbing
units include live-well completions and workovers,
underground blowout control, underbalanced completions,
underbalanced drilling and the snubbing of tubing, casing or
drillpipe into or out of the wellbore. Our snubbing units
operate primarily in Texas, Oklahoma, and Wyoming.
|
|
|
Downhole and Wellsite Services |
We provide an array of complementary downhole and wellsite
services that we classify into four groups: wireline services;
production optimization services; production testing services;
and rental, fishing and pressure testing services.
Wireline Services. As of February 15, 2006, we owned
and operated a fleet of 89 wireline units in North America and
provided both electric-line and slickline services. Truck and
skid mounted wireline services are used to evaluate downhole
well conditions, to initiate production from a formation by
perforating a wells casing, and to provide mechanical
services such as setting equipment in the well, or fishing lost
equipment out of a well. We provide wireline services in the
western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas,
Louisiana and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Of our fleet of
89 wireline units, we have 53 electric-line units,
nine of which are offshore skids, and 36 slickline
units.
With our fleet of wireline equipment we provide the following
services:
|
|
|
|
|
Perforating Services. Perforating involves positioning a
perforating gun that contains explosive jet charges down the
wellbore next to a productive zone. A detonator is fired and
primer cord is ignited, which then detonates the jet charges.
The resulting explosion burns a hole through the wellbore casing
and cement and into the formation, thus allowing the formation
fluid to flow into the wellbore and be produced to the surface.
The perforating gun may be deployed in a number of ways. The gun
can be conveyed by a conventional wireline cable if the wellbore
geometry allows, it may be conveyed on coiled tubing, it may be
conveyed on conventional tubing or the gun may be
pumped-down to the correct depth in the wellbore. |
|
|
|
|
Logging Services. Logging requires the use of a single or
multi-conductor, braided steel cable (electric-line), mounted on
a hydraulically operated drum, and a specialized logging truck.
Electronic instruments are attached to the end of the cable and
lowered to the bottom of the well and the line is slowly pulled
out of the well transmitting wellbore data up the cable to the
surface where the information is processed by a surface computer
system and displayed on a paper graph in a logging format. This
information is used by customers to analyze different downhole
formation structures, to detect the presence of oil, gas and
water and to check the integrity of the casing or the cement
behind the pipe. Logs are also run to detect gas or fluid
migration between zones or to the surface. |
|
|
|
|
Slickline Services. Slickline services are used primarily
for well maintenance. The line used for this application is
generally a small single steel line. Typical applications of
this service would include bottom hole pressure surveys, running
temperature gradients, setting tubing plugs, opening |
62
|
|
|
|
|
and closing sliding sleeves, fishing operations, plunger lift
installations, gas lift installations and other maintenance
services that the well would require during its lifecycle. |
Production Optimization Services. Our production
optimization services provide customers with technical solutions
to stem declining production that result from liquid loading,
reduced bottom-hole pressures or improper wellsite designs. We
assist in identifying candidates, designing solutions, executing
on-site and following
up to ensure continued performance. We have developed
proprietary technologies that allow us to enhance recovery for
our customers and provide on-going service. Specific services we
provide include:
|
|
|
|
|
Plunger Lift Services and Products. We provide plunger
lift candidate selection, installation and maintenance services
which may incorporate the use of our patented Pacemaker Plunger
Lift System. Plunger lift systems facilitate the removal of
fluids that restrict the production of natural gas wells.
Removing fluids that accumulate in wells increases production
and in many cases slows decline rates. The proprietary design of
our Pacemaker Plunger Lift System incorporates a large bypass
area which allows it to make more trips per day and remove more
wellbore fluids, versus other plunger lift designs, in wells
with certain characteristics. |
|
|
|
Acoustic Pressure Surveys. We provide acoustic pressure
surveys which are an analytical technique that assists our
customers in determining static reservoir pressure and the
existence of near wellbore formation damage. |
|
|
|
Dynamometer Analysis. Our dynamometer analysis services
include the analysis of reciprocating rod pumping systems
(pumpjacks) to determine pump performance and provide our
customers with critical information for well performance used to
optimize the production and recovery of oil and gas. |
|
|
|
Fluid Level Analysis. We provide fluid level
analysis services which record an acoustic pulse as it travels
down the wellbore in order to determine the fluid depth. |
We offer production optimization services to customers across
the United States and in Canada. We provide production
optimization services in Canada through our 50% joint venture
with Premier Production Services Ltd.
Production Testing Services. Production testing is a
service required by exploration and production companies to
evaluate and clean out new and existing wells. We use a
proprietary technology and service approach and are a leading
independent provider in North America. We provide production
testing services throughout the western Canadian Sedimentary
Basin and also provide production testing services in Wyoming,
Utah, Colorado, Texas and Mexico. As of February 15, 2006,
we operated a total of 78 production testing units.
Production testing has the following primary applications:
|
|
|
|
|
Well clean-ups or flowbacks are done shortly after
completing or stimulating a well and are designed to remove
damaging drilling fluids, completion fluids, sand and other
debris. This
clean-up
prevents damage to the permanent production facilities and
flowlines, thereby improving production. Our
clean-up offering
includes our Green Flowback services, which permit the flow of
gas to our customers while performing drill- outs and flowback
operations, increasing production, accelerating time to
production and eliminating the need to flare gas; |
|
|
|
Exploration well testing measures how a reservoir
performs under various flow conditions. These measurements allow
reservoir and production engineers, and geologists to understand
a wells or reservoirs production capability.
Exploration testing jobs can last from a few days to several
months; and |
|
|
|
In-line production testing measures a wells flow
rates, oil, gas and water composition, pressure and temperature.
These measurements are used by engineers to identify and solve
well and reservoir |
63
|
|
|
|
|
problems. In-line production testing is performed after a well
has been completed and is already producing. In-line tests can
run from several hours to more than several months. |
Rental Equipment, Fishing and Pressure Testing Services.
Oil and gas producers and drilling contractors often find it
uneconomical to maintain complete inventories of tools,
drillpipe, pressure testing equipment and other specialized
equipment and to retain the qualified personnel to operate this
equipment. We provide the following services and products:
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Equipment and Services. We rent specialized tools,
equipment and tubular goods for the drilling, completion and
workover of oil and gas wells. Items rented include pressure
control equipment, drill string equipment, pipe handling
equipment, fishing and downhole tools, and other equipment,
including stabilizers, power swivels and bottom-hole assemblies. |
|
|
|
Fishing Services. We provide highly skilled downhole
services, including fishing, milling and cutting services, which
consist of removing or otherwise eliminating fish or
junk (a piece of equipment, a tool, a part of the
drill string or debris) in a well that is causing an
obstruction. We also install whipstocks to sidetrack wells,
provide plugging and abandonment services, pipe recovery and
wireline recovery services, foam services and casing patch
installation. |
|
|
|
|
Pressure Testing Services. We provide specialized
pressure testing services which involve the use of truck mounted
equipment designed to carry small fluid volumes with high
pressure pumps and hydraulic torque equipment. This equipment is
primarily used to perform pressure tests on flow line, pressure
vessels, lubricators, well heads, casings and tubing strings.
The units are also used to assemble and disassemble BOPs for the
drilling and work over sector. We have developed specialized,
multi-service pressure testing units that enable one or two
employees to complete multiple services simultaneously. As of
February 15, 2006, we had 35 multi-service pressure testing
units that we operated in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming. |
|
Oil and gas operations use and produce significant quantities of
fluids. We provide a variety of services to assist our customers
to obtain, move, store and dispose of fluids that are involved
in the development and production of their reservoirs. We
provide fluid handling services in Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado,
Wyoming, North Dakota and Montana.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluid Transportation. As of February 15, 2006, we
operated over 600 specialized transport trucks to deliver,
transport and dispose of fluids safely and efficiently. We
transport fresh water, completion fluids, produced water,
drilling mud and other fluids to and from our customers
wellsites. Our assets include U.S. Department of
Transportation certified equipment for transportation of
hazardous waste. |
|
|
|
|
|
Frac Tank Rental. As of February 15, 2006, we
operated a fleet of over 2,058 frac tanks, of which
227 were rented, that are often used during hydraulic
fracturing operations. We use our fleet of fluid transport
assets to fill and empty these tanks and we deliver and remove
these tanks from the wellsite with our fleet of winch trucks. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fluid Disposal. As of February 15, 2006, we owned 24
salt water disposal wells in Oklahoma and Texas and one produced
water evaporation facility in Wyoming. These facilities are used
to dispose of water from fracturing operations and from fluids
produced during the routine production of oil and gas. In
addition, we also operated two mud disposal facilities that are
used to store and ultimately dispose of drilling mud. |
|
|
|
|
Other Services. We own and operate a fleet of hot oilers
and superheaters, which are assets capable of heating high
volumes of fluids. We also sell fluids used during well
completions, such as fresh water and potassium chloride, and
drilling mud, which we move to our customers wellsites
using our fluid transportation services. |
64
|
|
|
Drilling Services (17% of Revenue for the Year Ended
December 31, 2005) |
Through our drilling services segment, we deliver services that
initiate or stimulate oil and gas production by providing land
drilling, specialized rig logistics and site preparation.
Through this segment, we also provide pressure control, drill
string, pipe handling and downhole tools and equipment. Our
drilling rigs currently operate exclusively in the Barnett Shale
region of north Texas.
We provide contract drilling services to major oil companies and
independent oil and gas producers in north Texas. Contract
drilling services are primarily provided under standard day
rate, and, to a lesser extent, footage or turnkey contracts.
Drilling rigs vary in size and capability and may include
specialized equipment. As of February 15, 2006, the
majority of our drilling rig fleet of 14 drilling rigs was
equipped with mechanical power systems and had depth ratings
ranging from approximately 8,000 to 15,000 feet. We also
had three land drilling rigs under construction as of
February 15, 2006 which we expect to be operational by the
end of 2006.
We provide a variety of drilling logistic services as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Rig Moving. Through our owned and operated fleet
of over 200 specialized trucks as of February 15, 2006, we
provide drilling rig mobilization services primarily in
Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Wyoming. Our
capabilities allow us to move the largest rigs in the United
States. Our operations are strategically located in regions
where approximately 50% of the land drilling rigs in the United
States are located. We believe we have a leading market position
in the Gulf Coast region of Texas and Louisiana. We believe our
highly skilled personnel position us as one of the leading rig
moving companies in the industry. |
|
|
|
|
Wellsite Preparation and Remediation. We provide
equipment and services to build and reclaim drilling wellsites
before and after the drilling operations take place. We build
roads, dig pits, clear land, move earth and provide a host of
construction services to drilling contractors and to oil and gas
producers. Our wellsite preparation and remediation services are
in Texas, Colorado and Wyoming. |
|
|
|
Product Sales (16% of Revenue for the Year Ended
December 31, 2005) |
Through our product sales segment, we provide a variety of
equipment used by oil and gas companies throughout the lifecycle
of their wells. Our current product offering includes
completion, flow control and artificial lift equipment as well
as tubular goods. We sell products throughout North America
primarily through our supply stores and through distributors on
a wholesale basis. We also sell products through agents in
markets outside of North America.
We own and operate supply stores that provide products and
services to the oil and gas industry. As of February 15,
2006, we had a total of 15 supply stores and two sales offices
in Texas, Colorado, Louisiana and Oklahoma. We market tubular
products, drill pipe, flow control and completion equipment,
valves, fittings and other oilfield products.
|
|
|
Production Enhancement Products |
Our production enhancement products group designs, assembles and
distributes flow control, well completion and artificial lift
products primarily in North America.
|
|
|
|
|
Flow Control Products. We are a leading independent
supplier of subsurface flow control equipment to the North
American oil and gas market. Our product line includes downhole
blanking |
65
|
|
|
|
|
plugs, landing nipples, sliding sleeves, flapper valves and
bottom-hole chokes. Through our flow control business, we also
provide a proprietary thermo chemical metal treatment process
known as HARD
KOTEtm
that increases the useful life of downhole equipment by
providing enhanced resistance to abrasion, adhesion, erosion and
corrosion. |
|
|
|
Well Completion Products. We offer a comprehensive line
of well completion products, which include packers, tubing
anchors, plugs, retainers and other completion accessories. |
|
|
|
Artificial Lift Systems. Our line of artificial lift
system accessories is designed to optimize the performance of
rod pump and progressive cavity (PC) or screw
pump systems. We are a leader in tools designed to prevent the
counter rotation of PC pumps, particularly during high-volume
operation, and we hold eight patents in this area. Other
accessories include tubing centralizers and downhole gas
separators installed below the pump. Downhole gas separators
remove the natural gas from the reservoir fluid before it enters
the pump, thus improving pump efficiency. |
Our production enhancement products are sold throughout North
America primarily through distributors on a wholesale basis,
through our supply stores and through agents in international
markets.
Our manufacturing business produces a number of wellsite
production processing facility components. Products include
pressure vessels, separators, line heaters, dehydration units,
header packages and metering skids. Our equipment is designed to
comply with the standards of the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers National Board U stamp and the Alberta
Boilers Safety Association. Customers for our manufactured
products are predominantly gas producing companies in Canada;
however, the business does provide equipment throughout North
America and may periodically ship products into international
markets, including India and South America.
We operate an oilfield sales service and rental business based
in Singapore. This business sells new and reconditioned
equipment used in the construction and upgrade of offshore
drilling rigs; rents mud coolers, tubular handling equipment,
BOPs and other service tools; and provides machining and repair
services.
Properties
As of February 15, 2006, we own 45 offices, facilities
and yards, of which eight are in Texas, 19 are in Oklahoma, one
is in Arkansas, one is in North Dakota, one is in Montana, six
are in Wyoming, three are in Colorado, three are in Louisiana,
two are in Alberta, Canada, and one is in Poza Rica, Mexico. As
of February 15, 2006, we own 25 salt water disposal
wells, of which four are in Texas, 19 are in Oklahoma and two in
Arkansas. As of February 15, 2006, we own one drilling mud
disposal facility in Oklahoma and one produced water evaporation
facility in Wyoming.
In addition, as of February 15, 2006, we lease
153 offices, facilities and yards, of which 46 are in
Texas, 12 are in Oklahoma, 19 are in Wyoming, 27 are in
Colorado, four are in Louisiana, one is in Arkansas, two are in
Kansas, two are in Utah, 27 are in Alberta, Canada, one is in
British Columbia, Canada, five are in Mexico and seven are in
Singapore. As of February 15, 2006, we lease one drilling
mud disposal facility in Oklahoma and we lease two salt water
disposal wells in Texas.
Sales and Marketing
Most sales and marketing activities are performed through our
local operations in each geographical region. We believe our
local field sales personnel have an excellent understanding of
basin-specific issues and customer operating procedures and,
therefore, can effectively target marketing activities. We also
have a small corporate sales team located in Houston, Texas that
supplements our field sales efforts and focuses on large
accounts and selling technical services.
66
Customers
Our customers consist of large multi-national and independent
oil and gas producers, as well as smaller independent producers
and virtually all of the major land-based drilling contractors
in North America. Our top ten customers accounted for
approximately 34% of our revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2005, with no one customer representing more
than 10% of our revenue in this period. We believe we have a
broad customer base and wide geographic coverage of operations,
which somewhat insulates us from regional or customer specific
circumstances that might cause a significant erosion in revenue.
Operating Risk and Insurance
Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the oil and
gas industry, such as accidents, blowouts, explosions, fires and
oil spills that can cause:
|
|
|
|
|
personal injury or loss of life; |
|
|
|
damage or destruction of property, equipment and the
environment; and |
|
|
|
suspension of operations. |
In addition, claims for loss of oil and gas production and
damage to formations can occur in the well services industry. If
a serious accident were to occur at a location where our
equipment and services are being used, it could result in our
being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting large claims.
Because our business involves the transportation of heavy
equipment and materials, we may also experience traffic
accidents which may result in spills, property damage and
personal injury.
Despite our efforts to maintain high safety standards, we from
time to time have suffered accidents in the past and anticipate
that we could experience accidents in the future. In addition to
the property and personal losses from these accidents, the
frequency and severity of these incidents affect our operating
costs and insurability and our relationships with customers,
employees and regulatory agencies. Any significant increase in
the frequency or severity of these incidents, or the general
level of compensation awards, could adversely affect the cost
of, or our ability to obtain, workers compensation and
other forms of insurance, and could have other material adverse
effects on our financial condition and results of operations.
Although we maintain insurance coverage of types and amounts
that we believe to be customary in the industry, we are not
fully insured against all risks, either because insurance is not
available or because of the high premium costs. We do maintain
commercial general liability, workers compensation,
business auto, excess auto liability, commercial property, rig
physical damage and contractors equipment, motor truck
cargo, umbrella liability and excess liability, non-owned
aircraft liability, directors and officers, employment practices
liability, fiduciary, commercial crime and kidnap and ransom
insurance policies. However, any insurance obtained by us may
not be adequate to cover any losses or liabilities and this
insurance may not continue to be available or available on terms
which are acceptable to us. Liabilities for which we are not
insured, or which exceed the policy limits of our applicable
insurance, could have a material adverse effect on us.
Competition
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive. To be
successful, a company must provide services and products that
meet the specific needs of oil and gas exploration and
production companies and drilling services contractors at
competitive prices.
We provide our services and products across North America, and
we compete against different companies in each service and
product line we offer. Our competition includes many large and
small oilfield service companies, including the largest
integrated oilfield services companies.
67
Our major competitors for our completion and production services
segment include Schlumberger Ltd., BJ Services Company,
Halliburton Company, Weatherford International Ltd., Baker
Hughes Inc., Key Energy Services, Inc., Basic Energy Services,
Inc., Superior Energy Services, Inc., Tetra Technologies, Inc.
and a significant number of locally oriented businesses. In our
drilling services segment, our primary competitors include
Nabors Industries Ltd., Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., Unit
Corporation and Helmerich & Payne, Grey Wolf Inc.
Our principal competitors in our product sales segment include
National Oilwell Varco, Inc., Baker Hughes Inc., Weatherford
International Ltd., Halliburton Company, Smith International,
Inc., and various smaller providers of equipment. We believe
that the principal competitive factors in the market areas that
we serve are quality of service and products, reputation for
safety and technical proficiency, availability and price. While
we must be competitive in our pricing, we believe our customers
select our services and products based on local leadership and
basin-expertise that our personnel use to deliver quality
services and products.
Government Regulation
We operate under the jurisdiction of a number of regulatory
bodies that regulate worker safety standards, the handling of
hazardous materials, the transportation of explosives, the
protection of the environment and driving standards of
operation. Regulations concerning equipment certification create
an ongoing need for regular maintenance which is incorporated
into our daily operating procedures. The oil and gas industry is
subject to environmental regulation pursuant to local, state and
federal legislation.
Among the services we provide, we operate as a motor carrier and
therefore are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department
of Transportation and by various state agencies. These
regulatory authorities exercise broad powers, governing
activities such as the authorization to engage in motor carrier
operations, and regulatory safety, financial reporting and
certain mergers, consolidations and acquisitions. There are
additional regulations specifically relating to the trucking
industry, including testing and specification of equipment and
product handling requirements. The trucking industry is subject
to possible regulatory and legislative changes that may affect
the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating
practices or by changing the demand for common or contract
carrier services or the cost of providing truckload services.
Some of these possible changes include increasingly stringent
environmental regulations, changes in the hours of service
regulations which govern the amount of time a driver may drive
in any specific period, onboard black box recorder devices or
limits on vehicle weight and size.
Interstate motor carrier operations are subject to safety
requirements prescribed by the Department of Transportation. To
a large degree, intrastate motor carrier operations are subject
to safety regulations that mirror federal regulations. Such
matters as weight and dimension of equipment are also subject to
federal and state regulations. Department of Transportation
regulations mandate drug testing of drivers.
From time to time, various legislative proposals are introduced,
including proposals to increase federal, state, or local taxes,
including taxes on motor fuels, which may increase our costs or
adversely impact the recruitment of drivers. We cannot predict
whether, or in what form, any increase in such taxes applicable
to us will be enacted.
Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to numerous foreign, federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations governing the
release and/or discharge of materials into the environment or
otherwise relating to environmental protection. Numerous
governmental agencies issue regulations to implement and enforce
these laws, for which compliance is often costly and difficult.
The violation of these laws and regulations may result in the
denial or revocation of permits, issuance of corrective action
orders, assessment of administrative and civil penalties, and
even criminal prosecution. We believe that we are in substantial
compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations.
Further, we do not anticipate that compliance with existing
environmental laws and regulations will have a material effect
on our consolidated financial statements. However, it is
possible that substantial costs for compliance may be incurred
in the future. Moreover, it is possible that other developments,
such as the adoption of stricter
68
environmental laws, regulations, and enforcement policies, could
result in additional costs or liabilities that we cannot
currently quantify.
We generate wastes, including hazardous wastes, that are subject
to the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA,
and comparable state statutes. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, or EPA, and state agencies have limited the
approved methods of disposal for some types of hazardous and
nonhazardous wastes. Some wastes handled by us in our field
service activities that currently are exempt from treatment as
hazardous wastes may in the future be designated as
hazardous wastes under RCRA or other applicable
statutes. If this were to occur, we would become subject to more
rigorous and costly operating and disposal requirements.
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act, CERCLA or the Superfund law, and
comparable state statutes impose liability, without regard to
fault or legality of the original conduct, on classes of persons
that are considered to have contributed to the release of a
hazardous substance into the environment. Such classes of
persons include the current and past owners or operators of
sites where a hazardous substance was released, and companies
that disposed or arranged for disposal of hazardous substances
at offsite locations such as landfills. Under CERCLA, these
persons may be subject to joint and several liability for the
costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been
released into the environment and for damages to natural
resources, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and
other third parties to file claims for personal injury and
property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances
released into the environment. We currently own, lease, or
operate numerous properties and facilities that for many years
have been used for industrial activities, including oil and gas
production operations. Hazardous substances, wastes, or
hydrocarbons may have been released on or under the properties
owned or leased by us, or on or under other locations where such
substances have been taken for disposal. In addition, some of
these properties have been operated by third parties or by
previous owners whose treatment and disposal or release of
hazardous substances, wastes, or hydrocarbons, was not under our
control. These properties and the substances disposed or
released on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous
state laws. Under such laws, we could be required to remove
previously disposed substances and wastes (including substances
disposed of or released by prior owners or operators), remediate
contaminated property (including groundwater contamination,
whether from prior owners or operators or other historic
activities or spills), or perform remedial plugging or pit
closure operations to prevent future contamination. These laws
and regulations may also expose us to liability for our acts
that were in compliance with applicable laws at the time the
acts were performed.
In the course of our operations, some of our equipment may be
exposed to naturally occurring radiation associated with oil and
gas deposits, and this exposure may result in the generation of
wastes containing naturally occurring radioactive materials or
NORM. NORM wastes exhibiting trace levels of
naturally occurring radiation in excess of established state
standards are subject to special handling and disposal
requirements, and any storage vessels, piping, and work area
affected by NORM may be subject to remediation or restoration
requirements. Because many of the properties presently or
previously owned, operated, or occupied by us have been used for
oil and gas production operations for many years, it is possible
that we may incur costs or liabilities associated with elevated
levels of NORM.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean
Water Act, and analogous state laws impose restrictions and
strict controls regarding the discharge of pollutants into state
waters or waters of the United States. The discharge of
pollutants into jurisdictional waters is prohibited unless the
discharge is permitted by the EPA or applicable state agencies.
Many of our properties and operations require permits for
discharges of wastewater and/or stormwater, and we have a system
for securing and maintaining these permits. In addition, the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 imposes a variety of requirements on
responsible parties related to the prevention of oil spills and
liability for damages, including natural resource damages,
resulting from such spills in waters of the United States. A
responsible party includes the owner or operator of a facility.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act and analogous state laws
provide for administrative, civil and criminal penalties for
unauthorized discharges and, together with the Oil Pollution
Act, impose rigorous requirements for spill prevention and
response planning, as well as
69
substantial potential liability for the costs of removal,
remediation, and damages in connection with any unauthorized
discharges.
Our underground injection operations are subject to the federal
Safe Drinking Water Act, as well as analogous state and local
laws and regulations. Under Part C of the Safe Drinking
Water Act, the EPA established the Underground Injection Control
program, which established the minimum program requirements for
state and local programs regulating underground injection
activities. The Underground Injection Control program includes
requirements for permitting, testing, monitoring, record keeping
and reporting of injection well activities, as well as a
prohibition against the migration of fluid containing any
contaminant into underground sources of drinking water. State
regulations require us to obtain a permit from the applicable
regulatory agencies to operate our underground injection wells.
We believe that we have obtained the necessary permits from
these agencies for our underground injection wells and that we
are in substantial compliance with permit conditions and state
rules. Nevertheless, these regulatory agencies have the general
authority to suspend or modify one or more of these permits if
continued operation of one of our underground injection wells is
likely to result in pollution of freshwater, substantial
violation of permit conditions or applicable rules, or leaks to
the environment. Although we monitor the injection process of
our wells, any leakage from the subsurface portions of the
injection wells could cause degradation of fresh groundwater
resources, potentially resulting in cancellation of operations
of a well, issuance of fines and penalties from governmental
agencies, incurrence of expenditures for remediation of the
affected resource and imposition of liability by third parties
for property damages and personal injuries. In addition, our
sales of residual crude oil collected as part of the saltwater
injection process could impose liability on us in the event that
the entity to which the oil was transferred fails to manage the
residual crude oil in accordance with applicable environmental
health and safety laws.
Some of our operations also result in emissions of regulated air
pollutants. The federal Clean Air Act and analogous state laws
require permits for facilities that have the potential to emit
substances into the atmosphere that could adversely affect
environmental quality. Failure to obtain a permit or to comply
with permit requirements could result in the imposition of
substantial administrative, civil and even criminal penalties.
We are also subject to the requirements of the federal
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and comparable
state statutes that regulate the protection of the health and
safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication
standard requires that information be maintained about hazardous
materials used or produced in operations and that this
information be provided to employees, state and local government
authorities and the public. We believe that our operations are
in substantial compliance with the OSHA requirements, including
general industry standards, record keeping requirements, and
monitoring of occupational exposure to regulated substances.
Employees
As of January 31, 2006, we had 4,485 employees. Of our
total employees, 3,717 were in the United States,
534 were in Canada, 177 were in Mexico and
57 were in Singapore and other locations in the Far East.
We are a party to certain collective bargaining agreements in
Mexico. Other than these agreements in Mexico, we are not a
party to any collective bargaining agreements, and we consider
our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
70
Legal Proceedings
We operate in a dangerous business. We are party to various
pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative
proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our
commercial operations, products, employees and other matters,
including warranty and product liability claims and occasional
claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials,
on the job injuries and fatalities as a result of our products
or operations. Many of the claims filed against us relate to
motor vehicle accidents that result in the loss of life or
serious bodily injury. Some of these claims relate to matters
occurring prior to our acquisition of businesses. In certain
cases, we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of
businesses.
Although we cannot know the outcome of pending legal proceedings
and the effect such outcomes may have on us, we believe that any
ultimate liability resulting from the outcome of such
proceedings, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered
by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
71
MANAGEMENT
Our directors, executive officers and other key operational
management employees, their ages and their positions as of
February 28, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Andrew L. Waite
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
Joseph C. Winkler
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
J. Michael Mayer
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
James F. Maroney, III
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel |
Kenneth L. Nibling
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Vice President Human Resources and Administration |
Robert L. Weisgarber
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Vice President Accounting and Controller |
David C. Baldwin
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Director |
Robert S. Boswell
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director |
Harold G. Hamm
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Director |
W. Matt Ralls
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director |
R. Graham Whaling
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Director |
James D. Woods
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
Director |
Ronald Boyd
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
President Mid-Continent Division |
Lee Daniel, III
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
President Rockies Division |
Brian K. Moore
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
President IPS Operations |
John D. Schmitz
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
President Texas Division |
Andrew L. Waite. Mr. Waite has served as Chairman of
our board of directors since the date of the Combination.
Mr. Waite is a Managing Director of L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated, a private equity firm and has been an
officer of that company since October 1995. He was previously
Vice President of Simmons & Company International, an
investment banking firm specializing in the energy industry
where he served from August 1993 to September 1995. From 1984 to
1991, Mr. Waite held a number of engineering and management
positions with the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group, an integrated
energy company. From November 2003 to June 2005, he served as
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of CES. He
served as Chairman of CES prior to the Combination and currently
serves as a director of Oil States International, Inc., a
provider of products and services to oil and gas drilling and
production companies, and as a director of Hornbeck Offshore
Services, Inc., an operator of offshore supply vessels and other
marine assets. He received an M.B.A. degree from the
Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration
and an M.S. degree from the California Institute of
Technology.
Joseph C. Winkler. Mr. Winkler has served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer since the date of the
Combination and a director since June 2005. On June 20,
2005, Mr. Winkler assumed his duties as President and Chief
Executive Officer of CES and a director of CES, IEM and IPS.
Mr. Winkler served as the Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer of National Oilwell Varco, Inc., an
oilfield capital equipment and services company, from March 2005
until June 2005 and the companys predecessor, Varco
International, Inc.s President and Chief Operating Officer
from May 2003 until March 2005. From April 1996 until May 2003,
Mr. Winkler served in various other capacities with Varco
and its predecessor including Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. From 1993 to April 1996, Mr. Winkler
served as the Chief Financial Officer of D.O.S., Ltd., a
privately held provider of solids control equipment and services
and coil tubing equipment to the oil and gas industry, which was
acquired by Varco in April 1996. Prior to joining
D.O.S., Ltd., he was Chief Financial Officer of Baker
Hughes INTEQ, and served in a similar role for various companies
owned by Baker Hughes Incorporated including Eastman/ Teleco and
Milpark Drilling Fluids. Mr. Winkler received a Bachelor of
Science degree from Louisiana State University.
72
J. Michael Mayer. Mr. Mayer has served as our
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since the date
of the Combination. He joined CES as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer in May 2004. Prior to joining CES,
Mr. Mayer served as the Chief Financial Officer of
Tri-Point Energy Services, Inc., a Houston based private company
providing repair and refurbishment services to the drilling
industry, from March 2003 until May 2004. Before joining
Tri-Point, Mr. Mayer was the Chief Financial Officer of
NATCO Group Inc., an NYSE-listed provider of process and
production equipment to the oil and gas industry, from September
1999 to March 2003. At NATCO, Mr. Mayer was active in
taking the company public in 2000 and completed a number of
acquisitions while in that role. He has served as Chief
Financial Officer in a number of private entities engaged in
various facets of the oilfield service industry, as well as
approximately 10 years in various financial management
positions at Baker Hughes Incorporated, an international
oilfield service company. Mr. Mayer received a Bachelor of
Business Administration degree from Texas
A&M University and is a certified public accountant.
James F. Maroney, III. Mr. Maroney has served as our
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel since October
2005. From August 2005 until October 2005, Mr. Maroney
surveyed various opportunities until accepting employment with
us. Mr. Maroney served as Of Counsel to National Oilwell
Varco, Inc. from March 2005 to August 2005. He served as Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel of Varco International,
Inc. from May 2000 until March 2005. Prior to that time,
Mr. Maroney served as Vice President, Secretary and General
Counsel of Tuboscope, Inc., Varcos predecessor.
Kenneth L. Nibling. Mr. Nibling has served as our
Vice President Human Resources and Administration
since October 2005. From July 2005 to October 2005,
Mr. Nibling surveyed various opportunities until accepting
employment with us. He served as Vice President, Human Resources
of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. from March through July 2005. He
served as Varco International, Inc.s Vice
President Human Resources and Administration of
Varco International, Inc. from May 2000 until March 2005. Prior
to that time, Mr. Nibling served as Vice
President Human Resources and Administration of
Tuboscope, Inc.
Robert L. Weisgarber. Mr. Weisgarber has served as
our Vice President Accounting and Controller since
September 2005. From April 2004 until September 2005, he served
as the Vice President Accounting of CES. From
October 2003 until April 2004, Mr. Weisgarber served as CFO
Partner for Tatum Partners, an executive services and consulting
firm. Prior to joining Tatum Partners, Mr. Weisgarber
served as Chief Financial Officer of DSI Toys, Inc., a publicly
owned manufacturer of toys that has since liquidated pursuant to
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, from March 1999 until
October 2003.
David C. Baldwin. Mr. Baldwin has served as a
director since September 2002. From September 2002 to April
2004, Mr. Baldwin occupied the positions of President and
Chief Executive Officer of IPS. Mr. Baldwin is a Managing
Director of L.E. Simmons and Associates, Incorporated,
which he joined 1991. He served as Chairman of the board of
directors of IPS and IEM prior to the Combination. Prior to
joining SCF, Mr. Baldwin was a drilling and production
engineer with Union Pacific Resources, an independent
exploration and production company that has since been acquired.
He received both a B.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering and an
M.B.A. degree from the University of Texas at Austin.
Robert S. Boswell. Mr. Boswell has served as a
director since the date of the Combination. He serves as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Laramie Energy, LLC, a
Denver-based privately held oil and gas exploration and
production company he founded in September 2003. Prior to his
time at Laramie, Mr. Boswell served as Chairman of the
board of directors of Forest Oil Corporation, an independent
exploration and production company, from March 2000 until
September 2003. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Forest
Oil from December 1995 until September 2003. Mr. Boswell
served as Forest Oils President from November 1993 to
March 2000 and Chief Financial Officer from May 1991 until
December 1995, having served as a member of the board of
directors of Forest Oil from 1986 until September 2003. He has
also served as a director of C.E. Franklin Ltd., a provider of
products and services to the oilfield industry, specifically
completion products.
73
Harold G. Hamm. Mr. Hamm has served as a director
since the date of the Combination. Mr. Hamm was elected
Chairman of the board of directors of Hiland Partners
general partner in October 2004. Hiland Partners is a NASDAQ
publicly traded midstream master limited partnership.
Mr. Hamm has served as President and Chief Executive
Officer and as a director of Continental Gas, Inc., a midstream
natural gas gathering company since December 1994 and then
served as Chief Executive Officer and a director to 2004. Since
its inception in 1967, Mr. Hamm has served as President and
Chief Executive Officer and a director of Continental Resources,
Inc. and currently serves as Chairman of its board of directors.
Continental Resources, Inc. is an independent exploration and
production company. Mr. Hamm is the chairman of the
Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association. He is the founder
and served as Chairman of the board of directors of Save
Domestic Oil, Inc. Currently, Mr. Hamm is President of the
National Stripper Well Association, and serves on the executive
boards of the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association and the
Oklahoma Energy Explorers.
W. Matt Ralls. Mr. Ralls joined our board of
directors on December 2, 2005. Mr. Ralls serves as
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for
GlobalSantaFe Corporation, an international contract drilling
company, a position he has held since June 2005. Mr. Ralls also
serves as a director, Chairman of the Audit Committee and member
of the Governance Committee of the general partner of Enterprise
Products Partners L.P., a publicly traded provider of midstream
energy services, having been elected director in September 2004.
He had previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer for GlobalSantaFe. Previously, he was Global
Marine Inc.s Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer from January 1999 to November 2001 when
Global Marine merged to become GlobalSantaFe. He served as
Global Marines Vice President and Treasurer from 1997 to
January 1999. Mr. Ralls served as Vice President of Capital
Markets and Corporate Development for The Meridian Resource
Corporation, an independent exploration and production company,
before joining Global Marine. Prior to joining The Meridian
Resource Corporation, Mr. Ralls served as Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Kelley Oil
Corporation, an independent exploration and production company,
from 1990 until 1996. Mr. Ralls spent the first
17 years of his career in commercial banking, mostly at the
senior loan management level, with three large Texas banks,
including NationsBank in San Antonio, Texas.
R. Graham Whaling. Mr. Whaling has served as a
director since the date of the Combination. In addition, he has
served as a director of Brigham Exploration Company, an
independent exploration and production company, since June 2001.
Mr. Whaling is currently Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Laredo Energy, LP, a privately owned partnership
engaged in the acquisition and development of natural gas
reserves in south Texas, and has spent his entire career in the
energy industry, as a petroleum engineer, an energy investment
banker, a chief financial officer and a chief executive officer
of energy companies. Mr. Whaling worked as a petroleum
engineer for nine years in the beginning of his career primarily
with Ryder Scott Company, an oil and gas consulting firm.
Mr. Whaling then spent seven years as an investment banker
focusing on the energy industry with Lazard Freres &
Co. and Credit Suisse First Boston. Mr. Whaling then became
the Chief Financial Officer for Santa Fe Energy, an
independent exploration and production company, where he managed
the initial public offering and the spin-off of
Santa Fes western division, Monterey Resources.
Mr. Whaling was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Monterey Resources from its inception until it was acquired by
Texaco in 1997. From May 1999 to May 2001, Mr. Whaling was
a Managing Director with Credit Suisse First Bostons
Global Energy Partners, which specializes in private equity
investments in energy businesses world-wide. Immediately prior
to joining Laredo Energy, LP, Mr. Whaling was Chairman of
Michael Petroleum Corporation, an independent exploration and
production company that no longer exists.
James D. Woods. Mr. Woods has served as a director
since June 2001. During the period beginning in 1988 and
ending in March 2005, Mr. Woods served as director of Varco
at various times. Mr. Woods is the Chairman Emeritus and
retired Chief Executive Officer of Baker Hughes Incorporated.
Mr. Woods was Chief Executive Officer of Baker Hughes from
April 1987, and Chairman from January 1989, in each case until
January 1997. Mr. Woods is also a director of National
Oilwell Varco, Inc. and ESCO Technologies, an NYSE-listed
supplier of engineered filtration precuts to the process,
healthcare and
74
transportation markets; Foster Wheeler Ltd., an OTC-traded
holding company of various subsidiaries which provides a broad
range of engineering, design, construction and environmental
services; OMI Corporation, an NYSE-listed bulk shipping company
providing seaborne transportation services primarily of crude
oil and refined petroleum products; and USEC Inc., an
NYSE-listed supplier of enriched uranium.
Key Operational Management
Ronald Boyd President, Mid-Continent
Division. Mr. Boyd served as the President of the
Mid-Continent Division of CES from October 2004 until the date
of the Combination. He currently serves in this capacity with
us. Mr. Boyd joined the Hamm Group of Companies in 1988
where he served as President until the group was acquired by CES
in October 2004. From 1982 to 1988, he served as Vice President
for MB Oilfield Services, an oilfield services company. He
received his drilling fluid engineer certification and was
Regional Engineer Supervisor for Milchem, Inc., a drilling
fluids company until 1982. Mr. Boyd began his career in
western Oklahoma in 1973 working on drilling rigs.
Lee Daniel, III President, Rockies
Division. Mr. Daniel served as the President of the
Rockies Division of CES from February 2004 until the date of the
Combination. Mr. Daniel currently serves in this capacity
with us. Mr. Daniel founded LEED Energy Services, a
Colorado-based provider of oilfield services, in February 1990
and served as President and Chief Executive Officer of LEED
until it was acquired by CES in February 2004. Prior to founding
LEED, Mr. Daniel was the President and Chief Operating
Officer of Oil Field Rental Service Company (OFRS)
in Houston, Texas. OFRS was a subsidiary of Enterra Corporation,
which has since merged with Weatherford International.
Mr. Daniel received a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from the University of Oklahoma.
Brian K. Moore President, IPS Operations.
From April 2004 through September 12, 2005, Mr. Moore
served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director
of IPS. From January 2001 through April 2004, Mr. Moore
served as General Manager Oilfield Services,
U.S. Land Central Region, at Schlumberger Ltd., an
international oilfield and information services company. Prior
to serving as General Manager Oilfield Services,
Mr. Moore served as Pressure Pumping Manager for
Schlumbergers Eastern Region from July 1999 to January
2001. Mr. Moore has over 24 years of oilfield service
experience including 15 years with Camco International
where he served in various management and engineering positions
including General Manager Coiled Tubing Operations.
John D. Schmitz President, Texas Division.
Mr. Schmitz served as the President of the Texas Division
of CES from November 2003 until the date of the Combination.
Mr. Schmitz currently serves in this capacity with us. In
1983, Mr. Schmitz founded Brammer Supply and spent the next
20 years growing Brammer Supply, both organically and
through acquisitions, into BSI, an integrated wellsite service
provider with over 16 locations in North and East Texas,
Oklahoma and Louisiana, which was acquired by CES in November
2003. Mr. Schmitz began his career as a sales
representative for Fluid Packed Pumps in 1979.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors,
executive officers or key operational management employees. The
address of each director, executive officer and key operational
management employee is: c/o Complete Production Services,
Inc., 11700 Old Katy Road, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77079.
Board of Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of eight members,
including four independent members
Messrs. Boswell, Ralls, Whaling and Woods. The listing
requirements of the NYSE require that our board of directors be
composed of a majority of independent directors within one year
of the listing of our common stock on the NYSE. Accordingly, we
intend to appoint additional independent directors to our board
of directors following the completion of this offering.
75
Our board of directors is divided into three classes. The
directors serve staggered three-year terms. The initial terms of
the directors of each class will expire at the annual meetings
of stockholders to be held in 2006 (Class I), 2007
(Class II) and 2008 (Class III). At each annual
meeting of stockholders, one class of directors will be elected
for a full term of three years to succeed that class of
directors whose terms are expiring. The classification of
directors are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Class I Messrs. Joseph C. Winkler, Andrew
L. Waite and R. Graham Whaling; |
|
|
|
Class II Messrs. Harold G. Hamm, James D.
Woods and R. Matt Ralls; and |
|
|
|
Class III Messrs. David C. Baldwin and
Robert S. Boswell. |
SCF has certain rights to designate up to two members of our
board of directors. See Description of Our Capital
Stock Stockholders Agreement Management
Rights.
Our audit committee is currently comprised of
Messrs. Ralls, Whaling and Boswell. Our board has
determined that Messrs. Ralls, Whaling and Boswell are
independent directors as defined under and required by the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and the
listing requirements of the NYSE. Rule 10A-3 under the
Exchange Act and the listing requirements of the NYSE require
that our audit committee be composed of a minimum of three
members and that it be composed of a majority of independent
directors within 90 days of the effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and
that it be composed solely of independent directors within one
year of such date. Mr. Ralls has been designated as the
audit committee financial expert, as defined by Item 401(h)
of Regulation S-K
of the Exchange Act. The principal duties of the audit
committee, which is chaired by Mr. Ralls, will be as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to review our external financial reporting; |
|
|
|
to engage our independent auditors; and |
|
|
|
to review our procedures for internal auditing and the adequacy
of our internal accounting controls. |
Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the
audit committee that will be available on our website after the
completion of this offering.
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
Our nominating and corporate governance committee is currently
comprised of Messrs. Woods and Hamm. Our board has
determined that Mr. Woods is independent as required by the
listing requirements of the NYSE. The listing requirements of
the NYSE require that our nominating and corporate governance
committee be composed of a majority of independent directors
within 90 days of the listing of our common stock on the
NYSE and that it be composed solely of independent directors
within one year of such date. The principal duties of the
nominating and corporate governance committee will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to recommend to the board of directors proposed nominees for
election to the board of directors by the stockholders at annual
meetings, including an annual review as to the renominations of
incumbents and proposed nominees for election by the board of
directors to fill vacancies that occur between stockholder
meetings; and |
|
|
|
to make recommendations to the board of directors regarding
corporate governance matters and practices. |
Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the
corporate governance and nominating committee that will be
available on our website after the closing of this offering.
76
Our compensation committee is currently comprised of
Messrs. Woods and Whaling. Our board has determined that
Messrs. Woods and Whaling are independent as required by
the listing requirements of the NYSE. The principal duties of
the compensation committee will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to administer our stock plans and incentive compensation plans,
including our stock incentive plans, and in this capacity, make
all option grants or awards to our directors and employees under
such plans; |
|
|
|
to make recommendations to the board of directors with respect
to the compensation of our chief executive officer and our other
executive officers; and |
|
|
|
to review key employee compensation policies, plans and programs. |
Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the
compensation committee that will be available on our website
after the completion of this offering.
Compensation of Directors
Directors who are also employees do not receive a retainer or
fees for service on our board of directors or any committees.
Directors who are not employees will receive an annual fee of
$27,500 and fees of $1,500 for attendance at each meeting of our
board of directors or $750 for each meeting of our board of
directors attended telephonically. In addition, the chairman of
the audit committee will receive an annual fee of $15,000 and
each director who serves as committee chairmen (other than
chairman of the audit committee) will receive an annual fee of
$7,500 for each committee on which he serves as chairman.
Directors who are not employees will receive options to purchase
5,000 shares of our common stock in connection with their
election to the board of directors and options to purchase
5,000 shares of our common stock at each annual meeting
after which they continue to serve. These options will be
granted under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, will vest in four
annual installments and will expire ten years from the date of
grant. In the event of a change of control, the options will
vest in accordance with the plan. The exercise price of these
options will be the fair market value at the date of grant. In
addition, directors who are not employees will receive an annual
grant of restricted stock valued at $50,000. The restricted
stock will vest on the anniversary of the date of grant.
Directors must retain 65% of the restricted stock so long as
they are a director of the Company. All of our directors are
reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
attending meetings of our board of directors or committees and
for other reasonable expenses related to the performance of
their duties as directors.
Web Access
We will provide access through our website at
www.completeproduction.com to current information
relating to governance, including a copy of each board committee
charter, our code of conduct, our corporate governance
guidelines and other matters impacting our governance
principles. You may also contact our Chief Financial Officer for
paper copies of these documents free of charge.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
None of our executive officers serve as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one
or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our
board of directors or compensation committee.
77
Compensation of Executive Officers
The following table summarizes all compensation earned by each
person who served as Chief Executive Officer and our four other
most highly compensated executive officers during the year ended
December 31, 2005, to whom we refer in this prospectus as
our named executive officers.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual |
|
Stock |
|
Underlying |
|
All Other |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Compensation |
|
Awards |
|
Options |
|
Compensation(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph C. Winkler(2)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
213,846 |
|
|
$ |
318,904 |
|
|
$ |
5,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,136 |
|
|
|
597,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michael Mayer(3)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
174,714 |
|
|
$ |
355,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
239,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,951 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
106,298 |
|
|
|
89,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Maroney, III(4)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
56,250 |
|
|
$ |
42,072 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
175,058 |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Secretary |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and General Counsel |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth L. Nibling(5)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
51,250 |
|
|
$ |
38,332 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
175,058 |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human Resources and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Weisgarber(6)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
155,208 |
|
|
$ |
246,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,888 |
|
|
Vice President Accounting |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
141,667 |
|
|
|
13,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Controller |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew L. Waite(7)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Former Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
These amounts consist of matching contributions made by us under
our 401(k) plans in which the executive officer participates. |
|
|
(2) |
Upon the completion of the Combination, Mr. Winkler became
our Chief Executive Officer, President and director. See
Employment Agreements below for a
description of the terms of Mr. Winklers employment.
Mr. Winkler was employed by CES as Chief Executive Officer
and President and appointed as a director of CES in June 2005.
The stockholders of CES prior to the Combination held a majority
ownership in us following the Combination. In addition, former
directors of CES represent a majority of the directors of our
board of directors. |
|
|
(3) |
Upon the completion of the Combination, Mr. Mayer became
our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. Mayer was employed by CES as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer in May 2004. |
|
(4) |
On October 3, 2005, Mr. Maroney became our Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel. |
|
(5) |
On October 3, 2005, Mr. Nibling became our Vice
President Human Resources and Administration. |
|
(6) |
Upon the completion of the Combination, Mr. Weisgarber
became our Vice President Accounting and Controller.
Mr. Weisgarber was employed by CES as Vice
President Accounting in April 2004. |
|
(7) |
Mr. Waite is the Chairman of our board of directors and
served as the Chief Executive Officer of CES prior to the hiring
of Mr. Winkler in June 2005. Mr. Waite served as the
Chief Executive Officer of CES from November 7, 2003 until
June 20, 2005. Mr. Waite did not receive compensation
from CES for his services as Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Waite is a Managing Director of L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated. L.E. Simmons and Associates,
Incorporated received certain consideration from CES in
connection with its provision of support services to CES. For a
description of these services, see Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions. |
78
Equity Grants
The following table summarizes the option grants made to the
Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers
during 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates of Stock Price |
|
|
Appreciation for Options |
Individual Grants |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Total Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Granted to |
|
Exercise or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
Employees in |
|
Base Price |
|
Expiration |
|
|
Name |
|
Granted |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Per Share(1) |
|
Date |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph C. Winkler
|
|
|
597,660 |
|
|
|
34.2% |
|
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
|
|
06/2015 |
|
|
$ |
2,516,149 |
|
|
$ |
6,371,056 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michael Mayer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Maroney, III
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
|
11/2015 |
|
|
$ |
381,160 |
|
|
$ |
966,160 |
|
|
Vice President, Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and General Counsel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth L. Nibling
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
|
11/2015 |
|
|
$ |
381,160 |
|
|
$ |
966,160 |
|
|
Vice President Human |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources and Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Weisgarber
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting and Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew L. Waite
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
0.3% |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
|
10/2015 |
|
|
|
36,650 |
|
|
|
92,900 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Chief Executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Option exercise prices for options granted prior to
September 12, 2005 have been adjusted pursuant to
FIN 44 to take into account the impact of the approximate
$147.0 million Dividend paid to our stockholders following
the Combination. |
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2005 and Fiscal Year-End
Option Values
The following table sets forth information concerning options
exercised during the last fiscal year and held as of
December 31, 2005 by each of the named executive officers.
None of the named executive officers exercised options during
the year ended December 31, 2005. Because there was no
public market for our common stock as of December 31, 2005,
amounts described in the following table under the heading
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at
December 31, 2005 are determined by multiplying the
number of shares issued or issuable upon the exercise of the
option by the difference between the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share and the per share option exercise price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Underlying |
|
Value of Unexercised |
|
|
Unexercised Options at |
|
In-the-Money Options at |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph C. Winkler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
J. Michael Mayer
|
|
|
41,714 |
|
|
|
83,430 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
James F. Maroney, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Kenneth L. Nibling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Robert L. Weisgarber
|
|
|
31,286 |
|
|
|
62,572 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Andrew L. Waite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
79
Stock Incentive Plans
|
|
|
2001 Stock Incentive Plan |
In 2001 we adopted a stock incentive plan, which we refer to as
the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, for our and our affiliates
officers, directors, consultants and employees. The 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan amended and restated in its entirety our
predecessors 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the 2001
Stock Incentive Plan, eligible participants may receive
incentive and nonqualified options to purchase shares of our
common stock and/or an award of shares of our restricted stock.
Under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, options to purchase up to
2,540,364 shares of our common stock may be granted to
eligible participants. The terms of each incentive and
non-qualified option will be determined by a committee of, and
established by, our board of directors (the
Committee). The Committee will determine the
exercise price for both incentive and non-qualified options.
Generally, these shares vest equally over a three-year period
and have a five-year or ten-year life. As of December 31,
2005, under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, options for
approximately shares
of our common stock were outstanding.
In the case of employees, options granted under the 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan generally expire on the earlier of (i) 5 or
10 years from the date of grant; (ii) 90 days
from the employees termination date or (iii) one year from
the employees termination date due to death or disability.
In the case of non-employee directors, all options granted under
the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan expire on the earlier of
(i) 5 years from the date of grant or
(ii) one year from the date of termination of
directors service on our board of directors due to death
or disability.
Our restricted stock that is granted under the 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan is subject to certain restrictions on disposition
by the holder and an obligation of the holder to forfeit and
surrender the shares of our restricted stock to us under certain
circumstances. These forfeiture restrictions are determined by
the Committee and may lapse upon the occurrence of the
following: (i) the attainment of certain performance
targets established by the Committee, (ii) the
holders continued employment with our company or an
affiliate of our company or continued service as a consultant to
or director of our company for a specified period of time,
(iii) any event or the satisfaction of any condition
specified by the Committee or (iv) a combination of the
foregoing. As of December 31,
2005, shares
of our restricted stock granted under the 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan were unvested.
|
|
|
2003 Stock Incentive Plan |
In connection with the Combination, we assumed CESs 2003
Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan, for certain officers, directors, consultants and
employees. Under the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
eligible participants received incentive and nonqualified
options to purchase shares of CES common stock and/or an award
of CES restricted stock, which options and shares were
converted, respectively, to options for, and shares of, our
common stock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
Combination. Generally, these shares vest equally over a
three-year or four-year period, have a five-year life and may be
exercised only if the holder is one of our employees, directors
or consultants. As of December 31, 2005, under the 2003
Stock Incentive Plan, options for
approximately shares
of our common stock were outstanding. All options (other than
options granted to Mr. Winkler) expire on the earlier of
(i) 5 years from the date of grant;
(ii) 90 days from the employees termination
date; or (iii) one year from the employees
termination due to death or disability.
The restricted stock granted under the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan
is subject to certain restrictions on disposition by the holder
and an obligation of the holder to forfeit and surrender the
shares of the restricted stock to us under certain
circumstances. These forfeiture restrictions were determined by
the CES board of directors and may lapse upon the occurrence of
the following: (i) the attainment of certain performance
targets established by the CES board of directors, (ii) the
holders continued employment with our company or an
affiliate of our company or continued service as a consultant to
or director of our company for a specified period of time,
(iii) any event or the satisfaction of any condition
specified by the
80
CES board of directors or (iv) a combination of the
foregoing. As of December 31, 2005, 144,232 shares of
our restricted stock granted under the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan
were unvested.
The 2003 Stock Incentive Plan shall continue to govern the
existing options and restricted stock granted thereunder;
however, no future awards will be made under the 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
2004 Stock Incentive Plan |
In connection with the Combination, we assumed IEMs 2004
Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan, for certain officers, directors, consultants and
employees. Under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, eligible
participants received incentive and nonqualified options to
purchase shares of IEM common stock and/or an award of IEM
restricted stock, which options and shares were converted,
respectively, to options for, and shares of, our common stock
pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Combination.
Generally, these shares vest equally over a three-year or
four-year period, have a five-year life and may be exercised
only if the holder is one of our employees, directors or
consultants. As of December 31, 2005, under the 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan, options
for shares
of our common stock were outstanding. No options were granted to
employees of IEM. All options (other than options granted to
Mr. Winkler) expire on the earlier of (i) 5 years
from the date of grant; (ii) 90 days from the
employees termination date; or (iii) one year from
the employees termination due to death or disability.
The restricted stock granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
is subject to certain restrictions on disposition by the holder
and an obligation of the holder to forfeit and surrender the
shares of the restricted stock to us under certain
circumstances. These forfeiture restrictions were determined by
the IEM board of directors and may lapse upon the occurrence of
the following: (i) the attainment of certain performance
targets established by the IEM board of directors, (ii) the
holders continued employment with our company or an
affiliate of our company or continued service as a consultant to
or director of our company for a specified period of time,
(iii) any event or the satisfaction of any condition
specified by the IEM board of directors or (iv) a
combination of the foregoing. As of December 31,
2005, shares
of our restricted stock granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan were unvested.
The 2004 Stock Incentive Plan will continue to govern the
existing options and restricted stock granted thereunder;
however, no future awards will be made under the 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
Parchman Stock Incentive Plan |
In connection with our acquisition of Parchman Energy Group,
Inc. in February 2005, we assumed Parchmans 2003
Restricted Stock Plan, which we refer to as the Parchman Plan,
for certain of our employees. Under the Parchman Plan, eligible
participants received an award of our restricted stock subject
to the restrictions described below. The restricted stock
granted under the Parchman Plan is subject to certain
restrictions on disposition by the holder and an obligation of
the holder to forfeit and surrender the shares of restricted
stock to us under certain circumstances. These forfeiture
restrictions were determined by the former compensation
committee of Parchman and may lapse upon the occurrence of the
following: (i) the attainment of certain performance
targets established by the former compensation committee of
Parchman, (ii) the holders continued employment with
our company or an affiliate of our company or continued service
as a consultant to our company for a specified period of time,
or (iii) a combination of the foregoing. As of
December 31,
2005, shares
of our restricted stock granted under the Parchman Plan were
unvested.
The Parchman Plan will continue to govern the existing
restricted stock granted thereunder; however, no future awards
will be granted under the Parchman Plan.
Employment Agreements
We have entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Winkler, the initial term of which terminates on
June 20, 2008. Unless either party gives notice of its
intention not to renew prior to May 6,
81
2007, the term will be automatically extended for successive
one-year periods until notice is given by either party prior to
May 6 of any subsequent year that the term of employment will
expire on June 20 of the following year. Mr. Winklers
annual base salary is $400,000, subject to increase at the
discretion of our board of directors, and he will be eligible to
receive annual bonuses of at least 100% of his annual base
salary assuming the Company satisfies performance criteria
established by our board of directors. For 2005,
Mr. Winklers bonus was to be an amount of up to 150%
of the annual base salary if certain performance targets were
met, which was to be prorated to cover the period beginning
June 20, 2005, the effective date of
Mr. Winklers employment, to December 31, 2005.
Mr. Winkler earned the prorated amount of the maximum 2005
bonus. Mr. Winkler is also entitled to an annual car
allowance equal to $9,600.
Under the employment agreement, if Mr. Winklers
employment is terminated prior to his attainment of age 63
(and not during the two-year period following any Change of
Control (as such term is defined in the employment agreement))
by Mr. Winkler for Good Reason (as defined in the
employment agreement) or by us for any reason other than for
Cause (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), or
the disability or death of Mr. Winkler, Mr. Winkler
will be entitled to receive the following benefits:
|
|
|
(A) his base salary when otherwise due through the date of
the termination, |
|
|
(B) a bonus, in an amount determined in good faith by our
board of directors in accordance with the performance criteria
established under the employment agreement, prorated through and
including the date of termination, |
|
|
(C) an amount equal to two times the sum of his base salary
and average annual bonus (deemed to be 100% of his base salary
for this purpose), payable in a lump-sum within 30 days
following the date of termination, |
|
|
(D) all restricted shares, restricted stock units,
performance shares, and performance units and stock options held
by Mr. Winkler will vest immediately at the time of the
termination, and |
|
|
(E) additional benefits, such as health and disability
coverage, outplacement services and an automobile allowance, for
up to two years. |
Under the employment agreement, if during the two-year period
commencing on the effective date of any Change of Control,
Mr. Winklers employment is terminated by
Mr. Winkler for Good Reason or by us for any reason other
than for Cause, or the disability or death of Mr. Winkler,
Mr. Winkler will be entitled to receive the following
benefits:
|
|
|
(A) his base salary when otherwise due through the date of
the termination, |
|
|
(B) a bonus, in an amount determined in good faith by our
board of directors in accordance with the performance criteria
established under the employment agreement, prorated through and
including the date of termination, |
|
|
(C) an amount equal to three times the sum of his base
salary and average annual bonus (deemed to be 100% of his base
salary for this purpose), payable in a lump-sum within
30 days following the date of termination, |
|
|
(D) all restricted shares, restricted stock units,
performance shares, performance units and stock options held by
Mr. Winkler will vest immediately at the time of the
termination, |
|
|
(E) Mr. Winkler will become fully vested in accrued
benefits under benefit plans maintained by us; provided, that,
if such acceleration is prohibited by law or would require
accelerated vesting for all participants in such plans, we will
instead make a lump-sum payment to Mr. Winker equal to the
present value of such unvested accrued benefits, and |
|
|
(F) additional benefits, such as health and disability
coverage and benefits, outplacement services and an automobile
allowance, for up to three years. |
Under the terms of the agreement, subject to certain exceptions,
Mr. Winkler may not compete in the market in which we and
our affiliates engage in business during his employment with us
and for 18 months following the termination of his
employment. Also under the agreement, subject to certain
82
exceptions, we have agreed to pay a
gross-up payment to
Mr. Winkler so as to cover any excise tax imposed on
benefits provided to Mr. Winkler by us.
In connection with Mr. Winklers employment with us,
we granted Mr. Winkler options to purchase
597,660 shares of our common stock. The options are subject
to option agreements, which provide that the options vest 25%
per year. Mr. Winklers options may not be exercised
after June 20, 2015, the date of expiration of such
options. Furthermore, Mr. Winkler purchased
117,654 shares of our common stock and was granted an
additional 117,654 shares of restricted common stock in
connection with his stock purchase. The shares of restricted
stock are subject to restricted stock agreements between
Mr. Winkler and us. These agreements provide that all of
the shares of restricted stock will vest on the fourth
anniversary of the date of grant.
We have also entered into an employment agreement with
J. Michael Mayer, our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Under the agreement, Mr. Mayer will
receive an annual base salary equal to $250,000, subject to
increase at the discretion of our board of directors, and a
bonus of up to 90% of his base salary per year. Mr. Mayer
is also entitled to an annual car allowance equal to $9,600. In
addition, if we terminate Mr. Mayers employment for
reasons other than for Cause (as such term is defined in the
employment agreement) Mr. Mayer may be entitled to receive
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a severance payment equal to 160% of his annual base salary; |
|
|
|
|
|
all unvested stock options and restricted stock will immediately
vest; and |
|
|
|
|
|
a bonus for the year during which his employment is terminated,
prorated for the days served. |
|
We have also entered into an employment agreement with
James F. Maroney, III, our Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel. Under the agreement, Mr. Maroney will
receive an annual base salary equal to $225,000, subject to
increase at the discretion of our board of directors, and a
bonus of up to 75% of his base salary per year. The bonus earned
during 2005 was prorated based on the number of days
Mr. Maroney has been employed by us. In addition, if we
terminate Mr. Maroneys employment for reasons other
than for Cause (as such term is defined in the employment
agreement) Mr. Maroney may be entitled to receive the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
a severance payment equal to 150% of his annual base salary; |
|
|
|
all unvested stock options and restricted stock will immediately
vest; and |
|
|
|
a bonus for the year during which his employment is terminated,
prorated for the days served. |
In connection with Mr. Maroneys employment with us,
we granted Mr. Maroney options to
purchase 52,000 shares of our common stock. The
options are subject to an option agreement, which provides that
the options vest
331/3%
per year. Mr. Maroneys options may not be exercised
after October 3, 2015, the date of expiration of such
options. Furthermore, Mr. Maroney purchased
42,900 shares of our common stock and was granted an
additional 15,020 shares of restricted common stock in
connection with his stock purchase. The shares of restricted
stock are subject to a restricted stock agreement between
Mr. Maroney and us. The agreement provides that the
restricted stock vests 25% per year. Mr. Maroney is also
entitled to an annual car allowance equal to $9,600.
We have also entered into an employment agreement with
Kenneth L. Nibling, our Vice President Human
Resources and Administration. Under the agreement,
Mr. Nibling will receive an annual base salary equal to
$205,000, subject to increase at the discretion of our board of
directors, and a bonus of up to 75% of his base salary per year.
The bonus earned during 2005 was prorated based on the number of
days Mr. Nibling has been employed by us. In addition, if
we terminate Mr. Niblings employment for reasons
other than for Cause (as such term is defined in the employment
agreement) Mr. Nibling may be entitled to receive the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a severance payment equal to 150% of his annual base salary; |
|
|
|
|
all unvested stock options and restricted stock will immediately
vest; and |
|
|
|
a bonus for the year during which his employment is terminated,
prorated for the days served. |
83
In connection with Mr. Niblings employment with us,
we granted Mr. Nibling options to
purchase 52,000 shares of our common stock. The
options are subject to an option agreement, which provides that
the options vest
331/3%
per year. Mr. Niblings options may not be exercised
after October 3, 2015, the date of expiration of such
options. Furthermore, Mr. Nibling purchased
42,900 shares of our common stock and was granted an
additional 15,020 shares of restricted common stock in
connection with his stock purchase. The shares of restricted
stock are subject to a restricted stock agreement between
Mr. Nibling and us. The agreement provides that the
restricted stock vests 25% per year. Mr. Nibling is also
entitled to an annual car allowance equal to $9,600.
Indemnification Agreements
Our directors and our executive officers have entered into
customary indemnification agreements with us, pursuant to which
we have agreed to indemnify our directors and our executive
officers to the fullest extent permitted by law.
84
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The descriptions set forth below are qualified in their entirety
by reference to the applicable agreements.
Offering By Selling Stockholders
We are paying the expenses of the offering by the selling
stockholders, other than the underwriting discounts, commissions
and transfer taxes with respect to shares of stock sold by the
selling stockholders and the fees and expenses of any attorneys,
accountants and other advisors separately retained by them.
The Combination
The Combination closed on September 12, 2005. Immediately
prior to the Combination, SCF owned 13,840,356 shares or
69.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of IPS;
1,100,000 shares or 67.2% of the outstanding shares of
common stock of CES; and 200,000 shares or 75.2% of the
outstanding shares of common stock of IEM. As a result of the
Combination, as of September 12, 2005, SCF held a total of
39,396,756 shares or approximately 70% of our total shares
outstanding. For a discussion of the Combination, please see
Business The Combination.
Transactions with Our Significant Stockholder Prior to the
Combination
IPS was party to that certain Services Agreement dated as of
December 1, 2002 with L.E. Simmons and Associates,
Incorporated, the ultimate general partner of SCF, pursuant to
which IPS paid L.E. Simmons and Associates, Incorporated
$20,000 per month for the services of David C. Baldwin in
his capacity as its former Chief Executive Officer and certain
administrative staff. David C. Baldwin serves as one of our
directors and is a Managing Director of L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated. In March 2004, this agreement was
terminated by the parties and is no longer in effect.
CES was a party to that certain Financial Advisory Agreement
dated as of November 7, 2003 with L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated, pursuant to which CES paid
L.E. Simmons and Associates, Incorporated fees totaling
$1,970,000 for the provision of support services during 2003 and
2004. In addition, L.E. Simmons and Associates,
Incorporated provided certain management services, including the
services of Andrew L. Waite in his capacity as its former
Chief Executive Officer, to CES in exchange for $50,000 in the
first quarter in 2004, $87,500 in each of the second and third
quarters of 2004 and $125,000 in the fourth quarter of 2004 and
the first and second quarters of 2005. This agreement has been
terminated by the parties and is no longer in effect.
IEM was party to that Financial Advisory Agreement dated as of
August 14, 2004, with L.E. Simmons and Associates,
Incorporated, the ultimate general partner of SCF, pursuant to
which IEM paid L.E. Simmons and Associates, Incorporated an
upfront fee of $250,000 and subsequent to that $31,250 per
quarter for management services. This agreement has been
terminated by the parties and is no longer in effect.
Transactions with our Directors, Officers and Key Operational
Managers
Andrew L. Waite, the Chairman of our board of directors, is also
a Managing Director and an officer of L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated. David C. Baldwin, one of our
directors, is also a Managing Director and an officer of
L.E. Simmons and Associates, Incorporated.
We provide services to Laramie Energy, an exploration and
production company. Robert S. Boswell is a principal of
Laramie as well as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Boswell is a member of our board of directors. Laramie
paid us approximately $1.9 million and $205,000 for such
services for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
In connection with CESs acquisition of Hamm Co. in 2004,
CES entered into that certain Strategic Customer Relationship
Agreement with Continental Resources. By virtue of the
Combination, through a
85
subsidiary, we are now a party to such agreement. The agreement
provides Continental Resources the option to engage a limited
amount of our assets into a long-term contract at market rates.
Mr. Hamm is a majority owner of Continental Resources and
serves as a member of our board of directors.
We sell services and products to Continental Resources, Inc. and
its subsidiaries. Revenues attributable to these sales totaled
approximately $3.3 million from October 14, 2004, the
date of CESs acquisition of Hamm Co., through
December 31, 2004 and approximately $21.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005. Harold G. Hamm is a
majority owner of Continental Resources, Inc. and serves as a
member of our board of directors.
We lease offices and an oilfield yard from Continental
Management Co. and Mr. Hamm for an aggregate of
approximately $8,000 per month. These leases expire between 2009
and 2010. Harold G. Hamm is the owner of Continental
Management Co. and serves as a member of our board of directors.
We are obligated to pay Lee Daniel, III an aggregate
principal amount of $2.2 million pursuant to a subordinated
promissory note due March 31, 2009 that was issued by CES
in connection with the acquisition of LEED Energy Services in
2004. Mr. Daniel is a member of our key operational
management.
We sell products and services to HEP Oil Company and its
subsidiaries. Revenues attributable to these sales totaled
approximately $7.8 and $8.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. John D.
Schmitz is a majority owner of HEP Oil Company and is a member
of our key operational management.
We lease various oilfield yards, office buildings and other
locations from G-ville Properties and
B-29 Investments for
approximately $132,000 per month. These leases expire
between 2008 and 2016. Mr. Schmitz is a majority owner of
G-ville Properties and B-29 Investments.
On September 29, 2005, we entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement with Spindletop Production Services, Ltd. and
Mr. Schmitz. Pursuant to the agreement, we purchased the
assets of Spindletop in exchange for approximately
$0.2 million cash and 90,364 shares of our common
stock.
We believe that all of these related party transactions were
either on terms at least as favorable to us as could have been
obtained through arms-length negotiations with
unaffiliated third parties or were negotiated in connection with
acquisitions, the overall terms of which were as favorable to us
as could have been obtained through arms-length
negotiations with unaffiliated third parties. We intend to
address future material transactions with our affiliates by
having the transactions approved by a committee of disinterested
directors.
86
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following
table1
sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership
of our common stock as of February 28, 2006 by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who is known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of
our outstanding common stock; |
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers; |
|
|
|
each of our directors; |
|
|
|
all of our executive officers and directors as a group
(12 persons); and |
|
|
|
each selling stockholder. |
Except as otherwise indicated, the person or entities listed
below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, except to
the extent this power may be shared with a spouse. Unless
otherwise indicated, the address of each stockholder listed
below is 11700 Old Katy Road, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77079.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned After | |
|
Owned After | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering | |
|
Offering | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number | |
|
(Assuming No | |
|
(Assuming | |
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
|
|
of Shares to | |
|
Exercise of Over- | |
|
Exercise of Over- | |
|
|
Owned Prior | |
|
|
|
be Sold Upon | |
|
Allotment | |
|
Allotment Option | |
|
|
to this Offering | |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Exercise of | |
|
Option) | |
|
in Full) | |
|
|
| |
|
to be Sold in | |
|
Over-Allotment | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Offering | |
|
Option(1) | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
SCF-IV, L.P.(2)
|
|
|
39,396,756 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew L. Waite(3)(7)
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph C. Winkler(7)
|
|
|
235,308 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michael Mayer(4)(7)
|
|
|
138,522 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Maroney, III(7)
|
|
|
57,920 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth L. Nibling(7)
|
|
|
57,920 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Weisgarber(4)
|
|
|
57,890 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David C. Baldwin(5)(7)
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert S. Boswell(4)(7)
|
|
|
28,164 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harold G. Hamm(6)(7)
|
|
|
4,058,266 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Matt Ralls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Graham Whaling(4)(7)
|
|
|
26,166 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James D. Woods(4)(7)
|
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (12 persons)
(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
|
|
|
4,680,446 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
We will add the selling stockholders to the table once they have
been determined. |
87
|
|
(1) |
Assuming the over-allotment option is exercised in full. |
|
(2) |
L.E. Simmons is the natural person who has voting and
investment control over the securities owned by
SCF-IV, L.P.
Mr. Simmons serves as chairman of the Board and President
of L.E. Simmons and Associates, Incorporated, the ultimate
general partner of SCF-IV, L.P. |
|
|
(3) |
Mr. Waite serves as Managing Director of L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated, the ultimate general partner of
SCF-IV, L.P. As such,
Mr. Waite may be deemed to have voting and dispositive
power over the shares beneficially owned by
SCF-IV, L.P.
Mr. Waite disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares
owned by SCF-IV, L.P. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes shares that may be acquired within 60 days through
the exercise of options to purchase shares of our common stock
as follows: Messrs. Mayer 41,714;
Weisgarber 31,286; Boswell 4,170;
Whaling 2,466; and Woods 7,420. |
|
(5) |
Mr. Baldwin serves as Managing Director of L.E. Simmons and
Associates, Incorporated, the ultimate general partner of
SCF-IV, L.P. As such,
Mr. Baldwin may be deemed to have voting and dispositive
power over the shares beneficially owned by
SCF-IV, L.P.
Mr. Baldwin disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares
owned by SCF-IV, L.P. |
|
(6) |
Includes an aggregate of 4,053,976 shares owned by Harold
G. Hamm GRAT 4, Harold G. Hamm GRAT 6, and Harold G.
Hamm GRAT 8, each of which is an estate planning trust
(collectively, the Hamm Trusts). Mr. Hamm
serves as the trustee of each of the Hamm Trusts. As such,
Mr. Hamm may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power
over the shares beneficially owned by the Hamm Trusts. |
|
(7) |
Includes restricted common stock as follows: Waite
4,290; Winkler 117,654; Mayer 39,408;
Maroney 15,020; Nibling 15,020;
Baldwin 4,290; Boswell 4,290;
Hamm 4,290; Whaling 4,290;
Woods 4,290. |
Registration Rights
For a discussion of our stockholder agreement, please see
Description of Our Capital Stock Stockholders
Agreement.
88
DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $.01 per share, and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$.01 per share. As of February 28, 2006, we had
56,317,680 shares of common stock outstanding, including
786,170 shares of restricted stock. The shares of
restricted stock have voting rights, rights to receive dividends
and are subject to certain forfeiture restrictions.
Common Stock
As of February 28, 2006, there were approximately
140 holders of our common stock. Holders of our common
stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be
voted upon by our stockholders. Because holders of our common
stock do not have cumulative voting rights, the holders of a
majority of the shares of our common stock can elect all of the
members of the board of directors standing for election, subject
to the rights, powers and preferences of any outstanding series
of preferred stock. Subject to the rights and preferences of any
preferred stock that we may issue in the future, the holders of
our common stock are entitled to receive:
|
|
|
|
|
dividends as may be declared by our board of directors; and |
|
|
|
all of our assets available for distribution to holders of our
common stock in liquidation, pro rata, based on the number of
shares held. |
There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to
our common stock. All outstanding shares of our common stock are
fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred Stock
Subject to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation
and legal limitations, our board of directors has the authority,
without further vote or action by our stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one
or more series; and |
|
|
|
to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of
our preferred stock, including provisions related to dividends,
conversion, voting, redemption, liquidation and the number of
shares constituting the series or the designation of that
series, which may be superior to those of our common stock. |
There were no shares of preferred stock outstanding as of
February 28, 2006, and we have no present plans to issue
any preferred stock.
The issuance of shares of preferred stock by our board of
directors as described above may adversely affect the rights of
the holders of our common stock. For example, preferred stock
may rank prior to our common stock as to dividend rights,
liquidation preference or both, may have full or limited voting
rights and may be convertible into shares of our common stock.
The issuance of shares of preferred stock may discourage
third-party bids for our common stock or may otherwise adversely
affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, the
preferred stock may enable our board of directors to make more
difficult or to discourage attempts to obtain control of our
company through a hostile tender offer, proxy contest, merger or
otherwise, or to make changes in our management.
Anti-Takeover Provisions of Our Certificate of Incorporation
and Bylaws
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain several
provisions that could delay or make more difficult the
acquisition of us through a hostile tender offer, open market
purchases, proxy contest, merger or other takeover attempt that
a stockholder might consider in his or her best interest,
including those attempts that might result in a premium over the
market price of our common stock.
89
|
|
|
Written Consent of Stockholders |
Our certificate of incorporation provides that, on and after the
date when SCF ceases to own a majority of the shares of our
outstanding securities entitled to vote in the election of
directors, any action by our stockholders must be taken at an
annual or special meeting of stockholders, and stockholders
cannot act by written consent. Until that date, any action
required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders may be
taken at a duly called meeting of stockholders or by the written
consent of stockholders owning the minimum number of shares
required to approve the action.
|
|
|
Special Meetings of Stockholders |
Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred
stock, our bylaws provide that special meetings of the
stockholders may only be called by the chairman of the board of
directors or by the resolution of our board of directors
approved by a majority of the total number of authorized
directors. No business other than that stated in our notice may
be transacted at any special meeting.
|
|
|
Advance Notice Procedure for Director Nominations and
Stockholder Proposals |
Our bylaws provide that adequate notice must be given to
nominate candidates for election as directors or to make
proposals for consideration at annual meetings of our
stockholders. For nominations or other business to be properly
brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the
stockholder must have delivered a written notice to the
secretary of our company at our principal executive offices not
earlier than the close of business on the 120th calendar
day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding
years annual meeting nor later than the close of business
on the 90th calendar day prior to the first anniversary of
the date of the preceding years annual meeting; provided,
however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting
is more than 30 calendar days before or more than
70 calendar days after such anniversary date, notice by the
stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than
the close of business on the 120th calendar day prior to
such annual meeting nor later than the close of business on the
later of the 90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting
or the 10th calendar day following the calendar day on
which public announcement, if any, of the date of such meeting
is first made by us.
Nominations of persons for election to our board of directors
may be made at a special meeting of stockholders at which
directors are to be elected pursuant to our notice of meeting
(i) by or at the direction of our board of directors, or
(ii) by any stockholder of our company who is a stockholder
of record at the time of the giving of notice of the meeting,
who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with the
notice procedures set forth in our bylaws. In the event we call
a special meeting of stockholders for the purpose of electing
one or more directors to our board of directors, any stockholder
may nominate a person or persons (as the case may be) for
election to such position(s) if the stockholder provides written
notice to the secretary of our company at our principal
executive offices not earlier than the close of business on the
120th calendar day prior to such special meeting, nor later
than the close of business on the later of the
90th calendar day prior to such special meeting or the
10th calendar day following the day on which public
announcement, if any, is first made of the date of the special
meeting and of the nominees proposed by our board of directors
to be elected at such meeting.
These procedures may operate to limit the ability of
stockholders to bring business before a stockholders meeting,
including the nomination of directors and the consideration of
any transaction that could result in a change in control and
that may result in a premium to our stockholders.
|
|
|
Classified Board of Directors |
Our certificate of incorporation divides our directors into
three classes serving staggered three-year terms. As a result,
stockholders will elect approximately one-third of the board of
directors each year. This provision, when coupled with the
provision of our restated certificate of incorporation
authorizing only the board of directors to fill vacant or newly
created directorships or increase the size of the board of
directors and the provision providing that directors may only be
removed for cause, may deter a stockholder from
90
gaining control of our board of directors by removing incumbent
directors or increasing the number of directorships and
simultaneously filling the vacancies or newly created
directorships with its own nominees.
Renouncement of Business Opportunities
SCF has investments in other oilfield service companies that may
compete with us, and SCF and its affiliates, other than us, may
invest in other such companies in the future. We refer to SCF,
its other affiliates and its portfolio companies as the SCF
group. Our certificate of incorporation provides that, so long
as we have a director or officer that is affiliated with SCF (an
SCF Nominee), we renounce any interest or
expectancy in any business opportunity in which any member of
the SCF group participates or desires or seeks to participate in
and that involves any aspect of the energy equipment or services
business or industry, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
any business opportunity that is brought to the attention of an
SCF Nominee solely in such persons capacity as a director
or officer of our company and with respect to which no other
member of the SCF group independently receives notice or
otherwise identifies such opportunity; or |
|
|
|
any business opportunity that is identified by the SCF group
solely through the disclosure of information by or on behalf of
us. |
Thus, for example, members of the SCF group may pursue
opportunities in the oilfield services industry for their own
account or present such opportunities to SCFs other
portfolio companies. Our certificate of incorporation provides
that the SCF group has no obligation to offer such opportunities
to us, even if the failure to provide such opportunity would
have a competitive impact on us. We are not prohibited from
pursuing any business opportunity with respect to which we have
renounced any interest.
Amendment of the Bylaws
Our board of directors may amend or repeal the bylaws and adopt
new bylaws by the affirmative vote of a majority of the total
number of authorized directors. The holders of common stock may
amend or repeal the bylaws and adopt new bylaws by a majority
vote at any annual meeting or special meeting for which notice
of the proposed amendment, repeal or adoption was contained in
the notice for such special meeting.
Limitation of Liability of Directors
Our directors will not be personally liable to us or our
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director, except, if required by Delaware law, for
liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders; |
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law; |
|
|
|
for unlawful payment of a dividend or unlawful stock purchases
or redemptions; or |
|
|
|
for any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit. |
As a result, neither we nor our stockholders have the right,
through stockholders derivative suits on our behalf, to
recover monetary damages against a director for breach of
fiduciary duty as a director, including breaches resulting from
grossly negligent behavior, except in the situations described
above.
Delaware Takeover Statute
Under the terms of our certificate of incorporation and as
permitted under Delaware law, we have elected not to be subject
to Delawares anti-takeover law in order to give our
significant stockholders, including SCF, greater flexibility in
transferring their shares of our common stock. This law provides
that specified persons who, together with affiliates and
associates, own, or within three years did own, 15% or more of
the outstanding voting stock of a corporation could not engage
in specified business combinations with the corporation for a
period of three years after the date on which the person became
an interested stockholder. The law defines the term
business combination to encompass a wide variety of
transactions with or caused by an interested stockholder,
including mergers, asset sales and other transactions in which
91
the interested stockholder receives or could receive a benefit
on other than a pro rata basis with other stockholders. With the
approval of our stockholders, we may amend our certificate of
incorporation in the future to become governed by the
anti-takeover law. This provision would then have an
anti-takeover effect for transactions not approved in advance by
our board of directors, including discouraging takeover attempts
that might result in a premium over the market price for the
shares of our common stock. By opting out of the Delaware
anti-takeover law, a transferee of SCF could pursue a takeover
transaction that was not approved by our board of directors.
Stockholders Agreement
Complete and the existing stockholders are parties to that
certain Stockholders Agreement dated September 12, 2005
(the Stockholders Agreement).
As long as SCF owns 20% or more of our outstanding common stock,
we have agreed to take all action within our power required to
cause the board of directors at all times to include at least
two members designated by SCF and so long as SCF owns 5% or
more, at least one member designated by SCF.
|
|
|
Demand Registration Rights |
Under the Stockholders Agreement, from and after 180 days
following this offering, SCF has the right to demand on five
occasions, and Non-SCF stockholders holding at least 50% of our
unregistered common stock not held by SCF have the right to
demand on one occasion, that we register all or any portion of
their registrable securities so long as the registrable
securities proposed to be sold on an individual registration
statement have an aggregate gross offering price of at least
$20 million, unless we otherwise agree to a lesser amount
(a Demand Registration). Holders of registrable
securities may not require us to effect more than one Demand
Registration in any six-month period. After such time that we
become eligible to use
Form S-3 (or
comparable form) for the registration under the Securities Act
of any of its securities, any demand request by SCF with a
reasonably anticipated aggregate offering price of
$100 million may be for a shelf registration
statement pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act.
|
|
|
Piggyback Registration Rights |
If we propose to file a registration statement under the
Securities Act relating to an offering of our common stock,
subject to certain exceptions, upon the written request of
holders of registrable securities, we will use our commercially
reasonable efforts to include in such registration, and any
related underwriting, all of the registrable securities included
in such requests, subject to customary cutback provisions.
|
|
|
Registration Procedures and Expenses |
The Stockholders Agreement contains customary procedures
relating to underwritten offerings and the filing of
registration statements. We have agreed to pay all registration
expenses incurred in connection with any registration, including
all registration, qualification and filings fees, printing
expenses, accounting fees, escrow fees, legal fees of our
company, reasonable fees of one counsel to the holders of
registrable securities, blue sky fees and expenses and the
expense of any special audits incident to or required by any
such registration. All underwriting discounts and selling
commissions and stock transfer taxes applicable to securities
registered by holders and fees of counsel to any such holder
(other than as described above) will be payable by holders of
registrable securities.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for the common stock is Wells
Fargo Shareowner Services.
Listing
Our common stock has been approved for listing on the NYSE under
the symbol CPX.
92
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The market price of our common stock could drop
due to sales of a large number of shares of our common stock or
the perception that these sales could occur. These factors also
could make it more difficult to raise funds through future
offerings of common stock.
After this
offering, shares
of common stock will be outstanding. Of these shares, the shares
sold in this offering, including any shares sold pursuant to the
underwriters over-allotment option, will be freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (Securities Act), except for any shares
purchased by one of our affiliates as defined in
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. All of our other
outstanding shares of common stock will be restricted
securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the
Securities Act or subject to
lock-up arrangements.
The restricted securities generally may not be sold unless they
are registered under the Securities Act or are sold under an
exemption from registration, such as the exemption provided by
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. After this offering, the
holders of shares of our common stock prior to this offering
will have rights, subject to some limited conditions, to demand
that we include their shares in registration statements that we
file on their behalf, on our behalf or on behalf of other
stockholders. By exercising their registration rights and
selling a large number of shares, these holders could cause the
price of our common stock to decline. Furthermore, if we file a
registration statement to offer additional shares of our common
stock and have to include shares held by those holders, it could
impair our ability to raise needed capital by depressing the
price at which we could sell our common stock. For a description
of the registration rights held by our stockholders, please see
Description of Our Capital Stock Stockholders
Agreement.
Our officers and directors and the selling stockholders will
enter into lock-up
agreements described in Underwriting.
As restrictions on resale end, the market price of our common
stock could drop significantly if the holders of these
restricted shares sell them, or are perceived by the market as
intending to sell them.
As soon as practicable after this offering, we intend to file
one or more registration statements with the SEC on
Form S-8 providing
for the registration of shares of our common stock issued or
reserved for issuance under our stock incentive plans. Subject
to the exercise of unexercised options or the expiration or
waiver of vesting conditions for restricted stock and the
expiration of lock-ups that we and our stockholders have entered
into, shares registered under these registration statements on
Form S-8 will be
available for resale immediately in the public market without
restriction.
Rule 144
In general, beginning 90 days after the date of this
prospectus, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, any
person (or persons whose shares are aggregated), including an
affiliate, who has beneficially owned shares for a period of at
least one year is entitled to sell, within any three-month
period, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock; and |
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume in the common stock on the
NYSE during the four calendar weeks immediately preceding the
date on which the notice of the sale on Form 144 is filed
with the SEC. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to other provisions
relating to notice and manner of sale and the availability of
current public information about us.
93
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been
one of our affiliates at any time during the 90 days
preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares
proposed to be sold for at least two years, including the
holding period of any prior owner other than an
affiliate, is entitled to sell the shares without
complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume
limitation or notice provision of Rule 144.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 under the Securities Act as
currently in effect, any of our employees, consultants or
advisors who purchased or received shares from us in connection
with a compensatory stock or option plan or other written
agreement in a transaction that was completed in reliance on
Rule 701 and complied with the requirements of
Rule 701 is eligible to resell such shares beginning
90 days after the date of this prospectus in reliance on
Rule 144, but without compliance with most of its
restrictions, including the holding period, contained in
Rule 144.
94
PRINCIPAL U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES
TO
NON-U.S. HOLDERS
OF COMMON STOCK
The following is a general discussion of the principal
U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of our common stock applicable to
Non-U.S. Holders.
For purposes of this discussion, a
Non-U.S. Holder
is any beneficial owner of our common stock that is not:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity taxed as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in
the United States or under the laws of the United States, any
state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
a trust whose administration is subject to the primary
supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more
U.S. persons who have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust, or a trust in existence on
August 20, 1996 that has elected to continue to be treated
as a United States person (as defined for
U.S. federal income tax purposes). |
In the case of shares of our common stock held by a partnership
(or any other entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes), the tax treatment of a
partner generally will depend upon the status of the partner as
a Non-U.S. Holder
and the activities of the partnership. An individual may be
treated as a resident of the United States for federal income
tax purposes with respect to a calendar year if the individual
is present in the United States on at least 31 days in that
calendar year and at least 183 days during that calendar
year and the two preceding calendar years (counting, for this
purpose, each day present in the first preceding year as 1/3 of
a day and each day present in the second preceding year as 1/6
of a day). Residents are taxed for U.S. federal income tax
purposes as if they were U.S. citizens.
This discussion is based on current provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations promulgated under the
Internal Revenue Code, judicial opinions, published positions of
the Internal Revenue Service, and other applicable authorities,
all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive
effect. This discussion does not address all aspects of
U.S. federal income and estate taxation or any aspects of
state, local, or
non-U.S. taxation,
nor does it consider any specific facts or circumstances that
may apply to particular
Non-U.S. Holders
that may be subject to special treatment under the
U.S. federal tax laws, such as insurance companies,
tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, brokers,
dealers in securities, regulated investment companies, real
estate investment trusts, and certain former citizens or former
long-term residents of the United States. This discussion does
not address special tax rules that may apply to a
Non-U.S. Holder
that holds our common stock as part of a straddle,
hedge, conversion transaction,
synthetic security or other integrated investment,
and assumes that a
Non-U.S. Holder
holds our common stock as a capital asset.
Each Non-U.S Holder is urged to consult a tax advisor
regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. income
and other tax considerations of acquiring, holding and disposing
of shares of our common stock.
Dividends
Distributions on our common stock generally will constitute
dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the
extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles. In general, dividends paid to a
Non-U.S. Holder of
our common stock that are not effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business in the United States will be
subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30% of the
gross amount, or a lower rate prescribed by an applicable income
tax treaty. In order to claim a reduced rate of withholding tax
under an applicable income tax treaty, a
Non-U.S. Holder
must certify its eligibility by filing Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN. In
the case of common stock held by a foreign partnership, the
certification generally is
95
applied to the partners of the partnership, unless the
partnership agrees to become a withholding foreign
partnership and to provide eligibility information to the
Internal Revenue Service.
Dividends that are effectively connected with a
Non-U.S. Holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if an
income tax treaty applies, that are attributable to the
Non-U.S. Holders
permanent establishment in the United States) are taxed on a net
income basis at the regular graduated rates generally in the
manner applicable to U.S. persons. Such dividends are not
subject to U.S. withholding tax if the
Non-U.S. Holder
files Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8ECI. A
Non-U.S. Holder
that is a corporation also may be subject to a branch profits
tax at a rate of 30%, or such lower rate as may be specified by
an applicable income tax treaty, on the repatriation from the
United States of its earnings and profits effectively connected
with its U.S. trade or business.
A Non-U.S. Holder
of our common stock that is eligible for a reduced rate of
U.S. withholding tax under a tax treaty may obtain a refund
of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim
for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock
In general, a
Non-U.S. Holder
will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain
realized upon the sale, exchange, redemption, retirement or
other disposition of shares of our common stock so long as:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is not effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business in the United States by the
Non-U.S. Holder
(or, if an income tax treaty applies, is not attributable to the
Non-U.S. Holders
permanent establishment in the United States); |
|
|
|
if the
Non-U.S. Holder is
an individual, the
Non-U.S. Holder
either is not present in the United States for 183 days or
more in the taxable year of disposition or does not have a
tax home in the United States for U.S. federal
income tax purposes and meets certain other requirements; |
|
|
|
the
Non-U.S. Holder is
not subject to tax under the provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code regarding the taxation of certain former citizens or former
long-term residents of the United States; and |
|
|
|
we are not and have not been a U.S. real property holding
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any
time during the shorter of the
Non-U.S. Holders
holding period of our common stock and the five-year period
ending on the date of disposition. |
Generally, a corporation is a U.S. real property holding
corporation if the fair market value of its U.S. real
property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the fair market
value of its worldwide real property and its other assets used
or held for use in a trade or business. We believe that we are
not currently, and we do not anticipate becoming in the future,
a U.S. real property holding corporation.
Certain U.S. Federal Estate Tax Consequences
Common stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is
not a citizen or resident (as defined for U.S. federal
estate tax purposes) of the United States at the time of death
will be includible in the individuals gross estate for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes and therefore may be
subject to U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable
estate tax treaty provides otherwise.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Dividends paid to you may be subject to information reporting
and U.S. backup withholding tax (at a rate of 28%). If you
are a
Non-U.S. Holder
you will be exempt from backup withholding if you provide a
Form W-8BEN
certifying that you are a
Non-U.S. Holder or
you otherwise meet documentary evidence requirements for
establishing that you are a
Non-U.S. Holder,
or you otherwise establish an exemption.
96
The gross proceeds from the disposition of our common stock may
be subject to information reporting and U.S. backup
withholding tax. If you sell your common stock outside the
United States through a
non-U.S. office of
a non-U.S. broker
and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United
States, information reporting and backup withholding generally
will not apply to that payment. However, information reporting,
but not backup withholding, will generally apply to a payment of
sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United
States, if you sell your common stock through a
non-U.S. office of
a broker that is:
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. person; |
|
|
|
a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
|
|
|
a foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income from a
specified period is effectively connected with the conduct of a
U.S. trade or business; or |
|
|
|
a foreign partnership if at any time during its tax year either
(i) one or more of its partners are U.S. persons who
in the aggregate hold more than 50% of the income or capital
interests in the partnership, or (ii) the foreign
partnership is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, |
unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that you
are a
Non-U.S. Holder
and certain other conditions are met, or you otherwise establish
an exemption.
If you receive payments of the proceeds of a sale of our common
stock to or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment
is subject to both U.S. backup withholding tax and
information reporting unless you provide a Form W-8BEN
certifying that you are a
Non-U.S. Holder,
or you otherwise establish an exemption.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. You generally may
obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules that exceed your U.S. federal income tax
liability by timely filing a properly completed refund claim
with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
97
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement
dated ,
2006, we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the
underwriters named below, for whom Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC and UBS Securities LLC are acting as representatives,
the following respective number of shares of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriter |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson Rice & Company L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Simmons & Company International
|
|
|
|
|
Pickering Energy Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all of the shares of our common stock in
this offering if any are purchased, other than those shares
covered by the over-allotment option described below. The
underwriting agreement also provides that if an underwriter
defaults, the purchase commitments of the non-defaulting
underwriters may be increased or this offering may be terminated.
The selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters a
30-day option to
purchase on a pro rata basis up
to additional
outstanding shares from the selling stockholders at the initial
public offering price less the underwriting discounts and
commissions. The option may be exercised only to cover any
over-allotments of common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of
$ per
share. The underwriters and selling group members may allow a
discount of
$ per
share on sales to other broker/ dealers. After the initial
public offering, the representatives may change the public
offering price and concession and discount to broker/ dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we and the selling stockholders will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Without | |
|
With | |
|
Without | |
|
With | |
|
|
Over-allotment | |
|
Over-allotment | |
|
Over-allotment | |
|
Over-allotment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expenses payable by us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by selling
stockholders
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
We estimate that our
out-of-pocket expenses
for this offering will be approximately
$ .
The representatives have informed us that the underwriters do
not expect sales to accounts over which the underwriters have
discretionary authority to exceed 5% of the shares of common
stock being offered.
We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file
with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act
relating to, any shares of
98
our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable
or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, or publicly
disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge,
disposition or filing, without the prior written consent of
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and UBS Securities LLC for a
period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus,
except with respect to common stock issued or issuable pursuant
to stock options outstanding on the date of this prospectus,
common stock contingently issuable under existing acquisition
contracts, common stock, not to
exceed shares,
issued in connection with future acquisitions subject to the
same 180-day restriction on resales and common stock and other
stock-based awards issued or issuable pursuant to our stock
incentive plans. However, in the event that either
(1) during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the lock-up period, we announce that
we will release earnings results during the
16-day period beginning
on the last day of the lock-up period, then in
either case the expiration of the lock-up will be
extended until the expiration of the
18-day period beginning
on the date of the release of the earnings results or the
occurrence of the material news or event, as applicable, unless
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and UBS Securities LLC waive,
in writing, such an extension.
Our officers and directors, the selling stockholders and certain
other persons have agreed that they will not offer, sell,
contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have
the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other
arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the
economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether
any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our
common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge
or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or
other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written
consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and UBS Securities
LLC for a period of 180 days after the date of this
prospectus. However, in the event that either (1) during
the last 17 days of the lock-up period, we
release earnings results or material news or a material event
relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the
lock-up period, we announce that we will release
earnings results during the
16-day period beginning
on the last day of the lock-up period, then in
either case the expiration of the lock-up will be
extended until the expiration of the
18-day period beginning
on the date of the release of the earnings results or the
occurrence of the material news or event, as applicable, unless
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and UBS Securities LLC waive,
in writing, such an extension.
The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public
offering price up to 5% of the total shares of our common stock
offered hereby (excluding any shares to be sold pursuant to the
over-allotment option)for employees, directors and other persons
associated with us who have expressed an interest in purchasing
common stock in the offering. The number of shares available for
sale to the general public in the offering will be reduced to
the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any
reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the
underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the
other shares.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make in that respect.
Our common stock has been approved for listing on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol CPX.
Some of the underwriters and their affiliates have engaged in
transactions with, and performed commercial and investment
banking financial advisor or lending services for, us and our
affiliates from time to time, for which they have received
customary compensation and may do so in the future. Affiliates
of UBS Securities LLC are arrangers and agents under our credit
facility and receive fees customary for performing these
services and interest on such. In addition, a portion of the net
proceeds from this offering may be used to repay a portion of
our revolving credit facility and term loan facility, in which
case lenders
99
under such facilities, including affiliates of some of the
underwriters, will receive their proportionate share of the net
proceeds (consisting of less than 10% of such proceeds) used to
repay such debt.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price for our common
stock will be determined by negotiation between us and the
underwriters. The principal factors to be considered in
determining the initial public offering price include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the information included in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the underwriters; |
|
|
|
market conditions for initial public offerings; |
|
|
|
the history of and prospects for our business and our past and
present operations; |
|
|
|
the history of and prospects for the industry in which we
compete; |
|
|
|
our past and present earnings and current financial position; |
|
|
|
an assessment of our management; |
|
|
|
the market of securities of companies in businesses similar to
ours; and |
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets. |
The initial public offering price may not correspond to the
price at which our common stock will trade in the public market
subsequent to this offering, and an active trading market may
not develop and continue after this offering.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum. |
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of shares
over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number
of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option.
In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is
greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position by
either exercising their over-allotment option and/or purchasing
shares in the open market. |
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over- allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering. |
100
|
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions. |
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result,
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering
and one or more of the underwriters participating in this
offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The
representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that
will make Internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
101
NOTICE TO CANADIAN RESIDENTS
Resale Restrictions
The distribution of our common stock in Canada is being made
only on a private placement basis exempt from the requirement
that we and the selling stockholders prepare and file a
prospectus with the securities regulatory authorities in each
province where trades of common stock are made. Any resale of
the common stock in Canada must be made under applicable
securities laws which will vary depending on the relevant
jurisdiction, and which may require resales to be made under
available statutory exemptions or under a discretionary
exemption granted by the applicable Canadian securities
regulatory authority. Purchasers are advised to seek legal
advice prior to any resale of the common stock.
Representations of Purchasers
By purchasing common stock in Canada and accepting a purchase
confirmation, a purchaser is representing to us, the selling
stockholders and the dealer from whom the purchase confirmation
is received that:
|
|
|
|
|
the purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial securities
laws to purchase the common stock without the benefit of a
prospectus qualified under those securities laws; |
|
|
|
where required by law, that the purchaser is purchasing as
principal and not as agent; and |
|
|
|
the purchaser has reviewed the text above under
Resale Restrictions. |
Rights of Action Ontario Purchasers Only
Under Ontario securities legislation, a purchaser who purchases
a security offered by this prospectus during the period of
distribution will have a statutory right of action for damages,
or while still the owner of the common stock, for rescission
against us and the selling stockholders in the event that this
prospectus contains a misrepresentation. A purchaser will be
deemed to have relied on the misrepresentation. The right of
action for damages is exercisable not later than the earlier of
180 days from the date the purchaser first had knowledge of
the facts giving rise to the cause of action and three years
from the date on which payment is made for the common stock. The
right of action for rescission is exercisable not later than
180 days from the date on which payment is made for the
common stock. If a purchaser elects to exercise the right of
action for rescission, the purchaser will have no right of
action for damages against us or the selling stockholders. In no
case will the amount recoverable in any action exceed the price
at which the common stock was offered to the purchaser and if
the purchaser is shown to have purchased the securities with
knowledge of the misrepresentation, we and the selling
stockholders will have no liability. In the case of an action
for damages, we and the selling stockholders will not be liable
for all or any portion of the damages that are proven to not
represent the depreciation in value of the common stock as a
result of the misrepresentation relied upon. These rights are in
addition to, and without derogation from, any other rights or
remedies available at law to an Ontario purchaser. The foregoing
is a summary of the rights available to an Ontario purchaser.
Ontario purchasers should refer to the complete text of the
relevant statutory provisions.
Enforcement of Legal Rights
All of our directors and officers as well as the experts named
herein and the selling stockholders may be located outside of
Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible for Canadian
purchasers to effect service of process within Canada upon us or
those persons. All or a substantial portion of our assets and
the assets of those persons may be located outside of Canada
and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a judgment
against us or those persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment
obtained in Canadian courts against us or those persons outside
of Canada.
102
Taxation and Eligibility for Investment
Canadian purchasers of common stock should consult their own
legal and tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of
an investment in the common stock in their particular
circumstances and about the eligibility of the common stock for
investment by the purchaser under relevant Canadian legislation.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for us by Vinson &
Elkins L.L.P., Houston, Texas and certain legal matters in
connection with this offering will be passed upon for the
underwriters by Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston, Texas.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Complete Production
Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and
2004 and for the years then ended included in this prospectus
and elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by
Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants,
as indicated in their report with respect thereto, and are
included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Complete Production
Services, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2003, have been included herein and in the
registration statement in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP
(KPMG), independent registered public accounting
firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said
firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
Complete Production Services, Inc. has agreed to indemnify and
hold KPMG harmless against and from any and all legal costs and
expenses incurred by KPMG in the successful defense of any legal
action or proceeding that arises as a result of KPMGs
consent to the inclusion of its audit reports on the
Companys past financial statements included in this
registration statement.
The combined financial statements of BSI Companies, a
predecessor of Complete Production Services, Inc., as of
November 6, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and for the
period from January 1, 2003 through November 6, 2003
and for the year ended December 31, 2002, included in this
prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement have been
audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public
accountants, as indicated in their report with respect thereto,
and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of said
firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of I.E. Miller Companies,
a predecessor of Complete Production Services, Inc., as of
August 31, 2004 and for the eleven month period ended
August 31, 2004 included in this prospectus and elsewhere
in the registration statement have been audited by Grant
Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants, as
indicated in their report with respect thereto, and are included
herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of I.E. Miller Companies, a
predecessor of Complete Production Services, Inc., as of
September 30, 2003 and for the year ended
September 30, 2003 have been included herein and in the
registration statement in reliance upon the report of Darnall,
Sikes & Frederick, independent public accounting firm,
appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm
as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Oil Tool Rentals, Inc., an acquired
entity of a predecessor of Complete Production Services, Inc.,
as of September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002 and for the periods then ended, and the
financial statements of Hamm Co., an acquired entity of a
predecessor of Complete Production Services, Inc., as of
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the
respective nine-month and year periods then ended, have been
included herein and in the registration
103
statement in reliance upon the reports of BKD LLP, independent
registered public accountants, appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, given upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Big Mac Tank Trucks LLC, an acquired
entity of Complete Production Services, Inc., as of
October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for the ten
months and year then ended, included in this prospectus and
elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by
Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants,
as indicated in their report with respect thereto, and are
included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Hyland Enterprises Inc., an acquired
entity of Complete Production Services, Inc., as of
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004, and for the six
months ended August 31, 2004 and the year ended
February 29, 2004, included in this prospectus and
elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by
Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants,
as indicated in their report with respect thereto, and are
included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Monument Well Service, Inc., an
acquired entity of Complete Production Services, Inc., as of
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and for the four
months ended April 30, 2004 and the year ended
December 31, 2003, included in this prospectus and
elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by
Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants,
as indicated in their report with respect thereto, and are
included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1 regarding
the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus
does not contain all of the information found in the
registration statement. For further information regarding us and
the common stock offered in this prospectus, you may desire to
review the full registration statement, including its exhibits.
The registration statement, including the exhibits, may be
inspected and copied at the public reference facilities
maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of this material can also be
obtained upon written request from the Public Reference Section
of the SEC at prescribed rates, or accessed at the SECs
website on the Internet at www.sec.gov. Please call the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on its public reference room. In
addition, our future public filings can also be inspected
and copied at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer to
sell these securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale
is not permitted. You should assume that the information
appearing in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the
front cover of this prospectus only. Our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed
since that date.
Following the completion of this offering, we will file with or
furnish to the SEC periodic reports and other information. These
reports and other information may be inspected and copied at the
public reference facilities maintained by the SEC or obtained
from the SECs website as provided above. Our website on
the Internet is located at www.completeproduction.com,
and we expect to make our periodic reports and other information
filed with or furnished to the SEC available, free of charge,
through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after
those reports and other information are electronically filed
with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website or any
other website is not incorporated by reference into this
prospectus and does not constitute a part of this prospectus.
You may also request a copy of these filings at no cost, by
writing or telephoning us at the following address: Complete
Production Services, Inc., Attention: Chief Financial Officer,
11700 Old Katy Road, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77079,
(281) 372-2300.
We intend to furnish or make available to our stockholders
annual reports containing our audited financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP. We also intend to furnish or
make available to our stockholders quarterly reports containing
our unaudited interim financial information, including the
information required on a Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, for the
first three fiscal quarters of each fiscal year.
104
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Complete Production Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the
Years Ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-10 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-11 |
|
Audited Combined Financial Statements BSI
Companies (Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-44 |
|
|
Combined Balance Sheets as of November 6, 2003 and
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
F-45 |
|
|
Combined Statements of Earnings for the Period from
January 1, 2003 through November 6, 2003 and for the
Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
F-46 |
|
|
Combined Statement of Owners Equity for the Year Ended
December 31, 2002 and for the Period from January 1,
2003 through November 6, 2003
|
|
|
F-47 |
|
|
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Period from
January 1, 2003 through November 6, 2003 and for the
Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
F-48 |
|
|
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-49 |
|
Audited Combined Financial Statements I.E. Miller
Companies (Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-55 |
|
|
Combined Balance Sheet as of August 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-56 |
|
|
Combined Statement of Operations and Owners Equity for the
Eleven Month Period Ended August 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-57 |
|
|
Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the Eleven Month Period
Ended August 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-58 |
|
|
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-59 |
|
|
Independent Auditors Report
|
|
|
F-63 |
|
|
Combined Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2003
|
|
|
F-64 |
|
|
Combined Statement of Operations for the Year Ended
September 30, 2003
|
|
|
F-65 |
|
|
Combined Statement of Stockholders and Members
Equity for the Year Ended September 30, 2003
|
|
|
F-66 |
|
|
Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended
September 30, 2003
|
|
|
F-67 |
|
|
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-68 |
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements Hamm
Co. (Acquired Entity of a Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Accountants Report
|
|
|
F-72 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-73 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-74 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-75 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-76 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-77 |
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
Independent Accountants Report
|
|
|
F-83 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-84 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income for the Year Ended
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-85 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the Year
Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-86 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-87 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-88 |
|
Audited Financial Statements Oil Tool Rentals,
Inc. (Acquired Entity of a Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Accountants Report
|
|
|
F-94 |
|
|
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-95 |
|
|
Statements of Income for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2004 and the Years Ended December 31,
2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-96 |
|
|
Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2004 and the Years Ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-97 |
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2004 and the Years Ended December 31,
2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-98 |
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-99 |
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements Big Mac
Tank Trucks, Inc. and Affiliates (Acquired Entity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-103 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-104 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Ten Months Ended
October 31, 2005 and the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-105 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the Ten
Months Ended October 31, 2005 and the Year Ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-106 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Ten Months Ended
October 31, 2005 and the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-107 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-108 |
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements Hyland
Enterprises, Inc. (Acquired Entity of a Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Accountants Report
|
|
|
F-112 |
|
|
Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
|
|
|
F-113 |
|
|
Statements of Earnings for the Six Months Ended August 31,
2004 and the Twelve Months Ended February 29, 2004
|
|
|
F-114 |
|
|
Statement of Shareholders Equity for the Six Months Ended
August 31, 2004 and the Twelve Months Ended
February 29, 2004
|
|
|
F-115 |
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended
August 31, 2004 and the Twelve Months Ended
February 29, 2004
|
|
|
F-116 |
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-117 |
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Monument Well Service Company and Affiliates (Acquired Entity of
a Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Accountants Report
|
|
|
F-123 |
|
|
Combined Balance Sheets as of April 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-124 |
|
|
Combined Statements of Earnings for the Four Months Ended
April 30, 2004 and the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-125 |
|
|
Combined Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Four
Months Ended April 30, 2004 and the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-126 |
|
|
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Four Months Ended
April 30, 2004 and the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-127 |
|
|
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-128 |
|
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors
Complete Production Services, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Complete Production Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income,
stockholders equity and cash flows for the years then
ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the
consolidated financial statements of Integrated Production
Services, Inc., which financial statements reflect total assets
constituting 35 percent as of December 31, 2004 and
total revenues constituting 38 percent for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of the related consolidated totals. Those
consolidated financial statements were audited by other auditors
whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar
as it relates to the amounts included for Integrated Production
Services, Inc., is based solely on the accompanying report of
the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Complete Production Services, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
March 17, 2006
F-3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors
Complete Energy Services, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Complete Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the
period from inception (November 7, 2003) through
December 31, 2003 (not presented separately herein). These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Complete Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2003, and the consolidated results of their
operations and their consolidated cash flows for the period from
inception (November 7, 2003) through December 31,
2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
September 28, 2005
F-4
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors
Complete Production Services, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders
equity and cash flows of Complete Production Services, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit. We did not audit the consolidated financial statements of
Complete Energy Services, Inc., which financial statements
reflect total revenues constituting 10 percent for the
period from its formation on November 7, 2003 to
December 31, 2003 of the consolidated total. Those
consolidated financial statements were audited by other auditors
whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar
as it relates to the amounts included for Complete Energy
Services, Inc., is based solely on the accompanying report of
the other auditors.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit and the report
of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of
operations and cash flows of Complete Production Services, Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Calgary, Canada
September 30, 2005
(except as to notes 1 and 12(b),
which are as of January 17, 2006)
F-5
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors
Integrated Production Services, Inc.:
We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Integrated
Production Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders equity and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented separately
herein). These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Integrated Production Services, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Calgary, Canada
April 8, 2005
(except as to note 18, which is as
of August 19, 2005)
F-6
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except | |
|
|
share data) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
|
$ |
11,547 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
167,395 |
|
|
|
85,801 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
41,290 |
|
|
|
21,910 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
25,404 |
|
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
247,486 |
|
|
|
125,953 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
384,580 |
|
|
|
235,211 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
298,297 |
|
|
|
145,449 |
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
937,653 |
|
|
$ |
515,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank operating loans
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,745 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,953 |
|
|
|
28,493 |
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
50,693 |
|
|
|
27,688 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
40,972 |
|
|
|
18,848 |
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
6,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
14,985 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
120,203 |
|
|
|
104,740 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
509,990 |
|
|
|
169,190 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
54,334 |
|
|
|
26,225 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
42,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
686,892 |
|
|
|
343,073 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share,
200,000,000 shares authorized, 55,531,510 issued (2004 -
38,895,220 issued to controlling stockholders)
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
220,786 |
|
|
|
143,147 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
|
14,799 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(3,803 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
16,540 |
|
|
|
14,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
250,761 |
|
|
|
172,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
937,653 |
|
|
$ |
515,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
$ |
639,421 |
|
|
$ |
239,427 |
|
|
$ |
67,732 |
|
|
Product
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
81,320 |
|
|
|
35,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,726 |
|
|
|
320,747 |
|
|
|
103,279 |
|
Service expenses
|
|
|
393,856 |
|
|
|
157,540 |
|
|
|
47,329 |
|
Product expenses
|
|
|
87,538 |
|
|
|
58,633 |
|
|
|
25,795 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
111,754 |
|
|
|
46,077 |
|
|
|
16,591 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
Write-off of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
112,423 |
|
|
|
36,881 |
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
24,461 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
87,962 |
|
|
|
29,410 |
|
|
|
3,229 |
|
Taxes
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
54,246 |
|
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Weighted average shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
|
|
29,548 |
|
|
|
13,675 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,656 |
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
|
|
14,109 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
55,905 |
|
|
$ |
17,918 |
|
|
$ |
11,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
No. of | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Retained | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Stock | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Income | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts) | |
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
12,278,020 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
65,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
65,262 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
Issuance of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of CES
|
|
|
7,881,600 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
19,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Other acquisitions
|
|
|
147,498 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
56,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
For cash
|
|
|
12,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(27,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
20,348,400 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
86,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,463 |
|
|
|
97,956 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,884 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
Issuance of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of IEM
|
|
|
3,882,000 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
Other acquisitions
|
|
|
533,454 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
81,180 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
For cash
|
|
|
656,568 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
13,393,618 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
40,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,995 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
38,895,220 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
143,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,799 |
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
14,497 |
|
|
|
172,080 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,862 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
Issuance of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Parchman
|
|
|
2,655,336 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,888 |
|
|
Acquisition of Spindletop
|
|
|
90,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
2,048,526 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
For cash
|
|
|
136,376 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
15,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
Purchase of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
Stock compensation
|
|
|
16,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
Noncash compensation-options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
153,736 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Purchase of minority interest
|
|
|
11,556,344 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
138,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,540 |
|
Dividend paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146,894 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(35,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
55,531,510 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
220,786 |
|
|
$ |
(202 |
) |
|
$ |
16,885 |
|
|
$ |
(3,803 |
) |
|
$ |
16,540 |
|
|
$ |
250,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
Items not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
|
|
21,616 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes (benefit)
|
|
|
17,993 |
|
|
|
9,267 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
Write-off of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
Noncash compensation expense
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncash items
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
125 |
|
|
Net change in working capital
|
|
|
(52,402 |
) |
|
|
(14,806 |
) |
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,427 |
|
|
|
34,622 |
|
|
|
13,965 |
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt
|
|
|
741,599 |
|
|
|
121,639 |
|
|
|
35,878 |
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(464,605 |
) |
|
|
(9,859 |
) |
|
|
(7,275 |
) |
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under lines of credit
|
|
|
(19,603 |
) |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
6,429 |
|
|
Proceeds from issuances of common stock
|
|
|
12,267 |
|
|
|
16,611 |
|
|
|
21,075 |
|
|
Repayment of convertible debenture
|
|
|
(4,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock/warrants
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances (repayments) of notes payable
|
|
|
(1,690 |
) |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(146,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(4,408 |
) |
|
|
(3,637 |
) |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,139 |
|
|
|
157,630 |
|
|
|
55,281 |
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(67,689 |
) |
|
|
(139,362 |
) |
|
|
(54,798 |
) |
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(125,142 |
) |
|
|
(46,904 |
) |
|
|
(11,084 |
) |
|
Proceeds on disposal of other assets
|
|
|
4,473 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
Additions to intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,358 |
) |
|
|
(186,776 |
) |
|
|
(66,214 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
2,974 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
11,547 |
|
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
|
$ |
11,547 |
|
|
$ |
6,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
1. Significant accounting
policies:
Complete Production Services, Inc. (Complete or the
Company) is a provider of specialized services and
products focused on developing hydrocarbon reserves, reducing
operating costs and enhancing production for oil and gas
companies. The Company focuses on basins within North America
and delivers targeted services and products required by its
customers within each specific basin. The Company manages its
operations from regional field service facilities located
throughout the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas, Oklahoma,
Louisiana, western Canada and Mexico. The Company also has
offices in Southeast Asia from which it delivers products to
international oil and gas customers. Completes business
depends, to a large degree, on the level of spending by oil and
gas companies for exploration, development and production
activities. Therefore, a sustained increase or decrease in the
price of natural gas or oil, which could have a material impact
on exploration, development and production activities, also
could materially affect our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
On September 12, 2005, the Company completed the
combination (Combination) of Complete Energy
Services, Inc. (CES), Integrated Production
Services, Inc. (IPS) and I.E. Miller Services, Inc.
(IEM) pursuant to which the CES and IEM shareholders
exchanged all of their common stock for common stock of IPS. CES
shareholders received 19.704 shares of IPS for each share
of CES, and IEM shareholders received 19.410 shares of IPS
for each share of IEM. Subsequent to the combination, IPS
changed its name to Complete Production Services, Inc. The
former CES shareholders owned 57.6% of Complete common shares,
IPS shareholders owned 33.2% and the former IEM shareholders
owned 9.2%.
The consolidated financial statements include the activities of
CES, IPS and IEM for the respective periods and have been
prepared using the continuity of interests accounting method,
which yields results similar to the pooling of interests method,
under which the Company combined entities which were under
common control and majority ownership of
SCF-IV, L.P.
(SCF), a private equity fund that focuses on
investments in the energy services segment of the energy
industry. Under this method of accounting, the historical
financial statements of CES, IPS and IEM were combined for the
period January 1, 2005 through September 12, 2005, and
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, in each
case from the date each became controlled by SCF
(IPS May 22, 2001, CES
November 7, 2003, and IEM August 26,
2004). The accounting policies adopted by the Company were the
same policies that the predecessor companies employed. IPS was
the legal acquirer in the Combination. The minority interest
ownership in net income for each year is calculated based upon
the percentage of equity ownership not held by SCF in each of
CES and IEM. The consolidated financial statements have been
adjusted to reduce net income and stockholders equity by
the interest of minority stockholders in CES and IEM, as
applicable.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company are
expressed in U.S. dollars and have been prepared by
management in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts
reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial
statements have, in managements opinion, been properly
prepared using careful judgment with reasonable limits of
materiality and within the framework of the significant
accounting policies summarized below.
|
|
|
Complete Energy Services, Inc. |
CES, a Delaware corporation, was formed on November 7,
2003. CES is an integrated wellsite services provider with
operations in north and east Texas as well as in the
Mid-continent and the Rocky
F-11
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Mountain regions of the United States. CES provides a wide range
of services to the oil and gas exploration industry, including
contract drilling, well servicing, fluid handling, wellsite
rentals, materials and supplies and other support services.
These consolidated financial statements include the operations
of CES from the date of its incorporation on November 7,
2003.
|
|
|
Integrated Production Services, Inc. (formerly Saber Energy
Services, Inc. (Saber)) |
IPS, a Delaware corporation, was formerly named Saber Energy
Services, Inc. On September 18, 2002, an amendment to the
certificate of incorporation for Saber was filed with the State
of Delaware to change the name of the company from Saber to IPS.
Saber was incorporated on May 22, 2001 at which date SCF
was its controlling shareholder. Saber entered into a
combination agreement with Integrated Production Services Ltd.
(IPSL) on September 20, 2002. SCF held an
equity interest in IPSL from October 16, 2000 and became
the controlling shareholder of IPSL on July 3, 2002. IPS
provides a wide range of services and products to the oil and
gas industry designed to reduce customers operating costs
and increase production from customers hydrocarbon
reserves. Services provided include coiled tubing, wireline,
production testing and production optimization. Operations are
located in western Canada, Texas, Louisiana and Southeast Asia.
These consolidated financial statements include the operations
of Saber from the date of its incorporation on May 22, 2001
and the operations of Integrated Productions Services Ltd.
(IPSL) from the date of an initial investment by SCF
on October 16, 2000, following the continuity of interest
method of accounting based on common ownership by SCF.
|
|
|
I.E. Miller Services, Inc. |
IEM, a Delaware corporation, was formed on August 26, 2004
to acquire certain businesses that perform land rig moving
services in Louisiana and Texas and vacuum truck services in
south Louisiana.
These consolidated financial statements include the operations
of IEM from the date of its incorporation on August 26,
2004.
|
|
|
(a) Basis of preparation: |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the legal entities discussed above and their wholly owned
subsidiaries. All material inter-company balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
|
|
|
(b) Foreign currency translation: |
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, whose functional
currencies are the local currency, are translated from their
respective functional currencies to U.S. dollars at the
balance sheet date exchange rates. Income and expense items are
translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during
the year. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from
translation of account balances are included in income or loss
in the year in which they occur. The adjustment resulting from
translating the financial statements of such foreign
subsidiaries into U.S. dollars is reflected as a separate
component of stockholders equity.
F-12
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company recognizes service revenue when it is realized and
earned. The Company considers revenue to be realized and earned
when the services have been provided to the customer, the
product has been delivered, the sales price has been fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Generally
services are provided over a relatively short time.
Revenue and costs on drilling contracts are recognized as work
progresses. Progress is measured and revenues recognized based
upon agreed day-rate charges. For certain contracts, the Company
receives additional lump-sum payments for the mobilization of
rigs and other drilling equipment. Consistent with the drilling
contract day-rate revenues and charges, revenues and related
direct costs incurred for the mobilization are deferred and
recognized over the term of the related drilling contract. Costs
incurred to relocate rigs and other drilling equipment to areas
in which a contract has not been secured are expensed as
incurred.
The Company recognizes revenue under service contracts as
services are performed. For the year ended December 31,
2005, the Company entered into two separate agreements whereby
customers advanced funds totaling $7,400, and the Company agreed
to provide contract drilling services. This amount was recorded
as a current liability when received. Under this arrangement, a
third-party constructed two drilling rigs on the Companys
behalf for these customers. The first rig was completed in
October 2005, and the second was completed in January 2006. The
Company recognizes revenue under this arrangement when the rigs
drill for the customers. Revenue is recognized as it is earned
based upon predetermined prices for each day the rig is employed
by the customer and in a manner that is consistent with
Completes revenue recognition policy. The rates charged to
the customers are equal to or greater than prevailing marking
rates. As revenues are earned, the prepayment liability is
offset by billings to the customers. One rig began operating in
October 2005, and Complete has recognized revenues totaling $993
under this arrangement in 2005. The other rig began operating in
January 2006. Unearned revenue totaled $6,407 at
December 31, 2005. The Company expects that the entire
portion of the deferred revenue will be earned and recognized by
December 31, 2006. The Company had no unearned revenues
associated with long-term service contracts as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
(d) Cash and cash equivalents: |
Short-term investments with maturities less than three months
are considered to be cash equivalents and are recorded at cost,
which approximates fair market value. The Company considers all
investments in highly liquid debt instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
|
|
|
(e) Trade accounts receivable: |
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount
and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
the Companys best estimate of the amount of probable
credit losses in the Companys existing accounts
receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on
historical write-off experience, account aging and
managements assumptions about the oil and gas industry
economic cycle. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful
accounts monthly. Past due balances over 90 days and over a
specified amount are reviewed individually for collectibility.
All other balances are reviewed on a pooled basis. Account
balances are charged off against the allowance after all
appropriate means of collection have been exhausted and the
potential for recovery is considered remote. Based on its
customer base, the Company does not believe that it has any
significant concentrations of credit risk other than its
concentration in the oil and gas industry. The Company does not
have any off balance-sheet credit exposure related to its
customers.
F-13
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Inventory consisting of finished goods and materials and
supplies held for resale is carried at the lower of cost or
market. Market is defined as net realizable value for finished
goods and as replacement cost for manufacturing parts and
materials. Cost, which includes the cost of raw materials and
labor for finished goods, is determined on a
first-in
first-out basis for
refurbished parts and an average cost basis for all other
inventories.
|
|
|
(g) Property, plant and equipment: |
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Major betterments are capitalized.
Repairs and maintenance that do not extend the useful life of
equipment are expensed.
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful life of each
asset as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
Basis |
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
straight-line |
|
39 years |
Field Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline, optimization and coiled tubing equipment
|
|
straight-line |
|
10 years |
|
Gas testing equipment
|
|
straight-line |
|
15 years |
|
Drilling rigs
|
|
straight-line |
|
20 years |
|
Well-servicing rigs
|
|
straight-line |
|
25 years |
Office furniture and computers
|
|
declining balance |
|
30% |
Leasehold improvements
|
|
straight-line |
|
5 years |
Vehicles and other equipment
|
|
straight-line |
|
3 to 10 years |
Intangible assets, consisting of acquired customer
relationships, service marks, non-compete agreements, acquired
patents and technology, are carried at cost less accumulated
amortization, which is calculated on a straight-line basis over
a period of 2 to 10 years depending on the
assets estimated useful life. The weighted average
remaining amortization period was
approximately 4 years as of December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
(i) Impairment of long-lived assets: |
In accordance with SFAS 144, long-lived assets, such as
property, plant and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject
to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed
of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and
reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.
The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as
held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate
asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.
F-14
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
(j) Asset retirement obligations: |
In June 2001, SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, was issued. SFAS 143 requires the Company
to record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a
liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets
that result from the acquisition, construction, development,
and/or normal use of the assets. The Company also would record a
corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the
asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset
retirement obligation, the obligation would be adjusted at the
end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in
the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation. The
Company was required to adopt SFAS 143 on January 1,
2003. The adoption of SFAS 143 did not affect the
Companys financial statements.
|
|
|
(k) Deferred financing costs: |
Deferred financing costs associated with long-term debt are
carried at cost and are expensed over the term of the relevant
long-term debt.
Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of
assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill acquired in a business
combination is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment
at least annually in the fourth quarter. Under this goodwill
impairment test, if the fair value of a reporting unit does not
exceed its carrying value, the excess of fair value of a
reporting unit over the fair value of its net assets is
considered to be the implied fair value of goodwill. If the
carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, the
difference is recognized as an impairment loss. Goodwill was
evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2005. Management
determined that goodwill was not impaired, and thus no
impairment charge has been recorded related to goodwill for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
(m) Deferred income taxes: |
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for
income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are determined based upon temporary differences
between the carrying amount and tax basis of the Companys
assets and liabilities and measured using enacted tax rates and
laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to
reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in the tax rates is recognized in income in the period in
which the change occurs. The Company records a valuation reserve
in each reporting period when management believes that it is
more likely than not that any deferred tax asset created will
not be realized.
|
|
|
(n) Financial instruments: |
The financial instruments recognized in the balance sheet
consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable,
bank operating loans, accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
long-term debt and convertible debentures. The fair value of all
financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to
their current maturities or market rates of interest.
The treasury stock method of calculating diluted per share
amounts is utilized. This method assumes that any proceeds from
the exercise of options and other dilutive instruments where the
fair value exceeds the exercise price would be used to purchase
common stock at the average fair value during the period.
F-15
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
(p) Stock-based compensation: |
The Company has stock-based compensation plans for its
employees, officers and directors to acquire common stock.
Options are issued with an exercise price equal to fair value of
the stock on the date of grant; consequently, under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, no compensation expense is recorded.
Consideration paid on the exercise of stock options is credited
to share capital and additional paid-in capital. Pro forma
information required by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, is noted below. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. See note
12(e). Restricted shares are awarded at a price equal to fair
value and the related compensation expense is charged to income
over the vesting period of the restricted stock.
The Company applied the minimum value method prescribed in APB
No. 25 in accounting for its stock-based compensation
plans. If compensation cost for the Companys stock-based
compensation plans had been determined using the fair value
approach set forth in SFAS No. 123, the Companys
results of operations for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003 would approximate the pro forma amounts
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
Add: Compensation expense related to stock-based compensation,
net of tax
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Impact of stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value method, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
53,535 |
|
|
$ |
13,586 |
|
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
The fair value of each stock option award on the grant date was
estimated using the minimum value option pricing model with the
following fair values and assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average fair value
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.8% to 4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
3.0 to 4.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
F-16
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
(q) Research and development: |
Research and development costs are charged to income as period
costs when incurred.
Liabilities for loss contingencies, including environmental
remediation costs not within the scope of SFAS No. 143
arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, and
penalties and other sources, are recorded when it is probable
that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the
assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated.
|
|
|
(s) Measurement uncertainty: |
The Companys consolidated financial statements are
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of
the consolidated financial statements in accordance with
U.S. GAAP necessarily requires the Company to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company
evaluates its estimates including those related to bad debts,
inventory obsolescence, property plant and equipment useful
lives, goodwill, intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies
and litigation on an ongoing basis. The Company bases its
estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed at the time to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Under different assumptions or conditions,
the actual results could differ, possibly materially, from those
previously estimated. Many of the conditions impacting these
assumptions are estimates outside of the Companys control.
Certain prior year figures have been reclassified to conform to
the current years presentation.
|
|
2. |
Business combinations: |
On September 12, 2005, IPS, later renamed Complete
Production Services, Inc., acquired all of the interest of the
minority stockholders in CES and IEM in conjunction with the
Combination. The Combination was accounted for using
the continuity of interest method as described in Note 1.
The purchase of the interest of the minority stockholders by IPS
was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The
purchase resulted in goodwill of $93,792, which represented the
excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of the net
assets acquired.
The following table summarizes the acquisition of the interest
of minority stockholders of CES and IEM in exchange for shares
of the Companys common stock and the elimination of the
historical amounts reflected in the combined group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CES | |
|
IEM | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Common stock to minority interest
|
|
$ |
129,718 |
|
|
$ |
13,167 |
|
|
$ |
142,885 |
|
Minority interest in fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
|
44,565 |
|
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
|
49,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recorded as goodwill
|
|
$ |
85,153 |
|
|
$ |
8,639 |
|
|
$ |
93,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since this transaction represents the purchase of a minority
interest in the combined entity, assets and liabilities were
deemed to be recorded at historical cost which approximated fair
value. Therefore, the Company recorded an increase in additional
paid-in capital with a similar increase in goodwill, with no
F-17
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
other changes to asset or liability accounts.
|
|
|
(b) Post-Combination Acquisitions (After
September 12, 2005): |
|
|
|
(i) Spindletop Production Services, Ltd.
(Spindletop): |
On September 29, 2005, the Company acquired all of the
assets of Spindletop, an entity owned by a related party, in a
transaction accounted for as a purchase. This business consists
of a manufacturing and equipment repair operation located in
Gainsville, Texas, which produces completion products to be sold
through our supply stores, distributors and direct sales force,
with a primary service area of the Barnett Shale region of north
Texas. The results of operations for this business were included
in the accounts of the Company from the date of acquisition.
Goodwill of $613 resulted from the acquisition and was allocated
entirely to the product sales segment.
The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price
allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock (90,364 shares)
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
The price for common shares was based on internal calculations
of the fair value for such shares. The purchase price allocation
is preliminary and certain items such as acquisition costs,
final tax basis and fair values of asset and liabilities as of
the acquisition date have not yet been finalized.
|
|
|
(ii) Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. and Affiliates (Big
Mac): |
On November 1, 2005, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding equity interests of the Big Mac group of companies
(Big Mac Transports, LLC, Big Mac Tank Trucks, LLC and Fugo
Services, LLC) for $40,800 in cash. Big Mac is based in
McAlester, Oklahoma, and provides fluid handling services
primarily to customers in eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas.
The purchase price, which is subject to a post-closing
adjustment for actual working capital and reimbursable capital
expenditures as of the closing date, has not yet been finalized.
Goodwill of $23,724 resulted from this transaction and was
allocated entirely to the completion and production services
business segment. The Company has included the operating results
of Big Mac in the completion and production services business
segment from the date of acquisition. The Company believes that
this acquisition provides a platform to enter the eastern
Oklahoma market and new Fayetteville Shale play in Arkansas.
F-18
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price
allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
11,715 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
23,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
40,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
$ |
40,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Wolsey Well Service, LP (Wolsey): |
On December 15, 2005, the Company acquired the well
servicing assets of Wolsey, a well operating company with a
fleet of five well servicing rigs based in Bowie, Texas, for
$6,500 in cash. Of the total purchase price, $3,500 was
allocated to property, plant and equipment. This purchase price
allocation has not yet been finalized. Goodwill of $3,000
resulted from this transaction and has been allocated entirely
to the completion and production services business segment. The
results of operations of Wolsey were included in the completion
and production services business segment since the date of
acquisition.
The following table provides pro forma information related to
the acquisitions of Spindletop, Big Mac and Wolsey, assuming
each acquisition occurred on January 1, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Results | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
782,344 |
|
|
$ |
350,277 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest
|
|
$ |
93,752 |
|
|
$ |
36,167 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
57,322 |
|
|
$ |
17,921 |
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
To calculate pro forma amounts, the Company used the audited
financial statements of Big Mac for the ten months ended
October 31, 2005 and year ended December 31, 2004, and
assumed 7% debt service costs to finance the transaction, net of
tax effect calculated at the statutory tax rate of 35%. Results
for the Spindletop and Wolsey transactions were calculated by
annualizing results obtained during the period the assets were
held by the Company in 2005 and based on certain management
assumptions, adjusted for debt service costs and related tax
effect, as described above, for each of the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004. Although the accounting
policies and procedures used to prepare the pro forma results
are deemed reasonable by the Company, these pro forma results do
not purport to be indicative of the actual results which would
have been achieved had the acquisitions been consummated on
January 1, of the respective year, and are not intended to
be a projection of future results.
F-19
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
(c) Pre-Combination 2005 Acquisitions (Before
September 12, 2005): |
|
|
|
(i) Parchman Energy Group, Inc.
(Parchman): |
On February 11, 2005, the Company acquired all of the
common shares of Parchman in a business combination accounted
for as a purchase. Parchman performs coiled tubing services,
well testing services, snubbing services and wireline services
in Louisiana, Texas, Wyoming and Mexico. The results of
operations for Parchman were included in the accounts of the
Company from the date of acquisition. In addition, the purchase
agreement provides for the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of
common stock of the Company as contingent consideration over the
period from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2005
based on certain operating results of the Companys
operations in the United States. See note 20(b). Goodwill of
$20,255 resulted from the acquisition and was allocated entirely
to the completion and production services segment. Intangible
assets included customer relationships and patents that are
being amortized over a 3-to-5 year period. The Company
awarded 344,664 shares of non-vested restricted common stock to
certain former Parchman employees, which will vest over a
three-year term. Of these restricted shares, 153,736 shares
vested on December 31, 2005. The Company recorded deferred
compensation associated with these shares totaling $2,192, of
which $731 was expensed during the year ended December 31,
2005.
The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price
allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
49,975 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
Goodwill (no tax basis)
|
|
|
20,255 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(32,017 |
) |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(8,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
31,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
$ |
9,833 |
|
|
Subordinated note
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock (2,655,336 shares)
|
|
|
16,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
$ |
31,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
The price for common shares was based on internal calculations
of the fair value for such shares and consultations with the
seller. The purchase price allocation is preliminary and certain
items such as acquisition costs, final tax basis and fair values
of asset and liabilities as of the acquisition date have not yet
been finalized.
|
|
|
(ii) Premier Integrated Technologies
(Premier): |
On January 1, 2005, the Company acquired a 50% interest in
Premier in a business combination accounted for as a purchase.
Premier provides optimization services in Alberta, British
Columbia and Saskatchewan. The Company consolidates Premier,
including results of operations, in the accounts of the Company
from the date of acquisition and has recorded the minority
interest ownership. Goodwill of $997 resulted from this
acquisition and was allocated entirely to the completion and
production services segment.
F-20
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price
allocated to the Companys 50% interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
2,390 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(1,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
1,559 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price allocation is preliminary and certain items
such as fair value of assets and liabilities as of the
acquisition date have not yet been finalized.
|
|
|
(iii) Roustabout Specialties Inc. (RSI): |
On July 7, 2005, the Company acquired all of the common
shares of RSI in a business combination accounted for as a
purchase. RSI is a field services and rental company
headquartered in Grand Junction, Colorado, with a primary
service area of operation in the Piceance Basin of western
Colorado. The results of operations for RSI were included in the
accounts of the Company from the date of acquisition. Goodwill
of $3,073 resulted from the acquisition and was allocated
entirely to the completion and production services segment.
The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price
allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
1,843 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
9,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
$ |
8,656 |
|
Issuance of common stock to minority interest (136,444 shares)
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
9,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
The price for common shares was based on internal calculations
of the fair value for such shares. The purchase price allocation
is preliminary and certain items such as acquisition costs,
final tax basis and fair values of asset and liabilities as of
the acquisition date have not yet been finalized.
F-21
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
(d) IPS 2004 Acquisitions: |
During 2004, the Company acquired all of the interests of the
following entities in transactions accounted for as a purchase.
The businesses acquired included Double Jack Testing and
Services, Inc. (Double Jack), Nortex Perforating
Group, Inc. (Nortex), and MGM Well Service, Inc.
(MGM).
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation in
millions of dollars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Jack | |
|
Nortex | |
|
MGM | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Cash contingent consideration
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 533,454 common shares issued as consideration on
these acquisitions. The share price of $5.70 per share was
determined based on an internal valuation using a market
multiple methodology and approved by the Companys Board of
Directors. These acquisitions provide platforms for the
provision of the Companys services in the Barnett Shale
and Rocky Mountain regions. In addition, MGM operates an
optimization and swabbing business in Texas, and through
distributors in Wyoming and Canada, provides the Company with
expertise, personnel, and a platform to expand its optimization
business in North America. The results of operations are
included in the accounts from the date of acquisition. The
purchase agreement for Double Jack provides for up to $1,200 of
contingent consideration over the period from the date of
acquisition to December 31, 2005 based on operating results
of the acquired business. Contingent consideration will be
accounted for as an adjustment to the purchase price in the
period earned. At December 31, 2004, $300 of the contingent
consideration was earned. The purchase agreement for MGM
provides for contingent consideration of up to $3,430 of cash
and 214,132 common shares over the period from the date of
acquisition to December 31, 2006 based on certain operating
results of the acquired MGM business. Contingent consideration
will be accounted for as an adjustment to the purchase price in
the period earned. See note 20(b). The goodwill for these
acquisitions was allocated entirely to the completion and
production services segment. Of the total goodwill recorded of
$13,700, $12,700 is without tax basis.
|
|
|
(e) CES 2004 Acquisitions: |
During 2004, the Company acquired all of the interests (except
as noted) of the following entities in a combination accounted
for as a purchase. The businesses acquired included LEED Energy
Services (LEED), Salmon Drilling
(Salmon), A&W Water Service
(A&W), Monument Well Service and R&W Rentals
(MWS), Hyland Enterprises (Hyland), Hamm
Co. Companies (Hamm Management Co., Hamm and Phillips Service
Co., Stride Well Service Company, Inc., Rigmovers, Co., Guard
Drilling Mud Disposal, Inc., and Oil Tool Rentals, Co.)
(collectively, Hamm), and the remaining 50% interest
in Price Pipeline (Price).
F-22
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation
associated with these transactions in millions of dollars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEED | |
|
Salmon | |
|
A&W | |
|
MWS | |
|
Hyland | |
|
Hamm | |
|
Price | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current assets
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
24.5 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
101.8 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
$ |
87.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
169.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration and seller notes
|
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
48.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
97.6 |
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
Acquisition costs
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
$ |
87.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
169.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 6,568,332 common shares issued to minority
interest as consideration in connection with these acquisitions.
The share price of $2.54 or $6.09 per share was determined based
on an internal valuation using a market multiple methodology and
approved by the Companys board of directors. These
acquisitions provide the Company with a presence in the
completion and production services and drilling services
segments to the oil and gas industry in the Mid-continent and
Rocky Mountain and Barnett Shale regions. The results of
operations have been included in the accounts of Complete from
the dates of the respective acquisitions. Goodwill associated
with these acquisitions was allocated as follows: $1,549 to the
drilling services segment and $59,386 to the completion and
production services segment. Intangible assets are comprised of
customer relationships, service marks and non-compete agreements
and are being amortized over a 3 to 5 year period.
|
|
|
(f) I.E. Miller 2004 Acquisitions: |
On August 31, 2004, the Company acquired all of the stock
of I.E. Miller of Eunice (Texas) No. 2, L.L.C., I.E.
Miller Fowler Trucking (Texas) No. 2, L.L.C.
and I.E. Miller Heldt Brothers Trucking (Texas)
No. 2, L.L.C. in a combination accounted for as a purchase.
The results of operations were included in the accounts of
Complete from the date of acquisition. Goodwill associated with
these acquisitions was entirely allocated to the drilling
services segment. The price per common share of $2.58 was a
negotiated price with the seller.
F-23
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
8,641 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
12,250 |
|
|
Goodwill (no tax basis)
|
|
|
8,543 |
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(3,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
26,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$ |
13,573 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock to minority interest (4,852,500 common
shares)
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$ |
26,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) CES 2003 Acquisitions: |
On November 7, 2003, the Company acquired all of the
interests (except as noted) of BSI in a combination accounted
for as a purchase. BSI included Basin Tool, Bell Supply I,
LP, Felderhoff Drilling, Mercer Well Service, Price Pipeline
(50% interest acquired), Shale Tank Truck, L.P., Tejas Oilfield
Services, LLC, and Western Bentonite. BSI provided the Company
with a platform business in the Barnett Shale region of north
Texas. The results of operations of these acquired companies
have been included in the accounts of Complete from the date of
acquisition. Goodwill associated with these acquisitions was
allocated $9,471 to the completion and production services
segment and $4,940 to the drilling services segment. The price
for common stock, of $2.54 per share, issued pursuant to the
transaction was based on a negotiated price with the seller.
Intangible assets acquired were comprised of customer
relationships, service marks and non-compete agreements and are
being amortized over a
3-to-5 year period.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
12,226 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
36,160 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
14,411 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(5,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
58,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$ |
50,093 |
|
Issuance of common stock to minority interest (3,377,896 common
shares)
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
58,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) IPS 2003 Acquisitions: |
On April 30, 2003, the Company acquired all of the stock of
Ess-Ell Tool Co. Ltd., 852592 Alberta Ltd. and Sentry Oil Tools
LLC as well as related holding companies in a business
combination accounted for as a purchase. The companies operate a
flow control products business in Canada and Texas providing the
Company with an expanded line of production enhancement products
and geographic platforms from
F-24
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
which to expand. The results of operations of these acquired
companies have been included in the accounts of Complete from
the date of acquisition. Goodwill associated with these
acquisitions was entirely allocated to the product sales
segment. The price for common stock of $5.70 per share issued
pursuant to the transaction was based on the fair value
estimated by the financial advisor engaged in connection with
the September 20, 2002 combination as described in
note 2(f) and updated with an internally-prepared valuation
using a market-multiple approach.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
Goodwill (no tax basis)
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
4,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, net of cash acquired
|
|
$ |
3,863 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock (147,498 common shares)
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$ |
4,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Trade
|
|
$ |
158,585 |
|
|
$ |
80,980 |
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
9,636 |
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Other
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,297 |
|
|
|
86,344 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167,395 |
|
|
$ |
85,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Finished goods
|
|
$ |
30,306 |
|
|
$ |
19,929 |
|
Manufacturing parts and materials
|
|
|
12,966 |
|
|
|
3,344 |
|
Bulk fuel
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,360 |
|
|
$ |
23,273 |
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,290 |
|
|
$ |
21,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
5. |
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Net | |
December 31, 2005 |
|
Cost | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Book Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
$ |
4,906 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,906 |
|
Building
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
Field equipment
|
|
|
376,979 |
|
|
|
64,272 |
|
|
|
312,707 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
37,848 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
29,156 |
|
Office furniture and computers
|
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
4,293 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
23,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
460,034 |
|
|
$ |
75,454 |
|
|
$ |
384,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
Building
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
6,237 |
|
Field equipment
|
|
|
238,948 |
|
|
|
29,314 |
|
|
|
209,634 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
18,610 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
16,378 |
|
Office furniture and computers
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
268,793 |
|
|
$ |
33,582 |
|
|
$ |
235,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 | |
|
As of December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Term | |
|
Historical | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net Book | |
|
Historical | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net Book | |
Description |
|
(in months) | |
|
Cost | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Patents and trademarks
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
$ |
2,619 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$ |
2,049 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
1,588 |
|
Contractual agreements
|
|
|
24 to 120 |
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
Customer lists and other
|
|
|
36 to 60 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,454 |
|
|
$ |
2,487 |
|
|
$ |
4,967 |
|
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
|
$ |
4,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded amortization expense associated with
intangible assets of $1,493, $740 and $212 for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company
expects to record amortization expense associated with these
intangible assets for the next five years approximating:
2006 - $1,633; 2007 - $1,323; 2008 - $844;
2009 - $572; and 2010 - $231.
|
|
7. |
Deferred financing costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net | |
December 31, 2005 |
|
Cost | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Book Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred financing costs
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
$ |
5,763 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
4,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company expensed unamortized deferred financing fees
totaling $3,315 associated with debt facilities which were
retired on September 12, 2005 with the proceeds from the
Companys new $580.0 million term loan and revolving
credit facilities.
Tax expense (benefit) consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Domestic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise taxes
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
Current income taxes
|
|
|
11,653 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes (benefit)
|
|
|
18,557 |
|
|
|
8,015 |
|
|
|
(594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,210 |
|
|
|
8,404 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
Foreign:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
Current income taxes
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes (benefit)
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
33,716 |
|
|
$ |
10,821 |
|
|
$ |
1,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company operates in several tax jurisdictions. A
reconciliation of the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%
(2004 and 200334%) to the Companys effective income
tax rate follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected provision (benefit) for taxes:
|
|
$ |
30,787 |
|
|
$ |
9,999 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax rate differential
|
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
Foreign capital taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
33,716 |
|
|
$ |
10,821 |
|
|
$ |
1,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The net deferred income tax liability was comprised of the tax
effect of the following temporary differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
11,062 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
Research and development credits
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
Restricted stock compensation costs
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,259 |
|
|
|
11,867 |
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,382 |
|
|
|
10,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(48,888 |
) |
|
|
(33,159 |
) |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
(2,432 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,593 |
) |
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,724 |
) |
|
|
(36,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liability
|
|
$ |
(52,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred income tax liability consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Domestic
|
|
$ |
(45,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,566 |
) |
Foreign
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
|
|
(6,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(52,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred income tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not
be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income
during the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset,
the Company will need to generate future taxable income of
approximately $15,000 prior to the expiration of the net
operating loss carryforwards in 2024.
The Company has U.S. loss carryforwards of $1,599 at
December 31, 2005, compared to $26,023 at December 31,
2004. The Company has a $1,163 foreign non-capital loss
carryforward at December 31, 2005, compared to $3,772 at
December 31, 2004.
In 2003, the Company completed a review of the tax basis arising
from certain acquisitions which resulted in a reduction to the
valuation allowance by $1,400. The reduction in the valuation
allowance resulted in a reduction in goodwill attributable to
the completion and production services segment.
No deferred income taxes were provided on approximately $1,700
of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005, as the Company intends to indefinitely
reinvest these funds. Upon distribution of these earnings in the
form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject to
U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. It is not
practical, however, to estimate the amount of
F-28
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
taxes that may be payable on the eventual distribution of these
earnings after consideration of available foreign tax credits.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had Canadian and
U.S. dollarsyndicated revolving operating credit
facilities (see note 10(b)) in place. The Canadian
operating facility provided up to C$10,000. The
U.S. operating facility line provided a revolving credit
facility up to $10,000. Interest was on a grid based on certain
financial ratios and ranged from primetoprime plus
1.25% per annum. At December 31, 2004, Canadian and
U.S. prime were 4.25% and 5.25%, respectively. The
facilities were secured by a general security agreement
providing a first charge against the Companys assets. The
Canadian and U.S. credit facilities included a commitment
fee of 0.25% and 0.375% per annum, respectively, on the
average unused portion of the revolving credit facilities.
The maximum amounts available under these credit facilities were
subject to a borrowing base formula based upon trade accounts
receivable and inventory. As at December 31, 2004, the
maximum available under these combined facilities was limited by
the borrowing base formula to $20,536.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had drawn $15,745 on
these operating lines and an additional amount of $6,000
outstanding pursuant to an overnight facility in the United
States offset by a corresponding $6,000 of cash on deposit in
Canada. As at December 31, 2004, $48 of letters of credit
were outstanding.
On September 12, 2005, the Company retired all amounts
outstanding under these bank operating loans with proceeds from
borrowings under the new $580,000 term loan and revolving credit
facilities, as further described in note 10(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. term loan facility(a)
|
|
$ |
418,950 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. revolving credit facility(a)
|
|
|
58,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian revolving credit facility(a)
|
|
|
27,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reducing Canadian term facility(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,552 |
|
Reducing U.S. term facility(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,168 |
|
Term loan(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,650 |
|
Revolving line of credit(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,850 |
|
Subordinated seller notes(d)
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
Term loan(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,274 |
|
Subordinated note(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
Capital leases(g)
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Other(h)
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,943 |
|
|
|
197,683 |
|
Less: current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(5,953 |
) |
|
|
(28,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
509,990 |
|
|
$ |
169,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Concurrent with the consummation of the Combination on
September 12, 2005, the Company entered into a syndicated
senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility)
pursuant to which all bank debt held by each of IPS, CES and IEM
was repaid and replaced with the proceeds from the Credit
Facility. The Credit Facility was comprised of a $420,000 term
loan credit facility that will mature in September 2012, a U.S.
revolving credit facility of $130,000 that will mature in
September 2010, and a Canadian revolving credit facility of
$30,000 that will mature in September 2010. Interest on the
Credit Facility is determined by reference to LIBOR plus a
margin of 1.25% to 2.75% (dependent on the ratio of total debt
to EBITDA, as defined in the agreement) for revolving advances
and a margin of 2.75% for term loan advances. Interest on
advances under the Canadian revolving facility was calculated at
the Canadian Prime Rate plus a margin of 0.25% to 1.75%.
Quarterly principal repayments of 0.25% of the original
principal amount are required for the term loans commencing
December 2005. The Credit Facility contains covenants
restricting the levels of certain transactions including:
entering into certain loans, the granting of certain liens,
capital expenditures, acquisitions, distributions to
stockholders, certain asset dispositions and operating leases.
The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants under the
Credit Facility at December 31, 2005. The Credit Facility
is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. As
of December 31, 2005, the Company had borrowings of
$418,950 outstanding under the term loan portion of this
facility, which bore interest at 7.28%, with no borrowing
capacity available under the term loan. Borrowings outstanding
under the U.S. revolving and Canadian revolving portions of this
facility at December 31, 2005 were $58,096 and $27,016,
respectively, and bore interest at 7.23% and 6.5%, respectively.
In addition, there were letters of credit outstanding which
totaled $5,519 under the U.S. revolving portion of the facility
that further reduced the available borrowing capacity at
December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
At December 31, 2004, the Company had a syndicated credit
facility which included four separate facilities secured by a
common security package. The two operating facilities are
described in Note 9. The agreement also included a Canadian
reducing term facility (CTF) and a
U.S. reducing term facility (UTF). The CTF had
been fully drawn and was repayable in equal quarterly
installments of C$1,370 and $175. The UTF had also been fully
drawn and was repayable in equal quarterly installments of
C$954. The facilities were to mature on June 30, 2007 and
bore interest from prime plus 0.25% to prime plus 1.50% per
annum on a grid based on certain financial ratios. At
December 31, 2004, Canadian and U.S. prime were 4.25%
and 5.25% (2003 4.5% and 4.0%, 2002 4.5%
and 4.25%), respectively. The Company was in compliance with all
of the terms of these facilities at December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective February 11, 2005, in conjunction with the
acquisition of Parchman Energy Group, Inc., the Company and a
group of banks entered into a new credit facility replacing the
current credit facility. The new credit facility was comprised
of five separate facilities secured by a common security package
including a first charge against the Companys assets.
There are two operating facilities ($20,000 and C$15,000), each
of which was to mature on February 10, 2008, which replaced
the existing operating facilities. There were two reducing term
facilities ($20,000 and C$30,000) which were to mature on
February 10, 2010 and which required quarterly payments of
$1,000 and C$1,500 respectively. Each of these four facilities
bore interest from prime plus 0.25% to prime plus 1.50% per
annum on a grid based on certain financial ratios. The fifth
term facility was in the amount of $35,000, was to mature on
February 10, 2011, required quarterly payments of $88, and
bore interest at LIBOR plus 3.5%. Each of the three term
facilities were drawn in full on February 11, 2005. The
credit facilities required maintenance of certain financial
ratios and other covenants and were secured by substantially all
of the assets of IPS. This facility was retired on
September 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
In November 2003, the Company established a secured $30,600 term
loan and an $8,000 secured revolving line of credit. During
2004, the Company amended the term loan and revolving line of
credit several times to facilitate the acquisitions described in
note 2, which resulted in increasing the Companys
total borrowing capacity to $120,650 and $30,000, respectively,
and extension of the |
|
F-30
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
maturity dates. At December 31, 2004, the Company did not
have any remaining borrowing capacity on the term loan and
$10,200 of remaining capacity on the revolving line of credit. |
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of CESs real and personal property and a
pledge of the ownership interest of present and future
subsidiaries secure both the term loan and the revolving line of
credit. The term loan and revolving line of credit bore interest
at either the lead banks prime rate plus a margin of 1.75%
to 2.25% or the LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% to 3.25%, depending
on the Companys leverage ratio, as defined. The interest
rate on the term loan in 2004 averaged 5.75%. The interest rate
on the revolving loan in 2004 averaged 6.13%. |
|
|
|
|
There are quarterly principal payments on the term loan in the
amount of $4,350 with final maturity on August 31, 2009.
The revolving line of credit was due on August 31, 2007.
The Company must pay a commitment fee in the amount of 0.50% on
the unused revolving line of credit capacity. |
|
|
|
The Company was required to maintain certain financial ratios
and other financial conditions. In addition, the Company was
prohibited from making certain investments, advances or loans.
The term loan and credit agreements restrict substantial asset
sales, capital expenditures and cash dividends. The Company was
in compliance with all covenants and conditions as of
December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company amended the term
loan and revolving loans described above several times which
resulted in increased total borrowing capacity and the extension
of the maturity dates of the term loan to February 2012 and the
revolving line of credit to February 2009. Quarterly principal
payments of $350 were required on the term loan. All borrowings
under these facilities were retired on September 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
On February 11, 2005, the Company issued subordinated notes
to certain sellers of Parchman common shares. These notes are
unsecured, subordinated to all present and future senior debt
and bear interest at 6.0% during the first three years of the
note, 8.0% during year four and 10.0% thereafter. The notes
mature on the earliest of February 11, 2010 or ten days
after an initial public offering or change of control. The
Company, at its option, may repay the notes at anytime so long
as such payment does not result in an event of default under any
loan agreement. These subordinated notes, recorded as long-term
debt at December 31, 2005, included notes totaling $4,765
which were beneficially held by directors or employees of the
Company. In addition, the Company issued subordinated seller
notes totaling $3,450 in 2004 related to certain business
acquisitions. These notes bear interest at 6% and mature in
March 2009. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
In August 2004, the Company entered into a Senior Secured
Agreement (the Agreement) with a group of financial
institutions with a maximum commitment of $12,000 and a maturity
date of August 31, 2008. Quarterly principal payments of
$464 are required under the facility. As part of the Agreement,
the Company entered into a Revolving Note Agreement
(Revolver) providing for borrowings of up to $8,000
with a maturity date of August 31, 2007. At
December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings
under the Revolver. Pursuant to the Agreement, interest on the
borrowings was calculated using a variable base rate plus a
margin. The margin ranges from 0.25% to 1.25% for base rate
advances and from 2.50% to 3.50% for LIBOR loans depending on
IEMs leverage ratio. The interest rate averaged
approximately 5.18% for the four months ended December 31,
2004. In addition to interest, the banks receive various fees,
including a commitment fee. The commitment fee varies from
0.375% to 0.50% of average unused commitment amount on the
Revolver, depending on IEMs leverage ratio. The note was
subject to restrictive covenants. The Company was in compliance
with all covenants during 2004. The Agreement was secured by
substantially all of IEMs assets. This facility was
retired on September 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
On August 31, 2004, the Company entered into a Subordinate
Credit Agreement with a maximum term commitment of $20,000 and
maturity of August 31, 2009. Principal plus accrued
interest was to be due at maturity. Pursuant to the credit
agreement, interest on borrowings was calculated using a
variable base rate equal to the greater of the agent banks
Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus |
|
F-31
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
0.5% plus a margin. The margin ranges from 2.0% to 4.0%
depending on IEMs leverage ratio. The interest rate for
the four months ended December 31, 2004 was approximately
7.25%. The note was subject to restrictive covenants. The
Company was in compliance with all covenants during 2004. This
facility was retired on September 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
|
At December 31, 2005, the Companys capital leases are
collateralized by specific assets and bear interest at various
rates averaging 10.30% (2004 10.29%). |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Other includes: (1) a mortgage loan totaling $320 at
December 31, 2005 related to property in Wyoming, which
requires annual principal payments of approximately $56, accrues
interest at 6% and matures in 2012; and (2) loans totaling
$1,281 at December 31, 2005 related to equipment purchases
with terms of 12 to 36 months and extend through December
2008. |
|
At December 31, 2005, principal maturities under the
Companys long-term debt facilities (including capital
leases) for the next five years were:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
5,953 |
|
2007
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
2008
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
2009
|
|
|
7,706 |
|
2010
|
|
|
94,368 |
|
|
|
11. |
Convertible debentures: |
On May 31, 2000, IPSL, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, issued convertible debentures of C$5,000 maturing
June 30, 2005 and convertible into 627,408 shares of
common stock at the holders option at C$7.97 per
share at any time prior to maturity. The debentures were secured
by a general security agreement providing a charge against
IPSLs assets, subordinated to any other senior
indebtedness, and bore interest at 9% per annum. The chief
executive officer of the debenture holder was a director of the
Company. The debenture was repaid in full on June 30, 2005.
On September 12, 2005, the Company completed the
Combination of CES, IPS and IEM pursuant to which CES and IEM
stockholders exchanged all of their common stock for common
stock of IPS. The CES stockholders received 19.704 shares of IPS
common stock for each share of CES, and the IEM received 19.410
shares of IPS common stock for each share of IEM. Subsequent to
the combination, IPS changed its name to Complete Production
Services, Inc. In the Combination, the former CES stock was
converted into approximately 57.6% of the Companys common
stock, the IPS stock remained outstanding and represented
approximately 33.2% of the Companys common stock and the
former IEM stock was converted into approximately 9.2% of the
Companys common shares. The amounts of authorized and
issued stock, warrants and options of CES have been adjusted to
reflect the exchange ratio of 19.704 per share pursuant to
the Combination. The amounts of authorized and issued stock,
warrants and options of IEM have been adjusted to reflect the
exchange ratio of 19.410 per share pursuant to the
Combination.
On September 12, 2005, the authorized share capital of the
Company was increased to 200,000,000 shares of common stock from
24,000,000 shares of common stock with par value of $0.01 per
share and to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock from 1,000
shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.
F-32
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
On December 29, 2005, the Company effected a 2-for-1 split
of common stock. As a result, all common stock and per share
data, as well as data related to other securities including
stock warrants, restricted stock and stock options, have been
adjusted retroactively to give effect to this stock split for
all periods presented within the accompanying financial
statements, except par value which remained at $0.01 per share,
resulting in an insignificant reclassification between common
stock and additional paid-in capital.
On September 12, 2005, the Company paid a dividend of $2.62
per share for an aggregate payment of approximately $146,900 to
stockholders of record on that date. We are also obligated to
issue up to an aggregate of approximately 1,200,000 shares
of our common stock as contingent consideration based on certain
operating results of the companies we have previously acquired,
and we have agreed to make additional cash payments (up to
$3,100) in respect of such contingent shares ultimately issued
in the amount of the dividend that would have been paid on such
shares if those shares had been issued prior to the payment of
the dividend.
On May 23, 2001, the Company issued a warrant to its major
shareholder, SCF-IV,
L.P. (SCF), to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares
of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of
$5.00 per share any time through May 23, 2011. The
warrant was issued as a source of future financing for the
Companys growth. In 2001 and 2004, SCF purchased
740,000 shares and 400,000 shares, respectively, under
the warrant. On February 9, 2005, SCF purchased another
2,000,000 shares under the warrant. The warrant was
cancelled on September 12, 2005.
In November 2003, the Company issued a warrant to SCF to
purchase up to 13,792,800 shares of the Companys
common stock at an exercise price of $2.54 per share. This
warrant was exercised in full during 2004.
In August 2004, the Company issued a warrant to SCF to purchase
up to 6,211,200 shares of the Companys common stock
at an exercise price of $2.58 per share at any time through
August 31, 2007 and a warrant to one of the Companys
minority stockholders to purchase up to 970,500 shares of
the Companys common stock at an exercise price of
$2.58 per share at any time through August 31, 2007.
These warrants were cancelled on September 12, 2005.
Pursuant to the Subordinate Credit Agreement (note 10(f)),
the Company issued detachable warrants to the lenders to
purchase up to 71,818 shares of the Companys common
stock at $2.58 per share at any time through
August 31, 2007. These warrants were cancelled on
September 12, 2005.
Also pursuant to the Subordinate Credit Agreement
(note 10(f)), the Company issued detachable warrants to the
lenders to purchase up to 48,526 shares of the
Companys common stock at $0.01 per share at any time
through August 31, 2007. The fair value of these warrants,
$125,000, was recorded as additional paid-in capital and as a
discount on the liability under the subordinate credit
agreement. These warrants were exercised on September 12,
2005.
|
|
|
(e) Employee stock incentive plan: |
Following the Combination, the Company maintains each of the
options plans previously maintained by IPS, CES and IEM. Under
the three option plans, the options could be granted to
employees, officers
F-33
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
and directors to purchase up to 3,000,000 common shares,
1,477,800 common shares (increased to 2,364,480 during 2005) and
776,400 common shares, respectively. The exercise price of each
option is based on the fair value of the individual
companys stock at the date of grant. Options may be
exercised over a 5-year
period and generally a third of the options vest on each of the
first three anniversaries from the grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
659,888 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
196,414 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(56,190 |
) |
|
|
5.70 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(43,064 |
) |
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
757,048 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,118,856 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(81,180 |
) |
|
|
2.29 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(16,012 |
) |
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,778,712 |
|
|
$ |
4.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the Combination, upon payment of the dividend of
$2.62 per share as described above at (c), the terms of all
options outstanding at that time were adjusted to offset the
decrease in the Companys per share price attributable to
the dividend. The result of this adjustment was applied to the
options outstanding at December 31, 2004, resulting in an
increase in the number of options outstanding to 2,259,396 and a
reduction of the average exercise price to $3.60.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2004, adjusted for dividend
|
|
|
2,259,396 |
|
|
$ |
3.60 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,746,309 |
|
|
|
7.39 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(15,082 |
) |
|
|
4.11 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(478,179 |
) |
|
|
4.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,512,444 |
|
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Outstanding at | |
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
Exercisable at | |
|
Average | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Exercise | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Price |
|
2005 | |
|
Life (months) | |
|
Price | |
|
2005 | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$2.00-2.20
|
|
|
763,154 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
|
304,443 |
|
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
$3.94
|
|
|
85,782 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
85,782 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
$4.49-4.80
|
|
|
1,328,100 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
536,622 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
$5.01
|
|
|
223,944 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
70,414 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
$6.59-6.69
|
|
|
630,196 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$11.66
|
|
|
481,268 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
11.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,512,444 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
|
|
997,261 |
|
|
$ |
3.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1,
2006. This pronouncement requires the Company to measure the
cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of
equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the
award, with limited exceptions, by using an option-pricing model
to determine fair value. As permitted by
SFAS No. 123R, the Company will continue to account
for stock-based compensation for grants prior to
September 30, 2005, the date of the Companys initial
public filing with the SEC, using the minimum value method
prescribed by APB No. 25, and will provide the required pro
forma disclosures. For grants issued between October 1,
2005 and December 31, 2005 (prior to adoption of
SFAS No. 123R), the Company will utilize the modified
prospective transition method to record expense associated with
these stock-based instruments and to provide the required pro
forma disclosures. For grants awarded on or after
January 1, 2006, the Company will utilize the prospective
transition method, whereby the Company will recognize expense
associated with new awards of stock-based compensation, as
determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model over the expected
term of the options. For stock options outstanding as of
December 31, 2005, the Company expects to record
compensation expense of $844 over the remaining term of the
options, of which $307 would be recognized in 2006. Future stock
option grants will result in additional compensation expense.
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in
calculating basic and diluted earnings per share at
December 31, 2005 were 46,602,504 (2004
29,548,312; 2003 13,675,096) and 50,655,930
(2004 30,083,490; 2003 14,109,094),
respectively. The reconciling items between basic and diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding included the dilutive
impact of outstanding restricted stock, stock options,
convertible debt and warrants. The Company excluded the impact
of anti-dilutive potential common shares from the calculation of
diluted weighted average shares for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004. If these potential common
shares were included in the calculation, diluted weighted
average shares would have been 50,775,802 and 30,318,802 for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, with
no impact on diluted earnings per share as presented. The
Company had no anti-dilutive potential common shares for the
year ended December 31, 2003 except as related to
convertible debentures discussed below.
In 2004, interest expense, net of tax, of $234 (2003
$209) on the convertible debentures (see note 11) was added
back to the numerator in calculating diluted earning per share
when the impact, if converted, is dilutive. In 2004 and 2003,
the impact of conversion of the convertible debentures would
have been anti-dilutive.
F-35
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
13. |
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Change in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
(69,755 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,585 |
) |
|
$ |
(687 |
) |
Inventory
|
|
|
(18,346 |
) |
|
|
(7,936 |
) |
|
|
(1,959 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(4,903 |
) |
|
|
(3,480 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
Accounts payable
|
|
|
18,647 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
21,955 |
|
|
|
11,094 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(52,402 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,806 |
) |
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
$ |
23,718 |
|
|
$ |
6,756 |
|
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
Cash taxes paid
|
|
$ |
15,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
Common stock issued by controlling stockholder for acquisitions
|
|
$ |
20,118 |
|
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
Acquisition of minority interest
|
|
$ |
93,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes issued for acquisitions
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes issued for equipment
|
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional acquisition consideration accrued
|
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures in accounts payable
|
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash assets as acquisition consideration
|
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards
for the reporting of information about operating segments,
products and services, geographic areas, and major customers.
The method of determining what information to report is based on
the way management organizes the operating segments within the
Company for making operational decisions and assessments of
financial performance. The Company evaluates performance and
allocates resources based on net income (loss) before interest
expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and minority
interest (EBITDA). The calculation of EBITDA should
not be viewed as a substitute to calculations under
U.S. GAAP, in particular not net earnings. EBITDA
calculated by the Company may not be comparable to another
company.
The Company has three reportable operating segments: completion
and production services (C&PS), drilling
services and product sales, and three geographic regions: the
United States, Canada and International. The accounting policies
of the segments are the same as those described in note 1.
Inter-segment transactions are accounted for on a cost-recovery
basis.
F-36
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling | |
|
Product | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
C&PS | |
|
Services | |
|
Sales | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$ |
510,304 |
|
|
$ |
129,117 |
|
|
$ |
118,305 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
757,726 |
|
EBITDA, as defined
|
|
$ |
119,171 |
|
|
$ |
44,393 |
|
|
$ |
18,444 |
|
|
$ |
(20,745 |
) |
|
$ |
161,263 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
40,149 |
|
|
$ |
5,666 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
$ |
48,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
79,022 |
|
|
$ |
38,727 |
|
|
$ |
16,864 |
|
|
$ |
(22,190 |
) |
|
$ |
112,423 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
81,086 |
|
|
$ |
38,574 |
|
|
$ |
4,382 |
|
|
$ |
3,173 |
|
|
$ |
127,215 |
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
$ |
639,856 |
|
|
$ |
118,751 |
|
|
$ |
65,636 |
|
|
$ |
113,410 |
|
|
$ |
937,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling | |
|
Product | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
C&PS | |
|
Services | |
|
Sales | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$ |
194,953 |
|
|
$ |
44,474 |
|
|
$ |
81,320 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
320,747 |
|
EBITDA, as defined
|
|
$ |
38,349 |
|
|
$ |
10,093 |
|
|
$ |
12,924 |
|
|
$ |
(2,869 |
) |
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
16,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
1,222 |
|
|
$ |
21,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
21,599 |
|
|
$ |
7,356 |
|
|
$ |
12,017 |
|
|
$ |
(4,091 |
) |
|
$ |
36,881 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
32,004 |
|
|
$ |
11,840 |
|
|
$ |
2,944 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
46,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
$ |
384,014 |
|
|
$ |
72,839 |
|
|
$ |
53,751 |
|
|
$ |
4,549 |
|
|
$ |
515,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling | |
|
Product | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
C&PS | |
|
Services | |
|
Sales | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$ |
65,025 |
|
|
$ |
2,707 |
|
|
$ |
35,547 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103,279 |
|
EBITDA, as defined
|
|
$ |
9,134 |
|
|
$ |
712 |
|
|
$ |
4,951 |
|
|
$ |
(1,233 |
) |
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
6,147 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
727 |
|
|
$ |
7,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
$ |
582 |
|
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
$ |
(1,960 |
) |
|
$ |
5,916 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
7,474 |
|
|
$ |
2,623 |
|
|
$ |
987 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,084 |
|
F-37
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying
amount of goodwill by segment for the three-year period ended
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling | |
|
Product | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&PS | |
|
Services | |
|
Sales | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
33,870 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,684 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
9,471 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,473 |
|
Tax valuation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
48,456 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,296 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
73,101 |
|
|
|
10,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,183 |
|
Contingency adjustment
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
124,197 |
|
|
|
15,022 |
|
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,449 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
50,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,699 |
|
Purchase of minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,792 |
|
|
|
93,792 |
|
Accrue contingent consideration
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
Contingency adjustment and other
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
181,513 |
|
|
$ |
15,022 |
|
|
$ |
7,970 |
|
|
$ |
93,792 |
|
|
$ |
298,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax valuations adjustment of $1,400 was recorded to properly
reflect managements estimate of the net realizable
deferred tax assets associated with acquisitions made prior to
December 31, 2003, based upon a review of the tax provision
as of that date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
States | |
|
Canada | |
|
International | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue by sale origin to external customers
|
|
$ |
609,939 |
|
|
$ |
106,261 |
|
|
$ |
41,526 |
|
|
$ |
757,726 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest
|
|
$ |
74,946 |
|
|
$ |
7,173 |
|
|
$ |
5,843 |
|
|
$ |
87,962 |
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
597,834 |
|
|
$ |
85,685 |
|
|
$ |
6,648 |
|
|
$ |
690,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
States | |
|
Canada | |
|
International | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue by sale origin to external customers
|
|
$ |
231,509 |
|
|
$ |
73,743 |
|
|
$ |
15,495 |
|
|
$ |
320,747 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest
|
|
$ |
22,786 |
|
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
|
$ |
2,576 |
|
|
$ |
29,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
306,140 |
|
|
$ |
79,662 |
|
|
$ |
3,398 |
|
|
$ |
389,200 |
|
F-38
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
States | |
|
Canada | |
|
International | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue by sale origin to external customers
|
|
$ |
28,129 |
|
|
$ |
62,376 |
|
|
$ |
12,774 |
|
|
$ |
103,279 |
|
Income (loss) before taxes and minority interest
|
|
$ |
(771 |
) |
|
$ |
2,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,789 |
|
|
$ |
3,229 |
|
The Company does not have revenue from any single customer which
amounts to 10% or more of the Companys total revenue.
|
|
15. |
Financial instruments: |
The Company manages its exposure to interest rate risks through
a combination of fixed and floating rate borrowings. At
December 31, 2005, 98% of long-term debt was in floating
rate borrowings.
|
|
|
(b) Foreign currency rate risk: |
The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in
relation to its foreign operations. In 2005, approximately 14%
of the Companys operations were conducted in Canadian
dollars and the related balance sheet accounts were denominated
in Canadian dollars.
A significant portion of the Companys trade accounts
receivable are from companies in the oil and gas industry, and
as such, the Company is exposed to normal industry credit risks.
The Company evaluates the credit-worthiness of its major new and
existing customers financial condition and generally does
not require collateral.
|
|
16. |
Commitment and contingences: |
The Company has non-cancelable operating lease commitments for
equipment and office space. These commitments for the next five
years were as follows at December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
15,380 |
|
2007
|
|
|
12,859 |
|
2008
|
|
|
8,609 |
|
2009
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
2010
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005, operating lease payments expensed were approximately
$10,110 (2004 $6,585; 2003 $4,031).
The Company is subject to legal procedures and claims, either
asserted or unasserted, in the ordinary course of business.
While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with
certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any
of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on
its combined financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
F-39
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
17. |
Related party transactions: |
The Company believes all transactions with related parties have
the terms and conditions no less favorable to the Company as
transactions with unaffiliated parties.
The Company has entered into lease agreements for properties
owned by employees and directors of the Company. The leases
expire at different times through December 2016. In 2005, the
total lease expense pursuant to these leases was $2,976
(2004 $1,439; 2003 $151).
In connection with CES acquisition of Hamm Co. in 2004,
CES entered into that certain Strategic Customer Relationship
Agreement with Continental Resources, Inc. (CRI). By
virtue of the Combination, through a subsidiary, the Company is
now party to such agreement. The agreement provides CRI the
option to engage a limited amount of the Companys assets
into a long-term contract at market rates. Mr. Hamm is a
majority owner of CRI and serves as a member of the
Companys board of directors.
The Company provided services to companies that are
majority-owned by directors of the Company during 2005 which
aggregate $21,724, of which $21,255 was sold to CRI
(2004 $2,680; 2003 $620) and $469 was
sold to other companies. The Company purchased services from
companies that are majority-owned by its directors during 2005
totaling $2,164, of which $2,034 was purchased from CRI and $130
was purchased from other companies. At December 31, 2005,
the Companys trade receivables and trade payables included
amounts from CRI of $3,544 and $130, respectively.
The Company provided services totaling $8,794 in 2005 to
companies majority-owned by officers of the Company or its
subsidiaries, of which $7,804 was sold to HEP Oil
(HEP) and $990 was sold to other companies.
Purchases of services from companies majority-owned by these
officers totaled $5,149, of which $598 related to HEP, $1,390
related to other companies owned by the same officer, $2,805
related to companies owned by an officer of Parchman and $356
related to other companies. At December 31, 2005, the
Companys trade receivables included amounts from HEP of
$859. There were no amounts due to HEP at December 31, 2005.
The Company provided services totaling $1,910 in 2005 to Laramie
Energy LLC (Laramie), a company for which one of the
Companys directors serves as an officer. At
December 31, 2005, the Companys trade receivables
included $457 due from Laramie.
In addition, the Company provided services totaling $1,423 and
purchased services totaling $2,576 from companies that formerly
employed current officers of Complete or for which certain
directors of the Company currently serve on the customers
board of directors.
Effective December 1, 2002, the Company entered into a
management services agreement with an affiliate of its major
shareholder. This agreement provides for monthly payments of $20
for services rendered. In 2004, $60 (2003 $240) was
expensed pursuant to this agreement. This agreement was
terminated March 31, 2004. Effective November 7, 2003,
the Company entered into a financial advisory services agreement
with an affiliate of its major shareholder, which provided for
an upfront fee of $250 and quarterly payments of $31. This
agreement was cancelled effective September 12, 2005.
Effective August 14, 2004, the Company entered into a
financial advisory services agreement with an affiliate of its
major shareholder pursuant to which it paid fees of $1,600 in
conjunction with the Companys 2004 acquisitions, and
management fees of $350 during 2004. This agreement was
cancelled effective September 12, 2005.
F-40
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
In 2003, the Company purchased equipment with aggregate value of
$2,378 from a company in which the Companys major
shareholder has an equity interest. The Companys major
shareholder no longer holds an equity interest in this equipment
supplier.
The Company is obligated to pay employees an aggregate principal
amount of $8,450 pursuant to subordinated promissory notes
issued in connection with acquisitions in 2005 and 2004 (see
note 10(d)). Certain of these employees are officers of the
Companys subsidiaries.
On December 1, 2001, Bison Oilfield Tools, Ltd.
(Bison), and PEG, a subsidiary of IPS, entered into
a lease agreement pursuant to which PEG leases real property
from Bison. A former director of IPS controls Bison as the
president of its two general partners. IPS is required to pay
Bison $4 per month until December 2006, the date on which the
lease terminates.
Premier Integrated Technologies Ltd. (PIT), a
subsidiary of IPS, purchased $819 of machining services from a
company controlled by employees of PIT during the year ended
December 31, 2005.
On September 29, 2005, the Company entered into an Asset
Purchase Agreement with Spindletop and Mr. Schmitz.
Pursuant to the agreement, the Company purchased the assets of
Spindletop in exchange for approximately $200 cash and 90,364
shares of the Companys common stock. Mr. Schmitz is a
member of our key operational management.
The Company maintains defined contribution retirement plans for
substantially all of its U.S. and Canadian employees who have
completed six months of service. Employees may voluntarily
contribute up to a maximum percentage of their salaries to these
plans subject to certain statutory maximum dollar values. The
maximums range from 20% to 60%, depending on the plan. The
Company makes matching contributions at 25% 50% of
the first 6% or 7% of the employees contributions,
depending on the plan. The employer contributions vest
immediately with respect to the Canadian RRSP plan and vest at
varying rates under the U.S. 401(k) plans. Vesting ranges
from immediately to a graduated scale with 100% vesting after
five years of service.
In 2005, the Company recognized an expense of $2,039
(2004 $853; 2003 $331) related to its
various defined contribution plans.
The Company provides a seniority premium benefit to
substantially all of its Mexican employees, through a
subsidiary, in accordance with Mexican law. The benefit consists
of a one-time payment equivalent to
12-days wages for each
year of service (calculated at the employees current wage
rate but not exceeding twice the minimum wage), payable upon
voluntary termination after fifteen years of service,
involuntary termination or death. In addition, Complete provides
statutory mandated severance benefits to substantially all
Mexican employees, which includes a one-time payment of three
months wages, plus
20-days wages for each
year of service, payable upon involuntary termination without
cause and charged to income as incurred. The Companys
liability pursuant to these benefit arrangements in Mexico for
2005 was approximately $280.
|
|
19. |
Recent accounting pronouncements: |
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. SFAS No. 151 amends the
guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43,
Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage), and
generally requires that these amounts be expensed in the period
that the cost arises, rather than being included in the cost of
inventory, thereby requiring that the allocation of fixed
production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on
normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS
F-41
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
No. 151 becomes effective for inventory costs incurred
during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, but
earlier application is permitted. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 151 as of January 1, 2006, with no material
impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets.
SFAS No. 153 amends current guidance related to the
exchange on nonmonetary assets as per APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, to
eliminate an exception that allowed exchange of similar
nonmonetary assets without determination of the fair value of
those assets, and replaced this provision with a general
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial
substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to
change significantly as a result of the exchange.
SFAS No. 153 becomes effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS No. 153 as of
January 1, 2006, with no material impact on its financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, which revises
SFAS No. 123 and supercedes APB No. 25.
SFAS No. 123R will require the Company to measure the
cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of
equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the
award, with limited exceptions. The fair value of the award will
be remeasured at each reporting date through the settlement
date, with changes in fair value recognized as compensation
expense of the period. Entities should continue to use an
option-pricing model, adjusted for the unique characteristics of
those instruments, to determine fair value as of the grant date
of the stock options. SFAS No. 123R became effective
for public companies as of the beginning of the fiscal year
after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. See
note 12(e) for discussion of the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 123R on the Companys financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a Replacement of
APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.
SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application of
changes in accounting principle to prior periods financial
statements, rather than the use of the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle, unless impracticable. If
impracticable to determine the impact on prior periods, then the
new accounting principle should be applied to the balances of
assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest
period for which retrospective application is practicable, with
a corresponding adjustment to equity, unless impracticable for
all periods presented, in which case prospective treatment
should be applied. SFAS No. 154 applies to all
voluntary changes in accounting principle, as well as those
required by the issuance of new accounting pronouncements if no
specific transition guidance is provided. SFAS No. 154
does not change the previously-issued guidance for reporting a
change in accounting estimate or correction of an error.
SFAS No. 154 became effective for accounting changes
and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 154 on January 1, 2006, and will apply
its provisions, as applicable, to future reporting periods.
On January 3, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all
of the operating assets of Outpost Office Inc.
(Outpost), a Grand Junction, Colorado oilfield
equipment rental company, for $6,535 in cash. The purchase price
allocation has not yet been finalized. The Company will include
the operating results of Outpost in the completion and
production services segment from the date of acquisition.
F-42
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
On January 25, 2006, the Company acquired all the equity
interests of The Rosel Company (Rosel), a cased-hole
and open-hole electric-line business based in Liberal, Kansas,
with operations in Kansas and Oklahoma, for approximately
$13,900 in cash. The purchase price allocation has not yet been
finalized. The Company expects this acquisition to extend its
presence in the Mid-continent region and enhance its completion
and production services business. Rosels operating results
will be included in the completion and production services
segment from the date of acquisition.
Pursuant to earn-out agreement with the former owners and
employees of Double Jack, MGM and Parchman, the Company expects
to issue approximately 1,200,000 shares of its common stock
during the first quarter of 2006. The underlying agreements
state that the shares are issuable based upon financial results,
a specified number of days following an audit by the
Companys independent registered public accountants. If the
shares were issued at December 31, 2005, the Company would
record additional goodwill associated with these earn-out
provisions totaling approximately $24,300, with an offsetting
credit to additional paid-in capital. In addition, the
recipients would be entitled to approximately $3,200 associated
with the dividend paid to all stockholders at the date of the
Combination, or $2.62 per share, as well as cash consideration
of approximately $2,600. The Company has accrued $5,800 related
to these cash commitments at December 31, 2005, with an
offsetting adjustment to goodwill.
|
|
|
(c) Financing of Insurance Premiums: |
On January 5, 2006, the Company entered into a note
agreement with its insurance broker to finance annual insurance
premiums for the policy year beginning December 1, 2005
through November 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2005,
the Company has recorded a note payable totaling $14,584 and an
offsetting prepaid asset which includes a brokers fee of
$600. The prepaid asset will be amortized to expense over the
policy term. In addition, the Company expects to incur finance
charges totaling $268 as interest expense related to this
arrangement over the policy term.
F-43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Owners
BSI Companies:
We have audited the combined balance sheets of BSI Companies
(the Company) as of November 6, 2003 and
December 31, 2002, and the related statements of earnings,
owners equity and cash flows for the period from
January 1, 2003 through November 6, 2003 and for the
year ended December 31, 2002. These combined financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of BSI Companies as of November 6, 2003 and
December 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the period from January 1, 2003
through November 6, 2003 and for the year ended
December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Houston, Texas
February 1, 2005
F-44
BSI COMPANIES
Combined Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 6, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
22,124 |
|
|
$ |
369,224 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$157,218 and $110,606
|
|
|
7,245,632 |
|
|
|
5,351,266 |
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
534,886 |
|
|
|
803,525 |
|
|
Investment in partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,669 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
4,413,285 |
|
|
|
4,691,575 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
49,479 |
|
|
|
166,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
12,265,406 |
|
|
|
11,676,758 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
23,950,811 |
|
|
|
10,232,776 |
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
375,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
36,591,772 |
|
|
$ |
21,909,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
72,538 |
|
|
$ |
255,560 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,700,569 |
|
|
|
3,164,249 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,254,799 |
|
|
|
569,201 |
|
|
Note payable shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit
|
|
|
3,190,000 |
|
|
|
2,785,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,217,906 |
|
|
|
6,774,010 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,334 |
|
MINORITY INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARY
|
|
|
171,888 |
|
|
|
9,675 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OWNERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
11,757,909 |
|
|
|
8,207,336 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
16,444,069 |
|
|
|
6,666,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total owners equity
|
|
|
28,201,978 |
|
|
|
14,873,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND OWNERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
36,591,772 |
|
|
$ |
21,909,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-45
BSI COMPANIES
Combined Statements of Earnings
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
49,119,656 |
|
|
$ |
33,962,689 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods and services
|
|
|
30,188,568 |
|
|
|
22,963,942 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,035,329 |
|
|
|
1,643,842 |
|
|
Taxes and insurance
|
|
|
327,315 |
|
|
|
356,284 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,525,022 |
|
|
|
726,937 |
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
3,962,819 |
|
|
|
3,982,169 |
|
|
Shop and automobile expenses
|
|
|
1,040,867 |
|
|
|
1,740,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
8,891,352 |
|
|
|
8,450,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
10,039,736 |
|
|
|
2,548,517 |
|
OTHER INCOME, net
|
|
|
39,523 |
|
|
|
81,462 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
(139,156 |
) |
|
|
(47,668 |
) |
MINORITY INTEREST IN NET EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARY
|
|
|
(162,213 |
) |
|
|
(9,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
$ |
9,777,890 |
|
|
$ |
2,572,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-46
BSI COMPANIES
Combined Statement of Owners Equity
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
capital | |
|
Retained earnings | |
|
Total owners equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1, 2002
|
|
$ |
5,880,320 |
|
|
$ |
4,093,543 |
|
|
$ |
9,973,863 |
|
Capital contributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bell Supply I, LP
|
|
|
266,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,015 |
|
|
Shale Tank Truck, LP
|
|
|
2,061,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,061,001 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,572,636 |
|
|
|
2,572,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
8,207,336 |
|
|
|
6,666,179 |
|
|
|
14,873,515 |
|
Capital contributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSI Holdings, L.P. and BSI Holdings Management LLC
|
|
|
3,376,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,376,983 |
|
|
Acquire New Tejas, L.L.C. (50% Interest)
|
|
|
173,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,590 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,777,890 |
|
|
|
9,777,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at November 6, 2003
|
|
$ |
11,757,909 |
|
|
$ |
16,444,069 |
|
|
$ |
28,201,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-47
BSI COMPANIES
Combined Statements of Cash Flows
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
9,777,890 |
|
|
$ |
2,572,636 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash used in
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in net earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
162,213 |
|
|
|
9,675 |
|
|
|
Equity earnings in investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,291 |
) |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,525,022 |
|
|
|
726,937 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of equipment
|
|
|
16,268 |
|
|
|
3,884 |
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,894,366 |
) |
|
|
(790,379 |
) |
|
|
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
117,020 |
|
|
|
320,305 |
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in notes receivable
|
|
|
268,639 |
|
|
|
(372,927 |
) |
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in inventory
|
|
|
278,290 |
|
|
|
(1,787,879 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,221,918 |
|
|
|
978,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
11,472,894 |
|
|
|
1,634,516 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Western Bentonite, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(375,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment and improvements
|
|
|
(15,209,054 |
) |
|
|
(5,897,181 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment and improvements
|
|
|
244,398 |
|
|
|
59,789 |
|
|
Investment in partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(15,340,211 |
) |
|
|
(5,866,687 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net advances in lines of credit
|
|
|
405,000 |
|
|
|
1,285,000 |
|
|
Proceeds on long-term debt
|
|
|
2,156,629 |
|
|
|
388,800 |
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,591,985 |
) |
|
|
(307,133 |
) |
|
Contributions from partners
|
|
|
3,550,573 |
|
|
|
2,327,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,520,217 |
|
|
|
3,693,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(347,100 |
) |
|
|
(538,488 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
369,224 |
|
|
|
907,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
22,124 |
|
|
$ |
369,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-48
BSI COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
NOTE A NATURE OF OPERATIONS
BSI Companies (BSI) is an integrated well site
services provider with operations in north and east Texas. BSI
provides a wide range of services to the oil and gas exploration
industry, including contract drilling, well servicing, fluid
handling, well site rentals, materials and supplies and other
support services.
BSIs business depends, to a large degree, on the level of
spending by oil and gas companies for exploration, development
and production activities. Therefore, a sustained increase or
decrease in the price of natural gas or oil, which could have a
material impact on exploration, development and production
activities, also could materially affect our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The combined financial statements of BSI include entities under
common control that were acquired by SCF-IV, L.P. through its
majority-ownership interest in Complete Energy Services, Inc. on
November 7, 2003. At November 6, 2003, BSI includes
the following entities:
|
|
|
|
|
BSI Holdings, LP |
|
|
|
BSI Holdings Management, LLC |
|
|
|
Bell Supply I, LP |
|
|
|
Red River Well Service Ltd. (dbas Mercer Well Service,
Brammer Supply, Basin Tool) |
|
|
|
Shale Tank Truck, L.P. |
|
|
|
New Tejas, L.L.C. |
|
|
|
Price Pipeline Construction, Ltd. (50% interest) |
As of January 1, 2003, a common group of individuals and
related entities owned 100% of BSI Holdings, LP and BSI Holdings
Management, LLC (the Controlling Entities). For the
period January 1, 2003 through November 6, 2003, the
Controlling Entities owned 100% of Bell Supply I, LP; Red River
Well Service Ltd. and Shale Tank Truck, L.P. Operations of
Brammer Supply, Inc. were transferred to Bell Supply I, LP on
January 1, 2003. The Controlling Entities acquired the
assets of Felderhoff Drilling and the accounts of Western
Bentonite as of January 1, 2003, and acquired a remaining
50% ownership in New Tejas, L.L.C., an entity that was accounted
for under the equity method in 2002. Price Pipeline
Construction, Ltd. was consolidated in 2003, with a 50%
ownership interest held by a related party shown as minority
interest.
For the year ended December 31, 2002; Bell Supply I, LP;
Red River Well Service Ltd. and Shale Tank Truck, L.P., as well
as an equity investment in New Tejas, L.L.C. and a 50% ownership
interest in Price Pipeline Construction, Ltd. were managed by an
individual with a significant equity interest in each. The
operations of these entities were combined for the year ended
December 31, 2002 for comparative presentation with 2003
results.
All intercompany accounts among the entities in BSI were
eliminated for the year ended December 31, 2002 and the
period January 1, 2003 through November 6, 2003.
F-49
BSI COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from these estimates.
|
|
|
3. Cash
and Cash Equivalents |
BSI considers all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventory, which is stated at the lower of average cost or
market, consists primarily of materials and supplies held for
resale.
|
|
|
5. Property,
Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment, including renewals and
betterments, are stated at cost, while maintenance and repairs
are expensed currently. Depreciation on our buildings, drilling
rigs, well-servicing rigs, oilfield hauling and mobile
equipment, and other machinery and equipment is computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the
asset after provision for salvage value (buildings
20 years; drilling rigs 20 years;
well-servicing rigs 25 years; oilfield hauling
and mobile equipment and other machinery and
equipment 3 to 10 years). Upon retirement or
other disposal of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any
gains or losses are included in our results of operations.
BSI reviews our assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the net book value of property,
plant and equipment may not be recovered over its remaining
service life. Provisions for asset impairment are charged to
income when the sum of estimated future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, is less than the assets net book
value. Actual impairment charges are recorded using an estimate
of discounted future cash flows. The determination of future
cash flows requires us to estimate day rates and utilization in
future periods, and such estimates can change based on market
conditions, technological advances in the industry or changes in
regulations governing the industry. There was no impairment
recorded in 2003.
Goodwill represents the cost in excess of fair value of the net
assets of companies acquired. Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, presumes that all goodwill will not be
subject to amortization, but rather will be tested at least
annually for impairment. In addition, the standard provides
specific guidance on how to determine and measure goodwill
impairment.
BSI recognizes revenues and costs on drilling contracts as the
work progresses. For certain contracts, we receive lump-sum
payments for the mobilization of rigs and other drilling
equipment. Revenues and the related direct costs incurred for
the mobilization are deferred and recognized over the term of
the related
F-50
BSI COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
drilling contract. Costs incurred to relocate rigs and other
drilling equipment to areas in which a contract has not been
secured are expensed as incurred.
BSI recognizes revenues on service contracts (service rigs,
hauling, etc.) in the period in which the service is provided.
BSI recognizes revenue on the sale of materials and supplies
when products have been shipped, title and risk of loss have
been transferred and collectibility is probable.
NOTE C PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The major components of our property, plant and equipment as of
November 6, 2003 and December 31, 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Drilling and service rigs
|
|
$ |
23,527,831 |
|
|
$ |
9,765,282 |
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
2,997,672 |
|
|
|
1,782,770 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
70,722 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
530,854 |
|
|
|
233,981 |
|
Land
|
|
|
127,609 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
138,044 |
|
|
|
75,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
27,342,010 |
|
|
|
12,003,622 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(3,391,199 |
) |
|
|
(1,770,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
23,950,811 |
|
|
$ |
10,232,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE D INVENTORY
The major components of inventory as of November 6, 2003
and December 31, 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tubular products
|
|
$ |
1,123,399 |
|
|
$ |
595,633 |
|
Hardware
|
|
|
1,455,878 |
|
|
|
1,874,942 |
|
Plumbing and fittings
|
|
|
879,675 |
|
|
|
747,094 |
|
Other
|
|
|
954,333 |
|
|
|
1,473,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inventory
|
|
$ |
4,413,285 |
|
|
$ |
4,691,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE E FAIR VALUE INSTRUMENTS
The fair values of our cash equivalents, trade receivables and
trade payables approximate their carrying values due to the
short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of our
long-term debt approximates its carrying value as the stated
variable interest rate approximates the market rate at
November 6, 2003.
F-51
BSI COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
NOTE F DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following at November 6,
2003 and December 31, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Note payable to a finance company with interest payable monthly
at a rate of 2.9% per annum; payments of $882 payable
monthly with the last payment due May 12, 2003;
collateralized by truck
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,391 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $811 payable monthly with the last payment due
December 9, 2004; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,662 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $811 payable monthly with the last payment due
December 9, 2004; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,662 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $811 payable monthly with the last payment due
December 9, 2004; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,662 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $811 payable monthly with the last payment due
October 16, 2004; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,662 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with interest payable monthly
at a rate of 8.75% per annum; principal payments of $1,057
payable monthly with the last payment due September 19,
2003; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,042 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $3,410 payable monthly with the last payment due
April 6, 2006; collateralized by equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,133 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with interest payable monthly
at a rate of 6.53% per annum; principal payments of $5,420
payable monthly with the last payment due April 20, 2005;
collateralized by equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,129 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with interest payable monthly
at a rate of 4.80% per annum; principal payments of $5,279
payable monthly with the last payment due September 29,
2004; collateralized by equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,310 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $670 payable monthly with the last payment due
February 3, 2005; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,741 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $630 payable monthly with the last payment due
January 12, 2005; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,117 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $670 payable monthly with the last payment due
February 3, 2005; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,741 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $593 payable monthly with the last payment due
December 9, 2004; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,819 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $593 payable monthly with the last payment due
December 9, 2004; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,823 |
|
F-52
BSI COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $3,384 payable monthly with the last payment due
September 5, 2004; collateralized by truck
|
|
|
72,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
72,538 |
|
|
|
507,894 |
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
72,538 |
|
|
|
255,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
252,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to its long-term debt, BSI has the following lines
of credit at November 6, 2003 and December 31, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
$1,500,000 revolving line of credit, secured, with interest rate
of 4.0%; due December 2003
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,385,000 |
|
$1,500,000 revolving line of credit, secured, with interest rate
of 4.0%; due December 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
$750,000 revolving line of credit, secured, with interest rate
of 4.25% ; due January 2004
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,500,000 revolving line of credit, secured, with interest rate
of 5.25%; due June 2004
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,190,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,785,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE G RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the normal course of business, BSI provides and receives
goods and services with various entities in which an officer of
BSI has an ownership interest. BSI believes that all
transactions with related parties were on terms at least as
favorable to BSI as could have been obtained through
arms-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.
NOTE H COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
BSI and its subsidiaries occupy various facilities and lease
certain equipment under various lease agreements. The minimum
rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases, with
lease terms in excess of one year subsequent to November 6,
2003, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
$ |
477,894 |
|
2005
|
|
|
471,684 |
|
2006
|
|
|
436,560 |
|
2007
|
|
|
436,560 |
|
2008
|
|
|
401,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,223,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense with operating lease terms greater than
30 days amounted to $520,577 for the period ended
November 6, 2003.
F-53
BSI COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
Period from January 1, 2003 through November 6,
2003
and Year Ended December 31, 2002
Bell Supply I, LP and Shale Tank Truck, L.P., two entities
of BSI, are defendants in litigation involving the death of an
employee that occurred prior to November 6, 2003. BSI
believes that any exposure in connection with this litigation
would not exceed applicable insurance coverage. Depositions in
this case are continuing, and BSIs management and counsel
believe it is too early to predict the amount of any settlement.
In addition, in connection with its acquisition of BSI, Complete
Energy Services, Inc. is indemnified for any contingent
liabilities existing at the acquisition date in excess of
$250,000.
BSI is also subject to various other legal proceedings and
claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the
opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect
to these actions is either too early to determine or will not
materially affect BSIs consolidated financial statements
or results of operations.
F-54
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Owners
I.E. Miller Companies:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of I.E.
Miller Companies (defined in Note A1) as of August 31,
2004, and the related combined statements of operations,
owners equity and cash flows for the eleven month period
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of I.E. Miller Companies as of August 31, 2004, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the eleven
month period then ended, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Houston, Texas
January 27, 2005
F-55
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Combined Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,035,929 |
|
|
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $103,354
|
|
|
6,948,834 |
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
|
1,569,830 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
323,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
9,878,155 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
6,968,954 |
|
GOODWILL, net of accumulated amortization of $73,210
|
|
|
161,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,008,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
1,252,475 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,103,745 |
|
|
Payable to affiliates
|
|
|
164,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
3,520,297 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
OWNERS EQUITY
|
|
|
13,488,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,008,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
F-56
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Combined Statement of Operations and Owners Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Month | |
|
|
Period Ended | |
|
|
August 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
OPERATING REVENUE
|
|
$ |
41,507,522 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
30,057,266 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
4,779,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
6,670,587 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
84,856 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE
|
|
|
183,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
6,401,957 |
|
BALANCE OF OWNERS EQUITY AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2003
|
|
|
10,925,363 |
|
DISTRIBUTION TO OWNERS DURING THE PERIOD
|
|
|
(3,839,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
BALANCE OF OWNERS EQUITY AS OF AUGUST 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
13,488,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-57
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Combined Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven | |
|
|
Month | |
|
|
Period Ended | |
|
|
August 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,401,957 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,567,075 |
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
107,691 |
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid assets
|
|
|
(347,891 |
) |
|
|
Increase in other current assets
|
|
|
(105,250 |
) |
|
|
Increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
340,405 |
|
|
|
Increase in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
440,638 |
|
|
|
Increase in payable to affiliates
|
|
|
164,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
8,568,702 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset additions
|
|
|
(2,022,020 |
) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of affiliated debt
|
|
|
(2,144,431 |
) |
|
Distributions to owners
|
|
|
(3,839,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financial activities
|
|
|
(5,983,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH
|
|
|
563,251 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
472,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
1,035,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period
|
|
$ |
84,856 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-58
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
|
|
1. Financial
Statement Presentation |
The combined financial statements include the accounts of
I. E. Miller of Eunice, L.L.C.; I. E.
Miller Fowler Trucking, L.L.C.; and I. E.
Miller Heldt Brothers Trucking, L.L.C, collectively
referred to as the I. E. Miller Companies.
These entities were 100% owned by an individual through personal
ownership and affiliated persons or companies. The financial
statements of these entities were combined with no adjustments
to the balance sheet or statement of owners equity. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
The I. E. Miller Companies principal business
activity consists of land rig moving, line hauling, and vacuum
truck service in Louisiana and southeast Texas.
|
|
|
3. Cash
and Cash Equivalents |
For purpose of the combined statement of cash flows, the
I. E. Miller Companies consider all highly liquid debt
instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at
August 31, 2004.
Fixed assets are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided by
the straight-line method and declining balance method for
financial statement and tax purposes, respectively, over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
25-39 years |
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
1-5 years |
Shop equipment
|
|
2-5 years |
Vehicles
|
|
3 years |
Revenue equipment
|
|
2-10 years |
The I. E. Miller Companies have adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. As a result of this pronouncement,
goodwill is no longer subject to amortization. Rather, goodwill
is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently
if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate
an impairment is possible. Prior to adoption of SFAS 142,
the accumulated balance of amortized goodwill was $73,210. For
the period ended August 31, 2004, management of the
I. E. Miller Companies have concluded that there is no
impairment of goodwill.
I. E. Miller of Eunice, L.L.C. was formed and all the
assets I. E. Miller of Eunice, Inc. were transferred to the
L.L.C. effective October 1, 2002. Earnings and losses after
that date are included in the income tax return of the owners.
Accordingly, the L.L.C. will not incur additional income tax
obligations, and the financial statements do not include a
provision for income taxes.
I.E. Miller Heldt Brothers Trucking L.L.C. and
I. E. Miller Fowler Trucking, L.L.C., with the
consent of their owners, elected to be taxed as partnerships. In
lieu of company level income taxes, the owners are taxed on
their proportionate share of the net income from their
operations. Accordingly, no
F-59
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
provision or liability for income taxes is included in the
accompanying combined financial statements for their operations.
Revenue is recognized when the service is rendered.
The preparation of combined financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
NOTE B ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The I. E. Miller Companies provide for doubtful accounts
using the allowance method. Accounts estimated to be
uncollectible total $103,354 as of August 31, 2004.
NOTE C PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of property, plant and
equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization at August 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
265,732 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
512,608 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
372,593 |
|
Shop equipment
|
|
|
59,213 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
1,120,180 |
|
Revenue equipment
|
|
|
11,611,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,942,181 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,973,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,968,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE D RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related parties of the I. E. Miller Companies include the
following entities: Sunland Construction, Inc., Sunland-Kori
Services, L.L.C., I. E. Miller and Company, L.L.C.,
Gulfgate Construction, L.L.C., Andre Land and Cattle and
Progressive Tractor & Implement Co., Inc. Related party
transactions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
60,730 |
|
|
Progressive Tractor and Implement Co., Inc.
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
3,423 |
|
|
Purchases of services from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
896,494 |
|
|
|
Sunland-Kori Services, L.L.C
|
|
|
213,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,109,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of services to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
175,431 |
|
|
Progressive Tractor and Implement Co., Inc.
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
176,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the eleven months ended August 31, 2004, the
I. E. Miller Companies rented property from Andre Land and
Cattle for $33,000. The I. E. Miller Companies sold assets
to Sunland Construction, Inc. for $59,000 and repaid debts of
$2,144,431 and paid $9,063 in interest to Sunland.
NOTE E RETIREMENT PLAN
For the period ended August 31, 2004, the employees of
I. E. Miller Companies were allowed to participate in the
I. E. Miller Companies Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan. The Plan
covers all full-time employees of I. E. Miller Companies
who have one year of service and are age eighteen or older. The
Plan is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Each year (at the option of I. E. Miller Companies
management) the employer may make contributions. Participants
may contribute up to 15 percent of their annual wages
before bonuses and overtime. Employer contributions to the Plan
were $17,978.17 for the period ended August 31, 2004.
NOTE F CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The I. E. Miller Companies provide services to a
diversified group of customers in the petroleum industry,
including major oil companies, located primarily in the Southern
United States. Credit is extended based on a evaluation of each
customers financial condition. Credit losses, upon
occurrence, are provided for within the financial statements.
The I. E. Miller Companies maintain their cash in bank
deposit accounts at high credit quality financial institutions.
The balances, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.
F-61
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE G SALES TO MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The customer base for the I. E. Miller Companies is
primarily concentrated in the oil and gas industry. The revenue
earned for each customer varies from year to year based on the
services provided. Sales to customers exceeding 10 percent
or more of the I. E. Miller Companies total revenue
during the period comprised one customer at 13%.
NOTE H COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The I. E. Miller Companies are involved in various claims
and lawsuits in the normal course of business. Management does
not believe that any accruals are necessary in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
The I. E. Miller Companies lease equipment under various
operating lease agreements. Total minimum rental commitments at
August 31, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended August 31, |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
398,400 |
|
2006
|
|
|
200,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
598,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE I SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On August 31, 2004, the I. E. Miller Companies were
purchased by I. E. Miller Services, Inc. in an asset
acquisition.
F-62
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene H. Darnall, CPA, Retired 1990
Paula D. Bihm, CPA, Deceased 2002
E. Larry Sikes, CPA, CVA, CFP
Danny P. Frederick, CPA
Clayton E. Darnall, CPA,CVA
Eugene H. Darnall, III, CPA
Stephanie M. Higginbotham, CPA
John P. Armato, CPA
Jennifer S. Ziegler, CPA, CFP
Chris A. Miller, CPA,CVA
Stephen R. Dischler, MBA, CPA
Steven G. Moosa, CPA
Erich G. Loewer, Jr. CPA, CVA
Kathleen T. Darnall, CPA
Erich G. Loewer, III, MTX, CPA
Tamera T. Landry, CPA
Raegan D. Maggio, CPA
Julie Templet DeVillier, CPA
Barbara A. Clark, CPA
Lauren F. Verrett, CPA
Michelle B. Borrello, CPA
Jeremy C. Meaux, CPA
Kevin S. Young, CPA
Other Locations:
1231 E. Laurel Avenue
Eunice, LA 70535
337.457.4146
1201 Brashear Avenue
Suite 301
Morgan City, LA 70380
985.384.6264
404 Pere Megret
Abbeville, LA 70510
337.893.5470 |
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
Mr. John E. Soileau
I. E. Miller Companies
Eunice, Louisiana
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of I.E.
Miller Companies as of September 30, 2003, and the related
combined statement of operations, stockholders and
members equity and cash flows for the year then ended.
These combined financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its
internal control over financing reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of I.E. Miller Companies as of September 30,
2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ DARNALL, SIKES & FREDERICK
A Corporation of Certified Public Accountants
|
|
|
Eunice, Louisiana
November 10, 2003 |
|
Member of:
American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants
Society of Louisiana
Certified Public Accountants |
F-63
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Combined Balance Sheet
September 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
621,528 |
|
|
Accounts receivable trade net
|
|
|
7,116,525 |
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
191,091 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,206,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
9,135,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
|
314,475 |
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
399,714 |
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
377,555 |
|
|
Shop equipment
|
|
|
56,625 |
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
1,000,356 |
|
|
Revenue equipment
|
|
|
12,837,793 |
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
64,151 |
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
31,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,082,067 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
8,568,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,514,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill net
|
|
|
161,509 |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
27,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
15,838,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS AND MEMBERS
EQUITY |
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
$ |
133,467 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,021,172 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,367,537 |
|
|
Note payable insurance
|
|
|
246,467 |
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
2,144,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
4,913,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
355,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Members equity
|
|
|
8,564,759 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,004,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,569,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
15,838,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
See independent auditors report and notes to combined
financial statements.
F-64
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Combined Statement of Operations
Year Ended September 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUE
|
|
$ |
30,186,155 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses
|
|
|
17,295,775 |
|
|
Indirect expenses
|
|
|
12,628,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,924,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
261,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
36,088 |
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
7,676 |
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
175,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
480,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
See independent auditors report and notes to combined
financial statements.
F-65
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Combined Statement of Stockholders and Members
Equity
Year Ended September 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Members | |
|
Retained | |
|
Minority | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Equity | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Interest | |
|
Total Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balances, September 30, 2002
|
|
$ |
576,000 |
|
|
$ |
(149,683 |
) |
|
$ |
10,381,565 |
|
|
$ |
248,412 |
|
|
$ |
11,056,294 |
|
|
Conversion of corporation to L.L.C.
|
|
|
(575,000 |
) |
|
|
8,783,005 |
|
|
|
(8,145,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,146 |
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,144 |
|
|
|
(231,675 |
) |
|
|
107,160 |
|
|
|
480,629 |
|
|
Gain on liquidation of parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,468 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(888,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(888,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2003
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,564,759 |
|
|
$ |
2,004,031 |
|
|
$ |
355,572 |
|
|
$ |
10,925,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See independent auditors report and notes to combined
financial statements.
F-66
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Combined Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended September 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
480,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities Depreciation
|
|
|
1,817,037 |
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(36,088 |
) |
|
(Increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,010,184 |
) |
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
15,280 |
|
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
|
947,774 |
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
100,513 |
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(16,131 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
132,904 |
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(63,223 |
) |
|
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
(62,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(174,264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
306,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
195,432 |
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
(839,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(643,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from bank overdraft.
|
|
|
133,467 |
|
|
Net proceeds to affiliates
|
|
|
1,458,862 |
|
|
Net payments to member
|
|
|
(122,447 |
) |
|
Net decrease in short-term debt
|
|
|
(120,137 |
) |
|
Deferred compensation payments
|
|
|
(162,195 |
) |
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,404,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(216,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(554,303 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
|
|
|
1,175,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
|
|
$ |
621,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
131,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$ |
70,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
See independent auditors report and notes to combined
financial statements.
F-67
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
|
|
NOTE 1 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Principles of Combination
The combined financial statements include the accounts of I. E.
Miller of Eunice, L.L.C. (wholly owned by I. E.
Miller & Company, L.L.C.), I. E. Miller Holding Co.,
Inc. and its subsidiary, I. E. Miller Fowler
Trucking, L.L.C., and I. E. Miller Heldt Brothers
Trucking, L.L.C. collectively referred to as the I. E.
Miller Companies. During the year ended September 30,
2003, with the shareholders consent, I. E. Miller of
Eunice, Inc. transferred all of its operating assets to I. E.
Miller of Eunice, L.L.C. in exchange for 100% ownership in the
L.L.C. Subsequent to this transaction, I. E. Miller &
Company, L.L.C. elected to liquidate I. E. Miller of Eunice,
Inc., which resulted in I. E. Miller of Eunice, LLC. being 100%
owned by I. E. Miller & Company, L.L.C. The I. E.
Miller Companies were 100% owned by an individual through
personal ownership and affiliated persons or companies. The
financial statements of the I. E. Miller Companies were combined
with no adjustments to the balance sheet or statement of
owners equity. All significant intercompany transactions
have been eliminated in the combination.
The I. E. Miller Companies principal business
activity consists of land rig moving, line hauling, and vacuum
truck service in Louisiana and southeast Texas.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
For purposes of the Combined Statement of Cash Flows, the
I. E. Miller Companies consider all highly liquid debt
instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at
September 30, 2003.
Fixed assets are recorded at cost. Depreciation, for financial
statement purposes, is provided by the straight-line method and
declining balance method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
25 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1-5 |
|
Shop equipment
|
|
|
2-5 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
3 |
|
Revenue equipment
|
|
|
2-10 |
|
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of the I. E.
Miller Companies over the fair value of its net assets at the
date of acquisition. In prior periods goodwill was being
amortized on the straight-line basis over 40 years. For the
year ended September 30, 2003 the I. E. Miller
Companies have adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, which changes the accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill is no longer
amortized using the straight-line method over 40 years.
Instead, SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to test for
any impairment of goodwill. The I. E. Miller Companies have
concluded that there has been no impairment of goodwill during
the current year and therefore has not charged any expense to
the income statement for the year ended September 30, 2003.
Amortization expense charged to operations for 2002 was $6,682.
F-68
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
I. E. Miller of Eunice, L.L.C. |
I. E. Miller of Eunice, L.L.C. was formed and all the
assets of I. E. Miller of Eunice, Inc. were transferred to the
L.L.C. effective October 1, 2002. Earnings and losses after
that date will be included in the income tax return of the
member. Accordingly, the L.L.C. will not incur additional income
tax obligations, and future financial statements will not
include a provision for income taxes. Prior to the change,
income taxes currently payable and deferred income taxes based
on differences between the financial basis of assets and
liabilities and their tax basis were recorded in the financial
statements.
|
|
|
I. E. Miller Holding Co., Inc. & Subsidiary/ I.E.
Miller Heldt Brothers Trucking, L.L.C. |
I. E. Miller Holding Co., Inc. and Subsidiary and I. E.
Miller Heldt Brothers Trucking, L.L.C., with the
consent of their stockholders (members), elected to be taxed as
an S corporation and a partnership, respectively. In lieu
of company level income taxes, the stockholders
(members) are taxed on their proportionate share of the net
income from their operations. Accordingly, no provision or
liability for income taxes is included in the accompanying
combined financial statement for their operations.
The preparation of combined financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
|
|
NOTE 2 |
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE |
The I. E. Miller Companies provide for doubtful accounts
using the allowance method. Accounts estimated to be
uncollectible total $124,153 as of September 30, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to Canonwill, Inc., dated March 14, 2003,
original amount of $864,476, with a downpayment of $216,119,
bearing interest at 5% per annum, payable in 9 monthly
installments of $73,549, collateralized by insurance policies
|
|
$ |
213,172 |
|
Note payable to Hibernia Insurance, dated March 17, 2003,
original amount of $131,537, with a downpayment of $32,884,
bearing interest at 5% per annum, payable in 9 monthly
installments of $11,191, collateralized by insurance policies
|
|
|
33,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
246,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4 |
DEFERRED COMPENSATION |
The I. E. Miller Companies had established a deferred
compensation agreement with a key employee. Additional
compensation, if any, was earned based on profitability of the
I. E. Miller Companies through a formula set forth in the
plan. The plan also included a vesting schedule and withdrawal
options of amounts earned and vested. Included in long-term
liabilities is the deferred compensation payable earned as of
September 30, 2002 in the amount of $162,195. During the
year ended September 30, 2003, the covered individual
discontinued employment with the I. E. Miller Companies and
was paid all amounts owed as of that date.
F-69
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
NOTE 5 |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Related parties of the I. E. Miller Companies include the
following entities: Sunland Construction, Inc., Sunland-Kori
Services, L.L.C., I. E. Miller and Company, L.L.C., Gulfgate
Construction, L.L.C., and Progressive Tractor &
Implement Co., Inc. Related party transactions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable/ Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland-Kori Services, L.L.C
|
|
$ |
10,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due (to) from Affiliates/ Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
2,144,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
27,940 |
|
Gulfgate Construction, L.L.C
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
Progressive Tractor & Implement Co., Inc.
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
Sunland Construction, Inc.
|
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
Sunland-Kori Services, L.L.C
|
|
|
18,144 |
|
Progressive Tractor & Implement Co., Inc.
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended September 30, 2002, the employees of the
I. E. Miller Companies were allowed to participate in the
Sunland Construction, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan. For the
year ended September 30, 2003, the employees of the I. E.
Miller Companies are allowed to participate in the I. E. Miller
Companies Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan. The Plans cover all
full-time employees of the I. E. Miller Companies who have one
year of service and are age eighteen or older. They are subject
to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA).
Each year (at the option of the I. E. Miller Companies
management) the employer may make contributions. Participants
may contribute up to 15 percent of their annual wages
before bonuses and overtime. Employer contributions to the plans
were $21,100 for the year ended September 30, 2003.
The I. E. Miller Companies participate in the
Voluntary Employees Benefit Association Plan of
Sunland Construction, Inc. and Affiliated Companies. The
Plan provides health benefits and life insurance coverage to
full-time participants and to their beneficiaries and covered
dependents. Funding of the Plan is provided monthly by
contributions from both employers for employee coverage and
employees for spouse and dependent coverage.
F-70
I. E. MILLER COMPANIES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
NOTE 8 |
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK |
The I. E. Miller Companies provide services to a
diversified group of customers in the petroleum industry,
including major oil companies, located primarily in the Southern
United States. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of each
customers financial condition. Credit losses, upon
occurrence, are provided for within the financial statements.
The I. E. Miller Companies maintain its cash in bank
deposit accounts at high credit quality financial institutions.
The balances, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.
|
|
NOTE 9 |
STOCK RESTRICTIONS |
The Articles of Incorporation do not allow any unit of I. E.
Miller Heldt Brothers Trucking, L.L.C. to be
transferred by any member to any person not already a member of
I. E. Miller Heldt Brothers Trucking, L.L.C. unless
the unit has been first offered for sale to the other members
and the other members fail or refuse to accept the offer. The
other members shall have an option to purchase the unit to be
transferred at the same price and on the same terms and
conditions as the offer or shall have been offered by a third
person in an arms length transaction, acting in good
faith. The offer shall be in writing and open for a period of
60 days. After the offer period has expired, the member may
transfer his units at a price not less than the amount offered
to the other members. The right of first refusal shall not apply
to a gift or donation; however, a donation shall require the
consent of the members.
The I. E. Miller Companies are guarantors on a
line-of-credit of
$30,000,000 for Sunland Construction, Inc. (a commonly owned
affiliate). The outstanding balance was $4,995,814 at
September 30, 2003. Also, the I. E. Miller
Companies are guarantors on a term note for Sunland
Construction, Inc. The balance on the note was $1,671,911 at
September 30, 2003.
The I. E. Miller Companies have outstanding four
letters of credit with Bank One for a total of $2,120,978. At
September, 30, 2003, no amounts were drawn on the letters
of credit.
|
|
NOTE 11 |
SALES TO MAJOR CUSTOMERS |
The customer base for the I. E. Miller Companies is
primarily concentrated in the oil and gas industry. The revenue
earned from each customer varies from year to year based on the
services provided. Sales to customers exceeding 10 percent
or more of the I. E. Miller Companies total
revenue are summarized as follows:
F-71
Independent Accountants Report
Board of Directors
Hamm Co.
Enid, Oklahoma
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
HAMM CO., as of September 30, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
cash flows for the nine months then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of HAMM CO., as of September 30, 2004, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for the nine
months then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ BKD LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 9, 2004
F-72
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
1,907,097 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $69,917
|
|
|
11,243,181 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
312,635 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
293,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
13,756,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trucks, tanks and other
|
|
|
27,830,941 |
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
4,574,348 |
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
14,254,688 |
|
|
Leasehold
|
|
|
69,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,729,230 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,674,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,054,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment deposit
|
|
|
1,234,867 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
323,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,558,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
35,370,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable
|
|
$ |
3,458,978 |
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
2,625,177 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,568,772 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
1,317,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
11,970,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized
10,000,000 shares; issued 1,956,300 shares and
outstanding 1,956,175 shares
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
127,385 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
23,852,097 |
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 125 shares
|
|
|
(582,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
23,399,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
35,370,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-73
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Statement of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
$ |
42,919,515 |
|
|
Oil and gas
|
|
|
259,835 |
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
344,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,523,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
16,194,201 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,119,198 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
3,533,095 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,893,141 |
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
1,441,134 |
|
|
Disposal fee
|
|
|
2,392,600 |
|
|
Fuel and oil
|
|
|
2,739,152 |
|
|
Parts and supplies
|
|
|
3,582,245 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
496,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,390,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
6,132,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
532,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
308,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
6,356,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-74
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Stock | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,956,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
127,385 |
|
|
$ |
(582,209 |
) |
|
$ |
21,805,800 |
|
|
$ |
21,352,932 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,356,203 |
|
|
|
6,356,203 |
|
|
Distribution to stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,309,906 |
) |
|
|
(4,309,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
1,956,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
127,385 |
|
|
$ |
(582,209 |
) |
|
$ |
23,852,097 |
|
|
$ |
23,399,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-75
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,356,203 |
|
|
Items not requiring (providing) cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,119,198 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(494,368 |
) |
|
|
Undistributed earnings of affiliate
|
|
|
(15,052 |
) |
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
138,689 |
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
120,126 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,075,237 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
125,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
10,425,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
1,638,575 |
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment and deposit on equipment
|
|
|
(7,430,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,792,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings on line-of-credit agreement
|
|
|
171,241 |
|
|
Principal payments of long-term debt and note payable
|
|
|
(3,118,051 |
) |
|
Net advances to affiliates
|
|
|
(210,675 |
) |
|
Distributions to stockholders
|
|
|
(2,213,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(5,371,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash
|
|
|
(737,531 |
) |
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,644,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$ |
1,907,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flows Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
308,988 |
|
Hamm Co. sold equipment to the principal stockholder for cash,
forgiveness of a payable owed to the stockholder and an amount
of a declared cash distribution to the stockholder which was
applied to the purchase price. The noncash components of the
transaction were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment held for sale
|
|
$ |
3,523,642 |
|
Distribution to stockholder applied to equipment purchase price
|
|
$ |
2,096,333 |
|
Account payable to stockholder
|
|
$ |
353,439 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-76
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2004
|
|
Note 1: |
Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
Hamm Co. is an Oklahoma-based fluid-handling and well-servicing
company that earns revenue predominately from providing
trucking, saltwater disposal and well servicing services for oil
and gas producers in Oklahoma, Texas, Montana, North Dakota
and Wyoming. Hamm Co. extends unsecured credit to its customers
for a limited period of time.
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Hamm Co. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Hamm &
Phillips Service Co.; Stride Well Service, Inc.;
Rigmovers, Inc.; and Guard, Inc. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to customers
plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Hamm Co. provides an
allowance for doubtful accounts, if necessary, which is based
upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection
information and existing economic conditions. Accounts
receivable are ordinarily due 30 days after the issuance of
the invoice. Delinquent receivables are written off based on
individual credit evaluation and specific circumstances of the
customer.
Substantially all inventories, consisting of materials and
supplies and mud, are valued at weighted average cost, which
includes freight-in.
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful
life of each asset using the straight-line method. Useful lives
by significant asset category were as follows at
September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life | |
Asset Description |
|
(in years) | |
|
|
| |
Trucks, tanks and other
|
|
|
4-10 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10-40 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
4-14 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10-40 |
|
Hamm Co.s property and equipment was pledged as collateral
against its outstanding bank facility borrowings at
September 30, 2004. See discussion at Note 3,
Note Payable.
F-77
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
September 30, 2004
Hamm Co.s stockholders have elected to have Hamm Co.
income taxed as an S Corporation under provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code and a similar section of the Oklahoma
income tax law; therefore, taxable income or loss is reported to
the individual stockholders for inclusion in their respective
tax returns. No provision for federal and state income taxes is
included in these statements.
Hamm Co. earns revenue from the sale of services and equipment
rentals to customers in the oil and gas industry at agreed-upon
or contractual rates. Revenues are recognized when earned during
the month that the services are performed. Services are
performed within a relatively short period of time, and
therefore, Hamm Co. does not record revenue transactions under
long-term contract arrangements, and did not participate in
multiple-element revenue transactions during the nine months
ended September 30, 2004.
During 2003, Hamm Co. implemented two stock-based employee
compensation plans, which are described more fully in
Note 6. Hamm Co. accounts for these plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based
employee compensation cost is reflected in net income. The
following table illustrates the effect on net income if Hamm Co.
had applied the fair value provisions of FASB Statement
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to
stock-based employee compensation. Fair value has been estimated
using the minimum value method.
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
6,506,203 |
|
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation cost determined
under the fair value based method
|
|
|
41,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
6,464,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
The stock options were redeemed subsequent to year end.
Hamm Co. and other affiliated companies have elected to jointly
self-insure costs related to employee health and accident
benefit programs. Costs resulting from noninsured losses are
charged to income when incurred. Hamm Co. has purchased
insurance that limits its exposure for individual claims.
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities approximated
their carrying values at September 30, 2004.
Hamm Co. has a line of credit agreement in the amount of
$3,500,000 payable to a bank. The line of credit agreement is
due in May 2005 with monthly interest payments at 4%. Accounts
receivable, general intangibles and the principal
stockholders guarantee secure the note. At
September 30, 2004, $2,625,177 was drawn on the line of
credit agreement. The line of credit was paid in full in October
2004.
F-78
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
September 30, 2004
The note payable is to a bank and totaled $3,458,978 at
September 30, 2004. The note was to be due in May 2005 and
had terms requiring that whereby 1/60th of the outstanding
principal balance plus interest at 4.5% be paid monthly. The
note was secured by equipment and the principal
stockholders guarantee at September 30, 2004. The
note was paid in full in October 2004.
|
|
Note 4: |
Related Party Transactions |
During 2001, Hamm Co. borrowed $600,000 from a rental company
owned solely by one of its stockholders. The loan was payable in
monthly installments and was due on demand. The note was not
secured. During 2004, the note was paid in full.
During 2004, Hamm Co. provided oil field services and other
services to affiliated companies totaling approximately
$8,077,000. In addition, Hamm Co. purchased various services
including saltwater disposal fees and general and administrative
services totaling approximately $4,433,000. At
September 30, 2004, Hamm Co. had a receivable totaling
$2,284,657 from this related party and a payable of $376,201 as
a result of these transactions. These amounts are included in
the captions Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable,
respectively, in the accompanying balance sheet.
During 2004, Hamm Co. sold equipment to its stockholder for
$3,966,447. The sales price was satisfied through the receipt of
cash of $1,516,675, a distribution in kind to the stockholder of
$2,096,333 and a reduction of accounts payable to the
stockholder of $353,439. A gain of $442,805 was recognized as a
result of the sale based on the purchase price of the equipment.
|
|
Note 5: |
Profit Sharing Plan |
Hamm Co. has a 401(k) profit sharing plan covering substantially
all employees. Hamm Co. makes discretionary contributions to the
plan based on a percentage of eligible employees
compensation. During 2004, contributions to the plan were 5% of
eligible employees compensation. Contributions to the plan
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, were
approximately $315,000.
|
|
Note 6: |
Stock Option Plans |
|
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Plan (ISOP) |
Hamm Co. has an incentive stock option plan under which it may
grant options that vest in five years to its employees for up to
23,750 shares of common stock. The exercise price of each
option is intended to equal the fair value of Hamm Co.s
stock on the date of grant. An options maximum term is ten
years.
A summary of the status of the plan at September 30, 2004,
and changes during the nine months then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
September 30, 2004
The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of
the grant using the minimum value method with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share
|
|
$ |
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Expected life of options
|
|
|
10 years |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
under the plan outstanding at September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
Exercise Price | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise Price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (NSOP) |
Hamm Co. has a nonqualified stock option plan under which it may
grant options that vest in three years to its employees for up
to 23,750 shares of common stock. Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, requires compensation cost to be recognized over
the period in which an employee performs services if the
exercise price is less than the fair value of Hamm Co.s
stock on the date of the grant. The exercise price of each
option is less than the fair value of the companys stock
on the date of grant, however, management believes the annual
compensation is not material to the operations of Hamm Co. and
no cost has been recognized. An options maximum term is
ten years.
A summary of the status of the plan at September 30, 2004,
and changes during the nine months ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of
the grant using the minimum value method with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share
|
|
$ |
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Expected life of options
|
|
|
10 years |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
under the plan outstanding at September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
Exercise Price | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise Price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
F-80
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
September 30, 2004
|
|
Note 7: |
Significant Estimates and Concentrations |
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America require disclosure of certain significant estimates and
current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Those
matters include the following:
Hamm Co.s cash exceeded FDIC insured limits by
approximately $1,226,000 at September 30, 2004.
Hamm Co. earned approximately 20% of its revenues from one
customer, an affiliated company, during 2004.
Hamm Co. and other affiliated companies participate jointly in a
self-insurance pool covering health and workers
compensation claims made by employees up to the first $50,000
(health) and $500,000 (workers compensation),
respectively, per claim. Any amounts paid above these are
reinsured through third-party providers. Premiums charged to
Hamm Co. are based on estimated costs per employee of the pool.
Estimates of the liability recorded could differ materially from
the ultimate loss.
|
|
Note 8: |
Litigation and Commitments |
Hamm Co. is a defendant in a lawsuit that asserts property
damage from leakage of a wastewater disposal tank to which Hamm
Co. transported wastewater. The lawsuit seeks damages of an
unspecified amount against many transporters of oilfield
drilling fluids, including Hamm Co. The court sustained a motion
for summary judgment on behalf of the transporters. The appeal
has been fully briefed by the parties and has been assigned to
the Court of Appeals for decision. A decision on that appeal has
not been rendered. The amount of loss, if any, which may result
from the ultimate outcome of this action is not currently
reasonably estimable. No liability has been recorded for the
potential loss as of September 30, 2004. Events could occur
in the near term that would materially change the amount of
recognized liability.
Hamm Co. had no significant future obligations under operating
lease arrangements at September 30, 2004. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2004, rental expense under
operating leases totaled $77,238.
F-81
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
September 30, 2004
|
|
Note 9: |
Earnings Per Share |
Earnings per share were computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
Income | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,356,203 |
|
|
|
1,956,175 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,356,203 |
|
|
|
1,979,925 |
|
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10: |
Subsequent Event |
Subsequent to September 30, 2004, the Hamm Co. companies
were restructured and 100% of the stock of the restructured
entity was sold to Complete Energy Services, Inc., a
majority-owned company of
SCF-IV, L.P. Hamm
Co.s common stock was sold for cash and capital stock of
Complete Energy Services, Inc., pursuant to the purchase
agreement.
F-82
Independent Accountants Report
Board of Directors
Hamm Co.
Enid, Oklahoma
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
HAMM CO., as of December 31, 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of HAMM CO., as of December 31, 2003, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
/s/ BKD LLP
Enid, Oklahoma
February 27, 2004
F-83
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
2,644,628 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance, $47,917
|
|
|
11,381,870 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
432,761 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
505,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
14,964,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trucks, tanks and other
|
|
|
24,327,480 |
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
3,948,231 |
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
12,729,810 |
|
|
Leasehold
|
|
|
69,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,074,774 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(23,492,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,581,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset held for sale
|
|
|
2,860,250 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
141,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,002,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
35,548,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
5,558,801 |
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
2,453,936 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,789,506 |
|
|
Accounts payable-related party
|
|
|
353,439 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
1,021,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
13,177,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
1,018,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized
10,000,000 shares; issued 1,956,300 shares and
outstanding 1,956,175 shares
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
127,385 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
21,805,800 |
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 125 shares
|
|
|
(582,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
21,352,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
35,548,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-84
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Statement of Income
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
$ |
48,093,996 |
|
|
Oil and gas
|
|
|
495,884 |
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
313,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,903,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
19,570,318 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,795,280 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
3,323,714 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,672,551 |
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
1,373,587 |
|
|
Disposal fee
|
|
|
2,550,948 |
|
|
Fuel and oil
|
|
|
2,607,571 |
|
|
Parts and supplies
|
|
|
4,901,500 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
703,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,498,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
6,405,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
51,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
348,969 |
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
6,107,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-85
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Stock | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
119,341 |
|
|
$ |
(582,209 |
) |
|
$ |
15,698,026 |
|
|
$ |
15,245,158 |
|
|
Effect of change in par value
|
|
|
1,946,300 |
|
|
|
(8,044 |
) |
|
|
8,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,107,774 |
|
|
|
6,107,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
1,956,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
127,385 |
|
|
$ |
(582,209 |
) |
|
$ |
21,805,800 |
|
|
$ |
21,352,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-86
HAMM CO.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,107,774 |
|
|
Items not requiring (providing) cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,795,280 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(42,228 |
) |
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,308,913 |
) |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
14,076 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
944,524 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(242,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
6,267,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
121,305 |
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,192,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,070,863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net principal payments on line-of-credit agreement
|
|
|
(706,866 |
) |
|
Principal payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,510,376 |
) |
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(582,209 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,756,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
957,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH
|
|
|
2,154,514 |
|
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
490,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH, END OF YEAR
|
|
$ |
2,644,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
348,969 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-87
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
|
|
Note 1: |
Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
Hamm Co. is an Oklahoma-based fluid-handling and well-servicing
company that earns revenue predominately from providing
trucking, salt water disposal and well servicing services for
oil and gas producers in Oklahoma, Texas, North Dakota and
Wyoming. Hamm Co. extends unsecured credit to its customers for
a limited period of time.
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Hamm Co. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Hamm &
Phillips Service Co.; Stride Well Service, Inc.; Rigmovers,
Inc.; and Guard, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to customers
plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Hamm Co. provides an
allowance for doubtful accounts, if necessary, which is based
upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection
information and existing economic conditions. Accounts
receivable are ordinarily due 30 days after the issuance of
the invoice. Delinquent receivables are written off based on
individual credit evaluation and specific circumstances of the
customer.
Substantially all inventories, consisting of materials and
supplies and mud, are valued at weighted average cost, which
includes freight-in.
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful
life of each asset using the straight-line method. Useful lives
by significant asset category were as follows at
December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life | |
Asset Description |
|
(in years) | |
|
|
| |
Trucks, tanks and other
|
|
|
4-10 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10-40 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
4-14 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10-40 |
|
Hamm Co.s property and equipment was pledged as collateral
against outstanding bank facility borrowings at
December 31, 2003. See discussion at Note 3,
Long-Term Debt.
F-88
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2003
Hamm Co.s stockholders have elected to have the
companys income taxed as an S Corporation
under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and a similar
section of the Oklahoma income tax law; therefore, taxable
income or loss is reported to the individual stockholders for
inclusion in their respective tax returns. No provision for
federal and state income taxes is included in these statements.
Hamm Co. earns revenue from the sale of services and equipment
rentals to customers in the oil and gas industry at agreed-upon
or contractual rates. Revenues are recognized when earned during
the month that the services are performed. Services are
performed within a relatively short period of time, and
therefore, Hamm Co. does not record revenue transactions under
long-term contract arrangements, and did not participate in
multiple-element revenue transactions during the year ended
December 31, 2003.
During 2003, Hamm Co. implemented two stock-based employee
compensation plans, which are described more fully in
Note 6. Hamm Co. accounts for these plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee
compensation cost is reflected in net income. The following
table illustrates the effect on net income if Hamm Co. had
applied the fair value provisions of FASB Statement
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to
stock-based employee compensation. Fair value has been estimated
using the minimum value method.
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
6,107,774 |
|
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation cost determined
under the fair value based method
|
|
|
50,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
6,057,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hamm Co. and other affiliated companies have elected to jointly
self-insure costs related to employee health and accident
benefit programs. Costs resulting from noninsured losses are
charged to income when incurred. Hamm Co. has purchased
insurance that limits its exposure for individual claims.
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities approximated
their carrying values at December 31, 2003.
Hamm Co. has a line of credit agreement in the amount of
$3,500,000 payable to a bank. The line of credit agreement is
due July 2004 with monthly interest payments at the Chase
Manhattan prime rate less .5% with a floor of 4%. At
December 31, 2003, $2,453,986 was drawn on the line of
credit agreement. These borrowings bore interest at a rate of 4%
and were secured by accounts receivable, general intangibles and
a stockholders guarantee.
F-89
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, bank(A)
|
|
$ |
103,112 |
|
Note payable, bank(B)
|
|
|
104,964 |
|
Note payable, bank(C)
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
Note payable, bank(D)
|
|
|
3,956,779 |
|
Notes payable, related party(E)
|
|
|
366,450 |
|
Notes payable, finance company(F)
|
|
|
45,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,577,029 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
5,558,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,018,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt at
December 31, 2003, were:
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
$ |
5,558,801 |
|
2005
|
|
|
1,018,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,577,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Due June 2004; payable $18,192 monthly including interest
at National prime; secured by inventory, machinery and equipment. |
|
(B) |
|
Due March 2005; payable $8,646 monthly including interest
at National prime; remaining principal due at maturity; secured
by inventory, machinery and equipment. |
|
(C) |
|
Due March 2004; payable $83,333 monthly plus interest at
5%, secured by equipment. |
|
(D) |
|
Due September 2004; payable monthly at
1/60th of
the outstanding balance plus interest at 4.75%, secured by
equipment. |
|
(E) |
|
Unsecured notes payable to a related party; payable on demand,
at interest rates of 6.00% and 8.50%. |
|
(F) |
|
Various notes payable due December 2004; payable monthly;
secured by automobiles. |
|
|
Note 4: |
Related Party Transactions |
During 2001, Hamm Co. borrowed $600,000 from a rental company
owned solely by one of its shareholders. These loans are payable
in monthly installments and are due on demand. The notes are not
secured. At December 31, 2003, Hamm Co. owed the rental
company $366,450. During 2003, Hamm Co. paid $1,796 in interest
expense related to the loan.
During 2003, Hamm Co. provided oilfield services and other
services to affiliated companies totaling approximately
$13,720,000. In addition, Hamm Co. purchased various services
including salt water disposal fees and general and
administrative services totaling approximately $13,830,000. At
December 31, 2003, Hamm Co. had a receivable totaling
$4,144,561 from the affiliated companies, and a payable of
$343,777 as a result of those transactions. These amounts are
included in the captions Accounts Receivable and Accounts
Payable, respectively, in the accompanying balance sheet. Hamm
Co. recorded an accounts payable-related party totaling $353,439
to reimburse the owner of the Hamm Co. companies for expenses
paid on behalf of Hamm Co. related to the construction of an
asset. This amount was repaid in 2004.
F-90
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2003
|
|
Note 5: |
Profit Sharing Plan |
Hamm Co. has a 401(k) profit sharing plan covering substantially
all employees. Hamm Co. makes discretionary contributions to the
plan based on a percentage of eligible employees
compensation. During 2003, contributions to the plan were 5% of
eligible employees compensation. Contributions to the plan
for the year ended December 31, 2003, were approximately
$426,000.
|
|
Note 6: |
Stock Option Plans |
|
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Plan (ISOP) |
Hamm Co. has an incentive stock option plan under which Hamm Co.
may grant options that vest in five years to its employees for
up to 21,850 shares of common stock. The exercise price of
each option is intended to equal the fair value of Hamm
Co.s stock on the date of grant. An options maximum
term is ten years.
A summary of the status of the plan at December 31, 2003,
and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of
the grant using the minimum value method with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share
|
|
$ |
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
Expected life of options
|
|
|
10 years |
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year
|
|
$ |
74,000 |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
under the plan outstanding at December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise Price |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (NSOP) |
Hamm Co. has a nonqualified stock option plan under which it may
grant options that vest in three years to its employees for up
to 21,850 shares of common stock. Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, requires compensation cost to be recognized over
the period in which an employee performs services if the
exercise price is less than the fair value of the Hamm
Co.s stock on the date of the grant. The exercise price of
each option is less than the fair value of the Hamm Co.s
stock on the date of grant, however, management believes the
annual compensation is not
F-91
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2003
material to the operations of Hamm Co. and no cost has been
recognized. An options maximum term is ten years.
A summary of the status of the plan at December 31, 2003,
and changes during the year ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of
the grant using the minimum value method with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share
|
|
$ |
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
Expected life of options
|
|
|
10 years |
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year
|
|
$ |
181,000 |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
under the plan outstanding at December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise Price |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Note 7: |
Significant Estimates and Concentrations |
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America require disclosure of certain significant estimates and
current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Those
matters include the following:
Hamm Co. earned approximately 31% of its revenues from one
customer during 2003.
Hamm Co. and other affiliated companies participate jointly in a
self-insurance pool covering health and workers
compensation claims made by employees up to the first $50,000
(health) and $500,000 (workers compensation),
respectively, per claim. Any amounts paid above these are
reinsured through third-party providers. Premiums charged to
Hamm Co. are based on estimated costs per employee of the pool.
Estimates of the liability recorded could differ materially from
the ultimate loss.
F-92
HAMM CO.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2003
|
|
Note 8: |
Litigation and Commitments |
Hamm Co. is a defendant in a lawsuit that asserts property
damage from leakage of a wastewater disposal tank to which Hamm
Co. transported wastewater. The lawsuit seeks damages of an
unspecified amount against many transporters of oilfield
drilling fluids, including Hamm Co. The court sustained a motion
for summary judgement on behalf of the transporters. The appeal
has been fully briefed by the parties and has been assigned to
the Court of Appeals for decision. A decision on that appeal has
not been rendered. The amount of loss, if any, which may result
from the ultimate outcome of this action is not currently
reasonably estimable. No liability has been recorded for the
potential loss as of December 31, 2003. Events could occur
in the near term that would materially change the amount of
recognized liability.
Hamm Co. had no significant future obligations under operating
lease arrangements at December 31, 2003. For the year ended
December 31, 2003, rental expense under operating leases totaled
$72,712.
|
|
Note 9: |
Combination of Commonly Controlled Interest |
On March 31, 2003, the Hamm Co. (Hamm) liquidated a wholly
owned subsidiary Trinity Oil-Field Services, Inc. (Trinity) and
contributed the net assets to Stride Well Services, Inc.
(Stride). Because majority ownership of Trinity and Stride are
substantially the same, this combination was accounted for in a
manner similar to a pooling of interests, using Trinitys
historical book values.
During 2003, Hamm Co. amended and restated its certificate of
incorporation. The amendment increased the number of authorized
shares from 500,000 shares to 10,000,000 shares and
decreased the par value from $1 per share to $.001 per
share. The number of shares issued and outstanding increased
from 10,000 shares to 1,956,300 shares. There was no
consideration given as a result of the amendment. Common stock
was decreased by $8,044 and additional paid-in capital was
increased by $8.044.
|
|
Note 11: |
Earnings Per Share |
Earnings per share were computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
Income | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,107,774 |
|
|
|
1,956,175 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,107,774 |
|
|
|
1,971,034 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-93
Independent Accountants Report
Board of Directors
Oil Tool Rentals, Inc.
Enid, Oklahoma
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of OIL TOOL
RENTALS, INC. (the Company) as of September 30, 2004, and
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of
income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004, and the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC., as of September 30, 2004, and
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, and the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ BKD LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 9, 2004
F-94
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Balance Sheets
September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003 and
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
354,340 |
|
|
$ |
302,341 |
|
|
$ |
196,609 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,219,203 |
|
|
|
834,540 |
|
|
|
548,621 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
8,183 |
|
|
|
17,013 |
|
|
|
30,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,581,726 |
|
|
|
1,153,894 |
|
|
|
775,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENTS AND LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities
|
|
|
1,887,747 |
|
|
|
1,865,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable from related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,450 |
|
|
|
604,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,887,747 |
|
|
|
2,232,220 |
|
|
|
604,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
163,591 |
|
|
|
157,224 |
|
|
|
157,224 |
|
|
Trucks, trailers and other
|
|
|
620,059 |
|
|
|
627,379 |
|
|
|
639,863 |
|
|
Rental equipment
|
|
|
5,599,149 |
|
|
|
3,324,686 |
|
|
|
3,372,196 |
|
|
Shop equipment
|
|
|
151,198 |
|
|
|
150,092 |
|
|
|
160,566 |
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
85,704 |
|
|
|
78,304 |
|
|
|
149,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,619,701 |
|
|
|
4,337,685 |
|
|
|
4,479,109 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
3,364,286 |
|
|
|
3,133,075 |
|
|
|
3,025,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,255,415 |
|
|
|
1,204,610 |
|
|
|
1,453,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
6,724,888 |
|
|
$ |
4,590,724 |
|
|
$ |
2,833,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
290,413 |
|
|
$ |
589,095 |
|
|
$ |
118,964 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,423,392 |
|
|
|
28,933 |
|
|
|
64,288 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
169,368 |
|
|
|
79,823 |
|
|
|
76,773 |
|
|
Payable to related party
|
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,114,173 |
|
|
|
697,851 |
|
|
|
260,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
597,502 |
|
|
|
542,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 10,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 500 shares
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
4,003,213 |
|
|
|
3,340,032 |
|
|
|
2,563,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
4,013,213 |
|
|
|
3,350,032 |
|
|
|
2,573,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
6,724,888 |
|
|
$ |
4,590,724 |
|
|
$ |
2,833,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-95
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Statements of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004, and
Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
RENTAL INCOME
|
|
$ |
2,928,981 |
|
|
$ |
3,474,707 |
|
|
$ |
2,899,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense
|
|
|
504,150 |
|
|
|
504,915 |
|
|
|
368,120 |
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
908,750 |
|
|
|
1,068,029 |
|
|
|
1,000,071 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
238,338 |
|
|
|
331,564 |
|
|
|
495,679 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
129,383 |
|
|
|
147,110 |
|
|
|
159,878 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
219,717 |
|
|
|
227,882 |
|
|
|
212,669 |
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
13,504 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
Fuel and oil
|
|
|
17,664 |
|
|
|
6,144 |
|
|
|
7,252 |
|
|
License and permits
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
8,833 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
Parts and supplies
|
|
|
134,102 |
|
|
|
121,648 |
|
|
|
116,706 |
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
(23,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,165,385 |
|
|
|
2,400,096 |
|
|
|
2,370,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
763,596 |
|
|
|
1,074,611 |
|
|
|
528,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
276,036 |
|
|
|
262,128 |
|
|
|
29,887 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
32,451 |
|
|
|
57,613 |
|
|
|
25,123 |
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
1,007,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,126 |
|
|
$ |
533,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE (500 shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED
|
|
$ |
2,014.36 |
|
|
$ |
2,558.25 |
|
|
$ |
1,067.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-96
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Statements of Stockholders Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004, and
Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, January 1, 2002
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
9,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,242,663 |
|
|
$ |
2,252,663 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,678 |
|
|
|
533,678 |
|
Distribution to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212,435 |
) |
|
|
(212,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
2,563,906 |
|
|
|
2,573,906 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,279,126 |
|
|
|
1,279,126 |
|
Distribution to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503,000 |
) |
|
|
(503,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
3,340,032 |
|
|
|
3,350,032 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,007,181 |
|
|
|
1,007,181 |
|
Distribution to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344,000 |
) |
|
|
(344,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2004
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
9,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,003,213 |
|
|
$ |
4,013,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-97
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004, and
Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,007,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,126 |
|
|
$ |
533,678 |
|
|
Items not requiring (providing) cash
Depreciation
|
|
|
238,338 |
|
|
|
331,564 |
|
|
|
495,679 |
|
|
|
Amortization of discount on held-to-maturity investment
|
|
|
(21,977 |
) |
|
|
(25,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
(23,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(384,663 |
) |
|
|
(285,919 |
) |
|
|
(15,012 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
298,780 |
|
|
|
(32,305 |
) |
|
|
48,356 |
|
|
|
Other current assets and liabilities
|
|
|
10,723 |
|
|
|
13,709 |
|
|
|
(23,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,146,882 |
|
|
|
1,256,905 |
|
|
|
1,038,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,105,812 |
) |
|
|
(82,700 |
) |
|
|
(1,051,299 |
) |
|
Purchase held-to-maturity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,840,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net receipts on related party note receivable
|
|
|
366,450 |
|
|
|
238,055 |
|
|
|
46,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(737,862 |
) |
|
|
(1,661,145 |
) |
|
|
(1,004,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings on related party note payable
|
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,184,166 |
) |
|
|
(737,028 |
) |
|
|
(831,036 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
940,145 |
|
|
|
1,750,000 |
|
|
|
950,000 |
|
|
Distributions to stockholders
|
|
|
(344,000 |
) |
|
|
(503,000 |
) |
|
|
(212,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(357,021 |
) |
|
|
509,972 |
|
|
|
(93,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
51,999 |
|
|
|
105,732 |
|
|
|
(59,325 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
302,341 |
|
|
|
196,609 |
|
|
|
255,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
354,340 |
|
|
$ |
302,341 |
|
|
$ |
196,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
33,293 |
|
|
$ |
53,727 |
|
|
$ |
24,555 |
|
|
Property and equipment purchases in accounts payable
|
|
$ |
1,185,224 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-98
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004, and
Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
Note 1: |
Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
Oil Tool Rentals, Inc. (Oil Tools) is an
Oklahoma-based equipment rental company that earns revenue
predominately from providing rental equipment and services for
oil and gas producers in Oklahoma, Texas, North Dakota and
Wyoming. Oil Tools extends unsecured credit to its customers for
a limited period of time.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Oil Tools considers all liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At
September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003 and 2002,
cash equivalents consisted primarily of money market accounts
with brokers.
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to customers
plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Oil Tools provides an
allowance for doubtful accounts, if necessary, which is based
upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection
information and existing economic conditions. Accounts
receivable are ordinarily due 30 days after the issuance of
the invoice. Delinquent receivables are written off based on
individual credit evaluation and specific circumstances of the
customer.
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful
life of each asset using the straight-line method. Useful lives
by significant asset category were as follows as of
September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Description |
|
Useful Life | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in years) | |
Trucks, trailers and other
|
|
|
4-10 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10-40 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
4-14 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5-7 |
|
Oil Tools property and equipment was pledged as collateral
against outstanding bank facility borrowings at
September 30, 2004. See discussion at Note 3,
Long-Term Debt.
Oil Tools stockholder has elected to have the
companys income taxed as an S Corporation
under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and a similar
section of the Oklahoma income tax law; therefore,
F-99
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004, and
Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
taxable income or loss is reported to the individual stockholder
for inclusion in their respective tax returns. No provision for
federal and state income taxes is included in these statements.
Oil Tools earns revenue from the rental of equipment to
customers in the oil and gas industry and for supervisory
services performed at agreed-upon or contractual rates. Revenues
are recognized when earned during the month that the rental is
provided or the supervisory service is performed. Rental or
service agreement terms are for relatively short periods of
time, and therefore, Oil Tools does not record revenue
transactions under long-term contract arrangements, and did not
participate in multiple-element revenue transactions during the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the nine months
ended September 30, 2004.
Debt securities for which Oil Tools has the positive intent and
ability to hold until maturity are classified as held to
maturity and valued at historical cost, adjusted for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts computed by
the level-yield method.
Realized gains and losses, based on the specifically identified
cost of the security, are included in net income.
Oil Tools and other affiliated companies have elected to jointly
self-insure costs related to employee health and accident
benefit programs. Costs resulting from noninsured losses are
charged to income when incurred. Oil Tools has purchased
insurance that limits its exposure for individual claims.
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities, other than
held-to-maturity securities which are disclosed in Note 2,
approximate their carrying values at September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
Securities |
The amortized cost and approximate fair values of
held-to-maturity
securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$ |
1,887,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,865,770 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
|
182,253 |
|
|
|
144,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
$ |
2,070,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,010,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of
held-to-maturity debt
investments at September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Approximate Fair | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
After one through five years
|
|
$ |
1,887,747 |
|
|
$ |
2,070,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-100
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004, and
Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Note payable, bank(A)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
118,964 |
|
Note payable, bank(B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,131,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, bank(C)
|
|
|
887,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887,915 |
|
|
|
1,131,936 |
|
|
|
118,964 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
290,413 |
|
|
|
589,095 |
|
|
|
118,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
597,502 |
|
|
$ |
542,841 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt at
September 30, 2004, were:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
290,413 |
|
2006
|
|
|
315,370 |
|
2007
|
|
|
282,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
887,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Originally due March 2005; payable $28,366 monthly
including interest at 4.75%; secured by inventory, machinery and
equipment. The note was also personally guaranteed by Oil
Tools majority stockholder. The note was paid in 2003. |
|
(B) |
|
Originally due February 2006; payable $52,101 monthly
including interest at 4.50%; secured by inventory, machinery and
equipment. The note was also personally guaranteed by Oil
Tools majority stockholder. The note was paid in May 2004. |
|
(C) |
|
Due July 2007; payable $29,427 monthly including interest
at LIBOR; secured by inventory, machinery and equipment. The
note is personally guaranteed by Oil Tools majority
stockholder. |
|
|
Note 4: |
Related Party Transactions |
During 2001, Oil Tools loaned $600,000 to a service company
owned solely by one of its stockholders. This loan was payable
in monthly installments and was due on demand. The note is not
secured. At September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002, Oil Tools was owed $0, $366,450 and
$604,505, respectively, on this note.
At September 30, 2004, Oil Tools owed $231,000 to a service
company owned solely by one of its stockholders. This payable
has no stated terms. Imputed interest on this note arrangement
was deemed to be insignificant.
Oil Tools provides oil field services to affiliated companies
and also purchases various oil field and administrative services
from affiliated companies. The following summarizes the activity
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, and the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Rental income
|
|
$ |
1,072,220 |
|
|
$ |
1,299,322 |
|
|
$ |
990,840 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
147,964 |
|
|
|
164,241 |
|
|
|
661,447 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
415,744 |
|
|
|
389,075 |
|
|
|
277,574 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
4,926 |
|
|
|
14,195 |
|
F-101
OIL TOOL RENTALS, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004, and
Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
Held-to-maturity
securities are corporate bonds of a company owned solely by one
of its stockholders. These bonds are publicly traded on a
national exchange.
|
|
Note 5: |
Profit Sharing Plan |
Oil Tools has a 401(k) profit sharing plan covering
substantially all employees. Oil Tools makes discretionary
contributions to the plan based on a percentage of eligible
employees compensation. During 2004, 2003 and 2002
contributions to the plan were 5% of eligible employees
compensation. Contributions to the plan for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004, and years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002, were approximately $26,000, $37,000 and $30,000,
respectively.
|
|
Note 6: |
Significant Estimates and Concentrations |
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America require disclosure of certain significant estimates and
current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Those
matters include the following:
Oil Tools earned approximately 37%, 37% and 34% of its revenues
from one related party customer during the nine months ended
2004 and the years ended 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Oil Tools and other affiliated companies participate jointly in
a self-insurance pool covering health and workers
compensation claims made by employees up to the first $50,000
(health) and $500,000 (workers compensation),
respectively, per claim. Any amounts paid above these are
reinsured through third-party providers. Premiums charged to Oil
Tools are based on estimated costs per employee of the pool.
Estimates of the liability recorded could differ materially from
the ultimate loss.
At September 30, 2004, Oil Tools cash accounts
exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $340,000.
Subsequent to September 30, 2004, Oil Tools was
restructured and 100% of the stock of the restructured entity
was sold to Complete Energy Services, Inc., a majority-owned
company of SCF-IV, L.P.
Oil Tools common stock was sold for cash and for capital
stock of Complete Energy Services, Inc., pursuant to the
purchase agreement.
F-102
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. and Affiliates
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Big Mac Tank
Trucks, Inc., Big Mac Transports, Inc. and Fugo Services, Inc.
(collectively, the Company) as of October 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash
flows for the period from January 1, 2005 through
October 31, 2005 and for the year ended December 31,
2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America as
established by the Auditing Standards Board of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of the Company as of October 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for the period from January 1, 2005 through
October 31, 2005 and for the year ended December 31,
2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Houston, Texas
January 31, 2006
F-103
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
743,556 |
|
|
$ |
493,511 |
|
|
Accounts receivable trade, net
|
|
|
5,186,600 |
|
|
|
3,507,666 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
100,196 |
|
|
|
258,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
6,030,352 |
|
|
|
4,259,312 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,109,816 |
|
|
|
2,666,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
10,140,168 |
|
|
$ |
6,925,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
274,324 |
|
|
$ |
150,774 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
452,334 |
|
|
|
145,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
726,658 |
|
|
|
296,163 |
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value; authorized 125,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 4,500 shares
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
426,046 |
|
|
|
426,046 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
8,982,964 |
|
|
|
6,198,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
9,413,510 |
|
|
|
6,629,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
10,140,168 |
|
|
$ |
6,925,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-104
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Ten Months Ended October 31, 2005 and the Year
Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
21,070,793 |
|
|
$ |
19,493,625 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
9,280,423 |
|
|
|
8,534,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,790,370 |
|
|
|
10,959,035 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
926,377 |
|
|
|
974,510 |
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
664,780 |
|
|
|
708,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,591,157 |
|
|
|
1,682,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,199,213 |
|
|
$ |
9,276,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-105
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
For the Ten Months Ended October 31, 2005 and the Year
Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1, 2004
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
426,046 |
|
|
$ |
4,880,782 |
|
|
$ |
5,311,328 |
|
Shareholder distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,958,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,958,000 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,276,169 |
|
|
|
9,276,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
426,046 |
|
|
|
6,198,951 |
|
|
|
6,629,497 |
|
Shareholder distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,415,200 |
) |
|
|
(7,415,200 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,199,213 |
|
|
|
10,199,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
426,046 |
|
|
$ |
8,982,964 |
|
|
$ |
9,413,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-106
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Ten Months Ended October 31, 2005 and the Year
Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,199,213 |
|
|
$ |
9,276,169 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
870,473 |
|
|
|
795,578 |
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,678,934 |
) |
|
|
(555,866 |
) |
|
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaids and other
|
|
|
157,939 |
|
|
|
(191,172 |
) |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
123,550 |
|
|
|
(4,253 |
) |
|
|
Increase in accrued payables
|
|
|
306,945 |
|
|
|
45,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
9,979,186 |
|
|
|
9,366,032 |
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,313,941 |
) |
|
|
(1,207,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,313,941 |
) |
|
|
(1,207,910 |
) |
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to shareholder
|
|
|
(7,415,200 |
) |
|
|
(7,958,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(7,415,200 |
) |
|
|
(7,958,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash
|
|
|
250,045 |
|
|
|
200,122 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
493,511 |
|
|
|
293,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$ |
743,556 |
|
|
$ |
493,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-107
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ten Months Ended October 31, 2005 and Year Ended
December 31, 2004
NOTE A NATURE OF OPERATIONS
1. Nature of Operations
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc., Big Mac Transports, Inc. and Fugo
Services, Inc. (collectively, Big Mac), provides
trucking services and saltwater disposal for oil and gas
producers in Oklahoma and Arkansas.
Big Macs business depends, to a large degree, on the level
of spending by oil and gas companies for exploration,
development and production activities. Therefore, a sustained
increase or decrease in the price of natural gas or oil, which
could have a material impact on exploration, development and
production activities, also could materially affect our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
1. Basis of
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. Big Mac Transports, Inc. and Fugo
Services, Inc. (see Note F). All intercompany accounts
among entities in Big Mac are eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
|
|
3. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Big Mac considers all highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to
customers. Big Mac provides an allowance for doubtful
accounts, if necessary, which is based upon a review of
outstanding receivables, historical collection information and
existing economic conditions. Accounts receivable are ordinarily
due 30 days after the issuance of the invoice. Delinquent
receivables are written off based on an individual credit
evaluation and specific circumstances of the customer. The
allowance for doubtful accounts was $80,695 and $0 at
October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
|
|
5. |
Property and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment, which includes renewals and
betterments, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as period costs.
Depreciation on our buildings, trucks and equipment is computed
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of
the asset after provision for salvage value
(buildings 39 years; trucks and
equipment 5 years). Upon retirement or other
disposal of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any
gains or losses are included in our results of operations.
Big Mac reviews its assets for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the net book value of
property, plant and equipment may not be recovered over its
remaining service life. Provisions for asset impairment are
charged to income when the sum of estimated future cash flows,
on an
F-108
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Ten Months Ended October 31, 2005 and Year Ended
December 31, 2004
undiscounted basis, is less than the assets net book
value. Actual impairment charges are recorded using an estimate
of discounted future cash flows. There was no impairment
recorded in 2005 or 2004.
Revenues are considered earned and directly related costs are
recorded when an understanding has been agreed to between
Big Mac and a financially capable customer encompassing a
determinable price, and the services have been rendered by
delivering the product to its final destination or completing
other services, and collectibility of Big Macs fee is
reasonably assured. Typically there are no other motor carriers
involved in Big Macs transportation services and all
deliveries are made directly to customers.
Big Macs shareholder has elected to have
Big Macs income taxed as an S Corporation
under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and a similar
section of the Oklahoma income tax law; therefore, taxable
income or loss is reported to the individual shareholder for
inclusion in his respective tax returns. No provision for
federal and state income taxes is included in these statements.
Advertising costs of $7,524 and $11,846 in 2005 and 2004,
respectively, were charged to operations when incurred.
NOTE C PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The major components of our property, plant and equipment as of
October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Automobiles, trucks and equipment
|
|
$ |
6,957,166 |
|
|
$ |
5,705,574 |
|
Frac tanks
|
|
|
4,520,679 |
|
|
|
3,458,330 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
148,907 |
|
|
|
148,907 |
|
Land
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
Office equipment and other
|
|
|
650,162 |
|
|
|
650,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
12,312,914 |
|
|
|
9,998,973 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(8,203,098 |
) |
|
|
(7,332,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
4,109,816 |
|
|
$ |
2,666,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE D RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
An individual stockholder owns 100% of the outstanding stock in
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc., Big Mac Transports, Inc., and Fugo
Services, Inc. Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. leases transportation
equipment from Big Mac Transports, Inc. under short term leases.
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. also compensates Fugo Services, Inc.
to dispose of saltwater transported from wells that Big Mac Tank
Trucks, Inc. services. Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. is the only
customer of Big Mac Transports, Inc. and Fugo Services, Inc. and
pays all the expenses of the other two companies. All
transactions among companies and related receivables and
payables have been eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements.
F-109
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Ten Months Ended October 31, 2005 and Year Ended
December 31, 2004
The shareholder also participates in various other business
activities outside of the management and ownership of the three
consolidated companies. These activities are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Wilburton State Bank The shareholder has an
82% ownership interest in this bank and is a member of the
Banks Board. This was the only bank used by Big Mac Tank
Trucks, Inc., Big Mac Transports, Inc. and Fugo Services, Inc.
until October 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
First National Bank of McAlester The
shareholder is a member of the Board for this bank. This bank
was the primary bank that was being utilized by the three
companies subsequent to October 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
Brower Oil & Gas This is an
exploration and production company. The shareholder has
interests in wells operated by this company. Brower
Oil & Gas uses the services of Big Mac Tank Trucks,
Inc. at their well sites. At October 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. had
receivables of $24,796 and $23,459, respectively, due from
Brower Oil & Gas. For the periods ended
October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the amount of
revenue related to those services was $133,325 and $188,752,
respectively. |
|
|
|
Meade Energy Corporation This is an
exploration and production company. The shareholder has
interests in wells operated by this company. Meade Energy
Corporation uses the services of Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. at
their well sites. At October 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. had a receivable of $50,414 and
$9,527, respectively, due from Meade Energy Corporation. For the
periods ended October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
the amount of revenue related to those services was $81,484 and
$75,409, respectively. |
|
|
|
Chesapeake Operating Inc (Chesapeake Energy)
This is an exploration and production company. The shareholder
has interests in wells operated by this company. Chesapeake Inc.
uses the services of Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. at their well
sites and is one of Big Macs largest customers;
revenues from Chesapeake were $1,628,910 or 7.7% of
Big Macs total sales in 2005 and $2,111,366 or 10.9%
in 2004. At October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. had receivables of $429,243 and
$362,076, respectively, due from Chesapeake Operating Inc. |
NOTE E SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES AND
CONCENTRATIONS
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America require a disclosure of certain significant estimates
and current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Those
matters include the following:
1. Cash
Big Macs cash in banks exceeded the FDIC insured
limits by approximately $5,791,000 at October 31, 2005 and
by approximately $548,000 at December 31, 2004.
2. Concentration of
Credit Risk
Big Mac earned approximately 15% of its revenues from one
unrelated customer during the period ending October 31,
2005 and approximately 20% of its revenues from the same
unrelated customer during 2004.
F-110
BIG MAC TANK TRUCKS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Ten Months Ended October 31, 2005 and Year Ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
NOTE F |
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
FIN 46(R) VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES |
FASB Interpretation (FIN) 46(R), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities-An Interpretation of ARB
No. 51 was applicable to Big Mac by the
beginning of the first annual period beginning after
December 15, 2004 which was January 1, 2005.
Big Mac adopted FIN 46(R) on January 1, 2005 and
has elected to reflect its application as of the beginning of
2004 for these comparative financial statements as permitted
under FIN 46(R). There was no cumulative effect adjustment
needed as of January 1, 2004.
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. rents truck transports from Big Mac
Transports, Inc. and uses various disposal wells owned by Fugo
Services, Inc. both of whom are variable interest entities
(VIEs) whose sole purpose and activity is to provide services to
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc. consolidates
these VIEs because it is the VIEs primary beneficiary. The
consolidated financial statements include the following amounts
as of October 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 as a
result of the VIEs consolidation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Amounts | |
|
2004 Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
(In thousands) | |
Assets
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
Liabilities and debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Big Mac Tank Trucks, Inc., Big Mac Transports, Inc. and Fugo
Services, Inc. are commonly owned by one individual and
therefore there is no minority interest present.
NOTE G FAIR VALUE INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of our cash equivalents, trade receivables and
trade payables approximate their carrying values due to the
short-term nature of these instruments.
NOTE H COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Big Mac is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that
arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management and based on the present knowledge of the facts,
management believes the amount of any potential liability with
respect to these actions will not have a material adverse effect
on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or
liquidity of Big Mac.
NOTE I SUBSEQUENT EVENT
Subsequent to October 31, 2005, the companies were
restructured and 100% of the membership interests in the
restructured entities were sold to Complete Production Services,
Inc. for cash.
F-111
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Hyland Enterprises, Inc.
We have audited the balance sheets of Hyland Enterprises, Inc.
(the Company) as of August 31, 2004 and
February 29, 2004, and the related statements of earnings,
shareholders equity and cash flows for the six months
ended August 31, 2004 and the year ended February 29,
2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America as
established by the Auditing Standards Board of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Hyland Enterprises, Inc. as of August 31, 2004 and
February 29, 2004, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the six months and the year then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
March 7, 2006
F-112
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Balance Sheets
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
94,901 |
|
|
$ |
312,264 |
|
|
Restricted certificates of deposits
|
|
|
92,831 |
|
|
|
30,333 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$118,498 and $97,892
|
|
|
6,900,127 |
|
|
|
7,282,059 |
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
1,126,352 |
|
|
|
552,526 |
|
|
Asset held for sale
|
|
|
41,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,150,282 |
|
|
|
1,033,488 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
796,699 |
|
|
|
578,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
10,202,332 |
|
|
|
9,788,691 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
14,376,196 |
|
|
|
11,975,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
24,578,528 |
|
|
$ |
21,763,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
2,703,830 |
|
|
$ |
2,568,190 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,597,594 |
|
|
|
1,944,265 |
|
|
Transfers of receivables with recourse
|
|
|
3,236,115 |
|
|
|
3,170,903 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
3,221,489 |
|
|
|
2,531,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
11,759,028 |
|
|
|
10,215,177 |
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY
|
|
|
1,906,695 |
|
|
|
1,931,860 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
6,841,721 |
|
|
|
5,791,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
20,507,444 |
|
|
|
17,938,992 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value, 50,000 shares authorized,
12,340 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
4,070,084 |
|
|
|
3,823,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
4,071,084 |
|
|
|
3,824,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
24,578,528 |
|
|
$ |
21,763,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-113
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Statements of Earnings
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months | |
|
Twelve months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
August 31, 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
20,179,258 |
|
|
$ |
31,634,296 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods and services
|
|
|
9,305,121 |
|
|
|
14,926,264 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,483,086 |
|
|
|
1,896,581 |
|
|
Taxes and insurance
|
|
|
1,141,042 |
|
|
|
1,650,904 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,688,280 |
|
|
|
2,181,325 |
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
3,303,777 |
|
|
|
3,033,502 |
|
|
Shop expenses
|
|
|
2,561,996 |
|
|
|
4,796,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
19,483,302 |
|
|
|
28,484,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
695,956 |
|
|
|
3,149,316 |
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
81,231 |
|
|
|
430,654 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
398,326 |
|
|
|
590,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS BEFORE TAXES
|
|
|
378,861 |
|
|
|
2,989,203 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
132,603 |
|
|
|
1,076,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
$ |
246,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,913,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-114
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Statement of Shareholders Equity
Six Months Ended August 31, 2004 and Year Ended
February 29, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Retained | |
|
shareholders | |
|
|
Stock | |
|
earnings | |
|
equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at February 28, 2003
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,910,736 |
|
|
$ |
1,911,736 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,913,090 |
|
|
|
1,913,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 29, 2004
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
3,823,826 |
|
|
|
3,824,826 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,258 |
|
|
|
246,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,070,084 |
|
|
$ |
4,071,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-115
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Statements of Cash Flows
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months | |
|
Twelve months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
August 31 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
246,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,913,090 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of equipment
|
|
|
(54,257 |
) |
|
|
(173,093 |
) |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,688,280 |
|
|
|
2,181,325 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(25,165 |
) |
|
|
1,044,137 |
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
|
|
|
381,932 |
|
|
|
(2,605,210 |
) |
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(218,678 |
) |
|
|
(126,203 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase in notes receivable
|
|
|
(573,826 |
) |
|
|
(169,103 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase in inventory
|
|
|
(116,794 |
) |
|
|
(447,079 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase in assets held for sale
|
|
|
(41,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
135,640 |
|
|
|
1,235,409 |
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
653,329 |
|
|
|
369,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,075,579 |
|
|
|
3,223,228 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment
|
|
|
(4,155,925 |
) |
|
|
(3,517,668 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
120,833 |
|
|
|
357,888 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,019 |
|
|
Purchases of certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(62,498 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,097,590 |
) |
|
|
(2,997,761 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
3,074,145 |
|
|
|
1,091,580 |
|
|
Proceeds from transfers of accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
65,212 |
|
|
|
1,064,126 |
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,334,709 |
) |
|
|
(2,086,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,804,648 |
|
|
|
69,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(217,363 |
) |
|
|
295,090 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
312,264 |
|
|
|
17,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
94,901 |
|
|
$ |
312,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest
|
|
$ |
398,326 |
|
|
$ |
590,767 |
|
|
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
31,976 |
|
Non-cash activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment for notes payable
|
|
|
3,074,145 |
|
|
|
4,610,438 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-116
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
NOTE A NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Hyland Enterprises, Inc., (Hyland) specializes in
drilling completions, production services including production
and fresh water hauling, frac tank rental, gravel hauls and
construction, heavy equipment rentals and moves. Frac tanks are
typically rented weekly and heavy equipment is rented monthly.
Hyland is headquartered in Rawlins, Wyoming with locations in
Wamsutter, Baggs and Rock Springs, Wyoming and Rifle, Colorado.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
|
1. |
Use of Estimates and Reclassifications |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from these estimates. Certain amounts from the prior year
have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
|
|
2. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Hyland considers all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004, Hyland has cash
accounts that exceeded the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insured limit by $525,819 and $857,993. Hyland has not
experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not
exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash
equivalents. Restricted cash consists of certificates of deposit
required by the State of Wyoming to ensure proper land
restoration following water extraction. Certificates of deposits
can not be redeemed without authorization from the State of
Wyoming.
Inventory, which is stated at the lower of average cost or
market, consists primarily of truck parts for repairs and
maintenance on capitalized fixed assets, and crushed rock which
is held for resale.
|
|
4. |
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
Hylands accounts receivables are due from customers
located in its service areas. Credit is extended based on
evaluation of a customers financial condition. Accounts
receivable are due within 30 days and are stated at amounts
due from customers net of allowance of doubtful accounts. Hyland
reviews its receivables on a regular basis and adjusts the
allowance of doubtful accounts accordingly. Hyland determines
its allowance by considering factors including the length of
time trade accounts receivable are past due, Hylands
previous loss history, the customers current ability to
pay its obligation to Hyland and the condition of the general
economy and the industry as a whole. The allowance for doubtful
accounts was $118,498 and $97,892 at August 31, 2004 and
February 29, 2004.
Hylands notes receivable consist of amounts due from
owner/operators that are associated with Hyland whereby Hyland
has financed equipment which secures the notes for the
owner/operator. An amortization schedule is prepared for each
note and interest at an annual rate of 12% charged on a monthly
basis in accordance with the amortization schedule. In addition,
as of August 31, 2004, Hyland also had a note receivable
from the president and a majority shareholder of Hyland. The
total amount of
F-117
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
this note receivable was $927,997 as of August 31, 2004.
This amount was paid in full on September 3, 2004 when
Hylands stock was sold (See Note K). The shareholder
note receivable consisted of a series of advances from
June 19, 2003 through August 9, 2004, totaling
$939,113 at interest rates from 4.57% to 5.13%. These advances
were not secured by any collateral. Interest income for the six
months ended August 31, 2004 on all notes was $19,976 and
for the year ended February 29, 2004 was $35,604.
As of August 31, 2004, Hyland plans to dispose of a truck
which is classified as asset held for sale. This asset was
disposed of by sale in 2005.
|
|
7. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Capital assets are carried at cost and depreciated on a
straight-line basis over the following lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life | |
|
|
| |
Buildings
|
|
|
39 years |
|
Field equipment, trucks and trailers
|
|
|
5-10 years |
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Total depreciation expense for the six months ended
August 31, 2004 and for the twelve months ended
February 29, 2004 was $1,688,280 and $2,181,325.
Hyland recognizes revenues on service contracts in the period in
which the service is provided. Hyland recognizes revenues on the
sale of materials and supplies when products have been shipped,
title and risk of loss have been transferred and collectibility
is probable. Hyland recognizes revenues from the rental of
machinery and equipment in the period during which these items
are rented to outside parties.
Hyland recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences for events that have been
included differently on the financial statements and income tax
returns. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed
based on the difference between the financial statement and
income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax
rates in effect in the year in which the differences are
expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance for the amount of any tax benefit Hyland
does not expect to be realized.
|
|
10. |
Transfers of Receivables with Recourse |
Hyland entered into a service contract in August, 1999 with a
financial factor that obligated the factor to purchase eligible
accounts receivable from Hyland on a daily basis with recourse.
The original term of the agreement was one year, renewed
annually unless cancelled by either party within the time
periods specified in the contract. Hyland accounts for the
contract as a secured borrowing. Under the terms of the
agreement, the factor will advance Hyland 90% of the eligible
accounts receivable with the remaining 10% to be held back as a
non-interest bearing reserve which will be used as security and
to absorb certain expenses. The factor charges a daily service
fee based on the prime rate which averaged approximately 1.2% of
the receivables transferred. In addition various transactional
fees are charged by the factor. Total fees for the six months
ended August 31, 2004 and the year ended February 29,
2004 were $135,592 and $179,634 respectively, and are shown as
interest expense in the accompanying statement of earnings. The
F-118
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
advances by the factor are secured by all accounts receivable
and intangible assets of Hyland. As of August 31, 2004 and
February 29, 2004, secured borrowings from the factor
totaled $3,236,115 and $3,170,903 and the reserve held by the
factor was $366,045 and $317,090, respectively. Accounts
receivable at August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
included $3,236,115 and $3,170,903 of factored accounts,
respectively.
NOTE C 401(k) PLAN
Hyland provides a 401(k) plan to all eligible employees. An
eligible employee is any employee who has attained age 21
and completed one year of service as defined by the plan.
Participation is elective and not required. Eligible employees
may begin participating in the Plan on the first day of the
month following the completion of the eligibility requirements.
Under the Plan, participating employees can defer an amount of
their compensation not to exceed maximum dollar amounts
determined by the Federal government each year. Hyland did not
make discretionary matching contributions to the Plan for the
periods ended August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004.
NOTE D PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The major components of our property, plant and equipment as of
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
$ |
80,049 |
|
|
$ |
327,491 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
730,445 |
|
|
|
585,445 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
4,365,827 |
|
|
|
4,220,590 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
20,783,630 |
|
|
|
16,970,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
25,959,951 |
|
|
|
22,103,768 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
11,583,755 |
|
|
|
10,128,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
14,376,196 |
|
|
$ |
11,975,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE E RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
An individual shareholder, C. Douglas Dowlin, owns
12,203 shares which is 98.89% of the outstanding shares as
of August 31, 2004. Mr. Dowlin is also the President
and Treasurer of Hyland. The remaining outstanding shares in the
amount of 137 shares or 1.11% of the total are owned by
Joseph L. Carnes who is also the Vice President and Secretary of
Hyland. Both shareholders are actively involved in the business
of Hyland on a daily basis.
C. Douglas Dowlin, dba Falcon Filters owns various
facilities that are currently leased by Hyland. In addition, C.
Douglas Dowlin and Lori Dowlin (wife of C. Douglas Dowlin)
jointly own various facilities that are currently leased by
Hyland. A third entity, Red Canyon Ventures, owns land that is
also leased by Hyland. Red Canyon Ventures is a joint venture
between C. Douglas Dowlin and Bill Davis, who is the manager for
Hylands Rifle, Colorado terminal. Remote Enterprises,
LLC is an entity owned by Denice
F-119
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
Tripp, daughter of C. Douglas Dowlin. Following is a summary of
these properties along with the total rent and other payments
for the six months ended August 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent |
Description of facility |
|
Lessor |
|
payments |
|
|
|
|
|
Main Office, South Shop, Washbay, Safety Office, North Shop,
Drive Line Facility, Lots 1, 2, 8, 9, 15,
22 & 23 in the Wamsutter Industrial Park and the Rock
Springs Terminal Yard all leases are month to month
plus monthly rental of two pickups
|
|
C. Douglas Dowlin dba Falcon Filters, Douglas Dowlin and
Lori Dowlin |
|
$160,000 |
|
East storage yard in Rifle, Colorado consisting of five fenced
yards
|
|
Red Canyon Ventures |
|
87,383 |
|
Rental of ten Wichita 660 BBL frac tanks numbers
3091 through 3100
|
|
Remote Enterprises, LLC |
|
74,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rents to related parties
|
|
|
|
$321,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advances, net of interest payments received, to related
parties
|
|
Various loans to C. Douglas Dowlin and/or Falcon Filters |
|
$613,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases of equipment from related parties
|
|
Purchase of mobile homes and two used pick-up trucks from Falcon
Filters |
|
$124,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE F INVENTORY
The major components of inventory as of August 31, 2004 and
February 29, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Crushed rock
|
|
$ |
501,511 |
|
|
$ |
406,497 |
|
Truck parts and shop supples
|
|
|
648,771 |
|
|
|
626,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$ |
1,150,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,033,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE G LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following at August 31, 2004
and February 29, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Various note payables to finance companies, secured with
interest of 0 to 10.5%, payable in monthly installments through
various dates ranging from September 2004 to September 2009
|
|
$ |
10,063,210 |
|
|
$ |
8,323,774 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
3,221,489 |
|
|
|
2,531,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$ |
6,841,721 |
|
|
$ |
5,791,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-120
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
Substantially all of Hylands property and equipment secure
the various notes payable. Maturities of notes payable for the
five years following August 31, 2004, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
3,221,489 |
|
2006
|
|
|
2,614,447 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,242,039 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,440,206 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
545,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,063,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE H INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current tax provision
|
|
$ |
157,768 |
|
|
$ |
31,976 |
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
(25,165 |
) |
|
|
1,044,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
132,603 |
|
|
$ |
1,076,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2004 | |
|
February 29, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
1,901,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,956,600 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
(24,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,906,695 |
|
|
$ |
1,931,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE I COMMON STOCK
Hyland has authorized 50,000 shares of no par value common
stock, of which 12,340 shares are issued and outstanding on
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004. Holders of
Hylands common stock are entitled to one vote per share on
all matters to be voted on by shareholders and are entitled to
receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time
by Hylands Board of Directors. Upon any liquidation or
dissolution of Hyland, the holders of the common stock are
entitled to receive a pro rata share of all of the assets
remaining available for distribution to shareholders after
settlement of all liabilities.
F-121
HYLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
August 31, 2004 and February 29, 2004
NOTE J COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Hyland and its subsidiaries occupy various facilities and lease
certain equipment under various lease agreements. The minimum
rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases, with
lease terms in excess of one year subsequent to August 31,
2004, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
159,343 |
|
2006
|
|
|
79,427 |
|
2007
|
|
|
8,963 |
|
2008
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
2009
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
252,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense amounted to $1,250,736, including short-term
equipment rentals of $1,003,283, for the period ended
August 31, 2004.
Hyland is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that
arise in the ordinary course of business. As of August 31,
2004, the financial statements include an accrual in the amount
of $575,000 for the settlement of a lawsuit in November 2004
with Cloverleaf Construction, Inc. dba Plum Creek Sand and
Gravel and Theodore Roosevelt Jordon dba Ted Jordon. In the
opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect
to any other actions is either too early to determine or will
not materially affect Hylands financial statements or
results of operations.
NOTE K SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
A sale of all of Hylands outstanding stock occurred on
September 3, 2004 to Complete Energy Services, Inc.
F-122
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors
Monument Well Service Company and Affiliates
We have audited the combined balance sheets of Monument Well
Service Company, R & W Rentals, Ltd. and Medco, LLC
(Monument Well Service Company and Affiliates or the
Company) as of April 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, and the related combined statement of
earnings, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the four
month and twelve month periods then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America as
established by the Auditing Standards Board of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined
financial position of Monument Well Service Company and
Affiliates at April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
and the combined results of their operations and their cash
flows for the four month and twelve month periods then ended, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
February 24, 2006
F-123
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Combined Balance Sheets
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,791,749 |
|
|
$ |
1,637,888 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,111,254 |
|
|
|
1,199,198 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
6,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,904,265 |
|
|
|
2,843,940 |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
4,598,354 |
|
|
|
4,330,970 |
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
721,237 |
|
|
|
721,501 |
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,169,681 |
) |
|
|
(2,026,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
3,149,910 |
|
|
|
3,025,916 |
|
INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,054,175 |
|
|
$ |
5,890,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,706 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
294,565 |
|
|
|
20,916 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
81,057 |
|
|
|
141,574 |
|
|
Notes payable stockholder
|
|
|
36,442 |
|
|
|
133,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
412,064 |
|
|
|
330,623 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
5,642,111 |
|
|
|
5,559,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,054,175 |
|
|
$ |
5,890,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-124
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Combined Statements of Earnings
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
(Four Months) | |
|
(Twelve Months) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUE
|
|
$ |
3,294,758 |
|
|
$ |
7,754,858 |
|
|
Less discounts
|
|
|
(80,101 |
) |
|
|
(214,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,214,657 |
|
|
|
7,540,442 |
|
COSTS GOODS AND SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wages
|
|
|
772,625 |
|
|
|
1,365,898 |
|
|
Equipment rental
|
|
|
312,082 |
|
|
|
115,783 |
|
|
Material
|
|
|
186,543 |
|
|
|
680,691 |
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
164,827 |
|
|
|
429,134 |
|
|
Payroll tax expense
|
|
|
82,322 |
|
|
|
101,932 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
144,624 |
|
|
|
384,591 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
280,848 |
|
|
|
565,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,943,871 |
|
|
|
3,643,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,270,786 |
|
|
|
3,896,487 |
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
184,653 |
|
|
|
1,086,774 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
114,063 |
|
|
|
347,281 |
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
77,778 |
|
|
Taxes and insurance
|
|
|
127,425 |
|
|
|
473,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
445,641 |
|
|
|
1,985,584 |
|
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
|
|
|
(5,259 |
) |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
$ |
819,886 |
|
|
$ |
1,914,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-125
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Combined Statements of Stockholders Equity
April 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Members | |
|
Retained | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
93,924 |
|
|
$ |
6,914 |
|
|
$ |
108,380 |
|
|
$ |
3,529,620 |
|
|
$ |
3,738,838 |
|
Stockholder distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
Net earning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,914,230 |
|
|
|
1,914,230 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
93,924 |
|
|
|
6,914 |
|
|
|
108,380 |
|
|
|
5,350,541 |
|
|
|
5,559,759 |
|
Stockholder distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(735,566 |
) |
|
|
(735,566 |
) |
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819,886 |
|
|
|
819,886 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2004
|
|
$ |
93,924 |
|
|
$ |
6,914 |
|
|
$ |
108,380 |
|
|
$ |
5,432,893 |
|
|
$ |
5,642,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
F-126
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Combined Statements of Cash Flows
Period ended April 30, 2004 and December 31,
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
(Four Months) | |
|
(Twelve Months) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
819,886 |
|
|
$ |
1,914,230 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
144,624 |
|
|
|
384,591 |
|
|
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities Decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
87,944 |
|
|
|
69,630 |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
16,168 |
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
213,132 |
|
|
|
99,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,268,733 |
|
|
|
2,484,384 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
10,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(275,681 |
) |
|
|
(1,424,266 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
17,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(247,615 |
) |
|
|
(1,424,266 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions
|
|
|
(735,566 |
) |
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(131,691 |
) |
|
|
(38,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(867,257 |
) |
|
|
(133,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
153,861 |
|
|
|
926,194 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,637,888 |
|
|
|
711,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
1,791,749 |
|
|
$ |
1,637,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-127
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
NOTE A NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Monument Well Service Company, a Colorado corporation,
R & W Rentals, Ltd. and Medco, LLC (collectively
Monument), are oil well site service providers with
operations in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States.
Monument provides a wide range of services to the oil and gas
exploration industry, including well servicing, well site
rentals, materials and supplies and other support services.
Monuments business depends, to a large degree, on the
level of spending by oil and gas companies for exploration,
development and production activities. Therefore, a sustained
increase or decrease in the price of natural gas or oil, which
could have a material impact on exploration, development and
production activities, also could materially affect the
Monuments financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently
applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated
financial statements follows.
The combined financial statements include Monument Well Service
Company and its affiliates. These entities were 100% owned by an
individual through personal ownership and affiliated persons or
companies. The financial statements of these affiliates were
combined with no adjustments to the balance sheet or statement
of stockholders equity. All significant intercompany
transactions and accounts have been eliminated in the
combination.
|
|
2. |
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts |
Monuments accounts receivables are due from customers
located in the service areas. Credit is extended based on
evaluation of a customers financial condition. Accounts
receivables are due within 30 days from the date of
invoice. Monument reviews its accounts receivable every
30 days. When a customer balance is greater than
45 days past due, a
follow-up invoice is
sent. Monument has not experienced accounts receivable
write-offs in the past and its current assessment is that all
receivables will be collected in full. Monument had no allowance
for doubtful accounts at either December 31, 2003 or
April 30, 2004.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Monument reviews all
significant estimates affecting its financial statements on a
recurring basis and records the effect of any necessary
adjustments in the financial statements. Uncertainties with
respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the
preparation of financial statements and estimates may change in
the future when improved information is available or events
culminate. Certain amounts from the prior year have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Monument recognizes revenues for oilfield services and equipment
rentals in the period in which the services or rental is
provided.
F-128
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
|
|
5. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Monument considers all highly liquid investments with maturities
of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
|
|
6. |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life in Years | |
Service Rigs
|
|
|
25 |
|
Service Equipment
|
|
|
7-10 |
|
Vehicles, equipment and furniture
|
|
|
3 |
|
The stockholder has elected, under the provisions of Subchapter
S of the Internal Revenue Code, to have Monuments income
treated for Federal income tax purposes substantially as if
Monument were a partnership. The stockholders respective
equitable share in the net income or losses of Monument is
reportable on his individual tax return. Accordingly, the
financial statements reflect no provision or liability for
Federal and state income taxes.
Monument reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. No impairments were recognized in the
four and twelve month periods ended April 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003.
NOTE C LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $828 payable monthly with the last payment due
January 31, 2004; collateralized by a truck
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,934 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $832 payable monthly with the last payment due
December 16, 2004; collateralized by a truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,820 |
|
Note payable to a finance company with no interest; principal
payments of $1,160 payable monthly with the last payment due
December 10, 2004; collateralized by a truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,706 |
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monument elected to pay-off the notes due in December 2004 on
January 28, 2004.
F-129
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
NOTE D FAIR VALUE INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of Monuments cash equivalents, trade
receivables, trade payables and note payable to shareholder
approximate their carrying value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
NOTE E EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Monument sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan that
provides retirement benefits to all employees that elect to
participate. Under the plan, participating employees may defer
up to 15% of their base pre-tax compensation. Monument matches
the first 5% of such contributions. During the four month period
ended April 30, 2004 and the twelve months ended
December 31, 2003, Monument contributed approximately
$22,000 and $65,000, respectively, related to this plan.
NOTE F MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF
CREDIT RISK
Almost all of Monuments revenues are generated from
services provided to oilfield companies throughout the Rocky
Mountain region of the United States of America. While the
individual job contracts may be short-term in nature,
relationships with these entities may be longstanding. Customers
with revenues in excess of 10% of total revenues as of the four
month period ended April 30, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Monument Well Service Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
Customer B
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
Customer C
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
R & W Rentals, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Financial instruments which subject Monument to concentrations
of credit risk consist almost entirely of trade accounts
receivable. Management has not incurred significant bad debts in
the past.
At April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, Monument had
deposits in domestic banks in excess of federally insured limits
of approximately $1.7 million and $.2 million,
respectively.
NOTE G COMMON STOCK
Monument has authorized 25,025 shares of no par value
common stock. As of April 30, 2004 and December 31,
2003, Monument had issued 18,825 shares of common stock.
The holder of the common stock has full voting rights. Dividends
may be paid to the stockholder as approved by the Board of
Directors.
NOTE H RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Monument owed its stockholder $36,442 and $133,427 at
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The notes carry no interest and are due on demand.
Monument leases office space from a stockholder. The lease is on
a month-to-month basis
and has been in place for over 10 years. The current lease
has a rental rate of $6,500 per month.
F-130
MONUMENT WELL SERVICE COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
Notes to Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
April 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
NOTE I COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, Monument may become involved
in litigation incidents to operations. At present, management is
unaware of any matters in dispute, which would have a material
effect on the financial position or results of operations of
Monument.
NOTE J SUBSEQUENT EVENT
A sale of Monuments ownership interest occurred on
May 6, 2004 to Complete Energy Services, Inc. The
Subchapter S election was terminated at that time.
F-131
APPENDIX A
Glossary of Selected Industry Terms
Acidizing. The pumping of acid into the wellbore to
remove near-well formation damage and other damaging substances.
Acoustic pressure surveys. Surveys that determine oil and
gas reservoir pressure from surface using pressure transducers
and sound waves.
Artificial lift equipment. A system that adds energy to
the fluid column in a wellbore with the objective of initiating
and improving production from the well.
Blowout. An uncontrolled flow of reservoir fluids into
the wellbore, and sometimes catastrophically to the surface.
Blowout preventer (BOP). A large valve at the top of a
well that may be closed to regain control of a reservoir if the
drilling crew or other wellsite personnel loses control of
formation fluids.
Bottom-hole assemblies. The lower portion of the
drillstring, consisting of (from the bottom up in a vertical
well) the bit, bit sub, a mud motor (in certain cases),
stabilizers, drill collars, heavy-weight drillpipe, jarring
devices (jars) and crossovers for various
threadforms.
Casing. Large-diameter pipe lowered into an openhole
wellbore and cemented in place.
Casing patch. A downhole assembly or tool system used in
the remedial repair of casing damage, corrosion or leaks.
Cementing. To prepare and pump cement into place in a
wellbore.
Choke. A device incorporating an orifice that is used to
control fluid flow rate or downstream system pressure.
Coiled tubing. A long, continuous length of pipe wound on
a spool. The pipe is straightened prior to pushing into a
wellbore and recoiled to spool the pipe back onto the transport
and storage spool.
Completion phase. A generic term used to describe the
assembly of downhole tubulars and equipment required to enable
safe and efficient production from an oil or gas well. The point
at which the completion process begins may depend on the type
and design of the well.
Downhole. Pertaining to or in the wellbore (as opposed to
being on the surface).
Drillpipe. Tubular steel conduit fitted with special
threaded ends called tool joints. The drillpipe connects the
surface equipment with the bottomhole assembly, both to pump
drilling fluid to the bit and to be able to raise, lower and
rotate the bottomhole assembly and bit.
Drill string. The combination of the drillpipe, the
bottomhole assembly and any other tools used to make the drill
bit turn at the bottom of the wellbore.
Electric-line. Related to any aspect of logging that
employs an electrical cable to lower tools into the borehole and
to transmit data.
Fishing. The application of tools, equipment and
techniques for the removal of junk, debris or lost or stuck
equipment from a wellbore.
Flapper valves. A check valve that has a spring-loaded
plate (or flapper) that may be pumped through, generally in the
downhole direction, but closes if the fluid attempts to flow
back through the drillstring to the surface.
A-1
Flare gas. A vapor or gas that is burned through a pipe
or burners.
Flowback. The process of allowing fluids to flow from the
well following a treatment, either in preparation for a
subsequent phase of treatment or in preparation for cleanup and
returning the well to production.
Foam. Drilling foam is a fluid that contains air or gas
bubbles, that can withstand high salinity, hard water, solids,
entrained oil and high temperatures.
Frac tanks. A tank used to hold fluid during a frac job.
Capacity of such tanks are from 400 to 600 bbls.
Hydrocarbon. A naturally occurring organic compound
comprising hydrogen and carbon. Hydrocarbons can be as simple as
methane, but many are highly complex molecules, and can occur as
gases, liquids or solids. Petroleum is a complex mixture of
hydrocarbons. The most common hydrocarbons are natural gas, oil
and coal.
Jars. A mechanical device used downhole to deliver an
impact load to another downhole component, especially when that
component is stuck.
Jetting. A downhole treatment in which a fluid laden with
solid particles is used to remove deposits from the surface of
wellbore tubulars and completion components.
Landing nipples. A completion component fabricated as a
short section of heavy wall tubular with a machined internal
surface that provides a seal area and a locking profile.
Live-well. A well that is flowing or has the ability to
flow into the wellbore.
Log. The measurement versus depth or time, or both, of
one or more physical quantities in or around a well. The term
comes from the word log used in the sense of a
record or a note.
Logging tools. The downhole hardware needed to make a log.
Manifold. An arrangement of piping or valves designed to
control, distribute and often monitor fluid flow. Manifolds are
often configured for specific functions, such as a choke or kill
manifold used in well-control operations and a squeeze manifold
used in squeeze-cementing work.
Milling. A downhole tool used to cut and remove material
from equipment or tools located in the wellbore.
Mud coolers. A mud cooling system is used in a variety of
applications where drilling safety or efficiency is enhanced by
cooling the drilling fluid.
Nitrogen unit. A high-pressure pump or compressor unit
capable of delivering high-purity nitrogen gas for use in oil or
gas wells.
Packer. A downhole device used in many completions to
isolate the annulus from the production conduit, enabling
controlled production, injection or treatment.
Progressive Cavity (PC) pump. A type of sucker
rod-pumping unit that uses a rotor and a stator. The rotation of
the rod cavity by means of an electric motor at surface causes
the fluid contained in a cavity to flow upward.
Perforating guns. A device used to perforate oil and gas
wells in preparation for production. Perforating guns contain
several shaped explosive charges and are available in a range of
sizes and configurations.
Perforate. To create holes in the casing or liner to
achieve efficient communication between the reservoir and the
wellbore.
A-2
Pipe handling. Equipment used to move and connect
drillpipe.
Plug drilling. The process by which plugs are removed
from the wellbore.
Plugs. A downhole packer assembly used in a well to seal
off or isolate a particular formation for testing, acidizing,
cementing, etc.; also a type of plug used to seal off a well
temporarily while the wellhead is removed.
Plunger lift. An artificial-lift method principally used
in gas wells to unload relatively small volumes of liquid.
Power swivels. On a drilling rig, a swivel is a
mechanical device that must simultaneously suspend the weight of
the drillstring, provide for rotation of the drill string
beneath it while keeping the upper portion stationary, and
permit high-volume flow of high-pressure drilling mud from the
fixed portion to the rotating portion without leaking. Well
service rigs do not have integral swivels; therefore, if
rotation capability for drilling or any other reason is required
on a well service rig, then a power swivel is added to the well
service rig.
Drilling rig. The machine used to drill a wellbore.
Shale. A fine-grained, fissile, sedimentary rock formed
by consolidation of clay- and silt-sized particles into thin,
relatively impermeable layers.
Slickline. A thin non-electric cable used for selective
placement and retrieval of wellbore hardware, such as plugs,
gauges and valves. Valves and sleeves can also be adjusted using
slickline tools.
Sliding sleeves. Completion devices that can be operated
to provide a flow path between the production conduit and the
annulus.
Snubbing. The act of putting drillpipe or tubing into the
wellbore when the blowout preventers (BOPs) are closed and
pressure is contained in the well.
Stabilizers. A bottom-hole-assembly component having a
body diameter about the same size as a drill collar, and having
longitudinal or spiral blades that form a larger diameter, often
at or near hole diameter.
Supply stores. Retail stores that sell equipment for use
in oil and gas exploration, development and production.
Swabbing. The act of unloading liquids from the
production tubing to initiate or improve flow from the reservoir.
Tight sands. A type of unconventional tight reservoir.
Tight reservoirs are those which have low permeability, often
quantified as less than 0.1 millidarcies.
Tubing string. A pipe set inside the well casing, through
which the oil or gas is produced.
Underbalanced. A well condition where the amount of
pressure exerted on a formation is less than the internal fluid
pressure of the formation, enabling formation fluids to enter
the wellbore. The drilling rate typically increases as an
underbalanced condition is approached.
Well casing see Casing.
Well clean-up. A period of controlled production,
generally following a stimulation treatment, during which time
treatment fluids return from the reservoir formation.
Wellbore. The physical conduit from surface into the
hydrocarbon reservoir.
Whipstock. An inclined wedge placed in a wellbore to
force the drill bit to start drilling in a direction away from
the wellbore axis.
Wireline. A general term used to describe
well-intervention operations conducted using single-strand or
multistrand wire or cable for intervention in oil or gas wells.
A-3
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 13. |
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution |
Set forth below are the expenses (other than underwriting
discounts and commissions) expected to be incurred in connection
with the issuance and distribution of the securities registered
hereby. With the exception of the SEC registration fee and the
NASD filing fee, the amounts set forth below are estimates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$ |
40,607 |
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
NYSE listing fee
|
|
|
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Blue sky fees and expenses (including legal fees)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(DGCL) provides that a corporation may indemnify any
person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was
serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. Section 145
further provides that a corporation similarly may indemnify any
such person serving in any such capacity who was or is a party
or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending
or completed action or suit by or in the right of the
corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the
fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of
the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit if he acted in good faith
and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed
to the best interests of the corporation and except that no
indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or
matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be
liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the
Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court in which such
action or suit was brought shall determine upon application
that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all
of the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and
reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the
Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem
proper. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that
indemnification shall be to the fullest extent permitted by the
DGCL for all our current or former directors or officers. As
permitted by the DGCL, our certificate of incorporation provides
that we will indemnify our directors against liability to us or
our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary
duty as a director, except (1) for any breach of the
directors duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders,
(2) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which
involve intentional
II-1
misconduct or knowing violation of law, (3) under
Section 174 of the DGCL or (4) for any transaction
from which a director derived an improper personal benefit.
We have also entered into indemnification agreements with all of
our directors and all of our executive officers (including each
of our named executive officers). These indemnification
agreements are intended to permit indemnification to the fullest
extent now or hereafter permitted by the DGCL. It is possible
that the applicable law could change the degree to which
indemnification is expressly permitted.
The indemnification agreements cover expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement incurred as a result of the fact that such person, in
his or her capacity as a director or officer, is made or
threatened to be made a party to any suit or proceeding. The
indemnification agreements generally cover claims relating to
the fact that the indemnified party is or was an officer,
director, employee or agent of us or any of our affiliates, or
is or was serving at our request in such a position for another
entity. The indemnification agreements also obligate us to
promptly advance all reasonable expenses incurred in connection
with any claim. The indemnitee is, in turn, obligated to
reimburse us for all amounts so advanced if it is later
determined that the indemnitee is not entitled to
indemnification. The indemnification provided under the
indemnification agreements is not exclusive of any other
indemnity rights; however, double payment to the indemnitee is
prohibited.
We are not obligated to indemnify the indemnitee with respect to
claims brought by the indemnitee against:
|
|
|
|
|
claims regarding the indemnitees rights under the
indemnification agreement; |
|
|
|
claims to enforce a right to indemnification under any statute
or law; and |
|
|
|
counter-claims against us in a proceeding brought by us against
the indemnitee; or |
|
|
|
|
|
any other person, except for claims approved by our board of
directors. |
We have obtained director and officer liability insurance for
the benefit of each of the above indemnitees. These policies
include coverage for losses for wrongful acts and omissions and
to ensure our performance under the indemnification agreements.
Each of the indemnitees are named as an insured under such
policies and provided with the same rights and benefits as are
accorded to the most favorably insured of our directors and
officers.
|
|
ITEM 15. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities |
During the past three years, we have issued unregistered
securities to a limited number of persons, as described below.
None of these transactions involved any underwriters or public
offerings, and we believe that each of these transactions was
exempt from registration requirements pursuant to
Section 3(a)(9) or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act,
Regulation D promulgated thereunder or Rule 701 of the
Securities Act. The recipients of these securities represented
their intention to acquire the securities for investment only
and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any
distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were affixed to
the share certificates and instruments issued in these
transactions. No remuneration or commission was paid or given
directly or indirectly.
On September 20, 2002, we entered into a combination
agreement with Integrated Production Services Ltd.
(IPSL). Pursuant to the combination agreement, all
of the outstanding shares of IPSL were acquired in exchange for
9,388,020 of our shares.
On April 30, 2003, we acquired all of the shares of Ess-Ell
Tool Co. Ltd. and Sentry Oil Tools LLC for a total consideration
of $3.9 million in cash and 147,498 of our shares.
On March 31, 2004, we issued an aggregate of
263,392 shares of our common stock to former stockholders
of Double Jack Testing and Services, Inc. (Double
Jack) as consideration for the purchase of all of the
shares of common stock of Double Jack.
II-2
On December 10, 2004, we issued 208,604 shares of our
common stock to former stockholders of MGM Well Services, Inc.
(MGM), as consideration for the acquisition of all
of the common stock of MGM. We also issued 28,448 shares of
restricted stock to key employees who were former employees of
MGM. In addition, the purchase included contingent consideration
of up to 214,132 shares of our common stock over the period
of March 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006 based on
certain operating results of MGM.
On February 11, 2005, we issued 2,655,336 shares of
our common stock and 344,664 non-vested shares of restricted
stock to former stockholders of Parchman, as consideration for
the acquisition of all of the capital stock of Parchman. Of the
non-vested restricted shares, 58,272 shares vested on
December 31, 2005 upon termination of an employee, in
accordance with the agreement terms, and were deemed issued. In
addition, the acquisition included contingent consideration of
up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock over the period
of February 11, 2005 to December 31, 2005 based on
certain operating results of one of our divisions.
On June 20, 2005, Joseph C. Winkler, our Chief Executive
Officer and President, purchased 41,796 shares of our
common stock at purchase price of $8.50 per share or an
aggregate price of $355,270.
On July 7, 2005, we issued 136,428 shares of our
common stock to former stockholders of Roustabout Specialties
Inc. (RSI), as consideration for the acquisition of
all of the capital stock of RSI.
On September 12, 2005, we completed the Combination. We
issued an aggregate of 32,120,642 shares of our common
stock to former stockholders of CES and 4,901,762 shares of
our common stock to former stockholders of IEM. In addition, we
issued 144,232 shares of restricted stock to former holders
of CES restricted stock and 262,774 shares of restricted
stock to former holders of IEM restricted stock. Holders of
options to purchase shares of CES common stock received an
aggregate of options to purchase 1,914,206 shares of
our common stock and holders of options to purchase shares of
IEM common stock received an aggregate of options to
purchase 67,754 shares of our common stock.
On September 29, 2005, we issued 90,364 shares of our
common stock to John D. Schmitz, an officer of one of our
subsidiaries, as consideration for the acquisition of the assets
of Spindletop Production Services, Ltd.
On October 3, 2005, James F. Maroney, III, our
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, purchased
42,900 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of
$11.66 per share or an aggregate price of $499,999.50
On October 3, 2005, Kenneth L. Nibling, our Vice
President, Human Resources and Administration, purchased
42,900 shares of our common stock at a purchase price
$11.66 per share or an aggregate price $499,999.50.
On October 10, 2005, we issued 16,046 shares of our
common stock to some of our employees as a bonus for their
services.
On November 1, 2005, we acquired the equity interests of Big
Mac. In connection with this acquisition, we issued options to
purchase 90,000 shares of our common stock to the former
owner of Big Mac and options to purchase 140,000 shares of
our common stock to certain of Big Macs employees.
On December 29, 2005, we effected a
2-for-1 common stock
split. As a result, all common stock and per share data, as well
as data related to other securities including stock warrants,
restricted stock and stock options, have been adjusted
retroactively to give effect to this stock split for all periods
presented within this prospectus, except par value which
remained at $0.01 per share, resulting in an insignificant
reclassification between common stock and additional
paid-in-capital.
We issued options to purchase an aggregate of
504,188 shares of our common stock to certain of our
current and former directors and officers under our 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan and the Parchman Plan during the period beginning
on January 1, 2005 and ending on November 1, 2005.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we issued options
to purchase an aggregate of 166,144 shares of our common
stock to certain of our current and former directors and
officers under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. During the
II-3
year ended December 31, 2003, we issued options to purchase
an aggregate of 25,400 shares of our common stock to
certain of our current and former directors and officers under
our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. During the year ended
December 31, 2002, we issued options to purchase an
aggregate of 118,944 shares of our common stock to certain
of our current and former directors and officers under our 2001
Stock Incentive Plan.
We also issued 97,576 shares of our restricted stock to
certain of our current and former directors and officers under
our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan during the period beginning on
January 1, 2005 and ending on November 1, 2005. We
issued 17,560 shares of our restricted stock to certain of
our current and former directors and officers under our 2001
Stock Incentive Plan during the year ended December 31,
2004. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we did not
issue any shares of our restricted stock to our current and
former directors or officers under our 2001 Incentive Plan.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, we did not issue
shares of our restricted stock to our current and former
directors or officers under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
We relied upon Rule 701 of the Securities Act, among
others, for the exemption from registration of the issuance of
these options and shares of restricted stock.
|
|
ITEM 16. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
a. Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement |
|
3 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
|
3 |
.2** |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate representing common stock |
|
5 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Form of Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. |
|
10 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement |
|
10 |
.2** |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2005 with Joseph
C. Winkler |
|
10 |
.3* |
|
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated
as
of ,
2006 by and among Complete Production Services, Inc. and the
stockholders listed therein |
|
10 |
.4** |
|
|
|
Combination Agreement dated as of August 9, 2005, with
Complete Energy Services, Inc., I.E. Miller Services, Inc.
and Complete Energy Services, LLC and I.E. Miller Services,
LLC |
|
10 |
.5** |
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2005 by and
among Complete Production Services, Inc., as U.S. Borrower,
Integrated Production Services Ltd., as Canadian Borrower, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent,
U.S. Issuing Lender and US Swingline Lender, HSBC Bank
Canada, as Canadian Administrative Agent, Canadian Issuing
Lender and Canadian Swingline Lender, and the Lenders party
thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Sole Book
Runner and Co-Lead Arranger, UBS Securities LLC, as Co-Lead
Arranger and Syndication Agent and Amegy Bank N.A. and Comerica
Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents |
|
10 |
.6** |
|
|
|
Integrated Production Services, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.7** |
|
|
|
Complete Energy Services, Inc. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.8** |
|
|
|
First Amendment to the Complete Energy Services, Inc. 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.9** |
|
|
|
Second Amendment to the Complete Energy Services, Inc. 2003
Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.10** |
|
|
|
I.E. Miller Services, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.11** |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Integrated Production Services and Parchman
Energy Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.12** |
|
|
|
Strategic Customer Relationship Agreement, dated as of
October 14, 2004, by and among Complete Energy Services,
Inc., CES Mid-Continent Hamm, Inc. and Continental Resources,
Inc. |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Option Grant Agreement (Executive Officer) |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Option Grant Agreement (Non-Employee
Director) |
|
10 |
.15** |
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (Employee) |
|
10 |
.16** |
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Non-Employee Director) |
|
10 |
.17* |
|
|
|
Compensation Package Term Sheet dated as of December 1,
2005 with J. Michael Mayer |
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.18* |
|
|
|
Compensation Package Term Sheet dated as of October 3, 2005
with James F. Maroney, III |
|
10 |
.19* |
|
|
|
Compensation Package Term Sheet dated as of October 3, 2005
with Kenneth L. Nibling |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Complete Production Services, Inc. |
|
23 |
.1* |
|
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP |
|
23 |
.2* |
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
23 |
.3* |
|
|
|
Consent of Darnall, Sikes, Gardes & Frederick |
|
23 |
.4* |
|
|
|
Consent of BKD LLP |
|
23 |
.5** |
|
|
|
Consent of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (contained in
Exhibit 5.1) |
|
24 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Power of Attorney |
b. Financial Statement Schedules:
None
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
|
|
|
(a) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to
the provisions described in Item 14, or otherwise, the
Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act
and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue. |
|
|
(b) To provide to the underwriters at the closing specified
in the underwriting agreement, certificates in such
denominations and registered in such names as required by the
underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser. |
|
|
(c) For purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act
shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of
the time it was declared effective. |
|
|
(d) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Registration
Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Houston, in the State
of Texas, on March 17, 2006.
|
|
|
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph C. Winkler
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Registration Statement has been signed below by
the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Position |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph C. Winkler
Joseph C. Winkler |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ J. Michael Mayer
J. Michael Mayer |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ Robert L.
Weisgarber
Robert L. Weisgarber |
|
Vice President-Accounting and Controller (Principal Accounting
Officer |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ Andrew L. Waite*
Andrew L. Waite |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ David C. Baldwin*
David C. Baldwin |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ Robert Boswell*
Robert Boswell |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ Harold G. Hamm*
Harold G. Hamm |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ W. Matt Ralls*
W. Matt Ralls |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
/s/ R. Graham Whaling*
R. Graham Whaling |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Position |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James D. Woods*
James D. Woods |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
|
*By: |
|
/s/ J. Michael Mayer
J. Michael Mayer
Pursuant to a Power of Attorney previously filed as
Exhibit 24.1 to
this Registration Statement |
|
|
|
|
II-7
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement |
|
3 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
|
3 |
.2** |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate representing common stock |
|
5 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Form of Opinion of Vinson & Elkins LLP |
|
10 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement |
|
10 |
.2** |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2005 with Joseph
C. Winkler |
|
10 |
.3* |
|
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated
as
of ,
2006 by and among Complete Production Services, Inc. and the
stockholders listed therein |
|
10 |
.4** |
|
|
|
Combination Agreement dated as of August 9, 2005, with
Complete Energy Services, Inc., I.E. Miller Services, Inc.
and Complete Energy Services, LLC and I.E. Miller Services,
LLC |
|
10 |
.5** |
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2005 by and
among Complete Production Services, Inc., as U.S. Borrower,
Integrated Production Services Ltd., as Canadian Borrower, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent,
U.S. Issuing Lender and US Swingline Lender, HSBC Bank
Canada, as Canadian Administrative Agent, Canadian Issuing
Lender and Canadian Swingline Lender, and the Lenders party
thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Sole Book
Runner and Co-Lead Arranger, UBS Securities LLC, as Co-Lead
Arranger and Syndication Agent and Amegy Bank N.A. and Comerica
Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents |
|
10 |
.6** |
|
|
|
Integrated Production Services, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.7** |
|
|
|
Complete Energy Services, Inc. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.8** |
|
|
|
First Amendment to the Complete Energy Services, Inc. 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.9** |
|
|
|
Second Amendment to the Complete Energy Services, Inc. 2003
Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.10** |
|
|
|
I.E. Miller Services, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.11** |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Integrated Production Services and Parchman
Energy Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.12** |
|
|
|
Strategic Customer Relationship Agreement, dated as of
October 14, 2004, by and among Complete Energy Services,
Inc., CES Mid-Continent Hamm, Inc. and Continental Resources,
Inc. |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Option Grant Agreement (Executive Officer) |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Option Grant Agreement (Non-Employee
Director) |
|
10 |
.15** |
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (Employee) |
|
10 |
.16** |
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Non-Employee Director) |
|
10 |
.17* |
|
|
|
Compensation Package Term Sheet dated as of December 1,
2005 with J. Michael Mayer |
|
10 |
.18* |
|
|
|
Compensation Package Term Sheet dated as of October 3, 2005
with James F. Maroney, III |
|
10 |
.19* |
|
|
|
Compensation Package Term Sheet dated as of October 3, 2005
with Kenneth L. Nibling |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Complete Production Services, Inc. |
|
23 |
.1* |
|
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP |
|
23 |
.2* |
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
23 |
.3* |
|
|
|
Consent of Darnall, Sikes, Gardes & Frederick |
|
23 |
.4* |
|
|
|
Consent of BKD LLP |
|
23 |
.5** |
|
|
|
Consent of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (contained in
Exhibit 5.1) |
|
24 |
.1** |
|
|
|
Power of Attorney |
|
|
* |
Filed herewith |
|
** |
Filed previously |