def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant
x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to Rule § 240.14a-12
MAJESCO
ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
No fee required.
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
o Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
February 28,
2011
Dear Stockholder,
You are cordially invited to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Majesco Entertainment Company to be held at
9:30 a.m. (local time) on April 14, 2011, at
Majescos offices, located at 160 Raritan Center Parkway,
Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837. The attached notice of
Annual Meeting and proxy statement describe the matters to be
presented at the Annual Meeting and provide information about us
that you should consider when you vote your shares.
The principal business of the meeting will be (i) to elect
two Class III members to the Board of Directors,
(ii) to ratify the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP as our
independent public accountant for the fiscal year ending
October 31, 2011, and (iii) to transact such other
business as may be properly brought before the Annual Meeting
and any adjournments thereof.
We hope you will be able to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether
you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, it is important
that your shares are represented. Therefore, when you have
finished reading the proxy statement, you are urged to complete,
sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card promptly in
accordance with the instructions set forth on the card. This
will ensure your proper representation at the Annual Meeting,
whether or not you can attend.
Sincerely,
Jesse Sutton
Chief Executive Officer
YOUR VOTE
IS IMPORTANT.
PLEASE RETURN YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY.
MAJESCO
ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
NOTICE OF
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be
Held Thursday, April 14, 2011
To the Stockholders of Majesco Entertainment Company:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Majesco Entertainment Company, a Delaware corporation, will
be held at 9:30 a.m. (local time) on April 14, 2011,
at Majescos offices, located at 160 Raritan Center
Parkway, Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837, for the purpose
of considering and taking action on the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
To elect two Class III members to the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
To ratify the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP as our independent
public accountant for the fiscal year ending October 31,
2011.
|
|
|
3.
|
To transact such other business as may be properly brought
before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.
|
The foregoing business items are more fully described in the
following pages, which are made part of this Notice.
WHO MAY VOTE:
You may vote if you were the record owner of Majesco stock at
the close of business on February 25, 2011. The Board of
Directors has fixed the close of business on February 25,
2011 as the record date for the determination of stockholders
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at
any adjournments thereof. A list of stockholders of record will
be available at the meeting and, during the 10 days prior
to the meeting, at the office of the Secretary at the above
address.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual
Meeting. Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not,
you are requested to complete, sign, date and return the
enclosed proxy card as soon as possible in accordance with the
instructions on the proxy card. A pre-addressed, postage prepaid
return envelope is enclosed for your convenience.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Adam Sultan
Secretary
February 28, 2011
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
i
MAJESCO
ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
160 Raritan
Center Parkway, Suite 1
Edison, New Jersey 08837
(732) 225-8910
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
2011 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 14,
2011
GENERAL
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
This proxy statement, along with the accompanying notice of the
2011 Annual Meeting of stockholders, contains information about
the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Majesco Entertainment
Company, including any adjournments or postponements of the
Annual Meeting. We are holding the Annual Meeting at
9:30 a.m. (local time) on April 14, 2011, at
Majescos offices, located at 160 Raritan Center Parkway,
Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837.
In this proxy statement, we refer to Majesco Entertainment
Company as Majesco, the Company,
we and us.
Why Did
You Send Me This Proxy Statement?
We sent you this proxy statement in connection with the
solicitation by the Board of Directors of Majesco Entertainment
Company, a Delaware corporation, of proxies, in the accompanying
form, to be used at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to
be held at 9:30 a.m. (local time) on April 14, 2011,
at Majescos offices, located at 160 Raritan Center
Parkway, Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837, and any
adjournments thereof. This proxy statement along with the
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders summarizes
the purposes of the meeting and the information you need to know
to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on
April 14, 2011: The proxy statement and annual report to
security holders are available at
http://www.amstock.com/ProxyServices/ViewMaterial.asp?CoNumber=13856.
This proxy statement, the accompanying proxy and, though not
part of this proxy statement, our 2010 Annual Report, which
includes our financial statements for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2010, are being mailed on or about
February 28, 2011 to all stockholders entitled to notice of
and to vote at the meeting. You can also find a copy of our 2010
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
on the Internet through the Securities and Exchange
Commissions electronic data system called EDGAR at
www.sec.gov or through the Investor Relations
section of our website at www.majescoentertainment.com.
Who Can
Vote?
Only stockholders who owned Majesco common stock at the close of
business on February 25, 2011, are entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting. On that record date, there were
39,556,849 shares of Majesco common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote. Majesco common stock is our only class of
voting stock.
You do not need to attend the meeting to vote your shares.
Shares represented by valid proxies, received in time for the
meeting and not revoked prior to the meeting, will be voted at
the meeting. A stockholder may revoke a proxy before the proxy
is voted by delivering to our Secretary a signed statement of
revocation or a duly executed proxy card bearing a later date.
Any stockholder who has executed a proxy card but attends the
meeting in person may revoke the proxy and vote at the meeting.
1
How Many
Votes Do I Have?
Each share of Majesco common stock that you own entitles you to
one vote.
How Do I
Vote?
Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we urge
you to vote by proxy. All shares represented by valid proxies
that we receive through this solicitation, and that are not
revoked, will be voted in accordance with your instructions on
the proxy card or as instructed via Internet or telephone. You
may specify whether your shares should be voted for or against
all, some or none of the nominees for director, and whether your
shares should be voted for, against or abstain with respect to
each of the other proposals. If you properly submit a proxy
without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be
voted in accordance with the Boards recommendations as
noted below. Voting by proxy will not affect your right to
attend the Annual Meeting. If your shares are registered
directly in your name through our stock transfer agent, American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, or you have stock
certificates, you may vote:
|
|
|
|
|
By mail. Complete and mail the enclosed proxy
card in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope. Your proxy will
be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you sign the
proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares voted,
they will be voted as recommended by our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
In person at the meeting. If you attend the
meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person or
you may vote by completing a ballot, which will be available at
the meeting.
|
If your shares are held in street name (held in the
name of a bank, broker or other nominee), you must provide the
bank, broker or other nominee with instructions on how to vote
your shares and can do so as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
By Internet or by telephone. Follow the
instructions you receive from your broker to vote by Internet or
telephone.
|
|
|
|
By mail. You will receive instructions from
your broker or other nominee explaining how to vote your shares.
|
|
|
|
In person at the meeting. Contact the broker
or other nominee who holds your shares to obtain a brokers
proxy card and bring it with you to the meeting. You will not be
able to attend the Annual Meeting unless you have a proxy card
from your broker.
|
How Does
The Board Of Directors Recommend That I Vote On The
Proposals?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the election of our Board of
Directors nominees for Class III directors set forth
on the proxy card included in this proxy statement; and
|
|
|
|
FOR ratification of the selection of
EisnerAmper LLP as our independent public accountant for our
fiscal year ending October 31, 2011.
|
If any other matter is presented, the proxy card provides that
your shares will be voted by the proxy holder listed on the
proxy card in accordance with his or her best judgment. At the
time this proxy statement was printed, we knew of no matters
that needed to be acted on at the Annual Meeting, other than
those discussed in this proxy statement.
May I
Change or Revoke My Proxy?
If you give us your proxy, you may change or revoke it at any
time before the Annual Meeting. You may change or revoke your
proxy in any one of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
signing a new proxy card and submitting it as instructed above;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
if your shares are held in street name, re-voting by Internet or
by telephone as instructed above only your latest
Internet or telephone vote will be counted;
|
|
|
|
if your shares are registered in your name, notifying
Majescos Secretary in writing before the Annual Meeting
that you have revoked your proxy; or
|
|
|
|
attending the Annual Meeting in person and voting in person.
Attending the Annual Meeting in person will not in and of itself
revoke a previously submitted proxy unless you specifically
request it.
|
What If I
Receive More Than One Proxy Card?
You may receive more than one proxy card or voting instruction
form if you hold shares of our common stock in more than one
account, which may be in registered form or held in street name.
Please vote in the manner described under How Do I
Vote? on the proxy card for each account to ensure that
all of your shares are voted.
Will My
Shares Be Voted If I Do Not Return My Proxy Card?
If your shares are registered in your name or if you have stock
certificates, they will not be voted if you do not return your
proxy card by mail or vote at the Annual Meeting as described
above under How Do I Vote? If your shares are held
in street name and you do not provide voting instructions to the
bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares as
described above under How Do I Vote?, the bank,
broker or other nominee has the authority, even if it does not
receive instructions from you, to vote your unvoted shares for
Proposal 2, the ratification of our independent public
accountant, but does not have authority to vote your unvoted
shares for Proposal 1, the election of nominees to the
Board of Directors. We encourage you to provide voting
instructions. This ensures your shares will be voted at the
Annual Meeting in the manner you desire. If your broker cannot
vote your shares on a particular matter because it has not
received instructions from you and does not have discretionary
voting authority on that matter or because your broker chooses
not to vote on a matter for which it does have discretionary
voting authority, this is referred to as a broker
non-vote.
What Vote
is Required to Approve Each Proposal and How are Votes
Counted?
|
|
|
Proposal 1: Elect Class III Directors |
|
The nominees for director who receive the most votes (also known
as a plurality) will be elected. You may vote either FOR all of
the nominees, WITHHOLD your vote from all of the nominees or
WITHHOLD your vote from any one of the nominees. Votes that are
withheld will not be included in the vote tally for the election
of directors. Brokerage firms do not have authority to vote
customers unvoted shares held by the firms in street name
for the election of directors. As a result, any shares not voted
by a beneficial owner will be treated as a broker non-vote. Such
broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. |
|
Proposal 2: Ratify Our Selection of EisnerAmper LLP as
Our Independent Public Accountant for 2011 |
|
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast
affirmatively or negatively for this proposal is required to
ratify the selection of our independent public accountant.
Abstentions will have no effect on the results of this vote.
Brokerage firms have authority to vote customers unvoted
shares held by the firms in street name on this proposal. If a
broker does not exercise this authority, such broker non- |
3
|
|
|
|
|
votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. We are
not required to obtain the approval of our stockholders to
select our independent accountant. However, if our stockholders
do not ratify the selection of EisnerAmper LLP as our
independent public accountant for the fiscal year ending
October 31, 2011, the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors may reconsider its selection. |
What
Constitutes a Quorum for the Annual Meeting?
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled
to vote at the meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at
the Annual Meeting. Votes of stockholders of record who are
present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy,
abstentions, and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of
determining whether a quorum exists.
Householding
of Annual Disclosure Documents
The Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, previously
adopted a rule concerning the delivery of annual disclosure
documents. The rule allows us or brokers holding our shares on
your behalf to send a single set of our annual report and proxy
statement to any household at which two or more of our
stockholders reside, if either we or the brokers believe that
the stockholders are members of the same family. This practice,
referred to as householding, benefits both
stockholders and us. It reduces the volume of duplicate
information received by you and helps to reduce our expenses.
The rule applies to our annual reports, proxy statements and
information statements. Once stockholders receive notice from
their brokers or from us that communications to their addresses
will be householded, the practice will continue
until stockholders are otherwise notified or until they revoke
their consent to the practice. Each stockholder will continue to
receive a separate proxy card or voting instruction card.
Those stockholders who either (i) do not wish to
participate in householding and would like to
receive their own sets of our annual disclosure documents in
future years, or (ii) who share an address with another one
of our stockholders and who would like to receive only a single
set of our annual disclosure documents should follow the
instructions described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders whose shares are registered in their own name
should contact our transfer agent, American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, and inform them of
their request by calling them at
1-800-937-5449
or writing them at 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New York, New
York 10038.
|
|
|
|
Stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other nominee
should contact such broker or other nominee directly and inform
them of their request. Stockholders should be sure to include
their name, the name of their brokerage firm and their account
number.
|
4
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table is based upon 39,556,849 shares of
common stock outstanding as of February 25, 2011, and sets
forth, based on the public filings of such individuals and
entities and our knowledge of securities issued by us to them,
certain information concerning the ownership of voting
securities of: (i) each current member of the Board of
Directors, (ii) our Chief Executive Officer and other
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table,
(iii) all of our current directors and executive officers
as a group, and (iv) each beneficial owner of more than 5%
of the outstanding shares of any class of our voting securities.
Except as otherwise indicated, addresses are
c/o Majesco
Entertainment Company, 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Suite 1,
Edison, NJ 08837.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Robert S. Ellin
|
|
|
2,630,388
|
(1)
|
|
|
6.65
|
%
|
Joseph Sutton
|
|
|
2,383,664
|
(2)
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
Jesse Sutton
|
|
|
1,563,886
|
(3)
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
Michael Vesey
|
|
|
152,626
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Allan I. Grafman
|
|
|
317,641
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Louis Lipschitz
|
|
|
280,887
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Laurence Aronson
|
|
|
278,839
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Stephen Wilson
|
|
|
219,544
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Keith McCurdy
|
|
|
52,078
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Current Executive Officers and Directors as a Group
|
|
|
2,865,501
|
(10)
|
|
|
7.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents beneficial ownership of
less than 1% of the shares of common stock.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Based on a Schedule 13D/A
filed with the SEC on January 11, 2010. Includes:
(a) 115,297 shares of common stock owned by Robert S.
Ellin; (b) 2,433,650 shares of common stock owned by
the Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (Master Fund),
of which Mr. Ellin is the managing director; and
(c) 81,441 shares of common stock owned by the Robert
S. Ellin Profit Sharing Plan. Robert S. Ellin disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock directly
beneficially owned by the Master Fund except to the extent of
his pecuniary interests therein. Mr. Ellin also disclaims
any beneficial ownership of shares of common stock owned
directly by the Robert S. Ellin Profit Sharing Plan. The address
is 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1650, Los Angeles,
California 90067.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 51,000 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days. Joseph Sutton is an employee of the Company and is
the brother of Jesse Sutton.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 90,000 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 15,000 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 149,345 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes 112,006 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 106,907 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 68,712 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes 8,004 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 549,974 shares of
common stock underlying outstanding options but does not include
options that have not vested and are not vesting within
60 days.
|
5
MANAGEMENT
AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board
of Directors
Below is information about our current directors. We have a
staggered board of directors comprised of three classes and each
director serves until the annual meeting associated with their
class. The Class I board members are Jesse Sutton and Louis
Lipschitz, who will serve until our annual meeting in 2012. The
Class II board members are Laurence Aronson and Keith
McCurdy, who will serve until our annual meeting in 2013. The
Class III board members are Allan I. Grafman and Stephen
Wilson, who are up for re-election at this years annual
meeting, and if elected will serve until our annual meeting in
2014. Our Board of Directors has reviewed the materiality of any
relationship that each of our directors has with Majesco, either
directly or indirectly. Based upon this review, our Board has
determined that the following members of the Board are
independent directors as defined by the rules of the
Nasdaq Stock Market: Laurence Aronson, Allan I. Grafman, Louis
Lipschitz, Keith McCurdy, and Stephen Wilson.
Class I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Jesse Sutton
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Louis Lipschitz
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Class II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Laurence Aronson
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Director
|
Keith McCurdy
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
Class III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Allan I. Grafman
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Chairman
|
Stephen Wilson
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Director
|
JESSE SUTTON. Mr. Sutton is currently our Chief
Executive Officer and has served in such capacity since
November 29, 2007 and prior to that as Interim Chief
Executive Officer since August 23, 2006. Previously, he
served as our President, other than from December 5, 2003
through August 24, 2004, when he served as our Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Sutton also serves as one of our
directors. He had served as one of our directors since
December 5, 2003, but resigned effective February 6,
2006 in order for our Board to continue to have a majority of
independent directors. He joined the Board again on
August 23, 2006. In considering Mr. Sutton as a
director of the Company, the Board reviewed his extensive
knowledge of and experience in a variety of aspects of the
interactive entertainment industry.
LOUIS LIPSCHITZ. Mr. Lipschitz has served as one
of our directors since April 20, 2004. From February 1996
to March 2004, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. He currently
serves on the board of directors of New York and Company,
Forward Industries, and The Childrens Place Retail Stores,
Inc., and previously served as a director of Finlay Enterprises,
Inc. In considering Mr. Lipschitz as a director of the
Company, the Board reviewed his extensive expertise and
knowledge regarding finance and accounting matters as well as
corporate governance. Mr. Lipschitz qualifies as an
audit committee financial expert under the
applicable SEC rules and accordingly contributes to the Board of
Directors his understanding of generally accepted accounting
principles and his skills in auditing, as well as in analyzing
and evaluating financial statements.
6
LAURENCE ARONSON. Mr. Aronson has served as one
of our directors since November 4, 2004. He is currently an
owner of Homewatch CareGivers of Essex, Morris and Union
Counties, a provider of home care services. From 2003 to
December 2009, he served as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cartwheel LLC, a marketing services company. From
2000 to 2003, he was the President of Sales and Customer
Marketing at Revlon USA. Prior to that, he held senior
leadership positions at Procter & Gamble and Warner
Lambert/Adams USA. In considering Mr. Aronson as a director
of the Company, the Board reviewed his experience and extensive
knowledge in sales and marketing and his specialized expertise
in retail marketing.
KEITH MCCURDY. Mr. McCurdy has served as one of
our directors since March 9, 2009. Mr. McCurdy is the
co-founder of Vivaty, Inc. and until April 2010, served as its
Chief Executive Officer. Prior to this, Mr. McCurdy was the
Chief Operating Officer of Hands-On Mobile, Inc. He also served
as the Chief Executive Officer of Blaze Entertainment, and held
numerous executive positions at Electronic Arts Inc. (EA),
including Vice President of Product Development, Vice President
of Technology, Vice President of Online, and Director of the
Advanced Technology Group. He is a former member of the board of
directors of NeuMedia, Inc., formerly Mandalay Media, Inc. In
considering Mr. McCurdy as a director of the Company, the
Board reviewed his extensive experience in the interactive
entertainment business, including in product development and
online and social games and virtual worlds.
ALLAN I. GRAFMAN. Mr. Grafman has served as one
of our directors since April 11, 2007 and since
December 4, 2007 as our Chairman. He is currently the
President of All Media Ventures, and since 2005 has been an
operating partner of Mercury Capital Partners. Previously,
Mr. Grafman served as President of Archie Comics
Entertainment and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer of Hallmark Entertainment. From 1983 to 1996, at Tribune
Entertainment, he served as Vice President and at parent Tribune
Company, as Managing Director. In considering Mr. Grafman
as a director of the Company, the Board reviewed his knowledge
and expertise in the media and entertainment industry, and his
particular experience in monetizing consumer, technology and
media products and services through a variety of distribution
channels.
STEPHEN WILSON. Mr. Wilson has served as one of
our directors since May 1, 2006. He is currently a partner
with Camelot Equity Partners and a Senior Managing Director at
Brock Capital. From May 2001 to February 2006, Mr. Wilson
was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Administrative Officer at Footstar, Inc. He has also served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bridge
Information Systems, Readers Digest Association and RJR
Nabisco. His additional prior experience includes senior
management and financial positions at Cadbury Schweppes North
America and PepsiCo, Inc. In considering Mr. Wilson as a
director of the Company, the Board reviewed his extensive
experience in a variety of chief financial officer roles, as
well as his executive management experience. Mr. Wilson
qualifies as an audit committee financial expert
under the applicable SEC rules and accordingly contributes to
the Board of Directors his understanding of generally accepted
accounting principles and his skills in auditing as well as in
analyzing and evaluating financial statements.
Committees
of the Board of Directors and Meetings
Meeting Attendance. The Board of Directors has
a policy that directors make all reasonable efforts to attend
our Companys annual stockholder meetings. Laurence
Aronson, Allan I. Grafman, Louis Lipschitz, Keith McCurdy, Jesse
Sutton and Stephen Wilson attended last years annual
stockholders meeting. In fiscal 2010, there were a total
of 25 meetings of the Board of Directors and the various
committees of the Board met a total of 16 times. No director
attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the
Board and of committees of the Board on which he served during
fiscal year 2010. The independent members of the Board also met
regularly in executive session.
Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has a
standing Audit Committee, consisting of Messrs. Louis
Lipschitz (Chair), Allan I. Grafman, Laurence Aronson, and
Stephen Wilson. Our Audit
7
Committee held seven meetings during fiscal year 2010. The Audit
Committee acts under a written charter, which more specifically
sets forth its responsibilities and duties, as well as
requirements for the Committees composition and meetings.
The charter of the Audit Committee can be found on our website
at www.majescoentertainment.com.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the
audit committee is independent, as that term is
defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each
member of the audit committee is independent, as
that term is defined by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
The Board has determined that Messrs. Allan I. Grafman,
Louis Lipschitz and Stephen Wilson are financial
experts serving on its Audit Committee, and are
independent, as the SEC has defined that term in Item 407
of
Regulation S-K.
Please see the biographical information for these individuals
contained in the section above entitled, The Board of
Directors.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board
of Directors has a standing Nominating and Governance Committee.
The Nominating and Governance Committee consists of
Messrs. Stephen Wilson (Chair), Laurence Aronson, Allan I.
Grafman, and Louis Lipschitz. The Committee may employ a variety
of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director.
All members of the Committee qualify as independent as defined
by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nominating and
Governance Committee held five meetings during fiscal year 2010.
The Nominating and Governance Committee acts under a written
charter, which more specifically sets forth its responsibilities
and duties, as well as requirements for its composition and
meetings. The charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee
can be found on our website at
www.majescoentertainment.com.
The Committee regularly assesses the size of the Board, the need
for particular expertise on the Board, the upcoming election
cycle of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are
expected due to retirement or otherwise. Candidates may be
evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Committee, and
may be considered at any point during the year.
As reflected in the charter of the Nominating and Governance
Committee, factors considered by the Committee in the selection
of director nominees are those it may deem appropriate,
including judgment, character, high ethics and standards,
integrity, skills, diversity, independence, experience with
businesses and organizations of a comparable size to the
Company, the interplay of the candidates experience with
the experience of other Board of Directors members and the
extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to
the Board of Directors or any of its committees. In addition, in
considering nominees for director, the Nominating and Governance
Committee will review the qualifications of available candidates
that are brought to the attention of the Committee by any member
of the Board of Directors, stockholders and management or
identified by the Committee through the use of search firms or
otherwise.
The Nominating and Governance Committee does not set specific,
minimum qualifications that nominees must meet in order for the
Committee to recommend them to the Board of Directors, but
rather believes that each nominee should be evaluated based on
his or her individual merits, taking into account the needs of
the Company and the composition of the Board of Directors.
Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee discuss and
evaluate possible candidates in detail prior to recommending
them to the Board of Directors. While we do not have a formal
policy on diversity, our Nominating and Governance Committee
considers diversity of experience as one of the factors it
considers in conducting its assessment of director nominees,
along with such other factors as it deems appropriate given the
then current needs of the Board and the Company, to maintain a
balance of knowledge, experience and capability.
If a stockholder wishes to propose a candidate for consideration
as a nominee by the Nominating and Governance Committee, it
should follow the procedures described in this section and in
the Companys Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Charter. The Nominating and
8
Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by
stockholders, when the nominations are properly submitted. The
policy adopted by the Nominating and Governance Committee
provides that nominees recommended by stockholders are given
appropriate consideration and will be evaluated in the same
manner as other nominees. Following verification of the
stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, the
Committee makes an initial analysis of the qualifications of any
candidate recommended by stockholders or others pursuant to the
criteria summarized above to determine whether the candidate is
qualified for service on the Companys Board before
deciding to undertake a complete evaluation of the candidate. If
any materials are provided by a stockholder or professional
search firm in connection with the nomination of a director
candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Committee as part
of its review. Other than the verification of compliance with
procedures and stockholder status, and the initial analysis
performed by the Committee, a potential candidate nominated by a
stockholder is treated like any other potential candidate during
the review process by the Committee.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk
Oversight. Our current Board leadership structure
separates the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman,
although we do not have a corporate policy requiring that
structure. The Board believes that this separation is
appropriate for the Company at this time because it allows for a
division of responsibilities and a sharing of ideas between
individuals having different perspectives. Our Chief Executive
Officer, who is also a member of our Board, is primarily
responsible for the our operations and strategic direction,
while our Chairman, who is an independent member of the Board,
is primarily focused on matters pertaining to corporate
governance, including management oversight. While the Board
believes that this is the most appropriate structure at this
time, the Board retains the authority to change the Board
structure, including the possibility of combining the Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman position, if it deems such a
change to be appropriate in the future.
While management is responsible for managing the day to day
issues faced by the Company, the Board has an active role,
directly and through its committees, in the oversight of the
Companys risk management efforts. The Board carries out
this oversight role through several levels of review. The Board
regularly reviews and discusses with members of management
information regarding the management of risks inherent in the
operation of the Companys business and the implementation
of the Companys strategic plan, including the
Companys risk mitigation efforts.
Each of the Boards committees also oversees the management
of the Companys risks that are under each committees
areas of responsibility. For example, the Audit Committee
oversees management of accounting, auditing, external reporting,
internal controls, and cash investment risks. The Nominating and
Governance Committee oversees the Companys compliance
policies, Code of Conduct and Ethics, conflicts of interests,
director independence and corporate governance policies. The
Compensation Committee oversees risks arising from compensation
practices and policies. While each committee has specific
responsibilities for oversight of risk, the Board is regularly
informed by each committee about such risks. In this manner the
Board is able to coordinate its risk oversight.
Compensation Committee; Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation. The Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors is composed entirely of directors who
are not our current or former employees, each of whom meets the
applicable definition of independent as defined by
the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. None of the members of the
Compensation Committee during fiscal 2010 (i) had any
relationships requiring disclosure by the Company under the
SECs rules requiring disclosure of related party
transactions, and (ii) was an executive officer of a
company of which an executive officer of the Company is a
director. The current members of our Compensation Committee are
Messrs. Laurence Aronson (Chair), Allan I. Grafman, Louis
Lipschitz, Keith McCurdy and Stephen Wilson. Our committee has
no interlocks with other companies. Our Compensation Committee
held four meetings during fiscal year 2010. The charter of the
Compensation Committee can be found on our website at
www.majescoentertainment.com.
9
The Committee is responsible for establishing and administering
our executive compensation policies. The role of the
Compensation Committee is to (i) formulate, evaluate and
approve compensation of the Companys directors, executive
officers and key employees; (ii) oversee all compensation
programs involving the use of the Companys stock; and
(iii) produce, if required under the securities laws, a
report on executive compensation for inclusion in the
Companys proxy statement for its annual meeting of
stockholders. The duties and responsibilities of the
Compensation Committee under its charter include:
|
|
|
|
|
Annually reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with
respect to compensation of directors, executive officers of the
Company and key employees;
|
|
|
|
Annually reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives
relevant to Chief Executive Officer compensation, evaluating the
Chief Executive Officers performance in light of those
goals and objectives, and recommending to the Board the Chief
Executive Officers compensation levels based on this
evaluation;
|
|
|
|
Reviewing competitive practices and trends to determine the
adequacy of the executive compensation program;
|
|
|
|
Approving and overseeing compensation programs for executive
officers involving the use of the Companys stock;
|
|
|
|
Approving and administering cash incentives and deferred
compensation plans for executives (including any modification to
such plans) and oversight of performance objectives and funding
for executive incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
Annually evaluating the performance of the Compensation
Committee; and
|
|
|
|
Making regular reports to the Board concerning the activities of
the Compensation Committee.
|
When appropriate, the Compensation Committee may, in carrying
out its responsibilities, form and delegate authority to
subcommittees. The Chief Executive Officer plays a role in
determining the compensation of our other executive officers by
evaluating the performance of those executive officers. The
Chief Executive Officers evaluations are then reviewed by
the Compensation Committee. This process leads to a
recommendation for any changes in salary, bonus terms and equity
awards, if any, based on performance, which recommendations are
then reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.
From time to time the Compensation Committee has retained an
independent compensation consulting firm, James F.
Reda & Associates, LLC, to assist the Committee in
determining appropriate short-term and long-term incentive
awards for key executives. Other services have included a review
of the Companys Amended and Restated 2004 Employee,
Director and Consultant Incentive Plan (referred to herein as
the Incentive Plan), valuation of employee and director equity
grants, valuation of warrants, and advisement on RiskMetrics
policy guidelines.
The Compensation Committee retains the consulting firm directly,
although in carrying out assignments, the consulting firm also
interacts with Company management when necessary and appropriate
in order to obtain compensation and performance data for the
executives and the Company. In addition, the consultant may, in
its discretion, seek input and feedback from management
regarding its consulting work product prior to presentation to
the Compensation Committee in order to confirm alignment with
the Companys business strategy
and/or
identify data questions or other similar issues.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain,
terminate and set the terms of the Companys relationship
with any outside advisors who assist the Committee in carrying
out its responsibilities.
10
Communications
with the Board of Directors
Stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors by
sending an email to
InvestorRelations@majescoentertainment.com or by sending
a letter to Majesco Entertainment Companys Board of
Directors,
c/o the
Office of the Secretary, 160 Raritan Center Parkway,
Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837. The Office of the
Secretary will receive the correspondence and forward it to the
Chairman or to any individual director or directors to whom the
communication is directed, unless the communication is unduly
hostile, threatening, illegal, does not reasonably relate to the
Company or its business, or is similarly inappropriate. The
Office of the Secretary has the authority to discard or
disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other
appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate
communications.
Executive
Officers
The following sets forth certain information regarding our
executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Jesse Sutton
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Michael Vesey
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
JESSE SUTTON. See Management and Corporate
Governance starting on page 6.
MICHAEL VESEY. Mr. Vesey has served as our
Interim Chief Financial Officer since August 20, 2010.
Mr. Vesey joined the Company in May 2006 as its Corporate
Controller. Most recently he served as its Senior Vice
President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer.
From November 2004 until he joined the Company, Mr. Vesey
served as Chief Financial Officer of Nuvim, Inc., a company that
markets and distributes dietary supplement beverages. As Chief
Financial Officer of Nuvim, Mr. Vesey was responsible for
overseeing all financial and accounting processes and procedures.
11
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth summary
information as to compensation paid or accrued during the last
two fiscal years ended October 31, 2009 and 2010 to
(i) our current Chief Executive Officer, and (ii) our
next most highly compensated executive officers who earned more
than $100,000 during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Jesse Sutton, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
363,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539,336
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
363,000
|
|
|
|
45,375
|
|
|
|
362,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
770,765
|
|
Michael Vesey, Interim Chief Financial
Officer(3)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
194,660
|
(4)
|
|
|
24,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
58,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,936
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the aggregate grant date
fair value for stock awards granted during fiscal years 2010 and
2009 respectively, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic
718. See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
reported in our
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 and in our
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 for details as
to the assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value
of the stock awards.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the aggregate grant date
fair value for option awards granted during fiscal years 2010
and 2009 respectively, computed in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 718. See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
reported in our
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 and in our
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 for details as
to the assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value
of the option awards.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Mr. Vesey became an executive
officer (Interim Chief Financial Officer) in August 2010.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Represents Mr. Veseys
annual salary for 2010. His salary remained unchanged after his
becoming the Interim Chief Financial Officer in August 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Pursuant to the Companys 2010
incentive bonus program. See Narrative Disclosure to
Summary Compensation Table.
|
Narrative
Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Incentive
Bonus Program
On April 12, 2010, the Compensation Committee of our Board
of Directors finalized and approved the terms of an incentive
bonus plan for our 2010 fiscal year for our executive officers
and other management (the 2010 Plan). Pursuant to
the plan, each of our executive officers was eligible to receive
an incentive bonus based upon a targeted percentage of his base
salary. The percentage of base salary that each executive
officer would receive if the Company achieved all of the
objectives included in the plan was 100% for the Chief Executive
Officer and 50% for each other executive officer.
The 2010 incentive bonus program was comprised of two
components, a funding component and an allocation component. The
funding component is the basis on which the dollar amount of the
bonus pool to be allocated among all participants was calculated
and was based on the achievement by the Company of financial and
operational goals (the Goals). The allocation
component is the basis on which the actual bonus amount was to
be paid to each participant.
If the Company met all of the financial and operational goals
set forth below, the bonus pool for executive officers would be
$635,000. Subsequently, during fiscal 2010, two of our executive
officers resigned from the Company and Michael Vesey became our
Interim Chief Financial Officer, thereby lowering the bonus pool
for executive officers to $433,000 (the Bonus
Target).
The financial goal (the Financial Goal) accounted
for 75% of the Bonus Target, and was determined by a measure of
net income.
12
The four operational goals each accounted for 6.25% of the Bonus
Target, and were as follows (the Operational Goals):
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of a defined revenue target for titles on emerging
digital platforms;
|
|
|
|
Key Customer Account (Key Accounts) focus for the
Companys top four titles in 2010 (Top Titles):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of placement in at least 80% of the Key Accounts for
each Top Title;
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from each Top Title for Key Accounts should be at
least 75% of the forecasted estimate for each account;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise Creation: for one of the Top Titles, exceed the
Companys original internal forecast by 50% (150% of
forecast inclusive of all versions of the title); and
|
|
|
|
License Acquisition: During fiscal 2010, secure the license for
an additional top quality title with franchise potential.
|
On January 13, 2011, the Committee met to determine the
bonus payments to be made to our executive officers under the
2010 Plan. The Committee determined that the Company had
achieved two of the operational goals set forth in the 2010 Plan
but that it did not meet the financial goal. Under the 2010 Plan
a payout is not made if the Company does not meet its financial
goal and a payout would result in a net loss under the net
income calculation pursuant to the 2010 Plan. On
February 23, 2011, the Committee determined to award
bonuses to the executive officers as set forth below although
under the 2010 Plan the Company had a net loss. The Committee
determined to make payments for the 2010 performance since the
net loss was the result of a strategic business decision to move
the commercial release of certain of the Companys key
products to a later date, after the Companys 2010 fiscal
year.
The bonus amounts to be paid the executive officers as well as
their 2010 bonus targets under the 2010 Plan are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Target Bonus
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Bonus Payout
|
|
|
under the 2010 Plan
|
|
Jesse Sutton
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% of annual salary, or $363,000
|
Michael Vesey
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
35% of annual salary, or $70,000
|
Restricted
Stock Grants
On August 3, 2010, our Compensation Committee made
restricted stock grants to our executive officers. The shares of
restricted stock vest in equal installments over a three-year
period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.
Employment
Agreements
We currently have an employment agreement with Jesse Sutton, our
Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Suttons employment agreement, entered into in
January 2009, provides for an annual base salary of $363,000 and
a discretionary bonus of up to 100% of his base salary.
In addition, our employment arrangement with Michael Vesey, our
Interim Chief Financial Officer, entered into in August 2010,
provides for an annual base salary of $200,000 and a
discretionary bonus of up to 35% of his base salary.
13
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows grants of stock options and grants of
unvested stock awards outstanding on the last day of the fiscal
year ended October 31, 2010, to each of the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
Jesse Sutton
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
8/2/2012
|
|
|
|
469,790
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
291,270
|
|
Michael Vesey
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
5/4/2013
|
|
|
|
118,080
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
73,210
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The market value of the shares is
determined by multiplying the number of shares times $0.62, the
closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market
on October 29, 2010, the last business day of our fiscal
year.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Shares vest as follows:
239,279 shares on August 3, 2011; 142,349 shares
on August 3, 2012; and 88,162 shares on August 3,
2013.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Shares vest as follows:
51,821 shares on August 3, 2011; 37,121 shares on
August 3, 2012; and 29,138 shares on August 3,
2013.
|
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or
Change-In-Control
We have entered into agreements that require us to make payments
and/or
provide benefits to certain of our executive officers in the
event of a termination of employment or a change of control. The
following summarizes the potential payments to each named
executive officer for which we have entered into such an
agreement assuming that one of the events identified below
occurs.
Mr. Michael
Vesey, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to his employment arrangement, if the Company
terminates Mr. Veseys employment without cause or the
arrangement is terminated by Mr. Vesey for good reason, he
will receive continued payment of his base salary for a period
of six months.
Mr. Jesse
Sutton, Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to his employment agreement, if the Company terminates
Mr. Suttons employment without cause or the agreement
is terminated by Mr. Sutton for good reason, he will
receive severance benefits from the Company, including:
|
|
|
|
|
continued payment of his base salary on a monthly payroll basis
for a period of 12 months;
|
|
|
|
within 30 days:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a payment equal to the average of the percentages used to
calculate Mr. Suttons Annual Incentive Cash Bonus (as
such term is defined in the employment agreement) in each of the
previous three (3) fiscal years times
Mr. Suttons then current base salary (the
Severance Bonus); and
|
|
|
|
a payment for accrued but untaken vacation days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
acceleration and full vesting as of the date of termination of
all unvested restricted stock, stock options and other equity
awards held by Mr. Sutton at the time of such termination.
|
|
|
|
continued Company contributions toward Mr. Suttons
health care, dental, disability and life insurance benefits on
the same basis as immediately prior to the date of termination
for twelve (12) months following the date of termination.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company is
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
not required to provide any health care, dental, disability or
life insurance benefit otherwise receivable by Mr. Sutton
if he is actually covered or becomes covered by an equivalent
benefit (at the same cost to him, if any) from another source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the Company terminates Mr. Suttons employment
without cause or the agreement is terminated by Mr. Sutton
for good reason within twenty-four (24) months of a change
of control of the Company, he will receive severance benefits
(in lieu of all other severance programs/amounts) from the
Company, including:
|
|
|
|
payment within 30 days of his termination in an amount
equal to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
two (2) years base salary;
|
|
|
|
the Severance Bonus; and
|
|
|
|
accrued but untaken vacation days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
acceleration and full vesting as of the date of termination of
all unvested restricted stock, stock options and other equity
awards held by Mr. Sutton at the time of such termination.
|
|
|
|
continued Company contributions toward Mr. Suttons
health care, dental, disability and life insurance benefits on
the same basis as immediately prior to the date of termination
for twelve (12) months following the date of termination.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company is not required to
provide any health care, dental, disability or life insurance
benefit otherwise receivable by Mr. Sutton if he is
actually covered or becomes covered by an equivalent benefit (at
the same cost to him, if any) from another source.
|
Mr. Suttons employment agreement defines
Cause as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a good faith finding of dishonesty, gross negligence or
misconduct that is injurious to the Company which, if curable,
has not been cured within 10 business days of notice from the
Company;
|
|
|
|
a good faith finding by the Company that Mr. Sutton has
willfully failed to perform his duties thereunder that, if
curable, has not been cured within 10 business days after notice
from the Company;
|
|
|
|
Mr. Suttons failure to follow a specific written
directive of the Companys Board that is business justified
and issued in good faith;
|
|
|
|
a conviction or entry of nolo contendere to any felony or crime
involving moral turpitude, fraud, theft or embezzlement of
Company property;
|
|
|
|
a material breach of his employment agreement that, if curable,
has not been cured by Mr. Sutton within 10 business days
after he shall have received written notice from the
Company; or
|
|
|
|
Mr. Suttons willful disclosure of confidential
information or trade secrets
and/or his
breach of any confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements he
may have executed
and/or does
execute during the term of his employment with the Company.
|
Mr. Suttons employment agreement defines Good
Reason as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a material diminution in the his base compensation;
|
|
|
|
the material diminution in the his authority, duties or
responsibilities, including no longer directly reporting to the
Board; provided that such shall not constitute Good Reason if
Mr. Sutton continues to be employed in one of the top three
positions in the Company;
|
|
|
|
a change in geographic location at which Mr. Sutton must
regularly perform services of more than fifty (50) miles;
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
the Companys decision not to renew Mr. Suttons
employment agreement at the conclusion of the Initial Term (as
defined in Section 1.3 of such agreement)
and/or at
the conclusion of an Extended Term (as defined in
Section 1.3 of such agreement); or
|
|
|
|
any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach
by the Company under Mr. Suttons employment agreement.
|
|
|
|
None of the foregoing events shall constitute Good Reason unless
(i) Mr. Sutton gives notice to the Company of the
occurrence or existence of one of the events and the Company has
not cured the condition within thirty (30) days following
receipt of such written notice and (ii) Mr. Sutton
terminates employment within one hundred and twenty
(120) days following the occurrence of such event.
|
Mr. Suttons employment agreement defines Change
of Control as the occurrence of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
any consolidation or merger of the Company with or into any
other corporation or other entity or person, or any other
corporate reorganization, in which the stockholders of the
Company immediately prior to such consolidation, merger or
reorganization, own less than 50% of the voting power of the
surviving entity immediately after such consolidation, merger or
reorganization;
|
|
|
|
any transaction or series of related transactions to which the
Company is a party in which in excess of fifty percent (50%) of
the Companys voting power is transferred;
|
|
|
|
a sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all
of the assets of the Company in accordance with Delaware
Law; or
|
|
|
|
a change in the composition of the Board, as a result of which
fewer than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors.
Incumbent Directors is defined in
Mr. Suttons employment agreement to mean directors
who either (i) are directors of the Company as of
January 8, 2009 or (ii) are elected, or nominated for
election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a
majority of the Incumbent Directors at the time of such election
or nomination (but shall not include an individual whose
election or nomination is in connection with an actual or
threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors
to the Company).
|
Mr. Suttons employment agreement also provides that,
notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, a Change of
Control shall not include: (1) any consolidation or merger
effected exclusively to change the domicile of the Company;
(2) the event of any Person (as such term is
used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) becoming the Beneficial
Owner (as defined in
Rule 13d-3
under said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the
Company representing 50% or more of the total voting power
represented by the Companys then outstanding voting
securities (excluding for this purpose any such voting
securities held by the Company or its affiliates or by any
employee benefit plan of the Company) pursuant to a transaction
or a series of related transactions which the Board of Directors
does not approve; or (3) any transaction or series of
transactions principally for bona fide equity financing purposes
in which cash is received by the Company or indebtedness of the
Company is cancelled or converted or a combination thereof.
The agreement contains customary confidentiality,
non-competition, non-solicitation, and indemnification terms and
is terminable at-will by either party, subject to the conditions
set forth above.
16
Director
Compensation
The following table shows the total compensation paid or accrued
during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 to each of
our directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Jesse Sutton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurence Aronson
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Allan I. Grafman
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
228,000
|
|
Louis Lipschitz
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
Keith McCurdy
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
12,220
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
125,215
|
|
Stephen Wilson
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the aggregate grant date
fair value for stock awards granted by us in fiscal year 2010
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 3
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reported in
our
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 for details as
to the assumptions used to determine the fair value of the stock
awards.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the aggregate grant date
fair value of options granted in fiscal year 2010 computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 3 to our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reported in our
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 for details as
to the assumptions used to determine the fair value of the
option awards.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents a stipend for medical
insurance.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Pursuant to a consulting agreement
with the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
Number of Stock
|
|
|
Stock Held at
|
|
|
|
Options Held at
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Name
|
|
Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
Year-End
|
|
|
Laurence Aronson
|
|
|
167,669
|
|
|
|
27,252
|
|
Allan I. Grafman
|
|
|
270,868
|
|
|
|
54,505
|
|
Louis Lipschitz
|
|
|
172,768
|
|
|
|
27,252
|
|
Keith McCurdy
|
|
|
51,095
|
|
|
|
18,167
|
|
Stephen Wilson
|
|
|
119,348
|
|
|
|
22,709
|
|
Director
Compensation Program
Each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer of
$40,000, other than the Chair of the Companys Audit
Committee, who receives $50,000. In addition, the Chairman of
the Board receives an additional annual cash retainer of $32,000.
Each non-employee director also receives annual equity grants
valued at $40,000, other than the Chair of the Nominating and
Governance Committee, who receives grants valued at $50,000, and
the Chairs of the Compensation and Audit Committees, who receive
grants valued at $60,000. The Chairman receives additional
equity grants valued at $32,000.
Effective November 1, 2010, the Board adjusted the
compensation of the Chairman, reducing the additional cash
retainer from $50,000 to $32,000 and the additional equity grant
value from $80,000 to $32,000.
The equity portion of the compensation is a mix of
2/3
restricted stock and
1/3
stock options, and is granted under the Incentive Plan. The
restricted stock is awarded quarterly with the number of shares
determined by dividing the applicable dollar amount by the fair
market value of the Companys common stock on the day prior
to the grant date. The stock options are awarded annually with
the number of shares determined using a Black-Scholes formula.
The restricted stock vests 180 days from
17
the grant date. The options vest over two years, with half
vesting on each of the first and second anniversaries of the
grant date.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information (as of October 31,
2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Issued upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Price of Outstanding
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options, Warrants and
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
Plan category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
1,699,216
|
|
|
$
|
4.55
|
|
|
|
1,729,239
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
140,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,839,216
|
|
|
$
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
1,729,239
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents warrants to purchase
40,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price per share
of $1.55 granted to a consultant in 2006, and warrants to
purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price
of $1.056 per share granted to a consultant in 2010.
|
18
REPORT OF
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The current members of the Audit Committee are
Messrs. Louis Lipschitz (Chair), Laurence Aronson, Allan I.
Grafman, and Stephen Wilson.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which consists
entirely of directors who meet the required independence and
experience requirements of
Rule 10A-3
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, has furnished the following
report:
The Committee assists the Board in overseeing and monitoring the
integrity of the Companys financial reporting process, its
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the
quality of its internal and external audit processes. The role
and responsibilities of the Committee are set forth in a written
charter adopted by the Board, which is available on our website
at www.majescoentertainment.com. The Committee is
responsible for selecting, retaining and determining the
compensation of our independent public accountant, approving the
services they will perform, and reviewing the performance of the
independent public accountant. The Committee reviews with
management and our independent public accountant our annual
financial statements on
Forms 10-K
and our quarterly financial statements on
Forms 10-Q.
The Committee reviews and reassesses the charter annually and
recommends any changes to the Board for approval. The Committee
is responsible for overseeing our overall financial reporting
process. In fulfilling its responsibilities for the financial
statements for fiscal year 2010, the Audit Committee took the
following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 with management and
EisnerAmper LLP, our independent public accountant;
|
|
|
|
discussed with EisnerAmper the matters required to be discussed
in accordance with the rules set forth by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), relating to the
conduct of the audit; and
|
|
|
|
received written disclosures and the letter from EisnerAmper
regarding its independence as required by applicable
requirements of the PCAOB regarding EisnerAmpers
communications with the Committee and the Committee further
discussed with EisnerAmper their independence. The Committee
also considered the status of pending litigation, taxation
matters and other areas of oversight relating to the financial
reporting and audit process that the Committee determined
appropriate.
|
Based on the Audit Committees review of the audited
financial statements and discussions with management and
EisnerAmper, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that
the audited financial statements be included in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 for filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE:
Louis Lipschitz (Chair)
Laurence Aronson
Allan I. Grafman
Stephen Wilson
19
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more
than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file
reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC.
These persons are required by regulation to furnish us with
copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based
on our review of the copies of these reports received by us, or
written representations from the reporting persons that no other
reports were required, we believe that, during fiscal 2010, all
filing requirements applicable to our current officers,
directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied
with, except that one report, covering an aggregate of two
transactions, was filed late by Jesse Sutton.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Morris Sutton, the former chief executive officer of the
Company, resigned effective January 1, 2007 and became a
consultant. The Company paid approximately $402,000 to
Mr. Sutton under a consulting agreement during the year
ended October 31, 2009 and $281,000 during the year ended
October 31, 2010. Morris Sutton is Jesse Suttons
father.
Our Audit Committee reviews in advance all related person
transactions. The Audit Committee shall approve only those
related person transactions that are determined to be in, or not
inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its
stockholders, taking into account all available facts and
circumstances as the Audit Committee determines in good faith to
be necessary. These facts and circumstances will typically
include, but not be limited to, the benefits of the transaction
to the Company; the availability of other sources for comparable
products or services; the terms of the transaction; the terms of
comparable transactions that would be available to unrelated
third parties or to employees generally; and the impact on a
directors independence in the event the related person is
a director, an immediate family member of a director or an
entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or
executive officer.
In reviewing and approving such transactions, the Audit
Committee shall obtain, or shall direct management to obtain on
its behalf, all information that the Audit Committee believes to
be relevant and important to a review of the transaction prior
to its approval.
The Audit Committee may adopt any further policies and
procedures relating to the approval of related person
transactions that it deems necessary or advisable from time to
time.
20
RATIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
(Notice Item 2)
The Audit Committee has appointed EisnerAmper LLP
(EisnerAmper), independent public accountant, to
audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending
October 31, 2011. The Board proposes that the stockholders
ratify this appointment. We expect that representatives of
EisnerAmper will be present at the meeting, will be able to make
a statement if they so desire, and will be available to respond
to appropriate questions.
As previously disclosed, on August 16, 2010, the Company
was notified that Amper, Politziner and Mattia, LLP
(Amper), the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm, combined its practice with that of
Eisner LLP (Eisner) and that the name of the
combined practice would operate under the name EisnerAmper LLP.
The Audit Committee engaged EisnerAmper LLP to serve as our new
independent registered public accounting firm.
During the period that Amper served as our independent public
accountant, we did not consult with Eisner or with EisnerAmper
on (i) the application of accounting principles to a
specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type
of audit opinion that may be rendered on our financial
statements, and neither Eisner nor EisnerAmper provided either a
written report or oral advice to us that they concluded was an
important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to
any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue; or
(ii) any of the matters set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i)
or (ii) of
Regulation S-K.
Ampers report on the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, did
not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was
not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
accounting principles. During the two most recent fiscal years
and the subsequent interim period preceding EisnerAmpers
combination, the Company had no disagreements with Amper on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Amper,
would have caused Amper to make reference to the subject matter
of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the
Companys financial statements during such periods. None of
the events described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of
Regulation S-K
occurred during the two most recent fiscal years and any
subsequent interim periods preceding the combination of Eisner
and Amper into EisnerAmper.
Also, as previously disclosed, on April 30, 2009, we
dismissed McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
(M&P) as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm, who were our independent
public accountant for the fiscal year ended October 31,
2008. On May 5, 2009, Amper was engaged as our new
independent registered accounting firm and audited our financial
statements for the fiscal year ending on October 31, 2009.
The decision to engage Amper was approved by the Audit Committee
of our Board of Directors.
During the period that M&P served as our independent public
accountant, we did not consult with Amper on (i) the
application of accounting principles to a specified transaction,
either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that
may be rendered on our financial statements, and Amper did not
provide either a written report or oral advice to us that they
concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a
decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting
issue; or (ii) any of the matters set forth in
Item 304(a)(2)(i) or (ii) of
Regulation S-K.
None of M&Ps reports on the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended
October 31, 2008 or 2007, contained an adverse opinion or
disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the
two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period
preceding M&Ps dismissal, the Company had no
disagreements with M&P on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement
22
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements,
if not resolved to the satisfaction of M&P, would have
caused M&P to make reference to the subject matter of the
disagreements in connection with its reports on the
Companys financial statements during such periods. None of
the events described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of
Regulation S-K
occurred during the two most recent fiscal years and any
subsequent interim periods preceding the dismissal of M&P.
The following table sets forth the fees billed by our
independent public accountants for each of our last two fiscal
years for the categories of services indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
|
Category
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Audit Fees
M&P(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
Audit Fees
Amper(1)
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
Audit Fees
EisnerAmper(1)
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Audit Related Fees
M&P(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,201
|
|
Audit Related Fees
Amper(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,030
|
|
Audit Related Fees
EisnerAmper(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Tax
Fees(3)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
All Other Fees M&P
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,180
|
|
All Other Fees Amper
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,685
|
|
All Other Fees EisnerAmper
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of fees billed for the
audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial
statements included in our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and services that are normally provided by the auditors in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit and reviews of our financial statements and are not
included in audit fees in this table.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of services for tax
compliance and tax advice.
|
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval Policy
We understand the need for EisnerAmper to maintain objectivity
and independence in its audit of our financial statements. To
minimize relationships that could appear to impair the
objectivity of EisnerAmper, our Audit Committee has restricted
the non-audit services that EisnerAmper may provide to us
primarily to tax services.
The Audit Committee also has adopted policies and procedures for
pre-approving all non-audit work performed by EisnerAmper.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE TO APPROVE THE
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF EISNERAMPER LLP AS
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT, AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE
BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR THEREOF UNLESS A STOCKHOLDER HAS
INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY.
23
CORPORATE
CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS
We have adopted a Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all employees, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial and accounting officer, and
directors. The code can be found on our website at
www.majescoentertainment.com. We will provide, without
charge, a copy of our Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics upon
request to: Secretary, Majesco Entertainment Company, 160
Raritan Center Parkway, Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837.
Disclosure regarding any amendments to, or waivers from,
provisions of the Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics that
apply to our directors, principal executive and financial
officers will be included in a Current Report on
Form 8-K
within four business days following the date of the amendment or
waiver.
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
Cost and
Method
We will pay all of the costs of soliciting these proxies. In
addition to solicitation by mail, our employees, officers and
directors may, without additional compensation, solicit proxies
by mail,
e-mail,
facsimile, in person or by telephone or other forms of
telecommunication. We will ask banks, brokers and other
institutions, nominees and fiduciaries to forward these proxy
materials to their principals and to obtain authority to execute
proxies. We will then reimburse them for their expenses.
Participants
in the Proxy Solicitation
Under applicable regulations of the SEC, each of our directors
may be deemed to be a participant in our solicitation of proxies
in connection with the Annual Meeting. Please refer to the
sections of this proxy statement entitled Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management, and
Management and Corporate Governance The Board
of Directors for information about our directors who may
be deemed participants in the solicitation. Except as described
in this proxy statement, there are no agreements or
understandings between us and any of our directors or executive
officers relating to their employment with us or any future
transactions.
OTHER
MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board of Directors
knows of no other business that will be presented at the Annual
Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the
Annual Meeting, it is intended that proxies in the enclosed form
will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the best
judgment and in the discretion of the persons voting the proxies.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
Pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act, stockholders may present proper
proposals for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement
for consideration at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders by
submitting their proposals to the Company in a timely manner. In
order to be so included for the next annual meeting, stockholder
proposals must be received by the Company no later than
October 31, 2011 and must otherwise comply with the
requirements of
Rule 14a-8.
In addition, the Companys bylaws have an advance notice
procedure with regard to nominations for the election of
directors and business proposals to be brought before an annual
meeting of stockholders by any stockholder. In general, any
stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as
directors or propose business to be brought before an annual
meeting, or both, only if such stockholder has given timely
notice in proper written form of such nomination or nominations
or business proposal, setting forth certain specified
information relating to such stockholder and his or her
nominations or business proposal. To be timely, notice must be
received by the Companys Secretary no earlier than
December 15, 2011 and no later than January 13, 2012.
Proposals that are not received
24
in a timely manner will not be voted on at the 2012 annual
meeting of stockholders. If a proposal is received on time, the
proxies that management solicits for the meeting may still
exercise discretionary voting authority on the proposal under
circumstances consistent with the proxy rules of the SEC.
Stockholder proposals or notices of intent to nominate
candidates for election as directors should be submitted to
Majesco Entertainment Company, Attention: Secretary, at 160
Raritan Center Parkway, Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837.
Edison, New Jersey
February 28, 2011
25
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (other than exhibits
thereto), which provides additional information about Majesco,
is available to beneficial owners of our common stock without
charge upon written request to Adam Sultan, Corporate Secretary,
Majesco Entertainment Company, 160 Raritan Center Parkway,
Suite 1, Edison, New Jersey 08837. The information is also
publicly available through the EDGAR system at www.sec.gov and
is available on our website at
www.majescoentertainment.com in the Investor
Info section.
26
MAJESCO
ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
160
Raritan Center Parkway, Suite 1
Edison, New Jersey 08837
(732) 225-8910
PROXY FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
April 14, 2011
THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY SOLICITS THIS
PROXY
The undersigned, revoking any previous proxies relating to these
shares, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice and Proxy
Statement in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on April 14, 2011, at Majescos offices,
located at 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Suite 1, Edison, New
Jersey 08837, and hereby appoints Jesse Sutton, our Chief
Executive Officer, and Michael Vesey, our Interim Chief
Financial Officer, with full power to act alone, and each of
them (with full power to act alone), as attorneys and proxies of
the undersigned, with power of substitution to each, to vote all
shares of the common stock of Majesco Entertainment Company
registered in the name provided in this Proxy which the
undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, and at any adjournments of the meeting, with all
the powers the undersigned would have if personally present at
the meeting. Without limiting the general authorization given by
this Proxy, the proxies are, and each of them is, instructed to
vote or act as follows on the proposals set forth in the Proxy.
This Proxy when executed will be voted in the manner directed
herein. If no direction is made this Proxy will be voted FOR
Proposals 1 and 2.
In their discretion the proxies are authorized to vote upon
such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or
any adjournments of the meeting.
1. Election of Class III Directors (or if any nominee
is not available for election, such substitute as the Board of
Directors may designate):
Proposal to elect nominees:
|
|
|
|
|
Allan I. Grafman
|
|
o FOR
|
|
o WITHHOLD
VOTE
|
Stephen Wilson
|
|
o FOR
|
|
o WITHHOLD
VOTE
|
2. Ratify the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP as our
independent public accountant for the fiscal year ending
October 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
o FOR
|
|
o AGAINST
|
|
o ABSTAIN
|
þ
Please mark votes as in this example.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1
and 2.
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears
hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When
signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such.
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
Date
|
PLEASE
CAST YOUR VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!