e424b4
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration No. 333-169997
FINAL PROSPECTUS
4,500,000 Shares
MEDQUIST HOLDINGS
INC.
(formerly CBaySystems Holdings
Limited)
Common Stock
This is the initial public offering of our shares in the United
States. We are offering 3,000,000 shares of our common
stock, and the selling stockholders named in this prospectus are
offering 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. We will not
receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling
stockholders.
Our common stock has been approved for listing on The NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
Our shares were formerly listed on the Alternative Investment
Market of the London Stock Exchange, or AIM. However, we have
delisted from AIM and January 27, 2011 was the last day on
which our shares traded on AIM.
Investing in our shares involves significant risks. See
Risk Factors beginning on page 17.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
36,000,000
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
2,520,000
|
|
Proceeds to MedQuist Holdings Inc. (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
7.44
|
|
|
$
|
22,320,000
|
|
Proceeds to selling stockholders (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
7.44
|
|
|
$
|
11,160,000
|
|
See Underwriting for a discussion of the
underwriting compensation. Delivery of the shares of common
stock is expected to be made on or about February 9, 2011.
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters an option
for a period of 30 days to purchase on the same terms and
conditions set forth above, up to an additional
675,000 shares of our common stock to cover overallotments.
|
|
|
Lazard
Capital Markets |
Macquarie Capital |
RBC Capital Markets |
Loop Capital Markets
Prospectus dated February 4, 2011.
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
F-1
|
We have not authorized anyone to give any information or to make
any representations other than those contained in this
prospectus or in any free-writing prospectus that we may
specifically authorize to be delivered or made available to you.
We and the underwriters have not authorized anyone to provide
you with additional or different information. We and the selling
stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy,
shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where such
offers and sales are permitted. The information in this
prospectus or any free-writing prospectus is accurate only as of
its date, regardless of its time of delivery or of any sale of
shares of our common stock. Our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects may have changed since that
date.
References in this prospectus to dollars or
$ are to the currency of the United States and
references to pounds, £,
pence or p are to the currency of the
United Kingdom. There are 100 pence to each pound.
Except where otherwise indicated, reference in this prospectus
to volume or volumes are to lines of
text edited or transcribed by our medical transcriptionists, or
MTs, and medical editors, or MEs.
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and redomiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation. In
connection with our redomiciliation, we adjusted the number of
our shares outstanding through a reverse share split pursuant to
which every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding
prior to our redomiciliation were converted into one share of
our common stock upon our redomiciliation. We refer to this
herein as the conversion. Our redomiciliation and the conversion
resulted in no change to our stockholders relative
ownership interests in us. Unless otherwise noted, all
information regarding our shares of our common stock and all per
share information presented herein give effect to the conversion.
The industry and market data and other statistical information
used throughout this prospectus are based on independent
industry publications, government publications, reports by
market research firms or other published independent sources
that we believe to be reliable.
Prospectus
Summary
This summary highlights certain information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus and may not contain all of the
information you should consider before investing in our shares.
You should read this summary together with the entire
prospectus, including the information presented under the
heading Risk Factors, the consolidated financial
statements and related notes and the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information and related notes
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Except where the context otherwise requires, or where
otherwise indicated, references in this prospectus to
we, us, or our are to
MedQuist Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited)
and its subsidiaries, references to MedQuist Inc.
are to MedQuist Inc. and its subsidiaries and references to
Spheris are to Spheris Inc. and its subsidiaries for
the period prior to April 22, 2010 and to the business we
acquired from Spheris Inc. for the period after such date. For
purposes of our consolidated financial statements and references
to us contained therein, we have not reflected our anticipated
name change to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Overview
We are a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation
solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Our
end-to-end
solutions convert physicians dictation of patient
interactions, or the physician narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
automated speech recognition, or ASR, medical transcription and
editing, workflow automation, and document management and
distribution to deliver a complete managed service for our
customers. Our solutions enable hospitals, clinics, and
physician practices to improve the quality of clinical data as
well as accelerate and automate the documentation process, and
we believe our solutions improve physician productivity and
satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle performance, and facilitate
the adoption and use of electronic health records.
We are the largest provider by revenue of clinical documentation
solutions based on the physician narrative in the United States.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we
processed, on an annualized run rate basis, more than
3.4 billion lines of clinical documentation on our
platform. The significant majority of lines we process are
edited or transcribed by our approximately 14,000 MTs and
MEs. Of this volume, for the three months ended
September 30, 2010, 67% was processed using ASR technology
and 42% was produced offshore. Our size allows us to handle the
clinical documentation requirements of many of the largest and
most complex healthcare delivery networks in the United States,
provides us with economies of scale, and enables us to devote
significantly more resources to enhancing our solutions through
research and development than most of our competitors.
We serve more than 2,400 hospitals, clinics, and physician
practices throughout the United States, including 40% of
hospitals with more than 500 licensed beds. As of
September 30, 2010, the average tenure of our top
50 customers was over five years, and approximately 98% of
our revenue was from recurring services. Insights gained from
our broad, long-standing customer relationships allow us to
optimize our integrated solutions, and we believe that this
positions us for future growth as we target new customers.
We have realized significant increases in both revenue and
profitability as the result of two large acquisitions, MedQuist
Inc., in which we acquired a majority interest in August 2008,
and Spheris, which we acquired in April 2010. From 2007 to 2009,
our net revenues increased from $57.7 million to
$371.8 million. Over this same period, our Adjusted EBITDA,
which is a non-GAAP financial measure, increased from
$0.7 million to $59.7 million, and our Adjusted EBITDA
margins expanded from 1.1% to 16.1%. For a reconciliation of our
net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to
Adjusted EBITDA, see Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro
Forma Consolidated Financial Data.
1
Our
industry
Over the past several decades, our industry has evolved from
almost exclusively in-house production to outsourced services
and from labor-intensive services to technologically-enabled
solutions. The market opportunity for our solutions is driven by
overall healthcare utilization and cost containment efforts in
the United States. Numerous factors are driving increases in the
demand for healthcare services including population growth,
longer life expectancy, the increasing prevalence of chronic
illnesses, and expanded coverage from healthcare reform.
According to a September 2010 report by the U.S. Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services, spending on healthcare grew
from $1.2 trillion in 1998 to $2.3 trillion in 2008,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 7.0%. It also
projects that healthcare spending will grow to reach $4.2
trillion, or 19.3% of U.S. gross domestic product, by 2018,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 6.3%. At the same
time, U.S. healthcare providers remain under substantial
pressure to reduce costs while maintaining or improving the
quality of care.
Accurate and timely clinical documentation has become a critical
requirement of the growing U.S. healthcare system.
Medicare, Medicaid, and insurance companies demand extensive
patient care documentation. The 2009 Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or the HITECH
Act, includes numerous incentives to promote the adoption and
meaningful use of electronic health records, or EHRs, across the
healthcare industry. Consequently, healthcare providers are
increasingly using EHRs to input, store, and manage their
clinical data in a digital format. Healthcare providers that use
EHRs require accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective means to
input clinical data that are not disruptive to the physician
workflow.
The market for outsourced clinical documentation solutions based
on the physician narrative is substantial. Key components of
this market include voice capture and transmission technologies,
ASR software, medical transcription and editing services, and
document workflow and management software. ValueNotes Database
Pvt. Ltd., or ValueNotes, a market research firm, estimates that
the market for outsourced medical transcription services was
$5.4 billion in 2009 and is expected to grow 8.2% per annum
over the next five years to $8.0 billion in 2014.
Healthcare providers are increasingly choosing to outsource
their clinical documentation processes. The benefits of
outsourcing include reduced costs, access to leading
technologies, accelerated turn-around times, improved data
accuracy, greater physician productivity, and satisfaction of
security and compliance requirements. We believe that the
majority of clinical documentation is still produced in-house by
U.S. hospitals and physician practices today. ValueNotes
estimates that the in-house medical transcription market was 67%
of the overall market in 2009, and projects the percentage of
outsourced production of medical transcription will grow from
33% in 2009 to 38% in 2014.
While outsourcing provides many benefits, the landscape for
outsourced service providers is highly fragmented, with hundreds
of providers offering varying degrees of technological
automation and offshore capabilities. Technological automation
and a rise in offshore capabilities have substantially decreased
the cost of production and have further differentiated
outsourcing providers. We believe that participants in our
industry must expand their technology platform and offshore
production capabilities to remain competitive.
Our competitive
strengths
Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Leader in a large, fragmented market We are
the largest provider by revenue of clinical documentation
solutions based on the physician narrative in the United States.
Our size enables us to meet the needs of large, sophisticated
healthcare customers, provides economies of scale, and enables
us to devote significantly more resources to research and
development and quality assurance than many other providers.
|
|
n
|
Integrated solutions delivered as a complete managed
service We offer fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services that capture and convert the physician
narrative into a high quality customized electronic record. We
integrate technologies and services for voice capture and
transmission, ASR,
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
medical transcription and editing, workflow automation, and
document management and distribution. The end result is
value-added clinical documentation with high accuracy and quick
turn-around times.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Large and diversified customer base with long-term
relationships We serve more than 2,400
hospitals, clinics and physician practices throughout the United
States, including 40% of hospitals with more than 500 licensed
beds. We have a long-standing history with our customers and, as
of September 30, 2010, approximately 98% of our revenue was
from recurring services.
|
|
n
|
Highly-efficient operating model Over the
past two years, we have driven down our cost structure through
the use of technology automation, standardized processes, and
offshore resources. Our use of ASR, which has grown from 39% of
our volume in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 67% in the third
quarter of 2010, has increased our productivity. Additionally,
our expanding footprint in India has enabled us to increase our
offshore production from 28% of our volume to 42% over this same
period. The financial impact of these measures has been an
improvement in gross margins during this timeframe from 33.8% to
38.5%. We have grown our volume, excluding volume provided by
the Spheris Acquisition, by 2.3% over this same period while
sharing cost savings with our customers in the form of lower
prices.
|
|
n
|
Proven management team We have assembled an
outstanding senior leadership team with significant industry
experience and domain expertise in both domestic and offshore
operations. Our management team has delivered substantial
results and brings an entrepreneurial spirit with proven
experience in managing growth, driving operational improvements,
and successfully integrating acquisitions.
|
Our
strategy
Key elements of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expand our customer base and increase existing customer
penetration We intend to grow our customer base
by targeting three market segments: large healthcare providers
still using in-house services, large healthcare providers
currently using competing outsourced alternatives, and
small-to-medium medical practices. Given our market leadership,
strong solution offerings, and low cost structure, we believe we
are well positioned to both replace in-house solutions as well
as displace competing outsourced alternatives for large
healthcare providers. For small-to-medium sized physician
practices, we offer an easy-to-use web-based clinical
documentation platform, CBayScribe, to expand our market share
in this segment, which we believe to be underpenetrated. In
order to increase penetration within our existing customer base,
we intend to continue targeting additional healthcare clinical
areas and facilities of our current customers. Additionally, as
healthcare providers centralize their purchasing decisions, we
believe that our ability to deliver outstanding services for
large, complex requirements provides us with increasing access
to new sales opportunities within our existing customer base and
through existing customer relationships.
|
|
n
|
Continue to develop and enhance our integrated
solutions We seek to differentiate our
integrated solutions through sophisticated technology and
process improvement. We have over 100 employees dedicated
to research and development. Over the last year, we launched
numerous enhancements, including a front end speech platform for
general medicine, additional EHR system integration, and
advanced performance monitoring.
|
|
n
|
Enhance profitability through technical and operational
expertise We have made significant improvements
in productivity through business process and infrastructure
improvements. Notwithstanding reductions in customer pricing,
our gross margins have expanded from 33.8% in the fourth quarter
of 2008, our first fiscal quarter after we acquired MedQuist
Inc., to 38.5% in the third quarter of 2010, and our
Adjusted EBITDA margins have expanded from 9.5% to 21.4% for the
same periods. Our management team has proven its ability to
implement continuous process improvements and we intend to
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
further increase offshore production and our use of
technological automation, including ASR, to lower costs and
enhance our profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Facilitate the adoption and promote meaningful use of EHR
systems Our integrated solutions provide a
comprehensive, accurate and effective method to incorporate
physician narrative into an EHR system. We interface with
substantially all of the leading EHR vendors to integrate our
clinical documentation solutions and to help our customers
realize the full potential of their EHR systems through the use
of the physician narrative. In our experience, when EHR is
adopted, customers tend to consolidate their purchase decisions,
which benefits us as a leading provider of clinical
documentation solutions.
|
|
n
|
Pursue strategic acquisitions We believe that
there are significant opportunities available to create value
through strategic acquisitions. We intend to seek appropriate
opportunities to grow our customer base, enhance our solutions,
consolidate costs, and expand our value proposition to our
customers.
|
Risks associated
with our business
Our business is subject to a number of risks which you should be
aware of before making an investment decision. Those risks are
discussed more fully in Risk Factors beginning on
page 16. For example:
|
|
|
|
n
|
We compete with many others in the market for clinical
documentation solutions which may result in lower prices for our
services, reduced operating margins and an inability to maintain
or increase our market share.
|
|
n
|
Our business is dependent on the continued demand for
transcription services, and, if electronic health records
companies produce solutions acceptable to large hospital systems
for the creation of electronic clinical documentation, the
overall demand for medical transcription services could be
reduced.
|
|
n
|
Our ability to sustain and grow profitable operations is
dependent on the willingness of new customers to outsource and
adopt new technology platforms, as well as our ability to retain
customers.
|
|
n
|
Our success will depend on our ability to support existing
technologies, as well as adopt and integrate new technology into
our workflow platforms.
|
Our
history
We began operation in 1998 with the goal of providing
high-quality outsourced clinical documentation solutions to
U.S. healthcare providers at a low cost. We combined
U.S. sales, marketing, and customer service with offshore
operations, primarily in India, and have grown our scale through
strategic acquisitions.
Acquisitions
MedQuist
Inc.
In August 2008, an affiliate of S.A.C. Private Capital Group,
LLC, or SAC PCG, invested $124.0 million to acquire a
majority interest in us. Concurrent with this investment, we
acquired a 69.5% interest in MedQuist Inc., or the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition. At the time of the acquisition, MedQuist Inc. was
the largest U.S. medical transcription service provider by
revenue, but had been adversely impacted by inefficient
operations, litigation and customer disputes. Net revenues for
MedQuist Inc. had fallen from $483.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002 to $340.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
We believed that MedQuist Inc., despite its operational
challenges and substantial overhead, had strong underlying
technology, deep healthcare domain expertise, and a long-tenured
customer base. Following our acquisition of MedQuist Inc., we
embarked upon a strategy to enhance the management team,
streamline operations, improve relationships with customers,
leverage our offshore resources, increase the utilization of ASR
technology, and resolve all outstanding litigation. This
strategy resulted in a stabilization of volume trends starting
in the second quarter of 2009. The following table shows the
percentage change in MedQuist Inc.s volume for
4
the nine quarters ended March 31, 2010, the last quarter
prior to our acquisition of Spheris, or the Spheris Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Prior to the MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Volume % Change over Previous Year
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Spheris
In April 2010, we acquired certain assets, principally customer
contracts, from Spheris in a transaction conducted under
Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. Spheris was the second
largest U.S. medical transcription service provider by
revenue at the time. Spheris had experienced declines in volumes
from customer attrition, which we believed was attributable to
quality issues and underinvestment in product development caused
by financial constraints leading up to its bankruptcy. Some
volume declines continued after the date of the Spheris
Acquisition as the result of notices of termination given prior
to that date. The following table shows the percentage change in
Spheris volume for the nine quarters ended March 31,
2010, the last quarter prior to the Spheris Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Volume % Change over Previous Year
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We considered the negative volume trend for Spheris in our
acquisition valuation. Net revenues for Spheris were
$156.6 million and $35.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the three months ended March 31,
2010, respectively. Customers who submitted notices of
termination prior to the acquisition generated revenues of
$24.6 million and $1.7 million during the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the three months ended
March 31, 2010, respectively. Therefore, net revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and the three months ended
March 31, 2010, less revenues attributable to customers who
submitted notices of termination prior to the Spheris
Acquisition, were $132.0 million and $33.5 million,
respectively.
Our Spheris integration efforts have focused on merging the new
customer base acquired, integrating systems and eliminating cost
redundancies. We expect the measures we have implemented since
the Spheris Acquisition to yield $7.0 million of cost
savings in the fourth quarter of 2010, representing an
annualized impact of $28.0 million. Our results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflect
$4.9 million of such cost savings. We expect that the
integration of Spheris will be fully completed by the first half
of 2011.
Pricing
We base our pricing on various factors, principally, market
forces, the extent to which we can utilize our offshore
production facilities, the extent to which customers utilize the
ASR technology available in our solutions, the scope of services
provided and turn-around times requested by a particular
customer. We work with our customers to evaluate how different
solutions affect pricing and to determine an optimal mix of
service level and price for that customer. Higher utilization of
offshore production and ASR leads to lower costs for us, which
permits us to offer better pricing to our customers while at the
same time contributing to margin growth. We have successfully
migrated a significant portion of MedQuist Inc.s volume
offshore and we will continue these efforts in relation to our
combined businesses.
5
Recent
developments
Recapitalization
transactions
On October 14, 2010, MedQuist Inc. incurred
$85.0 million of indebtedness through the issuance of
13% senior subordinated notes due 2016, or the Senior
Subordinated Notes, under a note purchase agreement, or the Note
Purchase Agreement, and incurred $200.0 million of
indebtedness under a term loan, or the Term Loan, under a
$225.0 million credit facility, or the Senior Secured
Credit Facility. We are a guarantor of both the Senior
Subordinated Notes and the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
MedQuist Inc. used the proceeds to repay $80.0 million of
indebtedness under its prior credit facility, or the Acquisition
Credit Facility, to repay $13.6 million of indebtedness
under a subordinated promissory note, or the Acquisition
Subordinated Promissory Notes, each issued in connection with
the Spheris Acquisition, and to pay a $176.5 million
special dividend to its stockholders. We received
$122.6 million of this special dividend and used
$104.1 million to extinguish our 6% Convertible Notes
issued to Royal Philips Electronics, in connection with the
MedQuist Inc. Acquisition and $3.7 million to extinguish
certain other lines of credit. We refer to these transactions as
the Recapitalization Transactions.
Exchange
transactions
Certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling stockholders
entered into an exchange agreement with us, the Exchange
Agreement, whereby we agreed to issue 4.8 million shares of
our common stock in exchange for their
4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. We
refer to this transaction as the Private Exchange. The Private
Exchange is contingent upon, among other conditions, our
completion of this offering and listing our shares on The NASDAQ
Global Market and would increase our ownership in MedQuist Inc.
from 69.5% to 82.2%.
On October 18, 2010, we filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or the SEC, a registration statement on
Form S-4
in order to offer those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc.
stockholders who did not participate in the Private Exchange
shares of our common stock in exchange for their MedQuist Inc.
shares. We refer to that offer as the Registered Exchange Offer.
Assuming the Private Exchange is consummated, a full exchange in
the Registered Exchange Offer would increase our ownership in
MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to 100.0%. We can give no assurance
regarding the level of participation in the Registered Exchange
Offer.
For a more detailed description of the Recapitalization
Transactions, the Private Exchange and the Registered Exchange
Offer, collectively with the common stock offered hereby, the
Corporate Reorganization, see Corporate
Reorganization.
Sale of A-Life
Investment
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we sold
our approximately 32% interest in A-Life Medical, Inc., or
A-Life, an equity method investment. The consideration to us for
the sale of our A-Life investment was $23.6 million, of
which $19.5 million was paid to us in cash and
$4.1 million was paid into escrow, to be released in March
2012, subject to the satisfaction of indemnification obligations
under the related merger agreement. Our presentation of Adjusted
EBITDA contained herein does not include earnings attributable
to our investment in A-Life. See Summary Historical and
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data.
Sale of
PFS
On December 31, 2010, we completed the sale of our
non-strategic Patient Financial Services, or PFS, business. The
consideration to us was $14.8 million, of which
$13.5 million was paid to us in cash and the balance was in
the form of a note. Our unaudited pro forma condensed financial
information contained herein gives effect to the
reclassification of the PFS business into discontinued
operations. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Information.
6
Preliminary
Unaudited Results for the three months ended December 31,
2010
The following information is based on our preliminary unaudited
results for the three months ended December 31, 2010. This
information is derived from preliminary internal financial
reports and is subject to revision based on the completion of
the year-end accounting and financial reporting processes
necessary to finalize our consolidated financial statements as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. We cannot
assure you that, upon completion of the audit of our
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2010, we will not report results materially
different than those set forth below. We do not expect to file
our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2010 with the SEC until after this
offering is completed.
We currently estimate that for the three months ended
December 31, 2010, our net revenues were approximately
$110.5 million, our income from continuing operations
before income taxes and noncontrolling interests was
approximately $3.7 million and our Adjusted EBITDA was
approximately $27.6 million. Our estimate for Adjusted
EBITDA is based on our estimates for income from continuing
operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests of
approximately $3.7 million, plus interest expense, net of
approximately $7.3 million, depreciation and amortization
of approximately $8.9 million (including approximately
$3.9 million of amortization related to acquired
intangibles), cost of legal proceedings and settlements of
approximately $800,000, acquisition-related charges of
approximately $500,000, restructuring charges of approximately
$1.8 million, the loss on early extinguishment of debt of
approximately $13.5 million and less equity in income of
affiliated companies (principally the gain on the sale of
A-Life) of $8.9 million. See page 16 in Summary
Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Data for a description of Adjusted EBITDA. Cash taxes paid
during the three months ended December 31, 2010 were
approximately $300,000. As of December 31, 2010 we had
approximately $66.8 million of cash and approximately
$294.5 million of total debt outstanding. On
January 3, 2011, we made a $25.0 million cash payment,
of which $20 million was an optional payment, to reduce the
principal amount of our outstanding Term Loan.
Net revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2010
increased approximately $24.7 million, or approximately
28.8%, to approximately $110.5 million, compared with
$85.8 million for the three months ended December 31,
2009 (excluding for both periods the revenues associated with
the PFS business, which was sold in December 2010). The Spheris
Acquisition contributed approximately $29.9 million in
incremental revenue for the three months ended December 31,
2010, which was partially offset by a decrease in legacy
maintenance service revenues and lower average pricing realized
for our transcription services.
Our income from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interests was approximately $3.7 million and
$2.6 million for the three months ended December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Our income from continuing
operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests for
the three months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to
December 31, 2009 reflects an increase in operating income
of approximately $10.4 million and an increase in equity in
income of affiliated companies of approximately
$8.9 million, representing primarily the gain on the sale
of A-Life during the 2010 quarter. These increases were offset
by higher interest expense, net of approximately
$5.1 million during the 2010 quarter, as compared to 2009,
reflecting higher borrowing levels during the 2010 quarter and
the loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately
$13.5 million during the 2010 quarter. Amounts for both
periods exclude amounts attributable to the PFS business.
The improvement in gross profit and operating income during the
three months ended December 31, 2010 was attributable to
cost reductions associated with increased utilization of ASR and
increased offshore production, as well as overhead savings
realized as a result of the Spheris integration efforts. Our use
of ASR increased to approximately 71% of volume during the three
months ended December 31, 2010 compared with approximately
53% of volume in the three months ended December 31, 2009.
Additionally, our expanding footprint in India enabled us to
increase our offshore production to approximately 42% of volume
for the three months ended December 31, 2010 compared with
39% of volume for the three months ended December 31, 2009.
The cost savings and synergies resulting from the Spheris
Acquisition contributed approximately $7 million of cost
savings for the three months ended December 31, 2010.
Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended December 31,
2010 increased approximately $10.9 million, or
approximately 65%, to approximately $27.6 million, compared
with $16.7 million for the three months ended
7
December 31, 2009. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net
revenues increased to 25.0% for the three months ended
December 31, 2010, compared with 19.3% for the three months
ended December 31, 2009. The improvement in Adjusted EBITDA
was attributable to the factors described above.
Corporate
information
Our principal executive offices are located at 9009 Carothers
Parkway, Franklin, TN 37067. The telephone number of our
principal executive offices is (615) 261-1740.
8
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
3,000,000 shares |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
1,500,000 shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering
(1) |
|
50,947,467 shares |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to 675,000 additional shares. |
Use of
proceeds
Our net proceeds from this offering, after deducting the
underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses,
are expected to be approximately $15.0 million. We intend
to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital
and other general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion
of the net proceeds for the acquisition of complementary
companies or businesses, although we currently do not have any
acquisition or investment planned. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
Dividend
policy
We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, for use
in the operation and expansion of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Payments of future dividends, if any, will be at the sole
discretion of our board of directors after taking into account
various factors, including our business, operating results and
financial condition, current and anticipated cash needs, plans
for expansion and any legal or contractual limitations on our
ability to pay dividends. Our ability to pay dividends on our
common stock is limited by the covenants of the agreements
governing our indebtedness and may be further restricted by the
terms of any future debt or preferred securities.
The NASDAQ Global
Market listing
Our common stock has been approved for listing on The NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
Assumptions in
this prospectus
Unless we indicate otherwise, all information in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
n
|
assumes our redomiciliation under the laws of the state of
Delaware and gives effect to the conversion;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
assumes consummation of the Private Exchange based on an
exchange ratio of one share of our common stock for each
MedQuist Inc. share of common stock;
|
|
n
|
assumes a full exchange in the Registered Exchange
Offer; and
|
|
n
|
assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment
option;
|
(1) The
number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after this
offering consists of (i) 3.0 million shares issued by
us in this offering; (ii) 35.2 million shares held by
our existing stockholders, (iii) 4.8 million shares of
common stock to be issued in the Private Exchange, (iv)
6.7 million shares of our common stock to be issued in the
Registered Exchange Offer, assuming a full exchange, and
(v) 1.3 million shares of our common stock
issuable pursuant to an agreement, or the Consulting Services
Agreement, we entered into at the time of the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition, and excludes (i) approximately
3.5 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance
under our equity incentive plans, of which options to purchase
approximately 2.7 million shares with a weighted average
exercise price of $5.66 were outstanding as of
September 30, 2010 and (ii) 81,488 shares of our
common stock issuable pursuant to a warrant agreement,
exercisable at a price of £3.15 per share, between us
and Oosterveld International BV, dated March 19, 2009. See
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.
9
Summary
Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Data
The following table sets forth our summary historical
consolidated financial data for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and as of
September 30, 2010 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010. The summary historical
consolidated financial data for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The summary historical consolidated financial
data as of September 30, 2010 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 have been derived from our
unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. We prepared the unaudited historical
information on a basis consistent with that used in preparing
our audited consolidated financial statements, which reflect all
adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments,
that we consider necessary to present fairly our financial
position and results of operations for the unaudited periods.
Our summary historical consolidated statements of operations and
other operating data reflect the consolidation of the results of
operations of MedQuist Inc. since August 6, 2008 and
Spheris since April 22, 2010, the respective dates of their
acquisition. Our summary historical consolidated statements of
operations and other operating data do not give effect to the
reclassification for discontinued operations for the sale of our
PFS business, which was sold on December 31, 2010.
The summary consolidated financial data also sets forth our
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and our unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
2010. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations and the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet have been derived from the historical consolidated
financial information of us and Spheris, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations and the unaudited pro forma
consolidated balance sheet give effect to the reclassification
for discontinued operations. See Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Consolidated Financial Information
Discontinued Operations.
The pro forma combined statements of operations and other
operating data for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 give effect to the
following transactions as if they had occurred on
January 1, 2009:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the Spheris Acquisition and the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of
$113.6 million of debt to finance the Spheris Acquisition;
|
|
n
|
the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of $285.0 million of
indebtedness under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and Senior
Subordinated Notes, the simultaneous repayment of
$80.0 million of indebtedness under the Acquisition Credit
Facility, the repayment of $13.6 million of indebtedness
under the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Notes, the payment
of a $176.5 million special dividend to MedQuist
Inc.s stockholders, of which we received
$122.6 million and the noncontrolling stockholders of
MedQuist Inc. received $53.9 million, and the repayment by
us, using the proceeds of such dividend of $104.1 million
to extinguish our 6% Convertible Notes including a
$7.7 million premium on early prepayment, and
$3.7 million under certain other lines of credit;
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 4.8 million shares of our common stock
in exchange for 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement
with certain noncontrolling stockholders of MedQuist Inc., which
will increase our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%;
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 1.3 million shares of our common stock
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement; and
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 6.7 million shares of our common stock to
be issued in exchange for 6.7 million shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock in the Registered Exchange Offer, assuming a
full exchange. This would increase our ownership in MedQuist
Inc. from 82.2% to 100%.
|
10
The pro forma combined statements of operations and other
operating data for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 do not give effect to
the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact on net revenues from volume declines resulting from
Spheris customer terminations prior to the Spheris Acquisition.
The pro forma net revenues for the year ended December 31,
2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
include $24.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively,
of net revenues associated with such terminations; and
|
|
n
|
the full impact on Adjusted EBITDA of cost savings and synergies
resulting from the Spheris Acquisition, which we have
implemented since the Spheris Acquisition and expect to yield
$7.0 million of cost savings in the fourth quarter of 2010,
representing an annualized benefit of $28.0 million. Our
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
reflect $4.9 million of such cost savings.
|
The pro forma balance sheet data as of September 30, 2010
gives effect to the Recapitalization Transactions, the Private
Exchange, the Registered Exchange Offer, the reclassification
for discontinued operations and the shares of our common stock
issuable pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement, as if
they occurred as of September 30, 2010.
The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2010 also gives effect to the issuance of
3.0 million shares of common stock in this offering at the
initial public offering price of $8.00 per share, after
deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us as if such transaction
occurred as of September 30, 2010.
Our historical consolidated financial information has been
adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the Spheris Acquisition, the
Corporate Reorganization, the shares of our common stock
issuable pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement
(2) factually supportable and (3) with respect to the
statements of operations, expected to have a continuing impact
on the combined results. The pro forma information does not
reflect revenue opportunities and cost savings that may be
realized after the Spheris Acquisition. The pro forma financial
information also does not reflect expenses related to
integration activity that may be incurred by us in connection
with the Spheris Acquisition.
The pro forma data is based upon available information and
certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The pro
forma data is for informational purposes only and does not
purport to represent what our results of operations or financial
position actually would have been if such events had occurred on
the dates specified above and does not purport to project the
results of operations or financial position for any future
period or date. The pro forma data should be read in conjunction
with our historical consolidated financial statements, and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus as adjusted
for the acquisition of Spheris using the acquisition method of
accounting.
You should read the following summary financial and other data
together with our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this prospectus and the information
under the sections entitled Capitalization,
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information, Selected Consolidated Financial and
Other Data and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
57,694
|
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
$
|
371,768
|
|
|
$
|
281,828
|
|
|
$
|
316,977
|
|
|
$
|
510,528
|
|
|
$
|
350,163
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
30,209
|
|
|
|
125,074
|
|
|
|
239,549
|
|
|
|
182,924
|
|
|
|
200,234
|
|
|
|
338,760
|
|
|
|
226,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27,485
|
|
|
|
68,599
|
|
|
|
132,219
|
|
|
|
98,904
|
|
|
|
116,743
|
|
|
|
171,768
|
|
|
|
123,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
25,137
|
|
|
|
51,243
|
|
|
|
60,632
|
|
|
|
46,594
|
|
|
|
49,374
|
|
|
|
72,182
|
|
|
|
51,828
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
7,235
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
9,137
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
|
|
39,126
|
|
|
|
27,587
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
178,637
|
|
|
|
116,129
|
|
|
|
88,179
|
|
|
|
94,327
|
|
|
|
140,603
|
|
|
|
93,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(110,038
|
)
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
|
|
10,725
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
31,165
|
|
|
|
30,685
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,108
|
)
|
|
|
(3,954
|
)
|
|
|
(9,132
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
(31,490
|
)
|
|
|
(24,238
|
)
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
|
|
(113,917
|
)
|
|
|
8,902
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
11,590
|
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
7,605
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued Patient Financial Services
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
426
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
8,054
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
$
|
8,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
|
|
47,482
|
|
|
|
47,873
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
|
|
47,482
|
|
|
|
48,683
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (1)(2)
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
|
$
|
59,687
|
|
|
$
|
42,991
|
|
|
$
|
57,855
|
|
|
$
|
91,074
|
|
|
$
|
63,480
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See below for reconciliations of
net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA does not include earnings
attributable to our investment in A-Life, which was sold in
October 2010.
|
(2)
|
Pro forma amounts do not give
effect to (i) the impact on net revenues from volume declines,
resulting from pre-acquisition customer terminations at Spheris,
of $24.6 million and $2.4 million in net revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and (ii) the full impact
of cost savings and synergies resulting from the Spheris
Acquisition, which we have implemented since the Spheris
Acquisition and expect to yield $7.0 million of cost
savings in the fourth quarter of 2010, representing an
annualized benefit of $28.0 million. Our results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflect $4.9 million
of such cost savings. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Financial Information.
|
The following table sets forth certain historical financial and
operating data for us, MedQuist Inc. and Spheris.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated (1)(2)
|
|
$
|
57,694
|
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
$
|
371,768
|
|
|
$
|
281,828
|
|
|
$
|
316,977
|
|
|
$
|
510,528
|
|
|
$
|
350,163
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
340,342
|
|
|
|
326,853
|
|
|
|
307,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
200,392
|
|
|
|
182,843
|
|
|
|
156,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated (1)
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
|
$
|
59,687
|
|
|
$
|
42,991
|
|
|
$
|
57,855
|
|
|
$
|
91,074
|
|
|
$
|
63,480
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
3,480
|
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
55,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
28,227
|
|
|
|
26,317
|
|
|
|
30,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Pro forma amounts do not give
effect to (i) the impact on net revenues from volume declines,
resulting from pre-acquisition customer terminations at Spheris,
of $24.6 million and $2.4 million in net revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and (ii) the full impact
of cost savings and synergies resulting from the Spheris
Acquisition, which we have implemented since the Spheris
Acquisition and expect to yield $7.0 million of cost
savings in the fourth quarter of 2010, representing an
annualized benefit of $28.0 million. Our results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflect $4.9 million
of such cost savings. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Financial Information.
|
(2)
|
Includes revenues of the PFS
business, which was sold on December 31, 2010. PFS business
contributed revenues of $15.5 million, $22.3 million
and $17.8 million for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009 respectively, and $13.7 million and
$10.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2010, respectively.
|
(3)
|
See below for reconciliations of
net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA does not include earnings
attributable to our investment in A-Life, which was sold in
October 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents (a)
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
|
$
|
35,253
|
|
|
$
|
50,273
|
|
Working
capital (b)
|
|
|
11,618
|
|
|
|
26,450
|
|
|
|
26,450
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
379,304
|
|
|
|
397,882
|
|
|
|
412,902
|
|
Long term debt, including current portion of debt
|
|
|
204,172
|
|
|
|
294,848
|
|
|
|
294,848
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
|
31,132
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Pro forma as adjusted amount gives
effect to $2.5 million of a total $5.0 million payment
to SAC PCG in connection with the Corporate Reorganization and
does not reflect $19.5 million in proceeds received from
the sale of our investment in A-Life in October 2010 and
$13.5 million in proceeds received from the sale of the PFS
business in December 2010 and does not reflect our
$25.0 million repayment of a portion of our Term loan
borrowings in January 2011.
|
(b)
|
Working capital is defined as total
current assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, minus total
current liabilities, excluding current portion of debt.
|
13
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
$
|
8,065
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
5,291
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Income tax provision
(benefit) (a)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
9,132
|
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
|
12,031
|
|
|
|
31,490
|
|
|
|
24,238
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization(b)
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
|
|
39,126
|
|
|
|
27,587
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Acquisition-related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(2,534
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Receivable write-offs, asset impairment charges, severance
charges and accrual
reversals (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
PFS
business (d)
|
|
|
(1,721
|
)
|
|
|
(1,972
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (e)
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
|
$
|
59,687
|
|
|
$
|
42,991
|
|
|
$
|
57,855
|
|
|
$
|
91,074
|
|
|
$
|
63,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
We had $130.0 million of
federal net operating loss carry forwards as of
December 31, 2009 and will record approximately
$30.0 million of annual tax amortization related to
intangible assets, including goodwill, that will reduce future
taxable income. Due to the existence of federal net operating
loss carry forwards and the impact of tax amortization related
to intangible assets, including goodwill, cash taxes paid were
$84,000, $160,000, $796,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$667,000 and $30,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
|
(b)
|
Includes amortization of acquired
intangibles of $698,000, $7.1 million, $12.8 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, $9.8 million and $11.7 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively
and $19.2 million and $16.5 million on a pro forma
basis for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
|
(c)
|
Includes the write-off of amounts
due from an unconsolidated affiliate of Spheris, an impairment
charge to write-off the balance of an investment and the
reversal of certain accruals, related to litigation claims, as a
result of the expiration of the applicable statute of
limitations.
|
(d)
|
Includes the effect of the PFS
business, which was sold on December 31, 2010.
|
(e)
|
Pro forma amounts do not give
effect to (i) the impact on net revenues from volume declines,
resulting from pre-acquisition customer terminations at Spheris
prior to the Spheris Acquisition, of $24.6 million and
$2.4 million in net revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and (ii) the full impact
of cost savings and synergies resulting from the Spheris
Acquisition, which we have implemented since the Spheris
Acquisition and expect to yield $7.0 million of cost
savings in the fourth quarter of 2010, representing an
annualized benefit of $28.0 million. Our results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflect $4.9 million
of such cost savings. Adjusted EBITDA does not include earnings
attributable to our investment in A-Life, which was sold in
October 2010.
|
14
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for MedQuist Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68,795
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
(16,513
|
)
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(8,366
|
)
|
|
|
(2,438
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
Acquisition-related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements, net
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
19,738
|
|
|
|
14,843
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated
companies (a)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
(2,015
|
)
|
Other income and accrual
reversals (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|
|
(2,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
3,480
|
|
|
$
|
32,337
|
|
|
$
|
55,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents proportionate share of
earnings from our equity method investment in A-Life, which was
sold in October 2010.
|
(b) |
|
Represents the reversal of certain
accruals relating to certain litigation claims as a result of
the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to
Adjusted EBITDA for Spheris:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(187,383
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
(14,571
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
21,171
|
|
|
|
19,104
|
|
|
|
17,439
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,273
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
Operational restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
Transaction charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
28,227
|
|
|
$
|
26,317
|
|
|
$
|
30,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Adjusted EBITDA is a metric used by management to measure
operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc., MedQuist Inc. or
Spheris, as applicable, plus net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests, income taxes, interest expense,
depreciation and amortization, cost of legal proceedings and
settlements, acquisition related charges, goodwill impairment
charge, restructuring charges, equity in income (loss) of
affiliated company, asset impairment charges, severance costs,
certain unusual or nonrecurring items and the effect of our PFS
business. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental
performance measure because we believe it facilitates operating
performance comparisons from period to period and company to
company by backing out the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential differences caused by variations in capital structures
(affecting interest expense, net), tax positions (such as the
impact on periods or companies for changes in effective tax
rates), the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting
depreciation expense);
|
|
n
|
the impact of non-cash charges, such as goodwill impairment
charges and asset impairment charges; and
|
|
n
|
the impact of unusual expenses or events, such as acquisition
related charges, restructuring charges, severance costs and
certain unusual or nonrecurring items.
|
Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of
operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use
Adjusted EBITDA in measuring our performance relative to that of
our competitors. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our
financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to net income, operating income or any other
performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an
alternative to cash flow from operating activities as measures
of our profitability or liquidity. We understand that although
Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts,
lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, Adjusted
EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not
consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our
results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
n
|
although depreciation is a non-cash charge, the assets being
depreciated will often have to be replaced in the future, and
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and
|
|
n
|
other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA
differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
16
Risk
Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as
well as other information in this prospectus, before deciding
whether to invest in shares of our common stock. The occurrence
of any of the following risks, or other risks that are currently
unknown or unforeseen by us, could harm our business, financial
condition, results of operations or growth prospects. In that
case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and
you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks related to
our business
We compete
with many others in the market for clinical documentation
solutions which may result in lower prices for our services,
reduced operating margins and an inability to maintain or
increase our market share.
We compete with other outsourced clinical documentation
solutions companies in a highly fragmented market that includes
national, regional and local service providers, as well as
service providers with global operations. These companies have
services that are similar to ours, and certain of these
companies have substantially larger or have significantly
greater financial resources than we do. We also compete with the
in-house medical transcription staffs of our customers and
potential customers. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to compete effectively against our competitors or timely
implement new products and services. Many of our competitors
attempt to differentiate themselves by offering lower priced
alternatives to our outsourced medical transcription services
and customers could elect to utilize less comprehensive
solutions than the ones we offer due to the lower costs of those
competitive products. Some competition may even be willing to
accept less profitable business in order to grow revenue.
Increased competition and cost pressures affecting the
healthcare markets in general may result in lower prices for our
services, reduced operating margins and the inability to
maintain or increase our market share.
Our business
is dependent upon the continued demand for transcription
services. If EHR companies produce alternatives to medical
transcription that reduce the need for transcription, the demand
for our solutions could be reduced.
EHR companies solutions for the collection of clinical
data typically require physicians to directly enter and organize
patient information through
point-and-click
templates which attempt to reduce or eliminate the need for
transcription. A second alternative to conventional
transcription involves a physician dictating a record of patient
encounters and receiving a speech-recognized draft of their
dictation, which the physician can self-edit. There is
significant uncertainty and risk as to the demand for, and
market acceptance of, these solutions for the creation of
electronic clinical documentation. In the event that these and
other solutions are successful and gain wide acceptance, the
demand for our solutions could be reduced and our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
Our growth is
dependent on the willingness of new customers to outsource and
adopt our technology platforms.
We plan to grow, in part, by capitalizing on perceived market
opportunities to provide our services to new customers. These
new customers must be willing to outsource functions which may
otherwise have been performed within their organizations, adopt
new technologies and incur the time and expense needed to
integrate those technologies into their existing systems. For
example, the up-front cost and time involved in changing medical
transcription providers or in converting from an in-house
medical transcription department to an outsourced provider may
be significant. Many customers may prefer to remain with their
current provider or keep their transcription in-house rather
than invest the time and resources required for the
implementation of a new system. Also, as the maintenance of
accurate medical records is a critical element of a healthcare
providers ability to deliver quality care to its patients
and to receive proper and timely reimbursement for the services
it renders, potential customers may be reluctant to outsource or
change providers of such an important function.
17
Our success
will depend on our ability to support existing technologies as
well as to adopt and integrate new technology into our workflow
platforms.
Our ability to remain competitive in the clinical documentation
industry is based, in part, on our ability to develop, utilize
and support technology in the services and solutions that we
provide to our customers. As our customers advance
technologically, we must be able to effectively integrate our
solutions with their systems and provide advanced data
collection technology. We also may need to develop technologies
to provide service systems comparable to those of our
competitors as they develop new technology. If we are unable to
effectively develop and integrate new technologies, we may not
be able to compete effectively with our competitors. In
addition, if the cost of developing and integrating new
technologies is high, we may not realize our expected return on
investment.
Technology
innovations in the markets that we serve may create alternatives
to our products and result in reduced sales.
Technology innovations to which our current and potential
customers might have access could reduce or eliminate their need
for our products. A new or other disruptive technology that
reduces or eliminates the use of one or more of our products
could negatively impact the sale of these products. Our failure
to develop, introduce or enhance products able to compete with
new technologies in a timely manner could have an adverse effect
on our business, results of operation and financial condition.
Many of our
customer contracts are terminable at will by our customers, and
our ability to sustain and grow profitable operations is
dependent upon the ability to retain customers.
Many of our contracts can be terminated at will by our
customers. If a significant number of our customers were to
cancel or materially change their commitments with us, we could
have significantly decreased revenue, which would harm our
business, operating results and financial condition. We must,
therefore, engage in continual operational support and sales
efforts to maintain revenue stability and future growth with
these customers. If a significant number of our customers
terminate or fail to renew their contracts with us, our business
could be negatively impacted if additional business is not
obtained to replace the business which was lost.
Customer retention is largely dependent on providing quality
service at competitive prices. Customer retention may be
impacted by events outside of our control, such as changes in
customer ownership, management, financial condition and
competitors sales efforts. If we experience a higher than
expected rate of customer attrition the resulting loss of
business could adversely affect results of operations and
financial condition.
Our
indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise
additional capital to fund our operations and limit our ability
to pursue our growth strategy or to react to changes in the
economy or our industry, and our debt obligations include
restrictive covenants which may restrict our operations or
otherwise adversely affect us.
After the consummation of the Corporate Reorganization, we will
have approximately $269.8 million of indebtedness
outstanding, consisting of $175.0 million of Term Loan debt
under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, $85.0 million of
Senior Subordinated Notes and other indebtedness consisting of
capital leases and borrowings under other credit facilities, and
we may incur additional indebtedness in the future. For the
years 2010 through 2014, assuming no change in our indebtedness
following this offering, we will have average, annual payment
obligations of approximately $20.0 million for the
principal amount of our indebtedness. Our net interest expense
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was $9.1 million and
$12.0 million, respectively. Our variable rate indebtedness
bears interest at LIBOR plus 5.50% with a LIBOR floor of 1.75%.
Because the LIBOR floor is currently in effect, a 1.25% increase
in LIBOR above current LIBOR levels would not increase our
effective interest rate. A 1.0% increase in the interest rate
above this floor would impact our interest expense by
approximately $2.0 million. This indebtedness could have
important negative consequences to our business, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
increasing the difficulty of our ability to make payments on our
outstanding debt;
|
18
|
|
|
|
n
|
increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry
conditions because our debt payment obligations may limit our
ability to use our cash to respond to or defend against changes
in the industry or the economy;
|
|
n
|
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations
to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our
indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash
flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future
business opportunities;
|
|
n
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements,
acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes;
|
|
n
|
limiting our ability to pursue our growth strategy; and
|
|
n
|
placing us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors who are
less leveraged and may be better able to use their cash flow to
fund competitive responses to changing industry, market or
economic conditions.
|
In addition, under our debt financing agreements, we must abide
by certain financial and other restrictive covenants that, among
other things, require us to maintain a minimum consolidated
interest coverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a
maximum consolidated senior leverage ratio. Upon a breach of any
of the covenants in our debt financing agreements, the lenders
could declare us to be in default and could further require any
outstanding borrowings to be immediately due and payable, and
terminate all commitments to extend further credit.
We are
dependent on third party speech recognition software
incorporated in certain of our technologies, and the inability
to maintain, support or enhance such third party software over
time could harm our business.
We license speech recognition software from third parties, both
of which are competitors, that we incorporate into several of
our key products and solutions. Our ability to continue to sell
and support these products and solutions depends on continued
support from these licensors. If we were to experience the loss
of one of these licenses, the portion of our business that
relies on this software would be adversely affected while we
transitioned it to the software provided under our other
license. If we were to experience the loss of both of these
licenses at any one time, our business would be adversely
affected until we identify, license and integrate, or develop
and integrate equivalent software, which we may be unable to do.
There can be no assurance that such third party licensors will
continue to invest the appropriate levels of resources in the
software to maintain and enhance the capabilities of the
software and if such third party licensors do not continue to
develop their products, the development of our solutions to meet
the requirements of our customers and potential customers could
be adversely affected.
Our use of
open source and third-party software could impose unanticipated
conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our
solutions.
We incorporate open source software into our workflow solutions
platforms and other software solutions. Open source software is
accessible, usable and modifiable by anyone, provided that users
and modifiers abide by certain licensing requirements. Under
certain conditions, the use of some open source code to create
derivative code may obligate us to make the resulting derivative
code available to others at no cost. The circumstances under
which our use of open source code would compel us to offer
derivative code at no cost are subject to varying judicial
interpretations, and we cannot guarantee that a court would not
require certain of our core technology be made available as open
source code. The use of such open source code may also
ultimately require us to take remedial action, such as replacing
certain code used in our products, paying a royalty to use some
open source code, making certain proprietary source code
available to others or discontinuing certain products, any of
which may divert resources away from our development efforts.
We may also find that we need to incorporate certain proprietary
third-party technologies, including software programs, into our
products in the future. Licenses to relevant third-party
technologies may not be available to us on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all. Therefore, we could face delays in
product releases until equivalent technology can be identified,
licensed or developed and integrated into our current products.
Such delays could materially adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
19
Our ability to
expand our business depends on our ability to effectively manage
our domestic and offshore production capacity, which we may not
be able to do.
Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to effectively
manage our domestic and offshore production capacity, including
our ability to attract and retain qualified MTs and MEs who can
provide accurate medical transcription. We must also effectively
manage our offshore transcription labor pool, which is currently
located in India. If the productivity of our Indian employees
does not outpace any increase in wages, our profits could
suffer. Because medical transcription is a skilled position in
which experience is valuable, we require that our MTs and MEs
have substantial experience or receive substantial training
before being hired. Competition may force us to increase the
compensation and benefits paid to our MTs and MEs, which could
reduce our operating margins and profitability.
If we fail to
comply with contractual obligations and applicable laws and
regulations governing the handling of patient identifiable
medical information, we could suffer material losses or be
adversely affected by exposure to material penalties and
liabilities.
As part of the operation of our business, our customers provide
us with certain patient identifiable medical information.
Although many regulatory and governmental requirements do not
directly apply to our operations, we and our hospital and other
healthcare provider customers must comply with a variety of
requirements related to the handling of patient information,
including laws and regulations protecting the privacy,
confidentiality and security of protected health information, or
PHI. Most of our customers are covered entities under the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA,
and, in many of our relationships, we function as a business
associate. The provisions of HIPAA, require our customers to
have business associate agreements with us under which we are
required to appropriately safeguard the PHI we create or receive
on their behalf. Further, we and our customers are required to
comply with HIPAA security regulations that require us and them
to implement certain administrative, physical and technical
safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and
availability of electronic PHI, or EPHI. We are required by
regulation and contract to protect the security of EPHI that we
create, receive, maintain or transmit for our customers
consistent with these regulations. To comply with our regulatory
and contractual obligations, we may have to reorganize processes
and invest in new technologies. We also are required to train
personnel regarding HIPAA requirements. If we, or any of our
MTs, MEs or subcontractors, are unable to maintain the privacy,
confidentiality and security of the PHI that is entrusted to us,
we and/or our customers could be subject to civil and criminal
fines and sanctions and we could be found to have breached our
contracts with our customers.
We are bound by business associate agreements with covered
entities that require us to use and disclose PHI in a manner
consistent with HIPAA in providing services to those covered
entities. The HITECH Act, which was enacted into law on
February 17, 2009 as part of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, or ARRA, enhances and strengthens the
HIPAA privacy and security standards and makes certain
provisions applicable to business associates of
covered entities. As of February 17, 2010, some provisions
of HIPAA apply directly to us. In addition, the HITECH Act
creates new security breach notification requirements. The
direct applicability of the new HIPAA Privacy and Security
provisions will require us to incur additional costs and may
restrict our business operations. In addition, these new
provisions will result in additional regulations and guidance
issued by the United States Department of Health and Human
Services and will be subject to interpretation by various courts
and other governmental authorities, thus creating potentially
complex compliance issues for us and our customers.
As of February 17, 2010, we are directly subject to
HIPAAs criminal and civil penalties for breaches of our
privacy and security obligations.
Security and
privacy breaches in our systems may damage customer relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures or perceived failures in
our security and privacy measures could have a material adverse
effect on our financial position and results of operations. If
we are unable to protect, or our customers perceive that we are
unable to protect, the security and privacy of our electronic
information, our growth could be materially adversely affected.
A security or privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
n
|
cause our customers to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
20
|
|
|
|
n
|
harm our reputation;
|
|
n
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
n
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
While we believe that we use proven applications designed for
data security and integrity to process electronic transactions,
there can be no assurance that our use of these applications
will be sufficient to address changing market conditions or the
security and privacy concerns of existing and potential
customers.
Our business
depends on the reliable and secure operation of our computer
hardware, software, Internet applications and data
centers.
A substantial portion of our business involves the transfer of
large amounts of data to and from our workflow platforms. These
workflow platforms, and their underlying technologies, are
designed to operate and to be accessible by our customers
24 hours a day, seven days a week. Network and information
systems, the Internet and other technologies are critical to our
business activities. We have periodically experienced short term
outages with our workflow platforms that have not significantly
disrupted our business. However, a long term outage could
adversely affect our ability to provide service to our customers.
We also perform data center
and/or
hosting services for certain customers, including the storage of
critical patient and administrative data. Failure of public
power and backup generators, impairment of telecommunications
lines, a concerted denial of service cyber attack,
damage (environmental, accidental, intentional or pandemic) to
the buildings, the equipment inside the buildings housing our
data centers, the customer data contained therein
and/or the
personnel trained to operate such facilities could cause a
disruption in operations and negatively impact customers who
depend on us for data center and system support services. Any
interruption in operations at our data centers
and/or
customer support facilities could damage our reputation, cause
us to lose existing clients, hurt our ability to obtain new
customers, result in revenue loss, create potential liabilities
for our customers and us and increase insurance and other
operating costs.
Recent and
proposed legislation and possible negative publicity may impede
our ability to utilize offshore production
capabilities.
Certain state laws that have recently been enacted and bills
introduced in recent sessions of the U.S. Congress seek to
restrict the transmission of personally identifiable information
regarding a U.S. resident to any foreign affiliate,
subcontractor or unaffiliated third party without adequate
privacy protections or without providing notice of the
transmission and an opportunity to opt out. Some of the
proposals would require patient consent. If enacted, these
proposed laws would impose liability on healthcare businesses
arising from the improper sharing or other misuse of personally
identifiable information. Some proposals would create a private
civil cause of action that would allow an injured party to
recover damages sustained as a result of a violation of the new
law. A number of states have also considered, or are in the
process of considering, prohibitions or limitations on the
disclosure of medical or other information to individuals or
entities located outside of the U.S. Further, as a result
of concerns regarding the possible misuse of personally
identifiable information, some of our customers have
contractually limited our ability to use MTs and MEs located
outside of the U.S. The effect of these proposals would be
to limit our ability to utilize our lower-cost offshore
production facilities for affected customers, which could
adversely affect our operating margins.
Any change in
legislation, regulation or market practices in the United States
affecting healthcare or healthcare insurance may materially
adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Over the past twenty years the U.S. healthcare industry has
experienced a variety of regulatory and market driven changes to
how it is operated and funded. Further changes, whether by
government policy shift, insurance company changes or otherwise,
may happen, and any such changes may adversely affect the
U.S. healthcare information and services market. As
business process outsourcing and off-shoring have
grown in recent years, concerns have also grown about the impact
of these phenomena on jobs in the United States. These concerns
could drive government policy in a way which is disadvantageous
to us. Further, if government regulation or market practices
leads to fewer individuals seeking medical treatment, we could
experience a decline in our processed volumes.
21
Our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected by the political and economic conditions in
India.
A significant portion of our operations is located in India.
Multiple factors relating to our Indian operations could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
changes in political, regulatory, legal or economic conditions;
|
|
n
|
governmental actions, such as restrictions on the transfer or
repatriation of funds and foreign investments;
|
|
n
|
civil disturbances, including terrorism or war;
|
|
n
|
political instability;
|
|
n
|
public health emergencies;
|
|
n
|
changes in employment practices and labor standards;
|
|
n
|
local business and cultural factors that differ from our
customary standards and practices; and
|
|
n
|
changes in tax laws.
|
In addition, the Indian economy may differ favorably or
unfavorably from other economies in several respects, including
the growth rate of GDP, the rate of inflation, resource
self-sufficiency and balance of payments position. The Indian
government has traditionally exercised and continues to exercise
a significant influence over many aspects of the Indian economy.
Further actions or changes in policy, including taxation, of the
Indian central government or the respective Indian state
governments could have a significant effect on the Indian
economy, which could adversely affect private sector companies,
market conditions and the success of our operations.
U.S. and Indian transfer pricing regulations require that
any international transactions involving associated enterprises
are undertaken at an arms length price. Applicable income
tax authorities review our tax returns and if they determine
that the transfer prices we have applied are not appropriate, we
may incur increased tax liabilities, including accrued interest
and penalties, which would cause our tax expense to increase,
possibly materially, thereby materially reducing our
profitability and cash flows. Indian tax authorities reviewed
our transfer pricing practices at Spheris India Pvt. Ltd. for
tax years ended March 2004 and 2005, prior to our ownership of
Spheris, and concluded that the transfer price was not at
arms length. They assessed additional taxes for these
years, which we have paid or fully reserved. However, we
continue to dispute this assessment and the matter is currently
under appeal.
We are exposed
to fluctuations of the value of the Indian rupee against the
U.S. dollar, which could adversely affect our
operations.
Although our accounts are prepared in U.S. dollars, much of our
operations are carried out in India with payments to staff and
suppliers made in Indian Rupees. The exchange rate between the
Indian Rupee and the U.S. dollar has changed substantially and
could fluctuate in the future. Movements in the rate of exchange
between the Indian Rupee and the U.S. dollar could result in
increases or decreases in our costs and earnings, and may also
affect the book value of our assets located outside the United
States and the amount of our equity.
We are highly
dependent on certain key personnel, and the loss of any or all
of these key personnel may have an adverse impact upon future
performance.
Our operations and future success are dependent upon the
existence and expertise in this sector of certain key personnel.
The loss of services of any of these individuals for any reason
or our inability to attract suitable replacements would have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition of our
business and operations.
We have grown,
and may continue to grow, through acquisitions, which could
dilute existing stockholders and could involve substantial
integration risks.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. We may issue equity securities for future
acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
22
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of the acquisition.
We may also incur additional debt in connection with future
acquisitions, which may place additional restrictions on the
ability to operate the business. Furthermore, prior acquisitions
have required substantial integration and management efforts.
Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
difficulty in integrating the operations and personnel of the
acquired businesses, including different and complex accounting
and financial reporting systems;
|
|
n
|
potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
n
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of finance and accounting
systems;
|
|
n
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
products and technology;
|
|
n
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
n
|
management of geographically remote offices and operations;
|
|
n
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
n
|
customers delaying purchases or seeking concessions pending
resolution of integration between existing and newly acquired
services or technology platforms;
|
|
n
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which management has
limited experience; and
|
|
n
|
potential loss of customers or key employees of the acquired
company.
|
As a result of these and other risks, we may not realize
anticipated benefits from acquisitions. Any failure to achieve
these benefits or failure to successfully integrate acquired
businesses and technologies could materially and adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
We will be
subject to additional regulatory compliance requirements,
including section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
a result of this offering. If we fail to maintain an effective
system of internal controls, our reputation and our business
could be harmed.
As a U.S. public company, our ongoing compliance with various
rules and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
will increase our legal and finance compliance costs and will
make some activities more time-consuming and costly. These rules
and requirements may be modified, supplemented or amended from
time to time. Implementing these changes may take a significant
amount of time and may require specific compliance training of
our personnel. For example, Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that our management report on, and
our independent auditors attest to, the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting in our annual reports
filed with the SEC. Section 404 compliance may divert
internal resources and will take a significant amount of time
and effort to complete. We may not be able to successfully
complete the procedures and certification and attestation
requirements of Section 404 by the time we will be required
to do so. If we fail to do so, or if in the future our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or independent
registered public accounting firm determines that our internal
controls over financial reporting are not effective as defined
under Section 404, we could be subject to sanctions or
investigations by The NASDAQ Global Market, the SEC, or other
regulatory authorities. As a result, investor perceptions of our
company may suffer, and this could cause a decline in the market
price of our common stock. Irrespective of compliance with these
rules and regulations, including the requirements under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, any failure of our internal controls could
have a material adverse effect on our stated results of
operations and harm our business and reputation. If we are
unable to implement these changes effectively or efficiently, it
could harm our operations, financial reporting or financial
results and could result in an adverse opinion on internal
controls from our independent auditors.
The historical
and unaudited pro forma financial information included elsewhere
in this prospectus may not be representative of our results as a
combined company after the Spheris Acquisition, and accordingly,
you have limited financial information on which to evaluate the
combined company and your investment decision.
We and Spheris operated as separate companies prior to the
Spheris Acquisition. We have had no prior history as a combined
company and our operations have not previously been managed on a
combined basis. The pro forma
23
financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus,
which was prepared in accordance with Article 11 of the
SECs
Regulation S-X,
is presented for informational purposes only and is not
necessarily indicative of the financial position or results of
operations that would have actually occurred had the Spheris
Acquisition been completed at or as of the dates indicated, nor
is it indicative of the future operating results or financial
position of the combined company. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined consolidated statement of operations does not
reflect future events that may occur after the Spheris
Acquisition, including the potential realization of operating
cost savings (synergies) or restructuring activities or other
costs related to the planned integration of Spheris, and do not
consider potential impacts of current market conditions on
revenues, expense efficiencies or asset dispositions. The pro
forma financial information presented in this prospectus is
based in part on certain assumptions regarding the Spheris
Acquisition that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances. We cannot assure you that our assumptions will
prove to be accurate over time.
Our ability to
use our net operating loss carryforwards may be
limited.
As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately
$130.0 million of federal net operating loss, or NOL,
carryforwards to offset future taxable income, which will begin
to expire in 2026 if not utilized, and approximately
$250.0 million of state NOLs. Under the relevant federal
and state tax provisions currently in effect, certain
substantial cumulative changes in our ownership may further
limit the amount of NOL carryforwards that can be utilized
annually in the future to offset taxable income.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or the Code, imposes limitations on a companys
ability to use NOL carryforwards if such company experiences a
more-than-50-percent ownership change, or an ownership change,
over a three-year testing period. We believe that, as a result
of this offering or as a result of future issuances of capital
stock, it is possible that such an ownership change may occur.
Although we do not currently anticipate a significant limitation
as a result of an ownership change in connection with this
offering, if we experience an ownership change in connection
with or subsequent to this offering, our ability to use our
United States federal NOL carryforwards in any future periods
may be restricted. If we are limited in our ability to use our
NOL carryforwards, we will pay more taxes than if we were able
to utilize such NOL carryforwards fully. As a result, any
inability to use our NOL carryforwards could adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
We may not own
100% of the stock of certain of our subsidiaries.
Unless the Private Exchange closes and the Registered Exchange
Offer is completed at the highest acceptance level, we will not
wholly own MedQuist Inc., and our ability to gain 100% ownership
of MedQuist Inc. could be adversely affected by provisions of
New Jersey corporate law described below, that limit
certain business combinations between corporations such as
MedQuist Inc. organized in New Jersey and their significant
stockholders. If we do not wholly own MedQuist Inc., our
interests in MedQuist Inc. could conflict with the interests of
MedQuist Inc.s remaining noncontrolling stockholders.
Also, MedQuist Inc. may need to seek the consent of its
noncontrolling stockholders and/or independent members of its
board of directors in order to take certain actions, and those
consents may not be forthcoming. Our costs could also be
adversely affected by our inability to fully integrate MedQuist
Inc. into our consolidated operations and management structure.
Section 14A:10A of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act,
or the NJBCA, prohibits certain business combinations involving
New Jersey corporations and an interested stockholder. An
interested stockholder is defined generally as a
stockholder who is the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly,
of 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding stock of
the corporation. The NJBCA prohibits business combinations
subject to the NJBCA for a period of five years after the date
the interested stockholder acquired its stock, unless the
transaction was approved by the corporations board of
directors prior to the time the interested stockholder acquired
its shares. After the five year period expires, the prohibition
on business combinations with an interested stockholder
continues unless: (i) the business combination is approved
by the board of directors of the target corporation;
(ii) the business combination is approved by a vote of
two-thirds of the voting stock not owned by the interested
stockholder; or (iii) the stockholders of the corporation
receive a price in accordance with a fair price formula set
forth in the NJBCA.
24
In August 2008, we, through our subsidiary, CBay Inc., acquired
over 10% of the outstanding shares of MedQuist, Inc., a New
Jersey corporation, from Royal Philips Electronics. The board of
directors of MedQuist Inc. did not approve future business
combinations with us or CBay Inc. prior to that acquisition for
purposes of the provisions of NJBCA Section 14A:10A and,
accordingly, we believe that these provisions of the NJBCA apply
to CBay Inc. and us.
CBay Inc. and we are Delaware corporations. If CBay Inc. or we
own at least 90% of MedQuist Inc. following the Registered
Exchange Offer, we may be able to utilize a short-form back-end
merger through Section 267 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, or the DGCL. Under Section 267 of the
DGCL, if (i) at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each
class of stock of a corporation is owned by an entity,
(ii) one of the entities is a Delaware corporation and
(ii) the entity that is not a Delaware corporation is an
entity of a state, the laws of which do not forbid such merger,
the entity having such stock ownership may either merge the
entity into itself and assume all of its obligations, or merge
itself into the other entity. If the required 90% threshold is
reached, Section 267 of the DGCL would permit us to merge
MedQuist Inc. into us or CBay Inc. without MedQuist Inc.
shareholder approval if such merger is not forbidden by the laws
of New Jersey.
Section 14A:10-7(4)
of the NJBCA governs short-form mergers between a New Jersey
corporation and a foreign corporation. This provision allows a
non-New Jersey corporation owning at least 90% of the
outstanding shares of each class and series of a New Jersey
corporation to merge the other corporation into itself, or merge
itself into any subsidiary corporation, without approval of the
shareholders of either corporation, though the board of the
parent corporation must approve a plan of merger. However, the
New Jersey courts have not interpreted
Section 14A:10-7(4)
in the context of Section 14A:10A since the adoption of New
Jerseys Shareholder Protection Act.
We have made no determination whether, if the conditions of
Section 267 of the DGCL and
Section 14A:10-7(4)
of the NJBCA are met in relation to MedQuist Inc., we will
engage in a merger with MedQuist Inc. No assurance can be given
regarding whether or when, if ever, we will acquire 100%
ownership of MedQuist Inc.
Risks related to
our common stock
Our stock
price may fluctuate significantly.
An active U.S. public market for our common stock may not
develop or be sustained after the completion of this offering.
While our common stock was formerly listed on AIM, we have
delisted from AIM and January 27, 2011 was the last day on
which our shares traded on AIM. In connection with this
offering, our common stock has been approved for listing on the
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MEDH. We will
negotiate and determine the offering price of the shares offered
hereby with the underwriters based on several factors. This
price may vary from the market price of our common stock after
this offering. You may be unable to sell your shares of common
stock at or above the initial offering price. The stock market,
particularly in recent years, has experienced significant
volatility, and the volatility of stocks often does not relate
to the operating performance of the companies represented by the
stock. Factors that could cause volatility in the market price
of our common stock include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
market conditions affecting our customers businesses,
including the level of mergers and acquisitions activity;
|
|
n
|
the loss of any major customers or the acquisition of new
customers for our services;
|
|
n
|
announcements of new services or functions by us or our
competitors;
|
|
n
|
actual and anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results;
|
|
n
|
rumors relating to us or our competitors;
|
|
n
|
actions of stockholders, including sales of shares by our
directors and executive officers;
|
|
n
|
additions or departures of key personnel; and
|
|
n
|
developments concerning current or future strategic alliances or
acquisitions.
|
These and other factors may cause the market price and demand
for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit
or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common
stock and may otherwise
25
negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In
addition, in the past, when the market price of a stock has been
volatile, holders of that stock have instituted securities class
action litigation against the company that issued the stock. If
any of our stockholders brought a lawsuit against us, we could
incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. Such a lawsuit
could also divert the time and attention of our management.
Our largest
stockholder will exercise significant control over our
company.
After the Corporate Reorganization, affiliates of SAC PCG will
beneficially own in the aggregate shares representing
approximately 34.5% of our outstanding capital stock (assuming
the over allotment option is not exercised). Furthermore, we
have entered into a Stockholders Agreement with affiliates of
SAC PCG pursuant to which they will have the right to nominate
to our board three, two or one directors for so long as they
hold at least 20%, 10% or 5% of our voting power, respectively.
This concentration of ownership of our shares and the
Stockholders Agreement could delay or prevent proxy contests,
mergers, tender offers, open-market purchase programs or other
purchases of shares of our common stock that might otherwise
give you the opportunity to realize a premium over the
then-prevailing market price of our common stock. This
concentration of ownership may also adversely affect our stock
price.
Our
certificate of incorporation contains a provision renouncing our
interest and expectancy in certain corporate opportunities,
which could adversely affect our business or
prospects.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will renounce
any interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an
opportunity to participate in, any business opportunity that may
be from time to time presented to (i) members of our board
of directors who are not our employees, (ii) their
respective employers and (iii) affiliates of the foregoing
(other than us and our subsidiaries), other than opportunities
expressly presented to such directors solely in their capacity
as our director. This provision will apply even if the
opportunity is one that we might reasonably have pursued or had
the ability or desire to pursue if granted the opportunity to do
so. Furthermore, no such person will be liable to us for breach
of any fiduciary duty, as a director or otherwise, by reason of
the fact that such person pursues or acquires any such business
opportunity, directs any such business opportunity to another
person or fails to present any such business opportunity, or
information regarding any such business opportunity. None of
such persons or entities will have any duty to refrain from
engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business
activities or lines of business as us or any of our
subsidiaries. See Description of Capital Stock.
For example, affiliates of our non-employee directors may become
aware, from time to time, of certain business opportunities such
as acquisition opportunities and may direct such opportunities
to other businesses in which they have invested or advise, in
which case we may not become aware of or otherwise have the
ability to pursue such opportunities. Further, such businesses
may choose to compete with us for these opportunities. As a
result, our renouncing our interest and expectancy in any
business opportunity that may be from time to time presented to
such persons or entities could adversely impact our business or
prospects if attractive business opportunities are procured by
such persons or entities for their own benefit rather than for
ours.
Future sales
of our shares by our existing stockholders could cause our stock
price to decline.
Upon the completion of this offering, and, after giving effect
to (i) the Private Exchange, (ii) the Registered
Exchange Offer, assuming a full exchange and (iii) the
issuance of 1.3 million shares of our common stock
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement, we will have
outstanding 50.9 million shares of common stock,
assuming no exercise of outstanding options. If our existing
stockholders sell, or indicate an intent to sell, substantial
amounts of our common stock in the public market after the
consummation of this offering, the trading price of our common
stock could decline significantly.
Of the 50.9 million shares of our common stock
outstanding upon the completion of the Corporate Reorganization,
(i) 26.3 million shares will be subject to a
180-day
contractual
lock-up,
(ii) 3.8 million shares will be subject to a
90-day contractual lock-up,
(iii) 3.8 million shares will be subject to a
45-day contractual lock-up and (iv) 17.0 million
shares, including the 4.5 million shares being sold in this
offering and the 6.7 million shares being issued in the
Registered Exchange Offer, assuming a full exchange will not be
subject to any contractual lock-up. If our existing stockholders
sell, or indicate an intent to sell, substantial amounts of our
common stock in the public market after the applicable
contractual
lock-up and
other applicable legal restrictions
26
on resale discussed in this prospectus lapse, the trading price
of our common stock could decline significantly. Lazard Capital
Markets LLC and Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. may, in their sole
discretion, permit our officers, directors, employees and other
stockholders to sell shares prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that public
sales of these shares or the availability of these shares for
sale will have on the market price of our common stock.
In addition, the shares subject to outstanding options under our
equity incentive plans and the shares reserved for future
issuance under our equity incentive plans will become eligible
for sale in the public market in the future, subject to certain
legal and contractual limitations. Moreover, 180 days after
the completion of this offering, holders of approximately
22.7 million shares of our common stock will have the
right to require us to register these shares under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act,
pursuant to registration rights (17.5 million under demand
registration rights and 5.2 million under piggyback
registration rights). If our existing stockholders sell
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or
if the public perceives that such sales could occur, this could
have an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock,
even if there is no relationship between such sales and the
performance of our business.
Provisions of
Delaware law and our charter documents could delay or prevent an
acquisition of our company, even if the acquisition would be
beneficial to our stockholders, and could make it more difficult
for you to change management.
Provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation
and by-laws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger,
acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may
consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders
might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These
provisions may also prevent or delay attempts by stockholders to
replace or remove our current management or members of our board
of directors. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
a classified board of directors;
|
|
n
|
limitations on the removal of directors;
|
|
n
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
nominations;
|
|
n
|
the inability of stockholders to act by written consent or to
call special meetings;
|
|
n
|
the ability of our board of directors to make, alter or repeal
our by-laws; and
|
|
n
|
the authority of our board of directors to issue preferred stock
with such terms as our board of directors may determine.
|
In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which limits business combination
transactions with stockholders of 15% or more of our outstanding
voting stock that our board of directors has not approved. These
provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult
for stockholders or potential acquirers to acquire us without
negotiation. These provisions may apply even if some
stockholders may consider the transaction beneficial to them.
As a result, these provisions could limit the price that
investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our
common stock. These provisions might also discourage a potential
acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition
proposal or tender offer is at a premium over the then current
market price for our common stock.
If equity
research analysts do not publish research or reports about our
business or if they issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade
our common stock, the price of our common stock could
decline.
The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the
research and reports, that equity research analysts publish
about us and our business. The price of our common stock could
decline if one or more securities analysts downgrade our common
stock or if those analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or
cease publishing reports about us or our business.
27
We do not
currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and,
consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your
investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our
common stock.
We do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock
for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our
future earnings, if any, to fund our growth, including growth
through acquisitions. The payment of any future dividends will
be determined by the board of directors in light of conditions
then existing, including our earnings, financial condition and
capital requirements, business conditions, corporate law
requirements and other factors. See Dividend Policy.
We may apply
the proceeds of this offering to uses that do not improve our
operating results or increase the value of your
investment.
We currently intend to use a substantial portion of the net
proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes,
including working capital and other general corporate purposes.
We may also use a portion of the net proceeds for the execution
of our strategic plans, either through the acquisition of
companies or by other means that we believe will complement our
business. However, we do not have more specific plans for the
net proceeds from this offering. Our board of directors and
management will have broad discretion in how we use the net
proceeds of this offering and may spend the proceeds in a manner
that our stockholders do not deem desirable. These proceeds
could be applied in ways that do not improve our operating
results or increase the value of your investment.
28
Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All
statements other than statements of historical facts included in
this prospectus, including statements regarding our future
financial position, economic performance and results of
operations, as well as our business strategy, and projected
costs and plans and objectives of management for future
operations, and the information referred to under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking
statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally
can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology,
such as may, will, expect,
intend, estimate,
anticipate, believe or
continue or similar terminology.
Such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to
statements regarding:
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential synergies from the acquisition of Spheris;
|
|
n
|
our ability to adopt and integrate new technologies;
|
|
n
|
our expectation as to the future growth of the healthcare
industry;
|
|
n
|
increases in the productivity of MTs and MEs in order to outpace
the decline in prices for medical transcription;
|
|
n
|
customer retention;
|
|
n
|
potential benefits of our size and scale;
|
|
n
|
our ability to develop and adopt new technologies;
|
|
n
|
our ability to gain new customers;
|
|
n
|
our ability to increase sales;
|
|
n
|
our intended use of proceeds from this offering; and
|
|
n
|
our ability to consummate the Private Exchange and the
Registered Exchange Offer.
|
The preceding list is not intended to be an exhaustive list of
all of our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are not historical facts, and are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections about our industry,
managements beliefs and certain assumptions made by
management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, you are cautioned
that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking
statements are reasonable as of the date made, expectations may
prove to have been materially different from the results
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Unless
otherwise required by law, we also disclaim any obligation to
update our view of any such risks or uncertainties or to
announce publicly the result of any revisions to the
forward-looking statements made in this prospectus.
All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to
us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in
their entirety by these cautionary statements. You should
evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this prospectus
in the context of these risks and uncertainties.
29
Corporate
Reorganization
Recapitalization
Transactions
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as borrower, and our
subsidiaries, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc., as
co-borrowers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the Senior Secured
Credit Facility with General Electric Capital Corporation, as
administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto, providing
for (i) a $200.0 million Term Loan and (ii) a
$25.0 million revolving credit facility. On
September 30, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as issuer, and our
subsidiaries, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc., as
co-issuers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a Note Purchase
Agreement with BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation, PennantPark
Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A., and THL Credit, Inc.
providing for the issuance of $85.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 13% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016.
Interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes is payable in
quarterly installments at the issuers option at either
(i) 13% in cash or (ii) 12% in cash plus 2% in the
form of additional Senior Subordinated Notes. See
Description of Indebtedness for a more detailed
description of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes.
The closing and funding of the Term Loan and the Senior
Subordinated Notes occurred on October 14, 2010. MedQuist
Inc. used the proceeds to repay $80.0 million of
indebtedness under its Acquisition Credit Facility, to repay
$13.6 million of indebtedness under the Acquisition
Subordinated Promissory Note it issued in connection with the
Spheris Acquisition and to pay a $176.5 million special
dividend to its stockholders. We received $122.6 million of
this special dividend and used $104.1 million to redeem our
6% Convertible Notes, and $3.7 million to extinguish
certain other lines of credit.
Private
Exchange
We have entered into an Exchange Agreement with certain of
MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling stockholders that currently
hold in the aggregate approximately 12.7% of MedQuist
Inc.s outstanding shares. Pursuant to the Exchange
Agreement, those MedQuist Inc. stockholders will receive
one share of our common stock for each MedQuist Inc. share
and will enter into a stockholders agreement with us that, among
other things, provides them with registration rights and
contains provisions regarding their voting in the election of
our directors. The closing under the Exchange Agreement is
conditioned upon, among other conditions, our completion of this
initial public offering and the listing of our shares on The
NASDAQ Global Market and would increase our ownership in
MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
Registered
Exchange Offer
On October 18, 2010, we filed with the SEC a registration
statement on
Form S-4
in order to offer those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc.
stockholders that did not participate in the Private Exchange
shares of our common stock in exchange for their MedQuist Inc.
shares. Assuming the Private Exchange is consummated, a full
exchange in the Registered Exchange Offer would increase our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to 100.0%. We can give no
assurance regarding the level of participation in the Registered
Exchange Offer.
Redomiciliation
and share conversion
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and redomiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation. In
connection with our redomiciliation, we adjusted the number of
our shares outstanding through a reverse share split, pursuant
to which every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding
prior to our redomiciliation was converted into one share of our
common stock upon our redomiciliation. Our redomiciliation and
the conversion resulted in no change to our stockholders
relative ownership interests in us. Unless otherwise noted, all
information regarding our shares of common stock and all per
share information presented herein gives effect to the
conversion.
30
Use of
Proceeds
Our net proceeds from this offering, after deducting the
underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses,
are expected to be approximately $15.0 million. We intend
to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital
and other general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion
of the net proceeds for the acquisition of complementary
companies or businesses, although we currently do not have any
acquisition or investment planned. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock by the selling
stockholders.
The primary purposes of this offering are to raise additional
capital and create a U.S. public market for our common stock,
which we hope will provide for greater liquidity than the
trading market on AIM and, in turn, allow potential future
access to the U.S. public markets should we need more capital in
the future. In addition, other purposes of the offering are to
increase the profile and prestige of our company with existing
and possible future customers, vendors and strategic partners
and make our stock more valuable and attractive to our employees
and potential employees for compensation purposes.
Dividend
Policy
We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, for use
in the operation and expansion of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Payments of future dividends, if any, will be at the sole
discretion of our board of directors after taking into account
various factors, including our business, operating results and
financial condition, current and anticipated cash needs, plans
for expansion and any legal or contractual limitations on our
ability to pay dividends. Our ability to pay dividends on our
common stock is limited by the covenants of the agreements
governing our indebtedness and may be further restricted by any
future debt or preferred securities. See Description of
Indebtedness.
31
Capitalization
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
n
|
on an actual basis;
|
|
n
|
on a pro forma basis to give effect to the Corporate
Reorganization (but excluding the common stock offered hereby),
the reclassification for discontinued operations and the
issuance of stock pursuant to the Consulting Services
Agreement; and
|
|
n
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to the
completion of this offering.
|
You should read this table together with the information
contained in this prospectus, including Corporate
Reorganization, Use of Proceeds,
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information, Selected Consolidated Financial and
Other Data and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Pro
forma (4)
|
|
|
adjusted
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents (1)
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,253
|
|
|
$
|
50,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
debt (2)
|
|
|
36,224
|
|
|
|
|
22,949
|
|
|
|
22,949
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
13,898
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
6% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
96,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
debt (3)
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
204,172
|
|
|
|
|
294,848
|
|
|
|
294,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock: 25 million shares authorized, none issued
or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: 300 million shares authorized,
35.2 million shares issued and outstanding (actual);
47.9 million shares issued and outstanding (pro forma);
50.9 million shares issued and outstanding (pro forma
as adjusted)
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
149,100
|
|
|
|
|
134,451
|
|
|
|
149,171
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(109,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
(123,154
|
)
|
|
|
(123,154
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
42,970
|
|
|
|
|
15,707
|
|
|
|
30,727
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
40,598
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
|
31,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
287,740
|
|
|
|
$
|
310,960
|
|
|
$
|
325,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Pro forma as adjusted gives effect
to $2.5 million of a total $5.0 million payment to SAC
PCG in connection with the Corporate Reorganization, does not
reflect $19.5 million in proceeds received from our sale of
our investment in
A-Life,
which was sold in October 2010 and $13.5 million in
proceeds received from the sale of the PFS business in
December 2010, and does not reflect our $25.0 million
repayment of a portion of our Term Loan borrowings in January
2011.
|
(2)
|
Short-term debt includes amount
outstanding under our short-term credit facilities, the current
portion of long-term borrowings and the current portion of
capital lease obligations.
|
(3)
|
Other debt includes capital lease
obligations and indebtedness outstanding under our credit
agreement with ICICI Bank and with IndusInd Bank.
|
(4)
|
Pro forma basis reflects
(i) the $200.0 million borrowings under the Term Loan,
(ii) the issuance of $85.0 million of Senior Subordinated
Notes, (iii) our repayment of the 6% Convertible
Notes, (iv) the issuance of 4.8 million shares of
our common stock in the Private Exchange, (v) the issuance
of 6.7 million shares of our common stock in the Registered
Exchange Offer, assuming a full exchange and (vi) the
issuance of 1.3 million shares of our common stock pursuant
to the Consulting Services Agreement.
|
32
Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information includes our unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and our unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
and the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet
have been derived from the historical consolidated financial
information of us and Spheris, which are included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations and the unaudited pro forma
consolidated balance sheet gives effect to the reclassification
for discontinued operations. See Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information Discontinued Operations.
The pro forma combined statements of operations and other
operating data for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 give effect to the
following transactions as if they had occurred on
January 1, 2009:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the Spheris Acquisition and the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of
$113.6 million of debt to finance the Spheris Acquisition;
|
|
n
|
the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of $285.0 million of
indebtedness under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and Senior
Subordinated Notes, the simultaneous repayment of
$80.0 million of indebtedness under the Acquisition Credit
Facility, the repayment of $13.6 million of indebtedness
under the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Notes, the payment
of a $176.5 million special dividend to MedQuist
Inc.s stockholders, of which we received
$122.6 million and the noncontrolling stockholders of
MedQuist Inc. received $53.9 million, and the repayment by
us, using the proceeds of such dividend, of $104.1 million
to extinguish our 6% Convertible Notes including a
$7.7 million premium on early prepayment and
$3.7 million under certain of our other lines of credit;
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 4.8 million shares of our common stock
in exchange for 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement
with certain noncontrolling stockholders of MedQuist Inc., which
will increase our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to
82.2%;
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 1.3 million shares of our common stock
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement; and
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 6.7 million shares of our common stock
in exchange for 6.7 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock, assuming a full exchange. This would increase our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to 100%.
|
The pro forma combined statements of operations and other
operating data for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 do not give effect to
the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact on net revenues from volume declines resulting from
Spheris customer terminations prior to the Spheris Acquisition.
The pro forma net revenues for the year ended December 31,
2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
include $24.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively,
of net revenues associated with such terminations; and
|
|
n
|
the full impact on Adjusted EBITDA of cost savings and synergies
resulting from the Spheris Acquisition, which we have
implemented since the Spheris Acquisition and expect to yield
$7.0 million of cost savings in the fourth quarter of 2010,
representing an annualized benefit of $28.0 million. Our
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
reflect $4.9 million of such cost savings.
|
The pro forma balance sheet data as of September 30, 2010
gives effect to the Recapitalization Transactions, the Private
Exchange, the Registered Exchange Offer, the reclassification
for discontinued operations and the shares of our common stock
issuable pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement, as if
they occurred as of September 30, 2010.
33
The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2010 also gives effect to the issuance of
3.0 million shares of common stock in this offering at
the initial public offering price of $8.00 per share, after
deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us as if such transaction
occurred as of September 30, 2010.
Our historical consolidated financial information has been
adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the Spheris Acquisition, the
Corporate Reorganization the shares of our common stock issuable
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement,
(2) factually supportable and (3) with respect to the
statements of operations, expected to have a continuing impact
on the combined results. The pro forma information does not
reflect revenue opportunities and cost savings that may be
realized after the Spheris Acquisition. The pro forma financial
information also does not reflect expenses related to
integration activity that may be incurred by us in connection
with the Spheris Acquisition.
The pro forma data is based upon available information and
certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The pro
forma data is for informational purposes only and does not
purport to represent what our results of operations or financial
position actually would have been if such events had occurred on
the dates specified above and does not purport to project the
results of operations or financial position for any future
period or date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations and the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet should be read in conjunction with
the accompanying notes, our historical consolidated financial
statements, and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus as adjusted for the acquisition of Spheris using the
acquisition method of accounting.
You should read the following unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus and the information under the section
Capitalization, Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
34
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement
of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
and Private
|
|
|
before
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
Offer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc.(1)
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Offer
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
|
$
|
156,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
510,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
510,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
510,528
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
229,701
|
|
|
|
109,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
124,231
|
|
|
|
47,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
53,089
|
|
|
|
19,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,182
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
|
|
6,530
|
(a)
|
|
|
39,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,126
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
Acquisition and bankruptcy related charges
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
|
|
(8,207
|
) (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,872
|
|
|
|
(198,872
|
) (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
234,177
|
|
|
|
(200,549
|
)
|
|
|
140,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
(186,640
|
)
|
|
|
200,549
|
|
|
|
31,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,165
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(9,019
|
)
|
|
|
(17,439
|
)
|
|
|
6,611
|
(b)
|
|
|
(19,847
|
)
|
|
|
(11,643
|
) (g)
|
|
|
(31,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,490
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
(201,954
|
)
|
|
|
207,160
|
|
|
|
15,389
|
|
|
|
(11,643
|
)
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
15,204
|
(e)
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
(1,273
|
) (i)
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
|
|
(187,383
|
)
|
|
|
191,956
|
|
|
|
13,744
|
|
|
|
(10,370
|
)
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued Patent Financial Services business
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
(187,383
|
)
|
|
|
191,956
|
|
|
|
12,393
|
|
|
|
(10,370
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(347
|
) (f)
|
|
|
(7,432
|
)
|
|
|
6,017
|
(h)
|
|
|
(1,415
|
)
|
|
|
1,415
|
(k)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(187,383
|
)
|
|
$
|
191,609
|
|
|
$
|
4,961
|
|
|
$
|
(4,353
|
)
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Net loss per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
6,096
|
(h,j)
|
|
|
40,788
|
|
|
|
6,694
|
(k)
|
|
|
47,482
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
6,096
|
(h,j)
|
|
|
40,788
|
|
|
|
6,694
|
(k)
|
|
|
47,482
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Our historical financial
information gives effect to the reclassification for
discontinued operations. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Financial Information Discontinued
Operations.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements.
35
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement
of Operations
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
and Private
|
|
|
before
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
Offer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc.(1)
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Offer
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
306,792
|
|
|
$
|
43,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
350,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
350,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
350,163
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
194,886
|
|
|
|
31,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
111,906
|
|
|
|
12,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
45,665
|
|
|
|
6,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,828
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,137
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,745
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
(l)
|
|
|
27,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,587
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Acquisition and bankruptcy related charges
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
(8,625
|
) (n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
89,947
|
|
|
|
9,935
|
|
|
|
(6,633
|
)
|
|
|
93,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
21,959
|
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
6,633
|
|
|
|
30,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,685
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(11,970
|
)
|
|
|
(3,459
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
(m)
|
|
|
(15,290
|
)
|
|
|
(8,948
|
) (q)
|
|
|
(24,238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,238
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
reorganization items and income taxes
|
|
|
11,164
|
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
6,772
|
|
|
|
16,522
|
|
|
|
(8,948
|
)
|
|
|
7,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,762
|
)
|
|
|
5,762
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
11,164
|
|
|
|
(7,176
|
)
|
|
|
12,534
|
|
|
|
16,522
|
|
|
|
(8,948
|
)
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(2,822
|
)
|
|
|
2,800
|
(o)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
(t)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
11,210
|
|
|
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
16,590
|
|
|
|
(8,985
|
)
|
|
|
7,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,605
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued
Patient Financial Services business
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Income tax (benefit)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
|
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
17,039
|
|
|
|
(8,985
|
)
|
|
|
8,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,054
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,143
|
) (p)
|
|
|
(6,377
|
)
|
|
|
4,799
|
(r)
|
|
|
(1,578
|
)
|
|
|
1,589
|
(u)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
$
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,591
|
|
|
$
|
10,662
|
|
|
$
|
(4,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,476
|
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
8,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Net income per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
|
|
6,096
|
(r,s)
|
|
|
41,179
|
|
|
|
6,694
|
(u)
|
|
|
47,873
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
|
|
6,096
|
(r,s)
|
|
|
41,989
|
|
|
|
6,694
|
(u)
|
|
|
48,683
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Our historical financial
information gives effect to the reclassification for
discontinued operations. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Financial Information Discontinued
Operations.
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
36
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
and Private
|
|
|
before
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
Offer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. (1)
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Offer
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
23,235
|
|
|
$
|
12,018
|
(v,w,x,y)
|
|
$
|
35,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,253
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
72,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,482
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
19,544
|
|
|
|
927
|
(v)
|
|
|
20,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,471
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
14,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
129,906
|
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
142,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
23,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,572
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
90,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,254
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
111,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,754
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,945
|
|
|
|
5,633
|
(v)
|
|
|
25,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
$
|
18,578
|
|
|
$
|
397,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
397,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
$
|
35,951
|
|
|
$
|
(13,002
|
) (w)
|
|
$
|
22,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,949
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,879
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
33,635
|
|
|
|
(2,065
|
) (v)
|
|
|
31,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,570
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
119,164
|
|
|
|
(15,067
|
)
|
|
|
104,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
(2,850
|
) (z)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term portion of debt
|
|
|
167,948
|
|
|
|
103,951
|
(w)
|
|
|
271,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,899
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
295,736
|
|
|
|
86,034
|
|
|
|
381,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
610
|
(y,z)
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
669
|
(aa)
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
149,100
|
|
|
|
(5,982
|
) (y,z)
|
|
|
143,118
|
|
|
|
(8,667
|
) (aa)
|
|
|
134,451
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(109,261
|
)
|
|
|
(13,893
|
) (v,w)
|
|
|
(123,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,154
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
42,970
|
|
|
|
(19,265
|
)
|
|
|
23,705
|
|
|
|
(7,998
|
)
|
|
|
15,707
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
40,598
|
|
|
|
(48,191
|
) (x,y)
|
|
|
(7,593
|
)
|
|
|
7,998
|
(aa)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
(67,456
|
)
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
$
|
18,578
|
|
|
$
|
397,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
397,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Our historical financial
information gives effect to the reclassification for
discontinued operations. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Financial Information Discontinued
Operations.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated balance sheet.
37
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information
1. Basis of
presentation
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
is based on our and Spheris historical financial
information, and it is prepared and presented pursuant to the
regulations of the SEC regarding pro forma financial
information. The 2009 unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information includes our audited consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2009. Spheris historical financial information includes
its audited consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The 2010 presentation includes our
unaudited historical consolidated statement of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Spheris
historical information includes its unaudited historical
consolidated statement of operations for the period
January 1, 2010 through April 21, 2010, the date prior
to the date of the Spheris Acquisition. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 also include the effects of the
Corporate Reorganization and the shares of our common stock
issuable under the Consulting Services Agreement. The unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2010 is our historical unaudited consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2010 and is adjusted as
if the Corporate Reorganization and the shares of our common
stock issuable under the Consulting Services Agreement had
occurred as of September 30, 2010.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting under
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification, or ASC, Topic 805, Business Combinations. ASC
Topic 805 requires, among other things, that identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair
values as of the acquisition date, which is presumed to be the
closing date of the Spheris Acquisition. Accordingly, the pro
forma adjustments reflected in the accompanying unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial information may be materially
different from the actual acquisition accounting adjustments
required as of the acquisition date.
Under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
fair value is defined as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of
valuation techniques based on the nature of the inputs used to
develop the fair value measures. This is an exit price concept
for the valuation of the asset or liability. In addition, market
participants are assumed to be unrelated buyers and sellers in
the principal or the most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. Fair value measurements for an asset assume the
highest and best use by these market participants. Many of these
fair value measurements can be highly subjective, and it is also
possible that other professionals, applying reasonable judgment
to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a
range of alternative estimated amounts.
Total acquisition-related transaction costs incurred by us are
expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred. Under
ASC Topic 805, acquisition-related transaction costs (such as
advisory, legal, valuation and other professional fees) are not
included as components of consideration transferred but are
accounted for as expenses in the periods in which the costs are
incurred.
Reorganization items for Spheris directly relate to the process
of reorganizing Spheris under voluntary Chapter 11
Bankruptcy petitions filed by Spheris and certain subsidiaries
on February 3, 2010.
The historical consolidated financial information has been
adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the Corporate Reorganization
and the shares of our common stock issuable under the Consulting
Services Agreement, (2) factually supportable, and
(3) with respect to the statement of operations, expected
to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The pro
forma financial information does not reflect revenue
opportunities and cost savings that we may realize after the
Spheris Acquisition. No assurance can be given with respect to
the estimated revenue opportunities and operating cost savings
that may be realized as a result of the Spheris Acquisition. The
pro forma financial information also does not reflect expenses
related to integration activity or exit costs that may be
incurred by us in connection with integrating the businesses.
38
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
Certain Spheris amounts have been reclassified to conform to our
presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on
previously reported net income (loss). There were no material
transactions between us and Spheris during the periods presented
in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information that would need to be eliminated.
2. Description
of the Spheris Acquisition
On April 22, 2010, we, together with our MedQuist Inc.
subsidiary, completed the acquisition of substantially all of
the domestic assets of Spheris and the stock of certain of its
foreign affiliates, pursuant to the terms of the Stock and Asset
Purchase Agreement entered into on April 15, 2010. The
purchase price consisted of approximately $98.8 million of
cash and MedQuist Inc.s issuance of a promissory note, net
of discount, totaling $13.6 million, or the Acquisition
Subordinated Promissory Note. We had no prior material
relationship with Spheris other than the agreements related to
the Spheris Acquisition described elsewhere in this prospectus.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition, MedQuist
Transcriptions, Ltd., a subsidiary of MedQuist Inc., and certain
other subsidiaries of MedQuist Inc., or collectively, the Loan
Parties, entered into a credit agreement, or the Acquisition
Credit Facility, with General Electric Capital Corporation,
CapitalSource Bank, and Fifth Third Bank. The Acquisition Credit
Facility provided for up to $100.0 million in senior
secured credit facilities, consisting of a $50.0 million
term loan, and a revolving credit facility of up to
$50.0 million. The credit facilities were secured by a
first priority lien on substantially all of the property of the
Loan Parties. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility
were able to be made from time to time, subject to availability
under such facility, until the fourth anniversary of the closing
date. Amounts borrowed under the Acquisition Credit Facility
bore interest at a rate selected by MedQuist Transcriptions,
Ltd. equal to the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate (each as
defined in the Acquisition Credit Facility agreement) plus a
margin. At September 30, 2010, the revolving credit
facility and the term loan had interest rates of 6.25% and
6.75%, respectively. The Acquisition Credit Facility was repaid
in full in October 2010 in connection with the Recapitalization
Transactions.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition, MedQuist Inc. also
entered into the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note, with
Spheris Inc. The note was to mature in five years from the date
of the Spheris Acquisition. The face amount of the Acquisition
Subordinated Promissory Note was $17.5 million with
provisions for prepayment at discounted amounts, ranging from
77.5% of the principal if paid within six months, 87.5% from six
to nine months, 97.5% from nine to twelve months, 102.0% between
the first and second year, 101.0% between the second and third
year and 100.0% thereafter. For purposes of the purchase price
allocation, the note was discounted at 77.5% of the principal,
or $13.6 million. The Acquisition Subordinated Promissory
Note bore interest at 8.0% for the first six months. The
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note was repaid at 77.5% of
the face amount on October 14, 2010 in connection with the
Recapitalization Transactions.
On April 22, 2010, we transferred the following
consideration for the purchase of Spheris:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid
|
|
$
|
98,834
|
|
Fair value of unsecured Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note would have matured
in five years from the date of closing, and it had provisions
for prepayment at discounted amounts. We estimated the fair
value of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note to be
$13.6 million. The fair value was determined using a Monte
Carlo simulation valuation model with the following key
assumptions: volatility of 3.9% and cost of debt of 10.5%. The
fair value of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note is
included in the total purchase price.
39
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
The following table summarizes the consideration the amounts of
identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
acquisition date. The total amount assigned to identified
intangible assets and the related amortization period is shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Fair value of Spheris net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
22,407
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
9,133
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Developed technology (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
Customer relationships (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
Trademarks and trade name (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
44,917
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(20,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total assigned to identified intangible assets and the
related amortization period is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
$
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
37,210
|
|
|
|
7-9 years
|
|
Trademarks and Tradenames
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
44,917
|
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
The amounts and lives of the identified intangibles other than
goodwill were valued at fair value. The analysis included a
combination of the cost approach and an income approach. We used
discount rates from 15% to 17%. The goodwill is attributable to
the workforce and synergies expected to occur after the Spheris
Acquisition. The goodwill and intangible assets are deductible
for tax purposes.
We have performed a review of Spheriss accounting policies
and procedures. As a result of that review, we did not identify
any differences between the accounting policies and procedures
of the two companies that, when conformed, would have a material
impact on the future operating results.
3. The
Recapitalization Transactions
On September 30, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as issuer, and our
subsidiaries MedQuist Transcription Ltd., and CBay Inc., as
co-issuers
and guarantors, and we and certain of our other subsidiaries, as
guarantors, entered into the Note Purchase Agreement for the
issuance of $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of
13% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 to BlackRock Kelso
Capital Corporation, PennantPark Investment Corporation,
Citibank, N.A., and THL Credit, Inc. Interest on the notes is
payable in quarterly installments at the issuers option at
either (i) 13% in cash or (ii) 12% in cash plus 2% in
the form of additional Senior Subordinated Notes. Closing and
funding of the Senior Subordinated Notes occurred on
October 14, 2010.
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as borrower, and our
subsidiaries MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., and CBay Inc., as
co-borrowers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the
40
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
Senior Secured Credit Facility with General Electric Capital
Corporation, as administrative agent, and the parties thereto,
consisting of (i) a $200.0 million Term Loan and
(ii) a $25.0 million Revolving Credit Facility.
Closing and funding under the Term Loan occurred on
October 14, 2010. The Senior Secured Credit Facility bears
an interest rate of LIBOR plus 5.50% and a LIBOR floor of 1.75%.
In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility bears a fee of
50 basis points on undrawn amounts.
The proceeds from the borrowings from the Term Loan and the
Senior Subordinated Notes were used as follows:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Repayment of the then outstanding indebtedness under the
Acquisition Credit Facility of $80.0 million as of
September 30, 2010. With the repayment on October 14,
2010, the Acquisition Credit Facility was terminated.
|
|
n
|
Repayment of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note on
October 14, 2010. The amount paid to satisfy and extinguish
the principal amount of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory
Note was $13.6 million.
|
|
n
|
Declaration and payment of a special dividend on
October 18, 2010 by MedQuist Inc. of $4.70 per share. The
total amount of the MedQuist Inc. dividend was
$176.5 million, of which $122.6 million was paid to us.
|
|
n
|
Repayment on October 14, 2010 of our 6% Convertible
Notes due to Philips. The 6% Convertible Notes were settled
at $104.1 million including $7.7 million as a
negotiated prepayment premium to the outstanding balance at the
time of the repayment.
|
|
n
|
Repayment of $3.7 million on certain of our other lines of
credit.
|
The sources and uses of funds related to the Recapitalization
Transactions are shown as if they had occurred as of
September 30, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
|
Uses
|
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
$
|
200.0
|
|
|
Extinguishment of Acquisition Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
80.0
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
|
Extinguishment of Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extinguishment of 6% Convertible Notes (includes premium on
early prepayment)
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extinguishment of other debt agreements
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend distribution to noncontrolling stockholders
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash to working capital
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses (Private Exchange)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and expenses (Recapitalization Transactions)
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sources
|
|
$
|
285.0
|
|
|
Total Uses
|
|
$
|
285.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
4. Private
Exchange
On September 30, 2010, we entered into the Exchange
Agreement with certain MedQuist Inc. stockholders that hold in
the aggregate approximately 12.7% of MedQuist Inc.s
outstanding shares. The Private Exchange would increase our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%. Pursuant to the
Exchange Agreement, those MedQuist Inc. stockholders will
receive one share of our common stock for each MedQuist
Inc. share and will enter into a stockholders agreement with us
that, among other things, provides them with registration rights
and contains provisions regarding their voting in the election
of our directors. The closing under the Exchange Agreement is
conditioned upon, among other conditions, our completion of the
initial public offering, listing our shares on The NASDAQ Global
Market and our redomiciliation in Delaware.
5. Registered
Exchange Offer
On October 18, 2010, we filed with the SEC a registration
statement on
Form S-4
in order to offer those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc.
stockholders who did not participate in the Private Exchange
shares of our common stock in exchange for their MedQuist Inc.
shares. The terms of the Registered Exchange Offer are described
in such registration statement. Assuming the Private Exchange is
consummated, a full exchange in the Registered Exchange Offer
would increase our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to
100.0%.
|
|
6.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009
|
Spheris
Acquisition pro forma adjustments:
|
|
a. |
Adjustment to reflect increased amortization of acquired
intangibles as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and Tradenames
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
|
|
7-9 years
|
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional depreciation of approximately $203,000 would be
incurred related to fair value adjustments for certain tangible
assets, primarily equipment and leasehold improvements.
|
|
b. |
Adjustment to reflect interest expense related to the Spheris
Acquisition, as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Acquisition Credit Facility interest
|
|
$
|
6,177
|
|
Interest on the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,828
|
|
Less: Spheris historical interest expense
|
|
|
17,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$
|
(6,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
The Acquisition Credit Facility and the Acquisition Subordinated
Promissory Note were repaid in connection with the
Recapitalization Transactions.
|
|
c.
|
Adjustment to eliminate the 2009 Spheris goodwill impairment
charge.
|
|
d.
|
Adjustment to eliminate the direct incremental acquisition
related costs incurred by us and Spheris for bankruptcy related
and reorganization costs.
|
|
e.
|
Adjustment to eliminate the historical income tax benefit of
Spheris and to record the income tax provision of the combined
entities at our historical effective tax rate in effect for the
respective period. However, the effective tax rate of the
combined company could be different depending on
post-acquisition activities.
|
|
f.
|
Adjustment to recognize noncontrolling interest in MedQuist Inc.
|
Recapitalization
Transactions and the Private Exchange pro forma
adjustments:
|
|
g. |
Adjustment to reflect interest expense as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest on Term Loan
|
|
$
|
14,500
|
|
Interest on Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
11,050
|
|
Amortization of related deferred financing fees
|
|
|
3,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest that would not have been incurred under the prior
debt agreements, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Credit Facility
|
|
|
6,177
|
|
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
6% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
5,447
|
|
Other debt agreements
|
|
|
676
|
|
Amortization of previous deferred financing fees
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$
|
11,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Term Loan bears a variable interest rate. Each
1/8%
increase in the base rate (prime or LIBOR) would result in a
$0.3 million increase in annual interest expense.
In connection with the Recapitalization Transactions and our
repayment and termination of the Acquisition Credit Facility,
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note and 6% Convertible
Notes, we expensed $6.2 million of financing fees and
recorded a loss of $7.7 million on the repayment of the
6% Convertible Notes. As these amounts are non recurring
and resulted directly from the Recapitalization Transactions
they have not been reflected in the pro forma adjustments.
|
|
h. |
In connection with the Private Exchange, noncontrolling
stockholders holding 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
have agreed to exchange their MedQuist Inc. shares for shares of
our common stock whereby they will receive one share of our
common stock for each share of MedQuist Inc., which will result
in 4.8 million additional shares outstanding. After the
Private Exchange, we will own approximately 82.2% of MedQuist
Inc., and the noncontrolling interest will decrease from
approximately 30.5% to 17.8%. As we hold a controlling interest
in MedQuist Inc. before and after the Private Exchange, the
exchange is recorded as an equity transaction. Additionally, we
agreed to pay up to $2.5 million of expenses incurred by
certain stockholders who are party to the Exchange Agreement.
We will account for the payment as a capital transaction.
|
43
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and net
income (loss) per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect
the issuance of 4.8 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for MedQuist Inc. shares as if the shares had been
outstanding from January 1, 2009.
|
|
i.
|
Adjustment to record the income tax provision of the
Recapitalization Transactions at our historical effective tax
rate in effect for the respective period. However, the effective
tax rate after the Recapitalization Transactions could be
different.
|
|
j.
|
Adjustment to satisfy our obligations under the Consulting
Services Agreement. Based upon an $8.00 per share price for
shares issuable, the number of shares of our common stock
issuable would be 1.3 million shares. Basic and diluted
weighted average shares outstanding and net income (loss) per
share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the issuance of
1.3 million shares of our common stock.
|
Registered
Exchange Offer pro forma adjustments:
|
|
k. |
Adjustments to eliminate the net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests assuming 100% of the MedQuist Inc.
stockholders participate in the Registered Exchange Offer.
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and net
income (loss) per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect
the issuance of 6.7 million of our shares issued in
exchange for MedQuist Inc. shares as if the shares had been
outstanding from January 1, 2009.
|
|
7.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statement of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010
|
Spheris
Acquisition pro forma adjustments:
|
|
l. |
Adjustment to reflect increased amortization of acquired
intangibles as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and Tradenames
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
|
|
7-9 years
|
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization for the period January 1, 2010 to
April 21, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional depreciation of $68,000 would be incurred related to
fair value adjustments for certain tangible assets, primarily
equipment and leasehold improvements.
|
44
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
|
|
m. |
Adjustment to reflect interest expense related to the Spheris
Acquisition, as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Acquisition Credit Facility interest January 1, 2010 to
April 21, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
Interest on Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
January 1, 2010 to April 21, 2010
|
|
|
821
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
Less: Spheris historical interest expense
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n. |
Adjustment to eliminate direct incremental acquisition related
costs incurred by us and Spheris for bankruptcy related and
reorganization costs.
|
|
|
o. |
Adjustment to eliminate the historical income tax benefit of
Spheris and to record the income tax provision of the combined
entities at our historical effective tax rate in effect for the
respective period. However, the effective tax rate of the
combined company could be different depending on
post-acquisition activities.
|
|
|
p. |
Adjustment to reflect the noncontrolling interest in MedQuist
Inc.
|
Recapitalization
Transactions and Private Exchange pro forma
adjustments
|
|
q. |
Adjustment to reflect interest expense as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest on Term Loan for nine months
|
|
$
|
10,875
|
|
Interest on Senior Subordinated Notes for nine months
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
Amortization of related deferred financing fees
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
21,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest that would not have been incurred under the prior
debt agreements as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Credit Facility
|
|
|
4,633
|
|
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
6% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
Other debt agreements
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Amortization of previous deferred financing fees
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$
|
8,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Term Loan bears a variable interest rate. Each
1/8%
increase in the base rate (prime or LIBOR) would result in a
$0.3 million increase in annual interest expense.
In connection with the Recapitalization Transactions and our
repayment and termination of the Acquisition Credit Facility,
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note and 6% Convertible
Notes, we expensed $6.2 million of financing fees and
recorded a loss of $7.7 million on the repayment of the
6% Convertible Notes. As these amounts are nonrecurring and
resulted directly from the Recapitalization Transactions, they
have not been reflected in the pro forma adjustment.
|
|
r. |
In connection with the Private Exchange, noncontrolling
stockholders holding 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
have agreed to exchange their MedQuist Inc. shares for shares of
our common stock whereby they will
|
45
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
receive one share of our common stock for each share of
MedQuist Inc., which will result in 4.8 million additional
shares outstanding. After the Private Exchange, we will own
approximately 82.2% of MedQuist Inc., and the noncontrolling
interest will decrease from approximately 30.5% to 17.8%. As we
hold a controlling interest in MedQuist Inc. before and after
the Private Exchange, the exchange is recorded as an equity
transaction. Additionally, we agreed to pay up to
$2.5 million of expenses incurred by certain stockholders
who are party to the Exchange Agreement. We will account for the
payment as a capital transaction.
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and net
income (loss) per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect
the issuance of 4.8 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for MedQuist Inc. shares as if the shares had been
outstanding from January 1, 2009.
|
|
s. |
Adjustment to satisfy our obligations under the Consulting
Services Agreement. Based upon an $8.00 per share price,
the number of shares of our common stock issuable would be
1.3 million shares. Basic and diluted weighted average
shares outstanding and net income loss per share amounts have
been adjusted to reflect the issuance of 1.3 million shares
of our common stock.
|
|
|
t. |
Adjustment to record the tax provision of the Recapitalization
Transactions at our historical effective tax rate in effect for
the respective period. However, the effective tax rate after the
Recapitalization Transactions could be different.
|
Registered
Exchange Offer pro forma adjustments:
|
|
u. |
Adjustment to eliminate the net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests assuming 100% of the MedQuist Inc.
noncontrolling stockholders participate in the Registered
Exchange Offer.
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and net
income (loss) per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect
the issuance of 6.7 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for MedQuist Inc. shares as if the shares had been
outstanding from January 1, 2009.
|
|
8.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
2010
|
Recapitalization
Transactions and Private Exchange pro forma
adjustments
|
|
v. |
We incurred debt issuance costs of $15.5 million, of which
$2.1 million was accrued and $700,000 of which was paid as
of September 30, 2010, in connection with the Term Loan and
Senior Subordinated Notes. Of the $15.5 million,
$6.2 million was expensed and the balance was capitalized.
These amounts will be capitalized as other assets. This
adjustment reflects the incremental debt issuance costs to be
capitalized.
|
|
|
w. |
The proceeds of the Term Loan and Senior Subordinated Notes were
used to repay debt consisting of the Acquisition Credit
Facility, the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note and other
term loans and credit facilities maintained by us at the parent
company level. We recorded a loss of $7.7 million on the
|
46
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
|
|
|
extinguishment of our 6% Convertible Notes related to an
early redemption premium. The adjustment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
New Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Debt Repayment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Credit Facility
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,898
|
|
|
|
13,898
|
|
6% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,419
|
|
|
|
96,419
|
|
Other debt repayment
|
|
|
3,002
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Adjustment
|
|
$
|
(13,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
103,951
|
|
|
$
|
90,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x. |
Adjustment reflects the dividend paid to noncontrolling
stockholders of MedQuist Inc. totaling $53.9 million which
reduces our noncontrolling interest.
|
|
|
y. |
Reflects the issuance of 4.8 million shares of our common
stock in exchange for 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock. The impact of the Private Exchange is a
reclassification of $5.7 million between noncontrolling
interest and additional paid in capital. Additionally, we agreed
to pay up to $2.5 million of expenses incurred by certain
stockholders who are party to the Exchange Agreement. We will
account for the payment as a capital transaction.
|
|
|
z. |
Reflects the issuance of 1.3 million shares of our common
stock issuable pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement,
assuming a share issuance at $8.00 per share.
|
Registered
Exchange Offer pro forma adjustments
|
|
aa. |
Adjustment to reduce noncontrolling interest assuming 100%
of the MedQuist Inc. noncontrolling stockholders participate in
the Registered Exchange Offer. Reflects the issuance of
6.7 million shares of our common stock in exchange for
6.7 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The
impact of the Registered Exchange Offer is a reclassification of
$8.0 million between noncontrolling interest and additional
paid in capital.
|
47
Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information
Discontinued Operations
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information includes our unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 and our unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
2010. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements
of operations and the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet have been derived from our historical consolidated
financial information, which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
The pro forma consolidated statements of operations data for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010 give effect to the
reclassification of the operating results of our PFS business
into discontinued operations. On December 30, 2010, we
entered into an agreement to sell the assets and liabilities of
our PFS reporting unit, a
non-strategic
asset, which closed December 31, 2010.
The pro forma consolidated balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2010 gives effect to the reclassification of
assets and liabilities related to the PFS business, as held for
sale as of September 30, 2010.
48
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and
Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations Discontinued Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments(a)
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments(a)
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments(a)
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
57,694
|
|
|
$
|
(15,503
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,191
|
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
$
|
(22,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
171,413
|
|
|
$
|
371,768
|
|
|
$
|
(17,836
|
)
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
30,209
|
|
|
|
(8,101
|
)
|
|
|
22,108
|
|
|
|
125,074
|
|
|
|
(11,947
|
)
|
|
|
113,127
|
|
|
|
239 549
|
|
|
|
(9,848
|
)
|
|
|
229,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27,485
|
|
|
|
(7,402
|
)
|
|
|
20,083
|
|
|
|
68,599
|
|
|
|
(10,313
|
)
|
|
|
58,286
|
|
|
|
132 219
|
|
|
|
(7,988
|
)
|
|
|
124,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
25,137
|
|
|
|
(5,681
|
)
|
|
|
19,456
|
|
|
|
51,243
|
|
|
|
(8,341
|
)
|
|
|
42,902
|
|
|
|
60,632
|
|
|
|
(7,543
|
)
|
|
|
53,089
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
(778
|
)
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
(1,418
|
)
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
(1,611
|
)
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
(9,339
|
)
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
(6,459
|
)
|
|
|
21,593
|
|
|
|
178,637
|
|
|
|
(19,098
|
)
|
|
|
159,539
|
|
|
|
116,129
|
|
|
|
(9,154
|
)
|
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(943
|
)
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(110,038
|
)
|
|
|
8,785
|
|
|
|
(101,253
|
)
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,108
|
)
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
(1,657
|
)
|
|
|
(3,954
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
(3,813
|
)
|
|
|
(9,132
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(9,019
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(3,244
|
)
|
|
|
(113,917
|
)
|
|
|
8,926
|
|
|
|
(104,991
|
)
|
|
|
8,902
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
(3,060
|
)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
9,059
|
|
|
|
(99,460
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued Patient Financial Services
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
49
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and
Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations Discontinued Operations
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments(a)
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments(a)
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
281,828
|
|
|
$
|
(13,709
|
)
|
|
$
|
268,119
|
|
|
$
|
316,977
|
|
|
$
|
(10,185
|
)
|
|
$
|
306,792
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
182,924
|
|
|
|
(7,479
|
)
|
|
|
175,445
|
|
|
|
200,234
|
|
|
|
(5,348
|
)
|
|
|
194,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
98,904
|
|
|
|
(6,230
|
)
|
|
|
92,674
|
|
|
|
116,743
|
|
|
|
(4,837
|
)
|
|
|
111,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
46,594
|
|
|
|
(6,014
|
)
|
|
|
40,580
|
|
|
|
49,374
|
|
|
|
(3,709
|
)
|
|
|
45,665
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
7,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,235
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
(1,409
|
)
|
|
|
18,920
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
23,745
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
88,179
|
|
|
|
(7,423
|
)
|
|
|
80,756
|
|
|
|
94,327
|
|
|
|
(4,380
|
)
|
|
|
89,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
10,725
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
11,918
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
21,959
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(6,865
|
)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(11,970
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
7,583
|
|
|
|
11,590
|
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
11,164
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
11,210
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued Patient Financial Services
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
Less: Net (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0,07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0,07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
50
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet Discontinued Operations
As of September 30, 2010
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
Impact of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
operations(b)
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
|
$
|
(790
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,235
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
74,612
|
|
|
|
(2,130
|
)
|
|
|
72,482
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
19,798
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
19,544
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,645
|
|
|
|
14,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
118,435
|
|
|
|
11,471
|
|
|
|
129,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
23,826
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
23,572
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
99,030
|
|
|
|
(8,776
|
)
|
|
|
90,254
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
114,195
|
|
|
|
(2,441
|
)
|
|
|
111,754
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
$
|
36,224
|
|
|
$
|
(273
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,951
|
|
Account payable
|
|
|
12,033
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
11,879
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
36,437
|
|
|
|
(2,802
|
)
|
|
|
33,635
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
119,016
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
119,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
Long term portion of debt
|
|
|
167,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,948
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
295,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
149,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,100
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(109,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,261
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
42,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,970
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
40,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial statements
51
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information Discontinued Operations
1. Basis of
presentation and description of sale of PFS
In the fourth quarter of 2010, we entered into a letter of
intent to sell the assets and liabilities of our PFS business, a
non-strategic
asset. The sale closed on December 31, 2010. The selling
price was $14.8 million; of which $13.5 million was
received in cash and $1.3 million is in the form of a note
payable to us. The note payable has a one-year term and bears
interest at 5.25%. The estimated gain on the sale of the
discontinued operations is expected to be approximately $0.7
million.
|
|
2.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statements of operations for all periods
presented
|
|
|
a. |
Adjustments to reclassify the operating results of PFS into
discontinued operations. Discontinued businesses, including
assets held for sale, are removed from the results of continuing
operations. The results of operations in the current and prior
year periods, along with any cost to exit such businesses in the
year of discontinuation, are classified as discontinued
operations in the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
|
3.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
2010
|
|
|
b. |
Adjustments to reclassify assets and liabilities of PFS into
assets and liabilities held for sale. We have separately
classified $14.6 million and $3.4 million of carrying
value associated with its assets held for sale and liabilities
held for sale, respectively, in the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
2010. The assets held for sale consist primarily of
$2.1 million of accounts receivable, $8.8 million of
goodwill and $2.4 million of intangible assets. The
liabilities held for sale consist primarily of $2.8 million
of accrued liabilities and a total of $0.6 million of other
liabilities.
|
4. Summary
of discontinued operations for all periods presented
The following table sets forth the net revenues and the
components of income (loss) from discontinued operations for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
15,503
|
|
|
$
|
22,260
|
|
|
$
|
17,836
|
|
|
$
|
13,709
|
|
|
$
|
10,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
$
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
Selected
Consolidated Financial and Other Data
The following tables summarize our consolidated financial data
for the periods presented. You should read the following
selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus and the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of this prospectus.
We derived the statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere
in this prospectus. We derived the statement of operations data
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are
not included in this prospectus. We derived the statement of
operations data for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2010 and the balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In the opinion of our management, the unaudited
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and
include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring
adjustments that we consider necessary to present fairly the
financial information set forth in those statements. Our
historical results for any prior period are not necessarily
indicative of results to be expected for a full year or any
future period.
Our selected historical consolidated statements of operations
and other operating data reflect the consolidation of the
results of operations of MedQuist Inc. since August 6, 2008
and Spheris since April 22, 2010, the respective dates of
their acquisitions. Our selected historical consolidated
statements of operations and other operating data does not give
effect to the reclassification for discontinued operations for
the sale of our PFS business, which was sold on
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
31,806
|
|
|
$
|
41,862
|
|
|
$
|
57,694
|
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
$
|
371,768
|
|
|
$
|
281,828
|
|
|
$
|
316,977
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
15,999
|
|
|
|
20,613
|
|
|
|
30,209
|
|
|
|
125,074
|
|
|
|
239,549
|
|
|
|
182,924
|
|
|
|
200,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
15,807
|
|
|
|
21,249
|
|
|
|
27,485
|
|
|
|
68,599
|
|
|
|
132,219
|
|
|
|
98,904
|
|
|
|
116,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
13,237
|
|
|
|
17,318
|
|
|
|
25,137
|
|
|
|
51,243
|
|
|
|
60,632
|
|
|
|
46,594
|
|
|
|
49,374
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
7,235
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
15,872
|
|
|
|
19,576
|
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
178,637
|
|
|
|
116,129
|
|
|
|
88,179
|
|
|
|
94,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(110,038
|
)
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
|
|
10,725
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
(2,108
|
)
|
|
|
(3,954
|
)
|
|
|
(9,132
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
|
|
(113,917
|
)
|
|
|
8,902
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
11,590
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(698
|
)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Medquist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(704
|
)
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,731
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,731
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
Other Operating Data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (1)
|
|
$
|
2,576
|
|
|
$
|
3,001
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
|
$
|
59,687
|
|
|
$
|
42,991
|
|
|
$
|
57,855
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See above for reconciliations of
net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA does not include earnings
attributable to our investment in A-Life, which was sold in
October 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,344
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
2,667
|
|
|
$
|
42,868
|
|
|
$
|
29,633
|
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
Working capital
(deficit) (a)
|
|
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
10,870
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
(5,114
|
)
|
|
|
11,618
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
20,722
|
|
|
|
31,817
|
|
|
|
51,420
|
|
|
|
279,177
|
|
|
|
253,068
|
|
|
|
379,304
|
|
Long term debt, including current portion of debt
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
21,283
|
|
|
|
14,075
|
|
|
|
126,008
|
|
|
|
107,340
|
|
|
|
204,172
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
13,708
|
|
|
|
5,326
|
|
|
|
29,854
|
|
|
|
79,350
|
|
|
|
72,301
|
|
|
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Working capital is defined as total
current assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, minus total
current liabilities, excluding current portion of debt.
|
54
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(705
|
)
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
5,291
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
Income tax provision
(benefit) (a)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
9,132
|
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
|
12,031
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization(b)
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(2,534
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
Asset impairment charge, severance charges and accrual
reversals (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
PFS business
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,721
|
)
|
|
|
(1,972
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (e)
|
|
$
|
2,576
|
|
|
$
|
3,001
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
|
$
|
59,687
|
|
|
$
|
42,991
|
|
|
$
|
57,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We have $130.0 million of
federal net operating loss carry forwards as of
December 31, 2009 and will record approximately
$30.0 million of annual tax amortization related to
intangible assets, including goodwill, that will reduce future
taxable income. Due to the existence of federal net operating
loss carry forwards and the impact of tax amortization related
to intangible assets, including goodwill, cash taxes paid were
$84,000, $160,000, $796,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$667,000 and $30,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes amortization of acquired
intangibles of $698,000, $7.1 million and
$12.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively, and $9.8 million and
$11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2010, respectively.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes an impairment charge to
write-off the amount paid related to severance of one of our
former executives and the reversal of certain accruals, related
to litigation claims, as a result of the expiration of the
applicable statute of limitations.
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes the effect of the PFS
business, which was sold on December 31, 2010.
|
|
(e) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not include
earnings attributable to our investment in A-Life, which was
sold in October 2010.
|
Adjusted EBITDA is a metric used by management to measure
operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. plus net income
(loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, income taxes,
interest expense, depreciation and amortization, cost of legal
proceedings and settlements, acquisition related charges,
goodwill impairment charge, restructuring charges, equity in
income (loss) of affiliated company, asset impairment charge,
severance costs, certain unusual or nonrecurring items and the
effect of our PFS business. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a
supplemental performance measure because we
55
believe it facilitates operating performance comparisons from
period to period and company to company by backing out the
following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential differences caused by variations in capital structures
(affecting interest expense, net), tax positions (such as the
impact on periods or companies for changes in effective tax
rates), the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting
depreciation expense);
|
|
n
|
the impact of non-cash charges, such as goodwill impairment
charges and asset impairment charges; and
|
|
n
|
the impact of unusual expenses or events, such as acquisition
related charges, restructuring charges, severance costs and
certain unusual or nonrecurring items.
|
Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of
operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use
Adjusted EBITDA in measuring our performance relative to that of
our competitors. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our
financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to net income, operating income or any other
performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an
alternative to cash flow from operating activities as measures
of our profitability or liquidity. We understand that although
Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts,
lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, Adjusted
EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not
consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our
results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
n
|
although depreciation is a non-cash charge, the assets being
depreciated will often have to be replaced in the future, and
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and
|
|
n
|
other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA
differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
56
Market Price
Information for Our Shares
We expect our shares to be listed on The NASDAQ Global Market
upon consummation of this offering under the symbol
MEDH. They have not previously been listed on The
NASDAQ Global Market or any other U.S. market.
The share information presented below gives effect to our
redomiciliation and the related conversion of our shares,
pursuant to which every 4.5 shares of our common stock
outstanding prior to our redomiciliation were converted into one
share of our common stock upon our redomiciliation.
As of December 30, 2010, there were 35.2 million
shares outstanding and approximately 133 holders of record
of our shares. After the Corporate Reorganization, there will be
50.9 million shares outstanding, which includes
(i) 3.0 million shares issued by us in this offering;
(ii) 35.2 million shares held by our existing
stockholders, (iii) 4.8 million shares to be
issued in the Private Exchange, (iv) 6.7 million shares to
be issued in the Registered Exchange Offer, assuming a full
exchange, and (v) 1.3 million shares issuable
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement.
Our shares were formerly listed on AIM under the symbol
CBAY. Our shares began trading on AIM in
June 2007. However, we have delisted from AIM and
January 27, 2011 was the last day on which our shares
traded on AIM. Since December 24, 2010, the date we
announced the schedule for the delisting of our shares from AIM,
the average daily trading volume for our shares on AIM has been
less than 1,000 shares and our shares were traded on AIM on
only three of the sixteen trading days during that period. The
closing price of our shares on AIM on December 24, 2010,
was £6.08, equivalent to $9.36 per share based on the
Federal Reserve noon buying rate of $1.54 to £1.00 in
effect on December 24, 2010.
The following table shows the high and low market prices for our
shares for each fiscal quarter for the two most recent fiscal
years. Market prices for our shares have fluctuated
significantly since they were listed on AIM and trading volumes
on AIM have generally been very small in relation to the number
of our total outstanding shares. On many trading days no shares
have traded. During 2009, the average daily trading volume of
our shares on AIM was 1,568* shares. Between
January 1, 2010 and December 24, 2010, the average
daily volume of our shares on AIM was 2,313 shares. As a
result, the market prices shown in the following table may not
be indicative of the market prices at which our shares will
trade after this offering.
* Excludes a single trade on July 24, 2009 of
3.4 million shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share price
|
|
|
|
(pounds)
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9.54
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
2007
|
|
|
5.04
|
(1)
|
|
|
2.86
|
(1)
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share price
|
|
|
|
(pounds)
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2010
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
Third Quarter 2010
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
Second Quarter 2010
|
|
|
6.98
|
|
|
|
3.89
|
|
First Quarter 2010
|
|
|
9.54
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2009
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
Third Quarter 2009
|
|
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
Second Quarter 2009
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
First Quarter 2009
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
We were admitted to AIM on
June 18, 2007. Data for 2007 reflects closing prices from
June 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007.
|
58
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operation should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes of each of
us, MedQuist Inc. and Spheris Inc. and with the information
under Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information and Selected Consolidated Financial and
Other Data appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. In
addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis
contains forward looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward looking
statements as a result of certain factors. We discuss factors
that we believe could cause or contribute to these differences
below and elsewhere in this prospectus, including those set
forth under Risk Factors.
Overview
We are a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation
solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Our
end-to-end
solutions convert physicians dictation of patient
interactions, or the physician narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
ASR, medical transcription and editing, workflow automation, and
document management and distribution to deliver a complete
managed service for our customers. Our solutions enable
hospitals, clinics, and physician practices to improve the
quality of clinical data as well as accelerate and automate the
documentation process, and we believe our solutions improve
physician productivity and satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle
performance, and facilitate the adoption and use of electronic
health records.
Key factors
affecting our performance
In 2008 and 2010, we completed two large acquisitions which have
materially impacted our financial results. Our results have also
been impacted by volume and pricing trends, operating
improvements and selling, general and administrative expense
savings. These key factors are described below for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2010.
MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition
In August 2008, an affiliate of SAC PCG invested
$124.0 million to acquire a majority interest in us.
Concurrent with this investment, we acquired a 69.5% interest in
MedQuist Inc., the largest medical transcription service
provider by revenue in the United States at the time. The
purchase price was $239.7 million of which
$118.3 million was allocated to goodwill. The transaction
was financed using a combination of the investment proceeds and
debt financing.
MedQuist Inc. was more than four times the size of us as
measured by lines processed in 2008. Additionally, MedQuist Inc.
offered a complete integrated solution for clinical
documentation, which was a strong complement to our low-cost
service offering. However, prior to the acquisition, MedQuist
Inc. was facing deteriorating financial performance from
declining volumes, customer attrition issues, ongoing litigation
and a lack of offshore capabilities.
We believed that MedQuist Inc., despite its operational
challenges and substantial overhead, had strong underlying
technology, deep healthcare domain expertise, and a long-tenured
customer base. Following our acquisition of MedQuist Inc., we
embarked upon a strategy to enhance the management team,
streamline operations, improve relationships with customers,
leverage our offshore resources, increase the utilization of ASR
technology, and resolve all outstanding litigation. This
strategy resulted in a stabilization of volume trends starting
59
in the second quarter of 2009. The following table shows the
percentage change in MedQuist Inc.s volume for the nine
quarters ended March 31, 2010, the last quarter prior to
the Spheris Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Prior to the MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Volume % Change over Previous Year
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Our operational improvements and integration efforts have
resulted in tangible financial improvements to our
profitability. MedQuist Inc.s Adjusted EBITDA grew from
$3.5 million in 2007 to $55.6 million in 2009. See
Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Data for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to
net income. Gross profit margin has increased from 23% in 2007
to 33% in 2009. Selling, general and administrative expense for
MedQuist Inc. has decreased from $62.3 million or 18% of
revenue in 2007 to $33.4 million or 11% of revenue in 2009.
Spheris
Acquisition
On April 22, 2010, we acquired certain assets, principally
customer contracts, from Spheris in a transaction conducted
under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. The purchase
price was $112.4 million of which $44.9 million was
allocated to goodwill. Spheris was the second largest
U.S. medical transcription service provider by revenue at
the time. Spheris had experienced declines in volumes due
principally to customer attrition, which we believed was
attributable to quality issues and underinvestment in product
development caused by financial constraints leading up to its
bankruptcy. Some volume declines continued after the date of our
acquisition as the result of notices of termination given prior
to that date. The following table shows the percentage change in
Spheris volume for the nine quarters ended March 31,
2010, the last quarter prior to the Spheris Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Volume % Change over Previous Year
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We considered the negative volume trend for Spheris in our
acquisition valuation. Net revenues for Spheris were
$156.6 million and $35.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the three months ended March 31,
2010, respectively. Customers who submitted notices of
termination prior to the acquisition generated revenues of
$24.6 million and $1.7 million during the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the three months ended
March 31, 2010, respectively. Therefore, net revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2010, less revenue attributable to
customers who submitted notices of termination prior to the
Spheris Acquisition, were $132.0 million and
$33.5 million, respectively.
Our Spheris integration efforts have focused on merging the new
customer base acquired, integrating systems and eliminating cost
redundancies. We expect the measures we have implemented since
the Spheris Acquisition to yield $7.0 million of cost
savings in the fourth quarter of 2010, representing an
annualized impact of $28.0 million. Our results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflect
$4.9 million of such cost savings. We expect that the
integration of Spheris will be fully completed by the first half
of 2011.
Volume and
pricing trends
The vast majority of our revenue is generated by providing
clinical documentation services to our customers. Medical
transcription by our MTs and MEs accounted for 89% of our net
revenues for the nine months ended September 30,
60
2010. Product sales and related maintenance contracts, patient
financial services revenues and other made up the balance of our
revenues. Our customers are generally charged a rate per
character multiplied by the number of characters that we
process. MedQuist Inc. volume had been declining prior to the
MedQuist Inc. Acquisition, and we have been able to reverse this
trend by increasing our sales (through the acquisition of new
accounts and additional work types from existing customers) and
decreasing our losses of existing customers. We have reduced
losses of MedQuist Inc. customers primarily by improving our
quality and improving our account management efforts. MedQuist
Inc. volume increased 1% in 2009 compared to 2008.
We base our pricing on various factors, principally market
forces, the extent to which we can utilize our offshore
production facilities, the extent to which customers utilize the
ASR technology available in our solutions, the scope of services
provided, and turn-around times requested by a particular
customer. We work with our customers to evaluate how different
solutions affect pricing and to determine what for them is an
optimal mix of service level and price. Higher utilization of
offshore production and ASR leads to lower costs for us, which
permits us to offer better pricing to our customers while at the
same time contributing to margin growth. We have successfully
migrated a significant portion of MedQuist Inc.s volume
offshore and we will continue these efforts in relation to our
combined businesses.
As technological advances and increased use of offshore
resources have driven down industry costs, the average price per
character has also declined as healthcare providers have sought
to participate in the economic gains. We intend to monitor and
adjust our pricing accordingly to remain competitive as these
industry trends continue.
Operating
improvements
We have executed significant operational improvements since the
MedQuist Inc. Acquisition. Cost of revenues on a per unit basis
has declined due to the increased utilization of ASR technology
and the increased percentage of volume produced offshore. Our
use of speech recognition technology has increased from 39% to
67% over the eight quarters ended September 30, 2010.
Additionally we have increased our offshore production as a
percentage of our volume from 28% to 42% for the same period. As
we continue to increase the use of ASR technology and move
volume offshore, we expect to continue to reduce costs.
Some of our contracts specify lower prices for work performed
offshore or using speech recognition technology. Therefore, our
operating income will not increase by the full amount of the
savings we realize. Additionally, management has been reducing
support staff headcount in order to further reduce operating
costs.
These improvements have resulted in gross margin percentages
which have improved from 33.8% to 38.5% over the eight quarters
ended September 30, 2010 despite lower average prices.
Selling,
general and administrative expense savings
We have made significant reductions in selling, general and
administrative expenses since 2008. Such expenses were 26% of
revenue in 2008 compared to 16% of revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010. These savings were achieved
primarily through headcount reductions and aggressive efforts to
reduce other administrative expenses.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition we have identified
potential specific savings in the sales and marketing and
general and administrative areas. We anticipate that these
savings will be implemented throughout the remainder of 2010 and
2011.
Basis of
presentation
Revenue
We derive revenue primarily from providing clinical
documentation solutions to health systems, hospitals and large
group medical practices. Our customers are generally charged a
fixed rate multiplied by the volume of work that we transcribe
or edit. To a lesser extent we earn revenue by providing
maintenance contracts, digital dictation solutions, speech
recognition solutions and revenue cycle services. Approximately
98% of our revenue is from recurring services.
61
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues includes compensation of our direct employees
and subcontractors involved in production, other production
costs primarily related to operational and production
management, quality assurance, quality control and customer and
field service personnel and telecommunication and facility
costs. Cost of revenues also includes the direct cost of
technology products sold to customers. Compensation costs for
personnel in the United States are directly related to clinical
documentation revenue and are generally based on lines
transcribed or edited multiplied by a specific rate, while
personnel at our offshore production centers are generally paid
fixed wages. Cost of revenues does not include depreciation or
amortization.
Selling,
general and administrative expense
Our selling, general and administrative expense consists
primarily of marketing and sales costs, accounting costs,
information technology costs, professional fees, corporate
facility costs and corporate payroll and benefits expense.
Research and
development expense
Our research and development expense consists primarily of
personnel and related costs, including salaries and employee
benefits for software engineers and consulting fees paid to
independent consultants who provide software engineering
services to us. To date, our research and development efforts
have been devoted to new products and service offerings and
increases in features and functionality of our existing products
and services.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to
seven years for furniture, equipment and software, and the
lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for leasehold
improvements. Intangible assets are being amortized using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which
range from three to twenty years.
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements includes settlement of
claims, ongoing litigation, and associated legal and other
professional fees incurred.
Critical
accounting policies and use of estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States, or GAAP. We believe there are several accounting
policies that are critical to understanding our historical and
future performance, as these policies affect the reported
amounts of revenue and other significant areas that involve
managements judgments and estimates. These critical
accounting policies and estimates have been discussed with our
audit committee.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, expense and related
disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate these estimates and judgments. We base these estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable at such time, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
independent sources. Actual results may ultimately differ from
these estimates. Critical accounting policies are those policies
that require managements subjective and complex judgments,
often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect
of inherently uncertain matters that may change in subsequent
periods. While there are a number of accounting policies,
methods and estimates affecting our consolidated financial
statements
62
as addressed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements, our critical accounting policies include the
following:
Revenue
recognition
We recognize medical transcription services revenue when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed
or determinable, services have been rendered and collectability
is reasonably assured. These services are recorded using
contracted rates and are net of estimates for customer credits.
Historically, our estimates have been reasonably accurate. If
actual results are higher or lower than our estimates, we would
have to adjust our estimates and financial statements in future
periods.
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do
not bear interest. The carrying value of accounts receivable
approximates fair value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
our best estimate of potential losses resulting from the
inability of our customers to make required payments due. This
allowance is used to state trade receivables at estimated net
realizable value.
We estimate uncollectible amounts based upon our historical
write-off experience, current customer receivable balances,
aging of customer receivable balances, the customers
financial condition and current economic conditions.
Historically, our estimates have been adequate to provide for
our accounts receivable exposure.
Additionally, we enter into medical transcription service
contracts that may contain provisions for performance penalties
in the event we do not meet certain required service levels,
primarily related to turn-around time on transcribed reports. We
reduce revenue for any such performance penalties and service
level credits incurred and have included an estimate of such
penalties and credits in our allowance for uncollectible
accounts.
Valuation of
long-lived and other intangible assets and
goodwill
In connection with acquisitions, we allocate portions of the
purchase price to tangible and intangible assets, consisting
primarily of acquired technologies and customer relationships,
with the remainder allocated to goodwill. We prepared the
purchase price allocations and, in doing so, considered the
report of an independent valuation firm. As of
September 30, 2010, we had $99.0 million of goodwill
and $114.2 million of intangible assets. We assess the
realizability of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
useful lives at least annually, or sooner if events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. We have determined that we have three reporting
units but a sole operating segment.
We review our long-lived assets, including amortizable
intangibles, for impairment when events indicate that their
carrying amount may not be recoverable. When we determine that
one or more impairment indicators are present for an asset, we
compare the carrying amount of the asset to net future
undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate.
If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than the net
future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to
generate, we then compare the fair value to the book value of
the asset. If the fair value is less than the book value, we
recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss is the excess
of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value.
Some of the events that we consider as impairment indicators for
our long-lived assets, including goodwill, are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
our net book value is greater than the fair value;
|
|
n
|
significant adverse economic and industry trends;
|
|
n
|
significant decrease in the market value of the asset;
|
|
n
|
the extent that we use an asset or changes in the manner that we
use it;
|
|
n
|
significant changes to the asset since we acquired it; and
|
|
n
|
other changes in circumstances that potentially indicate all or
a portion of our business will be sold.
|
63
Deferred
income taxes
Deferred tax assets represent future tax benefits that we expect
to be able to apply against future taxable income. Our ability
to utilize the deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability
to generate future taxable income. To the extent that we believe
it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred
tax asset will not be utilized, we record a valuation allowance
against that asset. In making that determination we consider all
positive and negative evidence and give stronger consideration
to evidence that is objective in nature.
Commitments
and contingencies
We routinely evaluate claims and other potential litigation to
determine if a liability should be recorded in the event it is
probable that we will incur a loss and can estimate the amount
of such loss.
Customer
accommodation program
In response to customers concerns regarding historical
billing matters, MedQuist Inc. established a plan to offer
financial accommodations to certain of its customers during 2005
and 2006 and recorded the related liability at such time. In
2008 MedQuist Inc. reached an agreement on customer litigation
resolving all claims by the named parties. Since then we have
not made additional offers. The liability balance was
$10.4 million as of September 30, 2010.
MedQuist Inc. is unable to predict how many customers, if any,
may accept the outstanding accommodation offers on the terms
proposed by it, nor it is able to predict the timing of the
acceptance (or rejection) of any outstanding accommodation
offers. Until any offers are accepted, MedQuist Inc. may
withdraw or modify the terms of the accommodation program or any
outstanding offers at any time. In addition, MedQuist Inc. is
unable to predict how many future offers, if made, will be
accepted on the terms proposed by it. We regularly evaluate
whether to proceed with, modify or withdraw the accommodation
program or any outstanding offers. To the extent the program
were withdrawn or modified, our financial statements would be
affected.
64
Consolidated
results of operations
Comparison of
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010
The following tables set forth our unaudited consolidated
results of operations for the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
281,828
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
316,977
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
182,924
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
200,234
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
98,904
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
116,743
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
46,594
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
49,374
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
7,235
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
88,179
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
94,327
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
10,725
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
11,590
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (1)
|
|
$
|
42,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data for a reconciliation of net
income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted
EBITDA.
|
Net
revenues
Net revenues increased by $35.2 million, or 12%, to
$317.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to $281.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The Spheris Acquisition contributed
$57.0 million in incremental revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 which was partially offset
primarily by a decrease in legacy maintenance services revenue
from $13.7 million in 2009 to $12.4 million in 2010
and a decrease of $21.7 million in revenues from clinical
documentation solutions due to lower prices, as well as lower
revenue cycle management and product revenue.
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues increased $17.3 million, or 9%, to
$200.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to $182.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
As a percentage of net revenues, cost of revenues decreased to
63% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 65%
for the same period in 2009 primarily due to increased
utilization of speech recognition
65
technologies, increased utilization of offshore resources, and
other operating cost reduction initiatives. The increase in
total dollars versus the prior year-period was primarily due to
direct incremental costs associated with the incremental Spheris
volumes as well as a nonrecurring $1.2 million credit
during 2009 related to medical claim costs.
Selling,
general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$2.8 million, or 6%, to $49.4 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
$46.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. As a percentage of net revenues, selling general and
administrative expenses decreased to 16% of net revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 17% for the same
period in 2009 primarily due to the impact of synergies realized
for the Spheris Acquisition and other cost reduction initiatives.
Research and
development
Research and development expense increased $1.7 million, to
$8.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to $7.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to costs
associated with historical Spheris research and development
activities partially offset by synergies realized.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $4.0 million, or
20%, to $24.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to $20.3 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was
primarily due to the amortization of acquired intangible assets
associated with the Spheris Acquisition.
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements decreased
$10.7 million, or 79%, to $2.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
$13.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The decrease was due to the costs incurred in 2009 related
to the Anthurium settlement of $5.9 million, related legal
fees of $3.8 million and other legal fees of
$1.2 million.
Acquisition
related charges
We incurred acquisition related charges of $6.9 million
related to the Spheris Acquisition for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Restructuring
charges
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we
recorded restructuring charges of $2.0 million primarily
related to employee severance. We expect that restructuring
activities and related charges will continue into early 2011 as
management identifies opportunities for synergies resulting from
the Spheris Acquisition including the elimination of redundant
functions.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net increased $5.1 million, or 73%, to
$12.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to $6.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The increase was due to the debt
incurred in connection with the Spheris Acquisition, partially
offset by a decrease of $1.2 million in interest expense as
a result of the 2009 repayment of the bridge note incurred in
connection with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition.
66
Income tax
provision
Our consolidated income tax expense consists principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization deductions for income tax purposes during the
applicable period as well as state and foreign income taxes,
offset by a tax benefit related to the reversal of reserves for
various state jurisdictions as agreements on the liabilities
were reached. The tax benefit for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 includes the reversal of approximately
$500,000 from our accrual for various state uncertain tax
positions as a result of filing voluntary disclosure agreements
with state jurisdictions. We recorded a valuation allowance to
reduce our net deferred tax assets to an amount that is more
likely than not to be realized in future years.
We expect that our consolidated income tax expense for the year
ended December 31, 2010, similar to the year ended
December 31, 2009, will consist principally of an increase
in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill amortization
deductions for income tax purposes during the applicable year as
well as state and foreign income taxes. We regularly assess the
future realization of deferred taxes and whether the valuation
allowance against the majority of domestic deferred tax assets
is still warranted. To the extent sufficient positive evidence,
including past results and future projections, exists to benefit
all or part of these benefits, the valuation allowance will be
released accordingly.
Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by $57,000 to
$5.2 million. The decrease in net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests was due to the decrease in the net
income of MedQuist Inc.
Comparison of
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of
operations for the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
371,768
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
125,074
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
239,549
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
68,599
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
132,219
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
51,243
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
60,632
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
178,637
|
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
116,129
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(110,038
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)%
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(3,954
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(9,132
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
(113,917
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
|
|
8,902
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Income tax (provision) benefit
|
|
|
5,398
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)%
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (1)
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data for a reconciliation of net
income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted
EBITDA.
|
67
Net
revenues
Net revenues increased $178.1 million, or 92%, to
$371.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $193.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable primarily
to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
$171.5 million from the consolidation of MedQuist Inc. for
a full year resulting from our acquisition of MedQuist Inc. in
August 2008; and
|
|
n
|
an increase in clinical documentation revenue of
$11.0 million due to organic volume growth partially offset
by a decrease in our revenue cycle management revenue by
$4.4 million largely due to customer attrition.
|
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues increased $114.5 million, or 92%, to
$239.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $125.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable primarily
to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
$110.8 million from the consolidation of MedQuist Inc. for
a full year; and
|
|
n
|
an increase of $5.7 million in clinical documentation cost
of revenues, primarily due to increased personnel cost to
support expansion of capacity, partially offset by a reduction
on $2.1 million in our revenue cycle management business
costs to better align costs with revenue.
|
Selling,
general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$9.4 million, or 18%, to $60.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to $51.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was
primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
consolidation of a full-year of MedQuist Inc. selling, general
and administrative expense of $13.9 million;
|
|
n
|
increase in share based compensation charge of $798,000;
|
|
n
|
full year impact of the cost of our new management team and
corporate costs in 2009 amounting to $2.6 million; offset by
|
|
n
|
charges in 2008 amounting to $7.6 million comprised of
$5.6 million of acquisition related costs incurred in
connection with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition and
$2.1 million for the write-off of uncollectible accounts
receivable.
|
Research and
development
Research and development expense increased $3.5 million, or
57%, to $9.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2009 compared to $6.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable primarily
to the consolidation of a full-year of MedQuist Inc.s
research and development expenses.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$12.1 million, or 81%, to $27.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to $14.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was
attributable primarily to the consolidation of a full-year of
MedQuist Inc. depreciation and amortization expense including
the impact of amortization of acquired intangible assets
amounting to $12.5 million.
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlement
Cost of legal proceedings and settlement increased
$9.6 million, or 181%, to $14.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared with $5.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was due
primarily to the consolidation of a full year of MedQuist
Inc.s cost of legal proceedings and settlements, which
68
includes legal fees incurred in connection with both the SEC
investigations and proceedings and as well as the defense of
certain civil litigation and proceedings. Included in 2009 are
costs incurred related to the Anthurium settlement of
$5.9 million and related legal fees of $3.8 million.
Acquisition
related charges
We incurred costs of $1.2 million during the year ended
December 31, 2009 related to the Spheris Acquisition.
Goodwill
impairment charge
We carried out our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter
of 2008, which included our annual testing date in December.
During our annual impairment testing, we determined the fair
value using a combination of market capitalization based on
market price per share for approximately the 60 days before
December 31, 2008 including a control premium and a
discounted cash flow analysis. Determining fair value requires
the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about
appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates, the amount
and timing of expected future cash flows, as well as relevant
comparable company earnings multiples for the market-based
approach. The cash flows employed in the discounted cash flow
analyses were based on our internal business model for 2009 and,
for years beyond 2009 the growth rates we used are an estimate
of the future growth in the industry in which we participate.
The discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analyses are
intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows
of the reporting unit and are based on an estimated cost of
capital, which we determined based on estimated cost of capital
relative to the capital structure. In addition, the market-based
approach utilizes comparable company public trading values,
research analyst estimates and, where available, values observed
in private market transactions. The analysis indicated that the
reporting units fair value was below the book value for
the MedQuist Inc. and revenue cycle management reporting units
and accordingly, a goodwill impairment charge of
$99.0 million was recorded.
In 2009, the fair value of the MedQuist Inc. reporting unit
substantially exceeded its carrying value and the fair value of
the revenue cycle management reporting unit exceeded its
carrying value by 7%, and accordingly, no second step of the
goodwill impairment test was performed and no impairment charge
was recorded.
In estimating the fair value of our CBay transcription reporting
unit, the market approach and the income approach were used. The
fair value of the reporting unit substantially exceeded its
carrying value, and accordingly, no second step of the goodwill
impairment test was performed and no impairment charge was
recorded in 2009 or 2008.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net primarily reflects interest paid on our
credit facilities and long term debt, net of interest earned on
deposits with banks. Interest expense, net increased
$5.2 million, or 131%, to $9.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared with $4.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was
attributable to the full year impact of interest expense on the
acquisition related debt related to the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition amounting to $4.9 million and other increases
of $200,000.
Income tax
provision
The effective income tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was 12.2% compared with an effective
income tax benefit rate of 4.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The 2009 tax expense includes an
increase in the deferred tax liabilities associated with
indefinite life intangible assets related to goodwill, an
increase in the deferred tax liability associated with an equity
method investment, the reduction of the foreign valuation
allowance and adjustments related to state tax exposures. After
consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded again in 2009, that it was more likely than
not that a significant portion of the domestic deferred income
tax assets would not be realized; therefore, we have a valuation
allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to an amount
that is more likely than not to be realized in future years. The
2008 tax benefit includes the reversal of approximately
$5.6 million of deferred tax liabilities associated with
indefinite life intangible assets related to goodwill which was
impaired in 2008.
69
Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest increased
$1.9 million, or 37%, to $7.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to $5.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was
attributable to the consolidation of MedQuist Inc. for the full
year of 2009.
Comparison of
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of
operations for the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
57,694
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
30,209
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
125,074
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27,485
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
68,599
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
25,137
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
51,243
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
178,637
|
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(110,038
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,108
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,954
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Equity in loss (income) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(113,917
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
5,398
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)%
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (1)
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data for a reconciliation of net
income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted
EBITDA.
|
Net
revenues
Net revenues increased $136.0 million to
$193.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared with $57.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. This increase was attributable primarily
to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
$124.6 million from the consolidation of MedQuist Inc.
since the date of our acquisition of MedQuist Inc. in August
2008; and
|
|
n
|
an increase of $4.6 million in clinical documentation
revenue as a result of our organic volume growth and an increase
of $6.8 million in revenue cycle management revenue
primarily due to the full-year impact of revenue from AMS Plus,
Inc., a revenue cycle management business that we acquired in
August 2007.
|
70
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues increased $94.9 million to
$125.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared with $30.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. This increase was attributable primarily
to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
$88.8 million from the consolidation of MedQuist
Inc.s cost of revenues from the date of the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition in August 2008; and
|
|
n
|
increase in clinical documentation and revenue cycle management
cost of revenues by $6.1 million, primarily due to both
increased personnel cost to support expansion of capacity as
well as the full-year impact of our acquisition of AMS Plus,
Inc., which contributed $5.2 million to the increase.
Revenue cycle management costs declined by $1.3 million due
to a reduction in the workforce as part of cost realignment with
the reduced revenue. The cost of revenue for our clinical
documentation business increased by $2.2 million.
|
Selling,
general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$26.1 million, or 104%, to $51.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to $25.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. This increase was
primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
consolidation of MedQuist Inc.s selling, general and
administrative expense from the date of the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition in August 2008 of $17.5 million; and
|
|
n
|
an increase of $5.6 million for expenses related to the MedQuist
Inc. Acquisition, and
|
|
n
|
an increase of $2.8 million in clinical documentation and
revenue cycle management due to the full-year impact of AMS
Plus, Inc.; and offset by
|
|
n
|
a decline in share based compensation charge of
$1.2 million and other savings of $0.6 million.
|
Research and
development
Research and development expense increased $6.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $0 for the
year ended December 31, 2007. This increase was
attributable to the consolidation of MedQuist Inc.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$12.0 million, to $14.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared with $2.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. This increase was
attributable primarily to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
consolidation of a partial year of MedQuist Inc. depreciation
and amortization expense, including the impact of amortization
of acquired intangible assets associated with the acquisition of
MedQuist Inc. amounting to $10.0 million; and
|
|
n
|
an increase of $1.9 million in clinical documentation and
revenue cycle management.
|
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements increased
$5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared with no such costs for the year ended December 31,
2007. This increase was due to the consolidation of a partial
year of MedQuist Inc.s cost of legal proceedings and
settlement, which includes legal fees incurred in connection
with the SEC and U.S. Department of Justice investigations
and proceedings as well as the defense of certain civil
litigation and proceedings. See Note 14 to our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
71
Goodwill
impairment charge
We carried out our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter
of 2008, which included our annual testing date in December.
During our annual impairment testing, we determined the fair
value using a combination of market capitalization based on
market price per share for approximately the 60 days before
December 31, 2008 including a control premium, and a
discounted cash flow analysis. Determining fair value requires
the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about
appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates, the amount
and timing of expected future cash flows, as well as relevant
comparable company earnings multiples for the market-based
approach. The cash flows employed in the discounted cash flow
analyses were based on our internal business model for 2009 and,
for years beyond 2009 the growth rates we used are an estimate
of the future growth in the industry in which we participate.
The discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analyses are
intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows
of the reporting unit and are based on an estimated cost of
capital, which we determined based on estimated cost of capital
relative to the capital structure. In addition, the market-based
approach utilizes comparable company public trading values,
research analyst estimates and, where available, values observed
in private market transactions. The analysis indicated that the
reporting units fair value was below the book value for
the MedQuist Inc. and revenue cycle management reporting units
and accordingly, a goodwill impairment charge of
$99.0 million was recorded.
Restructuring
charges
During 2008, we recorded a restructuring charge of
$2.1 million for severance obligations related to a
reduction in workforce of 189 employees in order to better
align costs with revenue.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net primarily reflects interest paid on our
credit facilities and long term debt, net of interest earned on
deposits with banks. Interest expense, net increased
$1.8 million, or 88%, to $4.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to $2.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. This increase was
attributable to interest expense on acquisition related debt
related to the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition amounting to
$2.5 million offset by a $654,000 reduction in interest
expense due to the repayment of other debt.
Income tax
provision
The effective income tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was an income tax benefit rate of 4.7%
compared with an effective income tax benefit rate of 4.1% for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The 2008 tax benefit
includes the reversal of approximately $5.6 million of
deferred tax liabilities associated with indefinite life
intangible assets related to goodwill which was impaired in
2008. After consideration of all evidence, both positive and
negative, management concluded again in 2008, that it was more
likely than not that a significant portion of the domestic
deferred income tax assets would not be realized; therefore, we
have a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets
to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in
future years.
Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest increased
$5.2 million to $5.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared with $57,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2007. This increase was attributable to the
consolidation of MedQuist Inc. from the date of the
MedQuist Inc. Acquisition.
72
Unaudited
quarterly results of operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated
quarterly results of operations for each of the eight quarters
during the period from October 1, 2008 to
September 30, 2010. In our managements opinion, the
unaudited results of operations for each quarter have been
prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial
statements included in this prospectus and reflect all necessary
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations
for the quarters presented. You should read this information
together with our consolidated financial statements and the
related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Operating
results for any fiscal quarter are not necessarily indicative of
results for the full year. Historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future
periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
94,215
|
|
|
$
|
94,669
|
|
|
$
|
93,871
|
|
|
$
|
93,289
|
|
|
$
|
89,939
|
|
|
$
|
88,604
|
|
|
$
|
111,988
|
|
|
$
|
116,385
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
62,376
|
|
|
|
62,103
|
|
|
|
59,651
|
|
|
|
61,170
|
|
|
|
56,625
|
|
|
|
56,513
|
|
|
|
72,128
|
|
|
|
71,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
31,839
|
|
|
|
32,566
|
|
|
|
34,220
|
|
|
|
32,119
|
|
|
|
33,314
|
|
|
|
32,091
|
|
|
|
39,860
|
|
|
|
44,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
20,354
|
|
|
|
16,008
|
|
|
|
15,757
|
|
|
|
14,830
|
|
|
|
14,037
|
|
|
|
15,826
|
|
|
|
16,880
|
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,346
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,597
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
6,719
|
|
|
|
6,648
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
|
|
8,705
|
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
7,774
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
135,234
|
|
|
|
32,801
|
|
|
|
29,528
|
|
|
|
25,851
|
|
|
|
27,949
|
|
|
|
26,497
|
|
|
|
36,033
|
|
|
|
31,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(103,395
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
|
|
6,268
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
12,995
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,410
|
)
|
|
|
(2,342
|
)
|
|
|
(2,317
|
)
|
|
|
(2,286
|
)
|
|
|
(2,187
|
)
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
|
|
(5,460
|
)
|
|
|
(4,680
|
)
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
(105,778
|
)
|
|
|
(2,505
|
)
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
|
|
6,109
|
|
|
|
2,587
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
(1,601
|
)
|
|
|
8,866
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(7,573
|
)
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(98,205
|
)
|
|
|
(2,860
|
)
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
5,496
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
8,609
|
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(6,852
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,957
|
)
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(105,057
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
2,539
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
2,088
|
|
|
$
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines processed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ASR
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
% Offshore
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
73
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc., to Adjusted
EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September, 30,
|
|
|
December, 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(105,057
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
2,539
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
2,088
|
|
|
$
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
5,872
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
6,852
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,957
|
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
2,737
|
|
Income tax provision
(benefit) (a)
|
|
|
(7,573
|
)
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
257
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
5,460
|
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization (b)
|
|
|
8,597
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
6,719
|
|
|
|
6,648
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
|
|
8,705
|
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
7,774
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Asset impairment charges, severance charges and accrual
reversals (c)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFS
business (d)
|
|
|
(1,120
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
8,928
|
|
|
$
|
13,716
|
|
|
$
|
14,622
|
|
|
$
|
14,653
|
|
|
$
|
16,696
|
|
|
$
|
13,788
|
|
|
$
|
19,238
|
|
|
$
|
24,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
We have $130.0 million of
federal net operating loss carry forwards as of
December 31, 2009 and will record approximately
$30.0 million of annual tax amortization related to
intangible assets, including goodwill, that will reduce future
taxable income. Due to the existence of federal net operating
loss carry forwards and the impact of tax amortization related
to intangible assets, including goodwill, cash taxes paid were
$84,000, $160,000, $796,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$667,000 and $30,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
|
(b)
|
Includes amortization of acquired
intangibles of $3.4 million, $3.0 million,
$3.2 million, $3.6 million, $3.0 million,
$3.0 million, $4.2 million and $4.5 million for
the eight quarters ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
|
(c)
|
Includes an impairment charge to
write-off the amount paid related to severance of one of our
former executives and the reversal of certain accruals, related
to litigation claims, as a result of the expiration of the
applicable statute of limitations.
|
(d)
|
Includes the effect of the PFS
business, which was sold on December 31, 2010.
|
Our net revenues increased in the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 due to the consolidation of MedQuist Inc.
for the full quarter and then again in the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 with the consolidation of Spheris starting
April 22, 2010. We experience minor fluctuations in our
revenue as a result of variations in the number of business days
in certain months and the deferral by consumers of elective
medical procedures during certain holiday periods.
Our gross profit as a percentage of net revenues has increased
from 34% in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 to 38% for
the quarter ended September 30, 2010. This improvement was
due to the increased use of
74
speech recognition technology, which increased from 39% to 67%
over the eight quarters ended September 30, 2010 and the
increase in our offshore production, which, as percentage of our
volume has increased from 28% to 42% for the same period.
Additionally we reduced our indirect operating headcount to
further reduce our costs.
Selling, general and administrative expense has decreased from
$20.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008
to $16.7 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2010. As a percentage of revenue selling, general and
administrative expense has decreased from 22% to 14% over the
same period. This was due to headcount reductions and reductions
in other administrative expenses.
Our Adjusted EBITDA has increased over the eight quarter period
from $8.9 million in the quarter ended December 31,
2008 to $24.9 million in the quarter ended
September 30, 2010. This is the result of the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition and Spheris Acquisition, the operating improvements
and the expense reductions made over the period.
Liquidity and
capital resources
Our principal sources of liquidity include cash generated from
operations, available cash on hand, and availability under our
Senior Secured Credit Facility, as described below.
Available cash at September 30, 2010 was $24.0 million
compared to $29.6 million at December 31, 2009. During
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, we received
$100.0 million in cash inflow from our Acquisition Credit
Facility which was utilized to fund the Spheris Acquisition.
Additionally, several other items impacted cash flows for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2010, resulting in a
net decrease of $5.6 million, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
addition of cash flows provided by Spheris operations;
|
|
n
|
cash used to pay financing costs associated with the Acquisition
Credit Facility (as defined below);
|
|
n
|
$20 million in principal payments on the Acquisition Credit
Facility;
|
|
n
|
acquisition-related charges associated with the Spheris
Acquisition;
|
|
n
|
restructuring payments; and
|
|
n
|
other working capital changes.
|
We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, cash to be
generated from operations and available borrowings under our
revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our
operations for the next twelve months. However, if we fail to
generate adequate cash flows from operations in the future, due
to an unexpected decline in our net revenues, or due to
increased cash expenditures in excess of the net revenues
generated, then our cash balances may not be sufficient to fund
our continuing operations without obtaining additional debt or
equity. There are no assurances that sufficient funding from
external sources will be available to us on acceptable terms, if
at all.
Prior to the
Corporate Reorganization
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition, MedQuist
Transcriptions, Ltd., a subsidiary of MedQuist Inc., and certain
other subsidiaries of MedQuist Inc., or collectively, the Loan
Parties, entered into a credit agreement, or the Acquisition
Credit Facility, with General Electric Capital Corporation,
CapitalSource Bank, and Fifth Third Bank. The Acquisition Credit
Facility provided for up to $100.0 million in senior
secured credit facilities, consisting of a $50.0 million
term loan, and a revolving credit facility of up to
$50.0 million. The credit facilities were secured by a
first priority lien on substantially all of the property of the
Loan Parties. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility
were able to be made from time to time, subject to availability
under such facility, until the fourth anniversary of the closing
date. Amounts borrowed under the Acquisition Credit Facility
bore interest at a rate selected by MedQuist Transcriptions,
Ltd. equal to the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate (each as
defined in the Acquisition Credit Facility agreement) plus a
margin. At September 30, 2010, the revolving credit
facility and the term loan had interest rates of 6.25% and
6.75%, respectively. The Acquisition Credit Facility was repaid
in full on October 14, 2010 in connection with the
Recapitalization Transactions.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition, MedQuist Inc. also
entered into the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note, with
Spheris Inc. The note was to mature in five years from the date
of the Spheris Acquisition.
75
The face amount of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
was $17.5 million with provisions for prepayment at
discounted amounts, ranging from 77.5% of the principal if paid
within six months, 87.5% from six to nine months, 97.5% from
nine to twelve months, 102.0% between the first and second year,
101.0% between the second and third year and 100.0% thereafter.
For purposes of the purchase price allocation, the note was
discounted at 77.5% of the principal, or $13.6 million. The
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note bore interest at 8.0%
for the first six months. The Acquisition Subordinated
Promissory Note was repaid at 77.5% of the face amount on
October 14, 2010 in connection with the Recapitalization
Transactions.
In connection with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition, we issued the
6% Convertible Notes to Philips. The 6% Convertible Notes were
extinguished on October 14, 2010 in connection with the
Recapitalization Transactions.
We are party to a credit agreement with ICICI Bank, Mumbai,
India in the amount of $2.8 million, at interest rates
ranging from LIBOR plus 2.5% and 15.5%, respectively, which is
secured by CBay Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd.s, or CBay India,
current assets and fixed assets. The amount outstanding as of
September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$341,000, $1.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 we recorded $81,000,
$205,000, $98,000 and $36,000, respectively, of interest expense
in our consolidated statements of operations.
We had revolving lines of credit from K Bank. Subject to certain
terms and conditions of the agreement with K Bank, the agreement
provided a revolving line of credit of a maximum of
$5.7 million. These revolving lines of credit with
K Bank were repaid in full on October 14, 2010 in
connection with the Recapitalization Transactions.
We are party to a credit agreement with IndusInd Bank, Mumbai,
India of $3.2 million at interest rates of LIBOR plus 3%,
which is secured by current assets and fixed assets of CBay
India. The amount outstanding under this credit agreement as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
$3.2 million and $0, respectively.
Subsequent to
the Corporate Reorganization
In connection with the Corporate Reorganization, on
October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as borrower, and our
subsidiaries, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc.,
as co-borrowers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the Senior Secured
Credit Facility with General Electric Capital Corporation, as
administrative agent, and the parties thereto, consisting of
(i) a $200.0 million Term Loan and (ii) a
$25.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Senior Secured
Credit Facility is secured by a first priority lien on
substantially all existing and after-acquired property of the
borrowers and the guarantors. The Term Loan is repayable in
equal quarterly installments of $5.0 million commencing on
the first fiscal quarter after the closing date, with the
balance payable 5 years from the closing date. The term
loan interest rate is LIBOR plus 5.50% with a LIBOR floor of
1.75% and is payable monthly. We may also structure borrowings
as Eurodollar loans with an interest rate based on LIBOR rates.
Currently, the LIBOR floor is in effect. We may prepay the term
loan with certain prepayment penalties. Mandatory prepayments
are required when we generate excess cash flows as defined under
the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility, we are required to maintain (i) a minimum
consolidated interest coverage ratio, initially, of 2.75x and
increasing over the term of the facility to 4.00x, (ii) a
maximum total leverage ratio, initially of 4.00x and declining
over the term of the facility to 1.50x and (iii) a maximum
consolidated senior leverage ratio, initially of 3.00x and
declining over the term of the facility to 1.00x.
In addition to the Senior Secured Credit Agreement, in
connection with the Corporate Reorganization, on
September 30, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as issuer, MedQuist
Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc. as co-issuers and
guarantors, and we and certain of our other subsidiaries, as
guarantors, entered into the Note Purchase Agreement for the
issuance of $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of
13% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 to BlackRock Kelso
Capital Corporation, PennantPark Investment Corporation,
Citibank, N.A., and THL Credit, Inc. Interest on the notes is
payable in quarterly installments at the issuers option at
either (i) 13% in cash or (ii) 12% in cash plus 2% in
the form of additional senior subordinated notes. Closing and
funding of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes occurred on October 14, 2010. See
Description of Indebtedness for a more detailed
description of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes.
Proceeds from the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes were used by MedQuist Inc. to repay
$80.0 million of indebtedness under the Acquisition Credit
Facility, to repay $13.6 million indebtedness
76
under the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note and to pay a
$176.5 million special dividend to its stockholders. We
received $122.6 million of this special dividend and used
$104.1 million to extinguish our 6% Convertible Notes
issued in connection with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition and
$3.7 million to extinguish other lines of credit.
Operating
activities
Cash flow provided by operating activities was
$32.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and $28.7 million for the same period in 2010. For
2009, changes in operating assets and liabilities resulted in a
net cash flow of $5.0 million. The primary components of
that inflow were a $5.8 million lower accounts receivable
balance due to lower revenue and the timing of collections and a
$4.6 million higher accrued compensation balance due to
higher accrued but unpaid incentive compensation, partially
offset by a cash usage resulting from lower accrued expenses and
current liabilities balance. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 changes in operating assets and
liabilities resulted in a use of cash of $12.2 million,
consisting primarily of $4.5 million in higher other
current assets due to an increase in deferred financing fees and
$9.1 million due to decreased accrued expenses and other
current liabilities. This was primarily due to payments for
assumed liabilities of Spheris and settlement costs related to
the Kaiser litigation. Partially offsetting those outflows were
cash inflows of $2.1 million related to an increased
accounts payable balance and $2.5 million of higher accrued
compensation.
Cash flow provided by operating activities was
$3.3 million, ($2.6) million and $42.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. Changes in operating assets and liabilities
resulted in net cash flow of $1.9 million in 2007, net use
of cash of $7.9 million for 2008, and net cash flow of
$2.5 million for 2009. For 2007, the primary changes were
an outflow of $5.0 million from higher accounts receivable
balances as a result of an increase in direct billings to third
party customers offset by an inflow of $6.2 million from
lower other current assets due to the receipt of amounts from a
related party billed in the prior year. For 2008, the primary
components of the $7.9 million use of cash were a
$10.9 million cash outflow related to a decrease in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities and lower other
non-current liabilities of $4.8 million. This was due to
payments to customers under MedQuist Inc.s customer
accommodation program and the settlement of a previously accrued
litigation. These outflows were partially offset by cash inflows
from an increase in accounts payable of $2.0 million and
deferred revenue of $3.4 million. The increase in deferred
revenue represents cash received for maintenance contracts and
certain product sales in advance of the recognition of the
associated revenue. For 2009, the primary components of the
$2.5 million cash flow from operating assets and
liabilities were $3.8 million related to improved
receivables collections and lower receivable balances due to
lower revenue, and a cash inflow of $2.2 million from other
current assets. These inflows were partially offset by outflows
of $2.1 million related to deferred revenue primarily due
to lower maintenance contract revenue and a $3.6 million
outflow as a result of a decrease in accrued expenses and other
current liabilities primarily due to the payment of accrued
expenses associated with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition.
Investing
activities
Cash used in investing activities was $8.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 which reflects the
purchase of property and equipment and additions to intangible
assets (primarily capitalized software). Cash used by investing
activities was $107.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. The Spheris Acquisition accounted for
$97.7 million and purchases of property and equipment and
intangible assets accounted for $9.6 million of the 2010
cash used by investing activities. Cash used by investing
activities was $18.5 million, $76.5 million and
$12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2008
and 2009 respectively. Payments for acquisitions and interests
in affiliates were $10.2 million, $69.3 million and
$2.7 million for 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and the
remaining cash used in investing activities primarily related to
the purchase of property and equipment.
Financing
activities
Cash used by financing activities was $43.9 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. This was due to the
dividend paid by MedQuist Inc. to non-controlling shareholders
of $15.3 million and the repayment of
77
a bridge note related to the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 cash provided by
financing activities was $73.2 million primarily related to
the financing of Spheris Acquisition and subsequent partial
repayment of the Acquisition Credit Facility. Financing
activities used $44.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 representing dividends of
$15.3 million to noncontrolling interests and
$28.6 million related to repayments of loans. For the year
ended December 31, 2008 cash provided by financing
activities was $121.4 million which was primarily the
result of the $124.0 million investment by our majority
stockholder. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the cash
provided by financing activities was $16.1 million of which
the primary components were the proceeds from the sale of stock
offset by repayments of indebtedness.
Contractual
obligations
The following table summarizes our obligations to make future
payments under current contracts as of December 31, 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
20,770
|
|
|
$
|
5,561
|
|
|
$
|
13,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
obligations (1)
|
|
|
10,869
|
|
|
|
8,666
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities
|
|
|
107,340
|
|
|
|
6,207
|
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
98,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
138,979
|
|
|
$
|
20,434
|
|
|
$
|
18,395
|
|
|
$
|
100,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Purchase obligations are for
telecommunication contracts ($9.6 million), software
development cost ($1.0 million) and other recurring
purchase obligations ($250,000).
|
Our debt obligations changed materially as of September 30,
2010 because of the incurrence of the debt associated with the
Spheris Acquisition. The following table summarizes our
obligations to make future payments of principal (excluding
interest) under debt obligations as of September 30, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
13,090
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23,467
|
|
2012
|
|
|
117,292
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
2014
|
|
|
35,278
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
13,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
204,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our debt obligations changed materially subsequent to
September 30, 2010 because of the incurrence and
refinancing of debt obligations then outstanding. The following
table summarizes our obligations to make future payments of
principal (excluding interest) under debt obligations as of
September 30, 2010 on a pro forma basis after giving effect
to the Recapitalization Transactions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
9,932
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23,337
|
|
2012
|
|
|
20,832
|
|
2013
|
|
|
20,408
|
|
2014
|
|
|
20,278
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
200,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
294,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
Off-balance sheet
arrangements
We are not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements that
have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or
future impact on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenue or expense, results of operations, liquidity,
capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our
financial position due to adverse changes in financial market
prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result
of fluctuations in interest rates. We do not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes. Our offshore
production costs are subject to foreign exchange fluctuation as
these costs are primarily paid in Indian Rupees. We have entered
in to foreign exchange contracts to offset such fluctuation. As
of September 30, 2010, we had forward Indian rupee purchase
contracts totaling $5.3 million at an average contract
price of 47.01 Indian rupees. Such contracts have various
maturities through April 14, 2011.
Interest rate
sensitivity
We earn interest income from our balances of cash and cash
equivalents. This interest income is subject to market risk
related to changes in interest rates, which affects primarily
our investment portfolio. We invest in instruments that meet
high credit quality standards, as specified in our investment
policy.
The Term Loan of our Senior Secured Credit Facility bears
interest at LIBOR plus 5.50% with a LIBOR floor of 1.75%. Our
interest expense associated with this loan will increase if
LIBOR increases. Because the LIBOR floor is currently in effect,
a 1.25% increase in LIBOR above current LIBOR levels would not
increase our effective interest rate. A 1% increase in LIBOR
above this floor would result in an approximate
$2.0 million annual increase in our interest expense.
Recent accounting
pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
issued, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
This establishes the codification as the source of authoritative
GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under
federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP
for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification
carries an equal level of authority.
In September 2009, the FASB ratified two consensuses affecting
revenue recognition:
|
|
|
|
n
|
The first consensus, Revenue Recognition
Multiple-Element Arrangements, sets forth requirements that must
be met for an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of a
delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement
when other items have not yet been delivered. One of those
current requirements is that there be objective and reliable
evidence of the standalone selling price of the undelivered
items, which must be supported by either vendor-specific
objective evidence, or VSOE, or third-party evidence, or TPE.
This consensus eliminates the requirement that all undelivered
elements have VSOE or TPE before an entity can recognize the
portion of an overall arrangement fee that is attributable to
items that already have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE
or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more delivered
or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement,
entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of
those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be allocated to
each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on
their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those
selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the
entitys estimated selling price. Application of the
residual method of allocating an overall arrangement
fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted.
|
|
|
n
|
The second consensus, Software-Revenue Recognition, addresses
the accounting for a transaction involving software to exclude
from its scope tangible products that contain both software and
non-software components that function together to deliver a
products functionality.
|
79
The consensuses are effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We are evaluating the
potential impact of these requirements on our financial
statements.
Changes in
independent auditors
In October 2008, we informed Grant Thornton, India, or Grant
Thornton, that Grant Thornton was being dismissed as our
principal accountants effective immediately. We determined to
use the same accountants as our subsidiary, MedQuist Inc. after
the respective audit committees of MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist
Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) evaluated
our options and selected KPMG LLP, or KPMG. Our decision to
dismiss Grant Thornton was approved by our audit committee.
Grant Thorntons audit reports on our consolidated
financial statements as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 did not contain an adverse
opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or
modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and in
the subsequent interim period preceding Grant Thorntons
dismissal, there were: (i) no disagreements between us and
Grant Thornton on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or
procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of Grant Thornton, would have caused Grant Thornton
to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in
their reports on the financial statements for such years, and;
(ii) no reportable events within the meaning of
Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
We requested that Grant Thornton furnish a letter addressed to
the SEC stating whether or not it has reviewed and agrees with
the above statements. A copy of Grant Thorntons letter
dated November 24, 2010 is included as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is part.
In October 2008, we engaged KPMG as our new principal
accountants for the year ending December 31, 2008. Our
decision to engage KPMG was approved by our audit committee. In
deciding to engage KPMG, our audit committee reviewed auditor
independence issues and prior commercial relationships with KPMG
and concluded that KPMG has no commercial relationship with us
that would impair its independence for the year ended
December 31, 2008. During the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006, and in the subsequent interim period through
October 2008, neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf has
consulted with KPMG on any of the matters or events set forth in
Item 304(a)(2) of
Regulation S-K.
80
Business
Overview
We are a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation
solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Our
end-to-end
solutions convert physicians dictation of patient
interactions, or the physician narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
ASR, medical transcription and editing, workflow automation, and
document management and distribution to deliver a complete
managed service for our customers. Our solutions enable
hospitals, clinics, and physician practices to improve the
quality of clinical data as well as accelerate and automate the
documentation process, and we believe our solutions improve
physician productivity and satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle
performance, and facilitate the adoption and use of electronic
health records.
We are the largest provider by revenue of clinical documentation
solutions based on the physician narrative in the United States.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we
processed, on an annualized run rate basis, more than
3.4 billion lines of clinical documentation on our
platform. The significant majority of lines we process are
edited or transcribed by our approximately 14,000 MTs and
MEs. Of this volume, for the three months ended
September 30, 2010, 67% was processed using ASR technology
and 42% was produced offshore. Our size allows us to handle the
clinical documentation requirements of many of the largest and
most complex healthcare delivery networks in the United States,
provides us with economies of scale, and enables us to devote
significantly more resources to enhancing our solutions through
research and development than most of our competitors.
We serve more than 2,400 hospitals, clinics, and physician
practices throughout the United States, including 40% of
hospitals with more than 500 licensed beds. As of
September 30, 2010, the average tenure of our top
50 customers was over five years, and approximately 98% of
our revenue was from recurring services. Insights gained from
our broad, long-standing customer relationships allow us to
optimize our integrated solutions, and we believe that this
positions us for future growth as we target new customers.
We have realized significant increases in both revenue and
profitability as the result of two large acquisitions, MedQuist
Inc., in which we acquired a majority interest in August 2008,
and Spheris, which we acquired in April 2010. From 2007 to 2009,
our net revenue increased from $57.7 million to
$371.8 million. Over this same period, our Adjusted EBITDA
increased from $0.7 million to $59.7 million, and our
Adjusted EBITDA margins expanded from 1.1% to 16.1%. For a
reconciliation of our net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA, see Selected
Consolidated Financial and Other Data.
Our
industry
Growth of
clinical documentation in the United States
Over the past several decades, our industry has evolved from
almost exclusively in-house production to outsourced services
and from labor-intensive services to technologically-enabled
solutions. The market opportunity for our solutions is driven by
overall healthcare utilization and cost containment efforts in
the United States. Numerous factors are driving increases in the
demand for healthcare services including population growth,
longer life expectancy, the increasing prevalence of chronic
illnesses, and expanded coverage from healthcare reform.
According to a September 2010 report by the U.S. Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services, spending on healthcare grew
from $1.2 trillion in 1998 to $2.3 trillion in 2008,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 7.0%. It also
projects that healthcare spending will grow to reach
$4.2 trillion, or 19.3% of U.S. gross domestic
product, by 2018, representing a compound annual growth rate of
6.3%. At the same time, U.S. healthcare providers remain
under substantial pressure to reduce costs while maintaining or
improving the quality of care.
Accurate and timely clinical documentation has become a critical
requirement of the growing U.S. healthcare system.
Medicare, Medicaid, and insurance companies demand extensive
patient care documentation. The HITECH Act includes numerous
incentives to promote the adoption and meaningful use of
electronic health records, or EHRs, across the healthcare
industry. Consequently, healthcare providers are increasingly
using EHRs to input, store, and manage their clinical data in a
digital format. Healthcare providers that use EHRs require
81
accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective means to input
clinical data that are not disruptive to the physician workflow.
Importance of
the physician narrative
Physicians generally use one of two methods to capture clinical
data in a digital format: dictation and on-screen data entry.
Dictation allows a physician to use his or her voice to document
patient interactions, which is then converted into a text format
or EHR record. On-screen data entry enables a physician to
populate templates or drop-down menus in an EHR system,
typically with a handheld or other hardware device.
In many hospital settings, dictation is the most popular method
for capturing clinical data because of the many advantages it
provides over on-screen data entry. From an efficiency
standpoint, a physicians time is typically the most
expensive labor component of a clinical documentation process,
and reducing the time required for data capture lowers costs. It
is generally faster to dictate than enter data on-screen, and
dictation frees up the physician to do other tasks in parallel.
From a documentation standpoint, dictation allows for a flexible
narration of patient interactions. Templates and drop-down menus
typically restrict input to a structured format. While dictation
can be converted into structured format later, it provides a
more flexible method for data capture.
Market
opportunity
The need to convert and manage the physician narrative
represents a substantial market opportunity. Historically,
in-house hospital labor was used to transcribe clinical reports
using analog recordings from physicians. Later, healthcare
providers began to outsource production to domestic providers
and use digital formats. Today, advanced automation
technologies, such as ASR and workflow platforms, and low-cost
offshore resources are available to drive substantial
improvements in productivity and cost.
Outsourcing enables healthcare providers to reduce costs, gain
access to leading technologies, accelerate turn-around times,
improve accuracy, and fulfill security and compliance
requirements. In a March 2010 report, ValueNotes estimated that
spending on outsourced transcription services by hospitals,
clinics, and physician practices in the United States reached
$5.4 billion in 2009. ValueNotes further projected that the
market for outsourced transcription would grow 8.2% per annum to
$8.0 billion by 2014. As this market expands, ValueNotes
projects that outsourcing will grow relative to in-house
alternatives from 33% of production in 2009 to 38% by 2014.
Market
segmentation and trends
While outsourcing provides many benefits, the landscape for
outsourced service providers is highly fragmented with varying
degrees of technological automation and offshore capabilities
amongst providers. Thousands of local and regional providers
offer limited services without technology offerings. A small set
of national providers offer a combination of technology and
services, but have varying degrees of technological
sophistication and production capacity. Some vendors also focus
more on pure technology, offering ASR software, with
partnerships for third-party services, though most of these
vendors lack production scale.
Over the last five years, technological automation and a rise in
offshore capabilities have substantially decreased the cost of
production and have further differentiated outsourcing
providers. ASR has been a key technological driver of
productivity gains. ASR converts the physician narrative into a
text format which is available for editing. The effective use of
this technology lowers the cost of production relative to
conventional transcription services by replacing transcription
labor with editing, which, while still required, is much less
time consuming. Another key driver for cost reductions has been
the increased use of offshore infrastructure and resources.
Historically, most U.S. healthcare providers that
outsourced their production did so to domestic service
providers. With the advent of internet-based technologies and
improvements in the quality and training of offshore personnel,
the clinical documentation industry has seen a shift towards
offshore resources to reduce costs. India is by far the most
popular destination for outsourcing given relatively low wages
and a highly educated English-speaking workforce.
As the industrys cost of production has declined through
increases in technological automation and offshore capabilities,
the average market price for medical transcription services has
also declined. This has allowed
82
healthcare providers to participate in these economic gains.
However, we believe that participants in our industry must
expand their technology platforms and offshore capabilities to
remain competitive.
Our competitive
strengths
Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Leader in a large, fragmented market We are
the largest provider by revenue of clinical documentation
solutions based on the physician narrative in the United States.
Our size enables us to meet the needs of large, sophisticated
healthcare customers, provides economies of scale, and enables
us to devote significantly more resources to research and
development and quality assurance than many other providers.
|
|
|
n
|
Integrated solutions delivered as a complete managed
service We offer fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services that capture and convert the physician
narrative into a high quality customized electronic record. We
integrate technologies and services for voice capture and
transmission, ASR, medical transcription and editing, workflow
automation, and document management and distribution. The end
result is value-added clinical documentation with high accuracy
and quick
turn-around
times.
|
|
|
n
|
Large and diversified customer base with long-term
relationships We serve more than 2,400
hospitals, clinics and physician practices throughout the United
States, including 40% of hospitals with more than 500 licensed
beds. We have a long-standing history with our customers, and as
of September 30, 2010, approximately 98% of our revenue was
from recurring services.
|
|
|
n
|
Highly-efficient operating model Over the
past two years, we have driven down our cost structure through
the use of technology automation, standardized processes, and
offshore resources. Our use of ASR, which has grown from 39% of
our volume in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 67% in the third
quarter of 2010, has increased our productivity. Additionally,
our expanding footprint in India has enabled us to increase our
offshore production from 28% of our volume to 42% over this same
period. The financial impact of these measures has been an
improvement in gross margins during this timeframe from 33.8% to
38.5%. We have grown our volume, excluding volume provided by
the Spheris Acquisition, by 2.3% over this same period while
sharing cost savings with our customers in the form of lower
prices.
|
|
|
n
|
Proven management team We have assembled an
outstanding senior leadership team with significant industry
experience and domain expertise in both domestic and offshore
operations. Our management team has delivered substantial
results and brings an entrepreneurial spirit with proven
experience in managing growth, driving operational improvements,
and successfully integrating acquisitions.
|
Our
strategy
Key elements of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expand our customer base and increase existing customer
penetration We intend to grow our customer base
by targeting three market segments: large healthcare providers
still using in-house services, large healthcare providers
currently using competing outsourced alternatives, and
small-to-medium medical practices. Given our market leadership,
strong solution offerings, and low cost structure, we believe we
are well positioned to both replace in-house solutions as well
as displace competing outsourced alternatives for large
healthcare providers. For small-to-medium sized physician
practices, we offer an easy-to-use web-based clinical
documentation platform, CBayScribe, to expand our market share
in this segment, which we believe to be underpenetrated. In
order to increase penetration within our existing customer base,
we intend to continue targeting additional healthcare clinical
areas and facilities of our current customers. Additionally, as
healthcare providers centralize their purchasing decisions, we
believe that our ability to deliver outstanding services for
large, complex requirements provides us with increasing access
to new sales opportunities within our existing customer base and
through existing customer relationships.
|
83
|
|
|
|
n
|
Continue to develop and enhance our integrated
solutions We seek to differentiate our
integrated solutions through sophisticated technology and
process improvement. We have over 100 employees dedicated
to research and development. Over the last year, we launched
numerous enhancements, including a front end speech platform for
general medicine, additional EHR system integration, and
advanced performance monitoring.
|
|
|
n
|
Enhance profitability through technical and operational
expertise We have made significant improvements
in productivity through business process and infrastructure
improvements. Notwithstanding reductions in customer pricing,
our gross margins have expanded from 33.8% in the fourth quarter
of 2008, our first fiscal quarter after we acquired MedQuist
Inc., to 38.5% in the third quarter of 2010, and our Adjusted
EBITDA margins have expanded from 9.5% to 21.4% for the same
periods. Our management team has proven its ability to implement
continuous process improvements and we intend to further
increase offshore production and our use of technological
automation, including ASR, to lower costs and enhance our
profitability.
|
|
|
n
|
Facilitate the adoption and promote meaningful use of EHR
systems Our integrated solutions provide a
comprehensive, accurate and effective method to incorporate
physician narrative into an EHR system. We interface with
substantially all of the leading EHR vendors to integrate our
clinical documentation solutions and to help our customers
realize the full potential of their EHR systems through the use
of the physician narrative. In our experience, when EHR is
adopted, customers tend to consolidate their purchase decisions,
which benefits us as a leading provider of clinical
documentation solutions.
|
|
|
n
|
Pursue strategic acquisitions We believe that
there are significant opportunities available to create value
through strategic acquisitions. We intend to seek appropriate
opportunities to grow our customer base, enhance our solutions,
consolidate costs, and expand our value proposition to our
customers.
|
Our
solutions
Clinical
documentation solutions for healthcare providers
We provide enterprise-class solutions for healthcare providers
ranging from fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services to stand-alone offerings. These solutions
represent the large majority of our revenues. Our solutions
enable our customers to easily access advanced technologies with
confidence that their clinical documentation requirements will
be completed accurately and quickly. Our industry-leading
solutions integrate voice capture and transmission, automated
speech recognition, transcription services, workflow management,
and document management and distribution capabilities.
84
With proprietary and licensed technologies, we enable our
customers to efficiently manage their narrative-based
documentation through customizable workflows. A typical workflow
includes the following steps:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Capture As the first step in a workflow
process, users can dictate into one of several input devices,
including a variety of handheld dictation devices, smartphone
applications, or standard telephones.
PC-based
dictation stations can also be used for users who prefer to edit
their own files from speech recognition. By supporting a wide
array of capture methods, we provide flexibility to our
customers to decide which approach works best with their
workflow.
|
|
|
n
|
Manage Captured voice files are merged
with patient information from our customers information
systems and loaded into our enterprise platform for processing.
Our platform balances production resources across both in-house
and outsourced personnel, and its web-based management
capabilities allow administrators to easily manage workflows
from anywhere at any time. We generate draft reports using ASR
technology which are reviewed by our MEs. We can also use
conventional transcription services from our MTs. To maintain
high quality and efficiency, our platform automatically matches
voice files from various specialties and acuity levels to the
MTs or MEs with the appropriate skill sets. It also includes
random quality checks to give timely feedback to our personnel.
Turn-around time is an important metric for our customers, and
so the system optimizes processing to ensure we fulfill our
contracted service level agreements, which typically range from
one hour to 48 hours.
|
|
|
n
|
Analyze Completed reports are routed
back to physicians or other healthcare professionals for review,
final editing (as required), and authentication. These reports
are then available to drive additional value added services,
such as coding, data abstraction, and billing services. We
provide customers with sophisticated reporting capabilities and
integrated electronic signature solutions to simplify and
accelerate the review of their clinical reports. We use
Quantifytm,
our patent-pending natural language processing technology, to
convert final reports into structured documentation formats.
These structured formats allow data to be loaded into an EHR
system, easily analyzed for clinical documentation improvement
initiatives, or used for quality measures for reporting to
government agencies. In addition, reports can drive revenue
cycle management processes through our web-based CodeRunnerCAC
platform, which provides a complete coding workflow and
workforce management solution.
|
85
|
|
|
|
n
|
Distribute After being approved by the
physician, electronic records are distributed. We provide a
fully featured distribution solution for printing, faxing and
electronic distribution to referring physicians. We have
developed thousands of interfaces with major, mid-level and
proprietary hospital information systems, radiology information
systems, health information repositories and electronic health
record systems. Our solution supports HL7 and XML-based formats
which further allows us to meet the needs of each individual
customer. Throughout the entire workflow, our managed service
platform maintains security measures and audit trails in full
compliance with HIPAA privacy and security standards and
regulations and the protection of the confidentiality of patient
information.
|
In delivering these customized workflows, we offer a variety of
software products. These can work either as stand-alone
solutions or as integrated solutions with our other managed
services. These solutions include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Enterprise platform Our core platform
provides a powerful and flexible transcription solution that
integrates the process of dictation, transcription, speech
recognition, and document delivery into a unified clinical
information management workflow. We offer the platform typically
as a managed service. For those customers that prefer to use
their own services, we also offer it on a license basis. Our
platform provides a high performance and highly customizable
clinical documentation workflow. It integrates with every major
hospital system vendor, such as Epic, Cerner, and Meditech, and
we developed thousands of interfaces with customer systems.
|
|
|
n
|
SpeechQ Our front end speech recognition
solution enables physicians to dictate, edit, and sign their
reports in real-time. With workflows customized for numerous
medical practices, such as radiology and general medicine,
SpeechQ offers
end-to-end
workflows that combine voice commands and dictation. SpeechQ
integrates with our enterprise platform in scenarios where a
physician prefers to send text to our editors for review.
Additionally, it interfaces with EHR and other healthcare
systems to allow patient demographic information to be
automatically populated, updated, and distributed.
|
|
|
n
|
DocQVoice Our web-based enterprise digital
voice capture and transport solution is deployed at the
customers location and integrates with both our enterprise
platform and legacy dictation systems.
|
Clinical
documentation solutions for physician group practices, clinics
and small hospitals
Small healthcare providers, such as physician group practices,
clinics, and small hospitals, have many of the same requirements
as larger providers, but they frequently lack in-house expertise
in IT systems. For these providers, we offer fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services that have been tailored for their requirements.
We market these offerings under CBayScribe. Through this
service, we provide online access to advanced technologies
through a web-based platform. This gives small healthcare
providers access to functionality that was previously only
available to larger hospitals. With much of the same
functionality as our enterprise platform, CBayScribe gives
smaller healthcare providers the same confidence and
capabilities to manage their clinical documentation in an
accurate and timely fashion.
Our proprietary and licensed technologies enable small
healthcare providers to efficiently manage their narrative-based
documentation through numerous workflows. Like our solutions for
large healthcare providers, CBayScribe utilizes and maintains
security measures and audit trails that establish our compliance
with and assist our customers in their compliance with privacy
and security standards and HIPAA regulations.
Revenue cycle
management
We offer coding and other revenue cycle management solutions to
improve customers reimbursement, compliance and other
revenue cycle processes. CodeRunner, our internet-based coding
workflow, offers coding services which are used by certain of
the largest healthcare institutions in the industry. We recently
added computer assisted coding to CodeRunner which, like speech
recognition, provides the customer with improved productivity,
increased accuracy and more consistent coding. In addition, in
2013 there is a mandate to change to the ICD-10 coding system
which will increase the number of code possibilities five-fold.
The only way healthcare organizations can effectively deal with
this change is to adopt technology. We provide total
departmental outsourcing of coding,
on-site
temporary assistance and remote-coding services through both
VPN-enabled access to customer systems and CodeRunner. We also
offer complete recovery audit and consulting services, as well
as traditional coding audit
86
services. These solutions enable our customers to utilize an
end-to-end
solution from dictation to billing. Revenue cycle management is
a small part of our business.
Selling and
marketing
As of September 30, 2010, we employed more than
100 personnel in our sales force and account management
organization. Our sales force is focused on new customer sales
opportunities including both the conversion of customers that
are using in-house solutions as well as the displacement of
competitive offerings. This sales organization employs
consultative sales techniques to deliver customized programs and
solutions that respond to the customers unique
requirements. Our account management organization is responsible
for continuity of our current customer relationships and the
expansion of those relationships to include additional services,
facilities, or work types.
We complement our sales efforts with numerous marketing
initiatives, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
telemarketing and direct mail programs;
|
|
n
|
attending and sponsoring industry trade shows of national
organizations, such as the American Health Information
Management Association, Healthcare Information and Management
Systems Society, Association for Healthcare Documentation
Integrity, Radiological Society of North America, Society for
Imaging Informatics in Medicine, and Medical Transcription
Industry Alliance;
|
|
n
|
participating in work groups and leadership committees of the
industry associations; and
|
|
n
|
advertising in trade journals related to our industry.
|
We market our integrated clinical documentation solutions using
multiple brands. For health systems, hospitals and large group
medical practices, we primarily market our offerings through the
MedQuist Inc. brand. For
small-to-medium
sized physician practices, we primarily use the CBayScribe brand.
Operations
We serve our customers 24 hours a day, seven days a week
with our integrated clinical documentation solutions. We use ASR
in most of our production, which we complement with skilled,
English-speaking MTs and MEs.
Approximately 14,000 of our MTs and MEs are located in the
United States and India. We believe this is the largest
workforce of any company providing clinical documentation
services. The size of our global pool of resources allow us to
quickly and efficiently provide customers with the capacity
needed to implement comprehensive, scalable solutions.
Technology
Technology
development
We devote substantial resources to research and development to
ensure that our solutions meet both current and future customer
requirements. As of September 30, 2010, we employed a
development staff of over 90 employees. Our development staff
has expertise in multiple disciplines, including service
oriented architectures, web-based clients, high volume
transactional databases, data warehouses, web services and
integration with third-party systems. We also outsource
development for specific technologies, such as ASR,
capture-assisted codes, encoders, databases, portal technologies
and reporting. Much of the technology in our integrated
solutions is proprietary. Our development personnel follow a
rigorous development methodology that ensures repeatable, high
quality and timely delivery of solutions.
ASR is a key component of our narrative-based solutions, and we
license software for a portion of our ASR capabilities. We dual
source ASR software licenses.
87
Technology
operations
Together with our subsidiaries, we currently operate data
centers in the United States and in India. These data centers
have internal and external redundancy to protect data and
maintain service levels. We have three production data centers
of which two are owned and maintained, by third parties. The
services provided by these third party vendors are generally
available commercially at comparable rates from other vendors.
We operate six non-production data centers which are located in
existing office locations at reduced rates. Our data centers are
scalable to service additional customers without significant
capital investment.
Our clinical documentation solutions are hosted by us and
accessed using high-speed internet connections or private
network connections. We have devoted significant resources to
producing software applications and managed services to meet the
functionality and performance expectations of our customers. We
use commercially available hardware and a combination of
proprietary and commercially-available licensed software to
provide our clinical documentation solutions.
Competition
Because we integrate technologies and services, we compete with
companies in a number of different sectors. These competitors
include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
in-house service departments of healthcare providers, which we
believe produce the majority of clinical documentation today
based on the physician narrative;
|
|
n
|
national medical transcription service providers, such as Focus
Informatics, Inc. (a subsidiary of Nuance Communications, Inc.,
or Nuance), Heartland Information Services, Transcend Services,
Inc., and Webmedex, Inc.;
|
|
n
|
local or regional medical transcription service organizations;
|
|
n
|
ASR software vendors, such as Nuance and Multimodal
Technologies, Inc., or Multimodal, which market ASR as a means
to reduce clinical documentation labor; and
|
|
n
|
EHR software vendors which promote their systems as a
replacement to narrative-based input by using on-screen
templates and drop-down boxes for data entry.
|
Competition for our integrated clinical documentation solutions
is based primarily on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
n
|
accuracy and timeliness of documentation produced;
|
|
n
|
pricing;
|
|
n
|
ability to provide fully-integrated
end-to-end
solutions;
|
|
n
|
ease of upgrades and ability to add complementary offerings;
|
|
n
|
capacity to handle large volumes and complex workflows;
|
|
n
|
physician acceptance and productivity;
|
|
n
|
analytics provided to customers;
|
|
n
|
domestic or offshore production capabilities;
|
|
n
|
time to implement for new customers; and
|
|
n
|
financial stability.
|
We believe we compete effectively on all of the above criteria.
We provide fully integrated
end-to-end
managed services that translate the physician narrative into a
customized electronic record with high accuracy and low
turn-around time. We believe that our production cost structure
allows us to offer competitive prices while continuing to invest
in the development of new technologies and services. We have the
largest production capacity in our industry, which we believe
strengthens our operational capabilities and assists us in
meeting customer demands for timely implementation of our
solutions for new accounts.
88
Government
regulation
The provision of clinical documentation solutions is heavily
regulated by federal and state statutes and regulations. We and
our healthcare customers must comply with a variety of
requirements, including HIPAA and other restrictions regarding
privacy, confidentiality, and security of health information.
We have structured our operations to comply with HIPAA and other
regulatory and contractual requirements. We have implemented
appropriate safeguards related to the access, use, or disclosure
of PHI, to address the privacy and security of PHI consistent
with our regulatory and contractual requirements. We also train
our personnel regarding HIPAA and other requirements. We have
made and continue to make investments in systems to support
customer operations that are regulated by HIPAA and other
regulations. Because these standards are subject to
interpretation and change, we cannot predict the future impact
of HIPAA or other regulations on our business and operations.
HIPAA and
HITECH Act
HIPAA establishes a set of national privacy and security
standards for protecting the privacy, confidentiality and
security of PHI. Under HIPAA, health plans, healthcare
clearinghouses, and healthcare providers, together referred to
as covered entities for purposes of HIPAA, and their business
associates must meet certain standards in order to protect
individually identifiable health information. The HITECH Act
which was enacted into law on February 17, 2009 as part of
the ARRA, enhances and strengthens the HIPAA privacy and
security standards and makes certain provisions of HIPAA
applicable to business associates of covered entities.
As part of the operation of our business, our customers provide
us with certain PHI, and we are considered to be a business
associate of most of our customers for purposes of HIPAA. The
provisions of HIPAA require our customers to have agreements in
place with us whereby we are required to appropriately safeguard
the PHI we create or receive on their behalf. As a business
associate, we also have statutory and regulatory obligations
under HIPAA. We are bound by our business associate agreements
to use and disclose PHI in a manner consistent with HIPAA in
providing services to those covered entities.
We and our customers are also subject to HIPAA security
regulations that require the implementation of certain
administrative, physical and technical safeguards to ensure the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of EPHI. We are
required by regulation and contract to protect the security of
EPHI that we create, receive, maintain or transmit for our
customers consistent with these regulations. These requirements
include implementing administrative, physical and technical
safeguards that reasonably and appropriately protect the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of such EPHI. To
comply with our regulatory and contractual obligations, we may
have to reorganize processes and invest in new technologies. On
February 17, 2010, we became directly subject to
HIPAAs criminal and civil penalties for any breaches of
our privacy and security obligations.
Other
restrictions regarding privacy, confidentiality, and security of
health information
In addition to HIPAA, numerous other state and federal laws
govern the collection, dissemination, use, access to,
confidentiality and security of PHI. In addition, Congress and
some states are considering new laws and regulations that
further protect the privacy and security of medical records or
medical information. In many cases, these state laws are not
preempted by the HIPAA privacy and security standards.
Intellectual
property
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark, trade
secret and other intellectual property laws, nondisclosure
agreements, license agreements, contractual provisions and other
measures to protect our proprietary rights. We have a number of
registered trademarks in the United States and abroad, including
CBay®,
MedQuist®
and
SpeechQ®.
We have common law rights over a number of unregistered
trademarks. We also own a limited number of United States and
foreign patents and patent applications that relate to our
products, processes and technologies.
89
We dual source license ASR software that we incorporate into our
DEP, SpeechQ for Radiology and SpeechQ for General Medicine
proprietary products.
MedQuist Inc. licenses speech recognition and processing
software from Nuance pursuant to a licensing agreement entered
into in November 2009. Under its agreement with Nuance, MedQuist
Inc. pays a licensing fee based upon a per line charge for each
transcribed line of text processed using the software licensed
from Nuance. MedQuist Inc.s licensing agreement with
Nuance expires in June 2015. Thereafter, upon written notice to
Nuance, MedQuist Inc. has the right to renew the licensing
agreement for two successive periods of five years each on the
same terms (except pricing) and conditions of the licensing
agreement then in effect.
Nuance granted MedQuist Inc. co-ownership rights to and
interests in its SpeechQ product in exchange for a fixed sum,
pursuant to a supply agreement entered into in November 2009.
The supply agreement also provides that MedQuist Inc. receive,
in exchange for periodic fees, the exclusive right in the United
States, Canada and certain Caribbean islands to sell, service
and deliver SpeechQ. MedQuist Inc.s supply agreement with
Nuance expires in June 2015. Upon written notice to Nuance,
MedQuist Inc. has the right to renew the agreement for two
successive terms of five years each on the same terms (except
pricing) and conditions of the agreement then in effect.
MedQuist Inc. also licenses the speech recognition and
processing software used for SpeechQ from Nuance, under a
separate licensing agreement entered into in November 2009.
Under this agreement, MedQuist Inc. pays a licensing fee based
on total number of individual users or named-user licenses per
customer order. This agreement expires in June 2015. Thereafter,
upon written notice to Nuance, MedQuist Inc. has the right to
renew the licensing agreement for two successive periods of five
years each on the same terms (except pricing) and conditions of
the licensing agreement then in effect.
We also license speech recognition and processing software from
Multimodal. Our principal license agreement with Multimodal was
entered into by MedQuist Inc. in March 2010. Under that
licensing agreement, MedQuist Inc. pays Multimodal a monthly fee
in exchange for a fixed number of minutes of recording. Each
minute of recording that exceeds the fixed number is charged at
a specified rate per minute. MedQuist Inc.s agreement with
Multimodal expires in April 2013. Thereafter, the agreement
automatically renews and is extended for up to seven additional
successive one-year periods, unless MedQuist Inc. notifies
Multimodal in writing of its election not to extend at least
sixty days prior to the last day of the term. We are in
discussions with Multimodal regarding an amendment to the
licensing agreement that would modify the structure of the term
of the agreement. As part of that modified structure, MedQuist
Inc. would have the ability to use the software licensed under
the agreement through April 2021. In the event of a change of
control that results in a direct competitor of Multimodal
having, directly or indirectly, a 50% or greater ownership
interest in MedQuist Inc. or 50% or more of the voting control
of MedQuist Inc., or in the event we, through any acquisition of
a direct competitor of Multimodal, begin selling or licensing a
software product other than Multimodals that is directly
competitive with such technology, Multimodal shall have the
right to terminate its agreement with MedQuist Inc.
Employees
As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately
6,700 employees in the United States and approximately
5,700 in India. Most of our employees are MTs and MEs involved
in the production and quality assurance of clinical
documentation. We have approximately 5,900 such specialists in
the United States, virtually all of whom work from home, and
approximately 5,000 in India, who primarily work at
company-operated facilities. In addition, we engage
approximately 3,000 MTs and MEs who are not our employees.
Our large production capacity allows us to service the needs of
large, complex healthcare organizations, and we estimate it is
nearly three times as high as our next largest competitor.
We believe we have good relationships with our employees. Our
employees are not subject to collective bargaining agreements or
union representation.
90
Legal
proceedings
When we acquired MedQuist Inc. in August 2008, MedQuist Inc. was
involved in a number of legal matters, including customer and
stockholder issues and regulatory investigations. Substantially
all of these legal matters have been resolved. As of
September 30, 2010, one legal matter remains open related
to MedQuist Inc.s billing practices prior to the MedQuist
Inc. Acquisition. The SEC is pursuing civil litigation against
MedQuist Inc.s former chief financial officer, whose
employment ended with MedQuist Inc. in July 2004. Pursuant to
its by-laws, MedQuist Inc. has been providing indemnification
for the legal fees of this individual.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings or
regulatory investigations arising in the ordinary course of our
business. We are not currently a party to any material legal
proceedings that we believe would likely have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. See Note 14 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Properties
We lease 34 facilities in the U.S. and India representing
approximately 677,550 square feet including our
administrative headquarters for our United States operations,
which is located in an approximately 48,000 square foot
facility in Franklin, Tennessee and our sales, administrative
and research and development office, which is located in an
approximately 19,500 square foot facility in Norcross,
Georgia.
91
Management
Set forth below are the names and ages as of December 31,
2010 and positions of the persons who will serve as our
directors and executive officers upon the consummation of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Robert M. Aquilina
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice Chairman and Director of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Chief
Executive Officer of CBay India
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Chief Technology Officer and Director
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of MedQuist Inc.
|
Michael F. Clark
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Co-Chief
Operating Officer of MedQuist Inc.
|
Anthony James
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
Co-Chief
Operating Officer of MedQuist Inc.
|
Frank Baker
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Director
|
Peter Berger
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
Merle Gilmore
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
Jeffrey Hendren
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
Kenneth John McLachlan
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
James Patrick Nolan
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
Robert M.
Aquilina, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Aquilina has served as the Chairman of our board of
directors since August 2008 and as Chief Executive Officer since
October 2010. He also serves as chairman of the MedQuist Inc.
board of directors and its compensation committee. He has also
served as an Executive Partner, a senior operating consulting
role, to SAC PCG since 2007. From 2002 to 2004, he served as an
Industrial Partner with Ripplewood Holdings LLC, or Ripplewood,
a private equity firm based in New York, and held the role of
Co-Chairman of Flag Telecom Group Ltd. Mr. Aquilina was a
board member of Japan Telecom Inc. from 2003 to 2004. Prior to
these positions, Mr. Aquilina was a senior operating
executive of AT&T, Inc. with a
21-year
career. His last post at AT&T, ending in 2001 was as
Co-President of AT&T Consumer Services and a member of the
Chairmans Operating Group. Within AT&T,
Mr. Aquilina held a variety of senior positions including
President of Europe, Middle East & Africa, Vice
Chairman of AT&T Unisource, Vice Chairman of WorldPartners,
Chairman of AT&T-UK, and General Manager of Global Data
Services. Mr. Aquilina has been a Member of Cooper
Unions Board of Trustees since 2000. Mr. Aquilina
received an M.B.A. from The University of Chicago and a B.Sc. in
Engineering degree from The Cooper Union for the Advancement of
Science & Art in New York (Cooper Union).
V. Raman
Kumar, Vice Chairman and Director of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and
Chief Executive Officer of CBay India
Mr. Kumar is our co-founder and serves as a director. He
has served as our Vice Chairman since February 2007 and,
from February 2007 to October 2010, was also our Chief
Executive Officer. He has also served as the President of CBay
Inc. since December 2008, as Chairman & President
of CBay Systems & Services Inc. since April 2010
and as Executive Chairman & Chief Executive of CBay
Systems (India) Private Limited since July 2010. Prior to
his current position at CBay Systems (India) Private Limited,
Mr. Kumar served as its Chairman & Managing
Director from October 2005 to July 2010. Prior to our
founding in 1997, he worked as a Senior Vice President
(International Trade Finance and Marketing) at the Essar Group,
a multinational conglomerate. Mr. Kumar also currently
serves on the board of directors of CBay Inc., CBay
Systems & Services
92
Inc. as well as several other of our subsidiaries.
Mr. Kumar has a BA (Honors) and Masters Degree in History
from St. Stephenss College, New Delhi, India.
Michael Seedman,
Chief Technology Officer and Director
Mr. Seedman has served as our Chief Technology Officer and
as a director since August 2008. He also serves on the MedQuist
Inc. board of directors. He has more than 35 years of
senior executive management, leadership and technological
innovation expertise and experience. Mr. Seedman has served
as an Executive Partner, a senior operating consulting role, to
SAC PCG since 2007. In January 2000, he founded Seedman and
Associates, a private equity firm, where he worked until 2007.
From 2002 to 2005, he served as the founder and President of
Chrysalis Technology LLC. He was an Industrial Partner with
Ripplewood from September 1997 to June 2003, where he served on
the D&M Holdings Inc. board of directors from 1999 to 2003
and was Chairman of the Board for Digital Networks North America
from 2000 to 2003. Prior to this, Mr. Seedman founded and
was the Chairman of Entrega Technologies (acquired by Xircom), a
computer peripheral designer and manufacturer, in 1997. From
1993 to 1997, Mr. Seedman was the Senior Vice President and
General Manager of U.S. Robotics Personal
Communications Division (acquired by 3Com Corporation). Prior to
this, he served as CEO and President of Practical Peripherals,
which he founded in 1981 and sold to Hayes Microcomputer, Inc.
in 1989. Mr. Seedman has served as a director of several
public and private companies and currently serves as a director
of Revenew Systems Inc., Cleversafe Inc. and LS Research, LLC.
Mr. Seedman attended the University of Southern California
from 1974 to 1979 in Business and Accounting.
Clyde Swoger,
Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Swoger has served as our Chief Financial Officer since
August 2008. Mr. Swoger has also served as a senior
operating consultant to SAC PCG since August 2007, assisting
with the identification and evaluation of acquisition
opportunities. Mr. Swoger founded Creative Business
Solutions LLC, a
start-up
management consulting firm, in September 2006, where he
currently serves as President. Between 2004 and July 2006
Mr. Swoger provided consulting and management services to
several
start-up
companies. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Swoger served as Senior
Vice President and General Manager of DeVilbiss Air Power
Company (Pentair). He also held the position of Vice President
of Business Development of Pentair Tools Group in 2001. Prior to
this, Mr. Swoger held various executive positions in
Sanford Corporation and Kohler International Ltd including Vice
President Business Development and Group Controller.
Mr. Swoger has a B.Sc. in Materials Engineering and an
M.B.A. from the University of Michigan.
Peter L.
Masanotti, President and Chief Executive Officer of MedQuist
Inc.
Mr. Masanotti has served as MedQuist Inc.s Chief
Executive Officer since September 2008 and as MedQuist
Inc.s President since November 2008. Prior to this,
Mr. Masanotti was Managing Director and Global Head of
Business Process Sourcing at Deutsche Bank, an international
bank, since May 2007, where he was responsible for offshore and
onshore labor productivity and efficiency for the investment
banking platform. From July 2005 through May 2007,
Mr. Masanotti was the Chief Operating Officer and Executive
Vice President of Office Tiger LLC, a business outsourcing firm
which services major investment banks and Fortune
500 companies. From December 2001 to May 2005,
Mr. Masanotti served as Chief Operating Officer of
Geller & Company, a privately held finance and
accounting outsourcing firm. He also held executive positions at
Baltimore Technologies Inc., a Dublin, Ireland-based
e-security
solutions provider, and at International Telecommunication Data
Systems Inc., a leading billing and customer care solutions
provider to the wireless telecommunication industry.
Mr. Masanotti has a B.A. in economics from the University
of Connecticut-Storrs. He is also a graduate of the Temple
University School of Law.
93
Michael F. Clark,
Co-Chief Operating Officer of MedQuist Inc.
Mr. Clark has served as MedQuist Inc.s Co-Chief
Operating Officer since June 2009. From February 2005 to June
2009, Mr. Clark served as MedQuist Inc.s Senior Vice
President of Operations. From November 2003 until February 2005,
Mr. Clark served as MedQuist Inc.s Senior Vice
President of Operations for its Western Division. From May 2002
until November 2003, Mr. Clark served as MedQuist
Inc.s Vice President of Operations for its Southwest
Division and from January 1998 until July 2000, he served as
MedQuist Inc.s Region Vice President for the Southeast.
Mr. Clark joined MedQuist Inc. in 1998 through MedQuist
Inc.s acquisition of MRC Group, where he served as Vice
President, Marketing and Corporate Services. From May 2001 until
May 2002, Mr. Clark also served as Chief Operating Officer
for eScribe, a firm that outsources the HIM function in
hospitals. Mr. Clark has a B.S. in Marketing and
International Business from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio and
an M.B.A. from the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida.
Anthony James,
Chief Financial Officer and
Co-Chief
Operating Officer of MedQuist Inc.
Mr. James has served as MedQuist Inc.s Co-Chief
Operating Officer since June 2010, following MedQuist
Inc.s acquisition of Spheris and, in November 2010, was
named MedQuist Inc.s Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. James served as the Chief Operating Officer for Spheris
from 2006 to April 2010. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. James
served as Spheris Chief Financial Officer and from 1991 to
2001, he served as its Corporate Controller. Prior to this,
Mr. James worked in a variety of financial roles over a
seven-year tenure with Mariner Post-Acute Network, a long-term
healthcare company. Mr. James is a certified public
accountant and has a B.A. in Accounting from the University of
Northern Iowa.
Frank Baker,
Director
Mr. Baker has served as a director since August
2008. He also serves as a non-executive director of
MedQuist Inc. Mr. Baker is a co-founder of SAC PCG and has
been a Managing Director since 2007. From 1999 to 2006,
Mr. Baker was at Ripplewood, a New York based private
equity firm, and RHJ International, a financial services company
incorporated under the laws of Belgium, where he was responsible
for making various private equity investments. Prior to joining
Ripplewood, Mr. Baker spent over three years in investment
banking as an Associate at J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. in
its Capital Markets Group and as an Analyst at Goldman,
Sachs & Co. in its mergers and acquisitions
department. Mr. Baker also currently serves as director of
Cosmos Bank, Taiwan. Mr. Baker has a B.A. in Economics from
the University of Chicago and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business
School.
Peter Berger,
Director
Mr. Berger has served as a director since August
2008. He also serves as a non-executive director of
MedQuist Inc. Mr. Berger is a co-founder of SAC PCG and has
been a Managing Director since 2006. From 1995 to 1998 and 2000
to 2006, Mr. Berger was a founding member of Ripplewood, a
New York based private equity firm, and served as both a
Managing Director of Ripplewood and as a Special Senior Advisor
to the Board of RHJ International, a financial services company
incorporated under the laws of Belgium. From 1999 to 2000,
Mr. Berger served as Managing Director and Chief Executive
Officer of Mediacom Ventures LLC, a boutique investment advisory
firm. From 1989 to 1991, he served as a Managing Director in
investment banking at Bear Stearns Companies. Prior to this,
Mr. Berger was a senior partner and global head of the
Corporate Finance Group at Arthur Andersen & Co.,
where he began his career in 1974. He also served as
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Kepner-Tregoe, Inc., a
management consulting company. Mr. Berger also currently
serves as director of Cosmos Bank, Taiwan. Mr. Berger has a
B.Sc. from Boston University and an M.B.A. from Columbia
University Graduate School of Business.
94
Merle L. Gilmore,
Director
Mr. Gilmore has served as a director since August 2008. He
has been President of LKR Technology Partners, LLC since 2001.
Mr. Gilmore served as an Industrial Partner of Ripplewood
from 2001 to 2008 and has been an Executive Partner, a senior
operating consultant role, of SAC PCG since 2009.
Mr. Gilmore was a senior executive of Motorola, Inc.,
holding numerous senior management positions including Executive
Vice President and President of the Land Mobile Products Sector
from 1993 to 1997, Executive Vice President and President for
Europe, Middle East and Africa from 1997 to 1998 and Executive
Vice President and President of the Communications Enterprise
from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Gilmore has been a director of
Revenew Systems LLC, a marketing company, since 2006. In April,
2010 he was named Chairman of the Board of Airvana Network
Solutions, Inc. He was previously a member of the Proxim Corp.,
Japan Telecom, Inc. and Mediabolic, Inc. boards of directors and
the Chairman of the Board and a representative officer of
D&M Holdings Inc. from 2001 to 2006. Mr. Gilmore
received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University
of Illinois and his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Florida
Atlantic University.
Jeffrey Hendren,
Director
Mr. Hendren has served as a director since August 2008 and
as Vice Chairman of Finance since May 2010. He is a
co-founder of SAC PCG and has been a Managing Director since
2007. From 1997 to 2007, Mr. Hendren was a Managing
Director at Ripplewood, a New York based private equity firm,
and RHJ International, a financial services company incorporated
under the laws of Belgium, where he was responsible for making
various private equity investments and was also a director of
RHJ International, which was publicly traded on the Brussels
Stock Exchange. Before joining Ripplewood and RHJ International,
Mr. Hendren was a member of Goldman, Sachs &
Co.s mergers and acquisitions department from 1989 to
1997. From 1981 to 1988, Mr. Hendren held various positions
at Georgia Pacific Corp, a manufacturer and marketer of paper
and building products. Mr. Hendren also currently serves as
a director of Cosmos Bank, Taiwan and served as its acting
chairman from February 2009 to December 2009 and its
acting president from March 2009 to December 2009.
Mr. Hendren has a B.Sc. from Indiana University and an
M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Kenneth John
McLachlan, Director
Mr. McLachlan has served as a director since May 2007.
He is the founder and has been the chairman
McLachlan & Associates since January 1992. Prior
to that, he held leadership positions at companies such as
PricewaterhouseCoopers, a consulting firm, Boehringer Mannheim,
a pharmaceuticals company, and Mackie Plc. Mr. McLachlan
has held directorships at various UK international private
companies, including Vitaflo International Ltd. He is a
qualified Chartered Accountant in Scotland and a Registered
Accountant in the Netherlands. He is also a Fellow of the
Institute of Taxation in the UK.
James Patrick
Nolan, Director
Mr. Nolan has served as a director since August 2008.
He has been Executive Vice President at Royal Philips
Electronics and Head of Mergers & Acquisitions since
June 2005. From 2000-2005, Mr. Nolan served as an
executive in the Mergers and Acquisitions department at Royal
Phillips Electronics. Prior to joining Royal Phillips
Electronics, Mr. Nolan held merger and acquisition roles at
companies including Credit Commercial de France, a commercial
bank, Coopers & Lybrand Management Consultants and
Rabobank Internations, a financial services provider. He has
held several board positions including being a board member of
Navteq Inc., the worlds leading digital navigation
software company, and SHL Telemedicine Ltd., an IT-based
healthcare company. Mr. Nolan qualified as a barrister
after graduating in Law from the University of Oxford in the
United Kingdom and has an MBA from INSEAD, France.
There are no family relationships among any of our executive
officers and directors.
We currently expect that, following the Corporate
Reorganization, we will appoint Mr. Masanotti as our Chief
Executive Officer and Mr. James as our Chief Financial
Officer. In that event, we expect that Mr. Aquilina would
continue to serve as our Chairman. Mr. Swoger would cease
to serve as one of our executive officers but would continue to
assist us with accounting matters.
95
Director
qualifications
When determining that each of Messrs. Aquilina, Kumar,
Seedman, Baker, Berger, Gilmore, Hendren, McLachlan and Nolan is
particularly well-suited to serve on our board of directors and
that each individual has the experience, qualifications,
attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable our board of
directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively
in light of our business and structure, we considered the
experience and qualifications described above under
Management. We also noted that, as executive
officers, Messrs. Aquilina and Kumar bring a management
perspective to board deliberations and provide valuable
information about the status of our
day-to-day
operations. Additionally, Mr. Kumar is a founder of our
company and has played an integral role in our successful
growth. Our directors contribute the following individual
strengths:
Mr. Aquilina: We considered
Mr. Aquilinas experience chairing a board of
directors, in particular, that of our majority owned subsidiary,
MedQuist Inc. Mr. Aquilina also brings perspective, having
served on other boards of directors and has extensive
professional experience in engineering.
Mr. Kumar: We considered
Mr. Kumars unique familiarity with our business,
structure, culture and history as a founder of our business as
well as his extensive management experience and experience
holding directorships at various private companies including.
Mr. Seedman: In addition to his insights
as our Chief Technology Officer, we considered
Mr. Seedmans entrepreneurial and executive experience
as the founder of several companies in the financial and
technology industries and his significant executive management
and leadership experience.
Mr. Baker: We considered
Mr. Bakers extensive financial experience as a
private equity investor and his experience serving on the board
of directors of various public and private companies.
Mr. Berger: We considered
Mr. Bergers extensive financial experience as a
private equity investor and his experience serving on the board
of directors of various public and private companies.
Mr. Gilmore: We considered
Mr. Gilmores engineering background, his experience
as a senior executive of Motorola, Inc. and his experience
serving on the board of directors of various public companies.
Mr. Hendren: We considered
Mr. Hendrens extensive financial experience as a
private equity investor and his experience serving on the board
of directors of various public and private companies.
Mr. McLachlan: We considered
Mr. McLachlans managerial and entrepreneurial skills,
his expertise in tax and accounting and his experience serving
on the board of directors of various international private
companies.
Mr. Nolan: We considered
Mr. Nolans significant expertise in mergers and
acquisitions and his experience with the software and healthcare
industries.
Board of
directors
Our board of directors, or board, currently consists of nine
directors. Messrs. McLachlan and Nolan are independent directors
under the Corporate Governance Standards of The NASDAQ Global
Market and the independence requirements of
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act. Within twelve months after our common stock is
listed on The NASDAQ Global Market, we expect that a majority of
our board members will be independent as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3(b)(i) under the Exchange Act and in The NASDAQ
Listing Rule 5605(a)(2).
96
Committees of the
board
Our board currently includes an audit committee, a remuneration
committee and a nomination committee. After the Corporate
Reorganization and the completion of this offering, the
committees of our board will consist of an audit committee, a
remuneration committee and a nomination and corporate governance
committee.
Audit
committee
Our audit committee currently consists of Messrs. McLachlan and
Berger. Mr. McLachlan qualifies as an independent director
under the corporate governance standards of The NASDAQ Global
Market and the independence requirements of
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act. We expect to have a second independent
member within 90 days of the completion of this offering
and a third independent member within one year of the completion
of this offering so that all of our audit committee members will
be independent as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3(b)(i)
under the Exchange Act and in NASDAQ Listing
Rule 5605(a)(2). The independent member of our audit
committee, upon the completion of this offering, will qualify as
an audit committee financial expert as such term is
defined in Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K.
The purpose of the audit committee will be to assist our board
in overseeing and monitoring (1) the quality and integrity
of our financial statements, (2) our compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements, (3) our independent registered
public accounting firms qualifications and independence,
(4) the performance of our internal audit function and
(5) the performance of our independent registered public
accounting firm.
Our board will adopt a written charter for the audit committee,
which will be available on our website at the time of listing.
Remuneration
committee
Our remuneration committee currently consists of Messrs. Baker,
Hendren, Aquilina and Gilmore. We expect to have an independent
director under the corporate governance standards of The NASDAQ
Global Market at the completion of this offering, a second
independent member within 90 days of the completion of this
offering and the remaining members as independent within one
year of the completion of this offering so that all of our
remuneration committee members will be independent as such term
is defined in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). The purpose
of the remuneration committee is to assist our board in
discharging its responsibilities relating to (1) setting
our compensation program and compensation of our executive
officers and directors and (2) monitoring our incentive and
equity-based compensation plans. Following the completion of
this offering, the remuneration committee will also assist our
board in preparing the compensation committee report required to
be included in our proxy statement under the rules and
regulations of the SEC.
Our board will adopt a written charter for the remuneration
committee, which will be available on our website at the time of
listing.
Nomination
committee
Our nomination committee currently consists of Messrs. Berger,
Baker, Hendren and McLachlan. Mr. McLachlan qualifies as an
independent director under the corporate governance standards of
The NASDAQ Global Market. We expect to have a second independent
member within 90 days of the completion of this offering
and the remaining members as independent within one year of the
completion of this offering so that all of our nomination and
corporate governance committee members will be independent as
such term is defined in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). The
purpose of our nomination committee is to assist our board in
discharging its responsibilities relating to (1) developing
and recommending criteria for selecting new directors and
(2) screening and recommending to the board individuals
qualified to become executive officers.
Our board will adopt a written charter for the nominating
committee, which will be available on our website at the time of
listing.
97
Duties of
directors
Under Delaware law, our directors will have a duty of loyalty to
act honestly and in good faith with a view to our best
interests. Our directors will also have a duty to exercise the
skill they actually possess and such care and diligence that a
reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable
circumstances. In fulfilling their duty of care to us, our
directors must ensure compliance with our certificate of
incorporation and by-laws. A stockholder has the right to seek
damages if a duty owed by our directors is breached. You should
refer to Description of Capital Stock for additional
information on our standard corporate governance under Delaware
law.
Remuneration
committee interlocks and insider participation
We do not anticipate any interlocking relationships between any
member of our remuneration committee and any of our executive
officers that would require disclosure under the applicable
rules promulgated under the federal securities laws.
Code of business
conduct and ethics
We expect that, prior to the completion of the offering, our
board will adopt a code of business conduct and ethics
applicable to our directors, officers and employees, in
accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and
The NASDAQ Global Market.
Compensation
discussion and analysis
Named
executive officers
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the following
individuals constitute our named executive officers, or NEOs:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Robert Aquilina, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
|
|
n
|
V. Raman Kumar, our Vice Chairman;
|
|
n
|
Clyde Swoger, our Chief Financial Officer;
|
|
n
|
Michael Seedman, our Chief Technology Officer; and
|
|
n
|
Peter Masanotti, President and Chief Executive Officer of
MedQuist Inc.
|
Remuneration
committee
Our remuneration committee currently consists of
Messrs. Baker, Aquilina and Gilmore. The key
responsibilities of the remuneration committee are to consider
and recommend to our board the framework for the remuneration of
our executive officers. The remuneration committee is also
required to consider and recommend to our board the total
individual remuneration package of each employee director and
executive officer, including bonuses, incentive payments and
stock options or other equity and equity-based awards. The
remuneration committee is also empowered to review the design of
all equity and equity-based incentive plans and recommend the
approval of such plans to our board. None of the directors votes
on decisions concerning his or her own remuneration.
MedQuist Inc.
compensation committee
MedQuist Inc., our majority-owned subsidiary, has a separately
constituted compensation committee composed of
Messrs. Aquilina, Baker, Berger and Pinckert.
Mr. Pinckert is an independent director of MedQuist Inc.
and also serves as the Chairman of the MedQuist Inc. audit
committee. The key responsibilities of the compensation
committee are to make recommendations to the MedQuist Inc. board
of directors regarding the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the corporate and individual goals and objectives relevant to
the compensation of MedQuist Inc.s executive officers;
|
|
n
|
the evaluation of MedQuist Inc.s corporate performance and
the performance of its executive officers in light of such goals
and objectives; and
|
|
n
|
the compensation of MedQuist Inc.s executive officers
based on such evaluations.
|
98
Compensation
philosophy
We provide our NEOs with incentives tied to the achievement of
our corporate objectives or, in the case of Mr. Masanotti,
objectives that are tied to the performance of MedQuist Inc.
The remuneration and compensation committees have each
separately established a total compensation philosophy and
structure designed to accomplish the following objectives:
|
|
|
|
n
|
attract, retain and motivate executives who can thrive in a
competitive environment of continuous change and who can achieve
positive business results in light of challenging circumstances;
|
|
n
|
provide executives with a total compensation package that
recognizes individual contributions, as well as overall business
results; and
|
|
n
|
promote and reward the achievement of objectives that our board
or the MedQuist Inc. board, as applicable, and management
believe will lead to long-term growth in shareholder value.
|
To achieve these objectives, we intend to maintain compensation
arrangements that tie a substantial portion of our NEOs
overall compensation to the achievement of our key strategic,
operational and financial goals or to our individual business
divisions, as applicable.
Role of named
executive officers in setting compensation
Our NEOs do not play a role in their own compensation
determinations, other than discussing individual performance
objectives with members of the remuneration or compensation
committee, as applicable.
Elements of
compensation
Our and MedQuist Inc.s executive compensation programs
utilize four primary elements to accomplish the objectives
described above:
|
|
|
|
n
|
base salary;
|
|
n
|
annual cash incentives linked to corporate and individual
performance;
|
|
n
|
long-term incentives in the form of equity-based awards;
|
|
n
|
severance
and/or
change in control benefits; and
|
|
n
|
perquisites.
|
We believe that we can meet the objectives of our executive
compensation program by achieving a balance among these elements
that is competitive with our industry peers and creates
appropriate incentives for our NEOs. Actual compensation levels
are a function of both corporate and individual performance as
described under each compensation element set forth below. In
making compensation determinations, the remuneration and
compensation committees consider the competitiveness of
compensation both in terms of individual pay elements and the
aggregate compensation package provided to our NEOs. However,
neither we nor MedQuist Inc. engage in any formal benchmarking
or specifically target a percentile of compensation within any
peer groups as a reference point on which to base compensation
decisions.
Base
salary
We provide our NEOs with base salary in the form of fixed cash
compensation to compensate them for services rendered during the
fiscal year. The current salaries for our NEOs were negotiated
at the time that they were hired and are set forth in their
employment agreements, which were negotiated individually with
each executive. The remuneration and compensation committees
believe that the initial salaries of our NEOs were set at levels
competitive with individuals with similar responsibilities in
similarly-sized public companies in the healthcare IT sector.
The base salary of each of our NEOs is reviewed annually by the
remuneration or compensation committee, as applicable, to
determine if any salary adjustments are appropriate. Generally,
in making a determination of
99
whether to make base salary adjustments, the remuneration and
compensation committees consider the following factors:
|
|
|
|
n
|
success in meeting our (or, in the case of Mr. Masanotti,
MedQuist Inc.s) strategic operational and financial goals;
|
|
n
|
an assessment of such executive officers individual
performance; and
|
|
n
|
changes in scope of responsibilities of such executive officer.
|
In addition, the remuneration and compensation committees
consider internal equity within our organization and the
aggregate levels of compensation earned by our NEOs.
None of our NEOs received base salary increases during 2009
since each of them had commenced employment in the second half
of 2008 in accordance with newly negotiated employment
arrangements. In addition, no base salary adjustments for our
NEOs were made for 2010 or 2011 in light of the difficult
economic climate and because it was determined that the salaries
were sufficient to retain and incentivize our executives. The
current base salaries of our NEOs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Annual base
|
Name
|
|
salary rate ($)
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Annual cash
compensation performance-based incentive bonus
program
We believe that performance-based cash incentives play an
essential role to motivate our NEOs to achieve defined annual
goals. The objectives of our and MedQuist Inc.s annual
management incentive plans are to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
align the interests of executives and senior management with our
strategic plan and critical performance goals;
|
|
n
|
motivate and reward achievement of specific, measurable annual
individual and corporate performance objectives;
|
|
n
|
provide payouts commensurate with corporate performance;
|
|
n
|
provide competitive total compensation opportunities; and
|
|
n
|
enable us to attract, motivate and retain talented executive
management.
|
Our incentive bonus plans are designed to reward our executives
for the achievement of pre-established annual financial targets
and for personal performance. The financial objectives are
established for each individual NEO based upon the scope of his
responsibility. Specifically, Messrs. Aquilina, Swoger and
Seedmans bonuses were based upon our consolidated
performance (including MedQuist Inc.), Mr. Kumars
bonus was based upon the performance of our operations
(excluding MedQuist Inc.) in 2009 and upon consolidated
performance, including MedQuist Inc., in 2010.
Mr. Masanottis bonus was based on the performance of
MedQuist Inc. alone.
100
2009 incentive
plans
Each of our NEOs was eligible to earn an annual bonus up to
either a predetermined dollar amount or a percentage of such
executives base salary, as set forth in each NEOs
employment agreement. Our NEOs are eligible to earn their annual
bonus based upon the achievement of target performance
objectives under our 2009 Incentive Plan and, for
Mr. Masanotti, under the MedQuist Inc. 2009 Incentive Plan
(together with our 2009 Incentive Plan, the 2009 Plans), as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
Executive
|
|
bonus for 2009 and 2010
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents 140% of base salary.
|
Performance
measures
Payments of incentive awards were based on the achievement of a
combination of corporate performance objectives which were
established for each NEO and an assessment of individual
performance toward achievement of such corporate objectives as a
way to communicate and measure our performance expectations and
to maintain and unify our executives focus on our key
strategic objectives. The actual bonus payable for a particular
year is bifurcated into a corporate performance-based element
and a discretionary element based on the remuneration and
compensation committees subjective assessment of the
applicable NEOs individual performance in relation to the
achievement of pre-established net revenues and adjusted EBITDA
goals established exclusively for the 2009 Plans. As noted
below, the individual incentive pool was funded at 30% of the
total of all participants aggregate maximum incentives and
was allocated to eligible participants at the discretion of our
board in respect of the 2009 Incentive Plan and the MedQuist
Inc. board in respect of the MedQuist Inc. 2009 Incentive Plan.
For 2009, each NEOs cash bonus was based upon the
achievement of the following criteria, with the percentage
weightings as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Objective
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Personal performance
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined
for purposes of the 2009 Plans as net income (loss) attributable
to MedQuist Holdings Inc., MedQuist Inc. or Spheris, as
applicable, plus net income (loss) attributable to
non-controlling interests, income taxes, interest expense,
depreciation and amortization, cost of legal proceedings and
settlements, acquisition related charges, goodwill impairment
charges, restructuring charges, equity in income (loss) of
affiliated company, asset impairment charges, severance costs,
certain unusual or nonrecurring items and the effect of our PFS
business. The adjusted EBITDA metric utilized under the bonus
program was calculated differently than the Adjusted EBITDA
figures disclosed in the section Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. Specifically, the bonus program metric was
based on the sum of the adjusted EBITDA generated by the
individual business units and, as such, the calculation of bonus
targets and the actual performance did not include certain
adjustments associated with accrual reversals, purchase
accounting adjustments and certain corporate expenses. These
adjustments were considered outside the operational control of
the management and, therefore, were not included in the
calculation of the bonus targets or actual performance against
the targets.
101
The adjusted EBITDA for bonus calculation purposes can be
reconciled to the Adjusted EBITDA reported elsewhere in the
prospectus as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
59.7 million
|
|
Adjustment to remove non-operational
items(1)
|
|
|
2.2 million
|
|
Adjustment to remove consolidation
items(2)
|
|
|
2.8 million
|
|
Adjustment to remove certain corporate
expenses
|
|
|
5.5 million
|
|
Adjustment for effect of PFS business
|
|
|
0.4 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount used for bonus calculation
|
|
$
|
70.6 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects removal of asset
impairment, severance and accrual reversals
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects removal of impact of
purchase accounting adjustments
|
The corporate performance-based element of the annual bonus
incentive was calculated on the basis of achieving net revenues
and adjusted EBITDA targets under the 2009 Plans, based on
internal financial goals set in connection with the remuneration
and compensation committees consideration and approval of
the annual operating plans for 2009 for us and for MedQuist
Inc., respectively. The range of potential payouts under the
2009 Plans reflected the level of achievement of the applicable
financial goals for 2009. No payout was available for
performance below 80% of the adjusted EBITDA target
and/or below
90% of the net revenues target. The maximum payout for each
performance metric was capped at 170% of the pro-rated maximum
bonus amount (and, with respect to the corporate performance
targets, which maximum applied for performance in excess of 115%
of the adjusted EBITDA target
and/or for
performance in excess of 110% of the net revenues target).
Actual corporate performance was measured against the targeted
levels for each of the two financial objectives under the 2009
Plans and weighted in accordance with the weightings set forth
above. In addition, the remuneration and compensation committees
assessed each NEOs personal performance, with the
potential payout percentage ranging from 0% to 170% for the
individual performance portion of the annual bonus incentive.
However, unlike the corporate performance portion of the annual
bonus incentive, assessment of personal performance was
discretionary and was not tied to any pre-determined individual
performance objectives. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no
event could the total payout, based on an assessment of both
corporate and personal performance, exceed the maximum bonus
amount for each NEO set forth in his employment agreement. In
exercising their discretion with respect to determining the
payment for the portion of the 2009 Plans relating to personal
performance, the remuneration and compensation committees
considered each NEOs contribution toward achieving the
short- and long-term objectives for our business, including the
degree of achievement of the applicable net revenue and adjusted
EBITDA metrics for the 2009 fiscal year. The remuneration and
compensation committees have substantial discretion in
performing this assessment. During 2009, the remuneration
committee considered Mr. Kumars favorable performance in
expanding our offshore production capacity in its decision to
award him the maximum amount allocated for the personal
performance portion of his bonus award. The remuneration
committee considered the limited progress of certain financial
and administrative initiatives in deciding that Mr. Swoger would
not receive any bonus payment for the personal performance
portion of his bonus award. With respect to the remaining NEOs,
the remuneration and compensation committees, as applicable,
determined that the level of bonus payments for the personal
performance portion of the bonus award should approximate the
overall degree of achievement of the applicable revenue and
adjusted EBITDA metrics for the 2009 fiscal year for us and
MedQuist Inc., respectively.
For fiscal 2009, as established exclusively for our 2009
Incentive Plan, our consolidated net revenues goal was
$389.4 million and the adjusted EBITDA goal was
$69.1 million, which targets were achieved at 46% and 110%,
respectively for the 2009 fiscal year. For fiscal 2009, the net
revenues goal for our operations excluding MedQuist Inc. was
$85.8 million and the adjusted EBITDA goal for our
operations excluding MedQuist Inc. was $17.3 million,
neither of which targets was achieved. For fiscal 2009, as
established exclusively for the MedQuist Inc. 2009 Incentive
Plan, the net revenues goal was $315.6 million and the
adjusted EBITDA goal was $52.8 million, which targets were
achieved at 97% and 110%, respectively.
The actual bonus payment made to each of the NEOs was based upon
the actual performance for the quantifiable financial
performance objectives as well as a subjective assessment of the
individuals performance. In addition to determining the
applicable payout percentages based on the achievement of the
applicable corporate financial
102
goals for our NEOs, set forth above, the remuneration and
compensation committees determined the level of achievement of
each NEOs personal performance, and then approved the overall
bonus payment for 2009. Based on actual performance measured
against plan objectives, as well as the committees
subjective assessment of each NEOs personal performance,
the remuneration and compensation committees, as applicable,
approved the following cash incentive payments for 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2009 incentive
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
bonus payout ($)
|
Executive
|
|
revenues
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
Personal
|
|
(% of maximum)
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
$
|
120,750
|
(46%)
|
|
$
|
289,013
|
(110%)
|
|
$
|
175,500
|
(78%)
|
|
$
|
585,263
|
(78%)
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
$
|
0
|
(0%)
|
|
$
|
0
|
(0%)
|
|
$
|
382,500
|
(170%)
|
|
$
|
382,500
|
(51%)
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
$
|
64,400
|
(46%)
|
|
$
|
154,140
|
(110%)
|
|
$
|
0
|
(0%)
|
|
$
|
218,500
|
(55%)
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
$
|
28,980
|
(46%)
|
|
$
|
69,363
|
(110%)
|
|
$
|
42,120
|
(78%)
|
|
$
|
140,463
|
(78%)
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
$
|
238,385
|
(97%)
|
|
$
|
269,500
|
(110%)
|
|
$
|
192,115
|
(92%)
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
(100%)
|
The foregoing table also shows the payment as a percentage of
the maximum bonus for each NEO.
The bonus payments are normally paid by the end of the first
quarter of the year following the year in which the bonus is
earned. If for any reason the bonus payment is delayed, it
generally accrues interest between March 31st and the
actual date of payment, which shall not be later than
December 31, 2010, at the rate of 7% per year.
2010 management
incentive plans
The maximum bonus opportunities under the 2010 management
incentive plans for us and MedQuist Inc., or the 2010 Plans,
remained unchanged from 2009 levels for each of our NEOs.
However, the renumeration and compensation committees had
approved several changes to the 2010 Plans to take into account
certain changes in title and scope of responsibilities for
Mr. Kumar, as well as our and MedQuist Inc.s
increased emphasis on the importance of EBIDTA as a measure of
corporate performance for all of the NEOs. Specifically, the
financial performance objectives for Mr. Kumar for fiscal year
2010 were based on our consolidated financial performance,
including MedQuist Inc. operations. Additionally, the
percentage weightings for the corporate and personal objectives
under the 2010 Plans for all of the NEOs were changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
Executive
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
objectives
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
As noted above, payments of incentive awards for 2010 (which
will be made in March 2011) will be based on the achievement of
a combination of corporate performance objectives which were
established for each NEO, and an assessment of individual
performance toward the achievement of such corporate objectives.
No payout under the 2010 Plans will be available for performance
below 100% of the adjusted EBITDA target. In addition, no payout
will be available with respect to the net revenue portion of the
incentive award for performance below 95% of the revenue target.
The maximum payout for each element of the incentive award will
be capped at 170% of the maximum amount which may be earned by
each NEO with respect to each element of the total incentive
award for 2010.
103
Equity-based
incentive plans
Equity incentive
awards
Our equity award program is the primary vehicle for offering
long-term incentives to our NEOs. Historically, all of our
equity awards have been in the form of stock options. We believe
that equity-based compensation provides our NEOs with a direct
interest in our long-term performance, creates an ownership
culture and aligns the interests of our NEOs and our
stockholders. Grants of stock options, including those to our
NEOs, are approved by our board and are granted at an exercise
price at our above the fair market value of our common stock on
the date of grant. Options are generally subject to a time-based
vesting schedule, which furthers our objective of employee
retention, as it provides an incentive to our executives to
remain in our employ during the vesting period. Similarly,
MedQuist Inc. has implemented its own equity award program to
offer long-term incentives to its executives, including
Mr. Masanotti who holds options granted under a MedQuist
Inc. equity incentive plan, as described in greater detail below.
Options granted
to named executive officers under the 2007 Plan
Messrs. Aquilina, Kumar, Swoger and Seedman were awarded
stock options under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2007
Plan, pursuant to the provisions of their employment agreements
executed in August 2008 in connection with the completion of the
MedQuist Inc. Acquisition. Such stock options were granted by
our board on August 6, 2008 with an exercise price of
£3.15 per share. The options are subject to the following
vesting schedule: one-third of the shares vested on
August 6, 2009, and one-sixth of the shares vest every six
months thereafter, such that the options will be fully vested on
August 6, 2011. Any unvested options will automatically
vest if the executives employment is terminated without
cause or the executive quits for good
reason (as each such term is defined in the
executives employment agreement). As noted above, subject
to the NEOs continued service, all unvested options will
accelerate automatically upon a change in control
(as such term is defined in the executives option
agreement). Generally, an executive can exercise vested options
following a termination of employment without cause or a
resignation with or without good reason for a period of
90 days following such termination; however, this period
will be extended to 12 months in the event of death or
disability. Pursuant to the terms of the Management Stockholders
Agreement, each executive is subject to a customary
lock-up for
a period of 180 days following this offering.
Stand-Alone
executive option award
On June 12, 2007, our board approved a grant of options
over 311,129 shares of our common stock to Mr. Kumar
outside of the 2007 Plan. The options were granted in three
tranches, of which only options over 56,373 shares remain
outstanding and exercisable. The options were granted with an
exercise price of $7.88 per share, which was equal to the price
at which our common stock was issued in our initial public
offering on AIM. The options vested on June 18, 2007, the
date on which our shares were admitted for trading on AIM. The
options will remain exercisable for a period of six months from
the date of termination of Mr. Kumars employment
(except a termination for cause, unless otherwise determined by
the remuneration committee). If not exercised, the options will
expire on June 12, 2017.
MedQuist Inc.
option grant
On September 30, 2008, pursuant to the terms of
Mr. Masanottis employment agreement, MedQuist Inc.
granted Mr. Masanotti an option to purchase up to
295,749 shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock at $4.85 per
share, which was the fair market value of MedQuist Inc. common
stock on the date of grant. On March 2, 2009, MedQuist Inc.
entered into an amended and restated stock option agreement with
Mr. Masanotti to (i) amend the exercise price of the
original stock option grant and (ii) to provide that if
Mr. Masanottis employment by MedQuist Inc. is
terminated for cause (as defined in
Mr. Masanottis employment agreement), the option will
terminate immediately in full. The amended option agreement:
|
|
|
|
n
|
increased the exercise price to $8.25;
|
104
|
|
|
|
n
|
provides that the option vests as to one-third of the shares
subject to the option on the first anniversary of the grant date
and one-sixth of the shares subject to the option vest every six
months thereafter, such that the option will be fully vested the
third anniversary of the grant date; and
|
|
n
|
provides that upon the occurrence of a change in
control (as such term is defined in the amended and
restated option agreement) or termination of
Mr. Masanottis employment without cause
or by him for good reason (each as defined in
Mr. Masanottis employment agreement), the options
shall become immediately exercisable, to the extent not already
vested.
|
In addition, in accordance with the terms of
Mr. Masanottis option agreement, in December 2010 the
compensation committee approved an adjustment to the exercise
price of Mr. Masanottis option to $2.22 per share to
account for the payment of an extraordinary dividend of
$1.33 per share on September 15, 2009 and
$4.70 per share on October 15, 2010 to the
stockholders of MedQuist Inc.
Severance and
change in control benefits
We and MedQuist Inc., as applicable, have entered into severance
arrangements with each of Messrs. Aquilina, Kumar, Swoger,
Seedman and Masanotti, as set forth in their respective
employment agreements, and as discussed in detail under the
heading Potential payments upon termination or change in
control, below. These arrangements were determined on the
basis of arms length negotiations at the time we entered
into the respective employment agreements with each of our NEOs.
In general, the severance benefits are designed to provide
economic protection to our key executives in order that they can
remain focused on our business without undue personal concern in
the event that an executives position is eliminated or
significantly altered, including in connection with a change in
control. We recognize that circumstances may arise in which we
may consider eliminating certain key positions that are no
longer necessary, including in connection with a change in
control transaction. These benefits are intended to provide the
security needed for the executives to remain focused and reduce
the distraction regarding personal concerns during a transition.
In addition, under the terms of the option awards granted to our
NEOs, all options that are unvested at the time of an
executives termination without cause or resignation for
good reason will automatically vest in full upon such
termination. Additionally, all unvested options will
automatically accelerate in the event of a change of control of
us or MedQuist Inc., as the case may be.
Benefits and
perquisites
We and MedQuist Inc. each maintain broad-based benefits for all
of our respective full-time employees, including health, dental,
life and disability insurance, as well as our 401(k) plan. These
benefits are offered to our NEOs on the same basis as all other
employees, except that we provide, and pay the premiums for,
additional long-term disability and life insurance coverage for
Mr. Masanotti.
Tax and
accounting considerations
We structure our compensation program in a manner that is
consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives.
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) (as interpreted by IRS
Notice
2007-49)
denies a federal income tax deduction for certain compensation
in excess of $1 million per year paid to the chief
executive officer and the three other most highly-paid executive
officers (other than the companys chief executive officer
and chief financial officer) of a publicly-traded corporation.
Certain types of compensation, including compensation based on
performance criteria that are approved in advance by
stockholders, are excluded from the deduction limit. In
addition, grandfather provisions may apply to
certain compensation arrangements that were entered into by a
corporation before it was publicly held. Our policy will be to
qualify compensation paid to our executive officers for
deductibility for federal income tax purposes to the extent
feasible. However, to retain highly skilled executives and
remain competitive with other employers, the Remuneration and
Compensation Committees will have the right to authorize
compensation that would not otherwise be deductible under
Section 162(m) or otherwise.
We endeavor to design our equity incentive awards in a manner
that will result in equity accounting treatment under applicable
accounting standards.
105
Summary
compensation table
The following table sets forth, for the year ended
December 31, 2010, summary information concerning the
compensation of our NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
incentive plan
|
|
All other
|
|
|
Name and principal position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
awards (2)
|
|
compensation (3)
|
|
compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
Robert Aquilina,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Chairman and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
175,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,085,263
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Raman Kumar,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Vice Chairman and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
382,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
882,500
|
|
Director of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Chief Executive Officer
of CBay India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clyde Swoger,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
Chief Financial
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
518,500
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Seedman,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
Chief Technology
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
$
|
42,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
260,463
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Masanotti,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
192,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
Executive Officer of
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts in this column
represent payments made pursuant to the discretionary element of
the 2009 Incentive Plans. The bonus payments earned by the NEOs
for the 2010 fiscal year are not known at this time. We
currently expect that the determination of any bonus payment for
the 2010 fiscal year will be made in March 2011.
|
(2)
|
As discussed under the heading
Equity-based incentive plans MedQuist option
grant above, on September 30, 2008, MedQuist Inc.
made a stock option grant to Mr. Masanotti to purchase up
to 295,749 shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock, which
agreement was subsequently amended on March 2, 2009. The
amendment increasing the exercise price of the stock option
grant from $4.85 to $8.25 per share did not result in any
incremental fair value over the amount calculated for the 2008
fiscal year. In accordance with the terms of the option
agreement, the option was further adjusted in December 2010 to
decrease the exercise price to $2.22 per share to account for
the payment of extraordinary dividends to the stockholders of
MedQuist Inc. The adjustment did not result in any incremental
fair value over the amount calculated for the 2008 fiscal year.
|
(3)
|
The amounts in this column
represent payments made pursuant to the corporate
performance-based element of the 2009 Plans. The bonus payments
earned by the NEOs for the 2010 fiscal year are not known at
this time. We currently expect that the determination of any
bonus payment for the 2010 fiscal year will be made in March
2011.
|
Grants of
plan-based awards in fiscal year 2010
The following table sets forth each grant of an award made to
each NEO for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated possible payouts under non-equity incentive plan
awards (1)
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
$
|
421,875
|
|
|
$
|
562,500
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
$
|
393,750
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
$
|
94,500
|
|
|
$
|
108,000
|
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
$
|
393,750
|
|
|
$
|
525,000
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the performance-based
element of the awards granted under the 2010 Plans. The material
terms of these annual cash incentive awards are discussed above
(see Compensation discussion and
analysis Annual cash
compensation performance based incentive bonus
program).
|
106
Narrative
disclosure to summary compensation table and grants of
plan-based awards table
We have entered into written employment agreements with each of
our NEOs that provide for the payment of base salary and for
each NEOs participation in our bonus programs and employee
benefit plans. See Executive employment agreements,
below. In addition, each agreement specifies payments and
benefits that would be due to such named executive officer upon
the termination of his employment with us. See Potential
payments upon termination or change in control below,
for additional information regarding amounts payable upon
termination to each of our NEOs.
Outstanding
equity awards at fiscal year-end
The following table sets forth all outstanding equity awards
held by each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#)
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
exercise price
|
|
expiration date
|
|
MedQuist Holdings
Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
|
322,741
|
|
|
|
161,370
|
|
|
|
$5
|
.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
|
826,696
|
|
|
|
413,348
|
|
|
|
$5
|
.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
56,373
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7
|
.88
|
|
|
|
June 12, 2017
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
|
115,259
|
|
|
|
57,630
|
|
|
|
$5
|
.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
|
161,363
|
|
|
|
80,681
|
|
|
|
$5
|
.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
|
197,166
|
|
|
|
98,583
|
|
|
|
$2
|
.22
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
All options over shares of our
common stock granted to each of our NEOs except
Mr. Masanotti (with the exception of outstanding vested
options over 57,630 of our shares of common stock issued to
Mr. Kumar as a stand-alone grant) were issued under the
2007 Plan on August 6, 2008. One-third of these options
vested on August 6, 2009, with the remaining options
vesting in one-sixth increments every six months thereafter. All
outstanding unvested options will accelerate in full upon a
change in control; the options will also accelerate following a
termination of employment by us without cause or by
the executive for good reason (see
Equity-based incentive plans Equity incentive
awards Options granted to named executive officers
under the 2007 Plan, above).
|
(2)
|
Represents options granted outside
of the 2007 Plan which vested on June 18, 2007.
|
(3)
|
The option exercise price has been
converted to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate in effect
on January 27, 2011, the last day on which our common stock
was traded on AIM and we redomiciled in Delaware.
|
(4)
|
As discussed under
Equity-based incentive plans
Equity incentive awards MedQuist option grant
above, on September 30, 2008, MedQuist Inc. made an option
grant to Mr. Masanotti over 295,749 shares of its common stock
at the then applicable fair market value of $4.85 per share. On
March 2, 2009, MedQuist Inc. entered into an amended option
agreement with Mr. Masanotti to, among other things, increase
the exercise price of the option to $8.25 per share. One third
of the option vested on September 30, 2009 (the first
anniversary of the grant date) and one-sixth of the option vests
on each six month anniversary thereafter. The exercise price of
the option was adjusted to $2.22 per share in December 2010, in
accordance with the terms of the option agreement, to account
for the payment of an extraordinary dividend to the stockholders
of MedQuist Inc. on each of September 15, 2009 and
October 15, 2010.
|
Option exercises
and stock vested during last fiscal year
There were no option exercises by any of our NEOs during the
year ended December 31, 2010.
Pension benefits
and non-qualified deferred compensation
None of our NEOs participates in any qualified or non-qualified
defined benefit plan or any non-qualified deferred compensation
plan that provides for payments or other benefits at or in
connection with retirement sponsored by us or by MedQuist Inc.
Executive
employment agreements
Robert
Aquilina
We entered into an employment agreement with Robert Aquilina in
August 2008 pursuant to which Mr. Aquilina serves as
our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The term of the
agreement expires on
107
December 31, 2011, but will be automatically extended for
additional one year periods unless notice is provided by either
party that the term will not be extended.
Mr. Aquilina is entitled to an annual base salary of
$500,000, subject to increase as may be determined from time to
time in the sole discretion of our board. Mr. Aquilina is
eligible to earn an annual bonus award of up to $750,000 based
upon achievement of performance objectives established by our
board. Mr. Aquilina also received a signing bonus in the
amount of $1 million, one-half of which was paid within
10 days following the commencement date, and the remaining
half of which was paid on December 22, 2009. Additionally,
Mr. Aquilina was granted stock options over
484,111 shares of our common stock, subject to the terms
and conditions of the 2007 Plan.
The employment agreement provides that in the case of
termination without cause (including our election
not to extend the employment term) or resignation with
good reason (as such terms are defined below),
Mr. Aquilina is entitled to a payment of a pro-rata bonus
for the year of termination and, subject to his execution of a
release, continued payment of his base salary for a period of
12 months following the date of such termination.
Mr. Aquilina is also subject to certain restrictive
covenants regarding non-competition, non-interference and
non-solicitation of employees and consultants for a period of
one year following termination of employment and certain
restrictive covenants regarding non-disclosure of confidential
information and intellectual property.
V. Raman
Kumar
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Kumar on
August 2, 2008, which was amended and restated as of
December 6, 2010, pursuant to which Mr. Kumar serves
as our Vice-Chairman and previously served as our Chief
Executive Officer. The term of the agreement expires
December 31, 2011 but will be automatically extended for
additional one-year periods unless notice is provided by either
party that the term will not be extended.
Mr. Kumar is entitled to an annual base salary of $500,000,
subject to increase as may be determined from time to time in
the sole discretion of our board. Mr. Kumar is eligible to
earn an annual bonus award of up to $750,000 based upon
achievement of performance objectives established by our board.
Additionally, Mr. Kumar received a signing bonus of
$1 million, one-half of which was paid on or within
10 days following the commencement date and the remaining
half of which was paid on December 22, 2009. Additionally,
Mr. Kumar was granted options over 1,240,044 shares of
our common stock, subject to the terms and conditions of the
2007 Plan.
Mr. Kumar is entitled to the same severance benefits and
subject to the same restrictive covenants as the
Mr. Aquilina, as set forth above.
Clyde
Swoger
We entered into an employment agreement with Clyde Swoger on
August 7, 2008 pursuant to which Mr. Swoger serves as
our Chief Financial Officer. The term of the agreement expires
on December 31, 2011, but will be automatically extended
for additional one-year periods unless notice is provided by
either party that the term will not be extended.
Mr. Swoger is entitled to an annual base salary of
$300,000, subject to increase as may be determined from time to
time in the sole discretion of our board. Mr. Swoger is
eligible to earn an annual bonus award of up to $400,000, based
upon achievement of performance objectives established by our
board. Mr. Swoger also received a signing bonus in the
amount of $500,000, one-half of which was paid within
10 days following the commencement date, the remaining half
of which was paid on December 22, 2009. Additionally,
Mr. Swoger was granted stock options over
172,889 shares of our common stock, subject to the terms
and conditions of the 2007 Plan.
Mr. Swoger is entitled to the same severance benefits and
is subject to the same restrictive covenants as
Mr. Aquilina, as set forth above.
108
Michael
Seedman
We entered into an employment agreement with Michael Seedman on
August 8, 2008 pursuant to which Mr. Seedman serves as
our Chief Technology Officer. The term of the agreement expires
on December 31, 2011, but will be automatically extended
for additional one-year periods unless notice is provided by
either party that the term will not be extended.
Mr. Seedman is entitled to an annual base salary of
$120,000, subject to increase as may be determined from time to
time in the sole discretion of our board. Mr. Seedman is
eligible to earn an annual bonus award of up to $180,000 based
upon achievement of performance objectives established by our
board. Mr. Seedman also received a signing bonus in the
amount of $750,000, one-half of which was paid within
10 days following the commencement date, and the remaining
half of which was paid on December 22, 2009. Additionally,
Mr. Seedman was granted stock options over
242,044 shares of our common stock, subject to the terms
and conditions of the 2007 Plan.
Mr. Seedman is entitled to the same severance benefits and
is subject to the same restrictive covenants as
Mr. Aquilina, as set forth above.
Peter
Masanotti
In connection with his appointment as MedQuist Inc.s Chief
Executive Officer, MedQuist Inc. entered into an employment
agreement with Mr. Masanotti, dated as of September 3,
2008, pursuant to which he agreed to serve through
December 31, 2011. The agreement renews automatically for
successive one-year periods thereafter unless either party
provides written notice that the term will not be extended.
In structuring Mr. Masanottis compensation, the
MedQuist Inc. board of directors considered the importance of
motivating a new Chief Executive Officer to make a long-term
commitment to MedQuist Inc. and to consistently grow its
business. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Masanotti was entitled to receive up to $800,000 on or
prior to February 1, 2009 as a signing bonus based upon
certain conditions which did not transpire; consequently,
MedQuist Inc.s obligation to pay this amount was
extinguished. Mr. Masanotti is entitled to receive an
annual base salary of $500,000 and an annual bonus award based
upon the achievement of performance objectives established by
the MedQuist Inc. board of up to 140% of his base salary.
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Masanotti received a stock option grant to purchase up
to 295,749 shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. See
Equity-based incentive plans Equity
incentive awards MedQuist option grant above,
for additional information regarding the stock option grant to
Mr. Masanotti.
Mr. Masanotti is entitled to the same severance benefits as
Mr. Aquilina, as set forth above. Mr. Masanotti is
also subject to certain restrictive covenants regarding
non-competition, non-interference and non-solicitation of
employees and consultants for a period of one year following
termination of employment, and certain restrictive covenants
regarding non-disclosure of confidential information and
intellectual property.
Potential
payments upon termination or change in control
The following is a description of payments and benefits that
would be due to each of our NEOs upon the termination of his
employment with us or MedQuist Inc., as applicable, and upon a
change in control of us or MedQuist, Inc., as the case may be.
The amounts in the table below assume that each termination was
effective as of December 31, 2010 and are merely
illustrative of the impact of a hypothetical termination of each
executives employment or the consummation of a change in
control on December 31, 2010 of us or MedQuist Inc., as
applicable. The amounts that would be payable upon an actual
termination of employment or an actual change in control can
only be determined at the time of such termination based on the
facts and circumstances then prevailing.
109
The following table provides the total dollar value of the
compensation that would be paid to each of our NEOs assuming a
change in control of us or MedQuist Inc., as applicable, or the
termination of his employment in certain defined circumstances,
on December 31, 2010, pursuant to the arrangements
described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
without cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on death or
|
|
or for
|
|
Change in
|
Named executive officer
|
|
Compensation
|
|
disability
|
|
good reason
|
|
control
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata
Bonus(1)
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
760,440
|
|
|
$
|
760,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,010,440
|
|
|
$
|
760,440
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata
Bonus(1)
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,947,861
|
|
|
$
|
1,947,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,197,861
|
|
|
$
|
1,947,861
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata
Bonus(1)
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
271,596
|
|
|
$
|
271,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
971,576
|
|
|
$
|
271,576
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata
Bonus(1)
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
381,054
|
|
|
$
|
381,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
681,054
|
|
|
$
|
381,054
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata
Bonus(1)
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,833,889
|
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Because the 2010 bonus amounts are
not known at this time, the maximum bonus amount was used for
illustrative purposes.
|
(2)
|
Value represents the gain the NEO
would receive in the event all unvested options were accelerated
on December 31, 2010, calculated as the positive
difference, or spread, between our share price on
December 31, 2010 of £6.21 per share and the exercise
price of the option, converted into U.S. dollars using an
exchange rate of $1.54/£1, which is the Federal Reserve
noon buying rate in effect on December 30, 2010.
|
(3)
|
Value represents the gain
Mr. Masanotti would receive in the event all unvested
options were accelerated on December 31, 2010, calculated
as the positive difference between the share price for MedQuist
Inc. common stock on December 31, 2010 of $8.65 per share
and the adjusted exercise price of $2.22 per share.
|
Severance
payments upon termination of employment
Under the terms of their employment agreement with us, each of
our NEOs is entitled to payments of a pro-rata bonus for the
year of termination and continuation of his then current base
salary for 12 months in the event that:
|
|
|
|
n
|
his employment is terminated by us or MedQuist Inc., as the case
may be, without cause (as defined below), or
|
|
n
|
he resigns for good reason (as defined below).
|
Each of our NEOs is also entitled to the continuation of his
then current base salary for 12 months in the event that we
or MedQuist Inc., as the case may be, elect not to renew the
executives employment term beyond December 31, 2011.
In order to receive continued payments of base salary, the
executive would be required to execute and deliver a general
release of claims against us.
110
Additionally, each of our NEOs is entitled to receive a pro-rata
bonus for the year in which his employment terminates on account
of death or disability, calculated on the basis of our actual
performance for the year and payable when such bonus would
otherwise have been payable had the NEOs employment not
terminated.
As used in the employment agreements with us and MedQuist Inc.,
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Cause means the occurrence of any of the following:
(a) executives failure to substantially perform his
duties (other than as a result of total or partial incapacity
due to physical or mental illness) (b) willful dishonesty
in the performance of executives duties,
(c) executives conviction of, or plea of nolo
contendere to a crime constituting (x) a felony under
the laws of the United States or any state thereof or (y) a
misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (d) executives
willful malfeasance or willful misconduct in connection with his
duties or any intentional (willfull for Mr. Masanotti) act
or omission which is demonstrably injurious to our financial
condition or business reputation or that of our subsidiaries or
affiliates, or (e) executives breach of the
employment agreement provisions relating to non-competition,
non-interference, non-solicitation, confidentiality and our
intellectual property.
|
|
|
(2)
|
For each of our NEOs except Mr. Masanotti, good
reason means (a) breach by us of any material term of
employment agreement, (b) any material diminution in
executives authority or responsibilities, or
(c) relocation of the executives primary place of
employment to a location more than 30 miles from the
location specified in his employment agreement; provided that
any of the foregoing events shall constitute good reason only if
we fail to cure such event within 30 days after receipt
from the executive of written notice of the event which
constitutes good reason; provided, further, that good
reason shall cease to exist for an event on the 60th day
following the later of its occurrence or the executives
knowledge thereof, unless he has given us written notice thereof
prior to such date.
|
|
|
(3)
|
As used in Mr. Masanottis employment agreement with
MedQuist Inc., the term good reason means
(a) the failure to pay or cause to be paid his base salary
or annual bonus when due, (b) any reduction in his base salary
or annual bonus opportunity set forth in the employment
agreement, (c) any substantial and sustained diminution in
his authority, title, reporting relationship or responsibilities
from those described in the employment agreement, or
(d) MedQuist Inc.s material breach of the employment
agreement; provided that any of the foregoing events shall
constitute good reason only if MedQuist Inc. fails to cure such
event within 30 days after receipt from Mr. Masanotti
of written notice of the event which constitutes good reason;
provided, further, that good reason shall cease to
exist for an event on the 60th day following the later of its
occurrence or Mr. Masanottis knowledge thereof,
unless he has given us written notice thereof prior to such
date. Further, good reason will not be deemed to
have occurred by reason of Mr. Masanottis
reassignment to serve as the President or in another capacity as
the most senior executive of a division if MedQuist Inc.
materially expands its business.
|
As noted above, our NEOs are bound by certain non-competition,
non-interference and non-solicitation covenants which extend for
a period of 12 months following termination of employment
for any reason.
Change in
control benefits
Pursuant to the terms of the option agreements under the 2007
Plan with each of our NEOs except Mr. Masanotti, all
unvested options will accelerate in full upon a change in
control (see Severance and change in control
benefits, above).
Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Masanottis amended and
restated option agreement, all unvested options will accelerate
in full upon a change in control of MedQuist Inc.
For purposes of the amended and restated option agreement,
change in control is defined as: (i) the sale
or disposition of all or substantially all of
MedQuist Inc.s assets other than to certain permitted
holders, (ii) any person or group (other than to certain
permitted holders) becoming the beneficial owner of more than
50% of the total voting power of MedQuist Inc. common stock,
(iii) a recapitalization or other corporate transaction in
which the majority of the beneficial stock ownership of MedQuist
Inc. before the transaction is not retained by the then current
holders in substantially the same proportions, (iv) the
incumbent directors ceasing to constitute a majority of the
MedQuist Inc. board during any 12 month period, (v) we
cease to own a majority interest in MedQuist Inc., or
(vi) S.A.C. PEI CB Investment,
111
L.P., or SAC CBI, ceases to remain obligated to file a
Schedule 13D under the Exchange Act in respect of its
beneficial ownership in MedQuist Inc.
Equity
incentive plans
2007 Equity
Incentive Plan
We maintain our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan which was adopted on
June 12, 2007 and subsequently amended on September 4,
2008. The 2007 Plan provides a framework for the grant of equity
and other-equity related incentives to our employees, directors,
officers and consultants (excluding those who provide services
exclusively to MedQuist Inc.). The aggregate number of shares of
our common stock which may be issued
and/or
transferred pursuant to awards made under the 2007 Plan may not
exceed, when aggregated with the number of shares issued or
remaining issuable or transferred or remaining transferable in
respect of awards made under the 2007 Plan, 10% of the number of
shares then outstanding. No additional awards will be granted
under the 2007 Plan following the closing of this offering, but
the 2007 Plan will continue to govern the terms and conditions
of all options granted under the 2007 Plan which remain
outstanding.
Awards available
for grant
Benefits under the 2007 Plan consist of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units
and other share, share-based or cash awards. Awards granted
under the 2007 Plan cannot be assigned, transferred, charged or
otherwise disposed of or encumbered.
Stock
options
Stock options consist of a right to purchase shares which may be
granted to participants at any time as determined by our board.
Our board has the authority to determine the terms of any option
award granted under the 2007 Plan. All options have been granted
with an exercise price that equals or exceeds the fair market
value for our common stock on the date of grant. Only options
are currently outstanding under the 2007 Plan.
Change in
control
Pursuant to the terms of the options granted to our NEOs, in the
event of a change in control (as defined below), all
outstanding options will accelerate in full and the board will
give executives reasonable notice and an opportunity to exercise
any vested options in advance of the consummation of such
change in control. Change in control
means: (i) the sale or disposition of all or substantially
all of our assets, (ii) any person or group becoming the
beneficial owner of more than 50% of the total voting power of
our common stock, (iii) a recapitalization or other
corporate transaction in which the majority of our beneficial
stock ownership before the transaction is not retained by the
then current holders in substantially the same proportions,
(iv) the incumbent directors ceasing to constitute a
majority of our board during any 12 month period, or
(v) SAC CBI ceasing to be a beneficial owner of at least 5%
of the total voting power of our voting stock.
Termination of
employment or service
In the case of a qualifying termination of employment or service
by reason of death, disability, redundancy or retirement, or
upon the transfer of an employing company or business, the award
agreement will specify what portion of the award will lapse and,
for vested options, the applicable period during which such
awards may be exercised following termination of employment.
112
Adjustments
Our board may make or provide for such adjustments in the number
and kind of shares
and/or the
exercise price of shares subject to outstanding awards granted
under the 2007 Plan as it may determine as equitably required to
prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants
that would otherwise result from any change in our capital
structure including, but without limitation, from (a) any
stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares,
recapitalization or other change in our capital structure,
(b) any merger, consolidation, spin off, reorganization,
partial or complete liquidation or other distribution of assets,
issuance of rights or warrants to purchase securities, or
(c) any other corporate transaction or event having an
effect similar to any of the foregoing (other than a change in
control).
Amendments
Our board may at any time amend the 2007 Plan, in whole or in
part, provided that any amendment which may require approval by
our shareholders in order to comply with applicable law and the
rules of any relevant stock exchange will not be effective until
such approval has been obtained. The board may amend the terms
of any award granted under the 2007 Plan provided that no
amendment to the material advantage of participants may be made
without the prior approval of our shareholders, and no amendment
may impair the rights of any participant without his or her
consent.
MedQuist Inc.
2002 Stock Option Plan
Set forth below is a summary of certain significant portions of
the MedQuist Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan, or the MedQuist Inc.
Option Plan, pursuant to which the MedQuist Inc. board granted
certain stock option awards to Mr. Masanotti.
Eligibility and
administration
All officers, key employees and consultants of MedQuist Inc.,
including all non-employee directors, are eligible to receive
options under the MedQuist Inc. Option Plan.
Amendment and
termination
Options may not be granted pursuant to the MedQuist Inc. Option
Plan after the tenth anniversary of the approval of the plan by
shareholders of MedQuist Inc.. The board of MedQuist Inc.
reserves the right to modify, amend, suspend or terminate the
MedQuist Inc. Option Plan; provided, however, that such action
shall not affect options granted under the MedQuist Inc. Option
Plan prior to the actual date on which such action occurred. The
MedQuist Inc. board will also seek shareholder approval for any
amendment where such approval is required by law.
Number of shares
and adjustment
As of October 1, 2010, the number of MedQuist Inc. shares
of common stock which may be issued upon the exercise of options
granted under the MedQuist Inc. Option Plan is
1,500,000 shares. The aggregate number and kind of shares
issuable under the MedQuist Inc. Option Plan is subject to
appropriate adjustment to reflect changes in the capitalization
of MedQuist Inc., such as by stock dividend, stock split or
other similar circumstances. Any shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock subject to options that terminate unexercised will be
available for future options granted under the MedQuist Inc.
Option Plan.
113
Exercise price
and terms
The exercise price for options granted under the MedQuist Inc.
Option Plan shall be equal to at least the fair market value of
the MedQuist Inc. common stock as of the date of the grant of
the option. Unless terminated earlier by the options
terms, options granted under the MedQuist Inc. Option Plan will
generally expire ten years after the date they are granted.
Termination of
service; death; non-transferability
Except in the case of an optionholders death or
disability, all unexercised options will terminate 90 days
after the date either (i) the optionee ceases to perform
services for MedQuist Inc., or (ii) MedQuist Inc. delivers
or receives notice of an intention to terminate the employment
relationship. An optionee who ceases to be an employee because
of a disability must exercise the option within one year after
he ceases to be an employee (but in no event later than the
expiration date). The heirs or personal representative of a
deceased employee who could have exercised an option while alive
may exercise such option within one year following the
employees death (but in no event later than the expiration
date). Unless the compensation committee provides otherwise,
options granted under the MedQuist Inc. Option Plan are not
transferable except in the event of death by will or the laws of
descent and distribution.
2010 Equity
Incentive Plan
We believe that the use of stock-based awards promotes our
overall executive compensation objectives and expect that
stock-based awards will continue to be a significant source of
potential compensation for our executives. Therefore, prior to
the closing of this offering, we intend to adopt the 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan, or the 2010 Plan. The purpose of the 2010 Plan
is to attract and retain key personnel and to provide a means
for directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors to
acquire and maintain an interest in us, which interest may be
measured by reference to the value of our common stock. The 2010
Plan is also designed to permit us to make cash-based awards and
equity-based awards intended to qualify as
performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code.
The principal features of the 2010 Plan are summarized below.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
text of the 2010 Plan, which is filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Administration
Our remuneration committee will administer our 2010 Plan. The
remuneration committee will have the authority to determine the
terms and conditions of any agreements evidencing any awards
granted under our 2010 Plan and to adopt, alter and repeal
rules, guidelines and practices relating to our 2010 Plan. Our
remuneration committee will have full discretion to administer
and interpret the 2010 Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations
and procedures as it deems necessary or advisable and to
determine, among other things, the time or times at which the
awards may be exercised and whether and under what circumstances
an award may be exercised.
114
Eligibility
Our employees, directors, officers, advisors, consultants or
affiliates are eligible to participate in the 2010 Plan. Our
remuneration committee has the sole and complete authority to
determine who will be granted an award under the 2010 Plan,
however, it may delegate such authority to one or more of our
officers under the circumstances set forth in our 2010 Plan.
Number of shares
authorized
The 2010 Plan reserves for awards not more than 7.5% of the
total number of outstanding shares of our common stock, as
determined following the completion of this offering, the
Private Exchange and the Registered Exchange Offer, less the
number of shares that are subject to outstanding awards under
the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and the number of shares that
will be reserved for issuance under the 2010 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, or the Share Reserve. No participant may be
granted awards of options and stock appreciation rights with
respect to more than 20% of the Share Reserve in any one
year. No more than 20% of the Share Reserve may be granted
under our 2010 Plan to any participant during any single year
with respect to performance compensation awards in any one
performance period. The maximum amount payable pursuant to a
cash bonus for an individual employee or officer under our 2010
Plan for any single year during a performance period is
$5,000,000. If any award is forfeited or if any option
terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised, the
common stock subject to such award will again be made available
for future grant. Shares that are used to pay the exercise price
of an option or that are withheld to satisfy a
participants tax withholding obligation will not be
available for re-grant under the 2010 Plan. If there is any
change in our corporate capitalization, the remuneration
committee will make or recommend to our board for approval
substitutions or adjustments to the number of shares reserved
for issuance under our 2010 Plan, the number of shares covered
by awards then outstanding under our 2010 Plan, the limitations
on awards under our 2010 Plan, the exercise price of outstanding
options and such other equitable substitution or adjustments as
it may determine appropriate in its sole discretion.
The 2010 Plan will have a term of ten years and no further
awards may be granted under the 2010 Plan after the expiration
of the term.
Awards available
for grant
The remuneration committee may grant awards of non-qualified
stock options, incentive (qualified) stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units, stock bonus awards, dividend equivalents, performance
compensation awards (including cash bonus awards) or any
combination of the foregoing.
Options
The remuneration committee will be authorized to grant options
to purchase shares of common stock that are either
qualified, meaning they are intended to satisfy the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code for incentive stock
options, or non-qualified, meaning they are not
intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the
Code. Options granted under our 2010 Plan will be subject to the
terms and conditions established by the remuneration committee.
Under the terms of our 2010 Plan, unless the remuneration
committee determines otherwise in the case of an option
substituted for another option in connection with a corporate
transaction, the exercise price of the options will not be less
than the fair market value of our common stock at the time of
grant. Options granted under the 2010 Plan will be subject to
such terms, including the exercise price and the conditions and
timing of exercise, as may be determined by our remuneration
committee and specified in the applicable award agreement. The
maximum term of an option granted under the 2010 Plan will be
ten years from the date of grant (or five years in the case of a
qualified option granted to a 10% stockholder). Payment in
respect of the exercise of an option may be made in cash or by
check, by surrender of unrestricted shares (at their fair market
value on the date of exercise) that have been held by the
participant for any period deemed necessary to avoid an
additional compensation charge or have been purchased on the
open market, or the remuneration committee may, in its
discretion and to the extent permitted by law, allow such
payment to be made through a broker-assisted cashless exercise
mechanism, a net exercise method or by such other method as our
remuneration
115
committee may determine to be appropriate. Unless provided
otherwise in the option agreement, options will vest in four
equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of
the grant date.
Stock
appreciation rights
Our remuneration committee will be authorized to award stock
appreciation rights, or SARs, under the 2010 Plan. SARs will be
subject to the terms and conditions established by the
remuneration committee. An SAR is a contractual right that
allows a participant to receive, either in the form of cash,
shares or any combination of cash and shares, the appreciation,
if any, in the value of a share over a certain period of time.
An option granted under the 2010 Plan may include SARs and SARs
may also be awarded to a participant independent of the grant of
an option. SARs granted in connection with an option shall be
subject to terms similar to the option corresponding to such
SARs. The terms of the SARs shall be subject to terms
established by the remuneration committee and reflected in the
award agreement. Unless provided otherwise in the SAR agreement,
SARs will vest in four equal installments on each of the first
four anniversaries of the grant date.
Restricted
stock
Our remuneration committee will be authorized to award
restricted stock under the 2010 Plan. Unless provided otherwise
in the award agreement, restrictions on restricted stock will
lapse in four equal installments on each of the first four
anniversaries of the grant date. The remuneration committee will
determine the terms of such restricted stock awards. Restricted
stock is common stock that generally is non-transferable and is
subject to other restrictions determined by the remuneration
committee for a specified period. Unless the remuneration
committee determines otherwise or specifies otherwise in an
award agreement, if the participant terminates employment or
service during the restricted period, then any unvested
restricted stock will be forfeited.
Restricted stock
unit awards
Our remuneration committee will be authorized to award
restricted stock unit awards. Unless provided otherwise in the
award agreement, restricted stock units will vest in four equal
installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the
grant date. The remuneration committee will determine the terms
of such restricted stock units. Unless the remuneration
committee determines otherwise or specifies otherwise in an
award agreement, if the participant terminates employment or
service during the period of time over which all or a portion of
the units are to be earned, then any unvested units will be
forfeited. At the election of the remuneration committee, the
participant will receive a number of shares of common stock
equal to the number of units earned or an amount in cash equal
to the fair market value of that number of shares at the
expiration of the period over which the units are to be earned
or at a later date selected by the remuneration committee.
116
Stock bonus
awards
Our remuneration committee will be authorized to grant awards of
unrestricted common stock or other awards denominated in common
stock, either alone or in tandem with other awards, under such
terms and conditions as the remuneration committee may determine.
Dividend
equivalents
Our remuneration committee will be authorized to grant
participants the right to receive the equivalent value (in cash
or common stock) of dividends paid to holders of our common
stock.
Performance
compensation awards
The remuneration committee will be authorized to grant any award
under the 2010 Plan in the form of a performance compensation
award by conditioning the vesting of the award on the
satisfaction of certain performance goals. The committee may
establish these performance goals with reference to one or more
of the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Net earnings or net income (before or after taxes);
|
|
n
|
Basic or diluted earnings per share (before or after taxes);
|
|
n
|
Net revenues or revenue growth;
|
|
n
|
Net interest margin;
|
|
n
|
Operating profit (before or after taxes);
|
|
n
|
Return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets
or equity);
|
|
n
|
Cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow
and free cash flow);
|
|
n
|
Share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and
total stockholder return);
|
|
n
|
Expense targets;
|
|
n
|
Margins;
|
|
n
|
Operating efficiency;
|
|
n
|
Measures of economic value added;
|
|
n
|
Asset quality;
|
|
n
|
Enterprise value;
|
|
n
|
Employee retention;
|
|
n
|
Objective measures of personal targets, goals or completion of
projects;
|
|
n
|
Asset growth;
|
|
n
|
Dividend yield; or
|
|
n
|
Any combination of the foregoing.
|
Transferability.
Each award may be exercised during the participants
lifetime only by the participant or, if permissible under
applicable law, by the participants guardian or legal
representative and may not be otherwise transferred or
encumbered by a participant other than by will or by the laws of
descent and distribution. The remuneration committee, however,
may permit awards (other than incentive stock options) to be
transferred to family equityholders, a trust for the benefit of
such family equityholders, a partnership or limited liability
company whose partners or stockholders are the participant and
his or her family equityholders or anyone else approved
by it.
117
Amendment.
Our 2010 Plan will have a term of ten years. Our board may
amend, suspend or terminate our 2010 Plan at any time; however,
stockholder approval to amend our 2010 Plan may be necessary if
the law so requires. No amendment, suspension or termination
will impair the rights of any participant or recipient of any
award without the consent of the participant or recipient.
Change in
control.
In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2010
Plan), the remuneration committee may provide that all
outstanding options and equity awards (other than performance
compensation awards) issued under the 2010 Plan will become
fully vested and that performance compensation awards will vest,
as determined by the remuneration committee, based on the level
of attainment of the specified performance goals. The
remuneration committee may, in its discretion, cancel
outstanding awards and pay the value of such awards to the
participants in connection with a Change in Control. The
remuneration committee can also provide otherwise in an award
agreement under the 2010 Plan. Under the 2010 Plan, a change in
control is generally defined as:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Any person or group becomes the beneficial owner of 50% or more
of our voting shares;
|
|
n
|
A change in the composition of our board over a two-year period
such that 50% or more of the equityholders of the board were
elected through one or more contested elections;
|
|
n
|
A merger, share exchange, consolidation or other business
transaction in which we are involved, directly or indirectly,
other than a transaction which results in our outstanding voting
securities immediately before the transaction continuing to
represent a majority of the voting power of the acquiring
companys outstanding voting securities which are held in
substantially the same proportions as immediately before the
transaction, and after which no person or group beneficially
owns 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the
surviving entity immediately after the transaction and at least
a majority of our board following the transaction were
equityholders of the incumbent board immediately prior to the
transaction;
|
|
n
|
The sale, exchange or transfer of all or substantially all of
our assets;
|
|
n
|
The boards determination that as a consequence of any
transaction or event, a change in control has occurred; or
|
|
n
|
Shareholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution.
|
In addition, if an award under the 2010 Plan is subject to
Section 409A of the Code, a change in control transaction
may constitute a payment event only if the transaction is also a
change in control event for purposes of
Section 409A of the Code.
United States
federal income tax consequences
The following is a general summary of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the grant, vesting and
exercise of awards under the 2010 Plan and the disposition of
shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of such awards and is
intended to reflect the current provisions of the Code and the
regulations thereunder. This summary is not intended to be a
complete statement of applicable law, nor does it address
foreign, state, local and payroll tax considerations. Moreover,
the United States federal income tax consequences to any
particular participant may differ from those described herein by
reason of, among other things, the particular circumstances of
such participant.
118
Options
The Code requires that, for treatment of an option as a
qualified option, common stock acquired through the exercise of
a qualified option cannot be disposed of before the later of
(i) two years from the date of grant of the option or
(ii) one year from the date of exercise. Holders of
qualified options will generally incur no federal income tax
liability at the time of grant or upon exercise of those
options. However, the spread at exercise will be an item
of tax preference, which may give rise to
alternative minimum tax liability for the taxable
year in which the exercise occurs. If the holder does not
dispose of the shares before two years following the date of
grant and one year following the date of exercise, the
difference between the exercise price and the amount realized
upon disposition of the shares will constitute long-term capital
gain or loss, as the case may be. Assuming both holding periods
are satisfied, we will not be allowed a deduction for federal
income tax purposes in connection with the grant or exercise of
the qualified option. If, within two years following the date of
grant or within one year following the date of exercise, the
holder of shares acquired through the exercise of a qualified
option disposes of those shares, the participant will generally
realize taxable compensation at the time of such disposition
equal to the difference between the exercise price and the
lesser of the fair market value of the share on the date of
exercise or the amount realized on the subsequent disposition of
the shares, and that amount will generally be deductible by us
for federal income tax purposes, subject to the possible
limitations on deductibility under Sections 280G and 162(m)
of the Code for compensation paid to executives designated in
those Sections. Finally, if an otherwise qualified option
becomes first exercisable in any one year for shares having an
aggregate value in excess of $100,000 (based on the grant date
value), the portion of the qualified option in respect of those
excess shares will be treated as a non-qualified stock option
for federal income tax purposes.
No income will be realized by a participant upon grant of a
non-qualified stock option. Upon the exercise of a non-qualified
stock option, the participant will recognize ordinary
compensation income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of
the fair market value of the underlying exercised shares over
the option exercise price paid at the time of exercise. We will
be able to deduct this same amount for United States federal
income tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under
Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid
to certain executives designated in those Sections.
Restricted stock. A participant will not be
subject to tax upon the grant of an award of restricted stock
unless the participant otherwise elects to be taxed at the time
of grant pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code. On the date
an award of restricted stock becomes transferable or is no
longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the
participant will have taxable compensation equal to the
difference between the fair market value of the shares on that
date over the amount the participant paid for such shares, if
any, unless the participant made an election under
Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed at the time of grant.
If the participant made an election under Section 83(b),
the participant will have taxable compensation at the time of
grant equal to the difference between the fair market value of
the shares on the date of grant over the amount the participant
paid for such shares, if any. (Special rules apply to the
receipt and disposition of restricted stock received by officers
and directors who are subject to Section 16(b) of the
Exchange Act). We will be able to deduct, at the same time as it
is recognized by the participant, the amount of taxable
compensation to the participant for United States federal income
tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under
Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid
to certain executives designated in those Sections.
Restricted stock units. A participant will not
be subject to tax upon the grant of a restricted stock unit
award. Rather, upon the delivery of shares or cash pursuant to a
restricted stock unit award, the participant will have taxable
compensation equal to the fair market value of the number of
shares (or the amount of cash) the participant actually receives
with respect to the award. We will be able to deduct the amount
of taxable compensation to the participant for United States
federal income tax purposes, but the deduction may be limited
under Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation
paid to certain executives designated in those Sections.
SARs. No income will be realized by a
participant upon grant of an SAR. Upon the exercise of an SAR,
the participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in
an amount equal to the fair market value of the payment received
in respect of the SAR. We will be able to deduct this same
amount for United States federal income tax purposes, but such
deduction may be limited under Sections 280G and 162(m) of
the Code for compensation paid to certain executives designated
in those Sections.
119
Stock Bonus Awards and Dividend Equivalents. A
participant will have taxable compensation equal to the
difference between the fair market value of the shares on the
date the common stock subject to the award is transferred to the
participant over the amount the participant paid for such
shares, if any. We will be able to deduct, at the same time as
it is recognized by the participant, the amount of taxable
compensation to the participant for United States federal income
tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under
Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid
to certain executives designated in those Sections. Dividend
equivalents are taxable at ordinary income tax rates upon
receipt.
Section 162(m). In general,
Section 162(m) of the Code denies a publicly held
corporation a deduction for United States federal income tax
purposes for compensation in excess of $1 million per year
per person to its principal executive officer, and the three
other officers (other than the principal executive officer and
principal financial officer) whose compensation is disclosed in
its prospectus or proxy statement as a result of their total
compensation, subject to certain exceptions. Subject to
obtaining approval of the 2010 Plan by our stockholders prior to
the payment of any awards thereunder, the 2010 Plan is intended
to satisfy an exception with respect to grants of options to
covered employees. In addition, the 2010 Plan is designed to
permit certain awards of restricted stock, restricted stock
units, cash bonus awards and other awards to be awarded as
performance compensation awards intended to qualify under the
performance-based compensation exception to
Section 162(m) of the Code.
2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The purpose of the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, is to promote our interests and
that of our shareholders by providing our employees with an
opportunity to purchase our common stock at a discount through
accumulated payroll deductions. By encouraging stock ownership,
we seek to attract, retain and motivate employees and to
encourage them to devote their best efforts to our business and
financial success. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended
to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan within
the meaning of Section 423 of the Code.
The following is a summary of the material terms of the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the text of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, a
copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Administration
Our remuneration committee will administer the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and shall have full and exclusive discretionary
authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, to determine eligibility and to
adjudicate all disputed claims filed thereunder.
Share
purchases
Participation in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is voluntary.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan permits shares of our common
stock to be sold to participating employees on the last trading
day of any offering period at a price that may not be not less
than the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of our common
stock at the beginning of an offering period and 85% of the fair
market value of our common stock at the end of such offering
period.
Each six-month period will constitute an offering period under
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The remuneration committee
may, in its discretion and with prior notice, change the
duration
and/or
frequency of offering periods from time to time. The initial
offering period under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will
commence on the first trading day on or after July 1, 2011
and end on the last trading day on or before December 1,
2011.
120
Eligible
participants
Each of our employees is eligible to participate in the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, provided that:
|
|
|
|
a.
|
the employees customary employment is more than
20 hours per week and is more than five months per
year; and
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
the employee has been continuously employed by us or one of our
eligible subsidiaries for at least 30 days prior to the
start of the applicable offering period.
|
Our remuneration committee may also exclude any
(i) highly compensated employee within the
meaning of Code Section 414(q) or (ii) employee of a
participating subsidiary if it determines that participation by
employees of the participating subsidiary would not be permitted
under applicable local laws, would be unduly burdensome as a
result of constraints imposed by such laws or would cause a
violation of Section 423 of the Code.
Number of
shares
The aggregate number of shares of our common stock that are
available for purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
will be determined by our remuneration committee but in any
event will not exceed 2% of the total number of outstanding
shares of our common stock determined following the completion
of our initial public offering, the Private Exchange and the
Registered Exchange Offer. The number of shares of common stock
available for purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
as well as the price per share of our common stock covered by
share purchase rights that have not been exercised, are subject
to adjustment by the remuneration committee in the event of a
stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or
reclassification of our common stock, or other increase or
reduction of our outstanding common stock effected without the
receipt of consideration, provided that conversion of
convertible securities shall not be deemed to have been effected
without consideration.
No employee may receive the right to purchase our common stock
under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan: (i) to the extent
that he or she would own or have the right to purchase stock
possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or
value of all classes of our common stock of us or any of our
subsidiaries; or (ii) to the extent that his or her rights
to purchase stock under all stock purchase plans of us or any of
our subsidiaries would accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 in
fair market value in any calendar year.
Terms and
conditions
Eligible employees may elect to participate in the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan by giving proper notice to us to withhold a
specified percentage of the employees base salary (in any
multiple of 1% up to a maximum of 15%) on each pay period during
the applicable offering period.
A participant may increase or decrease the amount of his or her
contributions for future pay periods within an offering period,
subject to limitations set by the remuneration committee. A
participant may withdraw his or her cash contributions that have
accumulated during an offering period but have not yet been used
to purchase our common stock. Participants who withdraw from the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan will not be permitted to re-enroll
in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan until the next offering
period. Upon a participants termination of employment with
us an eligible subsidiary for any reason, the participant will
be deemed to have withdrawn from the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan.
Participants have no interest or voting rights in shares of our
common stock covered by share purchase rights until such rights
have been exercised.
121
Duration,
termination and amendment
Unless earlier terminated by our board or the remuneration
committee, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will continue in
effect for ten years from the later of the date that it is
adopted by our board or approved by stockholders. The Employee
Stock Purchase Plan permits our board or the remuneration
committee to amend or terminate the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
at any time, except that no amendment to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan may make any change in any share purchase rights
previously granted that adversely affects the rights of any
participant, except as otherwise provided in the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. In the event of a proposed sale of all or
substantially all of our assets, or a merger with another
corporation, each outstanding option shall be assumed or an
equivalent option substituted by the successor corporation. In
the event that the successor corporation refuses or assume or
substitute for the options, any offering period(s) then in
progress will be shortened by setting a new exercise date, and
participants will be notified that their options will be
exercised automatically on such new exercise date.
Transferability
of contributions and purchase rights
The right of a participant to purchase our common stock through
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will not be assignable or
transferable by the participant, except by will or the laws of
inheritance following a participants death.
Holding period
for purchased shares
Once shares are purchased at the end of an offering period, the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan requires that the participants hold
the shares of common stock in a restricted account for a period
of twenty-four months (or a shorter or longer period of time as
may be established by the remuneration committee). The shares
may not be sold or otherwise disposed of while held in the
restricted account without the remuneration committees
prior written consent. However, in the event of a qualifying
merger or asset sale, the twenty-four month holding period will
no longer apply.
Federal Income
Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the grant and exercise of
awards under the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
disposition of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of such
awards and is intended to reflect the current provisions of the
Code and the regulations thereunder. This summary is not
intended to be a complete statement of applicable law, nor does
it address foreign, state, local and payroll tax considerations.
Moreover, the United States federal income tax consequences to
any particular participant may differ from those described
herein by reason of, among other things, the particular
circumstances of such participant.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an
employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of
Section 423 of the Code. The purchase of stock under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan is made with after-tax earnings.
Generally, neither the grant of a right to buy stock under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan on the first trading day of the
offering period, or the Grant Date, nor the exercise of the
right to buy stock on the last trading day of the offering
period will result in taxable income to a participant or a tax
deduction for us. Thereafter, the federal income taxes for a
participant who sells the stock will depend on when the
participant sells the stock.
Generally, a participant in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
will recognize income in the year in which he or she disposes of
the shares or in which he or she dies. The participants
federal tax liability will depend on whether the participant
makes a qualifying or disqualifying disposition of the purchased
shares. A qualifying disposition generally will occur if the
sale or other disposition of the shares occurs after the
participant has held the shares for (i) more than two years
after the start of the offering period and (ii) more than
one year after the last trading day of the offering period.
A participant who makes a qualifying disposition will recognize
ordinary income in the year of the qualifying disposition equal
to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value on
the Grant Date of the shares being sold
122
or otherwise transferred over the aggregate purchase price for
such shares and (ii) the excess of the amount realized for
such shares on the date of the qualifying disposition over the
aggregate purchase price paid for such shares. Any additional
gain recognized upon a qualifying disposition will be a
long-term capital gain. If the fair market value of the shares
being sold or otherwise transferred on the date of the
qualifying disposition is less than the aggregate purchase price
paid for such shares, there will be no ordinary income, and any
loss recognized will be a long-term capital loss.
A participant who makes a disqualifying disposition will
recognize ordinary income in the year of the disqualifying
disposition equal to the excess of (i) the fair market
value of the shares on the last trading day of the offering
period over (ii) the purchase price. Any additional gain or
loss recognized upon a disqualifying disposition will be capital
gain, which will be long-term if the shares are held for more
than twelve months.
Generally, we are entitled to a tax deduction when a participant
engages in a disqualifying disposition for the amount of
ordinary income recognized by the participant. Otherwise, we are
not entitled to a tax deduction under the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan.
Compensation of
directors
We currently do not pay Frank Baker, Peter Berger, Jeffrey
Hendren or our employee directors any compensation for their
service on our board. Our other non-employee directors are paid
an annual retainer of $50,000, except for Mr. McLachlan who
receives $60,000 annually which reflects an additional $10,000
retainer for his role as chair of our audit committee. All
directors are reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred by
them in connection with their service on our board.
During 2010, our non-employee directors (other than Messrs.
Berger, Baker and Hendren) received the following compensation
from us:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees earned or
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
paid in cash
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Charles Siegfried Habermacher (former director)
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Atim Kabra (former director)
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Kenneth John McLachlan
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
Merle Gilmore
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
James Patrick Nolan
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
123
Principal and
Selling Stockholders
The following table and accompanying footnotes set forth
information regarding the beneficial ownership of our shares as
of December 30, 2010 based on the shares outstanding as of
December 30, 2010, of (i) each person known by us to
own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock,
(ii) each selling stockholder, (iii) each of the named
executive officers, (iv) each of our current directors,
(v) all current members of the board and the executive
officers as a group.
The amounts and percentages of shares beneficially owned are
reported on the basis of SEC regulations governing the
determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under SEC
rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner
of a security if that person has or shares voting power or
investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to
direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed
to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person
has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding
for purposes of computing such persons ownership
percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other
persons percentage. Under these rules, more than one
person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same
securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner
of securities as to which such person has no economic interest.
The number of shares and percentages of beneficial ownership
prior to this offering set forth below are based on the number
of shares issued and outstanding as of December 30, 2010
and give effect to the Private Exchange. The number of shares
and percentages of beneficial ownership after this offering set
forth below are based on the number of shares to be issued and
outstanding immediately after the consummation of this offering
and after giving effect to the Private Exchange and to the
Registered Exchange Offer, assuming a full exchange.
Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of
the beneficial owners has, to our knowledge, sole voting and
investment power with respect to the indicated shares of common
stock. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each director and
executive officer is
c/o MedQuist
Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited), 9009
Carothers Parkway, Franklin, TN 37067.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Assuming the
|
|
Assuming the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
underwriters
|
|
underwriters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
subject
|
|
option is
|
|
option is
|
|
|
Prior to this offering
|
|
shares
|
|
to the
|
|
not exercised
|
|
exercised in full
|
Name and address of
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
being
|
|
underwriters
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
beneficial owner
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
offered
|
|
option
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
Principal stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.A.C. PEI CB
Investment, L.P.
and affiliates
(1)(2)
|
|
|
16,788,241
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,557,802
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
17,557,802
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
Lehman Brothers
Commercial Corporation
Asia Limited
(in Liquidation)
(2)
|
|
|
4,228,584
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
917,741
|
|
|
|
412,984
|
|
|
|
3,310,843
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
2,897,859
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Costa Brava Partnership III,
L.P. (3)
|
|
|
2,873,142
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,873,142
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
2,873,142
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
GMO Emerging Markets
Fund, a series of
GMO Trust
|
|
|
2,643,567
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,643,567
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
2,643,567
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Godrej Group
(4)
|
|
|
2,138,786
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,138,786
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
2,138,786
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Directors and executive
officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
(5)
|
|
|
322,740
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
322,740
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
(6)
|
|
|
1,500,554
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,554
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1,500,554
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Michael Seedman
(7)
|
|
|
161,362
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,362
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
161,362
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Clyde Swoger
(8)
|
|
|
115,259
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,259
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
115,259
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Clark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony James
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Baker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Berger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merle Gilmore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Assuming the
|
|
Assuming the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
underwriters
|
|
underwriters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
subject
|
|
option is
|
|
option is
|
|
|
Prior to this offering
|
|
shares
|
|
to the
|
|
not exercised
|
|
exercised in full
|
Name and address of
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
being
|
|
underwriters
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
beneficial owner
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
offered
|
|
option
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
of shares
|
|
Jeffrey Hendren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth John McLachlan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Patrick Nolan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group (13 persons)
|
|
|
2,099,915
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,099,915
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2,099,915
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Selling stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black Horse
Capital (9)
|
|
|
1,150,295
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
340,712
|
|
|
|
153,320
|
|
|
|
809,583
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
656,263
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Sansar Capital Holdings,
Ltd. (10)
|
|
|
584,882
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
241,547
|
|
|
|
108,696
|
|
|
|
343,335
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
234,639
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts shown under the heading
Prior to this offering include
15,768,938 shares directly beneficially owned by S.A.C. PEI
CB Investment, L.P., a Cayman Islands limited partnership, or
SAC CBI, 715,128 shares directly beneficially owned by
S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, or SAC CBI II, and 304,175 shares directly
beneficially owned by International Equities (S.A.C. Asia)
Limited, a Mauritius company, or SAC Asia. Amounts shown under
the heading After this offering also include
769,561 shares which may be issued to SAC CBI II pursuant
to the Consulting Services Agreement. See Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions.
|
|
|
|
The general partner of SAC CBI is
S.A.C. PEI CB Investment GP, Limited, a Cayman Islands company,
or SAC CBI GP; S.A.C. Private Equity Investors, L.P., a Cayman
Islands limited partnership, or SAC PEI, is the sole shareholder
of SAC CBI GP; S.A.C. Private Equity GP, L.P., a Cayman Islands
limited partnership, or SAC PEI GP, is the general partner of
SAC PEI; S.A.C. Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, or SAC Management LLC, is the general partner
of SAC PEI GP; and Mr. Steven A. Cohen controls SAC
Management LLC. The manager of SAC CBI II is SAC PCG, a Delaware
limited liability company; S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership, or SAC Advisors LP, manages SAC
PCG; S.A.C. Capital Advisors Inc., a Delaware corporation, or
SAC Advisors Inc., is the general partner of SAC Advisors LP;
and Mr. Cohen controls SAC Advisors Inc. Pursuant to
investment management agreements, SAC Advisors LP and S.A.C.
Capital Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or
SAC Advisors LLC, maintain voting and dispositive power with
respect to securities held by SAC Asia; and Mr. Cohen
controls SAC Advisors LLC. SAC CBI GP, SAC PEI, SAC PEI GP, SAC
Management LLC, SAC PCG, SAC Advisors LP, SAC Advisors Inc., SAC
Advisors LLC and Mr. Cohen expressly disclaim beneficial
ownership of securities directly beneficially owned by any
person or entity other than, to the extent of any pecuniary
interest therein, the various accounts under their respective
management and control.
|
|
|
The address of SAC CBI is
c/o Walkers
Corporate Services Limited, Walker House, 87 Mary Street, George
Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9002, Cayman Islands. The address of SAC
CBI II is 72 Cummings Point Road, Stamford, Connecticut 06902.
The address of SAC Asia is
c/o Citco
( Mauritius) Ltd., 4th Floor, Tower A, One CyberCity,
Ebene, Mauritius.
|
|
|
(2)
|
In connection with this offering,
LBCCAs limited partnership interest in SAC CBI will be
redeemed by SAC CBI for cash of $13.7 million plus a
distribution to LBCCA of 4,228,584 shares. In connection
with the redemption, LBCCA is expected to grant to SAC CBI an
irrevocable proxy to vote such shares so long as they are
beneficially owned by LBCCA. SAC CBI disclaims beneficial
ownership of all shares owned by LBCCA, and such shares are not
included in the amounts shown for SAC CBI and affiliates above.
See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions. The address of Lehman Brothers Commercial
Corporation Asia Limited (In Liquidation) is
c/o KPMG,
8th Floor, Princes Building, 10 Chater Road,
Central, Hong Kong. Messrs. Paul Brough, Edward Middleton
and Patrick Cowley in their capacity as joint and several
liquidators of LBCCA acting as agents without personal
liability, have voting and dispositive power over the shares
held by LBCCA pursuant to section 199 of the Companies
Ordinance (Ch. 32 of the laws of Hong Kong).
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts shown under the heading
Prior to this offering include 2,478,698 shares
issuable pursuant to the Private Exchange and
394,444 shares outstanding as of the date hereof. The
address of Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P. is 222 Berkeley
Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.
|
|
(4)
|
These shares include
1,818,255 shares held by Godrej Industries Limited and
320,532 shares held by Godrej International Limited.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. Aquilina is our Chairman
and our Chief Executive Officer. Of the shares shown as
beneficially owned, all represent shares issuable pursuant to
options that are currently vested and exercisable.
|
|
(6)
|
Mr. Kumar is our Vice Chairman
and a director. These shares include 506,970 shares over
which Mr. Kumar has sole voting and investment power,
110,516 shares over which Mr. Kumar has shared voting and
investment power and 883,070 shares issuable pursuant to
options that are currently vested and exercisable.
|
|
(7)
|
Mr. Seedman is our Chief
Technology Officer and a director on our board. Of the shares
shown as beneficially owned, all represent shares issuable
pursuant to options that are currently vested and exercisable.
|
|
(8)
|
Mr. Swoger is our Chief
Financial Officer. Of the shares shown as beneficially owned,
all represent shares issuable pursuant to options that are
currently vested and exercisable.
|
|
(9)
|
Amounts shown under the heading
Prior to this offering include 1,150,295 shares
issuable pursuant to the Private Exchange and include
563,107 shares issuable to Black Horse Capital LP,
213,975 shares issuable to Black Horse Capital (QP) LP and
373,213 shares issuable to Black Horse Capital Master Fund
Ltd. The address of Black Horse Capital is
c/o Black
Horse Capital Advisors LLC, 338 S. Sharon Amity
Road, #202, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28211. Dale B.
Chappell exercises voting and investment power over the
securities held by Black Horse Capital LP, Black Horse Capital
(QP) LP and Black Horse Capital Master Fund Ltd.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Sansar Capital Holdings, Ltd., or
SCH, is a Cayman Islands exempted company. The address of SCH is
c/o Sansar
Capital Management, LLC, 152 West 57th Street,
8th Floor, New York, New York 10019. Sanjay Motwani is the
sole director of SCH, and in his capacity as the sole director
of SCH, he exercises voting and investment power over the
securities held by SCH.
|
125
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Agreements with
SAC PCG and affiliates and related transactions
Subscription
Agreement
On May 21, 2008, we entered into a subscription agreement, or
the Subscription Agreement, with SAC CBI and SAC PCG. Under the
Subscription Agreement, we issued 19,997,522 shares of our
common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$124.0 million and SAC CBI thereby acquired a majority
interest in us. We used the proceeds received under the
Subscription Agreement to fund a portion of the costs of the
MedQuist Inc. Acquisition.
Stock purchase
agreement
On May 21, 2008, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, CBay
Inc., entered into a stock purchase agreement with Royal Philips
Electronics N.V., or Philips, pursuant to which CBay Inc.
purchased 26,085,086 shares of common stock, or
approximately 69.5% of the outstanding common stock, of MedQuist
Inc. for (i) $98.1 million in cash, (ii) the
$90.9 million 6% Convertible Notes and (iii) a
$26.2 million promissory note. The 6% Convertible Notes and
the $26.2 million promissory note have been repaid.
Management
Stockholders Agreements
In connection with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition, we, SAC CBI
and certain members of our senior management team, collectively,
the Management Stockholders, including Robert Aquilina, Raman
Kumar, Michael Seedman and Clyde Swoger, entered into
stockholders agreements, collectively, the Management
Stockholders Agreements. Each Management Stockholders Agreement
provided that transfers to a third party of shares of our common
stock owned by the relevant Management Stockholder generally
required our consent and the consent of SAC CBI, provided for
drag-along and tag-along rights in
connection with certain sales of shares by SAC CBI and contained
a grant by each Management Stockholder to SAC CBI of a proxy
enabling SAC CBI to vote the shares held by the relevant
Management Stockholder. The Management Stockholders Agreements
are being amended to eliminate all of the foregoing provisions.
As amended, the Management Stockholders Agreements will contain
provisions addressing the requirements of the Securities Act
relating to the transferability of shares of our common stock
issued to the Management Stockholders pursuant to option
agreements entered into at the time of the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition and provisions requiring the Management Stockholders
to enter into to
lock-up
agreements in respect of shares of our common stock owned by
them in connection with certain public offerings of our common
stock.
Consulting
Services Agreement
On August 19, 2008, we entered into an agreement with
S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC, or SAC CBI II, an
affiliate of SAC CBI, and LBCCA and collectively with SAC
CBI II, the Consultants. The Consulting Services Agreement
was entered into to, among other things, effect the economic
understanding regarding the terms upon which SAC CBI acquired
its ownership interest in us and to address potential dilutive
and related effects at the time of SAC CBIs investment in
us. It provides for annual payments, to be made in quarterly
installments, of approximately $1.9 million to SAC CBI II
and $0.9 million to LBCCA, which may at our option be paid
in shares of our common stock at fair market value or in cash.
We account for the annual payments as a capital transaction. In
addition, we agreed to indemnify and reimburse the Consultants
and their affiliates for their
out-of-pocket
expenses in connection with the services rendered under this
agreement. Our payment obligations extend for five years from
the date of the agreement, unless a change of
control as defined in the agreement occurs, in which case
the present value of all amounts not previously paid become due
upon the change of control. Accruals in the amount of
$1.1 million and $2.8 million were recorded for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2009 and September 30, 2010, we
have accrued and recorded in due to related parties
$1.1 million, $2.2 million and $2.9 million,
respectively. In July 2009, we issued 570,266 shares of our
common stock and in May 2010 we issued 144,862 shares of
our common stock to satisfy a portion of the amounts due. The
closing of this offering and of the Private Exchange will result
in a change of control under the Consulting
Services Agreement and we intend to issue additional shares to
satisfy
126
our remaining payment obligations under the agreement based upon
the initial public offering price for our shares in this
offering. Based upon the initial public offering price of
$8.00 per share, the maximum number of shares issuable
would be 1.3 million shares. However, since
provisional liquidators were appointed in respect of LBCCA in
September 2008 and, because LBCCA is in liquidation, we are in
discussions with LBCCAs liquidators regarding LBCCAs
entitlement to payments under the agreement.
Transaction
fees
In connection with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition, we made a
payment of $8.0 million in the aggregate to two affiliates
of SAC PCG and to LBCCA.
On May 4, 2010, the audit committee of MedQuist Inc.s
board of directors approved a $1.5 million success-based
payment to SAC PCG in connection with the Spheris Acquisition.
We have approved a $5.0 million payment to SAC PCG in
connection with the Corporate Reorganization.
In the future, SAC PCG and its affiliates may receive customary
payments for other services rendered to us. If such services are
rendered in the future, the payments will be negotiated from
time to time on an arms length basis and will be based on
the services performed and the prevailing amounts then charged
by third parties for comparable services.
Voting
agreement
In connection with the Private Exchange, we entered into a
voting agreement, dated September 30, 2010, with SAC CBI,
SAC CBI II, and International Equities (S.A.C. Asia) Limited,
the SAC Stockholders. Under this agreement, the SAC Stockholders
agreed to vote the shares held by them in favor of any matter
subject to a vote of our stockholders that is reasonably
necessary for consummation of the transactions contemplated by
the Exchange Agreement.
Registration
Rights Agreement
In connection with this offering, we will enter into a
Registration Rights Agreement with the SAC Stockholders, or the
Registration Rights Agreement, to provide registration rights
with respect to shares of our common stock held by the SAC
Stockholders and their affiliates. The Registration Rights
Agreement will provide them with an unlimited number of
demand registrations and piggyback
registration rights. In addition, the Registration Rights
Agreement will provide that the SAC Stockholders and their
affiliates may request that we file a shelf registration
statement beginning on the 181st day after this offering.
The Registration Rights Agreement will also provide that we will
pay certain expenses relating to such registrations and
indemnify against certain liabilities.
Stockholders
agreements
In connection with this offering, we will enter into a
stockholders agreement with the SAC Stockholders, or the IPO
Stockholders Agreement. The IPO Stockholders Agreement will
grant the SAC Stockholders and their affiliates the right to
nominate to our board a number of designees, or SAC Directors,
equal to: (i) three directors so long as they hold at least
20% of our voting power; (ii) two directors so long as they
hold at least 10% of our voting power; and (iii) one
director so long as they hold at least 5% of our voting power.
They have the right to remove and replace their
director-designees at any time and for any reason and to
nominate any individual(s) to fill any such vacancies.
In connection with the Private Exchange, we will enter into a
stockholders agreement, or the Private Exchange Stockholders
Agreement, with the SAC Stockholders and the investors party to
the Private Exchange. For so long as the SAC Stockholders have
the right to nominate the SAC Directors, each Investor (as
defined in the Private Exchange Stockholders Agreement) agrees,
among other things (i) that for a period of one year from
the closing under the Private Exchange and thereafter for so
long as it owns at least three percent of our outstanding
shares, it will vote all of its voting shares, or (as
applicable) provide its written consent in respect thereof, in
favor of the
127
election of the SAC Directors to our board and (ii) not to
take any action that would cause the number of directors
constituting the entire board to be greater than nine without
the prior written consent of SAC CBI.
Under the Private Exchange Stockholders Agreement, the Investors
will have piggyback registration rights with respect
to their shares of common stock in the event that we sell shares
of our common stock. With respect to any underwritten public
offering, each Investor also agrees to a
lock-up
period of 180 days beginning on the effective date of the
initial public offering or 90 days beginning on the
effective date of any other public offering.
Redemption Agreement
In connection with this offering, we expect to enter into an
agreement, or the Redemption Agreement, with SAC CBI, SAC
PEI, SAC CBI GP, LBCCA and the liquidators of LBCCA pursuant to
which SAC PEI will contribute $13.7 million in cash to SAC
CBI in exchange for partnership interests in SAC CBI, SAC CBI
will redeem all of LBCCAs limited partnership interests in
SAC CBI for $13.7 million in cash and 4,228,584 shares
of our common stock, LBCCA will enter into a
180-day
contractual
lock-up on
the shares of our common stock that LBCCA will own after the
completion of this offering and LBCCA will grant to SAC CBI an
irrevocable proxy to vote such shares so long as they are
beneficially owned by LBCCA.
Other related
party transactions
Effective February 10, 2009, the former CEO and President
of Mirrus Systems Inc., or Mirrus, Nanda Krishnaiah, who also
formerly served as a director on our board, resigned from
services with us. Under the terms of his settlement, we paid him
$390,000 in severance and purchased his 13% stake in Mirrus for
$690,000. Mirrus is now our wholly owned 100% subsidiary.
During 2007, we repaid a loan made to us from V. Raman
Kumar, our Vice Chairman and a director, in the amount of
$226,706 plus interest. For the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2008, we received certain consulting services from
Mr. Kumar for an aggregate amount of $396,000 and $96,000,
respectively.
We sold software solution services to CBay Systems Limited,
owned by our predecessor parent and in which Mr. Kumar was
a director, in the amount of $920,000 and $471,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, CBay Systems Limited
transferred certain assets to us at an aggregate value of
$704,000 together with the related underlying liabilities
against certain assets amounting to $184,000 to be adjusted
against receivables from CBay Systems Limited. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, CBay Systems Limited settled
amounts recoverable by transferring to us certain fixed assets
of an aggregate value of $614,000. The balance receivable from
CBay Systems Limited of $760,000 was not considered recoverable
and accordingly it was written off. For the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2008, we provided transcription
services of $7.3 million and $574,000 respectively, and for
the year ended December 31, 2007, software and management
services of $1.2 million to CBay Systems Limited. For the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, we also provided
customer relationship and front end services to CBay Systems
Limited of $683,000 and $59,000, respectively. For the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, we received reimbursement
of expenses of $233,000 and $120,000, respectively, and made
reimbursements of expenses to CBay Systems Limited for an
aggregate value of $398,000 and $107,000, respectively. Further,
we have provided short term advances to CBay Systems Limited for
an aggregate value of $5.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. For the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2008, the net balance receivable from CBay Systems
Limited in respect of the above transactions aggregated
$2.8 million and $860,000, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, we sold
software solution services of $920,000 and $471,000,
respectively, to Ztec Ventures Limited, a company in which
Mr. Kumar is a director.
We occupied property owned by Godrej Group, a principal
stockholder, and paid rent and service charges totaling
$557,000, $429,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
128
Related person
transaction approval policy
Historically, any transaction involving us and related persons
was presented to, evaluated by and needed to be approved by the
disinterested directors on our board.
The board of MedQuist Inc. adopted a related party transaction
policy in August 2007, which charges its Audit Committee (or the
disinterested members of its board) with the responsibility of
ratifying all related party transactions. Transactions involving
compensation also required approval by the Compensation
Committee. On July 28, 2009, the board of MedQuist Inc. amended
the related party transaction policy such that any transaction
involving compensation where the related party is CBay, Inc. or
its affiliates must only be approved by the Audit Committee.
Prior to the completion of this offering, our board intends to
consider adoption of a written statement of policy for the
review, approval and monitoring of transactions involving us and
related persons.
The $8.0 million payment we made to two affiliates of SAC
PCG and to LBCCA in connection with the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition was approved by our board, none of whom were
interested parties in this payment.
The $1.5 million payment MedQuist Inc. made to SAC PCG in
connection with the Spheris Acquisition was approved by MedQuist
Inc.s audit committee in accordance with MedQuist
Inc.s related party transaction approval policy described
above.
The $5.0 million payment we have agreed to make to SAC PCG
in connection with the Corporate Reorganization was approved by
each of the disinterested directors on our board.
129
Description of
Indebtedness
Senior secured
credit facility
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as borrower, and our
subsidiaries MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc., as
co-borrowers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries as guarantors, entered into the Senior Secured
Credit Facility with certain lenders and General Electric
Capital Corporation, as administrative agent.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of:
|
|
|
|
n
|
a $200 million term loan, advanced in one drawing on
October 14, 2010, or the Closing Date, with a term of five
years, repayable in equal quarterly installments of
$5 million, commencing on the first day of the first fiscal
quarter beginning after the Closing Date, with the balance
payable at maturity.
|
|
n
|
a $25 million revolving credit facility under which
borrowings may be made from time to time during the period from
the Closing Date until the fifth anniversary of the Closing
Date. The revolving facility includes a $5 million
letter-of-credit
sub-facility
and a $5 million swing line loan
sub-facility.
|
Interest rate
and fees
The borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
co-borrowers option, either (a) a base rate
determined by reference to the highest of (1) the rate last
quoted by the Wall Street Journal as the Prime Rate
in the United States, (2) the federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1% and (3) the LIBOR rate for a one-month interest
period plus 1.00% or (b) the higher of (i) a LIBOR
rate determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits
in the currency of such borrowing for the interest period
relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs
and (ii) 1.75%. The applicable margin is 4.50% with respect
to base rate borrowings and 5.50% with respect to LIBOR
borrowings.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under
the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the borrowers are required
to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving
credit facility in respect of the unutilized commitments
thereunder at a rate per annum equal to 0.50%. The borrowers are
also required to pay a fee on the average daily issued but
undrawn face amount of all outstanding letters of credit at a
rate per annum equal to the applicable margin then in effect
with respect to LIBOR loans under the revolving credit facility,
as well as a customary fronting fee of 0.125% and other
customary letter of credit fees.
Prepayments
Subject to certain exceptions, the Senior Secured Credit
Facility requires the co-borrowers to prepay outstanding term
loans with:
|
|
|
|
n
|
prior to the earlier of December 31, 2013 or the date upon
which we own 100% of the stock of MedQuist Inc., a percentage of
excess cash flow of MedQuist Inc. ranging from 25% to 65%
depending upon certain leverage tests;
|
|
n
|
following the earlier of December 31, 2013 or the date upon
which we own 100% of the stock of MedQuist Inc., a percentage of
our excess cash flow ranging from 60% to 65% depending upon
certain leverage tests;
|
|
n
|
50% of the net cash proceeds arising from the issuance or
sale by us or any of our subsidiaries of its own stock, subject
to certain exceptions, including exceptions for up to
$100 million of proceeds arising from one or more sales by
us of its own stock pursuant to one or more underwritten public
offerings; and
|
|
n
|
100% of the net cash proceeds received by us or any of our
subsidiaries from any loss, damage, destruction or condemnation
of, or any sale, transfer or other disposition of, any asset,
subject to certain thresholds and certain exceptions and
reinvestment rights.
|
130
The borrowers may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under the
Senior Secured Credit Facility or voluntarily reduce unutilized
portions of the revolving credit facility at any time,
generally, without premium or penalty.
Guaranty and
security
The obligations of the borrowers under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by us and substantially
all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries. All
obligations and related guarantees are secured by a first
priority perfected security interest in substantially all
existing and after-acquired real and personal property of the
borrowers and the guarantors.
Certain
covenants and events of default
The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains a number of
significant covenants. We believe that these covenants are
material terms of the credit agreement and that information
about the covenants is material to an investors
understanding of our financial condition and liquidity. Covenant
compliance EBITDA is used to determine our compliance with
certain of these covenants. Any breach of covenants in the
Senior Secured Credit Facility (including those that are tied to
financial ratios based on covenant compliance EBITDA) could
result in a default under our credit agreement and the lenders
could elect to declare all amounts borrowed to be immediately
due and payable.
Subject to certain exceptions and threshold amounts, the
covenants under the credit agreement, among other things,
restrict the ability of us and our subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
incur, create, assume or permit to exist any additional
indebtedness;
|
|
n
|
incur, create, assume or permit to exist any lien on any
property or assets (including stock or other securities of any
person, including any of our subsidiaries);
|
|
n
|
enter into sale and lease-back transactions;
|
|
n
|
make investments, loans, or advances;
|
|
n
|
engage in mergers or consolidations;
|
|
n
|
make certain acquisitions;
|
|
n
|
pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock;
|
|
n
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
n
|
change the business conducted by our company and our
subsidiaries;
|
|
n
|
amend or modify certain material agreements governing our
indebtedness (including the Senior Subordinated Notes); or
|
|
n
|
make capital expenditures in excess of certain amounts.
|
Under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are required to
maintain (i) a minimum consolidated interest coverage
ratio, initially, of 2.75x and increasing over the term of the
facility to 4.00x, (ii) a maximum consolidated total
leverage ratio, initially of 4.00x and declining over the term
of the facility to 1.50x and (iii) a maximum consolidated
senior leverage ratio, initially of 3.00x, and declining over
the term of the facility to 1.00x.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility also contains certain
affirmative covenants and events of default, including financial
and other reporting requirements, as well as an event of default
pursuant to a change of control as defined therein.
As of January 5, 2011 we were in compliance in all material
respects with all covenants and provisions in the Senior Secured
Credit Facility.
The senior
subordinated notes
In addition to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, in connection
with the Corporate Reorganization, MedQuist Inc., as issuer, and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc., as
co-issuers
and guarantors, and we and certain of our other subsidiaries, as
guarantors, issued $85.0 million aggregate principal amount
of 13% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 pursuant to a
Note Purchase Agreement with BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation, PennantPark Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A.,
and THL Credit, Inc. The Senior Subordinated Notes are
guaranteed on a joint and several, absolute, unconditional and
irrevocable basis, by us and certain of our
131
subsidiaries. Interest on the notes is payable in quarterly
installments at the issuers option at either (i) 13%
in cash or (ii) 12% in cash plus 2% in the form of
additional Senior Subordinated Notes. Closing and funding of the
Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior Subordinated Notes
occurred on October 14, 2010. The Senior Subordinated Notes
are non-callable for two years after the closing date after
which they are redeemable at 105.0% declining ratably until four
years after the closing date. The Senior Subordinated Notes
contain a number of significant covenants that, among other
things, restrict our ability to dispose of assets, repay other
indebtedness, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends,
prepay subordinated indebtedness, incur liens, make capital
expenditures, investments or acquisitions, engage in mergers of
consolidations, engage in certain types of transactions with
affiliates and otherwise restrict our activities. Under the
Senior Subordinated Notes, we are required to satisfy and remain
in compliance with specified financial ratios. Under the Senior
Subordinated Notes, we are required to maintain (i) a minimum
consolidated interest coverage ratio, initially of 2.50x and
increasing over the term of the facility 3.60x, (ii) a maximum
consolidated total leverage ratio, initially of 4.40x and
declining over the term of the facility to 1.70x and (iii) a
maximum consolidated senior leverage ratio, initially of 3.30x
and declining over the term of the facility to 1.10x.
Other
indebtedness
CBay Systems and Services, Inc., Mirrus Systems, Inc., CBay Inc.
and CBay Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. have entered into certain
working capital facilities, term loans and revolving lines of
credit for purposes of operating their respective businesses. In
total, there are eight such financing arrangements currently in
place. As of September 30, 2010, the amounts outstanding
under these arrangements ranged from approximately $750,000 to
approximately $2.9 million with interest rates from 6.00%
to 12.00%. We anticipate entering into similar credit facilities
from time to time in the future to satisfy working capital and
other needs.
We are party to a credit agreement with ICICI Bank, Mumbai,
India in the amount of $2.8 million, at interest rates
ranging from LIBOR plus 2.5% and 15.5%, respectively, which is
secured by CBay Indias current assets and fixed assets.
The amount outstanding as of September 30, 2010,
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $341,000, $1.4 million
and $1.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 we recorded $81,000, $205,000, $98,000 and
$36,000, respectively, of interest expense in our consolidated
statements of operations.
We are party to a credit agreement with IndusInd Bank, Mumbai,
India of $3.2 million at interest rates of LIBOR plus 3%,
which is secured by current assets and fixed assets of CBay
India. The amount outstanding under this credit agreement as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
$3.2 million and $0, respectively. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 interest expense of
$38,000 and $0, respectively, was recorded in interest expense
in our consolidated statements of operations.
The foregoing agreements contain provisions that limit, in
certain circumstances, our subsidiaries ability to make
dividends payments to us.
132
Description of
Capital Stock
The following discussion summarizes the material terms of the
common stock to be issued in connection with the public offering
contemplated by this prospectus. This discussion does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to our certificate of incorporation and by-laws to be
filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part. You can obtain copies of those
documents by following the instructions under Where You
Can Find More Information.
Our purpose is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which
corporations may now or hereafter be organized under the DGCL.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue up to
300 million shares of common stock par value $0.10 per
share, and 25 million shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.10 per share. No shares of preferred stock will be issued or
outstanding immediately after the public offering contemplated
by this prospectus.
Common
stock
The common stock has the voting rights described below under
Voting, and the dividend rights
described below under Dividends. Holders
of common stock do not have conversion or redemption rights or
any preemptive rights to subscribe for any of our unissued
securities. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of
common stock are subject to the rights of the holders of any
preferred shares which may be authorized and issued in the
future.
Preferred
stock
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board to
establish one or more series of preferred stock and to
determine, with respect to any series of preferred stock, the
terms and rights of that series, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the designation of the series;
|
|
n
|
the number of shares of the series, which our board of directors
may, except where otherwise provided in the preferred stock
designation, increase (but not above the total number of
authorized shares of the class) or decrease (but not below the
number of shares then outstanding);
|
|
n
|
whether dividends, if any, will be cumulative or non-cumulative
and the dividend rate of the series;
|
|
n
|
the dates at which dividends, if any, will be payable;
|
|
n
|
the redemption rights and price or prices, if any, for shares of
the series;
|
|
n
|
the terms and amounts of any sinking fund provided for the
purchase or redemption of shares of the series;
|
|
n
|
the amounts payable on shares of the series in the event of any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of the affairs of our company;
|
|
n
|
whether the shares of the series will be convertible into shares
of any other class or series, or any other security, of our
company or any other company, and, if so, the specification of
the other class or series or other security, the conversion
price or prices or rate or rates, any rate adjustments, the date
or dates as of which the shares will be convertible and all
other terms and conditions upon which the conversion may be made;
|
|
n
|
restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of
any other class or series; and
|
|
n
|
the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series.
|
133
Voting
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share
on all matters to be voted on by holders of our common stock.
Dividends
The DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out
of surplus or, if there is no surplus,
out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend
is declared
and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Surplus is defined as the
excess of the net assets of the corporation over the amount
determined to be the capital of the corporation by the board.
The capital of the corporation is typically calculated to be
(and cannot be less than) the aggregate par value of all issued
shares of capital stock. Net assets equals the fair value of the
total assets minus total liabilities. The DGCL also provides
that dividends may not be paid out of net profits if, after the
payment of the dividend, capital is less than the capital
represented by the outstanding stock of all classes having a
preference upon the distribution of assets.
Declaration and payment of any dividend will be subject to the
discretion of our board of directors. The time and amount of
dividends will be dependent upon our financial condition,
operations, cash requirements and availability, debt repayment
obligations, capital expenditure needs and restrictions in our
debt instruments, industry trends, the provisions of Delaware
law affecting the payment of distributions to stockholders and
other factors.
Stockholder
meetings
Our by-laws provide that annual stockholder meetings will be
held at a time, date and place selected by our board.
Anti-takeover
effects of certain provisions of our certificate of
incorporation and by-laws
Several provisions in our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws have anti-takeover effects. These provisions are
intended to avoid costly takeover battles, reduce our
vulnerability to a hostile change of control and enhance the
ability of our board to maximize stockholder value in connection
with any unsolicited offer to acquire us. However, these
anti-takeover provisions, which are summarized below, could also
discourage, delay or prevent (1) the merger or acquisition
of our company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or
otherwise, that a stockholder may consider in its best interest,
and (2) the replacement and/or removal of incumbent
officers and directors.
Authorized
preferred stock and common stock
Our board may issue preferred shares on terms calculated to
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company
or the removal of our management. Moreover, our authorized but
unissued shares of preferred stock will be available for future
issuances without stockholder approval and could be utilized for
a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to
raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit
plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved
shares of preferred stock could render more difficult or
discourage an attempt to obtain control of our company by means
of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Classified
board of directors
Our certificate of incorporation provides that our board will be
divided into three classes of directors, with the classes to be
as nearly equal in number as possible. We will have a classified
board, with three directors in Class I, three directors in
Class II and three directors in Class III. The members
of Class I will serve for a term expiring at the first
succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. The members of
Class II will serve for a term expiring at the second
succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. The members of
Class III will serve for a term expiring at the third
succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. As a result,
approximately one-third of our board of directors will be
elected each year. A replacement director shall serve in the
same class as the former director
134
he or she is replacing. The classification of our board will
have the effect of making it more difficult for stockholders to
change the composition of our board. Our certificate of
incorporation and by-laws provide that the number of directors
will be fixed from time to time pursuant to a resolution adopted
by the board, but must consist of not less than seven or more
than 15 directors.
Removal of
directors; vacancies
Our certificate of incorporation provides that directors other
than those elected pursuant to any stockholders agreement
in existence at the time of the adoption of our certificate of
incorporation may be removed only for cause and only upon the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of
all then outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote generally
in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
In addition, our by-laws provide that, except as set forth in
any stockholders agreements in existence at the time of
the adoption of our certificate of incorporation or any
certificate of designation for preferred stock, any vacancies on
our board will be filled only by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the remaining directors, although less than a
quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
No cumulative
voting
The DGCL provides that stockholders are not entitled to the
right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless an
entitys certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.
Our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative
voting.
Calling of
special meetings of stockholders
Our certificate of incorporation provides that special meetings
of our stockholders may be called at any time only by or at the
direction of the chairman of the board, the board or a committee
of the board which has been designated by the board.
Stockholder
action by written consent
The DGCL permits stockholder action by written consent unless
otherwise provided by a corporations certificate of
incorporation. Our certificate of incorporation precludes
stockholder action by written consent subject to certain
exceptions.
Advance notice
requirements for stockholder proposals and director
nominations
Our by-laws provide that stockholders seeking to nominate
candidates for election as directors or to bring business before
an annual meeting of stockholders must provide timely notice of
their proposal in writing to the corporate secretary.
Generally, to be timely, a stockholders notice must be
received at our principal executive offices not less than
90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first
anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of
stockholders. Our by-laws also specify requirements as to the
form and content of a stockholders notice. These
provisions, which do not apply to certain stockholders, may
impede stockholders ability to bring matters before a
meeting of stockholders or make nominations for directors at a
meeting of stockholders.
Business
combinations
We are governed by Section 203 of the DGCL which provides
that we may not engage in certain business
combinations with any interested stockholder
for a three-year period following the time that the stockholder
became an interested stockholder, unless:
|
|
|
|
n
|
prior to such time, our board approved either the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder;
|
135
|
|
|
|
n
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced, excluding certain shares;
or
|
|
n
|
at or subsequent to that time, the business combination is
approved by our board and by the affirmative vote of holders of
at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Generally, a business combination includes a merger,
asset or stock sale or other transaction resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to
certain exceptions, an interested stockholder is a
person who, together with that persons affiliates and
associates, owns, or within the previous three years owned, 15%
or more of our voting stock.
Under certain circumstances, this provision will make it more
difficult for a person who would be an interested
stockholder to effect various business combinations with a
company for a three-year period. This provision may encourage
companies interested in acquiring our company to negotiate in
advance with our board because the stockholder approval
requirement would be avoided if our board approves either the
business combination or the transaction which results in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. These provisions
also may have the effect of preventing changes in our board and
may make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which
stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
Corporate
opportunity
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce any
interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to
participate in, any business opportunity which may be a
corporate opportunity for members of our board who are not our
employees (including any directors who also serve as officers)
and their respective employers, and affiliates of the foregoing.
We do not renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity
offered to any such director if such opportunity is expressly
offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as our
director.
Dissenters
rights of appraisal and payment
Under the DGCL, with certain exceptions, our stockholders will
have appraisal rights in connection with a merger or
consolidation of the company pursuant to which they will have
the right to receive payment of the fair value of their shares
as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery.
Stockholders
derivative actions
Under the DGCL, under certain circumstances, our stockholders
may bring an action in our name to procure a judgment in our
favor, also known as a derivative action, provided that the
stockholder bringing the action is a holder of common shares at
the time of the transaction to which the action relates or such
stockholders stock thereafter devolved by operation of law.
Forum
Our certificate of incorporation provides that unless we consent
to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum
for any (i) derivative action or proceeding brought on
behalf of our company, (ii) action asserting a claim of
breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer,
employee or agent of our company to the company or the
companys stockholders, (iii) action asserting a claim
arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, or
(iv) action asserting a claim governed by the internal
affairs doctrine, in each such case subject to said Court of
Chancery having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable
parties named as defendants therein. Any person or entity
purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of
capital stock of our company shall be deemed to have notice of
and consented to the forum provisions in our certificate of
incorporation.
136
Supermajority
provisions
The DGCL provides generally that the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote is
required to amend a corporations certificate of
incorporation, unless the certificate of incorporation requires
a greater percentage. Our certificate of incorporation provides
that certain provisions in our certificate of incorporation and
any provisions of the by-laws may be amended only by the
affirmative vote of holders of at least 75% of the voting power
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting
as a single class. Such provisions include the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding classified board (the election and term
of our directors);
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding competition and corporate opportunities;
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding stockholder action by written consent;
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding calling meetings of stockholders;
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding filling vacancies on our board and
newly created directorships;
|
|
n
|
the advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
director nominations;
|
|
n
|
the indemnification provisions; and
|
|
n
|
the amendment provision requiring that the above provisions be
amended only with a 75% supermajority vote.
|
In addition, our certificate of incorporation grants our board
the authority to amend and repeal our by-laws without a
stockholder vote in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of
the State of Delaware or our certificate of incorporation.
Limitations on
liability and indemnification of officers and
directors
The DGCL authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the
personal liability of directors to corporations and their
stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of
directors fiduciary duties. Our certificate of
incorporation will include a provision that eliminates the
personal liability of directors for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director to the fullest extent permitted
by Delaware law.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a corporation
may eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to
the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that such
provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a
director (i) for any breach of the directors duty of
loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under
Section 174 of the DGCL (regarding, among other things, the
payment of unlawful dividends) or (iv) for any transaction
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
In addition, Section 145 of the DGCL provides that a
Delaware corporation has the power to indemnify its officers and
directors in certain circumstances. Our by-laws also provide
that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest
extent authorized by law. We are also expressly required to
advance certain expenses to our directors and officers and carry
directors and officers insurance providing
indemnification for our directors and officers for some
liabilities. We believe that these indemnification provisions
and the directors and officers insurance are useful
to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.
Section 145(a) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to
indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent, or former
director, officer, employee or agent, who was or is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in
the right of the corporation) by reason of his service as a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or his
service, at the corporations request, as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise,
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding provided that such director or officer acted in good
faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, provided that such
director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful.
137
Section 145(b) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action
or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a
judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person is
or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit provided that such director
or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, except that no indemnification may be made in
respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such director
or officer shall have been adjudged to be liable to the
corporation unless and only to the extent that the Delaware
Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was
brought shall determine upon application that, despite the
adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances
of the case, such director or officer is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the court shall
deem proper.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may discourage
stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against its directors for
breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have
the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation
against directors and officers, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise benefit our company and our
stockholders. In addition, an investment in our common stock may
be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of
settlement and damage awards against directors and officers
pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which
indemnification is sought.
Transfer agent
and registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our shares in the United
States is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC.
Listing
Our common stock has been approved for listing on The NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
138
Shares Eligible
For Future Sale
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock in the U.S., and we cannot predict what effect,
if any, market sales of shares of common stock or the
availability of shares of common stock for sale will have on the
market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time.
Nevertheless, sales of substantial amounts of common stock,
including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding
options, in the public market, or the perception that such sales
could occur, could materially and adversely affect the market
price of our common stock and could impair our future ability to
raise capital through the sale of our equity or equity-related
securities at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
Upon the closing of this offering, after giving effect to the
Private Exchange, the Registered Exchange Offer and the shares
issuable pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement, we will
have outstanding an aggregate of approximately 50.9 million
shares of our common stock. In addition, options to purchase
approximately 2.7 million shares of our common stock
will be outstanding as of the closing of this offering, of which
options to purchase approximately 1.8 million shares will
have vested at or prior to the closing of this offering and
options to purchase approximately 900,000 shares will vest
over the next three years. In addition, 81,488 shares of
our common stock are issuable pursuant to a warrant agreement.
Of the outstanding shares, approximately 26.3 million will
be freely tradable without restriction, except as described
below in relation to certain contractual lock-up agreements, or
further registration under the Securities Act. The remaining
outstanding shares of common stock will be deemed restricted
securities, as defined under Rule 144. Restricted
securities may be sold in the public market only if registered
or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under
Rule 144, which we summarize below.
The restricted shares and the shares held by our affiliates will
be available for sale in the public market at various times
after the date of this prospectus pursuant to Rule 144.
Of the 50.9 million shares of our common stock outstanding
upon the completion of this offering, (i) 26.3 million
shares will be subject to a
180-day
contractual lock-up, (ii) 3.8 million shares will
be subject to a
90-day
contractual lock-up, (iii) 3.8 million shares will be
subject to a
45-day
contractual lock-up and (iv) 17.0 million shares,
including the 4.5 million shares being sold in this
offering and the 6.7 million shares being issued in the
Registered Exchange Offer, assuming a full exchange, will not be
subject to any contractual lock-up.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as in effect on the date of this
prospectus, a person who is not one of our affiliates at any
time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has
beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least six
months, would be entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares
of our common stock provided current public information about us
is available and, after owning such shares for at least one
year, would be entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares of
our common stock without restriction. Our affiliates who have
beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least six
months are entitled to sell within any three-month period a
number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
n
|
1% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding;
or
|
|
n
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on The
NASDAQ Global Market during the four calendar weeks preceding
the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates are also subject to
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
139
Lock-up
agreements
In connection with this offering, we, our executive officers and
directors, SAC CBI and certain of our other stockholders have
agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not
to sell, offer, contract or grant any option to sell, pledge,
transfer or otherwise dispose of any shares, options or warrants
to acquire, dispose of or hedge any of our common stock or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common
stock, during periods ending 45 days, 90 days or
180 days after the date of this prospectus, except with the
prior written consent of Lazard Capital Markets LLC and
Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. Of the 50.9 million shares of
our common stock outstanding upon the completion of this
offering, (i) 26.3 million shares will be subject
to a 180-day
contractual
lock-up,
(ii) 3.8 million shares will be subject to a
90-day
contractual
lock-up,
(iii) 3.8 million shares will be subject to a
45-day
contractual
lock-up and
(iv) 17.0 million shares, including the
4.5 million shares being sold in this offering and the
6.7 million shares being issued in the Registered Exchange
Offer, assuming a full exchange, will not be subject to any
contractual lock-up. See Underwriting.
Registration
rights
Pursuant to certain agreements with our stockholders, we have
granted certain stockholders the right to cause us, in certain
instances, at our expense, to file registration statements under
the Securities Act covering resales of our common stock held by
them. These shares will represent approximately 34.5% of our
outstanding common stock after this offering (assuming the
overallotment option is not exercised). These shares also may be
sold under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, depending on
their holding period and subject to restrictions in the case of
shares held by persons deemed to be our affiliates.
For a description of rights some holders of common stock have to
require us to register the shares of common stock they own, see
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreements with SAC PCG and affiliates
and related transactions Stockholders
agreements.
140
Material United
States Federal Income And Estate Tax
Consequences To
Non-U.S.
Holders
The following is a summary of material United States federal
income and estate tax consequences relating to the purchase,
ownership and disposition of our common stock that is purchased
pursuant to this offering. Except where noted, this summary
deals only with common stock that is held as a capital asset by
a
non-U.S. holder.
A
non-U.S. holder
means a person (other than a partnership) that is not for United
States federal income tax purposes any of the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
n
|
a corporation (or any other entity treated as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or
the District of Columbia;
|
|
n
|
an estate the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
n
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under
applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a
United States person.
|
This summary is based upon provisions of the Code and
regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, each as of the date
hereof. Those authorities may be changed, perhaps retroactively,
so as to result in United States federal income and estate tax
consequences different from those summarized below. This summary
does not address all aspects of United States federal income and
estate taxes and does not deal with foreign, state, local,
alternative minimum or other tax considerations that may be
relevant to
non-U.S. holders
in light of their personal circumstances. In addition, it does
not represent a detailed description of the United States
federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are
subject to special treatment under the United States federal
income tax laws (including if you are a United States expatriate
or former long-term resident of the United States, financial
institution, insurance company, tax-exempt organization, dealer
in securities, broker, controlled foreign
corporation, passive foreign investment
company, a partnership or other pass-through entity for
United States federal income tax purposes, or a person who
acquired our common stock as compensation or otherwise in
connection with the performance of services). We cannot assure
you that a change in law will not alter significantly the tax
considerations that we describe in this summary.
If a partnership holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a
partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a
partnership holding our common stock, you should consult your
tax advisors.
If you are considering the purchase of our common stock, you
should consult your own tax advisors concerning the particular
United States federal income and estate tax consequences to you
of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the common stock,
as well as the consequences to you arising under the laws of any
other taxing jurisdiction.
Dividends
The gross amount of any distribution by us of cash or property,
other than certain distributions, if any, of common stock
distributed pro rata to all of our shareholders, with respect to
common stock will constitute dividends to the extent such
distributions are paid out of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits as determined under United States federal
income tax principles. To the extent, if any, that the amount of
any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings
and profits, it generally will be treated first as a tax-free
return of capital, on a share-by-share basis, to the extent of
the non-U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in our common
stock, and thereafter as capital gain.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock generally will be subject to withholding of
United States federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower
rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
141
However, dividends that are effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (and, if required by an applicable
income tax treaty, are attributable to a United States permanent
establishment) are not subject to the withholding tax, provided
certain certification and disclosure requirements are satisfied.
Instead, such dividends are subject to United States federal
income tax on a net income basis in the same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a United States person as defined under the Code. Any such
effectively connected dividends received by a foreign
corporation may be subject to an additional branch profits
tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an
applicable treaty rate and avoid backup withholding, as
discussed below, for dividends will be required (a) to
complete Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable form) and certify under penalty of perjury
that such holder is not a United States person as defined under
the Code and is eligible for treaty benefits or (b) if our
common stock is held through certain foreign intermediaries, to
satisfy the relevant certification requirements of applicable
United States Treasury regulations. Special certification and
other requirements apply to certain
non-U.S. holders
that are pass-through entities rather than corporations or
individuals.
A
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock eligible for a reduced rate of United States
withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a
refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate
claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
Gain on
disposition of common stock
Any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock
generally will not be subject to United States federal income
tax unless:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of
the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income
tax treaty, is attributable to a United States permanent
establishment of the
non-U.S. holder);
|
|
n
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of that disposition,
and certain other conditions are met; or
|
|
n
|
we are or have been a United States real property holding
corporation for United States federal income tax purposes.
|
An individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the first bullet point immediately above will be
subject to tax on the net gain derived from the sale under
regular graduated United States federal income tax rates. An
individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the second bullet point immediately above will be
subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale,
which may be offset by United States source capital losses, even
though the individual is not considered a resident of the United
States. If a
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign corporation falls under the first bullet point
immediately above, it will be subject to tax on its net gain in
the same manner as if it were a United States person as defined
under the Code and, in addition, may be subject to the branch
profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings
and profits or at such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
We believe we are not and do not anticipate becoming a
United States real property holding corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes.
142
Federal estate
tax
Common stock held by an individual
non-U.S. holder
at the time of death will be included in such holders
gross estate for United States federal estate tax purposes,
unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.
Information
reporting and backup withholding
We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to
each
non-U.S. holder
the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld
with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether
withholding was required. Copies of the information returns
reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made
available to the tax authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to backup withholding for dividends paid to such
holder unless such holder certifies under penalty of perjury
that it is a
non-U.S. holder
(and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know
that such holder is a United States person as defined under the
Code), or such holder otherwise establishes an exemption.
Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances,
backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale of our
common stock within the United States or conducted through
certain United States-related financial intermediaries, unless
the beneficial owner certifies under penalty of perjury that it
is a
non-U.S. holder
(and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know
that the beneficial owner is a United States person as defined
under the Code), or such owner otherwise establishes an
exemption.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be
allowed as a refund or a credit against a
non-U.S. holders
United States federal income tax liability provided the required
information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Additional
withholding requirements
Under recently enacted legislation, the relevant withholding
agent may be required to withhold 30% of any dividends and the
proceeds of a sale of our common stock paid after
December 31, 2012 to (i) a foreign financial
institution unless such foreign financial institution agrees to
verify, report and disclose its U.S. accountholders and
meets certain other specified requirements or (ii) a
non-financial foreign entity that is the beneficial owner of the
payment unless such entity certifies that it does not have any
substantial United States owners or provides the name, address
and taxpayer identification number of each substantial United
States owner and such entity meets certain other specified
requirements. Non-U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax
advisors regarding the effect, if any, of the recent United
States federal income tax legislation on their investment in our
common stock.
143
Underwriting
Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. are
acting as the representatives of the underwriters for this
offering. Under the terms and subject to the conditions
contained in an underwriting agreement to be entered into prior
to the completion of this offering and to be filed as an exhibit
to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part, the underwriters named below have severally agreed to
purchase, and we and the selling shareholders have agreed to
sell to them, severally, the number of shares indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Name
|
|
shares
|
|
|
Lazard Capital Markets LLC
|
|
|
1,687,500
|
|
Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc.
|
|
|
1,687,500
|
|
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
1,057,500
|
|
Loop Capital Markets LLC
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement will provide that the underwriters
are obligated to purchase all of the shares in this offering if
any are purchased, other than those shares covered by the
over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement will provide that the obligations of the several
underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares
offered by this prospectus are subject to certain conditions.
Over-allotment
option
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to
an aggregate of 675,000 additional shares at the initial public
offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus,
less underwriting discounts and commissions. The underwriters
may exercise this option solely for the purpose of covering
over-allotments, if any, made in connection with the offering of
the additional shares offered by this prospectus. If the
underwriters exercise this option, each underwriter will be
obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase a number
of additional shares proportionate to that underwriters
initial purchase commitment as indicated in the table above.
Commission and
expenses
The underwriters have advised us that they propose to offer the
shares to the public at the initial public offering price set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to certain
dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $0.336
per share. The underwriters may allow, and certain dealers may
reallow, a discount from the concession not in excess of $0.10
per share to certain brokers and dealers. After this offering,
the initial public offering price, concession and reallowance to
dealers may be reduced by the representative. No such reduction
shall change the amount of proceeds to be received by us as set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus. The shares are
offered by the underwriters as stated herein, subject to receipt
and acceptance by them and subject to their right to reject any
order in whole or in part. The representatives have advised us
that the underwriters do not intend to confirm discretionary
sales in excess of 5% of the common shares offered in this
offering.
The following table shows the initial public offering price, the
underwriting discounts and commissions payable to the
underwriters by us and the selling stockholders, and the
proceeds, before expenses, to us and the selling
144
stockholders. Such amounts are shown assuming both no exercise
and full exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option to purchase additional shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
With full
|
|
|
|
With full
|
|
|
Without over-
|
|
exercise of
|
|
Without over-
|
|
exercise of
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
over-allotment
|
|
allotment
|
|
over-allotment
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
36,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
41,400,000
|
|
Underwriting discount and commissions paid by us
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
1,680,000
|
|
|
|
1,680,000
|
|
Underwriting discount and commissions paid by the selling
stockholders
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
840,000
|
|
|
|
1,218,000
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
|
7.44
|
|
|
|
7.44
|
|
|
|
22,320,000
|
|
|
|
22,320,000
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders
|
|
|
7.44
|
|
|
|
7.44
|
|
|
|
11,160,000
|
|
|
|
16,182,000
|
|
The expenses payable by us in connection with the offering of
shares, other than the underwriting discount and commissions
referred to above, will be approximately $7.3 million.
Indemnification
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act and liabilities arising from breaches
of representations and warranties contained in the underwriting
agreement, or to contribute to payments that the underwriters
may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.
Lock-up
agreements
We, our executive officers and directors, SAC CBI, and certain
of our other stockholders, all of which parties in the aggregate
hold approximately 66% of our outstanding common stock
immediately after this offering and the Registered Exchange
Offer, assuming a full exchange, have agreed, subject to
specified exceptions, not to directly or indirectly, for a
period of 45 days, 90 days and 180 days, as
applicable, after the date of this prospectus, without the prior
written consent of Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Macquarie
Capital (USA) Inc.:
|
|
|
|
n
|
sell, offer, contract or grant any option to sell (including any
short sale), pledge, transfer, establish an open put
equivalent position within the meaning of
Rule 16a-1(h)
under the Exchange Act;
|
|
n
|
otherwise dispose of any shares, options or warrants to acquire
shares, or securities exchangeable or exercisable for or
convertible into shares currently or hereafter owned either of
record or beneficially; or
|
|
n
|
publicly announce an intention to do any of the foregoing.
|
This restriction terminates after the close of trading of our
shares on and including the date 45 days, 90 days or
180 days, as applicable, after the date of this prospectus.
However, subject to certain exceptions, in the event that either
(i) during the last 17 days of the applicable
restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to us occurs or (ii) prior to
the expiration of the applicable restricted period, we announce
that we will release earnings results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the applicable restricted
period, then in either case the expiration of the applicable
restricted period will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the issuance of the earnings
release or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Macquarie
Capital (USA) Inc. waive, in writing, such an extension.
Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. may,
in their sole discretion and at any time or from time to time
before the termination of the applicable restricted period,
without notice, release all or any portion of the securities
subject to these
lock-up
agreements. There are no existing agreements between the
145
underwriters and any of the persons who will execute a
lock-up
agreement providing consent to the sale of shares prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period.
Listing
Our common stock has been approved for listing on The NASDAQ
Global Market under the trading symbol MEDH.
Electronic
distribution
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on
websites or through other online services maintained by one or
more of the underwriters of this offering, or by their
affiliates. Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the
information on an underwriters website and any information
contained in any other website maintained by that underwriter is
not part of the prospectus or the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved
and/or
endorsed by us or any underwriter in its capacity as underwriter
and should not be relied upon by investors.
Price
stabilization, short positions and penalty bids
Until the distribution of the shares is completed, SEC rules may
limit underwriters from bidding for and purchasing shares.
However, the representative may engage in transactions that
stabilize the market price of the shares, such as bids or
purchases to peg, fix or maintain that price so long as
stabilizing transactions do not exceed a specified maximum.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise make short
sales of our shares and may purchase our shares on the open
market to cover positions created by short sales. Short sales
involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of
shares than they are required to purchase in this offering.
Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not
greater than the underwriters over-allotment option to
purchase additional shares in this offering. The underwriters
may close out any covered short position by either exercising
their over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the open
market. In determining the source of shares to close out the
covered short position, the underwriters will consider, among
other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the
open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase
shares through the over-allotment option. Naked
short sales are sales in excess of the over-allotment option.
The underwriters must close out any naked short position by
purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is
more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that
there may be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the
open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors
who purchase in this offering. A stabilizing bid is
a bid for or the purchase of shares on behalf of the underwriter
in the open market prior to the completion of this offering for
the purpose of fixing or maintaining the price of the shares. A
syndicate covering transaction is the bid for or
purchase of shares on behalf of the underwriters to reduce a
short position incurred by the underwriters in connection with
the offering.
Similar to other purchase transactions, the underwriters
purchases to cover the syndicate short sales may have the effect
of raising or maintaining the market price of our shares or
preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our
shares. As a result, the price of our shares may be higher than
the price that might otherwise exist in the open market.
The representative may also impose a penalty bid on
underwriters. A penalty bid is an arrangement
permitting the representative to reclaim the selling concession
otherwise accruing to the underwriters in connection with this
offering if the shares originally sold by the underwriters are
purchased by the underwriters in a syndicate covering
transaction and have therefore not been effectively placed by
the underwriters. The imposition of a penalty bid may also
affect the price of the shares in that it discourages resales of
those shares.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters makes any representation
or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect
that the transactions described above may have on the price of
our shares. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters
makes any representation that the representative will engage in
these transactions or that any transaction, if commenced, will
not be discontinued without notice.
146
Passive market
making
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may engage in
passive market-making transactions in the shares on The NASDAQ
Global Market in accordance with Rule 103 of
Regulation M under the Exchange Act during the period
before the commencement of offers or sales of shares and
extending through the completion and distribution. A passive
market-maker must display its bids at a price not in excess of
the highest independent bid of the security. However, if all
independent bids are lowered below the passive
market-makers bid that bid must be lowered when specified
purchase limits are exceeded.
Determination of
offering price
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market in the
United States for our shares. The initial public offering price
will be determined through negotiations between us and Lazard
Capital Markets LLC and Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc., as
representatives of the underwriters. The factors to be
considered in determining the public offering price may include
our future prospects and those of our industry in general,
sales, earnings and certain of our other financial operating
information in recent periods, and the market prices of
securities and certain financial and operating information of
companies engaged in activities similar to those we engage in.
The price of our shares on AIM during recent periods will also
be considered in determining the public offering price. It
should be noted, however, that historically there has been a
limited volume of trading in our shares on AIM. Therefore, the
price of our shares on AIM will only be one factor in
determining the public offering price.
We offer no assurances that the initial public offering price
will correspond to the price at which the shares will trade in
the public market subsequent to the offering or that an active
trading market for the shares will develop in the United States
and continue after the offering.
Affiliations
Certain of the underwriters or their respective affiliates have
in the past performed investment banking, brokerage and other
financial services for us or our affiliates for which they
received advisory or transaction fees, as applicable, plus
out-of-pocket
expenses, of the nature and in amounts customary in the industry
for these financial services. Each of the underwriters may
perform such services for us or our affiliates in the future.
Lazard Frères & Co. LLC has acted as a financial
advisor in connection with certain aspects of this offering and
the Recapitalization Transactions described herein and will be
paid certain fees in connection therewith. Specifically, Lazard
Frères & Co. LLC entered into an engagement letter
with us in June 2010 pursuant to which it provided us with
advisory services in connection with any relisting of our
securities on a United States stock exchange and any associated
public equity offering. Lazard Frères & Co. LLC is
entitled to receive $1.825 million in fees and
reimbursement of expenses upon the closing of this offering
pursuant to such engagement letter, which is considered
underwriting compensation pursuant to rules of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. The relationship between
Lazard Frères & Co. LLC and Lazard Capital
Markets LLC is governed by a business alliance agreement between
their respective parent companies. Pursuant to such agreement,
Lazard Frères & Co. LLC referred this offering to
Lazard Capital Markets LLC and will receive a referral fee from
Lazard Capital Markets LLC in connection therewith.
Affiliates of Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. and RBC Capital
Markets, LLC are lenders under our $225.0 million Senior
Secured Credit Facility. Further, we have retained Macquarie
Capital (USA) Inc. to act as dealer manager for the Registered
Exchange Offer. We will pay a fee to Macquarie Capital (USA)
Inc. for soliciting acceptances of the Registered Exchange Offer.
Notice to
investors
European
economic area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the European Union Prospectus Directive
(Directive 2003/71/EC), each of which we refer to as a
Relevant Member State, an offer to
147
the public of any shares which are the subject of the offering
contemplated by this prospectus may not be made in that Relevant
Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in
relation to our shares which has been approved by the competent
authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate,
approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the
competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in
accordance with the Prospectus Directive except that an offer to
the public in that Relevant Member State of any of our shares
may be made at any time under the following exemptions under the
Prospectus Directive, if they have been implemented in that
Relevant Member State:
|
|
|
|
n
|
to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
n
|
to any legal entity which has two or more of: an average of at
least 250 employees during the last financial year; a total
balance sheet of more than 43 million euros; and an annual
net turnover of more than 50 million euros, as shown in its
last annual or consolidated accounts;
|
|
n
|
by the managing underwriters to fewer than 100 natural or legal
persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the
Prospectus Directive) subject to obtaining the prior consent of
Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. for
any such offer; or
|
|
n
|
in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of
the Prospectus Directive,
|
provided that no such offer of our shares shall result in a
requirement for the publication by us or any underwriter of a
prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus
Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer to the public in relation to any shares in any
Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by
any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer
and our shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to
decide to purchase or subscribe our shares, as the same may be
varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure implementing
the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member State and the
expression Prospectus Directive means European Union
Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing
measure in each Relevant Member State.
India
This document has not been and will not be registered as a
prospectus or a statement in lieu of prospectus with any
registrar of companies in India. This document has not been and
will not be reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority in
India, including the Securities and Exchange Board of India, any
registrar of companies in India or any stock exchange in India.
This document and this offering of our shares are not and should
not be construed as an invitation, offer or sale of any
securities to the public in India. Other than in compliance with
the private placement exemptions under applicable laws and
regulations in India, including the Companies Act, 1956, as
amended, our shares have not been, and will not be, offered or
sold to the public or any member of the public in India. This
document is strictly personal to the recipient and neither this
document nor the offering of our shares is calculated to result,
directly or indirectly, in our shares becoming available for
subscription or purchase by persons other than those receiving
the invitation or offer.
Selling
restrictions addressing additional United Kingdom securities
laws
With respect to the United Kingdom, this prospectus is only
being distributed to, and is only directed at, persons in the
United Kingdom that are qualified investors within the meaning
of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive that are
also (i) investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, or the Order, or
(ii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it
may lawfully be communicated, falling within
Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order, with all such
persons together being referred to as relevant persons. This
prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not be
distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or
disclosed by recipients to any persons other than relevant
persons in the United Kingdom. Any person in the United Kingdom
that is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this
document or any of its contents.
148
Legal
Matters
The validity of the shares is being passed upon for us by
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. White & Case
LLP, counsel to the underwriters, will pass upon on certain
legal matters for the underwriters.
Experts
The audited consolidated financial statements of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and for each
of the years then ended have been included herein and in this
prospectus in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The audited consolidated financial statements of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 appearing in this registration statement
and prospectus have been audited by Grant Thornton, India,
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, and are
included, and made part of, this registration statement in
reliance upon the report of such firm given upon the authority
of such firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The audited consolidated financial statements of MedQuist Inc.
and its subsidiaries as of December 2006 and 2007 and for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2007 have been included herein and in this prospectus in
reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus,
and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and
auditing. KPMG LLPs report on the consolidated financial
statements contains explanatory paragraphs that state MedQuist
Inc. and subsidiaries adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment,
effective January 1, 2006 and adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
SFAS No. 109, effective January 1, 2007.
The consolidated financial statements of Spheris Inc. at
December 2008 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2009, appearing in this
prospectus and registration statement have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth
in their report thereon (which contains an explanatory paragraph
describing conditions that raise substantial doubt about Spheris
Inc.s ability to continue as a going concern as described
in Notes 2 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements)
appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
Where You Can
Find More Information
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act to register the shares offered hereby.
The term registration statement means the initial registration
statement and any and all amendments thereto, including the
exhibits and schedules, if any, to the initial registration
statement and any amendments thereto. This prospectus, which
constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not
contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement or the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. For
further information with respect to us and the shares offered
hereby, reference is made to the registration statement and the
exhibits and schedules filed therewith. Statements contained in
this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any
other document that is filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement
is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of
such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement. A copy of the registration statement,
along with the exhibits and schedules filed therewith, may be
inspected without charge at the Public Reference Room maintained
by the SEC, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
DC 20549, and copies of all or any part of the registration
statement may be obtained from such offices upon the payment of
the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about the Public Reference Room. The SEC
also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information regarding
registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address
of the website is www.sec.gov.
149
As a result of this offering, we will become subject to the
information and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange
Act and, in accordance therewith, we will file periodic reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information will be
available for inspection and copying at the public reference
room and website of the SEC referred to above. You may access
our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC
free of charge at our website as soon as reasonably practicable
after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished
to, the SEC. The reference to our web address does not
constitute incorporation by reference of the information
contained at or accessible through this site.
We intend to furnish our stockholders with annual reports
containing combined financial statements audited by our
independent auditors and to make available to our stockholders
quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each fiscal
year containing unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements.
150
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings
Limited) and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
F-8
|
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
|
F-58
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-91
|
|
|
F-92
|
|
|
F-93
|
|
|
F-94
|
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
F-113
|
|
|
F-114
|
|
|
F-115
|
|
|
F-116
|
|
|
F-117
|
|
|
F-118
|
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
|
|
|
|
|
F-141
|
|
|
F-142
|
|
|
F-143
|
|
|
F-144
|
F-1
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited)
and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and
2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
equity and other comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for
the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis,evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of MedQuist Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems
Holdings Limited) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008
and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 13, 2010, except as to Note 22,
which is as of January 27, 2011
F-2
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive loss,
and cash flows of MedQuist Holdings Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited, a British Virgin Islands
Company) and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31,
2007. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. Our audit included consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results
of operations and cash flows of MedQuist Holdings Inc. (formerly
CBaySystems Holdings Limited, a British Virgin Islands Company)
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON, INDIA
Mumbai
October 15, 2010, except as to
Note 22, which is as of
January 27, 2011
F-3
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year end December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
57,694
|
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
$
|
371,768
|
|
|
$
|
281,828
|
|
|
$
|
316,977
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
30,209
|
|
|
|
125,074
|
|
|
|
239,549
|
|
|
|
182,924
|
|
|
|
200,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27,485
|
|
|
|
68,599
|
|
|
|
132,219
|
|
|
|
98,904
|
|
|
|
116,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
25,137
|
|
|
|
51,243
|
|
|
|
60,632
|
|
|
|
46,594
|
|
|
|
49,374
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
7,235
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
178,637
|
|
|
|
116,129
|
|
|
|
88,179
|
|
|
|
94,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(110,038
|
)
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
|
|
10,725
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,108
|
)
|
|
|
(3,954
|
)
|
|
|
(9,132
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
|
|
(113,917
|
)
|
|
|
8,902
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
11,590
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42,868
|
|
|
$
|
29,633
|
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
59,111
|
|
|
|
53,099
|
|
|
|
74,612
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
|
|
19,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
112,545
|
|
|
|
91,471
|
|
|
|
118,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,306
|
|
|
|
19,511
|
|
|
|
23,826
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
49,943
|
|
|
|
53,187
|
|
|
|
99,030
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
84,174
|
|
|
|
72,838
|
|
|
|
114,195
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
9,453
|
|
|
|
13,566
|
|
|
|
19,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
279,177
|
|
|
$
|
253,068
|
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
$
|
33,497
|
|
|
$
|
6,207
|
|
|
$
|
36,224
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
10,199
|
|
|
|
11,191
|
|
|
|
12,033
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
31,702
|
|
|
|
29,803
|
|
|
|
36,437
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
13,585
|
|
|
|
16,034
|
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
11,889
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
|
|
10,287
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
102,046
|
|
|
|
73,159
|
|
|
|
119,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
101,133
|
|
|
|
167,948
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
4,720
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
199,827
|
|
|
|
180,767
|
|
|
|
295,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock- $0.10 par value; authorized
25,000 shares;
none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock- $0.10 par value; authorized
300,000 shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,442, 35,013 and 35,158 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
150,475
|
|
|
|
149,339
|
|
|
|
149,100
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(116,421
|
)
|
|
|
(115,686
|
)
|
|
|
(109,261
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,191
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
36,307
|
|
|
|
36,980
|
|
|
|
42,970
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
43,043
|
|
|
|
35,321
|
|
|
|
40,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
79,350
|
|
|
|
72,301
|
|
|
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
279,177
|
|
|
$
|
253,068
|
|
|
$
|
379,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,820
|
|
|
$
|
5,061
|
|
|
$
|
11,659
|
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(6,431
|
)
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,580
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(2,534
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(5,024
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
5,783
|
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
6,209
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
(4,532
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
(1,391
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
(1,661
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
(10,850
|
)
|
|
|
(3,634
|
)
|
|
|
(6,700
|
)
|
|
|
(9,058
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
4,648
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(4,811
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
(2,642
|
)
|
|
|
42,670
|
|
|
|
32,116
|
|
|
|
28,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,849
|
)
|
|
|
(4,420
|
)
|
|
|
(6,475
|
)
|
|
|
(4,992
|
)
|
|
|
(4,345
|
)
|
Purchases of and capitalized intangible assets
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
|
(2,995
|
)
|
|
|
(2,147
|
)
|
|
|
(5,275
|
)
|
Payment to related parties
|
|
|
(5,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions and interests in affiliates, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(10,202
|
)
|
|
|
(69,319
|
)
|
|
|
(2,690
|
)
|
|
|
(1,025
|
)
|
|
|
(97,710
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(18,478
|
)
|
|
|
(76,477
|
)
|
|
|
(12,160
|
)
|
|
|
(8,164
|
)
|
|
|
(107,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock
|
|
|
28,210
|
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,256
|
)
|
|
|
(15,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,171
|
)
|
|
|
(7,031
|
)
|
Borrowings from term loans, credit facilities, notes payable and
capital leases
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
110,095
|
|
Repayments for term loans, credit facilities, notes payable and
capital leases
|
|
|
(10,649
|
)
|
|
|
(3,439
|
)
|
|
|
(28,613
|
)
|
|
|
(28,012
|
)
|
|
|
(29,866
|
)
|
Share issue expenses
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issue of shares to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
16,074
|
|
|
|
121,427
|
|
|
|
(44,411
|
)
|
|
|
(43,905
|
)
|
|
|
73,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
(2,107
|
)
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
40,201
|
|
|
|
(13,235
|
)
|
|
|
(19,663
|
)
|
|
|
(5,608
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
42,868
|
|
|
|
42,868
|
|
|
|
29,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
2,667
|
|
|
$
|
42,868
|
|
|
$
|
29,633
|
|
|
$
|
23,205
|
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
component of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
compound
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
paid in
|
|
|
financial
|
|
|
redemption
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
instrument
|
|
|
reserve
|
|
|
(deficit)
|
|
|
(loss)
|
|
|
(loss)
|
|
|
interests
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
|
$
|
3,922
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(147
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Equity component of related party convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Investment on CBay Infotech Ventures Private Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Gain in investment in CBay Infotech Ventures Private Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of shares on restructuring of CBay Group
|
|
|
10,957
|
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,847
|
|
Cancellation of CBay India equity on restructuring of CBay Group
|
|
|
(2,739
|
)
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
(4,345
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,847
|
)
|
Shares issued pursuant to share swap agreement
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Shares issued on initial public offering
|
|
|
3,182
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
24,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,150
|
|
Share issue expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
Components of comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
29,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
29,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
122,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Share of noncontrolling interest in MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,740
|
|
|
|
63,740
|
|
Share of noncontrolling interest in goodwill impairment charge
in MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,081
|
)
|
|
|
(25,081
|
)
|
Accrued payments to principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
Receivable related to IPO proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Components of comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
|
|
150,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,191
|
)
|
|
|
43,043
|
|
|
|
79,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to principal shareholder
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
Accrued payments to principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
Issuance of stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Dividend paid to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,256
|
)
|
|
|
(15,256
|
)
|
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
Dilution of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
35,013
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
149,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
35,321
|
|
|
|
72,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to principal shareholder
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
Accrued payments to principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
35,158
|
|
|
$
|
3,516
|
|
|
$
|
149,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(109,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(385
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,598
|
|
|
$
|
83,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-7
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Information as of September 30, 2010 and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009
and 2010 is unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited)
and subsidiaries (the Company or MedQuist
Holdings Inc.) provides technology-enabled clinical
documentation services and related revenue cycle solutions for
the healthcare industry with operations in the United States of
America and India. The Company provides transcription and
information management services to integrated healthcare
facility networks, hospitals, academic institutions, clinics and
physician practices. The Companys solutions leverage
internet technologies and trained transcriptionists to provide
medical transcription services under a global service model. The
Company also provides patient financial services including
billing and coding services to hospitals and healthcare
providers in the United States of America. The Companys
service and enterprise technology solutions (including mobile
voice capture devices, speech recognition technologies,
web-based workflow platforms), and a global network of medical
transcriptionists (MTs) and editors (MEs) enable healthcare
facilities to improve the quality and timeliness of clinical
data and information, reduce operational costs, increase
physician satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle performance and
facilitate the adoption and utilization of Electronic Health
Record (EHR) systems.
On August 6, 2008, an affiliate of S.A.C. Private Capital
Group, LLC invested $124,000 in the Company in exchange for
19,998 common shares in the Company at a price of
approximately $6.21 per share which was equivalent to
approximately 58.1% of the Company. The proceeds from the
issuance and certain borrowings were used by the Company to
finance the purchase of an approximately 69.5% shareholding in
MedQuist Inc. from Royal Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips), see
Note 10 Acquisitions. No purchase accounting adjustments
related to the investment have been pushed down to the Company.
The Company is listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM).
In August 2009, the board of MedQuist Inc., a consolidated
subsidiary of the Company, authorized a special cash dividend of
$1.33 per share or $49,949. The dividend was paid on
September 15, 2009 of which $15,256 was paid to the
noncontrolling interest which has reduced the carrying amount of
the noncontrolling interest in these consolidated financial
statements.
Recent
developments
On April 22, 2010, the Company through its subsidiaries,
MedQuist Inc. and CBay Inc. (Purchasers), completed
the acquisition (the Acquisition) of substantially
all of the assets of Spheris, Inc. (Spheris) and certain of its
affiliates, including the acquisition of the stock of Spheris
India Private Limited, (SIPL) (collectively with
Spheris and SIPL, the Sellers), pursuant to the
terms of the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement (the
Purchase Agreement) entered into between the
Purchasers and Sellers on April 15, 2010. See Note 10
for a description of the Acquisition. Costs incurred for the
Acquisition and direct integration costs are included in the
line item Acquisition related charges on the accompanying
statements of operations. See Note 21 for subsequent events.
F-8
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Significant
accounting policies
|
Principles of
consolidation
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and its subsidiary companies.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
Unaudited
interim financial information
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements of
the Company as of September 30, 2010 and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010 have been prepared
by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations relating to interim financial statements. In the
opinion of the Companys management, the accompanying
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial
statements and reflect all adjustments, which include only
normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the
financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2010,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010. The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
are not necessarily indicative of full year results.
Use of
estimates and assumptions in the preparation of consolidated
financial statements
The preparation of the Companys consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions
include the carrying amount of property and equipment, valuation
of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill, valuation
allowances for receivables and deferred income taxes, revenue
recognition, stock-based compensation and commitments and
contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
Revenues for medical transcription services are recognized when
the services are rendered. These services are based on
contracted rates. The Company also derives revenues from the
sale of voice-capture and document management products including
software, hardware and implementation, training and maintenance
service related to these products.
The Company recognizes software-related revenues using the
residual method when vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE)
of fair value exists for all of the undelivered elements in the
arrangement, but does not exist for one or more delivered
elements. The Company allocates revenues to each undelivered
element based on its respective fair value determined by the
price charged when that element is sold separately or, for
elements not yet sold separately, the price established by
management if it is probable that the price will not change
before the element is sold separately. The Company defers
revenues for the undelivered elements.
Provided that the arrangement does not involve significant
production, modification, or customization of the software,
revenues are recognized when all of the following four criteria
have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collectability is probable.
If at the outset of an arrangement, the Company had determined
that the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenues
are deferred until the arrangement fee becomes due and payable
by the customer. If at the outset of an arrangement the Company
had determined that collectability is not probable, revenues are
F-9
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
deferred until payment is received. The Companys license
agreements typically do not provide for a right of return other
than during the standard warranty period. If an arrangement
allows for customer acceptance of the software or services, the
Company defers revenues until the earlier of customer acceptance
or when the acceptance rights lapse.
The Company separately markets and sells hardware and software
post contract customer support (PCS). PCS covers phone support,
hardware parts and labor, software bug fixes and limited
upgrades, if and when available. The Company does not commit to
specific future software upgrades or releases. The contract
period for PCS is generally one year. The Company recognizes
both hardware and software PCS on a straight line basis over the
life of the underlying PCS contract. In some of the
Companys PCS contracts, the Company bills the customer
prior to performing the services. As of December 31, 2008
and 2009, deferred PCS revenues of $11,052 and $7,643,
respectively, are included in deferred revenues and $340 and
$177, respectively, are included in other non-current
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Certain arrangements include multiple elements involving
software, hardware and implementation, training, or other
services that are not essential to the functionality of the
software. VSOE for services does not exist. Since the
undelivered elements are typically services, the Company
recognizes the entire arrangement fee ratably over the period
during which the services are expected to be performed or the
PCS period, whichever is longer, beginning with delivery of the
software, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria
are met. The services are typically completed before the PCS
term expires. As such, upon completion of the services, the
difference between the VSOE of fair value for the remaining PCS
period and the remaining unrecognized portion of the arrangement
fee is recognized as revenue (i.e. the residual method), and the
remaining deferred revenue is recognized ratably over the
remaining PCS period.
Fees for patient financial services related to accounts
receivable management services are generally contracted as a
percentage of amounts collected out of the allocated accounts.
Revenue from such arrangements is recognized based on actual
collections by the hospitals.
Fees for patient financial services related to reimbursement
analytics are contracted either on a fixed fee or a contingent
fee basis. Under the fixed fee, a fee is contractually fixed for
each reimbursement package delivered. Revenue from such
arrangements is recognized on the delivery of the reimbursement
package. Under the contingent fee, the fee is contracted as a
percentage of the amounts that would ultimately be reimbursed to
the hospitals by the relevant authorities and is contingent upon
receipt of the reimbursement by the hospital. Revenue from such
arrangements is recognized when the contingency is resolved on
receipt of the approval of the reimbursement package by the
financial intermediaries. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009,
$231 and $224, respectively, of revenue recognized in excess of
billings is recorded as unbilled revenues and are included in
accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets.
Sales
taxes
The Company presents taxes assessed by a governmental authority
including sales, use, value added and excise taxes on a net
basis and therefore the presentation of these taxes is excluded
from the Companys revenues and is included in accrued
expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets until
such amounts are remitted to the taxing authorities.
Litigation and
settlement costs
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation,
claims, contingencies and other legal matters. The Company
records a charge equal to at least the minimum estimated
liability for a loss contingency when both of the following
conditions are met: (i) information available prior to
issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is
probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been
incurred at the date of the financial statements and
(ii) the range of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The
Company expenses legal costs as incurred.
F-10
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Restructuring
costs
A liability for restructuring costs associated with an exit or
disposal activity is recognized and measured initially at fair
value when the liability is incurred. The Company records a
liability for severance costs when the obligation is
attributable to employee service already rendered, the
employees rights to those benefits accumulate or vest,
payment of the compensation is probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. The Company records a liability for
future, non-cancellable operating lease costs when the Company
vacates a facility.
The Companys estimates of future liabilities may change,
requiring it to record additional restructuring charges or
reduce the amount of liabilities recorded. At the end of each
reporting period, the Company evaluates the remaining accrued
restructuring charges to ensure their adequacy, that no excess
accruals are retained and the utilization of the provisions are
for their intended purposes in accordance with developed exit
plans.
Research and
development costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements,
using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
the Companys statement of operations in the period that
includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded
to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it
is more likely than not that such assets will be realized.
Management considers various sources of future taxable income
including projected book earnings, the reversal of temporary
differences, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in
determining the need for a valuation allowance.
Share-based
compensation
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options on the
date of grant using an option pricing model. The Company uses
the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair
value of its options. The determination of the fair value of
stock based awards using an option pricing model is affected by
a number of assumptions including expected volatility of the
common stock over the expected term, the expected term, the risk
free interest rate during the expected term and the expected
dividends to be paid. The value of the portion of the award that
is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as compensation
expense over the requisite service periods.
Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock
options for 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $1,308, $124 and $856 which
was charged to selling, general and administrative expenses. As
of December 31, 2009 total unamortized stock-based
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of
expected forfeitures, was $673 which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.69 years.
Net income
(loss) per share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is
computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average
shares outstanding, as adjusted for the dilutive effect of
common stock equivalents, which consist of stock options,
convertible notes and certain obligations which may be settled
by the Company through issue of shares using the treasury stock
method.
F-11
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The table below reflects basic and diluted net loss per share
for the periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
Less: amount payable to principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available for common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(114,786
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,083
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
34,586
|
|
|
|
35,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share does not
assume conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would
have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted net income (loss) per
share. Potentially dilutive shares having an anti-dilutive
effect on net income (loss) per share and, therefore, excluded
from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share,
totaled 56, 5,345 and 13,127 shares for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively and 12,879
and 13,318 shares for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The net income
(loss) for the purpose of the basic income (loss) per share is
adjusted for the amounts payable to the Companys principal
shareholders amounting to $1,113 and $2,750 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively and $2,063 for
each of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010,
under the management services agreement, see Note 9, other
commitments - related party.
Advertising
costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 were $828, $1,169
and $1,734, respectively and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 were $709 and $1,610,
respectively.
Cash and cash
equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. The Companys cash management and investment
policies dictate that cash equivalents be limited to investment
grade, highly liquid securities. The Company places its
temporary cash investments with high-credit rated, quality
financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the
amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Consequently, the
Companys cash equivalents are subject to potential credit
risk. As of December 31, 2008, 2009 and September 30,
2010, cash equivalents consisted of money market investments.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates
fair value.
Restricted cash of $133, $93 and $1,041, as of December 31,
2008, 2009 and September 30, 2010, respectively, represents
deposits that are maintained with banks as security for
guarantees issued by them. Such amounts are included in other
current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
F-12
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do
not bear interest. The carrying value of accounts receivable
approximates fair value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
the Companys best estimate for losses inherent in its
accounts receivable portfolio. The sales return and allowance
reserve is the Companys best estimate of sales credits
that will be issued related to its accounts receivable
portfolio. These allowances are used to state trade receivables
at estimated net realizable value.
The Company estimates uncollectible amounts based upon its
historical write-off experience, current customer receivable
balances, age of customer receivable balances, the
customers financial condition and current economic
conditions. Historically, these estimates have been adequate to
cover its accounts receivable exposure.
The Company enters into medical transcription service
arrangements which contain provisions for performance penalties
in the event certain service levels, primarily related to
turnaround time on transcribed reports, are not achieved. The
Company reduces revenues for any performance penalties incurred
and have included an estimate of such credits in its allowance
for uncollectible accounts.
Product revenues for sales to end-user customers and resellers
are recognized upon passage of title if all other revenue
recognition criteria have been met. End-user customers generally
do not have a right of return. The Company provides certain of
its resellers and distributors with limited rights of return of
its products. The Company reduces revenues for rights to return
its product based upon our historical experience and have
included an estimate of such credits in its allowance for
doubtful accounts.
Deferred
equity offering costs
Costs have been incurred in connection with the planned initial
public offering of the Companys common stock. As of
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010, legal,
consulting and accounting costs aggregating approximately $270
and $2,809, respectively, have been deferred and are included in
other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Upon the consummation of the offering, these costs will
be treated as a reduction of the proceeds from the offering and
will be included as a component of additional
paid-in-capital.
If the offering is terminated, the costs will be charged to
expense in the period that it becomes probable that the costs
are no longer realizable.
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range
from two to seven years for furniture, equipment and software,
and the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for
leasehold improvements. Repairs and maintenance costs are
charged to expense as incurred while additions and betterments
are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposals are charged to
operations. Upon retirement, sale or other disposition, the
related cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from
the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.
Valuation of
long-lived and other intangible assets and
goodwill
In connection with acquisitions, the Company allocates portions
of the purchase price to tangible and intangible assets,
consisting primarily of acquired technologies and customer
relationships with the remainder allocated to goodwill. The
Company prepared the purchase price allocations and in doing so
considered the report of an independent valuation firm. The
Company assesses the realizability of goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives at least annually, or sooner
if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. The Company has determined that
the Companys three reporting units are MedQuist Inc., CBay
Transcription Business and Patient Financial Services (PFS). See
Note 8 for goodwill impairment charge recorded in 2008.
F-13
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Software
development
Costs incurred in creating a computer software product are
charged to expense when incurred as research and development
until technical feasibility has been established. Technical
feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program
design or, in its absence, completion of a working model.
Thereafter, all software production costs are capitalized until
the product is available for release to customers.
Software costs for internal use incurred in the preliminary
project stage are expensed as incurred. Capitalization of costs
begins when the preliminary project stage is completed and
management, with the relevant authority, authorizes and commits
funding of the project and it is probable that the project will
be completed and the software will be used to perform the
function intended. Capitalization ceases no later than the point
at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its
intended use.
Capitalized software is reported at the lower of unamortized
cost or net realizable value and is amortized over the
products estimated economic life which is generally three
years. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, $942 and $1,321,
respectively, of unamortized software development costs are
included in other intangible assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, software amortization
expense was $0, $40 and $220, respectively.
Long-lived and
other intangible assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. To determine the recoverability of
long-lived assets, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by an asset is compared to the carrying
value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived
asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an
impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the
carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Annually,
the Company evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of
these assets.
Intangible assets include certain assets (primarily customer
relationships and trade names) obtained from business
acquisitions and are being amortized using the straight-line
method over their estimated useful lives which range from three
to 10 years.
Foreign
currency translation
The Companys operating subsidiaries in the United Kingdom,
Canada and India use the local currency as their functional
currency. The Company translates the assets and liabilities of
those entities into U.S. dollars using the month-end
exchange rate. The Company translates revenues and expenses
using the average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting
period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within equity.
Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included
in net gain and were $1,314, $203 and $325 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
F-14
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Business
enterprise segments
The Company operates in one reportable operating segment, which
is providing integrated clinical documentation solutions for the
healthcare industry.
Concentration
of risk, geographic data and enterprise-wide
disclosures
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the
Companys net revenues in any period. There is no single
geographic area of significant concentration other than the
United States.
The following table summarizes the net revenues by the
categories of the Companys services and products as a
percentage of its total net revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Medical transcription
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
%
|
|
|
88.6
|
|
%
|
Products and related services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
%
|
PCS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
%
|
PFS
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other includes medical coding, application service provider and
other miscellaneous revenues.
The following summarizes the Companys revenues and
long-lived assets by geography.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
55,249
|
|
|
$
|
190,176
|
|
|
$
|
360,619
|
|
|
$
|
273,761
|
|
|
$
|
312,420
|
|
Others
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
11,149
|
|
|
|
8,067
|
|
|
|
4,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,694
|
|
|
$
|
193,673
|
|
|
$
|
371,768
|
|
|
$
|
281,828
|
|
|
$
|
316,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
18,556
|
|
|
$
|
13,765
|
|
|
$
|
16,964
|
|
Others
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
5,746
|
|
|
|
6,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,306
|
|
|
$
|
19,511
|
|
|
$
|
23,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Fair value of
financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses are reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets at carrying values which approximate
fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Comprehensive
income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss)
and Other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive
income (loss) consists of foreign currency translation
adjustments. Other comprehensive income (loss) and comprehensive
income (loss) are displayed separately in the Consolidated
Statements of Equity and Other Comprehensive Income (loss).
Acquisition
related costs
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company expenses costs
incurred in reviewing potential acquisitions in the period
incurred. This includes legal, investment banking, accounting,
tax and other consulting, as well as any internal costs. Prior
to this date direct and incremental external costs of
acquisitions were included in the purchase price.
Operating
leases
Lease rent expenses on operating leases are charged to expense
over the lease term. Certain operating lease agreements provide
for scheduled rent increases over the lease term. Rent expense
for such leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
lease term.
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations incurred to acquire equipment
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
3,523
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Issuance of notes payable for acquisition of MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired for settlement of receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of preferred stock for settlement of receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodation payments paid with credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees to principal shareholders by issuing common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of interest on convertible notes to additional notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash debt incurred in connection with acquisition of Spheris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
F-16
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In September 2009, the FASB ratified two consensuses affecting
revenue recognition:
The first consensus, Revenue Recognition
Multiple-Element Arrangements, sets forth requirements that
must be met for an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of
a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement
when other items have not yet been delivered. One of those
current requirements is that there be objective and reliable
evidence of the standalone selling price of the undelivered
items, which must be supported by either vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) or third-party evidence (TPE).
This consensus eliminates the requirement that all undelivered
elements have VSOE or TPE before an entity can recognize the
portion of an overall arrangement fee that is attributable to
items that already have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE
or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more delivered
or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement,
entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of
those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be allocated to
each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on
their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those
selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the
entitys estimated selling price. Application of the
residual method of allocating an overall arrangement
fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted.
The second consensus, Software-Revenue Recognition
addresses the accounting for transactions involving software
to exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both
software and non-software and non-software components that
function together to deliver a products functionality.
The Consensuses are effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is
evaluating the potential impact of these requirements on its
financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Comprehensive
(loss) income
|
Comprehensive (loss) income was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment gain (loss)
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,862
|
)
|
|
$
|
(115,712
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,752
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
6,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
|
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, the
Company recorded charges of $0, $5,311, $14,943, $13,540 and
$2,785 respectively, for costs associated with legal proceedings
and settlements. The following is a summary of the amounts
recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Legal fees and professional fees
|
|
$
|
5,311
|
|
|
$
|
8,593
|
|
|
$
|
7,690
|
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
Other, including settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
|
|
5,850
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,311
|
|
|
$
|
14,943
|
|
|
$
|
13,540
|
|
|
$
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount included in Other, including settlements for 2009, is
primarily for the settlement amount of $5,850 related to the
Anthurium patent claim which was settled and paid in June 2009
and $500 for the reseller arbitration. The amount included in
Other, including settlements for 2010, represents an additional
charge of $900 required to bring the total Kaiser litigation
settlement amount to $2,000 as a result of the settlement
agreement with Kaiser more fully discussed in Note 14.
2008
restructure plan
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company implemented a
restructuring plan related to a reduction in workforce in order
to better align costs with revenues. The Company recorded $2,135
in severance charges related to the 2008 restructuring plan. The
remaining restructuring costs are included in accrued expenses
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008. The table below reflects the financial
statement activity related to the 2008 restructuring plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
Charge (reversal)
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
restructure plan
During the third and fourth quarters of 2009, as a result of
managements continued planned process improvement and
technology development investments MedQuist committed to an exit
and disposal plan which includes projected employee severance
for planned reduction in headcount. Because of planned
development in late 2009 and execution of the plan over multiple
quarters in 2009 and 2010, not all personnel affected by the
plan know of the plan or its impact. The plan includes costs of
$2,500 for employee severance and $300 for
F-18
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
vacating operating leases. The table below reflects the
financial statement activity related to the 2009 restructuring
plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Nine month ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
Charge (reversal)
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects this to be paid in 2010.
2010
restructuring plan
During the second and third quarters of 2010, managements
ongoing cost reduction initiatives, including process
improvement, combined with the acquisition of Spheris resulted
in a restructuring plan involving staff reductions and other
actions designed to maximize operating efficiencies. The
affected employees are entitled to receive severance benefits
under existing established severance policies. The employees
were primarily in the operations and administrative functions.
This initial action under the plan was approved during the
second quarter of 2010. The table below reflects the financial
statement activity related to the 2010 restructuring plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects that restructuring activities may continue
in 2010 as management identifies opportunities for synergies
resulting from the acquisition of Spheris including the
elimination of redundant functions.
Accounts receivable consisted of the following as of December 31
and September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
60,824
|
|
|
$
|
54,852
|
|
|
$
|
76,934
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,713
|
)
|
|
|
(1,753
|
)
|
|
|
(2,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
59,111
|
|
|
$
|
53,099
|
|
|
$
|
74,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
1,713
|
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts recognized during the year
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
Doubtful accounts written-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(2,266
|
)
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
1,713
|
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Includes amounts written off to costs and expenses for bad debts
of $43, $1,584, $197 and $431 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and amounts charged to
revenues for customer credits of $0, $840, $2,109 and $1,195 for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
|
|
7.
|
Property and
equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
18,301
|
|
|
$
|
26,567
|
|
Software
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
4,869
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
Others
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
37,723
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(8,483
|
)
|
|
|
(18,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
21,306
|
|
|
$
|
19,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009 is $1,478, $6,756 and $12,014, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill and
other intangible assets
|
In connection with acquisitions, the Company allocates portions
of the purchase price to tangible and intangible assets,
consisting primarily of acquired technologies and customer
relationships with the remainder allocated to goodwill. The
Company prepared the purchase price allocations and in doing so
considered the report of an independent valuation firm. The
Company assesses the realizability of goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives at least annually, or sooner
if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. The Company has determined that
the impairment testing is to be conducted at our three reporting
unit levels which are: MedQuist, CBay Transcription Business and
PFS.
F-20
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1,
|
|
$
|
18,361
|
|
|
$
|
148,915
|
|
|
$
|
152,159
|
|
Accumulated impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,361
|
|
|
|
49,943
|
|
|
|
53,187
|
|
Goodwill from acquisitions
|
|
|
118,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,747
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in goodwill of MedQuist
|
|
|
12,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments and other
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Balance at period end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
148,915
|
|
|
|
152,159
|
|
|
|
198,002
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at period end
|
|
$
|
49,943
|
|
|
$
|
53,187
|
|
|
$
|
99,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2008 which included the Companys
annual impairment testing, the Company determined the fair value
using a combination of market capitalization based on market
price per share for approximately the 60 days before
December 31, 2008 and a discounted cash flow analysis.
Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant
judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates,
perpetual growth rates, the amount and timing of expected future
cash flows, as well as relevant comparable company earnings
multiples for the market-based approach. The cash flows employed
in the discounted cash flow analyses are based on the
Companys internal business model for 2009 and, for years
beyond 2009, the growth rates the Company used were an estimate
of the future growth in the industry in which the Company
participates. The discount rates used in the discounted cash
flow analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the
future cash flows of the reporting unit and are based on an
estimated cost of capital, which the Company determined based on
estimated cost of capital relative to its capital structure. In
addition, the market-based approach utilizes comparable company
public trading values, research analyst estimates and, where
available, values observed in private market transactions. In
2008, the analysis indicated that the reporting units fair
value was below the book value for the MedQuist and PFS
reporting units, and accordingly an impairment charge was
recorded to reduce the carrying value of goodwill to its fair
value. The test of impairment of goodwill is a two-step process:
|
|
|
|
n
|
First, the Company compares the carrying amount of the reporting
units, which is the book value to the fair value of its
reporting unit. If the carrying amount of its reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the Company has to perform the second
step of the process. If not, no further testing is needed. In
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company determined that the
carrying amount of two of its reporting units: MedQuist and PFS
exceeded the fair value and accordingly performed the second
step in the analysis.
|
|
n
|
If the second part of the analysis is required, the Company
allocates the fair value of its reporting unit to all assets and
liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a
business combination at the date of the impairment test. The
Company then compares the implied fair value of its reporting
units goodwill to its carrying amount. If the carrying
amount of the Companys goodwill exceeds its implied fair
value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss in an amount
equal to that excess.
|
F-21
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In the second step, the Company allocated the fair value of the
respective reporting unit to all assets and liabilities as if
the respective reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination at the date of the impairment test. The Company then
compared the implied fair value of goodwill of the respective
reporting unit to its respective carrying amount. As the
respective carrying amount of goodwill exceeded its respective
implied fair value, a pre-tax impairment charge for the MedQuist
and PFS reporting units of $89,633 and $9,339, respectively, was
recorded for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The Company carried out its goodwill impairment test during the
fourth quarter of 2009 and determined that the fair value of its
reporting units exceeded its carrying value. In 2009 the fair
value of the MedQuist reporting unit substantially exceeded its
carrying value and the fair value of the PFS reporting unit
exceeded its carrying value by 7%, and accordingly, no second
step of the goodwill impairment test was performed and no
impairment charge was recorded.
In estimating the fair value of the CBay Transcription reporting
unit, the market approach and the income approach were used. The
fair value of the reporting unit substantially exceeded its
carrying value, and accordingly, no second step of the goodwill
impairment test was performed and no impairment charge was
recorded in 2008 and 2009.
Other
intangible assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including amortizable
intangibles, for impairment when events indicate that their
carrying amount may not be recoverable. When the Company
determines that one or more impairment indicators are present
for an asset, it compares the carrying amount of the asset to
net future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to
generate. If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than
the net future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is
expected to generate, it compares the fair value to the book
value of the asset. If the fair value is less than the book
value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss. The impairment
loss is the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its
fair value.
Some of the events that the Company considers as impairment
indicators for our long-lived assets, including goodwill, are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
net book value compared to its fair value;
|
|
n
|
significant adverse economic and industry trends;
|
|
n
|
significant decrease in the market value of the asset;
|
|
n
|
the extent that the Company uses an asset or changes in the
manner that it uses it;
|
|
n
|
significant changes to the asset since acquired; and
|
|
n
|
other changes in circumstances that potentially indicate all or
a portion of the company will be sold.
|
During 2008 and 2009, the Company reviewed the carrying value of
its long-lived assets other than goodwill and determined that
the carrying amounts of such assets was less than the
undiscounted cash flows and accordingly no impairment charge was
recorded.
F-22
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
As of December 31, 2008, 2009 and September 30, 2010
other intangible asset balances were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
55,891
|
|
|
$
|
4,552
|
|
|
$
|
51,339
|
|
Technological knowhow
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
4,913
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
21,892
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
20,534
|
|
Marketing related intangibles
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Internally developed software
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
93,832
|
|
|
$
|
9,658
|
|
|
$
|
84,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
55,891
|
|
|
$
|
12,064
|
|
|
$
|
43,827
|
|
Technological knowhow
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
21,893
|
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
|
17,168
|
|
Marketing related intangibles
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Internally developed software
|
|
|
4,024
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
3,604
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,907
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
98,167
|
|
|
$
|
25,329
|
|
|
$
|
72,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
90,596
|
|
|
$
|
16,091
|
|
|
$
|
74,505
|
|
Technological knowhow
|
|
|
18,892
|
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
|
15,684
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
3,905
|
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
23,532
|
|
|
|
7,435
|
|
|
|
16,097
|
|
Marketing related intangibles
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internally developed software
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
150,022
|
|
|
$
|
35,827
|
|
|
$
|
114,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The estimated useful life and the weighted average remaining
lives of the intangible assets as of December 31, 2009 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
useful life
|
|
|
remaining lives
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
7-10 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Technological knowhow
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
2-3 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
6-7 years
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Marketing related intangibles
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Internally developed software
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Others
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Estimated annual amortization expense for intangible assets is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (represents amortization for period October 1,
2010 December 31, 2010)
|
|
|
5,998
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23,307
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,223
|
|
2013
|
|
|
19,632
|
|
2014
|
|
|
15,614
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
27,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
114,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded amortization expense of $1,437, $8,150 and
$14,963 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively.
|
|
9.
|
Contractual
obligations
|
Leases
The Company has acquired certain computers, office equipment and
other assets under capital leases. The gross amount recorded in
property and equipment for such capital leases and the related
accumulated amortization amounted to $1,062 and $623 as of
December 31, 2008 and $4,585 and $1,611 as of
December 31, 2009, respectively. Amortization expense is
$234, $400 and $988 for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively. See Note 13 for classification
of capital lease obligations.
Minimum rental payments under operating leases are recognized on
a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including any
periods of free rent and landlord incentives. Rental expense for
operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009 was $1,318, $3,622 and $5,320, respectively.
Future minimum
F-24
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
lease payments under non-cancelable leases (with initial or
remaining lease terms in excess of one year) are as follows as
of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,130
|
|
|
$
|
5,561
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
2012
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
2013
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
3,879
|
|
|
$
|
20,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Current portion of obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
(817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations, under capital leases, excluding current portion
|
|
$
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
commitments related party
Pursuant to an agreement entered into on August 19, 2008
the Company is obligated to pay S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC
(SAC CBI II) and Lehman Brothers Commercial
Corporation Asia (LBCCA), an annual amount of $1,863
and $887, respectively, which the Company can elect to pay in
cash or shares. The payment provision of the agreement has a
five year term that expires in August 2013. The agreement
provides that SAC CBI II and LBCCA may provide financial,
managerial and operational advice, the annual amount is payable
regardless of whether any management services are rendered and
the annual amount is fixed. Under the agreement, the Company is
committed to pay for the remaining unexpired term on termination
of the agreement or upon a change in control, determined as the
sum of the present value (using the discount rate equal to the
yield on U.S. Treasury securities of like maturity) of the
annual amounts that would have been payable with respect to the
period from the date of such change of control or termination,
as applicable through August 18, 2013. Such amounts are
being recorded as a capital transaction. For the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009, $1,113 and $2,750,
respectively, have been recorded in the consolidated statements
of equity and comprehensive income. During 2009 and 2010,
2,566 shares and 652 shares, respectively, of the
Companys common stock were issued to satisfy a portion of
the annual amounts. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and
September 30, 2010, $1,113, $2,185 and $2,850,
respectively, of the amounts payable was accrued and recorded in
due to related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.
Other
contractual obligations
The following summarizes our other contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other guaranteed
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
payments
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
12,759
|
|
|
$
|
8,666
|
|
|
$
|
4,093
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,962
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Purchase obligations represent telecommunication contracts
($9,619), software development ($1,000) and other recurring
purchase obligations ($250).
As of December 31, 2009, the Company has agreements with
certain of its senior management and board of directors that
provided for severance payments in the event these individuals
were terminated without cause. The maximum exposure related to
these agreements was $4,093 as of December 31, 2009.
Acquisition of
MedQuist Inc.
On August 6, 2008, CBay Inc acquired approximately
69.5 percent of the outstanding common shares of MedQuist
from Philips. The results of MedQuist operations have been
included in the consolidated financial statements from that
date. MedQuist is engaged in the business of medical
transcription technology and services, which are integral to the
clinical documentation workflow. It services health systems,
hospitals and large medical practices throughout the U.S.; in
the clinical documentation workflow, it provides, in addition to
medical transcription technology and services, digital
dictation, speech recognition, electronic signature and medical
coding technology and services. MedQuist is listed on The NASDAQ
Global Market.
The acquisition is considered to be beneficial to the Company
based upon the size and projected growth of the
U.S. Medical Transcription industry, the leading market
position of MedQuist and the complementary and potentially
synergistic nature of MedQuist and the Companys businesses
in terms of products and services, operations and technology.
The acquisition of a majority share in MedQuist will provide the
Company with the scope, scale and resources to invest in new
technology, to expand its suite of products and services and to
pursue revenue and market share growth.
The total purchase price was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
98,079
|
|
Issue of 6% Convertible note
|
|
|
90,935
|
|
Issue of Promissory Note (Bridge note)
|
|
|
26,244
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
24,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
239,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounted for the acquisition as a purchase in
accordance with FASB guidance on Business Combinations. In
accordance with the guidance, the purchase price was allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
fair values as at the date of acquisition. The Company prepared
the purchase price allocations and in doing so considered the
report of an independent valuation firm. The fair value of
experienced management and delivery team (assembled workforce),
which was one of the key drivers for this acquisition, was not
separately recognized and has been included in the value of
goodwill.
F-26
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
acquisition
|
|
|
|
August 6, 2008
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
12,757
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
71,599
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
74,720
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,756
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(44,337
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
121,430
|
|
Consideration paid
|
|
|
239,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
118,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill recognized from the transaction is a result of the
growth opportunity the investors anticipate in the
Companys core business, medical transcription.
No part of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Intangible assets recognized on acquisition of MedQuist on the
date of acquisition are set out in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
acquisition
|
|
|
|
August 6, 2008
|
|
|
Customer Relationships
|
|
$
|
40,380
|
|
Trade Names
|
|
|
21,892
|
|
Developed Technology
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
71,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMS Plus Inc.
(AMS Plus)
On August 13, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the equity
shares of AMS Plus, through its U.S. subsidiary Mirrus for
total consideration of $12,500 comprising an upfront payment of
$9,400 and a performance-related earn-out payment of $3,100
after two years.
AMS Plus manages billing and collections for physician practices
and hospitals.
The Company accounted for the acquisition as a purchase in
accordance with FASB guidance on Business Combinations.
Accordingly, the results of operations have been included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of
acquisition. In accordance with this guidance the purchase price
was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their fair values as at the date of acquisition based
on fair values determined by an independent appraiser.
In May 2009, the performance-related earn-out amount of $3,100
became payable and has been accounted for as additional purchase
price with a corresponding increase in goodwill.
F-27
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Acquisition of
Spheris
On April 22, 2010, the Company, through its subsidiaries
MedQuist Inc. (MedQuist) and CBay Inc. (the Purchasers),
completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
Spheris Inc. (Spheris) and certain of its affiliates including
Spheris India Private Limited (SIPL). This acquisition provided
a substantial customer base and also provided opportunities for
operating efficiencies and operating margin expansion. See
Note 5, Restructuring charges for further discussion of the
Companys 2010 restructuring plan approved by management to
realize some of these savings. Costs incurred for the
acquisition and direct integration costs are included in the
line item Acquisition related charges on the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. The acquisition was
funded from the proceeds of the Companys credit facilities
entered into in connection with the acquisition. See
Note 13 for a description of the acquisition financing.
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the
consolidated information of the Company as if the business
combination had occurred at the beginning of each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma nine months
|
|
|
|
ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
360,348
|
|
|
$
|
402,215
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
(Basic)
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
(Diluted)
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
These amounts have been calculated after applying the
Companys accounting policies and adjusting the results of
Spheris and SIPL to reflect the additional amortization of
intangibles that would have been charged assuming the fair value
adjustments to tangible and intangible assets had been applied
from the beginning of the period being reported on, and the
additional interest expense assuming the acquisition related
debt had been incurred at the beginning of the period being
reported on, excluding the acquisition costs and including the
related tax effects. The acquired business contributed net
revenues of $58,200 for the period April 22, 2010 to
September 30, 2010.
The net income for the purpose of the basic net income per share
is adjusted for the amounts payable to the Companys
majority shareholder.
The following table summarizes the consideration transferred by
the Company to acquire the assets of Spheris and stock of SIPL,
and the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the acquisition date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid
|
|
$
|
98,834
|
|
Fair value of unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Spheris net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
22,407
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
9,133
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Developed technology (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
Customer relationships (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
Trademarks and trade names (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
44,917
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(20,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The related amortization period is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
period
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
9 years
|
Customer relationships
|
|
7-9 years
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
4 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
Indefinite
|
The amounts and lives of the identified intangibles other than
goodwill were valued at fair value by the Company. In preparing
fair value, the Company considered the report of an independent
valuation firm. The goodwill is attributable to the workforce of
the acquired business and the significant synergies expected to
arise after the Companys acquisition of Spheris. The
goodwill and intangible assets are deductible for tax purposes.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
There is a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the nature
of the inputs used to develop the fair value measures. This is
an exit price concept for the valuation of the asset or
liability. In addition, market participants are assumed to be
unrelated buyers and sellers in the principal or the most
advantageous market for the asset or liability. Fair value
measurements for an asset assume the highest and best use by
these market participants. Many of these fair value measurements
can be highly subjective and it is also possible that other
professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts
and circumstances, could develop and support a range of
alternative estimated amounts.
Total acquisition-related transaction costs incurred by the
Company are expensed in the periods in which the costs are
incurred. Acquisition-related transaction costs (such as
advisory, legal, valuation and other professional fees) are not
included as components of consideration transferred but are
accounted for as expenses in the periods in which the costs are
incurred. External costs incurred to acquire the business, and
incremental direct integration costs, have been included in the
line item Acquisition related charges on the Companys
consolidated statement of operations.
F-29
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Investments in
affiliated companies
|
A-Life Medical
Inc. (A-Life)
As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, the
Company had an investment of $7,381 and $9,996, respectively, in
A-Life, a privately held entity which provides advanced natural
language processing technology for the medical industry,
representing 32% of the outstanding ownership. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, the investment increased by $2,015
related to the Companys share of A-Lifes net income,
primarily related to a gain resulting from an acquisition,
additional cash investments in A-Life of $852 offset by $252 for
a dilution which was recorded in equity in the consolidated
balance sheet.
The table below represents the carrying value of the investment
and the share in net assets in A-Life and other equity
investments as of December 31, 2009, which is recorded in
Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-Life
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
7,263
|
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
|
$
|
7,695
|
|
Share in income
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
7,776
|
|
Additional cash investments
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
Share in income
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
Dilution
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
9,996
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
10,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 21 for subsequent events.
|
|
12.
|
Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Customer accommodations
|
|
$
|
12,055
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
19,647
|
|
|
|
18,168
|
|
|
|
26,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
31,702
|
|
|
$
|
29,803
|
|
|
$
|
36,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2003, one of the employees of MedQuist raised
allegations that it had engaged in improper billing practices.
In response, the board of directors of MedQuist undertook an
independent review of these allegations (Review). In response to
MedQuists customers concern over its public disclosure of
the certain findings from the Review, it took action in the
fourth quarter of 2005 to avoid unnecessary litigation, which
preserved and solidified its customer business relationships by
offering a financial accommodation to certain of its customers.
In connection with MedQuists decision to offer financial
accommodations to certain of its customers (Accommodation
Customers), MedQuist analyzed its historical billing information
and the available report level data (Management Billing
Assessment) to develop individualized accommodation offers to be
made to accommodate customers (Accommodation Analysis). Based on
the Accommodation Analysis, MedQuist board of directors
authorized management to make cash or credit accommodation
offers to Accommodation Customers in the aggregate amount of
$75,818. By accepting MedQuists accommodation offer, the
customer agreed, among
F-30
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
other things, to release MedQuist from any and all claims and
liability regarding the billing related issues. MedQuist is
unable to predict how many customers, if any, may accept the
outstanding accommodation offers on the terms proposed by it,
nor it is able to predict the timing of the acceptance (or
rejection) of any outstanding accommodation offers. Until any
offers are accepted, it may withdraw or modify the terms of the
accommodation program or any outstanding offers at any time. In
addition, MedQuist is unable to predict how many future offers,
if made, will be accepted on the terms proposed by it. MedQuist
regularly evaluates whether to proceed with, modify or withdraw
the accommodation program or any outstanding offers.
The following is a summary of the financial statement activity
related to the customer accommodation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
12,206
|
|
|
$
|
12,055
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
Payments and other adjustments
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(1,248
|
)
|
Credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
12,055
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For each period presented, $1,100 of the balance is related to
the Kaiser litigation as discussed in Note 14.
Current portion of debt consisted of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Short term credit facilities
|
|
$
|
4,396
|
|
|
$
|
4,769
|
|
|
$
|
6,522
|
|
Current portion of long term borrowings
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
26,724
|
|
Bridge note
|
|
|
26,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
$
|
33,497
|
|
|
$
|
6,207
|
|
|
$
|
36,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debt consisted of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
|
$
|
3,134
|
|
|
$
|
4,534
|
|
Bridge note
|
|
|
26,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans from banks
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
6% Convertible note
|
|
|
90,935
|
|
|
|
96,419
|
|
|
|
96,419
|
|
Term loan due from 2010 to 2012, with interest at Prime plus
3.25% (Spheris Acquisition debt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Revolving loan with interest at Prime plus 3% with a scheduled
termination date of April 22, 2014 (Spheris acquisition
debt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Subordinated promissory note, due in 2015 with varying interest
rates (Spheris Acquisition debt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,898
|
|
Short-term credit facilities
|
|
|
4,396
|
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
126,008
|
|
|
|
107,340
|
|
|
|
204,172
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
33,497
|
|
|
|
6,207
|
|
|
|
36,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
92,511
|
|
|
$
|
101,133
|
|
|
$
|
167,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire amount of the Spheris Acquisition debt and the 6%
Convertible Note were refinanced in October 2010; see
Note 21, Subsequent Events.
Credit
facilities
Line of
credit K Bank
The Company has a revolving line of credit (LOC)
from K Bank. Subject to certain terms and conditions of the
agreement with K Bank, the agreement provides a revolving line
of credit of a maximum of $5,750. The amount available for
borrowing is based on eligible accounts receivable. The rate of
interest on this note is Prime + 1% with a floor of 6%. The note
is payable on demand and is renewed annually. Under the
agreement, certain subsidiaries of the Company assigned all
their accounts receivable to K Bank with full recourse. The
agreement contains certain covenants, which require the
borrowers to notify the Bank of the important developments,
including raising additional equity, borrowings, acquisition
etc. The agreement does not contain any financial covenants. For
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010 interest
expense of $438, $273, $266, $198 and $217 respectively, was
recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The
amount outstanding as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and
September 30, 2010 was $2,688, $3,343, and $2,998
respectively. The remaining available amount under the line of
credit was $3,062, $2,407, and $2,752 as of December 31,
2008, 2009, and as of September 30, 2010, respectively.
Credit
agreement ICICI Bank
The Company has a Credit Arrangement with ICICI Bank, Mumbai,
India of $2,772, at interest rates ranging from LIBOR + 2.5% and
15.5%, respectively, which is secured by CBay Indias
current assets and fixed assets. The amount outstanding as of
December 31, 2008, 2009, and September 30, 2010 was
$1,712, $1,426, and $341, respectively. For the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2010 interest expense of $36,
$98, $205, $121 and $81, respectively, was recorded in interest
expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
F-32
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Credit
Agreement IndusInd Bank
The Company has a Credit Arrangement with IndusInd Bank, Mumbai,
India of $3,227, at an interest rate of LIBOR + 3%,
respectively, which is secured by current assets and fixed
assets of CBay Systems (India) Private Limited (CBay
India) a 100% subsidiary of the Company. The amount
outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and September 30,
2010 was $0 and $3,160, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 interest expense of $0 and $38,
respectively, was recorded in interest expense in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Line of
Credit Wells Fargo
In August 2009, MedQuist entered into a five-year
$25 million revolving credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC. Subject to certain
terms and conditions, the Credit Agreement provides committed
revolving funding through August 2014 and includes an option
whereby MedQuist can increase its maximum credit to
$40 million. The amount available for borrowings is based
upon a percentage of eligible accounts receivable. Under the
agreement, there are reserves established which limit the
amounts that can be available. At December 31, 2009,
$21.0 million was available under the Credit Agreement. The
Credit Agreement is a working capital facility that may be used
for general corporate purposes. The Credit Agreement enables
MedQuist to borrow funds in U.S. dollars, at variable
interest rates. The Credit Agreement provides the lender a
security interest in and against significantly all of our
assets. Under the Credit Agreement, MedQuist agreed to certain
covenants customarily found in such agreements including, but
not limited to, financial covenants requiring us to maintain
certain minimum levels of EBITDA and a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio. At December 31, 2009, MedQuist was in
compliance with the financial covenants of the agreement. At
December 31, 2009 there were no borrowings outstanding
under the Credit Agreement.
Bridge
Note
The Bridge Note carried an interest rate of 1.67% per annum from
August 6, 2008 to November 4, 2008. This note was
renewed at an interest rate of 6% per annum until
February 4, 2009 and at a rate of 10% per annum thereafter.
The note was due on May 4, 2009, but was further extended
to September 30, 2009 on the same terms. During September
2009, the Company repaid the Bridge Note along with accrued
interest amounting to $28,352. The Company has no future
obligations under the Bridge Note.
6% Convertible
Note
The Company issued a 6% Convertible Note in connection with
the acquisition of MedQuist which is due August 5, 2015.
Any portion of the note can be converted at the option of
Philips (the holder) into common stock of the
Company, anytime after November 4, 2008. The conversion
rate for this purpose shall be $1 of the principal amount equals
0.1344 shares of common stock of the Company. If this
option is exercised by the holder, 12,959 shares of common
stock will become issuable. The Company has the option to redeem
this note or any portion thereof after August 6, 2011 at a
premium of 8%, after August 6, 2012 at a premium of 3%,
and, after August 6, 2013, at par.
Further, after August 6, 2012, the holders representing at
least 50% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes
outstanding have a collective one time right to require the
Company to repurchase for cash a portion of the notes which has
not been previously purchased or redeemed by the Company. Also,
if a change of control event occurs at any time prior to the
maturity and if the note has not been purchased or redeemed by
the Company, it shall be repurchased by the Company, at the
option of the holder. The Company will evaluate the
classification of the note at each reporting date considering
the early redemption option available to the Company or the one
time repurchase right available to the holder.
F-33
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In March and August 2009, the Company exercised its interest on
this convertible note from August 6, 2008 to August 5,
2009 into additional convertible notes aggregating to $5,484
with the same terms and conditions as the original note.
For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, interest expense
accrued on the note was $2,212, $5,447 and $4,339, respectively.
Term and
equipment loans
The Company has term loans payable to four banks which carry
interest rates ranging from 6.5% to 16% per annum and are
repayable monthly through August 2013. One loan contains certain
non-financial covenants and limits borrowings for one of the
Companys subsidiaries and the Company is in compliance
with these covenants. The Company has a working capital term
loan which is a Rupee denominated loan from EXIM Bank. This loan
is repayable in full in June 2011 and carries an interest rate
of 12%. This loan is secured by certain assets of one of the
Companys subsidiaries.
The Company has various equipment and vehicle loans that carry
interest rates ranging from 10% to 15% per annum and are
repayable monthly through 2013. These loans are secured by the
related equipment and vehicles.
Acquisition
debt
In connection with the Acquisition, MedQuist Transcriptions,
Ltd. a subsidiary of MedQuist, (MedQuist
Transcriptions), and certain other subsidiaries of
MedQuist (collectively, the Loan Parties) entered
into a Credit Agreement (the GE Credit Agreement)
with General Electric Capital Corporation, CapitalSource Bank,
and Fifth Third Bank. The GE Credit Agreement provides for up to
$100.0 million in senior secured credit facilities,
consisting of a $50.0 million term loan, and a revolving
credit facility of up to $50.0 million. The credit
facilities are secured by a first priority lien on substantially
all of the property of the Loan Parties. The term loan is
repayable in equal quarterly installments of $5.0 million
beginning October 1, 2010, with the balance payable
2.5 years from the date of closing. The Term Loan maturity
date is the earlier of October 22, 2012 or the date on
which the Companys 6% Convertible note is repaid or
otherwise becomes due and payable. Borrowings under the
revolving credit facility may be made from time to time, subject
to availability under such facility, until the fourth
anniversary of the closing date. Amounts borrowed under the GE
Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate selected by MedQuist
Transcriptions equal to the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate
(each as defined in the GE Credit Agreement) plus a margin, all
as more fully set forth in the GE Credit Agreement. At
September 30, 2010, the revolving credit facility and the
term loan had interest rates of 6.25% and 6.75%, respectively.
The GE Credit Agreement contains customary covenants, including
covenants relating to reporting and notification, payment of
indebtedness, taxes and other obligations, and compliance with
applicable laws. There are also financial covenants, which
include a Minimum Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, and
a Maximum Consolidated Senior Leverage Ratio and a Maximum
Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio and a Minimum Liquidity, each
as defined In the GE Credit Agreement. The GE Credit Agreement
also imposes certain customary limitations and requirements with
respect to the incurrence of indebtedness and liens,
investments, mergers, acquisitions and dispositions of assets.
Amounts due under the GE Credit Agreement may be accelerated
upon an Event of Default (as defined in the GE Credit
Agreement), including failure to comply with obligations under
the credit agreement, bankruptcy or insolvency, and termination
of certain material agreements. The Company will continue to
evaluate the classification of the term loan at each reporting
date.
The Company incurred $6.1 million in costs with the GE
Credit Agreement which are included in Other current assets and
Other assets. These costs associated with debt incurred in
connection with the Acquisition will be amortized as additional
interest expense over the life of the underlying debt
instruments.
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are limited to
the lesser of 85% of Eligible Receivables or the aggregate
Revolving Credit Commitments, as defined in the credit facility.
F-34
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The GE Credit Agreement also contains subjective acceleration
clauses and a springing lock box arrangement under which
MedQuist retains control and dominion over cash receipts unless
there is an Event of Default or Excess Availability is less than
20% of the aggregate Revolving Credit Commitments, as defined in
the GE Credit Agreement. Pursuant to these provisions, MedQuist
elected to make a payment of $5 million in July 2010 to
maintain cash dominion and prevent enactment of the springing
lock box provisions. The Company believes this payment will be
sufficient to avoid enactment of the springing lock box in
future periods. The Company also believes the probability of
default under the agreement within the next 12 months to be
remote.
The GE Credit Agreement also contains excess cash flow
repayments provisions that require 25% of Excess Cash Flows, as
defined in the agreement, to be remitted to the lenders within
95 days after year-end. The Company currently estimates
that the amount of repayments that would be due during April
2011 at approximately $10 million. Such amount is currently
classified as current. Actual payments, if any, may differ from
this estimate.
Total Current maturities under the GE Credit Agreement consists
of (a) $10 million estimated for excess cash flow
sweeps in April 2011, and (b) $15 million of
contractual maturities of the term loan obligations.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company believes that it is
in compliance with the covenants of the GE Credit Agreement.
As discussed in Note 21 the Company paid off all amounts
outstanding plus accrued interest under the GE Credit Agreement,
thus terminating the GE Credit Agreement.
When the Company entered into the GE Credit Agreement, the
five-year $25.0 million revolving credit agreement with
Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC (the Wells Credit
Agreement) that it entered into on August 31, 2009
was terminated. No borrowings were ever made under the Wells
Credit Agreement. In the nine month period ended
September 30, 2010 the Company wrote off deferred financing
fees of $1.1 million and incurred termination fees of
$0.6 million in connection with the termination of this
facility. Such costs are included in Interest Expense on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company entered into a
subordinated promissory note with Spheris, Inc. (the
Subordinated Promissory Note). The loan matures in
five years from the date of the Acquisition. The face amount of
the Subordinated Promissory Note totals $17.5 million with
provisions for prepayment at discounted amounts, ranging from
77.5% of the principal if paid within six months, 87.5% from six
to nine months, 97.5% from nine to twelve months, 102.0% by year
two, 101.0% by year three and 100.0% thereafter. For purposes of
the purchase price allocation, the note is discounted at 77.5%
of the principal ($13.6 million). This note was a non-cash
transaction. The fair value of the note was determined through
the use of a Monte Carlo model which is Level 3 in the Fair
Value hierarchy based upon significant unobservable inputs.
The Subordinated Promissory Note bears interest at 8.0% for the
first six months, 9.0% from six to nine months, and 12.5%
thereafter of which 2.5% may be paid by increasing the principal
amount. Payments of interest are made semi-annually on each six
month anniversary of the Acquisition. For financial statement
purposes the interest has been calculated using the average
interest rates over the term of the Subordinated Promissory Note.
F-35
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Future minimum principal payments on long term debt as of
September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (represent payments for period October 1,
2010 December 31, 2010)
|
|
$
|
13,090
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23,467
|
|
2012
|
|
|
117,292
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
2014
|
|
|
35,278
|
|
2015
|
|
|
13,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
204,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded interest expense of $1,513, $3,416, $8,387,
$6,885 and $8,985 during the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008, 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2010, respectively, on these borrowings.
See Note 21 for subsequent events.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Customer
litigation
Kaiser
litigation
On June 6, 2008, plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,
Inc. and affiliates (collectively, Kaiser) filed suit against
MedQuist in the Superior Court of the State of California
related to its billing practices.
In July 2010, the parties reached a settlement of the litigation
whereby the Company made a payment of $2,000 to resolve all of
Kaisers claims. Neither MedQuist, nor Kaiser, admitted to
any liability or wrongdoing in connection with the settlement.
Of this amount, $1,100 was included in Accrued expenses and
other current liabilities at December 31, 2009 and the
Company expensed an additional $900 in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Kahn putative
class action
This action was initiated on January 22, 2008, when one of
MedQuists shareholders filed a shareholder putative class
action lawsuit against MedQuist, Philips, MedQuists former
majority shareholder, and four of its former directors. The
action was venued in the Superior court of New Jersey, Chancery
Division, Burlington County. Thereafter on June 12, 2008,
plaintiff filed an amended class action complaint against
MedQuist, eight of its former directors, and Philips. In the
amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that its then current and
former directors breached their fiduciary duties of good faith,
fair dealing, loyalty, and due care by not providing its public
shareholders with the opportunity to decide whether they wanted
to participate in a share purchase offer with non-party MedQuist
Holdings Inc. The share purchase offer would have allowed the
public shareholders to sell their shares of MedQuists
common stock for an amount above market price. Plaintiff further
alleged that MedQuist Holdings Inc. made the share purchase
offer to Philips and that Philips breached its fiduciary duties
by accepting MedQuist Holdings Inc.s offer. Based on these
allegations, plaintiff sought declaratory, injunctive, and
monetary relief from all defendants. Plaintiff claimed that
MedQuist was only named as a party to the litigation for
purposes of injunctive relief.
On November 21, 2008, the Court dismissed plaintiffs
amended class action complaint with prejudice. Thereafter, on
July 1, 2010, the New Jersey Appellate Division entered an
Order and Opinion that affirmed the dismissal of the claims
against MedQuist and two of the MedQuist director defendants.
The Appellate Division
F-36
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
reversed the dismissal of the claims against the remaining
defendants, Philips and certain of its former directors, and
remanded those claims back to the Chancery Division. MedQuist is
no longer a defendant in this matter, but it is monitoring the
matter since it involves claims against its former directors.
Reseller
arbitration demand
On October 1, 2007, MedQuist received from counsel to nine
current and former resellers of MedQuists products
(Claimants), a copy of an arbitration demand filed by the
Claimants, initiating an arbitration proceeding.
On March 31, 2010, the parties entered into a Settlement
Agreement and Release pursuant to which MedQuist paid the
Claimants $500 on April 1, 2010 to resolve all claims.
Under the Settlement Agreement and Release, (i) the parties
exchanged mutual releases, (ii) the arbitration and related
state court litigation were dismissed with prejudice and
(iii) MedQuist did not admit to any liability or
wrongdoing. The Company accrued the entire amount of this
settlement as of December 31, 2009.
SEC investigation
of former MedQuist officer
With respect to MedQuists historical billing practices,
the SEC is pursuing civil litigation against its former chief
financial officer, whose employment with MedQuist ended in July
2004. Pursuant to its bylaws, MedQuist has been providing
indemnification for the legal fees for its former chief
financial officer.
Exchange
transactions
On September 30, 2010, the Company entered into a
definitive agreement with certain noncontrolling stockholders of
approximately 12.7% of MedQuists common stock whereby the
Company agreed to exchange shares of its common stock for shares
of MedQuist common stock, subject to a defined exchange ratio
(the Private Exchange). The consummation of this
agreement is subject to various conditions.
On October 18, 2010, the Company filed a registration
statement with the SEC on
Form S-4
(the Registered Exchange Offer) offering those
noncontrolling MedQuist stockholders who did not participate in
the Private Exchange shares of our common stock in exchange for
their MedQuist shares. Assuming the Private Exchange is
consummated, a full exchange in the Registered Exchange Offer
would increase our ownership in MedQuist from 82.2% to 100.0%.
We can give no assurance as to the level of participation in the
Registered Exchange Offer.
2007 Equity
incentive plan (the EI Plan)
The EI Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors (the
Board) of the Company on June 12, 2007. The EI
Plan is administered and operated by the Board in consultation
with the Remuneration Committee of the Board.
The EI Plan provides a framework for the grant of equity and
other equity related incentives to directors, officers,
consultants and other employees of the Company in different
jurisdictions. Awards may be in the form of share options,
including incentive stock options (which comply with
U.S. tax requirements), share appreciation rights,
restricted shares, restricted stock units and other share, share
based or cash awards.
In accordance with the EI Plan, share options for 211 ordinary
shares were granted by the Board on June 12, 2007, at a
price of $7.88. The options were granted to members of the
senior management and key employees of the Company.
In cases where the options granted to any option holder were
less than 4, such options vested in full on the date the shares
of the Company were admitted on AIM. The shares of the Company
were admitted to trading on AIM on June 18, 2007.
F-37
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Where options granted to any option holder were equal to or more
than 4, such options vested as follows 50% on the
date of grant, 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant
and the balance on the second anniversary of the date of grant.
The options are exercisable no later than 10 years from the
date of grant subject to vesting as stated above. However, the
options are subject to early exercise upon a change in control
of the Company, as defined. The options shall lapse at the end
of the option period. Additionally, the options of any option
holder, would lapse on the expiry of three months from the date
of cessation of employment or services to the Company for cause
(unless otherwise determined by the Board). However, if such
option holder leaves otherwise than for cause (as defined in the
option agreement), the option holder would be entitled to
exercise their options within a period of six months from the
date of cessation of employment or service. All share based
employee compensation is settled in equity. The Company has no
legal or constructive obligation to repurchase or cash settle
the options.
Additionally, on June 12, 2007, the board of directors of
the Company approved the grant of 674 options to certain
directors and senior management personnel of the Company. The
options were granted in 3 Tranches in the amounts of 337
options, 225 options and 112 options for Tranche 1,
Tranche 2 and Tranche 3, respectively. The exercise
price for the options in Tranche 1 was $5.85 per share and
for the options in Tranche 2 it was $7.88. Options in
Tranche 1 and 2 were exercisable until December 31,
2008 and all such options expired unexercised on
December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009,
there are 112 and 90, respectively, of outstanding options in
Tranche 3, of which all are exercisable and 23 were
forfeited in 2009.
Due to change in control on August 6, 2008, all unvested
options vested immediately on that date, which resulted in a
share based compensation expense of $18.
In April 2009, the board of directors of the Company approved
the key terms of an option award to certain management employees
for the completion of acquisition of MedQuist and 2,208 options
were granted at an exercise price of £3.15 per share (or
$4.64 per share based on the exchange rate on the grant date).
The options vest in a graded manner over a period ending on
August 6, 2011, with one third of the options vesting on
August 6, 2009 and one sixth of the options vesting every
six months thereafter. These options expire on August 6,
2018.
F-38
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Share options and weighted average exercise price are as follows
for the reporting periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
exercise price
(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
7.11
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
$
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Weighted average exercise prices are converted to
U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate at the end of the
reporting period.
|
Options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest as
of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
remaining contract
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
value as of
|
|
|
options
|
|
exercise price in $
|
|
term (in years)
|
|
value
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Vested and exercisable at year end
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Expected to vest
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
8.29
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
The Company recognized $664 as compensation cost during the
period in respect of these options. The fair values of these
options have been calculated using a Black Scholes model using
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
4.8 5.8 years
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
34%-35
|
%
|
The unamortized cost of the options as of December 31, 2009
was $333. The total fair value of the shares vested during
December 31, 2009 was $664. The weighted average grant date
fair values of options granted during the year ended
December 31, 2009 was $0.10. As of December 31, 2009,
there were 1,119 additional options available for grant under
the EI Plan.
F-39
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
MedQuist Stock
option plan
MedQuist stock option plans provide for the granting of options
to purchase shares of common stock to eligible employees
(including officers) as well as to our non-employee directors.
Options may be issued with the exercise prices equal to the fair
market value of the common stock on the date of grant or at a
price determined by a committee of our board of directors. Stock
options vest and are exercisable over periods determined by the
committee, generally five years, and expire no more than
10 years after the grant.
In July 2004, the board of directors of MedQuist affirmed its
June 2004 decision to indefinitely suspend the exercise and
future grant of options under our stock option plans. Ten former
executives separated from MedQuist in 2005 and 2004.
Notwithstanding the suspension, to the extent such executives
held options that were vested as of their resignation date, such
options remained exercisable for the post-termination period,
generally 90 days, commencing on the date that the
suspension was lifted for the exercise of options. There were
704 shares that qualified for this post-termination
exercise period. The suspension was lifted on October 4,
2007 and all but 154 of these options terminated on
February 1, 2008. In July 2008, 12 of the 154 options were
exercised for an aggregate exercise amount of $68. As of
December 31, 2009 there are no options outstanding related
to the 10 former executives.
Information with respect to MedQuists common stock options
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
subject to
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
life in
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2007
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
$
|
32.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
$
|
23.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
27.47
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference
between the closing stock price on the last trading day of 2009
and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
options. As of December 31, 2009, no options were in the
money.
There were no options granted or exercised in 2009. There were
296 options granted and 12 options exercised in 2008. MedQuist
estimated fair value for the option grant by applying the Black-
Scholes option pricing valuation
F-40
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
model. The application of this model involves assumptions that
are judgmental and sensitive in the determination of
compensation expense. The key assumptions used in determining
the fair value of the options were:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
54.5
|
%
|
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
Significant assumptions required to estimate the fair value of
stock options include the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expected term: The SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No 107
Simplified method has been used to determine a
weighted average expected term of options granted.
|
|
n
|
Expected volatility: We have estimated expected volatility based
on the historical stock price volatility of a company of similar
publicly traded companies. We believe that our historical
volatility is not indicative of future volatility.
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options modified
in the first quarter of 2009 was $1.97 per share.
A summary of outstanding and exercisable options as of
December 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise price
|
|
shares
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
$2.71-$10.00
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
$10.01-$20.00
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
17.13
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
$
|
17.13
|
|
$20.01-$30.00
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
26.41
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
26.41
|
|
$30.01-$40.00
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
32.29
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
32.29
|
|
$40.01-$70.00
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
59.13
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
59.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
27.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 296 and 0 options granted during 2008 and 2009. There
were 0 options exercised in 2008 and 2009.
The total fair value of shares vested during 2009 was $193.
As of December 31, 2009, there were 969 additional options
available for grant under MedQuists stock option plans.
On August 27, 2009, MedQuist board of directors, upon the
recommendation of its compensation committee, approved the
MedQuist Inc, Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan is
designed to encourage and reward the creation of long-term
equity value by certain members of its senior management team.
The executive and key employees will be selected by the
compensation committee and will be eligible to participate in
the Incentive Plan.
During the third quarter of 2010, the compensation committee of
MedQuist issued awards under the Long Term Incentive Plan, the
terms and conditions of which will be determined in the future
under the terms of the plan.
F-41
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Other
plan
A subsidiary of the Company has granted stock options under
non-qualified stock option agreements to certain of the
subsidiary employees, officers and directors. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2009, there are 72 and 42,
respectively, of outstanding options, of which 36 and 34,
respectively, are exercisable. The weighted average exercise
price is $0.40 as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the
weighted average remaining contract term as of December 31,
2009 is 3.50 years and there is no unamortized compensation
expense.
Warrant
In March 2009, we issued a warrant to a consultant to purchase
82 ordinary shares of CBay. The warrant is exercisable for a
term of three years from the date of issuance at an exercise
price of £3.15 per share. The warrant is equity classified.
We calculated the fair value of the warrant to be
approximately $100 using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following inputs: exercise price of £3.15
per share, contractual life of 3 years, expected volatility
of 41.7%, dividend yield of 0% and expected risk free interest
rate of 3.0%.
Domestic refers to income taxes recorded on our operations in
the British Virgin Islands and foreign refers to income taxes
recorded on operations in the United States and India. The
sources of income (loss) before income taxes and the income tax
provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(775
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,510
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,421
|
)
|
|
|
(113,142
|
)
|
|
|
11,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
|
|
(113,917
|
)
|
|
|
8,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(6,432
|
)
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provisions (benefit)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(6,432
|
)
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) at
statutory federal income tax rate to the Companys income
tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) at statutory tax rate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(39,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,116
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,593
|
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Adjustments to tax reserves
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
Intercompany dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,049
|
)
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2008 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
52,665
|
|
|
$
|
54,734
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
2,526
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
8,884
|
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
Employee compensation and benefit plans
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accommodation
|
|
|
4,668
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
3,520
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
77,595
|
|
|
|
76,558
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(70,711
|
)
|
|
|
(71,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
6,884
|
|
|
|
5,375
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(5,109
|
)
|
|
|
(4,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(5,150
|
)
|
|
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
|
$
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Indian Income Tax Act, a substantial portion of the
profits of the Companys Indian operations is exempt from
Indian income tax. The Indian tax year ends on March 31.
This tax holiday is available for a period of ten consecutive
years beginning in the year in which the respective Indian
undertaking commenced operations. The tax holiday expires with
respect to the Companys Indian operations through the year
ended March 31, 2011. The aggregate effect on net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. of the tax holiday
were $575, $695 and $838 for the years ended 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively. Further, the per common share effect
F-43
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
of this exemption on net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc. was $0.05, for the years ended 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had federal net
operating loss carry forwards of approximately $130,000 which
will begin to expire in 2026. The Company had state net
operating losses of approximately $250,000 which will expire
from 2010 to 2029.
Utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards will be
subject to an annual limitation in future years as a result of
the change in ownership as defined by Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. The Group
performed an analysis on the annual limitation as a result of
the ownership change that occurred in 2008.
In assessing the future realization of deferred taxes, the
Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be
realized based on projections of our future taxable earnings.
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods
in which those temporary differences become deductible.
After consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it was more likely than not that a
majority of the deferred tax assets would not be realized. As of
December 31, 2009, this valuation allowance has increased
from $70,711 as of December 31, 2008 to $71,183.
Deferred tax assets were recognized to the extent that objective
positive evidence existed with respect to their future
utilization. The objective positive evidence included income
expected to be recognized due to the reversal of deferred tax
liabilities as of December 31, 2009. In analyzing deferred
tax liabilities as a source for potential income for purposes of
recognizing deferred tax assets, the deferred tax liabilities
related to excess book basis in goodwill over tax basis in
goodwill were considered a source of future income for
benefiting deferred tax assets with indefinite lives only due to
the indefinite life and uncertainty of reversal of these
liabilities during the same period as the non-indefinite life
deferred tax assets.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of
December 31, 2009 was $5,497 which includes $484 of accrued
interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits which we
recognize as a component of the provision for income taxes. Of
the $5,497 unrecognized tax benefits, $4,613 relates to tax
positions which if recognized would impact the effective tax
rate, not considering the impact of any valuation allowance. Of
the $4,613, $3,576 is attributable to uncertain tax positions
with respect to certain deferred tax assets which if recognized
would currently be offset by a full valuation allowance due to
the fact that at the current time it is more likely than not
that these assets would not be recognized due to a lack of
sufficient projected income in the future.
F-44
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following is a roll-forward of the changes in the Company
unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,090
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
62
|
|
Amount of decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits relating to
settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of
applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective
tax rate if recognized
|
|
$
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
5,013
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
Amount of decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits relating to
settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
9,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective
tax rate if recognized
|
|
$
|
9,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
2010
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A majority of the $5,146 increase to the reserve for uncertain
tax positions recorded during the period ended
September 30, 2010 relates to certain tax exposure items
acquired as a result of the Spheris Acquisition. As such, the
liability related to these amounts was accounted for as part of
the purchase price allocations and was not charged to income tax
expense.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, all U.S. states which require income tax
returns and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the nature of the
Companys operations, no state or foreign jurisdiction is
individually significant. With limited exceptions the Company is
no longer subject to examination by the U.S. federal or
states jurisdiction for years prior to 2007. The Internal
Revenue Service concluded a federal tax audit for MedQuist Inc
and its subsidiaries for the tax years 2003 through 2006 with no
material adjustments. However those years have not been audited
for the other members of the Company. The Company is no longer
subject to examination by the UK federal jurisdiction for years
prior to 2007. The Company does have various state tax audits
and appeals in process at any given time. As of
December 31, 2009, the Indian tax authorities have
concluded their tax audits for the tax years through
March 31, 2008 with no significant tax adjustments.
The Company anticipates decreases in unrecognized tax benefits
of approximately $126 related to state statutes of limitations
expiring during 2010. The Companys unrecognized tax
benefits are expected to change in 2010. The Company is
currently in the process of negotiating with certain
jurisdictions to resolve specific issues related to tax
positions taken in prior periods.
F-45
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
17.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
401(k) plans
of U.S. subsidiaries
MedQuist
401(k) plan
MedQuist maintains a tax-qualified retirement plan named the
MedQuist 401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan) that provides eligible
employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax
advantaged basis. MedQuist 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees
to contribute up to 25% of their annual eligible compensation on
a pre-tax basis, subject to applicable Internal Revenue Code
limits. Elective deferral contributions are allocated to each
participants individual account and are then invested in
selected investment alternatives according to the
participants directives. Employee elective deferrals are
100% vested at all times. MedQuist 401(k) Plan provides that it
may make a discretionary matching contribution to the
participants in the 401(k) Plan. MedQuist discretionary matching
contribution, if any, shall be in an amount not to exceed 100%
of the first 25% of a plan participants compensation
contributed as pre-tax contributions to the 401(k) Plan. In its
sole discretion, it may make discretionary matching
contributions on a quarterly or annual basis. Historically
MedQuist has matched 50% of each participants
contribution, up to a maximum of 5% of each participants
total annual compensation. Matching contributions are 33% vested
after one year of service, 67% vested after two years of service
and 100% vested after three years of service. MedQuist did not
match the employee contributions for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009.
401(k) plan of
other U.S. subsidiaries
The Company maintains tax qualified retirement plans for its
U.S. employees that provide eligible employees the
opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantage basis. The
plans allow for eligible employees to contribute a portion of
their annual eligible compensation on a pretax basis subject to
applicable internal revenue code limits. The Company may make
discretionary matching contributions to the participants
accounts in its sole discretion. The Company did not match
employee contributions for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009.
Executive
deferred compensation plan
MedQuist had established the MedQuist Inc. Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (EDCP) in 2001. The EDCP, which was
administered by the compensation committee of MedQuist board of
directors, allowed certain members of management and highly
compensated employees to defer a certain percentage of their
income. Participants were permitted to defer compensation into
an account in which proceeds were available either during or
after termination of employment.
In the third quarter of 2009 MedQuist terminated the plan and
distributed plan assets to participants, and liquidated the
remaining plan assets prior to December 31, 2009. As of
December 31, 2008 the value of the assets held, primarily
insurance contracts, managed and invested pursuant to the EDCP
was $787 and was included in other current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of
December 31, 2008 the deferred compensation liability
reflecting amounts due to employees was $237 and was included in
accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F-46
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
CBay India and
its Indian subsidiaries
Gratuity
In accordance with applicable Indian laws, CBay India and its
Indian subsidiaries provide for a defined benefit retirement
plan (the Gratuity Plan) covering eligible
employees. The Gratuity Plan provides for a lump sum payment to
vested employees on retirement, death, incapacitation or
termination of employment at an amount that is based on salary
and tenure of employment. Liabilities with regard to the
Gratuity Plan are determined by actuarial valuation. The
measurement date used to measure fair value of plan assets and
benefit obligations is December 31, 2009; however, the
Gratuity Plan is unfunded as of December 31, 2009.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2009 the projected benefit
obligation was $267 and $330, respectively. These amounts have
been included in other noncurrent liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets. The accumulated benefit obligation
was $143 and $211 as of December 31, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. Net periodic benefit cost under the Gratuity Plan
amounted to $44, $187 and $65 for 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
Other benefit
plans
CBay India and its Indian subsidiaries also have a defined
contribution plans that are largely governed by local statutory
laws and covers the eligible employees. These plans are funded
both by the employees and by the Company with an equal
contribution, primarily based on a specified percentage of the
employees basic salary. The total contribution to these
plans by the Company during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009 was $350, $413, and $565, respectively, and
the Company has no obligation beyond the amounts contributed.
|
|
18.
|
Related party
transactions
|
Transactions
with affiliates of the companys majority
shareholder
During the year ended December 31, 2008, an aggregate of
$8,000 was paid to two affiliates of the Companys majority
shareholder and to LBCCA for services in connection with the
equity subscription in the Company and the acquisition of
MedQuist. The Company also entered into an agreement with LBCCA
and SAC CBI II, an affiliate of its majority shareholder, in
August 2008. Pursuant to this agreement, the combined amounts
payable to SAC CBI II and LBCCA of $1,113 and $2,750 were
recorded for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and as of
September 30, 2010, $1,113 $2,185 and $2,850, respectively,
is accrued as a result of this agreement and is recorded in due
to related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.
On May 4, 2010, the audit committee of MedQuists
board of directors approved the payment of and the Company
expensed a $1,500 success-based fee to SAC PCG, an affiliate of
its majority shareholder, in connection with the Spheris
Acquisition.
On October 17, 2010, members of the Board unaffiliated with
SAC CBI, having evaluated the services provided and fees charged
for similar transactions, approved a payment of $5,000 to SAC
PCG, an affiliate of SAC CBI, for services rendered in
connection with the recapitalization transactions described in
Note 21. The payment is due upon the closing of the
Companys U.S. public offering of its common stock.
F-47
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Transactions
with an entity under common control
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 the
Company provided transcription services, software development,
customer relationship and other services to an entity in which
the Companys director exercised significant influence.
Such entity was an entity under common control until the
August 6, 2008 investment by the Companys current
majority shareholder. The amounts charged by the Company for
such services aggregated $9,156 and $633 respectively for 2007
and 2008. Additionally, the Company at various times prior to
August 6, 2008 made and received short-term advances to and
from the related party. During the year ended December 31,
2008, the Company redeemed mandatory redeemable preferred stock
previously issued to the related party. Also during the year
ended December 31, 2008, the Company accepted transfers of
certain assets as repayment for amounts owed it by this party.
The balance receivable from this entity of $760 as of
December 31, 2008 was not considered to be recoverable and
accordingly it was written off. There were no transactions with
this party during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Mirrus Systems
Inc.
Effective February 10, 2009 the former CEO and President of
Mirrus Systems Inc. (Mirrus) and former executive director on
the Board of the Company resigned from services with the
company. Under the terms of his settlement among other matters,
he transferred his holdings of approximately 13% in Mirrus to
the Company. As a result of the settlement, Mirrus is a
100% subsidiary of the Company. The difference between the
consideration paid and the carrying value of the non-controlling
interest in Mirrus acquired of $690 has been recorded as
additional paid in capital.
Transactions
with entities in which directors exercise significant
influence
The Company occupied property owned by a significant shareholder
and paid rent and service charges totaling $557, $429 and $0 for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. Effective August 6, 2008, this shareholder
ceased to be a significant shareholder. The Company also
occupies a property owned by a trust in which the President, CEO
and a director of one of its subsidiary, has an interest as a
sole trustee and owner of the trust. An amount of $59, $179 and
$181, was paid as rent for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, the
Company paid $240 and $113 to a Director to purchase the
noncontrolling interest in one of its subsidiaries. The Company
sold software solution services to a company in which a Director
exercises significant influence aggregating $923 and $471 for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Transactions
with affiliated companies
The Company purchased transcription services from an affiliated
Company during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009 aggregating $479, $601 and $819, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2009, $38 and $222 is receivable from
this company. During 2008, the Company made an additional equity
investment in this company amounting to $116.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, the
Company purchased certain services of $162 and $365,
respectively, from an affiliated company.
|
|
19.
|
Financial
instruments
|
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the
provisions for fair value accounting for financial assets and
financial liabilities. This did not have a material impact on
the Companys financial position, results of operations
F-48
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
and cash flows. The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value into three broad categories.
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability
to access. Level 2: Observable market based inputs or
unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data such as
quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Level 3:
Inputs are unobservable data points that are not corroborated by
market data. At December 31, 2008, the Company held one
financial asset, Executive Deferred Compensation Plan,
Note 17, assets (EDCP) included in other current assets.
The Company measured the fair value of our EDCP on a recurring
basis using Level 2 (significant other observable) inputs.
In the third quarter of 2009 the Company terminated the plan and
distributed plan assets to participants and liquidated the
remaining plan assets. Accordingly there were no financial
instruments as defined as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
20.
|
Quarterly
financial information (unaudited)
|
The following table sets forth selected quarterly consolidated
financial information for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2009. The operating results for any given quarter are not
necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
4th Quarter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
17,224
|
|
|
$
|
17,896
|
|
|
$
|
64,338
|
|
|
$
|
94,215
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
8,046
|
|
|
$
|
9,157
|
|
|
$
|
19,557
|
|
|
$
|
31,839
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
978
|
|
|
$
|
(10,087
|
) (a)
|
|
$
|
(105,057
|
) (b)
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.06
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.06
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
26,666
|
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
14,482
|
|
|
|
26,666
|
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
94,669
|
|
|
$
|
93,871
|
|
|
$
|
93,289
|
|
|
$
|
89,939
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
32,566
|
|
|
$
|
34,220
|
|
|
$
|
32,119
|
|
|
$
|
33,314
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(3,195
|
) (c)
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
2,539
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
(d)
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,873
|
|
|
|
35,013
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,873
|
|
|
|
35,013
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes expenses of $5,622 for
management bonus and other legal expenses related to acquisition
of MedQuist recorded in selling, general and administrative
expense, and include $3,482 recorded in cost of legal
proceedings and settlements related to settlement of all claims
related to the DOJ investigation.
|
(b)
|
Includes $98,972 for goodwill
impairment charge.
|
(c)
|
Includes $5,950 recorded in cost of
legal proceedings and settlements related to the settlement of
all claims related to the Anthurium patent litigation settlement.
|
(d)
|
Includes $500 recorded in cost of
legal proceedings and settlements related to the settlement of
all claims related to the reseller arbitration settlement.
|
(e)
|
The sum of quarterly net income
(loss) per share may differ from the full year amount due to the
change in the number of shares outstanding during the year.
|
F-49
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
21.
|
Subsequent events
(unaudited)
|
Recapitalization
transactions, sale of A-Life and sale of PFS
Recapitalization
transactions
On October 1, 2010, the Company entered into a senior
secured credit facility, or the Senior Secured Credit Facility,
with certain lenders and General Electric Capital Corporation,
as Administrative Agent. The Senior Secured Credit Facility
contains a number of significant covenants and consists of
$225,000 in senior secured credit facilities comprised of:
|
|
|
|
i)
|
a $200,000 term loan, advanced in one draw on October 14,
2010 (the Closing Date), with a term of five years, repayable in
equal quarterly installments of $5,000, commencing on the first
day of the first fiscal quarter beginning after the Closing
Date, with the balance payable at maturity; and
|
|
|
ii)
|
a $25,000 revolving credit facility under which borrowings may
be made from time to time during the period from the Closing
Date until the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date. The
revolving facility includes a $5,000
letter-of-credit
sub-facility
and a $5,000 swing line loan
sub-facility.
|
The borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
co-borrowers option, either (a) a base rate
determined by reference to the highest of (1) the rate last
quoted by the Wall Street Journal as the Prime Rate
in the United States, (2) the federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1% and (3) the LIBOR rate for a one-month interest
period plus 1.00% or (b) the higher of (1) a LIBOR
rate determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits
in the currency of such borrowing for the interest period
relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs
and (2) 1.75%. The applicable margin is 4.50% with respect
to base rate borrowings and 5.50% with respect to LIBOR
borrowings.
The loans are secured by substantially all of the Companys
assets and are guaranteed by the Company. The agreements contain
customary covenants, including reporting and notification. The
financial covenants include a Senior Leverage Ratio, Total
Leverage Ratio, and an Interest Coverage Ratio. As of
September 30, 2010 the Company believes that it was in
compliance with its covenants.
In addition to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the Company
issued $85,000 aggregate principal amount of 13% senior
subordinated notes due 2016, or the Senior Subordinated Notes,
pursuant to a purchase agreement. Interest on the notes is
payable in quarterly installments at the issuers option at
either (i) 13% in cash or (ii) 12% in cash payment
plus 2% in the form of additional senior subordinated notes. The
Senior Subordinated Notes are non-callable for two years after
the closing date after which they are redeemable at 105.0%
declining ratably by 1.0% until four years after the closing
date. The Senior Subordinated Notes contain a number of
significant covenants that, among other things, restrict the
Companys ability to dispose of assets, repay other
indebtedness, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends,
prepay subordinated indebtedness, incur liens, make capital
expenditures, investments or acquisitions, engage in mergers of
consolidations, engage in certain types of transactions with
affiliates and otherwise restrict the Companys activities.
Proceeds from the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes were used to repay $80,000 of the
Companys indebtedness under the GE Credit Agreement plus
interest, to repay $13,900 indebtedness under the Subordinated
Promissory Note plus interest, to repay $104,100 of indebtedness
under the Convertible Note including an early redemption premium
of $7,700 plus accrued interest, and to pay a $53,900 special
cash dividend to the noncontrolling stockholders of MedQuist
Inc. The Company expensed $6,200 of debt issuance costs related
to the Senior Secured Credit Facility upon the closing of the
Companys new credit facilities in October 2010.
The Company, on October 14, 2010 repaid the 6% convertible
note to Philips with accrued interest at a redemption price of
108%, see Note 13.
F-50
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The effects on the Companys capital structure are
estimated to impact the Companys financial position as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
Pro forma as
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
refinancing
|
|
|
of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
and dividend
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long term debt and long term debt
|
|
$
|
204,172
|
|
|
$
|
90,949
|
|
|
$
|
295,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medquist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.10 par value; authorized
300,000 shares; 35,158 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
$
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,516
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
149,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,100
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(109,261
|
)
|
|
|
(13,900
|
)
|
|
|
(123,161
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
42,970
|
|
|
|
(13,900
|
)
|
|
|
29,070
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
40,598
|
|
|
|
(53,913
|
)
|
|
|
(13,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
83,568
|
|
|
$
|
(67,813
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of
A-Life
In September 2010, an Agreement and Plan of Merger was executed
by A-Life to merge A-Life with Ingenix. The sale was completed
on October 27, 2010. Under this transaction, the
Companys shares in A-Life were sold to Ingenix for cash
consideration of $23,600, of which $4,100 will be held in escrow
until March 2012. The Company received $19,500 of cash in
November 2010 in connection with the A-Life sale, and upon
receipt, the Company had over $40,000 in cash on-hand and
approximately $295,100 in debt.
Sale of
PFS
On December 31, 2010, the Company closed on the sale of the
assets and liabilities of its Patient Financial Services (PFS)
business, a non-strategic asset. The selling price was
$14.8 million, of which $13.5 million was received in
cash and $1.3 million is in the form of a note payable to
us. The note payable has a one-year term and bears interest at
5.25%. The gain on the sale of the discontinued operations is
expected to be approximately $0.7 million.
The following table sets forth the net revenues and the
components of income (loss) from discontinued operations for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
15,503
|
|
|
$
|
22,260
|
|
|
$
|
17,836
|
|
|
$
|
13,709
|
|
|
$
|
10,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
$
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. (formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited) and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
22.
|
Reverse Stock
Split Ratio
|
On December 17, 2010, the board of directors of the
Company, subject to stockholder approval, approved a reverse
stock split of the Companys common stock at a ratio of one
share for every 4.5 shares previously held. All shares of
common stock and per-share data included in the consolidated
financial statements reflects the reverse stock split.
On January 27, 2011, the Company changed its name from
CBaySystems Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc.,
redomiciled to a Delaware Corporation and authorized
300,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per
share and 25,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.10 per share. The stockholders approved the reverse
stock split on January 10, 2011, and it was effected on
January 27, 2011.
F-52
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of MedQuist Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MedQuist Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and other comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of MedQuist Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Notes 3 and 14 to the consolidated
financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, MedQuist
Inc. and subsidiaries adopted the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment.
As discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2007, MedQuist Inc. and
subsidiaries adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of
SFAS No. 109.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 17, 2008
F-53
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
353,005
|
|
|
$
|
358,091
|
|
|
$
|
340,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
315,399
|
|
|
|
280,273
|
|
|
|
260,879
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
54,558
|
|
|
|
53,675
|
|
|
|
62,288
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
|
13,219
|
|
|
|
13,695
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
17,099
|
|
|
|
11,802
|
|
|
|
10,988
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8,193
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
Cost of investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
|
|
34,127
|
|
|
|
13,001
|
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
Shareholder securities litigation settlement
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
450,315
|
|
|
|
381,241
|
|
|
|
362,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(97,310
|
)
|
|
|
(23,150
|
)
|
|
|
(21,858
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
|
|
7,628
|
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(90,870
|
)
|
|
|
(14,648
|
)
|
|
|
(12,867
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
20,762
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-54
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
175,412
|
|
|
$
|
161,582
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
54,778
|
|
|
|
48,725
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
|
|
219,042
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
20,969
|
|
|
|
21,366
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
124,826
|
|
|
|
125,505
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
45,448
|
|
|
|
42,262
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
|
6,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
441,139
|
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
10,779
|
|
|
$
|
12,754
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
28,812
|
|
|
|
18,989
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
15,558
|
|
|
|
14,826
|
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
24,777
|
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
Deferred income tax liability current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
15,202
|
|
|
|
16,023
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
95,128
|
|
|
|
85,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
18,034
|
|
|
|
15,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value; authorized
60,000 shares; 37,484 and 37,544 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
235,080
|
|
|
|
236,412
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
87,693
|
|
|
|
72,876
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
4,414
|
|
|
|
5,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
327,519
|
|
|
|
314,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
441,139
|
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-55
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash (used in) provided
by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,292
|
|
|
|
17,631
|
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
Write-off and impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
36,655
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
Stock based compensation Board Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
8,111
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
4,967
|
|
Asset writeoff charges
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
(1,359
|
)
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
(15,981
|
)
|
|
|
19,889
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,583
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
16,799
|
|
|
|
(9,366
|
)
|
|
|
(9,378
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
(5,537
|
)
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
37,176
|
|
|
|
(21,121
|
)
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(3,737
|
)
|
|
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
|
592
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
(2,090
|
)
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(7,751
|
)
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(9,535
|
)
|
|
|
(8,191
|
)
|
|
|
(11,639
|
)
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
(638
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(2,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(10,173
|
)
|
|
|
(8,249
|
)
|
|
|
(13,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(17,948
|
)
|
|
|
(2,859
|
)
|
|
|
(13,830
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
196,219
|
|
|
|
178,271
|
|
|
|
175,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
$
|
178,271
|
|
|
$
|
175,412
|
|
|
$
|
161,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (recovered) paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
(22,381
|
)
|
|
$
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodation payments paid with credits
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-56
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Years Ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2005
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
$
|
232,926
|
|
|
$
|
216,267
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
4,425
|
|
|
$
|
453,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
232,963
|
|
|
|
104,635
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
341,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,818
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
235,080
|
|
|
|
87,693
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
4,414
|
|
|
|
327,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation-stock grants
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
|
$
|
236,412
|
|
|
$
|
72,876
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,356
|
|
|
$
|
314,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-57
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business
|
We are a provider of medical transcription technology and
services which are integral to the clinical documentation
workflow. We service health systems, hospitals and large group
medical practices throughout the U.S. In the clinical
documentation workflow, we provide, in addition to medical
transcription technology and services, digital dictation, speech
recognition and electronic signature services. We are a member
of the Philips Group of Companies and collaborate with Philips
Medical Systems in product development. On November 2,
2007, our majority shareholder, Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. (Philips), announced that it was going to proceed with the
sale of its ownership interest in us if a satisfactory price and
other acceptable terms can be realized. In addition, on
November 2, 2007 we announced, in light of Philips
announcement, that our board of directors, in connection with
its previously disclosed review of our strategic alternatives,
is evaluating whether a sale of us is in our best interests and
the best interests of our shareholders.
In November 2003, one of our employees raised allegations that
we had engaged in improper billing practices. In response, our
board of directors undertook an independent review of these
allegations and engaged the law firm of Debevoise and Plimpton
LLP, who in turn retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, to assist
in the review (Review). On March 16, 2004, we announced
that we had delayed the filing of our 2003 annual report on
Form 10-K
pending completion of the Review. Subsequently, on
March 25, 2004, we filed a
Form 8-K
detailing our determination that the Review would not be
completed by the March 30, 2004 filing deadline for our
2003
Form 10-K.
As a result of our noncompliance with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commissions (SEC) periodic disclosure
requirements, our common stock was delisted from the NASDAQ
National Market on June 16, 2004.
On July 30, 2004, we issued a press release entitled
MedQuist Announces Key Findings Of Independent Review Of
Client Billing, which announced certain findings in the
Review regarding our billing practices (July 2004 Press
Release). The Review found, among other things, that with
respect to our medical transcription services contracts that
called for billing based on the AAMT line billing
unit of measure, we used ratios and formulae to help calculate
the number of AAMT transcription lines for which our customers
(AAMT Customers) were billed rather than counting each of the
relevant characters to determine a billable line as provided for
in the contracts. With respect to these contracts, our use of
ratios and formulae to arrive at AAMT line counts was generally
not disclosed to our AAMT Customers.
The AAMT line unit of measure was developed in 1993 by three
medical transcription industry groups, including the American
Association for Medical Transcription (AAMT), in an attempt to
standardize industry billing practices for medical transcription
services. Following the development of the AAMT line unit of
measure, customers increasingly began to request AAMT line
billing. Accordingly, we, along with other vendors in the
medical transcription industry, began to incorporate the AAMT
line unit of measure into certain customer contracts. The AAMT
line definition provides that a line consists of 65
characters and defined the term character to include
such things as macros and function keys as well as other
information necessary for the final appearance and content of a
document. However, these definitions turned out to be inherently
ambiguous and difficult to apply in practice. As a result, the
AAMT line was applied inconsistently throughout the medical
transcription industry. In fact, no single set of AAMT
characters was ever defined or agreed upon for this unit of
measure, and it was eventually renounced by the groups
responsible for its development.
The Review concluded that our rationale for using ratios and
formulae to determine the number of AAMT transcription lines for
billing was premised on a good faith attempt to adopt a
consistent and commercially reasonable billing method given the
lack of common standards in the industry and ambiguities
inherent in the AAMT line definition. The Review concluded that
the use of ratios and formulae within the medical transcription
platform setups may have resulted in over billing and under
billing of some customers. In addition, in some instances,
customers ratios and formulae were adjusted without
disclosure to the AAMT Customers. However, the
F-58
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Review found no evidence that the amounts we billed AAMT
Customers were, in general, commercially unfair or inconsistent
with what competitors would have charged. Moreover, it was noted
in the Review that we have been able to attract and retain
customers in a competitive market.
Following the issuance of the July 2004 Press Release, we began
an extensive review of our historical AAMT line billing
(Managements Billing Assessment) and in August 2004
informed our current and former customers that we would be
contacting them to discuss how they might have been impacted. In
response, several former and current customers, including some
of our largest customers, contacted us requesting, among other
things, (i) an explanation of the billing methods employed
by us for the customers account; (ii) an
individualized review of the customers past billings,
and/or
(iii) a meeting with a member of our management team to
discuss the July 2004 Press Release as it pertained to the
customers particular account. Some customers demanded an
immediate refund or credit to their account; others threatened
to withhold payment on invoices
and/or take
their business elsewhere unless we timely responded to their
information
and/or audit
requests.
In response to our customers concern over the July 2004
Press Release, we made the decision to take action to try to
avoid litigation and preserve and solidify our customer business
relationships by offering a financial accommodation to our AAMT
Customers. See Note 4.
Disclosure of the findings of the Review, along with the
delisting of our common stock, precipitated a number of
governmental investigations and civil lawsuits. See Note 13.
|
|
3.
|
Significant
accounting policies
|
Principles of
consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
MedQuist Inc. and its subsidiary companies. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
estimates and assumptions in the preparation of consolidated
financial statements
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements. Significant items subject to such
estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of
property and equipment, valuation of long-lived and intangible
assets and goodwill, valuation allowances for receivables,
inventories and deferred income taxes, revenue recognition,
stock-based compensation and commitments and contingencies.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
We follow revenue recognition criteria outlined in Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements, as amended by SAB 104. The
majority of our revenues are derived from providing medical
transcription services. Revenues for medical transcription
services are recognized when the services are rendered. These
services are based on contracted rates. The remainder of our
revenues are derived from the sale of voice-capture and document
management products including software, hardware and
implementation, training and maintenance service related to
these products.
We recognize software and software-related revenues pursuant to
the requirements of American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP)
97-2
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2),
as amended by
SOP 98-9,
Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain
Transactions,
SOP 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-type and Certain
Production-type Contracts, Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
00-03
Application of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on
Another Entitys Hardware,
EITF 03-05
Applicability of AICPA Statement of
F-59
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Position
97-2 to
Non-Software Deliverables in an Arrangement Containing
More-Than-Incidental
Software and other authoritative accounting guidance.
We recognize software-related revenues using the residual method
when vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value
exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement,
but does not exist for one or more delivered elements. We
allocate revenues to each undelivered element based on its
respective fair value determined by the price charged when that
element is sold separately or, for elements not yet sold
separately, the price established by management if it is
probable that the price will not change before the element is
sold separately. We defer revenues for the undelivered elements
and recognize the residual amount of the arrangement fee, if
any, when the basic criteria in
SOP 97-2
have been met.
Under
SOP 97-2,
provided that the arrangement does not involve significant
production, modification, or customization of the software,
revenues are recognized when all of the following four criteria
have been met; persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collectability is probable.
If at the outset of an arrangement, we determine that the
arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenues are
deferred until the arrangement fee becomes due and payable by
the customer. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine
that collectability is not probable, revenues are deferred until
payment is received. Our license agreements typically do not
provide for a right of return other than during the standard
warranty period. If an arrangement allows for customer
acceptance of the software or services, we defer revenues until
the earlier of customer acceptance or when the acceptance rights
lapse.
We separately market and sell hardware and software post
contract customer support (PCS). PCS covers phone support,
hardware parts and labor, software bug fixes and limited
upgrades, if and when available. We do not commit to specific
future software upgrades or releases. The contract period for
PCS is generally one year. We recognize both hardware and
software PCS on a straight line basis over the life of the
underlying PCS contract. In some of our PCS contracts, we bill
the customer prior to performing the services. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, deferred PCS revenues of
$12,235 and $11,494, respectively, are included in deferred
revenues and $450 and $221, respectively, are included in
non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Certain arrangements include multiple elements involving
software, hardware and implementation, training, or other
services that are not essential to the functionality of the
software. VSOE for services does not exist. Since the
undelivered elements are typically services, we recognize the
entire arrangement fee ratably over the period during which the
services are expected to be performed or the PCS period,
whichever is longer, beginning with delivery of the software,
provided that all other revenue recognition criteria in
SOP 97-2
are met. The services are typically completed before the PCS
term expires. As such, upon completion of the services, the
difference between the VSOE of fair value for the remaining PCS
period and the remaining unrecognized portion of the arrangement
fee is recognized as revenue (i.e. the residual method), and the
remaining deferred revenue is recognized ratably over the
remaining PCS period, provided that all other revenue
recognition criteria in
SOP 97-2
are met.
Sales
taxes
We present taxes assessed by a governmental authority including
sales, use, value added and excise taxes on a net basis and
therefore the presentation of these taxes is excluded from our
revenues and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets until such amounts are remitted to
the taxing authorities.
F-60
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Accounting for
consideration given to a customer
As a result of the Accommodation Analysis (which is described in
Note 4), we offered financial accommodations to our
customers. Pursuant to EITF Issue
01-9,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products)
(EITF 01-9),
consideration given by a vendor to a customer is presumed to be
a reduction of the selling price of the vendors services
and, therefore, should be characterized as a reduction of
revenues when recognized in the vendors income statement.
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
$57,678, $10,402 and $0, respectively, was recorded as a
reduction of revenues related to the Accommodation Analysis.
Litigation and
settlement costs
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, claims,
contingencies and other legal matters. We record a charge equal
to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss
contingency when both of the following conditions are met:
(i) information available prior to issuance of the
financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset
had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date
of the financial statements and (ii) the range of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. We expense legal costs, including
those legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a
loss contingency, as incurred.
Services
provided by independent registered public
accountant
Services provided by our independent registered public
accounting firm are expensed as the services are provided and
were $1,254, $6,429, and $6,840 for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Restructuring
costs
A liability for restructuring costs associated with an exit or
disposal activity is recognized and measured initially at fair
value when the liability is incurred. We record a liability for
severance costs when employees are notified that they are to be
terminated and for future, non-cancellable operating lease costs
when we vacate a facility.
Our estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring us to
record additional restructuring charges or reduce the amount of
liabilities recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we
evaluate the remaining accrued restructuring charges to ensure
their adequacy, that no excess accruals are retained and the
utilization of the provisions are for their intended purposes in
accordance with developed exit plans.
We periodically evaluate currently available information and
adjust our accrued restructuring charges as necessary. Changes
in estimates are accounted for as restructuring costs or credits
in the period identified.
Research and
development costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements,
using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
our statements of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the
carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely
than not that such assets will be realized. Management considers
various sources of future taxable income including projected
book earnings, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the
need for a valuation allowance.
F-61
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Stock-based
compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Statement 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
(Statement 123(R)), using the modified prospective transition
method which requires application of Statement 123(R) on the
date of adoption and, therefore, we have not retroactively
adjusted results from periods prior to 2006. Under the modified
prospective transition method, compensation costs associated
with share-based awards recognized in 2006 include compensation
costs for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair
value previously estimated in accordance with the provisions of
FASB Statement 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(Statement 123). Had we granted options in 2006, the
compensation costs for those options would have been based on
the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement 123(R). In March 2005, the SEC issued
SAB 107 (SAB 107) which provided supplemental
guidance related to Statement 123(R). We have applied the
provisions of SAB 107 in our adoption of Statement 123(R).
Statement 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value
of stock options on the date of grant using an option pricing
model. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
determine the fair value of our options. The determination of
the fair value of stock based awards using an option pricing
model is affected by a number of assumptions including expected
volatility of the common stock over the expected term, the
expected term, the risk free interest rate during the expected
term and the expected dividends to be paid. The value of the
portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is
recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service
periods.
Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock
options recognized under Statement 123(R) for 2006 and 2007 was
$2,117 and $565 which was charged to selling, general and
administrative expenses ($562 and $255), research and
development expenses ($240 and $91) and cost of revenues ($1,315
and $219). Included in the $2,117 and $565 is $194 and $120,
respectively, of expense related to options that were issued to
certain executive officers when we became current in our
periodic reporting obligations with the SEC in October 2007. As
of December 31, 2007, total unamortized stock-based
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of
expected forfeitures, was $1,371 which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.7 years.
Prior to the adoption of Statement 123(R), we accounted for
stock-based awards to employees and directors using the
intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25), as allowed under Statement 123. Under
the intrinsic value method, no compensation expense for employee
stock options was recognized in our consolidated statements of
operations because the exercise price of the stock options
granted to employees was greater than or equal to the fair
market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.
F-62
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net loss
and loss per share amounts for the year ended December 31,
2005 as if we had applied the fair-value recognition provisions
of Statement 123 to stock-based employee compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net loss
|
|
|
37
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair-value based method for all awards
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(115,082
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(3.07
|
)
|
Diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(3.07
|
)
|
We did not grant any options for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2006.
Net loss per
share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during each
period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net
loss by the weighted average shares outstanding, as adjusted for
the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, which consist
only of stock options, using the treasury stock method.
The table below reflects basic and diluted net loss per share
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted net loss per share does not assume
conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would have an
anti-dilutive effect on diluted net loss per share. During 2005,
2006 and 2007, we had a net loss. As a result, any assumed
conversions would result in reducing the net loss per share and,
therefore, are not included in the calculation. Shares having an
anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share and, therefore,
excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share,
totaled 3,432 shares, 2,150 shares and
2,298 shares for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007, respectively.
F-63
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Advertising
costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $2,098, $1,903
and $1,674, respectively.
Cash and cash
equivalents
We consider all highly liquid instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our
cash management and investment policies dictate that cash
equivalents be limited to investment grade, highly liquid
securities. We place our temporary cash investments with
high-credit rated, quality financial institutions. Deposits held
with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such
deposits. Consequently, our cash equivalents are subject to
potential credit risk. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
cash equivalents consisted of money market investments. The
carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair
value.
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do
not bear interest. The carrying value of accounts receivable
approximates fair value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
our best estimate for losses inherent in our accounts receivable
portfolio. The sales return and allowance reserve is our best
estimate of sales credits that will be issued related to our
accounts receivable portfolio. These allowances are used to
state trade receivables at estimated net realizable value.
We estimate uncollectible amounts based upon our historical
write-off experience, current customer receivable balances, age
of customer receivable balances, the customers financial
condition and current economic conditions. Historically, these
estimates have been adequate to cover our accounts receivable
exposure.
We enter into medical transcription service arrangements which
contain provisions for performance penalties in the event
certain service levels, primarily related to turn-around time on
transcribed reports, are not achieved. We reduce revenues for
any performance penalties incurred and have included an estimate
of such credits in our allowance for uncollectible accounts.
Product revenues for sales to end-user customers and resellers
is recognized upon passage of title if all other revenue
recognition criteria have been met. End-user customers generally
do not have a right of return. We provide certain of our
resellers and distributors with limited rights of return of our
products. We reduce revenues for rights to return our product
based upon our historical experience and have included an
estimate of such credits in our allowance for doubtful accounts.
Inventories
Inventories, which are primarily comprised of finished goods,
are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined
on a weighted-average basis. Inventories in excess of
anticipated future demand or for obsolete products are reserved.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the net inventory
balances were $2,608 and $2,011, respectively, and are included
in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range
from two to seven years for furniture, equipment and software,
and the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for
leasehold improvements. Repairs and maintenance costs are
charged to expense as incurred while additions and betterments
are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposals are charged to
operations. Upon retirement, sale or other disposition, the
F-64
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
related cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from
the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price
over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a purchase
business combination. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment on
December 1 of each year.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step test. Under the first
step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its
carrying value (including goodwill). We consider three methods
when determining fair value; the discounted cash flow method,
the quoted price method and the public company method. Of these
three methods, we assign the most significant weighting to the
discounted cash flow method. If the fair value of the reporting
unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill
impairment exists for the reporting unit and the enterprise must
perform step two of the impairment test. Under step two, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying
amount of the reporting units goodwill over the implied
fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill
is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit
in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in
accordance with FASB Statement 141, Business
Combinations. The residual fair value after this allocation
is the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill.
Software
development
We capitalize software development costs pursuant to the
requirements of FASB Statement 86, Accounting for the Costs
of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed
(Statement 86), for our software developed for sale and
AICPA
SOP 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for internal Use
(SOP 98-1),
for our software developed for internal use.
Statement 86 specifies that costs incurred in creating a
computer software product shall be charged to expense when
incurred as research and development until technical feasibility
has been established. Technical feasibility is established upon
completion of a detail program design or, in its absence,
completion of a working model. Thereafter, all software
production costs shall be capitalized until the product is
available for release to customers.
SOP 98-1
specifies that software costs incurred in the preliminary
project stage should be expensed as incurred. Capitalization of
costs should begin when the preliminary project stage is
completed and management, with the relevant authority,
authorizes and commits funding of the project and it is probable
that the project will be completed and the software will be used
to perform the function intended. Capitalization should cease no
later than the point at which the project is substantially
complete and ready for its intended use.
Capitalized software is reported at the lower of unamortized
cost or net realizable value and is amortized over the
products estimated economic life which is generally three
years. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, $485 and $2,343,
respectively, of unamortized software development costs are
included in other intangible assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, software amortization
expense was $336, $262 and $360, respectively.
Long-lived and
other intangible assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. To determine the recoverability of
long-lived assets, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by an asset is compared to the carrying
value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived
asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an
impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the
carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Annually we
evaluate the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
F-65
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Intangible assets include certain assets (primarily customer
lists) obtained from business acquisitions and are being
amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives which range from three to 20 years.
Foreign
currency translation
Our operating subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Canada use
the local currency as their functional currency. We translate
the assets and liabilities of those entities into
U.S. dollars using the month-end exchange rate. We
translate revenues and expenses using the average exchange rates
prevailing during the reporting period. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income within shareholders equity. Gains and
losses from foreign currency transactions are included in net
loss and were not material for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Business
enterprise segments
We operate in one reportable operating segment which is medical
transcription technology and services.
Concentration
of risk, geographic data and enterprise-wide
disclosures
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our net
revenues in any period. There is no single geographic area of
significant concentration other than the United States.
The following table summarizes the net revenues by the
categories of our products and services as a percentage of our
total net revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Medical transcription
|
|
|
79.5
|
%
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
Products and related services
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
PCS
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other includes medical coding, application service provider and
other miscellaneous revenues.
Fair value of
financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses are reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets at carrying values which approximate
fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments and
the variability of the respective interest rates where
applicable.
F-66
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Comprehensive
income/loss
Comprehensive income is comprised of Net income and Other
comprehensive income/loss.
Other comprehensive income/loss consists of foreign currency
translation adjustments. Other comprehensive income/loss and
comprehensive income are displayed separately in the
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and Other
Comprehensive Income.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement 157, Fair Value
Measurements, (Statement 157) which defines fair value,
establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Statement 157
does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions
of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. On February 12, 2008, the FASB
delayed the effective date of Statement 157 for non-financial
assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of
Statement 157 to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
including an amendment of FASB Statement 115 (Statement
159) which permits entities to choose to measure eligible
items at fair value at specified election dates. Unrealized
gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has
been elected will be reported in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date. The following balance sheet items are within the
scope of Statement 159:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Recognized financial assets and financial liabilities unless a
special exception applies;
|
|
n
|
Firm commitments that would otherwise not be recognized at
inception and that involve only financial instruments;
|
|
n
|
Non-financial insurance contracts; and
|
|
n
|
Host financial instruments resulting from separation of an
embedded non-financial derivative instrument from a
non-financial hybrid instrument
|
Statement 159 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 2007 with early adoption possible but subject to
certain requirements. We do not expect the adoption of Statement
159 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement 141(R), Business
Combinations (Statement 141R). Statement 141R establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. Statement 141R also
provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill
acquired in the business combination and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. Statement 141R will become effective as of
the beginning of our fiscal year beginning after
December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(Statement 160). Statement 160 establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
Statement 160 will become effective as of the beginning of our
fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not
believe that Statement 160 will have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
F-67
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Customer
accommodation and quantification
|
As discussed in Note 2, in connection with our decision to
offer financial accommodations to our AAMT Customers, we
analyzed our historical billing information and the available
report-level data to develop individualized accommodation offers
to be made to our AAMT Customers (Accommodation Analysis). This
analysis took approximately one year to complete. The
methodology utilized to develop the individual accommodation
offers was designed to generate positive accommodation outcomes
for our AAMT Customers. As such, the methodology was not a
calculation of potential over billing nor was it intended as a
measure of damages or a reflection of any admission of liability
due and owed to our AAMT Customers. Instead, the Accommodation
Analysis was a methodology that was developed to arrive at
commercially reasonable and fair accommodation offers that would
be acceptable to our AAMT Customers without negotiation.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, based on the Accommodation
Analysis, our board of directors authorized management to make
cash accommodation offers to AAMT customers in the aggregate
amount of $65,413. In 2006, this amount was adjusted by a net
additional amount of $1,157 based on a refinement of the
Accommodation Analysis resulting in an aggregate amount of
$66,570. By accepting our accommodation offer, an AAMT Customer
must agree, among other things, to release us from any and all
claims and liability regarding AAMT line and other billing
related issues.
As part of this process, we also conducted an analysis in an
attempt to quantify the economic consequences of potentially
unauthorized adjustments to AAMT Customers ratios and
formulae within the transcription platform setups
(Quantification). This Quantification was calculated to be
$9,835.
Of the authorized cash accommodation amount of $66,570, $57,678
and $1,157 were treated as consideration given by a vendor to a
customer and accordingly recorded as a reduction in revenues in
2005 and 2006, respectively. The balance of $7,735 plus an
additional $2,100 has been accounted for as a billing error
associated with the Quantification resulting in a reduction of
revenues in various reporting periods from 1999 to 2005.
The goal of our customer accommodation was to reach a settlement
with our AAMT Customers. However, the Accommodation Analysis for
certain AAMT Customers did not result in positive accommodation
outcomes. For certain other customers, the Accommodation
Analysis resulted in calculated cash accommodation offers that
we believed were insufficient as a percentage of their
historical AAMT line billing to motivate such customers to
resolve their billing disputes with us. Therefore, in 2006 we
modified our customer accommodation to enable us to offer this
group of AAMT Customers credits for the purchase of future
products
and/or
services from us over a defined period of time. On July 21,
2006, our board of directors authorized management to make
credit accommodation offers up to an additional $8,676 beyond
amounts previously authorized. During 2006, this amount was
adjusted by a net additional amount of $569 based on a
refinement of the Accommodation Analysis, resulting in an
aggregate amount of $9,245. In connection with the credit
accommodation offers we recorded a reduction in revenues and
corresponding increase in accrued expenses of $9,245 in 2006.
The following is a summary of the financial statement activity
related to the customer accommodation and the Quantification
which is included as a separate line item in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
46,878
|
|
|
$
|
24,777
|
|
Customer accommodation
|
|
|
10,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other adjustments
|
|
|
(31,523
|
)
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
Credits
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
24,777
|
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, we
recorded a charge of $34,127, $13,001 and $6,083, respectively,
for costs associated with the Review, Managements Billing
Assessment as well as defense and other costs associated with
the SEC and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations
and civil litigation that we deemed to be unusual in nature.
These costs are net of insurance claim reimbursements. We record
insurance claims when the realization of the claim is probable.
The following is a summary of the amounts recorded in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
$
|
20,858
|
|
|
$
|
14,427
|
|
|
$
|
18,678
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
9,789
|
|
|
|
4,787
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
Nightingale and Associates, LLC (Nightingale) services
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Insurance recoveries and claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,409
|
)
|
|
|
(15,386
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
34,127
|
|
|
$
|
13,001
|
|
|
$
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees represent accounting and dispute
analysis costs and document search and retrieval costs. In 2006,
insurance recoveries and claims represent insurance recoveries
($8,702) and insurance claims ($707). The insurance claims were
recorded in other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and
payment related to these claims was received in the first
quarter of 2007. During 2007 we recorded ($15,386) in additional
insurance recoveries and received payment of this entire amount
in 2007.
2005
Restructuring plan
During 2005, we implemented a restructuring plan (2005 Plan)
based on the implementation of a centralized national service
delivery model. The 2005 Plan involved the consolidation of
operating facilities and a related reduction in workforce. The
table below reflects the financial statement activity related to
the 2005 Plan which is included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cancelable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
|
$
|
1,693
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additional charge
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
(4,780
|
)
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Charge
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
(1,079
|
)
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments related to the 2005 Plan were made in 2007 for
severance and non-cancelable leases. The remainder of payments
related to the 2005 Plan will be made by 2009 for non-cancelable
leases.
F-69
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2007
Restructuring plans
During the third quarter of 2007, we implemented a restructuring
plan related to a reduction in workforce of 104 employees
as a result of the refinement of our centralized national
services delivery model. In addition, during the fourth quarter
of 2007 we implemented a restructuring plan related to an
additional reduction in workforce of 183 employees
attributable to our efforts to reduce costs. We recorded $2,263
in severance charges related to the 2007 restructuring plans.
The remaining restructuring costs are included in accrued
expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007. The table below reflects the financial
statement activity related to the 2007 restructuring plans for
the year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial charge
|
|
$
|
2,263
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of payments related to the 2007 restructuring
plans will be made in 2008.
Accounts receivable consisted of the following as of December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
59,272
|
|
|
$
|
53,084
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(4,494
|
)
|
|
|
(4,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
54,778
|
|
|
$
|
48,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Property and
equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
28,541
|
|
|
$
|
27,610
|
|
Communication equipment
|
|
|
6,602
|
|
|
|
6,932
|
|
Software
|
|
|
18,002
|
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
58,807
|
|
|
|
60,138
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(37,838
|
)
|
|
|
(38,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
20,969
|
|
|
$
|
21,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, we recorded a write-off of $767 which was allocated
between cost of revenues ($425) and restructuring charges
related to the 2005 Plan ($342). In the fourth quarter of 2005,
based upon an inventory of fixed assets, we recorded a write-off
of $4,070 (original cost $29,116 less accumulated depreciation
$25,046). This expense was allocated between cost of revenues
($3,851) and restructuring charges related to the 2005
F-70
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Plan ($219). In addition, during 2005 approximately $50,832 in
fully depreciated assets no longer in use were written off which
had no impact on net loss.
|
|
9.
|
Goodwill and
other intangible assets
|
Goodwill
The following table reflects the financial statement activity
related to the carrying amount of goodwill as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
123,849
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
124,826
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
125,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foreign currency adjustments reflect changes in the
period-end currency rates of our foreign subsidiaries.
Other
Intangible assets
As of December 31, other intangible asset balances were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
77,185
|
|
|
$
|
(32,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
44,531
|
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
(4,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
5,325
|
|
|
|
(4,893
|
)
|
|
|
432
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
89,666
|
|
|
$
|
(44,218
|
)
|
|
$
|
45,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
77,331
|
|
|
$
|
(37,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,919
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
5,325
|
|
|
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
4,815
|
|
|
|
(2,472
|
)
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
87,471
|
|
|
$
|
(45,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The estimated useful life and the weighted average remaining
lives of the intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
useful life
|
|
remaining lives
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
10 - 20 years
|
|
10.7 years
|
Capitalized software
|
|
3 years
|
|
2.7 years
|
Estimated annual amortization expense for intangible assets is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
5,693
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5,479
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,584
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
17,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
42,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Contractual
obligations
|
Leases
Minimum rental payments under operating leases are recognized on
a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including any
periods of free rent and landlord incentives. Rental expense for
operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007 was $5,710, $4,089 and $2,489, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one
year) as of December 31, 2007 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
4,650
|
|
|
$
|
4,571
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
15,732
|
|
|
$
|
15,612
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-72
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Other
contractual obligations
The following summarizes our other contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
guaranteed payments
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
8,328
|
|
|
$
|
5,650
|
|
|
$
|
2,678
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,102
|
|
|
$
|
21,424
|
|
|
$
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations represent telecommunication contracts
($21,174), and other recurring purchase obligations ($250).
Severance and other guaranteed payments are comprised of
severance payments ($1,493), employee retention payments ($785)
and amounts owed to Nightingale ($400).
As of December 31, 2007, we had agreements with certain of
our senior management that provided for severance payments in
the event these individuals were terminated without cause. The
maximum cost exposure related to these agreements was $1,207 as
of December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007, we had agreements with certain of
our senior management other than our President and Chief
Executive Officer that provided for payments to such individuals
in the event we are able to successfully complete a strategic
transaction and such individuals remained employed by us (or the
successor company as the case may be) for the
90-day
period immediately following the closing of the strategic
transaction or such individuals experience an involuntary
termination at any time during such
90-day
period. The maximum cost exposure related to these agreements
was $504 as of December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007, we had an agreement with
Nightingale that provided for a payment to Nightingale in the
event we are able to successfully complete a strategic
transaction and Mr. Hoffmann continues to serve as our
President and Chief Executive Officer for the
90-day
period immediately following the closing of a strategic
transaction or Nightingales engagement with us (or any
successor to our business), including the retention of
Mr. Hoffmann as our President and Chief Executive Officer
(or any successor to our business), is terminated upon the
closing of a strategic transaction or during such
90-day
period. The maximum cost exposure related to this agreement was
$133 as of December 31, 2007.
F-73
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Investment in
A-Life Medical, Inc. (A-Life)
|
We have an investment in A-Life, a privately held entity which
provides advanced natural language processing technology for the
medical industry. Our investment is recorded under the equity
method of accounting since we owned 33.6% of A-Lifes
outstanding voting shares as of December 31, 2006 and 2007.
The table below reflects the financial statement activity
related to A-Life as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 that is
recorded in other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
5,015
|
|
Share in income
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
Share in income
|
|
|
625
|
|
Reclassification
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investment in A-Life included a note receivable plus accrued
interest due from A-Life which matured on December 31,
2003. Prior to 2007, this note receivable and accrued interest
had been recorded in other assets. In January 2008, A-Life paid
us $1,250 to satisfy this note receivable and accrued interest
in full, as well as all other disputes and claims between A-Life
and us. Accordingly, we reclassified the note receivable and
accrued interest balances to other current assets in the
accompanying December 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet.
Accrued expenses consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Professional services
|
|
$
|
4,938
|
|
|
$
|
4,959
|
|
Shareholder litigation settlement
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
14,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
28,812
|
|
|
$
|
18,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No other individual accrued expense is in excess of 5% of total
current liabilities.
|
|
13.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Governmental
investigations
The SEC is currently conducting a formal investigation of us
relating to our billing practices. We have been fully
cooperating with the SEC since it opened its investigation in
2004. We have complied, and are continuing to comply, with
information and document requests by the SEC.
We also received an administrative HIPAA subpoena for documents
from the DOJ on December 17, 2004. The subpoena sought
information primarily about our provision of medical
transcription services to governmental and non-governmental
customers. The information was requested in connection with a
government investigation into whether we and others violated
federal laws in connection with the provision of medical
transcription services. We have complied, and are continuing to
comply, with information and document requests by the DOJ.
F-74
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The DOL is currently conducting a formal investigation into the
administration of our 401(k) plan. We have been fully
cooperating with the DOL since it opened its investigation in
2004. We have complied, and are continuing to comply, with
information and document requests by the DOL.
Developments relating to the SEC, DOJ
and/or DOL
investigations will continue to create various risks and
uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our
business and our historical and future financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
Shareholder
securities litigation
A shareholder putative class action lawsuit was filed against us
in the United States District Court District of New Jersey
on November 8, 2004. The action, entitled William
Steiner v. MedQuist, Inc., et al., Case
No. 1:04-cv-05487-FLW
(Shareholder Putative Action), was filed against us and certain
of our former officers, purportedly on behalf of an alleged
class of all persons who purchased our common stock during the
period from April 23, 2002 through November 2, 2004,
inclusive (Securities Class Period). The complaint
specifically alleged that defendants violated federal securities
laws by purportedly issuing a series of false and misleading
statements to the market throughout the Securities
Class Period, which statements allegedly had the effect of
artificially inflating the market price of our securities. The
complaint asserted claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5,
thereunder. Named as defendants, in addition to us, were our
former President and Chief Executive Officer and our former
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
On August 16, 2005, a First Amended Complaint in the
Shareholder Putative Class Action was filed against us in
the United States District Court District of New Jersey. The
First Amended Complaint named additional defendants, including
certain current and former directors, certain of our former
officers, our former and current external auditors and Philips.
Like the original complaint, the First Amended Complaint
asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder. The Securities Class Period of the original
complaint was expanded 20 months to include the period from
March 29, 2000 through June 14, 2004. Pursuant to an
October 17, 2005 consent order approved by the Court, lead
plaintiff Greater Pennsylvania Pension Fund filed a Second
Amended Complaint on November 15, 2005. The Second Amended
Complaint dropped Philips as a defendant, but alleged the same
claims and the same purported class period as the First Amended
Complaint. Plaintiffs sought unspecified damages. Pursuant to
the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act,
discovery in the action was stayed pending the filing and
resolution of the defendants motions to dismiss, which
were filed on January 17, 2006, and which were fully
briefed as of June 16, 2006. On September 29, 2006,
the Court denied our motions to dismiss and the motion to
dismiss of the individual defendants. In the same order, the
Court granted the motion to dismiss filed by our former and
current external auditors. On November 3, 2006, we filed
our Answer denying the material allegations contained in the
Second Amended Complaint. On March 23, 2007, we entered
into a memorandum of understanding and a stipulation of
settlement with the lead plaintiff in which we agreed to pay
$7,750 to settle all claims, throughout the class period,
against all defendants in the action. We accrued the
aforementioned $7,750 as of December 31, 2005. In April
2007, we paid the entire $7,750 into an escrow account for the
eventual distribution to the plaintiffs. On May 16, 2007,
the Court issued an Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and
Providing for Notice. The Court conducted a final approval
hearing and approved the settlement on August 15, 2007.
Neither we nor any of the individuals named in the action has
admitted to liability or any wrongdoing in connection with the
settlement. On August, 17, 2007, the Court entered final
judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Customer
litigation
A putative class action was filed in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California. The action,
entitled South Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Memorial
Regional Hospital, et al. v. MedQuist, Inc. et al., Case
No. CV-04-7520-TJH-VBKx,
was filed on September 9, 2004 against us and certain of
our present and former officials, purportedly on behalf of an
alleged class of non-federal governmental hospitals and medical
centers that the complaint claims were wrongfully and
fraudulently overcharged for transcription services by
F-75
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
defendants based primarily on our use of the AAMT line billing
unit of measure. The complaint charged fraud, violation of the
California Business and Professions Code, unjust enrichment,
conversion, negligent supervision and violation of RICO.
Plaintiffs seek damages in an unspecified amount, plus costs and
interest, an injunction against alleged continuing illegal
activities, an accounting, punitive damages and attorneys
fees. Named as defendants, in addition to us, were one of our
senior vice presidents, our former executive vice president of
marketing and new business development, our former executive
vice president and chief legal officer, and our former executive
vice president and chief financial officer.
On December 20, 2004, we and the individual defendants
filed motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and
improper venue, or in the alternative, to transfer the putative
action to the United States District Court for the District of
New Jersey. On February 2, 2005, plaintiffs filed a Second
Amended Complaint both adding and deleting named plaintiffs in
an attempt to keep the putative action in the United States
District Court for the Central District of California. On
March 30, 2005, the United States District Court for the
Central District of California issued an order transferring the
putative action to the United States District Court District of
New Jersey and assigning Case
No. 05-CV-2206-JBS-AMD.
On August 1, 2005, we and the individual defendants filed
their respective Answers denying the material allegations
contained in the Second Amended Complaint. On August 31,
2005, we and the individual defendants filed motions to dismiss
the Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim and a
motion to dismiss in favor of arbitration, or in the
alternative, to stay pending arbitration. On December 12,
2005, the plaintiffs filed an Amendment to the Second Amended
Complaint. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued an order
requiring plaintiffs to file a Third Amended Complaint.
Plaintiffs filed the Third Amended Complaint on January 4,
2006. The Third Amended Complaint expands the claims made beyond
issues arising from contracts based on AAMT line billing and
beyond customers billed based on an AAMT line, alleging that we
engaged in a scheme to inflate customers invoices without
regard to the terms of individual contracts and even in the
absence of any written contract. The Third Amended Complaint
also limits plaintiffs claim for fraud in the inducement
of the agreement to arbitrate to the three named plaintiffs
whose contracts contain an arbitration provision and a subclass
of similarly situated customers. On January 20, 2006 we and
the individual defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third
Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim and a motion to
compel arbitration of all claims by the arbitration subclass and
to stay the case in its entirety pending arbitration. On
March 8, 2006 the Court held a hearing on these motions,
and took the matter under submission. On March 30, 2007,
the Court issued an order holding that plaintiffs could not make
out a claim that we had violated the federal RICO statute, thus
eliminating any claim against us for treble damages. The Court
also found that plaintiffs could not make out a claim that we
had engaged in any unfair or deceptive acts or practices in
violation of state law, or that we had made any negligent
misrepresentations to plaintiffs. In its ruling, the Court,
without reaching a decision of whether any wrongdoing had
occurred, allowed plaintiffs to proceed with their claims
against us for fraud, unjust enrichment and an accounting. In
its order, the Court denied our motion to compel arbitration
regarding those customers whose contracts contained an agreement
to arbitrate. We have appealed that decision to the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals, and we moved the District Court to
stay the matter pending that appeal. The District Court heard
oral argument on our motion to stay on May 30, 2007 and
took the motion under submission.
On December 18, 2007, the Third Circuit entered judgment
denying our appeal and affirming the order of the District
Court. That same day, the District Court entered an order
denying our motion to stay pending appeal as moot and ordering
all Initial Disclosures, all
class-certification
related discovery, and all briefing upon
class-certification
motion practice completed within three months unless enlarged
for good cause. On February 21, 2008, the District Court
entered a scheduling order pursuant to which all fact discovery
related to class certification must be completed by
April 15, 2008 and plaintiffs motion for class
certification must be filed by April 30, 2008. All other
fact discovery must be completed by July 31, 2008, and all
expert discovery must be completed by October 31, 2008.
Dispositive motions must be filed by November 24, 2008. The
parties exchanged Initial Disclosures and commenced discovery.
F-76
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The parties participated in court-ordered mediation in late
2007, but no settlement was reached. The parties continued to
explore the possibility of resolving the litigation before
trial, and have now reached agreement on settlement terms
resolving all claims by the named plaintiffs. Under the
parties agreement, we will make a lump sum payment of
$7,537 to resolve all claims by the individual named plaintiffs
and certain other additional putative class members represented
by plaintiffs counsel but not named in the action. We have
accrued the entire amount of this lump sum payment, $5,205 of
which was accrued during 2005, in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2007. Neither we, nor any
of the individual defendants, will admit to any liability or any
wrongdoing in connection with the settlement. The District Court
has entered a consent order staying the action through
April 18, 2008 to allow the parties to finalize the
settlement. We anticipate that the parties will execute a final
settlement agreement and the case will be dismissed with
prejudice in its entirety within the next four to eight weeks.
Because the settlement will not be on a
class-wide
basis, no class will be certified and thus there is no
requirement to give notice.
Medical
Transcriptionist Litigation
Hoffmann Putative
Class Action
A putative class action lawsuit was filed against us in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia. The action, entitled Brigitte Hoffmann, et al. v.
MedQuist, Inc., et al., Case
No. 1:04-CV-3452,
was filed with the Court on November 29, 2004 against us
and certain current and former officials, purportedly on behalf
of an alleged class of current and former employees and
statutory workers, who are or were compensated on a per
line basis for medical transcription services
(Class Members) from January 1, 1998 to the time of
the filing of the complaint (Class Period). The complaint
specifically alleged that defendants systematically and
wrongfully underpaid the Class Members during the
Class Period. The complaint asserted the following causes
of action: fraud, breach of contract, demand for accounting,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, conversion, negligence,
negligent supervision, and RICO violations. Plaintiffs sought
unspecified compensatory damages, punitive damages, disgorgement
and restitution. On December 1, 2005, the Hoffmann matter
was transferred to the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey. On January 12, 2006, the Court
ordered this case consolidated with the Myers Putative
Class Action discussed below. As set forth below, we
believe that the claims asserted in the consolidated Myers
Putative Class Action have no merit and intend to
vigorously defend that action.
Force Putative
Class Action
A putative class action entitled Force v. MedQuist Inc. and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-2608-WSD,
was filed against us on October 11, 2005, in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of current and
former employees who claim they are or were compensated on a
per line basis for medical transcription services
but were allegedly underpaid due to the actions of defendants.
The named plaintiff asserted claims for breach of contract,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and for an accounting. Upon
stipulation and consent of the parties, on February 17,
2006, the Force matter was ordered transferred to the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the parties entered into a
stipulation and consent order whereby the Force matter was
consolidated with the Myers Putative Class Action discussed
below, and the consolidated amended complaint filed in the Myers
action on January 31, 2006 was deemed to supersede the
original complaint filed in the Force matter. As set forth
below, we believe that the claims asserted in the consolidated
Myers Putative Class Action have no merit and intend to
vigorously defend that action.
F-77
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Myers Putative
Class Action
A putative class action entitled Myers, et al. v. MedQuist Inc.
and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-4608
(JBS), was filed against us on September 22, 2005 in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of our employee
and independent contractor transcriptionists who claim that they
contracted with us to be paid on a 65 character line, but were
allegedly underpaid due to intentional miscounting of the number
of characters and lines transcribed. The named plaintiffs
asserted claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and
request an accounting.
The allegations contained in the Myers case are substantially
similar to those contained in the Hoffmann and Force putative
class actions and, as detailed above, the three actions have now
been consolidated. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on
January 31, 2006. In the consolidated amended complaint,
the named plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract,
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust
enrichment and demand an accounting. On March 7, 2006 we
filed a motion to dismiss all claims in the consolidated amended
complaint. The motion was fully briefed and argued on
August 7, 2006. The Court denied the motion on
December 21, 2006. On January 19, 2007, we filed our
answer denying the material allegations pleaded in the
consolidated amended complaint.
On May 17, 2007, the Court issued a Scheduling Order,
ordering all pretrial fact discovery completed by
October 30, 2007. The Court subsequently ordered plaintiffs
to file their motion for class certification by
December 14, 2007 and continued the date to complete fact
discovery to January 14, 2007. On October 18, 2007,
the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs motion to
compel further responses to written discovery regarding our
billing practices. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court
denied plaintiffs motion, finding plaintiffs had not
established that the billing discovery sought was relevant to
the claims or defenses regarding transcriptionist pay alleged in
their case. On December 14, 2007, plaintiffs filed their
motion for class certification, identifying a proposed class of
all our transcriptionists who were compensated on a per line
basis for work completed on MedRite, MTS or DEP transcription
platforms from November 29, 1998 to the present and
alleging that the proposed class was underpaid by more than
$80 million, not including interest.
On January 4, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order,
ordering our opposition to the motion for class certification to
be filed by March 14, 2008, plaintiffs reply brief to
be filed by May 14, 2008 and setting oral argument for
June 2, 2008. No date has been set for trial. On
January 9, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order
extending the deadline for the parties to complete depositions
of identified witnesses through February 15, 2008. We have
now deposed each of the named plaintiffs and all witnesses who
offered declarations in support of plaintiffs motion for
class certification, and plaintiffs have deposed numerous
MedQuist present and former employees. On February 8, 2008,
plaintiffs indicated that they will seek leave to file an
amended class certification brief to narrow their claims. On
February 19, 2008, the parties exchanged their Initial
Disclosures. Plaintiffs disclosures limit their damages
estimate to $41 million related to alleged underpayment on
the MedRite transcription platform; however, plaintiffs state
that they are continuing to analyze potential undercounting and
will supplement their damages claim. On March 10, 2008,
plaintiffs moved for leave to file an amended motion for
class certification dropping all allegations involving our DEP
transcription platform and narrowing the claims asserted
regarding the legacy MTS transcription platform. We did not
oppose plaintiffs motion for leave. On March 11,
2008, the Court granted plaintiffs motion, ordering us to
file our opposition to plaintiffs amended motion for class
certification by April 4, 2008 and ordering plaintiffs to
file their reply by May 23, 2008. The hearing date was not
changed and oral argument remains set for June 2, 2008. We
believe that the claims asserted in the consolidated actions
have no merit and intend to vigorously defend the suit.
F-78
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Shareholder
derivative litigation
On October 4, 2005, we announced the dismissal with
prejudice of a shareholder derivative action filed in
United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey. The suit, Rhoda Kanter (Plaintiff) v. Hans M.
Barella et al. (Defendants), was filed on November 12, 2004
against Philips and 10 current and former members of our board
of directors. We were named as a nominal defendant.
In a ruling dated September 21, 2005, the Court found
plaintiffs allegations that our board of directors
breached their fiduciary duties to us to be insufficient. The
plaintiff had alleged that for a period from 2001 through 2004,
the Defendants violated their fiduciary duties by permitting
artificial inflation of billing figures; failing to adequately
ensure accurate and lawful billing practices; and failing to
accurately report our true financial condition in our published
financial statements. On October 3, 2005, plaintiff filed a
motion for reconsideration of the Courts order dismissing
the action with prejudice. On November 16, 2005, the Court
denied plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. On
December 13, 2005, plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal with
the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Plaintiffs appeal was fully briefed as of May 2006, and
the Court of Appeals heard oral argument on the appeal on
March 1, 2007. Plaintiffs appeal was denied by the
Court of Appeals on May 25, 2007.
Shareholder
litigation
Costa Brava
Partnership III, L.P. shareholder litigation
On October 9, 2007, a single count Complaint and an Order
to Show Cause were filed against us in the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Chancery Division, Burlington County by one of our
shareholders. The action, entitled Costa Brava Partnership III,
L.P. v. MedQuist Inc. (Bur-C-0149-07), sought to compel us
to hold an annual meeting of shareholders (Annual Meeting Claim).
On October 30, 2007, plaintiff requested access under New
Jersey law to certain of our books and records. In response to
plaintiffs request, we voluntarily provided plaintiff with
those books and records that we believed we were required to
produce under New Jersey law. Thereafter, on November 9,
2007, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint to assert a second
claim to compel us to provide it with access to certain other
books and records (Books and Records Claim). The Annual Meeting
Claim and the Books and Records Claim sought equitable relief
only.
In December 2007, we agreed to hold our annual meeting of
shareholders on December 31, 2007. This resolved the Annual
Meeting Claim. Prior to the annual meeting, we voluntarily
produced to plaintiff certain additional books and records that
plaintiff requested in the Books and Records Claim. Thereafter,
on January 24, 2008, we filed an opposition to
plaintiffs Order to Show Cause to compel access to the
remaining books and records. On February 4, 2008, plaintiff
filed a reply brief. The Books and Records Claim has been
briefed and the parties are waiting for the Court to schedule a
hearing date to resolve the matter. We believe that the books
and records requests at issue in the Books and Records Claim are
burdensome and overbroad and intend to vigorously defend the
action.
Kahn Putative
Class Action
A shareholder putative class action lawsuit was filed against us
in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division,
Burlington County. The action, entitled Alan R. Kahn v.
Stephen H. Rusckowski, et al., Docket
No. BUR-C-000007-08,
was filed with the Court on January 22, 2008 against us,
Philips and our four non-independent directors, Clement
Revetti, Jr., Stephen H. Rusckowski, Gregory M. Sebasky and
Scott Weisenhoff. Plaintiff purports to bring the action on his
own behalf and on behalf of all current holders of our common
stock. The complaint alleges that defendants breached their
fiduciary duties of good faith, fair dealing, loyalty, and due
care by purportedly agreeing to and initiating a process for our
sale or a change of control transaction which will allegedly
cause harm to plaintiff and the putative class. Plaintiff seeks
damages in an unspecified amount, plus
F-79
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
costs and interest, a judgment declaring that defendants
breached their fiduciary duties and that any proposed
transactions regarding our sale or change of control are void,
an injunction preventing our sale or any change of control
transaction that is not entirely fair to the class, an order
directing us to appoint three independent directors to our board
of directors, and attorneys fees and expenses. We have not
yet been required to file a responsive pleading. We believe that
the claims asserted have no merit and intend to defend the case
vigorously
Reseller
arbitration demand
On October 1, 2007, we received from counsel to nine
current and former resellers of our products (Claimants), a copy
of an arbitration demand filed by the Claimants, initiating an
arbitration proceeding styled Diskriter, Inc., Electronic Office
Systems, Inc., Milner Voice & Data, Inc., Nelson
Systems, Inc., NEO Voice and Communications, Inc., Office
Business Systems, Inc., Roach-Reid Office Systems, Inc., Stiles
Office Systems, Inc., and Travis Voice and Data, Inc. v.
MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. (filed on
September 27, 2007, AAA, Case Number Not Yet Assigned). The
arbitration demand purports to set forth claims for breach of
contract; breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing;
promissory estoppel; misrepresentation; and tortuous
interference with contractual relations. The Claimants allege
that we breached our written agreements with the Claimants by:
(i) failing to provide reasonable training, technical
support, and other services; (ii) using the Claimants
confidential information to compete against the Claimants;
(iii) directly competing with the Claimants
territories; and (iv) failing to make new products
available to the Claimants. In addition, the Claimants
allege that we made false oral representations that we:
(i) would provide new product, opportunities and support to
the Claimants; (ii) were committed to continuing to use
Claimants; (iii) did not intend to create our own sales
force with respect to the Claimants territory; and
(iv) would stay out of Claimants territories and
would not attempt to take over the Claimants business and
relationships with the Claimants customers and end-users.
The Claimants assert that they are seeking damages in excess of
$24.3 million. The arbitrator has not yet set a date for us
to formally respond to the arbitration demand. We deny all
wrongdoing and intend to defend ourselves vigorously including
asserting counterclaims against the Claimants as appropriate.
Anthurium
Patent Litigation
On November 6, 2007, Anthurium Solutions, Inc. filed an
action entitled Anthurium Solutions, Inc. v. MedQuist
Inc., et al., Civil Action
No. 2-07CV-484,
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas, alleging that we infringed and continue to infringe
United States Patent No. 7,031,998 through our DEP
transcription platform. The complaint also alleges patent
infringement claims against Spheris, Inc. and Arrendale
Associates, Inc. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and
unspecified damages, including enhanced damages and
attorneys fees. We filed our answer on January 15,
2008 and counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment of
non-infringement and invalidity. No scheduling order has been
issued, and no pretrial dates have been set. Our investigation
of the claims is ongoing, and we are awaiting plaintiffs
preliminary infringement contentions. We believe that the claims
asserted have no merit and intend to vigorously defend the suit.
Other
matters
From time to time, we have been involved in various claims and
legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our
opinion, the outcome of such actions will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
We provide certain indemnification provisions within our
standard agreement for the sale of software and hardware
(collectively, Products) to protect our customers from any
liabilities or damages resulting from a claim of
U.S. patent, copyright or trademark infringement by third
parties relating to our Products. We believe that the likelihood
of any future payout relating to these provisions is remote.
Accordingly, we have not recorded any liability in our
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006
or 2007 related to these indemnification provisions.
F-80
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We had insurance policies which provided coverage for certain of
the matters related to the legal actions described herein. We
received total insurance recoveries of $24,795 related to these
policies (See Note 5). We do not expect to receive any
additional insurance recoveries related to the legal actions
described above.
Our stock option plans provide for the granting of options to
purchase shares of common stock to eligible employees (including
officers) as well as to our non-employee directors. Options may
be issued with the exercise prices equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant or at a price
determined by a committee of our board of directors. Stock
options vest and are exercisable over periods determined by the
committee, generally five years, and expire no more than
10 years after the grant.
In July 2004, our board of directors affirmed our June 2004
decision to indefinitely suspend the exercise and future grant
of options under our stock option plans. Ten former executives
separated from us in 2004 and 2005. Notwithstanding the
suspension, to the extent such executives held options that were
vested as of their resignation date, such options remain
exercisable for the post-termination period, generally
90 days, commencing on the date that the suspension is
lifted for the exercise of options. This suspension was lifted
on October 4, 2007. There were 704 shares that
qualified for this post-termination exercise period. A summary
of these remaining post-termination options as of
December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
shares
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$ 2.71-$10.00
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$10.01-$20.00
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
$20.01-$70.00
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extension of the life of the awards was recorded as a
modification of the grants. Under APB 25, the modification
created intrinsic value for vested stock if the market value of
the stock on the date of termination exceeded the exercise
price. Therefore, these grants required an immediate recognition
of the compensation expense with an offsetting credit to common
stock. We recorded a charge of $37, $0 and $0 for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
F-81
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Information with respect to our common stock options is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
subject to
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life in years
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2005
|
|
|
4,211
|
|
|
$
|
29.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
$
|
34.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
$
|
27.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
$
|
28.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1,207
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
$
|
32.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
33.30
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
$
|
31.64
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference
between the closing stock price on the last trading day of 2007
and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
options.
Under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, input assumptions
are determined at the time of option grant and are not adjusted
during the life of that grant. The following are assumptions
used in the 2007 option fair value calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
Significant assumptions required to estimate the fair value of
stock options include the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expected term: The SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No 107
Simplified method has been used to determine a
weighted average expected term of options granted.
|
|
n
|
Expected volatility: We have estimated expected volatility based
on the historical stock price volatility of a group of similar
publicly traded companies. We believe that our historical
volatility is not indicative of future volatility.
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options issued in
2007 was $7.03 per share.
F-82
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
A summary of outstanding and exercisable options as of
December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
shares
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$2.71-$10.00
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$10.01-$20.00
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.03
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
16.37
|
|
$20.01-$30.00
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
$30.01-$40.00
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
32.23
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
32.23
|
|
$40.01-$70.00
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
59.84
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
59.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
33.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 0 and 200 options granted during 2006 and 2007. There
were 0, 0 and 4 shares exercised in 2005, 2006 and 2007.
The total fair value of shares vested during 2007 was $396.
As of December 31, 2007, there were 962 additional options
available for grant under our stock option plans. When we became
up to date in our reporting to the SEC in October 2007, certain
executive officers, in accordance with their employment
agreements, received an aggregate of 200 options with an
exercise price equal to the then market value of our common
stock on the date of grant. In 2005, $78 is included in the pro
forma stock-based compensation amount depicted in Note 3
related to these options. In 2006 and 2007, $136 and $84,
respectively, is included as selling, general and administrative
expenses and $58 and $36 is included in research and development
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations related to these options with the total of $194 and
$120 included in common stock in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2006.
The sources of loss before income taxes and the income tax
provision for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(93,021
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,557
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(90,870
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(16,171
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision
|
|
$
|
(15,893
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,931
|
)
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
F-83
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
28,702
|
|
|
$
|
4,825
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
7,830
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
36,655
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
20,762
|
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to
our effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(62.5
|
)
|
|
|
(40.4
|
)
|
|
|
(53.0
|
)
|
Impact of foreign operations
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Adjustments to tax reserves
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Tax law changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
3,022
|
|
|
$
|
3,349
|
|
|
$
|
2,733
|
|
Domestic net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
18,492
|
|
|
|
36,295
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
24,192
|
|
|
|
22,285
|
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
Employee compensation and benefit plans
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
18,485
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
7,087
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
8,078
|
|
|
|
10,556
|
|
|
|
4,855
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
64,564
|
|
|
|
68,686
|
|
|
|
79,590
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(58,039
|
)
|
|
|
(64,601
|
)
|
|
|
(74,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
6,525
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
5,090
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(15,947
|
)
|
|
|
(18,704
|
)
|
|
|
(21,377
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
(739
|
)
|
|
|
(935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(16,866
|
)
|
|
|
(19,443
|
)
|
|
|
(22,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(10,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,358
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-84
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
As of December 31, 2007, we had federal net operating loss
carry forwards of approximately $80,520 which will partially
expire in 2027 and 2028.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, we had state net
operating loss carry forwards of approximately $115,632 and
$167,750, respectively, which will expire between 2008 and 2027.
In addition, we have foreign net operating loss carry forwards
of approximately $15,492, which do not expire. Utilization of
the net operating loss carry forwards may be subject to an
annual limitation in the event of a change in ownership in
future years as defined by Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code and similar state provisions.
In assessing the future realization of deferred taxes, we
consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized based
on projections of our future taxable earnings. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible.
During 2007, we decreased our valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets generated in foreign tax jurisdictions from
$1,803 to $1,217 based on managements assessment of future
earnings available to utilize these deferred tax assets.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, a valuation allowance of $56,808
was established against various domestic deferred tax assets.
After consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it was more likely than not that a
majority of the domestic deferred tax assets would not be
realized. In 2006 and 2007, we increased this valuation
allowance to $62,798 and $73,313, respectively.
Domestic deferred tax assets were recognized to the extent that
objective positive evidence existed with respect to their future
utilization. The objective positive evidence included the
potential to carry back any losses generated by the deferred tax
assets in the future as well as income expected to be recognized
due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities as of
December 31, 2007. In analyzing deferred tax liabilities as
a source for potential income for purposes of recognizing
deferred tax assets, the deferred tax liabilities related to
excess book basis in goodwill over tax basis in goodwill were
considered a source of future income for benefiting deferred tax
assets with indefinite lives only due to the indefinite life and
uncertainty of reversal of these liabilities during the same
period as the non-indefinite life deferred tax assets.
Our consolidated income tax expense for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 consists principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization deductions for income tax purposes during the
applicable year as well as state and foreign income taxes.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 prescribes, among other things, a recognition
threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a companys income tax return.
FIN 48 utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating
uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with FASB
Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Step one,
Recognition, requires a company to determine if the
weight of available evidence indicates that a tax position is
more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
Step two, Measurement, is based on the largest amount of
benefit, which is more likely than not to be realized on
settlement with the taxing authority. We recorded a cumulative
effect increase to retained earnings of $389 upon adoption.
In accordance with FIN 48, the total amount of unrecognized
tax benefits as of December 31, 2007 was $5,614, which
includes $581 of accrued interest related to unrecognized income
tax benefits which we recognize as a component of the provision
for income taxes. Of the $5,614 unrecognized tax benefits,
$4,773 relates to tax positions which if recognized would impact
the effective tax rate, not considering the impact of any
valuation allowance. Of the $4,773, $2,859 is attributable to
uncertain tax positions with respect to certain deferred tax
assets which if recognized would currently be offset by a full
valuation allowance due to the fact that at the current time it
is
F-85
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
more likely than not that these assets would not be recognized
due to a lack of sufficient projected income in the future.
The following is a roll-forward of the changes in our
unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
5,002
|
|
Gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
10
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
252
|
|
Amount of decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits relating to
settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Reduction to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of
applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective
tax rate if recognized
|
|
$
|
4,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, all U.S. states which require income tax
returns and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the nature of our
operations, no state or foreign jurisdiction is individually
significant. With limited exceptions we are no longer subject to
examination by the U.S. federal or states jurisdiction for
years beginning prior to 2003. We are currently under federal
tax audit for the tax years 2003 through 2006. We are no longer
subject to examination by the UK federal jurisdiction for years
beginning prior to 2005. We do have various state tax audits and
appeals in process at any given time.
We anticipate decreases in unrecognized tax benefits of
approximately $304 related to state statutes of limitations
expiring during 2008. Our unrecognized tax benefits are expected
to change in 2008. However, we do not anticipate any significant
increases or decreases within the next twelve months.
|
|
16.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
401(k)
plan
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan named the MedQuist
401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan) that provides eligible employees with
an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis.
Our 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to contribute up to
25% of their annual eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis,
subject to applicable Internal Revenue Code limits. Elective
deferral contributions are allocated to each participants
individual account and are then invested in selected investment
alternatives according to the participants directives.
Employee elective deferrals are 100% vested at all times. Our
401(k) Plan provides that we may make a discretionary matching
contribution to the participants in the 401(k) Plan. Our
discretionary matching contribution, if any, shall be in an
amount not to exceed 100% of the first 25% of a plan
participants compensation contributed as pre-tax
contributions to the 401(k) Plan. In our sole discretion, we may
make descretionary matching contributions on a quarterly or
annual basis. Historically we have matched 50% of each
participants contribution, up to a maximum of 5% of each
participants total annual compensation. Matching
contributions are 33% vested after one year of service, 67%
vested after two years of service and 100% vested after three
years of service. The charge to operations for our matching
contributions for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007 was $1,380, $1,432 and $1,547 respectively.
F-86
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Executive
deferred compensation plan
We established the MedQuist Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan (EDCP) in 2001. The EDCP, which is administered by the
compensation committee of our board of directors, allowed
certain members of management and highly compensated employees
to defer a certain percentage of their income. Participants were
permitted to defer compensation into an account in which
proceeds were available either during or after termination of
employment. The compensation committee authorized that certain
contributions made to a retirement distribution account be
matched with either shares of our common stock or cash.
Participants were not entitled to receive matching contributions
if they elected to make deferrals to an account into which
proceeds are available during employment. Participants were able
to defer up to 15% of their base salary (or such other maximum
percentage as may be approved by the compensation committee) and
90% of their bonus (or such other maximum percentage as may be
approved by the compensation committee). Distributions to a
participant made pursuant to a retirement distribution account
may be made to the participant upon the participants
termination or attainment of age 65, as elected by the
participant in their enrollment agreement. Distributions to a
participant made pursuant to an in-service distribution account
may be made at the election of the participant in their
enrollment agreement, subject to certain exceptions. The
balances in the EDCP are not funded, but are segregated, and
participants in the EDCP are our general creditors. All amounts
deferred in the EDCP increase or decrease based on hypothetical
investment results of the participants selected investment
alternatives. However, EDCP distributions are paid out of our
funds rather than from a dedicated investment portfolio. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, the value of the assets held,
managed and invested pursuant to the EDCP was $1,120 and $1,118,
respectively, and is included in other current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, the corresponding deferred
compensation liability reflecting amounts due to employees was
$827 and $637, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Effective January 1, 2005, the EDCP was suspended and no
further contributions have been made.
Board of
directors deferred compensation plan
Commencing on January 1, 2005, a portion of the
compensation paid to our independent directors was deferred
compensation in the form of common stock having a fair market
value of $50 on the date of grant. Our board of directors
postponed the granting of the deferred compensation awards for
2006 and 2007 until October 2007 which is when we became up to
date with our periodic reporting obligations with the SEC. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, $332 and $0, respectively,
related to deferred compensation is included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of shareholders equity and other
comprehensive income. This plan was terminated in February 2008.
|
|
17.
|
Related-party
transactions
|
From time to time, we enter into transactions in the normal
course of business with related parties. The audit committee of
our board of directors has been charged with the responsibility
of approving or satisfying all related party transactions other
than those between us and Philips. In any situation where the
audit committee sees fit to do so, any related party
transaction, other than those between us and Philips, may be
presented to disinterested members of our board of directors for
approval or ratification.
In connection with Philips investment in us, we have
entered into various agreements with Philips. All material
transactions between Philips and us are reviewed and approved by
the supervisory committee of our board of directors. The
supervisory committee is comprised of directors
independent from Philips. Listed below is a summary of our
material agreements with Philips.
F-87
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Licensing
agreement
In connection with Philips tender offer, we entered into a
Licensing Agreement with Philips Speech Processing GmbH, an
affiliate of Philips which is now known as Philips Speech
Recognition Systems GmbH (PSRS), on May 22, 2000 (Licensing
Agreement). The Licensing Agreement was subsequently amended by
the parties as of January 1, 2002, February 23, 2003,
August 10, 2003, September 1, 2004, December 30,
2005 and February 13, 2007.
Under the Licensing Agreement, we license from PSRS its
SpeechMagic speech recognition and processing software,
including any updated versions of the software developed by PSRS
during the term of the License Agreement (Licensed Product), for
use by us anywhere in the world. We pay a fee for use of this
license based upon a per line fee for each transcribed line of
text processed through the Licensed Product.
Upon the expiration of its initial term on June 28, 2005,
the Licensing Agreement was renewed for an additional five year
term.
In connection with the Licensing Agreement, we have a consulting
arrangement with PSRS whereby PSRS assists us with the
integration of its speech and transcription technologies.
OEM supply
agreement
On September 21, 2007, we entered into an Amended and
Restated OEM Supply Agreement (Amended OEM Agreement) with PSRS.
The Amended OEM Agreement amends and restates a previous OEM
Supply Agreement with PSRS dated September 23, 2004. In
connection with the Amended OEM Agreement certain amounts paid
to PSRS were capitalized in fixed assets and are being amortized
over a three-year period.
Pursuant to the Amended OEM Agreement, we purchased a
co-ownership interest in all rights and interests in and to
SpeechQ for Radiology together with its components, including
object and source code for the SpeechQ for Radiology application
and the SpeechQ for Radiology integration SDK (collectively, the
Product), but excluding the SpeechMagic speech recognition and
processing software, which we separately license from PSRS for a
fee under the Licensing Agreement. Additionally, the Amended OEM
Agreement provides that we shall receive, in exchange for a fee,
the exclusive right in the United States, Canada and certain
islands of the Caribbean (collectively the Exclusive Territory)
to sell, service and deliver the Product. In addition, PSRS has
agreed that for the term of the Amended OEM Agreement it will
not release a front-end multi-user reporting solution (including
one similar to the Product) in the medical market in the
Exclusive Territory nor will it directly authorize or assist any
of its affiliates to do so either; provided that the restriction
does not prevent PSRSs affiliates from integrating
SpeechMagic within their general medical application products.
The Amended OEM Agreement further provides that we shall make
payments to PSRS for PSRS development of an interim
version of the software included in the Product (Interim
Version). Except for the Interim Version which we and PSRS will
co-own, the Amended OEM Agreement provides that any
improvements, developments or other enhancements either we or
PSRS makes to the Product (collectively, Improvements) shall be
owned exclusively by the party that developed such Improvement.
Each party has the right to seek patent or other protection of
the Improvements it owns independent of the other party.
The term of the Amended OEM Agreement extends through
June 30, 2010 and will automatically renew for an
additional three year term provided that we are in material
compliance with the Amended OEM Agreement as of such date. If
PSRS decides to discontinue all business relating to the Product
in the Exclusive Territory on or after June 30, 2010, PSRS
can effect such discontinuation by terminating the Amended OEM
Agreement by providing us with six months prior written
notice of such discontinuation, provided the earliest such
notice can be delivered is June 30, 2010. Either party may
terminate the Amended OEM Agreement for cause immediately in the
event that a material breach by the other party remains uncured
for more than 30 days following delivery of written notice
or in the event that the other party becomes insolvent or files
for bankruptcy.
F-88
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Equipment
sales
We purchase dictation related equipment from Philips.
Insurance
coverage through Philips
We obtain all of our business insurance coverage (other than
workers compensation) through Philips.
Purchasing
agreements
For the three years ended December 31, 2007 we entered into
annual letter agreements with Philips Electronics North America
Corporation (PENAC), an affiliate of Philips, to purchase
products and services from certain suppliers under the terms of
the prevailing agreements between such suppliers and PENAC. As
of January 1, 2008, we are no longer a party to an
agreement with PENAC to purchase the aforementioned products and
services.
From time to time, we enter into other miscellaneous
transactions with Philips including Philips purchasing certain
products and implementation services from us. We recorded net
revenues from sales to Philips of $754, $26 and $0 for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and
2007 reflect other assets related to Philips of $0 and $1,002,
respectively, and accrued expenses related to Philips of $2,030
and $1,534, respectively.
Listed below is a summary of the expenses incurred by us in
connection with the various Philips agreements noted above for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Charges
related to these agreements are included in cost of revenues and
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
PSRS licensing
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
2,390
|
|
|
$
|
2,479
|
|
PSRS consulting
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
OEM agreement
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
Dictation equipment
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
PENAC
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
$
|
6,373
|
|
|
$
|
7,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On July 29, 2004, we entered into an agreement with
Nightingale under which Nightingale agreed to provide interim
chief executive services to us. On July 30, 2004, our board
of directors appointed Howard S. Hoffmann to serve as our
non-employee Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Mr. Hoffmann
serves as the Managing Partner of Nightingale. With the
departure of our former President in May 2007, our board of
directors appointed Mr. Hoffmann to the additional position
of President in June 2007. Mr. Hoffmann serves as our
President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the terms of
the agreement between us and Nightingale which was amended on
March 14, 2008 (Amendment). The Amendment, among other
things, extends the term of Mr. Hoffmanns role as our
President and Chief Executive Officer through August 1,
2008. Our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and
reviewing the performance of Mr. Hoffmann on an ongoing
basis. Our agreement with Nightingale also permits us to engage
additional personnel employed by Nightingale to provide
consulting services to us from time to time.
F-89
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, we
incurred charges of $3,207, $3,005 and $2,914, respectively, for
Nightingale services. From February 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007, the Nightingale charges were recorded in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations due to Nightingales
focus on operational matters instead of the Review and
Managements Billing Assessment. Prior to February 1,
2007, charges related to Nightingale were recorded in cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net (see Note 5). As
of December 31, 2006 and 2007, accrued expenses included
$548 and $400, respectively, for amounts due to Nightingale for
services performed.
See Note 11 for a discussion of our agreements with A-Life.
|
|
18.
|
Quarterly Data
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
96,014
|
|
|
$
|
93,359
|
|
|
$
|
82,096
|
|
|
$
|
86,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(8,471
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,416
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,951
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
89,066
|
|
|
$
|
88,692
|
|
|
$
|
82,518
|
|
|
$
|
80,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,886
|
|
|
$
|
(8,935
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,271
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,497
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
F-90
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
177,758
|
|
|
$
|
166,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
134,628
|
|
|
|
119,273
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
32,610
|
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
7,854
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,179
|
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
Cost of investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
|
|
(4,897
|
)
|
|
|
8,126
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
176,870
|
|
|
|
169,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
(3,586
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
4,175
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
(924
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,499
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-91
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
161,582
|
|
|
$
|
151,095
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $4,359 and $4,417,
respectively
|
|
|
48,725
|
|
|
|
48,215
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
8,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
219,042
|
|
|
|
208,783
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$38,772 and $38,825, respectively
|
|
|
21,366
|
|
|
|
18,920
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
125,505
|
|
|
|
125,418
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$45,209 and $44,610, respectively
|
|
|
42,262
|
|
|
|
41,363
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,885
|
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
$
|
403,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
12,754
|
|
|
$
|
11,137
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
18,989
|
|
|
|
13,501
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
14,826
|
|
|
|
14,495
|
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
|
|
12,242
|
|
Deferred income tax liability current
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
16,023
|
|
|
|
16,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
85,834
|
|
|
|
72,438
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
15,151
|
|
|
|
16,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
2,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value; authorized
60,000 shares; 37,544 and 37,544 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
236,412
|
|
|
|
236,574
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
72,876
|
|
|
|
70,294
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
5,356
|
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
314,644
|
|
|
|
312,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
$
|
403,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-92
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided
by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,883
|
|
|
|
8,658
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects
of acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
Insurance receivable
|
|
|
(11,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
(837
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(8,060
|
)
|
|
|
(5,405
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
(2,976
|
)
|
|
|
(5,593
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(9,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,137
|
)
|
|
|
(3,078
|
)
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(1,862
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,961
|
)
|
|
|
(4,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,131
|
)
|
|
|
(10,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
175,412
|
|
|
|
161,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
161,281
|
|
|
$
|
151,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodation payments paid with credits
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
F-93
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business
|
MedQuist is the largest Medical Transcription Service
Organization (MTSO) in the world, and a leader in technology
enabled clinical documentation workflow. We service health
systems, hospitals and large group medical practices throughout
the U.S., and we employ approximately 5,600 skilled medical
transcriptionists (MTs), making us the largest employer of MTs
in the U.S. We believe our services and enterprise
technology solutions including mobile voice capture
devices, speech recognition technologies, Web-based workflow
platforms, and global network of MTs and editors
enable healthcare facilities to improve patient care, increase
physician satisfaction, and lower operational costs.
Change in
majority owner
On August 6, 2008, CBaySystems Holdings Limited
(CBaySystems Holdings), a company that is publicly traded on the
AIM market of the London Stock Exchange with a portfolio of
investments in medical transcription, which includes a company
that competes in the medical transcription market, healthcare
technology, and healthcare financial services, acquired a 69.5%
ownership interest in MedQuist from Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V. (Philips) for $11.00 per share (CBaySystems
Holdings Purchase). Immediately prior to the closing of the
CBaySystems Holdings Purchase, four of our directors affiliated
with Philips resigned from our board of directors and four
individuals affiliated with CBaySystems Holdings were appointed
to our board of directors.
In November 2003, one of our employees raised allegations that
we had engaged in improper billing practices. In response, our
board of directors undertook an independent review of these
allegations (Review). On March 16, 2004, we announced that
we had delayed the filing of our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 pending the completion
of the Review. As a result of our noncompliance with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC)
periodic disclosure requirements, our common stock was delisted
from the NASDAQ National Market on June 16, 2004.
In response to our customers concern over the public
disclosure of certain findings from the Review, we made the
decision in the fourth quarter of 2005 to take action to try to
avoid litigation and preserve and solidify our customer business
relationships by offering a financial accommodation to certain
of our customers. See Note 7.
Disclosure of the findings of the Review, along with the
delisting of our common stock, precipitated a number of
governmental investigations and civil lawsuits. See Note 11.
On July 5, 2007, we filed our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (2005
Form 10-K).
The 2005
Form 10-K
was our first periodic report covering the period after
September 30, 2003. On August 31, 2007, we filed our
Forms 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006
and September 30, 2006 as well as our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. On October 4,
2007, we filed our
Forms 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007. On November 9, 2007, we timely filed our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and we have timely
filed all periodic reports since that date.
Our common stock was relisted on the Global Market of The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC on July 17, 2008.
F-94
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The consolidated financial statements included herein are
unaudited and have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations although we believe that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The
consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the
accounts of all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
These statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that,
in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair
presentation of the information contained herein. These
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. As permitted under GAAP,
interim accounting for certain expenses is based upon full year
assumptions. Such amounts are expensed in full in the year
incurred. For interim financial reporting purposes, income taxes
are recorded based upon actual year to date income tax rates as
permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim
Periods.
Our accounting policies are set forth in detail in Note 3
to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on
March 17, 2008.
In September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines
fair value, creates a framework within GAAP for measuring fair
value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In
defining fair value, SFAS 157 emphasizes a market-based
measurement approach that is based on the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements,
but does generally apply to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the
FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,
which delays for one year the effective date of
SFAS 157 for most nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. Nonfinancial instruments affected by this deferral
include assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured
at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted
SFAS 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities
recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. The partial
adoption of SFAS 157 for these items did not have a
material impact on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows. The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value into three broad categories. Level 1:
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the company has the ability to access.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable
inputs that are corroborated by market data such as quoted
prices, interest rates and yield curves. Level 3: Inputs
are unobservable data points that are not corroborated by market
data. At June 30, 2008, we held two financial assets, cash
and cash equivalents (Level 1) and our Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP) included in other current
assets with a fair value of $975. We measure the fair value of
our EDCP on a recurring basis using Level 2 (significant
other observable) inputs as defined by SFAS 157. The
adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the
basis for measuring the fair value of these items.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, including interim periods within that
fiscal year. We did not elect the fair value option for any of
our existing financial instruments as of June 30, 2008 and
we have not determined whether or not we will elect this option
for financial instruments we may acquire in the future.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R defines a business combination
as a transaction or other event in which an acquirer obtains
control of one or more businesses. Under SFAS 141R, all
business combinations are accounted for by applying the
F-95
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase
method), under which the acquirer measures all identified assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in
the acquiree at their acquisition date fair values. Certain
forms of contingent consideration and certain acquired
contingencies are also recorded at their acquisition date fair
values. SFAS 141R also requires that most acquisition
related costs be expensed in the period incurred. SFAS 141R
is effective for us in January 2009. SFAS 141R will change
our accounting for business combinations on a prospective basis.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires a company to recognize
noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as
minority interests) as a separate component in the
equity section of the consolidated statement of financial
position. It also requires the amount of consolidated net income
specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be
identified in the consolidated statement of income.
SFAS 160 also requires changes in ownership interest to be
accounted for similarly, as equity transactions; and when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity
investment in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the
deconsolidation of the subsidiary be measured at fair value.
SFAS 160 is effective for us in January 2009. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, SFAS 160 will have
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires a
company with derivative instruments to disclose information that
should enable financial statement users to understand how and
why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect a companys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for us in January 2009.
The FASB recently issued a Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets, which amends the factors a company should
consider when developing renewal assumptions used to determine
the useful life of an intangible asset under SFAS 142.
Paragraph 11 of SFAS 142 requires companies to
consider whether renewal can be completed without substantial
cost or material modification of the existing terms and
conditions associated with the asset.
FSP 142-3
replaces the previous useful life criteria with a new
requirement that an entity consider its own
historical experience in renewing similar arrangements. If
historical experience does not exist then the company would
consider market participant assumptions regarding renewal
including 1) highest and best use of the asset by a market
participant, and 2) adjustments for other entity-specific
factors included in paragraph 11 of SFAS 142. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any,
SFAS 142-3
will have on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
|
|
4.
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation
expense related to employee stock options recognized under
SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment,
(SFAS 123R).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-96
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
As of June 30, 2008, total unamortized stock-based
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of
expected forfeitures, was $1,199 which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.3 years.
Our stock option plans provide for the granting of options to
purchase shares of common stock to eligible employees (including
officers) as well as to our non-employee directors. Options may
be issued with the exercise prices equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant or at a price
determined by a committee of our board of directors. Stock
options vest and are exercisable over periods determined by the
committee, generally five years, and generally expire no more
than 10 years after the grant.
In July 2004, our board of directors affirmed our June 2004
decision to indefinitely suspend the exercise and future grant
of options under our stock option plans. For 10 of our former
executives (who separated from us in 2004 and 2005) who
held options that were vested as of their resignation date, our
board of directors allowed their options to remain exercisable
for the post-termination period commencing on the date that the
suspension was lifted for the exercise of options. There were
704 options that qualified for this post-termination exercise
period. The suspension was lifted on October 4, 2007 and
all but 154 of these options terminated on February 1,
2008. A summary of these remaining options as of June 30,
2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercisable
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
shares
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$ 2.71 - $10.00
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$10.01 - $20.00
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.38
|
|
$20.01 - $70.00
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Of the remaining 154 options, 12
were exercised in July 2008 and the remaining 142 expire on
October 3, 2009.
|
The extension of the life of the awards was recorded as a
modification of the grants in 2004 and 2005. Under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, (APB 25), the modification
created intrinsic value for vested stock if the market value of
the stock on the date of termination exceeded the exercise
price. Therefore, these grants required an immediate recognition
of the compensation expense with an offsetting credit to common
stock. No charges were incurred for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008.
Information with respect to our common stock options is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
subject to
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life in years
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
$
|
40.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
$
|
26.80
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
$
|
29.03
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
$
|
27.09
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-97
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference
between the closing stock price on the last trading day of the
quarter and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number
of
in-the-money
options.
There were no options granted or exercised during the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.
A summary of outstanding and exercisable common stock options as
of June 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
of shares
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$2.71 - $10.00
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$10.01 - $20.00
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
14.80
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
16.75
|
|
$20.01 - $30.00
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
26.41
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
26.41
|
|
$30.01 - $40.00
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
32.89
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
32.89
|
|
$40.01 - $70.00
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
58.88
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
58.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
26.80
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
$
|
29.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, there were 1,019 additional options
available for grant under our stock option plans. When we became
current in our reporting obligations with the SEC on
October 4, 2007, certain executive officers, in accordance
with their employment agreements, received a grant of an
aggregate of 200 options with an exercise price equal to the
grant date market value of our common stock on October 4,
2007.
|
|
5.
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,402
|
|
|
$
|
(2,621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Net income (loss)
per share
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per
share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average shares outstanding, as adjusted for the dilutive effect
of common stock equivalents, which consist only of stock
options, using the treasury stock method.
The following table reflects the weighted average shares
outstanding used to compute basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,499
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share does not
assume conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would
have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted net loss per share. For
the six months ended June 30, 2008 we had a net loss. As a
result, any assumed conversions would result in reducing the net
loss per share and, therefore, are not included in the
calculation. Shares having an anti-dilutive effect on net loss
per share and, therefore, excluded from the calculation of
diluted net loss per share, totaled 1,565 shares for the
six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
7.
|
Customer
accommodation and quantification
|
As noted in Note 2, in connection with our decision to
offer financial accommodations to certain of our customers
(Accommodation Customers), we analyzed our historical billing
information and the available report-level data
(Managements Billing Assessment) to develop individualized
accommodation offers to be made to Accommodation Customers
(Accommodation Analysis). The Accommodation Analysis took
approximately one year to complete. The methodology utilized to
develop the individual accommodation offers was designed to
generate positive accommodation outcomes for Accommodation
Customers. As such, the methodology was not a calculation of
potential over billing nor was it intended as a measure of
damages or a reflection of any admission of liability due and
owed to Accommodation Customers. Instead, the Accommodation
Analysis was a methodology that was developed to arrive at
commercially reasonable and fair accommodation offers that would
be acceptable to Accommodation Customers without negotiation.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, based on the Accommodation
Analysis, our board of directors authorized management to make
cash accommodation offers to Accommodation Customers in the
aggregate amount of $65,413. In 2006, this amount was adjusted
by a net additional amount of $1,157 based on a refinement of
the Accommodation Analysis resulting in an aggregate amount of
$66,570. By accepting our accommodation offer, an Accommodation
Customer must agree, among other things, to release us from any
and all claims and liability regarding certain billing related
issues.
F-99
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
As part of this process, we also conducted an analysis in an
attempt to quantify the economic consequences of potentially
unauthorized adjustments to Accommodation Customers ratios
and formulae within the transcription platform setups
(Quantification). This Quantification was calculated to be
$9,835.
Of the authorized cash accommodation amount of $66,570, $57,678
and $1,157 were treated as consideration given by a vendor to a
customer and accordingly recorded as a reduction in revenues in
2005 and 2006, respectively. The balance of $7,735 plus an
additional $2,100 has been accounted for as a billing error
associated with the Quantification resulting in a reduction of
revenues in various reporting periods from 1999 to 2005.
The goal of our customer accommodation was to reach a settlement
with certain of our customers. However, the Accommodation
Analysis for certain customers did not result in positive
accommodation outcomes. For certain other Accommodation
Customers, the Accommodation Analysis resulted in calculated
cash accommodation offers that we believed were insufficient as
a percentage of their historical line billing to motivate such
customers to resolve their billing disputes with us. Therefore,
in 2006 we modified our customer accommodation to enable us to
offer this group of Accommodation Customers credits for the
purchase of future products
and/or
services from us over a defined period of time. On July 21,
2006, our board of directors authorized management to make
credit accommodation offers up to an additional $8,676 beyond
amounts previously authorized. During 2006, this amount was
adjusted by a net additional amount of $569 based on a
refinement of the Accommodation Analysis, resulting in an
aggregate amount of $9,245. In connection with the credit
accommodation offers we recorded a reduction in revenues and
corresponding increase in accrued expenses of $9,245 in 2006.
The following is a summary of the financial statement activity
for the periods indicated related to the customer accommodation
and the Quantification which is included as a separate line item
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
24,777
|
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
Payments and other adjustments
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
|
|
(5,606
|
)
|
Credits
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
|
$
|
12,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, we
recorded a credit of ($4,897) and a charge of $8,126,
respectively for costs associated with the Review and
Managements Billing Assessment, as well as defense and
other costs associated with governmental investigations and
civil litigation, including, in 2007, $197 of consulting
services provided by Nightingale and Associates, LLC
(Nightingale), a management consulting company specializing in
turn-arounds and crisis management, that we deemed to be unusual
in nature. Howard Hoffmann, our former President and Chief
Executive Officer, provided services to us pursuant to the terms
of an agreement between us and Nightingale. Nightingale also
provided certain consulting services to us related to the Review
and Managements Billing Assessment. The agreement with
Nightingale was terminated consensually on June 10, 2008,
which was also the date that Mr. Hoffmann ceased being our
President and Chief Executive Officer. These costs are net of
insurance claim reimbursements. We record insurance claims when
the realization of the claim is
F-100
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
probable. The following is a summary of the amounts recorded as
Cost of investigation and legal proceedings, net, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
$
|
8,846
|
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Nightingale services
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries and claims
|
|
|
(15,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees represent accounting and dispute
analysis costs and document search and retrieval costs. In 2007,
insurance recoveries and claims represent insurance recoveries
($4,243) and insurance claims ($11,143). The insurance claims
were recorded in other current assets and payment related to
these claims was received in the third quarter of 2007. We do
not expect to receive any additional insurance recoveries in the
future. The 2008 Other amount of $1,500 is for the proposed
settlement of all claims related to the consolidated medical
transcriptionists putative class action.
2005
restructuring plan
During 2005, we implemented a restructuring plan (2005 Plan)
based on the implementation of a centralized national service
delivery model. The 2005 Plan involved the consolidation of
operating facilities and a related reduction in workforce. The
table below reflects the financial statement activity related to
the 2005 Plan which is included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Total non-cancelable
|
|
|
Total non-cancelable
|
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
Additional charge
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of payments related to the 2005 Plan will be made
by 2009 for non-cancelable leases.
F-101
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2007
restructuring plans
During the third quarter of 2007, we implemented a restructuring
plan related to a reduction in workforce of 104 employees
as a result of the refinement of our centralized national
services delivery model. In addition, during the fourth quarter
of 2007, we implemented a restructuring plan related to an
additional reduction in workforce of 183 employees
attributable to our efforts to reduce costs. All of the
restructuring costs incurred are severance related. The table
below reflects the financial statement activity related to the
2007 Plan which is included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Total severance
|
|
|
Total severance
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,263
|
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
Reversal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
(1,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2008, we reversed $45 related to the
2007 restructuring plan because certain employee severance
expenses will not be incurred. The remainder of payments related
to the 2007 restructuring plans will be made by the end of 2008.
Our consolidated income tax expense consists principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization deductions for income tax purposes during the
applicable period as well as state and foreign income taxes
offset by the reversal of certain state tax reserves due to the
expiration of the statutes of limitations. We have recorded a
valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to an
amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future
years.
Under FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48), we classify penalties and interest related to
uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense. There
were no material changes to our uncertain tax positions,
including penalties and interest for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Governmental
investigations
The SEC is currently conducting a formal investigation of us
relating to our billing practices. We have been fully
cooperating with the SEC since it opened its investigation in
2004 and we have complied with information and document requests
by the SEC.
We also received an administrative subpoena under Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) for
documents from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on
December 17, 2004. The subpoena sought information
primarily about our provision of medical transcription services
to governmental and non-governmental customers. The information
was requested in connection with a government investigation into
whether we and others violated federal laws in connection with
the provision of medical transcription services. We have
complied, and are continuing to comply, with information and
document requests by the DOJ.
F-102
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) conducted a formal
investigation into the administration of our 401(k) plan.
We fully cooperated with the DOL from the inception of its
investigation in 2004 and we complied with information and
document requests by the DOL. In April 2008, we made an
additional contribution of approximately $41 to our 401(k) plan
and certain current or former plan participants in an attempt to
resolve the DOL investigation. In July 2008, we received written
confirmation from the DOL that it has concluded its
investigation.
Developments relating to the SEC
and/or DOJ
investigations may continue to represent various risks and
uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our
business and our historical and future financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
Customer
litigation
South broward
putative class action
A putative class action was filed in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California. The action,
entitled South Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Memorial
Regional Hospital, et al. v. MedQuist Inc. et al., Case
No. CV-04-7520-TJH-VBKx,
was filed on September 9, 2004 against us and certain of
our present and former officers, purportedly on behalf of an
alleged class of non-federal governmental hospitals and medical
centers that the complaint claims were wrongfully and
fraudulently overcharged for transcription services by
defendants based primarily on our use of the AAMT line billing
unit of measure. The complaint charged fraud, violation of the
California Business and Professions Code, unjust enrichment,
conversion, negligent supervision and violation of RICO. Named
as defendants, in addition to us, were one of our senior vice
presidents, our former executive vice president of marketing and
new business development, our former executive vice president
and chief legal officer, and our former executive vice president
and chief financial officer.
On March 10, 2008, the parties reached agreement on
settlement terms resolving all claims by the named plaintiffs.
The parties entered into a final settlement agreement on or
about May 21, 2008. Under the parties agreement, we
made a lump sum payment of $7,520 to resolve all claims by the
individual named plaintiffs and certain other additional
putative class members represented by plaintiffs counsel
but not named in the action. We have accrued the entire amount
of this lump sum payment, $5,205 of which was accrued during
2005, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007. Neither we, nor any of the individual
defendants, admitted to any liability or any wrongdoing in
connection with the settlement. On June 16, 2008, the
District Court dismissed the case with prejudice in its entirety
and without costs. Because the settlement is not be on a
class-wide
basis, no class will be certified and thus there is no
requirement to give notice.
Kaiser
litigation
On June 6, 2008, plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,
Inc., Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, The Permanente Medical Group,
Inc., Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States,
Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado
(collectively, Kaiser) filed suit against MedQuist Inc. and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. (collectively, MedQuist) in the
Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County
of Alameda. The action is entitled Foundation Health Plan Inc.,
et al v. MedQuist Inc. et al., Case
No. CV-078-03425
PJH. The complaint asserts five causes of action, for common law
fraud, breach of contract, violation of California Business and
Professions Code section 17200, unjust enrichment, and a
demand for an accounting. More specifically, Kaiser alleges that
MedQuist fraudulently inflated the payable units of measure in
medical transcription reports generated by MedQuist for Kaiser
pursuant to the contracts between the parties. The damages
alleged in the complaint include an estimated $7 million in
compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages,
attorneys fees and costs, and injunctive relief. MedQuist
contends that it did not breach the contracts with Kaiser, or
commit the fraud alleged, and it intends to defend the suit
vigorously. MedQuist removed the case to the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California, and has
filed motions to dismiss Kaisers complaint and to transfer
venue of the case to the United Stated District Court for the
District of New Jersey. The parties
F-103
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
participated in mediation on July 24, 2008, but the case
was not settled. An initial case management conference has been
set for October 23, 2008.
Medical
transcriptionist litigation
Hoffmann putative
class action
A putative class action lawsuit was filed against us in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia. The action, entitled Brigitte Hoffmann, et al. v.
MedQuist Inc., et al., Case
No. 1:04-CV-3452,
was filed with the Court on November 29, 2004 against us
and certain current and former officials, purportedly on behalf
of an alleged class of current and former employees and
statutory workers, who are or were compensated on a per
line basis for medical transcription services
(Class Members) from January 1, 1998 to the time of
the filing of the complaint (Class Period). The complaint
specifically alleged that defendants systematically and
wrongfully underpaid the Class Members during the
Class Period. The complaint asserted the following causes
of action: fraud, breach of contract, demand for accounting,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, conversion, negligence,
negligent supervision, and RICO violations. Plaintiffs sought
unspecified compensatory damages, punitive damages, disgorgement
and restitution. On December 1, 2005, the Hoffmann matter
was transferred to the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey. On January 12, 2006, the Court
ordered this case consolidated with the Myers Putative
Class Action discussed below. As set forth below, the
parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle all
claims.
Force putative
class action
A putative class action entitled Force v. MedQuist Inc. and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-2608-WSD,
was filed against us on October 11, 2005 in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of current and
former employees who claim they are or were compensated on a
per line basis for medical transcription services
but were allegedly underpaid due to the actions of defendants.
The named plaintiff asserted claims for breach of contract,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and for an accounting. Upon
stipulation and consent of the parties, on February 17,
2006, the Force matter was ordered transferred to the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the parties entered into a
stipulation and consent order whereby the Force matter was
consolidated with the Myers Putative Class Action discussed
below, and the consolidated amended complaint filed in the Myers
action on January 31, 2006 was deemed to supersede the
original complaint filed in the Force matter. As set forth
below, the parties have reached an agreement in principle to
settle all claims.
Myers putative
class action
A putative class action entitled Myers, et al. v. MedQuist Inc.
and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-4608
(JBS), was filed against us on September 22, 2005 in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of our employee
and independent contractor transcriptionists who claim that they
contracted with us to be paid on a 65 character line, but were
allegedly underpaid due to intentional miscounting of the number
of characters and lines transcribed. The named plaintiffs
asserted claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and
requested an accounting.
The allegations contained in the Myers case are substantially
similar to those contained in the Hoffmann and Force putative
class actions and, as detailed above, the three actions have now
been consolidated. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on
January 31, 2006. In the consolidated amended complaint,
the named plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract,
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust
enrichment and demand an accounting. On March 7, 2006 we
filed a motion to dismiss all claims in the consolidated amended
complaint. The motion was fully briefed and argued on
August 7, 2006. The Court denied the motion on
December 21, 2006. On January 19, 2007, we filed our
answer denying the material allegations pleaded in the
consolidated amended complaint.
F-104
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
On May 17, 2007, the Court issued a Scheduling Order,
ordering all pretrial fact discovery completed by
October 30, 2007. The Court subsequently ordered plaintiffs
to file their motion for class certification by
December 14, 2007 and continued the date to complete fact
discovery to January 14, 2008. On October 18, 2007,
the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs motion to
compel further responses to written discovery regarding our
billing practices. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court
denied plaintiffs motion, finding plaintiffs had not
established that the billing discovery sought was relevant to
the claims or defenses regarding transcriptionist pay alleged in
their case. On December 14, 2007, plaintiffs filed their
motion for class certification, identifying a proposed class of
all of our transcriptionists who were compensated on a per line
basis for work completed on MedRite, MTS or DEP transcription
platforms from November 29, 1998 to the present and
alleging that the proposed class was underpaid by more than
$80 million, not including interest.
On January 4, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order
ordering our opposition to the motion for class certification to
be filed by March 14, 2008, plaintiffs reply brief to
be filed by May 14, 2008 and setting oral argument for
June 2, 2008. No date has been set for trial. On
January 9, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order
extending the deadline for the parties to complete depositions
of identified witnesses through February 15, 2008. We have
now deposed each of the named plaintiffs and all witnesses who
offered declarations in support of plaintiffs motion for
class certification, and plaintiffs have deposed numerous
MedQuist present and former employees. On February 8, 2008,
plaintiffs indicated that they would seek leave to file an
amended class certification brief to narrow their claims. On
February 19, 2008, the parties exchanged their Initial
Disclosures. Plaintiffs disclosures limited their damages
estimate to $41.0 million related to alleged underpayment
on the MedRite transcription platform; however, plaintiffs
stated that they were continuing to analyze potential
undercounting and would supplement their damages claim. On
March 10, 2008, plaintiffs moved for leave to file an
amended motion for class certification dropping all allegations
involving our DEP transcription platform and narrowing the
claims asserted regarding the legacy MTS transcription platform.
We did not oppose plaintiffs motion for leave. On
March 11, 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs motion,
ordering us to file our opposition to plaintiffs amended
motion for class certification by April 4, 2008 and
ordering plaintiffs to file their reply by May 23, 2008. On
April 4, 2008, we filed our opposition to plaintiffs
amended motion for class certification.
On or about April 21, 2008, the parties reached a tentative
settlement of all claims in exchange for payment by MedQuist of
$1.5 million plus certain injunctive relief. The parties
are in the process of documenting their agreement. The court has
been notified of the tentative settlement and the lawsuit has
been stayed while the parties continue to negotiate the
settlement documentation. The tentative settlement contemplates
notice to a settlement class consisting of all medical
transcriptionists paid by the line for the period from
November 29, 1998 through execution of the stipulation of
settlement and is conditioned on final approval by the court.
Neither MedQuist, nor any other party, has admitted or will
admit liability or any wrongdoing in connection with the
proposed settlement.
Shareholder
litigation
Costa Brava
partnership III, L.P. Shareholder Litigation
Annual meeting
and books and records claims
On October 9, 2007, a single count Complaint and an Order
to Show Cause were filed against us in the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Chancery Division, Burlington County by one of our
shareholders. The action, entitled Costa Brava Partnership III,
L.P. v. MedQuist Inc. (Bur-C-0149-07), sought to compel us
to hold an annual meeting of shareholders (Annual Meeting Claim).
On October 30, 2007, plaintiff requested access under New
Jersey law to certain of our books and records. In response to
plaintiffs request, we voluntarily provided plaintiff with
those books and records that we believed we were required to
produce under New Jersey law. Thereafter, on November 9,
2007, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint to assert a second
claim to compel us to provide it with access to certain other
books and records
F-105
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(Books and Records Claim). The Annual Meeting Claim and the
Books and Records Claim sought equitable relief only.
In December 2007, we agreed to hold our annual meeting of
shareholders on December 31, 2007. This resolved the Annual
Meeting Claim. Prior to the annual meeting, we produced to
plaintiff certain additional books and records that plaintiff
requested in the Books and Records Claim. Thereafter, on
January 24, 2008, we filed an opposition to
plaintiffs Order to Show Cause to compel access to the
remaining books and records. On February 4, 2008, plaintiff
filed a reply brief. In June 2008, we and the plaintiff settled
the Books and Records Claim on terms acceptable for all parties.
No monetary payments were made by either party and each party
was responsible for its own attorneys fees and costs
incurred in the litigation.
Claim for
preliminary and injunctive relief
On July 30, 2008, Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P. filed a
verified complaint and jury demand in the United States District
Court District of New Jersey against MedQuist Inc., Philips,
CBay Inc., CBaySystems Holdings, S.A.C. Capital Management, LLC,
S.A.C. Private Capital Group, LLC, S.A.C. PEI CB Investment,
L.P., and four of our former, non-independent directors, Clement
Revetti, Jr., Gregory M. Sebasky and Scott M. Weisenhoff
and Edward H. Siegel. It subsequently filed a first amended
complaint on August 1, 2008. The amended complaint alleges
that the defendants violated the Clayton Act, the New Jersey
Shareholder Protection Act, and federal securities laws, by
engaging in certain actions that were anti-competitive, harmful
to us and in furtherance of the CBaySystems Holdings purchase of
Philips stock in MedQuist. Certain of the claims are
purportedly asserted derivatively on our behalf. On
August 1, 2008, the plaintiff also sought an ex parte
temporary restraining order and entry of an order to show cause
requiring the defendants to appear and show cause why a
preliminary injunction should not be issued enjoining the
complained of actions. A hearing was held on the preliminary
injunction motion on August 5, 2008. At the conclusion of
the hearing, the Court denied the request for a temporary
restraining order and denied the request to enter an order to
show cause. The Court ruled that the plaintiff had not met the
standards for injunctive relief, including a showing of
likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm. The
Court allowed the plaintiff two weeks to file a further amended
complaint, and directed the parties to engage in discovery on an
expedited schedule. We deny any liability and intend to defend
this action vigorously.
Kahn putative
class action
A shareholder putative class action lawsuit was filed against us
in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division,
Burlington County. The action, entitled Alan R. Kahn v.
Stephen H. Rusckowski, et al., Docket
No. BUR-C-000007-08,
was filed with the Court on January 22, 2008 against us,
Philips and four of our former non-independent directors,
Clement Revetti, Jr., Stephen H. Rusckowski, Gregory M.
Sebasky and Scott Weisenhoff. Plaintiff purports to bring the
action on his own behalf and on behalf of all current holders of
our common stock. The complaint alleged that defendants breached
their fiduciary duties of good faith, fair dealing, loyalty, and
due care by purportedly agreeing to and initiating a process for
our sale or a change of control transaction which will allegedly
cause harm to plaintiff and the putative class. Plaintiff sought
damages in an unspecified amount, plus costs and interest, a
judgment declaring that defendants breached their fiduciary
duties and that any proposed transactions regarding our sale or
change of control are void, an injunction preventing our sale or
any change of control transaction that is not entirely fair to
the class, an order directing us to appoint three independent
directors to our board of directors, and attorneys fees
and expenses.
On June 12, 2008, plaintiff filed an amended class action
complaint against us, eight of our current and former directors,
and Philips in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery
Division. In the amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that our
current and former directors breached their fiduciary duties of
good faith, fair dealing, loyalty, and due care by not
permitting our public shareholders the opportunity to decide
whether they wanted to participate in a share purchase offer
with non-party CBaySystems Holdings that would have allowed the
public shareholders to sell their shares of our common stock for
an amount above market price. Plaintiff further alleges that
CBaySystems Holdings also made the share purchase offer to our
majority shareholder, Philips, and that Philips
F-106
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
breached its fiduciary duties by accepting CBaySystems
Holdings offer. Based on these allegations, plaintiff
seeks declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief from all
defendants.
On July 14, 2008, we moved to dismiss plaintiffs
amended class action complaint, arguing (1) that
plaintiffs amended class action complaint did not allege
that we engaged in any wrongdoing which supported a breach of
fiduciary duty claim and (2) that a breach of fiduciary
duty claim is not legally cognizable against a corporation.
Plaintiff filed an opposition to our motion to dismiss on
July 21, 2008. The Court will hold oral argument on our
motion some time in October 2008.
We deny any liability and intend to defend this action
vigorously.
Newcastle
shareholder litigation
On June 30, 2008, Newcastle Partners, L.P. (Newcastle), a
shareholder affiliated with one of our directors, derivatively
on our behalf, filed an action against Philips, CBaySystems
Holdings, CBay Inc., Stephen H. Rusckowski, Clement
Revetti, Jr., Greg Sebasky, Jr., Scott M. Weisenhoff
and Edward H. Siegel, each of whom is one of our former
non-independent directors, in the Superior Court of New Jersey,
Chancery Division, Burlington County. The complaint also named
us as a Nominal Defendant, meaning that no monetary
relief is being sought against us.
On July 9, 2008, Newcastle amended the complaint to add
Arklow Master Fund, Ltd. (Arklow), one of our shareholders and
affiliated with one of our directors, as an additional
plaintiff. Plaintiffs allege that defendants have taken steps to
sell Philips entire interest in MedQuist (i.e., 69.5% of
our outstanding shares) to CBaySystems Holdings and CBay Inc.
(collectively, CBay). Plaintiffs assert four counts in the
complaint. First, plaintiffs contend that Rusckowski, Revetti,
Sebasky, Weisenhoff and Siegel (collectively, the Philips
Directors), who are also senior officers of Philips, breached
their fiduciary duties, to the Company by taking steps to
consummate the proposed sale of Philips shares in MedQuist
to CBay Inc. that will adversely affect the Company. Second,
plaintiffs aver that all of the defendants, individually and
together, aided and abetted the Philips Directors breach
of their fiduciary duties. In light of the first two counts,
plaintiffs sought injunctive relief (including an order
enjoining the proposed sale of Philips shares in MedQuist
to CBay Inc.), declaratory relief and attorneys fees and
costs. Third, as an alternative form of relief, plaintiffs plead
that in the event that Philips sells its stake in MedQuist,
plaintiffs demand a declaration that a certain agreement related
to the governance of the Company remain in full force and
effect. Fourth, plaintiffs assert that CBay breached the
standstill provision contained in an April 2008 confidentiality
agreement between us and CBay and demand an injunction to
prevent CBay from violating that agreement.
On July 8, 2008, Newcastle filed an Application for an
Order to Show Cause (OSC) to (i) preliminarily enjoin
Philips and CBay from consummating the sale of Philips
MedQuist stock to CBay; (ii) preliminarily enjoin the
Philips Directors from taking any action to consummate the
proposed sale; and (iii) preliminarily enjoin CBay from
violating the Confidentiality Agreement. As part of the relief
requested in the OSC, plaintiffs sought a Temporary Restraining
Order (TRO) that would restrain all defendants from taking any
action in violation of the proposed OSC until a preliminary
injunction hearing could be held.
On July 9, 2008, counsel for MedQuist, Philips, the Philips
Directors, CBay, Newcastle and Arklow appeared before Judge
Michael Hogan of the Superior Court of New Jersey, for a hearing
on the TRO application. After entertaining argument from the
parties, Judge Hogan denied the TRO application. Judge Hogan
scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing for July 31,
2008 and ordered expedited discovery. The parties subsequently
agreed to an expedited discovery schedule, as well as a briefing
schedule on OSC for a preliminary injunction. The hearing was
held on July 31, 2008, and on August 1, 2008, the
Court issued an order denying plaintiffs motion seeking
preliminary injunctive relief. The Court found, among other
things, that the plaintiffs failed to establish by clear and
convincing evidence a reasonable probability of success on their
underlying claims, or that absent injunctive relief they would
suffer immediate irreparable harm.
F-107
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Reseller
arbitration demand
On October 1, 2007, we received from counsel to nine
current and former resellers of our products (Claimants), a copy
of an arbitration demand filed by the Claimants, initiating an
arbitration proceeding styled Diskriter, Inc., Electronic Office
Systems, Inc., Milner Voice & Data, Inc., Nelson
Systems, Inc., NEO Voice and Communications, Inc., Office
Business Systems, Inc., Roach-Reid Office Systems, Inc., Stiles
Office Systems, Inc., and Travis Voice and Data, Inc. v.
MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. (collectively
MedQuist) (filed on September 27, 2007, AAA,
30-118-Y-00839-07).
The arbitration demand purports to set forth claims for breach
of contract; breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing;
promissory estoppel; misrepresentation; and tortious
interference with contractual relations. The Claimants allege
that we breached our written agreements with the Claimants by:
(i) failing to provide reasonable training, technical
support, and other services; (ii) using the Claimants
confidential information to compete against the Claimants;
(iii) directly competing with the Claimants
territories; and (iv) failing to make new products
available to the Claimants. In addition, the Claimants allege
that we made false oral representations that we: (i) would
provide new product, opportunities and support to the Claimants;
(ii) were committed to continuing to use Claimants;
(iii) did not intend to create our own sales force with
respect to the Claimants territory; and (iv) would
stay out of Claimants territories and would not attempt to
take over the Claimants business and relationships with the
Claimants customers and end-users. The Claimants assert
that they are seeking damages in excess of $24.3 million.
We also moved to dismiss MedQuist Inc. as a party to the
arbitration since MedQuist Inc. is not a party to the
Claimants agreements, and accordingly, has never agreed to
arbitration. The AAA initially agreed to rule on these matters,
but then decided to defer a ruling to the panel of arbitrators
selected pursuant to the parties agreements (Panel). In
response, we informed the Panel that a court, not the Panel,
should rule on these issues. When it appeared that the Panel
would rule on these issues, we initiated a lawsuit in the
Superior Court of DeKalb County (the Court) and requested an
injunction enjoining the Panel from deciding these issues. The
Court denied the request, and indicated that a new motion could
be filed if the Panels ruling was adverse to MedQuist Inc.
or MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. On May 6, 2008, the Panel
dismissed MedQuist Inc. as a party, but ruled against our
opposition to a consolidated arbitration. We asked the Court to
stay the arbitration in order to review that decision. The Court
initially granted the stay, but later lifted the stay. The Court
did not make any substantive rulings regarding consolidation,
and in fact, left that decision and others to the assigned
judge, who was unable to hear those motions. Accordingly, until
further order of the Court, the arbitration will proceed forward.
We filed an answer and counterclaim in the arbitration, which
generally denied liability. In the lawsuit, the defendants filed
a motion to dismiss alleging that the our complaint failed to
state an actionable claim for relief. On July 25, 2008, we
filed our response which opposed the motion to dismiss in all
respects. Discovery has now commenced in both the arbitration
and the lawsuit. We deny all wrongdoing and intend to defend
ourselves vigorously including asserting counterclaims against
the Claimants as appropriate.
Anthurium
patent litigation
On November 6, 2007, Anthurium Solutions, Inc. filed an
action entitled Anthurium Solutions, Inc. v. MedQuist Inc.,
et al., Civil Action
No. 2-07CV-484,
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas, alleging that we infringed and continue to infringe
United States Patent No. 7,031,998 through our DEP
transcription platform. The complaint also alleges patent
infringement claims against Spheris, Inc. and Arrendale
Associates, Inc. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and
unspecified damages, including enhanced damages and
attorneys fees. We filed our answer on January 15,
2008 and counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment of
non-infringement and invalidity. Plaintiff filed its preliminary
infringement contentions on May 2, 2008. Our investigation
of the claims is ongoing. We believe that the claims asserted
have no merit and intend to vigorously defend the suit.
F-108
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Other
matters
From time to time, we have been involved in various claims and
legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our
opinion, the outcome of such actions will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
We provide certain indemnification provisions within our
standard agreement for the sale of software and hardware
(collectively, Products) to protect our customers from any
liabilities or damages resulting from a claim of
U.S. patent, copyright or trademark infringement by third
parties relating to our Products. We believe that the likelihood
of any future payout relating to these provisions is remote.
Accordingly, we have not recorded any liability in our
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2007
or June 30, 2008 related to these indemnification
provisions.
We had insurance policies which provided coverage for certain of
the matters related to the legal actions described herein and
certain other legal actions that were previously settled or
dismissed. To date, we have received total insurance recoveries
of $24,795 related to these policies (See Note 8). We do
not expect to receive any additional insurance recoveries
related to these legal actions.
|
|
12.
|
Related party
transactions
|
From time to time, we enter into transactions in the normal
course of business with related parties. The audit committee of
our board of directors has been charged with the responsibility
of approving or ratifying all related party transactions other
than those between us and Philips. In any situation where the
audit committee sees fit to do so, any related party
transaction, other than those between us and Philips, may be
presented to disinterested members of our board of directors for
approval or ratification.
We are a party to various agreements with Philips, our former
majority shareholder. All material transactions between Philips
and us have been reviewed and approved by the supervisory
committee of our board of directors. The supervisory committee
is comprised of directors independent from Philips. Listed below
is a summary of our material agreements with Philips.
On August 6, 2008, the supervisory committee of our board
of directors was eliminated by our board of directors after the
consummation of the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase. We are not a
party to any material agreements with CBaySystems Holdings.
Licensing
agreement
We are a party to a Licensing Agreement with Philips Speech
Processing GmbH, an affiliate of Philips which is now known as
Philips Speech Recognition Systems GmbH (PSRS), on May 22,
2000 (Licensing Agreement). The Licensing Agreement was
subsequently amended by the parties as of January 1, 2002,
February 23, 2003, August 10, 2003, September 1,
2004, December 30, 2005 and February 13, 2007.
Under the Licensing Agreement, we license from PSRS its
SpeechMagic speech recognition and processing software,
including any updated versions of the software developed by PSRS
during the term of the License Agreement (Licensed Product), for
use by us anywhere in the world. We pay a fee for use of this
license based upon a per line fee for each transcribed line of
text processed through the Licensed Product.
Upon the expiration of its initial term on June 28, 2005,
the Licensing Agreement was renewed for an additional five year
term. As part of the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase, Philips
waived its ability to terminate the Licensing Agreement until
the expiration of the current renewal term, conditioned upon a
similar waiver from us.
In connection with the Licensing Agreement, we have a consulting
arrangement with PSRS whereby PSRS assists us with the
integration of its speech and transcription technologies.
F-109
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
OEM supply
agreement
On September 21, 2007, we entered into an Amended and
Restated OEM Supply Agreement (Amended OEM Agreement) with PSRS.
The Amended OEM Agreement amends and restates a previous OEM
Supply Agreement with PSRS dated September 23, 2004. In
connection with the Amended OEM Agreement certain amounts paid
to PSRS were capitalized in fixed assets and are being amortized
over a three-year period.
Pursuant to the Amended OEM Agreement, we purchased a
co-ownership interest in all rights and interests in and to
SpeechQ for Radiology together with its components, including
object and source code for the SpeechQ for Radiology application
and the SpeechQ for Radiology integration SDK (collectively, the
Product), but excluding the SpeechMagic speech recognition and
processing software, which we separately license from PSRS for a
fee under the Licensing Agreement. Additionally, the Amended OEM
Agreement provides that we shall receive, in exchange for a fee,
the exclusive right in the United States, Canada and certain
islands of the Caribbean (collectively the Exclusive Territory)
to sell, service and deliver the Product. In addition, PSRS has
agreed that for the term of the Amended OEM Agreement it will
not release a front-end multi-user reporting solution (including
one similar to the Product) in the medical market in the
Exclusive Territory nor will it directly authorize or assist any
of its affiliates to do so either; provided that the restriction
does not prevent PSRSs affiliates from integrating
SpeechMagic within their general medical application products.
The Amended OEM Agreement further provides that we shall make
payments to PSRS for PSRSs development of an interim
version of the software included in the Product (Interim
Version). Except for the Interim Version which we and PSRS will
co-own, the Amended OEM Agreement provides that any
improvements, developments or other enhancements either we or
PSRS makes to the Product (collectively, Improvements) shall be
owned exclusively by the party that developed such Improvement.
Each party has the right to seek patent or other protection of
the Improvements it owns independent of the other party.
The term of the Amended OEM Agreement extends through
June 30, 2010 and will automatically renew for an
additional three year term provided that we are in material
compliance with the Amended OEM Agreement as of such date. If
PSRS decides to discontinue all business relating to the Product
in the Exclusive Territory on or after June 30, 2010, PSRS
can effect such discontinuation by terminating the Amended OEM
Agreement by providing us with six months prior written
notice of such discontinuation, provided the earliest such
notice can be delivered is June 30, 2010. Either party may
terminate the Amended OEM Agreement for cause immediately in the
event that a material breach by the other party remains uncured
for more than 30 days following delivery of written notice
or in the event that the other party becomes insolvent or files
for bankruptcy.
Equipment
purchases
We purchase certain dictation related equipment from Philips.
Insurance
coverage
Prior to the closing of the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase on
August 6, 2008, we obtained all of our business insurance
coverage (other than workers compensation) through
Philips. As of August 7, 2008, we have insurance policies
through CBaySystems Holdings.
Purchasing
agreements
For each of the three years ended December 31, 2007 we
entered into annual letter agreements with Philips Electronics
North America Corporation (PENAC), an affiliate of Philips, to
purchase products and services from certain suppliers under the
terms of the prevailing agreements between such suppliers and
PENAC. As of January 1, 2008, we are no longer a party to
an agreement with PENAC to purchase the aforementioned products
and services.
F-110
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
CBaySystems
Holdings Purchase
Philips will reimburse us for certain incremental and direct
costs incurred by us in connection with the CBaySystems Holdings
Purchase. These costs totaled $0 for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and $119 for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
From time to time prior to the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase, we
entered into other miscellaneous transactions with Philips
including Philips purchasing certain products and implementation
services from us. We recorded net revenues from sales to Philips
of $0 and $39 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
2008, respectively.
Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 reflect other assets related to Philips of
$1,003 and $955, respectively, and accrued expenses due to
Philips of $1,534 and $2,413, respectively.
Listed below is a summary of the expenses incurred by us in
connection with the various Philips agreements noted above for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.
Charges related to these agreements are included in cost of
revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Licensing agreement
|
|
$
|
1,102
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
OEM supply agreement
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Equipment purchases
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Insurance coverage
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Purchasing agreement
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBay Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,325
|
|
|
$
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On July 29, 2004, we entered into an agreement with
Nightingale under which Nightingale agreed to provide interim
chief executive officer services to us. On July 30, 2004,
our board of directors appointed Howard S. Hoffmann to serve as
our non-employee chief executive officer. Mr. Hoffmann
served as the Managing Partner of Nightingale. With the
departure of our former president in May 2007, our board of
directors appointed Mr. Hoffmann to the additional position
of president in June 2007. Mr. Hoffmann served as our
president and chief executive officer pursuant to the terms of
the agreement between us and Nightingale which was amended on
March 14, 2008 (Amendment). The Amendment, among other
things, extended the term of Mr. Hoffmanns role as
our president and chief executive officer through August 1,
2008. Our agreement with Nightingale also permitted us to engage
additional personnel employed by Nightingale to provide
consulting services to us from time to time.
Mr. Hoffmans service as president and chief executive
officer and the related engagement of Nightingale terminated
consensually on June 10, 2008.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, we
incurred charges of $1,487 and $1,073, respectively for
Nightingale services. From February 1, 2007 through
June 10, 2008, the Nightingale charges were recorded in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations due to Nightingales
focus on operational matters instead of the Review and
Managements Billing Assessment. Prior to February 1,
2007, charges related to Nightingale were recorded in cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net (see Note 8). As
of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, accrued
expenses included $400 and $40, respectively, for amounts due to
Nightingale for services performed.
F-111
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Investment in
A-Life Medical, Inc. (A-Life)
|
As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, we had an
investment of $6,016 and $6,056, respectively, in A-Life, a
privately held entity which provides advanced natural language
processing technology for the medical industry. Our investment
is recorded under the equity method of accounting since we owned
33.6% of A-Lifes outstanding voting shares as of
December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008. Our investment in
A-Life is recorded in other assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
Our investment in A-Life included a note receivable plus accrued
interest due from A-Life which matured on December 31,
2003. Prior to 2007, this note receivable and accrued interest
had been recorded in other assets. In January 2008, A-Life paid
us $1,250 to satisfy this note receivable and accrued interest
in full, as well as all other disputes and claims between A-Life
and us. Accordingly, we reclassified the note receivable and
accrued interest balances to other current assets in the
accompanying December 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet.
In January 2008, we recorded $438 of other income related to
this transaction.
On July 14, 2008, we announced that our board of directors
had declared a dividend of $2.75 per share of our common stock.
The dividend, aggregating $103,300, was paid on August 4,
2008 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on
July 25, 2008.
On July 17, 2008, we announced that our common stock began
trading on the Global Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
under the ticker symbol MEDQ. The Company had been
trading on the pink sheets since 2004.
On August 6, 2008, the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase was
consummated.
F-112
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Spheris Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Spheris Inc. (the Company) as of December 31,
2008 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Spheris Inc. at December 31, 2008 and
2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009 in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared assuming that Spheris Inc. would continue as a going
concern. As more fully described in Notes 2 and 22 to the
consolidated financial statements, on February 3, 2010, the
100% owner of Spheris Inc., Spheris Holding II, Inc.,
voluntarily filed petitions on behalf of itself and each of its
direct and indirect subsidiaries (except for Spheris India
Private Limited) for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. This filing, along with debt covenant
violations as of the balance sheet date, caused the Company to
be in default with covenants under its loan agreements and
senior subordinated notes. These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern. Managements plans in regard to these matters,
including the sale of substantially all of its assets, also are
described in Notes 2 and 22. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of
assets and the amounts, classification and satisfaction of
liabilities that resulted from the uncertainty regarding the
Companys ability to continue as a going concern and its
subsequent sale of assets.
Nashville, Tennessee
June 29, 2010
F-113
Spheris Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,262
|
|
|
$
|
8,817
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,332 and $632,
respectively
|
|
|
28,510
|
|
|
|
20,787
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
11,995
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
36,883
|
|
|
|
51,013
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,309
|
|
|
|
9,782
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
218,841
|
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
275,078
|
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
8,545
|
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
198,440
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
17,448
|
|
|
|
218,543
|
|
Long-term debt and lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
195,499
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
218,957
|
|
|
|
221,993
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized,
10 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effects of $0 and $1,500,
respectively
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
111,680
|
|
|
|
111,874
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(54,215
|
)
|
|
|
(242,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
56,121
|
|
|
|
(132,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders(deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
275,078
|
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-114
Spheris Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
200,392
|
|
|
$
|
182,843
|
|
|
$
|
156,596
|
|
Direct cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization below)
|
|
|
144,255
|
|
|
|
131,039
|
|
|
|
109,059
|
|
Marketing and selling expenses
|
|
|
4,782
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
19,730
|
|
|
|
20,845
|
|
|
|
16,592
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,273
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,872
|
|
Transaction charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
Costs of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Operational restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
193,040
|
|
|
|
177,196
|
|
|
|
343,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
5,647
|
|
|
|
(186,640
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
21,171
|
|
|
|
19,104
|
|
|
|
17,439
|
|
Loss on debt refinancing
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency (gain) loss
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(17,217
|
)
|
|
|
(15,309
|
)
|
|
|
(201,954
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(187,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-115
Spheris Inc.
(In
thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Contributed
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
equity (deficit)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,787
|
|
|
$
|
(474
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,675
|
)
|
|
$
|
86,638
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
|
(11,361
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
|
(10,323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,158
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
(35,036
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
|
(19,179
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
|
(21,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,680
|
|
|
$
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,215
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,383
|
)
|
|
|
(187,383
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation, net of tax effects of $974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
Effects of change in tax position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(187,909
|
)
|
|
|
(188,897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,874
|
|
|
$
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
$
|
(242,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(132,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-116
Spheris Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(187,383
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,273
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
Amortization of acquired technology
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,872
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(6,435
|
)
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
(15,287
|
)
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
Loss on sale or disposal of assets
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Loss on debt refinancing
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(4,674
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|
|
(1,572
|
)
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
(10,069
|
)
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
10,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
|
|
(5,423
|
)
|
|
|
(3,766
|
)
|
Purchase and development of internal-use software
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
Purchase of Vianeta, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(8,447
|
)
|
|
|
(6,296
|
)
|
|
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
71,320
|
|
|
|
7,288
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Payments on the 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
(4,081
|
)
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
Payments on the 2004 Senior Facility
|
|
|
(73,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(5,329
|
)
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
(2,488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
(3,933
|
)
|
|
|
5,555
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
|
|
7,195
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$
|
7,195
|
|
|
$
|
3,262
|
|
|
$
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
20,432
|
|
|
$
|
18,425
|
|
|
$
|
9,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment and internal-use software
through lease obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,019
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-117
Spheris Inc.
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business and summary of significant accounting
policies
|
Organization
and operations
Spheris Inc. (Spheris) is a Delaware corporation.
Subsequent to its acquisition by certain institutional investors
in November 2004 (the November 2004
Recapitalization), Spheris became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Spheris Holding II, Inc. (Spheris Holding
II), and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Spheris
Holding III, Inc. (Spheris Holding III), an entity
owned by affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC and TowerBrook Capital
Partners LLC, CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.
(CHS), and indirectly by certain members of
Spheris current and past management team.
Spheris and its direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Spheris Operations LLC (Operations), Spheris Leasing
LLC, Spheris Canada Inc., Spheris, India Private Limited
(SIPL) and Vianeta Communications
(Vianeta) (sometimes referred to collectively as the
Company), provide clinical documentation technology
and services to health systems, hospitals and group medical
practices located throughout the United States. The Company
receives medical dictation in digital format from subscribing
physicians, converts the dictation into text format, stores
specific data elements from the records, then transmits the
completed medical record to the originating physician in the
prescribed format. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
employed approximately 4,000 skilled medical language
specialists (MLS) in the United States and India.
Approximately 1,800 of these MLS work out of the Companys
facilities in India, making the Company one of the largest
global providers of clinical documentation technology and
services.
Basis of
presentation
For all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements and footnotes, Spheris is the reporting
unit. All dollar amounts shown in these consolidated financial
statements and tables in the notes are in thousands unless
otherwise noted. The consolidated financial statements include
the financial statements of Spheris, including its direct or
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the
realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets
and the amounts, classification and satisfaction of liabilities
that resulted from the uncertainty regarding the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern following its bankruptcy
filing and its subsequent sale of assets. See further discussion
in Note 2 and Note 22.
In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements,
the Company evaluated events and transactions that occurred
subsequent to December 31, 2009, through the date that the
accompanying consolidated financial statements were available to
be issued on June 29, 2010.
Revenue
recognition
The Companys customer contracts contain multiple elements
of services. The Company records service revenues as the
services are performed and defers one-time fees, which are
recognized as revenue over the life of the applicable contracts.
Software licensing revenues are recognized upon culmination of
the earnings process. Clinical documentation services are
provided at a contractual rate, and revenue is recognized when
the provision of services is complete including the satisfaction
of the following criteria: (1) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the
fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is
reasonably assured. The Company monitors actual performance
against contract standards and provides for credits against
billings as reductions to revenues.
F-118
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with
an original maturity of less than three months. At times, cash
balances in the Companys accounts may exceed Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. Consequently,
our cash equivalents are subject to potential credit risk. The
unrestricted cash amounts of SIPL, the Companys Indian
subsidiary, are included as a component of unrestricted cash.
Transfers of funds between the Companys domestic
operations and SIPL may be subject to certain foreign tax
effects.
Restricted
cash
The Companys cash balances include certain amounts that
are being held until the resolution of certain tax matters
related to the Vianeta acquisition, as well as amounts currently
available for distribution to former HealthScribe Inc.
(HealthScribe) and Vianeta shareholders. These
amounts are reflected as restricted cash in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Certain cash deposits made that are
being held as security under certain of the Companys lease
obligations are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk
of a specific customer, historical trends and other information.
Accounts receivables are written off against the allowance for
doubtful accounts when accounts are deemed to be uncollectible
on a specific identification basis. The determination of the
amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts is subject to
judgment and estimation by management. Increases or decreases to
the allowance may be made if circumstances or economic
conditions change.
A summary of the activity in the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
$
|
1,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
Provisions and adjustments to expense
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
344
|
|
Write-offs and adjustments, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration
of credit risk
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of our
customers financial performance and generally requires no
collateral from customers. No individual customer accounted for
10% or more of the Companys net revenues during 2007, 2008
or 2009.
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a
straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally
two to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the
estimated useful lives of the assets. Routine maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while betterments
and
F-119
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
renewals are capitalized. Equipment under capital lease
obligations is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the
applicable assets.
Software
costs
The costs of obtaining or developing internal-use software are
capitalized. Capitalized software is reported at the lower of
unamortized cost or net realizable value and is amortized over
its estimated useful life, which is generally two to five years.
The Company charges the development costs of software intended
for sale to expense as incurred until technological feasibility
is attained. Technological feasibility is attained upon
completion of a detailed program design or, in its absence,
completion of a working model. The time between the attainment
of technological feasibility and completion of software
development by the Company historically has been short. The
Company capitalizes software acquired through business
combinations and technology purchases if the related software
under development has reached technological feasibility or if
there are alternative future uses for the software.
Goodwill,
intangibles and other long-lived assets
Goodwill represents the excess of costs over the fair value of
assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and
intangible assets acquired in a business combination with
indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are subject to
impairment tests at least annually.
The Company performs an analysis of potential impairment of its
goodwill assets annually, or whenever circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may be impaired. Goodwill impairment
testing requires a two step process. The first step is to
identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair
value of each reporting unit with its carrying value, including
goodwill. Regarding the Companys specific analysis, this
assessment is made at the consolidated Company level as it only
has one reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit
exceeds the carrying value, goodwill is not considered to have a
potential impairment, and the second step is not necessary.
However, if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
the carrying value, the second step is performed to determine if
goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment
loss, if any.
Additionally, when events, circumstances or operating results
indicate that the carrying values of certain long-lived assets
and related identifiable intangible assets (excluding goodwill)
that are expected to be held and used might be impaired, the
Company prepares projections of the undiscounted future cash
flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their
eventual disposition. If the projections indicate that the
recorded amounts are not expected to be recoverable, such
amounts are reduced to estimated fair value. Fair value may be
estimated based upon internal evaluations that include
quantitative analysis of revenues and cash flows, reviews of
recent sales of similar assets and independent appraisals. As
further discussed in Note 3, the Company performed an
analysis during 2009 as circumstances arose that indicated that
the carrying value of its goodwill might be significantly
impaired.
Income
taxes
The Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on differences between the financial reporting
and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using
the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income during the period that includes the enactment date. The
Company periodically assesses the likelihood that net deferred
tax assets will be recovered in future periods. To the extent
the Company believes that deferred tax assets may not be fully
realizable, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce such
assets to the carrying amounts that are more likely than not to
be realized. The Company accounts for income taxes associated
with SIPL in accordance with Indian tax guidelines and is
eligible for certain tax holiday programs pursuant to Indian law.
F-120
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Company exercises judgments regarding the recognition and
measurement of uncertain tax positions. The Company recognizes
interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax
benefits in income tax expense.
Advertising
costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising
expenses of $1.7 million, $0.8 million, and
$0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively, were included as marketing and
selling expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. Advertising costs primarily consist of brand
advertising, recruiting for MLS and trade show participation.
Stock-based
compensation
Spheris Holding III has issued, at various times,
restricted stock and stock option grants to the Companys
employees and the Companys non-employee directors. These
restricted stock and stock option grants have been recorded as
compensation under general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations, due to
benefits received by the Company. These restricted stock and
stock option grants were valued at fair market value on the date
of grant using third-party valuations and typically vest over a
three or four-year period from the grant date. Accordingly,
compensation expense is currently being recognized ratably over
the applicable vesting periods.
The Company recognizes compensation expense, using a fair-value
based method, for costs related to share-based payments,
including stock options. The fair value of all share-based
payments received by the Companys employees, non-employee
directors and other designated persons providing substantial
services to the Company is based on the fair value assigned to
equity instruments issued by the Companys indirect parent,
Spheris Holding III.
In connection with an agreement for health information
processing services between Operations and Community Health
Systems Professional Services Corporation, an affiliate of CHS,
Spheris Holding III issued warrants to CHS to purchase
shares of common stock of Spheris Holding III upon the
attainment of certain revenue milestones set forth in the
warrants. Since the warrants were issued by Spheris
Holding III in order to induce sales by the Company, the
costs of the warrants subject to vesting are recognized over the
period in which the revenue is earned and are reflected as a
reduction of net revenues in the accompany consolidated
statements of operations.
Self-insurance
The Company is significantly self-insured for employee health
and workers compensation insurance claims. As such, the
Companys insurance expense is largely dependent on claims
experience and the Companys ability to control its claims.
The Company has consistently accrued the estimated liability for
these insurance claims based on its claims experience and the
time lag between the incident date and the date the cost is paid
by the Company, and based on third-party valuations of the
outstanding liabilities. These estimates could change in the
future. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company had
$2.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively, in
accrued liabilities for employee health and workers
compensation risks.
In August 2009, the Company converted its self-insured
workers compensation policy to a premium based policy.
Comprehensive
income (loss) and foreign currency translation
The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional and
reporting currency. SIPL uses the Indian rupee as its functional
currency. The assets and liabilities of SIPL were translated
using the current exchange rate at the corresponding balance
sheet date. Operating statement amounts for SIPL were translated
at the average exchange rate in effect during the applicable
periods. The resulting translation gains and losses are
reflected as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in
the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders
F-121
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
equity. Exchange rate adjustments resulting from foreign
currency transactions are included in the determination of net
income or loss. The income tax effects of the foreign currency
translation amounts reflect a change in the tax position as a
result of the sale of SIPL stock in April 2010 as discussed in
Note 17 and Note 22.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) requires management of the Company to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets and
liabilities and contingency disclosures at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation in the financial statements and
notes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. These
reclassifications primarily reflect transaction charges, costs
of proceedings and settlements and operational restructuring
charges. These expenses had previously been included in direct
costs of revenues, marketing and selling expenses and general
and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements. These items are further discussed in
Notes 4, 5 and 21. These reclassifications had no effect on
the Companys previously reported results of operations or
financial position.
Recently
adopted accounting pronouncements
For the interim period ended September 30, 2009, the
Company adopted the FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(ASC), which the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) recognizes as the source of
authoritative accounting principles to be applied by
nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive
releases of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are
also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the authoritative
guidance issued by the FASB on fair value measurement for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or
permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted authoritative guidance
issued by the FASB on business combinations, which retains the
current purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but
requires a number of changes, including changes in the way
assets and liabilities are recognized in purchase accounting.
The guidance also requires the capitalization of in-process
research and development at fair value and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs. The impact of this new
guidance did not have a material impact on the accompanying
consolidated financial statements as we have not completed any
acquisitions subsequent to its adoption.
On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted authoritative guidance
issued by the FASB that establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. As all of the
Companys subsidiaries are wholly-owned, adoption of the
new guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations or financial position.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the authoritative
guidance issued by the FASB relative to derivative instruments
and hedging activities, which requires entities that utilize
derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about
their objectives and strategies for using such instruments, as
well as any details of
credit-risk-related
contingent features contained within the derivative instruments.
The new guidance requires disclosure of the amounts and location
of derivative instruments included in an entitys financial
statements, as well as the accounting treatment of such
instruments and the impact that hedges have on an entitys
financial
F-122
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
position, financial performance and cash flows. See Note 6
for the Companys disclosures about its derivative
financial instruments.
Beginning with the interim period ended June 30, 2009, the
Company adopted the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB
that establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued. The new guidance requires entities to disclose the
date through which it has evaluated subsequent events and the
basis for determining that date. See the Companys
disclosure relative to this new guidance above in this
Note 1.
In August 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance on
the measurement and disclosure of the fair value of liabilities
that clarifies the valuation methodologies that may be used when
a quoted market price in an active market for an identical
liability is not available. This guidance was effective for the
Company beginning October 1, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued
ASC 985-605,
Revenue Recognition Software, on revenue recognition
that will become effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted. Under the
new guidance on arrangements that include software elements,
tangible products that have software components that are
essential to the functionality of the tangible product will no
longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition
guidance, and software-enabled products will now be subject to
other relevant revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, the
FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with
multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software
revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when
vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for
deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best
estimate of the selling price is required to separate
deliverables and allocate consideration received using the
relative selling price method. The new guidance includes new
disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative
selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue
recognition. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the impact
that this new guidance will have on its financial statements.
On September 23, 2009, the FASB ratified
ASC 605-25,
Revenue Recognition with Multiple Element
Arrangements (ASC
605-25).
ASC 605-25
requires the allocation of consideration among separately
identified deliverables contained within an arrangement, based
on their related selling prices. The Company utilizes current
accounting guidance, also titled Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables, in the recognition of revenue
associated with the Companys customer contracts that
contain multiple elements of services.
ASC 605-25
will become effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2011. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the impact that
this new guidance will have on its financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued
ASC 820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, an
amendment to earlier authoritative guidance concerning fair
value measurements and disclosures. This amendment requires an
entity to: (i) disclose separately the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 (as described in Note 6) fair value
measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and
(ii) present separate information for Level 3 (as
described in Note 6) activity pertaining to gross
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. This guidance will
become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010.
The Company has not yet fully evaluated the impact that this new
guidance will have on its financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2009 were prepared under the assumption
that the Company would continue to operate as a going concern as
of December 31, 2009, which contemplates the realization of
assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary
course of business. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
faced various uncertainties that raised substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.
F-123
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
On February 3, 2010, the Company, along with the other
Debtors (as defined in Note 22), filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United
States Code. On February 2, 2010, the Debtors entered into
an agreement, as amended April 15, 2010, under which the
Debtors agreed to sell substantially all of their assets to
MedQuist Inc. (MedQuist) and the stock of SIPL to
CBay Inc. (CBay and together with MedQuist, the
Purchasers), portfolio companies of CBaySystems
Holdings Ltd. and providers of medical transcription software
and services. In addition, the Purchasers agreed to assume
certain liabilities in connection with such sale. As further
discussed in Note 22, the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court)
approved the sale on April 15, 2010, and the sale was
consummated on April 22, 2010.
|
|
3.
|
Impairment of
goodwill
|
The Company performed an interim analysis of its goodwill as
circumstances arose that indicated that the carrying value of
its goodwill may be impaired. The potential impairment was
primarily due to deteriorating economic conditions and lower
projected future cash flows as of September 30, 2009.
Regarding the Companys specific analysis, this assessment
was made at the consolidated Company level as the Company only
has one reporting unit. The Company compared the fair value of
its reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill,
and identified a potential impairment. The Company assigned the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its respective
assets and liabilities, including goodwill, to determine if an
impairment charge was required. Fair value of the reporting unit
was estimated based upon internal evaluations and through the
use of independent third-party valuation professionals. The
impairment test resulted in an impairment charge of
$198.9 million. The remaining balance of goodwill of
approximately $20 million is reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
The Company bases its estimates of fair value on various
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates,
which may require an additional impairment charge that could
have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial
position and results of operations.
During 2009, the Company evaluated multiple strategic
opportunities including a technology license agreement, a sale
of the Company or its assets, or a restructuring of its capital
structure. The Company, along with the other Debtors, ultimately
chose to pursue a sale of their assets pursuant to voluntary
filings under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code as further described in Note 22. In connection with
evaluating and pursuing its options, the Company retained
financial and other advisors, including restructuring
professionals. These fees included (a) costs paid to
professionals and others in connection with evaluating,
preparing for, and pursuing filing for Chapter 11 relief,
(b) costs paid to professionals and others related to
evaluating, preparing for, and pursuing sales and licensing
options, (c) costs paid to creditors and creditor committee
advisors, including costs incurred to obtain interim financing
facilities, and (d) costs to retain key employees. Some of
the professionals engaged to assist the Company in these efforts
were utilized to perform multiple functions.
The total of all of the related costs to the Company for
services performed through December 31, 2009, prior to the
Companys and the other Debtors filing for bankruptcy
in February 2010, were $7.0 million, and are reflected as
transaction charges in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations. There were $1.6 million of retainers
representing prepayments for services reflected as a component
of prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
Additionally, there were $0.3 million of prepaid retention
bonus amounts related to employee obligations reflected as a
component of prepaid expenses and other current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2009.
F-124
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Costs of legal
proceedings and settlements
|
On November 6, 2007, the Company was sued for patent
infringement by Anthurium Solutions, Inc. in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging that
the Company had infringed and continues to infringe United
States Patent No. 7,031,998 through the Companys use
of its Clarity technology platform. The complaint also alleged
claims against MedQuist and Arrendale Associates, Inc., and
sought injunctive relief and damages. The Company entered into a
Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement with Anthurium on
August 19, 2009, the terms of which are confidential.
Defense costs, in addition to the confidential settlement paid
during 2009, were $0.4 million and $1.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
and were reflected as costs of legal proceedings and settlements
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
6.
|
Fair value of
financial instruments
|
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company holds certain derivative financial instruments that
are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
These derivative financial instruments are utilized by the
Company to mitigate risks related to interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. The derivatives are measured at fair
value in accordance with the established fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into
the following three levels:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Level 1 observable inputs such as quoted prices
in active markets.
|
|
n
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.
|
|
n
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which little or
no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop
its own assumptions.
|
The Company entered into certain interest rate management
agreements with a single counterparty to reduce its exposure to
fluctuations in market interest rates under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility (as defined in Note 13). An event of
default under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility would create an
event of default under these interest rate management
agreements, which may cause amounts due under these agreements
to become due and payable. The Companys accounting for
these derivative financial instruments did not meet hedge
accounting criteria. Accordingly, changes in fair value were
included as a component of other (income) expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of these interest rate management agreements was
determined using valuation techniques including discounted cash
flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.
This analysis considered the contractual terms of the
derivatives, including the period to maturity, and used
observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves
and implied volatilities. The interest rates used in the
calculation of projected cash flows were based on an expectation
of future interest rates derived from observable market interest
rate curves and volatilities. Additionally, the Company
incorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately
reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its interest derivatives fell within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its interest derivatives utilized Level 3
inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate
the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The Company
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of its interest
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the interest derivatives in their entirety were
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. This
contract expires during 2010. As a result, the full amount of
the liability at December 31, 2009 of $1.7 million is
reflected as a component of other current liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
F-125
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Payments to SIPL are denominated in United States dollars. In
order to hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates, SIPL
historically maintained a portfolio of forward currency exchange
contracts, which were transacted with a single counterparty. The
Companys accounting for these derivative financial
instruments, all of which expired during 2009, did not meet the
hedge accounting criteria. Accordingly, changes in fair value
were included as a component of other (income) expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Company determined the fair value of its foreign currency
exchange contracts utilizing inputs for similar or identical
assets or liabilities that were either readily available in
public markets, derived from information available in publicly
quoted markets or quoted by counterparties to these contracts.
The future value of each contract out to its maturity was
calculated using observable market data, such as the foreign
currency exchange rate forward curve. The present value of each
contract was then determined by using discount factors based on
the forward curve for the more liquid currency. Additionally,
the Company incorporated credit valuation adjustments to
appropriately reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements.
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its foreign currency exchange contracts fell
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit
valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilized
Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The
Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit
valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of the
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the foreign currency exchange contracts in their
entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The Companys derivative financial instruments measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and recorded in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification in the accompanying
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
consolidated balance sheets
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,466
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,016
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The (gains) losses from changes in fair value of the
Companys derivative financial instruments, as recorded in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Location of (gain) loss recognized
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
$
|
1,366
|
|
|
$
|
(779
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
(1,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,593
|
|
|
$
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
subordinated notes
The Companys Senior Subordinated Notes had a quoted market
value of $37.5 million and $63.8 million at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Company determined that its valuation of its Senior
Subordinated Notes was classified in Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy as the fair value was determined through quoted
prices in active markets. The carrying value of the Senior
Subordinated Notes was $123.2 million
F-126
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
at December 31, 2008, as included in current portion of
long-term debt and lease obligations, and was
$123.6 million at December 31, 2009, as included in
long-term debt and lease obligations, in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
7.
|
Prepaid expenses
and other current assets
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
$
|
1,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,788
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Due from affiliate
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Prepaid professional fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
Prepaid payroll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Other
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
4,430
|
|
|
$
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due from affiliate relate to expenses paid on behalf of
Spheris Holding III. Due to circumstances described in
Note 22, management has provided a reserve for the full
amount at December 31, 2009. Accordingly, a bad debt
expense was recorded for $0.8 million relating to the
write-off of this amount in the direct costs of revenues on the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Prepaid payroll for the year ended December 31, 2009 was a
result of the Companys decision to prefund payroll at
December 31, 2009.
The classification of debt issuance costs at December 31,
2009 was a result of the classification of the related debt
reflected in total current liabilities as discussed in
Note 13.
|
|
8.
|
Property and
equipment, net
|
Property and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2009
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
$
|
2,550
|
|
|
$
|
2,120
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
5,442
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
25,427
|
|
|
|
27,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,851
|
|
|
|
34,921
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(21,542
|
)
|
|
|
(25,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
12,309
|
|
|
$
|
9,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts above include assets acquired under financed lease
obligations of $0.5 million as of both December 31,
2008 and 2009. Depreciation expense, including amortization on
equipment under capital lease obligations, of $5.4 million,
$6.3 million, and $6.2 million was recorded in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
F-127
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Capitalized interest on leasehold improvements of approximately
$0.01 million and $0.02 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, was recorded as a
reduction to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
9.
|
Internal-use
software, net of amortization
|
The Company capitalizes its costs to purchase and develop
internal-use software, which is utilized primarily to provide
clinical documentation technology and services to its customers.
Net purchased and developed software costs at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Software under development
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
Software placed in service
|
|
|
16,363
|
|
|
|
17,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,296
|
|
|
|
17,707
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(15,710
|
)
|
|
|
(16,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
$
|
1,586
|
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization on projects begins when the software is ready for
its intended use and is recognized over the expected useful
life, which is generally two to five years. Amortization expense
related to internal-use software costs was $2.9 million,
$1.4 million and $1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and was
included in depreciation and amortization in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Capitalized interest on internal-use software development
projects of approximately $23,000, $29,000 and $28,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
was recorded as a reduction to interest expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In connection with the November 2004 Recapitalization, the
Company assigned a value of $50.7 million as the fair value
of Spheris customer contracts existing as of the date of the
transaction. These contracts were amortized over an expected
life of four years and were fully amortized as of
December 31, 2008. In connection with the HealthScribe
acquisition in December 2004, the Company assigned a value of
$13.1 million to the acquired contracts. These contracts
were amortized over an estimated life of four years and were
fully amortized as of December 31, 2008. Additionally, the
Company assigned a value of $0.1 million for customer
contracts acquired in connection with the Vianeta acquisition
consummated on March 31, 2006. These contracts were
amortized over an expected life of three years and were fully
amortized as of December 31, 2009. Amortization expense for
customer contracts for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009 was $16.0 million, $14.0 million, and
$9,000, respectively.
F-128
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Other noncurrent
assets
|
Other noncurrent assets of the Company at December 31, 2008
and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net
|
|
$
|
1,643
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Lease deposits
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
Insurance security deposits
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
Other
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent assets
|
|
$
|
5,459
|
|
|
$
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs are amortized to interest expense over the
life of the applicable credit facilities using the effective
interest method. These amounts were reflected in prepaid expense
and other current assets as discussed in Note 7 and
Note 13. Insurance security deposits include amounts
deposited to secure certain self-insurance obligations.
|
|
12.
|
Other current
liabilities
|
Other current liabilities of the Company at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accrued acquisition liabilities
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
7,448
|
|
Accrued fees for professional services
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Accrued group purchasing organization fees
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Reserve for sales credits and adjustments
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
Other
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
$
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in accrued interest for the year-ended
December 31, 2009 was caused by the Companys decision
to not make its scheduled interest payment on its Senior
Subordinated Notes, as further described in Note 13.
F-129
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Outstanding debt obligations of the Company at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007 Senior Credit Facility, net of discount, with principal due
at maturity on July 17, 2012; interest payable periodically
at variable rates. The weighted average interest rate was 5.75%
at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
72,290
|
|
|
$
|
74,552
|
|
11.0% Senior Subordinated Notes, net of discount, with
principal due at maturity in December 2012; interest payable
semi-annually in June and December
|
|
|
123,208
|
|
|
|
123,578
|
|
Financed lease obligations
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,182
|
|
|
|
198,520
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt and financed lease
obligations
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
(198,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and financed lease obligations, net of current
portion
|
|
$
|
195,499
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2007, the Company entered into a financing agreement
(the 2007 Senior Credit Facility), which consisted
of a term loan in the amount of $69.5 million and a
revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not
to exceed $25.0 million at any time outstanding. The
revolving loans and the term loan bore interest at LIBOR plus an
applicable margin or a reference banks base rate plus an
applicable margin, at the Companys option. Under the
revolving credit facility, the Company was permitted to borrow
up to the lesser of $25.0 million or a loan limiter amount,
as defined in the 2007 Senior Credit Facility, less amounts
outstanding under letters of credit. As of December 31,
2009, the Company had $5.7 million outstanding under the
revolver portion of the 2007 Senior Credit Facility.
Based on 2009 results of operations, the Company would not have
complied with the covenant requirements under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility. The Company elected not to report its financial
results pursuant to year-end covenant requirements under this
facility, and the Company, along with the other Debtors, filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code in February 2010. As a
result, all amounts due under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility
are reflected as current obligations in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. All amounts due under this facility
were paid in full on April 22, 2010 in connection with the
Debtors sale of substantially all of their assets to
MedQuist and the stock of SIPL to CBay, as further described in
Note 22.
Under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility, Operations was the
borrower. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility was secured by
substantially all of Operations assets and is guaranteed
by Spheris, Spheris Holding II and all of Operations
subsidiaries, except SIPL. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility
contained certain covenants which, among other things, limited
the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments,
dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales,
acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances
and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The
2007 Senior Credit Facility also contained customary events of
default, including breach of financial covenants, the occurrence
of which could allow the collateral agent to declare any
outstanding amounts to be due and payable. The financial
covenants contained in the 2007 Senior Credit Facility included
(a) a maximum leverage test, (b) a minimum fixed
charge coverage test and (c) a minimum earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(Consolidated EBITDA, as defined under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility) requirement, among others.
In connection with the borrowings under the 2007 Senior Credit
Facility, the Company incurred $0.6 million and
$1.1 million in debt issuance costs and debt discounts,
respectively. These costs are being amortized as additional
interest expense over the term of the debt. The balance of the
issuance costs at December 31, 2009 of $0.3 million,
net of accumulated amortization, was reflected in prepaid
expenses and other current assets in the
F-130
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The debt discount at
December 31, 2009 of $0.7 million was reflected as a
reduction in the carrying amount of the debt under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility.
Senior
subordinated notes
In December 2004, the Company issued its Senior Subordinated
Notes, which mature on December 15, 2012 (the Senior
Subordinated Notes). The Senior Subordinated Notes bear
interest at a fixed rate of 11.0% per annum. Interest is payable
in semi-annual installments through maturity on
December 15, 2012. The Company did not file a
Form 10-Q
with the SEC for the third quarter of 2009 which violated
certain covenants in the Indenture. In addition, the Company
elected not to make its scheduled interest payment on
December 15, 2009. As a result, the Company received a
notice from the Indenture Trustee on December 16, 2009 that
an Event of Default had occurred, as defined in the Indenture.
As further described in Note 22, the Company, along with
the other Debtors, elected to file for bankruptcy protection
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on
February 3, 2010. Resolution of final payments due under
the Senior Subordinated Notes is subject to the Companys
ongoing bankruptcy case.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are junior to the obligations of
the 2007 Senior Credit Facility. The Senior Subordinated Notes
are guaranteed by the Companys domestic operating
subsidiaries. The Senior Subordinated Notes contain certain
restrictive covenants that place limitations on the Company
regarding incurrence of additional debt, payment of dividends
and other items as specified in the indenture governing the
Senior Subordinated Notes. An acceleration of outstanding
indebtedness under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility creates an
event of default under the Senior Subordinated Notes, which
would allow the trustee or requisite holders of Senior
Subordinated Notes to declare the Senior Subordinated Notes to
be due and payable. As a result of the default under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility, the Company has reflected all amounts
due under the Senior Subordinated Notes as a current obligation
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2009.
The Company incurred $1.9 million and $2.9 million in
debt issuance costs and debt discounts, respectively, in
connection with the Senior Subordinated Notes. These costs are
being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of
the Senior Subordinated Notes. The remaining balance of the
issuance costs at December 31, 2009 of $0.9 million,
net of accumulated amortization, was reflected in prepaid
expenses and other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. The remaining debt discount at
December 31, 2009 of $1.4 million was reflected as a
reduction in the carrying amount of the Senior Subordinated
Notes.
|
|
14.
|
Other noncurrent
liabilities
|
Other noncurrent liabilities of the Company at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
$
|
2,569
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued workers compensation
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Other
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,710
|
|
|
$
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in the derivative financial instruments reflects the
foreign currency exchange contracts which expired during 2009
and the reflection of the interest rate management agreements in
other current liabilities as described in Note 6 and
reflected in Note 12.
F-131
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Contractual
obligations
|
The following summarizes future minimum payments under the
Companys contractual obligations as of December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Financed lease
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,576
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
$
|
21,328
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases certain equipment and office space under
noncancellable operating leases. The majority of the operating
leases contain annual escalation clauses. Rental expense for
these operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the term of the lease. Total rent expense for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was
$1.9 million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, under these lease obligations. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had $1.3 million on
deposit as security for certain operating leases. The deposits
are included in other noncurrent assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet.
The Company also leases certain hardware and software under
capital leases as defined in accordance with the provisions of
ASC 840 Leases. The related assets under
capital lease obligations are included in property and
equipment, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Amortization expense related to assets under leases was
$0.1 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008
and 2009 and was included in depreciation and amortization in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Future
minimum payments under these capital leases include interest of
approximately $15,000. The present value of net minimum lease
payments is approximately $0.4 million, with
$0.3 million classified as current portion of long-term
debt and lease obligations and $0.1 million classified as
long-term debt and lease obligations, net of current portion in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2009.
Purchase obligations represent contractual commitments with
certain telecommunications vendors and technology providers that
include minimum purchase obligations.
As part of the sale agreement dated April 15, 2010 between
the Debtors and the Purchasers (as described in Note 22),
all of the non-cancellable operating leases, financed lease
obligations and purchase obligations were assigned to the
Purchasers as of April 22, 2010.
Subsequent to the November 2004 Recapitalization, Spheris
Holding III approved the establishment of the Spheris
Holding III, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (as amended to date, the
Plan) for issuance of common stock to employees,
non-employee directors and other designated persons providing
substantial services to the Company. As of December 31,
2009, 15.6 million shares have been authorized for issuance
under the Plan. Shares are subject to restricted stock and stock
option agreements and typically vest over a three or four-year
period. As of December 31, 2009, an aggregate of
12.1 million shares of restricted stock and
1.9 million stock options were issued and outstanding under
the Plan. Additionally, 0.1 million shares of Series A
convertible preferred restricted stock have been issued by
Spheris Holding III to one of the Companys former
board members for services rendered. As these shares were issued
for services to be provided to the Company, compensation expense
of $0.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million
was reflected in general and administrative expenses in the
F-132
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Under provisions of the Plan, all unvested shares and options
shall immediately vest and become exercisable upon an event of a
change in control. The sale of the Companys
assets as a result of the APA discussed in Note 22
constituted a change in control under these
provisions. Accordingly, all unvested options and shares were
immediately vested and exercisable on April 22, 2010.
During October 2008, Spheris Holding III issued warrants to
CHS to purchase 14.3 million shares of common stock of
Spheris Holding III upon the attainment of certain revenue
milestones set forth in the warrants. The costs of the warrants
subject to vesting are recognized over the period in which the
revenue is earned and are reflected as a reduction of revenue.
Accordingly, $23,000 of such costs was reflected as a reduction
to net revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 while none
was recognized during 2009.
Income tax benefit on income (loss) consisted of the following
for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(6,680
|
)
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
(12,712
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(2,629
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(6,158
|
)
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
(15,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,870
|
|
|
$
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the
effective rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Federal tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(5,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,206
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70,683
|
)
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
Permanent differences for goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,703
|
|
Permanent differences, other
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
Foreign tax / tax holiday
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
9,192
|
|
|
|
(8,294
|
)
|
Tax credits adjusted due to rate change
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(1,048
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,870
|
|
|
$
|
(14,571
|
)
|
F-133
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The components of the Companys deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
Net operating losses federal
|
|
|
35,539
|
|
|
|
37,753
|
|
Net operating losses state
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
Amortization expense goodwill and
start-up
costs
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
46,068
|
|
|
|
53,704
|
|
Valuation allowance federal
|
|
|
(40,116
|
)
|
|
|
(32,620
|
)
|
Valuation allowance state
|
|
|
(3,288
|
)
|
|
|
(2,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
18,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense customer list and technology
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,035
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(2,592
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
16,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are
reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2008 and 2009 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred taxes (current assets)
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
11,995
|
|
Deferred taxes (noncurrent assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities (noncurrent liabilities)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
16,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its net
deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not
to be realized. The valuation allowance decreased by
$8.3 million during 2009 due to the sale of most of the
Companys assets on April 22, 2010 (see
Note 22) which will allow the realization of certain
of the Companys deferred tax assets, compared with an
increase of $9.2 million during 2008. Future changes in
valuation allowance amounts will be reflected as a component of
provision for (benefit from) income taxes in future periods.
In the United States, the Company benefitted from federal and
state net operating loss carryforwards. The Companys
consolidated federal net operating loss carryforwards available
to reduce future taxable income were $104.5 million and
$107.9 million at December 31, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, which began to expire in 2007. State net operating
loss carryforwards at December 31, 2008 and 2009 were
$67.3 million and $71.5 million, respectively, and
began to expire in 2005. The majority of these federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards are restricted due to
limitations associated with ownership change, and as such, are
reserved to reduce the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. In addition, the Company has alternative minimum
F-134
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
tax credits which do not have an expiration date and certain
other federal tax credits that will begin to expire in 2014.
In connection with the HealthScribe acquisition, the Company
acquired a wholly-owned Indian subsidiary, SIPL. The Company
accounts for income taxes associated with SIPL in accordance
with ASC 740, Income Taxes, following Indian
tax guidelines. At December 31, 2008, the Company was
considered permanently reinvested in SIPL; accordingly, deferred
taxes were not provided on the outside basis differences. Due to
the subsequent event of the sale of SIPL stock in April 2010,
the Company was no longer deemed to be indefinitely reinvested
in SIPL. Accordingly deferred tax was provided on the outside
basis differences for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Prior to 2009, because the Company was considered permanently
reinvested in SIPL, no taxes were provided on accumulated
translation adjustments recorded in other comprehensive income.
Due to the subsequent event of the sale of SIPL stock, the net
income tax effect of the currency translation adjustments
related to SIPL is reflected in other comprehensive income for
the year ended 2009.
Spheris Holding III and related subsidiaries (the
filing group members) file their U.S. federal
and certain state income tax returns on a consolidated, unitary,
combined or similar basis. To accurately reflect each filing
group members share of consolidated tax liabilities on
separate company books and records, on November 5, 2004,
Spheris Holding III and each of its subsidiaries entered
into a tax sharing agreement. Under the terms of the tax sharing
agreement, each subsidiary of Spheris Holding III is
obligated to make payments on behalf of Spheris Holding III
equal to the amount of the federal and state income taxes that
its subsidiaries would have owed if such subsidiaries did not
file federal and state income tax returns on a consolidated,
unitary, combined or similar basis. Likewise, Spheris
Holding III may make payments to subsidiaries if it
benefits from the use of a subsidiary loss or other tax benefit.
The tax sharing agreement allows each subsidiary to bear its
respective tax burden (or enjoy use of a tax benefit, such as a
net operating loss) as if its return was prepared on a
stand-alone basis. To date, no amounts have been paid under this
agreement.
Operations pays certain franchise tax obligations on behalf of
Spheris Holding III. Approximately $0.7 million of payments
by Operations related to these taxes were reflected by the
Company as a receivable due from affiliate and subsequently
written off as bad debt expense described in Note 7 in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
The Company analyzed filing positions for all federal, state and
international jurisdictions for all open tax years where it is
required to file income tax returns. Although the Company files
tax returns in every jurisdiction in which it has a legal
obligation to do so, it has identified the following as
major tax jurisdictions: Tennessee and Texas, as
well as India. Within these major jurisdictions, the Company has
tax examinations in progress related to transfer pricing rates
for its Indian facilities, as discussed in Note 19. Based
on the facts of these examinations, the Company believes that it
is more likely than not that it will be successful in supporting
its current positions related to the applicable filings. The
Company believes that all income tax filing positions and
deductions will be sustained upon audit and does not anticipate
any adjustments resulting in a material adverse impact on the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or
cash flow. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax
positions have been recorded pursuant to
ASC 740-10,
Income Taxes Overall (ASC
740-10).
In addition, the Company did not record a cumulative effect
adjustment related to the adoption of
ASC 740-10.
|
|
18.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
The Company sponsors an employee savings plan, the Spheris
Operations 401(k) Plan (the Spheris 401(k) Plan),
which permits participants to make contributions by salary
reduction pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code (IRC). Under the provisions of the
Spheris 401(k) Plan, participants may elect to contribute up to
75% of their compensation, up to the amount permitted under the
IRC. The Company also sponsored the Spheris Operations Amended
and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (the Deferred
Compensation Plan). Under the provisions of the Deferred
Compensation Plan, participants may elect to defer up
F-135
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of incentive pay, as
defined in the plan. This plan was terminated on
October 22, 2009.
At the Companys option, the Company may elect to match up
to 50% of the employees first 4% of wages deferred, in
aggregate, to the Spheris 401(k) Plan. In the event the Spheris
401(k) Plan participants contributions are limited under
provisions of the IRC and the participant is also deferring
amounts into the Deferred Compensation Plan, then such matching
amounts may be made to the Deferred Compensation Plan. The
Company recognizes the matching expense during the year the
discretionary match is awarded while the actual cash
contribution is made to the plan in the following year. The
Company made a cash contribution of $1.1 million in 2008
related to matches for the 2007 plan year. The Company elected
not to make any matching contributions in 2009 or 2008 related
to the 2008 and 2007 plan years.
The Company offers medical benefits to substantially all
full-time employees through the use of both Company and employee
contributions to third-party insurance providers. The Company is
significantly self-insured for certain losses related to medical
claims. The Companys expense for these benefits totaled
$4.1 million, $4.4 million and $4.4 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
19.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Litigation
In addition to the litigation described in Note 5, the
Company is also subject to various other claims and legal
actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the
opinion of management, any amounts for probable exposures are
adequately reserved for in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, and the ultimate resolution of such
matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
Employment
agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain members of
senior management that provide for the payment to these persons
of amounts equal to their applicable base salary, unpaid annual
bonus and health insurance premiums over the applicable periods
specified in their individual employment agreements in the event
the employees employment is terminated without cause or
certain other specified reasons. The maximum contingent
liabilities, excluding any earned but unpaid amounts accrued in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements, under these
agreements were $1.6 million and $1.0 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Tax
assessment
SIPL received notification of a tax assessment resulting from a
transfer pricing tax audit by Indian income tax authorities
amounting to 52.2 million Rupees (approximately
$1.1 million), including penalties and interest, for the
fiscal tax period ended March 31, 2004 (the 2004
Assessment). In January 2007, the Company filed a formal
appeal with the India Commissioner of Income Tax. Prior to
resolution of the Companys appeals process, the Indian
income tax authorities have required the Company to make advance
payments toward the 2004 Assessment amounting to
43.1 million Rupees (approximately $0.9 million). Any
amounts paid by the Company related to the 2004 Assessment are
subject to a claim by the Company for reimbursement against
escrow funds related to the Companys December 2004
acquisition of HealthScribe and its subsidiaries (the
HealthScribe Escrow). Accordingly, the Company has
recorded the advance payments as receivables from the escrow
funds, which are reflected as a component of prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, SIPL received notification of
a tax assessment from a transfer pricing tax audit by Indian
income tax authorities amounting to 40.6 million Rupees
(approximately $0.8 million), including
F-136
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
penalties and interest, for the fiscal tax period ended
March 31, 2005 (the 2005 Assessment). In
December 2008, the Company filed a formal appeal with the India
Commissioner of Income Tax. Prior to resolution of the
Companys appeals process, the Company was required to
provide a bank guarantee in January 2009 for the full amount of
the 2005 Assessment. The guarantee amount is included in
restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2009. Approximately $0.6 million of
the 2005 Assessment is subject to a claim for reimbursement
against the HealthScribe Escrow.
In May, 2010 the Company was informed that the competent
authorities of India and the United States (the Competent
Authorities) had met regarding the assessments for the two
years above. The Company was informed that the Competent
Authorities had reached an agreement regarding the transfer
pricing that should have been used for transactions between SIPL
and its related U.S. entities for the two years mentioned
above. Based on this agreement, the tax assessment for the
fiscal tax periods ended March 31, 2004 and March 31,
2005 would be reduced to approximately 36.6 million Rupees
(approximately $781,000) and 17.2 million Rupees
(approximately $366,000), respectively. An agreement reached by
the Competent Authorities under the U.S./India Income Tax Treaty
is not binding on the parties involved. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of the proposed settlement and has not
recorded a liability under the provision of
ASC 740-10
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ending
December 31, 2009.
If the assessments were brought forward from March 31, 2005
through December 31, 2009, a reasonable estimate of
additional liability could range from zero to $6.2 million,
contingent upon the final outcome of the claim. Payment of such
amounts would also result in potential credit adjustments to the
Companys U.S. federal tax returns. The Company
currently believes that it is more likely than not that it will
be successful in supporting its position relating to these
assessments. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any
accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the tax
assessments as of December 31, 2008 or December 31,
2009.
During the second quarter of 2009, SIPL received an assessment
order from Indian income tax authorities pertaining to an
inquiry regarding prior years usage of net operating
losses originating in 1999. The final assessment could
potentially amount to 5.6 million Rupees (approximately
$0.1 million).
|
|
20.
|
Related party
transactions
|
On October 3, 2008 (amended December 23, 2009),
Operations entered into an agreement for health information
processing services with Community Health Systems Professional
Services Corporation, an affiliate of Community Health Systems,
Inc. (CHS), to provide clinical documentation
technology and services to certain of its affiliated hospitals
(CHS Services Agreement). The Bankruptcy Court
approved the assumption of the CHS Services Agreement, as
amended, on March 17, 2010.
Contemporaneously with entering into the CHS Services Agreement,
CHS became a minority owner in Spheris Holding III, the
Companys indirect parent. The Company provided clinical
documentation technology and services to CHS in the ordinary
course of business at prices and on terms and conditions that
the Company believes are the same as those that would result
from arms length negotiations between unrelated parties.
The Company recognized net revenues from this customer of
$1.4 million and $4.0 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In March 2010, Spheris Holding III transferred
$9.2 million to the Debtors.
|
|
21.
|
Restructuring
charges
|
During October 2008, the Company commenced an operational
restructuring plan to effect changes in both the Companys
management structure and the nature and focus of its operations.
The Company initially recognized $0.5 million of
operational restructuring charges, including one-time
termination benefits and other restructuring related charges,
pursuant to this operational restructuring plan during the
fourth quarter of 2008. As a continuation of the plan during
2009, the Company eliminated a significant portion of its
U.S. based
F-137
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
administrative and corporate workforce, recognizing an
additional $0.8 million of operational restructuring
charges, including one-time termination benefits and other
operational restructuring related charges.
The following table sets forth the activity for accrued
operational restructuring charges, included in other current
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
Operational restructuring charges
|
|
|
775
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy
proceedings
Chapter 11
Bankruptcy filings
On February 3, 2010 (the Petition Date), the
100% owner of Spheris Inc., Spheris Holding, II, Inc.,
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy
Code) in the Bankruptcy Court. Simultaneously, Spheris,
Operations, and its subsidiaries: Spheris Canada Inc., Spheris
Leasing LLC, and Vianeta (collectively, the Debtors)
also filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. SIPL did not
file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
As of the issuance date of these financial statements, the
Debtors are currently operating as
debtors-in-possession
under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance
with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In
general, the Debtors are authorized to continue to operate as
ongoing businesses, but may not engage in transactions outside
the ordinary course of business without the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
Stock and asset
purchase agreement
On February 2, 2010, the Debtors entered into a Stock and
Asset Purchase Agreement, as amended April 15, 2010 (the
APA), with the Purchasers. The APA outlines the
arrangement whereby the Debtors agreed to sell substantially all
of their assets to MedQuist, and the stock of SIPL to CBay. In
addition, the Purchasers agreed to assume certain liabilities in
connection with such sale, all subject to the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
On April 15, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale
of substantially all of Spheris assets to the Purchasers,
and the related assumption of certain liabilities of the Debtors
by the Purchasers. The transaction was effected on
April 22, 2010. Under the terms of the sale, MedQuist
acquired significantly all of the Companys
U.S. assets and assumed certain liabilities and CBay
acquired the stock of SIPL. The purchase price was
$98.8 million in cash and an unsecured subordinated
promissory note issued by MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. in an
aggregate principal amount of $17.5 million. As a result of
the sale of substantially all of the Debtors assets, it is
likely that the Debtors Chapter 11 cases will result
in a liquidation of the Companys businesses and assets,
such that the Company will cease to operate as a going concern.
As a requirement of the APA, each of the Debtors changed their
names. Effective April 28, 2010, Spheris Holding II, Inc.
changed its name to SP Wind Down Holding II, Inc.; Spheris Inc.
became SP Wind Down Inc.; and Vianeta Communications, LLC became
VN Wind Down Communications. Effective April 30, 2010,
Spheris Operations LLC changed its name to SP Wind Down
Operations LLC; Spheris Leasing LLC became SP Wind Down Leasing
LLC; and Spheris Canada Inc. became SP Wind Down Canada Inc.
F-138
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor-in-possession
(DIP) financing
On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed a motion with the
Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of their Senior Secured
Super-Priority
Debtor-In-Possession
Financing Agreement with certain lenders (as amended, the
DIP Credit Agreement). Interim approval of the DIP
Credit Agreement was granted by the Bankruptcy Court on
February 4, 2010. Final approval was granted on
February 23, 2010.
The DIP Credit Agreement provided post-petition loans and
advances consisting of a revolving credit facility up to an
aggregate principal amount of $15 million.
Under the DIP Credit Agreement, on February 3, 2010, the
Debtors borrowed $6.4 million. In accordance with the terms
of the DIP Credit Agreement, the Debtors used proceeds of
$6.4 million, net of lenders fees of approximately
$309,000, to pay past due principal and interest of
approximately $5.7 million on the revolver portion of the
2007 Senior Credit Facility and to pay other expenses of
approximately $381,000.
The outstanding principal amount of the loans under the DIP
Credit Agreement, plus interest accrued and unpaid, were due and
payable in full at the disposition of the APA, which was
April 22, 2010. All borrowings under the DIP Credit
Agreement were paid in full as of such date.
Reorganization
process
The Bankruptcy Court approved payment of certain of the
Debtors pre-petition obligations, including employee
wages, salaries and benefits, and the payment of vendors and
other providers for goods received and services and other
business-related payments necessary to maintain the operation of
the Debtors business. The Debtors retained legal and
financial professionals to advise them in connection with the
bankruptcy proceedings.
Immediately after filing for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors notified
known current or potential creditors of the bankruptcy filings.
Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, upon
the Petition Date, creditors were automatically enjoined, or
stayed, from continuing any judicial or administrative
proceedings or other actions against the Debtors or their
property to recover, collect or secure a claim arising prior to
the Petition Date. Thus, for example, most creditor actions to
obtain possession of property from the Debtors, or to create,
perfect or enforce any lien against their property, or to
collect on monies owed or otherwise exercise rights or remedies
with respect to pre-petition claims are enjoined unless and
until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay with respect
to such actions.
As contemplated by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States
Trustee for the District of Delaware (the
U.S. Trustee) appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors (the Creditors
Committee). The Creditors Committee and its legal
representatives have a right to be heard on matters that come
before the Bankruptcy Court with respect to the Debtors.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors generally must assume or
reject pre-petition executory contracts, including but not
limited to real property leases, subject to the approval of the
Bankruptcy Courts and certain other conditions. In this context,
assumption means that the Debtors agree to perform
their obligations and cure all existing defaults under the
contract or lease, and rejection means that they are
relieved from their obligations to perform further under the
contract or lease, but are subject to a pre-petition claim for
damages for the breach thereof subject to certain limitations.
In connection with the Debtors sale of substantially all
of their assets, numerous of the Debtors executory
contracts and unexpired leases were assumed and assigned to the
Purchasers. In addition, the Debtors have rejected certain
executory contracts and unexpired leases. Any damages resulting
from rejection of executory contracts that are permitted to be
recovered under the Bankruptcy Code will be treated as
liabilities subject to compromise unless such claims were
secured prior to the Petition Date.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtors received approval from the
Bankruptcy Court to reject certain unexpired leases and
executory contracts of various types. Due to the uncertain
nature of many of the unresolved claims and rejection damages,
the Debtors cannot project the magnitude of such claims and
rejection damages with certainty.
F-139
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
On May 13, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order
establishing June 18, 2010, as the bar date for potential
creditors to file prepetition claims and postpetition claims
arising on or prior to April 30, 2010. The bar date is the
date by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed
if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the
bankruptcy cases. Creditors were notified of the bar date and
the requirement to file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy
Court. Differences between liability amounts estimated by the
Debtors and claims filed by creditors are will be analyzed and,
if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final
determination of the allowable amount of a claim. The
determination of how liabilities will ultimately be treated
cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of
reorganization. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or treatment of
such liabilities is not determinable at this time.
F-140
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8,817
|
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $632 and $646,
respectively
|
|
|
20,787
|
|
|
|
21,793
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
11,995
|
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
51,013
|
|
|
|
48,448
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
9,782
|
|
|
|
8,502
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
Liabilities not subject to compromise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
|
$
|
2,367
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
|
8,509
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
|
198,440
|
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
218,543
|
|
|
|
83,749
|
|
Long-term debt and lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities not subject to compromise
|
|
|
221,993
|
|
|
|
84,716
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
221,993
|
|
|
|
221,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized,
10 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $1,500 and $1,539
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
|
(2,274
|
)
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
111,874
|
|
|
|
111,876
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(242,124
|
)
|
|
|
(245,624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(132,582
|
)
|
|
|
(136,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-141
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
41,849
|
|
|
$
|
35,178
|
|
Direct costs of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization below)
|
|
|
28,574
|
|
|
|
25,600
|
|
Marketing and selling expenses
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,628
|
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Transaction charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
Operational restructuring charges
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
37,274
|
|
|
|
34,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
3,086
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
(1,056
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before reorganization items and income taxes
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
(2,413
|
)
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
(5,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
(2,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-142
(Unaudited and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
(1,014
|
)
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
3,467
|
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Purchase and development of internal-use software
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
Payments on DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,400
|
)
|
Proceeds from 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
|
|
(7,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,667
|
|
|
|
(3,679
|
)
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,929
|
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-143
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business and bankruptcy proceedings
|
Description of
business
Spheris Inc. (Spheris) is a Delaware corporation.
Subsequent to its acquisition by certain institutional investors
in November 2004 (the November 2004
Recapitalization), Spheris became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Spheris Holding II, Inc. (Spheris Holding
II), and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Spheris
Holding III, Inc. (Spheris Holding III), an entity
owned by affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC and TowerBrook Capital
Partners LLC, CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.
(CHS), and indirectly by certain members of
Spheris current and past management team.
Spheris and its direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Spheris Operations LLC (Operations), Spheris Leasing
LLC, Spheris Canada Inc., Spheris, India Private Limited
(SIPL) and Vianeta Communications
(Vianeta) (sometimes referred to collectively as the
Company), provide clinical documentation technology
and services to health systems, hospitals and group medical
practices located throughout the United States. The Company
receives medical dictation in digital format from subscribing
physicians, converts the dictation into text format, stores
specific data elements from the records, then transmits the
completed medical record to the originating physician in the
prescribed format.
Chapter 11
Bankruptcy proceedings
On February 3, 2010, (the Petition Date), the
100% owner of Spheris Inc., Spheris Holding, II, Inc.,
filed a voluntary petition (Chapter 11
Petition) for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy
Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington,
Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). Simultaneously,
Spheris, Operations, and its subsidiaries: Spheris Canada Inc.,
Spheris Leasing LLC, and Vianeta (collectively, the
Debtors) also filed voluntary petitions for relief
under the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. SIPL did not
file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
During 2009, the Company did not comply with the covenant
requirements of its 2007 Senior Credit Facility and its Senior
Subordinated Notes (each as defined in Note 5). The
Companys failure to comply with these requirements and the
filing of the Chapter 11 Petition constituted an event of
default under the Companys debt obligations. Since the
Petition Date, the Company discontinued accruing interest
expense on its Senior Subordinated Notes.
The Company is currently operating as
debtor-in-possession
under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance
with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In
general, the Company is authorized to continue to operate as
ongoing businesses, but may not engage in transactions outside
the ordinary course of business without the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
Going concern
matters
The consolidated financial statements and related notes have
been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern as of March 31, 2010, although its bankruptcy
filings raised substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. Except as otherwise expressly stated herein,
the consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments related to the recoverability of assets and the
amounts, classification and satisfaction of liabilities that
resulted from the uncertainty regarding the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern and its subsequent sale
of assets as described below.
F-144
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Stock and
asset purchase agreement
On February 2, 2010, the Debtors entered into a Stock and
Asset Purchase Agreement (the APA) as amended
April 15, 2010 with MedQuist Inc. (MedQuist)
and CBay Inc. (CBay and collectively referred to as
the Purchasers), portfolio companies of CBaySystems
Holdings Ltd.. The APA outlines the arrangement whereas the
Debtors agreed to sell substantially all of their assets to
MedQuist, and the stock of SIPL to CBay. In addition, the
Purchasers agreed to assume certain liabilities in connection
with such sale, all subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
On April 15, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale
of substantially all of Spheris assets to the Purchasers
and the related assumption of certain liabilities of the Debtors
by the Purchasers. The transaction was effected on
April 22, 2010. Under the terms of the sale, MedQuist
acquired significantly all of the Companys
U.S. assets and assumed certain liabilities. CBay acquired
the stock of SIPL. The purchase price was $98.8 million in
cash and an unsecured subordinated promissory note issued by
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. in an aggregate principal amount
of $17.5 million. As a result of the sale of substantially
all of the Debtors assets, it is likely that the
Debtors Chapter 11 cases will result in a liquidation
of the Companys businesses and assets, such that the
Company will cease to operate as a going concern.
As a requirement of the APA, each of the Debtors changed their
names. Effective April 28, 2010, Spheris Holding II, Inc.
changed its name to SP Wind Down Holding II, Inc.; Spheris
became SP Wind Down Inc.; and Vianeta became VN Wind Down
Communications. Effective April 30, 2010, Operations
changed its name to SP Wind Down Operations LLC; Spheris Leasing
LLC became SP Wind Down Leasing LLC; and Spheris Canada Inc.
became SP Wind Down Canada Inc.
Debtor-in-possession
(DIP) financing
On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed a motion with the
Bankruptcy Court seeking approval to enter into a Senior Secured
Super-Priority
Debtor-In-Possession
Financing Agreement with certain lenders (as amended, the
DIP Credit Agreement). Interim approval of the DIP
Credit Agreement was granted by the Bankruptcy Court on
February 4, 2010. Final approval was granted on
February 23, 2010.
The DIP Credit Agreement provided post-petition loans and
advances consisting of a revolving credit facility up to an
aggregate principal amount of $15 million.
Under the DIP Credit Agreement, on February 3, 2010, the
Debtors borrowed $6.4 million. In accordance with the terms
of the DIP Credit Agreement, the Debtors used proceeds of
$6.4 million, net of lenders fees of approximately
$309,000, to pay past due principal and interest of
approximately $5.7 million on the revolver portion of the
2007 Senior Credit Facility and to pay other expenses of
approximately $381,000. There was no outstanding balance on the
DIP Credit Agreement at March 31, 2010.
The outstanding principal amount of the loans under the DIP
Credit Agreement, plus interest accrued and unpaid, were due and
payable in full at the disposition of the APA, which was
April 22, 2010. All borrowings under the DIP Credit
Agreement were paid in full as of this date.
Reorganization
process
The Bankruptcy Court approved payment of certain of the
Debtors pre-petition obligations, including employee
wages, salaries and benefits, and the payment of vendors and
other providers in the ordinary course for goods received and
services and other business-related payments necessary to
maintain the operation of the Debtors business. The
Debtors retained legal and financial professionals to advise
them on the bankruptcy proceedings.
Immediately after filing the Chapter 11 Petition, the
Debtors notified all known current or potential creditors of the
bankruptcy filings. Subject to certain exceptions under the
Bankruptcy Code, upon the Petition Date, creditors
F-145
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
were automatically enjoined, or stayed, from continuing any
judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions against
the Debtors or their property to recover, collect or secure a
claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example,
most creditor actions to obtain possession of property from the
Debtors, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against their
property, or to collect on monies owed or otherwise exercise
rights or remedies with respect to a pre-petition claim are
enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the
automatic stay.
As required by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States Trustee
for the District of Delaware (the U.S. Trustee)
appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors (the
Creditors Committee). The Creditors
Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard
on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court with
respect to the Debtors.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors generally must assume or
reject pre-petition executory contracts, including but not
limited to real property leases, subject to the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. In this context,
assumption means that the Debtors agree to perform
their obligations and cure all existing defaults under the
contract or lease, and rejection means that they are
relieved from their obligations to perform further under the
contract or lease, but is subject to a pre-petition claim for
damages for the breach thereof subject to certain limitations.
In connection with the Debtors sale of substantially all
of their assets, numerous of the Debtors executory
contracts and unexpired leases were assumed and assigned to the
Purchasers. In addition, the Debtors have rejected certain
executory contracts and unexpired leases. Any damages resulting
from rejection of executory contracts that are permitted to be
recovered under the Bankruptcy Code will be treated as
liabilities subject to compromise unless such claims were
secured prior to the Petition Date.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtors received approval from the
Bankruptcy Court to reject unexpired leases and executory
contracts of various types. Liabilities subject to compromise
have been recorded related to the rejection of unexpired leases;
rejection of certain executory contracts; the claims related to
the outstanding unpaid Senior Subordinated Notes; and from the
determination of the Bankruptcy Court (or agreement by parties
in interest) of allowed claims for contingencies and other
disputed amounts. Due to the uncertain nature of many of the
unresolved claims and rejection damages, the Debtors cannot
project the magnitude of such claims and rejection damages with
certainty.
On May 13, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order
establishing June 18, 2010, as the bar date for potential
creditors to file prepetition claims and postpetition claims
arising on or prior to April 30, 2010. The bar date is the
date by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed
if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the
bankruptcy cases. Creditors were notified of the bar date and
the requirement to file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy
Court. Differences between liability amounts estimated by the
Debtors and claims filed by creditors are being investigated
and, if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final
determination of the allowable amount of a claim. The
determination of how liabilities will ultimately be treated
cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of
reorganization. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or treatment of
such liabilities is not determinable at this time.
Proposed plan
of reorganization
In order to successfully emerge from or liquidate pursuant to
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Debtors must propose and obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy
Court of a plan of reorganization that satisfies the
requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors and the
official committee of unsecured creditors appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases have jointly proposed the Joint
Liquidating Plan of SP Wind Down Inc., f/k/a Spheris Inc., and
its Affiliated Debtors (the Plan). The Plan was
filed on June 11, 2010. On such date, the Plan proponents
also filed the Disclosure Statement with Respect to the Joint
Liquidating Plan of SP Wind Down Inc., f/k/a Spheris Inc., and
its Affiliated Debtors (the Disclosure Statement). A
hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement is
scheduled for July 13, 2010, and the Debtors have requested
that a hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan be scheduled
for August 26, 2010.
F-146
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Under the priority scheme established by the Bankruptcy Code,
unless creditors agree otherwise, pre-petition liabilities and
post-petition liabilities must be satisfied in full before the
Debtors stockholders are entitled to receive any
distribution or retain any property under a plan of
reorganization on account of their equity interests. Given the
estimated liabilities of the Debtors, it is not anticipated that
the Debtors stockholders will receive any distribution
from the Debtors assets. The ultimate recovery to the
Debtors creditors, if any, will not be determined until
confirmation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance
can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed to each
of these constituencies or what types or amounts of
distributions, if any, they would receive. Because of such
possibilities, the value of the Debtors liabilities and
securities is highly speculative. Appropriate caution should be
exercised with respect to existing and future investments, if
any, of the Debtors liabilities and/or securities.
Section 1121(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides for an
initial period of 120 days after the commencement of a
Chapter 11 case to file a proposed plan of reorganization
(the Exclusive Filing Period) and an additional 180 days
after the commencement of the Chapter 11 case to solicit
acceptances of the plan of reorganization (the Exclusive
Solicitation Period). The Exclusive Filing Period and the
Exclusive Solicitation Period were set to expire on June 3,
2010 and August 2, 2010, respectively. Motions were filed
with the Bankruptcy Court to extend the Exclusive Filing Period
through and including September 1, 2010 and the Exclusive
Solicitation Period through and including November 1, 2010.
By order dated June 14, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved
such extensions of the Debtors exclusive periods to file a
plan of reorganization and to solicit votes with respect thereto.
Financial
reporting considerations
For periods subsequent to the bankruptcy filings, the Debtors
have applied the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 852, Reorganizations (ASC
852), in preparing the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that
the financial statements distinguish transactions and events
that are directly associated with the reorganization from the
ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain
expenses (including professional fees) that were incurred in the
Chapter 11 Petition have been recorded in reorganization
items in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations. In addition, pre-petition obligations that may have
been impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process have been
classified on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets in liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities
are reported at the amounts allowed or expected to be allowed by
the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser or
greater amounts.
Transaction costs
and reorganization items
During 2009, the Company evaluated multiple strategic
opportunities to continue as a going concern including a
technology license agreement, a sale of the Company or its
assets, or a restructuring of its capital structure. The Company
ultimately chose to pursue a sale of its assets pursuant to the
Chapter 11 Petition. In connection with evaluating and
pursuing its options, the Company retained financial and other
advisors, including restructuring professionals. These fees
included (a) costs paid to professionals and others in
connection with evaluating, preparing for, and pursuing filing
for Chapter 11 relief, (b) costs paid to professionals
and others related to evaluating, preparing for, and pursuing
sales and licensing options, (c) costs paid to creditors
and creditor committee advisors, including costs incurred to
obtain interim financing facilities, and (d) costs to
retain key employees. Some of the professionals engaged to
assist the Company in these efforts were utilized to perform
multiple functions.
The total of all of transaction costs to the Company for
services performed from January 1, 2010 through the
Petition Date, were $1.7 million, and are reflected as
transaction charges in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations. There were $1.6 million of
retainers representing prepayments for transactional services
reflected as a component of prepaid expenses and other current
assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2009. Additionally, there were
$0.3 million of prepaid
F-147
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
retention bonus amounts related to employee obligations
reflected as a component of prepaid expenses and other current
assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2009.
The Debtors reorganization items directly related to the
process of reorganizing the Debtors under Chapter 11 from
the Petition Date through March 31, 2010, are recorded in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations
as reorganization items and consist of professional fees
totaling $3.4 million. Professional fees directly related
to the reorganization include fees associated with advisors to
the Debtors after the Petition Date. There were
$1.5 million of retainers representing prepayments for
reorganizational services reflected as a component of prepaid
expenses and other current assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2010.
Liabilities
subject to compromise
Liabilities subject to compromise at March 31, 2010 consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
11.0% Senior Subordinated Notes, net
|
|
|
122,799
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
8,670
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Other
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
$
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise represent pre-petition
unsecured obligations to be settled under a proposed plan of
reorganization. Generally, actions to enforce or otherwise
effect payments of pre-Chapter 11 liabilities are stayed.
Pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise are
reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may
be settled for lesser or greater amounts. These liabilities
represent the amounts expected to be allowed on known or
potential claims to be resolved through the Chapter 11
process, and remain subject to future adjustments arising from
negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court,
rejection of executor contracts and leases, the determination as
to the value of collateral securing the claims, proof of claim,
or other events.
The Bankruptcy Court approved payment of certain pre-petition
obligations, including employee wages, salaries and benefits,
and the payment of vendors and other providers in the ordinary
course for goods and services received after the filing of the
Chapter 11 Petition and other business-related payments
necessary to maintain the operation of the Debtors
business. Obligations associated with these matters are not
classified as liabilities subject to compromise.
The Debtors rejected certain executory contracts and unexpired
leases with respect to the Debtors operations with
approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Damages resulting from
rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases are
generally treated as general unsecured claims and are classified
as liabilities subject to compromise.
Amounts subject to compromise include the Senior Subordinated
Notes. The Senior Subordinated Notes are shown net of discount
as described in Note 5. Debt issuance costs of
$0.9 million were also netted against this balance in
accordance with the fair value measurement requirements
described in ASC 852. Accrued interest related to these
Notes is also included in the liabilities subject to compromise.
F-148
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor
financial statements
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets,
statements of operations, and cash flows present the
consolidated financial position of the Company and consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods
presented. This information does not reflect the activity of
Spheris Holding II, Inc. which was included in the
Chapter 11 Petition.
The following schedules present the financial information for
the Debtors as of March 31, 2010 and the three months then
ended. In these schedules, the financial position and activity
of Spheris Holding II, Inc. (SH II, Inc.) is added
to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
of the Company. SH II, Inc. had no assets, liabilities, equity
or financial activity for all periods covered on these financial
statements.
As SIPL did not file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code,
SIPLs assets, liabilities, equity and financial activity
for the periods presented are subtracted from the accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the
Company. The subtraction of this activity from the accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements results in a
payable to SIPL of $8.7 million. In addition, all revenue
of SIPL is derived from subcontracting services provided to the
Company. Accordingly, $4.7 million in sales were eliminated
from the statements of operations. The addition of the payable
to SIPL and the elimination of the sales and related direct
costs reflect the operations and cash flows of the Debtors for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. These schedules are
presented as follows:
F-149
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet Schedule
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Reclassifications/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SH II, Inc.
|
|
|
SIPL
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
Debtors
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
|
$
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Cash
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
21,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,732
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
48,448
|
|
|
|
(13,628
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
43,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,502
|
|
|
|
(1,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
$
|
(16,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,732
|
|
|
$
|
77,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,367
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
8,509
|
|
|
|
(2,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
83,749
|
|
|
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
89,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities not subject to compromise
|
|
|
84,716
|
|
|
|
(3,577
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
89,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
221,184
|
|
|
|
(3,577
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
226,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,274
|
)
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
111,876
|
|
|
|
(5,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(245,624
|
)
|
|
|
(9,550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255,174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(136,022
|
)
|
|
|
(12,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
$
|
(16,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,732
|
|
|
$
|
77,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-150
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Operations Schedule
For the Three Months ended March 31, 2010
(Unaudited and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Reclassifications/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SH II, Inc.
|
|
|
SIPL
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
Debtors
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
35,178
|
|
|
$
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,714
|
|
|
$
|
35,178
|
|
Direct costs of revenues
|
|
|
25,600
|
|
|
|
(3,963
|
)
|
|
|
4,714
|
|
|
|
26,351
|
|
Marketing and selling expenses
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Transaction charges
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
Operational restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
34,420
|
|
|
|
(4,277
|
)
|
|
|
4,714
|
|
|
|
34,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Interest expense, net of income
|
|
|
3,086
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before reorganizational items and income taxes
|
|
|
(2,413
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(5,840
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,257
|
)
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(2,340
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-151
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Schedule
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(Unaudited and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Reclassifications/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SH II, Inc.
|
|
|
SIPL
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
Debtors
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,900
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
|
|
(892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,378
|
)
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
Intercompany payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Purchase and development of internal-use software
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
Payments on DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
(6,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,400
|
)
|
Proceeds from 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(7,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equivalents
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,679
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,576
|
)
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
|
$
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-152
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
significant accounting policies
|
Basis of
presentation
For all periods presented in the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and footnotes, Spheris is the
reporting unit. All dollar amounts shown in the accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements and tables
in the notes are in thousands unless otherwise noted. The
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements
include the financial statements of Spheris, including its
direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by the Company without audit and,
in the opinion of management, reflect all normal recurring
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results for the
unaudited interim periods presented. Certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in year-end financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. The
results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal
year.
For periods subsequent to the Chapter 11 Petition, the
Debtors have applied ASC 852, in preparing the accompanying
interim consolidated financial statements as further discussed
in Note 1.
Additionally, the accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis
which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability of assets and the amounts, classification, and
satisfaction of liabilities that resulted from uncertainty
regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern as of March 31, 2010, and its subsequent sale of
assets. See further discussion in Note 1.
In preparing the accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements, the Company evaluated events and
transactions that occurred subsequent to March 31, 2010,
through the date that the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements were issued, June 29,
2010.
Recently
adopted accounting pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued
ASC 820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASC 820-10)
as an amendment to earlier authoritative guidance concerning
fair value measurements and disclosures.
ASC 820-10
requires an entity to: (i) disclose separately the amounts
of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons
for the transfers and (ii) present separate information for
Level 3 activity pertaining to gross purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements.
ASC 820-10,
which became effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2010, did not have a material impact on its financial statements.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued
ASC 985-605,
Revenue Recognition Software (ASC
985-605)
that will become effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted. Under
ASC 985-605
on arrangements that include software elements, tangible
products that have software components that are essential to the
functionality of the tangible product will no longer be within
the scope of
ASC 985-605,
and software-enabled products will now be subject to other
relevant revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, the FASB
issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with
multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of
ASC 985-605.
Under
ASC 985-605,
when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence
for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best
estimate of the selling price is required to separate
deliverables and allocate consideration received using the
relative selling price method.
ASC 985-605
includes
F-153
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
new disclosure requirements on how the application of the
relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of
revenue recognition. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the
impact that
ASC 985-605
will have on its financial statements.
On September 23, 2009, the FASB ratified
ASC 605-25,
Revenue Recognition with Multiple Element
Arrangements (ASC
605-25).
ASC 605-25
requires the allocation of consideration among separately
identified deliverables contained within an arrangement, based
on their related selling prices. The Company utilizes current
accounting guidance, also titled Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables, in the recognition of revenue
associated with the Companys customer contracts that
contain multiple elements of services.
ASC 605-25
will become effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2011. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the impact that
ASC 605-25
will have on its financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Fair value of
financial instruments
|
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company holds certain derivative financial instruments that
are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
These derivative financial instruments are utilized by the
Company to mitigate risks related to interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. The derivatives are measured at fair
value in accordance with the established fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into
the following three levels:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Level 1 observable inputs such as quoted prices
in active markets.
|
|
n
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.
|
|
n
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which little or
no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop
its own assumptions.
|
The Company entered into certain interest rate management
agreements with a single counterparty to reduce its exposure to
fluctuations in market interest rates under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility (as defined in Note 5). An event of default
under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility would create an event of
default under these interest rate management agreements, which
may cause amounts due under these agreements to become due and
payable. The Companys accounting for these derivative
financial instruments did not meet hedge accounting criteria.
Accordingly, changes in fair value were included as a component
of other expense (income) in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of these interest rate management agreements was
determined using valuation techniques including discounted cash
flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.
This analysis considered the contractual terms of the
derivatives, including the period to maturity, and used
observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves
and implied volatilities. The interest rates used in the
calculation of projected cash flows were based on an expectation
of future interest rates derived from observable market interest
rate curves and volatilities. Additionally, the Company
incorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately
reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its interest derivatives fell within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its interest derivatives utilized Level 3
inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate
the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The Company
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of its interest
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the interest derivatives in their entirety were
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. This
contract was scheduled to expire during 2010. During February
2010, the Company did not make payments due
F-154
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
on its interest derivatives and received notice of termination
from the counterparty to the agreements stating that all amounts
were currently due. As a result, the full amount of the
liability at December 31, 2009 of $1.7 million is
reflected as a component of other current liabilities in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As discussed
in Note 1, the full amount of this liability at
March 31, 2010 of $1.8 million is reflected in
liabilities subject to compromise at March 31, 2010.
Payments to SIPL are denominated in U.S. dollars. In order
to hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates, SIPL
historically maintained a portfolio of forward currency exchange
contracts, which were transacted with a single counterparty. The
Companys accounting for these derivative financial
instruments, all of which expired during the third quarter of
2009, did not meet the hedge accounting criteria. Accordingly,
changes in fair value were included as a component of other
expense (income) in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
The Company determined the fair value of its foreign currency
exchange contracts utilizing inputs for similar or identical
assets or liabilities that were either readily available in
public markets, derived from information available in publicly
quoted markets or quoted by counterparties to these contracts.
The future value of each contract out to its maturity was
calculated using observable market data, such as the foreign
currency exchange rate forward curve. The present value of each
contract was then determined by using discount factors based on
the forward curve for the more liquid currency. Additionally,
the Company incorporated credit valuation adjustments to
appropriately reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements.
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its foreign currency exchange contracts fell
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit
valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilized
Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The
Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit
valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of the
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the foreign currency exchange contracts in their
entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The Companys derivative financial instruments measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and recorded in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification in the accompanying
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
condensed consolidated balance sheets
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The (gains) losses from changes in fair value of the
Companys derivative financial instruments, as recorded in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
Location of (gain) loss recognized
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
$
|
(209
|
)
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(527
|
)
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-155
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Senior
subordinated notes
The Companys Senior Subordinated Notes had a quoted market
value of $63.8 million and $21.9 million at
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 respectively. The
Company determined that its valuation of its Senior Subordinated
Notes was classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy
as the fair value was determined through quoted prices in active
markets. The carrying value of the Senior Subordinated Notes
$123.6 million (net of discount) at December 31, 2009
was included in current portion of long-term debt and lease
obligations in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
The carrying value of the Senior Subordinated Notes
$122.8 million (net of both discount and debt issuance
costs) at March 31, 2010 included debt issuance costs of
$0.9 million and is recorded in liabilities subject to
compromise as discussed in Note 1.
|
|
4.
|
Other
comprehensive loss
|
Other comprehensive loss was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss), net of tax of $0 and
$39, respectively
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(312
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding debt obligations of the Company at December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2007 Senior Credit Facility, net of discount, with principal due
at maturity on July 17, 2012; interest payable periodically
at variable rates. The weighted average interest rate was 5.75%
at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
74,552
|
|
|
$
|
66,883
|
|
11.0% Senior Subordinated Notes, net of discount, with
principal due at maturity in December 2012; interest payable
semi-annually in June and December
|
|
|
123,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financed lease obligations
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,520
|
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt and financed lease
obligations
|
|
|
(198,440
|
)
|
|
|
(67,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and financed lease obligations, net of current
portion
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-156
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2007 senior
credit facility
The Companys senior secured credit facility consisted of a
term loan in the amount of $67.5 million and a revolving
credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$25.0 million at any time outstanding (the 2007
Senior Credit Facility). The revolving loans and the term
loan bore interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or a
reference banks base rate plus an applicable margin, at
the Companys option. Under the revolving credit facility,
the Company was permitted to borrow up to the lesser of
$25 million or a loan limiter amount, as defined in the
2007 Senior Credit Facility, less amounts outstanding under
letters of credit. On February 1, 2010, the Company paid
$2 million in principal and $0.5 million in interest
on the term loan and approximately $40,000 in accrued interest
on the revolving credit facility. A principal payment of
$5.7 million on the revolving credit facility was made on
February 3, 2010 as discussed in Note 1. As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had no amounts outstanding
under the revolver portion of the 2007 Senior Credit Facility.
Based on 2009 results of operations, the Company would not have
complied with the covenant requirements under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility. The Company elected not to report its financial
results pursuant to year-end covenant requirements under the
2007 Senior Credit Facility, and filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code in February 2010. As a result, all amounts due under the
2007 Senior Credit Facility as of both December 31, 2009
and March 31, 2010 are reflected as current obligations in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. All
amounts due under this facility were paid in full on
April 22, 2010 in connection with the Companys sale
of substantially all of its assets to the Purchasers as further
described in Note 1.
Under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility, Operations was the
borrower. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility was secured by
substantially all of Operations assets and is guaranteed
by Spheris, Spheris Holding II and all of Operations
subsidiaries, except SIPL. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility
contained certain covenants which, among other things, limited
the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments,
dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales,
acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances
and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The
2007 Senior Credit Facility also contained customary events of
default, including breach of financial covenants, the occurrence
of which could allow the collateral agent to declare any
outstanding amounts to be due and payable. The financial
covenants contained in the 2007 Senior Credit Facility included
(a) a maximum leverage test, (b) a minimum fixed
charge coverage test and (c) a minimum earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(Consolidated EBITDA, as defined under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility) requirement, among others.
In connection with the borrowings under the 2007 Senior Credit
Facility, the Company incurred $0.6 million and
$1.1 million in debt issuance costs and debt discounts,
respectively. These costs were being amortized as additional
interest expense over the term of the debt. The balance of the
issuance costs at March 31, 2010 of $0.3 million, net
of accumulated amortization, was reflected in prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet. The debt discount at March 31,
2010 of $0.6 million was reflected as a reduction in the
carrying amount of the debt under the 2007 Senior Credit
Facility.
Senior
subordinated notes
In December 2004, the Company issued its Senior Subordinated
Notes, which mature on December 15, 2012 (the Senior
Subordinated Notes). The Senior Subordinated Notes bear
interest at a fixed rate of 11.0% per annum. Interest is payable
in semi-annual installments through maturity on
December 15, 2012. The Company did not file a
Form 10-Q
with the SEC in the third quarter of 2009 which violated certain
covenants in the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated
Notes (the Indenture). In addition, the Company
elected not to make its scheduled payment on the Senior
Subordinated Notes on December 15, 2009. As a result, the
Company received a notice in from the trustee on
December 16, 2009 that an Event of Default had occurred, as
defined in the Indenture. As further described in Note 1,
the Company elected to file bankruptcy protection under
F-157
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on
February 3, 2010. Resolution of final payments due under
the Senior Subordinated Notes is pending outcome of these
matters.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are junior to the obligations of
the 2007 Senior Credit Facility. The Senior Subordinated Notes
are guaranteed by the Companys domestic operating
subsidiaries. The Senior Subordinated Notes contain certain
restrictive covenants that place limitations on the Company
regarding incurrence of additional debt, payment of dividends
and other items as specified in the indenture governing the
Senior Subordinated Notes. An acceleration of outstanding
indebtedness under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility would create
an event of default under the Senior Subordinated Notes, which
would allow the trustee or requisite holders of Senior
Subordinated Notes to declare the Senior Subordinated Notes to
be due and payable. As a result of the default under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility, the Company has reflected all amounts
due under the Senior Subordinated Notes as a current obligation
in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2009. The Company reflected all amounts due
under these notes as liabilities subject to compromise as of
March 31, 2010.
The Company incurred $1.9 million and $2.9 million in
debt issuance costs and debt discounts, respectively, in
connection with the Senior Subordinated Notes. These costs are
being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of
the Senior Subordinated Notes. The remaining balance of the
issuance costs at March 31, 2010 of $0.9 million, net
of accumulated amortization, was reflected as a part of the
amounts due under the Senior Subordinated Notes and included in
liabilities subject to compromise in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as discussed in Note 1. The
remaining debt discount at March 31, 2010 of
$1.4 million was reflected as a reduction in the carrying
amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes and is also included in
liabilities subject to compromise.
As stated above, the Company did not accrue interest of
$2.2 million in the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements related to the Senior
Subordinated Notes from the Petition Date (February 3,
2010) through March 31, 2010 in accordance with
ASC 852. Accrued interest as of the Petition Date is
recorded in liabilities subject to compromise in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Subsequent to the November 2004 Recapitalization, Spheris
Holding III approved the establishment of the Spheris
Holding III, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (as amended to date, the
Plan) for issuance of common stock to employees,
non-employee directors and other designated persons providing
substantial services to the Company. As of March 31, 2010,
15.6 million shares have been authorized for issuance under
the Plan. Shares are subject to restricted stock and stock
option agreements and typically vest over a three or four-year
period. As of March 31, 2010, an aggregate of
12.1 million shares of restricted stock and
1.8 million stock options were issued and outstanding under
the Plan. As these shares and stock options were issued for
services to be provided to the Company, compensation expense of
$0.1 million was reflected in general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. No
amounts were recorded as compensation expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
Under provisions of the Plan, all unvested shares and options
shall immediately vest and become exercisable upon an event of a
change in control. The sale of the Companys
assets as a result of the APA discussed in Note 1
constituted a change in control under these
provisions. Accordingly, all unvested options and shares were
immediately vested and exercisable on April 22, 2010.
During October 2008, Spheris Holding III issued warrants to
CHS to purchase 14.3 million shares of common stock of
Spheris Holding III upon the attainment of certain revenue
milestones set forth in the warrants. The costs of the warrants
subject to vesting are recognized over the period in which the
revenue is earned and are reflected as a reduction of revenue.
Accordingly, $8,000 and $2,000 of such costs are reflected as a
reduction to net
F-158
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
revenues in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2010, respectively.
The Company records deferred income taxes for the tax effect of
differences between book and tax bases of its assets and
liabilities. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce
its net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. The valuation allowance decreased by
approximately $0.2 million and $20,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. As of
March 31, 2010, the Companys valuation allowance that
is reflected as a reduction to the carrying value of its net
deferred tax balances was $35.1 million.
In the United States, the Company currently benefits from
federal and state net operating loss carryforwards. The
Companys consolidated federal net operating loss
carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income totaled
$107.9 million and $109.4 million at December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively, and began to expire
in 2007. State net operating loss carryforwards at
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 were
$71.5 million and $71.7 million, respectively, and
began to expire in 2005. The majority of these federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards is restricted due to
limitations associated with ownership change, and to the extent
these carryforwards are restricted, is reserved to reduce the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In addition,
the Company has alternative minimum tax credits which do not
have an expiration date and certain other federal tax credits
that will begin to expire in 2014.
The Company recognized income tax (benefit) expense of
$0.4 million and $(2.3) million during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
The Company accounts for income taxes associated with SIPL in
accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, following
Indian tax guidelines. Prior to 2009, because the Company was
considered permanently reinvested in SIPL, no taxes were
provided on accumulated translation adjustments recorded in
other comprehensive loss. Due to the subsequent event of the
sale of SIPL stock (as discussed in Note 1), the net income
tax effect of the currency translation adjustments related to
SIPL is reflected in other comprehensive loss for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 (as provided in Note 4).
Spheris Holding III and related subsidiaries (the
filing group members) file their U.S. federal
and certain state income tax returns on a consolidated, unitary,
combined or similar basis. To accurately reflect each filing
group members share of consolidated tax liabilities on
separate company books and records, on November 5, 2004,
Spheris Holding III and each of its subsidiaries entered
into a tax sharing agreement. Under the terms of the tax sharing
agreement, each subsidiary of Spheris Holding III is
obligated to make payments to Spheris Holding III equal to
the amount of the federal and state income taxes that its
subsidiaries would have owed if such subsidiaries did not file
federal and state income tax returns on a consolidated, unitary,
combined or similar basis. Likewise, Spheris Holding III
may make payments to subsidiaries if it benefits from the use of
a subsidiary loss or other tax benefit. The tax sharing
agreement allows each subsidiary to bear its respective tax
burden (or enjoy use of a tax benefit, such as a net operating
loss) as if its return was prepared on a stand-alone basis. To
date, no amounts have been paid under this agreement.
The Company has analyzed filing positions for all federal, state
and international jurisdictions for all open tax years where it
is required to file income tax returns. Although the Company
files tax returns in every jurisdiction in which it has a legal
obligation to do so, it has identified the following as
major tax jurisdictions: Tennessee and Texas, as
well as India. Within these major jurisdictions, the Company has
tax examinations in progress related to transfer pricing rates
for its Indian facilities, as discussed in Note 8, as well
as significant federal and state net operating loss carryovers,
for which the earliest open tax year is 1997. Based on the facts
and circumstances of these examinations at March 31, 2010,
the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it
will be successful in supporting its current positions related
to the applicable filings. The Company believes that all
F-159
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained
upon audit and does not anticipate any adjustments resulting in
a material adverse impact on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations or cash flow. Therefore, no
reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded.
|
|
8.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Litigation
The Company is subject to various other claims and legal actions
that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, any amounts for probable exposures are adequately
reserved for in the Companys interim condensed
consolidated financial statements, and the ultimate resolution
of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
Employment
agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain members of
senior management that provide for the payment to these persons
of amounts equal to the applicable base salary, unpaid annual
bonus and health insurance premiums over the applicable periods
specified in their individual employment agreements in the event
the employees employment is terminated without cause or
for certain other specified reasons. The maximum contingent
liabilities, excluding any earned but unpaid bonuses accrued in
the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements; under these agreements were $1.0 million at
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010.
These employment agreements were not included in the liabilities
assumed under the APA between the Purchasers and the Debtors.
Management anticipates that any amounts, if any, that may be
accrued in the future will be recorded as liabilities subject to
compromise in the condensed consolidated balance sheets of
subsequent periods.
Tax
assessment
SIPL received notification of a tax assessment resulting from a
transfer pricing tax audit by Indian income tax authorities
amounting to 52.2 million Rupees (approximately
$1.1 million), including penalties and interest, for the
fiscal tax period ended March 31, 2004 (the 2004
Assessment). In January 2007, the Company filed a formal
appeal with the India Commissioner of Income Tax. Prior to
resolution of the Companys appeals process, the Indian
income tax authorities have required the Company to make advance
payments toward the 2004 Assessment amounting to
43.1 million Rupees (approximately $0.9 million). Any
amounts paid by the Company related to the 2004 Assessment are
subject to a claim by the Company for reimbursement against
escrow funds related to the Companys December 2004
acquisition of HealthScribe, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
HealthScribe Escrow). Accordingly, the Company has
recorded the advance payments as receivables from the escrow
funds, which are reflected as a component of prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, SIPL received notification of
a tax assessment from a transfer pricing tax audit by Indian
income tax authorities amounting to 40.6 million Rupees
(approximately $0.8 million), including penalties and
interest, for the fiscal tax period ended March 31, 2005
(the 2005 Assessment). In December 2008, the Company
filed a formal appeal with the India Commissioner of Income Tax.
Prior to resolution of the Companys appeals process, the
Company was required to provide a bank guarantee in January 2009
for the full amount of the 2005 Assessment. The guarantee amount
is included in restricted cash in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2010. Approximately $0.6 million of the 2005
Assessment is subject to a claim for reimbursement against the
HealthScribe Escrow.
F-160
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In May 2010, the Company was informed that the competent
authorities of India and the United States (the Competent
Authorities) had met regarding the assessments for the two
years above. The Company was informed that the Competent
Authorities had reached an agreement regarding the transfer
pricing that should have been used for transactions between SIPL
and its related U.S. entities for the two years mentioned
above. Based on this agreement, the tax assessment for the
fiscal tax periods ended March 31, 2004 and March 31,
2005 would be reduced to approximately 36.6 million Rupees
(approximately $813,000) and 17.2 million Rupees
(approximately $381,000), respectively. An agreement reached by
the Competent Authorities under the U.S./India Income Tax Treaty
is not binding on the parties involved. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of the proposed settlement and has not
recorded a liability under the provision of
ASC 740-10,
Income Taxes Other (ASC
740-10)
in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
ending December 31, 2009 or March 31, 2010.
If the assessments were brought forward from March 31, 2005
through March 31, 2010, a reasonable estimate of additional
liability could range from zero to $6.8 million, contingent
upon the final outcome of the claim. Payment of such amounts
would also result in potential credit adjustments to the
Companys U.S. federal tax returns. The Company
currently believes that it is more likely than not that it will
be successful in supporting its position relating to these
assessments. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any
accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the tax
assessments as of December 31, 2009 or March 31, 2010 .
During the second quarter of 2009, SIPL received an assessment
order from Indian income tax authorities pertaining to an
inquiry regarding prior years usage of net operating
losses originating in 1999. The final assessment could
potentially amount to 5.6 million Rupees (approximately
$0.1 million).
|
|
9.
|
Related party
transactions
|
On October 3, 2008 (amended December 23, 2009),
Operations entered into an agreement for health information
processing services with Community Health Systems Professional
Services Corporation, an affiliate of Community Health Systems,
Inc. (CHS), to provide clinical documentation
technology and services to certain of its affiliated hospitals
(CHS Services Agreement). The Bankruptcy Court
approved the assumption of the CHS Services Agreement, as
amended, on March 17, 2010.
Contemporaneously with entering into the CHS Services Agreement,
CHS became a minority owner in Spheris Holding III, the
Companys indirect parent. The Company provided clinical
documentation technology and services to CHS in the ordinary
course of business at prices and on terms and conditions that
the Company believes are the same as those that would result
from arms length negotiations between unrelated parties.
The Company recognized net revenues from this customer of
$1.4 million and $4.0 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In March 2010, Spheris Holding III transferred
$9.2 million to the Debtors.
|
|
10.
|
Restructuring
charges
|
During October 2008, the Company commenced an operational
restructuring plan to effect changes in both the Companys
management structure and the nature and focus of its operations.
The Company initially recognized $0.5 million of
operational restructuring charges, including one-time
termination benefits and other restructuring related charges,
pursuant to this operational restructuring plan during the
fourth quarter of 2008. As a continuation of the plan during
2009, the Company eliminated a significant portion of its
U.S. based administrative and corporate workforce,
recognizing an additional $0.8 million of operational
restructuring charges, including one-time termination benefits
and other operational restructuring related charges. The Company
incurred $0.7 million in restructuring charges for the
three months ended March 31, 2009.
F-161
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Companys operational restructuring plan was
substantially complete as of December 31, 2009. No
additional amounts were incurred in 2010. No additional charges
are anticipated due to the Chapter 11 Petition filed on the
Petition Date.
On May 14, 2010, the Debtors received a letter from
MedQuist in which MedQuist asserted that the Debtors owe SIPL,
now a subsidiary of CBay, approximately $0.9 million for
the Debtors alleged failure to make certain payments to
SIPL prior to the closing of the APA (the SIPL
Claim). In addition, in an email dated April 30,
2010, representatives of MedQuist asserted that the Debtors are
required to reimburse MedQuist for the cost of providing COBRA
continuation coverage to terminated Spheris employees and their
dependents who are COBRA-eligible (the COBRA Claim
and, together with the SIPL Claim, the MedQuist
Claims). The Debtors dispute the MedQuist Claims.
F-162
MEDQUIST HOLDINGS
INC.
(formerly CBaySystems Holdings
Limited)
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
Lazard Capital
Markets
Macquarie Capital
RBC Capital Markets
Loop Capital Markets
February 4, 2011
Until March 1, 2011 (25 days after the commencement of this
offering), all dealers that effect transactions in our shares,
whether or not participating in this offering, may be required
to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in
addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus
when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.