e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File Number: 1-32858
Complete Production Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
72-1503959 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
11700 Katy Freeway, |
|
|
Suite 300 |
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
77079 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (281) 372-2300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant outstanding as
of October 26, 2009: 74,893,651
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Complete Production Services, Inc.
2
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements. |
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (Revised)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
76,143 |
|
|
$ |
18,500 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
154,112 |
|
|
|
335,493 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
39,426 |
|
|
|
38,877 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
19,529 |
|
|
|
20,606 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
49,028 |
|
|
|
25,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
338,238 |
|
|
|
439,377 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
980,706 |
|
|
|
1,166,686 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $15,668 and $9,985,
respectively |
|
|
17,615 |
|
|
|
23,262 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $5,598 and
$4,186, respectively |
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
12,463 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
341,512 |
|
|
|
341,592 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
6,384 |
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,695,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,987,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
3,803 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
24,043 |
|
|
|
57,483 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
36,111 |
|
|
|
38,115 |
|
Accrued payroll and payroll burdens |
|
|
18,134 |
|
|
|
31,643 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
15,783 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
99,907 |
|
|
|
136,440 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
650,121 |
|
|
|
843,842 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
148,198 |
|
|
|
146,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
898,226 |
|
|
|
1,126,642 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 75,216,676 (2008 74,766,317) issued |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 5,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
633,858 |
|
|
|
623,988 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
145,482 |
|
|
|
223,675 |
|
Treasury stock, 53,839 (2008 35,570) shares at cost |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
17,848 |
|
|
|
12,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
797,612 |
|
|
|
860,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,695,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,987,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Quarters and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Revised)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
223,429 |
|
|
$ |
481,073 |
|
|
$ |
767,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,307,069 |
|
Product |
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
13,237 |
|
|
|
37,496 |
|
|
|
40,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,913 |
|
|
|
494,310 |
|
|
|
804,992 |
|
|
|
1,347,758 |
|
Service expenses |
|
|
157,708 |
|
|
|
294,958 |
|
|
|
519,694 |
|
|
|
801,908 |
|
Product expenses |
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
28,583 |
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
45,204 |
|
|
|
46,498 |
|
|
|
140,115 |
|
|
|
141,952 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
50,379 |
|
|
|
47,721 |
|
|
|
153,470 |
|
|
|
130,058 |
|
Impairment loss |
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before interest and taxes |
|
|
(64,132 |
) |
|
|
96,245 |
|
|
|
(73,028 |
) |
|
|
246,402 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
13,987 |
|
|
|
14,052 |
|
|
|
42,344 |
|
|
|
44,252 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
(78,106 |
) |
|
|
82,278 |
|
|
|
(115,329 |
) |
|
|
202,392 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
(26,081 |
) |
|
|
29,804 |
|
|
|
(37,136 |
) |
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(52,025 |
) |
|
|
52,474 |
|
|
|
(78,193 |
) |
|
|
130,570 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations (net of
tax benefit of $0 and $3,865, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(52,025 |
) |
|
$ |
52,321 |
|
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
|
$ |
125,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.69 |
) |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
(1.04 |
) |
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.69 |
) |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
(1.04 |
) |
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.69 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(1.04 |
) |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.69 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(1.04 |
) |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
75,200 |
|
|
|
73,935 |
|
|
|
75,045 |
|
|
|
73,225 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
75,200 |
|
|
|
75,008 |
|
|
|
75,045 |
|
|
|
74,370 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Quarters and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Revised)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(52,025 |
) |
|
$ |
52,321 |
|
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
|
$ |
125,711 |
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
(2,540 |
) |
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
(5,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(49,023 |
) |
|
$ |
49,781 |
|
|
$ |
(72,847 |
) |
|
$ |
120,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 (Revised)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2008 (Revised) |
|
|
74,766,317 |
|
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
623,988 |
|
|
$ |
223,675 |
|
|
$ |
(202 |
) |
|
$ |
12,502 |
|
|
$ |
860,711 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,193 |
) |
Cumulative translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
Issuance of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
63,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
Expense related to
employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
Excess tax benefit from
share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
Purchase treasury shares |
|
|
(18,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
Vested restricted stock |
|
|
405,448 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
non-vested restricted
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30,
2009 |
|
|
75,216,676 |
|
|
$ |
752 |
|
|
$ |
633,858 |
|
|
$ |
145,482 |
|
|
$ |
(328 |
) |
|
$ |
17,848 |
|
|
$ |
797,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Revised)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
|
$ |
125,711 |
|
Items not affecting cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
153,470 |
|
|
|
132,052 |
|
Impairment loss |
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
29,475 |
|
Loss on the sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,935 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(9,109 |
) |
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
9,571 |
|
|
|
8,444 |
|
Loss on non-monetary asset exchange |
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for/(recoveries of) bad debt expense |
|
|
9,311 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
Loss on retirement of fixed assets |
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect
of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
173,370 |
|
|
|
(26,677 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
(5,380 |
) |
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
|
(13,136 |
) |
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(33,702 |
) |
|
|
(3,985 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
(4,754 |
) |
|
|
7,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
270,063 |
|
|
|
265,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,823 |
) |
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(29,094 |
) |
|
|
(193,254 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,150 |
|
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
Proceeds from disposal of capital assets |
|
|
20,155 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,939 |
) |
|
|
(207,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
208,355 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(200,454 |
) |
|
|
(280,060 |
) |
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(6,241 |
) |
|
|
(12,642 |
) |
Proceeds from issuances of common stock |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
11,901 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
9,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(203,314 |
) |
|
|
(63,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
57,643 |
|
|
|
(5,081 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
18,500 |
|
|
|
13,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
76,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized |
|
$ |
26,744 |
|
|
$ |
30,179 |
|
Net cash paid for income taxes (refunds received) |
|
$ |
(17,064 |
) |
|
$ |
55,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt acquired in acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
Assets received as proceeds from the sale of disposal group |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,987 |
|
Note issued to finance insurance premiums |
|
$ |
7,960 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)
1. General:
(a) Nature of operations:
Complete Production Services, Inc. is a provider of specialized services and products focused
on developing hydrocarbon reserves, reducing operating costs and enhancing production for oil and
gas companies. Complete Production Services, Inc. focuses its operations on basins within North
America and manages its operations from regional field service facilities located throughout the
U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, western Canada,
Mexico and Southeast Asia.
References to Complete, the Company, we, our and similar phrases used throughout this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate collectively to Complete Production Services, Inc. and its
consolidated affiliates.
On April 21, 2006, our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol CPX.
(b) Basis of presentation:
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring
adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the financial
position of Complete as of September 30, 2009 and the statements of operations and the statements
of comprehensive income for the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
as well as the statement of stockholders equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
the statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Certain
information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. These
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. We believe that these
financial statements contain all adjustments necessary so that they are not misleading. See Note
2, Prior Period Adjustments.
In preparing financial statements, we make informed judgments and estimates that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We review our estimates
on an on-going basis, including those related to impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill,
contingencies, and income taxes. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates
and actual results may differ from these estimates.
The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations that could be expected for the full year. Certain reclassifications have been made to
2008 amounts in order to present these results on a comparable basis with amounts for 2009,
including a change to the presentation of capitalized interest at one of our subsidiaries for the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008, which resulted in a decrease in interest income
and an offsetting decrease in interest expense totaling $595 and $1,825, respectively. This change
had no impact on net interest expense as previously disclosed.
In May 2008, our Board of Directors authorized and committed to a plan to sell certain
operations in the Barnett Shale region of north Texas, consisting primarily of our supply store
business, as well as certain non-strategic drilling logistics assets and other completion and
production services assets. On May 19, 2008, we sold these operations to a company owned by a
former officer of one of our subsidiaries, for which we received proceeds of $50,150 and assets
with a fair market value of $7,987. We have reported the operating results of this disposal group
as discontinued operations in our financial statements. See Note 10, Discontinued Operations.
7
We performed an evaluation of subsequent events as of October 30, 2009, the date of
issuance of these financial statements.
2. Prior period adjustments:
In June 2009, we discovered accounting errors within one of our operations located in the
Rocky Mountain region, which occurred in prior years and would have impacted our reported operating
results for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008. The majority of the errors were due
to a flawed revenue accrual process and ineffective controls over inventory within this operation.
We evaluated the impact that these errors would have had on our financial statements and determined
that these errors would not have been material to our financial statements from a quantitative or
qualitative perspective for those periods. However, the amount of the adjustment required to
correct these errors was deemed to be material to the results for 2009. We corrected these errors
as of June 30, 2009 and have made the required adjustments to our reported results for the
comparative quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008. In addition, we have adjusted our
previously published balance sheet at December 31, 2008, decreasing beginning retained earnings by
$8,405. As applicable, we will revise our published financials in future filings, including our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, including comparative results for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. We have labeled our balance sheet, statement of
operations and statement of cash flows as Revised where applicable.
The following tables summarize the impact of these accounting errors on our previously
published financial statements by caption for each of the comparable periods presented in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (in thousands, except per share data).
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
Prior Period |
|
|
Revised |
|
|
Original |
|
|
Prior Period |
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
Presentation |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Presentation |
|
|
Presentation |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Presentation |
|
Service |
|
$ |
479,996 |
|
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
|
$ |
481,073 |
|
|
$ |
1,310,807 |
|
|
$ |
(3,738 |
) |
|
$ |
1,307,069 |
|
Product |
|
|
13,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,237 |
|
|
|
40,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,233 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
494,310 |
|
|
|
1,351,496 |
|
|
|
(3,738 |
) |
|
|
1,347,758 |
|
Service expenses |
|
|
294,097 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
294,958 |
|
|
|
800,451 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
801,908 |
|
Product expenses |
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
46,512 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
46,498 |
|
|
|
141,966 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
141,952 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
47,695 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
47,721 |
|
|
|
129,983 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
130,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations before interest and
taxes |
|
|
96,041 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
96,245 |
|
|
|
251,658 |
|
|
|
(5,256 |
) |
|
|
246,402 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
14,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,052 |
|
|
|
44,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,252 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations before taxes |
|
|
82,074 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
82,278 |
|
|
|
207,648 |
|
|
|
(5,256 |
) |
|
|
202,392 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
29,731 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
29,804 |
|
|
|
73,687 |
|
|
|
(1,865 |
) |
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
52,343 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
52,474 |
|
|
$ |
133,961 |
|
|
$ |
(3,391 |
) |
|
$ |
130,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutedcontinuing operations |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
Dilutedtotal |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
8
BALANCE SHEET:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Original |
|
Prior Period |
|
Revised |
Caption |
|
Presentation |
|
Adjustments |
|
Presentation |
Cash |
|
$ |
19,090 |
|
|
$ |
(590 |
) |
|
$ |
18,500 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
343,353 |
|
|
$ |
(7,860 |
) |
|
$ |
335,493 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
$ |
21,328 |
|
|
$ |
4,573 |
|
|
$ |
25,901 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
$ |
41,891 |
|
|
$ |
(3,014 |
) |
|
$ |
38,877 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
21,472 |
|
|
$ |
(866 |
) |
|
$ |
20,606 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,166,453 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,686 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
37,585 |
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
$ |
38,115 |
|
Accrued payroll and payroll burdens |
|
$ |
31,293 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
31,643 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
$ |
232,080 |
|
|
$ |
(8,405 |
) |
|
$ |
223,675 |
|
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Original |
|
Prior Period |
|
Revised |
Caption |
|
Presentation |
|
Adjustments |
|
Presentation |
Net income |
|
$ |
129,102 |
|
|
$ |
(3,391 |
) |
|
$ |
125,711 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
131,977 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
132,052 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
(30,356 |
) |
|
$ |
3,679 |
|
|
$ |
(26,677 |
) |
Inventory |
|
$ |
(6,500 |
) |
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
$ |
(5,380 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
(1,417 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,692 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,109 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
$ |
7,074 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
7,308 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
265,878 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
265,903 |
|
3. Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
$ |
140,684 |
|
|
$ |
285,850 |
|
Related party receivables |
|
|
4,806 |
|
|
|
11,631 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
19,451 |
|
|
|
38,969 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,251 |
|
|
|
341,469 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
13,139 |
|
|
|
5,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
154,112 |
|
|
$ |
335,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Inventory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
21,926 |
|
|
$ |
20,915 |
|
Manufacturing parts, materials and other |
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
15,208 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,456 |
|
|
|
40,087 |
|
Inventory reserves |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,426 |
|
|
$ |
38,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
5. Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
Land |
|
$ |
8,919 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,919 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
28,959 |
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
26,026 |
|
Field equipment |
|
|
1,295,925 |
|
|
|
465,366 |
|
|
|
830,559 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
130,029 |
|
|
|
53,040 |
|
|
|
76,989 |
|
Office furniture and computers |
|
|
17,047 |
|
|
|
8,615 |
|
|
|
8,432 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
22,433 |
|
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
18,194 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
11,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,514,899 |
|
|
$ |
534,193 |
|
|
$ |
980,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 (Revised) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
Land |
|
$ |
10,078 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,078 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
20,155 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
18,058 |
|
Field equipment |
|
|
1,314,252 |
|
|
|
359,441 |
|
|
|
954,811 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
152,258 |
|
|
|
49,805 |
|
|
|
102,453 |
|
Office furniture and computers |
|
|
16,069 |
|
|
|
6,736 |
|
|
|
9,333 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
23,925 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
51,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,588,045 |
|
|
$ |
421,359 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 primarily included
progress payments to vendors for equipment to be delivered in future periods and component parts to
be used in the final assembly of operating equipment, which in all cases were not yet placed into
service at the time. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded
capitalized interest of $108 and $729, respectively, related to assets that we are constructing for
internal use and amounts paid to vendors under progress payments for assets that are being
constructed on our behalf.
Effective March 1, 2009, our Canadian subsidiary transferred certain property, plant and
equipment used in our production testing business to Enseco, a competitor, in exchange for certain
electric line (e-line) equipment. This exchange was determined to have commercial substance for us
and therefore we recorded the new assets acquired at the fair market value of the assets
surrendered which had a carrying value of $9,284. We incurred costs to sell totaling approximately
$71. We determined the fair value of the assets with the assistance of a third-party appraiser,
assuming an orderly liquidation methodology, to be $4,487, resulting in a loss on the exchange of
$4,868. Of the total value assigned to the new assets, $4,209 was included in property, plant and
equipment and $279 was included in inventory in the accompanying balance sheet as of September 30,
2009. The fair market value of the assets received was determined to be $5,497, using the same
methodology applied to the assets surrendered. We believe that these e-line assets will generate
cash flows in excess of the cash flows that would have been received from the production testing
assets due to relatively higher demand from our customers for e-line services.
(a) Sale-Leaseback Transactions:
Effective March 31, 2009, we entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with Agua Dulce, LLC,
through which we sold a facility and approximately 50 acres of real property located near Rock
Springs, Wyoming for $3,827. The sales price approximated the net book value of the facility,
which is currently under construction, and the land, resulting in an insignificant gain on the
transaction which has been included as a component of selling, general and administrative expense
in the accompanying statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. In
addition, the buyer agreed to fund the completion of the construction of the facility. Effective
April 1, 2009, we became party to the lease agreement which requires monthly operating lease
payments for a term of 10 years, with an option to extend the lease term for an additional 10
years. The rental rate adjusts for construction draws to date divided ratably over the remaining
lease term. The lease term began on April 1, 2009 and the first monthly rental was $35. We will
also incur additional lease costs related to certain operating costs, taxes and insurance for the
facility over
10
the term of the lease.
Effective
July 30, 2009, we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement with Enterprise Leasing
Company of Houston to sell over 550 light-vehicles with a net book value of approximately $10,362
as of July 30, 2009. During the third quarter of 2009, we received proceeds from the sale which
totaled $10,551. In August 2009, pursuant to this lease agreement, we began making monthly rental
payments of approximately $306. The lease terms range from 24 to 36 months.
(b) Impairment of Long-lived Assets:
During September 2009, we evaluated the fair market value of assets in our contract drilling
business with the assistance of a third-party appraiser and determined that the carrying value of
certain of these drilling rigs exceeded the fair market value estimates.
We projected the undiscounted cash flows associated with these rigs, including an estimate of
salvage value, and compared these expected future cash flows to the carrying amount of the rigs. If
the undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying amount, no further testing was performed and the
rig was deemed to not be impaired. If the undiscounted cash flows did not exceed the carrying
value, we estimated the fair market value of the equipment based on management estimates and
general market data obtained by the third-party appraiser using the sales comparison market
approach, which included the analysis of recent sales and offering prices of similar equipment to
arrive at an indication of the most probable selling price for the equipment. The result of this
analysis was a calculated fixed asset impairment of $36,158, which was recorded as an impairment
loss in the accompanying statements of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September
30, 2009. This impairment charge was allocated entirely to the Drilling Services business segment.
This impairment was deemed necessary due to an overall decline in oil and gas exploration and
production activity in late 2008 which has extended throughout 2009, as well as managements
expectation of future operating results for this business segment for the foreseeable future.
We continue to evaluate the remaining useful lives of our drilling rigs, and have considered
our depreciation methodology and these estimates of useful lives in our projected future cash flows
associated with these assets.
The following tabular presentation is presented for quantitative
presentation of our significant fair value measurements at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Gains |
|
Description |
|
Charge |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Property, plant and
equipment, net |
|
$ |
136,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,820 |
|
|
$ |
(36,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
136,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,820 |
|
|
$ |
(36,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have not recorded any other significant adjustments to our financial statements
related to fair value measurements during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
except as incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008.
6. Notes payable:
We entered into a note arrangement to finance our annual insurance premiums for the policy
term beginning December 1, 2007 and extending through April 30, 2009. As of December 31, 2007, we
recorded a note payable totaling $15,354 and an offsetting prepaid asset which included a brokers
fee. At December 31, 2008, this note balance totaled $1,353 and was classified as a current
liability. We paid this note in full during the first quarter of 2009. Effective May 1, 2009, we
renewed our insurance policies and
11
entered into a similar financing arrangement through April 2010. We recorded a note payable of $7,960, and have
made payments toward this note of $4,888, resulting in a note payable balance of $3,072 at
September 30, 2009. In addition, we renewed our workers compensation, general liability and auto
insurance policies through our insurance broker. We have recorded a prepaid asset of approximately
$2,052 associated with these policies and are making monthly premium payments. Our primary
insurance policies extend through April 30, 2010.
7. Long-term debt:
The following table summarizes long-term debt as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
U.S. revolving credit facility (a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
186,000 |
|
Canadian revolving credit facility (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,495 |
|
8.0% senior notes (b) |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
Subordinated seller notes (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
Capital leases and other |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,395 |
|
|
|
847,645 |
|
Less: current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
650,121 |
|
|
$ |
843,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Prior to October 13, 2009, we maintained a senior secured credit facility (the
Credit Agreement) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative
Agent, and certain other financial institutions. The Credit Agreement provided for a
$360,000 U.S. revolving credit facility that was to mature in December 2011 and a $40,000
Canadian revolving credit facility (with Integrated Production Services Ltd., one of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries, as the borrower thereof (Canadian Borrower)) that was to
mature in December 2011. The U.S. revolving credit facility included a provision for a
commitment increase, as defined in the Credit Agreement, which permitted us to effect up
to two separate increases in the aggregate commitments under the facility by designating a
participating lender to increase its commitment, by mutual agreement, in increments of at
least $50,000, with the aggregate of such commitment increases not to exceed $100,000, and
in accordance with other provisions as stipulated in the Credit Agreement. Certain
portions of the credit facilities were available to be borrowed in U.S. dollars, Canadian
dollars, Pounds Sterling, Euros and other currencies approved by the lenders. |
|
|
|
|
Subject to certain limitations, we had the ability to elect how interest under the Credit
Agreement would be computed. Interest under the Credit Agreement could be determined by
reference to (1) the London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin
between 0.75% and 1.75% per annum (with the applicable margin depending upon our ratio of
total debt to EBITDA. EBITDA is defined in the Credit Agreement as consolidated net income
for the period plus, to the extent deducted in determining our consolidated net income,
interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges for such
period) or (2) the Base Rate (i.e., the higher of the Canadian banks prime rate or the
CDOR rate plus 1.00%, in the case of Canadian loans or the greater of the prime rate and
the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, in the case of U.S. loans), plus an applicable margin
between 0.00% and 0.75% per annum. If an event of default existed under the Credit
Agreement, advances would bear interest at the then-applicable rate plus 2.00%. Interest
was payable quarterly for base rate loans and at the end of applicable interest periods for
LIBOR loans, except that if the interest period for a LIBOR loan was nine months, interest
would be paid at the end of each three-month period. |
|
|
|
|
The Credit Agreement also contained various covenants that limited our and our
subsidiaries ability to: (1) grant certain liens; (2) incur additional indebtedness; (3)
make certain loans and investments; (4) make capital expenditures; (5) make distributions;
(6) make acquisitions; (7) enter into hedging transactions; (8) merge or consolidate; or
(9) engage in certain asset dispositions. The Credit Agreement contained financial
maintenance covenants which, among other things, required us and our subsidiaries, on a
consolidated basis, to maintain specified ratios or conditions as follows (with such ratios
tested at the end of each fiscal quarter): (1) total debt to EBITDA of not more than 3.0 to
1.0 and (2) EBITDA to total interest expense of not less than 3.0 to 1.0., except that
EBITDA was subject to pro forma adjustments for acquisitions and non- |
12
|
|
|
ordinary course asset sales assuming that such transactions occurred on the first day of
the determination period, with any such adjustments made in accordance with the guidelines
for pro forma presentations set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
We were in compliance with all debt covenants under the Credit Agreement as of September
30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Under the Credit Agreement, we are permitted to prepay our borrowings. |
|
|
|
|
All of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Credit Agreement were secured by first
priority liens on substantially all of the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries as well as a
pledge of approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries.
Additionally, all of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Credit Agreement were
guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. All of the obligations under the
Canadian portion of the Credit Agreement were secured by first priority liens on
substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries (other than our Mexican
subsidiary). Additionally, all of the obligations under the Canadian portion of the Credit
Agreement were guaranteed by us as well as certain of our subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
If an event of default existed under the Credit Agreement, as defined therein, the lenders
could accelerate the maturity of the obligations outstanding under the Credit Agreement and
exercise other rights and remedies. If an event of default was continuing, advances would
bear interest at the then-applicable rate plus 2.00%. |
|
|
|
|
There were no borrowings outstanding under our U.S. or Canadian revolving credit facilities
as of September 30, 2009. The weighted average interest rate for our revolving credit
facilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 1.87%. There were letters
of credit outstanding under the U.S. revolving portion of the facility totaling $54,649,
which reduced the available borrowing capacity as of September 30, 2009. We incurred fees
calculated at 1.25% of the total amount outstanding under letter of credit arrangements
through September 30, 2009. Our available borrowing capacity under the U.S. and Canadian
revolving facilities at September 30, 2009 was $305,351 and $40,000, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Amendment Effective October 13, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
On October 13, 2009, we amended the Credit Agreement (the Third Amendment and, the Credit
Agreement after giving effect to the Third Amendment, the Amended Credit Agreement) and
modified the structure of the credit facility to an asset-based facility subject to
borrowing base restrictions. Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC replaced Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent and also serves as U.S. Issuing Lender and U.S.
Swingline Lender. The banks and financial institutions which comprise the lending group
did not change significantly. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the Third Amendment, our U.S. revolving credit facility was reduced from
$360,000 to up to $225,000, and the Canadian revolving credit facility was reduced from
$40,000 to up to $15,000, in each case subject to borrowing base limitations (as described
in further detail below). The term of the facilities under the Amended Credit Agreement
will continue until the earlier of (1) December 6, 2011 or (2) the earlier termination of
the U.S. or Canadian lending commitments. Subject to certain limitations, we are permitted
to effect up to two increases in the aggregate commitments by designating one or more
existing lenders or other banks or financial institutions, subject to the banks sole
discretion as to participation, to provide additional aggregate financing up to $75,000,
with each committed increase equal to at least $25,000 in the U.S., or $5,000 in Canada.
New borrowings pursuant to this commitment increase are subject to the same terms as the
existing facility borrowings. In addition, we have the right to terminate, in whole or in
part, the unused portion of the U.S. commitments in $1,000 increments upon written notice
to the U.S. Administrative Agent. If all of the U.S. facility is terminated, the Canadian
facility must also be terminated. |
|
|
|
|
Our U.S. borrowing base is limited to: (1) 85% of U.S. eligible billed accounts receivable,
less dilution, if any, plus (2) the lesser of 55% of the amount of U.S. eligible unbilled
accounts receivable or $10,000, plus (3) the lesser of the equipment reserve amount and
80% times the most recently determined Net Liquidation Percentage, as defined in the
Amended Credit Agreement, times the value of our and the U.S. subsidiary guarantors
equipment, provided that at |
13
|
|
|
no time shall the amount determined under this clause exceed 50% of the U.S. borrowing
base, minus (4) the aggregate sum of reserves established by the U.S. Administrative Agent,
if any. The equipment reserve amount means $50,000 upon the effective date of the Third
Amendment, less $595 for each subsequent month, not to be reduced below zero in the
aggregate. |
|
|
|
|
The Canadian borrowing based is limited to: (1) 80% of Canadian eligible billed accounts
receivable, plus (2) if the Canadian Borrower has requested credit for equipment under the
Canadian borrowing base, the lesser of (a) $15,000,000, and (b) 80% times the most recently
determined Net Liquidation Percentage, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, times
the value (calculated on a basis consistent with our historical accounting practices) of
our and the US subsidiary guarantors equipment, minus (3) the aggregate amount of reserves
established by Canadian Administrative Agent, if any. |
|
|
|
|
Subject to certain limitations set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement, we have the
ability to elect how interest under the Amended Credit Agreement will be computed. Interest
under the Amended Credit Agreement may be determined by reference to (1) the London
Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 3.75% and 4.25% per
annum (with the applicable margin depending upon our Excess Availability Amount, as defined
in the Amended Credit Agreement) or (2) the Base Rate (which means the higher of the Prime
Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, 3 month LIBOR plus 1.00% and 3.50%), plus the
applicable margin, as described above. For the period from the effective date of the Third
Amendment until the six month anniversary of the effective date of the Third Amendment,
interest will be computed as described above with an applicable margin rate of 4.00%. If
an event of default exists or continues under the Amended Credit Agreement, advances will
bear interest as described above with an applicable margin rate of 4.25% plus 2.00%.
Interest is payable monthly. |
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement prior to the effectiveness of the
Third Amendment will be deemed outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement with fees
equal to the applicable margin, as described above. If an event of default exists or
continues, such fee will be equal to the applicable margin plus 2.00%. |
|
|
|
|
Under the Amended Credit Agreement, the only financial covenant to which we are subject is
a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant, which must exceed 1.10 to 1.00. This covenant
becomes effective only if our Excess Availability Amount, as defined under the Amended
Credit Agreement, plus certain qualified cash and cash equivalents is less than $50,000. |
|
|
|
|
We were in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant described in the Third
Amendment as of September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant is calculated as follows: (1) for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2009, the ratio of EBITDA, as defined in the Amended Credit
Agreement, calculated for the four fiscal quarters then ended minus capital expenditures
made in cash or incurred during the three fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2009
multiplied by 4/3, compared to Fixed Charges, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement,
for the four fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2009; (2) for fiscal quarters ending after
September 30, 2009, the ratio of EBITDA, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement,
calculated for the four fiscal quarter period ended after September 30, 2009 minus capital
expenditures made with cash (to the extent not already incurred in a prior period) or
incurred during such four quarter period, compared to Fixed Charges, calculated for the
four quarters then ended. The calculation of EBITDA, as defined in the Amended Credit
Agreement, is substantially consistent with the calculation of EBITDA under the Credit
Agreement prior to the effectiveness of the Third Amendment. Fixed Charges, as defined in
the Amended Credit Agreement, include interest expense, among other things, reduced by the
amortization of transaction fees associated with the Third Amendment. |
|
|
|
|
In addition to the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant, we continue to be subject to
various other covenants which existed under the Credit Agreement prior to the Third
Amendment, excluding the financial maintenance covenants (which have been replaced with the
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant as discussed above), including but not limited to
covenants that limit our and our subsidiaries ability to: (1) grant certain liens; (2)
incur additional indebtedness; (3) make |
14
|
|
|
certain loans and investments; (4) make capital expenditures; (5) make distributions; (6)
make acquisitions; (7) enter into hedging transactions; (8) merge or consolidate; or (9)
engage in certain asset dispositions. |
|
|
|
|
Events of default under the Amended Credit Agreement remain substantially the same as under
the Credit Agreement prior to the Third Amendment. |
|
|
|
|
The obligations under the U.S. portion of the Amended Credit Agreement continue to be
secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our
U.S. subsidiaries as well as a pledge of approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier
foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, all of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the
Amended Credit Agreement continue to be guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S.
subsidiaries. The obligations under the Canadian portion of the Amended Credit Agreement
continue to be secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the
assets of our subsidiaries (other than our Mexican subsidiary). Additionally, all of the
obligations under the Canadian portion of the Amended Credit Agreement continue to be
guaranteed by us as well as certain of our subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
We will incur unused commitment fees under the Amended Credit Agreement ranging from 0.50%
to 1.00% based on the average daily balance of amounts outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
To date, we have incurred fees and expenses associated with the execution and effectiveness
of the Third Amendment totaling approximately $2,634. These fees and expenses will be
included in our consolidated balance sheet as a long-term asset, deferred financing fees,
and will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the facility. |
|
(b) |
|
On December 6, 2006, we issued 8.0% senior notes with a face value of $650,000
through a private placement of debt. These notes mature in 10 years, on December 15,
2016, and require semi-annual interest payments, paid in arrears and calculated based on
an annual rate of 8.0%, on June 15 and December 15, of each year, which commenced on June
15, 2007. There was no discount or premium associated with the issuance of these notes.
The senior notes are guaranteed by all of our current domestic subsidiaries. The senior
notes have covenants which, among other things: (1) limit the amount of additional
indebtedness we can incur; (2) limit restricted payments such as a dividend; (3) limit our
ability to incur liens or encumbrances; (4) limit our ability to purchase, transfer or
dispose of significant assets; (5) limit our ability to purchase or redeem stock or
subordinated debt; (6) limit our ability to enter into transactions with affiliates; (7)
limit our ability to merge with or into other companies or transfer all or substantially
all of our assets; and (8) limit our ability to enter into sale and leaseback
transactions. We have the option to redeem all or part of these notes on or after
December 15, 2011. We can redeem 35% of these notes on or before December 15, 2009 using
the proceeds of certain equity offerings. Additionally, we may redeem some or all of the
notes prior to December 15, 2011 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
notes plus a make-whole premium. |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the holders of our 8.0% senior notes, on
June 1, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC which enabled
these holders to exchange their notes for publicly registered notes with substantially
identical terms. These holders exchanged 100% of the notes for publicly traded notes on
July 25, 2007. On August 28, 2007, we entered into a supplement to the indenture governing
the 8.0% senior notes, whereby additional domestic subsidiaries became guarantors under the
indenture. Effective April 1, 2009, we entered into a second supplement to this indenture
whereby additional domestic subsidiaries became guarantors under the indenture. |
|
(c) |
|
We issued subordinated seller notes totaling $3,450 in 2004 related to certain
business acquisitions. These notes bore interest at 6% and matured in March 2009. We
repaid the outstanding principal associated with these note agreements totaling $3,450
upon maturity. |
8. Stockholders equity:
15
(a) Stock-based CompensationStock Options:
We maintain option plans under which stock-based compensation can be granted to employees,
officers and directors. Stock option grants under these plans have an exercise price based on the
fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. These stock options may be exercised over a
five or ten-year period and generally a third of the options vest on each of the first three
anniversaries from the grant date. Upon exercise of stock options, we issue our common stock.
We calculate stock compensation expense for our stock-based compensation awards by measuring
the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the
grant-date fair value of the award, with limited exceptions, by using an option pricing model to
determine fair value. A further description can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of
December 31, 2008.
Effective January 30, 2009, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved the
annual grant of stock options and non-vested restricted stock to certain employees, officers and
directors. Pursuant to this authorization, we issued 1,287,008 shares of non-vested restricted
stock on January 30, 2009 at a grant price of $6.41 per share and 4,000 shares of non-vested
restricted stock on March 16, 2009 at a grant price of $2.64 per share. We expect to recognize
compensation expense associated with these grants of non-vested restricted stock totaling $8,260
ratably over the three-year vesting periods. In addition, on January 30, 2009, we granted 905,300
stock options to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.41 per share and on
July 1, 2009, we granted 10,000 stock options to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of
$6.78 per share. These stock options vest ratably over a three-year period. We will recognize
compensation expense associated with these stock option grants over the vesting period. The fair
value of the stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was determined
by applying a Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
Assumptions: |
|
2009 |
Risk-free rate |
|
0.89% to 2.51% |
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
2.2 to 5.1 |
|
Volatility |
|
28.6% to 47.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated fair value per option |
|
$ |
1.14 to $3.01 |
|
We completed our initial public offering in April 2006. Prior to the second quarter of 2008,
we did not have sufficient historical market data in order to determine the volatility of our
common stock. We analyzed the market data of peer companies and calculated an average volatility
factor based upon changes in the closing price of these companies common stock for a three-year
period. This volatility factor was then applied as a variable to determine the fair value of our
stock options granted prior to the second quarter of 2008. For stock options granted during or
after the second quarter of 2008, we calculated an average volatility factor for our common stock
for a three-year period. These volatility calculations were then applied to compute the fair
market value of stock option grants during the second quarter of 2008 and thereafter.
We projected a rate of stock option forfeitures based upon historical experience and
management assumptions related to the expected term of the options. After adjusting for these
forfeitures, we expect to recognize expense totaling $1,497 over the vesting period of these 2009
stock option grants. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we have recognized
expense related to these stock option grants totaling $125 and $329, respectively, which represents
a reduction of net income before taxes. The impact on the net loss for the quarter and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 was an increase of $83 and $223, respectively, with no impact on diluted
earnings per share as reported. The unrecognized compensation costs related to the non-vested
portion of these awards was $1,168 as of September 30, 2009 and will be recognized over the
applicable remaining vesting periods.
For the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized compensation expense
associated with all stock option awards totaling $869 and $1,332, respectively, resulting in an
increase in net loss of $579 and a reduction in net income of $850, respectively, and a $0.01
reduction in diluted earnings per share for each of the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
For the nine-month periods ended
16
September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized compensation expense associated with all stock
option awards totaling $3,259 and $3,898, respectively, resulting in an increase in net loss of
$2,210 and a reduction in net income of $2,514, respectively, and a $0.03 reduction in diluted
earnings per share for each of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Total
unrecognized compensation expense associated with outstanding stock option awards at September 30,
2009 was $2,804, or $1,901, net of tax.
The following tables provide a roll forward of stock options from December 31, 2008 to
September 30, 2009 and a summary of stock options outstanding by exercise price range at September
30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
Price |
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,746,512 |
|
|
$ |
15.33 |
|
Granted |
|
|
915,300 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(63,182 |
) |
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(81,766 |
) |
|
$ |
21.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,516,864 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding at |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Exercisable at |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Remaining |
|
Exercise |
|
September 30, |
|
Remaining |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Price |
|
2009 |
|
Life (months) |
|
Price |
|
2009 |
|
Life (months) |
|
Price |
$2.00 |
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
$4.48 $4.80 |
|
|
48,602 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
|
|
48,602 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
$5.00 |
|
|
114,115 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
|
68,282 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
$6.41 $8.16 |
|
|
1,519,533 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
$ |
6.53 |
|
|
|
597,637 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
$11.66 |
|
|
282,088 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
|
282,088 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
$15.90 |
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
15.90 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
$ |
15.90 |
|
$17.60 $19.87 |
|
|
636,187 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
$ |
19.83 |
|
|
|
383,674 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
$ |
19.83 |
|
$22.55 $24.07 |
|
|
456,046 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
$ |
23.95 |
|
|
|
453,213 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
$ |
23.95 |
|
$26.26 $27.11 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
$ |
26.35 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
$ |
26.35 |
|
$29.88 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
$ |
29.88 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
$ |
29.88 |
|
$34.19 |
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
34.19 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
34.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,516,864 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
|
2,011,789 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
$ |
15.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the quarter and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 was $108 and $280, respectively. The total intrinsic value of all
in-the-money vested outstanding stock options at September 30, 2009 was $884. Assuming all stock
options outstanding at September 30, 2009 were vested, the total intrinsic value of all
in-the-money outstanding stock options would have been $1,173.
(b) Non-vested Restricted Stock:
We recognize compensation expense associated with grants of non-vested restricted stock, based
on the fair value of the shares on the date of grant, ratably over the applicable vesting periods.
At September 30, 2009, amounts not yet recognized related to non-vested restricted stock totaled
$11,926, which represented the unamortized expense associated with awards of non-vested stock
granted to employees, officers and directors under our compensation plans, including $6,083 related
to grants during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We recognized compensation expense
associated with non-vested restricted stock totaling $1,998 and $2,070 for the quarters ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $6,312 and $4,321 for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
17
The following table summarizes the change in non-vested restricted stock from December 31,
2008 to September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant Price |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
789,191 |
|
|
$ |
19.95 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,301,008 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(405,355 |
) |
|
$ |
16.78 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(16,266 |
) |
|
$ |
11.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,668,578 |
|
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Treasury Shares:
In accordance with the provisions of the 2008 Incentive Award Plan, holders of unvested
restricted stock were given the option to either remit to us the required withholding taxes
associated with the vesting of restricted stock, or to authorize us to repurchase shares equivalent
to the cost of the withholding tax and to remit the withholding taxes on behalf of the holder.
Pursuant to this provision, we repurchased the following shares during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Extended |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Amount |
|
January 1 31, 2009 |
|
|
10,662 |
|
|
$ |
6.37 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
May 1 31, 2009 |
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
$ |
7.84 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
June 1 30, 2009 |
|
|
436 |
|
|
$ |
7.66 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
July 1 31, 2009 |
|
|
392 |
|
|
$ |
6.22 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
August 1 31, 2009 |
|
|
156 |
|
|
$ |
8.82 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These shares were included as treasury stock at cost in the accompanying balance sheet as
of September 30, 2009. We expect to purchase additional shares in the future pursuant to this
plan provision.
9. Earnings per share:
We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common and potential common
share includes the weighted average of additional shares associated with the incremental effect of
dilutive employee stock options and non-vested restricted stock, as determined using the treasury
stock method. The following table reconciles basic and diluted weighted average shares used in the
computation of earnings per share for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding |
|
|
75,200 |
|
|
|
73,935 |
|
|
|
75,045 |
|
|
|
73,225 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
Non-vested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common and potential
common shares outstanding |
|
|
75,200 |
|
|
|
75,008 |
|
|
|
75,045 |
|
|
|
74,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred a net loss and thus all
potential common shares were deemed to be anti-dilutive. We excluded the impact of anti-dilutive
potential common shares from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares for the quarters
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. If these potential common shares were included
in the calculation, the impact would have been a decrease in diluted weighted average shares
outstanding of 1,253,920 shares and 24,160 shares for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and 3,060,105 shares and 137,289 shares for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
18
10. Discontinued operations:
In May 2008, our Board of Directors authorized and committed to a plan to sell certain
business assets located primarily in north Texas which included our product supply stores, certain
drilling logistics assets and other completion and production services assets. Although this sale
did not represent a material disposition of assets relative to our total assets as presented in the
accompanying balance sheets, the disposal group did represent a significant portion of the assets
and operations which were attributable to our product sales business segment for the periods
presented, and therefore, was accounted for as a disposal group that is held for sale. We revised
our financial statements and reclassified the assets and liabilities of the disposal group as held
for sale as of the date of each balance sheet presented and removed the results of operations of
the disposal group from net income from continuing operations, and presented these separately as
income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for each of the accompanying statements of
operations. We ceased depreciating the assets of this disposal group in May 2008 and adjusted the
net assets to the lower of carrying value or fair value less selling costs, which resulted in a
pre-tax charge of approximately $200. In addition, we allocated $11,109 of goodwill associated
with the original formation of Complete Production Services, Inc. to this business. Our company
was formed from the combination of three entities under common control in September 2005, which
resulted in goodwill of $93,792. Of this amount, $11,109 was deemed to be attributable to this
disposal group and was impaired as of the date of the transaction. Thus, this amount has been
included in the calculation of the loss on the sale of this disposal group.
On May 19, 2008, we completed the sale of the disposal group for $50,150 in cash and we
received assets with a fair market value of $7,987. In addition, we retained the receivables and
payables associated with the operating results of these entities as of the date of the sale. The
carrying value of the related net assets was approximately $51,353 on May 19, 2008, excluding
allocated goodwill of $11,109. We recorded a loss of $6,935 associated with the sale of this
disposal group, which represents the excess of the carrying value of the assets less selling costs
over the sales price and a charge of approximately $2,610 related to income tax on the transaction.
The income tax on the disposal was primarily attributable to the $11,109 of allocated goodwill
which was non-deductible for tax purposes and resulted in a taxable gain on the disposal. We sold
this disposal group to Select Energy Services, L.L.C., an oilfield service company located in
Gainesville, Texas which is owned by a former officer of one of our subsidiaries. Pursuant to the
agreement, we sublet office space to Select Energy Services, L.L.C., and provided certain
administrative functions for a period of one year at an agreed-upon rate for services per hour.
Proceeds from the sale of this disposal group were used to repay outstanding borrowings under our
U.S. revolving credit facility and for other general corporate purposes.
The following table summarizes operating results for the disposal group for the applicable
period in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
2008 through |
|
|
May 19, |
|
|
2008 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
59,553 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
Net income before loss on disposal in 2008 |
|
$ |
2,076 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,706 |
) |
We incurred additional fees of $153 related to the sale of the disposal group in the
third quarter of 2008.
11. Segment information:
We have determined what segment information to report based on the way our management
organizes the operating segments for making operational decisions and assessing financial
performance. We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on net income (loss) from
continuing operations before net interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, minority
interest and impairment loss (Adjusted EBITDA). The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be
viewed as a substitute for calculations under U.S. GAAP, in particular net income. Adjusted EBITDA
calculated by us may not be comparable to
19
the EBITDA calculation of another company or to the calculation of EBITDA under our credit
facilities (see Note 7 for a description of the calculation of EBITDA under our existing credit
facility, as amended). See also the table below for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to
operating income (loss) by segment.
We have three reportable operating segments: completion and production services (C&PS),
drilling services and product sales. The accounting policies of our reporting segments are the same
as those used to prepare our unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2009.
Inter-segment transactions are accounted for on a cost recovery basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&PS |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
198,014 |
|
|
$ |
25,415 |
|
|
$ |
6,484 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
229,913 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
|
$ |
(2,628 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
31,396 |
|
|
$ |
(3,757 |
) |
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
$ |
(7,025 |
) |
|
$ |
22,405 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
43,744 |
|
|
$ |
5,466 |
|
|
$ |
603 |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
|
$ |
50,379 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(12,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,381 |
) |
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
(7,591 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,132 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
3,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
6,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
(Revised) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
418,865 |
|
|
$ |
62,208 |
|
|
$ |
13,237 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
494,310 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
15,002 |
|
|
$ |
(15,488 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
133,459 |
|
|
$ |
17,005 |
|
|
$ |
3,387 |
|
|
$ |
(9,885 |
) |
|
$ |
143,966 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
41,195 |
|
|
$ |
5,223 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
47,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,264 |
|
|
$ |
11,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
|
$ |
(10,531 |
) |
|
$ |
96,245 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
51,486 |
|
|
$ |
6,581 |
|
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
58,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
1,350,965 |
|
|
$ |
170,400 |
|
|
$ |
40,577 |
|
|
$ |
133,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,695,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
681,981 |
|
|
$ |
85,515 |
|
|
$ |
37,496 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
804,992 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
$ |
4,460 |
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
3,581 |
|
|
$ |
(8,775 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
129,044 |
|
|
$ |
6,698 |
|
|
$ |
6,427 |
|
|
$ |
(25,569 |
) |
|
$ |
116,600 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
133,393 |
|
|
$ |
16,502 |
|
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
153,470 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,349 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,962 |
) |
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
$ |
(27,283 |
) |
|
$ |
(73,028 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
25,267 |
|
|
$ |
3,004 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
29,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008 (Revised) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
1,134,358 |
|
|
$ |
172,711 |
|
|
$ |
40,689 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,347,758 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
$ |
25,541 |
|
|
$ |
(26,669 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
347,759 |
|
|
$ |
44,733 |
|
|
$ |
10,209 |
|
|
$ |
(26,241 |
) |
|
$ |
376,460 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
111,972 |
|
|
$ |
14,527 |
|
|
$ |
1,762 |
|
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
130,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
235,787 |
|
|
$ |
30,206 |
|
|
$ |
8,447 |
|
|
$ |
(28,038 |
) |
|
$ |
246,402 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
157,890 |
|
|
$ |
31,816 |
|
|
$ |
2,317 |
|
|
$ |
1,231 |
|
|
$ |
193,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
1,631,875 |
|
|
$ |
251,015 |
|
|
$ |
52,048 |
|
|
$ |
52,415 |
|
|
$ |
1,987,353 |
|
We do not allocate net interest expense or tax expense to the operating segments. The
following table reconciles operating income as reported above to net income (loss) from continuing
operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Segment operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,132 |
) |
|
$ |
96,245 |
|
|
$ |
(73,028 |
) |
|
$ |
246,402 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
13,987 |
|
|
|
14,052 |
|
|
|
42,344 |
|
|
|
44,252 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
(26,081 |
) |
|
|
29,804 |
|
|
|
(37,136 |
) |
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(52,025 |
) |
|
$ |
52,474 |
|
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
|
$ |
130,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&PS |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
333,628 |
|
|
$ |
5,563 |
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
341,592 |
|
Contingency adjustment and other |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
333,548 |
|
|
$ |
5,563 |
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
341,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The contingency adjustment represents a reclassification of costs associated with a
prior year acquisition, with no impact on net income as previously reported. |
12. Financial instruments:
The financial instruments recognized in the balance sheet consist of cash and cash
equivalents, trade accounts receivable, bank operating loans, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, long-term debt and senior notes. The fair value of all financial instruments
approximates their carrying amounts due to their current maturities or market rates of interest,
except the senior notes which were issued in December 2006 with a fixed 8% coupon rate. At
September 30, 2009, the fair value of these notes was $591,500 based on the published closing
price.
A significant portion of our trade accounts receivable is from companies in the oil and gas
industry, and as such, we are exposed to normal industry credit risks. We evaluate the
credit-worthiness of our major new and existing customers financial condition and generally do not
require collateral. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, one customer, XTO
Energy, Inc., provided approximately 10% of our sales.
13. Legal matters and contingencies:
In the normal course of our business, we are a party to various pending or threatened claims,
lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial
operations, products, employees and other matters, including warranty and product liability claims
and occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials, on the job injuries
and fatalities as a result of our products or operations. Many of the claims filed against us
relate to motor vehicle accidents which can result in the loss of life or serious bodily injury.
Some of these claims relate to matters occurring prior to our acquisition of businesses. In
certain cases, we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of such businesses.
Although we cannot know or predict with certainty the outcome of any claim or proceeding or
the effect such outcomes may have on us, we believe that any liability resulting from the
resolution of any of these matters, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by
insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
We have historically incurred an additional insurance premium related to a cost-sharing
provision of our general liability insurance policy, and we cannot be certain that we will not
incur additional costs until either existing claims become further developed or until the
limitation periods expire for each respective policy year. Any such additional premiums should not
have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
14. Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements:
On December 6, 2006, we issued 8.0% Senior Notes at a face value of $650,000 in a private
placement transaction. On June 1, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC
to register these 8.0% Senior Notes and became subject to the disclosure requirements of SEC
Regulation S-X Rule 3-10(f). The following tables present the financial data required pursuant to
SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10(f), which includes: (1) unaudited condensed consolidating balance
sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (Revised); (2) unaudited condensed
consolidating statements of operations for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Revised); (3) unaudited condensed consolidating statements of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Revised); and (4) unaudited condensed consolidating statements of cash
flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
21
(Revised).
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
65,222 |
|
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
$ |
13,818 |
|
|
$ |
(3,770 |
) |
|
$ |
76,143 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
125,136 |
|
|
|
28,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,112 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,384 |
|
|
|
13,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,426 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3,253 |
|
|
|
14,903 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,529 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
48,194 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
117,540 |
|
|
|
167,324 |
|
|
|
57,144 |
|
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
338,238 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
|
919,119 |
|
|
|
57,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
980,706 |
|
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
842,063 |
|
|
|
100,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(942,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inter-company receivable |
|
|
591,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(591,604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
55,473 |
|
|
|
283,181 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,512 |
|
Other long-term assets, net |
|
|
14,726 |
|
|
|
16,670 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,625,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,486,493 |
|
|
$ |
120,995 |
|
|
$ |
(1,537,636 |
) |
|
$ |
1,695,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
22,703 |
|
|
|
4,987 |
|
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
24,043 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
14,550 |
|
|
|
15,725 |
|
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,111 |
|
Accrued payroll and payroll burdens |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
14,779 |
|
|
|
3,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,134 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
15,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,783 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
Accrued taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
Current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
34,985 |
|
|
|
53,468 |
|
|
|
15,224 |
|
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
99,907 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,121 |
|
Inter-company payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,052 |
|
|
|
4,552 |
|
|
|
(591,604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
143,389 |
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
828,374 |
|
|
|
644,430 |
|
|
|
20,796 |
|
|
|
(595,374 |
) |
|
|
898,226 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
797,612 |
|
|
|
842,063 |
|
|
|
100,199 |
|
|
|
(942,262 |
) |
|
|
797,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,625,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,486,493 |
|
|
$ |
120,995 |
|
|
$ |
(1,537,636 |
) |
|
$ |
1,695,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (Revised)
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
25,399 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
5,078 |
|
|
$ |
(12,323 |
) |
|
$ |
18,500 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
304,731 |
|
|
|
30,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335,493 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,037 |
|
|
|
13,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,877 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
18,509 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,606 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
25,594 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
52,254 |
|
|
|
348,930 |
|
|
|
50,516 |
|
|
|
(12,323 |
) |
|
|
439,377 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
1,097,474 |
|
|
|
64,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166,686 |
|
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
929,368 |
|
|
|
88,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,018,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inter-company receivable |
|
|
779,553 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
55,354 |
|
|
|
283,657 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,592 |
|
Other long-term assets, net |
|
|
14,009 |
|
|
|
22,163 |
|
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,835,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,840,391 |
|
|
$ |
120,879 |
|
|
$ |
(1,809,411 |
) |
|
$ |
1,987,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,792 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,803 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
59,052 |
|
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
(12,323 |
) |
|
|
57,483 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
13,421 |
|
|
|
18,447 |
|
|
|
6,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,115 |
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Accrued payroll and payroll burdens |
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
23,310 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,643 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
23,141 |
|
|
|
105,890 |
|
|
|
19,732 |
|
|
|
(12,323 |
) |
|
|
136,440 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
836,000 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
7,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843,842 |
|
Inter-company payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,553 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(779,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
115,642 |
|
|
|
25,281 |
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
974,783 |
|
|
|
911,023 |
|
|
|
32,210 |
|
|
|
(791,374 |
) |
|
|
1,126,642 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
860,711 |
|
|
|
929,368 |
|
|
|
88,669 |
|
|
|
(1,018,037 |
) |
|
|
860,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,835,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,840,391 |
|
|
$ |
120,879 |
|
|
$ |
(1,809,411 |
) |
|
$ |
1,987,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
197,004 |
|
|
$ |
28,019 |
|
|
$ |
(1,594 |
) |
|
$ |
223,429 |
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
6,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,810 |
|
|
|
34,697 |
|
|
|
(1,594 |
) |
|
|
229,913 |
|
Service expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,093 |
|
|
|
20,209 |
|
|
|
(1,594 |
) |
|
|
157,708 |
|
Product expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
7,030 |
|
|
|
35,925 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,204 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
46,884 |
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,379 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before interest and taxes |
|
|
(7,444 |
) |
|
|
(61,474 |
) |
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,132 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
13,894 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(1,768 |
) |
|
|
13,987 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates |
|
|
47,359 |
|
|
|
(3,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before taxes |
|
|
(66,920 |
) |
|
|
(59,541 |
) |
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
43,619 |
|
|
|
(78,106 |
) |
Taxes |
|
|
(14,895 |
) |
|
|
(12,182 |
) |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(52,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(47,359 |
) |
|
$ |
3,740 |
|
|
$ |
43,619 |
|
|
$ |
(52,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Revised)
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
445,802 |
|
|
$ |
36,449 |
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
$ |
481,073 |
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
|
10,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448,817 |
|
|
|
46,671 |
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
494,310 |
|
Service expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,106 |
|
|
|
25,030 |
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
294,958 |
|
Product expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
6,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9,884 |
|
|
|
31,878 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,498 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
42,580 |
|
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before interest and taxes |
|
|
(10,302 |
) |
|
|
101,338 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,245 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
15,012 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
14,052 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(3,443 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates |
|
|
(64,851 |
) |
|
|
(4,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before taxes |
|
|
42,980 |
|
|
|
103,287 |
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
(69,080 |
) |
|
|
82,278 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
(9,210 |
) |
|
|
38,152 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
52,190 |
|
|
|
65,135 |
|
|
|
4,229 |
|
|
|
(69,080 |
) |
|
|
52,474 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations (net of
tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
52,190 |
|
|
$ |
64,982 |
|
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
|
$ |
(69,080 |
) |
|
$ |
52,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
686,237 |
|
|
$ |
85,273 |
|
|
$ |
(4,014 |
) |
|
$ |
767,496 |
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,639 |
|
|
|
23,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699,876 |
|
|
|
109,130 |
|
|
|
(4,014 |
) |
|
|
804,992 |
|
Service expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,332 |
|
|
|
61,376 |
|
|
|
(4,014 |
) |
|
|
519,694 |
|
Product expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,979 |
|
|
|
15,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,583 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
25,569 |
|
|
|
98,888 |
|
|
|
15,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,115 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
142,524 |
|
|
|
9,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,470 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before interest and taxes |
|
|
(26,759 |
) |
|
|
(53,005 |
) |
|
|
6,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,028 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
42,373 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(5,418 |
) |
|
|
42,344 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(5,452 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates |
|
|
44,998 |
|
|
|
(5,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before taxes |
|
|
(108,678 |
) |
|
|
(52,465 |
) |
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
39,220 |
|
|
|
(115,329 |
) |
Taxes |
|
|
(30,485 |
) |
|
|
(7,467 |
) |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,998 |
) |
|
$ |
5,778 |
|
|
$ |
39,220 |
|
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Revised)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,204,548 |
|
|
$ |
105,924 |
|
|
|
(3,403 |
) |
|
$ |
1,307,069 |
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
|
35,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210,105 |
|
|
|
141,056 |
|
|
|
(3,403 |
) |
|
|
1,347,758 |
|
Service expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
727,760 |
|
|
|
77,551 |
|
|
|
(3,403 |
) |
|
|
801,908 |
|
Product expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,831 |
|
|
|
23,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
26,241 |
|
|
|
103,460 |
|
|
|
12,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,952 |
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
118,295 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before interest and taxes |
|
|
(27,347 |
) |
|
|
256,759 |
|
|
|
16,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,402 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
46,716 |
|
|
|
8,487 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
(11,410 |
) |
|
|
44,252 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(11,539 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
11,410 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates |
|
|
(162,182 |
) |
|
|
(13,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
taxes |
|
|
99,658 |
|
|
|
261,377 |
|
|
|
16,633 |
|
|
|
(175,276 |
) |
|
|
202,392 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
(29,444 |
) |
|
|
97,727 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
129,102 |
|
|
|
163,650 |
|
|
|
13,094 |
|
|
|
(175,276 |
) |
|
|
130,570 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations (net of
tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
129,102 |
|
|
$ |
158,791 |
|
|
$ |
13,094 |
|
|
$ |
(175,276 |
) |
|
$ |
125,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,998 |
) |
|
$ |
5,778 |
|
|
$ |
39,220 |
|
|
$ |
(78,193 |
) |
Items not affecting cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates |
|
|
44,998 |
|
|
|
(5,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
142,524 |
|
|
|
9,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,470 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,158 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,877 |
|
|
|
20,520 |
|
|
|
3,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,184 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of effect of acquisitions |
|
|
65,708 |
|
|
|
54,019 |
|
|
|
(4,836 |
) |
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
123,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
44,580 |
|
|
|
202,445 |
|
|
|
14,485 |
|
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
270,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(25,016 |
) |
|
|
(3,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,094 |
) |
Inter-company receipts |
|
|
187,949 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the disposal of capital assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,860 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing
activities |
|
|
187,300 |
|
|
|
(5,658 |
) |
|
|
(3,134 |
) |
|
|
(187,447 |
) |
|
|
(8,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(187,638 |
) |
|
|
(3,759 |
) |
|
|
(9,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,454 |
) |
Repayments of notes payable |
|
|
(6,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,241 |
) |
Inter-company borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192,501 |
) |
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
187,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuances of common stock |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
Other |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
(192,057 |
) |
|
|
(196,260 |
) |
|
|
(2,444 |
) |
|
|
187,447 |
|
|
|
(203,314 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
39,823 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
8,740 |
|
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
57,643 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
25,399 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
(12,323 |
) |
|
|
18,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
65,222 |
|
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
$ |
13,818 |
|
|
$ |
(3,770 |
) |
|
$ |
76,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Revised)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
125,711 |
|
|
$ |
158,791 |
|
|
$ |
13,094 |
|
|
$ |
(171,885 |
) |
|
$ |
125,711 |
|
Items not affecting cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates |
|
|
(158,791 |
) |
|
|
(13,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
120,289 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,052 |
|
Other |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
38,918 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,983 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of effect of acquisitions |
|
|
61,694 |
|
|
|
(83,726 |
) |
|
|
(13,460 |
) |
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
(31,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
|
30,316 |
|
|
|
221,178 |
|
|
|
10,760 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
265,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,823 |
) |
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
(177,894 |
) |
|
|
(14,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193,254 |
) |
Inter-company advances |
|
|
29,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,150 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,645 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing
activities |
|
|
28,214 |
|
|
|
(192,922 |
) |
|
|
(13,818 |
) |
|
|
(29,445 |
) |
|
|
(207,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt |
|
|
197,714 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
10,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,355 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(269,623 |
) |
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
(9,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,060 |
) |
Repayments of notes payable |
|
|
(12,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,642 |
) |
Inter-company borrowings (repayments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,811 |
) |
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
29,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuances of common stock |
|
|
11,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,901 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing
activities |
|
|
(63,541 |
) |
|
|
(32,647 |
) |
|
|
3,406 |
|
|
|
29,445 |
|
|
|
(63,337 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(5,011 |
) |
|
|
(4,391 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
(5,081 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
8,217 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
6,605 |
|
|
|
(6,747 |
) |
|
|
13,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
7,277 |
|
|
$ |
(3,098 |
) |
|
$ |
7,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
15. Retirement Plans:
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted and established
(and subsequently amended and restated for compliance and other issues)
the Complete Production Services, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan, whereby eligible participants, including members of senior management,
non-employee
directors and certain highly-compensated individuals, could defer up to 90% of their compensation
and up to 90% of the employees annual incentive bonus, or 100% of director compensation for
services rendered, into various investment options pre-tax. For amounts deferred, we will match
the contribution dollar-for-dollar up to four percent of compensation minus $3.3, and we may make
other discretionary contributions pursuant to resolutions of this plans administrative committee.
Participants immediately vest in amounts deferred as well as any matching or discretionary
contributions we make. Participants bear the risk of loss associated with investment gains or
losses. We intend that this plan will meet all the requirements necessary to be a nonqualified,
unfunded, unsecured plan of deferred compensation within the meaning of Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3)
and 401(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. For
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we expensed $14 of matching contributions
associated with this deferred compensation plan.
In response to current market conditions, we amended our 401(k) plan and deferred compensation
plan effective May 1, 2009 to suspend matching contributions to such plans until further notice.
16. Recent accounting pronouncements and authoritative literature:
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued additional guidance
regarding business combinations that replaced the initial statement in its entirety. The guidance
now additionally requires that all assets and liabilities and non-controlling interests of an
acquired business be measured at their fair value, with limited exceptions, including the
recognition of acquisition-related costs and anticipated restructuring costs separate from the
acquired net assets. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing pre-acquisition
contingencies and states that an acquirer must recognize assets and liabilities assumed arising
from contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at acquisition-date fair
values, but must recognize all other contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured
at their acquisition-date fair values only if it is more likely than not that these contingencies
meet the definition of an asset or liability. Furthermore, this statement provides guidance for
measuring goodwill and recording a bargain purchase, defined as a business combination in which
total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of
the consideration transferred plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, and it requires
that the acquirer recognize that excess in earnings as a gain attributable to the acquirer. In
April 2009, the FASB issued a further update regarding accounting for assets and liabilities
assumed in a business combination that arises from contingencies which amends the previous guidance
to require contingent assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination to be
recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated during
the measurement period. If fair value cannot be reasonably estimated during the measurement
period, the contingent asset or liability would be recognized in accordance with U.S. GAAP to
account for contingencies and reasonable estimation of the amount of loss, if any. Further, this
update eliminated the specific subsequent accounting guidance for contingent assets and
liabilities, without significantly revising the original guidance. However, contingent
consideration arrangements of an acquiree assumed by the acquirer in a business combination would
still be initially and subsequently measured at fair value. We adopted this additional guidance
regarding business combinations on January 1, 2009 with no impact on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding the reporting of discontinued operations
which clarified the definition of a discontinued operation as either: (1) a component of an entity
which has been disposed of or classified as held for sale which meets the criteria of an operating
segment, or (2) as a business which meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale on
acquisition. This proposed guidance
27
further modifies certain disclosure requirements. We are currently evaluating the effect this
proposed guidance may have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a standard regarding subsequent events that provides guidance as
when an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after a balance sheet date in its
financial statements and the necessary disclosures related to these events. Specifically, the
entity should recognize subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that existed at
the balance sheet date, including significant estimates used to prepare financial statements. An
entity must disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that
date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were
available to be issued. We adopted this new accounting standard effective June 30, 2009 and will
apply its provisions prospectively.
In August 2009, the FASB further updated the fair value measurement guidance to clarify how an
entity should measure liabilities at fair value. The update reaffirms fair value is based on an
orderly transaction between market participants, even though liabilities are infrequently
transferred due to contractual or other legal restrictions. However, identical liabilities traded
in the active market should be used when available. When quoted prices are not available, the
quoted price of the identical liability traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities
or similar liabilities traded as an asset, or another valuation approach should be used. This
update also clarifies that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be
considered as a separate input or adjustment in the measurement of fair value. We will adopt the
provisions of this update for fair value measurements of liabilities effective October 1, 2009, and
we do not expect this adoption to have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
17. Subsequent Events:
On October 13, 2009, we completed the Third Amendment to our revolving credit agreement which
modified the structure of the credit facility to an asset-based facility subject to borrowing base
restrictions. This amendment provided us with less restrictive financial debt covenants and
reduced excess borrowing capacity under the facility. We believe this new facility will allow us
to better manage our cash flow needs, will provide better access to funds in the future and will
allow us to use our asset base for future financing needs. For a complete description of the Third
Amendment, see Note 7, Long-term debt.
28
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements and information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and
projections about us and the oil and gas industry. While management believes that these
forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, there can be no assurance that future
developments affecting us will be those that we anticipate. These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties that may be outside of our control and could cause actual results
to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to: market prices for oil and gas, the
level of oil and gas drilling, economic and competitive conditions, capital expenditures,
regulatory changes and other uncertainties. Other factors that could cause our actual results to
differ from our projected results are described in: (1) Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this report, (2) our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008, (3) our reports and registration statements filed from time to time with the SEC and (4)
other announcements we make from time to time. In light of these risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed below may not occur. Unless otherwise required
by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if new
information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
The words believe, may, estimate, continue, anticipate, intend, plan, expect
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All statements other
than statements of current or historical fact contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
forward-looking statements.
Reference to Complete, the Company, we, our and similar phrases used throughout this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate collectively to Complete Production Services, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes as of September 30, 2009 and for the
quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, included elsewhere herein.
Overview
We are a leading provider of specialized services and products focused on helping oil and gas
companies develop hydrocarbon reserves, reduce operating costs and enhance production. We focus on
basins within North America that we believe have attractive long-term potential for growth, and we
deliver targeted, value-added services and products required by our customers within each specific
basin. We believe our range of services and products positions us to meet the many needs of our
customers at the wellsite, from drilling and completion through production and eventual
abandonment. We manage our operations from regional field service facilities located throughout the
U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, western Canada,
Mexico and Southeast Asia.
We operate in three business segments:
Completion and Production Services. Through our completion and production services
segment, we establish, maintain and enhance the flow of oil and gas throughout the life of a well.
This segment is divided into the following primary service lines:
|
|
|
Intervention Services. Well intervention requires the use of specialized equipment to
perform an array of wellbore services. Our fleet of intervention service equipment
includes coiled tubing units, pressure pumping units, nitrogen units, well service rigs,
snubbing units and a variety of support equipment. Our intervention services provide
customers with innovative solutions to increase production of oil and gas. |
29
|
|
|
Downhole and Wellsite Services. Our downhole and wellsite services include
electric-line, slickline, production optimization, production testing, rental and fishing
services. We also offer several proprietary services and products that we believe create
significant value for our customers. |
|
|
|
|
Fluid Handling. We provide a variety of services to help our customers obtain, move,
store and dispose of fluids that are involved in the development and production of their
reservoirs. Through our fleet of specialized trucks, frac tanks and other assets, we
provide fluid transportation, heating, pumping and disposal services for our customers. |
Drilling Services. Through our drilling services segment, we provide services and
equipment that initiate or stimulate oil and gas production by providing land drilling, specialized
rig logistics and site preparation throughout our service area. Our drilling rigs primarily operate
in and around the Barnett Shale region of north Texas.
Product Sales. We provide oilfield service equipment and refurbishment of used
equipment through our Southeast Asian business, and we provide repair work and fabrication services
for our customers at a business located in Gainesville, Texas.
Substantially all service and rental revenue we earn is based upon a charge for a period of
time (an hour, a day, a week) for the actual period of time the service or rental is provided to
our customer or on a fixed per-stage-completed fee. Product sales are recorded when the actual sale
occurs and title or ownership passes to the customer.
General
The primary factors influencing demand for our services and products are (1) the number of
wells drilled and completed, (2) the amount of maintenance and workover activity, and (3) the
complexity of new well completions, all of which depend on current and anticipated future oil and
gas prices, production depletion rates and the resultant levels of cash flows generated by our
customers and allocated by them to their drilling and workover budgets. As a result, demand for our
services and products is cyclical, substantially depends on activity levels in the North American
oil and gas industry and is highly sensitive to current and expected oil and natural gas prices.
We consider the drilling and well service rig counts to be an indication of spending by our
customers in the oil and gas industry for exploration and development of new and existing
hydrocarbon reserves. These spending levels are a primary driver of our business, and we believe
that our customers tend to invest more in these activities when oil and gas prices are at higher
levels or are increasing. The following tables summarize average North American drilling and well
service rig activity, as measured by Baker Hughes Incorporated (BHI) and the Cameron
International Corporation/Guiberson/AESC Well Service Rig Count for Active Rigs, formerly the
Weatherford/AESC Service Rig Count for Active Rigs.
AVERAGE RIG COUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Nine Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
9/30/08 |
|
9/30/09 |
|
9/30/08 |
BHI Rotary Rig Count: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Land |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
Canada |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: BHI (www.BakerHughes.com.) |
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Nine Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
9/30/08 |
|
9/30/09 |
|
9/30/08 |
Cameron International
Corporation/Guiberson/AESC
Well Service Rig Count
(Active Rigs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
Canada |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America |
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: |
|
Cameron International Corporation/Guiberson/AESC Well Service Rig Count for Active
Rigs, formerly the Weatherford/AESC Service Rig Count for Active Rigs. |
Outlook
Since our initial public offering, which was completed in April 2006, our growth strategy has
been focused on internal growth in the basins in which we currently operate, as we sought to
maximize our equipment utilization, add additional like-kind equipment and expand service and
product offerings. In addition, we have sought new basins in which to replicate this approach and
augmented our internal growth with strategic acquisitions. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we
observed a decline in drilling and exploration expenditures by our customers following the
significant decline in oil and gas commodity prices, as well as an overall decline in the general
U.S. economy, which included tighter debt and equity markets and reduced availability of credit for
investment by our customers. For the first nine months of 2009, we decreased our level of internal
capital investment compared to the prior nine months and the same period in the prior year, and
implemented certain cost-saving measures including headcount reductions, while remaining responsive
to our customers needs for quality services. Since the fourth quarter of 2008, we have experienced
significant declines in activity and there can be no assurance that market activity will not
decline further. Our short-term strategy is to focus on cost savings, protect our market positions
in key basins, increase operating cash flow and maintain our financing relationships to manage our
debt levels, and remain in communication with our customers to ensure that we continue to provide
quality service.
|
|
|
Internal Capital Investment. Our internal expansion activities have generally
consisted of adding equipment and qualified personnel in locations where we have
established a presence. We have grown our operations in many of these locations by
expanding services to current customers, attracting new customers and hiring personnel
with local basin-level expertise and leadership recognition. Depending on customer
demand, we will consider adding equipment to further increase the capacity of services
currently being provided and/or add equipment to expand the services we provide. In
response to the current market conditions, we reduced our capital investment for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $29.1 million, as compared to $193.3 million for
the same period in 2008. Our significant investment in capital equipment in recent
years has resulted in a relatively newer fleet than many of our competitors. Therefore,
we expect our capital investment requirements for maintenance capital to be relatively
insignificant during fiscal 2009. |
|
|
|
|
External Growth. We use strategic acquisitions as an integral part of our growth
strategy. We consider acquisitions that will add to our service offerings in a current
operating area or that will expand our geographical footprint into a targeted basin. We
have completed several acquisitions in recent years. These acquisitions affect our
operating performance period to period. Accordingly, comparisons of revenue and
operating results are not necessarily comparable and should not be relied upon as
indications of future performance. We did not invest cash consideration in new
business acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as we assessed
current market conditions and the availability of financing, but we intend to continue
to evaluate acquisition opportunities that are beneficial to our long-term strategic
goals, while considering short-term objectives to maximize cash flow and maintain our
market share. |
31
Natural gas prices and rotary rig counts have significantly declined from 2008 levels. These
changes are likely the result of a number of macro-economic factors, such as an excess supply of
natural gas, lower demand for oil and gas, market expectations of weather conditions and the
utilization of heating fuels, the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry and other general
market conditions for the U.S. economy. Additionally, the recent global financial crisis has
contributed to significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from banks and other
providers of credit. Consistent with these trends, we have experienced a significant decline in
utilization of our assets and pricing for our products and services during late 2008 and thus far
in 2009, and we anticipate that commodity prices and activity levels will remain low and may
deteriorate further, adversely impacting our results due to pricing pressure and lower utilization
rates throughout 2009. During September 2009, we evaluated the fair market value of assets in our
contract drilling business and determined that the carrying value of certain of these
drilling rigs exceeded the undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets and the fair market
value estimates for these assets. This analysis resulted in a non-cash fixed asset impairment
charge of $36.2 million as of September 30, 2009. We recorded a $272.0 million goodwill impairment
charge at December 31, 2008. If challenging market conditions persist, we may be required to
record future impairment charges related to goodwill and other long-term assets, and may be
required to incur restructuring charges as we adapt to a more challenging business environment.
Although we cannot determine the depth or duration of the decline in activity in the oil and gas
industry, we believe the overall long-term outlook for North American oilfield activity and our
business remains favorable, especially in the basins in which we operate.
We, and many of our competitors, have invested in new equipment in recent years. With the
overall decline in oilfield activities, much of this equipment is sitting idle and there is excess
capacity in the industry, which has and will likely continue to negatively impact our utilization
rates and pricing for certain service offerings. Our equipment fleet is relatively new, as we have
made significant investments in new equipment over the past few years. We continue to monitor our
equipment utilization and poll our customers to assess demand levels. As equipment enters the
marketplace or competition for existing customers increases, we believe our customers will rely
upon service providers with local knowledge and expertise, which we believe we have and which
constitutes a fundamental aspect of our strategy.
Recent Transactions
On April 15, 2008, we acquired all the outstanding common stock of Frac Source Services, Inc.,
a provider of pressure pumping services to customers in the Barnett Shale of north Texas, for $62.4
million in cash, net of cash acquired, which included a working capital adjustment of $1.6 million
and recorded goodwill of $15.4 million. Upon closing this transaction, we entered into a contract
with one of our major customers to provide pressure pumping services in the Barnett Shale utilizing
three frac fleets under a contract with a term that extends up to three years from the date each
fleet is placed into service. We spent an additional $20.0 million in 2008 on capital equipment
related to these contracted frac fleets. Thus, our total investment in this operation was
approximately $82.4 million. We believe this acquisition expanded our pressure pumping business in
north Texas and that the related contract provides a stable revenue stream from which to expand our
pressure pumping business outside of this region.
In May 2008, our Board of Directors authorized and committed to a plan to sell certain
operations in the Barnett Shale region of north Texas, consisting primarily of our supply store
business, as well as certain non-strategic drilling logistics assets and other completion and
production services assets. On May 19, 2008, we sold these operations to Select Energy Services,
L.L.C., a company owned by a former officer of one of our subsidiaries, for which we received
proceeds of $50.2 million in cash and assets with a fair market value of $8.0 million. The
carrying value of the net assets sold was approximately $51.4 million, excluding $11.1 million of
allocated goodwill associated with the combination that formed Complete Production Services, Inc.
in September 2005. We recorded a loss on the sale of this disposal group totaling approximately
$6.9 million, which included $2.6 million related to income taxes. In accordance with the sales
agreement, we agreed to sublet office space to Select Energy Services, L.L.C. and to provide
certain administrative services for a term of one year, at an agreed-upon rate.
On October 3, 2008, we acquired all of the membership interests of TSWS Well Services, LLC, a
limited liability corporation which held substantially all of the well servicing and heavy haul
assets of TSWS, Inc., a company based in Magnolia, Arkansas, which provides well servicing and
heavy haul
32
services to customers in northern Louisiana, east Texas and southern Arkansas. As
consideration, we paid $57.2 million in cash and prepaid an additional $1.0 million related to an
employee retention bonus pool. We also recorded goodwill totaling $21.9 million. d. This
acquisition extended our geographic reach into the Haynesville Shale area.
On October 4, 2008, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Appalachian Well Services,
Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, each of which is based in Shelocta, Pennsylvania. This
business provides pressure pumping, e-line and coiled tubing services in the Appalachian region,
and includes a service area which extends through portions of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and
New York. As consideration for the purchase, we paid $50.1 million in cash and issued 588,292
unregistered shares of our common stock, valued at $15.04 per share. We invested an additional
$6.6 million to complete a frac fleet at this location and have an option to purchase real property
for approximately $0.6 million. In addition, we entered into an agreement under which we may be
required to pay up to an additional $5.0 million in cash consideration during the earn-out period,
which extends through 2011, based upon the results of operations of various service lines acquired.
We recorded goodwill of approximately $27.5 million associated with this acquisition. We believe
this acquisition created a platform for future growth for our pressure pumping and other completion
and production service lines in the Marcellus Shale.
In March 2009, our Canadian subsidiary exchanged certain non-monetary assets at a net book
value of $9.3 million related to our production testing business for certain e-line assets of a
competitor. We recorded a non-cash loss on the transaction of $4.9 million, which represented the
difference between the carrying value and the fair market value of the assets surrendered. We
believe the e-line assets will generate incremental future cash flows compared to the production
testing assets exchanged.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and provide a basis for
making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available
through open market quotes. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and actual results
may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We must use our judgment
related to uncertainties in order to make these estimates and assumptions.
For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates as well as certain
sensitivity disclosures related to those estimates, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Our critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed
materially during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Prior Period Adjustments
In June 2009, we discovered accounting errors within one of our operations located in the
Rocky Mountain region, which occurred in prior years and would have impacted our reported operating
results for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008. The majority of the errors were due
to a flawed revenue accrual process and ineffective controls over inventory within this operation.
We evaluated the impact that these errors would have had on our financial statements and determined
that these errors would not have been material to our financial statements from a quantitative or
qualitative perspective for those periods. However, the amount of the adjustment required to
correct these errors was deemed to be material to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We
corrected these errors as of June 30, 2009 and have made the required adjustments to our reported
results for the comparative quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008. In addition, we have
adjusted our previously published balance sheet at December 31, 2008, decreasing beginning retained
earnings by $8,405. As applicable, we will revise our published financials in future filings
including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and comparative
results for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. We have labeled our
33
previously filed balance sheet, statement of operations and statement of cash flows as
Revised where applicable. See Item 1. Financial Statements contained elsewhere within this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Similarly, we have labeled adjusted amounts as Revised
throughout the comparative results presented within Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Results of Operations (Continuing Operations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
2009/ |
|
|
2009/ |
|
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
|
9/30/08 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited, in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
198,014 |
|
|
$ |
418,865 |
|
|
$ |
(220,851 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
%) |
Drilling services |
|
|
25,415 |
|
|
|
62,208 |
|
|
|
(36,793 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
%) |
Product sales |
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
13,237 |
|
|
|
(6,753 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
229,913 |
|
|
$ |
494,310 |
|
|
$ |
(264,397 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
31,396 |
|
|
$ |
133,459 |
|
|
$ |
(102,063 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
%) |
Drilling services |
|
|
(3,757 |
) |
|
|
17,005 |
|
|
|
(20,762 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
%) |
Product sales |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
3,387 |
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
%) |
Corporate |
|
|
(7,025 |
) |
|
|
(9,885 |
) |
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,405 |
|
|
$ |
143,966 |
|
|
$ |
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
2009/ |
|
|
2009/ |
|
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
|
9/30/08 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited, in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
681,981 |
|
|
$ |
1,134,358 |
|
|
$ |
(452,377 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
%) |
Drilling services |
|
|
85,515 |
|
|
|
172,711 |
|
|
|
(87,196 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Product sales |
|
|
37,496 |
|
|
|
40,689 |
|
|
|
(3,193 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
804,992 |
|
|
$ |
1,347,758 |
|
|
$ |
(542,766 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
129,044 |
|
|
$ |
347,759 |
|
|
$ |
(218,715 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
%) |
Drilling services |
|
|
6,698 |
|
|
|
44,733 |
|
|
|
(38,035 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
%) |
Product sales |
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
10,209 |
|
|
|
(3,782 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
%) |
Corporate |
|
|
(25,569 |
) |
|
|
(26,241 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
116,600 |
|
|
$ |
376,460 |
|
|
$ |
(259,860 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate includes amounts related to corporate personnel costs, other general expenses and
stock-based compensation charges.
Adjusted EBITDA consists of net income (loss) from continuing operations before net interest
expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, minority interest and impairment loss. Adjusted
EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure of performance. We use Adjusted EBITDA as the primary internal
management measure for evaluating performance and allocating additional resources. The following
table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA for the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, operating income (loss). For a discussion of the
definition of EBITDA under our existing credit facilities, as recently amended, see Note 7,
Long-term debt.
34
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Most Comparable U.S. GAAP MeasureOperating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(unaudited, in thousands) |
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
31,396 |
|
|
$ |
(3,757 |
) |
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
$ |
(7,025 |
) |
|
$ |
22,405 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
43,744 |
|
|
$ |
5,466 |
|
|
$ |
603 |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
|
$ |
50,379 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(12,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,381 |
) |
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
(7,591 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 (Revised) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
133,459 |
|
|
$ |
17,005 |
|
|
$ |
3,387 |
|
|
$ |
(9,885 |
) |
|
$ |
143,966 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
41,195 |
|
|
$ |
5,223 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
47,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,264 |
|
|
$ |
11,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
|
$ |
(10,531 |
) |
|
$ |
96,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
129,044 |
|
|
$ |
6,698 |
|
|
$ |
6,427 |
|
|
$ |
(25,569 |
) |
|
$ |
116,600 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
133,393 |
|
|
$ |
16,502 |
|
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
153,470 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,349 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,962 |
) |
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
$ |
(27,283 |
) |
|
$ |
(73,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(Revised) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
347,759 |
|
|
$ |
44,733 |
|
|
$ |
10,209 |
|
|
$ |
(26,241 |
) |
|
$ |
376,460 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
111,972 |
|
|
$ |
14,527 |
|
|
$ |
1,762 |
|
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
130,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
235,787 |
|
|
$ |
30,206 |
|
|
$ |
8,447 |
|
|
$ |
(28,038 |
) |
|
$ |
246,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not allocate net interest expense or tax expense to our operating segments.
Below is a detailed discussion of our operating results by segment for these periods.
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 (Unaudited)
Revenue
Revenue from continuing operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 decreased by
$264.4 million, or 53%, to $229.9 million from $494.3 million for the same period in 2008. The
changes by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Segment revenue decreased $220.9 million, or 53%,
for the quarter primarily due to an overall decline in investment by our customers in oil
and gas exploration and development activities resulting from lower oil and gas commodity
prices and concerns over the availability of credit for such investment. We experienced a
decline in revenues on a year-over-year basis for all of our service lines due to lower
utilization and pricing. This overall decline in revenue was partially offset by
incremental revenues earned as a result of equipment placed into service throughout 2008
and into early 2009, as well as the contribution of several businesses acquired in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Segment revenue decreased $36.8 million, or 59%, for the quarter
primarily due to the overall decline in oilfield service activities during the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Lower utilization rates and pricing
pressure impacted our rig logistics and drilling businesses. |
|
|
|
|
Product Sales. Segment revenue decreased $6.8 million, or 51%, for the quarter
primarily due to an overall decline in spending by our customers following the decline in
the overall U.S. economy. Revenues declined for our Southeast Asian business during the
third quarter of 2009 compared to the |
35
|
|
|
same period in 2008 due to a change in the sales mix and the timing of product sales and
equipment refurbishment, which tends to be project-specific. |
Service and Product Expenses
Service and product expenses include labor costs associated with the execution and support of
our services, materials used in the performance of those services and other costs directly related
to the support and maintenance of equipment. These expenses decreased $141.5 million, or 47%, to
$162.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 from $303.8 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 primarily due to significantly lower activity levels and cost-saving measures we
began implementing in late 2008, including headcount reductions, payroll concessions, and reduced
pricing from our vendors. Our year-over-year results were also impacted by two business
acquisitions completed during October 2008, each of which contributed a full-quarter of costs for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009, but had no impact for the same period in 2008. The following
table summarizes service and product expenses as a percentage of revenues for the quarters ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008:
Service and Product Expenses as a Percentage of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
Segment: |
|
9/30/09 |
|
9/30/08 |
|
Change |
Completion and production services |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Drilling services |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
(18 |
%) |
Product sales |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Total |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
(10 |
%) |
Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue increased for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Margins by business segment were primarily
impacted by lower utilization and pricing as described in more detail below.
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Service and product expenses as a percentage
of revenue for this business segment increased when comparing the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 to the same period in 2008. The overall decline in activity levels
in the oil and gas industry, which began in late 2008 and continued throughout the first
nine months of 2009, resulted in lower utilization of our equipment and services, and
led to an increase in competition from other service providers which contributed to
pricing pressure in all of our completion and production service lines. Partially
defraying the impact of this overall decline in activity levels were cost-saving
measures we began implementing in late 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for
this business segment increased for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
same period in 2008 due to lower utilization of our equipment, and lower pricing on a
year-over-year basis, partially offset by cost-saving measures. |
|
|
|
|
Product Sales. Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for the
products segments increased for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
same period in 2008 due to the mix of products sold for the relative periods, as the
2008 results included several higher margin projects associated with our Southeast Asian
operations when compared to the third quarter of 2009. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries and other related expenses for
our selling, administrative, finance, information technology and human resource functions. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million, or 3%, for the quarter ended September
30, 2009 to $45.2 million from $46.5 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in expense was primarily due to overall cost-saving measures aimed to align our cost
structure in response to the decline in
36
oil and gas activity levels for oilfield industry, which has resulted in lower revenues for
service providers in 2009 compared to 2008. Our overall headcount has been significantly reduced
since December 31, 2008. These cost reductions were partially offset by an increase in bad debt
expense, particularly in our drilling services segment,
higher stock-based compensation costs and greater losses from the disposal of fixed assets
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. In addition, we
completed two acquisitions during October 2008 which contributed a full-quarter of selling, general
and administrative expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, but no expense for the
respective period in 2008. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative
expense was 20% and 9% for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.7 million, or 6%, to $50.4 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 from $47.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The
increase in depreciation and amortization expense resulted from placing into service much of the
equipment that was purchased during the twelve months ended September 30, 2009, which totaled
approximately $89.7 million. In addition, we recorded depreciation and amortization expense
related to assets associated with businesses acquired in 2008, some of which did not contribute a
full-quarter of depreciation expense during the third quarter of 2008 due to the timing of the
acquisitions. Amortization expense increased during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008 as a result of the amortization of intangible assets associated with
business acquisitions in 2008. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization expense
increased to 22% from 10% for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We
expect depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of revenue to continue to remain
higher than in recent periods due to the significant investment in capital expenditures made
throughout the last three years and the overall decline in activity levels that began in late 2008.
Impairment loss
We recorded an impairment charge related to our contract drilling business of $36.2 million in
the third quarter of 2009 after determining that the carrying value of certain of these drilling rigs exceeded the undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets and the fair market
value estimates for these assets.
Taxes
We recorded a tax benefit of $26.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 at an
effective rate of approximately 33% and tax expense of $29.8 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 at an effective rate of approximately 36%. The lower effective tax rate in 2009
was due to our foreign tax rate differential, the impact of state and provincial tax expense
relative to our operating loss and the impact of non-deductible items.
Discontinued Operations
On May 19, 2008, we sold certain operating assets primarily in north Texas, including our
supply store business, certain drilling logistics assets and other completion and production
services assets. We incurred additional fees of $153 related to the sale of the disposal group in
the third quarter of 2008.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Unaudited)
Revenue
Revenue from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by
$542.8 million, or 40%, to $805.0 million from $1,347.8 million for the same period in 2008. The
changes by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Segment revenue decreased $452.4 million, or 40%, for
the nine months primarily due to an overall decline in investment by our customers in oil
and gas |
37
|
|
|
exploration and development activities resulting from lower oil and gas commodity prices and
concerns over the availability of credit for such investment. We experienced lower
utilization and pricing for each of our service offerings on a year-over-year basis, except
for our coiled tubing business in Mexico which provided a positive contribution to 2009
results. |
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Segment revenue decreased $87.2 million, or 50%, for the nine
months primarily due to the overall decline in oilfield service activities throughout the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Lower
utilization rates and pricing pressure impacted our rig logistics and drilling businesses. |
|
|
|
|
Product Sales. Segment revenue decreased $3.2 million, or 8%, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to a decline in
our Southeast Asian business resulting from a change in the sales mix and the timing of
product sales and equipment refurbishment, which tends to be project-specific. Partially
offsetting this decrease was an increase in revenues earned at our fabrication business in
north Texas for the nine months ended September 2009 which included a work-over rig project
completed in the first quarter of 2009 and sales of low margin equipment to third-parties. |
Service and Product Expenses
Service
and product expenses decreased approximately
$281.1 million, or 34%, to $548.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 from $829.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to significantly lower activity levels and cost-saving measures we began implementing
in late 2008, including headcount reductions, payroll concessions and reduced pricing from our
vendors. Our year-over-year results were also impacted by the timing of business acquisitions
completed during 2008, each of which contributed costs for the full nine-month period in 2009, but
had less impact for the same period in 2008. The following table summarizes service and product
expenses as a percentage of revenues for the nine months ended September, 2009 and 2008:
Service and Product Expenses as a Percentage of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
Segment: |
|
9/30/09 |
|
9/30/08 |
|
Change |
Completion and production services |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Drilling services |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Product sales |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
(9 |
%) |
Total |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue increased for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Margins by business segment were primarily
impacted by lower utilization and pricing as described in more detail below.
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Service and product expenses as a percentage
of revenue for this business segment increased when comparing the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to the same period in 2008. The overall decline in activity levels
in the oil and gas industry, which began in late 2008 and continued throughout the first
nine months of 2009, resulted in lower utilization of our equipment and services, and
pricing pressure from competitors. Partially defraying the impact of this overall
decline in activity levels were cost-saving measures we began implementing in late 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for
this business segment increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
the same period in 2008 due to lower utilization of our equipment due to significantly
reduced activity levels by our customers, and lower pricing on a year-over-year basis,
partially offset by cost-saving measures. |
38
|
|
|
Product Sales. Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for the
products segments increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
same period in 2008 due to the mix of products sold for the relative periods, as the
2008 results included several higher margin projects associated with our Southeast Asian
operations when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Additionally, on
a year-over-year basis, a larger proportion of the revenues and related costs for the
product sales segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were provided by our
repair and fabrication facility in north Texas at lower margins relative to our
Southeast Asian business, including the sale of a large inventory item at little or no
margin. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses remained consistent at $140.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $142.0 million for the same period in 2008.
Several cost saving measures have been implemented during 2009 including headcount reductions,
other payroll concessions and lower outside service costs. These expense reductions were offset
by: (1) the full impact of several acquisitions completed in 2008, which did not contribute costs
for the full nine-month period ended September 30, 2008; (2) the loss on the exchange of certain
non-monetary assets in Canada during the first quarter of 2009 which totaled $4.9 million; (3)
higher bad debt expense, particularly in our drilling services segment;
(4) higher stock-based compensation costs; and (5) higher losses from the
disposal of fixed assets. Excluding the impact of the non-monetary asset exchange in Canada, as a
percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expense was 17% and 11% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $23.4 million, or 18%, to $153.5 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $130.1 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense resulted from placing into service
much of the equipment that was purchased during the twelve months ended September 30, 2009, which
totaled approximately $89.7 million. In addition, we recorded depreciation and amortization
expense related to assets associated with businesses acquired in 2008, some of which did not
contribute depreciation expense for the full nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 due to the
timing of the acquisitions. Amortization expense increased during the nine months ended September
30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 as a result of the amortization of intangible assets
associated with business acquisitions in 2008. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and
amortization expense increased to 19% from 10% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. We expect depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of revenue to
continue to remain higher than in recent periods due to the significant investment in capital
expenditures made throughout the last three years and the overall decline in activity levels that
began in late 2008.
Impairment loss
We recorded an impairment charge related to our contract drilling business of $36.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 after determining that the carrying value of certain
of these drilling rigs exceeded the undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets and the
fair market value estimates for these assets.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased approximately $2.0 million, or 4%, to $42.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 from $44.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The decrease in interest expense was attributable to a decrease in the average amount of debt
outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and lower interest rates in 2009
compared to 2008 on our revolving credit facilities, which had been fully repaid as of June 30,
2009. The weighted-average interest rate of borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 2008
was 8.0% and 7.5%, respectively.
Taxes
39
We recorded a tax benefit of $37.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 at an
effective rate of approximately 32% and tax expense of $71.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 at an effective rate of approximately 36%. The lower effective tax rate in 2009
was due to our foreign tax differential, the impact of state and provincial tax expense relative to
our operating loss and the impact of non-deductible items.
Discontinued Operations
On May 19, 2008, we sold certain operating assets primarily in north Texas including our
supply store business, certain drilling logistics assets and other completion and production
services assets. Net loss associated with these discontinued operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 totaled $4.9 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The recent and unprecedented disruption in the credit markets has had a significant adverse
impact on the availability of credit from a number of financial institutions. We are not
currently a party to any interest rate swaps, currency hedges or derivative contracts of any type
and have no exposure to commercial paper or auction rate securities markets. We will continue to
closely monitor our liquidity and the overall health of the credit markets. However, we cannot
predict with any certainty the impact that any further disruption in the credit environment would
have on us.
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures and general working capital. In
addition, we have historically obtained capital to fund strategic business acquisitions. Our
primary sources of funds have been cash flow from operations, proceeds from borrowings under bank
credit facilities, a private placement of debt that was subsequently exchanged for publicly
registered debt and the issuance of equity securities in our initial public offering.
We anticipate that we will rely on cash generated from operations, borrowings under our
amended revolving credit facility, future debt offerings and/or future public equity offerings to
satisfy our liquidity needs. We believe that funds from these sources, or funds received from our
newly amended credit facility, will be sufficient to meet both our short-term working capital
requirements and our long-term capital requirements. If our plans or assumptions change, or are
inaccurate, or if we make further acquisitions, we may have to raise additional capital. Our
ability to fund planned capital expenditures and to make acquisitions will depend upon our future
operating performance, and more broadly, on the availability of equity and debt financing, which
will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in our industry, and general financial, business
and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, new debt obtained could
include service requirements based on higher interest paid and shorter maturities and could impose
a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition. The issuance of
additional equity securities could result in significant dilution to stockholders.
On October 13, 2009, we completed an amendment to our revolving credit facilities (the Third
Amendment) which modified the structure of the credit facility to an asset-based facility subject
to borrowing base restrictions. This amendment provided us with less restrictive financial debt
covenants and reduced excess borrowing capacity under the facility. We believe this new facility
will allow us to better manage our cash flow needs, provide greater certainty of access to funds in
the future and allow us to use our asset base for future financing needs.
As of September 30, 2009, we had working capital of $238.3 million and cash and cash
equivalents of $76.1 million, as compared to working capital of $302.9 million and cash and cash
equivalents of $18.5 million at December 31, 2008. Our working capital decreased during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 due to an overall decline in activity during the first nine months
of 2009 compared to the prior year and the timing of cash receipts related to collection of trade
receivables and cash disbursements for current trade payables.
40
The following table summarizes cash flows by type for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Cash flows provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
270,063 |
|
|
$ |
265,903 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(8,939 |
) |
|
|
(207,971 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(203,314 |
) |
|
|
(63,337 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $4.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This increase in
operating cash flows in 2009 reflects an increase in cash receipts due primarily to collections of
outstanding accounts receivable, with lower activity levels resulting in a decline in billings and
revenues. Concurrent with the decrease in activity levels, accounts payable balances decreased
relative to the same period in 2008, as older payables clear and fewer new payables have been
recorded. Operating cash flows were also impacted by the timing of business acquisitions
throughout 2008.
Net cash used in investing activities declined by $199.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Of this decrease, $164.2
million was due to a reduction in the funds used to invest in capital equipment, which was $29.1
million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to $193.3 million for the same period in 2008.
We decreased our overall capital expenditures budget for 2009 in response to the decline in
commodity prices and anticipated activity levels. We expect to spend significantly less for
capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. In addition, we invested $71.8
million in business acquisitions for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, with no
corresponding business acquisitions for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and we received
$50.2 million as proceeds from the sale of a discontinued operation in May 2008. We do not
anticipate completing acquisitions for significant cash consideration until market conditions
stabilize, but will continue to evaluate the acquisition of complementary businesses. We will
evaluate each acquisition opportunity based upon the circumstances and our financing capabilities
at that time.
Net cash used by financing activities was $203.3 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 compared to $63.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. We repaid
long-term borrowings under our debt facilities totaling $200.5 million and only borrowed $3.2
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The primary source of these funds in 2009
was cash flow from operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we borrowed $208.4
million and repaid $280.1 million, a net repayment of $71.7 million under our debt facilities. The
source of funds for this net repayment was cash flow from operations and funds received from the
sale of a discontinued operation in 2008. Borrowings were used to fund capital expenditures,
business acquisitions and general corporate needs. For 2009, we have focused on eliminating
obligations under our credit facility and building cash. Our long-term debt balances, including
current maturities, were $650.4 million and $847.6 million as of September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively.
We believe that our operating cash flows and borrowing capacity will be sufficient to fund our
operations for the next twelve months if activity levels and capital markets do not materially
decline from current levels.
Dividends
We did not pay dividends on our $0.01 par value common stock during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 or during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. We do not intend to
pay dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather plan to build our cash balance near-term and
then reinvest such funds in our business when market conditions begin to stabilize. Furthermore,
our credit facility contains restrictive debt covenants which preclude us from paying future
dividends on our common stock.
Description of Our Indebtedness
41
Senior Notes.
On December 6, 2006, we issued 8.0% senior notes with a face value of $650.0 million through a
private placement of debt. These notes have a maturity of 10 years, with a maturity date of
December 15, 2016, and require semi-annual interest payments, paid in arrears and calculated based
on an annual rate of 8.0%, on June 15 and December 15 of each year, which commenced on June 15,
2007. There was no discount or premium associated with the issuance of these notes. The senior
notes are guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by all of our current domestic subsidiaries.
The senior notes have covenants which, among other things: (1) limit the amount of additional
indebtedness we can incur; (2) limit restricted payments such as a dividend; (3) limit our ability
to incur liens or encumbrances; (4) limit our ability to purchase, transfer or dispose of
significant assets; (5) limit our ability to purchase or redeem stock or subordinated debt; (6)
limit our ability to enter into transactions with affiliates; (7) limit our ability to merge with
or into other companies or transfer all or substantially all our assets; and (8) limit our ability
to enter into sale-leaseback transactions. We have the option to redeem all or part of these notes
on or after December 15, 2011. We can redeem 35% of these notes on or before December 15, 2009
using the proceeds of certain equity offerings. Additionally, we may redeem some or all of the
notes prior to December 15, 2011 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus
a make-whole premium.
Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the holders of our 8.0% senior notes, on June
1, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC which enabled these holders to
exchange their notes for publicly registered notes with substantially identical terms. These
holders exchanged 100% of the notes for publicly traded notes on July 25, 2007.
On August 28, 2007, we entered into a supplement to the indenture governing the 8.0% senior
notes, whereby additional domestic subsidiaries became guarantors under the indenture. Effective
April 1, 2009, we entered into a second supplement to this indenture whereby additional domestic
subsidiaries became guarantors under the indenture.
Credit Facility.
Prior to October 13, 2009, we maintained a senior secured credit facility (the Credit
Agreement) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent, and certain
other financial institutions. The Credit Agreement provided for a $360.0 million U.S. revolving
credit facility that was to mature in December 2011 and a $40.0 millionCanadian revolving credit
facility (with Integrated Production Services Ltd., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, as the
borrower thereof (Canadian Borrower)) that was to mature in December 2011. The U.S. revolving
credit facility included a provision for a commitment increase, as defined in the Credit
Agreement, which permitted us to effect up to two separate increases in the aggregate commitments
under the facility by designating a participating lender to increase its commitment, by mutual
agreement, in increments of at least $50.0 million, with the aggregate of such commitment increases
not to exceed $100.0 million, and in accordance with other provisions as stipulated in the Credit
Agreement. Certain portions of the credit facilities were available to be borrowed in U.S.
dollars, Canadian dollars, Pounds Sterling, Euros and other currencies approved by the lenders.
Subject to certain limitations, we had the ability to elect how interest under the Credit
Agreement would be computed. Interest under the Credit Agreement could be determined by reference
to (1) the London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 0.75% and
1.75% per annum (with the applicable margin depending upon our ratio of total debt to EBITDA.
EBITDA is defined in the Credit Agreement as consolidated net income for the period plus, to the
extent deducted in determining our consolidated net income, interest expense, taxes, depreciation,
amortization and other non-cash charges for such period) or (2) the Base Rate (i.e., the higher of
the Canadian banks prime rate or the CDOR rate plus 1.00%, in the case of Canadian loans or the
greater of the prime rate and the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, in the case of U.S. loans), plus
an applicable margin between 0.00% and 0.75% per annum. If an event of default existed under the
Credit Agreement, advances would bear interest at the then-applicable rate plus 2.00%. Interest was
payable quarterly for base rate loans and at the end of applicable interest periods for LIBOR
loans, except that if the interest period for a LIBOR loan was nine months,
interest would be paid at the end of each three-month period.
42
The Credit Agreement also contained various covenants that limited our and our subsidiaries
ability to: (1) grant certain liens; (2) incur additional indebtedness; (3) make certain loans and
investments; (4) make capital expenditures; (5) make distributions; (6) make acquisitions; (7)
enter into hedging transactions; (8) merge or consolidate; or (9) engage in certain asset
dispositions. The Credit Agreement contained financial maintenance covenants which, among other
things, required us and our subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, to maintain specified ratios or
conditions as follows (with such ratios tested at the end of each fiscal quarter): (1) total debt
to EBITDA of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and (2) EBITDA to total interest expense of not less than 3.0
to 1.0., except that EBITDA was subject to pro forma adjustments for acquisitions and non-ordinary
course asset sales assuming that such transactions occurred on the first day of the determination
period, with any such adjustments made in accordance with the guidelines for pro forma
presentations set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We were in compliance
with all debt covenants under the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2009.
Under the Credit Agreement, we are permitted to prepay our borrowings.
All of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Credit Agreement were secured by first
priority liens on substantially all of the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries as well as a pledge of
approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, all of the
obligations under the U.S. portion of the Credit Agreement were guaranteed by substantially all of
our U.S. subsidiaries. All of the obligations under the Canadian portion of the Credit Agreement
were secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our
subsidiaries (other than our Mexican subsidiary). Additionally, all of the obligations under the
Canadian portion of the Credit Agreement were guaranteed by us as well as certain of our
subsidiaries.
If an event of default existed under the Credit Agreement, as defined therein, the lenders
could accelerate the maturity of the obligations outstanding under the Credit Agreement and
exercise other rights and remedies. If an event of default was continuing, advances would bear
interest at the then-applicable rate plus 2.00%.
There were no borrowings outstanding under our U.S. or Canadian revolving credit facilities as
of September 30, 2009. The weighted average interest rate for our revolving credit facilities
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 1.87%. There were letters of credit
outstanding under the U.S. revolving portion of the facility totaling $54.6 million, which reduced
the available borrowing capacity as of September 30, 2009. We incurred fees calculated at 1.25% of
the total amount outstanding under letter of credit arrangements through September 30, 2009. Our
available borrowing capacity under the U.S. and Canadian revolving facilities at September 30, 2009
was $305.4 million and $40.0 million, respectively.
Amendment Effective October 13, 2009:
On October 13, 2009, we amended the Credit Agreement (the Third Amendment and, the Credit
Agreement after giving effect to the Third Amendment, the Amended Credit Agreement) and modified
the structure of the credit facility to an asset-based facility subject to borrowing base
restrictions. Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC replaced Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S.
Administrative Agent and also serves as U.S. Issuing Lender and U.S. Swingline Lender. The banks
and financial institutions which comprise the lending group did not change significantly.
Pursuant to the Third Amendment, our U.S. revolving credit facility was reduced from $360.0
million to up to $225.0 million, and the Canadian revolving credit facility was reduced from $40.0
million to up to $15.0 million, in each case subject to borrowing base limitations (as described in
further detail below). The term of the facilities under the Amended Credit Agreement will continue
until the earlier of (1) December 6, 2011 and (2) the earlier termination of the U.S. or Canadian
lending commitments. Subject to certain limitations, we are permitted to effect up to two
increases in the aggregate commitments by designating one or more existing lenders or other banks
or financial institutions, subject to the banks sole discretion as to participation, to provide
additional aggregate financing up to $75.0 million, with each committed increase equal to at least
$25.0 million in the U.S., or $5.0 million in Canada. New borrowings pursuant to this commitment
increase are subject to the same terms as the existing facility borrowings. In addition, we have the right to terminate, in whole or in part, the unused portion of the U.S.
commitments in
43
$1 million increments upon written notice to the U.S. Administrative Agent. If all
of the U.S. facility is terminated, the Canadian facility must also be terminated.
Our U.S. borrowing base is limited to: (1) 85% of U.S. eligible billed accounts receivable,
less dilution, if any, plus (2) the lesser of 55% of the amount of U.S. eligible unbilled accounts
receivable or $10.0 million, plus (3) the lesser of the equipment reserve amount and 80% times
the most recently determined Net Liquidation Percentage, as defined in the Amended Credit
Agreement, times the value of our and the U.S. subsidiary guarantors equipment, provided that at
no time shall the amount determined under this clause exceed 50% of the U.S. borrowing base, minus
(4) the aggregate sum of reserves established by the U.S. Administrative Agent, if any. The
equipment reserve amount means $50.0 million upon the effective date of the Third Amendment, less
$0.6 million for each subsequent month, not to be reduced below zero in the aggregate.
The Canadian borrowing based is limited to: (1) 80% of Canadian eligible billed accounts
receivable, plus (2) if the Canadian Borrower has requested credit for equipment under the Canadian
borrowing base, the lesser of (a) $15.0 million, and (b) 80% times the most recently determined Net
Liquidation Percentage, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, times the value (calculated on
a basis consistent with our historical accounting practices) of our and the US subsidiary
guarantors equipment, minus (3) the aggregate amount of reserves established by Canadian
Administrative Agent, if any.
Subject to certain limitations set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement, we have the ability
to elect how interest under the Amended Credit Agreement will be computed. Interest under the
Amended Credit Agreement may be determined by reference to (1) the London Inter-bank Offered Rate,
or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 3.75% and 4.25% per annum (with the applicable margin
depending upon our Excess Availability Amount, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) or (2)
the Base Rate (which means the higher of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, 3 month
LIBOR plus 1.00% and 3.50%), plus the applicable margin, as described above. For the period from
the effective date of the Third Amendment until the six month anniversary of the effective date of
the Third Amendment, interest will be computed as described above with an applicable margin rate of
4.00%. If an event of default exists or continues under the Amended Credit Agreement, advances
will bear interest as described above with an applicable margin rate of 4.25% plus 2.00%. Interest
is payable monthly.
Letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement prior to the effectiveness of the
Third Amendment will be deemed outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement with fees equal to
the applicable margin, as described above. If an event of default exists or continues, such fee
will be equal to the applicable margin plus 2.00%.
Under the Amended Credit Agreement, the only financial covenant to which we are subject is a
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant, which must exceed 1.10 to 1.00. This covenant becomes
effective only if our Excess Availability Amount, as defined under the Amended Credit Agreement,
plus certain qualified cash and cash equivalents is less than $50.0 million.
We were in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant described in the Third
Amendment as of September 30, 2009.
Our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant is calculated as follows: (1) for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2009, the ratio of EBITDA, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement,
calculated for the four fiscal quarters then ended minus capital expenditures made in cash or
incurred during the three fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2009 multiplied by 4/3, compared to
Fixed Charges, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, for the four fiscal quarters ended
September 30, 2009; (2) for fiscal quarters ending after September 30, 2009, the ratio of EBITDA,
as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, calculated for the four fiscal quarter period ended
after September 30, 2009 minus capital expenditures made with cash (to the extent not already
incurred in a prior period) or incurred during such four quarter period, compared to Fixed Charges,
calculated for the four quarters then ended. The calculation of EBITDA, as defined in the
Amended Credit Agreement, is substantially consistent with the calculation of EBITDA under the
Credit Agreement prior to the effectiveness of the Third Amendment. Fixed Charges, as defined in
the Amended Credit Agreement, include interest expense, among other things, reduced by the
amortization of transaction fees associated with the Third Amendment.
44
In addition to the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant, we continue to be subject to various
other covenants which existed under the Credit Agreement prior to the Third Amendment, excluding
the financial maintenance covenants (which have been replaced with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
covenant as discussed above), including but not limited to covenants that limit our and our
subsidiaries ability to: (1) grant certain liens; (2) incur additional indebtedness; (3) make
certain loans and investments; (4) make capital expenditures; (5) make distributions; (6) make
acquisitions; (7) enter into hedging transactions; (8) merge or consolidate; or (9) engage in
certain asset dispositions.
Events of default under the Amended Credit Agreement remain substantially the same as under
the Credit Agreement prior to the Third Amendment.
The obligations under the U.S. portion of the Amended Credit Agreement continue to be secured
by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries
as well as a pledge of approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries.
Additionally, all of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Amended Credit Agreement
continue to be guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. The obligations under the
Canadian portion of the Amended Credit Agreement continue to be secured by first priority liens on
substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries (other than our Mexican
subsidiary). Additionally, all of the obligations under the Canadian portion of the Amended Credit
Agreement continue to be guaranteed by us as well as certain of our subsidiaries.
We will incur unused commitment fees under the Amended Credit Agreement ranging from 0.50% to
1.00% based on the average daily balance of amounts outstanding.
To date, we have incurred fees and expenses associated with the execution and effectiveness of
the Third Amendment totaling approximately $2.6 million. These fees and expenses will be included
in our consolidated balance sheet as a long-term asset, deferred financing fees, and will be
amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the facility.
In accordance with the seller notes issued in conjunction with certain business acquisitions
consummated in 2004, we repaid all outstanding principal and interest under these note arrangements
totaling $3.5 million upon maturity in March 2009.
Outstanding Debt and Commitments
Our contractual commitments have not changed materially since December 31, 2008, except for
repayments of approximately $193.5 million of borrowings under our U.S. revolving credit facility,
primarily with cash flow from operations.
We have entered into agreements to purchase certain equipment for use in our business. The
manufacture of this equipment requires lead-time and we generally are committed to accept this
equipment at the time of delivery, unless arrangements have been made to cancel delivery in
accordance with the purchase agreement terms. We believe that our available borrowing capacity
under our credit facilities and our operating cash flows should be sufficient to fund our firm
purchase commitments.
If we complete business acquisitions in the future, we may use cash from operations, proceeds
from future debt or equity offerings and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities for this
purpose.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Authoritative Guidance
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued additional guidance
regarding business combinations that replaced the initial statement in its entirety. The guidance
now additionally requires that all assets and liabilities and non-controlling interests of an
acquired business be measured at their fair value, with limited exceptions, including the
recognition of acquisition-related costs and anticipated restructuring costs separate from the
acquired net assets. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing pre-acquisition contingencies and states that an acquirer must
recognize assets
45
and liabilities assumed arising from contractual contingencies as of the
acquisition date, measured at acquisition-date fair values, but must recognize all other
contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair
values only if it is more likely than not that these contingencies meet the definition of an asset
or liability. Furthermore, this statement provides guidance for measuring goodwill and recording a
bargain purchase, defined as a business combination in which total acquisition-date fair value of
the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus
any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, and it requires that the acquirer recognize that
excess in earnings as a gain attributable to the acquirer. In April 2009, the FASB issued a
further update regarding accounting for assets and liabilities assumed in a business combination
that arises from contingencies which amends the previous guidance to require contingent assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination to be recognized at fair value on the
acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated during the measurement period. If fair
value cannot be reasonably estimated during the measurement period, the contingent asset or
liability would be recognized in accordance with U.S. GAAP to account for contingencies and
reasonable estimation of the amount of loss, if any. Further, this update eliminated the specific
subsequent accounting guidance for contingent assets and liabilities, without significantly
revising the original guidance. However, contingent consideration arrangements of an acquiree
assumed by the acquirer in a business combination would still be initially and subsequently
measured at fair value. We adopted this additional guidance regarding business combinations on
January 1, 2009 with no impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding the reporting of discontinued operations
which clarified the definition of a discontinued operation as either: (1) a component of an entity
which has been disposed of or classified as held for sale which meets the criteria of an operating
segment, or (2) as a business which meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale on
acquisition. This proposed guidance further modifies certain disclosure requirements. We are
currently evaluating the effect this proposed guidance may have on our financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a standard regarding subsequent events that provides guidance as
when an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after a balance sheet date in its
financial statements and the necessary disclosures related to these events. Specifically, the
entity should recognize subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that existed at
the balance sheet date, including significant estimates used to prepare financial statements. An
entity must disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that
date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were
available to be issued. We adopted this new accounting standard effective June 30, 2009 and will
apply its provisions prospectively.
In August 2009, the FASB further updated the fair value measurement guidance to clarify how an
entity should measure liabilities at fair value. The update reaffirms fair value is based on an
orderly transaction between market participants, even though liabilities are infrequently
transferred due to contractual or other legal restrictions. However, identical liabilities traded
in the active market should be used when available. When quoted prices are not available, the
quoted price of the identical liability traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities
or similar liabilities traded as an asset, or another valuation approach should be used. This
update also clarifies that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be
considered as a separate input or adjustment in the measurement of fair value. We will adopt the
provisions of this update for fair value measurements of liabilities effective October 1, 2009, and
we do not expect this adoption to have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2009, we had no significant off balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The demand, pricing and terms for oil and gas services provided by us are largely dependent
upon the level of activity for the U.S. and Canadian oil and gas industry. Industry conditions are
influenced by
46
numerous factors over which we have no control, including, but not limited to: the
supply of and demand for oil and gas; the level of prices, and expectations about future prices, of
oil and gas; the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas; the
expected rates of declining current production; the discovery rates of new oil and gas reserves;
available pipeline and other transportation capacity; weather conditions; domestic and worldwide
economic conditions; political instability in oil-producing countries; technical advances affecting
energy consumption; the price and availability of alternative fuels; the ability of oil and gas
producers to raise equity capital and debt financing; and merger and divestiture activity among oil
and gas producers.
The level of activity in the U.S. and Canadian oil and gas exploration and production industry
is volatile. No assurance can be given that our expectations of trends in oil and gas production
activities will reflect actual future activity levels or that demand for our services will be
consistent with the general activity level of the industry. Any prolonged substantial reduction in
oil and gas prices would likely affect oil and gas exploration and development efforts and
therefore affect demand for our services. A material decline in oil and gas prices or U.S. and
Canadian activity levels could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, approximately 5% of our revenues from continuing
operations and approximately 3% of our total assets were denominated in Canadian dollars, our
functional currency in Canada. As a result, a material decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar
relative to the U.S. dollar may negatively impact our revenues, cash flows and net income. Each one
percentage point change in the value of the Canadian dollar would have impacted our revenues for
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 by approximately $0.1 million and $0.4
million, respectively. We do not currently use hedges or forward contracts to offset this risk.
Our Mexican operation uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency, and as a result, all
transactions and translation gains and losses are recorded currently in the financial statements.
The balance sheet amounts are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at the end of the
month and the income statement amounts are translated at the average exchange rate for the month.
We estimate that a hypothetical one percentage point change in the value of the Mexican peso
relative to the U.S. dollar would have impacted our revenues for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 by approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million. Currently, we conduct a portion
of our business in Mexico in the local currency, the Mexican peso.
None of our debt at September 30, 2009 was structured under floating rate terms and, as such,
we are not currently exposed to fluctuations in the prime rates in the U.S. and Canada.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Our management, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as such terms are defined in Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that
the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of September 30, 2009 at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no changes to our system of internal control procedures that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
47
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the normal course of our business, we are a party to various pending or threatened claims,
lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial
operations, products, employees and other matters, including warranty and product liability claims
and occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials, on the job injuries
and fatalities as a result of our products or operations. Many of the claims filed against us
relate to motor vehicle accidents which can result in the loss of life or serious bodily injury.
Some of these claims relate to matters occurring prior to our acquisition of businesses. In
certain cases, we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of such businesses.
Although we cannot know or predict with certainty the outcome of any claim or proceeding or
the effect such outcomes may have on us, we believe that any liability resulting from the
resolution of any of these matters, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by
insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
We have historically incurred an additional insurance premium related to a cost-sharing
provision of our general liability insurance policy, and we cannot be certain that we will not
incur additional costs until either existing claims become further developed or until the
limitation periods expire for each respective policy year. Any such additional premiums should not
have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q or our
other SEC filings, could have a material impact on our business, financial position or results of
operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. For a detailed discussion of the
risk factors that should be understood by any investor contemplating investment in our stock,
please refer to the section entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008. There has been no material change to the risk factors set forth
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, except as discussed below.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness, including Our Senior Notes
On October 13, 2009, we amended our revolving credit facilities and modified the structure to
an asset-based facility subject to borrowing base restrictions. Our U.S. and Canadian borrowing
bases are limited to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and certain property plant and
equipment, as further described within Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources, contained elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
If activity levels in the oil and gas industry remain low or decline further, our collateral
base may decrease as reduced sales result in lower receivable balances and reduced expectations of
future cash flows could result in asset impairments. If our collateral base declines, our
borrowing capacity under this facility could decrease to a level which does not provide sufficient
availability to fund our operations, to support our outstanding letters of credit or to fund future
growth through acquisitions. In addition, if we borrow funds under this amended facility, we will
incur higher interest costs which will impact our operating results in future periods.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
In accordance with the provisions of the 2008 Incentive Award Plan, holders of unvested
restricted stock were given the option to either remit to us the required withholding taxes
associated with the vesting of restricted stock, or to authorize us to repurchase shares equivalent
to the cost of the withholding tax and to remit the withholding taxes on behalf of the holder.
Such repurchases for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 are summarized in the following table:
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
number of |
|
Value) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
as Part of |
|
Yet Be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Publicly |
|
Purchased |
|
|
(a) Total Number |
|
Price |
|
Announced |
|
Under the |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
Plans or |
|
Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
July 1 31, 2009 |
|
|
392 |
|
|
$ |
6.22 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
* |
|
August 1 31, 2009 |
|
|
156 |
|
|
$ |
8.82 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
We had 1,668,578 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2009. The
holders of these shares have the option to either remit taxes due related to the vesting of these
shares or to authorize us to purchase the shares at the current market value in a sufficient amount
to settle the related tax withholding. The amount purchased will depend on the market value at the
time and whether or not the holders choose to surrender shares in settlement of the related tax
withholding. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are incorporated by reference into this
Item 6.
49
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Jose A. Bayardo
Jose A. Bayardo
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
Exhibit Title |
3.1
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(incorporated by reference from the Form S-1/A, filed
January 18, 2006 (File no. 333-128750)) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference
from the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 27,
2008 (File no. 001-32858)) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, Omnibus Amendment
to Credit Documents and Assignment, dated as of
October 13, 2009, among Complete Production Services,
Inc., Integrated Production Services Ltd., certain
subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party
thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Wells
Fargo Foothill, LLC and HSBC Bank Canada (incorporated
by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
October 16, 2009 (File no. 001-32858) |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a 14(a) and Rule 15a 14(a) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a 14(a) and Rule 15a 14(a) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith. |
51