SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 19, 2013
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-35611
Del Friscos Restaurant Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-8453116 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
930 S. Kimball Ave., Suite 100, Southlake, TX |
76092 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(817) 601-3421
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
As of April 29, 2013, the latest practicable date, 23,794,667 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.001 par value per share, were issued and outstanding.
2
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
DEL FRISCOS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
March 19, | December 25, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 9,809 | $ | 10,763 | ||||
Restricted cash |
215 | 215 | ||||||
Inventory |
12,125 | 12,103 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
232 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,302 | 2,067 | ||||||
Lease incentives receivable |
2,712 | 3,092 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
4,255 | 4,758 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
31,650 | 32,998 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
108,390 | 105,568 | ||||||
Goodwill |
75,365 | 75,365 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
36,360 | 36,391 | ||||||
Deferred compensation plan investments |
8,849 | 7,802 | ||||||
Other assets |
260 | 261 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 260,874 | $ | 258,385 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 5,200 | $ | 8,804 | ||||
Accrued payroll |
4,533 | 6,262 | ||||||
Accrued self-insurance |
1,646 | 1,662 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
8,657 | 10,314 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 1,768 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
6,176 | 4,943 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
26,212 | 33,753 | ||||||
Deferred rent obligations |
23,515 | 22,644 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
13,645 | 10,792 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
14,025 | 13,295 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
77,397 | 80,484 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at December 25, 2012 or March 19, 2013 (unaudited) |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 190,000,000 shares authorized, 23,794,667 shares issued and outstanding at December 25, 2012, and March 19, 2013 (unaudited) |
24 | 24 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
121,617 | 119,610 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
61,836 | 58,267 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
183,477 | 177,901 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 260,874 | $ | 258,385 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DEL FRISCOS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive IncomeUnaudited
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March 19, | March 20, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 59,802 | $ | 52,942 | ||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Costs of sales |
18,420 | 16,367 | ||||||
Restaurant operating expenses |
26,545 | 22,316 | ||||||
Marketing and advertising costs |
908 | 853 | ||||||
Pre-opening costs |
591 | 70 | ||||||
General and administrative costs |
3,775 | 2,646 | ||||||
Management and accounting fees paid to related party |
| 744 | ||||||
Secondary public offering costs |
412 | | ||||||
Public offering transaction bonuses |
1,805 | | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,442 | 1,694 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating income |
4,904 | 8,252 | ||||||
Other income (expense), net: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(24 | ) | (1,221 | ) | ||||
Other |
| (3 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
4,880 | 7,028 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
1,311 | 2,130 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 3,569 | $ | 4,898 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit |
| 87 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ | 3,569 | $ | 4,985 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic and diluted income per common share: |
||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
Discontinued operations |
| $ | 0.01 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic and diluted income per share |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Shares used in computing net income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
23,794,667 | 17,994,667 | ||||||
Diluted |
23,794,667 | 17,994,667 | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 3,569 | $ | 4,985 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
DEL FRISCOS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders EquityUnaudited
(Dollars in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional Paid | Retained | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Par Value | In Captial | Earnings | Income | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 25, 2012 |
23,794,667 | $ | 24 | $ | 119,610 | $ | 58,267 | $ | | $ | 177,901 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | 3,569 | | 3,569 | |||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation costs |
| 228 | | | 228 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contribution by majority shareholder (see Note 5) |
| 1,779 | | | 1,779 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance at March 19, 2013 |
23,794,667 | $ | 24 | $ | 121,617 | $ | 61,836 | $ | | $ | 183,477 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
DEL FRISCOS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsUnaudited
(Dollars in Thousands)
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March 19, | March 20, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,569 | $ | 4,985 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,442 | 1,713 | ||||||
Loan cost amortization |
4 | 94 | ||||||
Non-cash equity based compensation |
228 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,618 | (501 | ) | |||||
Amortization of deferred lease incentives |
(107 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Inventories |
(22 | ) | 153 | |||||
Lease incentives receivable |
1,030 | | ||||||
Other assets |
1,235 | 29 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
(3,604 | ) | (1,787 | ) | ||||
Income taxes |
(2,098 | ) | 1,154 | |||||
Deferred rent obligations |
289 | 121 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
(1,302 | ) | (2,596 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
4,282 | 3,323 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(5,224 | ) | (3,773 | ) | ||||
Other |
(12 | ) | 3 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(5,236 | ) | (3,770 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Payments of long-term debt |
| (5,000 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (5,000 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(954 | ) | (5,447 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
10,763 | 14,119 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 9,809 | $ | 8,672 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 23 | $ | 1,226 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 787 | $ | 1,517 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
DEL FRISCOS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsUnaudited
1. | BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
As of March 19, 2013, Del Friscos Restaurant Group, Inc. (the Company) owned and operated 35 restaurants under the brand names of Del Friscos Double Eagle Steak House (Del Friscos), Sullivans Steakhouse (Sullivans), and Del Friscos Grille (Grille). Of the 35 restaurants the Company operated at the end of the period covered by this report, there were ten Del Friscos restaurants, 19 Sullivans restaurants and six Grille restaurants in operation in 19 states throughout the United States of America. One new Grille location opened during the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 in Houston, Texas.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Operating results for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2012 included in the Companys Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2012 filed with the SEC on February 26, 2013.
The Company operates on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending the last Tuesday in December. The fiscal quarters ended March 19, 2013 and March 20, 2012 each contained 12 weeks and are referred to herein as the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, respectively. Fiscal year 2013 will be a 53-week fiscal year and fiscal year 2012 was a 52-week fiscal year.
2. | SECONDARY PUBLIC OFFERING |
On March 7, 2013, a secondary public offering of the Companys common stock was completed by the Companys majority shareholder (along with its affiliates and associates, excluding the Company and other companies that it or they own as a result of their investment activities, Lone Star Fund). The selling shareholder sold 4,750,000 previously outstanding shares. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the offering. The selling shareholder paid all of the underwriting discounts and commissions associated with the sale of the shares; however, the Company incurred $0.4 million in costs and registration expenses related to the offering during the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013. In addition, on April 10, 2013, the shareholder sold an additional 150,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments related to the March 7, 2013 offering.
7
3. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Basic earnings per share (EPS) data is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS data is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, including all potentially issuable shares of common stock. Diluted EPS for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 excludes options to purchase 796,000 shares of common stock, which were outstanding during the period but were anti-dilutive. At March 20, 2012, there were no outstanding stock options or other dilutive securities and therefore they were not included in the dilutive calculation.
(all information in thousands, except per share data)
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March 19, | March 20, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 3,569 | $ | 4,898 | ||||
Discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit |
| 87 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ | 3,569 | $ | 4,985 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Shares: |
||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
23,794,667 | 17,994,667 | ||||||
Dilutive shares |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Diluted Shares |
23,794,667 | 17,994,667 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic and diluted income per common share: |
||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
Discontinued operations |
| 0.01 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic and diluted income per share |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
|
|
|
|
4. | STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION |
2012 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
On July 16, 2012, the Company adopted the Del Friscos Restaurant Group, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the 2012 Plan), which allows the Company to grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units and other equity-based awards to directors, officers, key employees and other key individuals performing services for the Company. The 2012 Plan provides for granting of options to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price not less than the fair value of the stock on the date of grant. Options are exercisable at various periods ranging from one to four years from date of grant. The 2012 Plan has 2,232,800 shares authorized for issuance under the plan. There are 796,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options at March 19, 2013, and 1,436,800 shares available for future grants.
The Company recorded $228,000 in total stock option compensation cost during the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 which was expensed primarily in general and administrative costs.
8
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the period ended March 19, 2013:
12 Weeks Ended March 19, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Weighted average exercise price |
Weighted average Remaining Contractual Term |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000s) |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
825,000 | 13.09 | ||||||||||||||
Granted |
| | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(29,000 | ) | 13.00 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of period |
796,000 | $ | 13.10 | 9.4 years | $ | 3,162 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Options exercisable at end of period |
| $ | | | $ | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the status of non-vested shares as of March 19, 2013 and changes during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 is presented below:
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March 19, 2013 | ||||||||
Shares | Weighted average Grant- Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Non-vested shares at beginning of year |
825,000 | $ | 4.93 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
| | ||||||
Forfeited |
(29,000 | ) | 4.82 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-vested shares at end of period |
796,000 | $ | 4.94 | |||||
|
|
|
|
As of March 19, 2013, there was $3.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately 3.4 years.
9
5. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
In connection with the March 2013 secondary public offering, certain executives of the Company earned transaction bonuses totaling approximately $1.8 million. These bonuses were earned under letter agreements, as amended, with LSF5 Wagon Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Lone Star Fund (Wagon), in which certain executives of the Company were eligible to receive a transaction bonus upon the occurrence of an eligible transaction. Wagon is responsible for funding any transaction bonuses under these agreements, including those paid in connection with the March 2013 secondary public offering. As these bonuses were contingent upon employment with the Company, the Company is required to record the expense of these bonuses and recognized the funding by Wagon as additional paid in capital. The $1.8 million was recorded as an expense to the Company and capital contribution by Wagon in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Subsequent to the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2013, Wagon contributed approximately $1.8 million which was used by the Company to pay these bonuses.
In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a Transition Services Agreement with an affiliate of Lone Star Fund to provide certain limited support services, including legal and risk management, until the Company can complete transition of these functions to internal or third-party resources. General and administrative expenses include charges of approximately $18,000 for these services for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013.
6. | LONG-TERM DEBT |
On October 15, 2012 the Company entered into a new credit facility that provides for a three-year unsecured revolving credit facility of up to $25.0 million. Borrowings under the new credit facility bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee equal to 0.25% per annum on the available but unused revolving credit facility. The credit facility is guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company. The credit facility contains various financial covenants, including a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, and minimum fixed charge coverage, as defined in the credit agreement. The credit facility also contains covenants restricting certain corporate actions, including asset dispositions, acquisitions, the payment of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness and providing financing or other transactions with affiliates. The Company was in compliance with all of the debt covenants as of March 19, 2013 and December 25, 2012.
As of March 19, 2013 and December 25, 2012, there were no outstanding borrowings on the Companys revolving credit facility. Under the revolving loan commitment, the Company had approximately $24.2 million of borrowings available under its revolving credit facility, including $761,000 in outstanding letters of credit commitments drawn on the facility.
7. | INCOME TAXES |
The effective income tax rate was 26.9% and 30.3% in the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 and March 20, 2012, respectively. The factors that cause the effective tax rates to vary from the federal statutory rate of 35% include the impact of FICA tip and other credits, partially offset by state income taxes and certain non-deductible expenses. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 is primarily attributable to the impact of the deductions related to the public offering transaction bonuses described in Note 5, which reduced income before income taxes and increased the impacts of the FICA tip and other credits.
10
8. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT |
Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value, or to disclose the fair value of certain assets and liabilities recorded at cost. Pursuant to these fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value is calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities includes consideration of non-performance risk, including the Companys own credit risk. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the following three levels:
Level 1valuation inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2valuation inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3valuation inputs are unobservable and typically reflect managements estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 19, 2013 and December 25, 2012 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||
Level | March 19, 2013 | December 25, 2012 |
||||||||
Deferred compensation plan investments (life insurance policies) |
2 | $ | 8,849 | $ | 5,586 | |||||
Deferred compensation plan investments (mutual funds) |
1 | $ | | $ | 2,216 | |||||
Deferred compensation plan liabilities |
2 | $ | (9,243 | ) | $ | (8,415 | ) |
There were no transfers among levels within the fair-value hierarchy during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012. The carrying value of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of their short term nature.
9. | SEGMENT REPORTING |
The Company operates the Del Friscos, Sullivans, and Grille brands as operating segments. The concepts operate solely in the U.S. within the full-service dining industry, providing similar products to similar customers. Sales from external customers are derived principally from food and beverage sales, and the Company does not rely on any major customers as a source of sales. The concepts also possess similar economic characteristics, resulting in similar long-term expected financial performance characteristics. However, as Del Friscos restaurants typically have higher revenues, driven by their larger physical presence and higher average check, the Del Friscos, Sullivans, and Grille operating segments have varying operating income and restaurant-level EBITDA margins due to the leveraging of higher revenues on certain fixed operating costs such as management labor, rent, utilities, and building maintenance.
11
The following table presents information about reportable segments for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 and March 20, 2012 and as of March 19, 2013 and March 20, 2012. (in thousands):
12 Weeks Ended March 19, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Del Friscos | Sullivans | Grille | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 32,285 | $ | 19,898 | $ | 7,619 | $ | | $ | 59,802 | ||||||||||
Restaurant-level EBITDA |
8,754 | 3,640 | 1,535 | | 13,929 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
550 | 560 | 4,084 | 30 | 5,224 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment |
70,892 | 42,777 | 29,912 | 1,447 | 145,028 |
12 Weeks Ended March 20, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Del Friscos | Sullivans | Grille | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 28,323 | $ | 20,595 | $ | 4,024 | $ | | $ | 52,942 | ||||||||||
Restaurant-level EBITDA |
8,149 | 4,379 | 878 | | 13,406 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
245 | 1,297 | 2,203 | 28 | 3,773 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment |
56,664 | 42,683 | 12,175 | 1,090 | 112,612 |
In addition to using consolidated results in evaluating the Companys performance and allocating its resources, the Companys chief operating decision maker uses restaurant-level EBITDA, which is not a measure defined by GAAP. The Company defines restaurant-level EBITDA as operating income before pre-opening costs, general and administrative expenses, management and accounting fees paid to related party, secondary public offering costs, public offering transaction bonuses, and depreciation and amortization. Pre-opening costs are excluded because they vary in timing and magnitude and are not related to the health of ongoing operations. General and administrative expenses and management and accounting fees paid to related party are only included in the Companys consolidated financial results as they are generally not specifically identifiable to individual operating segments as these costs relate to supporting all of the restaurant operations of the Company and the extension of the Companys concepts into new markets. Public offering costs, transaction bonuses, and depreciation and amortization are excluded because they are not ongoing controllable cash expenses and they are not related to the health of ongoing operations. Property and equipment is the only balance sheet measure used by the Companys chief operating decision maker in allocating resources. See table below (in thousands) for a reconciliation of restaurant-level EBITDA to operating income from continuing operations.
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March 19, 2013 |
March 20, 2012 |
|||||||
Restaurant-level EBITDA |
$ | 13,929 | $ | 13,406 | ||||
Less pre-opening costs |
591 | 70 | ||||||
Less general and administrative costs |
3,775 | 2,646 | ||||||
Less management and accounting fees paid to related party |
| 744 | ||||||
Less secondary public offering costs |
412 | | ||||||
Less public offering transaction bonuses |
1,805 | | ||||||
Less depreciation and amortization |
2,442 | 1,694 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating income |
$ | 4,904 | $ | 8,252 | ||||
|
|
|
|
12
10. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
The Company is subject to various claims, possible legal actions, and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these issues, management is of the opinion that adequate provision for potential losses has been made in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Prior to the acquisition of the Company by Lone Star Fund, the Company guaranteed certain lease payments of related parties in connection with the leasing of real estate for restaurant locations. As of December 25, 2012 and March 19, 2013, the Company was responsible as guarantor for five of these leases. The leases expire at various times through 2016. These guarantees will require payment by the Company only in an event of default by the related party where it is unable to make the required lease payments. Management believes that any future payments required under these guarantees will not be significant. At December 25, 2012 and March 19, 2013 the maximum potential amount of future lease payments the Company could be required to make as a result of the guarantees was approximately $2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
At December 25, 2012 and March 19, 2013, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of $976,000, of which $761,000 were drawn on the Companys credit facility (see Note 6, Long-Term Debt) and $215,000 were collateralized by restricted cash. The letters of credit typically act as guarantee of payment to certain third parties in accordance with specified terms and conditions.
11. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
On June 30, 2012, the Company closed its Dallas Sullivans location and on July 2, 2012, the Company completed the sale of the real property to a third party. The Company determined that this closure met the criteria for classification as discontinued operations. As a result, all historical operating results as well as the loss on the sale of this property are reflected within discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for all periods presented. Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax is comprised of the following for the 12 weeks ended March 20, 2012 (in thousands):
12 Weeks Ended | ||||
March 20, | ||||
2012 | ||||
Revenues |
$ | 736 | ||
Income before income tax |
127 | |||
Income tax expense |
(40 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense |
$ | 87 | ||
|
|
13
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Cautionary Statement
Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our press releases and in statements made by or with the approval of authorized personnel constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and are subject to the safe harbor created thereby. Forward looking statements reflect intent, belief, current expectations, estimates or projections about, among other things, our industry, managements beliefs, and future events and financial trends affecting us. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, may, will and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward looking statements are reasonable, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These differences can arise as a result of the risks described in the section entitled Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2012, filed February 26, 2013, or the 2012 10-K, as well as other factors that may affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Forward looking statements in this report speak only as of the date hereof, and forward looking statements in documents incorporated by reference speak only as of the date of those documents. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks and uncertainties, we cannot assure you that the forward looking statements contained in this report will, in fact, transpire.
Overview
Del Friscos Restaurant Group develops, owns and operates three contemporary, high-end, complementary restaurants: Del Friscos Double Eagle Steak House, or Del Friscos, Sullivans Steakhouse, or Sullivans, and Del Friscos Grille, or the Grille. We currently operate 35 restaurants in 19 states. Of the 35 restaurants we operated as of the end of the period covered by this report, there were ten Del Friscos restaurants, 19 Sullivans restaurants and six Grille restaurants. During the first fiscal quarter of 2013 we opened one new Grille location in Houston, Texas.
Unless the context otherwise indicates, all references to we, our, us, or the Company refer to Del Friscos Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Our Growth Strategies and Outlook. Our growth model is comprised of the following three primary drivers:
| Pursue Disciplined Restaurant Growth. We believe that there are significant opportunities to grow our concepts on a nationwide basis in both existing and new markets where we believe we can generate attractive unit-level economics. We are presented with many development opportunities and we carefully evaluate each opportunity to determine that sites selected for development have a high probability of meeting our return on investment targets. Our disciplined growth strategy includes accepting only those sites that we believe present attractive rent and tenant allowance structures as well as reasonable construction costs given the sales potential of the site. We believe our concepts complementary market positioning and ability to coexist in the same markets, coupled with our flexible unit models, will allow us to expand each of our three concepts into a greater number of locations. |
| Grow Existing Revenue. We will continue to pursue opportunities to increase the sales and average check at our existing restaurants, pursue targeted local marketing efforts and evaluate operational initiatives, including growth in private dining, designed to increase restaurant unit volumes. |
| Maintain Margins Throughout Our Growth. We will continue to aggressively protect our margins using economies of scale, including marketing and purchasing synergies between our concepts and leveraging our corporate infrastructure as we continue to open new restaurants. |
We believe there are opportunities to open three to five restaurants annually, generally composed of one Del Friscos and two to four Sullivans and/or Grilles, with new openings of our Grille concept likely serving as the primary driver of new unit growth in the near term.
14
Performance Indicators. We use the following key metrics in evaluating the performance of our restaurants:
| Comparable Restaurant Sales. We consider a restaurant to be comparable during the first full fiscal period following the eighteenth month of operations. Changes in comparable restaurant sales reflect changes in sales for the comparable group of restaurants over a specified period of time. Changes in comparable sales reflect changes in customer count trends as well as changes in average check. Our comparable restaurant base consisted of 27 and 29 restaurants at March 20, 2012 and March 19, 2013, respectively. |
| Average Check. Average check is calculated by dividing total restaurant sales by customer counts for a given time period. Average check is influenced by menu prices and menu mix. Management uses this indicator to analyze trends in customers preferences, the effectiveness of menu changes and price increases and per customer expenditures. |
| Average Unit Volume. Average unit volume, or AUV, consists of the average sales of our restaurants over a certain period of time. This measure is calculated by dividing total restaurant sales within a period by the number of restaurants operating during the relevant period. This indicator assists management in measuring changes in customer traffic, pricing and development of our concepts. |
| Customer Counts. Customer counts are measured by the number of entrées ordered at our restaurants over a given time period. |
| Restaurant-Level EBITDA Margin. Restaurant-level EBITDA margin represents net income before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization plus the sum of certain non-operating expenses, including pre-opening costs, management fees and expenses, general and administrative expenses, secondary public offering costs, and public offering transaction bonuses, as a percentage of our revenues. By monitoring and controlling our restaurant-level EBITDA margins, we can gauge the overall profitability of our core restaurant operations. See Note 9, Segment Reporting in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information on restaurant-level EBITDA margin. |
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, the percentage of our annual revenues earned during the first and fourth fiscal quarters has been higher due, in part, to increased gift card redemptions and increased private dining during the year-end holiday season, respectively. In addition, our first, second and third quarters each contain 12 operating weeks with the fourth quarter containing 16 or 17 operating weeks. As many of our operating expenses have a fixed component, our operating income and operating income margin have historically varied significantly from quarter to quarter. Accordingly, results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.
15
Results of Operations
The following table shows our operating results (in thousands), as well as our operating results as a percentage of revenues, for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 and March 20, 2012.
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 19, | March 20, | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 59,802 | 100.0 | % | $ | 52,942 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Costs of sales |
18,420 | 30.8 | % | 16,367 | 30.9 | % | ||||||||||
Restaurant operating expenses |
26,545 | 44.4 | % | 22,316 | 42.2 | % | ||||||||||
Marketing and advertising costs |
908 | 1.5 | % | 853 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
Pre-opening costs |
591 | 1.0 | % | 70 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
General and administrative costs |
3,775 | 6.3 | % | 2,646 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||
Management and accounting fees paid to related party |
| 0.0 | % | 744 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||
Secondary public offering costs |
412 | 0.7 | % | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Public offering transaction bonuses |
1,805 | 3.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,442 | 4.1 | % | 1,694 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
4,904 | 8.2 | % | 8,252 | 15.6 | % | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(24 | ) | 0.0 | % | (1,221 | ) | 2.3 | % | ||||||||
Other |
| 0.0 | % | (3 | ) | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
4,880 | 8.2 | % | 7,028 | 13.3 | % | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,311 | 2.2 | % | 2,130 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 3,569 | 6.0 | % | $ | 4,898 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended March 19, 2013 (12 weeks) Compared to the Fiscal Quarter Ended March 20, 2012 (12 weeks)
The following tables show our operating results (in thousands), as well as our operating results as a percentage of revenues, for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 and March 20, 2012.
12 Weeks Ended March 19, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Del Friscos | Sullivans | Grille | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 32,285 | 100.0 | % | $ | 19,898 | 100.0 | % | $ | 7,619 | 100.0 | % | $ | 59,802 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
10,155 | 31.5 | % | 6,127 | 30.8 | % | 2,138 | 28.1 | % | 18,420 | 30.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restaurant operating expenses |
12,948 | 40.1 | % | 9,743 | 49.0 | % | 3,854 | 50.6 | % | 26,545 | 44.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising costs |
428 | 1.3 | % | 388 | 1.9 | % | 92 | 1.2 | % | 908 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Restaurant-level EBITDA |
8,754 | 27.1 | % | 3,640 | 18.3 | % | 1,535 | 20.1 | % | 13,929 | 23.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Pre-opening costs |
591 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,775 | 6.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secondary public offering costs |
412 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public offering transaction bonuses |
1,805 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,442 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Income |
$ | 4,904 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restaurant operating weeks |
120 | 228 | 61 | 409 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average unit volume |
$ | 3,229 | $ | 1,047 | $ | 1,499 | $ | 1,755 |
16
12 Weeks Ended March 20, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Del Friscos | Sullivans | Grille | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 28,323 | 100.0 | % | $ | 20,595 | 100.0 | % | $ | 4,024 | 100.0 | % | $ | 52,942 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
8,975 | 31.7 | % | 6,287 | 30.5 | % | 1,105 | 27.5 | % | 16,367 | 30.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restaurant operating expenses |
10,805 | 38.1 | % | 9,522 | 46.2 | % | 1,989 | 49.4 | % | 22,316 | 42.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising costs |
394 | 1.4 | % | 407 | 2.0 | % | 52 | 1.3 | % | 853 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Restaurant-level EBITDA |
8,149 | 28.8 | % | 4,379 | 21.3 | % | 878 | 21.8 | % | 13,406 | 25.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Pre-opening costs |
70 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,646 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management and accounting fees paid to related party |
744 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,694 | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Income |
$ | 8,252 | 15.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restaurant operating weeks |
108 | 228 | 24 | 360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average unit volume |
$ | 3,147 | $ | 1,084 | $ | 2,012 | $ | 1,765 |
Revenues. Consolidated revenues increased $6.9 million, or 13.0%, to $59.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $52.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase was due to an additional 49 operating weeks provided by the opening of five restaurants since the first quarter of 2012, which provided an additional $7.3 million in revenues. The increase in revenues from additional operating weeks was partially offset by a 0.5% decrease in total comparable restaurant sales comprised of a 0.7% decrease in customer counts and a 0.2% increase in average check.
Del Friscos revenues increased $4.0 million, or 14.1%, to $32.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $28.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase was primarily due to an additional 12 operating weeks provided by the opening of one restaurant since the first quarter of 2012, as well as a 1.9% increase in total comparable restaurant sales comprised of a 1.4% increase in customer counts and a 0.5% increase in average check.
Sullivans revenues decreased $0.7 million, or 3.4%, to $19.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $20.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This decrease was due to a 4.0% decrease in total comparable restaurant sales comprised of a 2.6% decrease in customer counts and a 1.4% decrease in average check.
Grille revenues increased $3.6 million, or 90.0%, to $7.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $4.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase was due to an additional 37 operating weeks provided by the opening of four restaurants since the first quarter of 2012.
Cost of Sales. Consolidated cost of sales increased $2.0 million, or 12.2%, to $18.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $16.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase was primarily due to an additional 49 operating weeks in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 from the five restaurants opened since the first quarter of 2012. As a percentage of consolidated revenues, consolidated cost of sales decreased to 30.8% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 30.9% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
As a percentage of revenues, Del Friscos cost of sales decreased to 31.5% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 31.7% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This decrease in cost of sales, as a percentage of revenues, was primarily due to lower protein costs, primarily for our prime beef and seafood, accounting for approximately 90% of the decrease, which was partially offset by unfavorable non-protein food and alcoholic beverage costs.
As a percentage of revenues, Sullivans cost of sales increased to 30.8% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 30.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase in cost of sales, as a percentage of revenues, was primarily due to higher non-protein food costs, accounting for approximately 50% of the increase, and beef costs, accounting for approximately 50% of the increase, which were partially offset by favorable seafood and alcoholic beverage costs.
As a percentage of revenues, Grille cost of sales increased to 28.1% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 27.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase in cost of sales, as a percentage of revenues, was primarily due to new restaurant opening inefficiencies.
Restaurant Operating Expenses. Consolidated restaurant operating expenses increased $4.2 million, or 18.8%, to $26.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $22.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase was primarily due to an additional 49 operating weeks in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 from the five restaurants opened since the first quarter of 2012. As a percentage of consolidated revenues, consolidated restaurant operating expenses increased to 44.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 42.2% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
17
As a percentage of revenues, Del Friscos restaurant operating expenses increased to 40.1% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 38.1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase in restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of revenues, was due to higher direct and indirect labor costs, accounting for approximately 70% of the increase, and higher other restaurant operating costs, accounting for approximately 30% of the increase. These increases were due primarily to the expected new-opening inefficiencies of our Del Friscos that opened in December 2012.
As a percentage of revenues, Sullivans restaurant operating expenses increased to 49.0% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 46.2% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase in restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of revenues, was due to higher direct and indirect labor costs, accounting for approximately 60% of the increase, and higher other restaurant operating costs, accounting for approximately 40% of the increase. These increases were due in part to the deleveraging of certain fixed and semi-variable costs on lower revenues.
As a percentage of revenues, Grille restaurant operating expenses increased to 50.6% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 49.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase in restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of revenues, was due to higher labor and restaurant operating costs due primarily to new opening inefficiencies.
Marketing and Advertising Costs. Consolidated marketing and advertising costs were consistent at $0.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012. As a percentage of consolidated revenues, consolidated marketing and advertising costs decreased slightly to 1.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 1.6% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
As a percentage of revenues, Del Friscos marketing and advertising costs decreased to 1.3% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 1.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The decrease in marketing and advertising costs, as a percentage of revenues, was primarily due to lower in-restaurant advertising expenses, partially offset by higher public relations and broadcast media spending.
As a percentage of revenues, Sullivans marketing and advertising costs decreased to 1.9% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 2.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, which was the result of lower spending for in-restaurant advertising expenses partially offset by higher outside promotions costs.
As a percentage of revenues, Grille marketing and advertising costs decreased to 1.2% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 1.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The decrease in marketing and advertising costs, as a percentage of revenues, was primarily due to lower in-restaurant advertising and broadcast media expenses, partially offset by higher public relations spending.
Pre-opening Costs. Pre-opening costs increased by $0.5 million to $0.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 due to higher pre-opening costs incurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 related to the opening of one Grille restaurant during March 2013 and pre-opening expenses from one additional restaurant expected to open during the summer of 2013, compared to no openings occurring during the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Pre-opening costs include non-cash straight line rent, which is incurred during construction and can precede a restaurant opening by four to six months.
General and Administrative Costs. General and administrative costs increased $1.2 million, or 46.2%, to $3.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $2.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase was primarily related to additional compensation costs related to growth in the number of corporate and regional management-level personnel to support recent and anticipated growth, as well as increased restaurant management training expenses. In addition, we incurred approximately $0.4 million in additional public company related expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 over the first quarter of fiscal 2012, including $0.2 million in non-cash stock compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative costs increased to 6.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from 5.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. General and administrative costs are expected to continue to increase as a result of costs associated with being a public company as well as costs related to our anticipated growth, including further investments in our infrastructure. As we are able to leverage these investments made in our people and systems, we expect these expenses to decrease as a percentage of total revenues over time.
Management and Accounting Fees Paid to Related Party. Management and accounting fees paid to related party were $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and consisted of asset management fees paid to an affiliate of Lone Star Fund under an asset advisory agreement. This agreement was terminated in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
Secondary Public Offering Costs. In conjunction with the secondary public offering in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company incurred $0.4 million in legal, accounting, printing, and registration expenses related to the offering.
Public Offering Transaction Bonuses. Under letter agreements, as amended, with LSF5 Wagon Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Lone Star Fund, or Wagon, certain executives of the Company were eligible to receive a transaction bonus upon the occurrence of an eligible transaction. Wagon is responsible to fund the transaction bonuses. As these bonuses were contingent upon employment with the Company, the Company is required to record the expense of these bonuses and recognized the funding by Wagon as additional paid in capital. Associated with the completion of the secondary public offering in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company recorded $1.8 million in transaction bonuses expense under the transaction bonus agreements.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.7 million, or 41.2%, to $2.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $1.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily resulted from new assets placed in service during 2012 and 2013 upon the opening of the five new restaurants as well as for existing restaurants that were remodeled during 2012 and the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
18
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $1.2 million to $24,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $1.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This decrease is attributable to the payoff of previously outstanding debt with the proceeds from the initial public offering and there being no outstanding borrowings during the first quarter of 2013 under the revolving credit facility that the Company entered into in October 2012.
Income Tax Expense. The effective income tax rate was 26.9% and 30.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and the first quarter of fiscal 2012, respectively. The factors that cause the effective tax rates to vary from the federal statutory rate of 35% include the impact of FICA tip and other credits, partially offset by state income taxes and certain non-deductible expenses. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the impact of certain transactions in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, specifically the public offering transaction bonus deductions, which reduced income before income taxes and increased the impacts of the FICA tip and other credits.
19
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect to finance our operations for at least the next several years, including costs of opening currently planned new restaurants, through cash provided by operations and borrowings available under our credit facility. We cannot be sure that these sources will be sufficient to finance our operations, and we may seek additional financing in the future. As of March 19, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $9.8 million.
Our operations have not required significant working capital and, like many restaurant companies, we may at times have negative working capital. Revenues are received primarily in cash or by credit card, and restaurant operations do not require significant receivables or inventories, other than our wine inventory. In addition, we receive trade credit for the purchase of food, beverages and supplies, thereby reducing the need for incremental working capital to support growth.
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 and March 20, 2012 (in thousands):
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March 19, | March 20, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 4,282 | $ | 3,323 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(5,236 | ) | (3,770 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (5,000 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (954 | ) | $ | (5,447 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities. Cash flows provided by operating activities was $4.3 million for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013, consisting primarily of net income of $3.6 million, adjustments for depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges totaling $2.6 million, a net increase in cash of $2.3 million resulting from a decrease in other current assets and the collection of lease incentives receivable, and a $2.6 million increase in net deferred income tax liability. These cash inflows were partially offset by decreases in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and income taxes payable totaling $7.0 million. Cash flows provided by operating activities was $3.3 million for the 12 weeks ended March 20, 2012, consisting primarily of net income of $5.0 million, adjustments for depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges totaling $1.8 million, and a net increase in cash of $1.3 million resulting from a decrease in inventories, other current assets and income taxes payable. These cash inflows were partially offset by decreases in accounts payable of $1.8 million, other liabilities of $2.6 million and deferred income taxes of $0.5 million.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013 was $5.2 million, consisting primarily of purchases of property and equipment. These purchases primarily related to construction of one Grille restaurant opened during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, one Grille restaurant in progress and scheduled to open in the summer of 2013, and remodel activity of existing restaurants. Net cash used in investing activities for the 12 weeks ended March 20, 2012 was $3.8 million, consisting primarily of purchases of property and equipment. These purchased primarily related to construction of new Grille restaurants opened during the summer of 2012, and remodel activity of existing restaurants.
Financing Activities. There was no cash used in or provided by financing activities for the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2013. Net cash used in financing activities for the 12 weeks ended March 20, 2012 was $5.0 million consisting of principal payments made on our prior credit facility.
Capital Expenditures. We typically target an average cash investment of approximately $7.0 million to $9.0 million per restaurant for a Del Friscos restaurant and $3.0 million to $4.5 million for a Sullivans or a Grille, in each case net of landlord contributions and equipment financing and including pre-opening costs. In addition, we are currently refreshing a number of our Sullivans and Del Friscos locations to, among other things, add additional patio seating. These capital expenditures will primarily be funded by cash flows from operations and, if necessary, by the use of our credit facility, depending upon the timing of expenditures.
Credit Facility. On October 15, 2012, we entered into a new credit facility that provides for a three-year unsecured revolving credit facility of up to $25.0 million. Borrowings under the 2012 credit facility bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%. We are required to pay a commitment fee equal to 0.25% per annum on the available but unused revolving loan facility. The credit facility is guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries. The credit facility contains various financial covenants, including a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA (as defined in the credit facility), and minimum fixed charge coverage. Specifically, we are required to have a leverage ratio of less than 1.00 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of greater than 2.00. As of March 19, 2013, we were in compliance with each of these tests. The credit facility also contains covenants restricting certain corporate actions, including asset dispositions, acquisitions, the payment of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness and providing financing or other transactions with affiliates. As of March 19, 2013 there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility. See Note 6, Long-Term Debt, in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information on our credit facility.
We believe that net cash provided by operating activities and available borrowings under our credit facility will be sufficient to fund currently anticipated working capital, planned capital expenditures and debt service requirements for the next 24 months. We regularly review acquisitions and other strategic opportunities, which may require additional debt or equity financing. We currently do not have any pending agreements or understandings with respect to any acquisition or other strategic opportunities.
20
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Prior to the acquisition of Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc. by Lone Star Fund, our predecessor guaranteed lease payments of certain non-Del Friscos Restaurant Group restaurants in connection with the leasing of real estate for these locations. As of March 19, 2013, we continue to be a guarantor for five of these leases. The leases expire at various times through 2016. These guarantees would require payment by us only in an event of default by the non-Del Friscos Restaurant Group tenant where it failed to make the required lease payments or perform other obligations under a lease. We believe that the likelihood is remote that material payments will be required under these guarantees. At March 19, 2013, the maximum potential amount of future lease payments we could be required to make as a result of the guarantees was $1.9 million.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at the time. Actual amounts may differ from those estimates.
There have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies from what was previously reported in our 2012 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2012-02, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This ASU simplifies the guidance for impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill and gives companies the option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. Companies electing to perform a qualitative assessment are no longer required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the company determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. This update is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes affect the fair market value of the debt but do not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely for variable rate debt, including borrowings available under our credit facility, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value of the debt, but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. Holding other variables constant, such as debt levels, a hypothetical immediate one percentage point change in interest rates would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flows of approximately $10,000 per $1.0 million outstanding.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices, these fluctuations can materially impact our food and beverage costs. While we have taken steps to qualify multiple suppliers who meet our standards as suppliers for our restaurants and enter into agreements with suppliers for some of the commodities used in our restaurant operations, there can be no assurance that future supplies and costs for such commodities will not fluctuate due to weather and other market conditions outside of our control. We are currently unable to contract for some of our commodities, such as fresh seafood and certain produce, for periods longer than one week. Consequently, such commodities can be subject to unforeseen supply and cost fluctuations. Dairy costs can also fluctuate due to government regulation. Because we typically set our menu prices in advance of our food product prices, our menu prices cannot immediately take into account changing costs of food items. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our customers through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. We do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices at this time.
Inflation
Over the past five years, inflation has not significantly affected our operations. However, the impact of inflation on labor, food and occupancy costs could, in the future, significantly affect our operations. We pay many of our employees hourly rates related to the applicable federal or state minimum wage. Food costs as a percentage of revenues have been somewhat stable due to procurement efficiencies and menu price adjustments, although no assurance can be made that our procurement will continue to be efficient or that we will be able to raise menu prices in the future. Costs for construction, taxes, repairs, maintenance and insurance all impact our occupancy costs. We believe that our current strategy, which is to seek to maintain operating margins through a combination of menu price increases, cost controls, careful evaluation of property and equipment needs, and efficient purchasing practices, has been an effective tool for dealing with inflation. There can be no assurance, however, that future inflationary or other cost pressure will be effectively offset by this strategy.
21
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedure
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all future events, no matter how remote, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may not deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are subject to various claims and legal actions, including class actions, arising in the ordinary course of business from time to time, including claims related to food quality, personal injury, contract matters, health, wage and employment and other issues. None of these types of litigation, most of which are covered by insurance, has had a material effect on us, and as of the date of this report, we are not a party to any material pending legal proceedings and are not aware of any claims that we believe could have a materially adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
There have been no material changes from our risk factors as previously reported in our 2012 10-K.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None.
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit |
Description | |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
23
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: April 30, 2013
Del Friscos Restaurant Group, Inc. | ||
By: | /s/ Mark S. Mednansky | |
Mark S. Mednansky | ||
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
By: | /s/ Thomas J. Pennison, Jr. | |
Thomas J. Pennison, Jr. | ||
Chief Financial Officer, (Principal Financial Officer) |
24