UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| x | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011
OR
| ¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File No. 000-51128
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| DELAWARE | 06-1529524 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
160 Raritan Center Parkway
Edison, New Jersey 08837
(Address of principal executive office)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (732) 225-8910
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
| (Title of class) |
(Name of exchange on which registered) | |
| Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 | NASDAQ Capital Market |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and, (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and, will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
| Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates as of April 30, 2011 was $143 million.
The outstanding number of shares of common stock as of January 10, 2012 was 41,333,481.
The Registrant’s proxy or information statement is incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Explanatory Note
The Company was previously a “smaller reporting company” that determined that it no longer qualified as such as of its October 31, 2011 determination date, at which time the Company met the definition of an “accelerated filer.” In accordance with SEC Release 33-8876, the Company has elected to comply with the disclosure requirements for a smaller reporting company in connection with the preparation of this annual report on Form 10-K.
| Item 1. | Business. |
Forward-looking Statements
Statements in this annual report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts constitute forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Those factors include, among other things, those listed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of these statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report to conform these statements to actual results. References herein to “we,” “us,” and “the Company” are to Majesco Entertainment Company.
Introduction
We are a provider of interactive entertainment software primarily for the casual game playing, mass-market consumer. Our products allow us to capitalize on the large and growing installed base of interactive entertainment enthusiasts on a variety of different consoles, handheld, and digital platforms. We sell our products primarily to large retail chains, specialty retail stores, video game rental outlets and distributors, or make them available for digital download over internet or mobile networks. We have developed our network of retail and distribution relationships over our 25-year history.
We publish video games for almost all major current generation interactive entertainment hardware platforms, including Nintendo’s 3DS, DS, and Wii, Sony’s PlayStation 3, or PS3, Microsoft’s Xbox 360 and the personal computer, or PC. We also publish games for digital platforms such as Xbox Live Arcade (“XBLA”) and PlayStation Network (“PSN”), as well as mobile platforms like iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, and online platforms such as Facebook.
Our video game titles are targeted at various demographics at a range of price points. In some instances, these titles are based on licenses of well-known properties and, in other cases are based on original properties. We collaborate and enter into agreements with content providers and video game development studios for the creation of our video games.
Due to the larger budget requirements for developing and marketing premium console titles for core gamers, we focus on publishing casual games targeting mass-market consumers. Recently, hardware manufacturers have introduced a number of innovative user interfaces attracting the casual game consumer to their platforms, such as the touch stylus for the Nintendo DS, motion based controllers for the Nintendo Wii and Sony PlayStation, and full-body motion sensing for the Microsoft Xbox 360. This has created new gaming genres such as dance and fitness, for which we have published innovative products in these categories. Additionally, touch screen interfaces and improved visual displays for smartphones and tablets, and on social networking platforms for the personal computer have proven to be attractive platforms for the casual game consumer.
Corporate Background
Our principal executive offices are located at 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, NJ 08837, and our telephone number is (732) 225-8910. Our web site address is www.majescoentertainment.com. Majesco Sales Inc. was incorporated in 1986 under the laws of the State of New Jersey. On December 5, 2003, Majesco Sales Inc. completed a reverse merger with Majesco Holdings Inc. (formerly ConnectivCorp), then a publicly traded company with no active operations. Majesco Holdings Inc. was incorporated in 2004 under the laws of the State of Delaware. As a result of the merger, Majesco Sales Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary and the sole operating business of the public company. On April 4, 2005, Majesco Sales Inc. was merged into Majesco Holdings Inc., and, in connection with the merger, Majesco Holdings Inc. changed its name to Majesco Entertainment Company.
1
Industry Overview
The interactive entertainment software market is comprised of two primary sectors. The first sector is software for dedicated console and handheld gaming systems such as the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, Wii and the DS and 3DS handheld systems. The majority of software for these platforms has historically been purchased in packaged form through retail outlets. However, in recent years an increasing amount of software has been made available digitally through online networks such as Microsoft’s Xbox Live Arcade (“XBLA”) and Sony’s PlayStation network (“PSN”). The second sector consists of software for multipurpose devices such as personal computers and mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. Significant growth is projected in this area, particularly in the form of downloadable and online games for use with mobile devices or over online social networks such as Facebook. These “games as a service” platforms often utilize different customer monetization models such as “freemium” gaming where a customer accesses certain game functionality for free, while paying for certain content in the form of in-game microtransactions such as virtual goods, or premium game features. North American retail sales of video game software were approximately $10 billion in 2011 according to the NPD Group, a global provider of consumer market research information. On a global basis, International Development Group (“IDG”) estimates that worldwide retail sales of console, handheld and PC software were roughly $24 billion in 2011. IDG estimates that non-traditional (digital) revenue surpassed $20 billion in 2011 and will grow to over $40 billion by 2015.
Strategy
Our objective is to be an innovative provider of video games for the mass market with a focus on developing and publishing a wide range of casual and family oriented video games. Specifically, we strive to:
Develop franchise titles with the capability to sell multiple sequels.
Video game franchises are those game brands that successfully sell multiple sequels. These provide valuable long-term benefits both in customer base growth and revenue predictability. A core strategy for growth is to pursue the development and cultivation of long-term franchises both through internally generated intellectual property and long-term licensing arrangements.
Focus product development efforts on quality games that are easy to “pick-up-and-play,” priced affordably and targeted for the mass market.
Video game development of casual games is generally less expensive and simpler than development of games for the core gamer demographic, where expectations for graphic quality and depth of play are very high. In general, from a game play/content perspective, we are focused on publishing games that are relatively easy to play and whose subject matter will appeal to as wide an audience as possible. Historically, we focused our game development efforts on products for the Nintendo DS and Wii systems, which have appealing price points and unique play mechanics that continue to resonate with the mainstream gamer and have experienced significant installed base growth over the past four years. With the introduction of motion-based gaming to both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, we have begun developing games for these platforms.
Leverage success of our existing franchises.
We plan to continue to extend our existing products through platform and brand extensions. We have successfully extended the Cooking Mama brand onto multiple games, including Gardening Mama, Crafting Mama, Babysitting Mama and Camping Mama and across multiple platforms including Nintendo DS, Wii, and 3DS systems. We will look to continue to grow this series with additional sequels, brand extensions and innovations.
Zumba Fitness launched on November 18, 2010 for the Nintendo Wii, Kinect for Xbox 360, and PlayStation 3 Move, and sold over 4 million units worldwide in its first twelve months. We aim to continue to capitalize on the rapid growth of this fitness program with additional releases in fiscal 2012. Zumba Fitness 2, for the Nintendo Wii, was released on November 15, 2011, and we plan to release Zumba Fitness Rush on Kinect for Xbox 360 in February 2012.
Build our digital business and product offering.
In 2011, we began building a business in digitally-delivered games alongside our traditional console and handheld business. This business encompasses new platforms such as free-to-play social games on Facebook, mobile games on Apple’s iOS as well as Android devices, and downloadable games on XBLA, PSN and WiiWare. To date, we have launched several digital games, including Cooking Mama: Friends Café, and Parking Wars 2, on Facebook, and Bloodrayne Betrayal, on XBLA and PSN, among others. In addition, we acquired the assets and development team of Quick Hit, Inc. in June of 2011 to increase our capability to develop and publish games for online and mobile platforms.
Leverage our industry relationships and entrepreneurial environment to enter new categories and bring innovative products to market.
In the past, we have leveraged our experience, entrepreneurial environment and industry relationships with developers, manufacturers, content providers, retailers and resellers to create and distribute new and innovative products. We will continue to capitalize on current market trends and pursue new product opportunities in categories related to our core business.
2
Products
We offer our customers a wide selection of interactive entertainment products for a variety of platforms. Our goal is to grow individual titles into successful franchises, which can provide predictable and profitable growth for years. When a franchise is successful, it may account for a large percentage of our overall net revenue. This has occurred in the past in the cases of both Cooking Mama and Zumba Fitness, as these brands have grown through numerous iterations across multiple platforms. In addition, we own the intellectual property related to certain games and also license the rights to content from developers or media entertainment companies, such as in the titles Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel, Hulk Hogan’s Main Event, and Twister Mania.
In fiscal year 2011, revenue from sales of Zumba Fitness represented approximately 70 percent of our total net revenue. In fiscal year 2009 and 2010, Cooking Mama accounted for 49 and 44 percent of net revenue, respectively.
Zumba Fitness introduced in November 2010 sold over 4 million copies worldwide in its first year. According to NPD, Zumba Fitness was the number one fitness title of 2011. We have licensed the right to release sequels to this product in 2012 and 2013.
The original Cooking Mama game was first introduced in 2006 for the Nintendo DS and has sold more than three million units to date. The Cooking Mama franchise has sold over 9 million units across ten titles in North America. Most recently, Cooking Mama made its debut on the Nintendo 3DS with the launch of Cooking Mama 4: Kitchen Magic, which was released in November 2011.
In addition to our traditional retail games, we also create titles for the leading online and mobile platforms, including Facebook, Apple’s iOS, Android, Microsoft’s XBLA, and Sony’s PSN.
Selected titles, their compatible platforms and launch dates include:
| Selected Titles |
Platform |
Launch Date | ||
| Cooking Mama | DS | September 2006 | ||
| Cooking Mama: Cook Off | Wii | March 2007 | ||
| Cooking Mama 2: Dinner with Friends | DS | November 2007 | ||
| Jillian Michaels’ Fitness Ultimatum 2009 | Wii | October 2008 | ||
| Cooking Mama: World Kitchen | Wii | November 2008 | ||
| Gardening Mama | DS | March 2009 | ||
| Jillian Michaels’ Fitness Ultimatum 2010 | Wii, DS | October 2009 | ||
| Cooking Mama 3: Shop and Chop | DS | October 2009 | ||
| Hello Kitty Party | DS | November 2009 | ||
| Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel | Wii, DS | December 2009 | ||
| Tetris Party Deluxe | Wii, DS | June 2010 | ||
| Greg Hastings Paintball 2 | Xbox 360, Wii | September 2010 | ||
| Gardening Mama | iPhone, iPad | October 2010 | ||
| My Baby 3 & Friends | DS | October 2010 | ||
| Crafting Mama | DS | October 2010 | ||
| Babysitting Mama | Wii | November 2010 | ||
| Zumba Fitness | Wii, Xbox 360, PS3 | November 2010 | ||
| Cooking Mama Friends Café | January 2011 | |||
| Camping Mama: Outdoor Adventures | DS | October 2011 | ||
| Hulk Hogan’s Main Event | Xbox 360 | October 2011 | ||
| Pet Zombies | 3DS | October 2011 | ||
Product Development
Prior to initiating the development of a video game title, we perform market research, studio due diligence and financial analysis. A title must then be approved by our “green light” committee comprised of members from our executive, product development, finance, sales and marketing and legal/business affairs teams before being accepted for publication. Once accepted, the title is evaluated at regular milestones to ensure it is progressing on time, according to specifications and on budget.
We primarily use third party development studios to develop our video game products. However, we employ game producers and quality assurance personnel to manage the creation of the game and its ultimate approval by the first party hardware manufacturer. We carefully select third parties to develop video games based on their capabilities, suitability, availability and cost. We usually have broad rights to commercially utilize products created by the third party developers we work with. Development contracts are structured to provide developers with incentives to provide timely and satisfactory performance by associating payments with the achievement of substantive development milestones, and by providing for the payment of royalties to them based on sales of the developed product, only after we recoup development costs. We have worked, and continue to work, with independent third party developers, such as:
| • | Zoe Mode |
3
| • | Panic Button |
| • | 1st Playable Productions |
| • | Behaviour Interactive and |
| • | Wayforward Technologies. |
The development process for video games also involves working with platform manufacturers from the initial game concept phase through approval of the final product. During this process, we work closely with the developers and manufacturers to ensure that the title undergoes careful quality assurance testing. Each platform manufacturer requires that the software and a prototype of each title, together with all related artwork and documentation, be submitted for its pre-publication approval. This approval is generally discretionary.
We develop online and mobile games internally, at our Foxboro, Massachusetts facility, or using external developers. On June 3, 2011, we acquired certain assets and the twelve person workforce of Quick Hit, Inc., a developer of free to play online games. This team will serve as the basis for our entry into the business of “freemium” games for play online and on mobile devices.
Intellectual Property
Platform Licenses
Hardware platform manufacturers require that publishers obtain a license from them to publish titles for their platforms. We currently have non-exclusive licenses from Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony for each of the popular console and handheld platforms. Each license generally extends for a term of between two to four years and is terminable under a variety of circumstances. Each license allows us to create one or more products for the applicable system, and requires us to pay a per-unit license fee and/or royalty payment from the title produced and may include other compensation or payment terms. Publishers are not required to obtain licenses for publishing video game software for PCs. All of the hardware manufacturers approve each of the titles we submit for approval on a title-by-title basis, at their discretion.
Licenses from Third Parties
While we develop original titles, most of our titles are based on rights, licenses and properties, including copyrights and trademarks, owned by third parties. Even our original titles usually include some rights or properties from third parties. License agreements with third parties generally extend for a term of between two to four years, are limited to specific territories or platforms and are terminable under a variety of events. Several of our licenses are exclusive within particular territories or platforms. The licensors often have strict approval and quality control rights. Typically, we are obligated to make minimum guaranteed royalty payments over the term of these licenses and advance payments against these guarantees, but other compensation or payment terms, such as milestone payments, are also common. From time to time, we may also license other technologies from third party developers for use in our products, which also are subject to royalties and other types of payment.
Licenses to Third Parties
As we create original titles we may decide to license rights to third parties, sometimes on an exclusive basis, in order to generate publicity or market demand for our titles, to generate additional revenue related to complementary products, or a combination of these factors. For example, for certain titles we have sold the movie rights, entered into strategy guide deals, licensed a comic book series as well as an apparel line.
Manufacturing
Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft control the manufacturing of our products that are compatible with their respective video game consoles, as well as the manuals and packaging for these products, and ship the finished products to us for distribution. Video games for Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony game consoles consist of proprietary format optical discs and are typically delivered to us within the relatively short lead time of approximately two to three weeks.
With respect to DS and 3DS products, which use a cartridge format, Nintendo typically delivers these products to us within 30 to 45 days after receipt of a purchase order.
Initial production quantities of individual titles are based upon estimated retail orders and consumer demand. At the time a product is approved for manufacturing, we must generally provide the platform manufacturer with a purchase order for that product, and pay for the entire purchase price prior to production. To date, we have not experienced any material difficulties or delays in the manufacture and assembly of our products. However, manufacturers’ difficulties, which are beyond our control, could impair our ability to bring products to the marketplace in a timely manner.
4
We operate in a capital intensive industry. Significant working capital is required to finance the manufacturing of inventory of products, especially during peak holiday selling season.
We typically ship orders immediately upon receipt of the order. To the extent that any backlog exists at the end of any period, it is not a material indicator of future results.
Sales and Marketing
North America
Historically, our marketing programs have principally supported our premium game titles. While we support most of our titles in some manner, those with the most potential will have long lead times, multi-faceted marketing programs designed to generate enthusiasm and demand. Specific consumer marketing strategies we may employ include: TV; radio and print advertising; website and online marketing; demo distribution; promotions and cross-promotions with third parties; and point-of-purchase advertising.
Additionally, we customize public relations programs that are designed to create awareness with all relevant audiences, including core gamers and mass-entertainment consumers. To date, our public relations efforts have resulted in significant coverage for our company and individual titles in computer and video game publications, such as Game Informer, IGN and Nintendo Power, as well as major newspapers, magazines and broadcast outlets, such as CNN, USA Today, Wired, Maxim, Newsweek, and the New York Times, among others. We also host media events throughout the year at which print, broadcast and online journalists can preview, review and evaluate our products prior to their release.
In addition to regular face-to-face meetings and communications with our sales force, we employ extensive trade marketing efforts including: direct marketing to buyers and store managers; trade shows; various store manager shows; and distribution and sales incentive programs.
We sell our products primarily to large retail chains, specialty retail stores, video game rental outlets and distributors. Our sales team has strong relationships with major retailers and communicates with them frequently. To supplement our sales team, we currently utilize six sales representative organizations located throughout the United States. The firms we use were chosen based on their performance and retailer relationships. On average, two sales representatives per organization are assigned to our accounts. It is customary for the sales representatives and resellers of our games who are assigned specific customers to also distribute games produced by other publishers. Distribution channels are dominated by a select group of companies, and a publisher’s access to retail shelf space is a significant competitive factor.
International
We do business internationally through our office in the United Kingdom by entering into license and distribution agreements with leading international publishers for distribution in Europe and the PAL territories. We distribute our products through either distribution or licensing agreements. These agreements may vary by product and by territory. In a distribution agreement, we manufacture the product, and sell it into the distributors at a wholesale price, with our distribution partner being responsible for retail sell-in and marketing the product. In a licensing agreement, our licensing partner is responsible for the manufacture and sale of the product and we receive royalties and usually an up-front royalty advance.
Digital
We also distribute online and mobile games through Microsoft’s Xbox Live Arcade (“XBLA”) and Sony’s Playstation Network (“PSN”), Steam, Facebook, and across mobile networks such as Apple’s iOS. We utilize various methods to market and drive awareness of our titles on these emerging platforms, including online advertising on Facebook, on platform homepages in the cases of XBLA and PSN, and on online sites. We also acquire users through both paid and unpaid channels, due to the viral nature of social and mobile games.
Customers
Our customers are comprised of national and regional retailers, specialty retailers and video game rental outlets. We believe we have developed close relationships with a number of retailers, including Amazon, Best Buy, GameStop, Target, Toys R Us, and Walmart. We also have strong relationships with Cokem, Ingram and SVG, who act as resellers of our products to smaller retail outlets. For the fiscal year ended 2011, our top four retail accounts were Walmart, GameStop, Best Buy, and Target, accounting for approximately 18%, 21%, 11% and 10% of our revenue, respectively. Revenue from 505 Games in Europe represented approximately 11% of revenue in 2011. A substantial reduction in purchases, termination of purchases, or business failure by any of our significant customers could have a material adverse effect on us.
5
Competition
In general, our products compete with other forms of entertainment for leisure time and discretionary spending of consumers. These other forms of entertainment include movies, television, music, online content and social media. More specifically, the market for interactive entertainment products is highly competitive and relatively few products achieve significant market acceptance. We continue to face significant competition with respect to our products, which may also result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing and product development resources than we do.
We compete with many other first and third party publishers and developers in the handheld, console and online segments. In the console and handheld segment, we compete with first party publishers such as Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony, each of which develop software for their respective platforms, as well as third party publishers such as Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts, Sega, Take-Two Interactive, THQ, and Ubisoft. In the digital segment, we compete with a large range of developers and publishers, which include Crowdstar, Electronic Arts, Gameloft, Glu Mobile, ngmoco, Playdom, Rovio and Zynga. We expect competition to increase in this area in the future.
Current and future competitors may be able to:
| • | respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer preferences; |
| • | carry larger inventories; |
| • | gain access to wider distribution channels; |
| • | undertake more extensive marketing campaigns; |
| • | adopt more aggressive pricing policies; |
| • | devote greater resources to securing the rights to valuable licenses; |
| • | develop stronger relationships with leading software developers; |
| • | make higher royalty payments; and |
| • | secure more and better shelf space. |
Competitive factors such as the foregoing may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Seasonality
The interactive entertainment business is highly seasonal, with sales typically higher during the peak holiday selling season during the fourth quarter of the calendar year. Traditionally, the majority of our sales for this key selling period ship in our fiscal fourth and first quarters, which end on October 31 and January 31, respectively. Significant working capital is required to finance the manufacturing of inventory of products that ship during these quarters.
Employees
We had 84 full-time employees in the United States and 1 full-time employee in the United Kingdom as of October 31, 2011. We have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Financial Information About Geographic Areas
See “Note 1 — Principal Business Activity and Basis of Presentation” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included on Page F-8.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, referred to herein as the SEC. Our SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act are available to the public free of charge over the Internet at our website at http://www.majescoentertainment.com or at the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov. Our SEC filings will be available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed or furnished them to the SEC. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this 10-K. You may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can view our Code of Conduct and Ethics and the charters for each of our committees of the Board of Directors free of charge on the corporate governance section of our website.
6
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
Our business and operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties as described below. However, the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we may currently deem immaterial, may become important factors that could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer.
We have experienced recent net losses and we may incur future net losses, which may cause a decrease in our stock price.
While we generated net income for fiscal year 2011, we incurred net losses of $1.0 million in fiscal year 2010 and $7.2 million in 2009. We may not be able to continue to generate revenues sufficient to offset our costs and may sustain net losses in future periods. Any such losses may have an adverse effect on our future operating prospects, liquidity and stock price.
Our business activities may require additional financing that might not be obtainable on acceptable terms, if at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and our ability to operate going forward.
Although there can be no assurance, our management believes that based on our current plan there are sufficient capital resources from existing levels of cash and operations, including our factoring and purchase order financing arrangements, to finance our operational requirements through at least the next 12 months. If we are unable to maintain profitability, or if unforeseen events occur that would require additional funding, we may need to raise capital or incur debt to fund our operations. We would expect to seek such capital through sales of additional equity or debt securities and/or loans from financial institutions, but there can be no assurance that funds will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all, and any sales of such securities may be dilutive to investors.
Failure to obtain financing or obtaining financing on unfavorable terms could result in a decrease in our stock price and could have a material adverse effect on future operating prospects, or require us to significantly reduce operations.
We are heavily reliant on our factoring arrangement.
We utilize credit under a factoring agreement with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (referred to herein as Rosenthal) whereby we sell our receivables for immediate payment of a portion of the invoice amount and, in some instances, the ability to take additional cash advances. This is our primary source of financing. If Rosenthal suffered financial difficulty, or our relationship with Rosenthal deteriorated, this could significantly impact our liquidity.
We have experienced volatility in the price of our stock.
The price of our common stock has experienced significant volatility. In the 12 months ended October 31, 2011, the high and low bid quotations for our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Capital Market ranged between a high of $4.53 and a low of $0.58. The historic market price of our common stock may be higher or lower than the price paid for our shares and may not be indicative of future market prices, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time; |
| • | actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or changes in the expectations of securities analysts; |
| • | our, or a competitor’s, announcement of new products, services or technological innovations; |
| • | departures of key personnel; |
| • | general economic, political and market conditions and trends; or |
| • | other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and filings with the SEC. |
We may not be able to sustain or increase the value of our common stock. Declines in the market price of our stock could adversely affect our ability to retain personnel with stock incentives, to acquire businesses or assets in exchange for stock and/or to conduct future financing activities with or involving our common stock.
In addition, purchases or sales of large quantities of our stock could have a significant effect on our stock price.
We seek to manage our business with a view to achieving long-term results, and this could have a negative effect on short-term trading.
Our focus is on creation of stockholder value over time, and we intend to make decisions that will be consistent with this long-term view. As a result, some of our decisions, such as whether to make or discontinue operating investments or pursue or discontinue strategic initiatives, may be in conflict with the objectives of short-term traders. Further, this could adversely affect our quarterly or other short-term results of operations.
7
We may not be able to maintain our listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Our common stock currently trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market, referred to herein as Nasdaq. This market has continued listing requirements that we must continue to maintain to avoid delisting. The standards include, among others, a minimum bid price requirement of $1.00 per share and any of: (i) a minimum stockholders’ equity of $2.5 million; (ii) a market value of listed securities of $35 million; or (iii) net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the most recently completed fiscal year or in the two of the last three fiscal years. Our results of operations and our fluctuating stock price directly impact our ability to satisfy these listing standards.
As mentioned above, our stock is volatile, and there is no guarantee that we will continue to meet the minimum bid price requirement or the other continued listing requirements of Nasdaq. If we fail to do so, we may be subject to delisting.
A delisting from Nasdaq would result in our common stock being eligible for listing on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) or other markets that are generally considered to be less efficient than markets such as Nasdaq or other national exchanges because of lower trading volumes, transaction delays and reduced security analyst and news media coverage. These factors could contribute to lower prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices for our common stock. Additionally, trading of our common stock in these markets may make us less desirable to institutional investors and may, therefore, limit our future equity funding options and could negatively affect the liquidity of our stock.
A significant portion of our revenue in 2011 was generated from games based on the Zumba Fitness property.
Approximately 70% of our net revenue in 2011 was generated from the Zumba Fitness games, the first of which was commercially released in November 2010. We license the rights to publish these games from a third party. In November 2011, we released the sequel for the Wii platform, Zumba Fitness 2. In addition, we have secured rights to publish other games based on this property. However, we cannot guarantee that any of the new versions will be as successful as the previous version. If the new versions are not successful, this may have a significant impact on our revenues. In addition, even if successful, we may be unable to secure the rights to publish further sequels to these games, which may adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Customer accommodations could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
When demand for our offerings falls below expectations, we may negotiate accommodations to retailers or distributors in order to maintain our relationships with our customers and access to our sales channels. These accommodations include negotiation of price discounts and credits against future orders commonly referred to as price protection. At the time of product shipment, we establish provisions for price protection and other similar allowances. These provisions are established according to our estimates of the potential for markdown allowances based upon historical rates, current sell-through of retailer inventory of our products, expected sales, retailer inventories of products and other factors. We cannot predict with certainty whether existing provisions will be sufficient to offset any accommodations we will provide, nor can we predict the amount or nature of accommodations that we will provide in the future. If actual accommodations exceed our provisions, our earnings would be reduced, possibly materially. Any such reduction may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. The granting of price protection and other allowances reduces our ability to collect receivables and impacts our availability for advances from our factoring arrangement. The continued granting of substantial price protection and other allowances may require additional funding sources to fund operations, but there can be no assurance that such funds will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.
If we do not consistently meet our product development schedules, our operating results will be adversely affected.
Our business is highly seasonal, with the highest levels of consumer demand and a significant percentage of our sales occurring during the end of the year holiday period. In addition, we often seek to release our products in conjunction with specific events, such as the release of a related movie. If we miss these key selling periods for any reason, including product development delays, our sales will suffer disproportionately. Likewise, if a key event to which our product release schedule is tied were to be delayed or cancelled, our sales would also suffer disproportionately. Our ability to meet product development schedules is affected by a number of factors, including the creative processes involved, the ability of third party developers to deliver work in a timely fashion and the need to fine-tune our products prior to their release. We have experienced development delays for our products in the past, which caused us to push back release dates. In the future, any failure to meet anticipated production or release schedules would likely result in a delay of revenue and/or possibly a significant shortfall in our revenue, harm our profitability, and cause our operating results to be materially different than anticipated.
8
Accessories related to two of our most successful titles expose us to hardware manufacturing and shipping risks.
Both Zumba Fitness and Zumba Fitness 2 require a belt accessory for use on the Nintendo Wii platform. The manufacturer of the belt accessory is located in China. Anything that impacts the ability of the manufacturer to produce or otherwise supply the belt accessories for us or increases their costs of production, including the utilization of such manufacturer’s capacity by another company; changes in safety, environment or other regulations applicable to the accessories and the manufacturing thereof; natural or manmade disasters that disrupt manufacturing, transportation or communications; labor shortages, civil unrest or other issues negatively impacting Chinese companies; increases in the prices of raw materials; increases in fuel prices and other shipping costs; and increases in local labor costs in China, may increase the prices we must pay for the accessories or otherwise impede our ability to supply the accessories to the market. If we are unable to supply such accessories, sales of the titles will be impacted.
Video games that are not high quality may not sell according to our forecast, which could materially impact our profitability in any given quarter.
In the past few years, the quality standards of games aimed at the mass market consumer have improved and it is clear that consumers prefer high-quality games. If our games are not high quality, consumers may not purchase as many games as we expect, which could materially impact our revenue and profitability in any given quarter.
Increased competition for limited shelf space and promotional support from retailers could affect the success of our business and require us to incur greater expenses to market our products.
Retailers typically have limited shelf space and promotional resources, such as circulars and in-store advertising, to support any one product among an increasing number of newly introduced entertainment offerings.
Competition for retail support and shelf space is expected to increase, which may require us to increase our marketing expenditures or reduce prices to retailers. Competitors with more extensive lines, popular products and greater financial resources frequently have greater bargaining power with retailers. Accordingly, we may not be able to achieve or maintain the levels of support and shelf space that our competitors receive. As a result, sales of our products may be less than expected, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to seasonality in the interactive entertainment industry and other factors related to our business operations could result in substantial losses to investors.
We have experienced, and may continue to experience, significant quarterly fluctuations in sales and operating results. The interactive entertainment market is highly seasonal, with sales typically significantly higher during the year-end holiday buying season. Other factors that cause fluctuations in our sales and operating results include:
| • | the timing of our release of new titles as well as the release of our competitors’ products; |
| • | the popularity of both new titles and titles released in prior periods; |
| • | the profit margins for titles we sell; |
| • | the competition in the industry for retail shelf space; |
| • | fluctuations in the size and rate of growth of consumer demand for titles for different platforms; and |
| • | the timing of the introduction of new platforms and the accuracy of retailers’ forecasts of consumer demand. |
We believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance. We may not be able to maintain consistent profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. In addition, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors causing the price of our common stock to fall or significantly fluctuate.
A weak global economic environment could result in a reduced demand for our products and increased volatility in our stock price.
Current uncertainty in global economic conditions poses a risk to the overall economy as consumers and retailers may defer or choose not to make purchases in response to tighter credit and negative financial news, which could negatively affect demand for our products. Additionally, due to the weak economic conditions and tightened credit environment, some of our retailers and customers may not have the same purchasing power, leading to lower purchases of our games for placement into distribution channels. Consequently, demand for our products could be materially different from expectations, which could negatively affect our profitability and cause our stock price to decline.
A significant portion of our sales is derived from our international operations, which may subject us to economic, currency, political, regulatory and other risks.
As we do not directly distribute our games outside of North America, our success and profitability internationally are wholly dependent on the competence and efforts of our international distributors. Moreover, our international operations are vulnerable to a number of additional factors outside of our control, including different consumer preferences; language and cultural differences; foreign currency fluctuations; changes in regulatory requirements; and taxes and tariffs. Such factors may have a negative impact on the sales of our games outside of North America.
9
Our business may be affected by issues in the economy that affect consumer spending.
Our products involve discretionary spending on the part of consumers. We believe that consumer spending is influenced by general economic conditions and the availability of discretionary income. This makes our products particularly sensitive to general economic conditions and economic cycles. Certain economic conditions, such as United States or international general economic downturns, including periods of increased inflation, unemployment levels, tax rates, interest rates, gasoline and other energy prices or declining consumer confidence could reduce consumer spending. Reduced consumer spending may result in reduced demand for our products and may also require increased selling and promotional expenses. A reduction or shift in domestic or international consumer spending could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. Consumers are generally more willing to make discretionary purchases, including purchases of products like ours, during periods in which favorable economic conditions prevail. If economic conditions worsen, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The loss of any of our key customers could adversely affect our sales.
Our sales to Wal-Mart, GameStop, Best Buy and Target accounted for approximately 18%, 21%, 11% and 10%, respectively, of our revenue for the fiscal year 2011. Although we seek to broaden our customer base, we anticipate that a small number of customers will continue to account for a large concentration of our sales given the consolidation of the retail industry. We do not have written agreements in place with several of our major customers. Consequently, our relationship with these retailers could change at any time. In addition, revenue from 505 Games in Europe represented approximately 11% of revenue in 2011. Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if:
| • | we lose any of our significant customers; |
| • | any of these customers purchase fewer of our offerings; |
| • | any of these customers encounter financial difficulties, resulting in the inability to pay vendors, store closures or liquidation; or |
| • | we experience any other adverse change in our relationship with any of these customers. |
Significant competition in our industry could continue to adversely affect our business.
The market for interactive entertainment products is highly competitive and, relatively few products achieve significant market acceptance. We face significant competition with respect to our products, which may also result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing and product development resources than we do. As a result, current and future competitors may be able to:
| • | respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer preferences; |
| • | undertake more extensive marketing campaigns; |
| • | devote greater resources to secure rights to valuable licenses and relationships with leading software developers; |
| • | gain access to wider distribution channels; and |
| • | have better access to prime shelf space. |
We compete with many other third party publishers in both our handheld and console market segments. In addition, console and handheld manufacturers, such as Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony, publish software for their respective platforms. Further, media companies and film studios are increasing their focus on the video game software market and may become significant competitors. We expect competition to increase as more competitors enter the interactive entertainment market.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully compete against our current or future competitors or that competitive pressures will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
If our marketing and advertising efforts fail to resonate with our customers, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Our products are marketed through a variety of advertising and promotional programs such as television and online advertising, print advertising, retail merchandising, website development and event sponsorship. Our ability to sell our products is dependent in part upon the success of these programs. If the marketing for our products fail to resonate with our customers, particularly during the critical holiday season or during other key selling periods, or if advertising rates or other media placement costs increase, these factors could have a material adverse impact on our business and operating results.
Increasing development costs for games which may not perform as anticipated can decrease our profitability and could result in potential impairments of capitalized software development costs.
Video games can be increasingly expensive to develop. Because the current generation console platforms and computers have greater complexity and capabilities than the earlier platforms and computers, costs are higher to develop games for the current
10
generation platforms and computers. If these increased costs are not offset by higher revenues and other cost efficiencies in the future, our margins and profitability will be impacted, and could result in impairment of capitalized software development costs. If these platforms, or games we develop for these platforms, do not achieve significant market penetration, we may not be able to recover our development costs, which could result in the impairment of capitalized software costs.
Our business is dependent on the viability of console hardware.
Our business depends on hardware on which consumers play our games. Our business can be adversely affected by various factors affecting hardware as follows:
| • | Software pricing. Software prices for the current console games are higher than prices for games for the predecessor platforms. There is no assurance that consumers will continue to pay the higher prices on these games. Additionally, as it gets later in the console cycle, consumers may be unwilling to continue to pay the higher prices that they paid closer to the launch of the consoles. |
| • | Significant development costs. The complexity and capabilities of the current consoles lead to higher development costs for games to make use of the consoles. Greater costs can lead to lower operating margins, negatively affecting our profitability. |
Our business is highly dependent on the continued growth of current generation video game platforms and our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms.
We derive most of our revenue from the sale of products for play on video game platforms manufactured by third parties. The success of our business is dependent upon the continued growth of these platforms and our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms.
Termination or modification of our agreements with platform hardware manufacturers, who are also competitors and frequently control the manufacturing of our titles, may adversely affect our business.
We are required to obtain a license in order to develop and distribute software for each of the manufacturers of video game hardware. We currently have licenses from Sony to develop products for PlayStation, PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3 and PSP, from Nintendo to develop products for the GBA, the DS, DSi, 3DS and Wii and from Microsoft to develop products for the Xbox and the Xbox 360. These licenses are non-exclusive and, as a result, our competitors also have licenses to develop and distribute video game software for these systems. These licenses must be periodically renewed, and if they are not, or if any of our licenses are terminated or adversely modified, we may not be able to publish games for such platforms or we may be required to do so on less attractive terms.
Our contracts with these manufacturers grant them approval rights with respect to new products and often also grant them control over the manufacturing of our products. While we believe our relationships with these manufacturers are good, the potential for delay or refusal to approve or support our products exists, particularly since these manufacturers are also video game publishers and, hence, are also our competitors. We may suffer an adverse effect on our business if these manufacturers:
| • | do not approve a project for which we have expended significant resources; |
| • | refuse or are unable to manufacture or ship our products; |
| • | increase manufacturing lead times or delay the manufacturing of our products; or |
| • | require us to take significant risks in prepaying and holding an inventory of products. |
The video game hardware manufacturers set the royalty rates and other fees that we must pay to publish games for their platforms, and therefore have significant influence on our costs. If one or more of these manufacturers change their fee structure, our profitability will be materially impacted.
In order to publish products for a video game system such as the Xbox 360 or Wii, we must take a license from Microsoft and Nintendo, respectively, which gives these companies the opportunity to set the fee structures that we must pay in order to publish games for that platform. Similarly, these companies have retained the flexibility to change their fee structures, or adopt different fee structures for new features for their video game systems. The control that hardware manufacturers have over the fee structures for their video game systems could adversely impact our costs, profitability and margins.
Our platform licensors control the fee structures for online distribution of our games on their platforms.
Pursuant to certain of our publisher license agreements, such platform licensors retain sole discretion to determine the fees to be charged for both base level and premium online services available via their online platforms. Each licensor’s ability to set royalty rates makes it challenging for us to predict our costs, and increased costs may negatively impact our operating margins. As a result of such varying fee structures, we may be unable to distribute our games in a cost-effective manner through such distribution channels.
11
We may be unable to develop and publish new products if we are unable to secure or maintain relationships with third party video game software developers.
We utilize the services of independent software developers to develop our video games. Consequently, our success in the video game market depends on our continued ability to obtain or renew product development agreements with quality independent video game software developers. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain or renew these product development agreements on favorable terms, or at all, nor can we assure you that we will be able to obtain the rights to sequels of successful products that were originally developed for us by independent video game developers.
Many of our competitors have greater financial resources and access to capital than we do, which puts us at a competitive disadvantage when bidding to attract independent video game developers. We may be unable to secure or maintain relationships with quality independent developers if our competitors can offer them better shelf access, better marketing support, more development funding, higher royalty rates, more creative control or other advantages. Usually, our agreements with such developers are easily terminable if either party declares bankruptcy, becomes insolvent, ceases operations or materially breaches the terms of such agreements.
In addition, many independent video game software developers have limited financial resources. Many are small companies with a few key individuals without whom a project may be difficult or impossible to complete. Consequently, we are exposed to the risk that these developers will go out of business before completing a project, lose key personnel or simply cease work on a project for which we have hired them.
If we are unable to maintain or acquire licenses to intellectual property, we may publish fewer titles and our revenue may decline.
Many of our video game titles are based on or incorporate intellectual property and other character or story rights acquired or licensed from third parties. We expect that many of our future products will also be based on intellectual property owned by others. The cost of acquiring these licenses is often high, and competition for these licenses is intense. Many of our competitors have greater resources to capitalize on licensing opportunities. Our licenses are generally limited in scope to specific platform and/or geographic territories and typically last for two to three years. We may not be able to obtain new licenses, renew licenses when they expire or include new offerings under existing licenses. If we are unable to obtain new licenses or maintain existing licenses that have significant commercial value at reasonable costs, we may be unable to sustain our revenue growth in the future other than through sales or licensing of our independently created material.
A decrease in the popularity of our licensed brands and, correspondingly, the video games we publish based on those brands could negatively impact our revenues and financial position.
Four games released in 2011 were based upon popular licensed brands. As previously mentioned, approximately 70% of our net revenue in 2011 was generated from the Zumba Fitness games commercially released in November 2010. A decrease in the popularity of the Zumba Fitness property or other licensed properties could negatively impact our ability to sell games based upon such licenses and could lead to lower net sales, profitability, and/or an impairment of our licenses, which would negatively impact our profitability.
We rely on business partners in many areas of our business and our business may be harmed if they are unable to honor their obligations to us.
We rely on development partners, distribution partners, licensors, third-party service providers, and vendors, among other business partners, in many areas of our business. The failure of these business partners to provide adequate services, such as the failure of an international distribution partner to meet deadline release dates, or the failure of a licensor to market the game containing its licensed property in accordance with our agreement, could disrupt or otherwise adversely impact our business operations and the sales of our games. Furthermore, as many of our business partners reside and/or operate outside of North America, the global economy and other international issues may present obstacles that would prevent them from honoring their obligations to us. Alternative arrangements may not be available to us due, for example, to the unique properties of a business partner such a licensor. In addition, with respect to other business partners, alternative arrangements may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or we may experience business interruptions during any transition to a new business partner. If we experience disruptions with or lose any such business partner, our business could be negatively affected.
If we are unable to successfully introduce new products on a timely basis, or anticipate and adapt to rapidly changing technology, including new hardware platform technology, our business may suffer.
A significant component of our strategy is to continue to bring new and innovative products to market, and we expect to incur significant development, licensing and marketing costs in connection with this strategy.
12
The process of introducing new products or product enhancements is extremely complex, time consuming and expensive, and will become more complex as new platforms and technologies emerge. In the event we are not successful in developing new titles and other products that gain wide acceptance in the marketplace, we may not recoup our investment costs in these new products, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected as a result thereof.
Furthermore, interactive entertainment platforms are characterized by rapidly changing technology. We must continually anticipate the emergence of, and adapt our products to, new interactive entertainment platforms and technologies. The introduction of new technologies, including new console and handheld technology, software media formats and delivery channels, could render our previously released products obsolete, unmarketable or unnecessary. In addition, if we incur significant expense developing products for a new system or hardware that is ultimately unpopular, sales of these products may be less than expected and we may not be able to recoup our investment. Conversely, if we choose not to publish products for a new system or hardware that becomes popular, our revenue growth, reputation and competitive position may be adversely affected. Even if we are able to accurately predict which video game platforms will be most successful, we must deliver and market offerings that are accepted in our extremely competitive marketplace.
Data breaches involving the source code for our products or customer data stored by us could adversely affect our reputation and revenues.
We store the source code and game assets for our games throughout the course of the games’ development and retain them thereafter on our systems. In addition, as we increase our presence in the social and mobile games market, we expect that we will store the confidential information of our customers. A breach of the systems on which such source code and game assets, customer information and other sensitive data is stored could lead to piracy of our software or litigation against us in connection with data security breaches. Data intrusion into a server for a game with online features could also disrupt the operation of such game. If we are subject to any such data security breaches, we may experience a loss in sales or be forced to pay damages in any such lawsuits, which will adversely impact our revenues. In addition, damage to our reputation resulting from a data breach could have a negative impact on our future profitability. We may also incur costs in implementing additional security measures to ensure that such breach is not repeated.
Technology changes rapidly in our business and if we fail to anticipate new technologies or the manner in which people play our games, the quality, timeliness and competitiveness of our products and services will suffer.
Rapid technology changes in our industry require us to anticipate, sometimes years in advance, which technologies we must implement and take advantage of in order to make our products and services competitive in the market. If we fail to anticipate and adapt to these and other technological changes, our market share and our operating results may suffer. Our future success in providing online games, wireless games and other content will depend on our ability to adapt to rapidly changing technologies, develop applications to accommodate evolving industry standards and improve the performance and reliability of our applications.
We have invested in products for systems utilizing new motion-based game technology, and if these new systems prove to be commercially unsuccessful, then sales of our products will suffer,
We are developing products for systems utilizing motion-based game technology, such as Microsoft’s Kinect for Xbox 360 and Sony’s Move for PlayStation 3. Consumers may not embrace and purchase these new systems and/or the products for them for a variety of reasons, such as:
| • | being accustomed to and satisfied with non-motion-based gaming systems; |
| • | being accustomed to and satisfied with the Nintendo Wii, which has been the sole player in the motion-based game system genre for the past four years; |
| • | with particular respect to exercise games, failing to appreciate the convergence of technology and exercise, choosing traditional, non-simulated modes of exercise instead; or |
| • | lacking the additional physical space required to play motion-based games. |
If these motion-based systems ultimately fail to achieve consumer acceptance, then the sales of our products for such systems will be negatively impacted.
We have invested in products for the Nintendo 3DS, and if this system proves to be commercially unsuccessful, then sales of our products will suffer.
We are developing products for the Nintendo 3DS, a new system that allows for three dimensional game playing. Consumers may be reluctant to purchase the 3DS system for a variety of reasons, including being accustomed to and satisfied with current two dimensional systems and being wary of eye fatigue, a potential side effect of the 3DS cited in Nintendo’s warning guidelines. Furthermore, the warning guidelines advise that children under six, whose eye muscles are still developing, should not use the 3D
13
mode. Nintendo’s DS, the precursor to the 3DS, has traditionally been popular with young audiences, however parents of young children may be reluctant to purchase the 3DS system. If for these and/or other reasons the system ultimately fails to achieve consumer acceptance, then sales of our 3DS products will be negatively impacted.
Competition with emerging forms of home-based entertainment may reduce sales of our products.
We also compete with other forms of entertainment and leisure activities. For example, we believe the overall growth in the use of the Internet and online services, including social networking, by consumers may pose a competitive threat if customers and potential customers spend less of their available time using interactive entertainment software and more of their time using the Internet and online services.
Our adoption of new business models could fail to produce positive results.
We are developing products for new platforms, including online distribution. These new platforms, such as Facebook, utilize new business models such as generating revenue through micro-transactions by end users, and subscription services. Forecasting our revenues and profitability for these new business models is inherently uncertain and volatile. Our actual revenues and profits for these businesses may be significantly greater or less than our forecasts. Additionally, these new business models could fail for one or more of our titles, resulting in the loss of our investment in the development and infrastructure needed to support these new business models, and the opportunity cost of diverting management and financial resources away from our core businesses.
The growth of digital distribution of games may have an adverse effect on our business and financial performance.
Historically, our products have been sold to and through traditional retail channels, such as physical retail stores. The majority of our console video games are purchased through retailers, however the digital distribution of titles through online services is becoming an increasing form of consumption for consumers. As technology improves, we expect digital distribution to become more prevalent and if we are unable to enhance our distribution to deliver games digitally, this will strongly impact our ability to sell our products and our resulting operating performance. In addition, certain of our significant customers could be adversely affected.
Our business is “hit” driven. If we do not deliver “hit” titles, or if consumers prefer competing products, our sales could suffer.
While many new products are regularly introduced, only a relatively small number of “hit” titles account for a significant portion of net revenue. Competitors may develop titles that imitate or compete with our “hit” titles, and take sales away from us or reduce our ability to command premium prices for those titles. Hit products published by our competitors may take a larger share of consumer spending than we anticipate, which could cause our product sales to fall below our expectations. If our competitors develop more successful products or offer competitive products at lower prices, or if we do not continue to develop consistently high-quality and well received products, our revenue, margins, and profitability will decline.
Intellectual property claims may increase our product costs or require us to cease selling affected products, which could adversely affect our earnings and sales.
Development of original content, including publication and distribution, sometimes results in claims of intellectual property infringement. Although we make efforts to ensure our products do not violate the intellectual property rights of others, it is possible that third parties still may allege infringement. These claims and any litigation resulting from these claims, could prevent us from selling the affected product, or require us to redesign the affected product to avoid infringement or obtain a license for future sales of the affected product. For example, if we were enjoined from selling one of our franchise titles this could have a significant financial impact on our business.
Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future business prospects. Any litigation resulting from these claims could require us to incur substantial costs and divert significant resources, including the efforts of our technical and management personnel.
Our intellectual property is vulnerable to misappropriation and infringement which could adversely affect our business prospects.
Our business relies heavily on proprietary intellectual property, whether our own or licensed from third parties. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may try to copy our products, or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the law of the United States. Our rights and the additional steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate to deter misappropriation, particularly given the difficulty of effectively policing unauthorized use of our properties. If we are unable to protect our rights in intellectual property, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
14
If our products contain defects, our business could be harmed significantly.
The products that we publish and distribute are complex and may contain undetected errors when first introduced or when new versions are released. Despite extensive testing prior to release, we cannot be certain that errors will not be found in new products or releases after shipment, which could result in loss of or delay in market acceptance. This loss or delay could significantly harm our business and financial results.
Rating systems for digital entertainment software, potential legislation and consumer opposition could inhibit sales of our products.
Trade organizations within the video game industry require digital entertainment software publishers to provide consumers with information relating to graphic violence, profanity or sexually explicit material contained in software titles, and impose penalties for noncompliance. Certain countries have also established similar rating systems as prerequisites for sales of digital entertainment software in their countries. In some instances, we may be required to modify our products to comply with the requirements of these rating systems, which could delay the release of those products in these countries. We believe that we comply with such rating systems and properly display the ratings and content descriptions received for our titles. Several proposals have been made for legislation to regulate the digital entertainment software, broadcasting and recording industries, including a proposal to adopt a common rating system for digital entertainment software, television and music containing violence or sexually explicit material; and the Federal Trade Commission has issued reports with respect to the marketing of such material to minors. Consumer advocacy groups have also opposed sales of digital entertainment software containing graphic violence or sexually explicit material by pressing for legislation in these areas, including legislation prohibiting the sale of certain “M” rated video games to minors, and by engaging in public demonstrations and media campaigns. Retailers may decline to sell digital entertainment software containing graphic violence or sexually explicit material, which may limit the potential market for any of our titles with an “M” rating. Further, if any groups, whether governmental entities, hardware manufacturers or advocacy groups, were to target any of our “M” rated titles, we might be required to significantly change or discontinue a particular title, which could adversely affect our business.
Our business is subject to risks generally associated with the entertainment industry, and we may fail to properly assess consumer tastes and preferences, causing product sales to fall short of expectations.
Our business is subject to all of the risks generally associated with the entertainment industry and, accordingly, our future operating results will depend on numerous factors beyond our control, including the popularity, price and timing of new hardware platforms being released; economic, political and military conditions that adversely affect discretionary consumer spending; changes in consumer demographics; the availability and popularity of other forms of entertainment; and critical reviews and public tastes and preferences, which may change rapidly and cannot be predicted. A decline in the popularity of certain game genres or particular platforms could cause sales of our titles to decline dramatically. The period of time necessary to develop new game titles, obtain approvals of platform licensors and produce finished products is unpredictable. During this period, consumer appeal for a particular title may decrease, causing product sales to fall short of expectations.
If we do not continue to attract and retain key personnel, we will be unable to effectively conduct our business.
The market for technical, creative, marketing and other personnel essential to the development and marketing of our products and management of our businesses is extremely competitive. We are frequently competing for this talent with other companies with greater resources. Our ability to operate within the highly competitive interactive entertainment industry is dependent upon our ability to attract and retain our employees. If we cannot successfully recruit and retain the employees we need, or replace key employees following their departure, our ability to develop and manage our businesses will be impaired.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results. As a result, current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could have a negative impact on our stock price.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to include in our annual report on Form 10-K our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Although we believe that we currently have adequate internal control procedures in place, we cannot be certain that our internal controls over financial reporting will remain effective. If we cannot adequately maintain the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, we may be subject to liability and/or sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC. Any such action could adversely affect our financial results and the market price of our common stock.
15
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
| Item 2. | Properties. |
We lease 21,250 square feet of office, development and storage space located at 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, NJ 08837. The lease, which provides for base rents of approximately $24,000 per month, plus taxes, insurance and operating costs, expires on January 31, 2015. In addition we lease 3,900 square feet of office space in California and 4,400 square feet of office space in Massachusetts under leases that expire in 2014.
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
On July 1, 2011, a complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware by Impulse Technology Ltd. against Microsoft Corporation and certain other game publisher defendants that have released games for Microsoft’s Kinect for Xbox 360, including the Company. The complaint alleges infringement relating to Microsoft’s Xbox Kinect hardware, and correspondingly, the Company’s Zumba Fitness game for Xbox 360, of Impulse’s patents for certain motion tracking technology. Impulse is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecified amount for the alleged infringement. The Company intends, in conjunction with Microsoft and the other defendants, to defend itself against the claim and has certain third-party indemnity rights from a developer for costs incurred under a joint representation agreement. The Company cannot currently estimate a potential range of loss if the claim against the Company is successful.
On November 18, 2011, a complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio by Impulse Technology Ltd. against the Company, Nintendo of America, Inc. and certain other game publisher defendants that have released games for Nintendo’s Wii console. The complaint alleges that Wii and correspondingly, our Zumba Fitness 2 and Jillian Michaels Fitness Workout 2009 games, infringe Impulse’s patents for certain interactive technology. Impulse is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecified amount for the alleged infringement. The Company intends to defend itself against the claim and believes it has third-party indemnity rights that may cover certain costs to the Company. The Company cannot currently estimate a potential range of loss if the claim against the Company is successful.
| Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved). |
16
PART II
| Item 5. | Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “COOL.” Prior to March 13, 2006, our common stock was listed on the Nasdaq Global Market. Prior to January 26, 2005, our common stock was quoted on the OTCBB. The market for our common stock has often been sporadic, volatile and limited.
The following table shows the high and low bid quotations for our common stock as reported by Nasdaq from November 1, 2009 through October 31, 2011. The prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, without retail markup, markdown or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.
| High | Low | |||||||
| Fiscal Year 2010 |
||||||||
| First Quarter |
$ | 1.28 | $ | 0.75 | ||||
| Second Quarter |
$ | 1.08 | $ | 0.77 | ||||
| Third Quarter |
$ | 0.88 | $ | 0.64 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter |
$ | 0.71 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
| Fiscal Year 2011 |
||||||||
| First Quarter |
$ | 1.45 | $ | 0.58 | ||||
| Second Quarter |
$ | 4.15 | $ | 1.18 | ||||
| Third Quarter |
$ | 4.53 | $ | 2.37 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter |
$ | 3.47 | $ | 1.61 | ||||
Holders of Common Stock. On January 6, 2012, we had approximately 117 registered holders of record of our common stock. On January 6, 2012, the closing sales price of our common stock as reported on Nasdaq was $2.97 per share.
Dividends and dividend policy. We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock at the present time. We currently intend to retain earnings, if any, for use in our business. We do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC within 120 days after our October 31, 2011 fiscal year end.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. All prior sales of unregistered securities have been previously reported on a quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
17
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
The following tables summarize certain selected consolidated financial data, which should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included elsewhere in this report.
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Net revenues |
$ | 125,291 | $ | 75,648 | $ | 94,452 | $ | 63,887 | $ | 50,967 | ||||||||||
| Cost of sales(1) |
79,816 | 57,263 | 71,543 | 40,798 | 33,682 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Gross profit |
45,475 | 18,385 | 22,909 | 23,089 | 17,285 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses(2) |
34,115 | 20,496 | 29,480 | 20,312 | 21,114 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) |
11,360 | (2,111 | ) | (6,571 | ) | 2,777 | (3,829 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Interest and financing costs, net |
1,255 | 999 | 1,318 | 649 | 1,552 | |||||||||||||||
| Other non-operating expense (income)(3) |
2,847 | (482 | ) | 415 | (1,250 | ) | (611 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes |
7,258 | (2,628 | ) | (8,304 | ) | 3,378 | (4,770 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Income taxes |
426 | (1,656 | ) | (1,115 | ) | 26 | — | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,832 | $ | (972 | ) | $ | (7,189 | ) | $ | 3,352 | $ | (4,770 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 6,832 | $ | (972 | ) | $ | (7,189 | ) | $ | 3,352 | $ | (4,770 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic |
$ | 0.18 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | 0.12 | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Diluted |
$ | 0.17 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | 0.12 | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic |
38,527,589 | 37,019,750 | 29,770,382 | 27,547,211 | 23,891,860 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Diluted |
40,123,968 | 37,019,750 | 29,770,382 | 27,547,211 | 23,891,860 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| October 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,689 | $ | 8,004 | $ | 11,839 | $ | 5,505 | $ | 7,277 | ||||||||||
| Working capital |
23,791 | 11,563 | 11,815 | 6,702 | 2,834 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets |
52,377 | 30,029 | 28,527 | 23,570 | 16,313 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-current liabilities |
1,949 | 144 | 626 | 211 | 1,460 | |||||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity |
23,235 | 12,008 | 11,719 | 7,137 | 2,591 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Cost of sales includes $2.7 million, $1.0 million and $2.5 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to recognize impairments to the carrying value of products for future release. |
| (2) | Operating expenses include: (i) for 2011, an impairment of capitalized software development costs and license fees — cancelled games of $1.5 million; (ii) for 2010, an impairment of capitalized software development costs and license fees — cancelled games of $0.4 million; (iii) for 2009, a settlement of litigation and related charges, net, of $0.4 million, and impairment of capitalized software development costs and license fees — cancelled games of $1.0 million; (iv) for 2008, a settlement of litigation and related charges, net, of $1.6 million, and impairment of software development costs and license fees — cancelled games of $0.1 million; and (v) for 2007, a settlement of litigation and related charges, net, of $2.8 million, a gain from settlement of liabilities of $0.3 million and impairment of software development costs and license fees — cancelled games of $0.2 million. |
| (3) | Other non-operating expense includes: (i) for 2011, a loss from a change in fair value of warrants of $2.8 million; (ii) for 2010, a gain from a change in fair value of warrants of $0.5 million; (iii) for 2009, a loss from a change in fair value of warrants of $0.4 million; (iv) for 2008, a gain from a change in fair value of warrants of $1.3 million; and (v) for 2007, a gain from a change in fair value of warrants of $0.6 million. |
18
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a provider of video game products primarily for the family oriented, mass-market consumer. We sell our products primarily to large retail chains, specialty retail stores, video game rental outlets and distributors. We publish video games for almost all major current generation interactive entertainment hardware platforms, including Nintendo’s DS, DSi and Wii, Sony’s PlayStation 3, or PS3, and PlayStation Portable, or PSP®, Microsoft’s Xbox 360 and the personal computer, or PC. We also publish games for numerous digital platforms, including mobile platforms like iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, as well as online platforms such as Facebook.
Our video game titles are targeted at various demographics at a range of price points. Due to the larger budget requirements for developing and marketing premium console titles for core gamers, we focus on publishing more casual games targeting mass-market consumers. In some instances, our titles are based on licenses of well known properties and, in other cases based on original properties. We collaborate and enter into agreements with content providers and video game development studios for the creation of our video games.
Our operations involve similar products and customers worldwide. These products are developed and sold domestically and internationally. The Company is centrally managed and our chief operating decision makers, the chief executive and other officers, use consolidated and other financial information supplemented by sales information by product category, major product title and platform for making operational decisions and assessing financial performance. Accordingly, we operate in a single segment.
Net Revenues. Our revenues are principally derived from sales of our video games. We provide video games primarily for the mass market and casual game player. Our revenues are recognized net of estimated provisions for price protection and other allowances.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales consists of product costs and amortization and impairment of software development costs and license fees. A significant component of our cost of sales is product costs. Product costs are comprised primarily of manufacturing and packaging costs of the disc or cartridge media, royalties to the platform manufacturer and manufacturing and packaging costs of peripherals. In cases where we act as a distributor for other publishers products, cost of sales may increase as we acquire products at a higher fixed wholesale price. While the product costs as a percentage of revenue is higher on these products, we do not incur upfront development and licensing fees or resulting amortization of software development costs. Commencing upon the related product’s release, capitalized software development and intellectual property license costs are amortized to cost of sales. When, in management’s estimate, future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover previously capitalized costs, we expense these capitalized costs to cost of sales — loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — future releases. These expenses may be incurred prior to a game’s release.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is the excess of net revenues over product costs and amortization and impairment of software development and license fees. Development and license fees incurred to produce video games are generally incurred up front and amortized to cost of sales. The recovery of these costs and total gross profit is dependent upon achieving a certain sales volume, which varies by title.
Product Research and Development Expenses. Product research and development expenses relate principally to our cost of supervision of third party video game developers, testing new products and conducting quality assurance evaluations during the development cycle as well as costs incurred at our development studio, which was closed in 2009, that are not allocated to games for which technological feasibility has been established. Costs incurred are primarily employee-related, may include equipment, and are not allocated to cost of sales.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses consist of marketing and promotion expenses, including television advertising, the cost of shipping products to customers and related employee costs. Credits to retailers for trade advertising are a component of these expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses primarily represent employee related costs, including corporate executive and support staff, general office expenses, professional fees and various other overhead charges. Professional fees, including legal and accounting expenses, typically represent the second largest component of our general and administrative expenses. These fees are partially attributable to our required activities as a publicly traded company, such as SEC filings.
19
Loss on Impairment of Software Development Costs and License Fees — Cancelled Games. Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — cancelled games consists of contract termination costs, and the write-off of previously capitalized costs, for games that were cancelled prior to their release to market. We periodically review our games in development and compare the remaining cost to complete each game to projected future net cash flows expected to be generated from sales. In cases where we don’t expect the projected future net cash flows generated from sales to be sufficient to cover the remaining incremental cash obligation to complete the game, we cancel the game, and record a charge to operating expenses. While we incur a current period charge on these cancellations, we believe we are limiting the overall loss on a game project that is no longer expected to perform as originally expected due to changing market conditions or other factors. Significant management estimates are required in making these assessments, including estimates regarding retailer and customer interest, pricing, competitive game performance, and changing market conditions.
Interest and Financing Costs. Interest and financing costs are directly attributable to our factoring and our purchase-order financing arrangements.
Income Taxes. Income taxes consists of our provision/(benefit) for income taxes and proceeds from the sale of rights to certain net operating loss carryforwards in the state of New Jersey. Utilization of our net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards before utilization. Due to our history of losses, a valuation allowance sufficient to fully offset our NOL and other deferred tax assets has been established under current accounting pronouncements, and this valuation allowance will be maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal. In fiscal 2011, we reversed our valuation allowance to the extent of our NOL used.
Seasonality and Variations in Interim Quarterly Results
Our quarterly net revenues, gross profit, and operating income are impacted significantly by the seasonality of the retail selling season, and the timing of the release of new titles. Sales of our catalog and other products are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters of our fiscal year (ending January 31 and October 31, respectively) due to increased retail sales during the holiday season. Sales and gross profit as a percentage of sales also generally increase in quarters in which we release significant new titles because of increased sales volume as retailers make purchases to stock their shelves and meet initial demand for the new release. These quarters also benefit from the higher selling prices that we are able to achieve early in the product’s life cycle. Therefore, sales results in any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of expected results for subsequent quarters during the fiscal year.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and to the understanding of our financial results. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue upon the shipment of our product when: (1) risks and rewards of ownership are transferred; (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (3) we have no continuing obligations to the customer; and (4) the collection of related accounts receivable is probable. Certain products are sold to customers with a street date (the earliest date these products may be resold by retailers). Revenue for sales of these products is not recognized prior to their street date. Some of our software products provide limited online features at no additional cost to the consumer. Generally, we have considered such features to be incidental to our overall product offerings and an inconsequential deliverable. Accordingly, we do not defer any revenue related to products containing these limited online features. However, in instances where online features or additional functionality is considered a substantive deliverable in addition to the software product, such characteristics will be taken into account when applying our revenue recognition policy. In addition, some of our software products are sold exclusively as downloads of digital content for which the consumer takes possession of the digital content for a fee. Revenue from product downloads is generally recognized when the download is made available (assuming all other recognition criteria are met).
When we enter into license or distribution agreements that provide for multiple copies of games in exchange for guaranteed amounts, revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of the agreements, generally upon delivery of a master copy, assuming our performance obligations are complete and all other recognition criteria are met, or as per-copy royalties are earned on sales of games.
20
We operate hosted online games in which players can play for free and purchase virtual goods for use in the games. We recognize revenues from the sale of virtual goods as service revenues over the estimated period in which players use the goods in the game. We currently estimate these periods of use to be three to four months. We will periodically assess our estimates for this period of use and future increases or decreases in these estimates will affect our recognized revenues prospectively. We also recognize advertising revenue related to advertising placed on our game sites as ads are served.
Price Protection and Other Allowances. We generally sell our products on a no-return basis, although in certain instances, we provide price protection or other allowances on certain unsold products in accordance with industry practices. Price protection, when granted and applicable, allows customers a partial credit with respect to merchandise unsold by them. Revenue is recognized net of estimates of these allowances. Sales incentives and other consideration that represent costs incurred by us for benefits received, such as the appearance of our products in a customer’s national circular advertisement, are generally reflected as selling and marketing expenses. We estimate potential future product price protection and other discounts related to current period product revenue. In addition, some of our software products are sold exclusively as downloads of digital content for which the consumer takes possession of the digital content for a fee. Revenue from product downloads is generally recognized when the download is made available (assuming all other recognition criteria are met).
Our provisions for price protection and other allowances fluctuate over periods as a result of a number of factors including analysis of historical experience, current sell-through of retailer inventory of our products, current trends in the interactive entertainment market, the overall economy, changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products and other related factors. Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the allowance for returns and price protection in any accounting period. However, actual allowances granted could materially exceed our estimates as unsold products in the distribution channels are exposed to rapid changes in consumer preferences, market conditions, technological obsolescence due to new platforms, product updates or competing products. For example, the risk of requests for allowances may increase as consoles pass the midpoint of their lifecycle and an increasing number of competitive products heighten pricing and competitive pressures. While management believes it can make reliable estimates regarding these matters, these estimates are inherently subjective. Accordingly, if our estimates change, this will result in a change in our provisions, which would impact the net revenues and/or selling and marketing expenses we report. For the 12-month periods ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we provided allowances for future price protection and other allowances of $4.0 million, $3.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively. The fluctuations in the provisions reflected our estimates of future price protection based on the factors discussed above. We limit our exposure to credit risk by factoring a portion of our receivables to a third party that buys without recourse. For receivables that are not sold without recourse, we analyze our aged accounts receivables, payment history and other factors to make a determination if collection of receivables is likely, or a provision for uncollectible accounts is necessary.
Capitalized Software Development Costs and License Fees. Software development costs include development fees, in the form of milestone payments made to independent software developers, and, prior to 2010, direct payroll and overhead costs for our internal development studio. Software development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of a product is established and management expects such costs to be recoverable against future revenues. For products where proven game engine technology exists, this may occur early in the development cycle. Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Amounts related to software development that are not capitalized are charged immediately to product research and development costs. Commencing upon a related product’s release capitalized software development costs are amortized to cost of sales based upon the higher of (i) the ratio of current revenue to total projected revenue or (ii) straight-line charges over the expected marketable life of the product.
Prepaid license fees represent license fees to holders for the use of their intellectual property rights in the development of our products. Minimum guaranteed royalty payments for intellectual property licenses are initially recorded as an asset (capitalized license fees) and a current liability (accrued royalties payable) at the contractual amount upon execution of the contract or when specified milestones or events occur and when no significant performance commitment remains with the licensor. Licenses are expensed to cost of sales at the higher of (i) the contractual royalty rate based on actual sales or (ii) an effective rate based upon total projected revenue related to such license.
Capitalized software development costs are classified as non-current if they relate to titles for which we estimate the release date to be more than one year from the balance sheet date. No such costs were classified as non-current as of October 31, 2011 and 2010.
The amortization period for capitalized software development costs and license fees is usually no longer than one year from the initial release of the product. If actual revenues or revised forecasted revenues fall below the initial forecasted revenue for a particular license, the charge to cost of sales may be larger than anticipated in any given quarter. The recoverability of capitalized software development costs and license fees is evaluated quarterly based on the expected performance of the specific products to which the costs relate.
When, in management’s estimate, future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover previously capitalized costs, we expense these capitalized costs to cost of sales — loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — future releases, in the period such a determination is made. These expenses may be incurred prior to a game’s release. If a game is cancelled and never released to
21
market, the amount is expensed to operating costs and expenses — loss on impairment of capitalized software development costs and license fees — cancelled games. As of October 31, 2011, the net carrying value of our licenses and software development costs was $12.6 million. If we were required to write off licenses or software development costs, due to changes in market conditions or product acceptance, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
License fees and milestone payments made to our third party developers are typically considered non-refundable advances against the total compensation they can earn based upon the sales performance of the products. Any additional royalty or other compensation earned beyond the milestone payments is expensed to cost of sales as incurred.
Inventory. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method. We estimate the net realizable value of slow-moving inventory on a title-by-title basis and charge the excess of cost over net realizable value to cost of sales. Some of our inventory items are packaged with accessories, such as belts for our Zumba games and dolls for our Babysitting Mama game. The purchase of these accessories involves longer lead times and minimum purchase amounts, which require us to maintain higher levels of inventory than for other games. Therefore, these items have a higher risk of obsolescence, which we review periodically based on inventory and sales levels.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including, in the case of stock option awards, estimating expected stock volatility. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
Commitments and Contingencies. We record a liability for commitments and contingencies when the amount is both probable and reasonably estimable.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations expressed as a percentage of total revenues:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Net revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
| Cost of sales |
||||||||||||
| Product costs |
43.8 | 51.2 | 42.0 | |||||||||
| Software development costs and license fees |
17.7 | 23.2 | 31.0 | |||||||||
| Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — future releases |
2.2 | 1.3 | 2.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Gross profit |
36.3 | 24.3 | 24.3 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses |
||||||||||||
| Product research and development |
5.6 | 4.4 | 5.0 | |||||||||
| Selling and marketing |
11.7 | 11.2 | 15.5 | |||||||||
| General and administrative |
8.4 | 10.8 | 9.1 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||||||||
| Settlements, loss on impairments and other expenses (income) |
1.2 | 0.5 | 1.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Operating income (loss) |
9.1 | (2.8 | ) | (7.0 | ) | |||||||
| Interest and financing costs and other non-operating expenses |
3.3 | 0.7 | 1.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes |
5.8 | (3.5 | ) | (8.8 | ) | |||||||
| Income taxes |
0.3 | (2.2 | ) | (1.2 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net income (loss) |
5.5 | % | (1.3 | )% | (7.6 | )% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
The following table sets forth the components of settlements and loss on impairments for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Settlement of litigation and related charges, net |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 404 | ||||||
| Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — cancelled games |
1,512 | 407 | 966 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total |
$ | 1,512 | $ | 407 | $ | 1,370 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
22
The following table sets forth the source of net revenues, by game platform, for the previous three fiscal years, in millions:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Revenues |
% of Total Net Revenues |
Net Revenues |
% of Total Net Revenues |
Net Revenues |
% of Total Net Revenues |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Nintendo Wii |
$ | 73.2 | 58.4 | % | $ | 23.6 | 31.2 | % | $ | 50.1 | 53.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Nintendo DS |
22.2 | 17.7 | 48.9 | 64.6 | 40.5 | 42.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other (1) |
29.9 | 23.9 | % | 3.1 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 125.3 | 100.0 | $ | 75.6 | 100.0 | $ | 94.5 | 100.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| (1) | Consists primarily of net revenues for other console and handheld games, such as PlayStation and Xbox, as well as downloadable PC games, distribution fees, licensing fees and peripheral products and accessories. |
Year ended October 31, 2011 versus year ended October 31, 2010
Net Revenues. Net revenues for the year ended October 31, 2011 increased to $125.3 million from $75.6 million in the comparable period last year. During the year ended October 31, 2011, we released Zumba Fitness on three platforms, the Nintendo Wii, Kinect for Xbox 360, and Sony’s Move for the Playstation3; two Cooking Mama titles — Babysitting Mama for the Nintendo Wii and Camping Mama for the Nintendo DS; and others, including Hulk Hogan’s Main Event and Motion Explosion for the Xbox 360. The strong performance of the Zumba titles was primarily responsible for the increased revenues over the prior-year period. Sales of Zumba Fitness accounted for approximately 70% of total revenue in the period. Sales from our series of products based on Cooking Mama accounted for approximately 17% of revenue in the year ended October 31, 2011.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the year ended October 31, 2011 was $45.5 million compared to a gross profit of $18.4 million in the same period last year. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to increased net revenues for the year ended October 31, 2011, and higher gross profit as a percentage of net sales. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 36% for the year ended October 31, 2011, compared to 24% for the year ended October 31, 2010. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of sales was primarily due to sales of Zumba Fitness in the United States and Europe. The Microsoft Xbox360 and Nintendo Wii versions of the product continued to sell at their original retail price throughout the year, resulting in comparatively higher gross margins. These factors were partially offset by $1.7 million of inventory charges for slow-moving inventory, $2.7 million of losses on impairment, compared to $1.0 million of losses in the year ended October 31, 2010, and accelerated amortization of capitalized software development costs and license fees. The charges for slow moving inventory related primarily to our Babysitting Mama product which was packaged with a plush doll which required longer lead times and order quantities to manufacture than our other products. The impairment of capitalized software development costs and license fees related to three of our titles released in November 2011 for which sales and profitability was below our original forecasts. We released fourteen game titles during October and November 2011 in anticipation of the Holiday selling season. The release of new titles, particularly on platforms early in their lifecycle carry a higher risk than the release of sequels. However, they also carry a potentially higher return if they are successful and are an important part of our business strategy. If projected sales of an individual product indicate that our investment will not be fully recovered through future cash flows, we record an impairment in the period such a determination can be made.
Product Research and Development Expenses. Research and development costs increased $3.7 million to $7.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2011, from $3.3 million for the comparable period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to costs related to our online games business, increased production headcount, and charges incurred for development of console game prototypes prior to reaching technological feasibility. We incurred approximately $3.2 million in the current year for salaries, third-party development and other costs related to the development of online games. In June 2011, we acquired assets from Quick Hit, Inc., a developer and operator of online games, and added their former development team to enhance our abilities in the development and operation of our social games. In addition, during 2011, we opened a second production facility in San Francisco and increased the number of producers we have managing game development due to an increase in the number and quality of games developed.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Total selling and marketing expenses were approximately $14.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2011, compared to $8.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to increased media advertising and other marketing costs associated with the launch of Zumba Fitness, Babysitting Mama, and Hulk Hogan’s Main Event including several television and internet advertising campaigns. Variable costs including commissions, warehousing and freight also increased due to higher volume and, were partially offset by lower costs incurred in Europe following our shift from a publishing and distribution model to a licensing approach, including the effects of severance charges recorded in the prior year.
23
General and Administrative Expenses. For the year ended October 31, 2011, general and administrative expenses were $10.5 million, an increase of $2.4 million from $8.1 million in the comparable period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in profit-based bonus compensation recognized in the current period. Certain professional and consulting fees, as well as stock-based compensation also increased.
Loss on Impairment of Software Development Costs and License Fees — Cancelled Games. For the year ended October 31, 2011, loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — cancelled games, amounted to $1.5 million compared to $0.4 million in the prior-year period, reflecting a greater number of projects cancelled. Our games in development are subject to periodic reviews to assess game design and changing market conditions. When we do not expect the projected future net cash flows generated from sales to be sufficient to cover the remaining incremental cash obligation to complete a game, we cancel the game, and record a charge to operating expenses for the carrying amount of the game. Charges for the year ended October 31, 2011 included several games in development for the Sony Move platform, which totaled $0.6 million, and other game projects totaling $0.9 million.
Operating Income. Operating income for the year ended October 31, 2011 was approximately $11.4 million, an increase of $13.5 million from a $2.1 million loss in the comparable period in 2010. As discussed above, increased revenues and gross profits during the year ended October 31, 2011 more than offset increased sales, marketing and other operating expenses and impairments during the period.
Interest and Financing Costs. Interest and financing costs were approximately $1.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2011 compared to $1.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2010 and include financing costs associated with our factoring activities.
Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability. We have outstanding warrants that contain a provision that may require settlement by transferring assets and are, therefore, recorded at fair value as liabilities. We recorded a loss of $2.8 million for the year ended October 31, 2011, which reflected an increase in the fair value of the warrants during the period primarily as a result of the increased market price for a share of our common stock, compared to a gain of $0.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2010, which reflected a decrease in the fair value of warrants during the period.
Income Taxes. For the year ended October 31, 2010, we received proceeds of approximately $1.7 million from the sale of approximately $21.2 million of New Jersey state income tax net operating loss carryforwards under the state’s Technology Business Tax Certificate Program and recorded the proceeds as an income tax benefit in the period. In the year ended October 31, 2011, our income tax expense represents our current alternative minimum tax provision and certain state income taxes and reflects the use of available net operating loss carryforwards to offset taxable income. We did not sell New Jersey loss carryforwards in the year ended October 31, 2011.
Net Income. Net income for the year ended October 31, 2011 was $6.8 million compared to a loss of $1.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2010. As discussed above, increased revenues and gross profits more than offset increased operating expenses, impairments and the change in the fair market value of our warrant liability.
Year ended October 31, 2010 versus year ended October 31, 2009
Net Revenues. Net revenues for the year ended October 31, 2010 decreased to $75.6 million from $94.5 million in the comparable period last year. The $18.8 million decrease was due primarily to decreased sales of games for the Nintendo Wii console. In October 2008, we released two games for the Wii platform, Jillian Michaels’ Fitness Ultimatum, and Cooking Mama: World Kitchen. The success of these games, during a time of rapid growth for the Wii platform resulted in significant sales during the 2008 holiday selling season, and reorders thereafter, impacting the year ended October 31, 2009. Comparatively, while we did release a sequel to the Jillian Michaels game, Jillian Michaels: Resolution, for the 2009 holiday season, its revenues were substantially lower than the previous year’s title, due primarily to similar titles introduced by other publishers at the same time. Also, we did not release a Cooking Mama title for Nintendo Wii until Babysitting Mama was released after the year ended October 31, 2010, in November 2010. In addition, the market for Wii games generally became more competitive as the platform matured, and the number of games for the consumer to choose from increased.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the year ended October 31, 2010 was $18.4 million compared to a gross profit of $22.9 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. The decrease in gross profit was attributable to the lower net revenues for the year discussed above. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was approximately 24% for both the year ended October 31, 2010 and the year ended October 31, 2009, as generally decreased gross profit percentages on 2010 sales were offset by lower charges for impairment of capitalized software development and license costs — future releases.
When, in management’s estimate, future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover previously capitalized software development and intellectual property license costs, we expense these capitalized costs to cost of sales. Significant management estimates are required in making these assessments, including estimates regarding retailer and customer interest, pricing, competitive game performance, and changing market conditions. In the year ended October 31, 2009, we recorded $2.5 million of such charges for impaired titles, compared to $1.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2010. Excluding the effects of impairment charges, the decrease in gross profits as a percentage of sales, was primarily attributable to a lower average selling price for Wii products during the year ended October 31, 2010, as compared to the year ended October 31, 2009. We attribute the decrease in average selling price to increased competitiveness in the Wii marketplace as the console matured.
24
Product Research and Development Expenses. Product research and development expenses decreased $1.3 million to $3.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2010, from $4.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily the result of expenses related to our development studio. After evaluation of the studio’s performance, and changes in the availability and cost of development with our third-party partners, we reduced the number of personnel at the studio in the second half of 2009. Additionally, approximately $0.4 million was expensed for a video game technology project that was terminated during the year ended October 31, 2009.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Total selling and marketing expenses were approximately $8.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2010 compared to $14.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. The $6.2 million decrease was due primarily to lower advertising media costs of approximately $4.0 million, lower shipping and commission expense related to lower sales and lower international selling costs due to the Company’s change in its international business model. During the year ended October 31, 2009 we ran several television and internet advertising campaigns. After analyzing the costs and benefits of these programs, we decided to reduce our media-related expenditures during the year ended October 31, 2010. In addition, during the year ended October 31, 2010, we reduced sales and other staff in the U.S., and sales staff in the United Kingdom, related to the termination of our direct distribution strategy in Europe. Selling and marketing expense as a percentage of net sales was approximately 11% for the year ended October 31, 2010 compared to 16% for the year ended October 31, 2009.
General and Administrative Expenses. For the year ended October 31, 2010, general and administrative expenses were $8.1 million, a decrease of $0.4 million from $8.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. The decrease was due primarily to lower non-cash, stock-based compensation expense, which amounted to $1.4 million and $1.7 million for the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Non cash compensation expense for the year ended October 31, 2010 was impacted by the effects of forfeitures from employee terminations during the fiscal year.
Settlement of Litigation Charges. Settlement of litigation charges in the year ended October 31, 2009 represented the change in fair value since October 31, 2008 of one million shares of common stock that were to be issued in settlement of our class action securities litigation. The shares were issued in March of 2009.
Operating Loss. Operating loss for the year ended October 31, 2010 was approximately $2.1 million, a decrease of $4.5 million from $6.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. As discussed above, decreased operating expenses during fiscal 2010 were partially offset by decreased revenues and gross profits.
Interest and Financing Costs. Interest and financing costs were approximately $1.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2010 compared to $1.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. The decrease was due to lower factoring fees resulting from lower sales.
Change in Fair Value of Warrants. On September 5, 2007, we issued warrants in connection with an equity financing. The warrants contain a provision that may require settlement by transferring assets. Therefore, they are recorded at fair value as liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.
We recorded a gain of $0.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2010, reflecting a decrease in the fair value of the warrants during the year, compared to a charge of $0.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2009, which reflected an increase in the fair value of warrants during the year.
Income Taxes. In December 2009 and November 2008, we received proceeds of approximately $1.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, from the sale of the rights to approximately $21.2 million and $25.9 million of New Jersey state income tax operating loss carryforwards, under the Technology Business Tax Certificate Program administered by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority. These net proceeds have been recorded as an income tax benefit during the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Net Loss. Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2010 was $1.0 million, a decrease of $6.2 million from a net loss of $7.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. The decrease was due primarily to the decreased operating expenses discussed above, together with lower impairment charges and the effects of remeasuring our warrant liability, which more than offset reduced sales and gross profits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our current plan is to fund our operations through product sales. However, our operating results may vary significantly from period to period and we have previously incurred operating losses. We may be required to modify our plan, or seek outside sources of financing, and/or equity sales, if our operating plan and sales targets are not met. There can be no assurance that such funds will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In the event that we are unable to negotiate alternative financing, or negotiate terms that are acceptable to us, we may be forced to modify our business plan materially, including making reductions in game development and
25
other expenditures. Additionally, we are dependent on our purchase order financing and account receivable factoring agreement to finance our working capital needs, including the purchase of inventory. If the current level of financing was reduced or we fail to meet our operational objectives, it could create a material adverse change in the business.
As of October 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $13.7 million and funds available to us under our factoring and purchase order financing agreements were $6.4 million and $8.8 million, respectively. We expect continued fluctuations in the use and availability of cash due to the seasonality of our business, timing of receivables collections and working capital needs necessary to finance our business.
Factoring and Purchase Order Financing.
To satisfy our liquidity needs, we factor our receivables. Under our factoring agreement, we have the ability to take cash advances against accounts receivable and inventory of up to $30.0 million, and the availability of up to $2.0 million in letters of credit. The factor, in its sole discretion, can reduce the availability of financing at any time. We had outstanding advances against accounts receivable of approximately $4.8 million under our factoring agreement at October 31, 2011. We also utilize financing to provide funding for the manufacture of our products. Under an agreement with a finance company, we have up to $10.0 million of availability for letters of credit and purchase order financing. In connection with these arrangements, the finance company and the factor have a security interest in substantially all of our assets. We had outstanding advances for purchase order financing of approximately $1.2 million at October 31, 2011.
Under the terms of our factoring agreement, we sell our accounts receivable to the factor. The factor, in its sole discretion, determines whether or not it will accept the credit risk associated with a receivable. If the factor does not accept the credit risk on a receivable, we may sell the accounts receivable to the factor while retaining the credit risk. In both cases we surrender all rights and control over the receivable to the factor. However, in cases where we retain the credit risk, the amount can be charged back to us in the case of non-payment by the customer. The factor is required to remit payments to us for the accounts receivable purchased from us, provided the customer does not have a valid dispute related to the invoice. The amount remitted to us by the factor equals the invoiced amount, adjusted for allowances and discounts we have provided to the customer, less factor charges of 0.45 to 0.5% of the invoiced amount.
In addition, we may request that the factor provide us with cash advances based on our accounts receivable and inventory. The factor may either accept or reject our request for advances at its discretion. Generally, the factor allowed us to take advances in an amount equal to 70% of net accounts receivable, plus 60% of our inventory balance, up to a maximum of $2.5 million of our inventory balance. Occasionally, the factor allows us to take advances in excess of these amounts for short-term working capital needs. These excess amounts are typically repaid within a 30-day period. At October 31, 2011, we had no excess advances outstanding.
Amounts to be paid to us by the factor for any accounts receivable are offset by any amounts previously advanced by the factor. The interest rate is prime plus 1.5%, annually, subject to a 5.5% floor. In certain circumstances, an additional 1.0% annually is charged for advances against inventory.
Manufacturers require us to present a letter of credit, or pay cash in advance, in order to manufacture the products required under a purchase order. We utilize letters of credit either from a finance company or our factor. The finance company charges 1.5% of the purchase order amount for each transaction for 30 days, plus administrative fees. Our factor provides purchase order financing at a cost of 0.5% of the purchase order amount for each transaction for 30 days. Additional charges are incurred if letters of credit remain outstanding in excess of the original time period and/or the financing company is not paid at the time the products are received. When our liquidity position allows, we will pay cash in advance instead of utilizing purchase order financing. This results in reduced financing and administrative fees associated with purchase order financing.
Advances from Customers. On a case by case basis, distributors and other customers have agreed to provide us with cash advances on their orders. These advances are then applied against future sales to these customers. In exchange for these advances, we offer these customers beneficial pricing or other considerations.
Contingencies and Commitments.
On July 1, 2011, a complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware by Impulse Technology Ltd. against Microsoft Corporation and certain other game publisher defendants that have released games for Microsoft’s Kinect for Xbox 360, including the Company. The complaint alleges infringement relating to Microsoft’s Xbox Kinect hardware, and correspondingly, the Company’s Zumba Fitness game for Xbox 360, of Impulse’s patents for certain motion tracking technology. Impulse is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecified amount for the alleged infringement. The Company intends, in conjunction with Microsoft and the other defendants, to defend itself against the claim and has certain third-party indemnity rights from a developer for costs incurred under a joint representation agreement. The Company cannot currently estimate a potential range of loss if the claim against the Company is successful.
26
On November 18, 2011, a complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio by Impulse Technology Ltd. against the Company, Nintendo of America, Inc. and certain other game publisher defendants that have released games for Nintendo’s Wii console. The complaint alleges that Wii and correspondingly, our Zumba Fitness 2 and Jillian Michaels Fitness Workout 2009 games, infringe Impulse’s patents for certain interactive technology. Impulse is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecified amount for the alleged infringement. The Company intends to defend itself against the claim and believes it has third-party indemnity rights that may cover a portion of costs to the Company. The Company cannot currently estimate a potential range of loss if the claim against the Company is successful.
The Company at times may be a party to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. We record a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company has not recorded a liability with respect to the matters above. While the Company believes that it has valid defenses with respect to the legal matters pending and intends to vigorously defend the matters above, given the uncertainty surrounding litigation and our inability to assess the likelihood of a favorable or unfavorable outcome, it is possible that the resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of October 31, 2011, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
Our management currently believes that inflation has not had, and does not currently have, a material impact on continuing operations.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $13.7 million as of October 31, 2011, compared to $8.0 million as of October 31, 2010. Working capital as of October 31, 2011 was $23.8 million compared to $11.6 million as of October 31, 2010. Total cash and equivalents, plus advances available to us under our factoring agreement was $20.1 and $11.5 at October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Operating Cash Flows. Our principal operating source of cash is from the sales of our interactive entertainment products. Our principal operating uses of cash are for payments associated with third party developers of our software; costs incurred to manufacture, sell and market our video games and general and administrative expenses.
For the year ended October 31, 2011, we generated approximately $9.4 million in cash flow from operating activities, compared to $3.0 million of net cash outflows from operations in the same period last year. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to increased operating income in the period, which increased $13.5 million from a $2.1 million loss in the year ended October 31, 2010 to $11.4 million of operating income in the year ended October 31, 2011. Operating income excludes the non-cash effects of the change in our warrant liability and interest and financing costs.
For the year ended October 31, 2010, we used approximately $3.0 million of cash in operating activities, compared to $6.6 million in the previous year. The decrease in cash used in operating activities was due primarily to the decreased net loss of $6.2 million, partially offset by an increase in the net change in the amount invested in capitalized software development and license fees of $4.5 million. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, we began investing in several game projects for release in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, impacting the cash used during fiscal 2009. The change in operating cash flows for the year ended October 31, 2010 was also impacted by changes in other working capital accounts. Increased cash flow from relative decreases in accounts receivable balances and increases in accounts payable and accrued liability balances were partially offset by greater increases in inventory on hand and prepaid balances with manufacturers.
Investing Cash Flows. Cash used in investing activities for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 are primarily related to purchases of computer equipment and leasehold improvements of $0.5 million, $0.3 million, and $0.1 million, respectively. In 2011, the Company used $0.8 million to acquire the assets of Quick Hit, Inc.
Financing Cash Flows. Net cash used in financing activities for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $2.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, reflecting decreased inventory financing. In 2011, the effect of the net decrease in outstanding financing was offset by net of proceeds from the exercise of outstanding options and warrants.
Net cash generated by financing activities for the year ended October 31, 2009 consisted primarily of net proceeds from a public offering of common stock of $8.6 million (see note 11 to the financial statements), and an increase in outstanding borrowings under our purchase order financing agreement, to finance seasonal inventory purchases.
27
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
As, in accordance with SEC Release 33-8876, the Company has elected to comply with the disclosure requirements for a smaller reporting company in connection with the preparation of this annual report on Form 10-K, we are not required to provide the information under this item, pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 305(e).
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
The financial statements required by Item 8 are submitted in a separate section of this report, beginning on Page F-1, are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
28
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures. |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this report.
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
No system of controls can prevent errors and fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur. Controls can also be circumvented by individual acts of some people, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with its policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Subject to the limitations above, management believes that the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this report, fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.
Based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
| • | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect transactions involving our assets; |
| • | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management; and |
| • | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. Based on this evaluation, management determined that our system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2011.
29
Eisner Amper LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements in this annual report on Form 10-K for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, has issued an audit report concerning the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended October 31, 2011, which is included in this annual report on Form 10-K on page F-2.
| Item 9B. | Other Information. |
Not applicable.
30
PART III
The information required by Part III of Form 10-K under the items listed below are incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC within 120 days after our October 31, 2011 fiscal year end:
Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Item 11 – Executive Compensation.
Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 13 – Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
Item 14 – Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
PART IV
| Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. |
(1) Financial Statements.
The financial statements required by item 15 are submitted in a separate section of this report, beginning on Page F-1, incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed with this report, or incorporated by reference as noted:
| 2.1 | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated June 3, 2011, among Majesco Entertainment Company, Quick Hit, Inc. and MMV Capital Partners Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2011). | |
| 3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2005). | |
| 3.2 | Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2005). | |
| 4.1 | Securities Purchase and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 29, 2007 by and among Majesco Entertainment Company and the Investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 5, 2007). | |
| 4.2 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 5, 2007). | |
| 4.3 | Restricted Stock Agreement dated June 7, 2010 between Majesco Entertainment Company and Chris Gray (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 14, 2010). | |
| 4.4 | Warrant Purchase Agreement dated March 29, 2010 between Majesco Entertainment Company and Gerald A. Amato (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 14, 2010). | |
| 10.1 | Lease Agreement, dated as of February 2, 1999, by and between 160 Raritan Center Parkway, L.L.C. and Majesco Sales Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 11, 2004). | |
| 10.2 | Factoring Agreement, dated April 24, 1989, between Majesco Sales Inc. and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.3 | Amendment, dated March 18, 1999, to Factoring Agreement, dated April 24, 1989, between Majesco Sales Inc. and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.4 | Amendment, dated September 30, 2004, to Factoring Agreement, dated April 24, 1989, between Majesco Sales Inc. and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
31
| 10.5 | Assignment of Monies Due Under Factoring Agreement, dated July 21, 2000, by and among Majesco Sales Inc., Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Transcap Trade Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.6 | Master Purchase Order Assignment Agreement, dated July 21, 2000, between Majesco Sales Inc. and Transcap Trade Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.7 | Sixth Amendment to Master Purchase Order Assignment Agreement, dated September 12, 2003, by and between Transcap Trade Finance and Majesco Sales Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.8 | Seventh Amendment to Master Purchase Order Assignment Agreement, dated October 16, 2003, by and between Transcap Trade Finance and Majesco Sales Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.9 | Eighth Amendment to Master Purchase Order Assignment Agreement, dated April 14, 2004, by and between Transcap Trade Finance and Majesco Sales Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.10 | Guaranty and Pledge Agreement, dated July 21, 2000, by and among Jesse Sutton, Joseph Sutton, Morris Sutton, Adam Sutton and Transcap Trade Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004). | |
| 10.11 | Amendment, dated October 18, 2005, to Factoring Agreement, dated April 24, 1989, between Majesco Sales, Inc. and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 1, 2006). | |
| 10.12 | Amendment, dated October 1, 2008, to Factoring Agreement, dated April 24, 1989, between Majesco Sales Inc. and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on January 29, 2009) | |
| #10.13 | Amended and Restated 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 15, 2009). | |
| #10.14 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2005). | |
| #10.15 | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2005). | |
| #10.16 | Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 14, 2011). | |
| #10.17 | Employment Agreement, dated January 8, 2008, between Jesse Sutton and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 13, 2008). | |
| 10.18 | First Amendment to Lease by and between the Company and the Landlord dated May 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2009). | |
32
| 10.19 | Form of Personal Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 15, 2009). | |
| 10.20 | Placement Agency Agreement dated September 17, 2009, by and between the Company and Roth Capital Partners, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2009). | |
| 10.21 | Form of Subscription Agreement between the Company and each of the investors signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2009). | |
| †10.22 | Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console (Western Hemisphere), effective February 21, 2007, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2010). | |
| †10.23 | First Amendment to the Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console (Western Hemisphere), effective January 4, 2010, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2010). | |
| †10.24 | Add On Content Addendum to the Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console, effective November 2, 2009, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2010). | |
| †10.25 | Confidential License Agreement for Nintendo DS (Western Hemisphere), effective May 1, 2005, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2010). | |
| †10.26 | First Amendment to the Confidential License Agreement for Nintendo DS (Western Hemisphere), effective April 30, 2008, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2010). | |
| †10.27 | Letter Agreement re: Game Publishing for Nintendo DSI, dated February 25, 2009, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 14, 2010). | |
| #10.28 | 2010 Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 16, 2010). | |
| †10.29 | XBOX 360 Publisher License Agreement, effective September 13, 2005, by and between Microsoft Licensing, GP and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on January 17, 2012). | |
| †10.30 | Amendment to the XBOX 360 Publisher License Agreement (2008 renewal, etc.), effective September 1, 2009, by and between Microsoft Licensing, GP and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on January 17, 2012). | |
| †10.31 | Amendment to the XBOX 360 Publisher License Agreement (Russian Incentive Program, Hits Program Revisions), effective February 4, 2010, by and between Microsoft Licensing, GP and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 14, 2011). | |
| 10.32 | Second Amendment to the Confidential License Agreement for Nintendo DS (Western Hemisphere), effective May 1, 2005 by and between Nintendo of America, Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 14, 2011). | |
| #10.33 | Employment Agreement, dated July 25, 2011, between Michael Vesey and Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2011). | |
| #10.34 | 2011 Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2011). | |
| 16.1 | Letter from Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP (GGK) to the Company, notifying the Company that the partners of GGK became partners of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP in a limited asset purchase agreement and that GGK resigned as independent registered public accounting firm for the Company, dated October 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2007). | |
33
| 16.2 | Letter furnished by Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP in response to the Company’s request, addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated November 1, 2007, indicating their agreement with the statements contained in the Current Report on Form 8-K filing dated November 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2007). | |
| 16.3 | Letter from McGladrey & Pullen, LLP regarding change in certifying accountant, dated May 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2009). | |
| *21.1 | Subsidiaries | |
| *23.1 | Consent of EisnerAmper LLP | |
| *23.2 | Consent of Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP | |
| *31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer | |
| *31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer | |
| *32.1 | Section 1350 Certificate of President and Chief Financial Officer | |
| # | Constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| † | We have requested confidential treatment of certain provisions contained in this exhibit. The copy filed as an exhibit omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. |
| * | Filed herewith. |
(b) Exhibits.
See (a)(3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules.
See (a)(2) above.
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY | ||
| By: | /s/ Jesse Sutton, | |
| Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
| Date: January 17, 2012 | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
| /s/ Jesse Sutton Jesse Sutton |
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
January 17, 2012 | ||
| /s/ Michael Vesey Michael Vesey |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
January 17, 2012 | ||
| /s/ Allan I. Grafman Allan I. Grafman |
Chairman of the Board | January 17, 2012 | ||
| /s/ Laurence Aronson Laurence Aronson |
Director | January 17, 2012 | ||
| /s/ Louis Lipschitz Louis Lipschitz |
Director | January 17, 2012 | ||
| /s/ Keith McCurdy Keith McCurdy |
Director | January 17, 2012 | ||
| /s/ Stephen Wilson Stephen Wilson |
Director | January 17, 2012 | ||
35
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Page | ||
| F-2 - F-3 | ||
| F-4 | ||
| Consolidated statements of operations — Years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 |
F-5 | |
| F-6 | ||
| Consolidated statements of cash flows — Years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 |
F-7 | |
| F-8 - F-21 |
1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Majesco Entertainment Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary (the “Company”) as of October 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended. We also have audited Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made my management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary as of October 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Internal Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
| /s/ EISNERAMPER LLP |
| January 17, 2012 |
| Edison, New Jersey |
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Majesco Entertainment Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows of Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary for the year ended October 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
| /S/ AMPER, POLITZINER & MATTIA, LLP |
| January 28, 2010 |
| Edison, New Jersey |
F-3
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| ASSETS |
||||||||
| Current assets: |
||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,689 | $ | 8,004 | ||||
| Due from factor, net |
937 | 1,015 | ||||||
| Accounts and other receivables |
3,143 | 725 | ||||||
| Inventory, net |
11,605 | 8,418 | ||||||
| Advance payments for inventory |
5,975 | 5,454 | ||||||
| Capitalized software development costs and license fees |
12,564 | 4,903 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
3,071 | 921 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total current assets |
50,984 | 29,440 | ||||||
| Property and equipment, net |
1,184 | 520 | ||||||
| Other assets |
209 | 69 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total assets |
$ | 52,377 | $ | 30,029 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
| Current liabilities: |
||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 20,313 | $ | 11,375 | ||||
| Inventory financing payables |
1,238 | 5,557 | ||||||
| Advances from customers and deferred revenue |
5,642 | 945 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total current liabilities |
27,193 | 17,877 | ||||||
| Warrant liability |
1,949 | 144 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
| Common stock — $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 41,307,349 and 39,326,376 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively |
41 | 39 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
119,222 | 114,824 | ||||||
| Accumulated deficit |
(95,501 | ) | (102,333 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(527 | ) | (522 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Net stockholders’ equity |
23,235 | 12,008 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 52,377 | $ | 30,029 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
See accompanying notes
F-4
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share data)
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Net revenues |
$ | 125,291 | $ | 75,648 | $ | 94,452 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Cost of sales |
||||||||||||
| Product costs |
54,939 | 38,718 | 39,699 | |||||||||
| Software development costs and license fees |
22,151 | 17,524 | 29,329 | |||||||||
| Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — future releases |
2,726 | 1,021 | 2,515 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| 79,816 | 57,263 | 71,543 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Gross profit |
45,475 | 18,385 | 22,909 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Operating costs and expenses |
||||||||||||
| Product research and development |
6,992 | 3,347 | 4,672 | |||||||||
| Selling and marketing |
14,707 | 8,432 | 14,618 | |||||||||
| General and administrative |
10,506 | 8,127 | 8,557 | |||||||||
| Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees — cancelled games |
1,512 | 407 | 966 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
398 | 183 | 263 | |||||||||
| Settlement of litigation and related charges, net |
— | — | 404 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| 34,115 | 20,496 | 29,480 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Operating income (loss) |
11,360 | (2,111 | ) | (6,571 | ) | |||||||
| Other expenses (income) |
||||||||||||
| Interest and financing costs |
1,255 | 999 | 1,318 | |||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrant liability |
2,847 | (482 | ) | 415 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Income (loss) income before income taxes |
7,258 | (2,628 | ) | (8,304 | ) | |||||||
| Income taxes |
426 | (1,656 | ) | (1,115 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net income (loss) |
6,832 | $ | (972 | ) | $ | (7,189 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||
| Basic |
$ | 0.18 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Diluted |
$ | 0.17 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||
| Basic |
38,527,589 | 37,019,750 | 29,770,382 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Diluted |
40,123,968 | 37,019,750 | 29,770,382 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
See accompanying notes
F-5
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, except share data)
| Common Stock $.001 par value |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Net Stockholders’ Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance — October 31, 2008 |
30,127,950 | $ | 30 | $ | 101,722 | $ | (94,172 | ) | $ | (443 | ) | $ | 7,137 | |||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in connection with: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sale of common stock |
6,420,000 | 6 | 8,622 | — | — | 8,628 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Settlement of litigation |
1,130,000 | 1 | 1,411 | — | — | 1,412 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of warrants |
28,807 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants — directors |
234,183 | — | 229 | — | — | 229 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants, net — employees |
612,800 | 1 | 1,384 | — | — | 1,385 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash compensation charges — stock options |
— | — | 116 | — | — | 116 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss |
— | — | — | (7,189 | ) | — | (7,189 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive loss |
(7,188 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Balance — October 31, 2009 |
38,553,740 | 38 | 113,484 | (101,361 | ) | (442 | ) | 11,719 | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in connection with: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants — directors |
261,706 | — | 218 | — | — | 218 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants, net — employees |
510,930 | 1 | 962 | — | — | 963 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash compensation charges — stock options |
— | — | 121 | — | — | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Warrants issued for services |
— | — | 39 | — | — | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss |
— | — | — | (972 | ) | — | (972 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | (80 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive loss |
(1,052 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Balance — October 31, 2010 |
39,326,376 | 39 | 114,824 | (102,333 | ) | (522 | ) | 12,008 | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in connection with: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants — directors |
147,549 | — | 192 | — | — | 192 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants, net — employees |
761,669 | 1 | 1,098 | — | — | 1,099 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash compensation charges — stock options |
— | — | 137 | — | — | 137 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of options |
69,545 | — | 61 | — | — | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of warrants and units |
1,002,210 | 1 | 2,852 | — | — | 2,853 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Warrants issued for license |
— | — | 58 | — | — | 58 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income |
— | — | — | 6,832 | — | 6,832 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income |
6,827 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Balance — October 31, 2011 |
41,307,349 | $ | 41 | $ | 119,222 | $ | (95,501 | ) | $ | (527 | ) | $ | 23,235 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
See accompanying notes
F-6
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,832 | $ | (972 | ) | $ | (7,189 | ) | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
398 | 183 | 263 | |||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrant liability |
2,847 | (482 | ) | 415 | ||||||||
| Non-cash compensation expense |
1,468 | 1,340 | 1,730 | |||||||||
| Loss on disposal of assets |
— | 27 | — | |||||||||
| Provision for price protection and customer allowances |
3,928 | 3,226 | 5,363 | |||||||||
| Amortization of capitalized software development costs and license fees |
6,204 | 6,543 | 13,418 | |||||||||
| Share-based litigation settlement |
— | — | 404 | |||||||||
| Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees |
4,238 | 1,428 | 3,481 | |||||||||
| Inventory write downs |
1,794 | 180 | 309 | |||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: |
||||||||||||
| Due from factor |
(2,997 | ) | (3,325 | ) | (7,186 | ) | ||||||
| Accounts and other receivables |
(3,223 | ) | 618 | 1,368 | ||||||||
| Inventory |
(4,981 | ) | (2,423 | ) | (721 | ) | ||||||
| Capitalized software development costs and license fees |
(18,064 | ) | (9,197 | ) | (13,741 | ) | ||||||
| Advance payments for inventory |
(521 | ) | (2,328 | ) | (2,875 | ) | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(1,918 | ) | (66 | ) | 874 | |||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
8,752 | 2,041 | (779 | ) | ||||||||
| Litigation settlement |
— | — | (700 | ) | ||||||||
| Customer billings due to distribution partner |
— | (230 | ) | (1,257 | ) | |||||||
| Advances from customers |
4,660 | 402 | 245 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
9,417 | (3,035 | ) | (6,578 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
| Purchases of property and equipment |
(465 | ) | (283 | ) | (146 | ) | ||||||
| Purchase of assets of Quick Hit, Inc., net of acquired cash |
(779 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,244 | ) | (283 | ) | (146 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants |
1,830 | — | 8,628 | |||||||||
| Inventory financing |
(4,319 | ) | (496 | ) | 4,513 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(2,489 | ) | (496 | ) | 13,141 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
1 | (21 | ) | (83 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
5,685 | (3,835 | ) | 6,334 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of year |
8,004 | 11,839 | 5,505 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents — end of year |
$ | 13,689 | $ | 8,004 | $ | 11,839 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
||||||||||||
| Cash paid during the year for interest and financing costs |
$ | 1,255 | $ | 1,006 | $ | 1,322 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Cash paid during the year for income taxes |
3 | $ | — | $ | 1 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
| Landlord-provided leasehold improvements |
$ | 163 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Warrant liability reclassified to additional paid-in capital upon exercise |
$ | 1,042 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Issuance of common stock in payment of accounts payable |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 459 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Issuance of warrants for license fees |
$ | 58 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
See accompanying notes
F-7
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
1. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying financial statements present the financial results of Majesco Entertainment Company and Majesco Europe Limited, its wholly owned subsidiary, (“Majesco” or “the Company”) on a consolidated basis.
The Company is a provider of video game products primarily for the mass-market consumer. It sells its products primarily to large retail chains, specialty retail stores, and distributors. It publishes video games for major current generation interactive entertainment hardware platforms, including Nintendo’s DS, DSi and Wii, Sony’s PlayStation 3, or PS3, and PlayStation Portable, or PSP®, Microsoft’s Xbox 360 and the personal computer, or PC. It also publishes games for digital platforms, including mobile platforms like iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, as well as online platforms such as Facebook.
The Company’s video game titles are targeted at various demographics at a range of price points. Due to the larger budget requirements for developing and marketing premium console titles for core gamers, it focuses on publishing more casual games targeting mass-market consumers. In some instances, its titles are based on licenses of well-known properties and, in other cases based on original properties. The Company enters into agreements with content providers and video game development studios for the creation of its video games.
The Company’s operations involve similar products and customers worldwide. These products are developed and sold domestically and internationally. The Company may also enter into agreements with licensees, particularly for sales of its products internationally. The Company is centrally managed and its chief operating decision makers, the chief executive and other officers, use consolidated and other financial information supplemented by sales information by product category, major product title and platform for making operational decisions and assessing financial performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in a single segment.
Geographic regions
Net sales by geographic region were as follows:
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | % | 2010 | % | 2009 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| United States |
$ | 110,115 | 87.9 | % | $ | 73,817 | 97.6 | % | $ | 90,428 | 95.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Europe |
15,176 | 12.1 | % | 1,831 | 2.4 | % | 4,024 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 125,291 | 100.0 | % | $ | 75,648 | 100.0 | % | $ | 94,452 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Major customers
Sales to Wal-Mart, Inc. represented approximately 18%, 20% and 18% of net revenues in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Sales to GameStop represented approximately 21%, 12% and 16% of net revenues in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Sales to Best Buy represented approximately 11%, 10% and 14% of sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Sales to Target represented approximately 10%, 10% and 11% of sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Sales to Cokem represented approximately 20% of sales in 2010. Revenue from 505 Games represented approximately 11% of sales in 2011.
Concentrations. The Company develops and distributes video game software for proprietary platforms under licenses from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft, which must be periodically renewed. The Company’s agreements with these manufacturers also grant them certain control over the supply and manufacturing of the Company’s products. In addition, for the year ended October 31, 2011, sales of the Company’s Zumba Fitness game, launched during the year, accounted for approximately 70% of revenue. We license the rights to publish these games from a third party and have rights to publish other Zumba Fitness games. If the new versions are not successful, this may have a significant impact on our future revenues.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary located in the United Kingdom. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue upon the shipment of its products when: (1) title and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred; (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (3) there are no continuing obligations to the customer; and (4) the collection of related accounts receivable is probable. Certain products are sold to customers with a street date (the earliest date these products may be resold by retailers). Revenue for sales of these products is not recognized prior to their street date. Some of
F-8
the Company’s software products provide limited online features at no additional cost to the consumer. Generally, such features have been considered to be incidental to the Company’s overall product offerings and an inconsequential deliverable. Accordingly, the Company does not defer any revenue related to products containing these limited online features. However, in instances where online features or additional functionality is considered a substantive deliverable in addition to the software product, such characteristics will be taken into account when applying the Company’s revenue recognition policy.
The Company generally sells its products on a no-return basis, although in certain instances, the Company provides price protection or other allowances on certain unsold products. Price protection, when granted and applicable, allows customers a partial credit against amounts they owe the Company with respect to merchandise unsold by them. Revenue is recognized, and accounts receivable is presented, net of estimates of these allowances.
The Company estimates potential future product price protection and other allowances related to current period product revenue. The Company analyzes historical experience, current sell through of retailer inventory of the Company’s products, current trends in the video game market, the overall economy, changes in customer demand and acceptance of the Company’s products and other related factors when evaluating the adequacy of price protection and other allowances.
Sales incentives or other consideration given by the Company to customers that are considered adjustments of the selling price of its products, such as rebates and product placement fees, are reflected as reductions of revenue. Sales incentives and other consideration that represent costs incurred by the Company for benefits received, such as the appearance of the Company’s products in a customer’s national circular ad, are reflected as selling and marketing expenses, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives.
In addition, some of the Company’s software products are sold exclusively as downloads of digital content for which the consumer takes possession of the digital content for a fee. Revenue from product downloads is generally recognized when the download is made available (assuming all other recognition criteria are met).
We operate hosted online games in which players can play for free and purchase virtual goods for use in the games. We recognize revenues from the sale of virtual goods as service revenues over the estimated period in which players use the goods in the game. We currently estimate these periods of use to be three to four months. We will periodically assess our estimates for this period of use and future increases or decreases in these estimates will affect our recognized revenues prospectively. We also recognize advertising revenue related to advertising placed on our game sites as ads are served. The Company has not earned significant revenue to date related to its online games.
The Company records revenue for distribution agreements where it is acting as an agent as defined by ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, Subtopic 45, Principal Agent Considerations, on a net basis. When the Company enters into license or distribution agreements that provide for multiple copies of games in exchange for guaranteed amounts, revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of the agreements, generally upon delivery of a master copy, assuming our performance obligations are complete and all other recognition criteria are met, or as per-copy royalties are earned on sales of games. The Company has recorded $0, $0, and $0.3 million of fees from distribution partners for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Shipping and handling, which consist principally of transportation charges incurred to move finished goods to customers, amounted to $0.9 million, $0.4 million and $1.0 million and are included in selling expenses for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In certain instances, customers and distributors provide the Company with cash advances on their orders. These advances are then applied against future sales to these customers. Advances are classified as advances from customers and deferred revenue in the accompanying balance sheet. Included in advances from customers and deferred revenue are $642 and $366 as of October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily related to up-front payments received under license agreement for Europe.
Capitalized Software Development Costs and License Fees. Software development costs include fees in the form of milestone payments made to independent software developers and licensors. Software development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of a product is established and management expects such costs to be recoverable against future revenues. For products where proven game engine technology exists, this may occur early in the development cycle. Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Amounts related to software development that are not capitalized are charged immediately to product research and development costs. Commencing upon a related product’s release capitalized costs are amortized to cost of sales based upon the higher of (i) the ratio of current revenue to total projected revenue or (ii) straight-line charges over the expected marketable life of the product.
Prepaid license fees represent license fees to owners for the use of their intellectual property rights in the development of the Company’s products. Minimum guaranteed royalty payments for intellectual property licenses are initially recorded as an asset (prepaid license fees) and a current liability (accrued royalties payable) at the contractual amount upon execution of the contract or when specified milestones or events occur and when no significant performance remains with the licensor. Licenses are expensed to
F-9
cost of sales at the higher of (i) the contractual royalty rate based on actual sales or (ii) an effective rate based upon total projected revenue related to such license. Capitalized software development costs are classified as non-current if they relate to titles for which the Company estimates the release date to be more than one year from the balance sheet date. No such costs are classified as non-current as of October 31, 2011 or 2010.
The amortization period for capitalized software development costs and prepaid license fees is usually no longer than one year from the initial release of the product. If actual revenues or revised forecasted revenues fall below the initial forecasted revenue for a particular license, the charge to cost of sales may be larger than anticipated in any given quarter. The recoverability of capitalized software development costs and prepaid license fees is evaluated quarterly based on the expected performance of the specific products to which the costs relate. When, in management’s estimate, future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover previously capitalized costs, the Company expenses these capitalized costs to “cost of sales-software development costs and license fees,” in the period such a determination is made. These expenses may be incurred prior to a game’s release for games that have been developed. If a game is cancelled prior to completion of development and never released to market, the amount is expensed to general and administrative expenses. If the Company was required to write off licenses, due to changes in market conditions or product acceptance, its results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Costs of developing online free-to-play social games, including payments to third-party developers are expensed as research and development expenses. Revenue from these games is largely dependent on players’ future purchasing behavior in the game and currently the Company cannot reliably project that future net cash flows from developed games will exceed related development costs.
Prepaid license fees and milestone payments made to the Company’s third party developers are typically considered non-refundable advances against the total compensation they can earn based upon the sales performance of the products. Any additional royalty or other compensation earned beyond the milestone payments is expensed to cost of sales as incurred.
Advertising Expenses. The Company generally expenses advertising costs as incurred except for production costs associated with media campaigns that are deferred and charged to expense at the first run of the advertisement. Advertising costs charged to operations were $6.7 million, $2.4 million and $6.4 million for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company evaluates the potential for realization of deferred tax assets at each quarterly balance sheet date and records a valuation allowance for assets for which realization is not likely.
Stock Based Compensation. Stock based compensation consists primarily of expenses related to the issuance of stock options and restricted stock grants. Stock options are granted to employees or directors at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the dates of grant. Stock options generally vest over two to three years and have a term of seven to ten years. Compensation expense for stock options is recognized on a straight line basis over the vesting period of the award, based on the fair value of the option on the date of grant.
The fair value for options issued is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk free rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The volatility factor is determined based on the Company’s historical stock prices.
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with insignificant rate risk and with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. At various times, the Company had deposits in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit. The Company has not experienced any losses on these accounts.
Inventory. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost as determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market. The Company estimates the net realizable value of slow-moving inventory on a title-by-title basis and charges the excess of cost over net realizable value to cost of sales. Such estimates may change and additional charges may be incurred until the related inventory items are sold or otherwise disposed of.
Property and equipment. Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is being provided for by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three to five years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is provided for over the shorter of the term of the lease or the life of the asset.
Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities or the
F-10
disclosure of gain or loss contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Among the more significant estimates included in these financial statements are price protection and customer allowances, the valuation of inventory and the recoverability of advance payments for software development costs and intellectual property licenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation. The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary is its local currency. All assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the year, and revenue and operating expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates during the year. The resulting translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the statement of stockholders’ equity and other comprehensive income (loss).
Income (Loss) Per Share. Basic income (loss) per share of common stock is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Basic income (loss) per share excludes the impact of unvested shares of restricted stock issued as long term incentive awards to directors, officers and employees. Diluted income per share reflects the potential impact of common stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock and outstanding common stock purchase warrants that have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method.
Reclassifications. For comparability, certain 2009 and 2010 amounts have been reclassified, where appropriate, to conform to the financial statement presentation used in 2011.
Commitments and Contingencies. We are subject to claims and litigation in the ordinary course of our business. We record a liability for commitments and contingencies when the amount is both probable and reasonably estimable.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
Fair Value — In May 2011, the FASB issued an update to ASC 820-10, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Values. The update to ASC 820-10 clarifies the application of fair value standards in certain circumstances and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements within Level 3, including sensitivity to changes in unobservable inputs. The update will become effective for the Company on November 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the update on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Comprehensive Income — In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to ASC 220, Comprehensive Incomes. The update to ASC 220 establishes standards for the reporting and presentation of comprehensive income. The update will become effective for the Company on November 1, 2012. Adoption of the update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
3. FAIR VALUE
The table below segregates all financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date.
| October 31, 2011 |
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (level 1) |
Significant other observable inputs (level 2) |
Significant unobservable inputs (level 3) |
|||||||||||||
| Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds |
$ | 9,046 | $ | 9,046 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Bank deposits |
4,643 | 4,643 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total financial assets |
$ | 13,689 | $ | 13,689 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Warrant liability |
$ | 1,949 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,949 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total financial liabilities |
$ | 1,949 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,949 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Company has outstanding warrants that may require settlement by transferring assets under certain change of control circumstances. These warrants are classified as liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.04 per share and expire in March 2013. The Company measures the fair value of the warrants at each balance sheet date, using the Black-Scholes method, and a gain or loss is recorded in earnings each period as change in fair value of warrants.
F-11
Assumptions used to determine the fair value of the warrants were:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
| Estimated fair value of stock |
$0.62-$3.75 | $0.62-$1.02 | $0.55-$2.17 | |||
| Expected warrant term |
1.4-2.4 years | 2.4-3.4 years | 3.4-4.4 years | |||
| Risk-free rate |
0.2-0.8% | 0.4-1.6% | 1.6%-2.8% | |||
| Expected volatility |
73.5-79.7% | 73.5-76.1% | 65.4-76.1% | |||
| Dividend yield |
0% | 0% | 0% |
A summary of the changes to the Company’s warrant liability, as measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is presented below:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Beginning balance |
$ | 144 | $ | 626 | $ | 211 | ||||||
| Warrants exercised |
(1,042 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Total loss (gain) included in net income |
2,847 | (482 | ) | 415 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Ending balance |
$ | 1,949 | $ | 144 | $ | 626 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
In the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, upon exercise of 587,734 of the warrants outstanding, the warrant liability associated with those warrants, amounting to $1.0 million, was reclassified to additional paid-in capital.
The carrying value of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, due from factor, and advances from customers are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of their short-term maturity.
4. DUE FROM FACTOR
The Company uses a factor to approve credit and to collect the proceeds from a substantial portion of its sales. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company sells to the factor and the factor purchases from the Company eligible accounts receivable.
Under the terms of the Company’s factoring agreement, the Company sells its accounts receivable to the factor. The factor, in its sole discretion, determines whether or not it will accept the credit risk associated with a receivable. If the factor does not accept the credit risk on a receivable, the Company may sell the accounts receivable to the factor while retaining the credit risk. In both cases, the Company surrenders all rights and control over the receivable to the factor. However, in cases where the Company retains the credit risk, the amount can be charged back to the Company in the case of non-payment by the customer, though this has only infrequently occurred. The factor is required to remit payments to the Company for the accounts receivable purchased from it, provided the customer does not have a valid dispute related to the invoice. The amount remitted to the Company by the factor equals the invoiced amount, adjusted for allowances and discounts the Company has provided to the customer, less factor charges of 0.45 to 0.5% of the invoiced amount.
The Company reviews the collectability of accounts receivable for which it holds the credit risk quarterly, based on a review of an aging of open invoices and payment history, to make a determination if any allowance for bad debts is necessary.
In addition, the Company may request that the factor provide it with cash advances based on its accounts receivable and inventory, up to a maximum of $30 million. The factor may either accept or reject the Company’s request for advances at its discretion. Generally, the factor allowed the Company to take advances in an amount equal to 70% of net accounts receivable, plus 60% of the Company’s inventory balance up to a maximum of $2.5 million. Occasionally, the factor allows the Company to take advances in excess of these amounts for short term working capital needs. These excess amounts are typically repaid within a 30-day period. At October 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no excess advances outstanding.
Amounts to be paid to the Company by the factor for any accounts receivable are offset by any amounts previously advanced by the factor. The interest rate is prime plus 1.5%, annually, subject to a 5.5% floor. In certain circumstances, an additional 1.0% annually is charged for advances against inventory.
The Company also utilizes purchase order financing through the factor, up to a maximum of $2.0 million, to provide funding for the manufacture of its products (see Note 10). In connection with these arrangements, the factor has a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. The factor charges 0.5% of invoiced amounts, subject to certain minimum charges per invoice.
F-12
Due from factor consists of the following:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Outstanding accounts receivable sold to factor |
$ | 12,667 | $ | 13,754 | ||||
| Less: allowances |
(6,952 | ) | (3,298 | ) | ||||
| Less: advances from factor |
(4,778 | ) | (9,441 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | 937 | $ | 1,015 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Outstanding accounts receivable sold to the factor as of October 31, 2011 and 2010 for which the Company retained credit risk amounted to $2.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively. As of October 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, there were no allowances for uncollectible accounts.
A summary of the changes in price protection and other customer sales incentive allowances included as a reduction of the amounts due from factor is presented below:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Allowances — beginning of year |
$ | (3,298 | ) | $ | (4,380 | ) | $ | (3,359 | ) | |||
| Provision for price protection |
(3,951 | ) | (3,482 | ) | (5,031 | ) | ||||||
| Amounts charged against allowance and other changes |
297 | 4,564 | 4,010 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Allowances — end of year |
$ | (6,952 | ) | $ | (3,298 | ) | $ | (4,380 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The following table presents the major components of accounts and other receivables:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Royalties receivable |
$ | 2,513 | $ | — | ||||
| Trade accounts receivable |
630 | 726 | ||||||
| Allowances |
— | (25 | ) | |||||
| Other |
— | 24 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | 3,143 | $ | 725 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
6. INVENTORY
Inventory consists of the following:
| October 31 | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Finished goods |
$ | 5,071 | $ | 6,711 | ||||
| Packaging and components |
6,534 | 1,707 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | 11,605 | $ | 8,418 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
7. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
The following table presents the major components of prepaid expenses:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Prepaid advertising |
$ | 2,795 | $ | 746 | ||||
| Other |
276 | 175 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | 3,071 | $ | 921 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
8. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
The following table presents the components of property and equipment, net:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Computers and software |
$ | 3,201 | $ | 2,699 | ||||
| Furniture and equipment |
1,131 | 739 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements |
317 | 150 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 4,649 | 3,588 | |||||||
| Accumulated depreciation |
(3,465 | ) | (3,068 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | 1,184 | $ | 520 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
F-13
9. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
The following table presents the major components of accounts payable and accrued expenses:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Accounts payable-trade |
$ | 5,994 | $ | 4,856 | ||||
| Royalty and software development |
10,071 | 5,517 | ||||||
| Salaries and other compensation |
3,407 | 592 | ||||||
| Income taxes payable |
423 | — | ||||||
| Other accruals |
418 | 410 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | 20,313 | $ | 11,375 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
10. INVENTORY FINANCING PAYABLE
Certain manufacturers require the Company to prepay or present letters of credit upon placing a purchase order for inventory. The Company has arrangements with a finance company which provides financing secured by the specific goods underlying the goods ordered from the manufacturer. The finance company makes the required payment to the manufacturer at the time a purchase order is placed, and is entitled to demand payment from the Company when the goods are delivered. The Company pays a financing fee equal to 1.5% of the purchase order amount for each transaction, plus administrative fees. Additional charges of 0.05% per day (18% annualized) are incurred if the financing remains open for more than 30 days.
11. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock offering
On September 17, 2009, the Company sold 6,420,000 shares of common stock in a “registered direct offering” at a purchase price of $1.50 per share. The sale of the shares was made pursuant to Subscription Agreements and a Prospectus Supplement dated September 17, 2009. The gross proceeds to the Company from the sale of the shares, before deducting for the Placement Agent’s fees and offering expenses, was approximately $9.6 million. The Company recorded net proceeds of $8.6 million, net of $0.8 million of placement agency fees and expenses, and $0.2 million of other expenses related to the offering, as additional paid in capital. The shares were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on a prospectus which was declared effective on August 28, 2009.
Common stock warrants and units
The following table sets forth the number shares of common stock purchasable under outstanding stock purchase warrants at October 31, 2011 and 2010:
| Issued in connection with |
Issue date |
Expiration date |
Exercise Price |
October 31, 2011 |
October 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||
| Equity financing |
September 5, 2007 | March 5, 2013 | $ | 2.04 | 1,110,001 | 1,697,735 | ||||||||||
| Consulting services |
June 14, 2006 | May 31, 2013 | $ | 1.55 | 16,500 | 40,000 | ||||||||||
| Consulting services |
March 29, 2010 | March 28,2015 | $ | 1.06 | 70,000 | 100,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| 1,196,501 | 1,837,735 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
On September 5, 2007, the Company completed a private placement of 3,966,668 units, each consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.4 shares of common stock, in which the Company raised $6.0 million in gross proceeds.
The warrants issued in the transaction have an exercise price of $2.04 per share and a term of five years, which begins six months from the issue date. Additionally, the warrants contain a cashless exercise feature if a registration statement is not effective on the date of exercise, and a provision for exercise price adjustments under certain circumstances as defined in the warrant agreement. If the Company is sold, merged, or otherwise enters into a “fundamental transaction” as defined in the warrant agreement, the successor entity is required to issue securities to the warrant holders equal to the number of shares of such stock immediately theretofore purchasable and receivable upon the exercise of the rights represented by the warrants. In the event the successor entity is not a publicly traded corporation whose securities are traded on a trading market, as defined in the securities purchase agreement the warrant holder can elect to receive a cash payment equal to the lesser of one dollar per share, or the transaction value of a share of common stock, as defined in the agreement, multiplied by: (i) on or prior to the first anniversary of the warrant, 55%; (ii) after the first anniversary of the warrant, but before the second, 45%; (iii) after the second anniversary of the warrant, but before the third, 35%, (iv) after the third anniversary of the warrant, but before the fourth, 25%; or (v) after the fourth anniversary of the warrant, 10%. The warrants contain a provision that may require settlement by transferring assets. Therefore, they are classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.
F-14
The Company initially allocated $2.1 million of the proceeds received in the transaction to the warrants based on the fair values of the warrants on the date of the transaction. The Company measures the fair value of the warrants at each balance sheet date, and records the change in fair value as a non-cash charge or gain to earnings each period. The warrants were valued at $1.9 million and $0.1 million at October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily due to fluctuations in the Company’s stock price. This resulted in a non-cash loss of $2.8 million, a non-cash gain of $0.5 million, and a non-cash loss of $0.4 million due to the change in fair value of warrants during the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company used the Black-Scholes method to value the warrants (see Note 3).
In 2010, the Company issued 100,000 warrants to a consultant for services (see Note 12). In 2011, the Company issued 100,000 warrants in connection with a license agreement which were subsequently cancelled upon termination of the agreement.
Additionally, in connection with the September 5, 2007 equity financing, the Company issued unit purchase options, to purchase at $1.50 per share, units consisting of (1) 277,667 shares of common stock, and (2) warrants to purchase up to 111,067 shares of common stock at $2.04, with terms identical to the warrants issued in the financing. The units and underlying warrants were exercised in the year ended October 31, 2011.
A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding warrants and units as of October 31 and changes during the years then ended is presented below:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at beginning of year |
2,226,469 | 2,201,469 | 2,311,469 | |||||||||
| Issued |
100,000 | 100,000 | — | |||||||||
| Exercised |
(1,029,968 | ) | — | (110,000 | ) | |||||||
| Cancelled |
(100,000 | ) | (75,000 | ) | — | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Outstanding at end of year |
1,196,501 | 2,226,469 | 2,201,469 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
On February 13, 2004, the stockholders approved a stock option plan that provides for the granting of stock-based awards. The plan covers employees, directors and consultants and provides for among other things, the issuance of restricted stock, non-qualified options and incentive stock options. On June 8, 2005, the Company’s stockholders and Board of Directors approved the amendment and restatement to the Company’s 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (renamed 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Incentive Plan) (the “Plan”) to: (a) increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan by 4,000,000; (b) add a share-counting formula to the Plan pursuant to which each share issued under restricted stock or other awards, other than options or stock appreciation rights, counts against the number of total shares available under the Plan as 1.3 shares, and each share issued as options or stock appreciation rights counts against the total shares available under the Plan as one share; (c) increase the share limitation on the number of awards that may be granted to any participant in any fiscal year to 1,000,000; (d) add provisions for the grant of cash awards and other types of equity based awards; and (e) delete a provision allowing for the repricing of awards. On June 11, 2007, the Company’s stockholders and Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan by 4,000,000, and on April 21, 2009 the Company’s stockholders and Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Plan to increase the number of common shares available for issuance under the Plan by 3,000,000 shares.
As of October 31, 2011, the Company had reserved 10.6 million shares of common stock for issuance under the Plan, of which 1.0 million are available for future issuance.
A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding stock options as of October 31 and changes during the years then ended is presented below:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number Of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at beginning of year |
1,699,216 | $ | 4.55 | 1,483,929 | $ | 5.24 | 1,352,610 | $ | 5.61 | |||||||||||||||
| Granted |
164,522 | $ | 1.97 | 289,475 | $ | 0.68 | 144,079 | $ | 1.88 | |||||||||||||||
| Cancelled |
(233,564 | ) | $ | 10.26 | (74,188 | ) | $ | 3.23 | (12,760 | ) | $ | 6.14 | ||||||||||||
| Exercised |
(69,545 | ) | $ | 0.89 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at end of year |
1,560,629 | $ | 4.50 | 1,699,216 | $ | 4.55 | 1,483,929 | $ | 5.24 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Options exercisable at year-end |
1,251,368 | $ | 5.23 | 1,362,440 | $ | 5.46 | 1,252,103 | $ | 5.94 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year |
$ | 1.15 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The fair value of options granted during the year ended October 31, 2011 was $0.2 million.
F-15
The intrinsic value of options shares outstanding at October 31, 2011 was $1.9 million based on a fair value of $3.37 per share.
The following table summarizes information about outstanding stock options at October 31, 2011:
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise Price |
Number | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted average Exercise Price |
Number | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||||||||
| $0.68 |
263,159 | 5.8 | $ | 0.68 | 118,420 | $ | 0.68 | |||||||||||||
| $0.89 |
176,668 | 4.8 | $ | 0.89 | 176,668 | $ | 0.89 | |||||||||||||
| $1.17 to $2.80 |
454,068 | 4.3 | $ | 1.92 | 289,546 | $ | 1.69 | |||||||||||||
| $3.20 |
335,035 | 0.8 | $ | 3.20 | 335,035 | $ | 3.20 | |||||||||||||
| $13.30 |
281,702 | 2.4 | $ | 13.30 | 281,702 | $ | 13.30 | |||||||||||||
| $14.00 to $28.00 |
49,997 | 2.0 | $ | 19.96 | 49,997 | $ | 19.96 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Total |
1,560,629 | 3.4 | $ | 4.50 | 1,251,368 | $ | 5.23 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
The weighted average contractual term of exercisable options outstanding at October 31, 2011 was 2.5 years.
| Number Outstanding |
Weighted-Average Fair Value at Grant Date |
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) |
||||||||||
| Non-Vested shares at October 31, 2010 |
336,776 | $ | 0.50 | 6.6 | ||||||||
| Options Granted |
164,522 | 1.15 | 6.8 | |||||||||
| Options Vested |
(192,039 | ) | 0.58 | 5.5 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Non-Vested shares at October 31, 2011 |
309,259 | 0.79 | 6.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions for the years ended October 31:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Risk free annual interest rate |
1.5 | % | 1.3 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||||
| Expected volatility |
76 | % | 74 | % | 76 | % | ||||||
| Expected life |
4.25 years | 4.25 years | 4.25 years | |||||||||
| Assumed dividends |
None | None | None | |||||||||
Restricted stock grants are granted to directors and employees and have a vesting period of six months to three years. The value of restricted stock grants are measured based on their fair value on the date of grant and amortized over the vesting period.
Non-cash compensation expenses related to stock options and restricted stock grants are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and totaled $1.5 million, $1.3 million and $1.7 million for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of October 31, 2011 and 2010, there was approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.8 and 1.4 years, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during October 31, 2011 was $0.3 million.
A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted stock grants for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period |
1,749,535 | 1,895,180 | 2,218,373 | |||||||||
| Granted |
1,041,201 | 1,243,467 | 955,183 | |||||||||
| Vested |
(1,051,918 | ) | (1,040,566 | ) | (1,187,740 | ) | ||||||
| Cancelled |
(115,167 | ) | (348,546 | ) | (90,636 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Outstanding at end of period |
1,623,651 | 1,749,535 | 1,895,180 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
The fair value of restricted shares granted during the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2.1 million, $0.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively. As of October 31, 2011, there was approximately $2.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.0 years.
In 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in consideration for services, of which 30,000 were exercised in 2011 and 70,000 remain outstanding. The warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $1.06 at any time over a five-year period.
F-16
In 2006, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock to a consulting firm in consideration for services. The warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $1.55 at any time over a seven-year period.
The Company issued 170,652 shares of restricted common stock as part of the inducement and retention of employees of Quick Hit, Inc. (See Note 16). The shares of restricted common stock have a transaction-date fair value of $524, which will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense as the shares vest at the rate of one-third of the shares granted every six months over the 18 month period following June 2011.
13. INCOME TAXES
The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 consists of:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Current: |
||||||||||||
| Federal |
$ | 274 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| State |
152 | (1,656 | ) | (1,115 | ) | |||||||
| Deferred: |
||||||||||||
| Federal |
3,954 | (403 | ) | (2,273 | ) | |||||||
| State |
77 | (84 | ) | (484 | ) | |||||||
| Impact of change in effective tax rates on deferred taxes |
1,937 | 1,312 | (1,760 | ) | ||||||||
| Less: valuation allowance |
(5,968 | ) | (825 | ) | 4,517 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| $ | 426 | $ | (1,656 | ) | $ | (1,115 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
The difference between income taxes computed at the statutory federal rate and the provision for income taxes for 2011, 2010 and 2009 relates to the following:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percent
of Pretax income |
Amount | Percent
of Pretax income |
Amount | Percent
of Pretax income |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Tax (benefit) at federal statutory rate |
$ | 2,469 | 34 | % | $ | (894 | ) | (34 | )% | $ | (2,823 | ) | (34 | )% | ||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income taxes |
229 | 3 | % | (84 | ) | (3 | )% | (515 | ) | (6 | )% | |||||||||||||
| Effect of warrant liability |
968 | 13 | % | (164 | ) | (6 | )% | 141 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Effect of sale of NOL |
— | — | % | 563 | 21 | % | 379 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Effect of other permanent items |
48 | 1 | % | 34 | 2 | % | 61 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Impact of change in effective tax rates on deferred taxes |
1,937 | 27 | % | 1,312 | 50 | % | (1,760 | ) | (21 | )% | ||||||||||||||
| Sale of state net operating losses |
— | — | % | (1,656 | ) | (63 | )% | (1,115 | ) | (13 | )% | |||||||||||||
| Change in valuation allowance |
(5,968 | ) | (82 | )% | (825 | ) | (32 | )% | 4,517 | 54 | % | |||||||||||||
| Reduction of deferred benefits |
743 | 10 | % | 58 | 2 | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| $ | 426 | 6 | % | $ | (1,656 | ) | (63 | )% | $ | (1,115 | ) | (13 | )% | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
The components of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) were as follows:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Impairment of capitalized software development costs and prepaid license fees not currently deductible |
$ | 1,448 | $ | 209 | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
(174 | ) | 17 | |||||
| Impairment of inventory |
631 | 80 | ||||||
| Compensation expense not deductible until options are exercised |
224 | 1,715 | ||||||
| All other temporary differences |
1,006 | 471 | ||||||
| Net operating loss carry forward |
23,703 | 30,314 | ||||||
| Less valuation allowance |
(26,838 | ) | (32,806 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Deferred tax asset |
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Realization of deferred tax assets, including those related to net operating loss carryforwards, are dependent upon future earnings, if any, of which the timing and amount are uncertain. Accordingly, the net deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. Based upon the Company’s current operating results, management cannot conclude that it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized. In the year ended October 31, 2011, the Company reversed valuation allowances to the extent of net operating loss carryforwards used and income tax expense reflects alternative minimum tax and state tax liabilities.
Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards before utilization. The net operating loss carryforwards available for income tax purposes at October 31, 2011 amounts to approximately $68.7 million and expires between 2025 and 2030 for federal income taxes, and approximately $21.6 million for state income tax, which expires between 2013 and 2030.
F-17
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S., various states and the United Kingdom. As of October 31, 2011, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits, which would impact its tax rate if recognized. As of October 31, 2011, the Company had no accrual for the potential payment of penalties and interest. As of October 31, 2011, the Company was not subject to any U.S. federal, state or foreign income tax examinations. The Company’s U.S. federal tax returns have been examined for the tax years 2003 through 2004, and income taxes for Majesco Europe Limited have been examined for the year ended October 31, 2006 in the United Kingdom with the results of such examinations being reflected in the Company’s results of operations as of October 31, 2011. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months.
In the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company received proceeds of approximately $0, $1.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, from the sale of the rights to approximately $0, $21.2 million and $25.9 million, respectively, of New Jersey state income tax net operating loss carryforwards, under the Technology Business Tax Certificate Program administered by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, which is reflected as an income tax benefit in the consolidation statements of operations.
14. INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
The table below provides a reconciliation of basic and diluted average shares outstanding used in computing income (loss) per share, after applying the treasury stock method.
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
38,527,589 | 37,019,750 | 29,770,382 | |||||||||
| Common stock options |
385,487 | — | — | |||||||||
| Non-vested portion of restricted stock grants |
900,681 | — | — | |||||||||
| Warrants |
310,211 | — | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
40,123,968 | 37,019,750 | 29,770,382 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Options, warrants and restricted stock grants representing a total of 761,265, 5,675,220 and 5,580,578 potential shares of common stock at October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the years ended, as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
The table below provides total potential shares outstanding, including those that are anti-dilutive, at each balance sheet date:
| October 31, 2011 |
October 31, 2010 |
|||||||
| Shares issuable under common stock warrants |
1,196,501 | 2,226,469 | ||||||
| Shares issuable under stock options |
1,560,629 | 1,699,216 | ||||||
| Non-vested portion of restricted stock grants |
1,623,651 | 1,749,535 | ||||||
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contingencies
Infringement claims
On July 1, 2011, a complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware by Impulse Technology Ltd. against Microsoft Corporation and certain other game publisher defendants that have released games for Microsoft’s Kinect for Xbox 360, including the Company. The complaint alleges infringement relating to Microsoft’s Xbox Kinect hardware, and correspondingly, the Company’s Zumba Fitness game for Xbox 360, of Impulse’s patents for certain motion tracking technology. Impulse is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecified amount for the alleged infringement. The Company intends, in conjunction with Microsoft and the other defendants, to defend itself against the claim and has certain third-party indemnity rights from a developer for costs incurred under a joint representation agreement. The Company cannot currently estimate a potential range of loss if the claim against the Company is successful.
On November 18, 2011, a complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio by Impulse Technology Ltd. against the Company, Nintendo of America, Inc. and certain other game publisher defendants that have released games for Nintendo’s Wii console. The complaint alleges that Wii and correspondingly, our Zumba Fitness 2 and Jillian Michaels Fitness Workout 2009 games, infringe Impulse’s patents for certain interactive technology. Impulse is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecified amount for the alleged infringement. The Company intends to defend itself against the claim and believes it has third-party indemnity rights that may cover a portion of costs to the Company. The Company cannot currently estimate a potential range of loss if the claim against the Company is successful.
F-18
The Company at times may be a party to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. We record a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company has not recorded a liability with respect to the matters above. While the Company believes that it has valid defenses with respect to the legal matters pending and intends to vigorously defend the matters above, given the uncertainty surrounding litigation and our inability to assess the likelihood of a favorable or unfavorable outcome, it is possible that the resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
Settlement agreement
On September 27, 2007, the Company entered into settlement agreements to settle certain litigations pending in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey: (i) a securities class action brought on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of the Company’s securities; (ii) a private securities action filed by Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (“Trinad”); and (iii) a second action filed by Trinad purportedly on behalf of the Company. All three actions are now concluded.
In January 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the securities class action settlement agreement. Under the terms of the settlement agreement in the securities class action, as amended, the Company agreed to make cash payments totaling $0.7 million in three installments. The first two payments were made in January and February 2009, and the last payment was made in May 2009. The Company also contributed one million shares of its common stock to the settlement fund. The Company’s insurance carrier also contributed a cash payment. On February 23, 2009, the settlement was approved by the Court, and the class action was dismissed. The dismissal is no longer subject to appeal. The settlement administrator distributed the shares and cash to eligible settlement claimants in May 2009 and the matter is now closed.
Under the terms of the settlement of the private securities claim in the action brought by Trinad, on its own behalf, the Company’s insurance carrier made a cash payment to Trinad. The Court dismissed this action on February 23, 2009 and the matter is now closed.
The settlement agreement in the action filed by Trinad, purportedly on behalf of the Company, did not result in a payment to the Company, and Trinad’s attorneys did not receive any fees in connection with the settlement. This settlement was approved by the Court, and the Court dismissed the action on May 12, 2009. The dismissal is no longer subject to appeal and the matter is now closed.
The Company recorded aggregate expense of $2.0 million under the amended settlement agreements, reflecting $0.7 million in cash payments, and the $1.3 million fair value of common stock, on its date of issuance, March 30, 2009. The Company originally recorded an accrual equal to the $2.5 million fair value of common stock to be issued under the settlement agreement on the date of its execution, September 27, 2007. The accrual was adjusted each quarter to reflect the change in the value of shares to be issued under the agreement. This adjustment resulted in a gain of $0.3 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The accrual was further adjusted at October 31, 2008 to $1.3 million reflecting the $0.7 million in cash payments, and $0.55 per share fair value of one million shares of common stock to be issued under the revised settlement agreement at that date. The share based portion of the accrual was adjusted to the fair value of the shares to be issued, at each balance sheet date thereafter, until their issuance on March 30, 2009. The fair value of the shares on date of issuance was $1.3 million ($1.25 per share), resulting in expense of $0.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2009.
Additionally, on March 30, 2009, the Company issued 130,000 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $0.2 million, to a group of underwriters named as defendants in the class action litigation, in payment of $0.5 million in legal fees for which the Company was responsible under an indemnification agreement. The gain of $0.3 million resulting from the difference between the fair value of the stock issued and the legal expenses, which had been recorded as general and administrative expenses during prior periods, was included in Settlement of Litigation and related charges, net, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
Commitments
At October 31, 2011, the Company was committed under agreements with certain software developers for future milestone payments aggregating $3.5 million. Milestone payments represent scheduled installments due to the Company’s developers based upon the developers providing the Company certain deliverables, as predetermined in the Company’s contracts. In addition, the Company may have to pay royalties for products sold. These payments will be used to reduce future royalties due to the developers from sales of the Company’s video games.
The Company is obligated under non-cancelable operating leases for administrative offices expiring at various dates through 2014. The future aggregate minimum rental commitments exclusive of required payments for operating expenses are as follows:
| Year ending October 31, |
||||
| 2012 |
$ | 481 | ||
| 2012 |
473 | |||
| 2013 |
394 | |||
| 2014 |
73 | |||
F-19
Total rent expense amounted to $513, $433 and $767 for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company has entered into “at will” employment agreements with several key executives. These employment agreements include provisions for, among other things, annual compensation, bonus arrangements and equity grants. These agreements also contain provisions related to severance terms and change of control provisions.
Workforce Reduction
In July 2009, the decision was made to close the Company’s development studio located in California. After a reduction of the studio’s performance, and changes in the availability and cost of development with the Company’s third party partners, management believed that closing the studio and taking advantage of these external opportunities represented a better value for the Company. As a result, the Company incurred approximately $0.2 million in severance and lease termination costs, which were recorded as a charge to product research and development expenses in the year ended October 31, 2009.
During January 2010, Company management initiated a plan of restructuring to better align its workforce to its revised operating plans. As part of the plan, the Company reduced its personnel count by 16 employees, representing 17% of its workforce. The Company recorded charges of approximately $0.4 million in the year ended October 31, 2010 in connection with the terminations, which consist primarily of severance and unused vacation payments. The expenses are included in operating costs and expenses as shown in the table below:
| Year Ended October 31, 2010 |
||||
| Product research and development |
$ | 90 | ||
| Selling and Marketing |
243 | |||
| General and Administrative |
70 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Total |
$ | 403 | ||
|
|
|
|||
The Company has no remaining obligations related to these activities.
16. PURCHASE OF ASSETS
On June 3, 2011, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Quick Hit, Inc. (“Quick Hit”), a developer and operator of online games. The aggregate purchase price paid was approximately $837 in cash. The Company also entered into an exclusive license agreement with a senior lender to Quick Hit for the source code to an online interactive football game, with options to extend the license and purchase the game at the end of the license period, under which it paid $125 to license the code through December 31, 2011. In December 2011, the Company paid $125 to license the code through September 2012, at which time the Company has an option to acquire the code for a payment of $60.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business combination pursuant to ASC 805, Business Combinations, and as such the Quick Hit assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated respective fair values and the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed was recorded as Goodwill. The Company acquired certain key operating assets as well as the Quick Hit development team to execute on its social games strategy. The Company believes the team can enhance its ability to build, deploy and monetize online games. These factors contributed to a purchase price in excess of the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The acquisition was financed with available cash on hand. The Company made significant assumptions and estimates in determining the allocation of the purchase price of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
| Valuation | ||||
| Intangible assets, included in other assets |
$ | 105 | ||
| Property and equipment |
434 | |||
| Working capital and other assets |
244 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Net identifiable assets |
783 | |||
| Goodwill, included in other assets |
54 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Net assets acquired |
$ | 837 | ||
|
|
|
|||
In accordance with ASC 805, the following supplemental pro forma consolidated financial information is provided using historical data of Quick Hit, Inc. and of the Company, adjusted for the application of the acquisition method of accounting as if the acquisition had occurred on November 1, 2009 for the year ended October 31, 2010 and on November 1, 2010 for the year ended October 31, 2011.
F-20
Quick Hit was originally formed in 2008 to develop and operate a series of online, head-to-head sports games (e.g. football, baseball, basketball, hockey and soccer) with aspects of massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG) and 3D technology. Between 2009 and 2011, Quick Hit revised its business plan to focus resources on adding features to its football game launched in 2009, delayed its schedule of future releases and reduced its workforce from over 30 in 2009 to 12 by June 2011. The Company intends to utilize this workforce to operate its social games strategy and reduce its subcontracted development costs. Accordingly, the supplemental pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the Company’s consolidated results of operations that would have been reported had the Quick Hit acquisition been completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as a representation of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations or financial position. The unaudited pro forma information also does not reflect any operating efficiencies and associated cost savings that the Company may achieve with respect to the combined companies.
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| (unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||
| Net revenues |
$ | 126,020 | $ | 76,173 | ||||
| Net income (loss) |
3,837 | (7,837 | ) | |||||
| Basic net income (loss) per share |
0.10 | (0.21 | ) | |||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share |
0.10 | (0.21 | ) | |||||
In the year ended October 31, 2011, net revenues and net losses related to the former Quick Hit operations amounted to approximately $240 and $1,488, respectively. In connection with the transaction, the Company hired 12 employees of Quick Hit, representing substantially all of its personnel. In addition, the Company issued 170,652 shares of restricted common stock as part of the inducement and retention of employees. The shares of restricted common stock have a transaction-date fair value of $524, which will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense as the shares vest at the rate of one-third of the shares granted every six months over the 18 month period following June 3, 2011.
17. EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN
The Company has a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering all eligible employees. The Company charged to operations $59, $81 and $75 for contributions to the retirement plan for the years ended October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Certain stockholders and key employees of the Company serve as trustees of the plan.
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company currently has an agreement with Morris Sutton, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Emeritus, under which he provides services as a consultant. The agreement provides for a monthly retainer of $13. Mr. Sutton was also eligible to receive a commission in an amount equal to 2% of net sales to certain accounts before January 1, 2010. Commissions were recorded when the sales occurred, but were not paid until payments of the related accounts receivable were received from customers. Consulting expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009 include $28 of fees earned in each of November and December of 2008 under Mr. Sutton’s prior agreement which expired on December 31, 2008.
The following table summarizes expense to Morris Sutton,:
| Year
Ended October 31, |
||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
| Consulting |
$ | 150 | $ | 150 | $ | 213 | ||||||
| Commissions |
— | 131 | 189 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total |
$ | 150 | $ | 281 | $ | 402 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
In 2011, the Company purchased Zumba belts from a second supplier, on terms equivalent to those of its primary supplier. Morris Sutton and another relative of Jesse Sutton, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, earned compensation from the supplier of approximately $260 based on the value of Company’s purchases.
The Company entered into an agreement with a Board member, effective March 2010, to provide specified strategic consulting services, in addition to his services as a board member, on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rate of $10. For the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, consulting fees incurred under the agreement amounted to $120 and $73, respectively. The Company had accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $10 and $0 as of October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, under the agreement.
F-21