UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
[] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 001-08918
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia | 58-1575035 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
303 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30308
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(404) 588-7711
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ | |||||
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ | |||||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
At July 28, 2011, 536,877,003 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, $1.00 par value, were outstanding.
Page | ||||||||
Glossary of Defined Terms |
i -iii | |||||||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 1 | ||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) | 1 | |||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 2 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity | 3 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 4 | |||||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 5 | |||||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 71 | ||||||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 110 | ||||||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures | 110 | ||||||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings | 110 | ||||||
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors | 110 | ||||||
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 110 | ||||||
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 111 | ||||||
Item 4. |
(Removed and Reserved) | 111 | ||||||
Item 5. |
Other Information | 111 | ||||||
Item 6. |
Exhibits | 111 | ||||||
113 |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, and accordingly do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to comply with Regulation S-X have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2011.
GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS
ABS Asset-backed securities.
AFS Available for sale.
ALCO Asset/Liability Management Committee.
ALLL Allowance for loan and lease losses.
AOCI Accumulated other comprehensive income.
ARS Auction rate securities.
ASC FASB Accounting Standard Codification.
ASU Accounting standards update.
ATE Additional termination event.
ATM Automated teller machine.
Bank SunTrust Bank.
BCBS Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Board The Companys Board of Directors.
CCAR Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review.
CDO Collateralized debt obligation.
CD Certificate of deposit.
CDS Credit default swaps.
CIB Corporate and Investment Banking.
Class A shares Visa Inc. Class A common stock.
Class B shares Visa Inc. Class B common stock.
CLO Collateralized loan obligation.
Coke The Coca-Cola Company.
Company SunTrust Banks, Inc.
CP Commercial paper.
CPP Capital Purchase Program.
CRE Commercial Real Estate.
CSA Credit support annex.
DBRS Dun and Bradstreet, Inc.
Dodd-Frank Act The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.
EPS Earnings per share.
ERISA Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Exchange Act Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board.
FDIC The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Federal Reserve The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Fed funds Federal funds.
FFIEC Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
FHA Federal Housing Administration.
FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank.
i
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation.
FINRA Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Fitch Fitch Ratings Ltd.
FTE Fully taxable-equivalent.
FVO Fair value option.
GB&T GB&T Bancshares, Inc.
GSE Government-sponsored enterprise.
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards.
IPO Initial public offering.
IRLC Interest rate lock commitments.
IRS Internal Revenue Service.
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Associations Master Agreement.
KBW Bank Sector Index Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Bank Sector Index.
LHFI Loans held for investment.
LHFI-FV Loans held for investment carried at fair value.
LHFS Loans held for sale.
LIBOR London InterBank Offered Rate.
LOCOM Lower of cost or market.
LTI Long-term incentive.
LTV Loan to value.
MBS Mortgage-backed securities.
MD&A Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Moodys Moodys Investors Service.
MSR Mortgage servicing right.
MVE Market value of equity.
NEO Named executive officers.
NOW Negotiable order of withdrawal account.
NPL Nonperforming loan.
NSF Non-sufficient funds.
OCI Other comprehensive income.
OREO Other real estate owned.
OTC Over-the-counter.
OTTI Other-than-temporary impairment.
Parent Company Parent Company of SunTrust Banks, Inc. and subsidiaries.
QSPE Qualifying special-purpose entity.
RidgeWorth RidgeWorth Capital Management, Inc.
ROA Return on average total assets.
ROE Return on average common shareholders equity.
S&P Standard and Poors.
SBA Small Business Administration.
ii
SEC U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
SIV Structured investment vehicles.
SPE Special purpose entity.
STIS SunTrust Investment Services, Inc.
STM SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
STRH SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.
SunTrust SunTrust Banks, Inc.
TARP Troubled Asset Relief Program.
TDR Troubled debt restructuring.
The Agreements Equity forward agreements.
Three Pillars Three Pillars Funding, LLC.
TRS Total return swaps.
U.S. GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States.
U.S. Treasury The United States Department of the Treasury.
UTB Unrecognized tax benefits.
VA Veterans Administration.
VAR Value at risk.
VI Variable interest.
VIE Variable interest entity.
Visa The Visa, U.S.A. Inc. card association or its affiliates, collectively.
W&IM Wealth and Investment Management.
iii
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions and shares in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Interest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$1,299 | $1,318 | $2,613 | $2,635 | ||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans held for sale |
22 | 33 | 50 | 66 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividends on securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable interest |
177 | 167 | 342 | 343 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt interest |
6 | 9 | 11 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Dividends1 |
21 | 19 | 41 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Trading account interest |
21 | 24 | 43 | 44 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total interest income |
1,546 | 1,570 | 3,100 | 3,144 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
162 | 225 | 331 | 458 | ||||||||||||
Interest on funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Interest on trading liabilities |
8 | 8 | 16 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Interest on other short-term borrowings |
3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt |
113 | 154 | 237 | 313 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total interest expense |
287 | 392 | 592 | 794 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net interest income |
1,259 | 1,178 | 2,508 | 2,350 | ||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
392 | 662 | 839 | 1,524 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
867 | 516 | 1,669 | 826 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Noninterest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
170 | 208 | 333 | 404 | ||||||||||||
Other charges and fees |
130 | 133 | 256 | 262 | ||||||||||||
Card fees |
105 | 94 | 205 | 181 | ||||||||||||
Trust and investment management income |
135 | 127 | 270 | 249 | ||||||||||||
Retail investment services |
59 | 48 | 117 | 95 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage production related income/(loss) |
4 | (16) | 3 | (47) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing related income |
72 | 88 | 144 | 158 | ||||||||||||
Investment banking income |
95 | 58 | 162 | 114 | ||||||||||||
Trading account profits and commissions |
53 | 109 | 105 | 102 | ||||||||||||
Net securities gains2 |
32 | 57 | 96 | 58 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest income |
57 | 46 | 104 | 74 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total noninterest income |
912 | 952 | 1,795 | 1,650 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Noninterest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Employee compensation |
638 | 575 | 1,256 | 1,132 | ||||||||||||
Employee benefits |
110 | 107 | 246 | 242 | ||||||||||||
Outside processing and software |
162 | 158 | 320 | 307 | ||||||||||||
Net occupancy expense |
89 | 90 | 178 | 181 | ||||||||||||
Regulatory assessments |
81 | 65 | 152 | 129 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate expense |
64 | 87 | 133 | 133 | ||||||||||||
Credit and collection services |
60 | 66 | 111 | 140 | ||||||||||||
Equipment expense |
44 | 42 | 88 | 83 | ||||||||||||
Marketing and customer development |
46 | 44 | 84 | 78 | ||||||||||||
Operating losses |
62 | 16 | 89 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
12 | 13 | 23 | 26 | ||||||||||||
Net loss/(gain) on debt extinguishment |
(1) | 63 | (2) | 54 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest expense |
175 | 177 | 329 | 329 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
1,542 | 1,503 | 3,007 | 2,864 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income/(loss) before provision/(benefit) for income taxes |
237 | (35) | 457 | (388) | ||||||||||||
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes |
58 | (50) | 91 | (244) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income/(loss) including income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
179 | 15 | 366 | (144) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
1 | 3 | 8 | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income/(loss) |
$178 | $12 | $358 | ($149) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders |
$174 | ($56) | $212 | ($285) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income/(loss) per average common share |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted3 |
$0.33 | ($0.11) | $0.41 | ($0.58) | ||||||||||||
Basic |
0.33 | (0.11) | 0.41 | (0.58) | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$0.01 | $0.01 | $0.02 | $0.02 | ||||||||||||
Average common shares - diluted |
535,416 | 498,499 | 519,548 | 498,369 | ||||||||||||
Average common shares - basic |
531,792 | 495,351 | 515,819 | 495,112 |
1 | Includes dividends on common stock of The Coca-Cola Company of $14 million and $13 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $28 million and $26 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
2 | Includes credit-related other-than-temporary impairment losses of $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. |
3 | For earnings per share calculation purposes, the impact of dilutive securities are excluded from the diluted share count during periods that the Company has recognized a net loss available to common shareholders because the impact would be anti-dilutive. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
1
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions and shares in thousands) (Unaudited) | June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$5,633 | $4,296 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
20 | 24 | ||||||
Funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
1,134 | 1,058 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
6,787 | 5,378 | ||||||
Trading assets |
6,586 | 6,175 | ||||||
Securities available for sale |
27,216 | 26,895 | ||||||
Loans held for sale1 (loans at fair value: $1,925 as of June 30, 2011 and $3,168 as of December 31, 2010) |
2,052 | 3,501 | ||||||
Loans2 (loans at fair value: $449 as of June 30, 2011 and $492 as of December 31, 2010) |
114,913 | 115,975 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(2,744) | (2,974) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loans |
112,169 | 113,001 | ||||||
Premises and equipment |
1,536 | 1,620 | ||||||
Goodwill |
6,343 | 6,323 | ||||||
Other intangible assets (MSRs at fair value: $1,423 as of June 30, 2011 and $1,439 as of December 31, 2010) |
1,539 | 1,571 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
483 | 596 | ||||||
Other assets |
7,462 | 7,814 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$172,173 | $172,874 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing consumer and commercial deposits |
$30,591 | $27,290 | ||||||
Interest-bearing consumer and commercial deposits |
91,080 | 92,735 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total consumer and commercial deposits |
121,671 | 120,025 | ||||||
Brokered deposits (CDs at fair value: $1,140 as of June 30, 2011 and $1,213 of December 31, 2010) |
2,345 | 2,365 | ||||||
Foreign deposits |
905 | 654 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deposits |
124,921 | 123,044 | ||||||
Funds purchased |
939 | 951 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
2,253 | 2,180 | ||||||
Other short-term borrowings |
2,791 | 2,690 | ||||||
Long-term debt 3 (debt at fair value: $2,022 as of June 30, 2011 and $2,837 as of December 31, 2010) |
13,693 | 13,648 | ||||||
Trading liabilities |
3,026 | 2,678 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
4,890 | 4,553 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
152,513 | 149,744 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Preferred stock, no par value |
172 | 4,942 | ||||||
Common stock, $1.00 par value |
550 | 515 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
9,330 | 8,403 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
8,745 | 8,542 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, and other |
(805) | (888) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
1,668 | 1,616 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total shareholders equity |
19,660 | 23,130 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$172,173 | $172,874 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common shares outstanding |
536,907 | 500,436 | ||||||
Common shares authorized |
750,000 | 750,000 | ||||||
Preferred shares outstanding |
2 | 50 | ||||||
Preferred shares authorized |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Treasury shares of common stock |
13,014 | 14,231 | ||||||
1 Includes loans held for sale, at fair value, of consolidated VIEs |
$329 | $316 | ||||||
2 Includes loans of consolidated VIEs |
2,896 | 2,869 | ||||||
3 Includes debt of consolidated VIEs ($289 and $290 at fair value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) |
743 | 764 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
2
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Dollars and shares in millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited) |
Preferred
Stock |
Common
Shares
Outstanding |
Common
Stock |
Additional
Paid in
Capital |
Retained
Earnings |
Treasury
Stock and
Other1 |
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
$4,917 | 499 | $515 | $8,521 | $8,563 | ($1,055) | $1,070 | $22,531 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
- | - | - | - | (149) | - | - | (149) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on securities, net of taxes |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 215 | 215 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on derivatives, net of taxes |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 377 | 377 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change related to employee benefit plans |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 83 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
526 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends, $0.02 per share |
- | - | - | - | (10) | - | - | (10) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A preferred stock dividends, $2,022 per share |
- | - | - | - | (4) | - | - | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury preferred stock dividends, $2,500 per share |
- | - | - | - | (120) | - | - | (120) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount for preferred stock issued to U.S. Treasury |
12 | - | - | - | (12) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
- | - | - | 11 | - | - | - | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity |
- | 1 | - | (69) | - | 42 | - | (27) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock compensation |
- | - | - | - | - | 22 | - | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock for employee benefit plans and other |
- | - | - | (18) | 1 | 23 | - | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value election of MSRs |
- | - | - | - | 89 | - | - | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
$4,929 | 500 | $515 | $8,445 | $8,358 | ($968) | $1,745 | $23,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2011 |
$4,942 | 500 | $515 | $8,403 | $8,542 | ($888) | $1,616 | $23,130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
- | - | - | - | 358 | - | - | 358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on securities, net of taxes |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 121 | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on derivatives, net of taxes |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (53) | (53) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change related to employee benefit plans |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (16) | (16) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in noncontrolling interest |
- | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends, $0.02 per share |
- | - | - | - | (11) | - | - | (11) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A preferred stock dividends, $2,022 per share |
- | - | - | - | (4) | - | - | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury preferred stock dividends, $1,236 per share |
- | - | - | - | (60) | - | - | (60) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount for preferred stock issued to U.S. Treasury |
6 | - | - | - | (6) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of preferred stock issued to U.S. Treasury |
(4,776) | - | - | - | (74) | - | - | (4,850) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
- | 35 | 35 | 982 | - | - | - | 1,017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
- | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity |
- | 2 | - | (54) | - | 46 | - | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock compensation |
- | - | - | - | - | 17 | - | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock for employee benefit plans and other |
- | - | - | (8) | - | 19 | - | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
$172 | 537 | $550 | $9,330 | $8,745 | ($805) | $1,668 | $19,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Balance at June 30, 2011 includes ($869) for treasury stock, ($67) for compensation element of restricted stock, and $131 for noncontrolling interest. |
Balance at June 30, 2010 includes ($1,021) for treasury stock, ($55) for compensation element of restricted stock, and $108 for noncontrolling interest.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income/(loss) including income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
$366 | ($144) | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion |
372 | 404 | ||||||
Origination of Mortgage Servicing Rights |
(136) | (134) | ||||||
Provisions for credit losses and foreclosed property |
930 | 1,620 | ||||||
Amortization of restricted stock compensation |
17 | 22 | ||||||
Stock option compensation |
7 | 11 | ||||||
Net (gain)/loss on extinguishment of debt |
(2) | 54 | ||||||
Net securities gains |
(96) | (58) | ||||||
Net (gain)/loss on sale of assets |
(141) | (218) | ||||||
Net decrease in loans held for sale |
1,718 | 1,045 | ||||||
Net increase in other assets |
(358) | (406) | ||||||
Net increase in other liabilities |
421 | 170 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,098 | 2,366 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and paydowns of securities available for sale |
2,414 | 2,802 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
10,763 | 10,526 | ||||||
Purchases of securities available for sale |
(12,603) | (12,677) | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and paydowns of trading securities |
124 | 78 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of trading securities |
102 | 61 | ||||||
Net (increase)/decrease in loans including purchases of loans |
(1,109) | 31 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of loans |
287 | 600 | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
(9) | (89) | ||||||
Contingent consideration and other payments related to acquisitions |
(18) | (4) | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of other assets |
360 | 349 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
311 | 1,677 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Net increase/(decrease) in total deposits |
1,877 | (3,194) | ||||||
Net increase/(decrease) in funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and other short-term borrowings |
162 | (1,135) | ||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt |
1,039 | 500 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(1,170) | (2,283) | ||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
1,017 | - | ||||||
Repurchase of preferred stock |
(4,850) | - | ||||||
Common and preferred dividends paid |
(75) | (135) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(2,000) | (6,247) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
1,409 | (2,204) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
5,378 | 6,997 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$6,787 | $4,793 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental Disclosures: |
||||||||
Loans transferred from loans held for sale to loans |
$46 | $17 | ||||||
Loans transferred from loans to loans held for sale |
198 | 238 | ||||||
Loans transferred from loans to other real estate owned |
367 | 622 | ||||||
Accretion of discount for preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury |
80 | 12 | ||||||
Total assets of newly consolidated VIEs at January 1, 2010 |
- | 2,049 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
4
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations in these financial statements, have been made.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could vary from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation.
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date its financial statements were issued.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Except for accounting policies that have been modified or recently adopted as described below, there have been no significant changes to the Companys accounting policies as disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are considered LHFI. The Companys loan balance is comprised of loans held in portfolio, including commercial loans, consumer loans, and residential loans. Interest income on all types of loans, except those classified as nonaccrual, is accrued based upon the outstanding principal amounts using the effective yield method.
Commercial loans (commercial & industrial, commercial real estate, and commercial construction) are considered to be past due when payment is not received from the borrower by the contractually specified due date. The Company typically classifies commercial loans as nonaccrual when one of the following events occurs: (i) interest or principal has been past due 90 days or more, unless the loan is secured by collateral having realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt in full and the loan is in the legal process of collection; (ii) collection of recorded interest or principal is not anticipated; or (iii) income for the loan is recognized on a cash basis due to the deterioration in the financial condition of the debtor. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, unpaid interest is reversed against interest income. Interest income on nonaccrual loans, if recognized, is recognized after the principal has been reduced to zero. If and when commercial borrowers demonstrate the ability to repay a loan in accordance with the contractual terms of a loan classified as nonaccrual, the loan may be returned to accrual status.
Consumer loans (guaranteed student loans, other direct, indirect, and credit card) are considered to be past due when payment is not received from the borrower by the contractually specified due date. Other direct and indirect loans are typically placed on nonaccrual when payments have been past due for 90 days or more except when the borrower has declared bankruptcy, in which case, they are moved to nonaccrual status once they become 60 days past due. Credit card loans are never placed on nonaccrual status but rather are charged off once they are 180 days past due. Guaranteed student loans continue to accrue interest regardless of delinquency status because collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, unpaid interest is reversed against interest income. Interest income on nonaccrual loans, if recognized, is recognized after the principal has been reduced to zero. Nonaccrual loans are typically returned to accrual status once they no longer meet the delinquency threshold that resulted in them initially being moved to nonaccrual status.
Residential loans (guaranteed residential mortgages, nonguaranteed residential mortgages, home equity products, and residential construction) are considered to be past due when a monthly payment is due and unpaid for one month. Nonguaranteed residential mortgages and residential construction loans are generally placed on nonaccrual when payments are 120 days past due. Home equity products are generally placed on nonaccrual when payments are 90 days past due. The exception for nonguaranteed residential mortgages, residential construction loans, and home equity products is when the borrower has declared bankruptcy, in which case, they are moved to nonaccrual status once they become 60 days past due. Guaranteed residential mortgages continue to accrue interest regardless of delinquency status because collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, unpaid interest is reversed against interest income. Interest income on nonaccrual loans, if recognized, is recognized on a cash basis. Nonaccrual loans are typically returned to accrual status once they no longer meet the delinquency threshold that resulted in them initially being moved to nonaccrual status.
5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
TDRs are loans in which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Company has granted an economic concession to the borrower. To date, the Companys TDRs have been predominantly first and second lien residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit. Prior to modifying a borrowers loan terms, the Company performs an evaluation of the borrowers financial condition and ability to service under the potential modified loan terms. The types of concessions granted are generally interest rate reductions and/or term extensions. If a loan is accruing at the time of modification, the loan remains on accrual status and is subject to the Companys charge-off and nonaccrual policies. See the Allowance for Credit Losses section within this Note for further information regarding these policies. If a loan is on nonaccrual before it is determined to be a TDR then the loan remains on nonaccrual. TDRs may be returned to accrual status if there has been at least a six month sustained period of repayment performance by the borrower. Consistent with regulatory guidance, upon sustained performance and classification as a TDR through the Companys year end, the loan will be removed from TDR status as long as the modified terms were market-based at the time of modification. Generally, once a residential loan becomes a TDR, it is probable that the loan will likely continue to be reported as a TDR for the life of the loan. Interest income recognition on impaired loans is dependent upon nonaccrual status, TDR designation, and loan type as discussed above.
For loans accounted for at amortized cost, fees and incremental direct costs associated with the loan origination and pricing process, as well as premiums and discounts, are deferred and amortized as level yield adjustments over the respective loan terms. Premiums for purchased credit cards are amortized on a straight-line basis over one year. Fees received for providing loan commitments that result in funded loans are recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment of the yield. If a loan is never funded, the commitment fee is recognized into noninterest income at the expiration of the commitment period. Origination fees and costs are recognized in noninterest income and expense at the time of origination for newly-originated loans that are accounted for at fair value. See Note 3, Loans for additional information.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Allowance for Credit Losses is composed of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments. The Companys ALLL is the amount considered adequate to absorb probable losses within the portfolio based on managements evaluation of the size and current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. In addition to the review of credit quality through ongoing credit review processes, the Company employs a variety of modeling and estimation techniques to measure credit risk and construct an appropriate and adequate ALLL. Numerous asset quality measures, both quantitative and qualitative, are considered in estimating the ALLL. Such evaluation considers numerous factors for each of the loan portfolio segments, including, but not limited to net charge-off trends, internal risk ratings, changes in internal risk ratings, loss forecasts, collateral values, geographic location, delinquency rates, nonperforming and restructured loan status, origination channel, product mix, underwriting practices, industry conditions, and economic trends. In addition to these factors, refreshed FICO scores are considered for consumer and residential loans and single name borrower concentration is considered for commercial loans. These credit quality factors are incorporated into various loss estimation models and analytical tools utilized in the ALLL process and/or are qualitatively considered in evaluating the overall reasonableness of the ALLL.
Large commercial (all loan classes) nonaccrual loans and certain consumer (other direct), residential (nonguaranteed residential mortgages, home equity products, and residential construction), and commercial (all classes) loans whose terms have been modified in a TDR are individually identified for evaluation of impairment. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the agreement. If necessary, a specific allowance is established for individually evaluated impaired loans. The specific allowance established for these loans is based on a thorough analysis of the most probable source of repayment, including the present value of the loans expected future cash flows, the loans estimated market value, or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral depending on the most likely source of repayment. Any change in the present value attributable to the passage of time is recognized through the provision for credit losses.
General allowances are established for loans and leases grouped into pools based on similar characteristics. In this process, general allowance factors are based on an analysis of historical charge-off experience, portfolio trends, regional and national economic conditions, and expected loss given default derived from the Companys internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made to the ALLL after an assessment of internal and external influences on credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or other risk rating data. These influences may include elements such as changes in credit underwriting, concentration risk, macroeconomic conditions, and/or recent observable asset quality trends.
The Companys charge-off policy meets or is more stringent than regulatory minimums. Losses on unsecured consumer loans are recognized at 90 days past due compared to the regulatory loss criteria of 120 days past due. Secured consumer loans, including residential real estate, are typically charged-off between 120 and 180 days past due, depending on the collateral type, in compliance with the FFIEC guidelines. Loans that have been partially charged-off remain on nonperforming status, regardless of collateral value, until specific borrower performance criteria are met.
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
The Company uses numerous sources of information in order to make an appropriate evaluation of a propertys value. Estimated collateral valuations are based on appraisals, broker price opinions, recent sales of foreclosed properties, automated valuation models, other property-specific information, and relevant market information, supplemented by the Companys internal property valuation professionals. The value estimate is based on an orderly disposition and marketing period of the property. In limited instances, the Company adjusts externally provided appraisals for justifiable and well-supported reasons, such as an appraiser not being aware of certain property-specific factors or recent sales information. Appraisals generally represent the as is value of the property but may be adjusted based on the intended disposition strategy of the property.
For commercial real estate loans secured by property, acceptable third-party appraisal or other form of evaluation is obtained prior to the origination of the loan. Updated evaluations of the collaterals value are obtained at least annually, or earlier if the credit quality of the loan deteriorates. In situations where an updated appraisal has not been received or a formal evaluation performed, the Company monitors factors that can positively or negatively impact property value, such as the date of the last valuation, the volatility of property values in specific markets, changes in the value of similar properties, and changes in the characteristics of individual properties. Changes in collateral value affect the ALLL through the risk rating or impaired loan evaluation process. Charge-offs are recognized when the amount of the loss is quantifiable and timing is known. The charge-off is measured based on the difference between the loans carrying value, including deferred fees, and the estimated net realizable value of the loan, net of estimated selling costs. When assessing property value for the purpose of determining a charge-off, a third-party appraisal or an independently derived internal evaluation is generally employed.
For mortgage loans secured by residential property where the Company is proceeding with a foreclosure action, a new valuation is obtained prior to the loan becoming 180 days past due and, if required, the loan is written down to net realizable value, net of estimated selling costs. In the event the Company decides not to proceed with a foreclosure action, the full balance of the loan is charged-off. If a loan remains in the foreclosure process for 12 months past the original charge-off, typically at 180 days past due, the Company obtains a new valuation and, if required, writes the loan down to the new valuation, less estimated selling costs. At foreclosure, a new valuation is obtained and the loan is transferred to OREO at the new valuation less estimated selling costs; any loan balance in excess of the transfer value is charged-off. Estimated declines in value of the residential collateral between these formal evaluation events are captured in the ALLL based on changes in the house price index in the applicable metropolitan statistical area or other market information.
In addition to the ALLL, the Company also estimates probable losses related to unfunded lending commitments, such as letters of credit and binding unfunded loan commitments. Unfunded lending commitments are analyzed and segregated by risk similar to funded loans based on the Companys internal risk rating scale. These risk classifications, in combination with an analysis of historical loss experience, probability of commitment usage, existing economic conditions, and any other pertinent information, result in the estimation of the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments is reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in other liabilities and through the third quarter of 2009, the provision associated with changes in the unfunded lending commitment reserve was reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) in noninterest expense. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company began recording changes in the unfunded lending commitment reserve in the provision for credit losses. See Note 4, Allowance for Credit Losses, for additional information.
Accounting Policies Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, an update to ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires the disclosure of transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, along with the reasons for the transfers and a gross presentation of purchases and sales of level 3 instruments. Additionally, the ASU requires fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and enhanced disclosures around level 2 valuation techniques and inputs. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements for level 1 and 2 transfers and the expanded fair value measurement and valuation disclosures effective January 1, 2010. The disclosure requirements for level 3 activities were effective for the interim reporting period ending March 31, 2011. The required disclosures are included in Note 12, Fair Value Election and Measurement. The adoption of these disclosure requirements had no impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or EPS.
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The ASU requires more disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables, which include loans, lease receivables, and other long-term receivables, and the credit allowances held against them. The disclosure requirements that were effective as of December 31, 2010 are included in Note 3, Loans, and Note 4, Allowance for Credit Losses. Disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period were effective for the interim reporting period ending March 31, 2011 are also included in Note 3, Loans, and Note 4, Allowance for Credit Losses,. The adoption of the ASU did not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or EPS.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. The update requires companies to perform step 2 of the goodwill impairment analysis if the carrying value of a reporting unit is zero or negative and it is more likely than not that goodwill for that reporting unit is impaired. The adoption of the ASU as of January 1, 2011 did not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or EPS.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The ASU provides additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a modification of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a TDR, both for purposes of recognizing loan losses and additional disclosures regarding TDRs. A modification of a credit arrangement constitutes a TDR if it constitutes a concession and the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The clarifications for classification apply to all restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011. The measurement of impairment for those newly identified TDRs will be applied prospectively beginning on July 1, 2011. The related disclosures, which were previously deferred by ASU 2011-01, will be required for the interim reporting period ending September 30, 2011 and subsequent reporting periods. The adoption of the ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or EPS. The Companys level of TDRs increased by less than $100 million at the date of adoption.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. A repurchase agreement is a transaction in which a company sells financial instruments to a buyer, typically in exchange for cash, and simultaneously enters into an agreement to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date. The determination of whether the transaction is accounted for as a sale or a collateralized financing is determined by assessing whether the seller retains effective control of the financial instrument. The ASU changes the assessment of effective control by removing the criterion that requires the seller to have the ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets with substantially the same terms, even in the event of default by the buyer and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The Company will apply the new guidance to repurchase agreements entered into or amended after January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect the ASU to have a significant impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or EPS.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The primary purpose of the ASU is to conform the language in the fair value measurements guidance in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The ASU also clarifies how to apply existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. Further, the ASU requires additional disclosures about transfers between level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, quantitative information for level 3 inputs, and the level of the fair value measurement hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but for which the fair value is required to be disclosed. The ASU is effective for the interim reporting period ending March 31, 2012. The Company is evaluating the impact of the ASU; however, it is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or EPS.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The ASU requires presentation of the components of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements. The update does not change the items presented in OCI and does not affect the calculation or reporting of EPS. The guidance is effective on January 1, 2012 and must be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company is in the process of evaluating the presentation options; however, adoption of the ASU will not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or EPS.
8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
Note 2 Securities Available for Sale
Securities Portfolio Composition
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$730 | $4 | $8 | $726 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
2,519 | 48 | 1 | 2,566 | ||||||||||||
U.S. states and political subdivisions |
499 | 19 | 2 | 516 | ||||||||||||
MBS - agency |
18,797 | 536 | 2 | 19,331 | ||||||||||||
MBS - private |
335 | 1 | 25 | 311 | ||||||||||||
CDO securities |
337 | - | - | 337 | ||||||||||||
ABS |
615 | 14 | 4 | 625 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other debt securities |
54 | 3 | 1 | 56 | ||||||||||||
Coke common stock |
- | 2,019 | - | 2,019 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities1 |
728 | 1 | - | 729 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total securities AFS |
$24,614 | $2,645 | $43 | $27,216 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$5,446 | $115 | $45 | $5,516 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
1,883 | 19 | 7 | 1,895 | ||||||||||||
U.S. states and political subdivisions |
565 | 17 | 3 | 579 | ||||||||||||
MBS - agency |
14,014 | 372 | 28 | 14,358 | ||||||||||||
MBS - private |
378 | 3 | 34 | 347 | ||||||||||||
CDO securities |
50 | - | - | 50 | ||||||||||||
ABS |
798 | 15 | 5 | 808 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other debt securities |
464 | 19 | 1 | 482 | ||||||||||||
Coke common stock |
- | 1,973 | - | 1,973 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities1 |
886 | 1 | - | 887 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total securities AFS |
$24,484 | $2,534 | $123 | $26,895 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1At June 30, 2011, other equity securities included $205 million in FHLB of Atlanta stock (par value), $391 million in Federal Reserve Bank stock (par value), and $132 million in mutual fund investments (par value). At December 31, 2010, other equity securities included $298 million in FHLB of Atlanta stock (par value), $391 million in Federal Reserve Bank stock (par value), and $197 million in mutual fund investments (par value).
Securities AFS that were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements, trusts, and other funds had a fair value of $4.5 billion and $6.9 billion as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Further, under The Agreements, the Company pledged its shares of Coke common stock, which is hedged with derivative instruments, as discussed in Note 11, Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company has also pledged $1.1 billion of certain trading assets and cash equivalents to secure $1.0 billion of repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2011.
9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
The amortized cost and fair value of investments in debt securities at June 30, 2011 by estimated average life are shown below. Actual cash flows may differ from estimated average lives and contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
(Dollars in millions) | 1
Year or Less |
1-5 Years |
5-10 Years |
After 10
Years |
Total | |||||||||||||||
Distribution of Maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$8 | $214 | $508 | $- | $730 | |||||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
60 | 2,010 | 414 | 35 | 2,519 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. states and political subdivisions |
131 | 255 | 44 | 69 | 499 | |||||||||||||||
MBS - agency |
778 | 11,566 | 1,105 | 5,348 | 18,797 | |||||||||||||||
MBS - private |
33 | 300 | 2 | - | 335 | |||||||||||||||
CDO securities |
150 | 187 | - | - | 337 | |||||||||||||||
ABS |
386 | 223 | 6 | - | 615 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate and other debt securities |
8 | 4 | 17 | 25 | 54 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total debt securities |
$1,554 | $14,759 | $2,096 | $5,477 | $23,886 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$8 | $219 | $499 | $- | $726 | |||||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
60 | 2,044 | 427 | 35 | 2,566 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. states and political subdivisions |
135 | 269 | 45 | 67 | 516 | |||||||||||||||
MBS - agency |
797 | 11,947 | 1,146 | 5,441 | 19,331 | |||||||||||||||
MBS - private |
30 | 279 | 2 | - | 311 | |||||||||||||||
CDO securities |
150 | 187 | - | - | 337 | |||||||||||||||
ABS |
395 | 225 | 5 | - | 625 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate and other debt securities |
8 | 4 | 19 | 25 | 56 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total debt securities |
$1,583 | $15,174 | $2,143 | $5,568 | $24,468 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position
The Company held certain investment securities having unrealized loss positions. Market changes in interest rates and credit spreads will result in temporary unrealized losses as the market price of securities fluctuates. As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not intend to sell these securities nor was it more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery or maturity. The Company has reviewed its portfolio for OTTI in accordance with the accounting policies outlined in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
Securities in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than twelve months | Twelve months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||||||||||
Temporarily impaired securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$499 | $8 | $- | $- | $499 | $8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
85 | 1 | - | - | 85 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. states and political subdivisions |
9 | - | 34 | 2 | 43 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
MBS - agency |
477 | 2 | - | - | 477 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
MBS - private |
4 | - | 23 | 3 | 27 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
CDO securities |
162 | - | - | - | 162 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS |
- | - | 13 | 3 | 13 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other debt securities |
- | - | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
1,236 | 11 | 73 | 9 | 1,309 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
MBS - private |
19 | 1 | 241 | 21 | 260 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS |
2 | - | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
21 | 1 | 244 | 22 | 265 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total impaired securities |
$1,257 | $12 | $317 | $31 | $1,574 | $43 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than twelve months | Twelve months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||||||||||
Temporarily impaired securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$2,010 | $45 | $- | $- | $2,010 | $45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
1,426 | 7 | - | - | 1,426 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. states and political subdivisions |
45 | 1 | 35 | 2 | 80 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
MBS - agency |
3,497 | 28 | - | - | 3,497 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
MBS - private |
18 | - | 17 | 3 | 35 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS |
- | - | 14 | 4 | 14 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other debt securities |
- | - | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
6,996 | 81 | 69 | 10 | 7,065 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
MBS - private |
- | - | 286 | 31 | 286 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS |
4 | 1 | - | - | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
4 | 1 | 286 | 31 | 290 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total impaired securities |
$7,000 | $82 | $355 | $41 | $7,355 | $123 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Includes OTTI securities for which credit losses have been recorded in earnings in current or prior periods.
Unrealized losses on securities that have been other-than-temporarily impaired are the result of factors other than credit and therefore are recorded in OCI. Losses related to credit impairment on these securities is determined through estimated cash flow analyses and have been recorded in earnings in current or prior periods. The unrealized OTTI loss relating to private MBS as of June 30, 2011, includes purchased and retained interests from 2007 vintage securitizations. The unrealized OTTI loss relating to ABS is related to three securities within the portfolio that are 2003 vintage home equity issuances. The expectation of cash flows for the previously impaired ABS securities has improved such that the amount of expected credit losses was reduced, and the expected increase in cash flows will be accreted into earnings as a yield adjustment over the remaining life of the securities.
11
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
Realized Gains and Losses and Other than Temporarily Impaired
Gross realized gains and losses on sales and OTTI on securities AFS during the periods were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Gross realized gains |
$33 | $62 | $176 | $77 | ||||||||||||
Gross realized losses |
- | (4) | (78) | (17) | ||||||||||||
OTTI |
(1) | (1) | (2) | (2) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net securities gains |
$32 | $57 | $96 | $58 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The securities that gave rise to the credit impairment recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 consisted of private MBS with a fair value of $193 million at June 30, 2011. The securities impacted by credit impairment during the six months ended June 30, 2010, consisted of private MBS with a fair value of $1 million as of June 30, 2010. Credit impairment that is determined through the use of cash flow models is estimated using cash flows on security specific collateral and the transaction structure. Future expected credit losses are determined by using various assumptions, the most significant of which include current default rates, prepayment rates, and loss severities. For the majority of the securities that the Company has reviewed for credit-related OTTI, credit information is available and modeled at the loan level underlying each security, and the Company also considers information such as loan to collateral values, FICO scores, and geographic considerations such as home price appreciation/depreciation. These inputs are updated on a regular basis to ensure the most current credit and other assumptions are utilized in the analysis. If, based on this analysis, the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, the expected cash flows are then discounted at the securitys initial effective interest rate to arrive at a present value amount. OTTI credit losses reflect the difference between the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis of these securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, all OTTI recognized in earnings on private MBS have underlying collateral of residential mortgage loans securitized in 2007. The majority of the OTTI was taken on private MBS which were originated by the Company and, therefore, have geographic concentrations in the Companys primary footprint. Additionally, the Company has not purchased new private MBS during the six months ended June 30, 2011, and continues to reduce existing exposure primarily through paydowns.
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | MBS - Private | MBS - Private | MBS - Private | MBS - Private | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI losses |
$1 | $1 | $2 | $2 | ||||||||||||
Portion of losses recognized in OCI (before taxes) 1 |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
$1 | $1 | $2 | $2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 The initial OTTI amount represents the excess of the amortized cost over the fair value of AFS debt securities. For subsequent impairments of the same security, amount represents additional declines in the fair value subsequent to the previously recorded OTTI, if applicable, until such time the security is no longer in an unrealized loss position.
The following is a rollforward of credit losses recognized in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, related to securities for which some portion of the OTTI loss remains in AOCI:
(Dollars in millions) | ||||
Balance, as of January 1, 2010 |
$22 | |||
Additions/reductions1 |
- | |||
|
|
|||
Balance, as of June 30, 2010 |
$22 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance, as of January 1, 2011 |
$20 | |||
Additions: |
||||
OTTI credit losses on previously impaired securities |
2 | |||
Reductions: |
||||
Increases in expected cash flows recognized over the remaining life of the securities |
(1) | |||
|
|
|||
Balance, as of June 30, 2011 |
$21 | |||
|
|
1 During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized $2 million of OTTI through earnings on debt securities in which no portion of the OTTI loss was included in OCI at any time during the period. OTTI related to these securities are excluded from this amount.
12
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
The following table presents a summary of the significant inputs used in determining the measurement of credit losses recognized in earnings for private MBS as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||
Current default rate |
4 - 8% | 2 - 7% | ||
Prepayment rate |
12 - 22% | 14 - 22% | ||
Loss severity |
39 - 44% | 37 - 46% |
Note 3 - Loans
Composition of Loan Portfolio
(Dollars in millions) | June 30,
2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||
Commercial & industrial1 |
$45,922 | $44,753 | ||||||
Commercial real estate |
5,707 | 6,167 | ||||||
Commercial construction |
1,740 | 2,568 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total commercial loans |
53,369 | 53,488 | ||||||
Residential loans: |
||||||||
Residential mortgages - guaranteed |
4,513 | 4,520 | ||||||
Residential mortgages - nonguaranteed2 |
23,224 | 23,959 | ||||||
Home equity products |
16,169 | 16,751 | ||||||
Residential construction |
1,118 | 1,291 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total residential loans |
45,024 | 46,521 | ||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||
Guaranteed student loans |
4,620 | 4,260 | ||||||
Other direct |
1,863 | 1,722 | ||||||
Indirect |
9,630 | 9,499 | ||||||
Credit cards |
407 | 485 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total consumer loans |
16,520 | 15,966 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LHFI |
$114,913 | $115,975 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LHFS |
$2,052 | $3,501 |
1Includes $4 million of loans carried at fair value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
2Includes $445 million and $488 million of loans carried at fair value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company transferred $198 million in LHFI to LHFS. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company sold $277 million in loans and leases that had been held for investment at December 31, 2010 for a gain of $10 million. There were no other material purchases or sales of LHFI during the period.
Credit Quality Evaluation
The Company evaluates the credit quality of its loan portfolio based on internal credit risk ratings using numerous factors, including consumer credit risk scores, rating agency information, LTV ratios, collateral, collection experience, and other internal metrics. For the commercial portfolio, the Company believes that the most appropriate credit quality indicator is the individual loans risk assessment expressed according to regulatory agency classification, pass or criticized. Loans are rated pass or criticized based on the borrowers willingness and ability to contractually perform along with the estimated net losses the Company would incur in the event of default. Criticized loans have a higher probability of default. As a result, criticized loans are further categorized into accruing and nonaccruing, representing managements assessment of the collectability of principal and interest. Ratings for loans are updated at least annually or more frequently if there is a material change in creditworthiness.
13
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
For consumer and residential loans, the Company believes that consumer credit risk, as assessed by the FICO scoring method, is a relevant credit quality indicator. FICO scores are obtained at origination as part of the Companys formal underwriting process, and refreshed FICO scores are obtained by the Company at least quarterly. However, for student loans which are guaranteed by a federal agency, the Company does not utilize FICO scores as the Company does not originate government guaranteed student loans. For guaranteed student loans, the Company monitors the credit quality based primarily on delinquency status, which it believes is the most appropriate indicator of credit quality. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, 77% of the guaranteed student loan portfolio was current with respect to payments; however, the loss exposure to the Company was mitigated by the government guarantee.
LHFI by credit quality indicator are shown in the tables below.
Commercial & industrial | Commercial real estate | Commercial construction | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||
Credit rating: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
$43,551 | $42,140 | $3,941 | $4,316 | $641 | $836 | ||||||||||||||||||
Criticized accruing |
1,834 | 2,029 | 1,367 | 1,509 | 472 | 771 | ||||||||||||||||||
Criticized nonaccruing |
537 | 584 | 399 | 342 | 627 | 961 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$45,922 | $44,753 | $5,707 | $6,167 | $1,740 | $2,568 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages
- nonguaranteed2 |
Home equity products | Residential construction | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current FICO score range: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
700 and above |
$15,752 | $15,920 | $11,471 | $11,673 | $752 | $828 | ||||||||||||||||||
620 - 699 |
4,226 | 4,457 | 2,862 | 2,897 | 219 | 258 | ||||||||||||||||||
Below 6201 |
3,246 | 3,582 | 1,836 | 2,181 | 147 | 205 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$23,224 | $23,959 | $16,169 | $16,751 | $1,118 | $1,291 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer - other direct3 | Consumer - indirect | Consumer - credit cards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current FICO score range: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
700 and above |
$1,111 | $973 | $7,023 | $6,780 | $219 | $258 | ||||||||||||||||||
620 - 699 |
237 | 231 | 1,822 | 1,799 | 123 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||||
Below 6201 |
90 | 105 | 785 | 920 | 65 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$1,438 | $1,309 | $9,630 | $9,499 | $407 | $485 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 For substantially all loans with refreshed FICO scores below 620, the borrowers FICO score at the time of origination exceeded 620 but has since deteriorated as the loan has seasoned.
2 Excludes $4.5 billion at both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 of federally guaranteed residential loans. At both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the vast majority of these loans had FICO scores of 700 and above.
3 Excludes $425 million and $413 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of private-label student loans with third party insurance. At both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the vast majority of these loans had FICO scores of 700 and above.
14
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
The payment status for the LHFI portfolio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is shown in the tables below:
As of June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Accruing Current |
Accruing 30-89 Days Past Due |
Accruing 90+ Days Past Due |
Nonaccruing3 | Total | |||||||||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial1 |
$45,271 | $93 | $21 | $537 | $45,922 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
5,291 | 15 | 2 | 399 | 5,707 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial construction |
1,102 | 11 | - | 627 | 1,740 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
51,664 | 119 | 23 | 1,563 | 53,369 | |||||||||||||||
Residential loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages - guaranteed |
3,408 | 163 | 942 | - | 4,513 | |||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages - nonguaranteed2 |
21,448 | 336 | 28 | 1,412 | 23,224 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity products |
15,601 | 233 | - | 335 | 16,169 | |||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
825 | 25 | 2 | 266 | 1,118 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total residential loans |
41,282 | 757 | 972 | 2,013 | 45,024 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Guaranteed student loans |
3,578 | 417 | 625 | - | 4,620 | |||||||||||||||
Other direct |
1,834 | 15 | 5 | 9 | 1,863 | |||||||||||||||
Indirect |
9,547 | 55 | 3 | 25 | 9,630 | |||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
391 | 8 | 8 | - | 407 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
15,350 | 495 | 641 | 34 | 16,520 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total LHFI |
$108,296 | $1,371 | $1,636 | $3,610 | $114,913 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Includes $4 million in loans carried at fair value.
2 Includes $445 million in loans carried at fair value.
3 Total nonaccruing loans past due 90 days or more totaled $2.8 billion. Nonaccruing loans past due fewer than 90 days include modified nonaccrual loans reported as TDRs.
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Accruing Current |
Accruing 30-89 Days Past Due |
Accruing 90+ Days Past Due |
Nonaccruing3 | Total | |||||||||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial1 |
$44,046 | $111 | $12 | $584 | $44,753 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
5,794 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 6,167 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial construction |
1,595 | 11 | 1 | 961 | 2,568 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
51,435 | 149 | 17 | 1,887 | 53,488 | |||||||||||||||
Residential loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages - guaranteed |
3,469 | 167 | 884 | - | 4,520 | |||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages - nonguaranteed2 |
21,916 | 456 | 44 | 1,543 | 23,959 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity products |
16,162 | 234 | - | 355 | 16,751 | |||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
953 | 42 | 6 | 290 | 1,291 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total residential loans |
42,500 | 899 | 934 | 2,188 | 46,521 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Guaranteed student loans |
3,281 | 383 | 596 | - | 4,260 | |||||||||||||||
Other direct |
1,692 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 1,722 | |||||||||||||||
Indirect |
9,400 | 74 | - | 25 | 9,499 | |||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
460 | 12 | 13 | - | 485 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
14,833 | 484 | 614 | 35 | 15,966 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total LHFI |
$108,768 | $1,532 | $1,565 | $4,110 | $115,975 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Includes $4 million in loans carried at fair value.
2 Includes $488 million in loans carried at fair value.
3 Total nonaccruing loans past due 90 days or more totaled $3.3 billion. Nonaccruing loans past due fewer than 90 days include modified nonaccrual loans reported as TDRs.
15
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the agreement. Commercial nonaccrual loans greater than $4 million and certain consumer, residential, and commercial loans whose terms have been modified in a TDR are individually evaluated for impairment. Smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are not included in the following tables. Additionally, the tables below exclude student loans and residential mortgages that were guaranteed by government agencies and for which there was nominal risk of principal loss.
As of June 30, 2011 | For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Unpaid Principal Balance |
Amortized
Cost1 |
Related Allowance |
Average Amortized Cost |
Interest Income Recognized2 |
Average Amortized Cost |
Interest Income Recognized2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial |
$109 | $100 | $- | $102 | $- | $103 | $- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
87 | 62 | - | 68 | 1 | 63 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial construction |
62 | 51 | - | 94 | 1 | 102 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
258 | 213 | - | 264 | 2 | 268 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial |
97 | 86 | 26 | 88 | - | 130 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
169 | 138 | 35 | 154 | 1 | 136 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial construction |
394 | 300 | 104 | 321 | - | 356 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
660 | 524 | 165 | 563 | 1 | 622 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages - nonguaranteed |
2,860 | 2,488 | 283 | 2,445 | 22 | 2,455 | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity products |
521 | 488 | 92 | 487 | 5 | 447 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
228 | 188 | 22 | 191 | 1 | 195 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total residential loans |
3,609 | 3,164 | 397 | 3,123 | 28 | 3,097 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other direct |
13 | 13 | 2 | 13 | - | 11 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans |
$4,540 | $3,914 | $564 | $3,963 | $31 | $3,998 | $62 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Amortized cost reflects charge-offs that have been recognized plus other amounts that have been applied to reduce the net book balance.
2 Of the interest income recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, cash basis interest income was $7 million and $13 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Unpaid Principal Balance |
Amortized Cost1 |
Related Allowance |
|||||||||
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial |
$86 | $67 | $- | |||||||||
Commercial real estate |
110 | 86 | - | |||||||||
Commercial construction |
67 | 52 | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total commercial loans |
263 | 205 | - | |||||||||
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial |
123 | 96 | 18 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate |
103 | 81 | 19 | |||||||||
Commercial construction |
673 | 524 | 138 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total commercial loans |
899 | 701 | 175 | |||||||||
Residential loans: |
||||||||||||
Residential mortgages - nonguaranteed |
2,785 | 2,467 | 309 | |||||||||
Home equity products |
503 | 503 | 93 | |||||||||
Residential construction |
226 | 196 | 26 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total residential loans |
3,514 | 3,166 | 428 | |||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||
Other direct |
11 | 11 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total impaired loans |
$4,687 | $4,083 | $605 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Amortized cost reflects charge-offs that have been recognized plus other amounts that have been applied to reduce net book balance.
16
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
Included in the impaired loan balances above were $2.6 billion and $2.5 billion of accruing TDRs at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of which 86% and 85% were current, respectively. See Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further information regarding the Companys loan impairment policy.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $21 million and $15 million, respectively, in commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing receivables whose terms have been modified in a TDR.
Nonperforming assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are shown in the following table:
(Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
Nonperforming Assets |
||||||||
Nonaccrual/NPLs: |
||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||
Commercial & industrial1 |
$537 | $584 | ||||||
Commercial real estate |
399 | 342 | ||||||
Commercial construction |
627 | 961 | ||||||
Residential loans: |
||||||||
Residential mortgages - nonguaranteed2 |
1,412 | 1,543 | ||||||
Home equity products |
335 | 355 | ||||||
Residential construction |
266 | 290 | ||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||
Other direct |
9 | 10 | ||||||
Indirect |
25 | 25 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total nonaccrual/NPLs |
3,610 | 4,110 | ||||||
OREO3 |
483 | 596 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets |
11 | 52 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$4,104 | $4,758 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
1Includes $4 million of loans carried at fair value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
2Includes $23 million and $24 million of loans carried at fair value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
3Does not include foreclosed real estate related to loans insured by the FHA or the VA. Proceeds due from the FHA and the VA are recorded as a receivable in other assets until the funds are received and the property is conveyed. The receivable amount related to proceeds due from FHA or the VA totaled $175 million and $195 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company does not have a significant concentration of risk to any individual client except for the U.S. government and its agencies. However, a geographic concentration arises because the Company operates primarily in the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic regions of the U.S. SunTrust engages in limited international banking activities. The Companys total cross-border outstanding loans were $383 million and $446 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The major concentrations of credit risk for the Company arise by collateral type in relation to loans and credit commitments. The only significant concentration that exists is in loans secured by residential real estate. At June 30, 2011, the Company owned $45.0 billion in residential loans, representing 39% of total LHFI, and had $13.2 billion in commitments to extend credit on home equity lines and $7.2 billion in mortgage loan commitments. Of the residential loans owned at June 30, 2011, 10% were guaranteed by a federal agency or a GSE. At December 31, 2010, the Company owned $46.5 billion in residential real estate loans, representing 40% of total LHFI, and had $13.6 billion in commitments to extend credit on home equity lines and $9.2 billion in mortgage loan commitments. Of the residential loans owned at December 31, 2010, 10% were guaranteed by a federal agency or a GSE.
17
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
Included in the residential mortgage portfolio were $16.7 billion and $17.6 billion of mortgage loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, that were not covered by mortgage insurance and whose terms, such as an interest only feature, a high LTV ratio, or a junior lien position, may increase the Companys exposure to credit risk and result in a concentration of credit risk. Of these mortgage loans, $12.1 billion and $13.2 billion were interest only loans at origination, primarily with a ten year interest only period, including $1.9 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, of loans that have since been modified into fully amortizing products.
Note 4 - Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses consists of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments. Activity in the allowance for credit losses is summarized in the table below:
Three Months Ended
June 30 |
Six Months Ended
June 30 |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$2,908 | $3,276 | $3,032 | $3,235 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
395 | 702 | 846 | 1,579 | ||||||||||||
Benefit for unfunded commitments |
(3) | (40) | (7) | (55) | ||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs |
(563) | (768) | (1,178) | (1,630) | ||||||||||||
Loan recoveries |
58 | 46 | 102 | 87 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$2,795 | $3,216 | $2,795 | $3,216 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Components: |
||||||||||||||||
ALLL |
$2,744 | $3,156 | ||||||||||||||
Unfunded commitments reserve1 |
51 | 60 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
$2,795 | $3,216 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1The unfunded commitments reserve is separately recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Activity in the ALLL by segment is presented in the tables below:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Commercial | Residential | Consumer | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$1,255 | $1,440 | $159 | $2,854 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
124 | 252 | 19 | 395 | ||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs |
(220) | (303) | (40) | (563) | ||||||||||||
Loan recoveries |
41 | 6 | 11 | 58 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$1,200 | $1,395 | $149 | $2,744 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Commercial | Residential | Consumer | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$1,399 | $1,590 | $187 | $3,176 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
270 | 413 | 19 | 702 | ||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs |
(251) | (470) | (47) | (768) | ||||||||||||
Loan recoveries |
29 | 5 | 12 | 46 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$1,447 | $1,538 | $171 | $3,156 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Commercial | Residential | Consumer | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$1,303 | $1,498 | $173 | $2,974 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
232 | 574 | 40 | 846 | ||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs |
(405) | (688) | (85) | (1,178) | ||||||||||||
Loan recoveries |
70 | 11 | 21 | 102 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$1,200 | $1,395 | $149 | $2,744 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Commercial | Residential | Consumer | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$1,353 | $1,592 | $175 | $3,120 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
485 | 1,014 | 80 | 1,579 | ||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs |
(443) | (1,078) | (109) | (1,630) | ||||||||||||
Loan recoveries |
52 | 10 | 25 | 87 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$1,447 | $1,538 | $171 | $3,156 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As further discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, the ALLL is composed of specific allowances for certain nonaccrual loans and TDRs and general allowances grouped into loan pools based on similar characteristics. No allowance is required for loans carried at fair value. Additionally, the Company does not record an allowance for loan products that are guaranteed by government agencies, as there is nominal risk of principal loss. The Companys LHFI portfolio and related ALLL at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, is shown in the tables below:
As of June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Residential | Consumer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated |
$737 | $165 | $3,164 | $397 | $13 | $2 | $3,914 | $564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated |
52,628 | 1,035 | 41,415 | 998 | 16,507 | 147 | 110,550 | 2,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total evaluated |
53,365 | 1,200 | 44,579 | 1,395 | 16,520 | 149 | 114,464 | 2,744 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LHFI at fair value |
4 | - | 445 | - | - | - | 449 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total LHFI |
$53,369 | $1,200 | $45,024 | $1,395 | $16,520 | $149 | $114,913 | $2,744 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Residential | Consumer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
Carrying Value |
Associated ALLL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated |
$906 | $175 | $3,166 | $428 | $11 | $2 | $4,083 | $605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated |
52,578 | 1,128 | 42,867 | 1,070 | 15,955 | 171 | 111,400 | 2,369 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total evaluated |
53,484 | 1,303 | 46,033 | 1,498 | 15,966 | 173 | 115,483 | 2,974 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LHFI at fair value |
4 | - | 488 | - | - | - | 492 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total LHFI |
$53,488 | $1,303 | $46,521 | $1,498 | $15,966 | $173 | $115,975 | $2,974 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis or as events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount or indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative. No events have occurred or circumstances changed since the annual testing of the Companys goodwill as of September 30, 2010 that caused interim testing of goodwill during the first six months of 2011.
19
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)-Continued
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the six months ended June 30 are as follows:
(Dollars in millions) | Retail & Commercial |
Retail Banking |
Diversified Commercial Banking |
CIB | W&IM | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
$5,739 | $- | $- | $223 | $357 | $6,319 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment transfers |
(5,739) | 4,854 | 928 | (43) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration |
- | - | - | - | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
$-& |