Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

OR

 

o         TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file number 001-34142

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

California

 

26-2326676

State or other jurisdiction of

 

I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization

 

Identification No.

 

125 N. Third Ave., Oakdale, CA  95361

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(209) 848-2265

Issuer’s telephone number

 

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  o  No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o  No  x

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

 

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  7,702,127 shares of common stock outstanding as of October 31, 2010.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

Oak Valley Bancorp

September 30, 2010

 

Index

 

 

 

Page

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

3

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

 

3

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009

 

4

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009

 

5

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes of Shareholders’ Equity for the Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2010 and the Year Ended December 31, 2009

 

6

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009

 

7

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

8

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

18

 

 

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

33

 

 

 

 

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

 

33

 

 

 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

34

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

 

34

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

34

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

34

Item 4.

Reserved

 

34

Item 5.

Other Information

 

34

Item 6.

Exhibits

 

34

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

3



Table of Contents

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

36,321,885

 

$

20,003,548

 

Federal funds sold

 

10,170,000

 

1,645,000

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

46,491,885

 

21,648,548

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale

 

55,023,463

 

50,765,314

 

Loans, net of allowance for loan loss of $7,700,206 in 2010 and $7,020,222 in 2009

 

400,459,919

 

417,795,686

 

Bank premises and equipment, net

 

10,334,633

 

10,167,297

 

Other real estate owned (OREO)

 

1,142,887

 

2,149,514

 

Accrued interest and other assets

 

21,426,083

 

22,195,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

534,878,870

 

$

524,721,713

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

$

448,904,177

 

$

429,210,284

 

Accrued interest and other liabilities

 

3,369,731

 

2,619,178

 

FHLB advances

 

18,500,000

 

32,200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

470,773,908

 

464,029,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, no par value; $1,000 per share liquidation preference, 10,000,000 shares authorized and 13,500 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

 

12,972,283

 

12,847,297

 

Common stock, no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 7,702,127 and 7,681,877 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

 

24,003,550

 

23,933,440

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

2,067,431

 

1,997,747

 

Retained earnings

 

22,726,795

 

20,230,683

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

2,334,903

 

1,683,084

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

64,104,962

 

60,692,251

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

534,878,870

 

$

524,721,713

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

 

 

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED

 

NINE MONTHS ENDED

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 30,

 

SEPTEMBER 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

INTEREST INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and fees on loans

 

$

6,405,225

 

$

6,736,602

 

$

19,232,421

 

$

20,048,818

 

Interest on securities available for sale

 

592,553

 

678,379

 

1,769,197

 

1,967,059

 

Interest on federal funds sold

 

3,346

 

1,334

 

7,220

 

2,929

 

Interest on deposits with banks

 

13,370

 

1,942

 

21,158

 

3,574

 

Total interest income

 

7,014,494

 

7,418,257

 

21,029,996

 

22,022,380

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTEREST EXPENSE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

570,347

 

1,245,576

 

2,097,640

 

3,918,842

 

FHLB advances

 

85,370

 

152,841

 

268,625

 

539,979

 

Federal funds purchased

 

0

 

38

 

110

 

381

 

Total interest expense

 

655,717

 

1,398,455

 

2,366,375

 

4,459,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

6,358,777

 

6,019,802

 

18,663,621

 

17,563,178

 

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

1,005,000

 

925,000

 

3,015,000

 

4,962,012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

5,353,777

 

5,094,802

 

15,648,621

 

12,601,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-INTEREST INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposits

 

272,136

 

300,282

 

787,142

 

875,229

 

Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance

 

103,986

 

101,057

 

308,671

 

303,170

 

Mortgage commissions

 

30,849

 

38,143

 

74,984

 

127,160

 

Other

 

269,078

 

338,154

 

884,047

 

717,763

 

Total non-interest income

 

676,049

 

777,636

 

2,054,844

 

2,023,322

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

2,143,094

 

1,974,022

 

6,483,605

 

5,889,247

 

Occupancy expenses

 

690,209

 

658,928

 

2,031,127

 

2,031,844

 

Data processing fees

 

233,694

 

220,181

 

706,889

 

672,597

 

OREO expenses

 

35,051

 

915,623

 

598,894

 

1,974,375

 

Assessments (FDIC & DFI)

 

258,000

 

230,269

 

774,000

 

667,355

 

Other operating expenses

 

828,155

 

745,563

 

2,355,381

 

2,234,073

 

Total non-interest expense

 

4,188,203

 

4,744,586

 

12,949,896

 

13,469,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income before provision for income taxes

 

1,841,623

 

1,127,852

 

4,753,569

 

1,154,997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES

 

700,700

 

248,701

 

1,626,221

 

(109,401

)

NET INCOME

 

$

1,140,923

 

$

879,151

 

$

3,127,348

 

$

1,264,398

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock dividends and accretion

 

210,412

 

210,411

 

631,236

 

631,233

 

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 

$

930,511

 

$

668,740

 

$

2,496,112

 

$

633,165

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.09

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET EARNINGS PER DILUTED COMMON SHARE

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.09

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.08

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

 

 

 

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Preferred Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Comprehensive

 

Shareholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Income

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances, January 1, 2009

 

7,661,627

 

$

23,863,331

 

13,500

 

$

12,680,649

 

$

1,925,224

 

$

19,226,645

 

 

 

$

290,230

 

$

57,986,079

 

Stock options exercised

 

20,250

 

$

70,109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70,109

 

Preferred stock accretion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

166,648

 

 

 

$

(166,648

)

 

 

 

 

0

 

Preferred stock dividend payments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(637,500

)

 

 

 

 

(637,500

)

Cash dividends ($0.025 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(191,542

)

 

 

 

 

(191,542

)

Stock based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

72,523

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

72,523

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net changes in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (net of income tax of $988,188)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,392,854

 

1,392,854

 

1,392,854

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,999,728

 

1,999,728

 

 

 

1,999,728

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,392,582

 

 

 

 

 

Balances, December 31, 2009

 

7,681,877

 

$

23,933,440

 

13,500

 

$

12,847,297

 

$

1,997,747

 

$

20,230,683

 

 

 

$

1,683,084

 

$

60,692,251

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options exercised

 

20,250

 

$

70,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

70,110

 

Preferred stock accretion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

124,986

 

 

 

$

(124,986

)

 

 

 

 

0

 

Preferred stock dividend payments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(506,250

)

 

 

 

 

(506,250

)

Stock based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,684

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,684

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net changes in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (net of income tax of $455,775)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

651,819

 

651,819

 

651,819

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,127,348

 

3,127,348

 

 

 

3,127,348

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,779,167

 

 

 

 

 

Balances, September 30, 2010

 

7,702,127

 

$

24,003,550

 

13,500

 

$

12,972,283

 

$

2,067,431

 

$

22,726,795

 

 

 

$

2,334,903

 

$

64,104,962

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

6



Table of Contents

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

 

 

 

NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

3,127,348

 

$

1,264,398

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

 

3,015,000

 

4,962,012

 

Depreciation

 

720,632

 

806,526

 

Amortization and accretion, net

 

660

 

(30,778

)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

69,684

 

56,400

 

OREO Write downs and losses on sale

 

413,275

 

1,974,375

 

Gain on called available for sale securities

 

(172,561

)

(132,192

)

Earnings from BOLI cash surrender value

 

(308,671

)

(302,634

)

Decrease (increase) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities

 

750,553

 

(385,587

)

Decrease in accrued interest receivable

 

76,316

 

113,663

 

Decrease (increase) in other assets

 

370,080

 

(1,545,829

)

Net cash from operating activities

 

8,062,316

 

6,780,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of available for sale securities

 

(11,090,604

)

(16,925,358

)

Proceeds from maturities, calls, and principal paydowns of securities available for sale

 

8,111,950

 

7,275,261

 

Net decrease (increase) in loans

 

13,679,367

 

(2,697,451

)

Proceeds from sale of OREO

 

1,234,752

 

209,467

 

Proceeds from redemption of BOLI policies

 

175,771

 

0

 

Net purchases of premises and equipment

 

(887,968

)

(82,872

)

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

 

11,223,268

 

(12,220,953

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

FHLB advanced funds

 

7,100,000

 

50,700,000

 

FHLB payments

 

(20,800,000

)

(92,700,000

)

Federal funds advances

 

480,000

 

8,770,000

 

Federal funds payments

 

(480,000

)

(8,770,000

)

Shareholder cash dividends paid

 

0

 

(191,541

)

Preferred stock dividend payment

 

(506,250

)

(468,750

)

Net increase in demand deposits and savings accounts

 

28,797,189

 

48,137,511

 

Net (decrease) increase in time deposits

 

(9,103,296

)

5,146,855

 

Proceeds from sale of common stock and exercise of stock options

 

70,110

 

70,110

 

Net cash from financing activities

 

5,557,753

 

10,694,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

24,843,337

 

5,253,586

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period

 

21,648,548

 

9,837,860

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period

 

$

46,491,885

 

$

15,091,446

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

2,597,190

 

$

4,766,247

 

Income taxes

 

$

1,646,000

 

$

1,014,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate acquired through foreclosure

 

$

641,400

 

$

1,186,263

 

Change in unrealized gain/loss on available-for-sale securities

 

$

1,107,594

 

$

2,302,718

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Accretion of preferred stock

 

$

124,986

 

$

124,986

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

On July 3, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), a bank holding company reorganization was completed whereby Oak Valley Bancorp became the parent holding company for Oak Valley Community Bank ( the “Bank”).  On the Effective Date, each outstanding share of the Bank was converted into one share of Oak Valley Bancorp and the Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the holding company. The condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes are presented as if the reorganization occurred as of the earliest periods presented and are consistent with those of Oak Valley Community Bank, since prior to the Effective Date, Oak Valley Bancorp had no material assets, liabilities or operations.

 

The accounting principles followed by the Company and the methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and with general practices within the banking industry. In preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates common to the banking industry that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include, but are not limited to, the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the estimation of compensation expense related to stock options granted to employees and directors, and valuation allowances associated with deferred tax assets, the recognition of which are based on future taxable income.

 

The interim consolidated financial statements included in this report are unaudited but reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of a full year’s operations.  For further information, refer to the audited financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

NOTE 2 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

Accounting Standards Codification. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) became effective on July 1, 2009. At that date, the ASC became FASB’s officially recognized source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the away companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.

 

FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” amends prior guidance to amend and expand the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities to provide greater transparency about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under ASC Topic 815, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. To meet those objectives, the new authoritative accounting guidance requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 815 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820,”Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. ASC Topic 820 requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. The new accounting guidance amended prior guidance to expand certain disclosure requirements. The Company adopted the new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820 during the first quarter of 2009. Adoption of the new guidance did not significantly impact the Company’s financial statements.

 

Further new authoritative accounting guidance (Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-5) under ASC Topic 820 provides guidance for measuring the fair value of a liability in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. In such instances, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value utilizing a valuation technique that uses (i) the

 

8



Table of Contents

 

quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, (ii) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or (iii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the existing principles of ASC Topic 820, such as an income approach or market approach. The new authoritative accounting guidance also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The forgoing new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820 became effective for the Company’s financial statements beginning October 1, 2009 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

FASB ASC Topic 320, “Investments - Debt and Equity Securities.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 320, “Investments - Debt and Equity Securities,” (i) changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under ASC Topic 320, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The Company adopted the provisions of the new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 320 during the second quarter of 2009. Adoption of the new guidance did not significantly impact the Company’s financial statements.

 

FASB ASC Topic 825 “Financial Instruments.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires an entity to provide disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information and amends prior guidance to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The new interim disclosures required under Topic 825 were included in the Company’s Form 10-Q beginning September 30, 2009.

 

FASB ASC Topic 825 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”   In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires: (1) disclosure of the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurement categories and the reasons for the transfers; and (2) separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures set forth in the Codification Subtopic 820-10: (1) For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and (2) a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2011, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. As ASU 2010-06 is disclosure-related only, our adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2010 did not impact our financial condition or results of operations.

 

FASB ASC Topic 310 “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Fincancing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.”  In July 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (Topic 310).  This standard expands disclosures about credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for loan losses. The standard will require the Company to expand disclosures about the credit quality of our loans and the related reserves against them. The extra disclosures will include disaggregated matters related to our past due loans, credit quality indicators, and modifications of loans. The Company will adopt the standard beginning with our December 31, 2010 financial statements. This standard will not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 3 — SECURITIES

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities as of September 30, 2010 are as follows:

 

 

 

Amortized Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated Fair
Market Value

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. agencies

 

$

29,699,856

 

$

2,256,113

 

$

 

$

31,955,969

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

 

8,039,954

 

490,957

 

(6

)

8,530,905

 

Municipalities

 

10,175,326

 

1,201,242

 

 

 

11,376,568

 

SBA Pools

 

1,532,923

 

 

(11,529

)

1,521,394

 

Mutual Fund

 

1,607,382

 

31,245

 

 

1,638,627

 

 

 

$

51,055,441

 

$

3,979,557

 

$

(11,535

)

$

55,023,463

 

 

The following tables detail the gross unrealized losses and fair values aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2010.

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

12 months or more

 

Total

 

 

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. agencies

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

 

$

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

 

79,428

 

(6

)

 

 

79,428

 

(6

)

Municipalities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SBA Pools

 

 

 

1,515,779

 

(11,529

)

1,515,779

 

(11,529

)

Asset Backed Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

 

$

79,428

 

$

(6

)

$

1,515,779

 

$

(11,529

)

$

1,595,207

 

$

(11,535

)

 

At September 30, 2010, a total of two SBA pools make up the total amount of securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months.  Management periodically evaluates each available-for-sale investment security in an unrealized loss position to determine if the impairment is temporary or other than temporary.  Management has determined that no investment security is other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses are due solely to interest rate changes and the Bank does not intend to sell the securities and it is not likely that we will be required to sell the securities before the earlier of the forecasted recovery or the maturity of the underlying investment security.

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2010, by contractual maturity or call date, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

 

 

Cost

 

Value

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

1,025,000

 

$

1,039,616

 

Due after one year through five years

 

5,408,997

 

5,992,891

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

20,084,019

 

21,983,253

 

Due after ten years

 

24,537,425

 

26,007,703

 

 

 

$

51,055,441

 

$

55,023,463

 

 

10



Table of Contents

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities as of December 31, 2009, are as follows:

 

 

 

Amortized Cost

 

Gross Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. agencies

 

$

29,475,777

 

1,511,122

 

$

(2,181

)

$

30,984,718

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

 

2,883,988

 

110,758

 

 

2,994,746

 

Municipalities

 

12,327,922

 

1,235,683

 

(6,454

)

13,557,151

 

SBA Pools

 

1,588,867

 

 

(9,519

)

1,579,348

 

Asset backed securities

 

81,867

 

707

 

 

82,574

 

Mutual Fund

 

1,546,465

 

20,312

 

 

1,566,777

 

 

 

$

47,904,886

 

$

2,878,582

 

$

(18,154

)

$

50,765,314

 

 

The following tables detail the gross unrealized losses and fair values aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

12 months or more

 

Total

 

Description of Securities

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Loss

 

U.S. agencies

 

$

425,908

 

$

(2,181

)

$

 

$

 

$

425,908

 

$

(2,181

)

Collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipalities

 

402,628

 

(6,454

)

 

 

402,628

 

(6,454

)

SBA pools

 

 

 

1,579,348

 

(9,519

)

1,579,348

 

(9,519

)

Asset backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

 

$

828,536

 

$

(8,635

)

$

1,579,348

 

$

(9,519

)

$

2,407,884

 

$

(18,154

)

 

At December 31, 2009, two SBA pools make up the total amount of securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months. Management periodically evaluates each available-for-sale investment security in an unrealized loss position to determine if the impairment is temporary or other than temporary. Management has determined that no investment security is other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses are due solely to interest rate changes and the Bank does not intend to sell the securities and it is not likely that we will be required to sell the securities before the earlier of the forecasted recovery or the maturity of the underlying investment security.

 

There were no realized gains or losses on sales of available-for-sale securities during 2010 and 2009, however the Company did recognize a gain of $46,030 and $172,561 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, on certain available-for-sale securities that were partially called, which compares to $77,811 and $132,192 in the same periods of 2009, respectively. There were no other sales of available-for-sale securities during 2010 and 2009.

 

Securities carried at $49,023,289 and $34,545,513 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, were pledged to secure deposits of public funds.

 

11



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 4 — LOANS

 

Loan totals were as follows:

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 30,

 

DECEMBER 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

$

293,203,342

 

$

283,387,329

 

Commercial

 

32,719,129

 

38,159,590

 

Real estate construction

 

32,168,954

 

52,951,968

 

Agriculture

 

28,093,824

 

29,659,656

 

Residential real estate and consumer

 

22,786,210

 

21,468,468

 

Total loans

 

408,971,459

 

425,627,011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred loan fees and costs, net

 

(811,334

)

(811,103

)

Allowance for loan losses

 

(7,700,206

)

(7,020,222

)

Net loans

 

$

400,459,919

 

$

417,795,686

 

 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 30,

 

DECEMBER 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

7,020,222

 

$

5,569,496

 

Provision charged to operations

 

3,015,000

 

5,862,012

 

Loans charged off

 

(2,340,217

)

(4,419,335

)

Loan recoveries

 

5,201

 

8,049

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

7,700,206

 

$

7,020,222

 

 

The total recorded investment in impaired loans at September 30, 2010, was $9,547,201 which had a loan loss reserve of $694,590.  The total recorded investment in impaired loans at December 31, 2009, was $14,418,204 which had a loan loss reserve of $1,256,329.  No interest income was recognized on impaired loans, while considered impaired during 2010 and 2009.  As of September 30, 2010, we had undisbursed funding commitments on one impaired loan to one borrower totaling $151,738 with a maturity date of May 2010As of September 30, 2010, we had three loans considered troubled debt restructurings totaling $1.4 million, which are included in nonaccrual loans.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 5 — OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

 

As of September 30, 2010, four loans with outstanding balances of $1,142,887 were reclassified to other real estate owned, as compared to six loans with outstanding balances of $2,149,514 as of December 31, 2009.

 

Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are to be sold and are initially recorded at the lower of carrying amount of the loan or fair value of the property at the date of foreclosure less selling costs.  Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed and any subject revisions in the estimate of fair value are reported as adjustment to the carrying value of the real estate, provided the adjusted carrying amount does not exceed the original amount at foreclosure.  Revenues and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other operating expenses.

 

NOTE 6 OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

 

During January 2008, the Bank awarded certain officers a salary continuation plan (the “Plan”).  Under the Plan, the participants will be provided with a fixed annual retirement benefit for twenty years after retirement. The Bank is also responsible for certain pre-retirement death benefits under the Plan. In connection with the implementation of the Plan, the Bank purchased single premium life insurance policies on the life of each of the officers covered under the Plan. The Bank is the owner and partial beneficiary of these life insurance policies. The assets of the Plan, under Internal Revenue Service regulations, are owned by the Bank and are available to satisfy the Bank’s general creditors.

 

During January 2008 the Bank awarded two of its directors a director retirement plan (“DRP”). Under the DRP, the participants will be provided with a fixed annual retirement benefit for ten years after retirement. The Bank is also responsible for certain pre-retirement death benefits under the DRP. In connection with the implementation of the DRP, the Bank purchased single premium life insurance policies on the life of each director covered under the DRP. The Bank is the owner and partial beneficiary of these life insurance policies. The assets of the DRP, under Internal Revenue Service regulations, are the property of the Bank and are available to satisfy the Bank’s general creditors.

 

Future compensation under both plans is earned for services rendered through retirement. The Bank accrues for the salary continuation liability based on anticipated years of service and vesting schedules provided under the plans. The Bank’s current benefit liability is determined based on vesting and the present value of the benefits at a corresponding discount rate. The discount rate used is an equivalent rate for investment-grade bonds with lives matching those of the service periods remaining for the salary continuation contracts, which average approximately 20 years.  The salary continuation liability as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $1,247,251 and $1,147,125, respectively, and is reported in accrued interest and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

During January 2008, the Bank purchased $4.7 million in bank owned life insurance policies and entered into split-dollar life insurance agreements with certain officers and directors.  In connection with the implementation of the split-dollar agreements, the Bank purchased single premium life insurance policies on the life of each of the officers and directors covered by the split-dollar life insurance agreements. The Bank is the owner of the policies and the partial beneficiary in an amount equal to the cash surrender value of the policies.

 

The combined cash surrender value of all Bank-owned life insurance policies recorded in other assets on the balance sheet was $10,400,761 and $10,267,862 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

 

NOTE 7 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

Fair values of financial instruments — The financial statements include various estimated fair value information as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Such information, which pertains to the Bank’s financial instruments, does not purport to represent the aggregate net fair value of the Bank. Further, the fair value estimates are based on various assumptions, methodologies, and subjective considerations, which vary widely among different financial institutions and which are subject to change. The following methods and assumptions are used by the Bank.

 

Cash and cash equivalents — The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.

 

Securities (including mortgage-backed securities) — Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

Loans receivable — For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans (e.g., real estate construction and mortgage, commercial, and installment loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

 

Deposit liabilities — The fair values estimated for demand deposits (interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of the aggregate expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

 

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances — Rates currently available to the Bank for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.

 

Accrued interest — The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair value.

 

Off-balance-sheet instruments — Fair values for the Bank’s off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the credit standing of the counterparties.

 

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments at September 30, 2010 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

46,491,885

 

46,491,885

 

Securities available for sale

 

55,023,463

 

55,023,463

 

Loans

 

408,971,459

 

414,347,568

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

1,658,016

 

1,658,016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

(448,904,177

)

(449,552,905

)

FHLB advance

 

(18,500,000

)

(18,573,636

)

Accrued interest payable

 

(169,354

)

(169,354

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Off-balance-sheet assets (liabilities):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and standby letters of credit

 

 

 

(543,390

)

 

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments at December 31, 2009 are as follows:

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

21,648,548

 

$

21,648,548

 

Securities available for sale

 

50,765,314

 

50,765,314

 

Loans

 

425,627,011

 

434,698,550

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

1,734,332

 

1,734,332

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

(429,210,284

)

(429,780,364

)

FHLB advance

 

(32,200,000

)

(32,367,049

)

Accrued interest payable

 

(400,169

)

(400,169

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Off-balance-sheet assets (liabilities):

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and standby letters of credit

 

 

 

(631,324

)

 

14



Table of Contents

 

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follow:

 

Level 1:  Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

Level 2:  Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

 

Level 3:  Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

 

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment , and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis are summarized below:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010

 

 

 

September 30,
2010

 

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. agencies

 

$

31,955,969

 

$

 

 

$

31,955,969

 

$

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

 

$

8,530,905

 

$

 

 

$

8,530,905

 

$

 

 

Municipalities

 

$

11,376,568

 

$

 

 

$

11,376,568

 

$

 

 

SBA Pools

 

$

1,521,394

 

$

 

 

$

1,521,394

 

$

 

 

Mutual Fund

 

$

1,638,627

 

$

 

 

$

1,638,627

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

 

$

3,781,621

 

$

 

$

 

$

3,781,621

 

Other real estate owned

 

$

1,142,887

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,142,887

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009

 

 

 

December 31,
2009

 

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. agencies

 

$

30,984,718

 

$

 

 

$

30,984,718

 

$

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

 

$

2,994,746

 

$

 

 

$

2,994,746

 

$

 

 

Municipalities

 

$

13,557,151

 

$

 

 

$

13,557,151

 

$

 

 

Asset backed securities

 

$

1,579,348

 

$

 

 

$

1,579,348

 

$

 

 

SBA Pools

 

$

82,574

 

$

 

 

$

82,574

 

$

 

 

Mutual Fund

 

$

1,566,777

 

$

 

 

$

1,566,777

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

 

$

10,372,613

 

$

 

$

 

$

10,372,613

 

Other real estate owned

 

$

2,149,514

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,149,514

 

 

The fair value of securities available for sale equals quoted market price, if available.  If quoted market prices are not available, fair value

 

15



Table of Contents

 

is determined using quoted market prices for similar securities.  Changes in fair market value are recorded in other comprehensive income net of tax.

 

The fair value measurement applies to impaired loans, which includes impaired loans measured at an observable market price (if available), or at the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent). Fair value of the loan’s collateral, when the loan is dependent on collateral, is determined by appraisals or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of the collateral.  At September 30, 2010, impaired loans that had a specific loan loss reserve had a principal balance of $4,476,211 with a valuation allowance of $694,590.  Upon being classified as impaired, either a charge off or a specific reserve or both may be taken to reduce the balance of each loan to an estimate of the collateral fair market value less cost to dispose. This estimate was a level 3 valuation.  There was no direct impact on the income statement.  The charge-offs were recorded as a debit to the allowance for loan losses.

 

Fair value of other real estate owned is determined by appraisals or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of the property.  Total fair market value at September 30, 2010 was $1,142,887 which was a level 3 valuation.  There is a direct impact to the income statement as any market value write downs are charged directly to operating expenses.  The Bank is required by internal bank policies to order real estate appraisals on OREO properties every six months.  In addition, management evaluates the book values on a quarterly basis for reasonableness and makes fair value adjustments as necessary.

 

NOTE 8 — EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

 

Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated based on the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period.  Basic EPS excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

 

 

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 30,

 

In thousands (except share and per share amounts)

 

2010

 

2009

 

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

930,511

 

$

668,740

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

7,692,900

 

7,668,891

 

Net income per common share

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

930,511

 

$

668,740

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

7,692,900

 

7,668,891

 

Effect of dilutive stock options

 

36,275

 

25,167

 

Weighted average shares of common stock and common stock equivalents

 

7,729,175

 

7,694,058

 

Net income per diluted common share

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.09

 

 

16



Table of Contents

 

 

 

NINE MONTHS ENDED

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 30,

 

In thousands (except share and per share amounts)

 

2010

 

2009

 

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

2,496,112

 

$

633,165

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

7,685,592

 

7,664,075

 

Net income per common share

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

2,496,112

 

$

633,165

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

7,685,592

 

7,664,075

 

Effect of dilutive stock options

 

34,024

 

28,035

 

Weighted average shares of common stock and common stock equivalents

 

7,719,616

 

7,692,110

 

Net income per diluted common share

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.08

 

 

During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, anti-dilutive weighted average options to purchase 223,386 and 234,517 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding with prices ranging from $5.20 to $15.67.  Anti-dilutive weighted average stock options of 240,187 and 241,888 were outstanding during the same three and nine month periods of 2009, respectively, with prices ranging from $4.58 to $15.67.  These options were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.  These options begin to expire in 2013.  In addition, weighted average warrants of 350,346 issued to the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program were anti-dilutive for the three and six-month periods of 2010 and 2009, as the price of $5.78 was more than the average market price of common shares.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion explains the significant factors affecting our operations and financial position for the periods presented. The discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes related thereto which appear or that are referenced to elsewhere in this report, and with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended.  Average balances, including balances used in calculating certain financial ratios, are generally comprised of average daily balances.

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. This discussion and analysis includes executive management’s (“Management”) insight of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations of Oak Valley Bancorp and its subsidiary.  Unless otherwise stated, the “Company” refers to the consolidated entity, Oak Valley Bancorp, while the “Bank” refers to Oak Valley Community Bank

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Some matters discussed in this Form 10-Q may be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and therefore may involve risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements.  These statements generally appear with words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “intend,” and “expect.”  Although management believes that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.  Factors that could cause actual results to differ from results discussed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: economic conditions (both generally and in the markets where the Bank operates); competition from other providers of financial services offered by the Bank; changes in government regulation and legislation; changes in interest rates; material unforeseen changes in the financial stability and liquidity of the Bank’s credit customers; risks associated with concentrations in real estate related loans; changes in accounting standards and interpretations; and other risks as may be detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of which are difficult to predict and which may be beyond the control of the Company or the Bank.  The Company undertakes no obligation to revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or changes after the date of this discussion or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

 

Management has determined the following four accounting policies to be critical:

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

Accounting for allowance for loan losses involves significant judgment and assumptions by management and is based on historical data and management’s view of the current economic environment. At least on a quarterly basis, our management reviews the methodology and adequacy of allowance for loan losses and reports its assessment to the Board of Directors for its review and approval.

 

We base our allowance for loan losses on an estimation of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. Our methodology for assessing loan loss allowances are intended to reduce the differences between estimated and actual losses and involves a detailed analysis of our loan portfolio in three phases:

 

· the specific review of individual loans,

 

· the segmenting and review of loan pools with similar characteristics and,

 

· our judgmental estimate based on various subjective factors.

 

The first phase of our methodology involves the specific review of individual loans to identify and measure impairment. We evaluate each loan by use of a risk rating system, except for homogeneous loans, such as automobile loans and home mortgages. Specific

 

18



Table of Contents

 

risk rated loans are deemed impaired if all amounts, including principal and interest, will likely not be collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the related loan agreement. Impairment for commercial and real estate loans is measured either based on the present value of the loan’s expected future cash flows or, if collection on the loan is collateral dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral, less selling and holding costs.

 

The second phase involves the segmenting of the remainder of the risk rated loan portfolio into groups or pools of loans, together with loans with similar characteristics, for evaluation. We determine the calculated loss ratio to each loan pool based on its historical net losses and benchmark it against the levels of other peer banks.

 

In the third phase, we consider relevant internal and external factors that may affect the collectibility of loan portfolio and each group of loan pool. The factors considered are, but are not limited to:

 

· concentration of credits,

 

· nature and volume of the loan portfolio,

 

· delinquency trends,

 

· non-accrual loan trend,

 

· problem loan trend,

 

· loss and recovery trend,

 

· quality of loan review,

 

· lending and management staff,

 

· lending policies and procedures,

 

· economic and business conditions, and

 

· other external factors including regulatory review.

 

Our management estimates the probable effect of such conditions based on our judgment, experience and known or anticipated trends. Such estimation may be reflected as an additional allowance to each group of loans, if necessary. Management reviews these conditions with our senior credit officers. To the extent that any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s estimate of the effect of such condition may be reflected as a specific allowance applicable to such credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specific, identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s evaluation of the inherent loss related to such condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance.

 

Central to our credit risk management and our assessment of appropriate loss allowance is our loan risk rating system. Under this system, the originating credit officer assigns borrowers an initial risk rating based on a thorough analysis of each borrower’s financial capacity in conjunction with industry and economic trends. Approvals are made based upon the amount of inherent credit risk specific to the transaction and are reviewed for appropriateness by senior line and credit administration personnel. Credits are monitored by line and credit administration personnel for deterioration in a borrower’s financial condition which may impact the ability of the borrower to perform under the contract. Although management has allocated a portion of the allowance to specific loans, specific loan pools, and off-balance sheet credit exposures (which are reported separately as part of other liabilities), the adequacy of the allowance is considered in its entirety.

 

Non-Accrual Loan Policy

 

Interest on loans is credited to income as earned and is accrued only if deemed collectible. Accrual of interest is discontinued when a loan is over 90 days delinquent or if management believes that collection is highly uncertain. Generally, payments received on nonaccrual loans are recorded as principal reductions. Interest income is recognized after all principal has been repaid or an improvement in the condition of the loan has occurred that would warrant resumption of interest accruals.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company recognizes in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based forms of compensation issued to employees over the employees’ requisite service period (generally the vesting period).  The Bank uses the

 

19



Table of Contents

 

straight-line recognition of expenses for awards with graded vesting.  The Bank utilizes a binomial pricing model for all grants.  Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Bank’s stock for the period equal to the contractual stock option term. The Bank uses historical data to estimate option exercise and stock option forfeiture rates within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted for the binomial model is derived from applying a historical suboptimal exercise factor to the contractual term of the grant. For binomial pricing, the risk-free rate for periods is equal to the U.S. Treasury yield at the time of grant and commensurate with the contractual term of the grant.

 

Other Real Estate Owned

 

Other real estate owned, which represents real estate acquired through foreclosure, or deed in lieu of foreclosure in satisfaction of commercial and real estate loans, is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less the estimated selling costs of the real estate. The fair value of the property is based upon a current appraisal. The difference between the fair value of the real estate collateral and the loan balance at the time of transfer is recorded as a loan charge off if fair value is lower. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations and the OREO property is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell. The  determination of a property’s estimated fair value incorporates (1) revenues projected to be realized from disposal of the property, (2) construction and renovation costs, (3) marketing and transaction costs, and (4) holding costs (e.g., property taxes, insurance and homeowners’ association dues). Any subsequent declines in the fair value of the OREO property after the date of transfer are recorded through a write-down of the asset. Any subsequent operating expenses or income, reduction in estimated fair values, and gains or losses on disposition of such properties are charged or credited to current operations.

 

Introduction

 

Oak Valley Community Bank commenced operations in May 1991.  We are an insured bank under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and are a member of the Federal Reserve.  Since its formation, the Bank has provided basic banking services to individuals and business enterprises in Oakdale, California and the surrounding areas. The focus of the Bank is to offer a range of commercial banking services designed for both individuals and small to medium-sized businesses in the two main areas of service of the Bank: the Central Valley and the Eastern Sierras.

 

The Bank offers a complement of business checking and savings accounts for its business customers.  The Bank also offers commercial and real estate loans, as well as lines of credit.  Real estate loans are generally of a short-term nature for both residential and commercial purposes.  Longer-term real estate loans are generally made with adjustable interest rates and contain normal provisions for acceleration.  In addition, the Bank offers traditional residential mortgages through a partner financial institution under Community Bank Lending Exchange (“CBLX”).

 

The Bank also offers other services for both individuals and businesses including online banking, remote deposit capture, merchant services, night depository, extended hours, traveler’s checks, wire transfer of funds, note collection, and automated teller machines in a national network.  The Bank does not currently offer international banking or trust services although the Bank may make such services available to the Bank’s customers through financial institutions with which the Bank has correspondent banking relationships.  The Bank does not offer stock transfer services nor does it directly issue credit cards.

 

Effective July 3, 2008, Oak Valley Community Bank became a subsidiary of Oak Valley Bancorp, a newly established bank holding company. Oak Valley Bancorp operates Oak Valley Community Bank as a community bank in the general commercial banking business, with our primary market encompassing the California Central Valley around Oakdale and Modesto, and the Eastern Sierras. As such, unless otherwise noted, all references are about Oak Valley Bancorp.

 

Overview of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

 

The purpose of this summary is to provide an overview of the items management focuses on when evaluating the condition of the Company and its success in implementing its business and shareholder value strategies. The Company’s business strategy is to operate the Bank as a well-capitalized, profitable and independent community oriented bank.  The Company’s shareholders value strategy has three major themes: (1) enhancing shareholders’ value; (2) making its retail banking franchise more valuable; and (3) efficiently utilizing its capital.

 

Management believes the following were important factors in the Company’s performance during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010:

 

·                  Thanks to our deep roots in the communities that we serve, our focus on customer care and our selectivity in lending, during the first nine months of 2010, our performance has been better than most institutions of our size that compete in our market.  Despite the severity of the recession affecting our primary market areas, we have been able to increase our core deposits to $405.3 million and have posted net income available to common shareholders of $0.12 and $0.32 per diluted share for the three and nine month periods of 2010, respectively.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

·                        While recently published economic data indicate that the current downturn may be easing, it is not clear when or at what speed the recession will end. To the extent that the recession continues, it will affect the market areas that we serve and our results accordingly.

 

·                      The Company recognized net income available to common shareholders of $931,000 and $2,496,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to $669,000 and $633,000 for the same periods in 2009.  The Company recognized net income before preferred stock dividends and accretion of $1,141,000 and $3,127,000, respectively, for the third quarter and nine month period of 2010.  The factors contributing to these results will be discussed below.

 

·                  The Company recognized $210,000 and $631,000, respectively, in the third quarter and nine month period of 2010 and 2009 associated with the accrual for preferred stock dividends and accretion of the preferred stock discount in connection with the 13,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock that the U.S. Treasury purchased from the Company in December 2008 under the TARP Program. So long as such preferred stock remains outstanding, it will pay quarterly cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year.

 

·                  The Company has taken significant steps to reduce the risk of loan losses.   In the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, the provision for loan loss was $1,005,000 and $3,015,000, respectively, which was an increase of $80,000 for the quarter and a decrease of $1,947,000 for the nine month period compared to 2009.  The year-to-date decrease was mainly due to management’s assessment of the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses and a decrease in the level of non-accrual loans. The Company continues to monitor its loan portfolio with the objective of avoiding defaults or write-downs.  Despite these actions, the possibility of additional losses cannot be eliminated, but the Board of Directors and all employees continue to work hard to make the best of these continuing challenging conditions.

 

·                      Net interest income increased $339,000 or 5.6% and $1,100,000 or 6.3% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009.  This increase was primarily due to the net interest margin increase of 17 and 31 basis points, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the same periods of 2009.  The net interest margin increase is attributable primarily to liabilities repricing faster than assets in the declining rate environment as described in further detail below.

 

·                      Non-interest income decreased by $102,000 or 13.1% for the third quarter and increased by $32,000 or 1.6% for the nine month period of 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009.  Year-to-date results show an increase in other income which includes the gain on called securities and bank debit card fees.  This was partially offset by a decrease in NSF fee income and mortgage commissions as described below.

 

·                      Non-interest expense decreased by $556,000 or 11.7% and $520,000 or 3.9% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2009.  The primary reason for the decrease was a significant reduction in the write downs of OREO property values, which was offset in part by increased salaries and benefits as described below.

 

·                      Total assets increased $10.2 million or 1.9% from December 31, 2009.  Total net loans decreased by $17.3 million or 4.1% and investment securities increased by $4.3 million or 8.4% from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010, while deposits increased by $19.7 million or 4.6% for the same period.

 

Income Summary

 

For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded net income available to common shareholders of $931,000 and $2,496,000, respectively, representing increases of $262,000 and $1,863,000, as compared to the same periods in 2009.  Return on average assets (annualized) was 0.86% and 0.81% for the third quarter and nine month periods of 2010, respectively, as compared with 0.67% and 0.32% for the same periods in 2009.  Annualized return on average common equity was 7.38% and 6.83% for the third quarter and nine month period of 2010, respectively, as compared to 5.73% and 1.85% for the same periods of 2009.

 

Net income before provisions for income taxes and preferred stock dividends and accretion was up $714,000 and $3,599,000 for the third quarter and nine month period of 2010, respectively, from the comparable 2009 periods.  The income statement components of these variances are as follows:

 

21



Table of Contents

 

Pre-Tax Income Variance Summary

 

 

 

Effect on Pre-Tax
Income

 

Effect on Pre-Tax
Income

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

(In thousands)

 

Three Months

 

Nine months

 

Change from 2009 to 2010 in:

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

339

 

$

1,100

 

Provision for loan losses

 

(80

)

1,947

 

Non-interest income

 

(102

)

32

 

Non-interest expense

 

557

 

520

 

Change in income before income taxes

 

$

714

 

$

3,599

 

 

These variances will be explained in the discussion below.

 

Net Interest Income

 

Net interest income is the largest source of the Bank’s operating income.  For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, net interest income was $6.4 million and $18.7 million, respectively, which represented an increase of $339,000 or 5.6% and $1,100,000 or 6.3%, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2009.

 

The net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets) was 5.23% and 5.27% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, an increase of 17 and 31 basis points, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2009.  The increase in the net interest margin in 2010 was primarily attributable to the impact that the decline in market interest rates had on our liability sensitive balance sheet which caused interest-bearing liabilities to decrease faster than the yields on earning assets.  The total cost of funds decreased 71 and 67 basis points in the third quarter and nine month period of 2010, respectively, compared to 2009 due to a shift from high cost CDs and FHLB borrowed funds into demand deposit and money market accounts.  Average non-interest-bearing demand deposit balances increased by $17.7 million and $11.1 million for the three and nine month periods of 2010, respectively, as compared to the same periods of 2009.  Compared to cost of funds, the decrease in our earning asset yield was not as significant at only 44 and 27 basis points for the three and nine month periods of 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2009.  Yield on loans remained relatively flat at 6.20% for the third quarter 2010 versus 6.32% in the third quarter of 2009, partly as a result of the significant portion of our loans that are at their contractual rate floors.

 

The following tables shows the relative impact of changes in average balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, and interest rates earned and paid by the Company on those assets and liabilities for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

Net Interest Analysis

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
 September 30, 2010

 

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009

 

 

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest
Income /
Expense

 

Avg
Rate/
Yield

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest
Income/
Expense

 

Avg
Rate/
Yield

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross loans (1) (2)

 

$

409,992

 

$

6,408

 

6.20%

 

$

423,947

 

$

6,751

 

6.32%

 

Investment securities (2)

 

49,626

 

652

 

5.21%

 

51,811

 

777

 

5.95%

 

Federal funds sold

 

5,792

 

3

 

0.21%

 

2,095

 

1

 

0.25%

 

Interest-earning deposits

 

21,452

 

13

 

0.24%

 

3,347

 

2

 

0.23%

 

Total interest-earning assets

 

486,862

 

7,076

 

5.77%

 

481,200

 

7,531

 

6.21%

 

Total noninterest earning assets

 

38,028

 

 

 

 

 

40,084

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

524,890

 

 

 

 

 

521,284

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market deposits

 

207,921

 

311

 

0.59%

 

191,740

 

630

 

1.30%

 

NOW deposits

 

60,583

 

48

 

0.31%

 

58,643

 

70

 

0.47%

 

Savings deposits

 

14,880

 

15

 

0.40%

 

13,362

 

20

 

0.58%

 

Time certificates of deposit $100,000 or more

 

40,528

 

98

 

0.96%

 

47,678

 

264

 

2.19%

 

Other time deposits

 

35,637

 

98

 

1.09%

 

52,821

 

263

 

1.97%

 

Other borrowings

 

18,500

 

85

 

1.82%

 

31,752

 

153

 

1.91%

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

378,049

 

655

 

0.69%

 

395,996

 

1,400

 

1.40%

 

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 

80,196

 

 

 

 

 

62,498

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities