Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Company and Nature of Business
Pacific Ventures Group, Inc. (the "Company," "we," "us" or "our") was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on October 3, 1986, under the name AOA Corporation. On November 12, 1991, the Company changed its name to American Eagle Group, Inc. On October22, 2012, the Company changed its name to "Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.".
The current structure of the Company resulted from a share exchange with Snöbar Holdings, Inc. ("Snöbar Holdings"), which was treated as a reverse merger for accounting purposes. On August 14, 2015, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") with Snöbar Holdings, pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Snöbar Holdings' Class A and Class B common stock in exchange for 22,500,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock, while simultaneously issuing 2,500,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock to certain other persons, including for services provided and to a former officer of the Company (the "Share Exchange").
As the result of the Share Exchange, Snöbar Holdings became the Company's wholly owned operating subsidiary and the business of Snöbar Holdings became the Company's sole business operations and MAS Global Distributors, Inc., a California corporation ("MGD"), became an indirect subsidiary of the Company.
Prior to the Share Exchange, the Company operated as an insurance holding company and through its subsidiaries, which marketed and underwrote specialized property and casualty coverage in the general aviation insurance marketplace. However, in 1997, after selling several of its divisions, the Company's remaining insurance operations were placed into receivership and the Company ceased operating its insurance business.
Since the Share Exchange represents a change in control of the Company and a change in business operations, the business operations changed to that of Snöbar Holdings and the discussions of business operations accompanying this filing are solely that of Snöbar Holdings and its affiliates and subsidiaries comprising of Snöbar Trust, International Production Impex Corporation, a California corporation ("IPIC"), and MGD.
Snöbar Holdings was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 7, 2013. Snöbar Holdings is the trustor and sole beneficiary of Snöbar Trust, a California trust ("Trust"), which was formed in June 1, 2013. The current trustee that holds legal title to the Trust is Clark Rutledge, the father of Shannon Masjedi, the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and majority stockholder. The Trust owns 100% of the shares of IPIC, which was formed on August 2, 2001. IPIC is in the business of selling alcohol-infused ice cream and ice-pops, and holds all of the rights to the liquor licenses to sell such products and trade names "Snöbar". As such, the Trust holds all ownership interest of IPIC and its liquor licenses, permitting IPIC to sell its product to distributors, with all income, expense, gains and losses rolling up to the Trust, of which Snöbar Holdings is the sole beneficiary. Snöbar Holdings also owns 99.9% of the shares of MGD. MGD is in the business of selling and leasing freezers and providing marketing services. As a result of the foregoing, Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of all assets, liabilities and any income received from the business of the Trust and IPIC through the Trust and is the parent company of MGD.
The Trust and IPIC are considered variable interest entities ("VIEs") and Snöbar Holdings is identified as the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810, Snöbar Holdings performs ongoing reassessments of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As the assessment of Snöbar Holdings' management is that Snöbar Holdings has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's activities (it is responsible for establishing and operating IPIC), and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE's economic performance, it was therefore concluded by management that Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. As such, the Trust and IPIC were consolidated in the financial statements of Snöbar Holdings since the inception of the Trust, in the case of the Trust, and since the inception of Snöbar Holdings, in the case of IPIC.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, Snöbar Holdings and its subsidiaries, in which Snöbar Holdings has a controlling voting interest and entities consolidated under the variable interest entities ("VIE") provisions of ASC 810, "Consolidation" ("ASC 810"). Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The Company applies the provisions of ASC 810 which provides a framework for identifying VIEs and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements.
Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In general, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, limited-liability corporation, trust, or any other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that is unable to make significant decisions about its activities, (3) has a group of equity owners that does not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations or (4) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or both and substantially all of the entity's activities (for example, providing financing or buying assets) either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately fewer voting rights.
ASC 810 requires a VIE to be consolidated by the party with an ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) that has both of the following characteristics: a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary beneficiary. If the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) and the VIE are under common control, the primary beneficiary shall initially measure the assets, liabilities, and non-controlling interests of the VIE at amounts at which they are carried in the accounts of the reporting entity that controls the VIE (or would be carried if the reporting entity issued financial statements prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles). ASC 810 also requires disclosures about VIEs in which the variable interest holder is not required to consolidate but in which it has a significant variable interest.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the Company, Snöbar Holdings, MGD, IPIC, and the Trust, which was established to hold IPIC, which in turn holds liquor licenses. All inter-company accounts have been eliminated during consolidation. See the discussion in Note 1 above for variable interest entity treatment of the Trust and IPIC.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Sales revenues are generally recognized in accordance with the SAB 104 Public Company Guidance, when an agreement exists and price is determinable, the products are shipped to the customers or services are rendered, net of discounts, returns and allowance and collectability is reasonably assured. We are often entitled to bill our customers and receive payment from our customers in advance of recognizing the revenue. In the instances in which we have received payment from our customers in advance of recognizing revenue, we include the amounts in deferred or unearned revenue on our consolidated balance sheet.
Unearned Revenue
Certain amounts are received pursuant to agreements or contracts and may only be used in the conduct of specified transactions or the related services are yet to be performed. These amounts are recorded as unearned or deferred revenue and are recognized as revenue in the year/period the related expenses are incurred or services are performed. As at September 30, 2017, the Company has $0 in deferred revenue as a result of prepayment by two of its customers. This is comparable to the Company year-end deferred revenue balance of $15,042 as of December 31, 2016, which was as a result of prepayment by two of its customers.
Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company's shipping costs are all recorded as operating expenses for all periods presented.
Disputed Liabilities
The Company is involved in a variety of disputes, claims, and proceedings concerning its business operations and certain liabilities. We determine whether an estimated loss from a contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated. We assess our potential liability by analyzing our litigation and regulatory matters using available information. We develop our views on estimated losses in consultation with outside counsel handling our defense in these matters, which involves an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Should developments in any of these matters cause a change in our determination as to an unfavorable outcome and result in the need to recognize a material accrual, or should any of these matters result in a final adverse judgment or be settled for significant amounts, they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position in the period or periods in which such change in determination, judgment or settlement occurs. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has $31,858 in disputed liabilities on its balance sheet.
In addition, on January 28, 2016, a labor dispute between IPIC and a former employee was ruled in favor of the former employee by the Labor Commissioner of the State of California. This finding resulted in compensation expenses of $29,103 and an accrued liability of the same amount on IPIC book for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly liquid instruments with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has a cash balance of $23,549 in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $25,284 at December 31, 2016.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at net realizable value. This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts. The allowance is calculated based upon the level of past due accounts and the relationship with and financial status of our customers. The Company did not write off any bad debts during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and thus has not set an allowance for doubtful accounts.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost has been determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory quantities on-hand are regularly reviewed, and where necessary, reserves for excess and unusable inventories are recorded. Inventory consists of finished goods and includes ice cream, popsicles and the related packaging materials. As of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2017, the Company has $0 in inventories.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the difference between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Net Income/(Loss) Per Common Share
Income/(loss) per share of common stock is calculated by dividing the net income/(loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company has no potentially dilutive securities. Accordingly, basic and dilutive income/(loss) per common share are the same.
Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and includes expenditures that substantially increase the useful lives of existing property and equipment. Maintenance, repairs, and minor renovations are expensed as incurred. Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations. The Company provides for depreciation of property and equipment using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, as appropriate. The estimated useful lives are as follows: vehicles, five years; office furniture and equipment, three to fifteen years; equipment, three years.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments, which include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses are representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions within the United States which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to limits of approximately $250,000. The Company has not experienced any losses with regard to its bank accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risk of loss on its cash bank accounts.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company considers revenue recognition and the valuation of accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts, and inventory and reserves as its significant accounting policies. Some of these policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts in the Company's financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB established the Accounting Standards Codification ("Codification" or "ASC") as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") issued under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of GAAP for SEC registrants. Existing GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the Codification, and accordingly the change did not impact our financial statements. The ASC does change the way the guidance is organized and presented.
In April 2015, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, "Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", to simplify presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The ASU does not affect the recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs. For public companies, the ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted.
In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-04, "Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer's Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets", which permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity's fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. The ASU is effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted.
Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, "Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement", which provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If such includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If the arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for it as a service contract. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-06, "Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions", which specifies that, for purposes of calculating historical earnings per unit under the two-class method, the earnings (losses) of a transferred business before the date of a drop down transaction should be allocated entirely to the general partner. In that circumstance, the previously reported earnings per unit of the limited partners (which is typically the earnings per unit measure presented in the financial statements) would not change as a result of the dropdown transaction. Qualitative disclosures about how the rights to the earnings (losses) differ before and after the dropdown transaction occurs for purposes of computing earnings per unit under the two-class method also are required. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted.
In June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, "Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation". The update removes all incremental financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the removal of Topic 915 from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. In addition, the update adds an example disclosure in Risks and Uncertainties (Topic 275) to illustrate one way that an entity that has not begun planned principal operations could provide information about the risks and uncertainties related to the company's current activities. Furthermore, the update removes an exception provided to development stage entities in Consolidations (Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity-which may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a company that has an interest in a company in the development stage. The update is effective for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, including interim periods therein. Early application is permitted with the first annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity's financial statements have not yet been issued (Public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Our company adopted this pronouncement.
In June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718); Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period". The amendments in this ASU apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. For all entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this ASU either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This updated guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 on "Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern". Currently, there is no guidance in GAAP about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management's plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued).
All other newly issued accounting pronouncements which are not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.
We reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and determined these have no current applicability to the Company or their effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.
3. GOING CONCERN
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $352,405 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and has an accumulated deficit of $5,679,506 as at September 30, 2017.
In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. The Company is significantly dependent upon its ability, and will continue to attempt, to secure equity and/or additional debt financing. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful and without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.
4. INVENTORIES
No inventories were recorded as September 30, 2017 and 2016.
Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, consisted of:
| |
|
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
Computers
|
|
$
|
15,986
|
|
|
$
|
15,986
|
|
|
Freezers
|
|
|
39,153
|
|
|
|
39,153
|
|
|
Office Furniture
|
|
|
15,687
|
|
|
|
15,687
|
|
|
Rugs
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
Software - Accounting
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
|
Telephone System
|
|
|
5,814
|
|
|
|
5,814
|
|
|
Video Camera
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
(58,227
|
)
|
|
|
(55,231
|
)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
$
|
28,841
|
|
|
$
|
31,838
|
|
Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $2,997 compared to $2,993 for the same period of September 30, 2016.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had accrued expenses of $280,463 compared to $231,060, for the year-end December 31, 2016.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following table presents a summary of the Company's promissory notes issued to related parties as of September 30, 2017:
|
Noteholder
|
|
Note Amount
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Unpaid Amount
|
|
|
S. Masjedi
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
12/10/2010
|
|
$
|
122,692
|
|
|
A. Masjedi
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
191,772
|
|
|
M. Shenkman
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
2/21/2012
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
M. Shenkman
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
2/23/2102
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
M. Shenkman
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
3/14/2013
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
M. Shenkman
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
9/9/2014
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
696,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
356,464
|
|
General
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on October 3, 1986, under the name "AOA Corporation". On October 22, 2012, the Company changed its name to "Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.". Prior to the Share Exchange described below, the Company operated as an insurance holding company and through its subsidiaries, marketed and underwrote specialized property and casualty coverage in the general aviation insurance marketplace. However, in 1997, after selling several of its divisions, the Company's remaining insurance operations were placed into receivership and the Company ceased operating its insurance business.
The current structure of the Company resulted from a share exchange with Snöbar Holdings, Inc. ("Snöbar"), which was treated as a reverse merger for accounting purposes. On August 14, 2015, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") with Snöbar Holdings, Inc. ("Snöbar Holdings"), pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Snöbar Holdings' Class A and Class B common stock in exchange for 22,500,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock, as well as issuing 2,500,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock to certain other persons (the "Share Exchange"). As the result of the Share Exchange, Snöbar Holdings. became the Company's wholly owned operating subsidiary and the business of Snöbar Holdings became the Company's sole business operations. In addition, Snöbar Holdings' majority owned subsidiary, MAS Global Distributors, Inc., a California corporation ("MGD"), became an indirect subsidiary of the Company.
Since the Share Exchange represented a change in control of the Company and a change in its business operations, the Company's business operations changed to that of Snöbar Holdings and the discussions of the Company's business operations contained in this Quarterly Report are solely that of Snöbar Holdings and its affiliates and subsidiaries comprising of the Snöbar Trust, IPIC and MGD.
Snöbar Holdings was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 7, 2013. Snöbar Holdings is the trustor and sole beneficiary of Snöbar Trust, a California trust (the "Trust"), which was formed in June 1, 2013. The current trustee that holds legal title to the Trust is Azita Davidiyan. The Trust owns 100% of the shares of International Production Impex Corporation, a California corporation ("IPIC"), which was formed on August 2, 2001. IPIC is in the business of selling alcohol-infused ice cream and ice-pops, and holds all of the rights to the liquor licenses to sell such products and trade names "SnöBar". Accordingly, the Trust holds all ownership interest of IPIC and its liquor licenses, permitting IPIC to sell its product to distributors, with all income, expense, gains and losses rolling up to the Trust, of which Snöbar Holdings is the sole beneficiary. Snöbar Holdings also owns 99.9% of the shares of MAS Global Distributors, Inc., a California corporation ("MGD"). MGD is in the business of selling and leasing freezers and providing marketing services. As a result of the foregoing structure, Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of all assets, liabilities and any income received from the business of the Trust and IPIC through the Trust and is the parent company of MGD.
The Trust and IPIC are considered variable interest entities ("VIEs") and Snöbar Holdings is identified as the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810, Snöbar Holdings performs ongoing reassessments of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As the assessment of Snöbar Holdings' management is that Snöbar Holdings has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's activities (it is responsible for establishing and operating IPIC), and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE's economic performance, it was therefore concluded by management that Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. As such, the Trust and IPIC were consolidated in the financial statements of Snöbar Holdings since the inception of the Trust, in the case of the Trust, and since the inception of Snöbar Holdings, in the case of IPIC.
The Trust and IPIC are considered variable interest entities ("VIEs") and Snöbar Holdings is identified as the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810, Snöbar Holdings performs ongoing reassessments of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As the assessment of Snöbar Holdings' management is that Snöbar Holdings has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's activities (it is responsible for establishing and operating IPIC), and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE's economic performance, it was therefore concluded by management that Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. As such, the Trust and IPIC were consolidated in the financial statements of Snöbar Holdings since the inception of the Trust, in the case of the Trust, and since the inception of Snöbar Holdings, in the case of IPIC.
Description of the Business Operations of Snöbar Holdings
Snöbar Holdings is the trustor and sole beneficiary of the Trust. The Trust owns 100% of the shares of IPIC. IPIC is the owner of liquor licenses and the trade name "SnöBar" and is in the business of selling and distributing alcohol-infused ice creams and ice-pops through its distributors. Snöbar Holdings also owns 99.9% of the shares of MGD. MGD is in the business of selling and leasing freezers and providing marketing services. As a matter of law, IPIC may not be engaged in any business similar to MGD.As a result of the foregoing, Snöbar Holdings is the beneficiary of all assets, liabilities and any income received from the business of IPIC through the Trust and is the parent company of MGD.
IPIC is a food, beverage and alcohol distribution company that is in the business of selling alcohol-infused ice cream and ice-pops, and holds all of the rights to the liquor licenses to sell such products and trade names "SnöBar". IPIC is initially marketing two products: SnöBar alcohol infused ice pops, and SnöBar alcohol infused ice cream and sorbet. SnöBar ice pops are original frozen alcohol beverage bars, similar to popsicles on a stick, but made with premium liquor such as premium tequila and vodka and are currently manufactured in three flavors, Margarita, Cosmopolitan and Mojito. The alcohol freezing technology used to produce these beverage bars can be applied to almost any alcohol type and mixture, presenting significant market potential and an almost unlimited variety of flavors and employment of premium brands. Each ice pop is the equivalent of a full cocktail.
SnöBar ice cream is an additional innovative product that the Company is marketing using proprietary formulas and technology. These products are premium ice cream and sorbets that are distilled spirit cocktails containing up to 15% quality liqueurs and liquors. Currently, there are four flavors available: Brandy Alexander; Brandy Alexander with chocolate chips; Grasshopper; and Pink Squirrel. There are also numerous different liquor ice cream flavors in development in classic ice cream drink styles such as Coffee Liqueur Ice Cream, Piña Colada Sorbet, Sherry Ice Cream, and Strawberry Margarita Sorbet. The product contains ultra premium dairy and the highest quality of ingredients.
What makes the SnöBar products unique in the Company's view is the proprietary formulation and method of manufacturing. SnöBar ice pops and SnöBar ice cream use a system to stabilize the alcohol molecule, whereby the alcohol content, quality and flavor is not degraded during the production process. The technology is also applicable to other food and beverage products such as yogurt, water ice creations and alcohol based goods. IPIC has begun the process of obtaining trade secret and other intellectual property protections as to these unique technologies. The SnöBar brand is fully trademarked within the USA and is currently seeking worldwide trademark rights.
SnöBar brand products have been through extensive consumer testing across all age groups and sexes over 21 years of age. According to the results of the consumer testing, there is a large untapped market potential for frozen alcohol desserts. Market research shows that there are very few alcohol infused ice-creams and ice pops available in the U.S. markets and the few that are out there are of lower quality ingredients and are not mass produced. IPIC holds several Federal and State granted liquor licenses. These licenses allow the SnöBar product line to be introduced and distributed in 95% of the United States. IPIC desires to be the first to mass market the SnöBar alcohol-infused products in this untapped and sizeable market segment and capitalize on these two exclusive products. IPIC only uses the finest of ingredients and dairy to produce SnöBar products and strives to achieve the highest quality of texture and taste for all of the SnöBar products. IPIC believes that the SnöBar brand has the potential to scale on a national and international level with worldwide distribution capabilities.
As of September 30, 2017, Snöbar products are currently being sold in the east coast by our distributor. The Company's management has been actively constructing an online platform that will allow Snöbar distribution on a national level. Please see "Plan of Operations" below for further detail.
Plan of Operations
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, Snöbar products are currently being sold in the east coast of United States by the Company's distributor. The Company's management has been actively constructing an online platform that will allow Snöbar distribution on a national level. The Company's platform is complete and ready to "go live" and, with the aim of purchasing inventory as well as increasing sales and marketing efforts, the Company seeks to raise additional capital to execute on its business plan.
The Company will need approximately $500,000 to sustain its operations for the next 12 months. The Company's plan of action in the next 12 months is to continue development of the Snöbar Product Line and fulfill the current orders that the brand has in hand from the Company's distributor in South Carolina as well as from other accounts. The Snöbar Product Line will have two fulfillment centers to ship the online orders, one in California to service west of the Mississippi and another fulfillment center in South Carolina to service east of the Mississippi. These fulfillment centers are established and ready to proceed as soon as inventory is purchased.
The Company's anticipated general and administrative costs can be expected to increase due to additional marketing costs associated with online sales. Specifically, the Company expects to utilize marketing and promotions through social media, radio and other avenues to create more brand awareness. The Company expects to continue to utilize independent contractors and not increase the number of employees.
The Company's plan is to increase sales revenue from the sale of the SnöBar products to meet its operating needs. However, it is very likely that the Company will not be able to increase its sales revenue sufficiently to meet these needs in time. It is also unlikely that the Company will be able to satisfy all of its obligations to pay interest and repay principal in the estimated aggregate amount of $570,800 due and payable within the next 12 months under the various forms of our outstanding debt. Although the Company has been able to extend the maturity dates as well as repayment terms of a substantial amount of such debt, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to further extend such repayments or maturity dates to avoid a default, as such further extension depends on the consent of the holders of such debt. If the Company is unable to make such payments and repayments and unable to extend and delay required payments or maturities of such debt, the holders of such debt will have the right to take legal action seeking enforcement of the debt. If any legal action is taken against it, the Company would face the risk of having to deplete our limited cash resources to defend against such suit or face the entry of a default judgment. In either event, such action would have grave impact on the Company's operations. The Company's ability to continue operations will be dependent upon the successful completion of additional long-term or permanent equity financing, the support of creditors and shareholders, and, ultimately, the achievement of profitable operations. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful, which would in turn significantly affect our ability to be successful in its new business plan. If not, the Company will likely be required to reduce operations or liquidate assets. The Company will continue to evaluate its projected expenditures relative to its available cash and to seek additional means of financing in order to satisfy the Company's working capital and other cash requirements.
Results of Operations
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017, as Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Revenues ― The Company recorded no revenue for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $0 and 3,780, respectively, for the same periods in 2016. The Company had no inventory of saleable merchandise because a sub-contractor to the Company changed terms and conditions of sale that required substantial minimum order quantities and up-front cash payments which resources were unavailable to the Company at that time or during any subsequent periods up until the date of this filing.
Operating Expenses ― Total operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $341,417 as compared to $240,683 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, due to increased operating activities during the nine month period ended September 30, 2017, and an increase in general and administrative expenses, marketing and advertising, professional fees, research and development, wages and salaries, and depreciation expense during the same period.
During the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2017, operating expenses remained nearly unchanged at $91,951 in the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to $90,810, in the same period in 2016.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ― Selling, general and administrative expenses for nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased to $296,676 from $219,952 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was due to an increase in business development expenses, travel expenses and other overhead expenses during the period in 2017.
During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $89,812 in selling, general and administrative expenses, relatively unchanged from $90,951 recorded in the same period in 2016.
Depreciation Expense ― Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2,997 and $2,995, respectively.
For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2017, depreciation expense was $1,000, and $998, respectively.
Salaries and Wages ― Salaries and wages expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $6,437, as compared to $19,496 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease was due to cost cutting measures implemented previously that froze compensation accrual for senior management. This action was primarily responsible for the reduction compensation of staff during the period under review.
The Company did not record any expenses for salaries and wages for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, representative of the cost cutting measures described above.
Other Non-Operating Income and Expenses ― For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded interest expense of $32,878, income of $6,849 from debt forgiveness and $15,042 in extraordinary income, as compared to interest expense of $16,439 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2016.
For the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $16,439 in interest expenses, providing a non-operating loss of $16,439. In the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded other non-operating expenses of $3,000 in interest expense and $18,750 in licensee fee income, for a non-operating income of $15,750.
Net Loss ― Net loss for nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $352,405, as compared to net loss of $384,933 for nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was primarily due to increased in operating expenses and the accrual of fees, legal fees and penalties on the Company's licensing contract. Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $108,390, as compared to $75,060 for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2017, we had a working capital deficit of $817,691, consisting of $23,549 in cash, $6,589 in accounts receivable and $1,500 in deposits, offset by accounts payable $146,085, accrued expenses of $280,463 and $422,781 in the current portion of notes payable.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, we used $270,599 of cash in operating activities, obtained cash of $268,863 from financing activities, resulting in a decrease in total cash of $1,736 and a balance of $23,549 for the period. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, we used cash of $416,592 in operating activities and obtained cash of $492,106 from financing activities, resulting in an increase in cash of $75,514 and a negative cash balance of $790 at the end of such period.
Total current assets as of September 30, 2017 were $60,479, while current liabilities for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017 were $849,329. We have incurred an operating loss of $341,417 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017, largely due the abandonment of licensing fees from an affiliate. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $5,680,860. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Changes in the composition of our Notes Payable and Notes Payable-Related Parties are presented in the table below:
| |
|
As of September 30, 2017
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
| |
|
Current
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Notes Payable - Related
|
|
$
|
109,281
|
|
|
$
|
247,183
|
|
|
$
|
110,081
|
|
|
$
|
404,636
|
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
409,821
|
|
|
|
26,510
|
|
|
|
671,154
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
422,781
|
|
|
|
657,004
|
|
|
|
136,591
|
|
|
|
1,075,790
|
|
Total Notes Payable for related and unrelated parties decreased $230,253 from the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 from $514,717 to $314,464 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2017.
As of September 30, 2017, total stockholders' equity increased to $(1,445,853) from $(1,576,353) as of December 31, 2016. Accumulated deficit increased from $(5,327,102) in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 to $(5,680,860) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017.
As of September 30, 2017, we had $23,549 in cash to fund our operations. We do not believe our current cash balances will be sufficient to allow us to fund our operating plan for the next twelve months. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on us obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until we become profitable. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we could be forced to cease operations or substantially curtail its drug development activities. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
Our principal sources of liquidity to date have been cash generated by issuing new shares of the Company's common stock and cash generated from loans to us. In order to be able to achieve our strategic goals, we need to further expand our business and financing activities. Expanding market awareness of the SnöBar products and our international distribution networks, together with further improvement of the SnöBar products will require future capital and liquidity expansion. Since our inception in January 2013, our shareholders have contributed a significant amount of capital making it possible for us to develop and market the SnöBar products. To continue to develop our product offerings and generate sales, significant capital has been and will continue to be required. Management intends to fund future operations through additional private or public equity and/or debt offerings. We continue to engage in preliminary discussions with potential investors and broker-dealers but no terms have been agreed upon. There can be no assurances, however, that additional funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Any equity financing may be dilutive to existing shareholders. We do not currently have any contractual restrictions on our ability to incur debt and, accordingly we could incur significant amounts of indebtedness to finance operations. Any such indebtedness could contain covenants which would restrict our operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The SEC has defined a company's critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the company's financial condition and results of operations, and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Based on this definition, we have identified the critical accounting policies and judgments addressed which are described in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Although we believe that our estimates, assumptions and judgments are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments or conditions.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), Rule 13a-15(b), we have carried out an evaluation(the "Evaluation"), under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our management, and the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2017.Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer has concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective because of the material weaknesses described below, in order to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure (see below for further discussion).We had neither the resources, nor the personnel, to provide an adequate control environment.
Due to our limited resources, the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting continued to exist at September 30, 2017:
|
· |
we do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act");
|
|
· |
we do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our limited size and early stage nature of operations, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible; however, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals;
|
|
· |
we do not have an independent audit committee of our Board of Directors;
|
|
· |
insufficient monitoring and review controls over the financial reporting closing process, including the lack of individuals with current knowledge of GAAP that led to the restatement of our previously issued financial statements; and
|
|
· |
we continue to outsource the functions of controller on an interim basis to assist us in implementing the necessary financial controls over the financial reporting and the utilization of internal management and staff to effectuate these controls.
|
We believe that these material weaknesses primarily related, in part, to our lack of sufficient staff with appropriate training in GAAP and SEC rules and regulations with respect to financial reporting functions, and the lack of robust accounting systems, as well as the lack of sufficient resources to hire such staff and implement these accounting systems.
If and when our financial resources allow, we plan to take a number of actions to correct these material weaknesses including, but not limited to, establishing an audit committee of our Board of Directors comprised of three independent directors, hiring a full-time Chief Financial Officer, adding experienced accounting and financial personnel and retaining third-party consultants to review our internal controls and recommend improvements.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a- 15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred as of September 30, 2017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
CEO and CFO Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Quarterly Report are the Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer, respectively. These Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Section 302 Certifications"). This Item 4 of this Quarterly Report, which you are currently reading, is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to above and in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no legal proceedings that have occurred within the past ten years concerning our directors or officers which involved a criminal conviction, a criminal proceeding, an administrative or civil proceeding limiting one's participation in the securities or banking industries, or a finding of securities or commodities law violations. Except for Mrs. Masjedi, who filed for Chapter 7 personal bankruptcy in 2010, which was discharged in August 2011, and Mr. Shenkman, who filed for Chapter 11 personal bankruptcy in 2010, which was dismissed but not discharged in May 2012, none of our directors or officers have filed for or have been affiliated with any company that has filed for bankruptcy within the last ten years.
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. We are not aware of any proceedings to which any of our officers or directors, or any associate of any such officer or director, is a party adverse to us or any of our or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued 7,615,169 shares of its common stock, of which (i) 1,540,000 shares were issued for services valued at $21,500, (ii) 1,145,169 shares were issued as repayment of debt in the amount of $93,000 and (iii) 4,900,000 shares in exchange for a contemplated acquisition that did not close and such shares were subsequently cancelled effective September 2017, resulting in a total issuance of 2,675,169 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
The Company believes the offers, sales and issuances of the securities described above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated under Regulation D under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purchasers of securities in each of these transactions acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof. Each of the purchasers of securities in these transactions was an accredited investor within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act and had adequate access, through employment, business or other relationships, to information about us. The offer, sale and issuance of these securities were made without any general solicitation or advertising.
Use of Proceeds of Registered Securities
Not applicable.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Us and Affiliated Purchasers
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company has not purchased any equity securities nor have any officers or directors of the Company.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
The Company is not aware of any defaults upon its senior securities.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. Other Information.
None.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Exchange Agreement, dated August 14, 2015, by and among the Company, Snöbar Holdings, Inc., and certain shareholders of Snöbar Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, filed with the SEC on August 14, 2015).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 10.11 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 10.12 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 10.13 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
| |
| |
|
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
|