UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
SCBT FINANCIAL CORPORATION | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
SCBT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
520 Gervais Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held April 24, 2012
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") of SCBT Financial Corporation, a South Carolina corporation (the "Company"), will be held at the Company's headquarters in the Orangeburg Conference Room on the second floor, 520 Gervais Street, Columbia, South Carolina at 2:00 p.m., on April 24, 2012, for the following purposes:
Only record holders of Common Stock of the Company at the close of business on March 2, 2012, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
You are cordially invited and urged to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you are requested to promptly vote by telephone, internet, or by mail on the proposals presented, following the instructions on the Proxy Card for whichever voting method you prefer. If you vote by mail, please complete, date, sign, and promptly return the enclosed proxy in the enclosed self-addressed, postage-paid envelope. If you need assistance in completing your proxy, please call the Company at 800-277-2175. If you are record shareholder, attend the meeting, and desire to revoke your proxy and vote in person, you may do so. In any event, a proxy may be revoked by a record holder at any time before it is exercised.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Renee
R. Brooks
Secretary
Columbia,
South Carolina
March 23, 2012
SCBT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
520 Gervais Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be Held April 24, 2012
This Proxy Statement is furnished to shareholders of SCBT Financial Corporation, a South Carolina corporation (herein, unless the context otherwise requires, together with its subsidiaries, the "Company"), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company's Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the Company's headquarters in the Orangeburg Conference Room on the second floor, 520 Gervais Street, Columbia, South Carolina at 2:00 p.m., on April 24, 2012 or any adjournment thereof (the "Annual Meeting"), for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Directions to the Company's headquarters may be obtained by contacting Keith Rainwater at 803-231-3539.
Solicitation of proxies may be made in person or by mail, telephone or other means by directors, officers and regular employees of the Company. The Company may also request banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of Common Stock of the Company held of record by such persons, and the Company will reimburse the reasonable forwarding expenses. The cost of solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company. This Proxy Statement was first mailed to shareholders on or about March 23, 2012.
The Company has its principal executive offices at 520 Gervais Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. The Company's mailing address is P.O. Box 1030, Columbia, South Carolina 29202, and its telephone number is 800-277-2175.
The Annual Report to Shareholders (which includes the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K containing, among other things, the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 financial statements) accompanies this proxy statement. Such Annual Report to Shareholders does not form any part of the material for the solicitation of proxies.
Any record shareholder returning the accompanying proxy may revoke such proxy at any time prior to its exercise (a) by giving written notice to the Company of such revocation, (b) by voting in person at the meeting, or (c) by executing and delivering to the Company a later dated proxy. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in itself constitute revocation of a proxy. Any written notice or proxy revoking a proxy should be sent to SCBT Financial Corporation, P.O. Box 1030, Columbia, South Carolina 29202, Attention: Renee R. Brooks. Written notice of revocation or delivery of a later dated proxy will be effective upon receipt thereof by the Company.
The Company's only voting security is its $2.50 par value per common stock ("Common Stock"), each share of which entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each matter to come before the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on March 2, 2012 (the "Record Date"), the Company had issued and outstanding 14,056,363 shares of Common Stock, which were held of record by approximately 5,300 persons. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote on matters that come before the Annual Meeting. Notwithstanding the Record Date
2
specified above, the Company's stock transfer books will not be closed and shares of the Common Stock may be transferred subsequent to the Record Date. However, all votes must be cast in the names of holders of record on the Record Date.
The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a share is represented for any purpose at the Annual Meeting by the presence of the registered owner or a person holding a valid proxy for the registered owner, it is deemed to be present for the purposes of establishing a quorum. Therefore, valid proxies which are marked "Abstain" or "Withhold" or as to which no vote is marked, including proxies submitted by brokers who are the record owners of shares but who lack the power to vote such shares (so-called "broker non-votes"), will be included in determining the number of votes present or represented at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present or represented at the meeting, the shareholders entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, have the power to adjourn the meeting from time to time until a quorum is present or represented. If any such adjournment is for a period of less than 30 days, no notice, other than an announcement at the meeting, is required to be given of the adjournment. If the adjournment is for 30 days or more, notice of the adjourned meeting will be given in accordance with the Bylaws. Directors, officers and regular employees of the Company may solicit proxies for the reconvened meeting in person or by mail, telephone or other means. At any such reconvened meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the meeting as originally noticed. Once a quorum has been established, it will not be destroyed by the departure of shares prior to the adjournment of the meeting.
Provided a quorum is established at the meeting, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of the Company do not have cumulative voting rights.
All other matters to be considered and acted upon at the Annual Meeting, including the proposal to ratify the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, Certified Public Accountants, as independent registered public accounting firm, require that the number of shares of Common Stock voted in favor of the matter exceed the number of shares of Common Stock voted against the matter, provided a quorum has been established. Abstentions, broker non-votes and the failure to return a signed proxy will have no effect on the outcome of such matters.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 24, 2012
The Company's Proxy, Proxy Statement (providing important shareholder information for the Annual Meeting), and 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders (which includes its 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K) accompany this Notice. The proxy statement and 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at http://www.scbtonline.com under the Investor Relations page.
3
ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY THE PROXIES
Each proxy, unless the shareholder otherwise specifies therein, will be voted according to the recommendations of the Board of Directors as follows:
Proposal One: | FOR the election of the persons named in this Proxy Statement as the Board of Directors' nominees for election to the Board of Directors; and | ||
Proposal Two: |
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012; and |
||
Proposal Three: |
FOR the approval of the proposal to adopt the 2012 Omnibus Stock and Performance Plan |
In each case where the shareholder has appropriately specified how the proxy is to be voted, it will be voted in accordance with his or her specifications. As to any other matter of business that may be brought before the Annual Meeting, a vote may be cast pursuant to the accompanying proxy in accordance with the best judgment of the persons voting the same. However, the Board of Directors does not know of any such other business.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Any shareholder of the Company desiring to include a proposal in the Company's 2013 proxy materials for action at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must deliver the proposal to the executive offices of the Company no later than November 16, 2012 if such proposal is to be considered for inclusion in the 2013 proxy materials. Only proper proposals that are timely received will be included in the Company's 2013 Proxy Statement and Proxy. In addition, a shareholder who desires to nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors of the Company or to make any other proposal for consideration by shareholders at a shareholders' meeting must deliver notice of such proposed action to the secretary of the Company no less than 45 days before such meeting. For a nominee for director, such notice should be addressed to the Governance Committee of the Company at P.O. Box 1030, Columbia, South Carolina 29202. The recommendation must set forth the name and address of the shareholder or shareholder group making the nomination; the name of the nominee; his or her address; the number of shares of Company stock owned by the nominee; any arrangements or understandings regarding nomination; the five-year business experience of the recommended candidate; legal proceedings within the last five years involving the candidate; a description of transactions between the candidate and the Company valued in excess of $120,000 and other types of business relationships with the Company; a description of any relationships or agreements between the recommending shareholder or group and the candidate regarding nomination; a description of known relationships between the candidate and the Company's competitors, customers, business partners or other persons who have a business relationship with the Company; and a statement of the recommended candidate's qualifications for Board membership. For any other shareholder proposal, such notice must set forth the name and address of the shareholder making the proposal and the text of the resolution to be voted on.
The Company does not have a formal process by which shareholders may communicate with the Board of Directors. Historically, however, the chairman of the Board or the Governance Committee has undertaken responsibility for responding to questions and concerns expressed by shareholders. In the view of the Board of Directors, this approach has been sufficient to ensure that questions and concerns raised by shareholders are adequately addressed. Any shareholder desiring to communicate with the Board may do so by writing to the Secretary of the Company at P.O. Box 1030, Columbia, South Carolina 29202.
4
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN PARTIES
The following table sets forth the number and percentage of outstanding shares that exceed 5% beneficial ownership (determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) by any single person or group, as known by the Company:
Title of Class
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Amount of Beneficial Ownership(1) |
Percent of Shares Outstanding |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Stock |
BlackRock, Inc. | 791,363 | 5.65 | % | |||||
|
40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022 | ||||||||
Common Stock |
Wellington Management Company, LLP | 1,354,886 | 9.67 | % | |||||
|
280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210 |
5
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth, as of March 2, 2012, the number and percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) each director and nominee for director of the Company, (ii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iii) all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group.
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Common Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Common Shares Subject to a Right to Acquire(2) |
Percent of Shares Outstanding |
|||||||
Jimmy E. Addison |
7,301 | 500 | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Luther J. Battiste, III |
6,734 | 2,211 | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Joseph E. Burns(4)(5)(6) |
36,820 | 20,427 | 0.4 | % | ||||||
M. Oswald Fogle |
31,408 | 2,321 | 0.2 | % | ||||||
Dwight W. Frierson(5) |
24,725 | 2,708 | 0.2 | % | ||||||
Herbert G. Gray |
9,027 | | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Cynthia A. Hartley |
1,003 | | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Robert R. Hill, Jr.(4)(6) |
99,040 | 52,338 | 1.1 | % | ||||||
Robert R. Horger(3)(4)(6) |
57,236 | 33,838 | 0.6 | % | ||||||
Harry M. Mims, Jr. |
43,584 | 2,487 | 0.3 | % | ||||||
Ralph W. Norman, Jr. |
13,138 | 1,550 | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Alton C. Phillips |
21,891 | | 0.2 | % | ||||||
Donald E. Pickett(6) |
6,201 | 1,536 | 0.1 | % | ||||||
John C. Pollok(3)(4)(6) |
58,087 | 34,104 | 0.7 | % | ||||||
James W. Roquemore(3)(5) |
37,348 | 2,377 | 0.3 | % | ||||||
Thomas E. Suggs |
9,419 | 2,377 | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Susie H. VanHuss |
7,959 | 1,025 | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Kevin P. Walker |
5,054 | | 0.0 | % | ||||||
John W. Williamson, III |
73,935 | 2,211 | 0.5 | % | ||||||
John F. Windley(4)(6) |
20,184 | 19,904 | 0.3 | % | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (23 persons)(4)(6) |
609,856 | 195,887 | 5.7 | % |
6
The Articles of Incorporation of the Company provide for a maximum of twenty directors; to be divided into three classes each serving three-year terms, with the classes as equal in number as possible. The Board of Directors has currently established the number of directors at 14, effective at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with the By-Laws of the Company pertaining to mandatory retirement at age 72 for directors, Susie H. VanHuss will retire from the Board of Directors upon conclusion of the Annual Shareholders' Meeting.
PROPOSAL 1: M. Oswald Fogle, Herbert G. Gray, Thomas E. Suggs, and Kevin P. Walker, all of whom currently are directors of the Company and whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting, have been nominated by the Board of Directors for re-election by the shareholders. If re-elected, Messrs. Fogle, Gray, Suggs, and Walker will serve as directors of the Company for a three-year term, expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company.
Cynthia A. Hartley was appointed to the Board of Directors effective July 7, 2011. Under South Carolina law, Mrs. Hartley's term expires at the Annual Meeting, and we ask that you re-elect Mrs. Hartley to our Board of Directors. If re-elected, Mrs. Hartley will serve as a director of the Company for a three-year term, expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR these nominees.
The table below sets forth for each director his or her name, age, when first elected and current term expiration, business experience for at least the past five years, and the qualifications that led to the conclusion that the individual should serve as a director.
Name
|
Age | First Elected Director |
Current Term Expires |
Nominee for New Term |
Business Experience for the Past Five Years and Director Qualifications |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Horger Chairman SCBT Employee |
61 | 1991 | 2013 | Chairman of SCBT Financial Corporation and SCBT, N.A. since 1998. He also has served as Vice Chairman of SCBT Financial Corporation and SCBT, N.A. from 1994 to 1998. Mr. Horger has been an attorney with Horger, Barnwell and Reid in Orangeburg, South Carolina, since 1975. During his tenure as Chairman, Mr. Horger has developed knowledge of the Company's business, history, organization, and executive management which, together with his personal understanding of many of the markets that we serve, has enhanced his ability to lead the board through the current challenging economic climate. Mr. Horger's legal training and experience enhance his ability to understand the Company's regulatory framework. |
7
Name
|
Age | First Elected Director |
Current Term Expires |
Nominee for New Term |
Business Experience for the Past Five Years and Director Qualifications |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Hill, Jr. Chief Executive Officer SCBT Employee |
45 | 1996 | 2014 | President and Chief Executive Officer of SCBT Financial Corporation since November 6, 2004. Prior to that time, Mr. Hill served as President and Chief Operating Officer of SCBT, N.A. from 1999 to November 6, 2004. Mr. Hill joined the Company in 1995. He was appointed to serve on the Federal Reserve Board of Directors in December 2010. Mr. Hill brings to the board an intimate understanding of the Company's business and organization, as well as substantial leadership ability, banking industry expertise, and management experience. | ||||||||||
Jimmy E. Addison |
51 |
2007 |
2013 |
Chief Financial Officer of SCANA Corporation, the holding company of South Carolina Electric and Gas Company and other utility-related concerns, since 2006. He also serves on the Business Partnership Foundation of the Moore School of Business at the University of South Carolina, South Carolina Future Minds, the South Carolina State Chamber of Commerce, and serves as Treasurer of the Southeastern Electric Exchange. Mr. Addison is also a licensed CPA and previously worked for a national accounting firm. His leadership experience, knowledge of financial reporting requirements of public companies, and business and personal ties to many of the Bank's market areas enhance his ability to contribute as a director. |
||||||||||
Luther J. Battiste, III |
62 |
2001 |
2014 |
Managing shareholder of the firm Johnson, Toal and Battiste, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina and Orangeburg, South Carolina, since 2007, and an attorney with the firm since 1974. Mr. Battiste also holds leadership positions in a number of local, state, and national legal organizations, serves on the boards of several non-profit institutions, and has previously served as a local government official in one the Company's largest market areas. Mr. Battiste's extensive legal career, experience as a government official, and non-profit service give him a unique perspective on certain business, legal, and regulatory matters. |
8
Name
|
Age | First Elected Director |
Current Term Expires |
Nominee for New Term |
Business Experience for the Past Five Years and Director Qualifications |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Oswald Fogle | 67 | 2001 | 2012 | | An Industrial Consultant since 2011. Mr. Fogle served as plant manager from 2007 to 2011 for Roseburg Forest Products Co. manufacturing facility in Orangeburg, South Carolina, a company engaged in the lamination of boards and general warehousing. Prior to that time, Mr. Fogle served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Decolam, Inc. from 1987 to 2007. As a result of his leadership experience, Mr. Fogle brings to the board useful knowledge of management, marketing, operations, and human resource issues. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves provides him with a useful appreciation of markets that we serve. | |||||||||
Dwight W. Frierson |
55 |
1996 |
A |
Vice Chairman of the Board, SCBT Financial Corporation and South Carolina Bank and Trust, N.A., since 1999. He has also served as Vice President and General Manager of Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Orangeburg, South Carolina, since 1987. As a business manager, Mr. Frierson has experience with management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves provides him with an appreciation of markets that we serve. Moreover, during his tenure as a director he has developed knowledge of the Company's business, history, organization, and executive management which, together with the relationships that he has developed, enhance his leadership and consensus-building ability. |
||||||||||
Herbert G. Gray |
47 |
2009 |
2012 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Grayco, a Beaufort-based company that primarily supplies building material and hardware for Beaufort and Jasper counties in South Carolina, since 2000. As the chief executive officer of a company, Mr. Gray has experience with management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves also provides him with an appreciation of markets that we serve. Moreover, his background and experience in the Beaufort market is useful to the board as the Bank continues to develop its business in the lowcountry of South Carolina. |
9
Name
|
Age | First Elected Director |
Current Term Expires |
Nominee for New Term |
Business Experience for the Past Five Years and Director Qualifications |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cynthia A. Hartley | 63 | 2011 | 2012 | | Cynthia A. Hartley retired in 2011 as Senior Vice President of Human Resources with Sonoco Products Company in Hartsville, South Carolina. Mrs. Hartley serves as a member of the Board of Trustees for Coker College in Hartsville, South Carolina. Mrs. Hartley was first elected to the SCBT Financial Corporation Board in May of 2011. Her leadership experience, knowledge of human resource matters, and business and personal ties to many of the Bank's market areas enhance her ability to contribute as a director. | |||||||||
Harry M. Mims, Jr. |
70 |
1988 |
2013 |
President of J.F. Cleckley & Company, a company engaged in site development, since 1977. Over his 21 years of experience with the board, Mr. Mims has developed an understanding of the Company's business, history, organization, and executive management. Moreover, as the president of a development company, Mr. Mims has experience with strategic planning, management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves also provides him with a useful appreciation of markets that we serve. |
||||||||||
Ralph W. Norman, Jr. |
58 |
1996 |
2014 |
President of Warren Norman Co., Inc., a real estate development firm, since 1990. Mr. Norman is also a member of the South Carolina House of Representatives. As the president of a company and an elected official, Mr. Norman has experience with strategic planning, management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters. His business, political, and personal experiences provide him with political insights and a useful appreciation of markets that we serve. |
||||||||||
Alton C. Phillips |
48 |
2007 |
2014 |
President of Carolina Eastern, Inc., a Charleston-based company that markets and distributes fertilizers, chemicals, and seed, since 1988. As the president of a company, Mr. Phillips has experience with strategic planning, management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves also provides him with an appreciation of markets that we serve. |
10
Name
|
Age | First Elected Director |
Current Term Expires |
Nominee for New Term |
Business Experience for the Past Five Years and Director Qualifications |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
James W. Roquemore | 57 | 1994 | 2013 | Chief Executive Officer of Patten Seed Company, Inc. of Lakeland, Georgia, and General Manager of Super-Sod/Carolina, a company that produces and markets turf, grass, sod and seed, since 1997. As the chief executive officer of a company, Mr. Roquemore has experience with management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves also provides him with an appreciation of markets that we serve. Moreover, during his tenure as a director he has developed knowledge of the Company's business, history, organization, and executive management which, together with the relationships that he has developed, enhance his leadership and consensus-building ability. | ||||||||||
Thomas E. Suggs |
62 |
2001 |
2012 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Keenan & Suggs, Inc., an insurance brokerage and consulting firm. Mr. Suggs has over 17 years of experience in the insurance industry and 28 years of banking experience. As the chief executive officer of a company, Mr. Suggs has experience with management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters, and his experience with the banking industry also provides him with certain insights. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves also provides him with an appreciation of markets that we serve. |
11
Name
|
Age | First Elected Director |
Current Term Expires |
Nominee for New Term |
Business Experience for the Past Five Years and Director Qualifications |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Susie H. VanHuss | 72 | 2004 | R | Retired in 2006 as Executive Director of the University of South Carolina Foundations; Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Management in the Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. As Executive Director, she was the Chief Executive Officer of the USC Educational Foundation and the USC Development Foundation, both 501(C)(3) non-profit South Carolina corporations. She is also an author for Cengage-South Western Publishing Company. From May 1, 2008, through January 31, 2009, she served as interim President and CEO of Central Carolina Community Foundation, a 501(C)(3) non-profit South Carolina corporation. With her leadership experiences and breadth of knowledge, she brings a unique perspective to the board. | ||||||||||
Kevin P. Walker |
61 |
2010 |
2012 |
|
Kevin P. Walker is a founding partner of Greer & Walker, LLP in Charlotte, North Carolina. He is also a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the North Carolina Association of Public Accountants, the Financial Consulting Group, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, and the American Arbitration Association Panel of Arbitrators. Mr. Walker was first elected to the SCBT Financial Corporation Board in October 2010. Mr. Walker's leadership experience, accounting knowledge and business and personal experience in certain of the Company's markets enhance his ability to contribute as a director. |
12
Name
|
Age | First Elected Director |
Current Term Expires |
Nominee for New Term |
Business Experience for the Past Five Years and Director Qualifications |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John W. Williamson, III | 62 | 2001 | 2013 | President of J.W. Williamson Ginnery, Inc., which is a partner in Carolina Eastern-Williamson Lynchburg Grain Company, since 1971. Also serves as Chairman of the Jackson Companies, which operate a camping resort, golf community, and commercial development group in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. As the president of a company, Mr. Williamson has experience with management, marketing, operations, and human resource matters, and his real estate development experience also provides him with certain insights. His business and personal experience in certain of the communities that the Bank serves also provides him with an appreciation of markets that we serve. |
RDirector will retire from the Board effective the date of the Annual Meeting, April 24, 2012.
ADirector is not standing for reelection, effective the date of the Annual Meeting, April 24, 2012
There are no family relationships among any of the directors and executive officers of the Company.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES
During 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company held ten meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (a) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period for which he or she served as a director, and (b) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors of the Company on which he or she served.
There is no formal policy regarding attendance at annual shareholder meetings; however, such attendance has always been strongly encouraged.
The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals that is applicable to the Company's chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer and all managers reporting to these individuals who are responsible for accounting and financial reporting. The Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals is located on the Company's website at www.scbtonline.com under Investor Relations. We will disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of these ethics policies and standards on our website promptly as practicable, as and to the extent required under NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and applicable SEC rules.
13
The Board of Directors of the Company maintains executive, audit, compensation, governance, policy and trust asset management committees. The composition and frequency of meetings for these committees during 2011 were as follows:
|
|
Committees of the Board of Directors | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Independent Under NASDAQ Requirements |
Executive (10 meetings) |
Audit (10 meetings) |
Compensation (6 meetings) |
Governance (7 meetings) |
Policy (3 meetings) |
Wealth Management and Trust (5 meetings) |
|||||||
Robert R. Horger |
No | Chair | | |||||||||||
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
No | | | |||||||||||
Jimmy E. Addison(1) |
Yes | | | | | |||||||||
Luther J. Battiste, III |
Yes | | | |||||||||||
Dalton B. Floyd, Jr(3). |
No | | ||||||||||||
M. Oswald Fogle |
Yes | Chair | | |||||||||||
Dwight W. Frierson |
Yes | | | Chair | ||||||||||
Herbert G. Gray |
Yes | | | |||||||||||
Cynthia A. Hartley(4) |
Yes | | | |||||||||||
Harry M. Mims, Jr. |
Yes | | | | ||||||||||
Ralph W. Norman, Jr. |
Yes | | | |||||||||||
Alton C. Phillips(2) |
Yes | | | |||||||||||
James W. Roquemore |
Yes | | | | ||||||||||
Thomas E. Suggs |
Yes | | Chair | | ||||||||||
Susie H. VanHuss |
Yes | Chair | | |||||||||||
Kevin P. Walker |
Yes | | | |||||||||||
John W. Williamson, III |
Yes | | | Chair | ||||||||||
Note: All directors other than Robert R. Horger and Robert R. Hill, Jr. meet the independence requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market. Therefore, under these requirements, a majority of the members of the Company's Board of Directors is independent.
The functions of these committees are as follows:
Executive CommitteeThe Board of Directors of the Company may, by resolution adopted by a majority of its members, delegate to the executive committee the power, with certain exceptions, to exercise the authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the affairs and property of the Company.
14
Audit CommitteeThe Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent directors under the independence requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market. The Board of Directors has also determined that M. Oswald Fogle is an "Audit Committee financial expert" for purposes of the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors of the Company in overseeing (i) the Company's accounting and financial reporting processes generally, (ii) the audits of the Company's financial statements and (iii) the Company's systems of internal controls regarding finance and accounting. In such role, the Audit Committee reviews the qualifications, performance, effectiveness and independence of the Company's independent accountants and has the authority to appoint, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the Company's independent accountants. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company's internal audit department and consults with management regarding the internal audit process and the effectiveness and reliability of the Company's internal accounting controls. The Board of Directors has adopted a charter for the Audit Committee, a copy of which is located on the Company's website at www.scbtonline.com under Investor Relations.
Compensation CommitteeThe Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors under the independence requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market applicable to directors who do not serve on the Audit Committee. The Compensation Committee, among other functions, has overall responsibility for evaluating, and approving or recommending to the Board for approval, the director and officer compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company. The full Board of Directors is then responsible for approving or disapproving compensation paid to the CEO and each of the other executive officers of the Company. The committee, which currently consists of seven independent directors, is required to be made up of no fewer than three independent directors who are recommended by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and approved by the Board. The Compensation Committee's processes and procedures for considering and determining executive compensation are described below under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis." The Compensation Committee charter can be found on the Company's website at www.scbtonline.com under Investor Relations.
Governance CommitteeThe Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Governance Committee are independent directors under the independence requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market applicable to directors who do not serve on the Audit Committee. The Governance Committee identifies and recommends individuals qualified to become Board members, reviews the corporate governance practices employed by the Company and recommends changes thereto, and assists the Board in its periodic review of the Board's performance. The Governance Committee charter can be found on the Company's website at www.scbtonline.com under Investor Relations.
The Governance Committee acts as the nominating committee for the purpose of recommending to the Board of Directors nominees for election to the Board. The Governance Committee has not established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met for a person to be nominated to serve as a director, and the Governance Committee has not identified any specific qualities or skills that it believes are necessary to be nominated as a director. The Governance Committee charter provides that potential candidates for the Board are to be reviewed by the Governance Committee and that candidates are selected based on a number of criteria, including a proposed nominee's independence, age, skills, occupation, diversity, experience and any other factors beneficial to the Company in the context of the needs of the Board. The Governance Committee has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. In determining whether to recommend a director nominee, Governance Committee members consider and discuss diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the needs of the Board of Directors as a whole. The Governance Committee members generally conceptualize diversity expansively to include,
15
without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities or attributes that contribute to Board heterogeneity when identifying and recommending director nominees. The Governance Committee believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with the Committee's goal of creating a Board of Directors that best serves the needs of the Company and the interest of its shareholders.
The Governance Committee has performed a review of the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of the Board's current membership, including the director nominees for election to the Board of Directors and the other members of the Board, and believes that the current members of the Board, including the director nominees, as a whole possess a variety of complementary skills and characteristics, including the following:
Each individual director has qualifications and skills that the Governance Committee believes, together as a whole, create a strong, well-balanced Board. The experiences and qualifications of our directors are found in the table on pages 7-13.
The Governance Committee will consider director nominees identified by its members, other directors, officers and employees of the Company and other persons, including shareholders of the Company. The Governance Committee will consider nominees for director recommended by a shareholder if the shareholder provides the committee with the information described in Paragraph 7 under the caption "Committee Authority and Responsibilities" of the Governance Committee's charter.
The required information regarding a director nominee is also discussed in general terms within the first paragraph of the "Shareholder Proposals and Communications" section on page 4 of this proxy statement.
Policy CommitteeThe primary purpose of the Policy Committee is to recommend and approve new policies and to review and approve present policies or policy updates and changes.
Wealth Management and Trust CommitteeThe primary purpose of the Wealth Management and Trust Committee is to monitor and oversee the wealth management and fiduciary activities of the Company's subsidiary bank, including the business, products, services, operations and financial performance and results of such activities.
Code of EthicsThe Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of the Company's subsidiary bank have adopted a Code of Ethics to provide ethical guidelines for the activities of agents, attorneys, directors, officers, and employees of the Company and its subsidiary. The
16
Code of Ethics will promote, train, and encourage adherence in business and personal affairs to a high ethical standard and will also help to maintain the Company as an institution that serves the public with honesty, integrity and fair-dealing. The Code of Ethics is designed to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and certain other laws that provide guidelines in connection with possible breaches of fiduciary duty, dishonest efforts to undermine financial institution transactions and the intent to corrupt or reward a Company employee or other Company representative. A copy of the Code of Ethics can be found on the Company's website at www.scbtonline.com under Investor Relations.
Board of Directors' Corporate Governance GuidelinesThe Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of the Company's subsidiary bank have each adopted certain guidelines governing the qualifications, conduct and operation of the Board. Among other things, these guidelines outline the duties and responsibilities of each director, and establish certain minimum requirements for director training. Each director is required to read, review and sign the corporate governance guidelines on an annual basis. A copy of these guidelines can be found on the Company's website at www.scbtonline.com under Investor Relations.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
We are focused on the Company's corporate governance practices and value independent Board oversight as an essential component of strong corporate performance to enhance shareholder value. Our commitment to independent oversight is demonstrated by the fact that, except for two directors, (our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board), all of our directors are independent. In addition, all of the members of our Board's Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees are deemed independent based upon the Board of Directors evaluation.
See the discussion entitled Certain Relationships and Related Transactions on page 59 for additional information concerning Board independence.
Our Board believes that it is preferable for Mr. Horger to serve as Chairman of the Board because of his strong institutional knowledge of the Company's business, history, industry, markets, organization and executive management gained in his nearly 18 years of experience in a leadership position on the Board. We believe it is the Chief Executive Officer's responsibility to manage the Company and the Chairman's responsibility to guide the Board as they provide leadership to our executive management. As directors continue to have more oversight responsibility than ever before, we believe it is beneficial to have separate individuals in the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Traditionally, the Company has maintained the separateness of the roles of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer. In making its decision to continue to have a separate individual as Chairman, the Board considered the time and attention that Mr. Hill is required to devote to managing the day-to-day operations of the Company. We believe that this Board leadership structure is appropriate in maximizing the effectiveness of Board oversight and in providing perspective to our business that is independent from executive management.
The Board of Directors oversees risk through the various Board standing committees, principally the Audit Committee, which report directly to the Board. Our Audit Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the Company's risk management processes on behalf of the full Board of Directors. The Audit Committee focuses on financial reporting risk and oversight of the internal audit process. It receives reports from management at least quarterly regarding the Company's assessment of risks and the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems, and also reviews credit and market risk (including liquidity and interest rate risk), and operational risk (including compliance and legal risk). Our Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer meet with the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis in executive sessions to discuss any potential risks or control issues involving management.
17
Each of the Board's standing committees, as described above, is involved to varying extents in the following:
The full Board of Directors focuses on the risks that it believes to be the most significant facing the Company and the Company's general risk management strategy. The full Board of Directors also seeks to ensure that risks undertaken by the Company are consistent with the Board of Directors' approved risk management strategies. While the Board of Directors oversees the Company's risk management, management is responsible for the day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibility is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing our Company and that our Board leadership structure supports this approach.
We recognize that different Board leadership structures may be appropriate for companies in different situations. We will continue to reexamine our corporate governance policies and leadership structures on an ongoing basis in an effort to ensure that they continue to meet the Company's needs.
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Although the Company is not required to seek shareholder ratification of the selection of its accountants, the Company believes obtaining shareholder ratification is desirable. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, the Audit Committee will re-evaluate the engagement of the Company's independent auditors. Even if the shareholders do ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee has the discretion to appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.
If a quorum is present, the number of shares of Common Stock voted in favor of this proposal must exceed the number of shares voted against it for approval of this proposal.
PROPOSAL 3: TO APPROVE THE 2012 OMNIBUS STOCK AND PERFORMANCE PLAN
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders of the Company will be asked to vote on a proposal to approve the 2012 Omnibus Stock and Performance Plan (the "2012 Plan"), which was adopted by the board of directors of the Company on March 16, 2012, subject to shareholder approval. The purpose of the 2012 Plan is to help the Company attract and retain directors, officers and employees, to motivate these persons by means of appropriate incentives to achieve the goals of the Company, and to provide incentive compensation opportunities that are competitive with those of similar companies. The 2012 Plan is intended to assist the Company in securing and retaining the services of directors, officers and employees by enabling them to participate in the future success and growth of the Company and to associate their interests with those of the Company. If approved by shareholders at the Company's 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the 2012 Plan will become effective on that date (the "Effective Date").
18
The 2012 Plan, if approved, will replace the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan approved by shareholders of the Company in April 2004 (the "2004 Plan") and no new awards will be granted under the 2004 Plan. However, options granted and outstanding under the 2004 Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan will continue to be outstanding and governed by the provisions of the applicable plan.
If the 2012 Plan is approved by shareholders, it will allow awards under the 2012 Plan to qualify as tax-deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Section 162(m)"). Section 162(m) generally places a $1 million annual limit on a company's tax deduction for compensation paid to certain senior executives, other than compensation that satisfies the applicable requirements for a performance-based compensation exception. To qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), the compensation must (among other requirements) be subject to attainment of performance goals that have been disclosed to shareholders and approved by a majority shareholder vote. The Company is asking shareholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to approve the material terms of the performance goals under the 2012 Plan so that the Company may make awards that qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), and thus, would be tax-deductible. For purposes of Section 162(m), the material terms of the performance goals requiring stockholder approval include the following:
By approving the 2012 Plan, the shareholders will be approving, among other things, the eligibility requirements, performance goals and limits on various stock and cash awards contained therein for purposes of Section 162(m).
A summary of the 2012 Plan is set forth below. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2012 Plan, which is included in this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.
SUMMARY OF THE 2012 PLAN
General. Awards granted under the 2012 Plan may be in the form of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, cash awards, other stock-based awards or any combination of those awards. The 2012 Plan provides that awards may be made under the 2012 Plan for ten years following the adoption of the 2012 Plan by the Company's board of directors.
Administration. Under the terms of the 2012 Plan, the 2012 Plan will be administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors or such other committee as the board of directors may designate (the "committee"). The committee will consist entirely of two or more "outside directors" within the meaning of Section 162(m) and who are "non-employee directors" as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Under the terms of the 2012 Plan, the committee can make rules and regulations and establish such procedures for the administration of the 2012 Plan as it deems appropriate. Any determination made by the committee under the 2012 Plan will be made in the sole discretion of the committee and such determinations will be final and binding on all persons.
Eligibility. The 2012 Plan provides for awards to the directors, officers, employees and consultants of the company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 584 directors, officers and employees eligible to participate in the 2012 Plan.
19
Shares Available. The 2012 Plan provides that the aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock that may be subject to awards under the 2012 Plan cannot exceed 1,684,000, of which no more than 817,476 shares may be subject to full-value awards (i.e., awards other than stock options and SARs), in each case subject to adjustment in certain circumstances to prevent dilution or enlargement. No participant may be granted, in each case during any calendar year, performance-based awards intended to qualify under Section 162(m) (other than stock options and SARs) covering in excess of 100,000 shares or stock options and SARs covering in excess of 200,000 shares. The maximum number of shares that may be granted pursuant to incentive stock options is 1,684,000.
As described above, if the 2012 Plan is approved by the Company's shareholders, no new awards may be granted under the 2004 Plan. However, awards previously granted and outstanding under the 1999 and the 2004 Plan will remain in full force and effect under such Plans according to their respective terms, and to the extent that any such award is forfeited, terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised (to the extent applicable), or is settled for cash, shares of common stock of the Company subject to such award which are not delivered as a result will not be available for awards under the 2012 Plan.
Shares underlying awards that expire or are forfeited or terminated without being exercised or awards that are settled for cash will again be available for the grant of additional awards within the limits provided by the 2012 Plan. Shares withheld by or delivered to the Company to satisfy the exercise price of options or SARs or tax withholding obligations with respect to any award granted under the 2012 Plan will nonetheless be deemed to have been issued under the 2012 Plan.
Stock Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the 2012 Plan, options to purchase shares of Company common stock may be granted to eligible individuals at any time and from time to time as determined by the committee. An option may be granted with or without a related SAR. Options may be granted as incentive stock options, which are intended to qualify for favorable treatment to the recipient under Federal tax law, or as non-qualified stock options, which do not qualify for this favorable tax treatment. Subject to the limits provided in the 2012 Plan, the committee determines the number of options granted to each recipient. Each option grant will be evidenced by a stock option agreement that specifies the option exercise price, whether the options are intended to be incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options, the duration of the options, the number of shares to which the options pertain, the vesting terms and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine.
The committee determines the exercise price for each option granted, except that the option exercise price may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of a share of Company common stock on the date of grant. As of March 16, 2012, the fair market value (as that term is defined under the 2012 Plan) of a share of Company common stock was $31.71. All options granted under the 2012 Plan will expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. The methods of exercising an option granted under the 2012 Plan is set forth in the 2012 Plan. Stock options are nontransferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. The granting of an option does not accord the recipient the rights of a stockholder, and such rights accrue only after the exercise of an option and the registration of shares of Company common stock in the recipient's name.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A SAR will entitle the holder to receive, with respect to each share of Company common stock covered by the SAR, the amount by which the fair market value of one share of Company common stock at the time of exercise exceeds the fair market value of one share of Company common stock on the date of grant. A SAR may be granted with or without a related option. The exercise price of a SAR shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of Company common stock on the date of grant.
20
Each SAR will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the exercise price (or base price), the number of shares to which the SAR pertains and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine. The Company may make payment of the amount to which the participant exercising SARs is entitled by delivering shares of Company common stock, cash or a combination of common stock and cash as set forth in the award agreement relating to the SARs. The method of exercising a SAR granted under the 2012 Plan is set forth in the 2012 Plan. SARs are not transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Each SAR will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the date and terms of the award and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine.
Restricted Stock. The 2012 Plan provides for the award of shares of Company common stock that are subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transferability as set forth in the 2012 Plan and as may be otherwise determined by the committee. Each grant of restricted stock will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the number of shares of restricted stock and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine. Except for these restrictions and any others imposed by the committee, upon the grant of restricted stock, the recipient will have rights of a stockholder with respect to the restricted stock, including the right to vote the restricted stock and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid or made with respect to the restricted stock (which dividends relating to restricted stock subject to performance vesting conditions will only vest upon the vesting of the restricted stock relating to such dividends). During the restriction period set by the committee, the recipient may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange or otherwise encumber the restricted stock.
Restricted Stock Units. The 2012 Plan authorizes the committee to grant restricted stock units and deferred share rights. Restricted stock units and deferred share rights are not shares of Company common stock and do not entitle the recipients to the rights of a stockholder. Each grant of restricted stock units will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the number of restricted stock units and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine. Restricted stock units granted under the 2012 Plan may or may not be subject to performance conditions. The recipient may not sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber restricted stock units granted under the 2012 Plan prior to their vesting. Restricted stock units will be settled in cash or shares of Company common stock, in an amount based on the fair market value of Company common stock on the settlement date.
Performance Units. The 2012 Plan provides for the award of performance units that may valued by reference to a designated amount of cash, share of Company common stock or other property other than shares of Company common stock. The payment of the value of a performance unit is conditioned upon the achievement of performance goals set by the committee in granting the performance unit and may be paid in cash, shares of Company common stock, other property or a combination thereof. The maximum value of the property that may be paid to a participant pursuant to a performance unit in any year is $2,500,000.
Cash Awards. The 2012 Plan provides for the award of cash awards on such terms and conditions determined by the committee, including, without limitation, performance goals that must be satisfied and the applicable performance period. The maximum value of cash awards that may be paid or payable to any participant in any calendar year is $2,500,000.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The 2012 Plan also provides for the award of shares of Company common stock and other awards that are valued by reference to Company common stock, including unrestricted stock, dividend equivalents and convertible debentures.
21
Performance Goals. The 2012 Plan provides that performance goals may be established by the committee in connection with the grant of any award under the 2012 Plan. In the case of an award intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exception of Section 162(m):
Change of Control. Unless otherwise determined by the committee, immediately prior to consummation of a change of control (as defined below), (i) all outstanding options and SARs will become fully vested and exercisable and (ii) all restrictions on any restricted stock, restricted stock units, cash awards or other stock-based awards that are not subject to performance goals will lapse, and these awards will become free of all restrictions and become fully vested and transferable to the full extent of the original grant and (iii) all restrictions on any restricted stock, restricted stock units, cash awards or other stock-based awards that are subject to performance goals will lapse, and these awards will become free of all restrictions and become fully vested and transferable, in each case, to the extent set forth in the applicable award agreement. The committee will, in its sole and absolute discretion, establish such terms and conditions as may be required to permit a participant to exercise an option or SAR that will terminate in connection with a change of control. Under the 2012 Plan, a "change of control" will be deemed to have taken place if:
Amendment. The Company's board of directors or the committee may amend, alter, or discontinue the 2012 Plan, but no amendment, alteration or discontinuation will be made that
22
materially impairs the rights of a participant with respect to a previously granted award without such participant's consent, except such an amendment made to comply with applicable law, including without limitation Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), stock exchange rules or accounting rules. In addition, no such amendment will be made without the approval of the company's stockholders (a) if the amendment would permit the Company to reprice any outstanding options or SARs, (b) to the extent such approval is required (1) by applicable law or the listing standards of the applicable stock exchange as in effect as of the date hereof or (2) under applicable law or the listing standards of the applicable stock exchange as may be required after the date hereof, (c) to the extent such amendment would materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the 2012 Plan, (d) materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under the 2012 Plan or (e) materially modify the requirements for participation in the 2012 Plan. No amendment will be made if the amendment would disqualify the applicable awards under the 2012 Plan from the exemption provided by Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of certain federal income tax consequences of awards made under the 2012 Plan based upon the laws in effect on the date hereof. The discussion is general in nature and does not take into account a number of considerations which may apply in light of the circumstances of a particular participant under the 2012 Plan. The income tax consequences under applicable state and local tax laws may not be the same as under federal income tax laws.
Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of a non-qualified stock option, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over their exercise price, and the Company generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.
Incentive Stock Options. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of an incentive stock option. A participant will not recognize taxable income (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax) upon exercise of an incentive stock option. If the shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option are held for the longer of two years from the date the option was granted and one year from the date the shares were transferred, any gain or loss arising from a subsequent disposition of such shares will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss, and the Company will not be entitled to any deduction. If, however, such shares are disposed of within such two- or one-year periods, then in the year of such disposition the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the excess of the lesser of the amount realized upon such disposition and the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price, and the Company generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The excess of the amount realized through the disposition date over the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date will be treated as capital gain.
SARs. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of a SAR, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. Upon exercise, a participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and for the amount of cash paid by the Company, and the Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding deduction.
Restricted Stock. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of shares of restricted stock, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time, unless the participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed at the time of grant. If such
23
election is made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of grant equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for such shares. If such election is not made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time the restrictions lapse in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for such shares. The Company is entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time the ordinary income is recognized by the participant, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) apply. In addition, a participant receiving dividends with respect to restricted stock for which the above-described election has not been made and prior to the time the restrictions lapse will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee), rather than dividend income. The Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) apply.
Restricted Stock Units. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of a restricted stock unit, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of settlement of the award equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Company, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) apply.
Performance Units. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of performance units, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of settlement of the award equal to the fair market value of any shares or property delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Company, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) apply.
Section 162(m) Limitations. As explained above, Section 162(m) generally places a $1 million annual limit on a company's tax deduction for compensation paid to certain senior executives, other than compensation that satisfies the applicable requirements for a performance-based compensation exception. The 2012 Plan is designed so that options and SARs qualify for this exemption, and it also permits the committee to grant other awards designed to qualify for this exception. However, the committee reserves the right to grant awards that do not qualify for this exception, and, in some cases, the exception may cease to be available for some or all awards that otherwise so qualify. Thus, it is possible that Section 162(m) may disallow compensation deductions that would otherwise be available to the company.
24
ESTIMATE OF BENEFITS
The Company currently is not able to estimate the number or terms of grants and awards that may be made under the 2012 Plan. However, the number of options granted by the Company during 2011 under the 2004 Plan (which will be replaced by the 2012 Plan), and the number of restricted share awards granted by the Company during 2011 under the 2004 Plan, are as follows:
Name and Position
|
Number of Shares Covered by Stock Options |
Shares of Restricted Stock |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
8,332 | 5,413 | |||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|||||||
John C. Pollok |
4,848 |
3,998 |
|||||
Senior Executive Vice President and |
|||||||
John F. Windley |
3,054 |
2,985 |
|||||
President of SCBT, N.A. and |
|||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
2,698 |
2,308 |
|||||
Senior Executive Vice President and |
|||||||
Donald E. Pickett |
1,899 |
1,740 |
|||||
Executive Vice President and |
|||||||
Robert R. Horger |
4,311 |
4,144 |
|||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|||||||
All non-employee directors as a group |
|
12,972 |
|||||
All non-employee advisory board members as a group |
2,400 |
|
|||||
All employees (including executive officers) as a group |
25,142 |
44,667 |
In addition, each nominee for director at the Annual Meeting other than Robert R. Horger was granted between 920 to 1,073 restricted share awards under the 2004 Plan during 2011. No options or restricted share awards were granted during 2011 to any associate of any director, nominee for director or executive officer. Except as shown in the table above, no other person received more than five percent of the total number of options and restricted share awards awarded during 2011.
25
The following table sets forth information about the Company's outstanding equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011:
|
A | B | C | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plan Category
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column "A") |
|||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
370,207 | $ | 30.69 | 254,731 | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
| | | |||||||
Total |
370,207 | $ | 30.69 | 254,731 | ||||||
Included within the 254,731 number of securities available for future issuance in the table above is a total of 184,278 shares remaining from the authorized total of 363,825 under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In addition, there are 70,453 shares remaining available for future issuance under the Company's 2004 Plan. No more than 55,000 shares shall be awarded pursuant to equity grants made between December 31, 2011 and the date of the Annual Shareholders' Meeting on April 24, 2012. All securities totals for the outstanding and remaining available for future issuance amounts described in this item have been adjusted to give effect to stock dividends paid on March 23, 2007, January 1, 2005 and December 6, 2002.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNAMNIMAOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE 2012 OMNIBUS STOCK AND PERFORMANCE PLAN.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Company Performance
The primary goals of the Compensation Committee in 2011 were consistent with its established philosophy. The Compensation Committee seeks to provide compensation arrangements for executive officers that are designed to retain and attract executives who can perform and manage the company in the shareholders' best interest. These compensation arrangements are designed to be aligned with the performance of the company both on a short-term and long-term basis and are based both on the individual's contribution and the company's performance. Our company, although certainly impacted by the economic downturn of the past three years, has during this period experienced transformational growth while at the same time remaining profitable in every year during the downturn. The management team during the period 2009-2011 has been able to not only avoid some of the difficulties which banks in the southeast have encountered, but has also been able to significantly grow the size of the company and the franchise. As a result, our company has clearly outperformed many banking institutions in the southeast. In 2011, the management group continued to grow our company and take advantage of opportunities available in the turbulent banking environment. As described below, the company completed two acquisitions during 2011 and entered into an agreement for a third that is scheduled to close in 2012. At the same time there was organic core deposit growth and long-term growth. Considering the environment, the Compensation Committee views the performance in 2011 as a continuation of performance at a very high level under difficult circumstances. More detail on some of the achievements in the last three years and in 2011 is outlined below.
26
27
5-Year Total Shareholder Return (%)
1-Year Total Shareholder Return (%)
Source: SNL Financial
The Compensation Committee considered the performance metrics above, the continued turbulence in the banking environment, and the Company's performance compared to other financial institutions in the southeast as well as to our national peer group in making recommendations for executive compensation. Additional information about the national peer group is presented on page 30. The decisions were made with the intent to align compensation with the Company's overall performance for the year and with the best interests of the shareholders.
Summary of Key 2011 Compensation Decisions
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we held an advisory vote on the compensation of our executive officers (the "Say on Pay Vote") at our 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting. The results were that 80.26% of the shareholders who voted on our Say on Pay proposal voted in favor of it. While there was strong support for our executive compensation
28
programs, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors considered comments received from shareholders and advisors. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee and executive management addressed the following areas during the year.
Additional strategic actions and compensation decisions made in 2011:
Governance Practices
29
Long-Term Pay for Performance Approach
It is important for the reader to understand recent compensation decisions that impact the values reported in the summary compensation tables to follow, and that the Compensation Committee believes were critical to achieving its goal to promote the long-term growth and success of the Company. Material items over the past-few years that are directly related to this philosophy were:
The Committee firmly believes these actions were in line with the long-term focus and upon looking back, continue to be appropriate components of executive total compensation. Incentive plans for 2011 returned to a more normal level.
30
Highlights of Compensation Component Decisions
The following table summarizes the components of compensation paid or awarded to our executive officers who appear in the "Summary Compensation Table" below (referred to collectively throughout this section as our "NEOs").
Compensation Component | What the Component Rewards | Key Features | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Base Salary | Reflects the scope of leadership and responsibility, individual achievement toward the objectives of their respective position, and their relative value in the industry. | The Committee approved increases for the CEO and other NEOs to bring them closer to the market determined by the compensation peer group median. Actual positioning varies above or below the median to reflect each executive's contributions to the success of SCBT. | ||
Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentive |
Focuses executives on achieving annual financial and performance objectives based on Soundness, Profitability, and Growth. |
The opportunity for performance-based annual cash incentive was based 50% on pre-set financial goals and 50% upon strategic initiatives. The Committee establishes the weighting on each of the categories for the formulaic goals to include 40% based on soundness, 40% based on profitability, and 20% based on growth with each goal having threshold, target, and maximum levels. The Committee can also recommend an award for the executives' achievement toward Strategic Initiatives which include each executive's contribution toward events and circumstances that are not necessarily formulaic. This includes the successful integration of bank acquisitions, improvement in credit practices, risk management, leadership development, succession planning, and improvement in customer relations. |
||
In 2011, 4 out of the 5 goals were met at the maximum achievement level and 1 goal was met at the target level resulting in 91% of the maximum payout opportunity. Strategic Initiatives were paid out to each executive at 50-70% of the total opportunity. The basis of the payout of strategic initiatives are outlined on page 37. |
||||
Incentive Stock Awards (75% Restricted Stock Grants and 25% Stock Options) |
Rewards the achievement of long-term business objectives that benefit our shareholder. Supports the retention of a talented management team over time. |
Restricted stock grant opportunities are based 50% on pre-set financial goals and 50% upon strategic initiatives. Restricted stock grants vest on a "cliff" basis on the fourth anniversary of the award. |
31
Compensation Component | What the Component Rewards | Key Features | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
The Committee elected to grant stock options in 2011. The committee believes that granting stock options align executives' interests with those of the shareholders because these awards will only have value if the stock price increases. Stock options vest in 25% installments over four years. Stock options represent less than 10% of total direct compensation for 2011. | ||||
The burn rate of our equity plan averaged over a three-year period was 1.24%. This burn rate meets prescribed guidelines for banks. |
In summary, the Committee concluded that the 2011 performance-based compensation together with 2011 base salary levels are well aligned with the Company's performance for the year and that the linkage between pay and performance is strong.
Compensation Philosophy
The fundamental philosophy of the Company's compensation program is to offer competitive compensation opportunities for executive officers that are (i) aligned with the performance of the Company on both a short-term and long-term basis, and (ii) based both on the individual's contribution and on the Company's performance. The compensation paid is designed to retain and reward executive officers who are capable of leading the Company in achieving its business objectives in a highly regulated industry characterized by complexity, competitiveness and change.
More than half of each of our NEO's target total direct compensation is in the form of performance-based compensation.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for the design, implementation and administration of the compensation programs for our executive officers and directors of the Company. The Compensation Committee presents its recommendations to the full Board of Directors and the Board of Directors makes the final decision on compensation for our NEOs.
The Compensation Committee seeks to increase shareholder value by rewarding performance with cost-effective compensation and striving to attract and retain talented executives through adherence to the following compensation objectives:
32
The Compensation Committee met seven times in 2011. The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by the Senior Vice President, Human Resources Manager, her staff, and an executive compensation consultant, as described below.
The Compensation Committee may receive recommendations from the chairman of the board with respect to the CEO's performance in light of goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our CEO. The CEO reviews with the Compensation Committee the performance of the other NEOs and, based on that review, the CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee about the total compensation of NEOs (other than the CEO). The CEO does not participate in, and is not present during, deliberations or approvals by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors with respect to his own compensation.
The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the total compensation of the NEOs annually. The Compensation Committee makes decisions based on the Company's philosophy of providing a competitive base salary, relative to the peer group, complemented with significant performance-based incentives. After reviewing all of the compensation arrangements discussed below, along with corporate and individual performance, the Compensation Committee believes that the measurement tools, compensation levels and the design of the Company's executive compensation program are appropriate and motivate our NEOs to lead the Company in the best interests of its shareholders.
Compensation Consultant
During 2011, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of McLagan, an Aon Hewitt company, to provide compensation consulting services for both directors and executive management of the Company. McLagan reports directly to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to hire consultants and set the engagements and the related fees of those consultants.
The following consulting services were provided to the Compensation Committee in 2011:
33
Compensation Benchmarking and Compensation Committee Functions
Each year, with assistance from McLagan, the Compensation Committee reviews a survey of the compensation practices of the Company's peers in order to assess the competitiveness of the compensation arrangements of our NEOs. Although benchmarking is an active tool used to measure compensation structures among peers, it is only one of the tools used by the Compensation Committee to determine total compensation. Benchmarking is used by the Compensation Committee primarily to ascertain competitive total compensation levels (including base salary, equity awards, cash incentives, etc.) with comparable institutions. The Compensation Committee uses this data as a reference point, establishes competitive base salaries, and then addresses pay-for-performance (meritocracy) as discussed further in the sections below on cash incentives and long-term retention. A combination of peer performance, market factors, company performance and personal performance are all factors that the Compensation Committee considers when establishing total compensation, including incentives. This practice is in line with the Company's meritocracy philosophy of pay. The Compensation Committee, at its discretion, may determine that it is in the best interest of the Company to negotiate total compensation packages that deviate from regular compensation and incentive levels in order to attract and retain specific talent.
The Compensation Committee reviews the composition of the peer group annually and may change it as a result of mergers, changes to banks within the group, or changes within the Company. The 2011 compensation peer group was selected based on certain current market criteria, including the following:
The companies that comprised the peer group consisted of the following 20 financial institutions, all of which were also included in the 2010 compensation peer group (one bank was removed from 2010 due to poor performance):
Texas Capital Bancshares Inc. | Flushing Financial Corp. | Tompkins Financial Corporation | ||
First Financial Bancorp. | Heartland Financial USA Inc. | Simmons First National Corp. | ||
BancFirst Corp. | First Financial Bankshares | Southside Bancshares Inc. | ||
NBT Bancorp Inc. | TowneBank | First Bancorp | ||
Independent Bank Corp. | Carter Bank & Trust | Provident New York Bancorp | ||
1st Source Corp. | Great Southern Bancorp Inc. | Washington Trust Bancorp Inc. | ||
WSFS Financial Corp. | Community Trust Bancorp Inc. |
When making compensation determinations for the Company's NEOs, the Compensation Committee focuses on total compensation that is generally competitive with the 60th percentile of the market at target levels of performance. The findings for the Company compared to the peer group during 2011 revealed that for NEOs, salaries ranged from the 11th to 25th percentiles of the peer group and target levels of total compensation ranged from the 42nd to 59th percentiles of the peer group. The Company's strong performance compared to its goals results in actual 2011 compensation for the NEOs expected to fall between the 58th and 71st percentiles of the compensation peer group.
34
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION
The chart below shows the compensation mix for the Company's NEOs both in terms of total opportunities and actual results for 2011. More than half of their compensation is variable based on performance. In addition over half of their incentive opportunities are in the form of long-term equity.
The key elements of compensation for the NEOs are base salary, annual and long-term incentives, and benefits.
January 2011, named executive officer annual base salaries were increased to achieve levels that were more in line with the market median (50th percentile). Robert R. Hill received a 10% increase from $448,800 in 2010 to $493,680 in 2011. Although he received a 10% increase, his base salary remained below the median for peer group. Other NEOs received increases ranging from 4% to 13% based on their individual performance and peer group data. The Compensation Committee approved the following merit increases, effective January 2012: Mr. Hill to $520,000 or 5.3% and the other NEOs ranging from 3.8% to 10.4%.
The purpose of the Performance Plan is to establish reasonable goals and objectives in light of the economic environment while promoting the long-term growth and financial success of the Company by (1) attracting and retaining key officers and employees of outstanding ability, (2) strengthening the Company's capability to develop, maintain, and direct a competent management team, (3) providing an effective means for selected key officers and employees to acquire and maintain ownership of Company stock, and (4) providing incentive compensation opportunities competitive with those of other major corporations.
35
The Performance Plan and its goals are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee. The 2011 Performance Plan followed a similar structure as 2010. Plan opportunities as a percentage of salary and 2011 results are displayed below:
|
|
Total Opportunity as a % of Salary (Cash and Equity Opportunity split 50/50) |
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Actual Earned |
|||||||||||||
Name
|
Position | Threshold | Target | Max | |||||||||||
Robert Hill |
President and CEO | 52% | 104% | 176% | 139% | ||||||||||
John Pollok |
Senior EVP, COO | 50% | 100% | 168% | 140% | ||||||||||
John Windley |
President of SCBT, N.A. | 43% | 86% | 146% | 115% | ||||||||||
Donald Pickett |
EVP, CFO | 43% | 86% | 146% | 109% | ||||||||||
Joseph Burns |
Sr. EVP, Chief Risk Off. | 43% | 86% | 146% | 109% |
The 2011 executive performance plan was made up of cash, restricted stock, and stock options:
Performance-Based Goals
The goals for the formula-based portion of the 2011 Performance Plan are weighted as follows: 40% soundness, 40% profitability, and 20% loan and deposit growth.
36
In addition there is both an Overall Plan Trigger and a Specific Soundness Trigger:
|
Soundness (40%) | Profitability (40%) | Loan & Deposit Growth (20%) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Plan Trigger
|
NPA Level (20%) |
Classified/Capital (20%) |
After-tax Net Income |
Loan Growth (10%) |
Core Deposits (10%) |
|||||||||||
|
Net income to provide dividend coverage |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold |
2.75% | 52.00 | % | $ | 13.4 Million | 3.50 | % | 4.00 | % | |||||||
Target |
2.40% | 49.00 | % | $ | 15.0 Million | 4.50 | % | 6.20 | % | |||||||
Maximum |
2.25% | 47.00 | % | $ | 17.5 Million | 5.50 | % | 7.20 | % | |||||||
Actual |
2.39% | (1) | 45.79 | % | $ | 22.6 Million | 9.76 | % | 25.45 | % |
Strategic Initiatives
While pre-determined goals dictated 50% of how the 2011 Executive Performance Plan paid out with respect to the Cash Incentive component and Restricted Stock component, 50% was determined on non-formula based Strategic Initiatives for the Cash Incentive component and Restricted Stock component. The Strategic Initiatives are based on implementation of actions to achieve long-term growth and profitability such as achievement and successful integration of acquisitions, improvement in credit practices and measurements and other practices related to risk management, leadership development, succession planning and continuing to build upon company culture.
For 2011, the Compensation Committee determined that the weighting on Strategic Initiatives was appropriate in light of uncertainties related to the economy at the beginning of 2011 and the resulting difficulty in predicting specific multi year financial goals as well as the company's strong emphasis on acquisitions which have a major impact on achievement of long term goals but cannot be predicted with any certainty as to timing or size. Robert Hill received 60% of the strategic initiative opportunity for cash and restricted stock. Other NEOs received 50-70% of the strategic initiative opportunity for cash and restricted stock based upon their individual performance and contributions.
The Compensation Committee granted Incentive Stock Options in 2012 that were in recognition of Mr. Hill's 2011 contributions. He received 9,275 stock options. Other NEOs received between 3,662 and 5,667 stock options in recognition of their 2011 contributions. See "Equity Grant Practices" caption.
2011 Equity Grants
Equity grants shown in the compensation tables reflect restricted stock earned in 2010 due to the achievement of established performance goals and the one-time awards correlated with the
37
results of the merger with CBT. Restricted stock received in 2011 in recognition of the NEOs' 2010 contributions was as follows: Mr. Hill, 5,413; Mr. Pollok, 3,998; Mr. Windley, 2,985; Mr. Burns, 2,308; and Mr. Pickett, 1,740.
Stock options are evaluated each year and motivate a focus on increasing the share price. Stock options only become valuable to the Executive if the stock price increases over a period of time. The Compensation Committee believes that a balancing of restricted stock grants and Incentive Stock Options align their interests with those of the shareholders. Incentive Stock Options received in 2011 in recognition of the NEOs' 2010 contribution are as follows: Mr. Hill, 8,332; Mr. Pollok, 4,848; Mr. Windley, 3,054; Mr. Burns, 2,698; and Mr. Pickett, 1,899.
See the Grants of Plan Based Awards table of equity grants by executive during 2011.
Benefits
During 2011, SCBT maintained various employee benefit plans that constitute a portion of the total compensation package available to the NEOs and all eligible employees of SCBT. These plans consist of the following:
Employees' Pension PlanFour of the five NEOs are participants in a noncontributory defined pension plan which covers substantially all employees of the Company hired before January 1, 2006. Pension benefits are paid based upon age of the employee and years of service. The Plan was frozen in July 2009 and no further benefits are being accrued. See the Pension Benefits table and the accompanying footnotes and narrative for more information.
Employees' Savings Plan401(k)Each of the NEOs are participants in a defined contribution plan which in 2011 permitted employees to contribute up to 50% of their compensation, on a tax-deferred basis, up to certain IRS compensation deferral amount limits applicable to tax-qualified retirement plan, with SCBT matching 50% up to 4% of their deferrals. In 2012, SCBT will match 50% up to 6% employee deferrals.
See the table in footnote 7 of the Summary Compensation Table.
Health Careprovides medical and dental coverage for all eligible employees.
Other Welfare Benefitsincludes sick leave, vacation, etc.
The employee benefits for the NEOs discussed in the subsection above are determined by the same criteria applicable to all SCBT employees. These benefits help keep SCBT competitive in attracting and retaining employees. SCBT believes that its employee benefits are generally in line with benefits provided by the Peer Group and consistent with industry standards.
Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanThe Company provides non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) agreements for Mr. Windley, and certain other executives. The Company elects to offer this type of incentive as a way to retain executives over the long term and to provide a partial offset to shortfalls in the percentage of income provided for retirement by its qualified retirement plans.
On November 1, 2006, the Company approved updated or new supplemental executive retirement agreements with Mr. Windley, and certain other executives.
In 2009, traditional non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plans (SERPs) were replaced with restricted stock grants that vest ratably and that become 100% vested at age 60 for Messrs Hill and Pollok and at age 65 for Mr. Burns. The use of these Long-Term Equity Grants helps to insure the executives' focus is on the long-term interests of the shareholders and motivates retention over a long-term period. In addition, by utilizing the Long-Term
38
Equity Grants, the Company expects to realize lower compensation expense of approximately $5.5 million over the span of the vesting periods for these executives.
Deferred Compensation PlanWe make available to selected members of our senior management group, including all NEOs and /or other selected employees who are highly compensated, the opportunity to elect to defer current compensation for retirement income or other future financial needs. The plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that is designed to be exempt from certain ERISA requirements as a plan that covers a select group of management and certain other highly compensated employees. Each year, participants can choose to have their compensation for the upcoming year reduced by a certain whole percentage amount ranging between 5% and 80%, or by a specific dollar amount (in all cases, subject to a minimum value established by the bank). In addition, the employer may make matching or partiallymatching contributions for participant deferrals. The employer may also make discretionary contributions for any or all participant (s). Both of these types of employer contributions would be subject to certain vesting requirements. There are also forfeiture provisions, which can result from unvested amounts existing at terminations or from materially incorrect earnings that are subsequently adjusted or corrected. Deferrals may be held by a trustee in a grantor (rabbi) trust and may be invested in funds that mirror deemed investments selected by the participants and offered pursuant to the plan. Such a trust would not isolate assets for the benefit of the participants. Consequently, distributions made under the plan will be made from the general assets of the bank which could be subject to claims of its creditors. Amounts deferred under the plan will generally be subject to income taxes payable by the participant in the year in which received (end of the deferral period), but these deferred amounts are subject to employment taxes in the year of deferral. In 2011, Mr. Hill and Mr. Windley elected to participate. There were no employer contributions made to any plan participants in 2011.
See the discussion entitled Deferred Compensation Plan for additional information.
PerquisitesThe Company also provides limited perquisites to NEOs that are not available to all employees. Some examples of these include bank-owned automobiles, automobile allowances, club and membership dues. The values of these items are presented in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading All Other Compensation. The value attributable to any personal use of bank-owned automobiles is considered compensation to the executive and represents the aggregate incremental cost to the Company associated with that personal use. The Company and the board believe that the use of each of these perquisites is helpful for the proper performance of the NEOs' duties.
ADDITIONAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Share Ownership Guidelines
The Company's stock ownership guidelines require NEOs to own equity representing a multiple of their salary and to retain this equity throughout their tenure. The specific share ownership requirements are:
The Company's NEOs have five years from being named a NEO to comply with the stock ownership guidelines. As of the end of our fiscal year, Messrs. Hill, Pollok, Windley, and Burns have exceeded their required ownership levels. Mr. Pickett is currently progressing toward meeting the required ownership guidelines. Beneficially owned shares include shares held by a named executive officer, directly or indirectly, and unvested shares of restricted stock, as to which the executive officers
39
have full voting privileges; but excludes vested and unexercised stock options. Until the stock ownership guidelines are achieved, the sale of shares of the Company's common stock is restricted.
Equity Grant Practices
To address volatility concerns, the 30-day moving average of SCBT's stock was utilized to determine the number of restricted shares to be issued under the Executive Performance Plan for 2011. Stock option values were determined based upon Black Scholes Valuation methodology. This value was divided into the dollar amount the executive is expected to receive to quantify the number of options granted to an executive. The calculated number of restricted shares or stock options will continue to be issued with a stock price reflecting the date of the grant.
Employment and Non-Competition Agreements
The purpose of these agreements is to attract and retain high caliber executive officers, recognizing that termination and change in control protections are commonly provided at comparable companies with which we compete for executive talent. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes change in control protections enhance the impartiality and objectivity of the NEOs in the event of a change in control transaction and better ensure that stockholder interests are protected. Finally, these agreements include non-competition provisions that further protect the company should the NEO elect to pursue other employment opportunities. In 2006, the Company approved employment agreements with each of the NEOs. The agreements, which were amended and restated in 2008 to address Internal Revenue Code Section 409(a) matters, provide for the following:
40
non-compliance. If Mr. Hill is terminated for cause according to his agreement, the non-compete period is abbreviated and ends 12 months after the date of termination.
See the discussion entitled "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," which provides the amount of compensation each executive would receive under various termination events based upon the employment agreements.
162(m) Tax Considerations
Internal Revenue Service regulations disallow a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation, other than performance-based compensation, over $1 million paid to a chief executive officer and the additional three most highly compensated NEOs (excluding the Company's Chief Financial Officer). The Compensation Committee considers the impact of those regulations in connection with its decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes, however, that shareholder interests are best served by not restricting the Compensation Committee's discretion and flexibility in structuring compensation programs, even though such programs may result in certain non-deductible compensation expenses.
Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs
For the second year in a row, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed a compensation risk assessment with assistance from human resources, legal and compliance personnel. The conclusion was that the Company's compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect. This risk assessment process included a review of the design and operation of the Company's nine incentive compensation programs, identifying and evaluating situations or compensation elements that may raise material risks, and an evaluation of other controls and processes designed to identify and manage risk. In addition, the Chief Risk Officer reported to the Compensation Committee that he along with the Chief Financial Officer, General Auditor, and Audit Supervisor will review, test, and report on the following:
Transactions in Company Securities
In general, SEC rules prohibit uncovered short sales of shares of the Company's common stock by its executive officers, including the NEOs. Accordingly, the Company's insider trading policy prohibits short sales of shares of the Company's common stock by its executive officers, including the NEOs, and discourages all employees from engaging in any hedging transactions relating to the Company's common stock. The policy also requires all affiliates and insiders to consult with the Company's Treasurer or Chief Executive Officer if they intend to engage in any transactions involving the Company's common stock. In 2011, no executive officer consulted with the Company's Treasurer of Chief Executive Officer regarding hedging transactions.
The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402 (b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, has recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation
41
Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and be incorporated by reference into the Company's 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Compensation Committee certifies that it has reviewed with the Company's senior risk officer the senior executive officer incentive compensation arrangements and has made reasonable efforts to ensure that such arrangements do not encourage senior executive officers to take unnecessary or excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company.
This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Compensation Committee:
Susie
H. VanHuss, Chair
Jimmy E. Addison
M. Oswald Fogle
Cynthia A. Hartley
Harry M. Mims, Jr.
Alton C. Phillips
James W. Roquemore
42
The following table summarizes for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the current and long-term compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Each component of compensation is discussed in further detail in the footnotes following the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) (1) |
Bonus ($) (2) |
Stock Awards ($) (3) |
Option Awards ($) (4) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (5) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (6) |
All Other Compensation ($) (7) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Robert R. Hill, Jr.(9) |
2011 | $ | 493,680 | $ | | $ | 175,706 | $ | 98,693 | $ | 329,778 | $ | 49,184 | $ | 38,960 | $ | 1,186,001 | |||||||||||
President and |
2010 | 448,800 | 600,000 | 128,082 | 246,729 | 307,586 | 25,312 | 41,954 | 1,798,463 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
2009 | 408,000 | | 848,605 | 88,068 | | 6,691 | 39,618 | 1,390,982 | |||||||||||||||||||
John C. Pollok(8) |
2011 | 316,000 | | 129,775 | 57,425 | 214,880 | 46,130 | 27,641 | 791,850 | |||||||||||||||||||
Senior Executive Vice President, |
2010 | 287,232 | 500,000 | 59,488 | 128,690 | 160,026 | 24,446 | 27,340 | 1,187,223 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer |
2009 | 261,120 | | 779,266 | 51,243 | | 5,590 | 27,624 | 1,124,843 | |||||||||||||||||||
John F. Windley |
2011 |
265,000 |
|
96,893 |
36,175 |
146,810 |
62,687 |
11,987 |
619,552 |
|||||||||||||||||||
President of SCBT, N.A. |
2010 | 241,230 | 225,000 | 41,677 | 85,260 | 114,043 | 51,333 | 10,126 | 768,668 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2009 | 219,300 | | | 32,273 | | 42,229 | 4,628 | 298,430 | |||||||||||||||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
2011 |
240,000 |
|
74,918 |
31,958 |
124,200 |
39,437 |
24,205 |
534,718 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Senior Executive Vice President, |
2010 | 213,180 | 225,000 | 33,616 | 72,150 | 97,584 | 28,439 | 28,930 | 698,899 | |||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Risk Officer |
2009 | 193,800 | | 390,998 | 28,523 | | 13,885 | 19,733 | 646,938 | |||||||||||||||||||
Donald E. Pickett(8) |
2011 |
235,000 |
|
56,480 |
22,494 |
121,613 |
|
7,431 |
443,018 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and |
2010 | 225,000 | 225,000 | | 27,096 | 67,500 | | 177,630 | 722,226 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
2009 | | | | | | | | |
43
Name
|
Matching Contributions to Employee Savings Plan |
Life Insurance and Long-Term Disability Premium |
Dividends on Unvested Restricted Stock |
Memberships | Imputed Taxable Value of Vehicles |
Total | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
$ | 4,900 | $ | 1,548 | $ | 28,953 | $ | 2,376 | $ | 1,183 | $ | 38,960 | ||||||||
John C. Pollok |
1,580 | 1,548 | 22,489 | | 2,024 | 27,641 | ||||||||||||||
John F. Windley |
4,900 | 1,548 | 4,229 | | 1,310 | 11,987 | ||||||||||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
4,810 | 1,548 | 11,558 | 3,180 | 3,110 | 24,205 | ||||||||||||||
Donald E. Pickett |
4,700 | 1,548 | 1,183 | | | 7,431 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (3) |
All Other Options Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Options Awards ($/Sh) (4) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Options Awards ($) (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Approval of Award Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Thres- hold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maxi- mum ($) |
Thres- hold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maxi- mum (#) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
1/27/11 | 1/27/11 | | 8,332 | $ | 32.46 | 98,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/27/11 | 1/27/11 | 5,413 | 175,706 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
n/a | n/a | 128,357 | 256,714 | 434,438 | 3,266 | 6,532 | 11,054 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John C. Pollok |
1/27/11 |
1/27/11 |
|
4,848 |
32.46 |
57,425 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/27/11 | 1/27/11 | 3,998 | 129,775 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
n/a | n/a | 79,000 | 158,000 | 265,440 | 2,010 | 4,020 | 6,754 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John F. Windley |
1/27/11 |
1/27/11 |
|
3,054 |
32.46 |
36,175 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/27/11 | 1/27/11 | 2,985 | 96,893 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
n/a | n/a | 56,975 | 113,950 | 193,450 | 1,450 | 2,899 | 4,922 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
1/27/11 |
1/27/11 |
|
2,698 |
32.46 |
31,958 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/27/11 | 1/27/11 | 2,308 | 74,918 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
n/a | n/a | 51,600 | 103,200 | 175,200 | 1,313 | 2,626 | 4,458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Donald E. Pickett |
1/27/11 |
1/27/11 |
|
1,899 |
32.46 |
22,494 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1/27/11 | 1/27/11 | 1,740 | 56,480 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
n/a | n/a | 50,525 | 101,050 | 171,550 | 1,286 | 2,571 | 4,365 |
|
Assumptions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 27, 2011 | |||
Dividend yield |
2.20% | |||
Expected life |
6 years | |||
Expected volatility |
44% | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.37% |
44
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable (1) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (1) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) |
Options Exercise Price ($) |
Options Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (2) (9) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (3) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
6,615 | | $ | 27.22 | 1/2/2014 | 40,851 | $ | 1,185,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
6,765 | | 31.97 | 1/31/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7,300 | | 31.83 | 1/6/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8,761 | | 39.74 | 1/2/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5,550 | 1,851 (4 | ) | 31.50 | 1/2/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4,508 | 4,508 (5 | ) | 27.57 | 1/22/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,326 | 6,981 (6 | ) | 31.10 | 1/21/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1,998 | 5,996 (7 | ) | 37.66 | 3/18/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 8,332 (8 | ) | 32.46 | 1/27/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
John C. Pollok |
4,410 | | 22.13 | 1/3/2013 | 31,393 | 910,717 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5,512 | | 27.22 | 1/2/2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3,937 | | 31.97 | 1/31/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3,937 | | 31.83 | 1/6/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4,081 | | 39.74 | 1/2/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,523 | 841 (4 | ) | 31.50 | 1/2/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,623 | 2,623 (5 | ) | 27.57 | 1/22/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1,356 | 4,069 (6 | ) | 31.10 | 1/21/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1,005 | 3,018 (7 | ) | 35.20 | 2/15/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 4,848 (8 | ) | 32.46 | 1/27/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
John F. Windley |
1,653 | | 22.13 | 1/3/2013 | 6,218 | 180,397 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,205 | | 27.22 | 1/2/2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1,575 | | 31.97 | 1/31/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,100 | | 31.83 | 1/6/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3,583 | | 39.74 | 1/2/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,351 | 784 (4 | ) | 31.50 | 1/2/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1,652 | 1,652 (5 | ) | 27.57 | 1/22/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
854 | 2,563 (6 | ) | 31.10 | 1/21/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
704 | 2,114 (7 | ) | 35.20 | 2/15/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 3,054 (8 | ) | 32.46 | 1/27/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
4,410 | | 27.22 | 1/2/2014 | 16,007 | 464,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,625 | | 31.97 | 1/31/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,887 | | 31.83 | 1/6/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,887 | | 39.74 | 1/2/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,007 | 669 (4 | ) | 31.50 | 1/2/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1,460 | 1,460 (5 | ) | 27.57 | 1/22/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
755 | 2,265 (6 | ) | 31.10 | 1/21/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
568 | 1,706 (7 | ) | 35.20 | 2/15/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2,698 (8 | ) | 32.46 | 1/27/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Donald E. Pickett |
531 | 1,594 (6 | ) | 31.10 | 1/21/2020 | 1,740 | 50,477 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 1,899 (8 | ) | 32.46 | 1/27/2021 |
All options listed above vest at a rate of 25% per year over the first four years of a 10-year option term.
45
OPTIONS EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized On Exercise ($) (1) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (2) |
Value Realized On Vesting ($) (3) |
|||||||||
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
| | 8,384 | $ | 267,854 | ||||||||
John C. Pollok |
| | 3,635 | 112,689 | |||||||||
John F. Windley |
4,851 | $ | 46,565 | 1,430 | 46,775 | ||||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
| | 1,252 | 37,304 | |||||||||
Donald E. Pickett |
| | | |
Name
|
Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) (1) |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefits ($) (2) |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan | 14 | $ | 212,511 | $ | | ||||||
John C. Pollok |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan | 14 | 148,179 | | ||||||||
John F. Windley |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan | 8 | 126,073 | | ||||||||
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 4 | 134,897 | | ||||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan | 9 | 179,068 | |
46
The Defined Benefit Pension Plan is described in Compensation Discussion and AnalysisEmployee & Executive BenefitsEmployee's Pension Plan.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
On December 31, 2008, SCBT, N.A. (the "Bank"), the wholly-owned operating subsidiary of the Company, amended its SERP agreements by and between the Bank and Robert R. Hill, Jr., John C. Pollok and Joseph E. Burns, each individually, to allow for a payout of the accrued account balances immediately (or within 30 days) upon termination of the agreements. Effective December 31, 2008, these agreements for these executives were terminated and the balance of accrued benefits owed under these agreements was paid in January 2009. As described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, on January 22, 2009, the Company replaced these agreements with a long-term restricted stock grant which are intended to provide similar economic benefit to the executives and more closely align the interests of these executives with the long-term profitability of the Company and its shareholders, and to motivate these officers to remain with the Company. Each restricted stock grant vests on December 31 of each year with final vesting at the end of the month in which the executive reaches his retirement age of 60 years old for Mr. Hill and Mr. Pollok, and age 65 years old for Mr. Burns. Mr. Hill was granted 30,780 shares of restricted stock with final vesting on October 31, 2026. Mr. Pollok was granted 28,265 shares of restricted stock with final vesting on October 31, 2025. Mr. Burns was granted 10,555 shares of restricted stock with final vesting on August 31, 2019. The fair value per share of the stock granted was $27.57 on January 22, 2009.
As of December 31, 2011, the SERP agreement of Mr. Windley provided for a supplemental executive retirement benefit payout under one of five scenarios: normal retirement, early termination, disability, change in control or early retirement benefit.
Normal and Early Retirement Benefit
The following table provides the normal retirement age, reduced benefit retirement age (if applicable), base benefit amount, and payout period:
Name
|
Normal Retirement Age |
Early Retirement Age |
Base Benefit Amount |
Payout Period in Years |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John F. Windley |
65 | n/a | $ | 50,000 | 15 |
The exact amount of benefits would be generally determined by reference to the number of calendar years after 2002 in which the Company satisfied specified performance measures, namely that the Company's net income after taxes and its total assets grew in the aggregate by an amount that would at least equal to annualized growth of 6% and 7%, respectively. If the named executive officer had retired at normal retirement age as of December 31, 2011, he would have been entitled to 100% of his maximum annual retirement benefit based on this performance measure. A smaller annual benefit, payable over the 15-year period after the executive attains his normal retirement age, will become payable if his employment is terminated prior to attaining retirement age for any reason other than death or for cause.
47
Benefit at Death
If the executive dies, the Company will be required to pay his beneficiary a lump sum death benefit of $250,000 plus annual payments as presented below:
Name
|
Normal Retirement Age |
Early Retirement Age |
Base Benefit Amount |
Payout Period in Years |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John F. Windley |
65 | n/a | $ | 50,000 | 10 |
Noncompetition
Mr. Windley will forfeit his retirement benefits under the SERP if he competes with the Company during the 18 months following termination of his employment.
The Company's obligations under the agreements are general unsecured obligations of the Company, although the agreements require the Company to establish a grantor ("rabbi") trust for such benefits following a change in control.
The Company has adopted a deferred compensation plan in which selected members of senior management, including executive officers, and/or other highly compensated employees, have the opportunity to elect to defer current compensation for retirement income or other future financial needs. Only eligible employees, as approved by the Compensation Committee, may participate in the plan. Each year participants can choose to have portions of their compensation for the upcoming year deferred by a certain whole percentage amount ranging between 5% and 100%. Deferrals are recorded in a bookkeeping account which is adjusted to reflect hypothetical investment earnings and losses of investment funds selected by the plan participant among those offered pursuant to the plan. Payments made under the plan will be made from the general assets of SCBT, N.A., and will be subject to claims of its creditors. Amounts payable under the plan are payable at the future times (or over the periods) designated by plan participants upon their enrollment in the plan and their annual renewal of enrollment.
The investment options available to an executive under the deferred compensation plan are listed below along with their annual rate of return for the calendar year ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
48
2009, as reported by the administrator of the deferred compensation plan. The rates assume that 100% of the participant's contribution was deferred as of the first business day of 2011.
|
Rates of Return | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Fund
|
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Mainstay Variable Product Cash Management |
N/A | -0.23 | % | 0.00 | % | |||||
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond |
N/A | 6.51 | % | 15.43 | % | |||||
Mainstay Variable Product S&P 500 Index |
N/A | 14.10 | % | 25.95 | % | |||||
Fidelity Variable Product Mid-Cap |
N/A | 27.77 | % | 39.74 | % | |||||
Vanguard Prime Money Market |
0.05 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Harbor Bond |
3.48 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Columbia Dividend Income |
6.96 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Vanguard 500 Index Sig |
2.08 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Mainstay Large Cap Growth |
-0.19 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Goldman Sach MC Value |
-6.61 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth |
-1.21 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Diamond Hill SC |
-7.17 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Columbia Acorn USA |
-4.95 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Amer Fds EuroPacific R5 |
-13.33 | % | N/A | N/A |
Beginning in 2011, the Company changed the investment options for participants in the deferred compensation plan and moved from Titan Executive Benefit Group to options from Findley Davies (same investment options as the 401(k) plan offered to all employees).
The table below summarizes the amounts in each named executive officer's deferred compensation savings plan:
Name
|
Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) (1) |
Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($) (2) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) |
Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
$ | 19,167 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 24,396 | ||||||
John C. Pollok |
| | | | | |||||||||||
John F. Windley |
12,698 | | | | 60,893 | |||||||||||
Joseph E. Burns |
| | | | 7,937 | |||||||||||
Donald E. Pickett |
| | | | |
49
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The Company has entered into certain agreements and maintains certain plans that will require the Company to provide compensation to NEOs of the Company in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control of the Company. Each employment agreement has a term of employment of three years from the effective date of the agreement. On each anniversary date of the effective date of the agreement, the term of the agreement is automatically extended for an additional year unless at 60 days prior to the anniversary date either party gives the other party written notice of non-renewal. The amounts of total compensation payable to each named executive officer upon voluntary termination without good reason, voluntary termination for good reason, termination by Company without cause, termination by Company for cause, normal retirement, early retirement, termination due to disability, termination due to death and termination associated with a change in control are shown in the tables below. The amounts assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2011 (the last day of the fiscal year), and thus include amounts earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts that would have been paid out to the executives upon their termination as of such date. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive's separation from the Company.
For purposes of each named executive officer's employment agreement, the terms "good reason," "cause," "disability," "change of control" and "total compensation" are defined below:
50
performance; (F) the commission of an act by Employee involving gross negligence or moral turpitude that brings the Company or any of its affiliates into public disrepute or disgrace or causes material harm to the customer relations, operations or business prospects of the Company or its affiliates; (G) bringing firearms or weapons into the workplace; (H) the Employee's failure to comply with policies, standards, and regulations of Company; (I) the Employee's engagement in conduct which is in material contravention of any federal, state or local law or ordinance other than a minor offense which does not reflect or impact upon the Employer or Bank; (J) the Employee's engagement in conduct which is unbecoming to or inconsistent with the duties and responsibilities of a member of management of the Employer; or (K) the Employee engaging in sexual or other form of illegal harassment.
This definition of Change in Control is intended to fully comply with the definition of a change in control event as set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5).
51
dental insurance premiums. For Mr. Hill, total compensation also includes the value associated with the personal use of a company-owned automobile and reimbursement for country club dues and other such dues and fees as may be approved by the board.
The following table outlines certain differences between each agreement:
Name
|
Base Salary | Change in Control Payout Multiple |
Non-Compete Period (Months) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
$ | 493,680 | .99 times | 24 | |||||
John C. Pollok |
$ | 316,000 | 2.5 times | 24 | |||||
John F. Windley |
$ | 265,000 | 2 times | 18 | |||||
Joseph E. Burns |
$ | 240,000 | 2 times | 12 | |||||
Donald E. Pickett |
$ | 235,000 | 2 times | 12 |
Mr. Hill is the only named executive officer entitled to receive compensation for his noncompete agreement with the Company. His noncompete agreement is set for a 24 month period starting on the termination date. He would be entitled to two years of his Total Compensation package, as defined in the Total Compensation definition (Item e) above, paid in two equal lump sums, the first at time of termination and the second on the first anniversary of termination. Should he violate any of the covenants listed in the noncompetition agreement, no payments that are still due will be paid and the Company has the right to secure an injunction for damages to recover any previous payments made under the agreement.
On January 22, 2009, the Company established an equity based retirement benefit represented by grants of restricted stock to Messrs. Hill, Pollok and Burns. The grants replaced prior SERP agreements and are intended to provide similar economic benefit to the executives and more closely align the interests of these executives with the long-term profitability of the Bank, the Company and its shareholders. Each restricted stock grant vests on December 31 of each year with final vesting at the end of the month in which the executive reaches his retirement age of 60 years old, except in the case of Mr. Burns at age 65. Mr. Hill was granted 30,780 shares of restricted stock with final vesting on October 31, 2026. Mr. Pollok was granted 28,265 shares of restricted stock with final vesting on October 31, 2025. Mr. Burns was granted 10,555 shares of restricted stock with final vesting on August 31, 2019. The fair value per share of the stock granted was $27.57 on January 22, 2009.
The Company has individual SERP agreements established on or about November 1, 2006 and amended on December 31, 2008, by and between the Bank and John F. Windley and certain other executives. Although benefits under the SERP arrangements are defined for retirement and early retirement, we do not present these payout estimates in the following tables. None of the named executive officers would be eligible to receive such payments due to the age of the officers on December 31, 2011. The earliest a retirement benefit could be provided to any of the current named executive officerscurrently Mr. Windleywould be in 2018.
The following tables provide the potential payments upon termination for all relevant scenarios as of December 31, 2011.
52
Robert R. Hill, Jr.
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination for various reasons for Robert R. Hill, Jr., the Company's Chief Executive Officer.
Compensation and/or Benefits Payable Upon Termination |
Voluntary Termination by Employee Without Good Reason (1) |
Voluntary Termination by Employee for Good Reason (not CIC related) (2) |
Involuntary Termination by Company w/out Cause (2) |
Involuntary Termination by Company For Cause (3) |
Termination in the Event of Disability (4) |
Termination in the Event of Death (5) |
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control (6) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Hill, Jr. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
$ | | $ | 493,680 | $ | 493,680 | $ | | $ | 493,680 | $ | 493,680 | $ | 1,387,253 | ||||||||
Noncompete Payments |
2,802,532 | 2,802,532 | 2,802,532 | | | | 2,802,532 | |||||||||||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
| | | | 6,492 | 6,492 | 6,492 | |||||||||||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Restricted Stock |
| | | | 442,344 | 442,344 | 442,344 | |||||||||||||||
Benefits & Perquisites |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Based Retirement Benefit(7) |
| | | | 742,714 | 742,714 | 742,714 | |||||||||||||||
Medical & Dental Insurance |
13,836 | 20,753 | 20,753 | | 6,918 | 13,836 | 20,684 | |||||||||||||||
Company Car and Club Dues |
7,119 | 10,678 | 10,678 | | 3,559 | 3,559 | 10,642 | |||||||||||||||
Tax Gross Up(8) |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total Benefit before Repayments |
2,823,486 | 3,327,643 | 3,327,643 | | 1,695,707 | 1,702,625 | 5,412,662 | |||||||||||||||
Retention Bonus Repayment(9) |
(85,377 | ) | | | (85,377 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||
Total Benefit |
$ | 2,738,109 | $ | 3,327,643 | $ | 3,327,643 | $ | (85,377 | ) | $ | 1,695,707 | $ | 1,702,625 | $ | 5,412,662 | |||||||
53
John C. Pollok
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination for various reasons for John C. Pollok, the Company's Chief Operating Officer.
Compensation and/or Benefits Payable Upon Termination |
Voluntary Termination by Employee Without Good Reason (1) |
Involuntary Termination by Company w/out Cause (2) |
Involuntary Termination by Company For Cause (1) |
Termination in the Event of Disability (3) |
Termination in the Event of Death (3) |
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control (4) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John C. Pollok |
|||||||||||||||||||
Compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
$ | | $ | 158,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,440,066 | |||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
| | | 3,777 | 3,777 | 3,777 | |||||||||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Restricted Stock |
| | | 236,809 | 236,809 | 236,809 | |||||||||||||
Benefits & Perquisites |
|||||||||||||||||||
Equity Based Retirement Benefit(5) |
| | | 673,847 | 673,847 | 673,847 | |||||||||||||
Medical & Dental Insurance |
| 3,459 | | | | 17,294 | |||||||||||||
Tax Gross Up(6) |
| | | | | 1,390,035 | |||||||||||||
Total Benefit before Repayments |
| 161,459 | | 914,433 | 914,433 | 4,761,828 | |||||||||||||
Retention Bonus Repayment(7) |
(39,663 | ) | | (39,663 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Total Benefit |
$ | (39,663 | ) | $ | 161,459 | $ | (39,663 | ) | $ | 914,433 | $ | 914,433 | $ | 4,761,828 | |||||
54
John F. Windley
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination for various reasons for John F. Windley, the President of the Company's subsidiary SCBT, N.A.
Compensation and/or Benefits Payable Upon Termination |
Voluntary Termination by Employee Without Good Reason (1) |
Involuntary Termination by Company w/out Cause (2) |
Involuntary Termination by Company For Cause (1) |
Termination in the Event of Disability (3) |
Termination in the Event of Death (3) |
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control (4) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John F. Windley |
|||||||||||||||||||
Compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
$ | | $ | 132,500 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 539,451 | (5) | ||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
| | | 2,379 | 2,379 | 2,379 | |||||||||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Restricted Stock |
| | | 180,384 | 180,384 | 180,384 | |||||||||||||
Benefits & Perquisites |
|||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Non-Qualified Pension(6) |
231,764 | 231,764 | | 463,552 | 744,098 | 609,972 | |||||||||||||
Medical & Dental Insurance |
| 3,459 | | | | 13,836 | |||||||||||||
Total Benefit before Repayments |
231,764 | 367,723 | | 646,315 | 926,861 | 1,346,022 | (5) | ||||||||||||
Retention Bonus Repayment(7) |
(27,783 | ) | | (27,783 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Total Benefit |
$ | 203,981 | $ | 367,723 | $ | (27,783 | ) | $ | 646,315 | $ | 926,861 | $ | 1,346,022 | (5) | |||||
Scenario
|
Payment Term |
Annual Benefit |
Total Benefit |
Explanation of Calculation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Voluntary Termination by Employee Without Good Reason | 15 years payable at normal retirement age | $ | 18,998 | $ | 284,970 | 50% of $37,996 the present value of $50,000 (annual benefit) discounted using a 4% annual rate from normal retirement age times payment term. | |||||
Termination by Company Without Cause | 15 years payable at normal retirement age | $ | 18,998 | $ | 284,970 | 50% of $37,996 the present value of $50,000 (annual benefit) discounted using a 4% annual rate from normal retirement age times payment term. | |||||
Termination Due to Disability | 15 years payable at normal retirement age | $ | 37,996 | $ | 569,940 | Present value at 12/31/11 of $50,000 annual benefit discounted using a 4% annual rate from normal retirement age. | |||||
Termination Due to Death | 10 years payable at time of death + lump sum of $250,000 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 750,000 | Termination due to death annual benefit times payment term plus additional lump sum of $250,000. | |||||
Termination Associated with a Change in Control | 15 years payable at normal retirement age | $ | 50,000 | $ | 750,000 | The annual benefit of $50,000 times the payment terms. |
55
Joseph E. Burns
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination for various reasons for Joseph E. Burns, the Company's Chief Credit Officer.
Compensation and/or Benefits Payable Upon Termination |
Voluntary Termination by Employee Without Good Reason (1) |
Involuntary Termination by Company w/out Cause (2) |
Involuntary Termination by Company For Cause (1) |
Termination in the Event of Disability (3) |
Termination in the Event of Death (3) |
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control (4) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joseph E. Burns |
|||||||||||||||||||
Compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
$ | | $ | 120,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 779,307 | (5) | ||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
| | | 2,102 | 2,102 | 2,102 | |||||||||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Restricted Stock |
| | | 244,264 | 244,264 | 244,264 | |||||||||||||
Benefits & Perquisites |
|||||||||||||||||||
Equity Based Retirement Benefit(6) |
| | | 220,070 | 220,070 | 220,070 | |||||||||||||
Medical & Dental Insurance |
| 3,459 | | | | 13,836 | |||||||||||||
Total Benefit before Repayments |
| 123,459 | | 466,436 | 466,436 | 1,259,579 | (5) | ||||||||||||
Retention Bonus Repayment(7) |
(22,420 | ) | | (22,420 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Total Benefit |
$ | (22,420 | ) | $ | 123,459 | $ | (22,420 | ) | $ | 466,436 | $ | 466,436 | $ | 1,259,579 | (5) | ||||
56
Donald E. Pickett
The following table describes the potential payments upon termination for various reasons for Donald E. Pickett, the Company's Chief Financial Officer.
Compensation and/or Benefits Payable Upon Termination |
Voluntary Termination by Employee Without Good Reason (1) |
Involuntary Termination by Company w/out Cause (2) |
Involuntary Termination by Company For Cause (1) |
Termination in the Event of Disability (3) |
Termination in the Event of Death (3) |
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control (4) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Donald E. Pickett |
|||||||||||||||||||
Compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
$ | | $ | 235,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,055,000 | |||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Restricted Stock |
| | | 50,477 | 50,477 | 50,477 | |||||||||||||
Benefits & Perquisites |
|||||||||||||||||||
Medical & Dental Insurance |
| 2,258 | | | | 9,031 | |||||||||||||
Total Benefit |
$ | | $ | 237,258 | $ | | $ | 50,477 | $ | 50,477 | $ | 1,114,508 | |||||||
57
The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on the Board of Directors. Directors are subject to a minimum share ownership requirement. Each director is required to directly own $100,000 in SCBT stock by the end of the third anniversary of the first election to the board of directors, and $150,000 in SCBT stock by the end of the sixth anniversary of the first election to the Board of Directors. Director compensation is recommended by the Compensation Committee after discussion with the compensation consultants, is approved by the Board of Directors, is intended to provide an appropriate level of compensation to attract and retain qualified directors, and is competitive with that of comparable financial institutions.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, non-employee directors of the Company were paid $1,000 per regularly scheduled board meeting attended. The Company pays a quarterly cash retainer fee to each director. Directors who are also officers employed by the Company or its bank subsidiary do not receive fees or any other separate cash compensation for serving as a director. Members of the committees are paid additional compensation of $300 to $500, for each regularly scheduled meeting attended. The chair of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees received $1,000, $1,000, and $500, respectively, per committee meeting attended in lieu of the corresponding amounts above. For special meetings, the director is paid at the same rates above, except for those attending via telephone who are paid at half the regular rate.
In May 2011, the Company awarded to each non-employee director serving at the time 920 shares of restricted stock except for 1,073 shares awarded to M. Oswald Fogle, 1,073 shares awarded to Thomas E. Suggs, 1,073 shares awarded to Susie H. VanHuss, and 1,073 shares awarded to John W. Williamson, III, who serve as the chair of the Audit, Governance, Compensation and Wealth Management and Trust Committees, respectively. These awards were granted following the Company's annual shareholders' meeting and vested 25% per quarter over a period of one year from the date of grant. The Company intends to grant restricted stock awards annually to its non-employee directors in similar amounts and terms following the shareholders' meeting, under the authorization of the 2012 Plan.
Robert R. Horger, who serves as chairman of the Board of the Company, currently received $105,500 annually for serving in that capacity. During 2011, the Compensation Committee agreed to pay approximately $32,000 of salary in the form of immediately vested stock options rather than in cash. In addition, in January 2011, the Company granted to Mr. Horger 583 shares of restricted stock valued at $32.46 per share at the date of grant and 1,750 stock options at an exercise price per share of $32.46. The restricted stock cliff vests 100% at the end of four years and the stock options become exercisable in four equal annual installments over the four-year period following the date of grant. In November of 2011, Mr. Horger was granted 3,561 shares of restricted stock valued at $28.08 per share at the date of grant. This award was recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board in recognition of Mr. Horger's leadership, vision and contribution to the results of SCBT during the current economic turbulence and market difficulty over the past few years.
58
The following table sets forth the fees and all other forms of compensation paid to Chairman Horger and the Company's directors in 2011. Each component of compensation is discussed in further detail in the footnotes following the table.
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1) |
Stock Awards ($) (2) |
Option Awards (3) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (4) |
All Other Compensation ($) (5) |
Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Horger(6) |
$ | 73,500 | $ | 118,917 | $ | 51,064 | $ | | $ | 14,856 | $ | 4,188 | $ | 262,525 | ||||||||
Jimmy E. Addison |
27,525 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 56,842 | |||||||||||||||
Luther J. Battiste, III |
26,875 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 56,192 | |||||||||||||||
Dalton B. Floyd, Jr.(7) |
8,425 | | | | | 31 | 8,456 | |||||||||||||||
M. Oswald Fogle |
33,250 | 33,746 | | | | 447 | 67,443 | |||||||||||||||
Dwight W. Frierson |
28,525 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 57,842 | |||||||||||||||
Herbert G. Gray |
27,125 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 56,442 | |||||||||||||||
Cynthia A. Hartley(8) |
10,625 | 11,116 | | | | 119 | 21,860 | |||||||||||||||
Harry M. Mims, Jr. |
28,125 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 57,442 | |||||||||||||||
Ralph W. Norman, Jr. |
24,900 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 54,217 | |||||||||||||||
Alton C. Phillips |
25,625 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 54,942 | |||||||||||||||
James W. Roquemore |
27,625 | 28,934 | | | | 383 | 56,942 | |||||||||||||||
Thomas E. Suggs |
31,625 | 33,746 | | | | 447 | 65,818 | |||||||||||||||
Susie H. VanHuss |
31,900 | 33,746 | | | | 447 | 66,093 | |||||||||||||||
Kevin P. Walker |
31,250 | 28,934 | | | | 471 | 60,655 | |||||||||||||||
John W. Williamson, III |
28,720 | 33,746 | | | | 447 | 62,913 |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company's banking subsidiary has loan and deposit relationships with some of the directors of the Company and its subsidiary and loan, deposit, and fee-for-service relationships with some of the companies with which the directors are associated, as well as with some members of the immediate
59
families of the directors. (The term "members of the immediate families" for purposes of this paragraph includes each person's spouse, parents, children, siblings, mother and father-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, and brothers and sisters-in-law.) Such loan, deposit, or fee relationships were made in the ordinary course of business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates, collateral and fee pricing as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons not related to the lender, and did not, at the time they were made, involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
Robert R. Horger, Chairman of the Board of the Company, is a partner in the law firm of Horger, Barnwell & Reid, LLP, which SCBT, N.A. engaged, among other law firms, as counsel during 2011 and may engage during the current fiscal year. In 2011, the Company and Mr. Horger were involved in non-material related party transactions in that the Company made payments totaling approximately $31,000 to Horger, Barnwell & Reid, LLP. This amount did not exceed either $200,000 nor 5% of the law firm's gross revenue in accordance with NASDAQ standards.
Thomas E. Suggs, a director, is President and Chief Executive Officer of Keenan & Suggs, Inc., an insurance brokerage and consulting firm that the Company used during 2011 and will use during the current fiscal year as an insurance broker for certain policies. In 2011, the Company made payments directly to either, Keenan & Suggs, Inc., as the Company's insurance placement agent, or the insurance carriers. Keenan & Suggs, Inc. recognized $242,000 in revenue (commission) from the Company as its insurance placement agent. The CFO at Keenan & Suggs, Inc. has verified the amount paid to Keenan & Suggs, Inc. was well below 5% of Keenan & Suggs, Inc.'s total gross revenue for 2011 as set forth by NASDAQ's independence requirements. Based on the facts, the Audit Committee concluded that Mr. Suggs qualified as an independent director and the transactions do not reach the level of a material related party transaction.
During 2011, Gray Holdings, LP, of which Herbert G. Gray is a partner, received $9,000 in rent payments related to thirty-eight parking spaces at one of our branches on the coast of South Carolina. The governance committee has determined that Mr. Gray does qualify as an independent director and that the receipts his company obtained in this transaction are not a material related transaction as they are well below the 5% of gross revenue standards as established by NASDAQ.
The Company has adopted a Conflict of Interest/Code of Ethics Policy that contains written procedures for reviewing transactions between the Company and its directors and executive officers, their immediate family members, and entities with which they have a position or relationship. These procedures are intended to determine whether any such related party transaction impairs the independence of a director or presents a conflict of interest on the part of a director or executive officer. This policy also requires the Company's bank subsidiary to comply with Regulation O, which contains restrictions on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, certain principal shareholders, and their related interests. Such extensions of credit (i) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties and (ii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. The Conflict of Interest/Code of Ethics policy is located on the Company's website at www.scbtonline.com under Investor Relations.
The Company annually requires each of its directors and executive officers to complete a directors' and officers' questionnaire that elicits information about related person transactions. The Company's Governance Committee, which consists entirely of independent directors, annually reviews all relationships and amounts disclosed in the directors' and officers' questionnaires, and the Board of Directors makes a formal determination regarding each director's independence under NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and applicable SEC rules.
In addition, the Company's bank subsidiary is subject to the provisions of Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, which places limits on the amount of loans or extensions of credit to, or
60
investments in, or certain other transactions with, affiliates and on the amount of advances to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of affiliates. Each bank is also subject to the provisions of Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act which, among other things, prohibits an institution from engaging in certain transactions with certain affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to such institution or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies.
In addition to the annual review, the Company has appointed a corporate ethics officer to implement and monitor compliance with the Conflict of Interest/Code of Ethics Policy. The corporate ethics officer reports to the Company's general auditor who passes this information to the board's Audit Committee and Chief Executive Officer quarterly and also advises the Company's executive committee and management with respect to potential conflicts of interest. The related party transactions described above were approved by the Company.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
As required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company's directors and executive officers are required to report periodically their ownership of the Company's stock and any changes in ownership to the SEC. Based on written representations made by these affiliates to the Company and a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5, it appears that all such reports for these persons were filed in a timely fashion in 2011, except for a late Form 4 filing by James W. Roquemore on November 15, 2011 for four direct open market purchases, two indirect open market purchases, a direct open market sale, and three indirect open market sales, some of which were broker sales in a managed account and not directed by Mr. Roquemore.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has appointed Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, certified public accountants, as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company and its subsidiary for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, subject to ratification by the Company's shareholders. Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP has advised the Company that neither the firm nor any of its partners has any direct or material interest in the Company and its subsidiary except as independent registered auditors and certified public accountants of the Company. Representatives of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP are expected to be at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Audit Committee oversees the Company's financial reporting process, including internal controls, on behalf of the Board of Directors. The committee is composed of six directors of the Company, each of whom is independent as defined by the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market applicable to directors who serve on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates under an Audit Committee charter that complies with the requirements regarding Audit Committees established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations of the SEC and The NASDAQ Stock Market.
Management has the primary responsibility for the Company's financial statements, internal controls, and financial reporting. The Company's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company's audited financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as specified by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In the context of its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met with management and the independent registered public accounting firm to review and discuss the December 31, 2011 audited
61
financial statements. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees). In addition, the Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with them their independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee also has considered whether the independent registered public accounting firm's provision of non-audit services, as set forth in the section entitled Audit and Other Fees below, is compatible with the auditor's independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for filing with the SEC.
This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Audit Committee:
M. Oswald Fogle, Chairman | Kevin P. Walker | Luther J. Battiste, III | ||
Ralph W. Norman, Jr. | Herbert G. Gray | Alton C. Phillips |
The Audit Committee selected Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year ended December 31, 2011. Fees for professional services provided for the respective fiscal years ended December 31 are set forth below:
|
2011 | 2010 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP: |
|||||||
Audit fees(1) |
$ | 518,786 | $ | 535,503 | |||
Audit related fees(2) |
54,525 | 40,500 | |||||
Tax fees(3) |
60,775 | 41,151 | |||||
|
$ | 634,086 | $ | 617,154 | |||
62
The Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, and in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. However, any member to whom such authority is delegated is required to report on any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee pre-approved all services provided by Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP during 2011 and 2010. None of the services were performed by individuals who were not employees of the independent registered public accounting firm.
AVAILABILITY OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
The Company is mailing to shareholders contemporaneously with these proxy materials a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC. Further inquiries regarding the Form 10-K should be directed to: SCBT Financial Corporation, P.O. Box 1030, Columbia, South Carolina 29202, Attention: Donald E. Pickett, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
No current or former officer, and no other member of the Compensation Committee, has directly or indirectly entered into any transactions with the Company of a nature that would be required to be disclosed in this proxy statement.
The Company does not know of any other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, however, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote such proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
63
SCBT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
OMNIBUS STOCK AND PERFORMANCE PLAN
A-1
transaction described in clause (a), (b) or (d) of this definition) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof; or
A-2
A-3
This Plan has been established to attract and retain Eligible Individuals, to motivate Participants by means of appropriate incentives to achieve the goals of the Company, and to provide incentive compensation opportunities that are competitive with those of other similar companies. The Plan is intended to assist the Company in recruiting and retaining the services of Eligible Individuals by enabling them to participate in the future success and growth of the Company and to associate their interests with those of the Company and its shareholders.
A-4
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may not, without shareholder approval, reprice any outstanding Option or SAR by reducing the Exercise Price thereof or canceling such Award in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options or SAR with an Exercise Price that is less than the Exercise Price of the pre-cancellation Option or SAR.
ARTICLE V
STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN
A-5
Options intended to be Incentive Stock Options shall be 1,684,000 Shares. Such maximum numbers of shares of Common Stock is subject to adjustment as provided in Article XI.
ARTICLE VI
OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
A-6
A-7
Participant shall have any rights as a shareholder with respect to Shares subject to an Option or a SAR until such Option or SAR is exercised and such Shares are issued.
"The transferability of this certificate and the shares of stock represented hereby are subject to the terms and conditions (including forfeiture) of the SCBT 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and the applicable Agreement, dated as of , . Copies of such Plan and Agreement are on file at the offices of SCBT, 520 Gervais St., Columbia, SC 29201."
A-8
ARTICLE VIII
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
A-9
Performance Units may be issued hereunder to Eligible Individuals, for no cash consideration or for such minimum consideration as may be required by applicable law, either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under this Plan. The Performance Goals to be achieved during any Performance Period and the length of the Performance Period shall be determined by the Committee upon the grant of each Performance Unit. The Committee may, in connection with the grant of Performance Units, designate them as Qualified Performance-Based Awards. The conditions for grant or vesting and the other provisions of Performance Units (including without limitation any applicable Performance Goals) need not be the same with respect to each recipient. Performance Units may be paid in cash, Shares, other property or any combination thereof, in the sole discretion of the Committee as set forth in the applicable Agreement. The maximum value of the property, including cash, that may be paid or distributed to any Participant pursuant to a grant of Performance Units made in any one calendar year shall be $2,500,000.
ARTICLE X
OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS; CASH AWARDS
ARTICLE XI
ADJUSTMENT UPON CHANGE IN COMMON STOCK
A-10
Committee or the Board in its sole discretion (it being understood that in the case of a Corporate Transaction with respect to which shareholders of Common Stock receive consideration other than publicly traded equity securities of the ultimate surviving entity, any such determination by the Committee that the value of an Option or SAR shall for this purpose be deemed to equal the excess, if any, of the value of the consideration being paid for each Share pursuant to such Corporate Transaction over the Exercise Price of such Option or SAR shall conclusively be deemed valid); (B) the substitution of other property (including, without limitation, cash or other securities of the Company and securities of entities other than the Company) for the Shares subject to outstanding Awards; and (C) in connection with any Disaffiliation, arranging for the assumption of Awards, or replacement of Awards with new awards based on other property or other securities (including, without limitation, other securities of the Company and securities of entities other than the Company), by the affected Subsidiary or division or by the entity that controls such Subsidiary or division following such Disaffiliation (as well as any corresponding adjustments to Awards that remain based upon Company securities). The Committee may adjust the Performance Goals applicable to any Awards to reflect any unusual or non-recurring events and other extraordinary items, impact of charges for restructurings, discontinued operations, and the cumulative effects of accounting or tax changes, each as defined by generally accepted accounting principles or as identified in the Company's financial statements, notes to the financial statements, management's discussion and analysis or other the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, provided that in the case of Performance Goals applicable to any Qualified Performance-Based Awards, such adjustment does not violate Section 162(m) of the Code.
ARTICLE XII
QUALIFIED PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS;
SECTION 16(B)
A-11
such designation (including, without limitation, that all such Awards be granted by a committee composed solely of Outside Directors). To the extent required to comply with the Section 162(m) Exemption, no later than 90 days following the commencement of a Performance Period or, if earlier, by the expiration of 25% of a Performance Period, the Committee will designate one or more Performance Periods, determine the Participants for the Performance Periods and establish the Performance Goals for the Performance Periods.
ARTICLE XIII
COMPLIANCE WITH LAW AND
APPROVAL OF REGULATORY BODIES
No Award shall be exercisable, no Common Stock shall be issued, no certificates for Shares shall be delivered, and no payment shall be made under this Plan except in compliance with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations (including, without limitation, withholding tax requirements) and the rules of any Applicable Exchange. The Company may rely on an opinion of its counsel as to such compliance. Any share certificate issued to evidence Common Stock for which an Award is exercised or issued may bear such legends and statements as the Committee may deem advisable to assure compliance with Federal and state laws and regulations. No Award shall be exercisable (to the extent applicable), no Common Stock shall be issued, no certificate for Shares shall be delivered, and no payment shall be made under this Plan until the Company has obtained such consent or approval as the Committee may deem advisable from regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over such matters.
ARTICLE XIV
GENERAL PROVISIONS
A-12
nor any right or claim to any benefit under the Plan, unless such right or claim has specifically accrued under the terms of the Plan.
A-13
may amend the terms of any Award theretofore issued under this Plan, prospectively or retrospectively, and include in such amendment the right of the Company to pay a Participant cash in lieu of shares of Common Stock upon the termination (by exercise or otherwise) or settlement of an Award, but no such amendment shall impair the rights of any Participant without the Participant's consent except such an amendment made to cause the Plan, or any Award, to qualify for the exemption provided by Rule 16b-3.
A-14
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 0IFBKD 5 2 B V + Annual Meeting Proxy Card. Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and Sign Below C Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below. + B Non-Voting Items A Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. Change of Address Please print new address below. Comments Please print your comments below. 1. Election of Directors: 01 - M. Oswald Fogle 04 - Thomas E. Suggs 02 - Herbert G. Gray 05 - Kevin P. Walker 2. Proposal to ratify appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, Certified Public Accountants, as SCBT Financial Corporations independent auditors for 2012. 3. Proposal to approve the Omnibus Stock and Performance Plan. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION 03 - Cynthia A. Hartley 4. And, in the discretion of said agents, upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting, and matters incidental to the conduct of the meeting. For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 ENDORSEMENT LINE SACKPACK NNNNNNNNNNNN 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext NNNNNNN 1 3 4 2 8 0 1 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND NNNNNNNNN C 1234567890 J N T NNNNNNNNNNN NNNN C123456789 1234 5678 9012 345 IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on April 24, 2012. Vote by Internet Log on to the Internet and go to www.investorvote.com/ SCBT Follow the steps outlined on the secured website. Vote by telephone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call. Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message. |
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Robert R. Hill, Jr., John C. Pollok and Donald E. Pickett, and each of them, with full power of substitution, are hereby appointed as agent(s) of the undersigned to vote as proxies all of the shares of Common Stock of SCBT Financial Corporation held of record by the undersigned on the record date at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April 24, 2012, and at any adjournment thereof. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you can be sure your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly returning your proxy in the enclosed envelope. THE PROXIES WILL BE VOTED AS INSTRUCTED. IF NO CHOICE IS INDICATED WITH RESPECT TO A MATTER WHERE A CHOICE IS PROVIDED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR SUCH MATTER. (Items to be voted appear on the reverse.) . Proxy SCBT Financial Corporation Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting The proxy statement and 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders (which includes our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K) are available at http:// www.scbtonline.com on our Investor Relations page in the SEC Filings section under Documents. IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |