e10vk
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
     
þ   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 0-14749
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Colorado   84-0910696
(State of Incorporation)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
265 Turner Drive, Durango, CO 81303
(Address of principal executive offices)
(970) 259-0554
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(b) Of The Act:
     
Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
     
Common Stock $.03 Par Value per Share   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(g) Of The Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o    No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yes o    No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ    No o   
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o   No  þ
On April 30, 2008, there were 5,980,919 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of the Common Stock (based on the closing price as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market on August 31, 2007) held by non-affiliates was $67,078,231. As of September 30, 2007 Hodges Capital Management, Inc. and affiliates held 1,024,123 shares of outstanding Common Stock. These shares have been excluded from the dollar value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement furnished to stockholders in connection with the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the registrant’s fiscal year.
 
 

 


 

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page No.  
       
 
    3  
 
    13  
 
    14  
 
    15  
 
    15  
 
    15  
 
       
 
    15  
 
    17  
 
    18  
 
    27  
 
    28  
 
    45  
 
    45  
 
    46  
 
       
 
    46  
 
    46  
 
    46  
 
    46  
 
    46  
 
       
 
    47  
 Commodity Contract
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906

2


Table of Contents

PART I.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Founded in 1981 and incorporated in Colorado in 1982, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (the “Company”, and sometimes referred to herein with the pronouns “we,” “us,” or “our”) is an international franchisor and confectionery manufacturer. The Company is headquartered in Durango, Colorado and manufactures an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. As of March 31, 2008 there were 5 Company-owned and 329 franchised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores operating in 38 states, Canada, and the United Arab Emirates.
The Company believes approximately 50% of the products sold at Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores are prepared on the premises. The Company believes this in-store preparation creates a special store ambiance and the aroma and sight of products being made attracts foot traffic and assures customers that products are fresh.
The Company believes that its principal competitive strengths lie in its brand name recognition, its reputation for the quality, variety and taste of its products; the special ambiance of its stores; its knowledge and experience in applying criteria for selection of new store locations; its expertise in the manufacture of chocolate candy products and the merchandising and marketing of chocolate and other candy products; and the control and training infrastructures it has implemented to assure consistent customer service and execution of successful practices and techniques at its stores.
The Company believes its manufacturing expertise and reputation for quality has facilitated the sale of selected products through new distribution channels. The Company is currently selling its products in a select number of new distribution channels including wholesaling, fundraising, corporate sales, mail order and internet sales.
The Company’s revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: (i) sales to franchisees and others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by the Company (75-72-69%); (ii) sales at Company-owned stores of chocolates and other confectionery products (including products manufactured by the Company) (5-8-11%) and (iii) the collection of initial franchise fees and royalties from franchisees (20-20-20%). The Company’s revenues are derived from domestic (97-98-98%) and international (3-2-2%) sources. The figures in parentheses show the percentage of total revenues attributable to each source for fiscal years ended February 28 (29), 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
According to the National Confectioners Association, the total U.S. candy market approximated $29.1 billion of retail sales in 2007 with chocolate generating sales of approximately $16.3 billion. According to the Department of Commerce, per capita consumption of chocolate in 2006 was approximately 14 pounds per year nationally and decreased 1% when compared to 2005.
Business Strategy
The Company’s objective is to build on its position as a leading international franchisor and manufacturer of high quality chocolate and other confectionery products. The Company continually seeks opportunities to profitably expand its business. To accomplish this objective, the Company employs a business strategy that includes the following elements:
Product Quality and Variety
The Company maintains the unsurpassed taste and quality of its chocolate candies by using only the finest chocolate and other wholesome ingredients. The Company uses its own proprietary recipes, primarily developed by the Company’s master candy makers. A typical Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store offers up to 100 of the Company’s chocolate candies throughout the year and as many as 200, including many packaged candies, during the holiday seasons. Individual stores also offer numerous varieties of premium fudge and gourmet caramel apples, as well as other products prepared in the store from Company recipes.
Store Atmosphere and Ambiance
The Company seeks to establish an enjoyable and inviting atmosphere in each Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store. Each store prepares numerous products, including fudge, barks and caramel apples, in the store. In-store preparation is designed both to be fun and entertaining for customers and to convey an image of freshness and homemade quality. The Company’s design staff has developed easily replicable designs and specifications to ensure that the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory concept is consistently implemented throughout the system.

3


Table of Contents

In February 2000, the Company retained a nationally recognized design firm to evaluate and update its existing store design. The objective of the store design project is threefold: (1) increase average revenue per unit thereby opening untapped real estate environments; (2) further emphasize the entertainment and freshness value of the Company’s in-store confectionery factory; and (3) improve operational efficiency through optimal store layout. The Company completed the store redesign project and the testing of the new design in fiscal 2002. Through March 31, 2008, 197 stores incorporating the new design have been opened.
Site Selection
Careful selection of a site is critical to the success of a Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store. Many factors are considered by the Company in identifying suitable sites, including tenant mix, visibility, attractiveness, accessibility, level of foot traffic and occupancy costs. Final site selection occurs only after the Company’s senior management has approved the site. The Company believes that the experience of its management team in evaluating a potential site is one of the Company’s competitive strengths.
Customer Service Commitment
The Company emphasizes excellence in customer service and seeks to employ and to sell franchises to motivated and energetic people. The Company also fosters enthusiasm for its customer service philosophy and the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory concept through its bi-annual franchisee convention, regional meetings and other frequent contacts with its franchisees.
Increase Same Store Retail Sales at Existing Locations
The Company seeks to increase profitability of its store system through increasing sales at existing store locations. Changes in system wide domestic same store retail sales are as follows:
         
2004
    (0.6 %)
2005
    4.8 %
2006
    2.4 %
2007
    0.3 %
2008
    (0.9 %)
The Company believes that the negative trend in fiscal 2008 was due to the overall weakening of the economy and retail environment. The Company experienced positive same store sales of 1.0% and 1.6% in its fiscal first and second quarters of 2008 followed by decreases in same store sales of (2.5%) and (4.7%) in its fiscal third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2008 compared with the same periods in fiscal 2007.
In February 2000, the Company retained a nationally recognized packaging design firm to completely redesign the packaging featured in the Company’s retail stores. The Company has designed a contemporary and coordinated line of packaged products that capture and convey the freshness, fun and excitement of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory retail store experience. The Company completed the packaging redesign project during 2002. The Company also believes that the successful launch of new packaging has had a positive impact on same store sales.
Increase Same Store Pounds Purchased by Existing Locations
In fiscal 2008, same store pounds purchased by franchisees decreased 9.1% compared to the prior fiscal year. The Company continues to add new products and focus its existing product lines in an effort to increase same store pounds purchased by existing locations. The Company believes the decrease in same store pounds purchased was due to a product mix shift from factory-made products to products made in the store such as caramel apples and fudge.
Enhanced Operating Efficiencies
The Company seeks to improve its profitability by controlling costs and increasing the efficiency of its operations. Efforts in the last several years, include the purchase of additional automated factory equipment, implementation of a comprehensive Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS) system, implementation of alternative manufacturing strategies and installation of enhanced Point-of-Sale (POS) systems in all of its Company-owned and 182 of its franchised stores through March 31, 2008. These measures have significantly improved the Company’s ability to deliver its products to its stores safely, quickly and cost-effectively and impact store operations. Additionally, the divestiture of substantially all of the Company-owned stores in fiscal 2002 has reduced the Company’s exposure to real estate risk, improved the Company’s operating margins and allowed the Company to increase its focus on franchising.

4


Table of Contents

Expansion Strategy
Key elements of the Company’s expansion strategy include:
Unit Growth
The cornerstone of the Company’s growth strategy is to aggressively pursue unit growth opportunities in locations where the Company has traditionally been successful, to pursue new and developing real estate environments for franchisees which appear promising based on early sales results, and to improve and expand the retail store concept, such that previously untapped and unfeasible environments (such as most regional centers) generate sufficient revenue to support a successful Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory location.
High Traffic Environments
The Company currently establishes franchised stores in the following environments: outlet centers, tourist environments, regional centers, street fronts, airports and other entertainment oriented environments. The Company, over the last several years, has had a particular focus on regional center locations. The Company is optimistic that its exciting new store design will allow it to continue targeting the over 1,400 regional centers in the United States. The Company has established a business relationship with most of the major developers in the United States and believes that these relationships provide it with the opportunity to take advantage of attractive sites in new and existing real estate environments.
Name Recognition and New Market Penetration
The Company believes the visibility of its stores and the high foot traffic at many of its locations has generated strong name recognition of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory and demand for its franchises. The Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system has historically been concentrated in the western and Rocky Mountain region of the United States, but recent growth has generated a gradual easterly momentum as new stores have been opened in the eastern half of the country. This growth has further increased the Company’s name recognition and demand for its franchises. Distribution of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory products through specialty markets also increases name recognition and brand awareness in areas of the country in which the Company has not previously had a significant presence. The Company believes that by distributing selected Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory products through new distribution channels its name recognition will improve and benefit its entire store system.
Store Concept
The Company seeks to establish a fun and inviting atmosphere in its Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store locations. Unlike most other confectionery stores, each Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store prepares certain products, including fudge and caramel apples, in the store. Customers can observe store personnel making fudge from start to finish, including the mixing of ingredients in old-fashioned copper kettles and the cooling of the fudge on large granite or marble tables, and are often invited to sample the store’s products. The Company believes that an average of approximately 50% of the revenues of franchised stores are generated by sales of products prepared on the premises. The Company believes the in-store preparation and aroma of its products enhance the ambiance at Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores, are fun and entertaining for its customers and convey an image of freshness and homemade quality.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores opened prior to fiscal 2002 have a distinctive country Victorian decor, which further enhances their friendly and enjoyable atmosphere. Each store includes finely crafted wood cabinetry, copper and brass accents, etched mirrors and large marble tables on which fudge and other products are made. To ensure that all stores conform to the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory image, the Company’s design staff provides working drawings and specifications and approves the construction plans for each new store. The Company also controls the signage and building materials that may be used in the stores.
In fiscal 2002, the Company launched its revised store design concept intended specifically for high foot traffic regional shopping centers. The revised store design concept is modern with crisp and clean site lines and an even stronger emphasis on the Company’s unique upscale kitchen. The Company is requiring that all new Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores incorporate the revised store design concept. The Company also requires that key elements of the revised store design concept be incorporated into existing store design upon renewal of the Franchise Agreement, or transfer in store ownership.

5


Table of Contents

The average store size is approximately 1,000 square feet, approximately 650 square feet of which is selling space. Most stores are open seven days a week. Typical hours are 10 a.m. to 9 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and 12 noon to 6 p.m. on Sundays. Store hours in tourist areas may vary depending upon the tourist season.
Kiosk Concept
In fiscal 2002, the Company opened its first full service retail kiosk concept. The kiosk is a vehicle for retail environments where in-line real estate is unavailable or build-out costs and/or rent factors do not meet the Company’s financial criteria. The kiosk, which ranges from 150 to 250 square feet, incorporates the Company’s trademark cooking area where caramel apples, fudge and other popular confections are prepared in front of customers using traditional cooking utensils. The kiosk also includes the Company’s core product and gifting lines in order to provide the customer with a full Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory experience.
The Company believes the kiosk concept enhances its franchise opportunity by providing more flexibility in support of existing franchisees’ expansion programs and allows new franchisees that otherwise would not qualify for an in-line location an opportunity to join the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system. As of March 31, 2008 there were 18 kiosks in operation.
Products and Packaging
The Company typically produces approximately 300 chocolate candies and other confectionery products, using proprietary recipes developed primarily by the Company’s master candy makers. These products include many varieties of clusters, caramels, creams, mints and truffles. The Company continues to engage in a major effort to expand its product line by developing additional exciting and attractive new products. During the Christmas, Easter and Valentine’s Day holiday seasons, the Company may make as many as 100 additional items, including many candies offered in packages specially designed for the holidays. A typical Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store offers up to 100 of these candies throughout the year and up to an additional 100 during holiday seasons. Individual stores also offer more than 15 premium fudges and other products prepared in the store. The Company believes that, on average, approximately 40% of the revenues of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores are generated by products manufactured at the Company’s factory, 50% by products made in the store using Company recipes and ingredients purchased from the Company or approved suppliers and the remaining 10% by products, such as ice cream, coffee and other sundries, purchased from approved suppliers.
The Company uses only the finest chocolates, nut meats and other wholesome ingredients in its candies and continually strives to offer new confectionery items in order to maintain the excitement and appeal of its products. The Company develops special packaging for the Christmas, Valentine’s Day and Easter holidays, and customers can have their purchases packaged in decorative boxes and fancy tins throughout the year.
Chocolate candies manufactured by the Company are sold at prices ranging from $14.90 to $24.00 per pound, with an average price of $18.30 per pound. Franchisees set their own retail prices, though the Company does recommend prices for all of its products.
Operating Environment
The Company currently establishes Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in five primary environments: regional centers, tourist areas, outlet centers, street fronts, airports and other entertainment oriented shopping centers. Each of these environments has a number of attractive features, including high levels of foot traffic.
Outlet Centers
There are approximately 110 factory outlet centers in the United States, and as of February 29, 2008, there were Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in approximately 67 of these centers in over 25 states. The Company has established business relationships with most of the major outlet center developers in the United States. Although not all factory outlet centers provide desirable locations for the Company’s stores, management believes the Company’s relationships with these developers will provide it with the opportunity to take advantage of attractive sites in new and existing outlet centers.
Tourist Areas, Street Fronts and Other Entertainment Oriented Shopping Centers
As of February 29, 2008, there were approximately 40 Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in locations considered to be tourist areas, including Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco, California and the Riverwalk in San Antonio, Texas. Tourist areas are very attractive locations

6


Table of Contents

because they offer high levels of foot traffic and favorable customer spending characteristics, and greatly increase the Company’s visibility and name recognition. The Company believes significant opportunities exist to expand into additional tourist areas with high levels of foot traffic.
Regional Centers
There are approximately 1,400 regional centers in the United States, and as of February 29, 2008, there were Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in approximately 95 of these centers, including locations in the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota; and Fort Collins, Colorado. Although often providing favorable levels of foot traffic, regional centers typically involve more expensive rent structures and competing food and beverage concepts. The Company’s new store concept is designed to unlock the potential of the regional center environment.
The Company believes there are a number of other environments that have the characteristics necessary for the successful operation of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores such as airports and sports arenas. Twelve franchised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores exist at airport locations: two at Atlanta International (Hartsfield-Jackson), two at Denver International Airport, one at Charlotte International Airport, one at Minneapolis International Airport, one at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport, one at Salt Lake City International Airport, one at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport and three in Canada; one at Edmonton International Airport, one at Toronto Pearson International Airport and one at Vancouver International Airport.
On July 20, 2007 the Company entered into an exclusive airport development agreement (the “Agreement”) with The Grove, Inc. Pursuant to this Agreement, The Grove will have the exclusive right to open Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in all airports in the United States where there are no Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores currently operating or under development. Additionally, the Agreement sets forth a commission on the initial franchise fee and future royalty revenue to be paid by the Company to The Grove, Inc. for any third-party, qualified, franchisees who develop an airport location under the Agreement. The Agreement expires on July 20, 2009 or upon 30 days written notice of default by the Franchisee.
Franchising Program
General
The Company’s franchising philosophy is one of service and commitment to its franchise system, and the Company continuously seeks to improve its franchise support services. The Company’s concept has consistently been rated as an outstanding franchise opportunity by publications and organizations rating such opportunities. In January 2008, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory was rated the number one franchise opportunity in the candy category by Entrepreneur Magazine. As of March 31, 2008, there were 329 franchised stores in the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system. See the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in the report for a discussion of the revenues, profits or losses and total assets related to the franchising segment of the Company’s business.
Franchisee Sourcing and Selection
The majority of new franchises are awarded to persons referred by existing franchisees, to interested consumers who have visited Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores and to existing franchisees. The Company also advertises for new franchisees in national and regional newspapers as suitable potential store locations come to the Company’s attention. Franchisees are approved by the Company on the basis of the applicant’s net worth and liquidity, together with an assessment of work ethic and personality compatibility with the Company’s operating philosophy.
In fiscal 1992, the Company entered into a franchise development agreement covering Canada with Immaculate Confections, Ltd. of Vancouver, British Columbia. Pursuant to this agreement, Immaculate Confections purchased the exclusive right to franchise and operate Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in Canada. Immaculate Confections, as of March 31, 2008, operated 38 stores under the agreement.
In fiscal 2000, the Company entered into a franchise development agreement covering the Gulf Cooperation Council States of United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Oman with Al Muhairy Group of United Arab Emirates. Pursuant to this agreement, Al Muhairy Group purchased the exclusive right to franchise and operate Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in the Gulf Cooperation Council States. Al Muhairy Group, as of March 31, 2008, operated 3 stores under this agreement.
In fiscal 2008, the Company entered into an airport development agreement with The Grove, Inc. Pursuant to this Agreement, The Grove will have the exclusive right to open Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in all airports in the United States where there are no Rocky Mountain

7


Table of Contents

Chocolate Factory stores currently operating or under development. The Grove, Inc., as of March 31, 2008, operated 3 stores under this agreement.
Training and Support
Each domestic franchisee owner/operator and each store manager for a domestic franchisee is required to complete a 7-day comprehensive training program in store operations and management. The Company has established a training center at its Durango headquarters in the form of a full-sized replica of a properly configured and merchandised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store. Topics covered in the training course include the Company’s philosophy of store operation and management, customer service, merchandising, pricing, cooking, inventory and cost control, quality standards, record keeping, labor scheduling and personnel management. Training is based on standard operating policies and procedures contained in an operations manual provided to all franchisees, which the franchisee is required to follow by terms of the franchise agreement. Additionally, and importantly, trainees are provided with a complete orientation to Company operations by working in key factory operational areas and by meeting with members of the senior management of the Company.
The Company’s operating objectives include providing Company knowledge and expertise in merchandising, marketing and customer service to all front-line store level employees to maximize their skills and ensure that they are fully versed in the Company’s proven techniques.
The Company provides ongoing support to franchisees through its field consultants, who maintain regular and frequent communication with the stores by phone and by site visits. The field consultants also review and discuss with the franchisee store operating results and provide advice and guidance in improving store profitability and in developing and executing store marketing and merchandising programs. The Company has developed a handbook containing a “pre-packaged” local store marketing plan, which allows franchisees to implement cost-effective promotional programs that have proven successful in other Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores.
Quality Standards and Control
The franchise agreement for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchisees requires compliance with the Company’s procedures of operation and food quality specifications and permits audits and inspections by the Company.
Operating standards for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores are set forth in operating manuals. These manuals cover general operations, factory ordering, merchandising, advertising and accounting procedures. Through their regular visits to franchised stores, Company field consultants audit performance and adherence to Company standards. The Company has the right to terminate any franchise agreement for non-compliance with the Company’s operating standards. Products sold at the stores and ingredients used in the preparation of products approved for on-site preparation must be purchased from the Company or from approved suppliers.
The Franchise Agreement: Terms and Conditions
The domestic offer and sale of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises is made pursuant to the Uniform Franchise Offering Circular prepared in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. States that regulate the sale and operation of franchises require a franchiser to register or file certain notices with the state authorities prior to offering and selling franchises in those states.
Under the current form of domestic Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchise agreement, franchisees pay the Company (i) an initial franchise fee for each store, (ii) royalties based on monthly gross sales, and (iii) a marketing fee based on monthly gross sales. Franchisees are generally granted exclusive territory with respect to the operation of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores only in the immediate vicinity of their stores. Chocolate products not made on the premises by franchisees must be purchased from the Company or approved suppliers. The franchise agreements require franchisees to comply with the Company’s procedures of operation and food quality specifications, to permit inspections and audits by the Company and to remodel stores to conform with standards in effect. The Company may terminate the franchise agreement upon the failure of the franchisee to comply with the conditions of the agreement and upon the occurrence of certain events, such as insolvency or bankruptcy of the franchisee or the commission by the franchisee of any unlawful or deceptive practice, which in the judgment of the Company is likely to adversely affect the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system. The Company’s ability to terminate franchise agreements pursuant to such provisions is subject to applicable bankruptcy and state laws and regulations. See “Business — Regulation.”

8


Table of Contents

The agreements prohibit the transfer or assignment of any interest in a franchise without the prior written consent of the Company. The agreements also give the Company a right of first refusal to purchase any interest in a franchise if a proposed transfer would result in a change of control of that franchise. The refusal right, if exercised, would allow the Company to purchase the interest proposed to be transferred under the same terms and conditions and for the same price as offered by the proposed transferee.
The term of each Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchise agreement is ten years, and franchisees have the right to renew for one additional ten-year term.
Franchise Financing
The Company does not provide prospective franchisees with financing for their stores, but has developed relationships with several sources of franchisee financing to whom it will refer franchisees. Typically, franchisees have obtained their own sources of such financing and have not required the Company’s assistance.
Company Store Program
As of March 31, 2008 there were 5 Company-owned Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores. Company-owned stores provide a training ground for Company-owned store personnel and district managers and a controllable testing ground for new products and promotions, operating and training methods and merchandising techniques, which may then be incorporated into the franchise store operations.
Managers of Company-owned stores are required to comply with all Company operating standards and undergo training and receive support from the Company similar to the training and support provided to franchisees. See “Franchising Program-Training and Support” and “Franchising Program-Quality Standards and Control.”
Manufacturing Operations
General
The Company manufactures its chocolate candies at its factory in Durango, Colorado. All products are produced consistent with the Company’s philosophy of using only the finest, highest quality ingredients to achieve its marketing motto of “the Peak of Perfection in Handmade Chocolates®.”
It has always been the belief of management that the Company should control the manufacturing of its own chocolate products. By controlling manufacturing, the Company can better maintain its high product quality standards, offer unique, proprietary products, manage costs, control production and shipment schedules and potentially pursue new or under-utilized distribution channels. See the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report for a discussion of the revenues, profits or losses and total assets related to the manufacturing segment of the Company’s business.
Manufacturing Processes
The manufacturing process primarily involves cooking or preparing candy centers, including nuts, caramel, peanut butter, creams and jellies, and then coating them with chocolate or other toppings. All of these processes are conducted in carefully controlled temperature ranges, and the Company employs strict quality control procedures at every stage of the manufacturing process. The Company uses a combination of manual and automated processes at its factory. Although the Company believes that it is currently preferable to perform certain manufacturing processes, such as dipping of some large pieces, by hand, automation increases the speed and efficiency of the manufacturing process. The Company has from time to time automated processes formerly performed by hand where it has become cost-effective for the Company to do so without compromising product quality or appearance.
The Company seeks to ensure the freshness of products sold in Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores with frequent shipments. Most Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores do not have significant space for the storage of inventory, and the Company encourages franchisees and store managers to order only the quantities that they can reasonably expect to sell within approximately two to four weeks. For these reasons, the Company generally does not have a significant backlog of orders.
Ingredients
The principal ingredients used by the Company are chocolate, nuts, sugar, corn syrup, cream and butter. The factory receives shipments of ingredients daily. To ensure the consistency of its products, the Company buys ingredients from a limited number of reliable suppliers. In order to assure a continuous supply of chocolate and certain nuts, the Company frequently enters into

9


Table of Contents

purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for these products. Because prices for these products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts, but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall. The Company has one or more alternative sources for all essential ingredients and therefore believes that the loss of any supplier would not have a material adverse effect on the Company and its results of operations. The Company currently also purchases small amounts of finished candy from third parties on a private label basis for sale in Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores.
Trucking Operations
The Company operates eight trucks and ships a substantial portion of its products from the factory on its own fleet. The Company’s trucking operations enable it to deliver its products to the stores quickly and cost-effectively. In addition, the Company back-hauls its own ingredients and supplies, as well as product from third parties, on return trips as a basis for increasing trucking program economics.
Marketing
The Company relies primarily on in-store promotion and point-of-purchase materials to promote the sale of its products. The monthly marketing fees collected from franchisees are used by the Company to develop new packaging and in-store promotion and point-of-purchase materials, and to create and update the Company’s local store marketing handbooks.
The Company focuses on local store marketing efforts by providing customizable marketing materials, including advertisements, coupons, flyers and mail order catalogs generated by its in-house Creative Services department. The department works directly with franchisees to implement local store marketing programs.
The Company aggressively seeks low cost, high return publicity opportunities through participation in local and regional events, sponsorships and charitable causes. The Company has not historically and does not intend to engage in national advertising in the near future.
Competition
The retailing of confectionery products is highly competitive. The Company and its franchisees compete with numerous businesses that offer confectionery products. Many of these competitors have greater name recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than the Company. In addition, there is intense competition among retailers for real estate sites, store personnel and qualified franchisees. Competitive market conditions could adversely affect the Company and its results of operations and its ability to expand successfully.
The Company believes that its principal competitive strengths lie in its name recognition and its reputation for the quality, value, variety and taste of its products and the special ambiance of its stores; its knowledge and experience in applying criteria for selection of new store locations; its expertise in merchandising and marketing of chocolate and other candy products; and the control and training infrastructures it has implemented to assure execution of successful practices and techniques at its store locations. In addition, by controlling the manufacturing of its own chocolate products, the Company can better maintain its high product quality standards for those products, offer proprietary products, manage costs, control production and shipment schedules and pursue new or under-utilized distribution channels.
Trade Name and Trademarks
The trade name “Rocky Mountain Chocolate FactoryÒ,” the phrases, “The Peak of Perfection in Handmade ChocolatesÒ”, “America’s ChocolatierÒ”, “The World’s Chocolatierâas well as all other trademarks, service marks, symbols, slogans, emblems, logos and designs used in the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system, are proprietary rights of the Company. All of the foregoing are believed to be of material importance to the Company’s business. The registration for the trademark “Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory” has been granted in the United States and Canada. Applications have been filed to register the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory trademark and/or obtained in certain foreign countries.
The Company has not attempted to obtain patent protection for the proprietary recipes developed by the Company’s master candy-maker and is relying upon its ability to maintain the confidentiality of those recipes.

10


Table of Contents

Employees
At February 29, 2008, the Company employed approximately 190 people. Most employees, with the exception of store, factory and corporate management, are paid on an hourly basis. The Company also employs some people on a temporary basis during peak periods of store and factory operations. The Company seeks to assure that participatory management processes, mutual respect and professionalism and high performance expectations for the employee exist throughout the organization. The Company believes that it provides working conditions, wages and benefits that compare favorably with those of its competitors. The Company’s employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company considers its employee relations to be good.
Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company and their ages at April 30, 2008 are as follows:
             
Name   Age   Position
Franklin E. Crail
    66     Chairman of the Board, President and Director
 
           
Bryan J. Merryman
    47     Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
 
           
Gregory L. Pope
    41     Sr. Vice President — Franchise Development and Operations
 
           
Edward L. Dudley
    44     Sr. Vice President — Sales and Marketing
 
           
William K. Jobson
    52     Chief Information Officer
 
           
Jay B. Haws
    58     Vice President — Creative Services
 
           
Virginia M. Perez
    70     Corporate Secretary
Mr. Crail co-founded the first Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store in May 1981. Since the incorporation of the Company in November 1982, he has served as its President and a Director. He was elected Chairman of the Board in March 1986. Prior to founding the Company, Mr. Crail was co-founder and president of CNI Data Processing, Inc., a software firm which developed automated billing systems for the cable television industry.
Mr. Merryman joined the Company in December 1997 as Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Since April 1999 Mr. Merryman has also served the Company as the Chief Operating Officer and as a Director, and since January 2000 as its Treasurer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Merryman was a principal in Knightsbridge Holdings, Inc. (a leveraged buyout firm) from January 1997 to December 1997. Mr. Merryman also served as Chief Financial Officer of Super Shops, Inc., a retailer and manufacturer of aftermarket auto parts from July 1996 to November 1997 and was employed for more than eleven years by Deloitte and Touche LLP, most recently as a senior manager.
Mr. Pope became Sr. Vice President of Franchise Development and Operations in May 2004. Since joining the Company in October 1990, he has served in various positions including store manager, new store opener and franchise field consultant. In March 1996 he became Director of Franchise Development and Support. In June 2001 he became Vice President of Franchise Development, a position he held until he was promoted to his present position.
Mr. Dudley joined the Company in January 1997 to spearhead the Company’s newly formed Product Sales Development function as Vice President — Sales and Marketing, with the goal of increasing the Company’s factory and retail sales. He was promoted to Senior Vice President in June 2001. During his 10 year career with Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Mr. Dudley served in a number of senior marketing and sales management capacities, including most recently that of Director, Distribution Services from March 1996 to January 1997.
Mr. Jobson joined the Company in July 1998 as Director of Information Technology. In June 2001, he was promoted to Chief Information Officer, a position created to enhance the Company’s strategic focus on information and information technology. From July 1995 to July 1998, Mr. Jobson worked for ADAC Laboratories in Durango, Colorado, a leading provider of diagnostic imaging and information systems solutions in the healthcare industry, as Manager of Technical Services and before that, Regional Manager.
Mr. Haws joined the Company in August 1991 as Vice President of Creative Services. Since 1981, Mr. Haws had been closely associated with the Company both as a franchisee and marketing/graphic design consultant. From 1986 to 1991 he operated two Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises located in San Francisco, California. From 1983 to 1989 he served as Vice President of Marketing for Image Group, Inc., a marketing communications firm based in Northern California. Concurrently, Mr. Haws was co-owner of two other Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises located in Sacramento, and Walnut Creek California. From 1973 to 1983 he was principal of Jay Haws and Associates, an advertising and graphic design agency.

11


Table of Contents

Ms. Perez joined the Company in June 1996 and has served as the Company’s corporate secretary since February, 1997. From 1992 until joining the Company, she was employed by Huettig & Schromm, Inc., a property management and development firm in Palo Alto, California as executive assistant to the president and owner. Huettig & Schromm developed, owned and managed over 1,000,000 square feet of office space in business parks and office buildings on the San Francisco peninsula. Ms. Perez is a paralegal and has held various administrative positions during her career including executive assistant to the Chairman and owner of Sunset Magazine & Books, Inc.
Seasonal Factors
The Company’s sales and earnings are seasonal, with significantly higher sales and earnings occurring during the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons than at other times of the year, which causes fluctuations in the Company’s quarterly results of operations. In addition, quarterly results have been, and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and the sale of franchises. Because of the seasonality of the Company’s business and the impact of new store openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
Regulation
Each of the Company-owned and franchised stores is subject to licensing and regulation by the health, sanitation, safety, building and fire agencies in the state or municipality where located. Difficulties or failures in obtaining the required licensing or approvals could delay or prevent the opening of new stores. New stores must also comply with landlord and developer criteria.
Many states have laws regulating franchise operations, including registration and disclosure requirements in the offer and sale of franchises. The Company is also subject to the Federal Trade Commission regulations relating to disclosure requirements in the sale of franchises and ongoing disclosure obligations.
Additionally, certain states have enacted and others may enact laws and regulations governing the termination or non-renewal of franchises and other aspects of the franchise relationship that are intended to protect franchisees. Although these laws and regulations, and related court decisions, may limit the Company’s ability to terminate franchises and alter franchise agreements, the Company does not believe that such laws or decisions will have a material adverse effect on its franchise operations. However, the laws applicable to franchise operations and relationships continue to develop, and the Company is unable to predict the effect on its intended operations of additional requirements or restrictions that may be enacted or of court decisions that may be adverse to franchisers.
Federal and state environmental regulations have not had a material impact on the Company’s operations but more stringent and varied requirements of local governmental bodies with respect to zoning, land use and environmental factors could delay construction of new stores.
Companies engaged in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products are subject to extensive regulation by various governmental agencies. A finding of a failure to comply with one or more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of all or a portion of the Company’s facilities for an indeterminate period of time. The Company’s product labeling is subject to and complies with the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 and the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004.
The Company provides a limited amount of trucking services to third parties, to fill available space on the Company’s trucks. The Company’s trucking operations are subject to various federal and state regulations, including regulations of the Federal Highway Administration and other federal and state agencies applicable to motor carriers, safety requirements of the Department of Transportation relating to interstate transportation and federal, state and Canadian provincial regulations governing matters such as vehicle weight and dimensions.
The Company believes it is operating in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
Available Information
The Internet address of the Company’s website is www.rmcf.com.
The Company makes available free of charge, through the Company’s Internet website, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

12


Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors
Ingredients Subject to the Price Fluctuations
Several of the principal ingredients used in our products, including chocolate and nuts, are subject to significant price fluctuations. Although cocoa beans, the primary raw material used in the production of chocolate, are grown commercially in Africa, Brazil and several other countries around the world, cocoa beans are traded in the commodities market, and their supply and price are therefore subject to volatility. We believe our principal chocolate supplier purchases most of its beans at negotiated prices from African growers, often at a premium to commodity prices. The supply and price of cocoa beans, and in turn of chocolate, are affected by many factors, including monetary fluctuations and economic, political and weather conditions in countries in which cocoa beans are grown. We purchase most of our nut meats from domestic suppliers who procure their products from growers around the world. The price and supply of nuts are also affected by many factors, including weather conditions in the various regions in which the nuts we use are grown. Although we often enter into purchase contracts for these products, significant or prolonged increases in the prices of chocolate or of one or more types of nuts, or the unavailability of adequate supplies of chocolate or nuts of the quality sought by us, could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Suitable Sites for Franchised Stores at Reasonable Occupancy Costs
Our expansion plans are critically dependent on our ability to obtain suitable sites at reasonable occupancy costs for our franchised stores and kiosks in the regional center environment. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain suitable locations for our franchised stores and kiosks in this environment at a cost that will allow such stores to be economically viable.
Growth Dependent Upon Attracting and Retaining Qualified Franchisees
Our continued growth and success is dependent in part upon our ability to attract, retain and contract with qualified franchisees and the ability of those franchisees to operate their stores successfully and to promote and develop the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store concept and our reputation for an enjoyable in-store experience and product quality. Although we have established criteria to evaluate prospective franchisees and have been successful in attracting franchisees, there can be no assurance that franchisees will be able to operate successfully Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in their franchise areas in a manner consistent with our concepts and standards.
Federal, State and Local Regulation
We are subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission and must comply with certain state laws governing the offer, sale and termination of franchises and the refusal to renew franchises. Many state laws also regulate substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship by, for example, requiring the franchisor to deal with its franchisees in good faith, prohibiting interference with the right of free association among franchisees and regulating discrimination among franchisees in charges, royalties or fees. Franchise laws continue to develop and change, and changes in such laws could impose additional costs and burdens on franchisors. Our failure to obtain approvals to sell franchises and the adoption of new franchise laws, or changes in existing laws, could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Each of our Company-owned and franchised stores is subject to licensing and regulation by the health, sanitation, safety, building and fire agencies in the state or municipality where located. Difficulties or failures in obtaining required licenses or approvals from such agencies could delay or prevent the opening of a new store. We and our franchisees are also subject to laws governing our relationships with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working and safety conditions and citizenship requirements. Because a significant number of our employees are paid at rates related to the federal minimum wage, increases in the minimum wage would increase our labor costs. The failure to obtain required licenses or approvals, or an increase in the minimum wage rate, employee benefits costs (including costs associated with mandated health insurance coverage) or other costs associated with employees, could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Companies engaged in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products are subject to extensive regulation by various governmental agencies. A finding of a failure to comply with one or more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of all or a portion of our facilities for an indeterminate period of time, and could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.

13


Table of Contents

Competition
The retailing of confectionery products is highly competitive. We and our franchisees compete with numerous businesses that offer confectionery products. Many of these competitors have greater name recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than we do. In addition, there is intense competition among retailers for real estate sites, store personnel and qualified franchisees. Competitive market conditions could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations and our ability to expand successfully.
Consumer Tastes and Trends
The sale of our products is affected by changes in consumer tastes and eating habits, including views regarding consumption of chocolate. Numerous other factors that we cannot control, such as economic conditions, demographic trends, traffic patterns and weather conditions, influence the sale of our products. Changes in any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Adverse Changes in National or Regional U.S. Economic Conditions
Adverse economic changes could have a significant negative impact on U.S. consumer spending, particularly discretionary spending, which, in turn, could directly affect the Company’s overall revenues. Consumer confidence, recessionary and inflationary trends, equity market levels, consumer credit availability, interest rates, consumers’ disposable income and spending levels, energy prices, job growth and unemployment rates may impact the volume of customer traffic and level of sales in our locations. Negative trends in any of these economic conditions, whether national or regional in nature, could adversely affect our financial results, including our net sales and profitability.
Company Manufactured Products
We believe that approximately 40% of franchised stores’ revenues are generated by sales of products manufactured by and purchased from us, 50% by sales of products made in the stores with ingredients purchased from us or approved suppliers and 10% by sales of products purchased from approved suppliers for resale in the stores. Franchisees’ sales of products manufactured by us generate higher revenues to us than sales of store-made or other products. A significant decrease in the amount of products franchisees purchase from us, therefore, could adversely affect our total revenues and results of operations. Such a decrease could result from franchisees’ decisions to sell more store-made products or products purchased from third party suppliers.
Inflation — Costs of Ingredients and Labor
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs of ingredients, energy and labor directly affect our operations. Most of our leases provide for cost-of-living adjustments and require us to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses, all of which are subject to inflation. Additionally, our future lease costs for new facilities may reflect potentially escalating costs of real estate and construction. There is no assurance that we will be able to pass on our increased costs to our customers.
Seasonality of Sales
Our sales and earnings are seasonal, with significantly higher sales and earnings occurring during the Christmas and summer vacation seasons than at other times of the year, which causes fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations. In addition, quarterly results have been, and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and the sale of franchises. Because of the seasonality of our business and the impact of new store openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

14


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company’s manufacturing operations and corporate headquarters are located at its 53,000 square foot manufacturing facility, which it owns, in Durango, Colorado. During fiscal 2008, the Company’s factory produced approximately 2.84 million pounds of chocolate candies, an increase of 4% from the approximately 2.73 million pounds produced in fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2008 the Company conducted a study of factory capacity. As a result of this study, the Company believes the factory has the capacity to produce approximately 5.3 million pounds per year. In January 1998, the Company acquired a two-acre parcel adjacent to its factory to ensure the availability of adequate space to expand the factory as volume demands.
As of March 31, 2008, all of the 5 Company-owned stores were occupied pursuant to non-cancelable leases of five to ten years having varying expiration dates from April 2008 to August 2017, some of which contain optional five-year renewal rights. The Company does not deem any individual store lease to be significant in relation to its overall operations.
The Company acts as primary lessee of some franchised store premises, which it then subleases to franchisees, but the majority of existing locations are leased by the franchisee directly. Current Company policy is not to act as primary lessee on any further franchised locations. At March 31, 2008, the Company was the primary lessee at 3 of its 329 franchised stores. The subleases for such stores are on the same terms as the Company’s leases of the premises. For information as to the amount of the Company’s rental obligations under leases on both Company-owned and franchised stores, see Note 5 of Notes to financial statements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not currently involved in any material legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
Part II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The Company’s Common Stock trades on the National Global Market which is part of The Nasdaq Stock Market under the trading symbol “RMCF”. On July 10, 2007 the Board of Directors declared a 5% stock dividend payable on July 31, 2007 to shareholders of record as of July 20, 2007. On February 19, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.10 cents per common share outstanding. The cash dividend was paid March 14, 2008 to shareholders of record as of February 29, 2008.
The Company declared these stock and cash dividends because the Company felt that its Common Stock lacked sufficient shares and related liquidity to satisfy an increasing number of investors interested in purchasing the Company’s Common Stock. All of the following items in this Item 5. have been adjusted, where necessary, for the effects of the stock dividend.
Between January 9, 2008 and February 8, 2008, the Company repurchased 391,600 shares at an average price of $11.94. Between August 15, 2007 and August 28, 2007, the Company repurchased 16,000 shares at an average price of $15.96 per share. Between March 1, 2007 and May 15, 2007 the Company repurchased 76,335 shares at an average price of $13.12 per share. Between May 1, 2006 and February 28, 2007 the Company repurchased 253,141 shares at an average price of $12.94 per share. Between March 24, 2006 and April 28, 2006 the Company repurchased 74,249 shares at an average price of $14.90 per share. Between October 7, 2005 and February 3, 2006 the Company repurchased 185,429 Company shares at an average price of $14.63 per share. Between April 18 and April 20, 2005, the Company repurchased 18,529 Company shares at an average price of $13.28 per share.
The Company made these purchases because the Company felt that its Common Stock was undervalued and that such purchases would therefore be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

15


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth high and low price information for the Common Stock for each quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, and dividend information.
                         
Fiscal Year Ended February 29, 2008   HIGH   LOW   Dividends declared
Fourth Quarter
  $ 17.69     $ 10.45       .1000  
Third Quarter
  $ 18.04     $ 15.40       .1000  
Second Quarter
  $ 18.00     $ 14.20       .0950  
First Quarter
  $ 15.18     $ 12.62       .0952  
                         
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2007   HIGH   LOW   Dividends declared
Fourth Quarter
  $ 14.75     $ 12.65       .0857  
Third Quarter
  $ 14.26     $ 11.86       .0857  
Second Quarter
  $ 13.81     $ 11.11       .0762  
First Quarter
  $ 15.24     $ 12.14       .0762  
On April 30, 2008 the closing price for the Common Stock was $12.30.
Holders
On April 30, 2008 there were approximately 400 record holders of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company believes that there are more than 800 beneficial owners of its Common Stock.
Repurchases
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
                                 
                    (c) Total Number of    
                    Shares Purchased as   (d) Approximate Dollar Value
    (a) Total Number   (b) Average   Part of Publicly   of Shares that May Yet Be
    of Shares   Price Paid per   Announced Plans or   Purchased Under the Plans or
Period   Purchased   Share   Programs(1)   Programs(2)
December 2007
                      4,649,960  
January 2008
    141,600       12.63       141,600       2,861,373  
February 2008
    250,000       11.55       250,000       3,003,867  
Total
    391,600       11.94       391,600       3,003,867  
 
(1)   During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008 ending February 29, 2008, the Company purchased 391,600 shares in the open market.
 
(2)   On January 5, 2006, May 4, 2006 and May 25, 2006 the Company announced plans to repurchase up to $2,000,000 of the Company’s common stock, on May 10, 2007 the Company announced plans to repurchase up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s common stock and on February 19, 2008 the Company announced plans to repurchase up to $3,000,000 of the Company’s common stock in the open market or in private transactions, whenever deemed appropriate by management. The plans were only to expire once the designated amounts were reached. The January 5, 2006 plan was completed in May 2006. The May 4, 2006 plan was completed in July 2006. The May 25, 2006 plan was completed in May 2007. The May 10, 2007 plan was completed in February 2008. The Company plans to continue the February 19, 2008 plan until it has been completed.

16


Table of Contents

Comparison of Return on Equity
          The following graph reflects the total return, which assumes reinvestment of dividends, of a $100 investment in the Company’s Common Stock, in the Nasdaq Index, in the Russell 2000 Index and in a Peer Group Index of companies in the confectionery industry, on February 28, 2003.
(LINE GRAPH)
                                                 
    Base Period   Return   Return   Return   Return   Return
Company/Index Name   2/2003   2/2004   2/2005   2/2006   2/2007   2/2008
 
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
    100.00       215.97       540.76       551.24       502.19       503.38  
Nasdaq Index — US
    100.00       152.22       154.10       172.40       183.46       172.24  
Russell 2000 Index
    100.00       164.41       180.08       209.95       230.67       201.98  
Peer Group(l)
    100.00       117.82       151.42       141.44       148.50       164.43  
 
(1)   Comprised of the following companies: The Hershey Company, Imperial Sugar Company, Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc., Paradise, Inc., Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., Valhi, Inc. and Wrigley (Wm.), Jr. Company.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented below for the fiscal years ended February 28 or 29, 2004 through 2008, are derived from the Financial Statements of the Company, which have been audited by Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, independent registered public accounting firm. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

17


Table of Contents

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                                         
            YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29,        
    2008     2007     2006     2005     2004  
Selected Statement of Operations Data                              
Total revenues
  $ 31,878     $ 31,573     $ 28,074     $ 24,524     $ 21,133  
Operating income
    7,914       7,561       6,459       5,339       3,779  
Net income
  $ 4,961     $ 4,745     $ 4,065     $ 3,317     $ 2,319  
 
                                       
Basic Earnings per Common Share
  $ .78     $ .74     $ .62     $ .53     $ .38  
 
                                       
Diluted Earnings per Common Share
  $ .76     $ .71     $ .58     $ .49     $ .35  
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    6,341       6,432       6,582       6,307       6,147  
 
                                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution
    6,501       6,659       7,009       6,806       6,619  
 
                                       
Selected Balance Sheet Data
                                       
Working capital
  $ 5,152     $ 7,503     $ 7,533     $ 8,008     $ 6,394  
Total assets
    16,147       18,456       19,057       19,248       17,967  
Long-term debt
                      1,539       1,986  
Stockholders’ equity
    11,655       14,515       15,486       13,894       11,590  
 
                                       
Cash Dividend Declared per Common Share
  $ .390     $ .324     $ .271     $ .200     $ .102  
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A Note About Forward Looking Statements
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related Notes of the Company included elsewhere in this report. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The nature of the Company’s operations and the environment in which it operates subject it to changing economic, competitive, regulatory and technological conditions, risks and uncertainties. The statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this report are forward-looking statements. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this document may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “will,” “intend,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “plan,” “estimate” and “potential,” or similar expressions. Factors which could cause results to differ include, but are not limited to: changes in the confectionery business environment, seasonality, consumer interest in the Company’s products, general economic conditions, consumer trends, costs and availability of raw materials, competition and the effect of government regulation. Government regulation which the Company and its franchisees either are or may be subject to and which could cause results to differ from forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: local, state and federal laws regarding health, sanitation, safety, building and fire codes, franchising, employment, manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products and motor carriers. For a detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company’s actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements contained herein, please see the “Risk Factors” contained in this document at 1A. These forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this report. As such they should not be unduly relied upon for more current circumstances. Except as required by law, the Company is not obligated to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements that might reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or those that might reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
The Company is a product-based international franchisor. The Company’s revenues and profitability are derived principally from its franchised system of retail stores that feature chocolate and other confectionery products. The Company also sells its candy in selected locations outside its system of retail stores to build brand awareness. The Company operates five retail units as a laboratory to test marketing, design and operational initiatives.
The Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales because of the location of its franchisees, which have traditionally been located in resort or tourist locations. As the Company expands its geographical diversity to include regional centers, it has seen some moderation to its seasonal sales mix. Seasonal fluctuation in sales causes fluctuations in

18


Table of Contents

quarterly results of operations. Historically, the strongest sales of the Company’s products have occurred during the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons. Additionally, quarterly results have been, and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and sales of franchises. Because of the seasonality of the Company’s business and the impact of new store openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
The most important factors in continued growth in the Company’s earnings are ongoing unit growth, increased same store sales and increased same store pounds purchased from the factory. Historically, unit growth has more than offset decreases in same store sales and same store pounds purchased.
The Company’s ability to successfully achieve expansion of its Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchise system depends on many factors not within the Company’s control including the availability of suitable sites for new store establishment and the availability of qualified franchisees to support such expansion.
Efforts to reverse the decline in same store pounds purchased from the factory by franchised stores and to increase total factory sales depend on many factors, including new store openings, competition, the receptivity of the Company’s franchise system to the Company’s product introductions and promotional programs. Same store pounds purchased from the factory by franchised stores declined approximately 9% in the first quarter, second quarter and third quarter; 12% in the fourth quarter and 9% overall in fiscal 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures. Estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the carrying value of accounts and notes receivable from franchisees, inventories, the useful lives of fixed assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on analyses, of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe that the following represent our more critical estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our financial statements, although not all inclusive.
Accounts and Notes Receivable — In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to customers, primarily franchisees, that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria. The Company believes that it has limited concentration of credit risk primarily because its receivables are often secured by the assets of the franchisees to which the Company ordinarily extends credit, including, but not limited to, their franchise rights and inventories. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through analysis of the aging of accounts receivable, assessments of collectability based on historical trends, and an evaluation of the impact of current and projected economic conditions. The process by which the Company performs its analysis is conducted on a customer by customer, or franchisee by franchisee, basis and takes into account, among other relevant factors, sales history, outstanding receivables, customer financial strength, as well as customer specific and geographic market factors relevant to projected performance. The Company monitors the collectability of its accounts receivable on an ongoing basis by assessing the credit worthiness of its customers and evaluating the impact of reasonably likely changes in economic conditions that may impact credit risks. Estimates with regard to the collectability of accounts receivable are reasonably likely to change in the future.
The Company recorded expense of approximately $48,000 per year for potential uncollectible accounts over the three-year period ended February 29, 2008. Write-offs of uncollectible accounts net of recoveries averaged approximately $54,000 over the same period. The provision for uncollectible accounts is recognized as general and administrative expense in the Statements of Income. Over the past three years, the allowances for doubtful notes and accounts have ranged from 2.6% to 4.4% of gross receivables.
Revenue Recognition — The Company recognizes revenue on sales of products to franchisees and other customers at the time of delivery. Through fiscal 2006, franchise fee revenue was recognized upon completion of all significant initial services provided to the franchisee and upon satisfaction of all material conditions of the franchise agreement. The initial $5,000 portion of the fee was recognized upon signing of the franchise agreement. The balance of the fee

19


Table of Contents

was recognized upon the franchisee’s commitment to a property lease. Beginning in fiscal 2007, franchise fee revenue is recognized upon the opening of the store. The Company also recognizes a marketing and promotion fee of one percent (1%) of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchised stores’ gross retail sales and a royalty fee based on gross retail sales. Beginning with franchise store openings in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Company modified its royalty structure. Under the current structure, the Company recognizes no royalty on franchised stores’ retail sales of products purchased from the Company and recognizes a ten percent (10%) royalty on all other sales of product sold at franchise locations. For franchise stores opened prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 the Company recognizes a royalty fee of five percent (5%) of franchised stores’ gross retail sales.
Inventories — The Company’s inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value and are reduced by an allowance for slow-moving, excess, discontinued and shelf-life expired inventories. Our estimate for such allowance is based on our review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and demand for our products. Such review encompasses not only potentially perishable inventories but also specialty packaging, much of it specific to certain holiday seasons. If actual future usage and demand for our products are less favorable than those projected by our review, inventory write-downs may be required. We closely monitor our inventory, both perishable and non-perishable, and related shelf and product lives. Historically we have experienced low levels of obsolete inventory or returns of products that have exceeded their shelf life. Over the three-year period ended February 29, 2008, the Company recorded expense averaging approximately $68,000 per year for potential inventory losses, or approximately 0.4% of total cost of sales for that period.
Goodwill — Goodwill consists of the excess of purchase price over the fair market value of acquired assets and liabilities. Effective March 1, 2002, under SFAS 142 all goodwill with indefinite lives is no longer subject to amortization. SFAS 142 requires that an impairment test be conducted annually or in the event of an impairment indicator. Our test conducted in fiscal 2008 showed no impairment of our goodwill.
Other accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements include estimates associated with its evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets, as well as those used in the determination of liabilities related to litigation and taxation. Various assumptions and other factors underlie the determination of these significant estimates. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, and product mix. The Company constantly re-evaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those determined using the estimates described above.
As discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company is involved in litigation incidental to its business, the disposition of which is expected to have no material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions related to these proceedings.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2008 Compared To Fiscal 2007
Results Summary
Basic earnings per share increased 5.4% from $.74 in fiscal 2007 to $.78 in fiscal 2008. Revenues increased 1.0% from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008. Operating income increased 4.7% from $7.6 million in fiscal 2007 to $7.9 million in fiscal 2008. Net income increased 4.6% from $4.7 million in fiscal 2007 to $5.0 million in fiscal 2008. The increase in revenue, earnings per share, operating income, and net income in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 was due primarily to increased sales to specialty markets, increased number of franchised stores in operation and the corresponding increases in revenue.
                                 
Revenues                
 
($’s in thousands)   2008   2007   Change   % Change
Factory sales
  $ 23,758.2     $ 22,709.0     $ 1,049.2       4.6 %
Retail sales
    1,800.0       2,626.7       (826.7 )     (31.5 %)
Royalty and marketing fees
    5,696.9       5,603.8       93.1       1.7 %
Franchise fees
    623.1       633.8       (10.7 )     (1.7 %)
Total
  $ 31,878.2     $ 31,573.3     $ 304.9       1.0 %

20


Table of Contents

Factory Sales
Factory sales increased in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 due to an increase of 28.8% in product shipments to specialty markets and growth in the average number of stores in operation to 324 in fiscal 2008 from 310 in fiscal 2007. Same store pounds purchased in fiscal 2008 were down approximately 9% from fiscal 2007, more than offsetting the increase in the average number of franchised stores in operation and mostly offsetting the increase in specialty market sales. The Company believes the decrease in same store pounds purchased is due primarily to a product mix shift from factory products to products made in the stores and softening in the retail sector of the economy.
Retail Sales
The decrease in retail sales resulted primarily from a decrease in the average number of Company-owned stores in operation from 8 in fiscal 2007 to 5 in fiscal 2008. Same store sales at Company-owned stores increased 1.1% from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008.
Royalties, Marketing Fees and Franchise Fees
The increase in royalties and marketing fees resulted from growth in the average number of domestic units in operation from 266 in fiscal 2007 to 281 in fiscal 2008 partially offset by a decrease in same store sales of 0.9%. Franchise fee revenues decreased due to a decrease in the number of franchises sold during the same period last year.
Costs and Expenses
                                 
                            %
($’s in thousands)   2008   2007   Change   Change
Cost of sales — factory adjusted
  $ 15,948.7     $ 14,942.9     $ 1,005.8       6.7 %
Cost of sales — retail
    729.8       1,045.7       (315.9 )     (30.2 %)
Franchise costs
    1,498.7       1,570.0       (71.3 )     (4.5 %)
Sales and marketing
    1,503.2       1,538.5       (35.3 )     (2.3 %)
General and administrative
    2,505.7       2,538.7       (33.0 )     (1.3 %)
Retail operating
    994.8       1,502.1       (507.3 )     (33.8 %)
Total
  $ 23,180.9     $ 23,137.9     $ 43.0       0.2 %
Adjusted Gross margin
                                 
                            %
($’s in thousands)   2008   2007   Change   Change
Factory adjusted gross margin
  $ 7,809.5     $ 7,766.1     $ 43.4       0.6 %
Retail
    1,070.2       1,581.0       (510.8 )     (32.3 %)
Total
  $ 8,879.7     $ 9,347.1     $ (467.4 )     (5.0 %)
 
                               
(Percent)
                               
Factory adjusted gross margin
    32.9 %     34.2 %     (1.3 %)     (3.8 %)
Retail
    59.5 %     60.2 %     (0.7 %)     (1.2 %)
Total
    34.7 %     36.9 %     (2.2 %)     (6.0 %)
Adjusted gross margin is equal to gross margin minus depreciation and amortization expense. We believe adjusted gross margin is helpful in understanding our past performance as a supplement to gross margin and other performance measures calculated in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). We believe that adjusted gross margin is useful to investors because it provides a measure of operating performance and our ability to generate cash that is unaffected by non-cash accounting measures. Additionally, we use adjusted gross margin rather than gross margin to make incremental pricing decisions. Adjusted gross margin has limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization expense and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for any measure reported under GAAP. Our use of capital assets makes depreciation and amortization expense a necessary element of our costs and our ability to generate income. Due to these limitations, we use adjusted gross margin as a measure of performance only in conjunction with GAAP measures of performance such as gross margin. The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to gross margin, the most comparable performance measure under GAAP:
                 
($’s in thousands)   2008   2007
Factory adjusted gross margin
  $ 7,809.5     $ 7,766.1  
Less: Depreciated and Amortization
    389.3       412.6  
Factory GAAP gross margin
  $ 7,420.2     $ 7,353.5  

21


Table of Contents

Cost of Sales
Factory adjusted gross margin declined 130 basis points from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 due primarily to increased costs and mix of product sold during fiscal 2008 versus fiscal 2007. Company-owned store margin declined 70 basis points from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 due primarily to a change in mix of product sold associated with a decrease in the average number of company stores in operation.
Franchise Costs
The decrease in franchise costs is due to lower incentive compensation costs. As a percentage of total royalty and marketing fees and franchise fee revenue, franchise costs decreased to 23.7% in fiscal 2008 from 25.2% in fiscal 2007.
Sales and Marketing
The decrease in sales and marketing was due primarily to lower incentive compensation costs.
General and Administrative
The decrease in general and administrative costs is due primarily to lower incentive compensation costs related to Company performance. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 7.9% in fiscal 2008 compared to 8.0% in fiscal 2007.
Retail Operating Expenses
The decrease in retail operating expenses was due primarily to a decrease in the average number of Company-owned stores during fiscal 2008 versus fiscal 2007. Retail operating expenses, as a percentage of retail sales, decreased from 57.2% in fiscal 2007 to 55.3% in fiscal 2008 due to a larger decrease in costs relative to the decrease in revenues associated with a decrease in the average number of Company stores in operation.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of $783,000 in fiscal 2008 decreased 10.4% from $874,000 incurred in fiscal 2007 due to the sale or closure of four Company-owned stores and certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
Other, Net
Other, net of $101,000 realized in fiscal 2008 represents an increase of $34,000 from the $67,000 realized in fiscal 2007, due primarily to higher average outstanding balances of invested cash during fiscal 2008. Notes receivable balances and related interest income declined in fiscal 2008 because of two notes maturing or being paid in full compared with fiscal 2007. The Company also incurred interest expense related to use of an operating line of credit.
Income Tax Expense
The Company’s effective income tax rate in fiscal 2008 was 38.1% which is an increase of 0.3% compared to fiscal 2007. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to increased income in states with higher income tax rates.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company adopted FIN 48 effective March 1, 2007 with no impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Fiscal 2007 Compared To Fiscal 2006
Results Summary
Basic earnings per share increased 18.5% from $.62 in fiscal 2006 to $.74 in fiscal 2007. Revenues increased 12.5% from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007. Operating income increased 17.1% from $6.5 million in fiscal 2006 to $7.6 million in fiscal 2007. Net income increased 16.7% from $4.1 million in fiscal 2006 to $4.7 million in fiscal 2007. The increase in revenue, earnings per share, operating income, and net income in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 was due primarily to increased number of franchised stores in operation, increased sales to speciality

22


Table of Contents

markets and the corresponding increases in revenue.
Revenues
                                 
($’s in thousands)   2007   2006   Change   % Change
Factory sales
  $ 22,709.0     $ 19,297.2     $ 3,411.8       17.7 %
Retail sales
    2,626.7       3,046.0       (419.3 )     (13.8 %)
Royalty and marketing fees
    5,603.8       5,047.9       555.9       11.0 %
Franchise fees
    633.8       682.5       (48.7 )     (7.1 %)
Total
  $ 31,573.3     $ 28,073.6     $ 3,499.7       12.5 %
Factory Sales
The increase in factory sales was due to the growth in the average number of franchised stores in operation to 302 in fiscal 2007 from 285 in fiscal 2006 and an increase of 53.3% in sales to specialty markets. Partially offsetting this increase was a 2.6% decrease in same store pounds purchased from the factory by franchised stores when compared to the same period in the prior year. The Company believes that this same store pounds decrease reflects an unseasonably hot summer in many regions of the country. Historically, retail sales of chocolate products suffer when weather conditions are unusually hot in particular markets.
Retail Sales
The decrease in retail sales resulted primarily from a decrease in the average number of Company-owned stores in operation from 9 in fiscal 2006 to 7 in fiscal 2007. Same store sales at Company-owned stores increased 6.9% from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007.
Royalties, Marketing Fees and Franchise Fees
The increase in royalties and marketing fees resulted from growth in the average number of domestic units in operation from 251 in fiscal 2006 to 266 in fiscal 2007 plus an increase in same store sales of 0.3%. Franchise fee revenues decreased due to a decrease in the number of franchises sold during the same period last year.
Costs and Expenses
                                 
                            %
($’s in thousands)   2007   2006   Change   Change
Cost of sales — factory adjusted
  $ 14,942.9     $ 12,732.3     $ 2,210.6       17.4 %
Cost of sales — retail
    1,045.7       1,224.3       (178.6 )     (14.6 %)
Franchise costs
    1,570.0       1,466.3       103.7       7.1 %
Sales and marketing
    1,538.5       1,321.0       217.5       16.5 %
General and administrative
    2,538.7       2,239.1       299.6       13.4 %
Retail operating
    1,502.1       1,755.7       (253.6 )     (14.4 %)
Total
  $ 23,137.9     $ 20,738.7     $ 2,399.2       11.6 %
Adjusted Gross margin
                                 
                            %  
($’s in thousands)   2007     2006     Change     Change  
Factory adjusted gross margin
  $ 7,766.1     $ 6,564.9     $ 1,201.2       18.3 %
Retail
    1,581.0       1,821.7       (240.7 )     (13.2 %)
Total
  $ 9,347.1     $ 8,386.6     $ 960.5       11.5 %
 
                               
(Percent)
                               
Factory adjusted gross margin
    34.2 %     34.0 %     0.2 %     0.6 %
Retail
    60.2 %     59.8 %     0.4 %     0.7 %
Total
    36.9 %     37.5 %     (0.6 %)     (1.6 %)
Adjusted gross margin is equal to gross margin minus depreciation and amortization expense. We believe adjusted gross margin is helpful in understanding our past performance as a supplement to gross margin and other performance measures calculated in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). We believe that adjusted gross margin is useful to investors because it provides a measure of operating performance and our ability to generate cash that is unaffected by non-cash accounting measures. Additionally, we use adjusted gross margin rather than gross margin to make incremental pricing decisions. Adjusted gross margin has limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization expense and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for any measure reported under GAAP. Our use of capital assets makes depreciation and amortization expense a necessary element of our costs and our ability to generate income.

23


Table of Contents

Due to these limitations, we use adjusted gross margin as a measure of performance only in conjunction with GAAP measures of performance such as gross margin. The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to gross margin, the most comparable performance measure under GAAP:
                 
($’s in thousands)   2007   2006
Factory adjusted gross margin
  $ 7,766.1     $ 6,564.9  
Less: Depreciated and Amortization
    412.6       381.1  
Factory GAAP gross margin
  $ 7,353.5     $ 6,183.8  
Cost of Sales
Factory margins were consistent from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007. Higher commodity and labor costs were offset by increased production volume, which lowered fixed costs per unit of production. Increases in Company-owned store margin is due to changes in mix of product sold.
Franchise Costs
The increase in franchise costs is due to increased professional fees and incentive compensation costs. As a percentage of total royalty and marketing fees and franchise fee revenue, franchise costs decreased to 25.2% in fiscal 2007 from 25.6% in fiscal 2006. This decrease as a percentage of royalty, marketing and franchise fees is primarily a result of higher franchise revenues relative to costs.
Sales and Marketing
The increase in sales and marketing was due primarily to increased incentive compensation costs and expenses related to a 53.3% increase in sales to specialty markets.
General and Administrative
The increase in general and administrative costs is due primarily to increased incentive compensation costs related to Company performance. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses were unchanged at 8.0% in fiscal 2007 compared to 8.0% in fiscal 2006.
Retail Operating Expenses
The decrease in retail operating expenses was due primarily to a decrease in the average number of Company-owned stores during fiscal 2007 versus fiscal 2006. Retail operating expenses, as a percentage of retail sales, decreased from 57.6% in fiscal 2006 to 57.2% in fiscal 2007 due to a larger decrease in costs relative to the increase in revenues.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of $874,000 in fiscal 2007 was essentially unchanged from the $876,000 incurred in fiscal 2006.
Other, Net
Other, net of $67,000 realized in fiscal 2007 represents a decrease of $9,000 from the $76,000 realized in fiscal 2006, due primarily to lower interest income on lower average outstanding balances of notes receivable and invested cash. Notes receivable balances are declining due to payments and the Company has been using its excess cash to repurchase stock. The Company also incurred less interest expense on lower average balances of long-term debt. The Company paid its long-term debt in full during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
Income Tax Expense
The Company’s effective income tax rate in fiscal 2007 was 37.8%, which is the same as the effective rate in fiscal 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of February 29, 2008, working capital was $5.2 million compared with $7.5 million as of February 28, 2007. The change in working capital was due primarily to operating results less the payment of $2.4 million in cash dividends and the repurchase and retirement of $5.9 million of the Company’s common stock.
Cash and cash equivalent balances decreased from $2.8 million as of February 28, 2007 to $676,000

24


Table of Contents

as of February 29, 2008 as a result of cash flows generated by operating and investing activities being less than cash flows used in financing activities. The Company’s current ratio was 2.35 to 1 at February 29, 2008 in comparison with 3.30 to 1 at February 28, 2007. The Company monitors current and anticipated future levels of cash and cash equivalents in relation to anticipated operating, financing and investing requirements.
The Company has a $5.0 million credit line, of which $4.7 million was available (subject to certain borrowing base limitations) as of February 29, 2008, secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets except retail store assets. The credit line is subject to renewal in July, 2008.
The table below presents significant contractual obligations of the Company at February 29, 2008.
                                         
(Amounts in thousands)   Less than                     After 5        
Contractual Obligations   1 year     1-3 Years     4-5 years     years     Total  
Line of credit
    300                         300  
Notes payable
                             
Operating leases
    418       621       203       52       1,294  
Other long-term obligations
    87       141       150       386       764  
Total Contractual cash obligations
    805       762       353       438       2,358  
For fiscal 2009, the Company anticipates making capital expenditures of approximately $500,000, which will be used to maintain and improve existing factory and administrative infrastructure and update certain Company-owned stores. The Company believes that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund capital expenditures and working capital requirements for fiscal 2009. If necessary, the Company has available bank lines of credit to help meet these requirements.
Impact of Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs of ingredients and labor directly affect the Company’s operations. Most of the Company’s leases provide for cost-of-living adjustments and require it to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses, all of which are subject to inflation. Additionally, the Company’s future lease cost for new facilities may include potentially escalating costs of real estate and construction. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to pass on increased costs to its customers.
Depreciation expense is based on the historical cost to the Company of its fixed assets, and is therefore potentially less than it would be if it were based on current replacement cost. While property and equipment acquired in prior years will ultimately have to be replaced at higher prices, it is expected that replacement will be a gradual process over many years.
Seasonality
The Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales, which cause fluctuations in quarterly results of operations. Historically, the strongest sales of the Company’s products have occurred during the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons. In addition, quarterly results have been, and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and sales of franchises. Because of the seasonality of the Company’s business and the impact of new store openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. SFAS 157 also creates consistency and comparability in fair value measurements among the many accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods) beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard amends SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities, with respect to accounting for a transfer to the trading category for all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities electing the fair value option. This standard allows companies to elect fair value accounting for many financial instruments and other items that currently are not required

25


Table of Contents

to be accounted as such, allows different applications for electing the option for a single item or groups of items, and requires disclosures to facilitate comparisons of similar assets and liabilities that are accounted for differently in relation to the fair value option. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 159 in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The Company is in the process of evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No.160 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The Company is in the process of evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 160.

26


Table of Contents

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company does not engage in commodity futures trading or hedging activities and does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading or other speculative purposes. The Company also does not engage in transactions in foreign currencies or in interest rate swap transactions that could expose the Company to market risk. However, the Company is exposed to some commodity price and interest rate risks.
The Company frequently enters into purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for chocolate and certain nuts. These contracts permit the Company to purchase the specified commodity at a fixed price on an as-needed basis during the term of the contract. Because prices for these products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts, but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall and it is unable to renegotiate the terms of the contract.
The Company has a $5.0 million bank line of credit that bears interest at a variable rate. As of February 29, 2008, $300,000 was outstanding under the line of credit. The Company does not believe that it is exposed to any material interest rate risk related to the line of credit.
The Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company has primary responsibility over the Company’s long-term and short-term debt and has primary responsibility for determining the timing and duration of commodity purchase contracts and negotiating the terms and conditions of those contracts.

27


Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
         
    Page  
    29  
    30  
    31  
    32  
    33  
Notes to Financial Statements
    34  

28


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
Durango, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (the “Company”) as of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, and the related statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 29, 2008. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule II for each of the three years in the period ended February 29, 2008. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, included in item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 29, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule II for each of the three years in the period ended February 29, 2008, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
May 14, 2008
Denver, Colorado

29


Table of Contents

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
                         
    FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 OR 29
    2008   2007   2006
Revenues
                       
Sales
  $ 25,558,198     $ 25,335,739     $ 22,343,209  
Franchise and royalty fees
    6,319,985       6,237,594       5,730,403  
Total revenues
    31,878,183       31,573,333       28,073,612  
 
                       
Costs and Expenses
                       
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense of $389,273, $412,546 and $381,141, respectively
    16,678,472       15,988,620       13,956,550  
Franchise costs
    1,498,709       1,570,026       1,466,322  
Sales & marketing
    1,503,224       1,538,476       1,320,979  
General and administrative
    2,505,676       2,538,667       2,239,109  
Retail operating
    994,789       1,502,134       1,755,738  
Depreciation and amortization
    782,951       873,988       875,940  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    23,963,821       24,011,911       21,614,638  
 
                       
Operating Income
    7,914,362       7,561,422       6,458,974  
 
                       
Other Income (Expense)
                       
Interest expense
    (1,566 )           (19,652 )
Interest income
    102,360       67,071       95,360  
Other, net
    100,794       67,071       75,708  
 
                       
Income Before Income Taxes
    8,015,156       7,628,493       6,534,682  
 
                       
Income Tax Expense
    3,053,780       2,883,575       2,470,110  
 
                       
Net Income
  $ 4,961,376     $ 4,744,918     $ 4,064,572  
 
                       
Basic Earnings per Common Share
  $ .78     $ .74     $ .62  
 
                       
Diluted Earnings per Common Share
  $ .76     $ .71     $ .58  
 
                       
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
    6,341,286       6,432,123       6,581,612  
Dilutive Effect of Employee Stock Options
    159,386       227,350       427,780  
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding, Assuming Dilution
    6,500,672       6,659,473       7,009,392  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

30


Table of Contents

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
                 
    AS OF FEBRUARY 28 or 29
    2008   2007
Assets
               
Current Assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 675,642     $ 2,830,175  
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $114,271 and $187,519, respectively
    3,801,172       3,756,212  
Notes receivable
    22,435       50,600  
Refundable income taxes
    63,357        
Inventories, less reserve for slow moving inventory of $194,719 and $147,700, respectively
    4,015,459       3,482,139  
Deferred income taxes
    117,846       272,871  
Other
    267,184       367,420  
Total current assets
    8,963,095       10,759,417  
 
               
Property and Equipment, Net
    5,665,108       5,754,122  
 
               
Other Assets
               
Notes receivable
    205,916       310,453  
Goodwill, net
    939,074       939,074  
Intangible assets, net
    276,247       349,358  
Other
    98,020       343,745  
Total other assets
    1,519,257       1,942,630  
 
               
Total assets
  $ 16,147,460     $ 18,456,169  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
Current Liabilities
               
Line of Credit
  $ 300,000     $  
Accounts payable
    1,710,380       898,794  
Accrued salaries and wages
    430,498       931,614  
Other accrued expenses
    467,543       585,402  
Dividend payable
    599,473       551,733  
Deferred income
    303,000       288,500  
Total current liabilities
    3,810,894       3,256,043  
 
               
Deferred Income Taxes
    681,529       685,613  
 
               
Commitments and Contingencies
               
Stockholders’ Equity
               
Common stock, $.03 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 100,000,000 and 5,980,919, 6,418,905 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    179,428       192,567  
Additional paid-in capital
    7,047,142       6,987,558  
Retained earnings
    4,428,467       7,334,388  
Total stockholders’ equity
    11,655,037       14,514,513  
 
               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 16,147,460     $ 18,456,169  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

31


Table of Contents

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                         
    FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29
    2008   2007   2006
Common Stock
                       
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 192,567     $ 197,881     $ 193,301  
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
    (14,518 )     (9,822 )     (6,119 )
Issuance of common stock
          26       55  
Exercise of stock options and other
    1,379       4,482       10,644  
Balance at end of year
    179,428       192,567       197,881  
 
                       
Additional Paid-In Capital
                       
Balance at beginning of year
    6,987,558       10,363,107       11,041,971  
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
    (5,918,087 )     (4,371,268 )     (2,952,323 )
Stock dividends declared
    5,415,148              
Costs related to stock splits and dividends
    (9,647 )           (8,902 )
Issuance of common stock
          15,797       37,444  
Exercise of stock options and other
    388,290       819,992       1,062,085  
Tax benefit from employee stock transactions
    183,880       159,930       1,182,830  
Balance at end of year
    7,047,142       6,987,558       10,363,107  
 
                       
Retained Earnings
                       
Balance at beginning of year
    7,334,388       4,924,830       2,658,298  
Net income
    4,961,376       4,744,918       4,064,572  
Stock dividends declared
    (5,415,148 )            
Cash dividends declared
    (2,452,149 )     (2,078,208 )     (1,798,040 )
Adoption of SAB 108
          (257,152 )      
Balance at end of year
    4,428,467       7,334,388       4,924,830  
 
                       
Total Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 11,655,037     $ 14,514,513     $ 15,485,818  
 
                       
Common Shares
                       
Balance at beginning of year
    6,418,905       6,596,016       6,443,354  
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
    (483,935 )     (327,390 )     (203,958 )
Issuance of common stock
          876       1,840  
Exercise of stock options and other
    45,949       149,403       354,780  
Balance at end of year
    5,980,919       6,418,905       6,596,016  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

32


Table of Contents

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                         
    FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29
    2008   2007   2006
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
                       
Net income
  $ 4,961,376     $ 4,744,918     $ 4,064,572  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    782,951       873,988       875,940  
Provision for loss on accounts receivable
    75,000       70,000        
Provision for inventory loss
    90,000       70,000       45,000  
Loss on sale of assets
    34,744       101       37,411  
Expense recorded for stock options
    58,355       201,269        
Deferred income taxes
    150,941       (133,432 )     4,195  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Accounts receivable
    (117,460 )     (711,456 )     (445,921 )
Refundable income taxes
    (63,357 )           364,630  
Inventories
    (623,320 )     (613,905 )     (461,207 )
Other assets
    76,891       104,843       (236,640 )
Accounts payable
    811,586       (246,616 )     56,934  
Income taxes payable
    (167,965 )     (33,729 )     (824,860 )
Accrued liabilities
    (449,784 )     452,255       602,187  
Deferred income
    14,500       5,000        
Net cash provided by operating activities
    5,634,458       4,783,236       4,082,241  
 
                       
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
                       
Additions to notes receivable
          (124,452 )      
Proceeds received on notes receivable
    132,702       211,143       345,442  
Proceeds (expense) from sale or distribution of assets
    29,382       434,335       (4,395 )
Decrease in other assets
    158,826       (134,221 )     15,748  
Purchase of property and equipment
    (578,433 )     (201,037 )     (1,300,314 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (257,523 )     185,768       (943,519 )
 
                       
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
                       
Net change in line of credit
    300,000              
Payments on long-term debt
                (1,665,084 )
Costs of stock split or dividend
    (9,647 )           (8,902 )
Issuance of common stock
    331,313       623,206       1,072,729  
Tax benefit of stock option exercise
    183,880       159,930       1,182,830  
Repurchase and redemption of common stock
    (5,932,605 )     (4,381,090 )     (2,958,441 )
Dividends paid
    (2,404,409 )     (2,030,625 )     (1,710,980 )
Net cash used in financing activities
    (7,531,468 )     (5,628,579 )     (4,087,848 )
 
                       
Net Decrease In Cash And Cash Equivalents
    (2,154,533 )     (659,575 )     (949,126 )
 
                       
Cash And Cash Equivalents At Beginning Of Year
    2,830,175       3,489,750       4,438,876  
 
                       
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Year
  $ 675,642     $ 2,830,175     $ 3,489,750  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

33


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. is an international franchiser, confectionery manufacturer and retail operator in the United States, Canada, and the United Arab Emirates. The Company manufactures an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. The Company’s revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: sales to franchisees and others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by the Company; the collection of initial franchise fees and royalties from franchisees’ sales; and sales at Company-owned stores of chocolates and other confectionery products. The following table summarizes the number of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores at February 29, 2008:
                         
    Sold, Not Yet        
    Open   Open   Total
Company owned stores
          5       5  
Franchise stores — Domestic stores
    14       266       280  
Franchise stores — Domestic kiosks
          18       18  
Franchise stores — International
          41       41  
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of six months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions it invests with. As of the balance sheet date, and periodically throughout the year, the Company has maintained balances in various operating accounts in excess of federally insured limits, approximately $257,000 at February 29, 2008.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
At the time that accounts, notes and royalties receivable are originated, the Company considers a reserve for doubtful accounts. The provision for uncollectible amounts is continually reviewed and adjusted to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to cover future losses. The allowance is management’s best estimate of uncollectible amounts and is determined based on historical performance that is tracked by the Company on an ongoing basis. The losses ultimately incurred could differ materially in the near term from the amounts estimated in determining the allowance. At February 29, 2008, the Company has $228,000 of notes receivable outstanding. The notes require monthly payments and bear interest at rates ranging from 8.0% to 8.5%. The notes mature through February 2012 and are secured by the assets financed.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Property and Equipment and Other Assets
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful life of the asset, which range from five to thirty-nine years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases or the service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets through analysis of estimated fair value, including identifiable intangible assets, whenever events or changes indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company’s policy is to review the recoverability of all assets, at a minimum, on an annual basis.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. The Company’s temporary differences are listed in Note 6.
Goodwill
Goodwill arose from two transaction types. The first type was the result of the incorporation of

34


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — CONTINUED
the Company after its inception as a partnership. The goodwill recorded was the excess of the purchase price of the Company over the fair value of its assets. The Company has allocated this goodwill equally between its Franchising and Manufacturing operations. The second type was the purchase of various retail stores, either individually or as a group, for which the purchase price was in excess of the fair value of the assets acquired.
Insurance and Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance plans to provide for the potential liabilities for workers’ compensation, general liability, property insurance, director and officers’ liability insurance, vehicle liability and employee health care benefits. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are estimated, in part, by considering historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other assumptions. While the Company believes that its assumptions are appropriate, the estimated accruals for these liabilities could be significantly affected if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends.
Sales
Sales of products to franchisees and other customers are recognized at the time of delivery. Sales of products at retail stores are recognized at the time of sale.
Shipping Fees
Shipping fees charged to customers by the Company’s trucking department are reported as sales. Shipping costs incurred by the Company for inventory are reported as cost of sales or inventory.
Franchise and Royalty Fees
Franchise fee revenue is recognized upon opening of the franchise store. Also see Note 14 to these financial statements. In addition to the initial franchise fee, The Company also recognizes a marketing and promotion fee of one percent (1%) of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchised stores’ gross retail sales and a royalty fee based on gross retail sales. Beginning with franchise store openings in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Company modified its royalty structure. Under the current structure, the Company recognizes no royalty on franchised stores’ retail sales of products purchased from the Company and recognizes a ten percent (10%) royalty on all other sales of product sold at franchise locations. For franchise stores opened prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 the Company recognizes a royalty fee of five percent (5%) of franchised stores’ gross retail sales.
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Vulnerability Due to Certain Concentrations
As of February 29, 2008, the Company had notes receivable of approximately $228,000 due from two franchisees. The notes are collateralized by the underlying store assets. The Company is, therefore, vulnerable to changes in the cash flow from these locations.
Stock-Based Compensation
At February 29, 2008, the Company had stock-based compensation plans for employees and nonemployee directors which authorized the granting of stock options.
Prior to March 1, 2006, the Company accounted for the plans under the measurement and recognition provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations, permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”). As a result, employee stock option-based compensation was included as a pro forma disclosure in the Notes to the Company’s Financial Statements for prior year periods.
Effective March 1, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), using the

35


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — CONTINUED
modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost in 2006 includes the portion vesting in the period for (1) all share-based payments granted prior to, but not vested, as of March 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (2) all share-based payments granted subsequent to March 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Results for the prior periods have not been restated.
The Company recognized $33,198 related equity-based compensation expense during the year ended February 29, 2008. Compensation costs related to share-based compensation are generally amortized over the vesting period in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations.
On February 21, 2006, the Company accelerated the vesting of all outstanding stock options and recognized a share-based compensation charge related to this acceleration. The Company recognized an additional share-based compensation charge of $25,158 for the year ended February 29, 2008 related to this acceleration due to changes in certain estimates and assumptions related to employee turnover since the acceleration date. Adjustments in future periods may be necessary as actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.
Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R, the Company presented all benefits from tax deductions arising from equity-based compensation as a non-cash transaction in the Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123R requires that the tax benefits in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those exercised options be classified as cash provided by financing activities. The excess tax benefit included in net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended February 28 or 29, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $183,880, $159,930 and $1,182,830 respectively.
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended February 28, 29, 2008 and 2007 was $2.69 and $0 per share, respectively. As of February 29, 2008, there was $0 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation.
                         
    2008   2007   2006
Net Income — as reported
  $ 4,961     $ 4,745     $ 4,065  
Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax
                43  
Deduct stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of tax
                (676 )
Net Income — pro forma
    4,961       4,745       3,432  
Basic Earnings per Share-as reported
    .78       .74       .62  
Diluted Earnings per Share-as reported
    .76       .71       .58  
Basic Earnings per Share-pro forma
    .78       .74       .52  
Diluted Earnings per Share-pro forma
    .76       .71       .49  
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, 136,119, 140,389, and 144,186 stock options were excluded from diluted shares as their affect was anti-dilutive.
Advertising and Promotional Expenses
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Total advertising expense amounted to $261,663, $308,052, and $354,367 for the fiscal years ended February 28 or 29, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, payables, notes receivable, and debt. The fair value of all instruments approximates the carrying value.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation.

36


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 — INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following at February 28 or 29:
                 
    2008   2007
Ingredients and supplies
  $ 1,985,929     $ 1,730,850  
Finished candy
    2,029,530       1,751,289  
 
  $ 4,015,459     $ 3,482,139  
NOTE 3 — PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consists of the following at February 28 or 29:
                 
    2008   2007
Land
  $ 513,618     $ 513,618  
Building
    4,717,230       4,717,230  
Machinery and equipment
    6,855,408       6,284,433  
Furniture and fixtures
    699,473       673,194  
Leasehold improvements
    428,937       418,764  
Transportation equipment
    350,714       350,714  
 
    13,565,380       12,957,953  
 
               
Less accumulated depreciation
    7,900,272       7,203,831  
 
               
Property and equipment, net
  $ 5,665,108     $ 5,754,122  
NOTE 4 — LINE OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Line of Credit
At February 29, 2008 the Company had a $5.0 million line of credit from a bank, collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets with the exception of the Company’s retail store assets. Draws may be made under the line at 75% of eligible accounts receivable plus 50% of eligible inventories. Interest on borrowings is at prime less 50 basis points (5.50% at February 29, 2008). At February 29, 2008, $4.7 million was available for borrowings under the line of credit, subject to borrowing base limitations. Terms of the line require that the line be rested (that is, that there be no outstanding balance) for a period of 30 consecutive days during the term of the loan. Additionally, the line of credit is subject to various financial ratio and leverage covenants. At February 29, 2008 the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The credit line is subject to renewal in July, 2008.
NOTE 5 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating leases
The Company conducts its retail operations in facilities leased under five to ten-year noncancelable operating leases. Certain leases contain renewal options for between five and ten additional years at increased monthly rentals. The majority of the leases provide for contingent rentals based on sales in excess of predetermined base levels.
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental payments required under such leases for the years ending February 28 or 29:
         
2009
  $ 159,000  
2010
    207,000  
2011
    171,000  
2012
    100,000  
2013
    103,000  
Thereafter
    52,000  
Total
  $ 792,000  
In some instances, in order to retain the right to site selection or because of requirements imposed by the lessor, the Company has leased space for its proposed franchise outlets. When a franchise was sold, the store was subleased to the franchisee who is responsible for the monthly rent and other obligations under the lease. The Company’s liability as primary lessee on sublet franchise outlets, all of which is offset by sublease rentals, is as follows for the years ending February 28 or 29:

37


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES — CONTINUED
         
2009
  $ 87,300  
2010
    69,700  
2011
    71,800  
2012
    73,900  
2013
    76,100  
Thereafter
    386,300  
 
  $ 765,100  
The following is a schedule of lease expense for all retail operating leases for the three years ended February 28 or 29:
                         
    2008   2007   2006
Minimum rentals
  $ 336,859     $ 438,797     $ 611,535  
Less sublease rentals
    (100,900 )     (108,200 )     (239,300 )
Contingent rentals
    22,476       26,640       23,921  
 
  $ 258,435     $ 357,237     $ 396,156  
In fiscal year 2008 the Company entered into an operating lease for warehouse space in the immediate vicinity of its manufacturing operation. The following is a schedule, by year, of future minimum rental payments required under such lease for the years ending February 28 or 29:
         
2009
  $ 102,000  
2010
    102,000  
2011
    34,000  
 
  $ 238,000  
The Company also leases trucking equipment under operating leases. The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental payments required under such leases for the years ending February 28 or 29:
         
2009
  $ 157,000  
2010
    58,200  
2011
    48,500  
 
  $ 263,700  
The following is a schedule of lease expense for trucking equipment operating leases for the three years ended February 28 or 29:
         
2008   2007   2006
222,682
  187,599   308,719
Purchase contracts
The Company frequently enters into purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for chocolate and certain nuts. These contracts permit the Company to purchase the specified commodity at a fixed price on an as-needed basis during the term of the contract. Because prices for these products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts, but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall and it is unable to renegotiate the terms of the contract. Currently the Company has contracted for approximately $1,825,517 of raw materials under such agreements.
Contingencies
The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

38


Table of Contents

NOTE 6 — INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense is comprised of the following for the years ending February 28 or 29:
                         
    2008   2007   2006
Current
                       
Federal
  $ 2,435,496     $ 2,533,401     $ 2,147,826  
State
    467,342       483,605       318,089  
Total Current
    2,902,838       3,017,007       2,465,915  
 
                       
Deferred
                       
Federal
    131,776       (120,018 )     3,774  
State
    19,166       (13,414 )     421  
Total Deferred
    150,942       (133,432 )     4,195  
Total
  $ 3,053,780     $ 2,883,575     $ 2,470,110  
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective rate as a percentage of pretax income is as follows for the years ending February 28 or 29:
                         
    2008   2007   2006
Statutory rate
    34.0 %     34.0 %     34.0 %
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
    4.0 %     4.1 %     3.2 %
Other
    0.1 %     (0.3 %)     .6 %
Effective Rate
    38.1 %     37.8 %     37.8 %
The components of deferred income taxes at February 28 or 29 are as follows:
                 
    2008     2007  
Deferred Tax Assets
               
Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes
  $ 43,538     $ 70,882  
Inventories
    74,188       55,831  
Accrued compensation
    34,512       42,701  
Loss provisions and deferred income
          143,925  
Self insurance accrual
    20,214       15,368  
Amortization, design costs
    74,649       67,208  
 
    247,101       395,915  
Deferred Tax Liabilities
               
Depreciation and amortization
    (803,066 )     (808,657 )
Loss provisions and deferred income
    (7,718 )      
Net deferred tax liability
  $ (563,683 )   $ (412,742 )
 
               
Current deferred tax assets
  $ 117,846     $ 272,871  
Non-current deferred tax liabilities
    (681,529 )     (685,613 )
Net deferred tax liability
  $ (563,683 )   $ (412,742 )
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state taxing jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state tax examinations in its major tax jurisdictions for periods before fiscal year 2004.
Realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company generating sufficient taxable income, in the appropriate tax jurisdictions, in future years to obtain benefit from the reversal of net deductible temporary differences. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income are changed. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets as of February 29, 2008.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The interpretation applies to all tax positions accounted for in accordance with Statement 109 and requires a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Subsequent recognition, derecognition, and measurement is based on management’s best judgment given the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an enterprise’s fiscal year, provided the enterprise has not yet issued financial statements, including financial statements for any interim period, for that fiscal year. The Company adopted FIN No. 48 as of March 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Company’s balance sheet or statement of income.
The Company does not have any significant unrecognized tax benefits and does not anticipate a significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. Amounts are recognized for income tax related interest and penalties as a component of general and administrative expense in the statement of income and are immaterial for years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007.

39


Table of Contents

NOTE 7 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock Issuance
In March 2006, the Company issued 584 shares of stock, valued at $12,500, for partial payment of certain sales services for one year. In June 2006 the Company issued 250 shares of stock valued at $3,322 for franchise recognition at the Company’s National Convention.
In September 2005, the Company issued 1,752 shares of stock, valued at $37,500, for certain licensing rights for five years and partial payment of certain sales services for one year.
Stock Dividends
On July 10, 2007 the Board of Directors declared a 5 percent stock dividend payable on July 31, 2007 to shareholders of record as of July 20, 2007. Shareholders received one additional share of Common Stock for every twenty shares owned prior to the record date. Subsequent to the dividend there were 6,380,945 shares outstanding.
On February 15, 2005 the Board of Directors declared a 5 percent stock dividend payable on March 10, 2005 to shareholders of record as of February 28, 2005. Shareholders received one additional share of Common Stock for every twenty shares owned prior to the record date. Subsequent to the dividend there were 4,602,135 shares outstanding.
Stock Splits
On May 18, 2005 the Board of Directors approved a four-for-three stock split payable June 13, 2005 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 31, 2005. Shareholders received one additional share of common stock for every three shares owned prior to the record date.
Immediately prior to the split there were 4,639,244 shares outstanding. Subsequent to the split there were 6,186,007 shares outstanding.
All share and per share data have been restated in all years presented to give effect to the stock dividends and stock splits.
Stock Repurchases
Between January 9, 2008 and February 8, 2008, the Company repurchased 391,600 shares at an average price of $11.94. Between August 15, 2007 and August 28, 2007, the Company repurchased 16,000 shares at an average price of $15.96 per share. Between March 1, 2007 and May 15, 2007 the Company repurchased 76,335 shares at an average price of $13.12 per share. Between May 1, 2006 and February 28, 2007 the Company repurchased 253,141 shares at an average price of $12.94 per share. Between March 24, 2006 and April 28, 2006 the Company repurchased 74,249 shares at an average price of $14.90 per share. Between October 7, 2005 and February 3, 2006 the Company repurchased 185,429 Company shares at an average price of $14.63 per share. Between April 18 and April 20, 2005, the Company repurchased 18,529 Company shares at an average price of $13.28 per share.
Cash Dividend
The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0643 per common share on March 16, 2005, June 16, 2005 and September 16, 2005 to shareholders of record on March 11, 2005, June 3, 2005 and September 1, 2005 respectively. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0667 per common share on December 16, 2005 to shareholders of record on December 1, 2005. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0762 per common share on March 16, 2006, June 16, 2006 and September 16, 2006 to shareholders of record on March 8, 2006, June 2, 2006 and September 1, 2006, respectively. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0857 per common share on December 15, 2006 and March 16, 2007 to shareholders of record on December 1, 2006 and March 2, 2007. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0952 per common share on June 15, 2007 to shareholders of record on June 1, 2007. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0950 per common share on September 14, 2007 to shareholders of record on September 4, 2007. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per common share on December 14, 2007 and March 14, 2008 to shareholders of record on December 3, 2007 and February 29, 2008.
Future declaration of dividends will depend on, among other things, the Company’s results of operations, capital requirements, financial condition and on such other factors as the Company’s Board of Directors may in its discretion consider relevant and in the best long term interest of the shareholders.

40


Table of Contents

NOTE 8 — STOCK OPTION PLANS
In fiscal 2008 shareholders approved the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan allows awards of stock options; stock appreciation rights; stock awards, restricted stock, and stock units; performance shares and performance units; other stock or cash based awards. As of February 29, 2008, no awards had been made under the 2007 Plan and 391,325 shares of common stock is available for award under the plan consisting of 300,000 shares originally authorized, 85,340 previously reserved for issuance under earlier plans and 5,985 shares forfeited under suspended plans.
Under the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”), the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Plan”)the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the “Director’s Plan”) and the 2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the “2000 Director’s Plan”), options to purchase up to 970,200, 441,000, 279,720 and 299,060 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock were previously authorized to be granted at prices not less than market value at the date of grant. Options granted may not have a term exceeding ten years under the 1995 plan, the 2004 plan and the Director’s Plan. Options granted may not have a term exceeding five years under the 2000 Director’s Plan. Options representing the right to purchase 68,875, 292,446, 0 and 38,808 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding under the 1995 Plan, the 2004 Plan, the Director’s Plan, and the 2000 Director’s Plan, respectively, at February 29, 2008. On February 21, 2006, the Company accelerated the vesting of all outstanding stock options in order to prevent past option grants from having an impact on future results. The options outstanding under these plans will expire, if not exercised through February 2016.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model utilizing the following weighted average assumptions:
                         
    2008   2007   2006
Expected dividend yield
    2.60 %     n/a       2.18 %
Expected stock price volatility
    20 %     n/a       30 %
Risk-free interest rate
    4.69 %     n/a       4.5 %
Expected life of options
  5 years     n/a     5 years
Information with respect to options outstanding under the Plans at February 29, 2008, and changes for the three years then ended was as follows:
                 
    2008
            Weighted Average
    Shares   Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year
    440,041     $ 9.80  
Granted
    12,936       13.16  
Exercised
    (45,813 )     7.23  
Forfeited
    (7,035 )     18.69  
Outstanding at end of year
    400,129     $ 10.05  
 
               
Options exercisable at February 29, 2008
    400,129     $ 10.05  
                 
    2007
            Weighted Average
    Shares   Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year
    604,670     $ 8.61  
Granted
           
Exercised
    (149,404 )     4.17  
Forfeited
    (15,225 )     17.83  
Outstanding at end of year
    440,041     $ 9.80  
 
               
Options exercisable at February 28, 2007
    440,041     $ 9.80  
                 
    2006
            Weighted Average
    Shares   Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year
    808,500     $ 4.47  
Granted
    157,122       17.28  
Exercised
    (354,778 )     3.02  
Forfeited
    (6,174 )     7.41  
Outstanding at end of year
    604,670       8.61  
 
               
Options exercisable at February 28, 2006
    604,670     $ 8.61  
 
               
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $2.69, $0 and $3.03, respectively.
               

41


Table of Contents

NOTE 8 — STOCK OPTION PLANS — CONTINUED
Additional information about stock options outstanding at February 29, 2008 is summarized as follows:
                         
            Options Outstanding
    Number   Weighted average remaining   Weighted average
Range of exercise prices   exercisable   contractual life   exercise price
$1.527 to 3.748
    68,875       4.17       3.35  
$5.857 to 7.415
    189,630       6.22       7.38  
$13.162 to 20.571
    141,624       6.76       16.87  
NOTE 9 — OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company classifies its business interests into two reportable segments: Franchising and Manufacturing. The Company has five Company-owned stores. Company-owned stores provide an environment for testing new products and promotions, operating and training methods and merchandising techniques. Company management evaluates these stores in relation to their contribution to franchising efforts. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on operating contribution, which excludes unallocated corporate general and administrative costs, provision for loss on accounts and income tax expense or benefit. The Company’s reportable segments are strategic businesses that utilize common merchandising, distribution, and marketing functions, as well as common information systems and corporate administration. All inter-segment sales prices are market based. Each segment is managed separately because of the differences in required infrastructure and the difference in products and services:
                                 
    Franchising   Manufacturing   Other   Total
FY 2008
                               
Total revenues
  $ 8,119,957     $ 25,531,054           $ 33,651,011  
Intersegment revenues
          (1,772,828 )           (1,772,828 )
Revenue from external customers
    8,119,957       23,758,226             31,878,183  
Segment profit (loss)
    3,416,155       7,190,535       (2,591,534 )     8,015,156  
Total assets
    2,341,722       11,494,058       2,311,680       16,147,460  
Capital expenditures
    25,835       415,377       137,221       578,433  
Total depreciation & amortization
    186,865       410,660       185,426       782,951  
 
                               
FY 2007
                               
Total revenues
  $ 8,864,314     $ 24,656,272     $     $ 33,520,596  
Intersegment revenues
          (1,947,253 )           (1,947,253 )
Revenue from external customers
    8,864,314       22,709,019             31,573,333  
Segment profit (loss)
    3,222,840       7,084,812       (2,679,159 )     7,628,493  
Total assets
    2,438,225       10,660,079       5,357,865       18,456,169  
Capital expenditures
    32,703       108,372       59,962       201,037  
Total depreciation & amortization
    233,346       434,398       206,244       873,988  
 
                               
FY 2006
                               
Total revenues
  $ 8,776,429     $ 21,035,748     $     $ 29,812,177  
Intersegment revenues
          (1,738,565 )           (1,738,565 )
Revenue from external customers
    8,776,429       19,297,183             28,073,612  
Segment profit (loss)
    2,986,944       5,884,990       (2,337,252 )     6,534,682  
Total assets
    2,964,486       10,209,790       5,883,204       19,057,480  
Capital expenditures
    90,757       878,871       330,686       1,300,314  
Total depreciation & amortization
    264,658       406,494       204,788       875,940  
NOTE 10 — SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For the three years ended February 28 or 29:
                         
    2008   2007   2006
Interest paid
  $ 1,566     $     $ 19,872  
Income taxes paid
    2,950,281       2,890,807       560,485  
 
                       
Non-Cash Operating Activities:
                       
 
                       
Revenue Recognition Changes (Note 14)
                       
Accounts receivable
  $     $ (129,928 )   $  
Income taxes payable
          156,276        
Deferred income
          (283,500 )      
Retained earnings
          257,152        
 
                       
Non-Cash Investing Activities:
                       
 
                       
Dividend payable
  $ 47,740     $ 47,583     $ 87,060  
Issue stock for rights and services
          15,822       37,500  
Fair value of assets received upon settlement of notes and accounts receivable:
                       
Store to be operated
                200,000  
Inventory
                3,815  
Note receivable
                153,780  

42


Table of Contents

NOTE 11 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company has a 401(k) plan called the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. 401(k) Plan. Eligible participants are permitted to make contributions up to statutory limits. The Company makes a matching contribution, which vests ratably over a 3-year period, and is 25% of the employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 1.5% of the employee’s compensation. During the years ended February 28 or 29, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company’s contribution was approximately $41,000, $40,000, and $46,000, respectively, to the plan.
NOTE 12 — SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
Following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the fiscal years ended February 28 or 29, 2008 and 2007:
                                         
                    Fiscal Quarter              
    First     Second     Third     Fourth     Total  
2008
                                       
Total revenue
  $ 7,278,885     $ 7,548,079     $ 8,765,471     $ 8,285,748     $ 31,878,183  
Gross margin before depreciation
    2,123,512       2,324,799       2,222,255       2,209,160       8,879,726  
Net income
    1,031,617       1,333,353       1,265,555       1,330,851       4,961,376  
Basic earnings per share
    .16       .21       .20       .21       .78  
Diluted earnings per share
    .16       .20       .19       .21       .76  
                                         
                    Fiscal Quarter              
    First     Second     Third     Fourth     Total  
2007
                                       
Total revenue
  $ 6,768,412     $ 6,779,569     $ 9,094,436     $ 8,930,916     $ 31,573,333  
Gross margin before depreciation
    2,012,762       2,071,381       2,622,621       2,640,355       9,347,119  
Net income
    930,541       1,039,790       1,331,795       1,442,792       4,744,918  
Basic earnings per share
    .14       .16       .21       .22       .74  
Dilute earnings per share
    .14       .16       .20       .22       .71  
The Company has evaluated the impact of changes to revenue recognition on a quarterly basis and determined that the change is not significant to the results of any quarter. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 13 — GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following at February 28 or 29:
                                         
            2008     2007  
            Gross             Gross        
    Amortization     Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying     Accumulated  
    Period     Value     Amortization     Value     Amortization  
Intangible assets subject to amortization
                                       
Store design
  10 Years     205,777       127,314       205,777       106,204  
Packaging licenses
  3-5 Years     120,830       109,164       120,830       104,164  
Packaging design
  10 Years     430,973       264,855       430,973       217,854  
Trademark
          20,000             20,000        
Total
            777,580       501,333       777,580       428,222  
 
                                       
Intangible assets not subject to amortization
                                       
Franchising segment-
                                       
Company stores goodwill
            1,011,458       267,020       1,011,458       267,020  
Franchising goodwill
            295,000       197,682       295,000       197,682  
Manufacturing segment-Goodwill
            295,000       197,682       295,000       197,682  
Total Goodwill
            1,601,458       662,384       1,601,458       662,384  
 
                                       
Total intangible assets
          $ 2,379,038     $ 1,163,717     $ 2,379,038     $ 1,090,606  
Amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled $73,111, $73,111, and $77,092 during the fiscal year ended February 28 or 29, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The aggregate estimated amortization expense for intangible assets remaining as of February 29, 2008 is as follows:
         
2009
    73,100  
2010
    73,100  
2011
    64,400  
2012
    37,700  
2013
    7,000  
Thereafter
     947  
Total
    256,247  
During fiscal year 2007 the Company sold or closed four Company stores. The sale and closures resulted in the reduction of Company store goodwill and related accumulated amortization of $264,504 and $69,827, respectively, for a net decrease in goodwill of $194,677.

43


Table of Contents

NOTE 14 — REVENUE RECOGNITION CHANGES
Historically the Company has recognized franchise fees upon completion of all significant initial services provided to the franchisee and upon satisfaction of all material conditions of the franchise agreement. Effective with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company decided to change that policy to more closely coincide with industry practice, that is, to recognize franchise fees when the franchise store opens. Due to the change the Company recorded adjustments to its March 1, 2006 balance sheet as follows:
         
Increase in deferred income
  $ 283,500  
Decrease in income taxes payable
    107,163  
Decrease in retained earnings
    176,337  
Historically the Company has recognized factory revenue upon shipment of candy to franchisees on Company trucks. Effective with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company decided to change that policy to recognize factory revenue upon delivery of candy to franchisees. Due to the change the Company recorded adjustments to its March 1, 2006 balance sheet as follows:
         
Decrease in accounts receivable
  $ 379,636  
Increase in inventory
    249,708  
Decrease in income taxes payable
    49,113  
Decrease in retained earnings
    80,815  
NOTE 15 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. SFAS 157 also creates consistency and comparability in fair value measurements among the many accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods) beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard amends SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities, with respect to accounting for a transfer to the trading category for all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities electing the fair value option. This standard allows companies to elect fair value accounting for many financial instruments and other items that currently are not required to be accounted as such, allows different applications for electing the option for a single item or groups of items, and requires disclosures to facilitate comparisons of similar assets and liabilities that are accounted for differently in relation to the fair value option. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 159 in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The Company is in the process of evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No.160 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The Company is in the process of evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 160.

44


Table of Contents

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Limitations on Controls and Procedures — Because of their inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting (collectively, “Control Systems”) may not prevent or detect all failures or misstatements of the type sought to be avoided by Control Systems. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s Control Systems to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), does not expect that the Company’s Control Systems will prevent all error or all fraud. A Control System, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the Control System are met. Further, the design of a Control System must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all Control Systems, no evaluation can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These reports by management, including the CEO and CFO, on the effectiveness of the Company’s Control Systems express only reasonable assurance of the conclusions reached.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures — The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the officers who certify the Company’s financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of February 29, 2008, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 29, 2008.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under supervision of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of February 29, 2008, of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In making this evaluation, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in its publication Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 29, 2008.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting — There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Section 240.13a-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm — The operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008 has been audited by Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.

45


Table of Contents

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in the section entitled “Executive Officers” in Part I of this report.
The information required by this item with respect to directors will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 under the caption “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 is under the caption “Executive Compensation” and is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” is incorporated herein by this reference.
The following table provides information with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans as of February 29, 2008.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
                         
    Number of        
    securities to be        
    issued upon exercise   Weighted average   Number of
    of outstanding   exercise price of   securities remaining
    options, warrants and   outstanding options,   available for future
Plan category   rights   warrants and rights   issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
    400,129     $ 10.05       391,325  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
    -0-       -0-       -0-  
Total
    400,129     $ 10.05       391,325  
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 is under the caption “Certain Transactions” is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 is under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” is incorporated herein by this reference.

46


Table of Contents

PART IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS and FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
     1. Financial Statements
         
    Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
    29  
 
       
Statements of Income
    30  
 
       
Balance Sheets
    31  
 
       
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
    32  
 
       
Statements of Cash Flows
    33  
 
       
Notes to Financial Statements
    34  
     2. Financial Statement Schedules
         
    Page
SCHEDULE II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
    47  
 
       
SCHEDULE II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
       
                                 
    Balance at   Additions            
    Beginning of   Charged to           Balance at End
    Period   Costs & Exp.   Deductions   of Period
Year Ended February 29, 2008 Valuation Allowance for Accounts and Notes Receivable
    187,519       75,000       148,248       114,271  
 
                               
Year Ended February 28, 2007 Valuation Allowance for Accounts and Notes Receivable
    98,925       70,000       (18,594 )     187,519  
 
                               
Year Ended February 29, 2006 Valuation Allowance for Accounts and Notes Receivable
    132,646       -0-       33,721       98,925  

47


Table of Contents

3. Exhibits
         
Exhibit        
Number   Description   Incorporated by Reference to
 
       
3.1
  Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended   Exhibit 3.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended February 28,2007
 
       
3.2
  Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant   Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant filed December 14, 2007
 
       
4.1
  Specimen Common Stock Certificate   Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
4.2
  Business Loan Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between Wells Fargo Bank and the Registrant   Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 and Exhibit 4.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006
 
       
4.3
  Promissory Note dated July 31, 2006 in the amount of $5,000,000 between Wells Fargo Bank and the Registrant.   Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006.
 
       
10.1
  Form of Employment Agreement between the Registrant and its officers   Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
10.2
  Airport Development Agreement between The Grove, Inc. and the Registrant   Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended November 30, 2007
 
       
10.3
  Current form of franchise agreement used by the Registrant   Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007
 
       
10.4
  Form of Real Estate Lease between the Registrant as Lessee and franchisee as Sublessee   Exhibit 10.7 to Registration Statement on Form S-18 (Registration No. 33-2016-D).
 
       
10.4
  1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995.
 
       
10.5
  2007 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-145986) filed on September 11, 2007.
 
       
10.6
  Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its directors   Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
10.7
  Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its officers   Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
10.8
  1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995.
 
       
10.9
  Forms of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan   Exhibit 10.10 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995.

48


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit        
Number   Description   Incorporated by Reference to
 
       
Exhibits — continued    
 
       
10.10
  Forms of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan   Exhibit 10.11 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995.
 
       
10.10
  2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors   Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-109936 filed on October 23, 2003.
 
       
10.11
  2004 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-119107) filed September 17, 2004.
 
       
10.12
  Commodity Contract with Guittard Chocolate Company*   Filed herewith.
 
       
23.1
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   Filed herewith.
 
       
 
       
31.1
  Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer   Filed herewith.
 
       
31.2
  Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer   Filed herewith.
 
       
32.1
  Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer   Furnished herewith.
 
       
32.2
  Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer   Furnished herewith
 
*   Contains material that has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and such material has been filed separately with the Commission.

49


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
             
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.    
 
           
Date: May 14, 2008
      /S/ Bryan J. Merryman
 
BRYAN J. MERRYMAN
   
 
      Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director    
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
         
Date: May 14, 2008
  /S/ Franklin E. Crail
 
FRANKLIN E. CRAIL
   
 
  Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Director
(principal executive officer)
   
 
       
Date: May 14, 2008
  /S/ Bryan J. Merryman
 
BRYAN J. MERRYMAN
   
 
  Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
(principal financial and accounting officer)
   
 
       
Date: May 14, 2008
  /S/ Gerald A. Kien
 
GERALD A. KIEN, Director
   
 
       
Date: May 14, 2008
  /S/ Lee N. Mortenson
 
LEE N. MORTENSON, Director
   
 
       
Date: May 14, 2008
  /S/ Fred M. Trainor
 
FRED M. TRAINOR, Director
   
 
       
Date: May 14, 2008
  /S/ Clyde Wm. Engle
 
CLYDE Wm. ENGLE, Director
   

50


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
         
Exhibit        
Number   Description   Incorporated by Reference to
 
       
3.1
  Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended   Exhibit 3.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended February 28,2007
 
       
3.2
  Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant   Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant filed December 14, 2007
 
       
4.1
  Specimen Common Stock Certificate   Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
4.2
  Business Loan Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between Wells Fargo Bank and the Registrant   Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 and Exhibit 4.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006
 
       
4.3
  Promissory Note dated July 31, 2006 in the amount of $5,000,000 between Wells Fargo Bank and the Registrant.   Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006.
 
       
10.1
  Form of Employment Agreement between the Registrant and its officers   Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
10.2
  Airport Development Agreement between The Grove, Inc. and the Registrant   Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended November 30, 2007
 
       
10.3
  Current form of franchise agreement used by the Registrant   Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007
 
       
10.4
  Form of Real Estate Lease between the Registrant as Lessee and franchisee as Sublessee   Exhibit 10.7 to Registration Statement on Form S-18 (Registration No. 33-2016-D).
 
       
10.4
  1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995.
 
       
10.5
  2007 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-145986) filed on September 11, 2007.
 
       
10.6
  Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its directors   Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
10.7
  Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its officers   Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007
 
       
10.8
  1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995.
 
       
10.9
  Forms of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan   Exhibit 10.10 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995.

 


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit        
Number   Description   Incorporated by Reference to
 
       
EXHIBIT INDEX — continued    
 
       
10.10
  Forms of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan   Exhibit 10.11 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995.
 
       
10.10
  2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors Of the Registrant   Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-109936 filed on October 23, 2003.
 
       
10.11
  2004 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant   Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-119107) filed September 17, 2004.
 
       
10.12
  Commodity Contract with Guittard Chocolate Company*   Filed herewith.
 
       
23.1
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   Filed herewith.
 
       
31.1
  Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer   Filed herewith.
 
       
31.2
  Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer   Filed herewith.
 
       
32.1
  Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer   Furnished herewith.
 
       
32.2
  Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer   Furnished herewith
 
*   Contains material that has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and such material has been filed separately with the Commission.