UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

 

Commission file no. 0-7459

 

A. SCHULMAN, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (330) 666-3751

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  o     Accelerated filer  þ     Non-accelerated filer  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

As of February 28, 2006, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $687,000,051 based on the closing sale price as reported on the Nasdaq National Market System.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date 26,842,722 Shares of Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value, at October 31, 2006.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

 

The Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation, the Report of the Audit Committee and the Performance Graph contained in the registrant’s Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders shall not be deemed incorporated by reference herein.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

A. Schulman, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized as an Ohio corporation in 1928 and changed its state of incorporation to Delaware in 1969.

 

The Company is engaged in the sale of plastic resins in various forms, which are used as raw materials by its customers. To identify reportable segments, the Company considered its operating structure and the types of information subject to regular review by its President and Chief Executive Officer, who is the Chief Operating Decision Maker. On this basis, the Company operates primarily in two geographic segments, North America and Europe, including Asia (“Europe”).

 

BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

 

The Company combines basic resins purchased from plastic resin producers and, through mixing and extrusion processes, introduces additives that provide color, stabilizers, flame retardants or other enhancements that may be required by a customer. These compounds are formulated in the Company’s laboratories and technical centers and are manufactured in the Company’s 15 plastics compounding plants in North America, Europe and Asia. Customers for the Company’s plastic compounds include manufacturers, custom molders and extruders of a wide variety of plastic products and parts. The Company generally produces compounds on the basis of customer commitments and expectations. When necessary, compounds are produced for future delivery and are stored in Company or public warehouses.

 

The Company’s plastic compounds are sold to manufacturers and suppliers in various markets such as packaging, automotive, consumer products, electrical/electronics, office equipment and agriculture. These compounds are used in the packaging industry for such products as plastic bags and labels and packaging materials for food, soap, fragrances, flowers, gardening supplies and various household necessities; in the automotive industry for such products as grilles, body side moldings, bumper protective strips, window seals, valance panels, bumper guards, air ducts, steering wheels, fan shrouds and other interior and exterior components; in the consumer products industry for such items as writing instruments, shelving, soft drink coolers, video tape cassettes, batteries, outdoor furniture, lawn sprinklers, artificial turf, skateboards, toys, games and plastic parts for various household appliances; in the electrical/electronics industry for such products as outdoor lighting, parts for telephones, connector blocks, transformers and capacitor housings; in the office equipment industry for such products as cases and housings for computers, trim for arms of office chairs, folders and binders, stack trays and panels and drawers for copying machines; and in the agriculture industry for such products as greenhouse coverings and protective film for plants and agricultural mulch.

 

The Company also acts as a merchant, buying prime and off-grade plastic resins and reselling these commodities, without further processing, to a variety of users. The plastic resins generally are purchased from major producers. Prime resins purchased from these producers are usually sold to small and medium-sized customers. In addition to prime resins, the Company purchases supplies of resins resulting from overruns, changes in customers’ specifications and failure to meet rigid prime specifications. Historically, these materials have been in continuous supply, generally in proportion to the total industry production of plastic resins.

 

The Company, through its European operations, acts as a distributor for several major resin producers that include BASF, ExxonMobil Chemical, Total Petrochemicals, Solvay, GE Plastics and Vestolit GmbH. The Company also acts as a North American distributor of ExxonMobil Chemical polyethylene used for injection and rotational molding.

 

In September 2005, the Company introduced its new Invision^® sheet product and formed A. Schulman Invision, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary. Invision^® is a revolutionary product based on cutting-edge technology that is expected to provide high growth opportunities in many markets around the world. Invision^® is a multi-layered, extruded sheet product that reduces costs and simplifies the manufacturing process for the Company’s customers, while providing a higher-performing and more environmentally friendly alternative to existing plastic and film materials that are painted or colored. The Company expects Invision^® to appeal to customers in a variety of markets, both automotive and non-automotive. Initially, the Company will focus on automotive applications to capitalize on the Company’s market presence and recognized capabilities. Samples from the Company’s pilot line have been tested by several potential customers and the Company has received positive feedback based on the initial results of these tests. The initial production line in the Company’s Sharon Center facility is nearing completion and is scheduled for start-up in January 2007 with the ability to produce saleable product expected

shortly thereafter. In addition, the Company has purchased land for a greenfield plant site in Findlay, Ohio for construction of a dedicated Invision^® facility. While Invision^® did not produce operating income in fiscal 2006, the Company believes this is a very large market that could have significant sales in the years ahead.

 

The Company’s manufacturing in each of its geographic business segments can be classified into five major product families: color and additive concentrates; engineered compounds; polyolefins; polyvinyl chloride (PVC); and tolling.

 

COLOR AND ADDITIVE CONCENTRATES

 

The Company’s concentrate business consists of the compounding of resins that provide plastic with specific color and/or physical properties, such as conductivity, flexibility, viscosity and textures. A color concentrate is a clear or natural plastic resin into which a substantial amount of color pigment is incorporated or dispersed. The Company manufactures its concentrates using its formulae and purchased natural resins. These concentrates are sold to manufacturers of plastic products, such as film for packaging, household goods, toys, automotive parts, mechanical goods and other plastic items.

 

The Company’s concentrates are sold under various trade names, including the following:

 

 

ENGINEERED COMPOUNDS

 

The Company’s engineered compounds are products designed to have and maintain characteristics such as chemical resistance, electrical conductivity, heat resistance and/or high strength-to-weight ratios. The engineered compounds manufactured by the Company include the following:

 

 

POLYOLEFINS

 

The Company’s polyolefin business consists of numerous polypropylene and polyethylene resins and compounds. Polyolefins are used for interior trim, fascias and bumper covers in automotive applications; for toys, small appliances,

sporting goods, and agricultural and watercraft products in roto-molding applications; and for office supplies in industrial/commercial applications. The polyolefin products manufactured by the Company include the following:

 

 

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE

 

The Company’s PVC business is transacted under the name Polyvin^® and involves the formulation of compounds and elastomers to introduce a variety of product attributes, including weatherability, consistency, ease of processing, material flexibility, and high-gloss or low-gloss finish. The Company’s thermoplastic PVC compounds are available in blow molding, injection molding and extrusion grades for application in the manufacture of automotive, furniture, architectural and consumer products. The Company’s Sunprene^® compound serves as a replacement for rubber and other thermoplastic elastomers in automotive applications.

 

TOLLING

 

The Company provides tolling services as a fee for processing of material provided and owned by customers. On some occasions, the Company is required to provide certain amounts of its materials, such as additives or packaging. These materials are charged to the customer as an addition to the tolling fees. The Company recognizes revenues from tolling services and related materials when such services are performed. The only amounts recorded as revenue related to tolling are the processing fees and the charges related to materials provided by the Company.

 

The approximate amount and percentage of net consolidated sales for each of the Company’s product families for the three fiscal years ended August 31, 2006 are as follows:

 

 

Information regarding the amount of sales, operating income and identifiable assets attributable to each of the Company’s geographic business segments for the last three years is set forth in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company appearing in ITEM 8 of this Report.

The Company’s principal subsidiaries are as follows:

 

A. Schulman Plastics, BVBA, a Belgian subsidiary located in Bornem, Belgium, manufactures color and additive concentrates and compounds. These products principally are sold in Germany, France, the Benelux countries, Italy and Asia.

 

A. Schulman International Services N.V., a Belgian subsidiary located in Bornem, Belgium, provides financing and administrative services to the Company’s European operations.

 

A. Schulman, Inc., Limited, a United Kingdom subsidiary located in South Wales, United Kingdom, primarily manufactures color and additive plastic concentrates, which are sold in the United Kingdom and to various A. Schulman European locations.

 

A. Schulman GmbH, a German subsidiary located in Sindorf, Germany, manufactures engineered and flame-retardant plastic compounds. In addition, this subsidiary purchases and sells prime and off-grade plastic resins from major European producers. This subsidiary also distributes plastic resins and compounds for companies, including Vestolit GmbH, ExxonMobil Chemical, GE Plastics and Solvay.

 

A. Schulman Canada Ltd., a Canadian subsidiary located in St. Thomas, Ontario, manufactures engineered and various other plastic compounds, acts as a merchant of prime and off-grade plastic resins and distributes for companies, including ExxonMobil Chemical polyethylene for injection molding. Its principal sales office is located in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

 

A. Schulman AG, a Swiss subsidiary located in Zurich, Switzerland, sells plastic compounds and concentrates manufactured by other European subsidiaries of the Company and also acts as a merchant of plastic resins.

 

A. Schulman, S.A., a French subsidiary, has sales offices in France and is a distributor in France for Total Petrochemicals. A. Schulman, S.A. also acts as a merchant of plastic resins and sells compounds manufactured by the Company’s subsidiaries in Bornem, Belgium, Sindorf, Germany and Givet, France. Diffusion Plastique is a Paris-based subsidiary that is a distributor for BASF of certain plastic materials in France.

 

A. Schulman Plastics, S.A., another French subsidiary, is located in Givet, France. This subsidiary produces plastic concentrates for the Company’s European market.

 

Through its Mexican subsidiary, A. Schulman de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., the Company manufactures concentrates for the packaging industry and compounds for the automotive, construction, appliance and consumer products markets. This subsidiary has sales offices in Mexico.

 

A. Schulman Polska Sp. z o.o., is a subsidiary located in Warsaw, Poland. The subsidiary sells products manufactured by other subsidiaries of the Company and acts as distributor and merchant of plastic resins and compounds in Poland.

 

A. Schulman Plastics SpA is a subsidiary located in Italy. This subsidiary manufactures and sells engineered compounds and concentrates to the Italian market. It sells products manufactured by A. Schulman Plastics, BVBA, A. Schulman Plastics, S.A., A. Schulman Gmbh and A. Schulman, Inc., Limited and acts as a merchant of plastic resins in Italy.

 

A. Schulman Plastics S.L., a Spanish subsidiary, is primarily a distributor of plastic resins to the Spanish market through its offices located in Barcelona and Valencia, Spain. This subsidiary also engages in merchant activities in Spain and sells certain products manufactured by A. Schulman Gmbh, and A. Schulman Plastics, BVBA.

 

A. Schulman Hungary Kft., a Hungarian subsidiary, sells engineered compounds manufactured by A. Schulman GmbH and concentrates manufactured by A. Schulman Plastics, BVBA, A. Schulman Plastics, S.A., and A. Schulman, Inc., Limited. It also acts as a merchant of plastic resins in Hungary.

 

A. Schulman Plastics (Dongguan) Ltd., a subsidiary in China, manufactures concentrates for sale in the local Chinese markets. This subsidiary produces material for customers in the film and packaging markets.

 

A. Schulman Europe GmbH, a subsidiary with offices in Wurselen, Germany provides support in the areas of sales, procurement, logistics and financing for the European operations.

A. Schulman S.ár.l. et Cie SCS, A. Schulman S.ár.l. and A. Schulman Holdings S.ár.l. are Luxembourg subsidiaries that provide financing and other corporate services for the European group.

 

A. Schulman Invision, Inc. is a subsidiary located in Sharon Center, Ohio formed in fiscal 2006. The subsidiary manufactures Invision^®, a multi-layered, extruded sheet product for sale in both the automotive and non-automotive markets.

 

JOINT VENTURES

 

The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary ASI Investments Holding Co., owns a 70% partnership interest in The Sunprene Company, which manufactures a line of PVC thermoplastic elastomers and compounds primarily for the North American automotive market. The other partner is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Mitsubishi Chemical MKV Co., one of the largest chemical companies in Japan. This partnership has two manufacturing lines at the Company’s Bellevue, Ohio facility. The Company’s partner provides technical and manufacturing expertise.

 

The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary A. Schulman International, Inc., owns a 65% interest in PT. A. Schulman Plastics, Indonesia, an Indonesian joint venture. This joint venture has a manufacturing facility with two production lines in Surabaya, Indonesia. P.T. Prima Polycon Indah owns the remaining 35% interest in this joint venture.

 

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION

 

As of August 31, 2006, the Company had 1,042 employees in North America and 1,438 employees in its European operations. Approximately 80% of the Company’s hourly production employees are represented by various unions under collective bargaining agreements.

 

The Company has laboratory facilities at a majority of its plants staffed by 313 technical personnel. The Company’s plastic compounding business is, to a degree, dependent on its ability to hire and retain qualified technical personnel. These personnel are involved in activities relating to the testing and sampling of material for conformity with product specifications and the development of new compounds. The Company has generally been successful in hiring or retaining such personnel.

 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

 

A large part of the Company’s technical activities relate to the continuous refinement of compounds for specific applications of customers. Research activities relating to the development of new products and the improvement of existing products are important to the Company. These activities are conducted at the Company’s various technical centers and laboratories. Research and development expenditures were approximately $4.7 million in fiscal 2006 and approximately $3.8 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in these activities is primarily related to the new Invision^® sheet product.

 

COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS

 

The Company’s operations on and ownership of real property are subject to extensive environmental, health and safety laws and regulations at the national, state and local governmental levels. The nature of the Company’s business exposes it to risks of liability under these laws and regulations due to the production, storage, transportation, recycling or disposal and/or sale of materials that can cause contamination or personal injury if they are released into the environment or workplace. Environmental laws may have a significant effect on the costs of these activities involving raw materials, finished products and wastes. The Company may incur substantial costs, including fines, damages, criminal or civil sanctions, remediation costs, or experience interruptions in its operations for violations of these laws.

 

Also, national and state environmental statutes impose strict, and under some circumstances, joint and several liability for the cost of investigations and remedial actions on any company that generated the waste, arranged for disposal of the waste, transported the waste to the disposal site or selected the disposal site, as well as on the owners and operators of these sites. Any or all of the responsible parties may be required to bear all of the costs of clean up, regardless of fault or legality of the waste disposal or ownership of the site, and may also be subject to liability for natural resource damages. It is possible that the Company could be identified as a potential responsible party at more sites in the future, which could result in the Company being assessed substantial investigation or clean up costs.

Management believes that compliance with national, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, does not currently have a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company.

 

DEPENDENCE ON CUSTOMERS

 

During the year ended August 31, 2006, the Company’s five largest customers accounted in the aggregate for less than 10% of total sales. In management’s opinion, the Company is not dependent upon any single customer and the loss of any one customer would not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business other than, potentially, on a temporary basis.

 

AVAILABILITY OF RAW MATERIALS

 

The raw materials required by the Company are readily available from major plastic resin producers or other suppliers. The principal types of plastic resins used in the manufacture of the Company’s proprietary plastic compounds are polypropylene, PVC (polyvinyl chloride), polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon, ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) and polyurethane. For additional information on the availability of raw materials, see ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS in this Report.

 

WORKING CAPITAL PRACTICES

 

The Company, along with other companies in its industry, is generally not subject to unusual working capital practices. The nature of the Company’s business does not require significant amounts of inventories to be held to meet rapid delivery requirements of its products or services or assure the Company of a continuous allotment of goods from suppliers. The Company’s manufacturing processes are generally performed with a short turnaround time. The Company does not generally offer extended payment terms to its customers. The Company generally allows its customers to return merchandise for failure to meet pre-agreed quality standards or specifications; however, the Company employs quality assurance practices that minimize customer returns.

 

COMPETITION

 

The Company’s business is highly competitive. The Company competes with producers of basic plastic resins, many of which also operate compounding plants, as well as other independent plastic compounders. The producers of basic plastic resins generally are large producers of petroleum and chemicals, which are much larger than the Company and have greater financial resources. Some of these producers compete with the Company principally in such competitors’ own respective local market areas, while other producers compete with the Company on a global basis.

 

The Company also competes with other merchants and distributors of plastic resins and other products. No accurate information is available to the Company as to the extent of its competitors’ sales and earnings in respect of these activities, but management believes that the Company has only a small fraction of the total market.

 

The principal methods of competition in plastics manufacturing are innovation, price, availability of inventory, quality and service. The principal methods of competition in respect of merchant and distribution activities are price and service. Management believes it has strong financial capabilities, excellent supplier relationships and the ability to provide quality plastic compounds at competitive prices.

 

TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES

 

The Company uses various trademarks and trade names in its business. These trademarks and trade names protect names of certain of the Company’s products and are significant to the extent they provide a certain amount of goodwill and name recognition in the industry. The Company also holds patents in various parts of the world for certain of its products. These trademarks, trade names and patents, including those which are pending, contribute to profitability, however the Company does not consider its business to be dependent on such trademarks and trade names, except in the case of its new Invision^® product line.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

 

The Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, together with any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, will be made available free of charge on the Company’s web site, www.aschulman.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause our actual results or financial condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. Before you invest in us, you should know that making such an investment involves some risks, including the risks we describe below. The risks that are discussed below are not the only ones we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition could be negatively affected.

 

If we fail to develop and commercialize new products, our business operations would be adversely affected.

 

A significant portion of our anticipated growth is dependent upon the successful development and commercialization of new products, such as our Invision^® product line. The development and commercialization of new products, including Invision^®, requires significant investments in research and development, production, and marketing costs. The successful production and commercialization of these products is uncertain as is the acceptance of the new products in the marketplace. If we fail to successfully develop and commercialize new products, or if customers decline to purchase the new products, we will not be able to recover our development investment and the growth prospects for our products will be adversely affected.

 

If we are unable to retain key personnel or attract new skilled personnel, it could have an adverse effect on our business.

 

The unanticipated departure of any key member of our management team could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, because of the specialized and technical nature of our business, our future performance is dependent on the continued service of, and on our ability to attract and retain, qualified management, scientific, technical, marketing and support personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we may be unable to continue to attract or retain such personnel.

 

Our sales, profitability, operating results and cash flows are sensitive to global economic conditions and cyclicality, and could be adversely affected during economic downturns.

 

General economic conditions and business conditions of our customers’ industries affect demand for our products. The business of most of our customers, particularly our industrial, automotive, construction and electronics customers, can be cyclical in nature and sensitive to changes in general economic conditions. Political instability may lead to financial and economic instability, which could lead to deterioration in general global economic conditions. Downturns in the businesses that use our products will adversely affect our sales. Historically, downturns in general economic conditions have resulted in diminished product demand, excess manufacturing capacity and lower average selling prices, and we may experience similar problems in the future. In addition, downturns in our customers’ industries, even during periods of strong general economic conditions, could adversely affect our sales, profitability, operating results and cash flows.

 

Price increases in raw materials and energy costs could adversely affect operating results and financial condition.

 

We purchase various plastic resins to produce our proprietary plastic compounds. These resins, derived from petroleum or natural gas, have been subject to periods of rapid and significant movements in price. These fluctuations in price may be caused or aggravated by a number of factors, including political instability or hostilities in oil-producing countries and supply and demand changes. We may not be able to pass on increases in the prices of raw materials and energy to our customers. As a result, higher petroleum or natural gas costs could lead to declining margins, operating results and financial conditions.

A major failure of our information systems could harm our business.

 

We depend upon integrated information systems to process orders, respond to customer inquiries, manage inventory, purchase, sell and ship goods on a timely basis, maintain cost-efficient operations, prepare financial information and reports, and operate our website. We may experience operating problems with our information systems as a result of system failures, viruses, computer “hackers” or other causes. Any significant disruption or slowdown of our systems could cause orders to be lost or delayed and could damage our reputation with our customers or cause our customers to cancel orders, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Our manufacturing operations are subject to hazards and other risks associated with polymer production and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and wastes.

 

Our manufacturing operations are subject to the possible hazards and risks associated with polymer production and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and wastes, including explosions, fires, inclement weather, natural disasters, mechanical failure, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, remediation, chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases and other risks. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to, or destruction of, property and equipment and environmental contamination. In addition, the occurrence of material operating problems at our facilities due to any of these hazards may diminish our ability to meet our output goals. Accordingly, these hazards, and their consequences could have a material adverse effect on our operations as a whole, including our results of operations and cash flows, both during and after the period of operational difficulties.

 

Extensive environmental, health and safety laws and regulations impact our operations and assets, and compliance, or lack of compliance, with these regulations could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Our operations on and ownership of real property are subject to extensive environmental, health and safety laws and regulations at the national, state and local governmental levels. The nature of our business exposes us to risks of liability under these laws and regulations due to the production, storage, transportation, recycling or disposal and/or sale of materials that can cause contamination or personal injury if they are released into the environment or workplace. Environmental laws may have a significant effect on the costs of these activities involving raw materials, finished products and wastes. We may incur substantial costs, including fines, damages, criminal or civil sanctions, remediation costs, or experience interruptions in our operations for violations of these laws.

 

Also, national and state environmental statutes impose strict, and under some circumstances, joint and several liability for the cost of investigations and remedial actions on any company that generated the waste, arranged for disposal of the waste, transported the waste to the disposal site or selected the disposal site, as well as on the owners and operators of these sites. Any or all of the responsible parties may be required to bear all of the costs of clean up, regardless of fault or legality of the waste disposal or ownership of the site, and may also be subject to liability for natural resource damages. It is possible that we will be identified as a potentially responsible party at more sites in the future, which could result in our being assessed substantial investigation or clean up costs.

 

Accruals for estimated costs, including, among other things, the ranges associated with our accruals for future environmental compliance and remediation may be too low or we may not be able to quantify the potential costs. We may be subject to additional environmental liabilities or potential liabilities that have not been identified. We expect that we will continue to be subject to increasingly stringent environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. We believe that compliance with these laws and regulations may, but does not currently, require significant capital expenditures and operating costs, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

 

We face competition from other polymer companies, which could adversely affect our sales and financial condition.

 

We operate in a highly competitive marketplace, competing against a number of domestic and foreign polymer producers. Competition is based on several key criteria, including product performance and quality, product price, product availability and security of supply, responsiveness of product development in cooperation with customers and customer service. Some of our competitors are larger than we are and may have greater financial resources. These competitors may also be able to maintain significantly greater operating and financial flexibility than we do. As a result, these competitors may be better able to withstand changes in conditions within our industry, changes in the prices of raw materials and energy and in

general economic conditions. Additionally, competitors’ pricing decisions could compel us to decrease our prices, which could affect our margins and profitability adversely. Our ability to maintain or increase our profitability is, and will continue to be, dependent upon our ability to offset decreases in the prices and margins of our products by improving production efficiency and volume, shifting to higher margin products and improving existing products through innovation and research and development. If we are unable to do so or to otherwise maintain our competitive position, we could lose market share to our competitors.

 

We expect that our competitors will continue to develop and introduce new and enhanced products, which could cause a decline in the market acceptance of our products. In addition, our competitors could cause a reduction in the selling prices of some of our products as a result of intensified price competition. Competitive pressures can also result in the loss of major customers. An inability to compete successfully could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We may also experience increased competition from companies that offer products based on alternative technologies and processes that may be more competitive or better in price or performance, causing us to lose customers and result in a decline in our sales volume and earnings.

 

We may incur significant charges in the event we close all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility.

 

We periodically assess our manufacturing operations in order to manufacture and distribute our products in the most efficient manner. Based on our assessments, we may make capital improvements to modernize certain units, move manufacturing or distribution capabilities from one plant or facility to another plant or facility, discontinue manufacturing or distributing certain products or close all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility. We also have shared services agreements at several of our plants and if such agreements are terminated or revised, we would assess and potentially adjust our manufacturing operations. The closure of all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility could result in future charges which could be significant.

 

Our substantial international operations subject us to risks of doing business in foreign countries, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We conduct a substantial portion of our business outside of the United States. We and our joint ventures currently have ten manufacturing facilities located outside the United States, including facilities and offices located in Mexico, Canada, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, China, Luxembourg, Denmark and the United Kingdom. We expect sales from international markets to continue to represent a significant portion of our net sales. Accordingly, our business is subject to risks related to the differing legal, political, social and regulatory requirements and economic conditions of many jurisdictions. Risks inherent in international operations include the following:

 

 

 

Our success as a global business will depend, in part, upon our ability to succeed in differing legal, regulatory, economic, social and political conditions by developing, implementing and maintaining policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we and our joint ventures do business.

 

Other increases in operating costs could affect our profitability.

 

Scheduled or unscheduled maintenance programs could cause significant production outages, higher costs and/or reduced production capacity at our equity affiliates and suppliers due to the industry in which they operate. The inability to achieve or the delay in achieving the anticipated financial benefits from our cost reduction initiatives and employee productivity goals could also affect our future profitability.

 

Our business depends upon good relations with our employees.

 

We may experience difficulties in maintaining appropriate relations with unions and employees in certain locations. About 80% of our hourly employees at our operations are represented by labor unions. In addition, problems or changes affecting employees in certain locations may affect relations with our employees at other locations. The risk of labor disputes, work stoppages or other disruptions in production could adversely affect us. If we cannot successfully negotiate or renegotiate collective bargaining agreements or if the negotiations take an excessive amount of time, there may be a heightened risk of a prolonged work stoppage. Any work stoppage could have a material adverse effect on the productivity and profitability of a manufacturing facility or on our operations as a whole.

 

Our business and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unable to protect our material trademarks and other proprietary information.

 

We have numerous valuable patents, trade secrets and know-how, domain names, trademarks and trade names, including certain marks that are material to our business, which are identified under Item 1 of this Report. Despite our efforts to protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights from unauthorized use or disclosure, other parties, including our former employees or consultants, may attempt to disclose, obtain or use our proprietary information or marks without our authorization. Unauthorized use of our trademarks, or unauthorized use or disclosure of our other intellectual property, could negatively impact our business and financial condition.

 

Although our pension and postretirement plans are currently adequately funded, events could occur that would require us to make significant contributions to the plans and reduce the cash available for our business.

 

We have several defined benefit pension and postretirement plans around the world, including in the United States, covering most of our employees. We are required to make cash contributions to our pension plans to the extent necessary to comply with minimum funding requirements imposed by the various countries’ benefit and tax laws. The amount of any such required contributions will be determined annually based on an actuarial valuation of the plans as performed by the plans’ actuaries and as required by law. The amount we may elect or be required to contribute to our pension plans in the future may increase significantly. Specifically, if year-end accumulated obligations exceed assets, we may elect to make a voluntary contribution, over and above the minimum required, in order to avoid charges to our balance sheet and consequent reductions to shareholders’ equity. These contributions could be substantial and would reduce the cash available for our business.

 

Increasing cost of employee healthcare may decrease our profitability.

 

The cost of providing healthcare coverage for our employees is continually increasing. If healthcare costs continue to rise at a rapid pace, the Company may not be able to or willing to pass on those costs to employees. Therefore, if we are unable to offset continued rising healthcare costs through improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, the increased costs of employee healthcare may result in declining margins and operating results.

Changes in tax laws could have an adverse impact on our earnings.

 

Changes to tax laws, rules and regulations, including changes in the interpretation or implementation of tax laws, rules and regulations by the Internal Revenue Service or other domestic or foreign governmental bodies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject us to additional compliance costs and tax liabilities which could have an adverse impact on our earnings.

 

Specific acts of terrorism may disrupt operations and cause increased costs and liabilities.

 

The threat of terrorist attacks or actual terrorist events in the United States or abroad could affect us in unpredictable ways. Terrorist threats or events could create political or economic instability, affecting our business in general. The increased costs related to heightened security or insurance coverage could also have a negative impact on our financial condition. Such threats or events could also result in operational disruption, including difficulty in obtaining raw materials, difficulty in delivering products to customers, or general delay and inefficiencies in our supply chain. Additionally, our manufacturing facilities, both within the United States and those located abroad, may become direct targets or indirect casualties of terrorist attacks, leading to severe damage including loss of life and loss of property.

 

Increased indebtedness could restrict growth and adversely affect our financial health.

 

As of August 31, 2006, our debt on a consolidated basis was approximately $131.7 million. We are more heavily leveraged than in the past and an increase in the level of indebtedness could have significant consequences. For example, it could:

 

 

We expect to pay expenses and to pay principal and interest on current and future debt from cash provided by operating activities. Therefore, our ability to meet these payment obligations will depend on future financial performance which is subject in part to numerous economic, business and financial factors beyond our control. If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our increased debt, we may be forced to reduce or delay expansion plans and capital expenditures, limit payment of dividends, sell material assets or operations, obtain additional capital or restructure our debt.

 

Litigation from customers, employees or others could adversely affect our financial condition.

 

From time to time, we may be subject to claims or legal action from customers, employees and/or others. Whether these claims and legal action are founded or unfounded, if these claims and legal actions are not resolved in our favor, they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect market perception of the Company and our products. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on our business. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are dependent upon good relationships with our various suppliers, vendors and distributors.

 

We rely upon good relationships with a number of different suppliers, vendors and distributors. If our relationships with these parties were to deteriorate or if a number of these parties should elect to discontinue doing business with us, our business operations could be adversely affected.

 

None.

 

The Company owns and operates seven plants in North America, six in Europe and two in Asia. The following table indicates the location of each plastics compounding plant, the approximate annual plastics compounding capacity and approximate floor area, including warehouse and office space and the geographic segment that is principally supported by such plant:

 

 

The Company considers each of the foregoing facilities to be in good condition and suitable for its purposes.

 

 

 

Public warehouses are used wherever needed to store the Company’s products conveniently for shipment to customers. The number of public warehouses in use varies from time to time. Currently, usage approximates 16 in North America and 67 in Europe. The Company believes an adequate supply of suitable public warehouse facilities is available to it.

The Company owns its corporate headquarters, which is located in Akron, Ohio and which contains approximately 48,000 square feet of office space. The Company leases sales offices in various locations in North America, Europe and Asia.

 

The Company also owns a 158,000 square foot facility in Akron, Ohio that, until December 31, 2000, was a manufacturing operation. The facility is now used for warehousing, logistics, product sampling and product development.

 

The Company also owns a 145,000 square foot facility in Orange, Texas, that, until August 31, 2003, was a manufacturing facility. The facility is now used for warehousing and logistics.

 

The Company is engaged in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The ultimate outcome of these proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

During fiscal 2006, a railroad company filed suit against the Company seeking compensatory damages and reimbursement of environmental costs to investigate and remediate property located near its Bellevue, Ohio facility. The Company subsequently filed an answer to this complaint and both parties are now conducting discovery. Management of the Company, in consultation with legal counsel, is of the opinion that a valid cause of action does not exist. The Company will continue to pursue resolution of this matter. The Company has not recorded a reserve relating to this matter. The ultimate outcome of this matter is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

 

The age (as of October 9, 2006), business experience during the past five years and offices presently held by each of the Company’s Executive Officers are reported below. The Company’s By-Laws provide that officers shall hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.

 

Terry L. Haines: Age 60; President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 1991.

 

Paul F. DeSantis: Age 42; Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company since April 2006; joined the Company as Vice President of Finance in January 2006; prior to that time, he was with Scott’s Miracle-Gro where he held various financial roles since 1997 before becoming Vice President and Corporate Treasurer of the Company in 2003.

 

Alain C. Adam: Age 57; Vice President — Global Automotive Market Development of the Company since March 2006; prior to that time Vice President — International Automotive Operations since September 1, 1999.

 

Barry A. Rhodes: Age 46; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of North America since March 2006; prior to that time Vice President — North American Sales and Marketing since October 2001.

 

John M. Myles: Age 62; Vice President — Research and Development since October 28, 2003; prior to that time, Vice President — North American Purchasing since October 1997.

 

Ronald G. Andres: Age 56; Vice President — North American Operations since March 2006; prior to that time, Vice President — North American Manufacturing since October 20, 1999.

 

Gary J. Elek: Age 54; Vice President and Controller for North America since March 2006; prior to that Corporate Controller since February 2004; prior to that time, Executive Vice President, Corporate Development of FirstMerit Corporation from 1997 to 2004.

 

The Company’s Common Stock is traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol “SHLM.” At October 31, 2006, there were 545 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock. This figure does not include beneficial owners who hold shares in nominee name. The closing stock price on October 31, 2006 was $24.21.

 

The quarterly high and low closing stock prices for fiscal 2006 and 2005 are presented in the table below.

 

 

The quarterly cash dividends declared for fiscal 2006 and 2005 are presented in the table below.

 

 

On April 25, 2006, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 6.75 million shares of its outstanding common stock (the “Repurchase Program”). This authorized share amount in the Repurchase Program equated to approximately 23.3% of the Company’s outstanding shares at the authorization date. It is anticipated that the Company will complete the Repurchase Program through open market repurchases from time to time. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of repurchases will depend upon the prevailing market prices and any other considerations that may, in the opinion of the Board of Directors or management, affect the advisability of repurchasing shares. The Repurchase Program replaced the Company’s prior repurchase authorization, under which approximately 1.7 million shares had remained authorized for repurchase. The Company’s purchases of its common stock under the Repurchase Program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

2006

 

Net income for the 2006 fiscal year was $32.7 million, or $1.07 per diluted share, compared to last year’s net income of $32.1 million, or $1.03 per diluted share. Net income in fiscal 2006 increased slightly as compared to the prior year and earnings per diluted share increased due to the reduced number of common shares outstanding as a result of the Company’s share repurchase program that was implemented in fiscal 2006 and the purchase of the Company’s common shares through a self-tender offer. The translation effect of foreign currencies, primarily the euro, decreased net income by $1.6 million or $0.05 per diluted share.

 

The Company had record sales performance and improved its gross margin in fiscal 2006; however the following significant and unusual items occurred that impacted net income by approximately $7.3 million:

 

 

Net income also included approximately $4.5 million of expense related to the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2006. There were no charges related to SFAS 123R in fiscal year 2005.

Net consolidated sales for fiscal 2006 were $1.616 billion, an increase of 12.8% over sales of $1.433 billion in fiscal 2005. A comparison of net consolidated sales by business segments, which are North America and Europe, including Asia (“Europe”), is as follows:

 

 

The components of the percentage change in 2006 net consolidated sales are as follows:

 

 

Worldwide tonnage was up 9.1% for the year as European tonnage was up 14.8% offsetting a North American tonnage decrease of 2.1%. The increase in European tonnage was a result of the improved European economic environment while North American tonnage declined slightly due to competition and weakness in the marketplace. The translation effect of foreign currencies, primarily the euro, decreased net consolidated sales by approximately $29.2 million or 2.0% in fiscal 2006.

 

The two largest markets served by the Company are the packaging and automotive markets. The approximate percentage of net consolidated sales by market for 2006 compared to 2005 is as follows:

 

 

Other markets include appliances, construction, medical, consumer products, electrical/electronics, office equipment and agriculture.

 

The majority of the Company’s consolidated sales can be classified into five primary product families. The approximate amount and percentage of consolidated sales for these product families compared to the previous year are as follows:

 

A comparison of gross profit dollars and percentages by business segment for 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

 

 

 

Gross profit margin increased twenty basis points on a year to year comparison to 13.6% in fiscal 2006 from 13.4% in fiscal 2005.

 

The increase of $17.5 million in gross profit dollars in Europe in fiscal 2006 was primarily driven by the increased tonnage as the gross profit percentage remained relatively flat as compared to fiscal 2005. North America also showed a significant increase in gross profit in fiscal 2006 as gross profits were up $9.8 million or 21.3% from fiscal 2005. This improvement in gross profit was the result of favorable pricing and changes in product mix. Overall, the Company enjoyed an increase in gross profit per pound in fiscal 2006, most notably in North America.

 

A comparison of capacity utilization levels is as follows:

 

 

Worldwide capacity utilization increased by 5%. The increase in European capacity utilization was the result of stronger customer demand and product mix. In order to meet this increased demand, some of Europe’s manufacturing facilities temporarily added additional production shifts above the normal production schedule during the second half of fiscal 2006. North American capacity utilization decreased slightly from 2005 as a result of continuing softening demand, the shutdown of the largest production line at the Company’s Texas facility due to a mechanical issue and a two-week shutdown at the same Texas facility because of Hurricane Rita.

 

A comparison of operating income (loss) by business segment for the years 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

 

 

The increase of $16.3 million in European operating income was primarily the result of the higher level of sales driven by the $17.5 million or 11.9% increase in gross profit and 14.8% increase in tonnage from the prior year. European operating expenses in fiscal 2006 remained relatively flat with fiscal 2005 although the translation effect of foreign currencies decreased operating expenses by $2.4 million. Operating income in North America in fiscal 2006 improved $1.9 million from the prior year, primarily because of favorable pricing and product mix which increased gross profit from the prior year. This increase was offset by an increase in operating expenses as explained in the next paragraph.

 

Total Company selling, general and administrative expenses were $148.5 million for fiscal 2006, up $10.7 million or 7.7% compared with fiscal 2005’s total of $137.8 million. The translation effect of foreign currencies had a favorable impact,

decreasing these expenses by $2.1 million in 2006. Increases in these expenses, of which the majority are in North America, included stock-based compensation expense related to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS), SFAS 123R in fiscal 2006 of $4.5 million, costs associated with the Company’s CFO transition, incentive compensation which was driven by the Company’s increasing common stock price, legal and professional fees, medical insurance and various IT related projects. SFAS 123R accounted for approximately half of the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

On September 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, which requires the Company to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record the related expense in the financial statements. The Company elected to use the modified prospective transition method. The modified prospective transition method requires that compensation cost be recognized in the financial statements for all awards granted after the date of adoption as well as for existing awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered as of the date of adoption and requires that prior periods not be restated. All periods presented prior to September 1, 2005 were accounted for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and followed a nominal vesting period approach.

 

The adoption of SFAS 123R reduced income before taxes for year ended August 31, 2006 by approximately $4.5 million ($0.15 per basic and diluted share). These expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. The first quarter of fiscal 2006 included approximately $1.0 million of charges related to the accelerated vesting of retirement eligible employees under the non-substantive vesting period approach applied to new grants after adoption. The expense recorded did not impact income tax expense since the Company’s deferred tax assets are fully reserved by a valuation allowance. There was no impact to the statement of cash flows related to the adoption of SFAS 123R. In addition, Unearned Stock Grant Compensation of $3.2 million was reclassified to Other Capital in Stockholders’ Equity upon adoption of SFAS 123R.

 

A large part of the Company’s technical activities relate to the continuous refinement of compounds for specific applications of customers. Research activities relating to the development of new products and the improvement of existing products are important to the Company. These activities are conducted at the Company’s various technical centers and laboratories. Research and development expenditures were approximately $4.7 million in fiscal 2006 and approximately $3.8 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in these activities is primarily related to the new Invision^® sheet product.

 

Interest expense was $6.2 million in fiscal 2006 compared to $3.7 million in fiscal 2005. The increase of $2.5 million was the result of an increased level of borrowings required for the Company’s common stock tender offer and open market common stock repurchase plans which were implemented in fiscal 2006.

 

Foreign currency transaction losses represent changes in the value of currencies in major areas where the Company operates. During fiscal 2006 the Company incurred foreign currency transaction losses of approximately $2.1 million compared to approximately $2.8 million in fiscal 2005. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar accounted for $1.3 million of this loss in fiscal 2006.

 

Minority interest represents a 30% equity position of Mitsubishi Chemical MKV Company in a partnership with the Company and a 35% equity position of P.T. Prima Polycon Indah in an Indonesian joint venture with the Company.

 

Other income in fiscal 2006 was approximately $1.9 million, which included income of $0.8 million from the cancellation by suppliers of certain distribution arrangements in Europe and the receipt of a life insurance settlement of approximately $0.5 million. Other income of $0.9 million in 2005 included approximately $0.8 million of income related to gain on the sale of an office in Europe.

 

In connection with the Company’s new financing arrangements, as discussed hereafter in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section, the Company prepaid its $50.0 million private placement 7.27% senior notes and terminated its

$100.0 million revolving credit arrangement. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $5.0 million which was comprised of the following:

 

 

A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate with the effective tax rates of 47.4% in 2006 and 35.0% in 2005 is as follows:

 

 

One of the Company’s major facilities in Texas was closed for a two-week period in September 2005 because of Hurricane Rita. In addition, a warehouse in Texas also incurred damage from Hurricane Rita. While repair work continues and operations have returned to normal, the financial impact from this hurricane is still being assessed. The claim for this hurricane has been filed with the insurance carriers, but the ultimate amount of any gain or loss related to this claim has not yet been determined. It is anticipated that amounts not covered by insurance will not have a material impact on future earnings.

 

In September 2005, the Company introduced its new Invision^® sheet product and formed A. Schulman Invision, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary. Invision^® is a revolutionary product based on cutting-edge technology that is expected to provide high growth opportunities in many markets around the world. Invision^® is a multi-layered, extruded sheet product that reduces costs and simplifies the manufacturing process for the Company’s customers, while providing a higher-performing and more environmentally friendly alternative to existing plastic and film materials that are painted or colored. The Company expects Invision^® to appeal to customers in a variety of markets, both automotive and non-automotive. Initially, the Company will focus on automotive applications to capitalize on the Company’s market presence and recognized capabilities. Samples from the Company’s pilot line have been tested by several potential customers and the Company has received positive feedback based on the initial results of these tests. The initial production line in the Company’s Sharon Center facility is nearing completion and is scheduled for start-up in January 2007 with the ability to produce saleable product expected shortly thereafter. In addition, the Company has purchased land for a greenfield plant site in Findlay, Ohio for construction of a dedicated Invision^® facility. While Invision^® did not produce operating income in fiscal 2006, the Company believes this is a very large market that could have significant sales in the years ahead.

 

In October 2006, in order to balance capacity with demand, reduce costs and improve efficiencies in North America, the Company announced its intentions to close two of its manufacturing lines at its Orange, Texas plant, close a warehouse also located in Orange, Texas and reduce the workforce at its Bellevue, Ohio plant. As a result, the Company expects to record a charge during fiscal 2007 in an estimated range of $1.0 million to $3.0 million. The Company expects the charge to include

costs such as severance payments, medical insurance, accelerated depreciation, equipment removal costs, other exit costs and the impact on its postretirement obligation due to the reduction in the workforce.

 

In October 2005, the Company reached an agreement with a group of investors led by Barington Capital Group, L.P. (the “Barington Group”) which then had an ownership position of approximately 8.7% of the Company’s outstanding stock (the “2005 Agreement”). Under the terms of the agreement, among other things, the Barington Group withdrew its notice of intent to nominate persons for election as directors at the Company’s 2005 Annual Meeting and agreed to abide by certain standstill provisions until the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting (the “Standstill Period”), while the Company, through its Board of Directors, expanded the size of the Board from 10 to 12 and appointed James A. Mitarotonda, a member of the Barington Group, to serve as a director until the 2007 Annual Meeting. The Company also agreed to initiate and consummate a self-tender offer by April 30, 2006.

 

On February 21, 2006 the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a modified Dutch auction self-tender offer for up to 8.75 million shares of its common stock, at a price between $21.00 and $24.00 per share. The Company commenced the self-tender offer on March 1, 2006 and it expired on April 11, 2006. On April 25, 2006 the Company announced the final results of the self-tender offer where the Company accepted for purchase 2,071,585 shares at a price of $24.00 per share for a total of approximately $49.7 million. The Company also incurred costs in connection with the self-tender of $0.5 million in legal and professional fees.

 

On May 30, 2006, the Barington Group filed Amendment No. 9 to its Schedule 13-D disclosing certain changes, among group members and in the aggregate, of the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock. The Barington Group disclosed its positions that completion of the self-tender offer by the Company without repurchasing 8,750,000 shares of common stock constituted a failure of the Company to fulfill its obligations under the 2005 Agreement and therefore the Standstill Period terminated after the close of business on April 30, 2006. Among other things, termination of the Standstill Period would eliminate certain restrictions on the ability of Barington Group members to purchase additional shares of common stock of the Company and to solicit proxies in connection with the Company’s 2006 Annual Meeting.

 

In October 2006, the Company reached another agreement with the Barington Group, which as of the date of the agreement owned in the aggregate 2,816,536 shares, or approximately 10.5% of the Company’s common stock (the “2006 Agreement”). Under the terms of the 2006 Agreement, the Barington Group withdrew a notice of its intent to nominate certain persons for election as directors at the 2006 annual meeting, agreed to dismiss a lawsuit it had filed against the Company in Delaware seeking to enforce its rights as a stockholder to inspect and copy certain books, records and documents of the Company, and agreed to abide by certain standstill provisions until the Company’s 2007 annual meeting. The Company agreed, among other things, to nominate James S. Marlen, Ernest J. Novak, Jr. (each current directors of the Company), Howard R. Curd and Michael A. McManus, Jr. on the Board’s slate of nominees for election as Class II directors of the Company at the 2006 annual meeting. The 2006 Agreement also superseded the 2005 Agreement, except with respect to Sections 5(d), 6(a) and 9 of the 2005 Agreement.

 

The foregoing descriptions of certain of the terms of the 2005 Agreement and the 2006 Agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements, each of which are attached as Exhibit 99.2 to the Forms 8-K filed by the Company on October 24, 2005 and October 26, 2006.

 

During fiscal 2006 the Company made significant progress toward improving its North American business. The Company is currently working on several initiatives that management believes will add significant value in the next few years which include sales price optimization, purchase price reductions, inventory reductions, continued freight cost reductions, manufacturing conversion cost reductions and production process refinement.

 

The Company is focused and dedicated to continuous improvement in the challenging and competitive business climate in which it operates. As fiscal 2006 came to a close, gross margins in North America continued to improve despite strong competition and weakness in the marketplace. Heading into fiscal 2007, demand has weakened in North America primarily in the automotive industry. On a longer-term basis, the prospects of Invision^® remain significant as the Company proceeds with the commercialization of this new technology.

2005

 

Net income for the 2005 fiscal year was $32.1 million or $1.03 per diluted share, an increase of 15% over fiscal 2004’s net income of $27.9 million or $0.91 per diluted share. The translation effect of foreign currencies, primarily the euro, increased net income by $2.7 million or $0.09 per share.

 

The primary reason for the increase in fiscal 2005 net income was a reduction in the effective tax rate to 35.0% in 2005 from 48.9% in 2004. The tax rate was lower due to $3.3 million or $0.11 per share of tax benefits from tax reserves no longer required due to a change in Mexican tax laws as of January 1, 2005. The change in Mexican tax law impacted the timing of recognizing inventory purchases in cost of sales. The change had an immediate effect of increasing Mexican taxable income and thus allowing the Company to utilize tax credits previously paid on a net asset tax. The tax credits had a full valuation allowance previously recorded thus the change in tax law allowed the Company to remove the valuation allowance on the net asset tax credits resulting in an income tax benefit. In addition, the Company received a favorable settlement of a transfer pricing audit assessment in Canada of $1.1 million or $.03 per share. The Company had recorded a tax reserve related to anticipated transfer pricing adjustments between the U.S. and Canada. During February 2005 the Company received notification from the Canadian tax authorities that they were formally withdrawing the proposed assessment for transfer pricing. Accordingly, the tax reserve was no longer considered necessary and was reversed. In addition, there was a reduction in losses in the United States where no tax benefits are currently recognized.

 

Net income for fiscal 2005 also included a net gain of $0.5 million or $0.02 per share from the sale of an office in Europe and $1.0 million or $0.03 per share from the refinement in assumptions relating to freight in North America. Enhancements to the Company’s information system provided new information for estimating freight liabilities for outbound customer shipments. The estimating of freight liabilities is required due to the lag in time between the incurrence of freight expenses and the eventual receipt and validation of the freight vendor’s invoices. As a result of the new information, the Company revised its estimate and recorded a favorable adjustment which decreased cost of sales and increased net income. Net income for fiscal 2004 included restructuring charges of $2.1 million or $0.07 per share, an impairment charge for goodwill of $1.8 million or $0.06 per share and a charge of $1.4 million or $0.05 per share for a valuation allowance on tax assets not recoverable.

 

Net consolidated sales for 2005 were $1.433 billion, an increase of 15.7% over sales of $1.239 billion for the comparable period in 2004. A comparison of net consolidated sales by business segment is as follows:

 

 

The translation effect of foreign currencies, primarily the euro, increased consolidated sales by $59.9 million in 2005. The components of the percentage change in 2005 consolidated sales are as follows:

 

 

Worldwide tonnage was up 0.5% for the year, European tonnage was up 4.8% while North American volume decreased 7.2%. The increase in Europe was primarily attributable to the manufacturing and merchant activities. In North America, tonnage declined for manufacturing and the sale of commodity products.

The two largest markets served by the Company are the packaging and automotive markets. The approximate percentage of consolidated sales by market for 2005 compared to 2004 is as follows:

 

 

Sales to the automotive market declined due to pricing, margin pressure and efforts by the industry to reduce unit inventory. Other markets include appliances, construction, medical, consumer products, electrical/electronics, office equipment and agriculture.

 

The majority of the Company’s consolidated sales can be classified into five primary product families. The approximate amount and percentage of consolidated sales for these product families compared to the previous year are as follows:

 

 

A comparison of gross profit dollars and percentages by business segment for 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

 

 

 

The gross profit margin was 13.4% in fiscal 2005 compared with 14.8% in fiscal 2004. The decline in margin was the result of higher raw material costs due to increased energy prices and the lag in passing on such increases in the form of higher selling prices. The reduction in margin had an adverse effect of approximately $17.0 million on pre-tax income.

 

Gross profit dollars in Europe were up from 2004 primarily due to the positive impact of the euro, which increased margins by $8.1 million in fiscal 2005. The decline in the European gross profit percentage was due to rising raw material prices and the lag in passing on cost increases in the form of higher sales prices.

 

North American gross profit in 2005 increased $2.4 million or 5.4% from 2004. Gross profit in 2005 includes a $1.0 million refinement in assumptions relating to freight, as discussed previously. In addition, gross profit in 2004 was reduced by $1.4 million for restructuring charges in Nashville pertaining to accelerated depreciation on disposed equipment.

A comparison of capacity utilization levels is as follows:

 

 

Capacity utilization decreased by 3% worldwide. The decrease in European capacity utilization was due primarily to the production capacity added for a new facility in China. The China plant, which has an estimated annual production capacity of approximately 35 million pounds, utilized only 20% of its capacity in 2005, its first year of production. North American capacity utilization was flat in 2005.

 

A comparison of operating income (loss) by business segment for the years 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

 

 

The decrease of $4.2 million in European income was primarily the result of higher operating expenses of $11.8 million, including increased costs of $2.5 million related to compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley requirements. In addition, the translation effect of foreign currencies increased operating expenses by $4.4 million. The balance of the increase consisted of $0.4 million for a major trade show, increased costs for compensation and other expenses required to support a higher level of sales. The increase in expenses offset higher gross profit from an increase in sales. Income in North America declined $3.5 million, primarily because of higher Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses of $1.3 million and the adverse effects of currency transaction losses. These transaction losses include $2.0 million related to the Canadian dollar.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $137.8 million for 2005, up $15.5 million or 12.7% compared with 2004. The translation effect of foreign currencies increased these expenses by $4.6 million for 2005. Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses increased $3.8 million and expenses for compensation and benefits were up $2.9 million from the 2004 fiscal year. Various other expenses increased $4.2 million.

 

Interest expense decreased $0.5 million in 2005 due to an interest-rate swap of $25 million, and a reduction of average borrowings. Interest income increased $0.4 million due to a higher level of investments.

 

Foreign currency transaction losses represent changes in the value of currencies in major areas where the Company operates. During 2005 the Company incurred foreign currency transaction losses of approximately $2.0 million in Canada as a result of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar.

 

Minority interest represents a 30% equity position of Mitsubishi Chemical MKV Company in a partnership with the Company and a 35% equity position of P.T. Prima Polycon Indah in an Indonesian joint venture with the Company.

 

During fiscal 2004, in order to balance capacity with demand, the Company closed two manufacturing lines at its Nashville, Tennessee plant. As a result, the Company recorded pre-tax charges of $0.2 million and $1.8 million for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At August 31, 2005, the restructuring was complete, therefore no further cash out-flows were required by the Company.

 

One of the Company’s major facilities in Texas was down for a two-week period in September 2005 and a warehouse in Texas also incurred damage from Hurricane Rita. See the update on this hurricane damage in the 2006 section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

In September 2005 the Company introduced its new Invision^® sheet product and formed A. Schulman Invision, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary. See the update on Invision^® in the 2006 section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In October 2005 the Company reached an agreement with a group of investors led by Barington Capital Group, L.P. which had an ownership position of approximately 8.7% of the Company’s outstanding stock. See the update on this agreement in the 2006 section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The Company has identified critical accounting policies that, as a result of the judgments, uncertainties, and the operations involved, could result in material changes to its financial condition or results of operations under different conditions or using different assumptions. The Company’s most critical accounting policies relate to the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, restructuring costs, goodwill, long-lived assets, provisions for income taxes, pension and other postretirement benefits and stock-based compensation.

 

Management records an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on the current and projected credit quality of the Company’s customers, historical experience, customer payment history, expected trends and other factors that affect collectibility. Changes in these factors or changes in economic circumstances could result in changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

 

Management establishes an inventory reserve based on historical experience and amounts expected to be realized for slow-moving and obsolete inventory. The Company monitors its slow-moving and obsolete inventory on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments as considered necessary. The proceeds from the sale or dispositions of these inventories may differ from the net recorded amount.

 

Restructuring charges are recorded in accordance with, SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Liabilities for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity are recognized when the liability is incurred. Fair value is the basis for the measurement of any asset write-downs that are reflected as accelerated depreciation in cost of sales.

 

Goodwill is not amortized. The Company conducts a formal impairment test of goodwill at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.

 

Long-lived assets, except goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future net cash flows estimated by the Company to be generated by such assets.

 

The Company’s quarterly provision for income taxes involves a significant amount of judgment by management. Quarterly, the provision for income taxes is based upon actual year to date results plus an estimate of pretax income for the remainder of the year. This provision is impacted by the income and tax rates of the countries where the Company operates. A change in the geographical source of the Company’s income can have a significant effect on the tax rate. No taxes are provided on earnings which are permanently reinvested.

 

The Company has not recognized any tax benefits from losses in the United States.

 

Various taxing authorities periodically audit the Company’s tax returns. These audits may include questions regarding the Company’s tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions the Company records tax liabilities for probable exposures. A significant period of time may elapse before a particular matter, for which the Company has recorded a tax liability, is audited and fully resolved.

 

The establishment of the Company’s tax liabilities relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with its various filing positions. Although management believes those estimates and judgments are reasonable, actual results could differ, resulting in gains or losses that may be material to the Company’s consolidated statement of income.

 

To the extent that the Company prevails in matters for which tax liabilities have been recorded, or are required to pay amounts in excess of these tax liabilities, the Company’s effective tax rate in any given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement could result in an increase in the Company’s effective tax rate in the

financial statement period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in the Company’s effective tax rate in the financial statement period of resolution.

 

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109 Accounting for Income Taxes, all available evidence, both positive and negative, is considered to determine whether a valuation allowance is needed. Evidence, such as the results of operations for the current and preceding years, is given more weight than projections of future income, which is inherently uncertain. The Company’s losses in the U.S. in recent periods provide sufficient negative evidence to require a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets in the U.S. The Company intends to maintain a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets in the U.S. until sufficient positive evidence exists to support realization of such assets.

 

Defined pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans are a significant cost of doing business that represents obligations that will be ultimately settled far into the future and therefore subject to estimation. Pension and postretirement benefit accounting is intended to reflect the recognition of future benefit costs over the employee’s approximate period of employment based on the terms of the plans and the investment and funding decisions made by the Company. While management believes the Company’s assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in the Company’s actual experience or significant changes in the Company’s assumptions, including the discount rate used and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, may materially affect the Company’s pension and postretirement obligations and future expenses.

 

The Company has several postretirement benefit plans worldwide. These plans consist primarily of defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans, but also include other postretirement benefit plans. For financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, many assumptions are required to be made in order to value the plans’ liabilities on a projected and accumulated basis, as well as to determine the annual expense for the plans. The assumptions chosen take into account historical experience, the current economic environment and management’s best judgment regarding future experience. Assumptions include the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on assets, future salary increases, health care escalation rates, cost of living increases, turnover, retirement ages and mortality. The cumulative difference between actual experience and assumed experience is deferred under current accounting principles. These gains or losses are recognized in expense over the average future working lifetime of employees to the extent that the cumulative experience exceeds 10% of the greater of the Projected Benefit Obligation (or Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation) and assets. Additionally, the current accounting principles defer the amount of any plan changes. These amounts are then recognized in expense over the average future working lifetime of the affected group. In accordance with SFAS 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans, the full unfunded liability will be recognized on the Company’s balance sheet in fiscal 2007. The deferred items will be charged to accumulated other comprehensive income and will be amortized through expense in the same manner as before.

 

For the majority of the Company’s pension plans, the Company consults with various actuaries annually when reviewing and selecting the discount rates to be used. The discount rates used by the Company are based on yields of various corporate bond indices with varying maturity dates. The discount rates are also reviewed in comparison with current benchmark indices, economic market conditions and the movement in the benchmark yield since the previous fiscal year. The liability weighted-average discount rate for the defined benefit pension plans is 4.7% for fiscal 2006. For the other postretirement benefit plan, the rate is 6.0% and is obtained from the Citigroup Pension Liability Index and Discount Curve. This rate represents the higher interest rates generally available in the United States, which is the Company’s only country with other postretirement benefit liabilities. Another assumption that affects the Company’s pension expense is the expected return on assets. The weighted-average expected return on assets assumption is 7.7% for fiscal 2006.

The following table illustrates the sensitivity to a change in the assumed discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on assets for the Company’s pension plans and other postretirement plans as of August 31, 2006:

 

 

Stock-based compensation requires the use of a valuation model. The Company currently uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of its stock options. The Black-Scholes model requires assumptions based on management’s judgment regarding, among others, the volatility of the Company’s stock, the expected forfeiture rate, the expected life of the stock award and the Company’s dividend yield. The Company primarily uses historical data to determine the assumptions to be used in the Black-Scholes model and has no reason to believe that future data is likely to differ from historical data. However, changes in the assumptions to reflect future stock price volatility, future dividend payments and future stock award exercise experience may result in a material change to the fair value calculation of share-based awards. While management believes the Company’s assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in the Company’s actual experience or significant changes in the Company’s assumptions, including the volatility of the Company’s stock, the expected forfeiture rate, the expected life of the stock award and the dividend yield, may materially affect the Company’s future stock-based compensation expense.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

 

As of August 31, 2006, the current ratio was 2.8 to 1 and working capital, excluding cash, was $353.1 million. Net cash provided from operations was $19.0 million in 2006 compared with $55.6 million in 2005. Cash used in financing activities increased $42.7 million, mainly due to the Company’s purchases of its common stock pursuant to the Repurchase Program, as discussed later in this section, and through the self-tender offer.

 

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $50.7 million at August 31, 2006, a decrease of $51.6 million, or 50.4% from August 31, 2005. The decrease is primarily due to the purchases of treasury stock and an increase in working capital, excluding cash. The increase in working capital, excluding cash, is due primarily to the increase in accounts receivable and inventories which supported the Company’s significant growth in sales in fiscal 2006.

 

Accounts receivable increased in 2006 by $47.4 million. The translation effect of foreign currencies, primarily the euro, accounted for $6.2 million of the increase in accounts receivable. Excluding the translation effect, the increase in accounts receivable was the result of higher sales, which increased 22.1% in the fourth quarter and 12.8% for the year compared to the same periods in the prior year. Days sales in accounts receivable improved from 59 days to 58 days.

 

Inventory increased in 2006 by $52.7 million or 22.6%. While this represents a significant increase from the prior year, the stronger sales volume has resulted in the Company days sales in inventory to remain relatively flat with the prior year. The translation effect of foreign currencies also accounted for $5.6 million or 10.7% of the increase in inventory.

 

The Company increased total long-term debt by $57.5 million or 91.0% during 2006. Total long-term debt was $120.7 million as of August 31, 2006. The increase is related to the financing actions discussed below.

Capital expenditures for the year ended August 31, 2006 were $29.2 million compared with $26.9 million last year. The major components of the capital expenditures included the pilot line and other components for the new Invision^® product line which totaled $7.8 million, land for the future site of Invision^® of approximately $1.0 million, a new line for the manufacturing facility in China of approximately $2.2 million, a new packaging line for the manufacturing facility in Germany of approximately $2.5 million, an upgrade to a production line for the manufacturing facility in Mexico of approximately $1.0 million and an expansion of the laboratory in the United Kingdom facility for about $0.5 million. The Company’s Board of Directors approved $32.0 million for capital expenditures for A. Schulman Invision, Inc. of which approximately $15.0 million has been spent through fiscal year 2006.

 

On February 28, 2006 the Company completed a refinancing in which it replaced a $100.0 million credit facility with a new $260.0 million credit facility (“Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility consists of $260.0 million of revolving credit lines of which the U.S. dollar equivalent of $160.0 million is available to certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries for borrowings in euros or other currencies. The Credit Facility, which matures on February 28, 2011, contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability to incur indebtedness and enter into certain transactions beyond specified limits. The Company must also maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and may not exceed a maximum net debt leverage ratio. As of August 31, 2006, there were no covenant violations under the Credit Facility.

 

Interest rates on the Credit Facility are based on LIBOR or EURIBOR (depending on the borrowing currency) plus a spread determined by the Company’s total leverage ratio. The Company also pays a facility fee on the commitments whether used or unused. As of August 31, 2006 there was $26.2 million outstanding under the Credit Facility.

 

The Company used proceeds from the Credit Facility to prepay its $50.0 million in 7.27% senior notes which were due in 2009. In conjunction with the prepayment of these notes the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $5.0 million, which included a make-whole provision of approximately $3.3 million, interest rate swap termination fee of $1.5 million and the write-off of related deferred debt costs and deferred interest. Deferred interest related to proceeds deferred in 1999 when the Company completed an interest rate lock effectively reducing the annual interest rate from 7.27% to 7.14% over the life of the notes. In connection with the prepayment of debt and termination of this interest rate lock, the remaining balance of these deferred proceeds of $0.2 million was written off.

 

On March 1, 2006, the Company issued senior guaranteed notes (“Senior Notes”) in the private placement market consisting of the following:

 

 

The Senior Notes are guaranteed by the Company’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and contain covenants substantially identical to those in the $260.0 million revolving credit facility. As of August 31, 2006, there were no covenant violations under the Senior Notes.

 

Both the Credit Facility and the Senior Notes are supported by up to 65% of the capital stock of certain of the Company’s directly owned foreign subsidiaries.

 

The proceeds from the Euro Notes, available cash, and borrowings on the Credit Facility were used to fund the $143.8 million repatriation from Europe completed in March 2006. The Company used these repatriated proceeds to fund the self-tender offer which cost approximately $50.2 million including $0.5 million in fees directly related to the tender offer.

In connection with the Company’s agreement to initiate a self-tender offer, which required new debt and repatriation from foreign subsidiaries, the Company incurred $11.5 million, which is summarized as follows:

 

 

Charges of $2.6 million related to the issuance of the Senior Notes and the Credit Facility have been deferred as of August 31, 2006 and are being amortized over the contractual lives of the Senior Notes and the Credit Facility, respectively.

 

The Company had approximately $8.5 million and $17.0 million of uncollateralized short-term lines of credit from various domestic banks at August 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. There was $8.5 million outstanding at August 31, 2006 and no borrowings under these lines of credit at August 31, 2005.

 

The Company had approximately $58.0 million and $55.0 million of uncollateralized short-term foreign lines of credit available to its subsidiaries at August 31, 2006 and August 31, 2005, respectively. There was $2.5 million outstanding under these lines of credit at August 31, 2006 and no borrowings at August 31, 2005.

 

The Company leases certain items under capital leases. The European segment leased certain land and buildings with an amount due on this capital lease at August 31, 2005 of approximately $0.4 million. The European and North American segments had no significant capital leases outstanding at August 31, 2006.

 

The Company’s unfunded pension liability is approximately $65.0 million at August 31, 2006. This amount is primarily due to an unfunded plan of $50.3 million maintained by the Company’s German subsidiary. Under this plan, no separate vehicle is required to accumulate assets to provide for the payment of benefits. The benefits are paid directly by the Company to the participants. It is anticipated that the German subsidiary will generate sufficient funds from operations to pay these benefits in the future.

 

The Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts as a hedge against amounts due or payable in foreign currencies. These contracts limit the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Any gains or losses associated with these contracts as well as the offsetting gains or losses from the underlying assets or liabilities hedged are recognized on the foreign currency transaction line in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The Company estimates that a 10% change in foreign exchange rates at August 31, 2006 would have changed the fair value of the contracts by approximately $3.6 million. Changes in the fair value of forward exchange contracts are substantially offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged positions. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes or utilize any other types of derivative instruments.

A summary of the Company’s future obligations subsequent to August 31, 2006 are presented below:

 

 

 

 

Operating lease information is provided in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 8 of this Report. The aggregate future minimum rental commitment for non-cancelable leases, excluding obligations for taxes, insurance, etc. was $12.0 million at August 31, 2006.

 

The Company’s outstanding commercial commitments at August 31, 2006 are not material to the Company’s financial position, liquidity or results of operations except as discussed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in ITEM 8 of this Report.

 

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2006, the Company paid cash dividends aggregating to $0.58 per share. The total amount of these dividends was $17.6 million. Cash flow has been sufficient to fund the payment of these dividends.

 

For the year ended August 31, 2006, the Company issued 650,667 common shares upon the exercise of employee stock options and 78,950 common shares were issued to employees under the restricted stock plan. The total amount received from the exercise of these options was $9.8 million.

 

On April 25, 2006, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 6.75 million shares of its outstanding common stock (the “Repurchase Program”). This authorized share amount in the Repurchase Program equated to approximately 23.3% of the Company’s outstanding shares at the authorization date. It is anticipated that the Company will complete the Repurchase Program through open market repurchases from time to time. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of repurchases will depend upon the prevailing market prices and any other considerations that may, in the opinion of the Board of Directors or management, affect the advisability of repurchasing shares. The Repurchase Program replaced the Company’s prior repurchase authorization, under which approximately 1.7 million shares had remained authorized for repurchase. During the year ended August 31, 2006, the Company repurchased 2,000,081 common shares under the new program at an average cost of $22.76 per share, excluding commissions. Under the current plan the Company has approximately 4.7 million shares still available to be repurchased. During fiscal 2006, the Company purchased approximately 4.1 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $23.39 excluding transaction fees through the Repurchase Program and self-tender offer.

 

The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates. Income statement items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in the “accumulated other comprehensive income” account in stockholders’ equity. The continued weakness of the U.S. dollar during the year ended August 31, 2006 increased this account by $6.8 million.

 

A. SCHULMAN, INC.

 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

November 2, 2006

A. Schulman, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Income

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

A. Schulman, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet