MOD-PAC CORP
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2005
Commission File Number: 0-50063
MOD-PAC CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
16-0957153 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1801 Elmwood Avenue Buffalo, New York 14207
(Address of principal executive office)
(716) 873-0640
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
$.01 par value Common Stock
$.01 par value Class B Stock
|
|
NASDAQ National Market System
NASDAQ National Market System |
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ.
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file report pursuant to Section 13 of
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of March 2, 2006, 3,441,957 shares were outstanding, consisting of 2,729,999 shares of Common
Stock $.01 Par value and 711,958 shares of Class B Stock $.01 Par Value. The aggregate market
value, as of July 2, 2005, of the shares of Common Stock and Class B Stock of MOD-PAC CORP. held by
non-affiliates was approximately $39,525,116 (assuming conversion of all of the outstanding Class B
Stock into Common Stock and assuming the affiliates of the Registrant to be its directors,
executive officers and persons known to the Registrant to beneficially own more than 10% of the
outstanding capital stock of the Corporation).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
Portions of the Companys Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 10,
2006 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
Forward Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature
are forward-looking, and the word anticipate, believe, expect, estimate, project, and
similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward looking statements. Any forward
looking statement contained herein, in press releases, written statements or other documents filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or in MOD-PAC CORPs (MOD-PAC) communications and
discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings,
webcasts, phone calls and conference calls, regarding expectations with respect to sales, earnings,
cash flows, operating efficiencies, product and market channel expansions, capacity utilization and
expansion, and repurchase of capital stock, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and contingencies. Many of these risks, uncertainties, and contingencies are beyond our control,
and may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated
results, performance or achievements. Factors that might affect such forward-looking statements
include, among other things:
|
|
|
Overall economic and business conditions; |
|
|
|
|
The demand for MOD-PACs goods and services; |
|
|
|
|
Customer acceptance of the products and services MOD-PAC provides; |
|
|
|
|
Competitive factors in commercial printing and the folding cartons; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in tax requirements (including tax rate changes, new tax laws and revised tax law interpretations); |
|
|
|
|
The availability and costs of natural gas supplies in Western New York State; |
|
|
|
|
The internal and external costs of compliance with laws and regulations such as Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Overview
MOD-PAC is a high value-added, on demand print services firm operating a unique low-cost business
model. MOD-PACs strategy is to grow market share through strategic niche applications for its
custom folding carton business and to capture a share of the $25 billion commercial print market
currently served by over 28,000 printers with under $5 million in annual print volume. We believe
that we can aggregate this market by leveraging our capabilities to innovate and aggressively
integrate technology into the Companys marketing, order in-take and production operations, and to
provide economically-priced, short run, on demand full-color print products and services. MOD-PAC
has economic advantage and scale as a result of channeling a large number of small to medium-sized
print orders through its Superprint facility.
Our key differentiator is our success at being a just-in-time producer of short-run, quality on
demand print products. Through our lean manufacturing processes coupled with state-of-the-art
printing technologies, we are able to address short run, highly variable content needs of our
customers with a short turn around time relative to industry standards.
We provide products in two primary categories, folding cartons and full color print-on-demand.
Folding Cartons:
Custom Folding Cartons: Through MOD-PACs fully-integrated, automated die design and custom
folding carton print production, we can meet the highly variable needs of our custom packaging
customers and provide cost competitive prices for on-demand products in the required quantities. Full service design,
employing advanced computer-aided design and manufacturing systems, computer-to-plate speed and
accuracy, and rapid turnover print processes give our customers the products they need when they
need them. Our customers are generally in the
2
healthcare, pharmaceuticals, confectionary, food and beverage, and automotive sectors, including private label manufacturers. We sell directly to these
customers, who have requirements that are characterized by high product variability, short
production cycles, and variable print run quantities.
Stock Boxes: Stock boxes are standardized box sizes and shapes that are then customized for our
customers needs. We serve over 4,300 customers around the globe through a distributor network and
directly through one distributor. Our market is primarily the global independent confectioners
industry, however, we also provide stock boxes during the holiday season to gift retailers and for
general consumer use.
Full Color Print-On-Demand:
Short-run Commercial Printing: MOD-PAC produces a variety of commercial print products, including
business cards, direct mail post cards, letterhead and corporate stationery, presentation folders,
product catalogs and product flyers. We are targeting U.S. businesses for commercial print as
these customers all require corporate branding, stationery, such as business cards and letterhead,
and point of sale marketing materials. MOD-PACs capabilities allow them to eliminate the need to
stock inventory and provide economically-priced products due to our scale. We approach this large
market through two channels:
|
§ |
|
Direct targeted markets: We sell directly to a select group of targeted industries in
the small business world. Our web-to-print store, www.printlizard.com, provides convenient
design and order capabilities. In addition, customers have the option of using our design
staff to assist them in their print product development. Customers may include nonprofit
organizations, event planners, realtors and creative design agencies. |
|
|
§ |
|
Print distributors: The print distribution industry is an efficient channel to market
for commercial print products with approximately $2.5 billion in annual sales. Print
distributors have strong relationships established throughout the U.S. with small business
to large corporate entities. Print distributors have historically been served by networks
of small localized printers, which lack the scale and diversity of services that we have,
or by larger, regional printers which have not converted to print-on-demand production. |
Personalized Printed Products: MOD-PAC produces and markets a variety of event-oriented products
for the corporate and consumer market including specialty items such as invitations and
announcements, napkins, and stationery. Distinctive designs can be provided for all social
occasions such as corporate sales conferences, corporate client events, weddings, graduations, and
anniversaries. Personalized print products are marketed through resellers such as bridal and gift
shops, event planners, internet resellers, for example eInvite.com, and our retail website,
www.partybasics.com.
General Development of Business
The spin-off from Astronics Corporation on March 14, 2003, was an important event in the Companys
history. The spin-off was accomplished by means of a distribution (the Distribution) of all of the
outstanding shares of MOD-PACs common stock and Class B stock. The shares of MOD-PAC were
distributed on a pro rata basis to the shareowners of Astronics in a tax-free distribution. The
Astronics Board of Directors set a one-for-two distribution ratio, in which (i) each Astronics
common stock owner received one share of MOD-PAC common stock for every two shares of Astronics
common stock owned on the record date for the Distribution and (ii) each Astronics Class B stock
owner received one share of MOD-PAC Class B stock for every two shares of Astronics Class B stock
owned on the record date for the Distribution. At the time of the Distribution, MOD-PAC became a
separately traded, publicly held company.
MOD-PACs business has developed rapidly over the last five years because of the development of our
commercial print product line for VistaPrint, a former customer of the Company, as well as the
success of our custom folding carton product line which has gained new customers and captured more
business from existing customers. In 2002, we began servicing VistaPrint, which was a front-end web store for commercial print to the small
office/home office market. MOD-PAC produced and distributed the orders VistaPrint received. In
order to respond to the growth in sales of the commercial print product line for VistaPrint,
MOD-PAC rapidly increased its capacity with capital expenditures of $19.7 million over the last
three years and employment increasing to 435 employees from 289 employees. In July 2004, the
Company announced a new agreement to terminate the supply agreement with
3
VistaPrint, which was scheduled to expire in April 2011. At that time, VistaPrint had decided to bring a majority of its
printing needs in house. In connection with this, MOD-PAC received $22 million as a contract
buy-out fee from VistaPrint on September 1, 2004 and established a new supply agreement. This new
agreement expired on August 30, 2005. Although disappointed with the prospect of losing a large
customer, MOD-PAC, as a result of the processes and production resources gained from the
relationship, had also been strategically expanding its marketing and sales plans to develop other
channels to market for commercial print.
On April 15, 2005, the Company agreed to amend the new supply agreement with VistaPrint, which
modified the exclusivity provision regarding the North American market through August 2005. As a
result of the amendment, VistaPrint was allowed to produce and ship product to its North American
customers from its Windsor, Ontario plant in advance of the expiration of the contract provided
MOD-PAC received payments that approximated the fixed costs and mark-up on any products VistaPrint
shipped to its customers. Simultaneously, the Company executed a supply agreement with VistaPrint
for the 12-month period ending August 30, 2006. This agreement established unit pricing for
volumes above $750,000 per month, and a low volume surcharge for volumes under that monthly
threshold. VistaPrint is not obligated to purchase printed products from MOD-PAC under this
agreement. During the fourth quarter of 2005, VistaPrint was able to fulfill all of their print
needs in-house, and therefore, no further orders were received by MOD-PAC, and no future orders are
anticipated from VistaPrint.
Practices as to Maintaining Working Capital
Part of the Companys strategy is to minimize working capital requirements by reducing production
cycle times, generally enabling the Company to generate substantially all its capital requirements
from operations. The Company had no outstanding bank debt at December 31, 2005, and has substantial
liquidity in the form of cash, cash equivalents and temporary investments, which combined totaled
$3.9 million at December 31, 2005. An unsecured line of credit of $6 million is available, and in
combination with its $3.9 million of cash, cash equivalents and temporary investments, the Company
believes it can meet its obligations, other working capital requirements and capital expenditure
needs in 2006.
Competitive Conditions
The print industry is a highly competitive industry, and MOD-PAC faces a number of competitors for
each of the markets it serves. In the U.S. folding carton industry, which rapidly consolidated
during the 1990s, our competitors include approximately 300 companies, many of which are
independent and privately-held. The largest competitors in this market are primarily focused on
the long-run print order market. They include large integrated paper companies, such as
SmurfitStone Container Corporation and Mead Westvaco, and large, publicly held converting companies
such as Caraustar and Graphic Packaging Corporation. MOD-PACs focus is on niche market needs
requiring short print runs, which capitalize on our efficient processes and operations to
profitably meet customers highly variable needs.
For commercial print products, the market we are targeting is served by over 28,000 small U.S.
printers that typically have less than 20 employees and less than $5 million in revenue. These
small operations do not the have technological capabilities equivalent to MOD-PAC, lack the variety
of print and finishing capabilities and are often geographically constrained to local customers.
There are several larger competitors in this sector, such as Modern Postcard, Taylor Corporation
and BCT International. We believe that as a result of their operating models, they generally are
not able to execute a print-on-demand strategy as effectively as MOD-PAC.
Our success is dependent upon our competitive pricing, innovative and responsive customer support,
creative graphics support and short lead-time delivery performance. We believe our investments in
state-of-the-art technology and production processes will enable us to continue introducing new,
enticing product designs and to consistently provide flexible and responsive service for our customers, while shortening lead-times and
maintaining or improving our delivery times.
Employees
The Company employed 435 employees as of December 31, 2005. The Company considers its relations
with its employees to be good.
4
Raw Materials and Components
Our principal raw materials are paperboard, paper and ink which are available from multiple
sources. We purchase most of these raw materials from a limited number of strategic and preferred
suppliers. Although the paper industry is cyclical and prices can fluctuate, we have not been
significantly adversely impacted in recent years by increases in paper prices as we have been able
to pass on these price increases to our customers.
International Quality Standards
Our principal printing and packaging plant is ISO 9001 certified for folding carton production and
ISO 9001 compliant for commercial printing. ISO 9001 standards are an international consensus on
effective management practices with the goal of ensuring that a company can consistently deliver
its products and related services in a manner that meets or exceeds customer quality requirements.
ISO 9001 standards set forth the requirements that a companys quality systems must meet to achieve
a high standard of quality. As an ISO 9001-registered manufacturer, we can represent to our
customers that we maintain high quality industry standards in the education of our employees and
the design and manufacture of our products.
Environmental and Other Governmental Regulation
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws relating to the protection of the
environment. We continually assess our obligations and compliance with respect to these
requirements. We believe we are in material compliance with all existing applicable environmental
laws and permits and our current expenditures will enable us to remain in material compliance.
Because of the complexity and changing nature of environmental regulatory standards, it is possible
situations will arise from time to time that require us to incur expenditures in order to ensure
environmental regulatory compliance. However, we are not aware of any environmental condition or
any operation at any of our facilities, either individually or in the aggregate, which would cause
expenditures having a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition
and, accordingly, have not budgeted any material capital expenditures for environmental compliance
for fiscal 2006.
Our operations are also governed by many other laws and regulations, including those relating to
workplace safety and worker health. We believe we are in material compliance with these laws and
regulations and do not believe future compliance with such laws and regulations will have a
material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition.
Available information
The Company files its financial information and other materials required by the SEC electronically
with the SEC. These materials can be accessed electronically via the Internet at www.sec.gov.
Such materials and other information about the Company are available through the Companys website
at www.modpac.com under the Investor Relations information section.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
|
§ |
|
Significant increases in the cost of energy or raw materials
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys margins and income
from operations. Increases in paper costs, which represent a significant
portion of our raw material costs, and any decrease in availability of
paper could particularly adversely affect our business. |
|
|
§ |
|
The Companys ability to successfully implement its business
strategies, its efforts to expand its markets for commercial print and to
realize anticipated savings is subject to significant business, economic
and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond
the Companys control. |
|
|
§ |
|
Delays in our plans to improve manufacturing productivity and
control costs of operations could negatively impact our margins. |
|
|
§ |
|
We have been dependent on certain customers, the loss of which
could have material adverse effects on product sales and, depending on
the significance of the loss, our results of operations, financial
condition or cash flow. The Companys ability to generate cash flows is
dependent, in significant part, on its ability to reestablish growth in
sales volume and maintain or increase selling prices that it realizes for
its products. |
5
|
§ |
|
The Company faces intense competition and, if it is unable to
compete successfully against other manufacturers of paperboard or
cartons, it could lose customers and its revenues may decline. |
|
|
§ |
|
If we cannot protect our reputation due to product quality and
liability issues, our business could be harmed. |
|
|
§ |
|
The Companys net sales and profitability could be affected by
intense pricing pressures. If the Companys facilities are not as cost
efficient as those of its competitors, or if its competitors otherwise
choose to lower prices, the Company may lose customers to its
competitors, which could negatively impact its revenues, cash flows and
financial condition. |
|
|
§ |
|
Any prolonged disruption in production due to labor difficulties,
equipment failures, destruction of or material damage to any of the
Companys facilities could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys net sales, margins and cash flows. |
|
|
§ |
|
The Company may not be able to adequately protect and defend its
intellectual property and proprietary rights, which could harm its future
success and competitive position. |
|
|
§ |
|
The Company is subject to environmental, health and safety laws
and regulations, and costs to comply with such laws and regulations, or
any liability or obligation imposed under such laws or regulations, could
negatively impact its financial condition and results of operations. |
|
|
§ |
|
Work stoppages and other labor relations matters may make it
substantially more difficult or expensive for the Company to manufacture
and distribute its products, which could result in decreased sales or
increased costs, either of which would negatively impact its financial
condition and results of operations. |
|
|
§ |
|
We are dependent on key management personnel. We cannot be
certain that we will be able to retain our executive officers and key
personnel or attract additional qualified management in the future. |
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not Applicable
Item 2. PROPERTIES
We maintain our corporate headquarters and conduct our operations at the following facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square |
|
Owned or |
Location |
|
Type of Facility |
|
Footage |
|
Leased |
Buffalo, NY
|
|
Corporate headquarters; printing
and manufacturing
|
|
|
335,000 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blasdell, NY
|
|
Printing and imprinting
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffalo, N.Y.
|
|
Office and warehouse
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
Leased |
We believe the 335,000 square foot corporate headquarters, printing and manufacturing property and
the Blasdell property have been adequately maintained, are in generally good condition and are
suitable for our business as presently conducted. We also believe our existing facilities provide
sufficient production capacity for our present needs and for our anticipated needs in the
foreseeable future. The Company entered into a forty-nine year lease for the 230,000 square feet
of office and warehouse buildings in November 2003. These buildings are adjacent to our corporate
headquarters, printing and manufacturing property and were acquired for potential expansion of such
facilities. In 2004, we undertook a survey of these buildings, developed a rehabilitation program,
and spent $0.9 million in connection with this program. In 2005, we spent $1.7 million in
connection with this rehabilitation program. Currently, much of this space is being rented to
third parties. We have plans to continue additional rehabilitation over the next several years. The timing of these future rehabilitation expenditures will be based on our anticipated facility
requirements.
6
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
There are no material pending legal proceeding to which the Registrant or any of its subsidiaries
is a party or of which any of their property is the subject.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
Not applicable.
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
MARKET FOR THE COMPANYS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
On March 14, 2003, the Company was spun-off from Astronics Corporation in a tax-free distribution
to the shareholders of Astronics Corporation and became listed on the NASDAQ National Market under
the symbol MPAC. Except for a special $7,000,000 dividend paid to Astronics Corporation on
December 31, 2002, in connection with its spin-off from Astronics, the Company has not paid any
cash dividends in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. It has no plans to pay dividends
as it plans to retain all cash from operations as a source of capital to finance growth in the
business. As of March 2, 2006, there were approximately 642 registered shareholders for the
Companys Common Stock and 591 registered shareholders for the Class B stock.
Quarterly information for each quarterly period during 2005 and 2004 on the range of prices for the
Companys Common Stock appears in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Quarter |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
High |
|
$ |
12.12 |
|
|
$ |
17.98 |
|
$ |
16.74 |
|
$ |
16.99 |
|
$ |
13.05 |
|
$ |
11.50 |
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
$ |
8.87 |
Low |
|
$ |
10.10 |
|
|
$ |
10.10 |
|
$ |
10.94 |
|
$ |
12.26 |
|
$ |
10.81 |
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
$ |
8.16 |
|
$ |
7.40 |
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES IN THE FOURTH QUARTER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)Total Number of Shares |
|
(d) Maximum Number of |
|
|
(a) Total Number |
|
(b) Average Price |
|
(or Units) Purchased as Part |
|
Shares (or Units) that May |
|
|
of Shares (or |
|
Paid per Share |
|
of Publicly Announced Plans |
|
Yet Be Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Units) Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
or Programs |
|
the Plans or Programs |
|
Oct. 1 Oct.
29, 2005 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
100,885 |
|
Oct. 30
Nov. 26, 2005 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
100,885 |
|
Nov. 27 -
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
100,885 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
100,885 |
|
7
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (2) |
|
$ |
71,193 |
|
|
$ |
50,280 |
|
|
$ |
41,215 |
|
|
$ |
32,121 |
|
|
$ |
30,842 |
|
Cost of Products Sold |
|
$ |
42,960 |
|
|
$ |
37,008 |
|
|
$ |
31,474 |
|
|
$ |
24,110 |
|
|
$ |
23,350 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
$ |
10,476 |
|
|
$ |
7,658 |
|
|
$ |
6,161 |
|
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
|
$ |
4,596 |
|
Operating Margin |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Net Income |
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,722 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,959 |
|
|
$ |
1,733 |
|
Net Margin |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding Basic |
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
4,026 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
Return on Average Assets |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Return on Average Equity |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year End Financial Position: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
43,724 |
|
|
$ |
57,960 |
|
|
$ |
40,381 |
|
|
$ |
30,042 |
|
|
$ |
29,682 |
|
Long Term Debt (excluding current portion) |
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
$ |
9,657 |
|
|
$ |
4,412 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
32,598 |
|
|
$ |
24,272 |
|
|
$ |
21,816 |
|
|
$ |
20,389 |
|
|
$ |
25,494 |
|
Book Value Per Share |
|
$ |
9.50 |
|
|
$ |
6.66 |
|
|
$ |
5.86 |
|
|
$ |
5.18 |
|
|
$ |
6.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
$ |
5,667 |
|
|
$ |
4,951 |
|
|
$ |
4,075 |
|
|
$ |
3,054 |
|
|
$ |
3,004 |
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
4,732 |
|
|
$ |
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
|
$ |
8,014 |
|
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
Shares Outstanding Common |
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
2,836 |
|
Class B |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Number of Registered Shareholders Common |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
(as of
March 2, 2006)
Class B |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information related to the
restatements of 2003 amounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $19,556 and $2,443 of revenue in 2005 and 2004 related to the amortization of the
contract buy-out fee. |
8
Item 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read together with the Selected Financial Data, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results
may differ materially from those anticipated in those forward-looking statements as a result of
many factors including those under the caption Forward-Looking
Information in Item 1.
Overview
Our strategy for returning to growth is continuing to gain market share in the custom folding
cartons business and aggressively entering the commercial print market by serving the largest print
distributors and internet print providers while capturing direct customers in select markets. We
believe the commercial print industry will continue consolidating and, given our operational
expertise to serve multitudes of large orders on a rapid, profitable basis, we can rapidly gain
market share. We believe we can effectively challenge other printer businesses because we offer
faster speed, higher variability and flexibility and can capitalize on our Superprint facilitys
economies of scale to offer competitive prices with better margins than those printers whose
business models are based on long lead-times and large production runs or those lacking the depth
in capabilities and sufficient scale to profitably serve such a diverse marketplace. During the
period of 2003 through 2005 reviewed in the following discussion, our operations have been
significantly influenced by the activities associated with our supply agreements with VistaPrint
Limited. In 2005, we lost VistaPrints business to its decision to produce its print products in
house, however, we had stepped up our sales and marketing efforts to expand our existing custom
folding carton market and to build new market opportunities for our commercial print products. We
anticipate expenditures for sales and marketing to continue into 2006, however, we anticipate there
should be reductions in our sales and marketing spending of approximately $1.0 million as a result
of not having the marketing activities associated with the launch of our web-to-print store,
www.printlizard.com. We anticipate 2006 to be a transition year as we build volume to fill the
capacity vacated by our former customer.
Revenue
2005 compared with 2004
For fiscal 2005, revenue was $71.2 million compared with $50.3 million in 2004, an increase of
$20.9 million or 41.6%. Included in 2005 and 2004 revenue was $19.6 million and $2.4 million,
respectively, associated with the contract buy-out fee received from our former customer.
Excluding the revenue related to the contract buy-out fee, 2005 revenue was $51.6 million compared
with $47.8 million in 2004.
The custom folding cartons product line had sales of $23.6 million in 2005, up $5.8 million, or
32.7%, from $17.8 million in 2004. Approximately 58% of this increase came from new customers,
while 42% came from higher volumes with existing customers.
Commercial print-on-demand product line sales were down $2.1 million, or 12.8%, to $14.4 million in
2005 from $16.5 million in 2004. Until the fourth quarter of 2005, commercial print product sales
were, for the most part, to VistaPrint.
During the first eight months of 2004, MOD-PACs contract with VistaPrint was based on a long-term
cost recovery approach with the terms of the agreement stretching until April 2011. VistaPrint was
billed for the costs in our plant that were dedicated to their production requirements plus a
one-third mark-up on product fulfillment. On September 1, 2004, this arrangement was revised to a
more traditional customer/vendor supply arrangement with the definitive term of the agreement
changed to one year, through August 31, 2005. The pricing structure was changed as well to a
units-based approach. As a part of the restructuring of the agreement, MOD-PAC received payment of
$22 million from VisatPrint as a buy-out fee for the remaining years of the original contract.
This fee was to be amortized over a 36-month period, which was defined by the 12-month definitive
term of the new agreement that was effective September 1, 2004 and the 24-month period for which a
pricing framework was described in this agreement relative to any subsequent agreements. On April 15, 2005, MOD-PAC agreed to an amendment of the supply
agreement that was effective September 1, 2005, which modified the exclusivity provision regarding
the North American market. As a result of the amendment, VistaPrint was allowed to produce and
ship product to its North American customers from
9
its Windsor, Ontario plant prior to August 31, 2005, the expiration of the supply agreement. In exchange, MOD-PAC received payments that
approximated MOD-PACs fixed costs and mark-up on such costs for the actual products VistaPrint
shipped. During the period April 15, 2005 through the termination of the supply agreement at
August 31, 2005, MOD-PAC received $2.2 million in payments from VistaPrint. Simultaneously, the
Company executed a supply agreement with VistaPrint for the 12-month period ending August 30, 2006.
This agreement established unit pricing for volumes above $750,000 per month, while for volumes
below that threshold, a low volume surcharge was put into place. VistaPrint, however, was not
obligated to purchase printed products from MOD-PAC under this agreement. During the fourth
quarter of 2005, given the conclusion that the Company does not anticipate any future sales to
VistaPrint, the remaining $14.1 million of the unamortized portion of the contract buy-out fee was
recognized as revenue.
2005 net sales in MOD-PACs stock box product line remained flat year-over-year at $9.8 million,
while the personalized print product line realized a slight increase of $0.1 million in net sales
to $3.4 million in 2005, from $3.3 million in 2004.
2004 compared with 2003
For fiscal 2004, revenue was $50.3 million compared with $41.2 million in 2003, an increase of $9.1
million or 22%. Commercial print-on-demand, which had net product sales of $16.5 million in 2004,
accounted for $2.9 million of this increase. This product line was up 21.3% from $13.6 million in
2003 sales. Revenue in 2004 also included $2.4 million associated with the amortization of the
contract buy-out fee from VistaPrint.
The custom folding cartons product line had net sales of $17.8 million, up $3 million, or 20.3%
from $14.8 million in 2003. Approximately 60% of this increase came from new customers with the
balance of the increase coming from higher volume to existing customers.
Net sales in MOD-PACs stock box product line experienced a 3.2% increase of $0.3 million to $9.8
million in 2004 from $9.5 million in 2003. In 2004, personalized print net sales realized a slight
increase of $0.1 million to $3.3 million from $3.2 million in 2003.
Cost of Products Sold
As a percentage of revenue, the cost of products sold were 60.3%, 73.6%, and 76.4% for the years
2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Excluding the amortization of the contract buy-out fee, the
cost of products sold were 83.2%, 77.4%, and 76.4% for the years 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively.
Throughout the majority of this three-year period, we have added additional capacity measured both
in terms of equipment and production hours available. In the first half of 2003, two high-speed
presses were added, and by the second half of 2003, we were generally running three shifts a day.
In 2004, another high-speed press was added, while we continued to increase the capabilities of our
second and third shifts through increased supervision and production support, such as engineering,
material handling, shipping and receiving. In 2005, additional machinery for finishing was
purchased, including a stitchmaster, folder, and cutter that allows us to enlarge our portfolio of
commercial print products. This aggressive ramp-up of capacity through the beginning of 2005 was
undertaken both to successfully service the rapidly growing VistaPrint business and to address our
strategic effort to aggressively enter the commercial print market. During the latter half of
2005, capacity was underutilized and pressure was placed on our cost of products sold. An increase
in raw material costs and changing sales mix also contributed to the increase in costs.
The increase in cost of products sold, excluding the amortization of the contract buy-out fee, in
2005 to 83.2% of revenue from 77.4% of revenue in 2004 was primarily the result of increased raw
material cost, changing sales mix, and investment in resources which supported previous VistaPrint
business. With the loss of VistaPrint as a customer, the Company now has excess capacity, which we
plan to use to reestablish growth in the commercial print business. The cost of products sold as a
percentage of revenue in 2004, excluding the amortization of the contract buy-out fee, was 77.4% compared with 76.4% in 2003. The increase was a result of the costs associated with our
increased capacity not recovered through volume increases and the effect on revenue related to the
change in our billing structure with VistaPrint.
10
Selling, General and Administrative Costs
As a percentage of total revenue, selling, general and administrative costs were 14.7%, 15.2%, and
15.0% for the years 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Excluding the amortization of the contract
buy-out fee, selling, general, and administrative costs were 20.5%, 16.0%, and 15.0% for the years
2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively. The majority of selling, general and administrative costs were
related to salaries and benefits for sales and administrative personnel, which have increased in
order to develop our commercial print product line, salary adjustments and increased costs for
benefits such as employee medical and dental. In addition, 2005 expenses were impacted by the
increase in expenditures to develop and implement our web-to-print store, www.printlizard.com.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $216 thousand, $410 thousand and $245 thousand, respectively, in 2005, 2004,
and 2003. The 2004 expense included $95 thousand reclassified from other comprehensive income
related to a cash flow hedge on debt that was prepaid in 2004. The decrease in interest expense
from 2004 to 2005 was a result of lower outstanding debt that was reduced with proceeds from the
contract buy-out fee. The increase in 2004 from 2003 was a result of borrowings to fund the
Companys capital program.
Loss on Disposal of Assets
The loss on sale of assets of $101 thousand in 2003 resulted from the sale or disposal of mainly
pre-press equipment and components, which became redundant as a result of the implementation of
more advanced technology.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate was 38.0% in 2005, 29.7% in 2004, and 36.2% in 2003. The 2005 tax
rate was higher than would be customary due to an increase in the valuation allowance for deferred
tax assets related to New York State Tax Credits. New York State enacted tax legislation resulting
in a change to the New York State apportionment methodology. The enacted legislation will lower
the apportionment of the Companys taxable income to New York State and should result in lower New
York State income taxes. Accordingly, the Companys ability to use or realize New York State tax
credits was reduced. As a result, the Company increased its valuation allowance reflecting an
increase to income tax expense of approximately $696,000 in 2005. The 2004 tax rate was lower than
customary due to the Company reducing its valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as a result
of realizing a portion of the deferred tax assets for the state tax credits.
Net Income
Net income in 2005 was $11.0 million, an increase of $7.3 million, or 196.3%, over 2004s net
income of $3.7 million. This increase was mainly a result of $19.6 million of revenue recognized
in 2005 related to the contract buy-out fee. In 2004, the Company recognized $2.4 million of
revenue related to the contract buy-out fee. These increases were partially offset by higher
selling, general, and administrative costs related to the development of the Companys
Printlizard.com web-to-print store.
Net income in 2004 was $3.7 million, an increase of $1.7 million over 2003. This increase was
primarily the result of increased sales in both the custom folding carton and commercial print
product lines, as well as the recognition of $2.4 million of revenue related to the contract
buy-out fee.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (EPS) calculations prior to the spin-off reflect the shares and options
outstanding had the Distribution occurred at the beginning of 2003. Shares used for the basic
shares outstanding prior to the Distribution reflect the shares outstanding of Astronics
Corporation factored by the distribution ratio. Since the date of the Distribution, the Companys
shares and dilutive stock options are used in the EPS calculations.
The dilutive earnings per share calculation for 2005 exclude 119,077 stock options that were
anti-dilutive at December 31, 2005. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company repurchased 100,328
shares of common stock, which was approximately 3% of shares outstanding at the beginning of the
first quarter of 2005. These repurchases had a $0.08 per share favorable effect on 2005 basic and diluted earnings per share. In the first
quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased 2,555 shares of common stock. The purchase of this stock
did not affect the results of the basic and diluted EPS calculations. In the third quarter of
2005, the Company repurchased 290,232 shares of its common
11
stock, which was approximately 8% of the shares outstanding at the beginning of the third quarter. These repurchases had an $0.08 per share
favorable affect on the 2005 basic EPS and a $0.07 per share favorable affect on the diluted EPS.
The diluted earnings per share calculation for 2004 exclude 24,094 stock options that were
anti-dilutive at December 31, 2004. Although the Company repurchased 133,829 shares of its common
stock in 2004, 100,328 of the shares repurchased occurred in December 2004 and as a result, the
2004 repurchases did not affect the results of basic and diluted EPS calculations for 2004.
The diluted earnings per share calculation for 2003 exclude 54,052 stock options that were
anti-dilutive at December 31, 2003. In the second quarter of 2003, the Company repurchased 199,082
shares of its common stock, which was approximately 5% of the shares then outstanding. These
repurchases had a $0.02 per share favorable effect on the 2003 basic and diluted EPS calculation.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In 2005, cash used in operating activities was $2.8 million, $33.5 million less than the $30.6
million in cash generated in 2004. This decrease is primarily due to the receipt of the $22.0
million advance payment from VistaPrint in 2004 and the $7.5 million of income taxes paid in 2005
related to the receipt of this payment. In addition, lower net income, excluding the amortization
of the buy-out fee, contributed to the decrease in cash provided by operations in 2005. In 2004,
cash provided by operating activities was $30.6 million, $24.4 million more than the $6.2 million
in 2003. This increase was primarily due to the $22.0 million advance payment received from
VistaPrint, supplemented by a reduction in working capital components.
Capital expenditures in 2005 were $4.7 million compared with $6.3 million in 2004 and $8.6 million
in 2003. Most of these expenditures were related to additional production equipment and, to a
lesser extent, additional production facilities. Since the Companys spin-off from Astronics in
2003, our high-speed press capacity has increased by 43% with the addition of three large format
presses. In connection with these presses, substantial investment was made in pre-press and
post-press equipment. During this time, four production lines were added which were based on
leading edge digital press technology. Additionally, production, warehouse and office space were
expanded at both of our production facilities in Western New York. At the main production
facility, a 3.1-megawatt power plant was installed in 2003 that provides a more secure and stable
source of electrical power to operate our production equipment than could have been achieved
through the local utility. Capital expenditures for 2006 are expected to be substantially less and
primarily related to maintenance. The Company anticipates up to approximately $1.0 million in
capital spending for 2006.
The Company acquired temporary investments in 2004 of $12.2 million with its extra cash; $7.5
million of this was used in 2005 to pay income taxes above our regular requirements as all of the
income taxes associated with the advanced contract buy-out fee were paid in 2005.
The Company borrowed $10.0 million on a term loan facility in 2003. The proceeds were used to pay
amounts due Astronics and to fund capital expenditures. The term loan was paid in September 2004
with a portion of the advanced contract buy-out fee from VistaPrint.
A line of credit is available to MOD-PAC from a commercial bank for $6 million. We did not use the
line of credit in 2005. The line of credit was used during 2003 and 2004, however, no amounts were
outstanding on the line at December 31, 2003 and 2004. The line of credit is unsecured, and
amounts outstanding, if any, bear interest generally based on LIBOR or the banks prime rate, at
the Companys option.
During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company expended $3.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.0 million for
the repurchase of a total of 625,698 shares, or approximately 18.2% of total shares outstanding.
In August of 2005, the Company received authorization from its Board to purchase an additional
200,000 shares for its share repurchase program. At December 31, 2005, the Companys outstanding
authorization for repurchase of shares is 100,885. The closing price of the Companys common stock as of December 31, 2005 was $11.24. At this price, the repurchase of
100,885 shares would require $1,133,947.
At December 31, 2005, outstanding irrevocable letters of credit were $297,000.
We believe that cash on hand of $1.2 million at December 31, 2005, temporary investments of $2.7
million, cash flow
12
from operations, and the $6 million available on the line of credit are
sufficient to meet our cash requirements for operations, capital expenditures, common stock
redemptions and debt service for 2006. We expect to generate approximately break-even cash flow
from operations in 2006, and expect capital expenditures up to approximately $1.0 million in 2006.
Contractual
Obligations
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligation |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
2007-2008 |
|
2009-2010 |
|
After 2010 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations Principal |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations Interest |
|
|
6.510 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
5,730 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Deferred Compensation |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,175 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
1,386 |
|
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
|
$ |
7,817 |
|
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The only off-balance sheet arrangements the Company has are operating leases for production
equipment and a car lease. Rental expense under these non-cancellable leases was $498,000 in 2005,
$492,000 in 2004, and $440,000 in 2003. Minimum future rental payments under non-cancellable
operating lease obligations as of December 31, 2005 are: 2006, $498,000; 2007, $497,000; 2008,
$445,000; 2009, $424,000; and thereafter, $354,000. The Company has the right to purchase the
leased equipment for the fair market value at the end of the lease.
Relationship
with VistaPrint Limited
The Company performed printing and order fulfillment services for VistaPrint Limited that resulted
in revenue of $12,012,000 in 2005, $16,467,000 in 2004 and $13,631,000 in 2003. Accounts
receivable from VistaPrint Limited at December 31, 2004 and 2003, were $1,870,000 and $2,239,000
respectively, related to such services, and have subsequently been paid. There are no outstanding
receivables from VistaPrint as of December 31, 2005. In 2005 and 2004, the Company also recognized
$19,556,000 and $2,443,000 of revenue attributable to the amortization of the $22 million contract
buy-out fee received on September 1, 2004 in connection with the new supply agreement. Robert S.
Keane is a shareholder in and chief executive officer of VistaPrint Limited and is the son of Kevin
T. Keane, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of MOD-PAC.
MOD-PAC had a supply agreement with VistaPrint Limited pursuant to which they were VistaPrint
Limiteds exclusive North American supplier of printed products through August 30, 2005. This
agreement, which was effective July 2004, set prices on a price per unit basis and provided a
framework for pricing products covered by any renewals or extensions through August 2007. The unit
prices were arrived at by reference to MOD-PACs fully burdened costs for products subject to the
agreement, plus a 25% mark-up. The $22 million buyout fee that VistaPrint paid MOD-PAC on August
31, 2004 was negotiated between the two companies. The buyout fee was primarily associated with
providing MOD-PAC cost recovery and profit on the production resources developed or acquired which
were dedicated to the fulfillment of VistaPrints business in North America through 2011. This
agreement replaced a previous supply agreement that extended to 2011, and whereby MOD-PAC charged
VistaPrint on a cost plus one-third mark-up basis.
On April 15, 2005, the Company agreed to an amendment of the supply agreement with VistaPrint,
which modified the exclusivity provision regarding the North American market. As a result,
VistaPrint was allowed to produce and ship product to its customers in North America from its
Windsor, Ontario plant prior to August 31, 2005, the expiration of the supply agreement, in
exchange for payments to MOD-PAC that approximated MOD-PACs fixed costs and mark-up on such costs
for the actual products VistaPrint ships. These payments totaled $2,154,000 in 2005.
13
Simultaneously, the Company executed a supply agreement with VistaPrint for the 12 month
period ending August 30, 2006. This agreement established unit pricing for volumes above $750,000
per month, and for volumes below that threshold, a low volume surcharge was put into place.
However, VistaPrint is not obligated to purchase printed products from MOD-PAC under this
agreement. During the fourth quarter of 2005, given the final conclusion that the Company no
longer expects to have sales to VistaPrint, the remaining $14.1 unamortized portion of the contract
buy-out fee was recognized as revenue.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No.
123(R) (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123.
However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro
forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Statement 123(R) must be adopted no later than
January 1, 2006, which is when the Company will adopt it.
As permitted by Statement 123, the company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees
using Opinion 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost
for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of Statement 123(R)s fair value method will
have an impact on our result of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall
financial position. Statement 123(R) allows for prospective adoption methods or restating prior
years. The Company intends to apply the prospective method upon adoption. The impact of adoption
of Statement 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of
share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior
periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as
described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note 1 to our
consolidated financial statements. Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions
in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an
operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net
operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. While the
Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among
other things, when employees exercise stock options), no amounts of operating cash flows were
recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4. The amendments made by this statement clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs and waste (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period
charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this statement are effective for
inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is
permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 2004. The
Company believes the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its results of
operations or financial position.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. In developing such estimates, management evaluates the
facts known to it at the time and applies such facts within the framework of certain critical
accounting policies that govern valuation allowances of the Companys assets. These policies
include determining the need for a valuation allowance with respect to doubtful accounts
receivable, lower of cost or market reserves related to the Companys inventories, depreciation
allowances, impairment reserves with respect to the Companys long-lived assets and valuation
allowances with respect to the realizability of deferred tax assets. Often, management must make
certain assumptions about the future when applying these policies. Management uses past experience
in developing such assumptions about the future. Actual experience will be different than the
assumptions made and the differences could result in material adjustments to managements
estimates.
14
Specifically and with respect to deferred tax assets, the Company had gross deferred assets at
December 31, 2005 of $3.8 million related to New York State tax credits. These credits are subject
to certain statutory provisions, such as length of available carry-forward period and minimum tax,
which reduces the probability of realization of the full value of such credits. Management
estimates the amount of credits the Company is likely to realize in the future based on actual
historical realization rates and the statutory carry-forward period. As a result of the analysis
performed as of December 31, 2005, management adjusted the valuation allowance for these credits to
$3.8 million.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a result of short cycle times, the Company does not have any long-term commitments to
purchase production raw materials or sell products that would present significant risks due to
price fluctuations. Raw paper stock is available to us from multiple domestic sources and, as a
result, we believe the risk of supply interruptions due to such things as strikes at the source of
supply or to logistics systems are limited.
Risks due to fluctuation in interest rates are not material to the Company at December 31, 2005,
because we have no exposure to floating rate debt and limited market risk on our $2.7 million of
temporary investments because interest is reset to market rates up to every 35 days.
Since May of 2003, over 90% of the Companys power needs are met through natural gas. The Company
has investigated supply contracts of various lengths; currently it has no supply arrangements for
fixed prices. Historically, the price of natural gas has fluctuated widely. In the past 39 months,
natural gas prices have been as low as $4.43 per decatherm and as high as $13.91 per decatherm, and
it is currently trading around $7.10 per decatherm for April 2006 natural gas. A one-dollar per
decatherm change in the price of natural gas would affect the Companys annual net income by
approximately $120,000. Although the Company is concerned about cost, and has from time to time
acquired contracts for natural gas, its main concern is availability. The Company monitors the
availability of natural gas, considering such factors as amount in storage, gas production data and
transportation data, so that it can take appropriate action if concerns about availability occur.
The Company has investigated and tested a back-up power source in the form of a rented
transportable diesel-powered generator. Although such generators are generally available, the
Company cannot be assured that a generator adequate to meet the Companys needs would be available
if and when such need should arise.
We have no foreign operations, nor do we transact any business in foreign currencies. Accordingly,
we have no foreign currency market risks.
The market risk that the Company was exposed to at December 31, 2004 was generally the same as
described above.
15
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MOD-PAC CORP. as of December 31,
2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We
were not engaged to perform an audit of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of MOD-PAC CORP. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Buffalo, New York
February 3, 2006
16
MOD-PAC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
$ |
2,584 |
|
Temporary investments |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
12,183 |
|
Trade accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VistaPrint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
All other customers |
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
Net trade accounts receivable |
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
4,995 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
12,771 |
|
|
|
23,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
Buildings and equipment |
|
|
13,673 |
|
|
|
11,873 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
49,197 |
|
|
|
47,602 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,363 |
|
|
|
60,339 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
34,678 |
|
|
|
29,765 |
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
29,685 |
|
|
|
30,574 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,323 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
43,724 |
|
|
$ |
57,960 |
|
|
|
|
17
MOD-PAC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
Due to Astronics Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Account payable |
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,961 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
5,272 |
|
|
|
11,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
Deferred income advanced payment from VistaPrint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,555 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
11,126 |
|
|
|
33,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares, issued
3,340,577 at December 31, 2005; 3,049,479 at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Class B stock, $.01 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares, issued
717,968
at December 31, 2005; 925,440 at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
37,228 |
|
|
|
26,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,663 |
|
|
|
26,815 |
|
|
|
|
Less treasury stock at cost: 625,698 shares in 2005; 332,911 in 2004 |
|
|
(6,065 |
) |
|
|
(2,543 |
) |
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
32,598 |
|
|
|
24,272 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
43,724 |
|
|
$ |
57,960 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
18
MOD-PAC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share data) |
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
51,174 |
|
|
$ |
47,380 |
|
|
$ |
41,146 |
|
Amortization of buy-out fee |
|
|
19,556 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
71,193 |
|
|
|
50,280 |
|
|
|
41,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
42,960 |
|
|
|
37,008 |
|
|
|
31,474 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
10,476 |
|
|
|
7,658 |
|
|
|
6,161 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
53,404 |
|
|
|
44,982 |
|
|
|
37,880 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
17,789 |
|
|
|
5,298 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,761 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,722 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
19
MOD-PAC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,722 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
4,951 |
|
|
|
4,075 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
(6,198 |
) |
|
|
970 |
|
Deferred income advanced payment from
VistaPrint |
|
|
(19,555 |
) |
|
|
19,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification from other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
Cash flows from changes in operating assets and
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
(1,439 |
) |
Refundable or payable income taxes |
|
|
(7,955 |
) |
|
|
7,602 |
|
|
|
(587 |
) |
Due from or due to Astronics |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
(476 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(2,833 |
) |
|
|
30,629 |
|
|
|
6,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale (purchase) of temporary investments |
|
|
9,483 |
|
|
|
(12,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in other assets |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(4,732 |
) |
|
|
(6,316 |
) |
|
|
(8,600 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
(18,197 |
) |
|
|
(9,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(9,354 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
Due to Astronics through spin-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,751 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of stock |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(3,522 |
) |
|
|
(1,541 |
) |
|
|
(1,002 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(2,922 |
) |
|
|
(10,479 |
) |
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
$ |
2,584 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCLOSURE OF CASH PAYMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
8,399 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
See accompanying notes.
20
MOD-PAC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Common Stock |
|
Class B Stock |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Par |
|
Shares |
|
Par |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Issued |
|
Value |
|
Issued |
|
Value |
|
Shares |
|
Cost |
|
Capital |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
20,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of loss included in
net income (net of income tax of $3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
Stock option and employee stock purchase
plans |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to shares outstanding for
Astronics: stock repurchases |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B stock converted |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of assets from Astronics in
conjunction with the spin-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003 (Restated) |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
22,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
|
$ |
3,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of loss included in
net income (net of income tax of $36) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and employee stock
purchase plans |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B stock converted |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,028 |
|
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and employee stock
purchase plan, including tax benefit
of $205 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B stock converted |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
$ |
6,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
21
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
On March 14, 2003, MOD-PAC CORP. (the Company) was spun-off from Astronics Corporation by means of
a tax-free distribution (the Distribution) of all of the outstanding shares of MOD-PAC CORP.s
common stock and Class B stock to Astronics shareholders. The Astronics Board of Directors set a
one-for-two distribution ratio, in which (i) each Astronics common stock owner received one share
of MOD-PAC CORP. common stock for every two shares of Astronics common stock owned on the record
date for the Distribution and (ii) each Astronics Class B stock owner received one share of MOD-PAC
CORP. Class B for every two shares of Astronics Class B stock owned on the record date for the
Distribution. As a result of the Distribution, MOD-PAC CORP. became a separately traded,
publicly-held company.
Prior to the Distribution, the Company was recapitalized. Astronics exchanged its existing shares
of our common stock for approximately 2,868,316 shares of our common stock and approximately
1,007,341 shares of our Class B stock. The accompanying financial statements give retroactive
effect to this recapitalization.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue and Expense Recognition
The Company is a manufacturer and printer of folding cartons used primarily in the confectionary
and consumer product markets. The Company also markets its printing and imprinting capabilities to
the short-run commercial and the personalized print markets. Short-run commercial printing
includes business cards, corporate stationery, marketing materials, booklets, calendars, annual
reports, folders and direct mail post cards. Personalized printing and imprinting includes items
used for social occasions and corporate events such as invitations, announcements and napkins. The
vast majority of the Companys sales are to customers in North America, although the Company often
ships orders to destinations outside of North America on behalf of its North American customers.
Revenue is recognized on the accrual basis, which is at the time of shipment of goods, except for
the advance payment received from VistaPrint, which was originally estimated to be amortized, on a
straight line basis, over 36 months from September 2004 through August 2007. During the fourth
quarter of 2005, given the final conclusion that the Company would likely no longer have sales to
VistaPrint, the remaining $14.1 million unamortized portion of the contract buy-out fee was
recognized as revenue. There are no significant contracts allowing for right of return. A trade
receivable is recorded at the value of the sale. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations
of its customers financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Amounts not
collected from customers within 120 days of the due date of the invoice are credited to an
allowance for doubtful accounts. After collection efforts have been exhausted, uncollected
balances are charged off to the allowance. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003
VistaPrint Limited accounted for 47.4%, 37.3% and 33.1%, respectively, of the Companys revenue.
Costs related to shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and are included in costs of
products sold. Revenue excludes discounts.
All repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense. The Company does not provide services
such as engineering or design for which it receives revenues.
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and were $1,056,000 in 2005, $187,000 in 2004 and
$198,000 in 2003.
The Company accounts for its stock-based awards using the intrinsic value method in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and its related interpretations. The measurement
prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25 does not recognize compensation expense if the exercise price of
the stock option equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
Accordingly, no compensation expense related to stock options has been recorded in the financial
statements.
22
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the Companys stock options at
the date of grant is amortized to expense over the options vesting period. The Companys pro
forma information for the three years ended December 31, 2005 is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,722 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
Stock-based compensation included in net income, as reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record compensation expense for stock option
awards under the fair value method of accounting |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
10,648 |
|
|
$ |
3,442 |
|
|
$ |
1,923 |
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported |
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Basic, pro forma |
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
Diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Diluted, pro forma |
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share computations are based upon the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
Basic earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
Earnings per share calculations prior to the spin-off reflect the shares and options outstanding
had the Distribution occurred at the beginning of 2003. Shares used for the basic shares
outstanding prior to the Distribution reflect the shares outstanding of Astronics Corporation
factored by the distribution ratio. The net effect of dilutive stock options prior to the
Distribution relates only to stock options held by employees of the Company and the Directors of
Astronics. Since the date of the Distribution the Companys shares and dilutive stock options are
used in the EPS calculations. The diluted earnings per share calculations exclude 54,052 stock
options that were anti-dilutive at December 31, 2003, 24,094 stock options that were anti-dilutive
at December 31, 2004, and 119,077 stock option that were anti-dilutive at December 31, 2005.
23
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed on the straight-line method for financial
reporting purposes and on accelerated methods for income tax purposes. Estimated useful lives of
the assets are as follows: buildings, 10-40 years; and machinery and equipment,
3-10 years.
The costs of properties sold, or otherwise disposed of, and the accumulated depreciation thereon is
eliminated from the accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in income. Renewals and
betterments are capitalized; maintenance and repairs are expensed.
Machinery and equipment includes $791,000 and $465,000 of unamortized computer software costs at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively. The depreciation expense related to the amortization of
capitalized computer software costs for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 was
$192,000, $13,000, and $0 respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences
of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets are reduced, if deemed necessary, by a valuation allowance for the amount of
tax benefits not expected to be realized. The Company was included in the consolidated federal
income tax return of Astronics Corporation through the date of the spin-off, however; income tax
expense has been recorded on a separate return basis. Investment tax credits are recognized on the
flow through method.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase are
considered cash equivalents.
Temporary Investments
Temporary investments represent municipal or state agency debt securities that are classified as
available for sale and are carried at market, which approximates cost, because these securities
bear interest that is generally reset to market rates up to every 35 days. As a result of the
periodic reset of the interest rates, no realized or unrealized gains or losses exist. The
contractual maturities of such obligations range from January 1, 2027 to January 1, 2036.
Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, temporary
investments, receivables, accounts payable, and long-term debt. The carrying value of the
Companys financial instruments approximate fair value. The Company does not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined in accordance
with the first-in, first-out method. Costs included in inventory are the cost to purchase the raw
material, the direct labor incurred on work in progress and finished goods, and an overhead factor
based on other indirect manufacturing costs incurred. Inventories at December 31, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
1,583 |
|
|
$ |
1,779 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Raw material |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
Total inventory |
|
$ |
2,888 |
|
|
$ |
3,037 |
|
|
24
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Capital Stock
Class B Stock is identical to common stock, except Class B Stock has ten votes per share, and is
automatically converted to common stock on a one-for-one basis when sold or transferred, and cannot
receive dividends unless an equal or greater amount is declared on common stock. As of December
31, 2005, 1,033,907 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance upon conversion of the
Class B stock and for options granted under the employee and director stock option plans.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets to be held and used are initially recorded at cost. The carrying value of these
assets is evaluated for recoverability whenever adverse effects or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairments are recognized if future
undiscounted cash flows and earnings from operations are not expected to be sufficient to recover
the long-lived assets. The carrying amounts are then reduced by the estimated shortfall of the
discounted cash flows.
Other Comprehensive Income or Loss
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had an accumulated net loss in other comprehensive income
related to a cash flow hedge, an interest rate option of $59,000 net of applicable income taxes.
This accumulated net loss was being reclassified to interest expense over the term of the debt
associated with the cash flow hedge. However, because the debt was paid in 2004 the entire amount
was reclassified to interest expense. There were no hedging transactions in 2005.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No.
123(Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the
approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However,
Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure
is no longer an alternative. Statement 123(R) must be adopted no later than January 1, 2006, which
is when the Company will adopt it.
As permitted by Statement 123, the company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees
using Opinion 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost
for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of Statement 123(R)s fair value method will
have an impact on our result of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall
financial position. Statement 123(R) allows for prospective adoption methods or restating prior
years. The Company intends to apply the modified prospective method upon adoption. The impact of
adoption of Statement 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of
share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior
periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as
described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements. Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions
in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as
an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net
operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. While the
company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among
other things, when employees exercise stock options), no amounts of operating cash flows were
recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4. The amendments made by this statement clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs and
25
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
waste (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period
charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads
to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this
statement are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning
after November 2004. The Company believes the adoption of this standard will not have a material
impact on its results of operations or financial position.
3. Long-Term Debt
In November of 2003, the Company entered into a lease transaction, which gave it control of the
real estate complex adjoining its main production facility. This complex consists of approximately
13 acres and buildings totaling approximately 270,000 square feet. It is a capital lease for
accounting and financial reporting purposes, meaning that the land and buildings are capitalized
and the building is amortized, while the lease obligation is treated as the equivalent of a
mortgage note. The lease is for a term of forty-nine years with the option to buy the underlying
real estate and terminate the lease in the 20th year. Lease payments are $155,000 annually for the
first seven years, and $180,000 annually for the remainder of the lease. The purchase option in
the twentieth year is $1.8 million, which represents the principal balance of the obligation. The
carrying value of the underlying real estate, including improvements, was $4,376,000 at December
31, 2005. Amortization of such assets is included with depreciation and amortization in the
accompanying statement of cash flows. Lease payments in each of the next five years are $155,000,
and starting in November 2010, the lease payment will increase to $180,000 annually. The aggregate
of the lease payments over the lease term is $8,645,000. The Company has non-cancelable sub-leases
for space in the complex that have scheduled rents as follows over the next five years: $458,000 in
2006, $281,000 in 2007, $144,000 in 2008, $31,000 in 2009.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands ) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Capitalized lease obligation due in 2023; bears interest at 10%; payable monthly |
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
Other |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
Less estimated current maturities |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt matures as follows: $87,000 in 2006, $37,000 in 2007, $19,000 in 2008, $20,000
in 2009, $21,000 in 2010 and $72,000 thereafter.
26
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Operating Leases
The Company leases two pieces of production equipment under separate operating leases. Rental
expense under these leases was $492,000 in 2005, $492,000 in 2004 and $440,000 in 2003. Minimum
future rental payments under non-cancelable lease obligations as of December 31, 2005 are: 2006,
$498,000; 2007, $497,000; 2008, $445,000; 2009, $424,000; 2010, $354,000. The Company has the
right to purchase the leased equipment for the fair market value at the end of the lease.
5. Transactions with VistaPrint Limited
The Company performed printing and order fulfillment services for VistaPrint Limited that resulted
in revenue of $12,012,000 in 2005, $16,467,000 in 2004 and $13,631,000 in 2003. Accounts
receivable from VistaPrint Limited at December 31, 2004 and 2003, were $1,870,000 and $2,239,000
respectively, related to such services, and have subsequently been paid. There are no outstanding
receivables from VistaPrint as of December 31, 2005. In 2005 and 2004, the Company also recognized
$19,556,000 and $2,443,000 of revenue attributable to the amortization of the $22 million contract
buy-out fee received on September 1, 2004 in connection with the new supply agreement. Robert S.
Keane is a shareholder in and chief executive officer of VistaPrint Limited and is the son of Kevin
T. Keane, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of MOD-PAC.
MOD-PAC had a supply agreement with VistaPrint Limited pursuant to which they were VistaPrint
Limiteds exclusive North American supplier of printed products through August 30, 2005. This
agreement, which was effective July 2004, set prices on a price per unit basis and provided a
framework for pricing products covered by any renewals or extensions through August 2007. The unit
prices were arrived at by reference to MOD-PACs fully burdened costs for products subject to the
agreement, plus a 25% mark-up. The $22 million buyout fee that VistaPrint paid MOD-PAC on
September 1, 2004 was negotiated between the two companies. The buyout fee was primarily
associated with providing MOD-PAC cost recovery and profit on the production resources developed or
acquired which were dedicated to the fulfillment of VistaPrints business in North America through
2011. This agreement replaced a previous supply agreement that extended to 2011, and whereby
MOD-PAC charged VistaPrint on a cost plus one-third mark-up basis.
On April 15, 2005, the Company agreed to an amendment of the supply agreement with VistaPrint,
which modified the exclusivity provision regarding the North American market. As a result,
VistaPrint was allowed to produce and ship product to its customers in North America from its
Windsor, Ontario plant prior to August 31, 2005, the expiration of the supply agreement, in
exchange for payments to MOD-PAC that approximated MOD-PACs fixed costs and mark-up on such costs
for the actual products VistaPrint ships. These payments totaled $2,154,000 in 2005.
Simultaneously, the Company executed a supply agreement with VistaPrint for the 12 month period
ending August 30, 2006. This agreement established unit pricing for volumes above $750,000 per
month, and for volumes below that threshold, a low volume surcharge was put into place. However,
VistaPrint is not obligated to purchase printed products from MOD-PAC under this agreement. During
the fourth quarter of 2005, given the final conclusion that the Company no longer expects to have
sales to VistaPrint, the remaining $14.1 unamortized portion of the contract buy-out fee was
recognized as revenue.
6. Stock Option and Purchase Plans
Prior to the Distribution, the Companys employees participated in stock option plans sponsored by
Astronics Corporation. In connection with the Distribution the Company granted, to its employees
holding Astronics options, substitution options under its stock option plan. The substitution
options preserve the intrinsic value of the Astronics options that were outstanding at the date of
the Distribution. To determine the number and exercise price of the
Companys options to be substituted, the Company multiplied the number of shares purchasable under
each Astronics stock option by a ratio determined at the time of the Distribution and divided the
exercise price per share of each option by the same ratio. This ratio was determined by reference
to the fair value of Astronics common stock and the Company common stock at the time of the
Distribution, so as to equalize the intrinsic value of the option before and after the
Distribution. Under SEC regulations, fair value for this purpose is defined as the first trade
immediately following the
distribution. Fractional shares were rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares. The other
27
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
terms of the substituted options are the same as those in effect under the Astronics options
immediately prior to the Distribution.
MOD-PAC CORP. established a Stock Option Plan that authorizes the issuance of 800,000 shares of
Common Stock for the purpose of attracting and retaining executive officers and key employees, and
to align managements interests with those of the shareholders of MOD-PAC CORP. The options must be
exercised no more than ten years from the grant date and vest over up to a five-year period. The
exercise price for the options is equal to the fair market value as
of the date immediately preceding the date of grant.
MOD-PAC CORP. established the Directors Stock Option Plan that authorizes the issuance of 200,000
shares of Common Stock for the purpose of attracting and retaining the services of experienced and
knowledgeable outside directors, and to align their interest with those of its shareholders. The
options must be exercised no more than ten years from the grant date and vest after six months. The
exercise price for the options is equal to the fair market value at the date of grant.
The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2005, 2004 and 2003; risk-free
interest rate of 4.7%, 4.5%, and 4.0% respectively; dividend yield of 0% for all three years;
volatility factor of the expected market price of MOD-PAC common stock of .38, .36, and .35
respectively; and a weighted average expected option life of 7 years for all three years. The
weighted average fair value at the grant date of options granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was
$6.08, $3.92, and $2.76, respectively.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option
valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock
price volatility. Because the Companys employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
A summary of stock option activity for the years ended December 31 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
|
|
Outstanding at the beginning
of the year |
|
|
316,650 |
|
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
|
|
248,816 |
|
|
$ |
6.29 |
|
|
|
311,249 |
|
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
117,800 |
|
|
$ |
12.47 |
|
|
|
103,050 |
|
|
$ |
8.44 |
|
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(46,684 |
) |
|
$ |
8.99 |
|
|
|
(3,663 |
) |
|
$ |
7.30 |
|
|
|
(154,724 |
) |
|
$ |
3.80 |
|
Adjustments to actual amount
of substitution options
granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,611 |
|
|
$ |
(1.60 |
) |
Options exercised |
|
|
(71,827 |
) |
|
$ |
7.06 |
|
|
|
(31,553 |
) |
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
|
(22,320 |
) |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of year |
|
|
315,939 |
|
|
$ |
10.49 |
|
|
|
316,650 |
|
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
|
|
248,816 |
|
|
$ |
6.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31 |
|
|
192,807 |
|
|
$ |
8.56 |
|
|
|
108,232 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
|
106,293 |
|
|
$ |
5.20 |
|
28
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 range as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Price |
|
Contractual Life of |
|
|
Number of Options |
|
of Options |
|
Options |
Exercise Price Range |
|
Outstanding/Exercisable |
|
Outstanding/Exercisable |
|
Outstanding |
|
$2.60 |
|
|
4,679/4,679 |
|
|
$ |
2.60/$2.60 |
|
|
1.00 years |
$5.21 to $8.44 |
|
|
175,360/126,354 |
|
|
$ |
6.94/$7.09 |
|
|
6.68 years |
$10.34 to $15.54 |
|
|
135,900/61,774 |
|
|
$ |
12.18/$12.62 |
|
|
8.74 years |
|
MOD-PAC CORP. established the Employee Stock Purchase Plan to encourage its employees to invest in
the Company. The plan provides employees that have been with the Company for at least a year the
option to invest up to 20% of their cash compensation (up to an annual maximum of $20,000) in the
Companys common stock at a price equal to 85% of the fair market value of the Companys common
stock, determined each October 1. Employees are allowed to enroll annually. Employees indicate the
number of shares they wish to obtain through the program and their intention to pay for the shares
through payroll deductions over the annual cycle of October 1 through September 30. Employees can
withdraw anytime during the annual cycle and all money withheld from the employees pay is returned
with interest. If an employee remains enrolled in the program, enough money will have been withheld
from the employees pay during the year to pay for all the shares that the employee opted for under
the program. At December 31, 2005, employees have enrolled to purchase 15,940 shares at $9.25 per
share on September 30, 2006.
7. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Federal |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
7,445 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
State |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
(6,198 |
) |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rates differ from the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Impact of graduated tax rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nontaxable income and expense |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
.5 |
|
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
|
29
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 2005
and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability: Tax depreciation over financial statement depreciation |
|
$ |
(3,712 |
) |
|
$ |
4,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred asset: Revenue deferred for financial statements recognized upon
receipt for tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,195 |
|
Long-term deferred asset: State investment tax credit carry forwards |
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
Other net |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
Total long-term deferred tax assets |
|
|
4,019 |
|
|
|
8,820 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset related to investment tax credit carry forwards |
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax asset |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
7,962 |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liability) asset |
|
$ |
(3,457 |
) |
|
$ |
3,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As combined in the balance sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,323 |
|
Net long-term deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
3,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
On December 31, 2005, the Company had various state tax credit carry forwards of $5,703,000
($2,350,000 in 2004) including approximately $2,090,000 of state investment tax credits expiring
through 2019 and $3,613,000 of other business credits. In 2005, New York State enacted tax
legislation resulting in a change to the New York State apportionment methodology. The enacted
legislation will lower the apportionment of the Companys taxable income to New York State and
should result in lower New York State income taxes. Accordingly, the Companys ability to use or
realize New York State tax credits was reduced. As a result, the Company increased its valuation
allowance reflecting an increase to income tax expense of approximately $696,000 in 2005. In 2004,
the valuation allowance relates to such credits and was reduced by $130,000 as a result of
realizing a portion of the deferred tax asset for the state tax credits. The valuation allowance
at December 31, 2003 was $988,000.
8. Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan
Prior to the Distribution, the Company participated in the Astronics Qualified Profit
Sharing/401(k) Plan. Subsequent to the Distribution, the assets in the Astronics Plan were
transferred into the MOD-PAC CORP. Qualified Profit Sharing /401(k) Plan. Most of the Companys
full-time employees are eligible for annual contributions based on percentages of pre-tax income.
In addition, employees may contribute a portion of their salary to the 401(k), which is partially
matched by the Company. The plan may be amended or terminated at any time. Total charges to income
for the Company plan and the predecessor Astronics Plan were $586,000, $689,000 and $511,000 in
2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
9. Transactions with Astronics
In connection with the Distribution, the Company executed the Separation and Distribution Agreement
(Distribution Agreement) and certain related agreements that are summarized below. This summary is
qualified in all respects by the terms of the Distribution Agreement and such related agreements.
Distribution Agreement
Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, Astronics transferred to the Company all assets and
liabilities associated with the Company that were not already in its name and distributed to its
shareholders all of the shares of the Companys common stock and Class B stock owned by Astronics.
Pursuant to the Distribution, each holder of Astronics common stock received one share of the
Companys common stock for every two shares of Astronics common stock held by him
or her on the record date, and each holder of Astronics Class B stock received one share of the
Companys Class B
30
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock for every two shares of Astronics Class B stock held by him or her on the
record date. The Distribution Agreement also provides, among other things, that the Company
indemnifies Astronics for all liabilities, including contingent liabilities, relating to the
Companys business and that certain contingent liabilities not allocated to one of the parties will
be shared equally by the Company and Astronics.
Employee Benefits Agreement and Plans
The Company and Astronics entered into an Employee Benefits Agreement, pursuant to which the
Company created independent employee benefit plans that are substantially similar to the existing
Astronics plans, at the Distribution date. The agreement provides for the transfer of assets and
liabilities of various Astronics employee benefit plans related to the Companys employees.
Generally, following the Distribution, Astronics ceases to have any liability or obligation to the
Companys employees and their beneficiaries under any of Astronics benefit plans, programs or
policies.
Tax Sharing Agreement
The Company and Astronics entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement, which governs the Companys and
Astronics respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Distribution with respect
to taxes for the periods ending on or before Distribution. Generally, pre-Distribution taxes that
are clearly attributable to the business of one party will be borne solely by that party, and other
pre-Distribution taxes will be shared by the parties based upon a formula set forth in the Tax
Sharing Agreement. In addition, under the Tax Sharing Agreement, liability for taxes that are
incurred as a result of the restructuring activities undertaken to implement the Distribution will
be borne 60% by Astronics and 40% by the Company. If the Distribution fails to qualify as a
tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code because of an acquisition of
our stock or assets, or some other action of ours, then the Company will be solely liable for any
resulting corporate taxes.
Interim Services Agreement
The Company and Astronics entered into an Interim Services Agreement, whereby Astronics will
provide the Company, on an interim, transitional basis, payroll processing, general ledger
preparation, financial reporting, training, shareholder relations, risk management and benefits
administration services. The agreed upon charges for such services are generally intended to allow
Astronics to fully recover the allocated direct costs of providing the services, plus all
out-of-pocket costs and expenses, without profit, and will be allocated between us and Luminescent
Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of Astronics, on a fifty-fifty basis. Amounts paid to Astronics for
such services for the period after the distribution date through December 31, 2003 was $506,000. In
2004 such amounts were $294,000. No amount was paid in 2005.
10. Bank line of credit and Letters of Credit
The Company has a $6,000,000 line of credit facility with a commercial bank. No amounts were
outstanding on the line of credit at December 31, 2005. The commercial bank has also provided the
company with a standby letter of credit facility of $750,000 and has issued on behalf of the
Company $297,000 in standby letters of credit as collateral in lieu of cash with respect to several
agreements entered into by the Company.
31
MOD-PAC CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
24,458 |
|
|
$ |
14,234 |
|
|
$ |
16,286 |
|
|
$ |
16,215 |
|
|
$ |
15,050 |
|
|
$ |
12,232 |
|
|
$ |
11,434 |
|
|
$ |
11,564 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
14,659 |
|
|
|
4,026 |
|
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
4,913 |
|
|
|
4,741 |
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,032 |
|
|
$ |
817 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
|
$ |
1,741 |
|
|
$ |
856 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
12. Concentrations Related to Production Assets, Employees and Power
Nearly all of the Companys production assets and its employees are located in Western New York
State. The Company believes that the supply of labor and the infrastructure to support the supply
of materials and the shipment of product from its facilities is generally adequate. Since May of
2003, over 90% of the Companys power needs are met through natural gas. The Company has
investigated supply contracts of various lengths, however, it currently has no supply arrangements
for fixed prices. Historically, the price of natural gas has fluctuated widely. Although the
Company is concerned about cost and has from time to time acquired contracts for natural gas, its
main concern is availability. The Company monitors the availability of natural gas, considering
such factors as amount in storage, gas production data and transportation data, so that it can take
appropriate action if concerns about availability occur. The Company has investigated and tested a
back-up power source in the form of a rented transportable diesel powered generator. Although such
generators are generally available, the Company cannot be assured that a generator adequate to meet
the Companys needs will be available if and when such need should arise.
13. Restatements and Change in Classification
In February 2005, the Company restated its financial statements and related footnote disclosures
for the year ended December 31, 2003 to correct an error that overstated the cash balance reported
on the balance sheet at December 31, 2003 by $679,000. This correction to cash resulted in: (a)
increased cost of Products Sold of $209,000 and increased Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses of $2,000 for a total reduction of income before taxes of $211,000, (b) reduced income
taxes of $76,000 because of the additional Costs of Products Sold and Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses, (c) decreased net income by $135,000 and net income per diluted share by
$0.03, (d) an increase in amounts due from Astronics Corporation of $402,000 and (e) an increase in
property plant and equipment by $66,000. The Company filed an amended 2003 Annual Report on Form
10-K/A reflecting this restatement on February 7, 2005.
32
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d) 15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as of December 31, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of December 31, 2005.
Item 9B. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the fourth
quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
The information regarding directors is contained under the captions Election of Directors and
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by
reference.
The information regarding the Companys audit committee and audit committee financial experts is
contained under the captions Corporate Governance and Board Matters in the Companys definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year and is incorporated
herein by reference.
The executive officers of the Company, their ages, their positions and offices with the Company,
and the date each assumed their office with the Company are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Age |
|
|
|
Year First Elected |
Of Executive Officer |
|
Positions and Offices with MOD-PAC |
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel G. Keane Age 40
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David B. Lupp
|
|
Chief Financial Officer of the Company
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Age 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Code of Ethics
The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to its
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, as well as all other directors, officers and
employees of the Company. This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the Investor
Information section of the Companys website at www.modpac.com. The Company will disclose any
amendment to this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or waiver of a provision of this Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, including the name of any person to whom the waiver was granted, on
its website. We will provide a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics free of charge upon
request.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information contained under the caption Executive Compensation and Summary Compensation
Table in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of the end of our
fiscal year is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information contained under the caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of the end of
our fiscal year is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information contained under the caption Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The
information contained under the caption Auditor Fees in the Companys definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year is incorporated herein by
reference.
34
PART IV
Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following financial statements and supplemental schedule of MOD-PAC CORP. and Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms thereon are included herein:
(a) (1) Financial Statements
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Income Statement for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2005, and
2003 (Restated)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003
(Restated)
Notes to Financial Statements
(a) (2). Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II Valuation and qualifying accounts
All other consolidated financial schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required,
or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes
thereto.
35
SCHEDULE II
MOD-PAC CORP.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the |
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Costs and |
|
Write-offs/ |
|
end of |
Year |
|
Description |
|
of Period |
|
Expense |
|
Recoveries |
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
42 |
|
2004 |
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
44 |
|
2003 |
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Valuation allowance Deferred Tax Assets |
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
$ |
2,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,764 |
|
2004 |
|
Valuation allowance Deferred Tax Assets |
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
$ |
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
2003 |
|
Valuation allowance Deferred Tax Assets |
|
$ |
712 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
36
(a) 3. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Separation and Distribution Agreement Dated December 7, 2002
by and between Astronics Corporation and the Registrant;
incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants
Form 10/A Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
3(a)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants, Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
By-Laws, as amended; incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2
of the Registrants Form 10/A Registration Statement Dated
January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Secured $16,000,000 Credit Agreement with HSBC Bank USA, dated
February 20, 2003; incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 of
the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
MOD-PAC CORP. 2002 Stock Option Plan; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.6 of the Registrants Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
MOD-PAC CORP. 2002 Director Stock Option Plan; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.8 the Registrants Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
MOD-PAC CORP. Employee Stock Purchase Plan; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.7 of the Registrants Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement Dated December 7, 2002 by and between
Astronics Corporation and the Registrant; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Interim Services Agreement Dated December 7, 2002 by and
between Astronics Corporation and the Registrant; incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Employee Benefits Agreement Dated December 7, 2002 by and
between Astronics Corporation and the Registrant; incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Supply Agreement North America Dated September 30, 2002 by and
between VistaPrint Limited and the Registrant; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants Form 10/A
Registration Statement Dated January 28, 2003. |
37
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.8*
|
|
Supply Agreement North America Dated July 2, 2004 by and
between VistaPrint Limited and the Registrant; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 20.6 of the Registrants Form 10-Q Dated
August 5, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Termination Agreement Dated July 2, 2004 by and between
VistaPrint Limited and the Registrant; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 20.7 of the Registrants Form 10-Q Dated
August 5, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
Separation Agreement Dated May 9, 2005 by and between the
Registrant and C. Anthony Rider; incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Dated May 10, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.11*
|
|
Employment Agreement with David B. Lupp; incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K dated
January 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant; filed herewith. |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm; filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed Herewith) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed Herewith) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(Furnished Herewith) |
|
|
|
*Identifies a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement as required
by Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K. |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on March 9, 2006.
MOD-PAC CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Daniel G. Keane
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ David B. Lupp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel G. Keane, President
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Daniel J. Geary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Geary, Corporate Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William G. Gisel Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel G. Keane
|
|
Director
|
|
March 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin T. Keane
|
|
Director
|
|
March 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. McKenna
|
|
Director
|
|
March 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s/ Howard Zemsky
|
|
Director
|
|
March 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
39