10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
OR
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number
001-09071
BFC Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Florida   59-2022148
     
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
  (IRS Employer Identification Number)
     
2100 West Cypress Creek Road    
Fort Lauderdale, Florida   33309
     
(Address of Principal executive office)   (Zip Code)
(954) 940-4900
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ      NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o      NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company þ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o      NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date is as follows:
Class A Common Stock of $.01 par value, 38,254,389 shares outstanding as of May 12, 2009.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,875,104 shares outstanding as of May 12, 2009.
 
 

 


 

BFC Financial Corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
37
 
72
 
74
 
 
75
 
75
 
75
 
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-31.3
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-32.3

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition- Unaudited
(In thousands, except share data)
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
ASSETS
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 354,652       278,937  
Restricted cash
    8,575       21,288  
Securities available for sale and other financial instruments (at fair value)
    538,516       722,698  
Investment securities at cost or amortized costs (fair value: $37,294 in 2009 and $12,475 in 2008)
    36,955       12,008  
Tax certificates, net of allowance of $7,036 in 2009 and $6,064 in 2008
    172,641       213,534  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost which approximates fair value
    48,751       54,607  
Residential loans held for sale at lower of cost or fair value
    6,238       3,461  
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses $158,397 in 2009 and $137,257 in 2008
    4,197,587       4,314,184  
Accrued interest receivable
    38,519       41,817  
Real estate held for development and sale
    269,014       268,763  
Real estate owned
    21,763       19,045  
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
    28,494       41,386  
Properties and equipment, net
    309,251       315,347  
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
    36,553       44,986  
Other assets
    44,945       43,521  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 6,112,454       6,395,582  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
Liabilities:
               
Interest bearing deposits
  $ 3,254,626       3,184,677  
Non-interest bearing deposits
    798,687       741,691  
 
           
Total deposits
    4,053,313       3,926,368  
Advances from FHLB
    817,372       967,491  
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings
    62,967       238,339  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    28,238       41,387  
Subordinated debentures, mortgage notes payable and mortgage-backed bonds
    287,314       287,772  
Junior subordinated debentures
    379,460       376,104  
Loss in excess of investment in Woodbridge’s subsidiary
          52,887  
Other liabilities
    115,609       118,784  
 
           
Total liabilities
    5,744,273       6,009,132  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 17)
               
 
               
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized - 10,000,000 shares; Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock — $.01 par value; authorized 15,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,000 shares in 2009 and 2008 with a redemption value of $1,000 per share
    11,029       11,029  
 
           
 
               
Equity:
               
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 70,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 38,254,389 in 2009 and 2008
    382       382  
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,875,104 in 2009 and 2008
    69       69  
Additional paid-in capital
    124,182       123,562  
Accumulated deficit
    (19,439 )     (8,848 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (742 )     (2,298 )
 
           
Total BFC Financial Corporation (“BFC”) shareholders’ equity
    104,452       112,867  
Noncontrolling interests
    252,700       262,554  
 
           
Total equity
    357,152       375,421  
 
           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 6,112,454       6,395,582  
 
           
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
          (As Adjusted)  
Revenues
               
BFC Activities:
               
Interest and dividend income
  $ 258       415  
Other income
    164       1,258  
 
           
 
    422       1,673  
 
           
Financial Services:
               
Interest and dividend income
    62,908       83,732  
Service charges on deposits
    18,685       24,014  
Other service charges and fees
    7,025       7,433  
Securities activities, net
    4,440       (4,738 )
Other income
    2,650       2,602  
 
           
 
    95,708       113,043  
 
           
Real Estate Development:
               
Sales of real estate
    1,427       154  
Interest and dividend income
    509       1,455  
Other income
    2,944       3,090  
 
           
 
    4,880       4,699  
 
           
Total revenues
    101,010       119,415  
 
           
 
               
Costs and Expenses
               
BFC Activities:
               
Employee compensation and benefits
    2,196       3,160  
Other expenses
    701       927  
 
           
 
    2,897       4,087  
 
           
Financial Services:
               
Interest expense
    24,775       41,075  
Provision for loan losses
    44,277       42,888  
Employee compensation and benefits
    28,806       35,155  
Occupancy and equipment
    14,911       16,386  
Advertising and promotion
    2,832       4,895  
Restructuring charges and exit activities
    1,875       (115 )
Cost associated with debt redemption
    591       1  
Provision for (recovery from) tax certificates losses
    1,486       (117 )
Impairment of goodwill
    8,541        
Other expenses
    13,514       13,564  
 
           
 
    141,608       153,732  
 
           
Real Estate Development:
               
Cost of sales of real estate
    693       88  
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
    2,773       2,911  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    10,339       12,451  
 
           
 
    13,805       15,450  
 
           
Total costs and expenses
    158,310       173,269  
 
           
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    6,495       1,803  
Impairment of other investments
    (22,797 )      
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridge’s subsidiary
    40,369        
 
           
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests
    (33,233 )     (52,051 )
Benefit for income taxes
          (18,953 )
 
           
Loss from continuing operations
    (33,233 )     (33,098 )
Discontinued operations, less income tax provision $0 in 2009 and $708 in 2008
    4,201       1,019  
 
           
Net loss
    (29,032 )     (32,079 )
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
    18,629       26,208  
 
           
Net loss attributable to BFC
    (10,403 )     (5,871 )
5% Preferred Stock dividends
    (188 )     (188 )
 
           
Net loss allocable to common stock
  $ (10,591 )     (6,059 )
 
           
 
Basic and Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share (see Note 20):
               
Loss per share from continuing operations
  $ (0.26 )     (0.13 )
Earnings per share from discontinued operations
    0.03        
 
           
Net loss per common share
  $ (0.23 )     (0.13 )
 
           
 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
    45,114       45,103  
 
           
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss — Unaudited
(In thousands)
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Loss from continuing operations
  $ (29,032 )     (32,079 )
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
               
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale
    7,016       (5,741 )
Benefit for income taxes
          (2,214 )
 
           
Unrealized gains (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax
    7,016       (3,527 )
 
           
 
               
Unrealized gains (losses) associated with investment in unconsolidated affiliates
    473       (427 )
Benefit for income taxes
          (165 )
 
           
Unrealized gains (losses) associated with investment in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax
    473       (262 )
 
           
 
Reclassification adjustments of net realized losses (gains) included in net loss
    (2,044 )     2,036  
Provision for income taxes
          786  
 
           
Net realized (losses) gains reclassified into net loss, net of tax
    (2,044 )     1,250  
 
           
 
               
 
           
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    5,445       (2,539 )
 
           
 
               
Comprehensive loss
    (23,587 )     (34,618 )
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
    14,740       28,170  
 
           
Total comprehensive loss attributable to BFC
  $ (8,847 )     (6,448 )
 
           
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity — Unaudited
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(In thousands)
                                                                                 
                                                    Accumulated                    
                                                    Other     Total     Non-        
    Shares of Common     Class A     Class B     Additional     Accu-     Compre-     BFC     controlling        
    Stock Outstanding     Common     Common     Paid-in     mulated     hensive     Shareholders’     Interests in     Total  
    Class A     Class B     Stock     Stock     Capital     Deficit     Loss     Equity     Subsidiaries     Equity  
Balance, December 31, 2008
    38,254       6,875     $ 382     $ 69     $ 123,562     $ (8,848 )   $ (2,298 )   $ 112,867     $ 262,554     $ 375,421  
Net loss
                                  (10,403 )           (10,403 )     (18,629 )     (29,032 )
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
                                        1,556       1,556       3,889       5,445  
Noncontrolling interests net effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions
                                                    4,886       4,886  
Net effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions attributable to BFC
                            391                   391             391  
Cash dividends on 5% Preferred Stock
                                  (188 )           (188 )           (188 )
Share-based compensation related to stock options and restricted stock
                            229                   229             229  
 
                                                           
 
Balance, March 31, 2009
    38,254       6,875     $ 382     $ 69     $ 124,182     $ (19,439 )   $ (742 )   $ 104,452     $ 252,700     $ 357,152  
 
                                                           
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Unaudited
(In thousands)
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Net cash used in operating activities
  $ (5,013 )     (27,801 )
 
           
Investing activities:
               
Proceeds from redemption and maturities of investment securities and tax certificates
    43,528       40,953  
Purchase of investment securities and tax certificates
    (29,491 )     (11,912 )
Purchase of securities available for sale
          (101,954 )
Proceeds from sales and maturities of securities available for sale
    199,731       187,498  
Decrease in restricted cash
    12,713       338  
Cash paid in settlement of Woodbridge’s subsidiary bankruptcy
    (12,430 )      
Purchases of FHLB stock
    (2,295 )     (8,325 )
Redemption of FHLB stock
    8,151       4,771  
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
    (461 )     (198 )
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries
    224       1,889  
Net decrease (increase) in loans
    69,773       (13,323 )
Proceeds from the sale of loans receivable
          10,100  
Adjustment to acquisition of Pizza Fusion
    3,000        
Improvements to real estate owned
          (11 )
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned
    602       756  
Net additions to office properties and equipment
    (973 )     (4,120 )
 
           
Net cash provided by investing activities
    292,072       106,462  
 
           
Financing activities:
               
Net increase in deposits
    128,618       42,209  
Prepayment of FHLB advances
    (249,591 )      
Net proceeds from FHLB advances
    99,000       80,000  
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    (13,148 )     (2,818 )
Decrease in federal funds purchased
    (175,373 )     (62,489 )
Repayment of notes and bonds payable
    (583 )     (16,316 )
Proceeds from notes and bonds payable
    132       4,667  
Preferred stock dividends paid
    (188 )     (188 )
Proceeds from issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A common stock
          93  
Purchase and retirement of Woodbridge Class A common stock
    (13 )      
BankAtlantic Bancorp cash dividends paid to non-BFC shareholders
    (198 )     (216 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (211,344 )     44,942  
 
           
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
    75,715       123,603  
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
    278,937       332,165  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 354,652       455,768  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental cash flow information:
               
Interest paid on borrowings and deposits
  $ 29,424       45,568  
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Loans and tax certificates transferred to REO
    3,388        
Increase (decrease) in BFC accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes
    1,556       (577 )
Net increase in equity from the effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions to BFC
    391       170  
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Presentation of Interim Financial Statements
          BFC Financial Corporation (“BFC” or the “Company”) is a diversified holding company whose major holdings include controlling interests in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“BankAtlantic Bancorp”) and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (formerly Levitt Corporation) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Woodbridge”) and a noncontrolling interest in Benihana, Inc. (“Benihana”), which operates Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States. As a result of the Company’s position as the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a “unitary savings bank holding company” regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”).
          As a holding company with controlling positions in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, BFC is required under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to consolidate the financial results of these companies. As a consequence, the financial information of both entities is presented on a consolidated basis in BFC’s financial statements. However, except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata share in a dividend or distribution.
          BFC’s ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge as of March 31, 2009 was as follows:
                         
                    Percent
    Shares   Percent of   of
    Owned   Ownership   Vote
BankAtlantic Bancorp
                       
Class A Common Stock
    2,389,697       23.29 %     12.35 %
Class B Common Stock
    975,225       100.00 %     47.00 %
Total
    3,364,922       29.95 %     59.35 %
 
                       
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
                       
Class A Common Stock
    3,735,392       22.45 %     11.90 %
Class B Common Stock
    243,807       100.00 %     47.00 %
Total
    3,979,199       23.57 %     58.90 %
          BankAtlantic Bancorp is a unitary savings bank holding company organized under the laws of the State of Florida. BankAtlantic Bancorp’s principal asset is its investment in BankAtlantic and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic, a federal savings bank headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, provides traditional retail banking services and a wide range of commercial banking products and related financial services through a network of over 100 branches or “stores” located in Florida.
          On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp completed the sale of Ryan Beck Holdings, Inc. (“Ryan Beck”), a subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp engaged in retail and institutional brokerage and investment banking, to Stifel Financial Corp. (“Stifel”). As a consequence, the results of operations of Ryan Beck are presented as “Discontinued Operations” in the consolidated statements of operations. Under the terms of the agreement, BankAtlantic Bancorp received, among other consideration, consideration based on revenues generated by Ryan Beck over the two year period following the closing of the sale. This earn-out consideration in the amounts of $4.2 million and $1.7 million is included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations in discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
          Historically, Woodbridge’s operations were primarily within the real estate industry; however Woodbridge’s current business strategy includes the pursuit of investments and acquisitions within or outside of the real estate industry, as well as the continued development of master-planned communities.
          Woodbridge engages in business activities through its Land Division, consisting of the operations of Core Communities, LLC (“Core Communities” or “Core”), which develops master-planned communities, and through its Other Operations segment (“Woodbridge Other Operations”), which includes the other operations of Woodbridge, such as the consolidated operations of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (“Pizza Fusion”), the consolidated operations of Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (“Carolina Oak”), which engaged in homebuilding activities in South Carolina prior to

8


Table of Contents

the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and the activities of Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (“Cypress Creek Capital”) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC (“Snapper Creek”). An equity investment in Bluegreen Corporation (“Bluegreen”) and an investment in Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) are also included in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment.
          Prior to November 9, 2007, Woodbridge also conducted homebuilding operations through Levitt and Sons, LLC (“Levitt and Sons”), which comprised Woodbridge’s Homebuilding Division. Woodbridge’s Homebuilding Division consisted of two reportable operating segments, the Primary Homebuilding segment and the Tennessee Homebuilding segment. As previously reported, on November 9, 2007, Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (the “Bankruptcy Court”). In connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007, eliminating all future operations of Levitt and Sons from Woodbridge’s financial results of operations. As a result of the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons, in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements” (“ARB No. 51”), Woodbridge recorded its interest in Levitt and Sons under the cost method of accounting.
          As previously reported, on February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the settlement agreement that was entered into on June 27, 2008. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Court’s order was timely filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time, payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement. Under cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the settlement agreement, as amended) was recognized into income in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary. See Note 24 for further information regarding the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons.
          The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In management’s opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain such adjustments as are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008; the consolidated results of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the changes in consolidated equity for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
          Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.
          In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 established new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The Company implemented SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 and, accordingly, the Company reflected the new presentation of noncontrolling interest as a separate item in the equity section in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The Company also reflected the amount of consolidated net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and the amount attributable to BFC to be separately presented in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. SFAS No. 160 was applied prospectively with the exception of the financial statements presentation and required disclosures, which were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Accordingly, included in the Company’s equity in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition is the equity attributable to noncontrolling interests of approximately $252.7 million and $262.6 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. SFAS No. 160 also clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, SFAS No. 160 requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss is measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. See Note 4.

9


Table of Contents

          In 2007, Core Communities began soliciting bids from several potential buyers to purchase assets associated with two of Core’s commercial leasing projects (the “Projects”). As the criteria for assets held for sale had been met in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”), the assets were reclassified to assets held for sale and the liabilities related to those assets were reclassified to liabilities related to assets held for sale. The results of operations for these assets were reclassified as discontinued operations. During the fourth quarter of 2008, Woodbridge determined that given the difficulty in predicting the timing or probability of a sale of the assets associated with the Projects as a result of, among other things, the economic downturn and disruptions in credit markets, the requirements of SFAS No. 144 necessary to classify these assets as held for sale and to be included in discontinued operations were no longer met and Woodbridge could not assert the Projects could be sold within a year. Therefore, the results of operations for these Projects were reclassified back into continuing operations for prior periods to conform to the current period’s presentation.
          A revision was recorded by Woodbridge in the first quarter of 2009 to account for assets and non-controlling interests not recorded properly in the initial application of purchase accounting of Woodbridge’s investment in Pizza Fusion. The adjustment resulted in an increase in cash of $3.0 million, goodwill of $1.1 million and non-controlling interest of $4.1 million. Woodbridge has also recorded an increase in cash flows from investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $3.0 million which is included in adjustment to acquisition of Pizza Fusion. The impact of this revision is not material to our consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, nor is it material to our consolidated statement of cash flows for the periods then ended. The revision had no impact on our net income or loss or on our cash flows from operating activities for the three month periods ended September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008.
2. Liquidity
BFC
          Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata share in a dividend or distribution. BFC has incurred operating cash flow deficits which have been financed with available working capital. BFC expects to meet its liquidity requirements generally through existing cash balances and cash dividends from Benihana and, if necessary with respect to its long-term liquidity requirements, through secured and unsecured indebtedness, future issuances of equity and/or debt securities, and, the sale of assets; however, there is no assurance that any of these alternatives will be available to BFC on attractive terms, or at all, particularly if the adverse current economic and financial market conditions continue.
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic
          BankAtlantic’s liquidity is dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and availability under its lines of credit, federal funds and Treasury and Federal Reserve programs. Additionally, interest rate changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets or deterioration in BankAtlantic’s financial condition may make terms of the borrowings and deposits less favorable. As a result, there is a risk that BankAtlantic’s cost of funds will increase or that the availability of funding sources may decrease. As of March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic had available unused borrowings of approximately $813 million in connection with its FHLB line of credit, federal funds lines, and Treasury and Federal Reserve programs. However, such available borrowings are subject to periodic reviews and they may be terminated or limited at any time.
          As of March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic met the regulatory requirements of a “well capitalized” institution with actual capital amounts and ratios exceeding all “well capitalized” amounts and ratios. However, the OTS, at its discretion, can at any time require an institution to maintain capital amounts and ratios above the established “well capitalized” requirements based on its view of the risk profile of the specific institution. If higher capital requirements are imposed, BankAtlantic could be required to raise additional capital. There is no assurance that additional capital will not be necessary, or that BankAtlantic Bancorp or BankAtlantic would be successful in raising additional capital in subsequent periods. BankAtlantic Bancorp’s inability to raise capital or be deemed “well capitalized” could have a material adverse impact on BFC’s and BankAtlantic Bancorp’s financial condition and results.

10


Table of Contents

Core Communities
          Core’s operations have been negatively impacted by the downturn in the residential and commercial real-estate industries. Market conditions have adversely affected Core’s commercial leasing projects and its ability to complete sales, and Core is currently experiencing cash flow deficits. Possible liquidity sources available to Core include the sale of real estate inventory, including commercial properties, debt or outside equity financing, including secured borrowings using unencumbered land; however, there is no assurance that any or all of these alternatives will be available to Core on attractive terms, if at all, or that Core will otherwise be in a position to utilize such alternatives to improve its cash position. In addition, while funding from Woodbridge is a possible source of liquidity, Woodbridge is under no obligation to provide funding to Core and there can be no assurance that it will do so.
          Core has a credit agreement with a financial institution which provides for borrowings of up to $64.3 million, of which $58.3 million was outstanding at March 31, 2009. This facility matures in June 2009 and has two one-year extension options. The loan agreement requires that Core provide at least 30 days notice prior to the initial maturity of its election to exercise the one-year option period. Throughout the extension period, the collateral must generate a debt service coverage ratio of 1.20:1, otherwise Core would be required to re-margin the loan. Core does not currently anticipate that it will meet the debt service coverage ratio requirements with respect to the extension period, and Core is in discussions with its lender regarding this credit agreement. Under the terms of the loan, Core can make a re-margining payment, if necessary, from current cash reserves, and the loan will be automatically extended. As part of its discussions with the lender, Core is seeking to achieve the extension by restructuring the loan without making a re-margining payment. However, there can be no assurance that Core will be successful in doing so.
          All of Core’s debt facilities contain financial covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and loan to value ratios. In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that the lender had received an external appraisal on the land that serves as collateral for a loan, which had an outstanding balance of $86.7 million at March 31, 2009. The appraised value would suggest that a re-margining payment must be required to reduce the note payable so as to meet the minimum loan-to-value requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review procedures, including the determination of the appraised value. As of the date of this filing, the lender’s evaluation is continuing and, until such time as there is final conclusion on the part of the lender, the amount of a possible re-margining requirement is not determinable.
          As discussed above, the negative trends in the operations of Core which have been impacted by the deterioration of the real estate market and the potential for re-margining payments of yet unknown amounts raise substantial doubt regarding Core’s ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with “Statement of Auditing Standards No. 59, “The Auditors Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” if Woodbridge chooses not to provide Core with the cash needed to meet any such obligations when and if they arise. Core’s results are reported separately for segment purposes as the Land Division segment in Note 5. The financial information provided in the Land Division segment and in the unaudited consolidated financial statements has been prepared assuming that Core will meet its obligations and continue as a going concern. As a result, the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the financial information provided for the Land Division do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

11


Table of Contents

3. Fair Value Measurement
          The following table presents major categories of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009  
            Quoted prices in              
            Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant  
            for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
    March 31,     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
Description   2009     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Securities Available for Sale:
                               
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 363,389             363,389        
REMICS
    154,449             154,449        
Bonds
    250                   250  
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
    16,384                   16,384  
Other equity securities
    4,044       2,792             1,252  
 
                       
Total securities available for sale at fair value
  $ 538,516       2,792       517,838       17,886  
 
                       
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s financial statements.
          The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                                 
            Benihana        
            Convertible   Equity    
    Bonds   Preferred Stock   Securities   Total
     
Beginning Balance
  $ 250       16,426       1,588       18,264  
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
                               
Included in earnings
                       
Included in other comprehensive loss
          (42 )     (336 )     (378 )
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
                       
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
                       
     
Ending balance
  $ 250       16,384       1,252       17,886  
     
          The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                                         
            Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 using    
            Quoted prices in            
            Active Markets   Significant   Significant    
    As of   for Identical   Other Observable   Unobservable    
    March 31,   Assets   Inputs   Inputs   Total
Description   2009   (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3)   Impairments
     
Loans measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral
  $ 36,208                   36,208       9,860  
Impaired real estate owned
    1,590                   1,590       211  
Impaired goodwill
                            8,541  
          There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the Company’s financial statements.

12


Table of Contents

          Loans Measured For Impairment
          Impaired loans are generally valued based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Third party appraisals of the collateral are primarily used to assist in measuring impairment. These appraisals generally use the market or income approach valuation technique and use market observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the loan’s collateral. However, the appraiser uses professional judgment in determining the fair value of the collateral or properties, and these values may also be adjusted for changes in market conditions subsequent to the appraisal date. When current appraisals are not available for certain loans, judgment on market conditions is used to adjust the most current appraisal. The sales prices may reflect prices of sales contracts not closed, and the amount of time required to sell out the real estate project may be derived from current appraisals of similar projects. As a consequence, the fair value of the collateral is considered a Level 3 valuation.
          Impaired Real Estate Owned
          Real estate owned is generally valued using third party appraisals or broker price opinions. These appraisals generally use the market approach valuation technique and use market observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the properties. However, the appraiser or brokers use professional judgment in determining the fair value of the properties, and BankAtlantic may also adjust these values for changes in market conditions subsequent to the valuation date. As a consequence of using broker price opinions and adjustments to appraisals, the fair values of the properties are considered a Level 3 valuation.
          Impaired Goodwill
          Goodwill impairment charges relating to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s tax certificates and investments reporting units in the aggregate amount of $8.5 million, net of purchase accounting adjustment from the 2008 step acquisition in the amount of approximately $0.6 million, was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The remaining $13.1 million of goodwill on BankAtlantic Bancorp’s statement of financial condition relates to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s capital services reporting unit, and the goodwill associated with this reporting unit was determined not to be impaired as of March 31, 2009. In determining the fair value of the reporting units, BankAtlantic Bancorp used discounted cash flow valuation techniques. This method requires assumptions for expected cash flows and applicable discount rates. The aggregate fair value of all reporting units derived from the above valuation methodology was compared to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s market capitalization adjusted for a control premium in order to determine the reasonableness of the financial model output. A control premium represents the value an investor would pay above minority interest transaction prices in order to obtain a controlling interest in the respective company. BankAtlantic Bancorp used financial projections over a period of time considered necessary to achieve a steady state of cash flows for each reporting unit. The primary assumptions in the projections were anticipated loan, tax certificates and securities growth, interest rates and revenue growth. The discount rates were estimated based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which considers the risk-free interest rate, market risk premium, beta, and unsystematic risk and size premium adjustments specific to a particular reporting unit. The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in the discount rate and terminal value assumptions. Changes in the assumptions used could impact significantly the fair value assigned to a reporting unit and cause the fair value of the reporting unit to be below its carrying value. As a result of the significant judgments used in determining the fair value of the reporting units, the fair values of the reporting units are considered a Level 3 valuation.
4. Noncontrolling Interests
          The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held by others in the Company’s subsidiaries at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
BankAtlantic Bancorp
  $ 145,011       170,888  
Woodbridge
    103,488       91,389  
Other subsidiaries
    4,201       277  
 
           
 
  $ 252,700       262,554  
 
           

13


Table of Contents

          The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests loss (earnings) recognized by others with respect to the Company’s subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Noncontrolling interests - Continuing Operations:
               
BankAtlantic Bancorp
  $ 32,649       18,779  
Woodbridge
    (11,296 )     8,274  
Other subsidiaries
    219       12  
 
           
 
    21,572       27,065  
 
           
 
               
Noncontrolling interests - Discontinued Operations:
               
BankAtlantic Bancorp
  $ (2,943 )     (857 )
Woodbridge
           
Other subsidiaries
           
 
           
 
    (2,943 )     (857 )
 
           
 
  $ 18,629       26,208  
 
           
5. Segment Reporting
          Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources. Reportable segments consist of one or more operating segments with similar economic characteristics, products and services, production processes, types of customers, distribution systems or regulatory environments.
          The information provided for segment reporting is based on internal reports utilized by management of the Company and its respective subsidiaries. The presentation and allocation of assets and results of operations may not reflect the actual economic costs of the segments as stand alone businesses. If a different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative contributions of the segments might differ but the relative trends in segments’ operating results would, in management’s view, likely not be impacted.
          The Company operates through five reportable segments, which are: BFC Activities, BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations, Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations. The Company’s financial services activities include BankAtlantic Bancorp’s results of operations and consist of two reportable segments, which are: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations. The Company’s real estate development activities include Woodbridge’s results of operations and consist of two reportable segments, which are: Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations.
          The Company evaluates segment performance based on net income (loss) net of tax and noncontrolling interests.
          The following summarizes the aggregation of the Company’s operating segments into reportable segments:
BFC Activities
          This segment includes all of the operations and all of the assets owned by BFC other than BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries. The BFC Activities segment includes dividends from BFC’s investment in Benihana’s convertible preferred stock and income and expenses associated with shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk management, investor relations and executive office administration and other services that BFC provides to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge pursuant to a shared services agreement. Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and administrative services to Bluegreen. This segment also includes BFC’s overhead and expenses, the financial results of venture partnerships that BFC controls and BFC’s benefit for income taxes.

14


Table of Contents

BankAtlantic
          The Company’s BankAtlantic segment consists of the banking operations of BankAtlantic.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations
          The BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations segment consists of the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp other than the banking operations of BankAtlantic, including cost of acquisitions, asset and capital management and financing activities.
Land Division
          The Company’s Land Division segment consists of Core Communities’ operations.
Woodbridge Other Operations
          The Woodbridge Other Operations segment consists of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation’s operations, the operations of Pizza Fusion and Carolina Oak, other investment activities through Cypress Creek Capital and Snapper Creek. Woodbridge’s equity investment in Bluegreen and its investment in Office Depot are also included in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment.

15


Table of Contents

          The table below sets forth the Company’s segment information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
                                                         
                    BankAtlantic                            
                    Bancorp             Woodbridge     Adjustments        
    BFC             Other     Land     Other     and        
2009   Activities     BankAtlantic     Operations     Division     Operations     Eliminations     Total  
Revenues:
                                                       
Sales of real estate
  $                   1,427                   1,427  
Interest and dividend income
    258       62,409       209       275       237       287       63,675  
Other income
    909       32,787       342       2,276       677       (1,083 )     35,908  
 
                                         
Total revenues
    1,167       95,196       551       3,978       914       (796 )     101,010  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Costs and Expenses:
                                                       
Cost of sale of real estate
                      693                   693  
Interest expense, net
          20,640       4,230       1,370       1,403       (95 )     27,548  
Provision for loan losses
          43,520       757                         44,277  
Other expenses
    2,958       71,703       1,704       6,247       4,507       (1,327 )     85,792  
 
                                         
Total costs and expenses
    2,958       135,863       6,691       8,310       5,910       (1,422 )     158,310  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    (71 )     78       118             6,336       34       6,495  
Impairment of other investment
                            (22,797 )           (22,797 )
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridge’s subsidiary
                            26,985       13,384       40,369  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations
    (1,862 )     (40,589 )     (6,022 )     (4,332 )     5,528       14,044       (33,233 )
Discontinued operations
    1,258             4,201                   (1,258 )     4,201  
 
                                         
Net (loss) income
    (604 )     (40,589 )     (1,821 )     (4,332 )     5,528       12,786       (29,032 )
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
    15       28,431       1,276       3,358       (4,082 )     (10,369 )     18,629  
 
                                         
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
  $ (589 )     (12,158 )     (545 )     (974 )     1,446       2,417       (10,403 )
 
                                         
At March 31, 2009
                                                       
 
                                                       
Total assets
  $ 39,807       5,488,603       506,711       333,810       191,503       (447,980 )     6,112,454  
 
                                         

16


Table of Contents

                                                         
                    BankAtlantic                            
                    Bancorp             Woodbridge     Adjustments        
    BFC             Other     Land     Other     and        
2008   Activities     BankAtlantic     Operations     Division     Operations     Eliminations     Total  
Revenues:
                                                       
Sales of real estate
  $                   154                   154  
Interest and dividend income
    420       83,358       420       189       1,287       (72 )     85,602  
Other income
    1,689       34,440       (4,808 )     3,420       314       (1,396 )     33,659  
 
                                         
 
    2,109       117,798       (4,388 )     3,763       1,601       (1,468 )     119,415  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Costs and Expenses:
                                                       
Cost of sales of real estate
                      28             60       88  
Interest expense, net
          35,353       5794       993       2,673       (827 )     43,986  
Provision for loan losses
          42,888                               42,888  
Other expenses
    4,158       68,626       1,675       5,531       7,096       (779 )     86,307  
 
                                         
 
    4,158       146,867       7,469       6,552       9,769       (1,546 )     173,269  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    2       1,113       162             526             1,803  
 
                                         
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
    (2,047 )     (27,956 )     (11,695 )     (2,789 )     (7,642 )     78       (52,051 )
Benefit for income taxes
    (3,866 )     (10,975 )     (4,112 )                       (18,953 )
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations
  $ 1,819       (16,981 )     (7,583 )     (2,789 )     (7,642 )     78       (33,098 )
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
    1,019             1,121                   (1,121 )     1,019  
 
                                         
Net (loss) income
    2,838       (16,981 )     (6,462 )     (2,789 )     (7,642 )     (1,043 )     (32,079 )
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
    12       13,603       5176       1,983       5,434             26,208  
 
                                         
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
  $ 2,850       (3,378 )     (1,286 )     (806 )     (2,208 )     (1,043 )     (5,871 )
 
                                         
 
                                                       
At March 31, 2008
                                                       
Total assets
  $ 35,511       6,212,300       730,427       328,255       365,699       (563,360 )     7,108,832  
 
                                         

17


Table of Contents

6. Discontinued Operations
          On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp sold Ryan Beck to Stifel. The sales agreement provided for contingent earn-out payments, payable in cash or shares of Stifel common stock, at Stifel’s election, based on certain defined revenues generated by Ryan Beck during the two-year period which ended on February 28, 2009. The contingent earn-out payments were accounted for when earned as additional proceeds from the sale. BankAtlantic Bancorp received additional earn-out consideration of $1.7 million and $4.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
7. Restructuring Charges and Exit Activities
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic
          The following provides liabilities associated with restructuring charges and exit activities (in thousands):
                         
    Employee        
    Termination        
    Benefits   Contract   Total
    Liability   Liability   Liability
     
Balance at January 1, 2008
  $ 102       990       1,092  
Expenses (recoveries)
          (115 )     (115 )
Amounts paid or amortized
    (88 )     (88 )     (176 )
     
Balance at March 31, 2008
  $ 14       787       801  
     
 
                       
Balance at January 1, 2009
    171       1,462       1,633  
Expense incurred
    1,875             1,875  
Amounts paid or amortized
    (138 )     (30 )     (168 )
     
Balance at March 31, 2009
  $ 1,908       1,432       3,340  
     
          In March 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp completed a reduction of its workforce by approximately 130 associates, or 7%, impacting back-office functions as well as its community banking and commercial lending business units. BankAtlantic Bancorp incurred $1.9 million of employee termination costs which were included in the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and Levitt and Sons
          The following table summarizes the restructuring related accruals activity recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
                                         
    Severance           Independent        
    Related and           Contractor   Surety Bond    
    Benefits   Facilities   Agreements   Accrual   Total
     
Balance at December 31, 2007
  $ 1,954       1,010       1,421       1,826       6,211  
Restructuring charges (credits)
    1,207             (42 )           1,165  
Cash payments
    (1,527 )     (86 )     (206 )     (165 )     (1,984 )
     
Balance at March 31, 2008
  $ 1,634       924       1,173       1,661       5,392  
     
 
                                       
Balance at December 31, 2008
  $ 129       704       597       1,144       2,574  
Restructuring charges
    89             8             97  
Cash payments
    (132 )     (93 )     (206 )     (37 )     (468 )
     
Balance at March 31, 2009
  $ 86       611       399       1,107       2,203  
     
          On November 9, 2007, Woodbridge implemented an employee fund and indicated that it would pay up to $5.0 million of severance benefits to terminated Levitt and Sons employees to supplement the limited termination benefits which Levitt and Sons was permitted to pay to those employees. Levitt and Sons was restricted in the payment of termination benefits to its former employees by virtue of the Chapter 11 Cases.
          The severance related and benefits accrual includes severance payments made to Levitt and Sons employees as well as other employees of Woodbridge, payroll taxes and other benefits related to the terminations that occurred in 2007 as part of the Chapter 11 Cases. Woodbridge incurred severance and benefits related restructuring charges in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 of approximately $89,000 and $1.2

18


Table of Contents

million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge paid approximately $132,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, in severance and termination charges related to the above described employee fund as well as severance for employees other than Levitt and Sons employees, all of which are reflected in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment. Employees entitled to participate in the fund either received a payment stream, which in certain cases extended over two years, or a lump sum payment, dependent on a variety of factors. Former Levitt and Sons’ employees who received these payments were required to assign to Woodbridge their unsecured claims against Levitt and Sons.
          The facilities accrual as of March 31, 2009 represents expense associated with property and equipment leases that Woodbridge had entered into that are no longer providing a benefit to Woodbridge, as well as termination fees related to contractual obligations that Woodbridge cancelled. Included in this amount are future minimum lease payments fees and expenses for which the provisions of SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, as applicable, were satisfied. Total cash payments related to the facilities accrual were $93,000 and $86,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
          The independent contractor agreements accrual relates to two consulting agreements entered into by Woodbridge with former Levitt and Sons employees. The total commitment related to these agreements as of March 31, 2009 was approximately $399,000 and will be paid monthly through November 2009. During each of the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge paid $206,000 under these agreements.
          At each of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had $1.1 million in surety bonds accrual related to certain bonds where Woodbridge’s management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge reimbursed the surety approximately $37,000 and $165,000, respectively, in accordance with the indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is no assurance that Woodbridge will not be responsible for amounts in excess of the $1.1 million accrual. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. (See Note 17.)
8. Securities Available for Sale
          The following tables summarize securities available for sale (in thousands):
                                 
    March 31, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
Mortgage-Backed Securities
                               
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 350,142       13,258       11       363,389  
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (1)
    150,445       4,004             154,449  
 
                       
Total mortgage-backed securities
    500,587       17,262       11       517,838  
 
                       
Investment Securities:
                               
Other bonds
    250                   250  
Investment in Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
    16,426             42       16,384  
Equity securities
    4,290       97       343       4,044  
 
                       
Total investment securities
    20,966       97       385       20,678  
 
                       
Total
  $ 521,553       17,359       396       538,516  
 
                       
                                 
    December 31, 2008  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
                               
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 521,895       11,017       39       532,873  
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (1)
    165,449       1,846       944       166,351  
 
                       
Total mortgage-backed securities
    687,344       12,863       983       699,224  
 
                       
Investment Securities:
                               
Other bonds
    250                   250  
Investment in Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
    16,426                   16,426  
Equity securities
    6,686       112             6,798  
 
                       
Total investment securities
    23,362       112             23,474  
 
                       
Total
  $ 710,706       12,975       983       722,698  
 
                       

19


Table of Contents

 
(1)   Real estate mortgage investment conduits are pass-through entities that hold residential loans and investors are issued ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The securities were issued by government agencies.
          Included in Financial Services securities activities, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations were (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Gross gains on securities sales
  $ 4,440     $ 1,776  
 
           
Gross losses on securities sales
          (6,514 )
 
           
Proceeds from sales of securities
    162,429       141,085  
 
           
BFC — Benihana Investment
          The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihana Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock”). The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $12.67 per share of Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment from time to time upon certain defined events. Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihana’s capital stock, the Convertible Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent an approximately 19% voting interest and an approximately 9.4% economic interest in Benihana. Holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative quarterly dividends at an annual rate equal to $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at the original issue price plus accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless BFC elects to extend the mandatory redemption date to a later date not to extend beyond July 2, 2024. At March 31, 2009, the closing price of Benihana’s Common Stock was $2.53 per share. The market value of the Convertible Preferred Stock if converted at March 31, 2009 would have been approximately $4.0 million.
          Historically, the Company’s investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock was classified as investment securities and was carried at historical cost. In December 2008, the Company performed an impairment review of its investment in the Convertible Preferred Stock to determine if an impairment adjustment was needed. Based on the evaluation and the review of various qualitative and quantitative factors, including the decline in the underlying trading value of Benihana’s Common Stock at December 31, 2008 and the redemption provisions of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company determined that there was an other-than-temporary decline of approximately $3.6 million and, accordingly, the investment was written down to its fair value of approximately $16.4 million at December 31, 2008. Concurrent with management’s evaluation of the impairment of this investment at December 31, 2008, it made the determination to reclassify this investment from investment securities to investment securities available for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” At March 31, 2009, the Company performed an impairment review of its investment in the Convertible Preferred Stock and determined, based on such review, that no further other-than-temporary impairment adjustment was required at that time. BFC will continue to monitor this investment in accordance with FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“FSP FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1”) to determine whether any further other-than-temporary impairment associated with this investment may be required in future periods. On May 6, 2009, the closing price of Benihana’s Common Stock was $6.06 per share. The fair value of the Company’s investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock was assessed by using Level 3 inputs as defined by SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), whereby BFC’s valuation technique was used to measure the fair value based upon the income approach by discounting the cash flows at a market discount rate.
          See Note 18 for additional information concerning the Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock.
Office Depot Investment
          At March 31, 2009, Woodbridge owned approximately 1.4 million shares of Office Depot’s common stock, representing less than 1% of Office Depot’s outstanding common stock as of that date. This investment is reviewed quarterly for other-than-temporary impairments in accordance with FSP FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1 and is accounted for under the available-for-sale method of accounting whereby any unrealized holding gains or losses are included in equity.

20


Table of Contents

          During December 2008, Woodbridge performed an impairment analysis of its investment in Office Depot common stock. Woodbridge concluded that there was an other-than-temporary impairment associated with its investment in Office Depot based on the severity of the decline of the fair value of its investment, the length of time the stock price had been below the carrying value of Woodbridge’s investment, the continued decline in the overall economy and credit markets, and the unpredictability of the recovery of the Office Depot stock price. Accordingly, Woodbridge recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of approximately $12.0 million representing the difference of the average cost of $11.33 per share and the fair value of $2.98 per share as of December 31, 2008 multiplied by the number of shares of Office Depot common stock owned by Woodbridge at that date. Woodbridge again performed an impairment analysis at March 31, 2009 and, based on, among other things, the continued decline of Office Depot’s stock price, determined that an additional other-than-temporary impairment charge was required. As a result, Woodbridge recorded a $2.4 million impairment charge relating to its investment in Office Depot in the three months ended March 31, 2009, which decreased the carrying value of Woodbridge’s investment in Office Depot from $4.3 million as of December 31, 2008 to $1.9 million as of March 31, 2009.
          Woodbridge valued Office Depot’s common stock using a market approach valuation technique and Level 1 valuation inputs under SFAS No. 157. Woodbridge uses quoted market prices to value equity securities. The fair value of the Office Depot common stock in Woodbridge’s unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition at March 31, 2009 was calculated based upon the $1.31 closing price of Office Depot’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 31, 2009. On May 7, 2009, the closing price of Office Depot common stock was $3.45 per share.
9. Acquisition
          On September 18, 2008, Woodbridge, indirectly through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP, purchased for an aggregate of $3.0 million, 2,608,696 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion, together with warrants to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. Woodbridge also has options, exercisable on or prior to September 18, 2009, to purchase up to 521,740 additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share and, upon exercise of such options, will receive warrants to purchase up to 300,000 additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier expiration in certain circumstances.
          Pizza Fusion is a restaurant franchise operating in a niche market within the quick service and organic food industries. As of March 31, 2009, Pizza Fusion, which was founded in 2006, was operating 18 locations throughout the United States and had entered into franchise agreements to open an additional 17 stores by the end of 2009.
          During 2008, Woodbridge evaluated its investment in Pizza Fusion under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN No. 46(R)”), and determined that Pizza Fusion is a variable interest entity. Pizza Fusion is in its early stages and will likely require additional financial support for its normal operations and further expansion of its franchise operations. Furthermore, on a fully diluted basis, Woodbridge’s investment represents a significant interest in Pizza Fusion and, therefore, Woodbridge is expected to bear the majority of the variability of the risks and rewards of Pizza Fusion. Additionally, as shareholder of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, Woodbridge has control over the Board of Directors of Pizza Fusion. Based upon these factors, Woodbridge concluded that it is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, under purchase accounting, the assets and liabilities of Pizza Fusion are consolidated in accordance with Statement of SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations". Apart from its investment of $3.0 million, Woodbridge has not provided any additional financial support to Pizza Fusion since acquisition. There are no restrictions on the assets currently held by Pizza Fusion and its liabilities are primarily related to franchise deposits, which are not refundable.
          Woodbridge recorded $5.5 million in other intangible assets, including an adjustment of $1.1 million in goodwill. The intangible assets consist primarily of the value of franchise agreements that had been executed by Pizza Fusion at the acquisition date. These intangible assets will be amortized over the length of the franchise agreements which is generally 10 years.

21


Table of Contents

10. Loans Receivable
          The consolidated loan portfolio consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Real estate loans:
               
Residential
  $ 1,862,341       1,916,562  
Builder land loans
    83,945       84,453  
Land acquisition and development
    214,561       226,484  
Land acquisition, development and construction
    52,090       60,730  
Construction and development
    232,054       229,856  
Commercial
    714,617       713,571  
Consumer — home equity
    711,236       718,950  
Small business
    212,011       218,694  
Other loans:
               
Commercial business
    145,264       144,554  
Small business — non-mortgage
    104,163       108,230  
Consumer loans
    14,339       16,406  
Deposit overdrafts
    6,404       9,730  
 
           
Total gross loans
    4,353,025       4,448,220  
 
           
Adjustments:
               
Premiums, discounts and net deferred fees
    2,959       3,221  
Allowance for loan losses
    (158,397 )     (137,257 )
 
           
Loans receivable, net
  $ 4,197,587       4,314,184  
 
           
Loans held for sale
  $ 6,238       3,461  
 
           
          Loans held for sale at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are loans originated through the assistance of an independent mortgage company. The mortgage company provides processing and closing assistance to BankAtlantic. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, this mortgage company purchases the loans from BankAtlantic 14 days after the date of funding. BankAtlantic owns the loan during the 14 day period and accordingly earns the interest income during the period. Gains from the sale of loans held for sale were $112,000 and $76,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
          Undisbursed loans in process consisted of the following components (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Construction and development
  $ 88,375       124,332  
Commercial
    31,476       38,930  
 
           
Total undisbursed loans in process
  $ 119,851       163,262  
 
           
          Allowance for loan losses (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 137,257       94,020  
 
           
Loans charged-off
    (23,929 )     (47,247 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
    792       175  
 
           
Net (charge-offs)
    (23,137 )     (47,072 )
Provision for loan losses
    44,277       42,888  
 
           
Balance, end of period
  $ 158,397       89,836  
 
           

22


Table of Contents

          The following summarizes impaired loans (in thousands):
                                 
    March 31, 2009   December 31, 2008
    Gross           Gross    
    Recorded   Specific   Recorded   Specific
    Investment   Allowances   Investment   Allowances
     `    
Impaired loans with specific valuation allowances
  $ 189,706       45,487       174,710       41,192  
Impaired loans without specific valuation allowances
    235,964             138,548        
     `    
Total
  $ 425,670       45,487       313,258       41,192  
         
          As of March 31, 2009, impaired loans with specific valuation allowances had been previously charged down by $45.1 million and impaired loans without specific valuation allowances had been previously charged down by $22.7 million.
          Interest income which would have been recorded under the contractual terms of impaired loans and the interest income actually recognized were (in thousands):
         
    For the Three Months  
    Ended  
    March 31, 2009  
Contracted interest income
  $ 5,097  
Interest income recognized
    (694 )
 
     
Foregone interest income
  $ 4,403  
 
     
11. Real Estate Held for Development and Sale
          Real estate held for development and sale consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Land and land development costs
  $ 220,379       221,684  
Construction costs
    463       463  
Capitalized interest and other costs
    40,095       38,539  
Land held for sale
    8,077       8,077  
 
           
Total
  $ 269,014       268,763  
 
           
          Real estate held for development and sale includes the combined real estate assets of Woodbridge and its subsidiaries as well as BankAtlantic’s residential construction development. Also included in other real estate held for development and sale in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition is BFC’s unsold land at the commercial development known as Center Port in Pompano Beach, Florida.
          Real estate inventory is reviewed for impairment on a project-by-project basis in accordance with SFAS No. 144. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, or by using appraisals of the related assets. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
12. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
          At March 31, 2009, Woodbridge owned approximately 9.5 million shares of Bluegreen’s common stock representing approximately 31% of Bluegreen’s outstanding common stock. Woodbridge accounts for its investment in Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting. The cost of the Bluegreen investment is adjusted to recognize Woodbridge’s interest in Bluegreen’s earnings or losses. The difference between a) Woodbridge’s ownership percentage in Bluegreen multiplied by its earnings and b) the amount of Woodbridge’s equity in earnings of Bluegreen as reflected in Woodbridge’s financial statements relates to the amortization or accretion of purchase

23


Table of Contents

accounting adjustments made at the time of the acquisition of Bluegreen’s common stock and a basis difference due to impairment charges recorded on Woodbridge’s investment in Bluegreen, as described below.
          During 2008, Woodbridge began evaluating its investment in Bluegreen for other-than-temporary impairments in accordance with FSP FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock", and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59 as the fair value of Bluegreen’s common stock had fallen below the carrying value of Woodbridge’s investment in Bluegreen. Woodbridge analyzed various quantitative and qualitative factors including Woodbridge’s intent and ability to hold the investment, the severity and duration of the impairment and the prospects for the improvement of fair value. As a result of the impairment evaluations performed in the third and fourth quarters of 2008, Woodbridge recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $53.6 million and $40.8 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
          Woodbridge again performed an impairment review of its investment in Bluegreen as of March 31, 2009 and as part of such review, analyzed various qualitative and quantitative factors relating to the performance of Bluegreen, and its current stock price. Woodbridge valued Bluegreen’s common stock by using a market approach valuation technique and Level 1 valuation inputs in accordance with SFAS No. 157. As a result of the evaluation, based on, among other things, the continued decline of Bluegreen’s common stock price, Woodbridge determined that an other-than-temporary impairment was necessary, and accordingly, recorded a $20.4 million impairment charge (calculated based upon the $1.74 closing price of Bluegreen’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 31, 2009) and adjusted the carrying value of its investment in Bluegreen to its fair value of $16.6 million at March 31, 2009. On May 7, 2009, the closing price of Bluegreen’s common stock was $1.75 per share.
          As a result of the impairment charges taken, a basis difference was created between Woodbridge’s investment in Bluegreen and the underlying assets and liabilities carried on the books of Bluegreen. Therefore, earnings from Bluegreen will be adjusted each period to reflect the amortization of this basis difference. As such, Woodbridge established an allocation methodology by which Woodbridge allocated the impairment loss to the relative fair value of Bluegreen’s underlying assets based upon the position that the impairment loss was a reflection of the perceived value of these underlying assets. The appropriate amortization will be calculated based on the useful lives of the underlying assets and other relevant data associated with each asset category. As such, amortization of $5.3 million was recorded into Woodbridge’s pro rata share of Bluegreen’s net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
          The following table shows the reconciliation of Woodbridge’s pro rata share of Bluegreen’s net income to Woodbridge’s total earnings from Bluegreen recorded in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
         
    March 31,  
    2009  
Pro rata share of Bluegreen’s net income
  $ 1,082  
Amortization of basis difference
    5,254  
 
     
Total earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
  $ 6,336  
 
     
          The following table shows the reconciliation of Woodbridge’s pro rata share of its net investment in Bluegreen and its investment in Bluegreen after impairment charges (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Pro rata share of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
  $ 31,707       115,072  
Purchase accounting adjustment (from the step acquisition)
          (4,700 )
Amortization of basis difference
    5,254       13,850  
Less: Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
    (20,401 )     (94,433 )
 
           
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
  $ 16,560       29,789  
 
           

24


Table of Contents

          Bluegreen’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income are as follows (in thousands):
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Total assets
  $ 1,192,339       1,193,507  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities
  $ 772,873       781,522  
 
           
 
               
Total Bluegreen shareholders’ equity
    388,762       382,467  
Noncontrolling interest
    30,704       29,518  
 
           
Total equity
    419,466       411,985  
 
           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 1,192,339       1,193,507  
 
           
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Revenues and other income
  $ 79,024       139,352  
Cost and other expenses
    71,989       136,263  
 
           
Income before noncontrolling interests and provision for income taxes
    7,035       3,089  
Provision for income taxes
    (2,296 )     (855 )
 
           
Net income
    4,739       2,234  
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    (1,186 )     (838 )
 
           
Net income attributable to Bluegreen
  $ 3,553       1,396  
 
           
13. Goodwill
          Goodwill is tested for potential impairment annually or during interim periods if impairment indicators exist. In response to the deteriorating economic and real estate environments and the effects that the external environment had on BankAtlantic’s business units, BankAtlantic, in the first quarter of 2009, reduced its asset balances with a view toward strengthening its regulatory capital ratios and revised its projected operating results to reflect a smaller organization in subsequent periods. Additionally, BankAtlantic Bancorp’s market capitalization continued to decline as the average closing price of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A common stock on the NYSE during March 2009 was $1.57 compared to $4.23 during December 2008, a decline of 63%. Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp believed that the foregoing factors indicated that the fair value of its reporting units might have declined below their carrying amount, and, accordingly, an interim goodwill impairment test was performed as of March 31, 2009.
          Based on the results of the interim goodwill impairment evaluation, an impairment charge of $8.5 million, net of purchase accounting adjustment from step acquisition of approximately $0.6 million, was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The entire amount of goodwill relating to BankAtlantic’s tax certificate ($4.7 million) and investment ($4.4 million) reporting units was determined to be impaired. Goodwill of $13.1 million associated with BankAtlantic’s capital services reporting unit was determined not to be impaired at that time.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp’s management believes that the goodwill impairment recorded during 2009 generally reflects the ongoing adverse conditions in the financial services industry, as well as the decline of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s market capitalization below its tangible book value and BankAtlantic Bancorp’s decision to reduce the size of certain reporting units in order to enhance liquidity and improve its regulatory capital ratios. If market conditions do not improve or deteriorate further, additional goodwill impairment charges may be recognized in future periods.

25


Table of Contents

14. Debt and Development Bonds Payable
          All of Core’s debt facilities contain financial covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and loan to value ratios. Further, certain of Core’s debt facilities contain cross-default provisions under which a default on one loan with a lender could cause a default on other debt instruments with the same lender. If Core fails to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants, the lenders under the applicable debt facilities could cause Core’s debt to become due and payable prior to maturity.  These accelerations or significant re-margining payments could require Core to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash to pay its debt and reduce its ability to use its cash to fund its operations. If Core does not have sufficient cash to satisfy these required payments, then Core would need to seek to refinance the debt or obtain alternative funds, which may not be available on attractive terms, if at all. In the event that Core is unable to refinance its debt or obtain additional funds, it may default on some or all of its existing debt facilities.  
          The following table summarizes Woodbridge’s outstanding notes and mortgage notes payable (which includes Core’s outstanding notes and mortgage notes payable) at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. These notes accrue interest at fixed rates and variable rates tied to the Prime Rate and/or LIBOR rate (in thousands):
                         
    March 31,     December 31,        
    2009     2008     Maturity Date  
2.33% Commercial development mortgage note payable (a)
  $ 58,262       58,262     June 2009
2.31% Commercial development mortgage note payable
    4,710       4,724     June 2010
2.66% Commercial development mortgage note payable
    9,041       8,919     July 2010
5.00% Land development mortgage note payable
    25,000       25,000     February 2012
3.93% Land acquisition mortgage note payable
    23,040       23,184     October 2019
6.88% Land acquisition mortgage note payable
    4,880       4,928     October 2019
3.32% Land acquisition mortgage note payable (b)
    86,710       86,922     June 2011
3.25% Borrowing base facility
    37,458       37,458     March 2011
5.47% Other mortgage note payable
    11,781       11,831     April 2015
6.00% – 6.13% Development bonds
    3,282       3,291     May 2035
2.44% – 9.15% Other borrowings
    326       381     July 2009 - June 2013
 
                   
Total
  $ 264,490       264,900          
 
                   
 
(a)   Core has a credit agreement with a financial institution which provides for borrowings of up to $64.3 million. This facility matures in June 2009 and has two one-year extension options. The loan agreement requires that Core provide at least 30 days notice prior to the initial maturity of its election to exercise the one-year option period. Throughout the extension period, the collateral must generate a debt service coverage ratio of 1.20:1, otherwise Core would be required to re-margin the loan. Core does not currently anticipate that it will meet the debt service coverage ratio requirements with respect to the extension period, and Core is in discussions with its lender regarding this credit agreement. (See Note 2.)
 
(b)   In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that the lender had received an external appraisal on the land that serves as collateral for a loan, which had an outstanding balance of $86.7 million at March 31, 2009. The appraised value would suggest that a re-margining payment might be required to reduce the note payable so as to meet the minimum loan-to-value requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review procedures, including the determination of the appraised value. As of the date of this filing, the lender’s evaluation is continuing and, accordingly, although it is likely that a re-margining payment will be required, the amount of such payment is not currently determinable.
          In connection with the development of certain of Core’s projects, community development, special assessment or improvement districts have been established and may utilize tax-exempt bond financing to fund construction or acquisition of certain on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements near or at these communities. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and the associated priority lien on the property are typically payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments levied on the property benefited. Core is required to pay the revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the districts on the properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements. Core may also be required to pay down a specified portion of the bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The costs of these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the development period and recognized as cost of sales when the properties are sold.

26


Table of Contents

          Core’s bond financing at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of district bonds totaling $218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding amounts of approximately $143.8 million and $130.5 million, respectively. Further, at March 31, 2009, there was approximately $69.2 million available under these bonds to fund future development expenditures. Bond obligations at March 31, 2009 mature in 2035 and 2040.  As of March 31, 2009, Core owned approximately 16% of the property subject to assessments within the community development district and approximately 91% of the property subject to assessments within the special assessment district.  During the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately $159,000 and $105,000, respectively, in assessments on property owned by it in the districts.   Core is responsible for any assessed amounts until the underlying property is sold and will continue to be responsible for the annual assessments if the property is never sold.   In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for assessments under the district bonds in Tradition, Florida which would require funding if future assessments to be allocated to property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds.   Management has evaluated this exposure based upon the criteria in SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, and has determined that there have been no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in the development subject to the bond which would make it probable that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.      
          In accordance with EITF Issue No. 91-10, “Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment Financing”, Woodbridge records a liability for the estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user.   At each of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the liability related to developer obligations associated with Core’s ownership of the property was $3.3 million. This liability is included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition as of March 31, 2009.
15. Interest Expense
          The following table is a summary of the Company’s consolidated interest expense and the amounts capitalized (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three Months Ended,  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Interest expense
  $ 29,182       47,174  
Interest capitalized
    (1,634 )     (3,188 )
 
           
Interest expense, net
  $ 27,548       43,986  
 
           
16. Woodbridge Incentive Compensation Program
          On September 29, 2008, Woodbridge’s Board of Directors approved the terms of incentive programs for certain of Woodbridge’s employees including certain of Woodbridge’s named executive officers, pursuant to which a portion of their compensation will be based on the cash returns realized by Woodbridge on its investments. The programs relate to the performance of existing investments and new investments designated by the Board (together, the “Investments”). All of Woodbridge’s investments have been or will be held by individual limited partnerships or other legal entities which will be the basis for their incentives under the programs. Woodbridge’s named executive officers may have interests tied both to the performance of a particular investment as well as interests relating to the performance of the portfolio of investments as a whole. Woodbridge believes that the program appropriately aligns payments to the executive officer participants and other participating employees with the performance of Woodbridge’s investments.
          In accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), Woodbridge has determined that the new executive incentive program qualifies as a liability-based plan and, accordingly, has evaluated the components of the program to determine the fair value of the liability, if any, to be recorded. Based on its evaluation, Woodbridge determined a liability for compensation under the executive compensation program as of March 31, 2009 was not material.

27


Table of Contents

17. Commitments, Contingencies and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
          Commitments and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,   December 31,
    2009   2008
BFC Activities
               
Guaranty agreements
  $ 38,000       38,000  
Financial Services
               
Commitments to sell fixed rate residential loans
    43,184       25,304  
Commitments to originate loans held for sale
    36,945       21,843  
Commitments to originate loans held to maturity
    39,571       16,553  
Commitments to extend credit, including the undisbursed portion of loans in process
    499,913       597,739  
Standby letters of credit
    19,717       20,558  
Commercial lines of credit
    51,266       66,954  
Real Estate Development
               
Continued Agreement of Indemnity- surety bonds
    19,800       19,900  
BFC Activities
          On March 31, 2008, BFC sold its membership interests in two of its indirect subsidiaries which owned two South Florida shopping centers to an unaffiliated third party. In connection with the sale of the membership interests, BFC was relieved of its guarantee related to the loans collateralized by the shopping centers, and BFC believes that any possible remaining obligations are both remote and immaterial.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC, Inc. (“BFC/CCC”), has a 10% interest in a limited partnership as a non-managing general partner. The partnership owns an office building located in Boca Raton, Florida. In connection with the purchase of such office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC guaranteed repayment of a portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner. BFC/CCC’s maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement is $8.0 million (which is shared on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner), representing approximately 35.2% of the current indebtedness of the property, with the guarantee to be partially reduced in the future based upon the performance of the property.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of $5.0 million each for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. The BFC guarantee represents approximately 19.3% of the current indebtedness collateralized by the commercial properties.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in Tampa, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007, BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0 million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfers of interests not in accordance with the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
          Other than these guarantees, the remaining instruments indicated in the table above are direct commitments of BankAtlantic Bancorp or Woodbridge.
Financial Services
          Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by BankAtlantic to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. BankAtlantic’s standby letters of credit are generally issued to customers in the construction industry guaranteeing project performance. These types of standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $13.6 million at March 31, 2009. BankAtlantic also issues standby letters of credit to commercial lending customers guaranteeing the payment of goods and services. These types of standby letters of credit had a

28


Table of Contents

maximum exposure of $6.1 million at March 31, 2009. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements and have maturities of one year or less. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. BankAtlantic may hold certificates of deposit and residential and commercial liens as collateral for such commitments. Included in other liabilities at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $32,000 and $20,000, respectively, of unearned guarantee fees. There were no obligations associated with these guarantees recorded in the financial statements.
Real Estate Development
          At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had outstanding surety bonds of approximately $8.1 million and $8.2 million, respectively, which were related primarily to its obligations to various governmental entities to construct improvements in its various communities. Woodbridge estimates that approximately $4.8 million of work remains to complete these improvements and does not believe that any outstanding surety bonds will likely be drawn upon.
          Levitt and Sons had $33.3 million in surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at the time of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases.  In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $11.7 million plus costs and expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At each of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had $1.1 million in surety bonds accrual at Woodbridge related to certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements.   During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge reimbursed the surety approximately $37,000 and $165,000, respectively, in accordance with the indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is no assurance that Woodbridge will not be responsible for amounts in excess of the $1.1 million accrual. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion of the $11.7 million surety bonds exposure relating to two bonds totaling $5.4 million after a municipality made claims against the surety. Woodbridge believes that the municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the bonds and initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. Because Woodbridge does not believe a loss is probable, Woodbridge did not accrue any amount in connection with this claim as of March 31, 2009. As claims had been made on the bonds, the surety requested Woodbridge post a $4.0 million letter of credit as security while the matter is litigated with the municipality and Woodbridge has complied with that request.
          At March 31, 2009, Woodbridge had $2.4 million in unrecognized tax benefits related to FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB No. 109” (“FIN No. 48”). FIN No. 48 provides guidance for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
18. Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
          On June 7, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company designated 15,000 shares of preferred stock as 5% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“5% Preferred Stock”) and set the relative rights, preferences and limitations of the 5% Preferred Stock. On June 21, 2004, the Company sold all 15,000 shares of the Preferred Stock to an investor group in a private offering. On December 17, 2008, the Company amended Article IV of the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) to change certain of the previously designated relative rights, preferences and limitations of the Company’s 5% Preferred Stock. The Amendment eliminated the right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their shares of 5% Preferred Stock into shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The Amendment also requires the Company to redeem shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company sells any of its shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) the Company sells any shares of Benihana’s Common Stock received upon conversion of the Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of the Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company. Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its obligation to make dividend payments on the 5% Preferred Stock, the Amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in place of the Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain payments on the shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihana’s Common Stock received by the Company upon conversion of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock.

29


Table of Contents

          Effective with the Amendment in December 2008 and in accordance with Accounting Series Release No. 268 (“ASR 268”), the Company determined that the 5% Preferred Stock met the requirements to be re-classified outside of permanent equity at its fair value at the Amendment date of approximately $11.0 million into the mezzanine category as Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock and the remaining amount of approximately $4.0 million remained classified in Additional Paid in Capital in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The fair value of the 5% Preferred Stock was obtained by using an income approach by discounting estimated cash flows at a market discount rate.
          The 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share. The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company, from time to time, at redemption prices (the “Redemption Price”) ranging from $1,030 per share for the year 2009 to $1,000 per share for the year 2015 and thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is equal to its stated value of $1,000 per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the Redemption Price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up of the Company. Holders of the 5% Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, cumulative quarterly cash dividends on each such share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value from the date of issuance, payable quarterly. Since June 2004, the Company has paid dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of $187,500 on a quarterly basis. The 5% Preferred Stock has no voting rights except as required by Florida law.
19. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
          BFC is the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest in Benihana and, through Woodbridge, an indirect ownership interest in Bluegreen. Shares representing a majority of BFC’s total voting power are owned or controlled by the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Alan B. Levan, and by the Company’s Vice Chairman, John E. Abdo, both of whom are also directors of the Company and Bluegreen, and executive officers and directors of Woodbridge, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic. Mr. Abdo is also Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Benihana.
          The following table presents BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp, Woodbridge and Bluegreen related party transactions at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Amounts related to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge Corporation were eliminated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
                                         
                    BankAtlantic        
(In thousands)           BFC   Bancorp   Woodbridge   Bluegreen
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
                                       
Shared service income (expense)
    (a )   $ 861       (448 )     (276 )     (137 )
Facilities cost
    (a )   $ (57 )     78       (38 )     17  
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    (b )   $       (19 )     19        
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
                                       
Shared service income (expense)
    (a )   $ 498       (264 )     (146 )     (88 )
Facilities cost
    (a )   $ (63 )     50             13  
Interest income (expense)
    (b )   $ 5       (26 )     21        
At March 31, 2009
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements to repurchase)
    (b )   $ 301       (7,406 )     7,105        
Shared service receivable (payable)
    (a )   $ 501       (288 )     (90 )     (123 )
At December 31, 2008
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements to repurchase)
    (b )   $ 263       (4,696 )     4,433        
Shared service receivable (payable)
    (a )   $ 398       (175 )     (115 )     (108 )
 
(a)   Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements between BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, subsidiaries of BFC provide shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective services. Also, as part of the shared service arrangement, BFC pays BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for office facilities costs relating to BFC and its shared service operations.

30


Table of Contents

    In May 2008, BFC and BFC Shared Service Corporation (“BFC Shared Service”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, entered into office lease agreements with BankAtlantic under which BFC and BFC Shared Service agreed to pay BankAtlantic an annual rent of approximately $294,000 for office space in BankAtlantic’s corporate headquarters. In May 2008, BFC also entered into an office sub-lease agreement with Woodbridge for office space in BankAtlantic’s corporate headquarters pursuant to which Woodbridge agreed to pay BFC an annual rent of approximately $152,000.
 
(b)   BFC and Woodbridge entered into securities sold under agreements to repurchase transactions with BankAtlantic in the aggregate of approximately $7.4 million and $4.7 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Interest recognized in connection with these transactions was approximately $19,000 and $26,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These transactions have similar terms as BankAtlantic’s agreements with unaffiliated parties. As of March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic facilitated the placement of $49.9 million of certificates of deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) with other insured depository institutions on Woodbridge’s behalf through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) program.  The CDARS program facilitates the placement of funds into certificates of deposits issued by other financial institutions in increments of less than the standard FDIC insurance maximum to insure that both principal and interest are eligible for full FDIC insurance coverage.
          In March 2008, Woodbridge entered into an agreement with BankAtlantic, pursuant to which BankAtlantic agreed to house Woodbridge’s information technology servers and provide information technology support in exchange for monthly payments by Woodbridge to BankAtlantic. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Woodbridge paid BankAtlantic hosting fees of approximately $30,000.
          Woodbridge is currently working with Bluegreen to explore avenues in assisting Bluegreen in obtaining liquidity in the securitization of its receivables which may include, among other potential alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker dealer to raise capital through private or public offerings, among other things. Bluegreen has agreed to reimburse Woodbridge for certain expenses, including legal and professional fees incurred in connection with this effort. As of March 31, 2009, Woodbridge was reimbursed approximately $307,000 from Bluegreen and has recorded a receivable of approximately $298,000.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp in prior periods issued options to purchase shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A common stock to employees of Woodbridge prior to the spin-off of Woodbridge to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s shareholders. Additionally, certain employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp have transferred to affiliate companies and BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected, in accordance with the terms of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s stock option plans, not to cancel the stock options held by those former employees. BankAtlantic Bancorp accounts for these options to former employees as employee stock options because these individuals were employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp on the grant date.
          Outstanding options held by former employees consisted of the following as of March 31, 2009:
                 
    BankAtlantic Bancorp    
    Class A   Weighted
    Common   Average
    Stock   Price
Options outstanding
    53,789     $ 48.46  
Options non-vested
    13,610     $ 92.85  
          In 2007 and 2006, BankAtlantic Bancorp issued to BFC employees that perform services for BankAtlantic Bancorp options to acquire 9,800 and 10,060 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A common stock at an exercise price of $46.90 and $73.45, respectively. These options vest in five years and expire ten years from the grant date. BankAtlantic Bancorp recorded $12,000 and $13,000 of service provider expense relating to these options for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
          Certain of the Company’s affiliates, including its executive officers, have in the past independently made investments with their own funds in both public and private entities that the Company sponsored in 2001 and in which it holds investments.
          Florida Partners Corporation owns 133,314 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock and 1,270,302 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. Alan B. Levan may be deemed to be controlling shareholder with

31


Table of Contents

beneficial ownership of approximately 44.6% of Florida Partners Corporation and is also a member of its Board of Directors.
20. Loss Per Common Share
          The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding. The two-class method is not presented because the Company’s capital structure does not provide for different dividend rates or other preferences, other than voting rights, between the two classes. The number of options considered outstanding shares for diluted earnings per share is based upon application of the treasury stock method to the options outstanding as of the end of the period.
          The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to the Company (in thousands, except for per share data):
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
(In thousands, except per share data)                
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
               
Numerator:
               
Loss from continuing operations
  $ (33,233 )     (33,098 )
Noncontrolling interests – continuing operations
    21,572       27,065  
 
           
Loss attributable to BFC
    (11,661 )     (6,033 )
Preferred stock dividends
    (188 )     (188 )
 
           
Loss allocable to common stock
    (11,849 )     (6,221 )
 
           
 
               
Discontinued operations, net of taxes
    4,201       1,019  
Noncontrolling interests – discontinued operations
    (2,943 )     (857 )
 
           
Discontinued operations, net of taxes attributable to BFC
    1,258       162  
 
           
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
  $ (10,591 )     (6,059 )
 
           
 
               
Denominator:
               
 
           
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
    45,114       45,103  
 
           
 
               
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
               
Loss per share from continuing operations
  $ (0.26 )     (0.13 )
Earnings per share from discontinued operations
    0.03        
 
           
Basic loss per common share
  $ (0.23 )     (0.13 )
 
           
 
               
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
               
Loss allocable to common stock
  $ (11,849 )     (6,221 )
Effect of securities issuable by subsidiaries
           
 
           
Loss allocable to common stock after assumed dilution
  $ (11,849 )     (6,221 )
 
           
 
               
Discontinued operations, net of taxes attributable to BFC
  $ 1,258       162  
Effect of securities issuable by subsidiaries
           
 
           
 
  $ 1,258       162  
 
           
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
  $ (10,591 )     (6,059 )
 
           
 
               
Denominator:
               
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
    45,114       45,103  
Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock
           
 
           
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
    45,114       45,103  
 
           
 
               
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
               
Loss per share from continuing operations
  $ (0.26 )     (0.13 )
Earnings per share from discontinued operations
    0.03        
 
           
Diluted loss per common share
  $ (0.23 )     (0.13 )
 
           
          During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, 1,797,960 and 1,560,180, respectively, of options to acquire shares of Class A Common Stock were anti-dilutive.

32


Table of Contents

21. Parent Company Financial Information
          BFC’s parent company accounting policies are generally the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company’s investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Woodbridge and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries and venture partnerships are presented in the parent company financial statements as if accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
          BFC’s parent company unaudited condensed statements of financial condition at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, unaudited condensed statements of operations and unaudited condensed statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are shown below:
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands)
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 7,554       9,218  
Investment securities
    16,458       16,523  
Investment in venture partnerships
    342       361  
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
    55,854       66,326  
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
    39,417       35,575  
Investment in and advances to wholly owned subsidiaries
    2,237       2,323  
Other assets
    911       835  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 122,773       131,161  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
               
Advances from and negative basis in wholly owned subsidiaries
  $ 791       789  
Other liabilities
    6,501       6,476  
 
           
Total liabilities
    7,292       7,265  
 
               
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
    11,029       11,029  
 
               
Shareholders’ equity
    104,452       112,867  
 
           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 122,773       131,161  
 
           
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March, 31  
    2009     2008  
Revenues
  $ 283       522  
Expenses
    2,023       2,644  
 
           
(Loss) before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries
    (1,740 )     (2,122 )
Equity from loss in BankAtlantic Bancorp
    (13,359 )     (5,785 )
Equity from earnings (loss) in Woodbridge
    3,545       (2,078 )
Equity from earnings (loss) in other subsidiaries
    (107 )     86  
 
           
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to BFC
    (11,661 )     (9,899 )
Benefit for income taxes
          (3,866 )
 
           
Loss from continuing operations, net of taxes attributable to BFC
    (11,661 )     (6,033 )
Discontinued operations, net of taxes
    1,258       162  
 
           
Net loss attributable to BFC
    (10,403 )     (5,871 )
5% Preferred Stock dividends
    (188 )     (188 )
 
           
Net loss allocable to common stock
  $ (10,591 )     (6,059 )
 
           

33


Table of Contents

Parent Company Statements of Cash Flow
(In thousands)
                 
    For the Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Operating Activities:
               
Net cash used in operating activities
  $ (1,560 )     (2,825 )
 
           
 
               
Investing Activities:
               
Distribution from partnership
    84        
 
           
Net cash provided by in investing activities
    84        
 
           
 
               
Financing Activities:
               
5% Preferred Stock dividends paid
    (188 )     (188 )
 
           
Net cash used in financing activities
    (188 )     (188 )
 
           
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (1,664 )     (3,013 )
Cash at beginning of period
    9,218       17,999  
 
           
Cash at end of period
  $ 7,554       14,986  
 
           
 
               
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities
               
Net increase in shareholders’ equity from the effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions, net of income taxes
  $ 391       170  
Increase (decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes
    1,556       (577 )
          Cash dividends received from subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $84,000 and $66,000, respectively.
22. New Accounting Pronouncements
          In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4 “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS 157-4”). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance in determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms what SFAS No. 157 states is the objective of fair value measurement— to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. If it is determined that a transaction is not orderly, a reporting entity should place little, if any, weight on that transaction price when estimating fair value. The guidance in FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
          In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2”). FSP FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities. Prior to issuance of FSP FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2, if a debt security was impaired and an entity had the ability and intent to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value then the impairment loss was not recognized in earnings. The guidance of FSP FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2 indicates that if an entity does not intend to sell an impaired debt security that the entity should assess whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery. If the entity more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred that would be recognized in earnings. If an entity more likely than not will not be required to sell the debt security but does not expect to recover its cost, the entity should determine whether a credit loss exists, and if so, the credit loss should be recognized in earnings and the remaining impairment should be recognized in other comprehensive income. The guidance in FSP FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
          In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1/APB28-1”). Prior to issuing FSP FAS 107-1/APB28-1, fair values for financial assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. FSP FAS 107-1/APB28-1 now requires disclosures

34


Table of Contents

of these fair values on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. The guidance in FSP FAS 107-1/APB28-1 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted. FSP FAS 107-1/APB28-1 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
23. Litigation
Class Action Lawsuit
          On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a purported class action complaint as a putative purchaser of Woodbridge’s securities against Woodbridge and certain of its officers and directors, asserting claims under the federal securities law and seeking damages.  This action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and is captioned Dance v. Levitt Corp. et al., No. 08-CV-60111-DLG.  The securities litigation purports to be brought on behalf of all purchasers of Woodbridge’s securities beginning on January 31, 2007 and ending on August 14, 2007.  The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of false and/or misleading statements concerning Woodbridge’s financial results, prospects and condition.  Woodbridge intends to vigorously defend this action.
Surety Bond Claim
          In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post $5.4 million of collateral relating to two bonds totaling $5.4 million after a municipality made claims against the surety. Woodbridge believes that the municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the bonds and initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. Because Woodbridge does not believe a loss is probable, Woodbridge did not accrue any amount related to this claim as of March 31, 2009. As claims had been made on the bonds, the surety requested Woodbridge post a $4.0 million letter of credit as security while the matter is litigated with the municipality and Woodbridge has complied with that request.
General litigation
          In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant involving its bank operations, lending, tax certificates activities and real estate development activities. Although the Company and its subsidiaries believe it has meritorious defenses in all current legal actions, the outcome of the various legal actions is uncertain. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims or lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 
24. Bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons
          As described in Note 1 above, on November 9, 2007, the Debtors filed the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in order to preserve the value of their assets and to facilitate an orderly wind-down of their businesses and disposition of their assets in a manner intended to maximize the recoveries of all constituents. In connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007. As a result of the deconsolidation, Woodbridge had a negative basis in its investment in Levitt and Sons because Levitt and Sons generated significant losses and intercompany liabilities in excess of its asset balances. This negative investment, “Loss in excess of investment in subsidiary”, was reflected as a single amount on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition as a $55.2 million liability as of December 31, 2008. This balance was comprised of a negative investment in Levitt and Sons of $123.0 million, and outstanding advances due to Woodbridge from Levitt and Sons of $67.8 million. Included in the negative investment was approximately $15.8 million associated with deferred revenue related to intra-segment sales between Levitt and Sons and Core Communities. During the fourth quarter of 2008, Woodbridge identified approximately $2.3 million of deferred revenue on intercompany sales between Core and Carolina Oak that had been misclassified against the negative investment in Levitt and Sons. As a result, Woodbridge recorded a $2.3 million reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008 between inventory of real estate and the loss in excess of investment in subsidiary in the consolidated statements of financial condition. As a result, as of December 31, 2008, the net negative investment was $52.9 million.
          On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Joint Committee”) appointed in the Chapter 11

35


Table of Contents

Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things, (i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors’ bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment, (ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its administrative expense claims through July 2008, and (iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its affiliates. After certain of Levitt and Sons’ creditors indicated that they objected to the terms of the Settlement Agreement and stated a desire to pursue claims against Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the Debtors and the Joint Committee entered into an amendment to the Settlement Agreement, pursuant to which Woodbridge would, in lieu of the $12.5 million payment previously agreed to, pay $8 million to the Debtors’ bankruptcy estates and place $4.5 million in a release fund to be disbursed to third party creditors in exchange for a third party release and injunction. The amendment also provided for an additional $300,000 payment by Woodbridge to a deposit holders fund. The Settlement Agreement, as amended, was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
          As previously reported, on February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint Committee and approved the settlement pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as amended. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Court’s order was timely filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time, payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, as amended. Under cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as amended) was recognized into income in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary. As a result, Woodbridge no longer holds an investment in this subsidiary.

36


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Overview
          The objective of the following discussion is to provide an understanding of the financial condition and results of operations of BFC Financial Corporation (and its subsidiaries) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
          BFC Financial Corporation (“BFC”, “we”, “us”, “our”. or the “Company”) is a diversified holding company whose major holdings include controlling interests in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“BankAtlantic Bancorp”) and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (formerly Levitt Corporation) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Woodbridge”) and a noncontrolling interest in Benihana, Inc. (“Benihana”), which operates Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States. As a result of the Company’s position as the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a “unitary savings bank holding company” regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”).
          Historically, BFC’s business strategy has been to invest in and acquire businesses in diverse industries either directly or through controlled subsidiaries. BFC believes that the best potential for growth is likely through the growth of the companies it currently controls and its focus is to provide overall support for its controlled subsidiaries with a view to the improved performance of the organization as a whole.
          The Company’s primary activities relate to managing its investments. As of March 31, 2009, BFC had total consolidated assets and liabilities of approximately $6.1 billion and $5.7 billion, respectively, including the assets and liabilities of its consolidated subsidiaries, and equity of approximately $357.2 million, which includes noncontrolling interests’ equity of approximately $252.7 million.
          We report our results of operations through five reportable segments, which are: BFC Activities, BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations, Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations. The Financial Services division includes BankAtlantic Bancorp’s results of operations and consists of two reportable segments, which are: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Other operations. The Real Estate Development division includes Woodbridge’s results of operations and consists of two reportable segments, which are: Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations.
          As a holding company with controlling positions in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, BFC is required under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to consolidate the financial results of these companies. As a consequence, the financial information of both entities is presented on a consolidated basis in BFC’s financial statements. However, except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata share in a dividend or distribution.
          BFC’s ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge as of March 31, 2009 was as follows:
                         
                    Percent
    Shares   Percent of   of
    Owned   Ownership   Vote
BankAtlantic Bancorp
                       
Class A Common Stock
    2,389,697       23.29 %     12.35 %
Class B Common Stock
    975,225       100.00 %     47.00 %
Total
    3,364,922       29.95 %     59.35 %
 
               
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
                       
Class A Common Stock
    3,735,392       22.45 %     11.90 %
Class B Common Stock
    243,807       100.00 %     47.00 %
Total
    3,979,199       23.57 %     58.90 %

37


Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements
          Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this document contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in this document and in any documents incorporated by reference herein, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions identify certain of such forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations of Company and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond the Company’s control. When considering those forward-looking statements, the reader should keep in mind the risks, uncertainties and other cautionary statements made in this report, as well as those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. This document also contains information regarding the past performance of our investments and the reader should note that prior or current performance of investments and acquisitions is not a guarantee or indication of future performance.
          Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally to the financial services, real estate development, resort development and vacation ownership, and restaurant industries, while other factors apply directly to us. Risks and uncertainties associated with BFC include, but are not limited to:
    the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, and their operations, markets, products and services;
 
    adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other capital markets and the impact of such conditions on the activities of the Company and its subsidiaries;
 
    the Company’s ability to meet its operating needs and provide for its ongoing operating requirements through its cash and cash equivalents; and the Company’s ability to obtain additional funds on attractive terms, if at all, if additional funds are required;
 
    the performance of entities in which the Company has made investments may not be as anticipated;
 
    BFC is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries to fund its operations, and BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not currently paying dividends and may not pay dividends in the future, and even if paid, BFC has historically experienced and may continue to experience negative cash flow;
 
    BFC may need to issue debt or equity securities to fund its operations, and any such securities may not be issued on favorable terms, if at all;
 
    BFC will be subject to the unique business and industry risks and characteristics of each entity in which an investment is made; and
 
    BFC shareholders’ interests may be diluted if additional shares of BFC common stock are issued and its interests in its subsidiaries may be diluted if its subsidiaries issue additional shares of common stock.
          With respect to BFC’s subsidiary, BankAtlantic Bancorp, and its subsidiary, BankAtlantic, the risks and uncertainties include:
    the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting BankAtlantic Bancorp and its operations, markets, products and services, including the impact of a continued or deepening recession and increased unemployment on its business generally, its capital ratios, as well as the ability of its borrowers to service their obligations and its customers to maintain account balances;
 
    credit risks and loan losses, and the related sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses, including the impact on the credit quality of BankAtlantic loans (including those held in the asset workout subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp) of a sustained downturn in the economy and in the real estate market and other changes in the real estate markets in BankAtlantic’s trade area, and where BankAtlantic’s collateral is located;
 
    the quality of BankAtlantic’s residential land acquisition and development loans (including builder land bank loans, land acquisition and development loans and land acquisition, development and construction loans) as well as commercial land loans, other commercial real estate loans; and Commercial business loans; and conditions specifically in those market sectors;
 
    the risks of additional charge-offs, impairments and required increases in BankAtlantic’s allowance for loan losses;

38


Table of Contents

    changes in interest rates and the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws including their impact on BankAtlantic’s net interest margin;
 
    adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other financial and credit markets and the impact of such conditions on BankAtlantic Bancorp’s activities, the value of its assets and on the ability of borrowers to service their debt obligations;
 
    BankAtlantic’s seven-day banking initiatives and other initiatives not resulting in continued growth of core deposits or increasing average balances of new deposit accounts or producing results which do not justify their costs;
 
    the success of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s expense reduction initiatives and the ability to achieve additional cost savings;
 
    changes in laws and regulation including increased regulatory costs; and
 
    the impact of periodic valuation testing of goodwill, deferred tax assets and other assets; 
     With respect to BFC’s subsidiary, Woodbridge and its subsidiaries, the risks and uncertainties include:
    the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting Woodbridge and its operations;
 
    the market for real estate in the areas where Woodbridge has developments, including the impact of market conditions on Woodbridge’s margins and the fair value of its real estate inventory;  
 
    the risk that the value of the property held by Core Communities and Carolina Oak may decline, including as a result of the current downturn in the residential and commercial real estate and homebuilding industries;
 
    the impact of the factors negatively impacting the homebuilding and residential real estate industries on the market and values of commercial property;
 
    the risk that the downturn in the credit markets may adversely affect Core’s commercial leasing projects, including the ability of current and potential tenants to secure financing which may, in turn, negatively impact long-term rental and occupancy;
 
    the risks relating to Core’s dependence on certain key tenants in its commercial leasing projects, including the risk that current adverse conditions and the economy in general and/or adverse developments in the businesses of these tenants could have a negative impact on Core’s financial condition;
 
    the risk that the development of parcels and master-planned communities will not be completed as anticipated;
 
    the continued declines in the estimated fair value of Woodbridge’s real estate inventory and the potential for write-downs or impairment charges; 
 
    the effects of increases in interest rates and availability of credit to buyers of Woodbridge’s inventory;
 
    the impact of the problems in financial and credit markets on the ability of buyers of Woodbridge’s inventory to obtain financing on acceptable terms, if at all, and the risk that Woodbridge will be unable to obtain financing and to renew existing credit facilities on acceptable terms, if at all;
 
    the risks relating to Core’s liquidity, cash position and ability to satisfy required payments under its debt facilities, including the risk that Woodbridge may not provide funding to Core;
 
    the risk that Woodbridge may be required to make accelerated principal payments on its debt obligations due to re-margining or curtailment payment requirements, which may negatively impact its financial condition and results of operations;
 
    Woodbridge’s ability to access additional capital on acceptable terms, if at all; 
 
    risks associated with the securities owned by Woodbridge, including the risk that Woodbridge may record further impairment charges with respect to such securities in the event trading prices continue to decline;
 
    the risks associated with the businesses in which Woodbridge holds investments;
 
    risks associated with Woodbridge’s business strategy, including Woodbridge’s ability to successfully make investments notwithstanding adverse conditions in the economy and the credit markets; 
 
    Woodbridge’s success in pursuing strategic alternatives that could enhance liquidity;
 
    the impact on the price and liquidity of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock and on Woodbridge’s ability to obtain additional capital in the event Woodbridge chooses to de-register its securities; and
 
    Woodbridge’s success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. 
     In addition to the risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to other risks and factors detailed in reports filed by the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company cautions that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.

39


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies
          Management views critical accounting policies as accounting policies that are important to the understanding of our financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments about inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of financial condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income and expenses on the consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in subsequent periods relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, the valuation of real estate held for development and sale and its impairment reserves, revenue and cost recognition on percent complete projects, estimated costs to complete construction, the valuation of investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the application of the purchase method of accounting, accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowance, accounting for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and assumptions used in the valuation of stock-based compensation. The accounting policies that we have identified as critical accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses; (ii) valuation of securities as well as the determination of other-than-temporary declines in value; (iii) impairment of goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets; (iv) impairment of long-lived assets; (v) accounting for business combinations; (vi) the valuation of real estate held for development and sale; (vii) the valuation of unconsolidated subsidiaries; (viii) accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowance; (ix) accounting for contingencies; and (x) accounting for stock-based compensation. For a more detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies see “Critical Accounting Policies” appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Summary of Consolidated Results of Operations by Segment
The table below sets forth the Company’s summarized results of operations (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
BFC Activities
  $ (1,862 )   $ 1,819  
Financial Services
    (46,008 )     (24,564 )
Real Estate Development
    14,637       (10,353 )
 
           
Loss from continuing operations
    (33,233 )     (33,098 )
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
    4,201       1,019  
 
           
Net loss
    (29,032 )     (32,079 )
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
    18,629       26,208  
 
           
Net loss attributable to BFC
    (10,403 )     (5,871 )
5% Preferred Stock dividends
    (188 )     (188 )
 
           
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
  $ (10,591 )   $ (6,059 )
 
           
          Consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $10.4 million compared with net loss of $5.9 million for the same period in 2008. Consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 includes discontinued operations, net of income taxes, of approximately $4.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, associated with Ryan Beck, which BankAtlantic Bancorp sold to Stifel during February 2007.
          The 5% Preferred Stock dividend represents the dividends paid by the Company on its 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock (see Note 18).
          The results of operations from continuing operations of our business segments and related matters are discussed below.

40


Table of Contents

x

Consolidated Financial Condition
Consolidated Assets and Liabilities
          Total assets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $6.1 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively. The changes in components of total assets between March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized below:
    an increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $75.7 million primarily reflecting $119.7 million of higher cash balances at depository institutions associated with daily cash management activities at BankAtlantic. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was offset in part by (i) a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $1.8 million at BFC, which resulted primarily from cash used in operations of approximately $1.6 million and cash used in financing activities of $188,000 associated with BFC’s 5% Preferred Stock dividend payment and (ii) Woodbridge’s net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $30.7 million, primarily related to cash used in operations and investments in timed deposits of approximately $25.0 million;
 
    a decrease in Woodbridge’s restricted cash associated with the settlement payment made in connection with the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons;
 
    a decrease in securities available for sale reflecting BankAtlantic’s sale of $149.1 million of its mortgage-backed securities;
 
    a decrease in BankAtlantic’s tax certificate balances primarily due to redemptions and decreased tax certificate acquisitions compared to prior periods;
 
    a decline in BankAtlantic’s FHLB stock related to lower FHLB advance borrowings;
 
    a decrease in BankAtlantic’s loan receivable balances associated with repayments of residential loans in the normal course of business combined with a significant decline in loan originations and purchases;
 
    a decrease in BankAtlantic’s accrued interest receivable primarily resulting from lower loan balances and a significant decline in interest rates;
 
    an increase in BankAtlantic’s real estate owned associated with residential loan foreclosures;
 
    a net decrease in investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries primarily due to a decrease in Woodbridge’s investment in Bluegreen of $13.2 million mainly related to an other-than-temporary impairment charge recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, offset in part by an increase in Woodbridge’s equity in earnings from Bluegreen; and
 
    a decrease in BankAtlantic’s goodwill associated with an $8.5 million impairment charge to goodwill, net of purchase accounting adjustment in the amount of $0.6 million, recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
          The Company’s total liabilities at March 31, 2009 were $5.7 billion compared to $6.0 billion at December 31, 2008. The changes in components of total liabilities from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 are summarized below:
    increased interest bearing deposit account balances at BankAtlantic associated with promotions of higher-yielding interest-bearing checking accounts and increases in certificates of deposits;
 
    higher non-interest-bearing deposit balances at BankAtlantic primarily due to increased customer balances in checking accounts;
 
    lower FHLB advances and short-term borrowings at BankAtlantic due to repayments using proceeds from the sale of securities and loan repayments and an increase in deposit account balances;
 
    increase in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s junior subordinated debentures due to interest deferments; and
 
    a decrease of $52.9 million associated with Woodbridge’s reversal into income of the loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons as a result of the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the Levitt and Sons’ bankruptcy plan.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS.
          See Note 22 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries.

41


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
BFC Activities
          The “BFC Activities” segment includes all of the operations and all of the assets owned by BFC other than BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries and Woodbridge and its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements between BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, BFC provides shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective services. This segment also includes BFC’s overhead expenses, interest income and dividend income from BFC’s investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, the financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls, and financial results from our wholly-owned subsidiary, BFC/CCC, Inc. (formerly known as Cypress Creek Capital, Inc.) (“BFC/CCC”).
          BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are consolidated in BFC’s financial statements, as described earlier. The Company’s earnings or losses in BankAtlantic Bancorp are included in our Financial Services division which consists of two reportable segments, which are: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations. The Company’s earnings and losses in Woodbridge are included in two reportable segments, which are: Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations.
          At March 31, 2009, BFC had 9 employees dedicated to BFC operations and 29 employees providing shared services to BFC and its affiliated companies. At March 31, 2008, BFC had 10 employees dedicated to BFC operations, 7 employees in BFC/CCC, and 26 employees providing shared services to BFC and its affiliated companies. During the second quarter of 2008, all employees previously employed by BFC/CCC became employees of Woodbridge where we believe they can potentially provide greater value to the overall organization.
          The discussion that follows reflects the operations and related matters of the BFC Activities segment (in thousands).
                         
    For the Three Months Ended     Change  
    March 31,     2009 vs.  
    2009     2008     2008  
Revenues
                       
Interest and dividend income
  $ 258     $ 420     $ (162 )
Other income, net
    909       1,689       (780 )
 
                 
 
    1,167       2,109       (942 )
 
                 
 
                       
Cost and Expenses
                       
Employee compensation and benefits
    2,196       3,160       (964 )
Other expenses
    762       998       (236 )
 
                 
 
    2,958       4,158       (1,200 )
 
                 
Equity (loss) earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries
    (71 )     2       (73 )
 
                 
Loss before income taxes
    (1,862 )     (2,047 )     185  
Benefit for income taxes
          (3,866 )     3,866  
 
                 
Net (loss) income from continuing operations
    (1,862 )     1,819       4,051  
 
                 
          The decrease in interest and dividend income during the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily related to lower interest rates and lower cash balances on deposit.
          The decrease in other income during the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 primarily related to BFC/CCC’s gain from the sale of its investment in a limited partnership during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in other income was partially offset by an increase in shared service revenues recognized by BFC during the 2009 period. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, BFC/CCC’s income was approximately $17,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, shared service revenue was approximately $861,000 and $498,000, respectively. BFC also incurred similar expenses related to shared service operations during the first quarter of 2009 and 2008.
          The decrease in employee compensation and benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to the transfer of BFC/CCC’s employees to Woodbridge.
          The decrease in other expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily associated with lower legal and other professional and consulting fees.

42


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
          BFC Activities’ provision for income taxes is estimated to result in an effective tax rate of 0.0% in 2009. The 0.0% effective tax rate in 2009 is a result of BFC recording a valuation allowance in September 2008 against its deferred tax assets (primarily resulting from BFC’s net operating loss (“NOLs”)) that are not expected to be recovered in the future. Due to losses in the past and expected taxable losses in the foreseeable future, BFC may not have sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future to realize any portion of the net deferred tax asset.
          During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the results of BFC Activities included the benefit for income taxes associated with our equity losses in Woodbridge and the tax effect of our equity losses in BankAtlantic Bancorp in the amounts of approximately $2.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively.
          BFC’s business strategy is to hold its investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp indefinitely. Accordingly, based on the Company’s change in intent in 2008 as to the expected manner of recovery of its investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, the Company reversed its deferred tax liability of $29.3 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
Purchase Accounting
          The acquisitions in 2008 and 2007 of additional shares purchased of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, respectively, were accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities acquired were revalued to reflect market values at the respective dates of acquisition. Accordingly, the discounts and premiums arising as a result of such revaluation are generally being accreted or amortized over the remaining life of the assets and liabilities. The net impact of such accretion, amortization and other purchase accounting adjustments decreased our consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 by approximately $669,000 and $78,000, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources of BFC
          The following provides cash flow information for the BFC Activities segment (in thousands).
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Net cash provided by (used in):
               
Operating activities
  $ (1,649 )     (3,264 )
Investing activities
    84       139  
Financing activities
    (194 )     (193 )
 
           
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (1,759 )     (3,318 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    9,719       18,898  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 7,960       15,580  
 
           
          BFC expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements generally through existing cash balances and cash dividends from Benihana. The Company expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements through the foregoing, as well as, if necessary, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, and future issuances of equity and/or debt securities and the sale of assets.
          The primary sources of funds to the BFC Activities segment for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (without consideration of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s or Woodbridge’s liquidity and capital resources, which, except as noted, are not available to BFC) were:
    Revenues from shared services activities for affiliated companies;
 
    Dividends from Benihana;
 
    Venture partnership distributions;
 
    Revenues from BFC/CCC in 2008; and
 
    Dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp until January 2009.
     Funds were primarily utilized by BFC to:
    Pay dividends on BFC’s outstanding 5% Preferred Stock; and
 
    Fund BFC’s operating and general and administrative expenses, including shared services costs.

43


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
          The decrease in cash used in operating activities during 2009 compared to 2008 primarily resulted from lower operating and general administrative expenses. Investing activities in 2009 and 2008 are primarily due to distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries. Financing activities in 2009 and 2008 are primarily due to the 5% Preferred Stock dividends payment of $188,000 for each period.
          On October 24, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 1,750,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock at an aggregate cost of no more than $10.0 million. In 2008, the Company repurchased in the open market an aggregate of 100,000 shares at an average price of $0.54 per share. As a result of these shares repurchases, 1,650,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock remain available for repurchase under the plan. These remaining shares may be repurchased in the open market or through private transactions. The timing and the amount of repurchases, if any, will depend on market conditions, share price, trading volume and other factors, and there is no assurance that the Company will repurchase any or all of the remaining shares in the future. No termination date was set for the repurchase program. It is anticipated that any share repurchases would be funded through existing cash balances.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp does not anticipate receiving dividends from BankAtlantic during the year ended December 31, 2009 or until economic conditions and the performance of BankAtlantic’s assets improve. The ability of BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other distributions to BankAtlantic Bancorp in subsequent periods is subject to regulations and OTS approval. The OTS would not approve any distribution that would cause BankAtlantic to fail to meet its capital requirements or if the OTS believes that a capital distribution by BankAtlantic constitutes an unsafe or unsound action or practice, and there is no assurance that the OTS would approve future applications for capital distributions from BankAtlantic. At March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic met all applicable liquidity and regulatory capital requirements.
          In order for BankAtlantic Bancorp to preserve liquidity in the current difficult economic environment, BankAtlantic Bancorp elected in February 2009 to defer interest payments on all of its outstanding junior subordinated debentures and to cease paying dividends on its common stock. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the trust documents allow BankAtlantic Bancorp to defer payments of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods without default or penalty. During the deferral period, the respective trusts will likewise suspend the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred securities. BankAtlantic Bancorp has the ability under the junior subordinated debentures to continue to defer interest payments through ongoing, appropriate notices to each of the trustees, and will make a decision each quarter as to whether to continue the deferral of interest. During the deferral period, BankAtlantic Bancorp may not, among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on or repurchase its common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank equally with or junior to the junior subordinated debentures. BankAtlantic Bancorp may end the deferral by paying all accrued and unpaid interest. BankAtlantic Bancorp anticipates that it will continue to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures and will not pay dividends on its common stock for the foreseeable future. In January 2009, the Company received approximately $84,000 in dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp. The Company does not expect to receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp in the foreseeable future.
          Woodbridge has not paid any dividends since the first quarter of 2007, and the Company does not anticipate that it will receive additional dividends from Woodbridge for the foreseeable future. Any future dividends are subject to approval by Woodbridge’s Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other factors, Woodbridge’s results of operations and financial condition.
          On June 21, 2004, the Company sold all 15,000 issued and outstanding shares of its 5% Preferred Stock to an investor group in a private offering. On December 17, 2008, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) to change certain of the previously designated relative rights, preferences and limitations of the Company’s 5% Preferred Stock. The Amendment eliminated the right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock into shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The Amendment also requires the Company to redeem shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company sells any of its shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) the Company sells any shares of Benihana’s Common Stock received upon conversion of the Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of its Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company. Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its obligation to make dividend payments on its 5% Preferred Stock, the Amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in place of the Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain payments on the shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihana’s Common Stock received by the Company upon

44


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
conversion of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock. Effective with the Amendment, the Company determined that the 5% Preferred Stock met the requirements to be re-classified outside of permanent equity at its fair value at the Amendment date of approximately $11.0 million into the mezzanine category as Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock at December 31, 2008 in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share. The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company, from time to time, at redemption prices ranging from $1,030 per share for the year 2009 to $1,000 per share for the year 2015 and thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is equal to its stated value of $1,000 per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the applicable redemption price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up of the Company. Holders of the 5% Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as provided by Florida law, and are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, cumulative quarterly cash dividends on each such share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value from the date of issuance, payable quarterly. Since June 2004, the Company has paid dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of $187,500 on a quarterly basis.
     Shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock are subject to mandatory redemption on July 2, 2014. The date may be extended by the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of Benihana Preferred Stock to a date no later than July 2, 2024. The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock that it purchased for $25.00 per share. The Company has the right to receive cumulative quarterly dividends at an annual rate equal to 5% or $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. It is anticipated that the Company will continue to receive approximately $250,000 per quarter in dividends on Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock (see Notes 8 and 18 for further information).
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC, Inc. (“BFC/CCC”) has a 10% interest in a limited partnership as a non-managing general partner. The partnership owns an office building located in Boca Raton, Florida, and in connection with the purchase of such office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC guaranteed repayment of a portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner. BFC/CCC’s maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement is $8.0 million (which is shared on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner), representing approximately 35.2% of the current indebtedness of the property, with the guarantee to be partially reduced in the future based upon the performance of the property.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of $5.0 million each for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. The BFC guarantee represents approximately 19.3% of the current indebtedness collateralized by the commercial properties.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in Tampa, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007, BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0 million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfers of interests not in accordance with the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
          There were no obligations associated with the above guarantees recorded in the financial statements based on the value of the assets collateralizing the indebtedness, the potential indemnification by unaffiliated members and the limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.

45


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Financial Services
     Our Financial Services activities of BFC are comprised of the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic Bancorp presents its results in two reportable segments and its results of operations are consolidated in BFC Financial Corporation. The only assets available to BFC Financial Corporation from BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends when and if paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is a separate public company and its management prepared the following discussion regarding BankAtlantic Bancorp which was included in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, references to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” in the following discussion under the caption “Financial Services” are references to BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC Financial Corporation.
          The objective of the following discussion is to provide an understanding of the financial condition and results of operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, which may also be referred to as “we,” “us,” or “our”) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The principal assets of the Company consist of its ownership in BankAtlantic, a federal savings bank headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and its subsidiaries (“BankAtlantic”).
          Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this document contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (“the Company”) and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond the Company’s control. These include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties associated with: the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its operations, markets, products and services, including the impact of a continued or deepening recession and increased unemployment on our business generally, our capital ratios, as well as the ability of our borrowers to service their obligations and of our customers to maintain account balances; credit risks and loan losses, and the related sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses, including the impact on the credit quality of our loans (including those held in the asset workout subsidiary of the Company) of a sustained downturn in the economy and in the real estate market and other changes in the real estate markets in our trade area and where our collateral is located; the quality of our residential land acquisition and development loans (including builder land bank loans, land acquisition and development loans and land acquisition, development and construction loans) as well as commercial land loans, other commercial real estate loans, and Commercial business loans, and conditions specifically in those market sectors; the risks of additional charge-offs, impairments and required increases in our allowance for loan losses; changes in interest rates and the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws including their impact on the bank’s net interest margin; adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other financial and credit markets and the impact of such conditions on our activities, the value of our assets and on the ability of our borrowers to service their debt obligations; BankAtlantic’s seven-day banking initiatives and other initiatives not resulting in continued growth of core deposits or increasing average balances of new deposit accounts or producing results which do not justify their costs; the success of our expense reduction initiatives and the ability to achieve additional cost savings; changes in laws and regulations including increased regulatory costs; and the impact of periodic valuation testing of goodwill, deferred tax assets and other assets. Past performance, actual or estimated new account openings and growth may not be indicative of future results. In addition to the risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to other risks and factors detailed in reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company cautions that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.
Critical Accounting Policies
          Management views critical accounting policies as accounting policies that are important to the understanding of our financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments about inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income and expenses on the consolidated statements

46


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
of operations for the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in subsequent periods relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment, the valuation of securities as well as the determination of other-than-temporary declines in value, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, the amount of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, accounting for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and assumptions used in the valuation of stock based compensation. The four accounting policies that we have identified as critical accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses; (ii) valuation of securities as well as the determination of other-than-temporary declines in value; (iii) impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets; and (iv) the accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowance. For a more detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies see “Critical Accounting Policies” appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Consolidated Results of Operations
          (Loss) from continuing operations from each of the Company’s reportable segments was as follows (in thousands):
                         
    For the Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008     Change  
BankAtlantic
  $ (40,589 )     (16,981 )     (23,608 )
Parent Company
    (6,022 )     (7,583 )     1,561  
 
                 
Net loss
  $ (46,611 )     (24,564 )     (22,047 )
 
                 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to the Same 2008 Period:
          The increase in BankAtlantic’s net loss during the 2009 quarter compared to the same 2008 quarter primarily resulted from a $9.1 million goodwill impairment charge and an increase in the provision for loan losses. Additionally, there was no recognition of any tax benefit related to BankAtlantic’s loss because a deferred tax valuation allowance was established for the tax benefits associated with the loss. BankAtlantic did not recognize a goodwill impairment charge during the 2008 quarter and recorded an $11.0 million benefit for income taxes associated with the 2008 loss. Also contributing to the increase in BankAtlantic’s net loss for the 2009 quarter compared to the 2008 quarter was lower net interest income and fee income as well as termination costs recognized in 2009 as a result of a reduction in its workforce. The decline in BankAtlantic’s net interest income primarily resulted from lower earning asset balances as BankAtlantic slowed the origination and purchase of loans and sold $149.1 million in agency securities in order to enhance liquidity and improve regulatory capital ratios. The decline in fee income mainly reflects lower customer overdraft fees recognized during 2009 compared to 2008. In March 2009, BankAtlantic reduced it workforce by 7%, incurring one-time termination benefit costs of $1.9 million. BankAtlantic’s non-interest expenses excluding goodwill impairment and termination benefits declined by $8.2 million during the 2009 quarter compared to the same 2008 quarter. This decline in expenses was primarily due to BankAtlantic’s expense reduction initiatives during 2008 which included workforce reductions, consolidation of certain back-office facilities, sale of five central Florida stores, renegotiation of vendor contracts, outsourcing of certain back-office functions and other targeted expense reduction programs. In addition, BankAtlantic’s provision for loan losses was $43.5 million for the 2009 quarter compared to $42.9 million for the 2008 quarter. The provision during 2009 primarily related to charge-offs and loan loss reserves associated with our consumer, residential and commercial real estate loan portfolios. The 2008 provision mainly resulted from reserves and charge-offs associated with our commercial residential loan portfolio, which consist of builder land bank loans, land acquisition and development loans and land acquisition, development and construction loans.
          The decrease in the Parent Company’s net loss in the 2009 quarter compared to the same 2008 quarter resulted from a $1.4 million decline in net interest expenses recognition of a deferred tax valuation allowance and an improvement in securities activities, net. The lower net interest expense reflects a decline in interest expense on junior subordinated debentures associated with a significant decline in the three-month LIBOR interest rate from March 2008 to March 2009, as the majority of the Parent Company’s debentures are indexed to the three-month LIBOR interest rate. The improvement in securities activities, net reflects a $0.1 million gain from the sales of securities during 2009 compared to a net loss from securities activities of $5.1 million during 2008. The above improvements in the Parent Company’s performance were partially offset by a $0.8 million provision for loan losses recognized in the 2009 quarter associated with non-performing loans transferred from BankAtlantic to an asset work-out subsidiary of the Parent

47


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Company in March 2008. The Parent Company did not recognize a provision for loan losses during the 2008 quarter. Also, the Parent Company recognized a $4.1 million income tax benefit in the 2008 quarter while no income tax benefit was recognized during the 2009 quarter.
          During the 2009 and 2008 quarters, the Company recognized under discontinued operations $4.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of additional proceeds from Ryan Beck contingent earn-out payments under the Ryan Beck merger agreement with Stifel. The earn-out period ended on February 28, 2009.
BankAtlantic Results of Operations
Net interest income
                                                 
    Bank Operations Business Segment  
    Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis  
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31, 2009     March 31, 2008  
    Average     Revenue/     Yield/     Average     Revenue/     Yield/  
(in thousands)   Balance     Expense     Rate     Balance     Expense     Rate  
Total loans
  $ 4,355,818       49,607       4.56     $ 4,637,747       68,136       5.88  
Investments
    935,936       12,803       5.47       1,031,714       15,222       5.90  
                     
Total interest earning assets
    5,291,754       62,410       4.72 %     5,669,461       83,358       5.88 %
 
                                       
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles
    25,971                       75,718                  
Other non-interest earning assets
    356,514                       416,496                  
 
                                           
Total Assets
  $ 5,674,239                     $ 6,161,675                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Deposits:
                                               
Savings
  $ 441,278       500       0.46 %   $ 566,448       2,018       1.43 %
NOW
    1,047,116       1,413       0.55       926,381       2,683       1.16  
Money market
    421,883       773       0.74       609,062       3,158       2.09  
Certificates of deposit
    1,300,056       10,301       3.21       992,078       10,734       4.35  
                     
Total interest bearing deposits
    3,210,333       12,987       1.64       3,093,969       18,593       2.42  
                     
Short-term borrowed funds
    278,209       182       0.27       168,742       1,325       3.16  
Advances from FHLB
    903,077       7,164       3.22       1,423,746       14,946       4.22  
Long-term debt
    22,820       308       5.47       26,456       489       7.43  
                     
Total interest bearing liabilities
    4,414,439       20,641       1.90       4,712,913       35,353       3.02  
Demand deposits
    775,977                       854,761                  
Non-interest bearing other liabilities
    61,523                       48,823                  
 
                                           
Total Liabilities
    5,251,939                       5,616,497                  
Stockholder’s equity
    422,300                       545,178                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity
  $ 5,674,239                     $ 6,161,675                  
 
                                           
Net interest income/ net interest spread
            41,769       2.82 %             48,005       2.86 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
Margin
                                               
Interest income/interest earning assets
                    4.72 %                     5.88 %
Interest expense/interest earning assets
                    1.58                       2.51  
 
                                           
Net interest margin
                    3.14 %                     3.37 %
 
                                           
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to the Same 2008 Period:
          The decrease in net interest income primarily resulted from a decline in the net interest margin, a $377.7 million decline in average interest earning assets and a shift in the deposit mix.
          The decline in average non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts reflects the competitive banking environment in Florida and the migration of demand deposit accounts to interest-bearing NOW and certificate of deposit accounts.
          The net interest margin declined as yields on average interest earning assets declined faster than the interest rates on average interest-bearing liabilities. The majority of BankAtlantic’s commercial, small business and consumer loans have adjustable interest rates indexed to prime or LIBOR. The prime interest rate declined from 5.25% at March 31, 2008 to 3.25% at March 31, 2009, and the average three-month LIBOR rate declined from 2.69% at March 31, 2008 to 1.19% at March 31, 2009.

48


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
          Interest income on earning assets declined $20.9 million in the 2009 quarter as compared to the 2008 quarter. The decline was primarily due to lower average earning assets, the impact that lower interest rates during 2009 had on our loan portfolio average yields and the impact of increased non-performing assets. The decline in securities yields resulted primarily from the suspension by the FHLB of its stock dividend during the third quarter of 2008. The decline in average earning assets reflects a management decision to slow the origination and purchase of loans and to sell agency securities in an effort to enhance liquidity and improve regulatory capital ratios.
          Interest expense on interest bearing liabilities declined by $14.7 million during the 2009 quarter compared to the 2008 quarter. The decline was primarily due to lower interest rates, and a change in the mix of liabilities from higher cost FHLB advance borrowings to lower cost deposits. The lower interest rates on BankAtlantic’s interest bearing liabilities primarily resulted from the lower interest rate environment in the 2009 quarter compared to the 2008 quarter. The decline in interest rates generally was offset in part by a shift in deposit mix to a greater proportion of higher cost deposits. The increase in certificate accounts reflects higher average brokered deposit account balances as well as high yield certificate account promotions during 2008. Brokered deposits increased from $15.0 million at March 31, 2008 to $269.1 million at March 31, 2009 or 6.6% of deposits as of March 31, 2009, which included $121.1 million of CDARS reciprocal deposit balances from BankAtlantic’s customers at March 31, 2009. BankAtlantic significantly reduced its borrowings with the FHLB as these borrowings generally have higher interest rates than deposits or short-term borrowings with other financial institutions. Additionally, in order to improve its net interest margin and lower borrowing costs, BankAtlantic used cash and funds from low interest rate short-term borrowings to prepay higher rate FHLB advances during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
Asset Quality
          At the indicated dates, BankAtlantic’s non-performing assets and potential problem loans (contractually past due 90 days or more, performing impaired loans or restructured loans) were (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
               
Nonaccrual:
               
Tax certificates
  $ 1,298       1,441  
Loans (3)
    271,444       208,088  
 
           
Total nonaccrual
    272,742       209,529  
 
           
Repossessed assets:
               
Real estate owned
    21,763       19,045  
 
           
Total nonperforming assets, net
  $ 294,505       228,574  
 
           
 
               
Allowances
               
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 146,639       125,572  
Allowance for tax certificate losses
    7,036       6,064  
 
           
Total allowances
  $ 153,675       131,636  
 
           
 
               
POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
               
Contractually past due 90 days or more (1)
  $ 3,030       15,721  
Performing impaired loans (2)
    34,398        
Troubled debt restructured loans
    43,187       25,843  
 
           
TOTAL POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
  $ 80,615       41,564  
 
           
 
(1)   The majority of these loans have matured and the borrowers continue to make payments under the matured agreements.
 
(2)   BankAtlantic believes that it will ultimately collect all of the principal and interest associated with these loans; however, the timing of the payments may not be in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
 
(3)   Includes $4.7 million of troubled debt restructured loans.

49


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
          The activity in BankAtlantic’s allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 125,572       94,020  
 
           
Charge-offs
               
Residential
    (4,588 )     (624 )
Commercial
    (5,565 )     (40,591 )
Consumer
    (10,321 )     (4,836 )
Small business
    (2,771 )     (1,196 )
 
           
Total Charge-offs
    (23,245 )     (47,247 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
    792       175  
 
           
Net (charge-offs)
    (22,453 )     (47,072 )
Transfer of specific reserves to Parent Company
          (6,440 )
Provision for loan losses
    43,520       42,888  
 
           
Balance, end of period
  $ 146,639       83,396  
 
           
          During the three months ended March 31, 2009, real estate values in markets where our collateral is located continued to decline and economic conditions deteriorated further. As a consequence, BankAtlantic continued to experience adverse credit quality trends in all loan products resulting in higher loan delinquencies and increased classified and non-performing assets. We continued to incur losses in our commercial residential real estate loan portfolio and we also began experiencing higher losses in our commercial non-residential and small business loan portfolios as the deteriorating economic environment had an unfavorable impact on these borrowers. We believe that if real estate and general economic conditions do not improve in Florida or unemployment trends in Florida continue to be negative, the credit quality of our loan portfolio will continue to deteriorate and additional provisions for loan losses may be required in subsequent periods.
          Non-performing assets were substantially higher at March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008. The higher non-performing assets primarily resulted from a $48.5 million and a $10.9 million increase in non-accrual commercial and residential loans, respectively. Approximately half of the new commercial non-accrual loans were associated with commercial non-residential loans. BankAtlantic is experiencing unfavorable trends in commercial loans collateralized by land and retail income producing properties and may encounter increased non-performing loans in these loan products in subsequent periods. The increase in residential non-accrual loans reflects the general deterioration in the national economy and the residential real estate market as home prices throughout the country continued to decline and it is taking longer than historical time-frames to foreclose on and sell homes. Additionally, BankAtlantic’s small business and consumer non-accrual loan balances increased by $2.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic continued to experience unfavorable delinquency trends in these loan portfolios.
          The increase in the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 primarily resulted from an increase in reserves for consumer, small business and residential loans of $10.0 million, $1.3 million and $6.0 million, respectively, due to unfavorable delinquency trends and an increase in charge-offs in these portfolios during the first quarter of 2009 compared to prior periods. The remaining increase in the allowance for loan losses was due to higher specific reserves on commercial real estate loans associated with deteriorating real estate values during the first quarter of 2009. Continued declines in home prices during 2009 and recent substantial increases in unemployment have affected our borrowers’ ability to perform under the loan agreements and resulted in higher residential and home equity loan charge-offs and delinquencies. As a consequence, we significantly increased our residential and consumer allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2009.
          During the three months ended March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic modified $9.9 million, $4.7 million and $3.7 million of home equity, residential and small business loans, respectively, in troubled debt restructurings. In response to the increase in unemployment and the general economic conditions in its markets, BankAtlantic has developed loan modification programs for certain borrowers experiencing financial difficulties that reduce and/or defer monthly payments. BankAtlantic currently anticipates collecting all principal and interest on these loans based on the modified loan terms; however, there is no assurance this will be the case.

50


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic’s Non-Interest Income
                         
    For the Three Months
    Ended March 31,
(in thousands)   2009   2008   Change
         
Service charges on deposits
  $ 18,685       24,014       (5,329 )
Other service charges and fees
    7,025       7,433       (408 )
Securities activities, net
    4,320       341       3,979  
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries
    78       1,113       (1,035 )
Other
    2,757       2,652       105  
             
Non-interest income
  $ 32,865       35,553       (2,688 )
             
          The lower revenues from service charges on deposits during the 2009 quarter compared to the 2008 quarter primarily resulted from lower overdraft fee income. This decline in overdraft fee income reflects a decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account which we believe is the result of the growth in business and retail customers that maintain higher deposit account balances. Management believes that the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account will continue to decline during 2009; however, a 9% increase in the fees for overdraft transactions effective March 1, 2009, may result in increased fee income notwithstanding a decrease in the number of overdrafts. The increase in overdraft fees reflect increased costs of processing and collecting overdrafts, and are in line with local competition.
          The lower other service charges and fees during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period was primarily due to a decline in debit interchange income based, we believe, on decreased spending by our customers reflecting economic conditions in Florida. We anticipate that transaction volume and fee income may continue to decline if current economic conditions do not improve.
          During the three months ended March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic sold $149.1 million of agency securities available for sale for a $4.3 million gain. The net proceeds of $153.4 million from the sales were used to pay down FHLB advance borrowings which improved BankAtlantic’s liquidity position.
          Securities activities, net during the three months ended March 31, 2008 reflect gains from the writing of covered call options on agency securities. BankAtlantic did not write covered call options on its agency securities during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
          Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries during the three months ended March 31, 2009 represents equity earnings from a joint venture that engages in accounts receivable factoring. Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries for 2008 includes $1.0 million of equity earnings from a joint venture that was liquidated in January 2008 and equity earnings from the receivable factoring joint venture. BankAtlantic liquidated all of its investments in income producing real estate joint ventures during 2008.
          The increase in other non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period was primarily the result of $0.4 million of higher commissions earned on the sale of investment products to our customers. This increase in other non-interest income was partially offset by a $0.2 million decline in fee income from the outsourcing of our check clearing operation as lower short-term interest rates reduced our earnings credit on outstanding checks.

51


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic’s Non-Interest Expense
                         
    For the Three Months
    Ended March 31,
(in thousands)   2009   2008   Change
         
Employee compensation and benefits
  $ 28,078       34,243       (6,165 )
Occupancy and equipment
    14,910       16,383       (1,473 )
Advertising and business promotion
    2,781       4,861       (2,080 )
Check losses
    844       2,718       (1,874 )
Professional fees
    2,944       2,260       684  
Supplies and postage
    1,000       1,003       (3 )
Telecommunication
    694       1,496       (802 )
Cost associated with debt redemption
    591       1       590  
Restructuring charges and exit activities
    1,874       (115 )     1,989  
Provision for tax certificates
    1,486       (117 )     1,603  
Impairment of goodwill
    9,124             9,124  
Other
    7,377       5,893       1,484  
             
Total non-interest expense
  $ 71,703       68,626       3,077  
             
          The substantial decline in employee compensation and benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period resulted primarily from a decline in the workforce, including reductions in March 2009 and April 2008. In April 2008, BankAtlantic’s work force was reduced by 124 associates or 6%, and in March 2009, BankAtlantic’s work force was further reduced by 130 associates, or 7%. As a consequence of these work force reductions and attrition, the number of full-time equivalent employees declined from 2,385 at December 31, 2007 to 1,633 at March 31, 2009, or 32%. The workforce was reduced primarily due to lower loan production, outsourced activities, consolidated functions, and reduced call center and store hours. BankAtlantic continues to operate approximately 65% of its stores seven-days a week in support of its on-going focus on customer service.
          The decline in occupancy and equipment primarily resulted from the consolidation of back-office facilities and the sale of five central Florida stores to an unrelated financial institution during 2008 which reduced rent expense by $0.7 million, depreciation expense by $0.4 million and maintenance costs by $0.3 million.
          As a consequence of the adverse economic and market conditions for financial institutions, management decided to substantially reduce its advertising expenditures during 2009.
          The lower check losses for the 2009 quarter were primarily related to more stringent overdraft policies implemented during 2008 as well as lower volume of new account growth.
          The increase in professional fees during the 2009 quarter reflects higher legal fees mainly associated with loan modifications, commercial loan work-outs, tax certificate activities litigation and securities class action lawsuits.
          The lower telecommunication costs for the 2009 quarter primarily resulted from switching to a new vendor on more favorable terms.
          The costs associated with debt redemptions were the result of prepayment penalties incurred upon the prepayment of $249.6 million of FHLB advances during the 2009 quarter. The prepayments were part of an initiative to improve our net interest margin as the repayments of FHLB borrowings were funded with cash and short-term borrowings at lower interest rates. BankAtlantic may continue to incur such debt redemption charges in order to reduce its borrowing costs.
          The restructuring charge for the 2009 quarter reflects one-time termination costs incurred as a result of the workforce reduction discussed above. The restructuring charge recovery for the 2008 quarter resulted from an adjustment of operating lease termination liabilities established during the fourth quarter of 2007.

52


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
          The significant increase in the provision for tax certificates losses during the 2009 quarter reflects higher charge-offs and increases in tax certificate reserves for certain out-of state certificates acquired in distressed markets. We have ceased the acquisition of out-of state tax certificates and intend to concentrate the majority of our tax certificate acquisitions in Florida.
          BankAtlantic tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or during interim periods if impairment indicators exist. Based on the results of an interim impairment evaluation, BankAtlantic recorded an impairment charge of $9.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The entire amount of goodwill relating to BankAtlantic’s tax certificates ($4.7 million) and investments ($4.4 million) reporting units was determined to be impaired. However, goodwill of $13.1 million associated with BankAtlantic’s capital services reporting unit was determined to not be impaired. The impairments in our tax certificates and investments business units reflect the ongoing adverse conditions in the financial services industry, the Company’s market capitalization declining significantly below its tangible book value and BankAtlantic’s decision to down-size certain reporting units in order to enhance liquidity and preserve capital. If market conditions do not improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may recognize additional goodwill impairment charges in subsequent periods.
          The increase in other non-interest expense for the 2009 quarter related to $1.1 million of increased property maintenance costs associated with real estate owned and non-performing loans. Additionally, BankAtlantic’s deposit insurance premium increased $1.4 million as the FDIC increased deposit insurance premiums by seven basis points effective January 1, 2009 and BankAtlantic exhausted its assessment credit relating back to the early 1990’s and began paying the full deposit premium during the second quarter of 2008. BankAtlantic anticipates its deposit assessment premiums will further increase during the remaining nine months of 2009 as a result of additional premium increases adopted by the FDIC for the entire banking industry effective April 1, 2009. The above increases in other expenses were partially offset by lower general operating expenses directly related to management’s expense reduction initiatives.
Parent Company Results of Operations
                         
    For the Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     Change  
Net interest (expense)
  $ (4,021 )     (5,374 )     1,353  
Provision for loan losses
    (757 )           (757 )
 
                 
Net interest (expense) after provision for loan losses
    (4,778 )     (5,374 )     596  
Non-interest income (expense)
    460       (4,646 )     5,106  
Non-interest expense
    1,704       1,675       29  
 
                 
(Loss) before income taxes
    (6,022 )     (11,695 )     5,673  
Income tax benefit
          (4,112 )     4,112  
 
                 
Parent company (loss)
  $ (6,022 )     (7,583 )     1,561  
 
                 
          Net interest expense declined during the first quarter of 2009, compared to the same 2008 period, as a result of lower average interest rates for the 2009 period. Average rates on junior subordinated debentures decreased from 7.92% during the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 5.83% during the same 2009 period reflecting lower LIBOR interest rates during the 2009 quarter compared to the 2008 quarter. The average balances on junior subordinated debentures during 2009 and 2008 remained unchanged at $294 million.
          The increase in non-interest income was primarily the result of securities activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Parent Company sold 250,233 shares of Stifel common stock received in connection with the contingent earn-out payment from the sale of Ryan Beck for a $120,000 gain. The net proceeds from the sale of Stifel common stock of $8.7 million were used to fund a portion of a $25 million capital contribution to BankAtlantic in March 2009. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company realized a $4.7 million loss on the sale of 2,135,000 shares of Stifel common stock and recognized a $1.9 million unrealized loss from Stifel warrants at March 31, 2008. The above losses were partially offset by $1.3 million of gains from the sale of private investment securities and a $0.1 million gain associated with the liquidation of equity investments

53


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
in managed funds. The net proceeds from these securities sales during the three months ended March 31, 2008 of $141.1 million were primarily utilized to fund the $94.8 million payment to BankAtlantic for the transfer of non-performing loans from BankAtlantic to a subsidiary of the Parent Company and to contribute $20 million of capital to BankAtlantic, each of which occurred in March 2008.
          In March 2008, BankAtlantic transferred non-performing loans to a work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company. The composition of these loans as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Nonaccrual loans:
               
Commercial residential real estate:
               
Builder land loans
  $ 22,019       22,019  
Land acquisition and development
    16,660       16,759  
Land acquisition, development and construction
    25,726       29,163  
 
           
Total commercial residential real estate
    64,405       67,941  
Commercial non-residential real estate
    9,916       11,386  
 
           
Total non-accrual loans
    74,321       79,327  
Allowance for loan losses — specific reserves
    (11,758 )     (11,685 )
 
           
Non-accrual loans, net
    62,563       67,642  
Performing commercial non-residential loans
    2,259       2,259  
 
           
Loans receivable net
  $ 64,822       69,901  
 
           
          During the first quarter of 2009, the Parent Company’s work-out subsidiary received $4.3 million from loan payments and the sale of a foreclosed property. The work-out subsidiary also recognized a $0.7 million charge-off associated with the foreclosure of a loan.
          The activity in the Parent Company’s allowance for loan losses was as follows: (in thousands)
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 11,685        
 
           
Loans charged-off
    (684 )      
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
           
 
           
Net (charge-offs)
    (684 )      
Reserves transferred from BankAtlantic
          6,440  
Provision for loan losses
    757        
 
           
Balance, end of period
  $ 11,758       6,440  
 
           
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Consolidated Financial Condition
          The Company reduced its total assets with a view to improving its regulatory capital ratios. Total assets were decreased by selling securities available for sale, significantly reducing loan originations and purchases as well as substantially reducing the acquisition of tax certificates. The proceeds from payments on earning asset and securities sales were used to pay down borrowings.
          Total assets at March 31, 2009 were $5.6 billion compared to $5.8 billion at December 31, 2008. The changes in components of total assets from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 are summarized below:
    Increase in cash and cash equivalents primarily reflecting $119.7 million of higher cash balances at depository institutions associated with daily cash management activities;

54


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
    Decrease in securities available for sale reflecting the sale of $149.1 million of mortgage-backed securities;
 
    Decrease in tax certificate balances primarily due to redemptions and decreased tax certificate acquisitions compared to prior periods;
 
    Decline in FHLB stock related to lower FHLB advance borrowings;
 
    Decrease in loan receivable balances associated with repayments of residential loans in the normal course of business combined with a significant decline in loan originations and purchases;
 
    Decrease in accrued interest receivable primarily resulting from lower loan balances and a significant decline in interest rates;
 
    Increase in real estate owned associated with residential loan foreclosures; and
 
    Decrease in goodwill associated with the impairment of $9.1 million of goodwill.
          The Company’s total liabilities at March 31, 2009 were $5.4 billion compared to $5.6 billion at December 31, 2008. The changes in components of total liabilities from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 are summarized below:
    Increased interest bearing deposit account balances associated with promotions of higher-yielding interest-bearing checking accounts and increases in certificates of deposits;
 
    Higher non-interest-bearing deposit balances primarily due to increased customer balances in checking accounts;
 
    Lower FHLB advances and short term borrowings due to repayments using proceeds from the sales of securities and loan repayments and increases in deposit account balances; and
 
    Increase in junior subordinated debentures due to interest deferments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Liquidity and Capital Resources
          The Company’s principal source of liquidity is its cash and investments. The Company also may obtain funds through dividends from its subsidiaries, issuance of equity and debt securities, and liquidation of its investments. The Company may use these funds to contribute capital to its subsidiaries, pay debt service and shareholder dividends, repay borrowings, invest in equity securities and other investments, and fund operations. The Company’s estimated 2009 interest expense associated with its junior subordinated debentures is approximately $16.5 million. In order to preserve liquidity in the current difficult economic environment, the Company elected in February 2009 to defer interest payments on all of its outstanding junior subordinated debentures and to cease paying dividends on its common stock. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the trust documents allow the Company to defer payments of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods without default or penalty. During the deferral period, the respective trusts will likewise suspend the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred securities. The deferral election began with respect to regularly scheduled quarterly interest payments aggregating $3.9 million that would otherwise have been made in March and April of 2009. The Company has the ability under the junior subordinated debentures to continue to defer interest payments through ongoing, appropriate notices to each of the trustees, and will make a decision each quarter as to whether to continue the deferral of interest. During the deferral period, interest will continue to accrue on the junior subordinated debentures at the stated coupon rate, including on the deferred interest, and the Company will continue to record the interest expense associated with the junior subordinated debentures. During the deferral period, the Company may not, among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on or repurchase its common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank equally with or junior to the junior subordinated debentures. The Company may end the deferral by paying all accrued and unpaid interest. The Company anticipates that it will continue to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures and will not pay dividends on its common stock for the foreseeable future.
          During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received $15.0 million of dividends from BankAtlantic. The Company does not anticipate receiving dividends from BankAtlantic during the year ended December 31, 2009 until economic conditions and the performance of BankAtlantic assets improve. The ability of BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other distributions to the Company in subsequent periods is subject to regulations and Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) approval. The OTS would not approve any distribution that would cause BankAtlantic to fail to meet its capital requirements or if the OTS believes that a capital distribution by

55


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic constitutes an unsafe or unsound action or practice, and there is no assurance that the OTS would approve future applications for capital distributions from BankAtlantic.
          The Company’s anticipated liquidity focus during 2009 is on providing capital to BankAtlantic, if needed, managing the cash requirements of its asset work-out subsidiary, and funding its operating expenses. The Company is required to provide BankAtlantic with managerial assistance and capital as the OTS may determine necessary under applicable regulations and supervisory standards. In March 2009, the Company contributed $25 million of capital to BankAtlantic.
          In light of the current challenging economic environment and the desire for the Company to be in a position to provide capital to BankAtlantic, if needed, the Company is considering pursuing the issuance of securities, which could include Class A common stock, debt, preferred stock, warrants or any combination thereof. Any such financing could be obtained through public or private offerings, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Additionally, we could pursue these financings at the Parent Company level or directly at BankAtlantic or both. Any financing involving the issuance of our Class A common stock or securities convertible or exercisable for our Class A common stock could be highly dilutive for our existing shareholders. There is no assurance that any such financing will be available to us on favorable terms or at all.
          The sale of Ryan Beck to Stifel closed on February 28, 2007, and the sales agreement provided for contingent earn-out payments, payable in cash or shares of Stifel common stock, at Stifel’s election, based on certain Ryan Beck revenues during the two-year period immediately following the closing, which ended on February 28, 2009. The Company received earn-out payments of $1.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and the Company received an additional $8.6 million in earn-out payments paid in 250,233 shares of Stifel common stock in March 2009 for the remaining earn-out. The Stifel stock was sold for net proceeds of $8.7 million.
          Pursuant to the terms of the Ryan Beck merger, the Company agreed to indemnify Stifel against certain losses arising out of activities of Ryan Beck prior to its sale. Stifel recently indicated that it believes it is entitled to indemnification payments of approximately $500,000 under the agreement. Based on information provided by Stifel, management believes that it is not obligated to indemnify Stifel under the terms of the merger agreement.
          The Company has the following cash and investments that it believes provide a source for potential liquidity based on values at March 31, 2009; however, there is no assurance that these investments will maintain such value or that we would receive proceeds equal to estimated fair value upon the liquidation of these investments.
                                 
    As of March 31, 2009
            Gross   Gross    
    Carrying   Unrealized   Unrealized   Estimated
(in thousands)   Value   Appreciation   Depreciation   Fair Value
     
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 19,860                   19,860  
Securities available for sale
    1,253                   1,253  
Private investment securities
    2,036       339             2,375  
     
Total
  $ 23,149       339             23,488  
     
          The non-performing loans transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company may also provide a potential source of liquidity through workouts, repayments of the loans or sales of interests in the subsidiary. The balance of these loans at March 31, 2009 was $76.6 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Parent Company work-out subsidiary received $4.3 million of proceeds from loan repayments and foreclosed property sales relating to this loan portfolio.
BankAtlantic Liquidity and Capital Resources
          BankAtlantic’s liquidity will depend on its ability to generate sufficient cash to support loan demand, to meet deposit withdrawals, and to pay operating expenses. BankAtlantic’s securities portfolio provides an internal source of liquidity through its short-term investments as well as scheduled maturities and interest payments. Loan repayments and loan sales also provide an internal source of liquidity. BankAtlantic’s liquidity is also dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and availability under lines of credit, federal funds, Treasury

56


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
and Federal Reserve programs. Additionally, interest rate changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets or deterioration in BankAtlantic’s financial condition may make terms of the borrowings and deposits less favorable. As a result, there is a risk that our cost of funds will increase or that the availability of funding sources may decrease. As of March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic had available unused borrowings of approximately $813 million in connection with its FHLB line of credit, federal funds lines, and Treasury and Federal Reserve programs. However, such available borrowings are subject to periodic reviews and may be terminated or limited at any time.
          BankAtlantic’s primary sources of funds are deposits; principal repayments of loans, tax certificates and securities available for sale; proceeds from the sale of loans and securities available for sale; proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase; advances from FHLB; Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs; interest payments on loans and securities; capital contributions from the Parent Company and other funds generated by operations. These funds are primarily utilized to fund loan disbursements and purchases, deposit outflows, repayments of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, repayments of advances from FHLB, purchases of tax certificates and securities available for sale, acquisitions of properties and equipment, and operating expenses.
          In October 2008, the FDIC announced a Liquidity Guarantee Program. Under this program, certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued on or before October 31, 2009, would be fully protected in the event the issuing institution subsequently fails, or its holding company files for bankruptcy. This includes promissory notes, commercial paper, inter-bank funding, and any unsecured portion of secured debt. Coverage would be limited to the period ending December 31, 2012, even if the maturity exceeds that date. The program could provide BankAtlantic with additional liquidity as certain new borrowings may be guaranteed by the FDIC. The FDIC also announced that any participating depository institution will be able to provide full deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts including interest bearing accounts with rates at or below fifty basis points, regardless of dollar amount. This new, temporary guarantee will expire at the end of 2009. BankAtlantic “opted-in” to the additional coverage on qualifying borrowings and non-interest bearing deposits. As a result, BankAtlantic will be assessed a 75-basis point fee on new covered borrowings, and was assessed a 10-basis point surcharge for non-interest bearing deposit transaction account balances exceeding the previously insured amount.
          In October 2008, the FDIC adopted a restoration plan that increased the rates depository institutions pay for deposit insurance. Under the restoration plan, the assessment rate schedule was raised by 7 basis points for all depository institutions beginning on January 1, 2009 and beginning with the second quarter of 2009, changes would be made to the assessment rate to increase assessments on a risk adjusted basis. The 7 basis point assessment rate increase resulted in a $1.4 million increase in FDIC assessment premiums for BankAtlantic during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period.
          The FHLB has granted BankAtlantic a line of credit capped at 40% of assets subject to available collateral, with a maximum term of ten years. BankAtlantic had utilized its FHLB line of credit to borrow $817.0 million as of March 31, 2009. The line of credit is secured by a blanket lien on BankAtlantic’s residential mortgage loans and certain commercial real estate and consumer home equity loans. BankAtlantic’s available borrowings under this line of credit were approximately $464 million at March 31, 2009. However, we expect that during the second quarter of 2009, the total borrowings under the FHLB line of credit will decrease due to higher collateral requirements. An additional source of liquidity for BankAtlantic is its securities portfolio. As of March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic had $207.3 million of un-pledged securities that could be sold or pledged for additional borrowings with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve or other financial institutions. BankAtlantic is a participating institution in the Federal Reserve Treasury Investment Program for up to $50 million in fundings and at March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic had $3.0 million of short-term borrowings outstanding under this program. BankAtlantic is also eligible to participate in the Federal Reserve’s discount window program. The amount that can be borrowed under this program is dependent on available collateral, and BankAtlantic had available borrowings of approximately $143.1 million as of March 31, 2009. BankAtlantic had no amounts outstanding under this program at March 31, 2009. The above lines of credit are subject to periodic review, may be reduced or terminated at any time by the issuer institution. If the current economic trends continue to adversely affect our performance, the above borrowings may be limited, additional collateral may be required or these borrowings may not be available to us, and BankAtlantic’s liquidity could be materially adversely affected.
          BankAtlantic also has various relationships to acquire brokered deposits, and to execute repurchase agreements, which may be utilized as an alternative source of liquidity, if needed. Brokered deposits are not

57


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
considered a primary funding source of BankAtlantic, and BankAtlantic does not anticipate its brokered deposit balances to increase in the foreseeable future. At March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic had $269.1 million and $35.6 million of brokered deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase outstanding, representing 4.9% and 0.6% of total assets, respectively. Additional repurchase agreement borrowings are subject to available collateral, and the issuance of brokered certificates of deposits requires BankAtlantic to maintain “well capitalized” regulatory capital ratios. Additionally, BankAtlantic had total cash on hand or with other financial institutions of $269.4 million as of March 31, 2009.
          BankAtlantic’s liquidity may be affected by unforeseen demands on cash. Our objective in managing liquidity is to maintain sufficient resources of available liquid assets to address our funding needs. Multiple market disruptions have made it more difficult for financial institutions to borrow money. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty how long these market conditions may continue, nor can we anticipate the degree that such market conditions may impact our operations. Deterioration in the performance of other financial institutions may adversely impact the ability of all financial institutions to access liquidity. There is no assurance that further deterioration in the financial markets will not result in additional market-wide liquidity problems, and affect our liquidity position. In order to improve its liquidity position, BankAtlantic reduced its borrowings by $343.0 million as of March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008, by increasing its total deposits and utilizing the proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale and repayments of earning assets to pay down borrowings. Additionally, BankAtlantic does not anticipate an increase in its total assets in the foreseeable future.
          BankAtlantic’s commitments to originate and purchase loans at March 31, 2009 were $76.5 million and $0, respectively, compared to $176.7 million and $14 million, respectively, at March 31, 2008. At March 31, 2009, total loan commitments represented approximately 1.84% of net loans receivable.
          At March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic had investments and mortgage-backed securities of approximately $38.5 million pledged against securities sold under agreements to repurchase, $6.4 million pledged against public deposits and $49.3 million pledged against treasury tax and loan accounts.
          As of March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic met the regulatory capital ratios established for “well capitalized” institutions with actual capital amounts and ratios exceeding all “well capitalized” amounts and ratios. However, the OTS, at its discretion, can at any time require an institution to maintain capital amounts and ratios above the established “well capitalized” requirements based on its view of the risk profile of the specific institution. If higher capital requirements are imposed, BankAtlantic could be required to raise additional capital. There is no assurance that additional capital will not be necessary, or that the Company or BankAtlantic would be successful in raising additional capital in subsequent periods. The Company’s inability to raise capital or be deemed “well capitalized” could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results.
          At the indicated dates, BankAtlantic’s capital amounts and ratios were (dollars in thousands):
                                 
                    Minimum Ratios
                    Adequately   Well
    Actual   Capitalized   Capitalized
    Amount   Ratio   Ratio   Ratio
     
At March 31, 2009:
                               
Total risk-based capital
  $ 449,506       11.86 %     8.00 %     10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    379,245       10.01       4.00       6.00  
Tangible capital
    379,245       6.97       1.50       1.50  
Core capital
    379,245       6.97       4.00       5.00  
 
                               
At December 31, 2008:
                               
Total risk-based capital
  $ 456,776       11.63 %     8.00 %     10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    385,006       9.85       4.00       6.00  
Tangible capital
    385,006       6.94       1.50       1.50  
Core capital
    385,006       6.94       4.00       5.00  

58


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
          Savings institutions are also subject to the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”). Regulations implementing the prompt corrective action provisions of FDICIA define specific capital categories based on FDICIA’s defined capital ratios, as discussed more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements -as of March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                                         
    Payments Due by Period (2)
            Less than                   After 5
Contractual Obligations   Total   1 year   1-3 years   4-5 years   years
     
Time deposits
  $ 1,293,215       1,227,244       52,357       13,614        
Long-term debt
    320,341             22,000       822       297,519  
Advances from FHLB (1)
    817,000       725,000       92,000              
Operating lease obligations held for sublease
    30,466       1,230       3,636       2,408       23,192  
Operating lease obligations held for use
    72,196       7,523       17,195       7,595       39,883  
Pension obligation
    17,340       1,269       2,995       3,229       9,847  
Other obligations
    12,800             4,800       6,400       1,600  
     
Total contractual cash obligations
  $ 2,563,358       1,962,266       194,983       34,068       372,041  
     
 
(1)   Payments due by period are based on contractual maturities
 
(2)   The above table excludes interest payments on interest bearing liabilities

59


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
Real Estate Development
          The Real Estate Development activities of BFC are comprised of the operations of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries. Woodbridge presents its results in two reportable segments and its results of operations are consolidated with BFC Financial Corporation. The only assets available to BFC Financial Corporation are dividends when and if paid by Woodbridge. Woodbridge is a separate public company and its management prepared the following discussion regarding Woodbridge which was included in Woodbridge’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, references to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” in the following discussion under the caption “Real Estate Development” are references to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC Financial Corporation
          The objective of the following discussion is to provide an understanding of the financial condition and results of operations of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (“Woodbridge,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. We currently engage in business activities through our Land Division, consisting of the operations of Core Communities, LLC (“Core Communities” or “Core”), which develops master-planned communities, and through our Other Operations segment (“Other Operations”). Other Operations includes the parent company operations of Woodbridge (the “Parent Company”), the consolidated operations of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (“Pizza Fusion”), the consolidated operations of Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (“Carolina Oak”), which engaged in homebuilding activities in South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and the activities of Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (“Cypress Creek Capital”) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC (“Snapper Creek”). Also included in the Other Operations segment are our equity investment in Bluegreen Corporation (“Bluegreen”) and an investment in Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”).
          Some of the statements contained or incorporated by reference herein include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act” ), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “intend,” “expect,” “will,” “should,” “seek” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based largely on management’s expectations and involve inherent risks and uncertainties. In addition to the risks identified in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, you should refer to the other risks and uncertainties discussed throughout this document for specific risks which could cause actual results to be significantly different from those expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally to the real estate industry and other industries in which the companies we hold investments in operate, while other factors apply directly to us. Any number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements including:
    the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its operations;
 
    the market for real estate in the areas where the Company has developments, including the impact of market conditions on the Company’s margins and the fair value of its real estate inventory;
 
    the risk that the value of the property held by Core Communities and Carolina Oak may decline, including as a result of the current downturn in the residential and commercial real estate and homebuilding industries;
 
    the impact of the factors negatively impacting the homebuilding and residential real estate industries on the market and values of commercial property;
 
    the risk that the downturn in the credit markets may adversely affect Core’s commercial leasing projects, including the ability of current and potential tenants to secure financing which may, in turn, negatively impact long-term rental and occupancy;
 
    the risks relating to Core’s dependence on certain key tenants in its commercial leasing projects, including the risk that current adverse conditions and the economy in general and/or adverse developments in the businesses of these tenants could have a negative impact on Core’s financial condition;
 
    the risk that the development of parcels and master-planned communities will not be completed as anticipated;
 
    continued declines in the estimated fair value of our real estate inventory and the potential for write-downs or impairment charges;

60


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
    the effects of increases in interest rates on us and the availability and cost of credit to buyers of our inventory;
 
    the impact of the problems in financial and credit markets on the ability of buyers of our inventory to obtain financing on acceptable terms, if at all, and the risk that we will be unable to obtain financing and to renew existing credit facilities on acceptable terms, if at all;
 
    the risks relating to Core’s liquidity, cash position and ability to satisfy required payments under its debt facilities, including the risk that Woodbridge may not provide funding to Core;
 
    the risk that we may be required to make accelerated principal payments on our debt obligations due to re-margining or curtailment payment requirements, which may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations;
 
    the Company’s ability to access additional capital on acceptable terms, if at all;
 
    risks associated with the securities owned by the Company, including the risk that the Company may record further impairment charges with respect to such securities in the event trading prices continue to decline;
 
    the risks associated with the businesses in which the Company holds investments;
 
    risks associated with the Company’s business strategy, including the Company’s ability to successfully make investments notwithstanding adverse conditions in the economy and the credit markets;
 
    the Company’s success in pursuing strategic alternatives that could enhance liquidity;
 
    the impact on the price and liquidity of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and on the Company’s ability to obtain additional capital in the event the Company chooses to de-register its securities; and
 
    the Company’s success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.
          Many of these factors are beyond our control. The Company cautions that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.
Executive Overview
          We continue to focus on managing our real estate holdings during this challenging period for the real estate industry, and on efforts to bring costs in line with our strategic objectives. We have taken steps to align our staffing levels and compensation with these objectives. Our goal is to pursue acquisitions and investments in diverse industries, including investments in affiliates, using a combination of our cash and stock and third party equity and debt financing. This business strategy may result in acquisitions and investments both within and outside of the real estate industry. We also intend to explore a variety of funding structures which might leverage or capitalize on our available cash and other assets currently owned by us. We may acquire entire businesses, or majority or minority, non-controlling interests in companies. Under this business model, we likely will not generate a consistent earnings stream and the composition of our revenues may vary widely due to factors inherent in a particular investment, including the maturity and cyclical nature of, and market conditions relating to, the business invested in. We expect that net investment gains and other income will depend on the success of our investments as well as overall market conditions. We also intend to pursue strategic initiatives with the goal of enhancing liquidity. These initiatives may include pursuing alternatives to monetize a portion of our interests in certain of Core’s assets through sale, possible joint ventures or other strategic relationships.
          Our operations have historically been concentrated in the real estate industry which is cyclical in nature. Our largest subsidiary is Core Communities, a developer of master-planned communities, which sells land to residential builders as well as to commercial developers, and internally develops, constructs and leases income producing commercial real estate. In addition, our Other Operations segment includes an equity investment in Bluegreen, a NYSE-listed company, which represents approximately 31% of Bluegreen’s outstanding common stock, and a cost method investment in Office Depot, a NYSE-listed company in which we own less than 1% of the outstanding common stock. Bluegreen is engaged in the acquisition, development, marketing and sale of ownership interests in primarily “drive-to” vacation resorts, and the development and sale of golf communities and residential land. We are currently working with Bluegreen Corporation to explore avenues in assisting Bluegreen in obtaining liquidity in the securitization of their receivables, which may include, among other potential alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker dealer to raise capital through private or public offerings. Our Other Operations segment also includes the operations of Pizza Fusion, which is a restaurant franchise operating within the quick service and organic food industries, and the activities of Carolina Oak, which engaged in homebuilding activities at Tradition Hilton Head prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008.

61


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
Financial and Non-Financial Metrics
          We evaluate our performance and prospects using a variety of financial and non-financial metrics. The key financial metrics utilized to evaluate historical operating performance include revenues from sales of real estate, margin (which we measure as revenues from sales of real estate minus cost of sales of real estate), margin percentage (which we measure as margin divided by revenues from sales of real estate), income before taxes, net income and return on equity. We also continue to evaluate and monitor selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue. In evaluating our future prospects, management considers non-financial information such as acres in backlog (which we measure as land subject to an executed sales contract) and the aggregate value of those contracts. Additionally, we monitor the number of properties remaining in inventory and under contract to be purchased relative to our sales and development trends. Our ratio of debt to shareholders’ equity and cash requirements are also considered when evaluating our future prospects, as are general economic factors and interest rate trends. Each of the above metrics is discussed in the following sections as it relates to our operating results, financial position and liquidity. These metrics are not an exhaustive list, and management may from time to time utilize different financial and non-financial information or may not use all of the metrics mentioned above.
          Going forward, under the terms and conditions of the new executive compensation program, all of the Company’s investments are or will be held by individual limited partnerships or other legal entities established for such purpose. The executive officer participants may have interests tied both to the performance of a particular investment as well as interests relating to the performance of the portfolio of investments as a whole. The Company will evaluate these investments based on certain performance criteria and other financial metrics established by the Company in its capacity as investor in the program.
Land Division Overview
          Core Communities develops master-planned communities and is currently developing Tradition, Florida, which is located in Port St. Lucie, Florida, and Tradition Hilton Head, which is located in Hardeeville, South Carolina. Tradition, Florida encompasses approximately 8,200 total acres. Core has sold approximately 1,800 acres to date and has approximately 3,800 net saleable acres remaining in inventory. No acres were subject to sales contracts as of March 31, 2009. Tradition Hilton Head encompasses approximately 5,400 total acres, of which 175 acres have been sold to date. Approximately 2,800 net saleable acres are remaining at Tradition Hilton Head. No acres were subject to sales contracts as of March 31, 2009. Acres sold to date in Tradition Hilton Head include the intercompany sale of 150 acres owned by Carolina Oak.
          We plan to continue to focus on our Land Division’s commercial operations through sales to developers and the internal development of certain projects for leasing to third parties. Core is currently pursuing the sale of two of its commercial leasing projects. Conditions in the commercial real estate market have deteriorated and financing is not as readily available in the current market, which may adversely impact both Core’s ability to complete sales and the profitability of any sales.
          In addition, the overall slowdown in the real estate markets and disruptions in credit markets continue to have a negative effect on demand for residential land in our Land Division which historically was partially mitigated by increased commercial leasing revenue. Traffic at both the Tradition, Florida and Tradition Hilton Head information centers remains slow, reflecting the overall state of the real estate market.
Other Operations Overview
          Other Operations consist of the operations of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation, Carolina Oak, and Pizza Fusion, activities through Cypress Creek Capital and Snapper Creek, our equity investment in Bluegreen and an investment in Office Depot.
          During 2008, we began evaluating our investment in Bluegreen for other-than-temporary impairment in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock”, and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59 as the fair value of the Bluegreen stock had fallen below

62


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
the carrying value of our investment in Bluegreen. We analyzed various quantitative and qualitative factors including our intent and ability to hold the investment, the severity and duration of the impairment and the prospects for the improvement of fair value. The Company valued Bluegreen’s common stock using a market approach valuation technique and Level 1 valuation inputs under SFAS No. 157. As a result of the impairment evaluations performed in the third and fourth quarters of 2008, we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $53.6 million and $40.8 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
          We again performed an impairment review of our investment in Bluegreen as of March 31, 2009 and, as part of that review, evaluated various qualitative and quantitative factors relating to the performance of Bluegreen and its current stock price. As a result of the evaluation, based on, among other things, the continued decline of Bluegreen’s common stock price, we determined that an other-than-temporary impairment was necessary and, accordingly, recorded a $20.4 million impairment charge (calculated based upon the $1.74 closing price of Bluegreen’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 31, 2009) and adjusted the carrying value of our investment in Bluegreen to its fair value of $16.6 million at March 31, 2009. On May 7, 2009, the closing price of Bluegreen’s common stock was $1.75 per share.
          During December 2008, we performed an impairment analysis of our investment in Office Depot’s common stock. We concluded that there was an other-than-temporary impairment associated with our investment in Office Depot based on the severity of the decline of the fair value of our investment, the length of time the stock price had been below the carrying value of our investment, the continued decline in the overall economy and credit markets, and the unpredictability of the recovery of Office Depot’s stock price. Accordingly, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of approximately $12.0 million representing the difference of the average cost of $11.33 per share and the fair value of $2.98 per share as of December 31, 2008 multiplied by the number of shares of Office Depot common stock owned by us at that date. Further, we performed an impairment analysis at March 31, 2009 and, based on, among other factors, the continued decline of Office Depot’s stock price, we determined that an additional other-than-temporary impairment charge was required. As a result, we recorded a $2.4 million impairment charge relating to our investment in Office Depot in the three months ended March 31, 2009, which decreased the carrying value of our investment in Office Depot from $4.3 million as of December 31, 2008 to $1.9 million as of March 31, 2009. On May 7, 2009, the closing price of Office Depot’s common stock was $3.45 per share.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
          Critical accounting policies are those policies that are important to the understanding of our financial statements and may also involve estimates and judgments about inherently uncertain matters. In preparing our financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. These estimates require the exercise of judgment, as future events cannot be determined with certainty. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in subsequent periods relate to revenue and cost recognition on percent complete projects, reserves and accruals, impairment reserves of assets, valuation of real estate, estimated costs to complete construction, reserves for litigation and contingencies and deferred tax valuation allowances. The accounting policies that we have identified as critical to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations are: (a) fair value measurements; (b) investments; (c) goodwill and intangible assets; (d) revenue recognition; (e) income taxes; and (f) loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons. For a more detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” appearing in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

63


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
Consolidated Results of Operations
                         
    Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008     Change  
(In thousands)                        
Revenues:
                       
Sales of real estate
  $ 1,427       154       1,273  
Other revenues
    2,890       2,964       (74 )
 
                 
Total revenues
    4,317       3,118       1,199  
 
                 
 
                       
Costs and expenses:
                       
Cost of sales of real estate
    693       28       665  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    10,754       12,627       (1,873 )
Interest expense
    2,773       3,024       (251 )
 
                 
Total costs and expenses
    14,220       15,679       (1,459 )
 
                 
 
                       
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
    6,336       526       5,810  
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
    (20,401 )           (20,401 )
Impairment of other investments
    (2,396 )           (2,396 )
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
    40,369             40,369  
Interest and other income
    566       1,604       (1,038 )
 
                 
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
    14,571       (10,431 )     25,002  
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
                 
 
                 
Net income (loss)
    14,571       (10,431 )     25,002  
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
    204             204  
 
                 
Net income (loss) attributable to Woodbridge
  $ 14,775       (10,431 )     25,206  
 
                 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to the Same 2008 Period:
          Consolidated net income was $14.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared to a consolidated net loss of $10.4 million for the same 2008 period. The increase in net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was mainly associated with the reversal into income of the loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons after Levitt and Sons’ bankruptcy was finalized. The reversal resulted in a $40.4 million gain in the first quarter of 2009. Additionally, earnings from Bluegreen were higher in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. These increases were offset in part by impairment charges on our investments of approximately $22.8 million recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Sales of real estate
          The table below summarizes sales of real estate by segment:
                         
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In thousands)  
Land Division
  $ 1,427       154       1,273  
Other Operations
                 
 
                 
Consolidated
  $ 1,427       154       1,273  
 
                 
          Revenues from sales of real estate increased to $1.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 from $154,000 for the same 2008 period. Revenues from sales of real estate for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were comprised of land sales, recognition of deferred revenue and revenue related to incremental revenue received from homebuilders based on the final resale price to the homebuilders’ customer (“look back revenue”). During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, our Land Division sold approximately 10 acres generating revenues of approximately $650,000, compared to the sale of one lot encompassing less than one acre, which generated revenues of approximately $73,000, net of deferred revenue, in the same 2008 period. Look back revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 were approximately $23,000 compared to approximately $71,000 in the same 2008 period. Additionally, our Land Division recognized deferred revenue on previously sold land of approximately $754,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, compared to approximately $10,000 in the same 2008 period.

64


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
Other revenues
          The table below summarizes other revenues by segment:
                         
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In thousands)  
Land Division
  $ 2,277       2,705       (428 )
Other Operations
    622       259       363  
Eliminations
    (9 )           (9 )
 
                 
Consolidated
  $ 2,890       2,964       (74 )
 
                 
          Other revenues in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 remained relatively consistent with the same 2008 period. The decrease in Land Division revenues was primarily due to lower impact fees associated with a decrease in building permits requested for new construction, and straight line rent amortization associated with tenant improvement reimbursements. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in rental revenues in the Land Division due to additional tenants and an increase in other revenues in Other Operations as franchise revenues related to Pizza Fusion were recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. No franchise revenues were recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Cost of sales of real estate
          The table below summarizes cost of sales of real estate by segment:
                         
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In thousands)  
Land Division
  $ 693       28       665  
Other Operations
                 
 
                 
Consolidated
  $ 693       28       665  
 
                 
          Cost of sales of real estate increased $665,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, compared to the same 2008 period due to an increase in sales of real estate in our Land Division. Approximately 10 acres were sold in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, compared to one lot sold of less than one acre in the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
          The table below summarizes selling, general and administrative expenses by segment:
                         
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In thousands)  
Land Division
  $ 6,247       5,531       716  
Other Operations
    4,507       7,096       (2,589 )
 
                 
Consolidated
  $ 10,754       12,627       (1,873 )
 
                 
          Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, compared to the same 2008 period as we incurred lower compensation, benefits and office related expenses as a result of reductions in force. In Other Operations, insurance costs were significantly lower as no insurance costs related to Levitt and Sons were incurred after the second quarter of 2008. In addition, professional services decreased as during the first quarter of 2008 we incurred costs associated with our investments in equity securities while these costs were not incurred in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. In the Land Division, we experienced an increase in depreciation expense in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same 2008 period as depreciation expense was not recorded in the first quarter of 2008 while the commercial assets were classified as discontinued

65


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
operations. These commercial assets were reclassified back to continuing operations during the fourth quarter of 2008. The increase in expenses in the Land Division was partially offset by a decrease in sales and marketing expenses.
Interest expense
          The table below summarizes interest expense by segment:
                         
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In thousands)  
Land Division
  $ 1,370       993       377  
Other Operations
    1,403       2,673       (1,270 )
Eliminations
          (642 )     642  
 
                 
Consolidated
  $ 2,773       3,024       (251 )
 
                 
          Interest expense consists of interest incurred minus interest capitalized. Interest incurred totaled $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $6.2 million for the same 2008 period. Interest capitalized totaled $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $3.2 million for the same 2008 period. Interest expense was lower in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008 primarily as a result of lower interest rates during the 2009 period. At the time of land sales, the capitalized interest allocated to inventory is charged to cost of sales. Cost of sales of real estate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 did not include a significant amount of capitalized interest charged to cost of sales of real estate.
          Bluegreen reported net income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $3.6 million, as compared to $1.4 million for the same 2008 period. Our interest in Bluegreen’s earnings was $6.3 million for the first quarter of 2009 (after the amortization of approximately $5.3 million related to the change in the basis as a result of the impairment charges on this investment) compared to $526,000 for the first quarter of 2008. We review our investment in Bluegreen for impairment on a quarterly basis or as events or circumstances warrant for other-than-temporary declines in value. See Note 12 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for further details of the impairment analysis of our investment in Bluegreen.
          Interest and other income decreased to $566,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $1.6 million during the same 2008 period. This decrease was related to a decrease in interest income as a result of lower interest rates as well as a decrease in our cash balances for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period.
          The provision for income taxes is estimated to result in an effective tax rate of 0.0% in 2009. The effective tax rate used for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was 0.0%. The 0.0% effective tax rate is a result of recording a valuation allowance for those deferred tax assets that are not expected to be recovered in the future. Due to large losses in the past and expected taxable losses in the foreseeable future, we do not believe at this time that we will have sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future to realize any portion of the net deferred tax asset.
          Land Division operational data
                         
    Three Months
    Ended March 31,
    2009   2008   Change
     
Acres sold
    10             10  
Margin percentage (a)
    51.4 %     81.8 %     (30.4 )%
Unsold saleable acres
    6,629       6,679       (50 )
Acres subject to sales contracts — Third parties
          260       (260 )
Aggregate sales price of acres subject to sales contracts to third parties
  $       78,488       (78,488 )
 
(a)   Includes revenues from look back provisions and recognition of deferred revenue associated with sales in prior periods.

66


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
          Due to the nature and size of individual land transactions, our Land Division results have historically fluctuated significantly. Although we have historically realized margins of between approximately 40.0% and 60.0% on Land Division sales, margins on land sales are expected to be below the historical range given the downturn in the real estate markets and the significant decrease in demand. In addition to the impact of economic and market factors, the sales price and margin of land sold varies depending upon: the location; the parcel size; whether the parcel is sold as raw land, partially developed land or individually developed lots; the degree to which the land is entitled; and whether the designated use of the land is residential or commercial. The cost of sales of real estate is dependent upon the original cost of the land acquired, the timing of the acquisition of the land, the amount of land development, and interest and real estate tax costs capitalized to the particular land parcel during active development. Allocations to cost of sales involve significant management judgment and include an estimate of future costs of development, which can vary over time due to labor and material cost increases, master plan design changes and regulatory modifications. Accordingly, allocations are subject to change based on factors which are in many instances beyond management’s control. Future margins will continue to vary based on these and other market factors. If conditions in the real estate markets do not improve or deteriorate further, we may not be able to sell land at prices above our carrying cost or even in amounts necessary to repay our indebtedness.
          The value of acres subject to third party sales contracts decreased $78.5 million from March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. There was no backlog at March 31, 2009. While the backlog is not an exclusive indicator of future sales activity, it provides an indication of potential future sales activity.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008
          Our total assets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $524.1 million and $559.3 million, respectively. The change in total assets primarily resulted from:
    a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $30.7 million, primarily related to cash used in operations and approximately $25.0 million was used for the investment in timed deposits;
 
    a decrease in restricted cash of $12.7 million associated with the settlement payment made in connection with the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons; and
 
    a net decrease in our investment in Bluegreen of $13.2 million mainly related to an other-than-temporary impairment charge recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, offset in part by an increase in our equity in earnings from Bluegreen.
          Total liabilities at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $384.8 million and $439.7 million, respectively. The change in total liabilities primarily resulted from:
    a net decrease in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities of approximately $1.5 million primarily attributable to the timing of payments to our vendors; and
 
    a decrease of $52.9 million associated with the reversal into income of the loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons as a result of the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the Levitt and Sons’ bankruptcy plan.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
          Management assesses our liquidity in terms of our cash and cash equivalent balances and our ability to generate cash to fund our operating and investment activities. We separately manage our liquidity at the Parent Company level and at the operating subsidiary level. Subsidiary operations, consisting primarily of Core Communities’ operations, are generally financed using proceeds from sales of real estate inventory and debt financing using land or other developed assets as loan collateral. Many of the financing agreements contain covenants at the subsidiary level. Parent Company guarantees are provided only in limited circumstances and, when provided, are generally provided on a limited basis. We may use available cash and our borrowing capacity to pursue development of our master-planned communities or to pursue investments generally. We are also exploring possible ways to monetize a portion of our investment in certain of Core’s assets through joint ventures or other strategic relationships, including the possible sale of such assets. We have historically utilized community development districts to fund development costs at Core when possible. We also will use available cash to repay borrowings and to pay operating expenses.

67


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
          We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with anticipated cash flows from operations and other sources of funds, which may include proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or investments, will provide for our anticipated near-term liquidity needs. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through the means described above, as well as long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, and future issuances of equity and/or debt securities.
Woodbridge (Parent Company level)
          As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had cash and short-term certificates of deposits, of $104.1 million and $107.3 million, respectively. Our cash decreased by $3.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to general and administrative expenses and debt service costs.
          At November 9, 2007, the date of the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons, Woodbridge had a negative investment in Levitt and Sons of $123.0 million and there were outstanding advances due to Woodbridge from Levitt and Sons of $67.8 million, resulting in a net negative investment of $55.2 million. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company identified approximately $2.3 million of deferred revenue on intercompany sales between Core and Carolina Oak that had been misclassified against the negative investment in Levitt and Sons. As a result, the Company recorded a $2.3 million reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008 between inventory of real estate and the loss in excess of investment in subsidiary in the consolidated statements of financial condition. As a result, as of December 31, 2008, the net negative investment was $52.9 million. After the filing of the Levitt and Sons’ bankruptcy, Woodbridge incurred certain administrative costs relating to services performed for Levitt and Sons and its employees (the “Post Petition Services”). Woodbridge did not incur Post Petition Services in the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to approximately $987,000 incurred in the same period in 2008.
          On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Joint Committee”) appointed in the Chapter 11 Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things, (i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors’ bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment, (ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its administrative expense claims through July 2008, and (iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its affiliates. After certain of Levitt and Sons’ creditors indicated that they objected to the terms of the Settlement Agreement and stated a desire to pursue claims against Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the Debtors and the Joint Committee entered into an amendment to the Settlement Agreement, pursuant to which Woodbridge would, in lieu of the $12.5 million payment previously agreed to, pay $8 million to the Debtors’ bankruptcy estates and place $4.5 million in a release fund to be disbursed to third party creditors in exchange for a third party release and injunction. The amendment also provided for an additional $300,000 payment by Woodbridge to a deposit holders fund. The Settlement Agreement, as amended, was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint Committee. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as amended. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Court’s order was timely filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time, payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, as amended. Under cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as amended) was recognized into income in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary.
Core Communities
          At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Core had cash and cash equivalents of $14.6 million and $16.9 million, respectively. Cash decreased $2.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily as a result of cash used to fund the continued development of Core’s projects as well as selling, general and administrative expenses. At March 31, 2009, Core had no immediate availability under its various lines of credit. Core has made efforts to minimize its development expenditures in both Tradition, Florida and in Tradition Hilton Head; however, Core continues to incur expenses related to the development of these communities, particularly at Tradition Hilton Head, which is in the early stage of the master-planned community’s development cycle to develop the community infrastructure.

68


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
          Core’s loan agreements generally require repayment of specified amounts upon a sale of a portion of the property collateralizing the debt. The loans which provide the primary financing for Tradition, Florida and Tradition Hilton Head have annual appraisal and re-margining requirements. These provisions may require Core, in circumstances where the value of the real estate collateralizing these loans declines, to pay down a portion of the principal amount of the loan to bring the loan within specified minimum loan-to-value ratios. Accordingly, should land prices decline, reappraisals could result in significant future re-margining payments. Additionally, the loans which provide the primary financing for the commercial leasing projects contain certain debt service coverage ratio covenants. If net operating income from these projects falls below levels necessary to maintain compliance with these covenants, Core would be required to make principal curtailment payments sufficient to reduce the loan balance to an amount which would bring Core into compliance with the requirement, and these curtailment payments could be significant.
          In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that it had received an external appraisal on the land that serves as collateral for a development mortgage note payable, which had an outstanding balance of $86.7 million at March 31, 2009. The appraised value would suggest the potential for a re-margining payment to bring the note payable back in line with the minimum loan-to-value requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review procedures, including the determination of the appraised value. As of the date of this filing, the lender’s evaluation is continuing and, accordingly, although it is likely that a re-margining payment will be required, the amount of such payment is not currently determinable.
          Core has a credit agreement with a financial institution which provides for borrowings of up to $64.3 million. This facility matures in June 2009 and has two one-year extension options. The loan agreement requires that Core provide at least 30 days notice prior to the initial maturity of its election to exercise the one-year option period. Throughout the extension period, the collateral must generate a debt service coverage ratio of 1.20:1, otherwise Core would be required to re-margin the loan. While Core does not currently anticipate it will meet the debt service coverage ratio requirement, Core is in discussions with its lender regarding this credit agreement. Under the terms of the loan, Core can make a re-margining payment, if necessary, from current cash reserves, and the loan will be extended automatically. . As part of its discussions with the lender, Core is seeking to achieve the extension by restructuring the loan absent a re-margining payment. However, there can be no assurance that Core will be successful in doing so.
          All of Core’s debt facilities contain financial covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and loan to value ratios. Further, certain of Core’s debt facilities contain cross-default provisions under which a default on one loan with a lender could cause a default on other debt instruments with the same lender. If Core fails to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants, the lenders under the applicable debt facilities could cause Core’s debt to become due and payable prior to maturity. These accelerations or significant re-margining payments could require Core to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash to pay its debt and reduce its ability to use its cash to fund its operations. If Core does not have sufficient cash to satisfy these required payments, then Core would need to seek to refinance the debt or obtain alternative funds, which may not be available on attractive terms, if at all. In the event that Core is unable to refinance its debt or obtain additional funds, it may default on some or all of its existing debt facilities.
          Core’s operations have been negatively impacted by the downturn in the residential and commercial real-estate industries. Market conditions have adversely affected Core’s commercial leasing projects and its ability to complete sales, and Core is currently experiencing cash flow deficits. Possible liquidity sources available to Core include the sale of real estate inventory, including commercial properties, debt or outside equity financing, including secured borrowings using unencumbered land; however, there is no assurance that any or all of these alternatives will be available to Core on attractive terms, if at all, or that Core will otherwise be in a position to utilize such alternatives to improve its cash position. In addition, while funding from Woodbridge is a possible source of liquidity, Woodbridge is under no obligation to provide funding to Core and there can be no assurance that it will do so.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
     In connection with the development of certain of Core’s projects, community development, special assessment or improvement districts have been established and may utilize tax-exempt bond financing to fund

69


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
construction or acquisition of certain on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements near or at these communities. If these improvement districts were not established, Core would need to fund community infrastructure development out of operating cash flow or through sources of financing or capital, or be forced to delay its development activity. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and the associated priority lien on the property are typically payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments levied on the property benefited. Core pays a portion of the revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the districts on the properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements. Core may also be required to pay down a specified portion of the bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The costs of these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the development period and recognized as cost of sales when the properties are sold.
          Core’s bond financing at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of district bonds totaling $218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding amounts of approximately $143.8 million and $130.5 million, respectively. Further, at March 31, 2009, there was approximately $69.2 million available under these bonds to fund future development expenditures. Bond obligations at March 31, 2009 mature in 2035 and 2040. As of March 31, 2009, Core owned approximately 16% of the property subject to assessments within the community development district and approximately 91% of the property subject to assessments within the special assessment district. During the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately $159,000 and $105,000, respectively, in assessments on property owned by it in the districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts until the underlying property is sold and will continue to be responsible for the annual assessments if the property is never sold. In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for assessments under the district bonds in Tradition, Florida which would require funding if future assessments to be allocated to property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds. Management has evaluated this exposure based upon the criteria in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies", and has determined that there have been no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in the development subject to the bond which would make it probable that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.
          In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 91-10, “Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment Financing”, the Company records a liability for the estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At each of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the liability related to developer obligations associated with Core’s ownership of the property was $3.3 million. This liability is included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition as of March 31, 2009.
          The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                                         
            Payments due by period  
            Less than     2 - 3     4 - 5     More than  
Category   Total     1 year     Years     Years     5 years  
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
  $ 349,542       3,836       221,789       2,536       121,381  
Operating lease obligations
    3,402       1,140       853       389       1,020  
 
                             
Total obligations
  $ 352,944       4,976       222,642       2,925       122,401  
 
                             
 
(1)   Amounts exclude interest because terms of repayment are based on construction activity and sales volume. In addition, a large portion of the debt is based on variable rates.
 
(2)   These amounts represent scheduled principal payments. Some of those borrowings require the repayment of specified amounts upon a sale of portions of the property collateralizing those obligations, as well as curtailment repayments prior to scheduled maturity pursuant to re-margining and minimum sales requirements.
          Long-term debt obligations consist of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable. Operating lease obligations consist of lease commitments. In addition to the above contractual obligations, we have $2.4 million in unrecognized tax benefits related to FASB Interpretation No. 48 - "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB No. 109” (“FIN No. 48”). FIN No. 48 provides guidance for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.

70


Table of Contents

Real Estate Development
(Woodbridge
)
          At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had outstanding surety bonds of approximately $8.1 million and $8.2 million, respectively, which were related primarily to obligations to various governmental entities to construct improvements in our various communities. We estimate that approximately $4.8 million of work remains to complete these improvements and do not believe that any outstanding surety bonds will likely be drawn upon.
          Levitt and Sons had $33.3 million in surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at the time of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $11.7 million plus costs and expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At each of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $1.1 million in surety bonds accrual at Woodbridge related to certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge performed under its indemnity agreements and reimbursed the surety approximately $37,000 and $165,000, respectively. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is no assurance that Woodbridge will not be responsible for amounts in excess of the $1.1 million accrual. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post $5.4 million of collateral against a portion of the $11.7 million surety bonds exposure in connection with demands made by a municipality. We believe that the municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the bonds and we initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. We do not believe a loss is probable and accordingly have not accrued any amount related to this claim. However, based on claims made on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0 million letter of credit as security while the matter is litigated with the municipality, and we have complied with that request.
          On November 9, 2007, Woodbridge put in place an employee fund and offered up to $5 million of severance benefits to terminated Levitt and Sons employees to supplement the limited termination benefits paid by Levitt and Sons to those employees. Levitt and Sons was restricted in the payment of termination benefits to its former employees by virtue of the Chapter 11 Cases. Woodbridge incurred severance and benefits related restructuring charges of approximately $89,000 and $1.2 million during the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge paid approximately $132,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, in severance and termination charges related to the above described fund as well as severance for employees other than Levitt and Sons employees. Employees entitled to participate in the fund either received a payment stream, which in certain cases extends over two years, or a lump sum payment, dependent on a variety of factors. Former Levitt and Sons’ employees who received these payments were required to assign to Woodbridge their unsecured claims against Levitt and Sons. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $86,000 and $129,000, respectively, was accrued to be paid.

71


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
          The discussion contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 under Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” provides quantitative and qualitative disclosures about the Company’s primary market risks which are interest rate and equity pricing risks.
BFC
          Market risk is defined as the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market valuations that arise from interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and equity price risk. BFC’s primary market risk is equity price risk.
          Because BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, a significant change in the market price of their stock would not directly impact the Company’s financial results, but would likely have an effect on the market price of our common stock. The market price of BFC’s common stock and the market prices of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge’s common stock are important to the valuation and financing capability of BFC. BFC also owns 800,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock for which no market is available. The ability to realize or liquidate this investment will depend on future market and economic conditions and the ability to register the shares of Benihana’s Common Stock acquired by BFC in the event it converts its shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred stock, all of which are subject to significant risk. At March 31, 2009, the closing price of Benihana’s Common Stock was $2.53 per share. The market value of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock if converted at March 31, 2009 would have been approximately $4.0 million.
          During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company performed an impairment review of its investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock to determine if an impairment adjustment was needed. Based on the evaluation and the review of various qualitative and quantitative factors, including the decline in the underlying trading value of Benihana’s Common Stock and the redemption provisions of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company determined that there was an other-than-temporary decline of approximately $3.6 million and, accordingly, the investment was written down to its fair value of approximately $16.4 million. At March 31, 2009, the Company performed an impairment review and determined that there was no other-than-temporary decline in the Company’s investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock. BFC will continue to monitor this investment in accordance with FSP FAS 115-1/124-1 to determine whether any further other-than-temporary impairment associated with this investment may be required in future periods. On May 6, 2009, the closing price of Benihana’s Common Stock was $6.06 per share. See Note 8 for additional information.
BankAtlantic Bancorp
          The majority of BankAtlantic’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, the earnings and growth of BankAtlantic are significantly affected by interest rates, which are subject to the influence of economic conditions generally, both domestic and foreign, and also to the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board. The nature and timing of any changes in such policies or general economic conditions and their effect on BankAtlantic are unpredictable. Changes in interest rates can impact BankAtlantic’s net interest income as well as the valuation of its assets and liabilities. BankAtlantic’s interest rate risk position did not significantly change during the three months ended March 31, 2009. For a discussion on the effect of changing interest rates on BankAtlantic’s earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2009, see Item 2. in Financial Services “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Net Interest Income.”
Woodbridge
          Woodbridge has a risk of loss associated with its borrowings as Woodbridge is subject to interest rate risk on its long-term debt. At March 31, 2009, Woodbridge had $244.2 million in borrowings with adjustable rates tied to the Prime Rate and/or LIBOR rate and $105.3 million in borrowings with fixed or initially-fixed rates. Consequently, the impact on Woodbridge’s variable rate debt from changes in interest rates may affect its earnings and cash flow but would generally not impact the fair value of such debt except to the extent of changes in credit spreads. With respect to fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value of the debt but not Woodbridge’s earnings or cash flow.

72


Table of Contents

          Assuming the variable rate debt balance of $244.2 million outstanding at March 31, 2009 (which does not include initially fixed-rate obligations which do not become floating rate during 2009) was to remain constant, each one percentage point increase in interest rates would increase the interest incurred by Woodbridge by approximately $2.4 million per year.
          Woodbridge is subject to equity pricing risks associated with its investments in Bluegreen and Office Depot. The value of these securities will vary based on the results of operations and financial condition of these investments, the general liquidity of Bluegreen and Office Depot common stock and general equity market conditions. The trading market for Bluegreen and Office Depot common stock may not be liquid enough to permit Woodbridge to sell the shares of such stock that it owns without significantly reducing the market price of the shares, if Woodbridge is able to sell them at all.

73


Table of Contents

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

74


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There have been no material developments in our legal proceedings from those disclosed in the “Legal Proceedings” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risks and uncertainties that we face from those disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 6. Exhibits
     
Exhibit 31.1 *
  Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 31.2 *
  Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 31.3 *
  Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 32.1 **
  Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 32.2 **
  Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 32.3 **
  Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
*   Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q
 
**   Exhibits furnished with this Form 10-Q

75


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
 
Date: May 14, 2009  By:   /s/ Alan B. Levan    
    Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer   
       
 
     
Date: May 14, 2009  By:   /s/ John K. Grelle    
    John K. Grelle, Chief Financial Officer   
       
 
     
Date: May 14, 2009  By:   /s/ Maria R. Scheker    
    Maria R. Scheker, Chief Accounting Officer