e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-13305
PARALLEL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-1971716 |
|
|
|
State of other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1004 N. Big Spring, Suite 400,
Midland, Texas
|
|
79701 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(432) 684-3727
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At
May 1, 2008, 41,375,731 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENT
PARALLEL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,757 |
|
|
$ |
7,816 |
|
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas sales |
|
|
28,149 |
|
|
|
20,499 |
|
Joint interest owners and other, net of allowance
for doubtful account of $50 |
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
Affiliates and joint ventures |
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,901 |
|
|
|
26,929 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
12,209 |
|
|
|
10,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
55,034 |
|
|
|
45,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties, full cost method (including
$101,746 and $86,402 not
subject to depletion) |
|
|
688,976 |
|
|
|
648,576 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
2,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691,905 |
|
|
|
651,453 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(154,752 |
) |
|
|
(145,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
537,153 |
|
|
|
505,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Investment in pipelines and gathering system ventures |
|
|
8,701 |
|
|
|
8,638 |
|
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,565 and $1,425 |
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
603,619 |
|
|
$ |
563,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
53,661 |
|
|
$ |
47,848 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
Derivative obligations |
|
|
35,912 |
|
|
|
30,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
90,234 |
|
|
|
78,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Senior notes (principal amount $150,000) |
|
|
145,505 |
|
|
|
145,383 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
Derivative obligations |
|
|
21,159 |
|
|
|
13,194 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
26,163 |
|
|
|
26,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
279,968 |
|
|
|
248,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred stock par value $0.10 per share, authorized
50,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock par value $0.01 per share, authorized
60,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 41,320,215 and 41,252,644 |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
197,351 |
|
|
|
196,457 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
35,653 |
|
|
|
38,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
233,417 |
|
|
|
235,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
603,619 |
|
|
$ |
563,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements
(1)
PARALLEL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Oil and natural gas revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas sales |
|
$ |
43,941 |
|
|
$ |
23,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
6,979 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
6,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
21,188 |
|
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
22,753 |
|
|
|
8,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on derivatives not classified as hedges |
|
|
(21,886 |
) |
|
|
(4,435 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,518 |
) |
|
|
(3,708 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Equity in gain (loss) of pipelines and gathering system ventures |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net |
|
|
(27,154 |
) |
|
|
(8,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(4,401 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
Income tax benefit, deferred |
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,740 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
41,273 |
|
|
|
37,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
41,273 |
|
|
|
37,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
PARALLEL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(unaudited)
( dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,740 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
6,709 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Accretion of senior notes discount |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Loss on derivatives not classified as hedges |
|
|
21,886 |
|
|
|
4,435 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Equity in (gain) loss in pipelines and gathering system ventures |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
274 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(7,972 |
) |
|
|
4,537 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
6,194 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
25,526 |
|
|
|
17,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to oil and natural gas properties |
|
|
(39,718 |
) |
|
|
(44,584 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of oil and natural gas properties |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Settlements of derivative instruments |
|
|
(8,282 |
) |
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
Net investment in pipelines and gathering system ventures |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(1,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(47,880 |
) |
|
|
(48,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings from bank line of credit |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
22,295 |
|
|
|
38,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
8,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
7,816 |
|
|
|
5,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
7,757 |
|
|
$ |
13,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing and investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
782 |
|
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
Non-cash exchange of oil and natural gas properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties received in exchange |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,463 |
|
Properties delivered in exchange |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,495 |
) |
Other transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
9,076 |
|
|
$ |
3,875 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)
PARALLEL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
Parallel was incorporated in Texas on November 26, 1979, and reincorporated in the State of
Delaware on December 18, 1984.
Parallel Petroleum Corporation, or Parallel, is engaged in the acquisition, development and
exploitation of long-lived oil and natural gas reserves and, to a lesser extent, the exploring for
new oil and natural gas reserves. The majority of our current producing properties are in the:
|
|
|
Permian Basin of west Texas and New Mexico; |
|
|
|
|
Fort Worth Basin of north Texas; and |
The financial information included herein is unaudited. The balance sheet as of December 31,
2007 has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2007.
The unaudited financial information includes all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring
adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the
results of operations for the interim periods. The results of operations for the interim period are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for an entire year.
Certain information, accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been condensed or omitted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to certain rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to we,
us, our, Parallel, or Company mean the registrant, Parallel Petroleum Corporation and,
where applicable, its former consolidated subsidiaries.
NOTE 2. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Options
We account for our stock-based compensation in accordance with the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)).
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we recognized compensation expense of
approximately $82,000 and $92,000, respectively, with an estimated tax benefit of approximately
$28,000 and $31,500, respectively, associated with our stock option grants.
(4)
The following table presents future stock-based compensation expense expected to be recognized
over the vesting period of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Second quarter 2008 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
Third quarter 2008 |
|
|
50 |
|
Fourth quarter 2008 |
|
|
39 |
|
2009 |
|
|
93 |
|
2010 |
|
|
29 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
268 |
|
Vested options to purchase 368,679 shares of common stock were outstanding and non-vested
options outstanding were 121,250 as of March 31, 2008. During the three months ended March 31,
2008, options to purchase 67,571 shares of common stock were exercised. No options expired or were
forfeited.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant. The fair values of
stock options granted prior to and remaining outstanding at March 31, 2008 and that had option
shares subject to future vesting at that date were determined using the Black-Scholes option
valuation method and the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based
on historical volatility of the stock. The expected term of the options granted used in the model
represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2005 |
|
2001 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
52.52 |
% |
|
|
54.20 |
% |
|
|
57.95 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Risk-free rate |
|
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
5.05 |
% |
A summary of the option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008 is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Outstanding December 31, 2007 |
|
|
558 |
|
|
$ |
7.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
4.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrendered |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding March 31, 2008 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
5,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
369 |
|
|
$ |
5.99 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
5,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Intrinsic Value of Options Exercised Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
Intrinsic Value of Options Exercised Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market Value of Options Granted Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair Market Value of Options Granted Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
We have outstanding stock options granted under five separate plans. Generally, these options
expire 10 years from the date of grant and become exercisable at rates ranging from 10% each year
up to 50% each year. The exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value per share of
common stock on the date of grant.
NOTE 3. CREDIT FACILITIES
In the past, we have maintained two separate credit facilities. One of these credit facilities
is our Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended, or Revolving Credit Agreement,
with a group of bank lenders that provide us with a revolving line of credit having a borrowing
base limitation of $200.0 million at March 31, 2008. The total amount that we can borrow and have
outstanding at any one time is limited to the lesser of $350.0 million or the borrowing base
established by the lenders. At March 31, 2008, the principal amount outstanding under our revolving
credit facility was $82.0 million, excluding $445,000 reserved for our letters of credit. Our
second credit facility, which was terminated in July 2007, was a five year term loan facility
provided to us under a Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, or the Second Lien Agreement, with a
group of banks and other lenders. The Second Lien Agreement was paid off and terminated on July 31,
2007 with our payment to the lenders of $50.2 million, including interest. This payment was made
with proceeds from our sale of unsecured senior notes in the principal amount of $150.0 million
that we completed on July 31, 2007.
Revolving Credit Facility
The Revolving Credit Agreement allows us to borrow, repay and reborrow amounts available under
the revolving credit facility. The amount of the borrowing base is based primarily upon the
estimated value of our oil and natural gas reserves. The borrowing base amount is redetermined by
the lenders semi-annually on or about April 1 and October 1 of each year or at other times required
by the lenders or at our request. If, as a result of the lenders redetermination of the borrowing
base, the outstanding principal amount of our loans exceeds the borrowing base, we must either
provide additional collateral to the lenders or repay the outstanding principal of our revolving
credit facility in an amount equal to the excess. Except for the principal payments that may be
required because of our outstanding loans being in excess of the borrowing base, interest only is
payable.
Loans made to us under this revolving credit facility bear interest at the banks base rate or
the LIBOR rate, at our election. Generally, the banks base rate
is equal to its prime rate
announced from time to time.
The LIBOR rate is generally equal to the sum of (a) the rate designated as British Bankers
Association Interest Settlement Rates and offered in one, two, three, six or twelve month interest
periods for deposits of $1.0 million, and (b) a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50%, depending upon
the outstanding principal amount of our loan. If the principal amount outstanding is equal to or
greater than 75% of the borrowing base, the margin is 2.50%. If the principal amount outstanding is
equal to or greater than 50%, but less than 75% of the borrowing base, the margin is 2.25%. If the
principal amount outstanding is less than 50% of the borrowing base, the margin is 2.00%.
(6)
The interest rate we are required to pay on our borrowings, including the applicable margin,
may never be less than 5.00%. At March 31, 2008, our weighted average base rate and LIBOR rate,
plus the applicable margin, was 6.41% on $82.0 million, the outstanding principal amount of our
revolving loan on that same date.
In the case of base rate loans, interest is payable on the last day of each month. In the case
of LIBOR loans, interest is payable on the last day of each applicable interest period.
If the total outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility are less than the
borrowing base, we are required to pay an unused commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal
to .25% of the daily average of the unadvanced portion of the borrowing base. The fee is payable
quarterly.
If the borrowing base is increased, we are also required to pay a fee of .375% on the amount
of any such increase.
The Revolving Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants, including (i)
maintenance of a minimum current ratio, (ii) maintenance of a maximum ratio of funded indebtedness
to earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, (iii)
maintenance of a minimum net worth, (iv) prohibition of payment of dividends and (v) restrictions
on incurrence of additional debt. We have pledged substantially all of our producing oil and
natural gas properties to secure the repayment of our indebtedness under the Revolving Credit
Agreement.
All outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest under the revolving credit facility
is due and payable on October 31, 2010. The maturity date of our outstanding loans may be
accelerated by the lenders upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Revolving Credit
Agreement.
As of March 31, 2008 we were in compliance with all of the covenants in our Revolving Credit
Agreement.
Senior Notes
On July 31, 2007, we completed a private offering of unsecured senior notes, or the senior
notes in the principal amount of $150.0 million. The senior notes mature on August 1, 2014 and
bear interest at 10.25% which is payable semi-annually beginning on
February 1, 2008. Prior to August 1, 2010, we may redeem up to 35% of the senior notes for a price equal to
110.250% of the original principal amount of the senior notes with the proceeds of certain equity
offerings. On or after August 1, 2011 we may redeem all or some of the senior notes at a redemption
price that will decrease from 105.125% of the principal amount of the senior notes to 100% of the
principal amount on August 1, 2013. In addition, prior to August 1, 2011, we may redeem some or all
of the senior notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes
to be redeemed, plus a make-whole premium, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Generally, the
make-whole premium is an amount equal to the greater of (a) 1% of the principal amount of the
senior notes being redeemed and (b) the excess of the present value of the redemption price of such
notes as of August 1, 2011 plus all required interest payments due through August 1, 2011 (computed
at a discount rate equal to a specified U.S. Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points), over the
principal amount of the senior notes being redeemed.
The indenture governing the senior notes restricts our ability to: (i) borrow money; (ii)
issue redeemable and preferred stock; (iii) pay distributions or dividends; (iv) make investments;
(v) create liens without securing the senior notes; (vi) enter into agreements that restrict
dividends from subsidiaries; (vii) sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies;
(viii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (ix) guarantee indebtedness; and (x) enter into new
lines of business.
(7)
Interest Accrued
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the aggregate interest accrued under our revolving
credit facility and our senior notes was approximately $5.2 million. Of this amount, approximately
$25,000 was capitalized.
NOTE 4. PROPERTY EXCHANGE
On February 23, 2007, we entered into a property exchange agreement with an unrelated third
party. As a result of the exchange, we acquired an additional 9,233 net undeveloped acres in our
New Mexico Wolfcamp project area with an estimated fair value of approximately $6.5 million. We are
the operator of wells drilled on this undeveloped acreage. Under the terms of the exchange
agreement, we assigned to the third party interests in 37 non-operated wells and 3,250 net
undeveloped non-operated acres in the New Mexico Wolfcamp project area, along with cash of
approximately $969,000. In accordance with the full cost method of accounting, no gain or loss was
recorded on the transaction.
NOTE 5. FULL COST METHOD OF ACCOUNTING
We use the full cost method to account for our oil and natural gas producing activities. Under
the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and natural gas properties, less
related deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated ceiling. The ceiling limitation is the
discounted estimated after-tax future net cash flows from proved oil and natural gas properties.
The net book value of oil and natural gas properties, less related deferred income taxes over the
ceiling, is compared to the ceiling on a quarterly and annual basis. Any excess of the net book
value, less related deferred income taxes, is generally written off as an expense. Under rules and
regulations of the SEC, the excess above the ceiling is not written off if, subsequent to the end
of the quarter or year but prior to the release of the financial results, prices have increased
sufficiently that such excess above the ceiling would not have existed if the increased prices were
used in the calculations.
Under the full cost method of accounting, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration
and development of oil and natural gas properties, including a portion of our overhead, are
capitalized. In the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, overhead costs capitalized
were approximately $380,000 and $318,000, respectively.
NOTE 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
General
We enter into derivative contracts to provide a measure of stability in the cash flows
associated with our oil and natural gas production and interest rate payments and to manage
exposure to commodity price and interest rate risk. Our objective is to lock in a range of oil and
natural gas prices and to limit variability in our cash interest payments. In addition, our
revolving credit facility requires us to maintain derivative financial instruments which limit our
exposure to fluctuating commodity prices covering at least 50% of our estimated monthly production
of oil and natural gas extending 24 months into the future.
Derivative contracts not designated as hedges are marked-to-market at each period end and
the increases or decreases in fair values recorded to earnings.
We are exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to these
contracts, BNP Paribas and Citibank, N.A. However, we periodically assess the creditworthiness of
the counterparty to mitigate this credit risk.
(8)
Adoption of SFAS No. 157
We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, effective January 1, 2008 for all
financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 provides standards and disclosures for assets and
liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No.
157-2, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 by one year for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities. Beginning January 1, 2009, we will apply SFAS 157 fair value requirements to
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed on a
recurring basis. As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date (exit price). SFAS No. 157 requires disclosure that establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement
requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:
|
Level 1: |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. We consider
active markets as those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. |
|
|
Level 2: |
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are
observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
asset or liability. This category includes those derivative instruments that we value
using observable market data. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the
marketplace throughout the full term of the derivative instrument, can be derived
from observable data, or supported by observable levels at which transactions are
executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category include non-exchange traded
derivatives such as over-the-counter commodity price swaps and interest rate swaps. |
|
|
Level 3: |
|
Measured based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that
are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective
sources (i.e., supported by little or no market activity). Our valuation models are
primarily industry-standard models that consider various inputs including: (a) quoted
forward prices for commodities, (b) time value, (c) volatility factors and (d)
current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as
other relevant economic measures. Level 3 instruments primarily include derivative
instruments, such as commodity price collars. Although we review our counterpartys
valuation and assess the reasonableness of our prices and valuation techniques, we do
not have sufficient corroborating market evidence to support classifying these assets
and liabilities as Level 2. |
As required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect
the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value
hierarchy levels. The following
(9)
table summarizes the valuation of our derivative financial instruments by SFAS No. 157 pricing
levels as of March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Other Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Interest Swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,076 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,076 |
) |
Oil Swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(21,606 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(21,606 |
) |
Oil & Gas Collars |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(31,389 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(25,682 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,389 |
) |
|
$ |
(57,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of the fair values above incorporates various factors required under SFAS
No. 157. These factors include not only the impact of our nonperformance risk on our liabilities
but also the credit standing of the counterparties involved.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial
assets and liabilities classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Collars |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
(15,852 |
) |
Total gains or (losses) |
|
$ |
(16,746 |
) |
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
Transfers in and/or out of level 3 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(31,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to derivativess still held as of March 31, 2008(1) |
|
$ |
(15,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the
three months ending March 31, 2008 are reported in Other Income on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. |
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We have employed fixed interest rate swap contracts with BNP Paribas and Citibank, N.A. based
on the 90-day LIBOR rates at the time of the contracts. These contracts are accounted for by mark
to market accounting as prescribed in SFAS 133. We view these contracts as protection against
future interest rate volatility. As of March 31, 2008, the fair market value of these interest rate
swaps was a liability of approximately $4.1 million.
(10)
The table below recaps the nature of these interest rate swaps and the fair market value of
these contracts as of March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Estimated |
|
Period of Time |
|
Amounts |
|
|
Fixed Interest Rates |
|
|
Fair Market Value |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,932 |
) |
January 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
(1,331 |
) |
January 1, 2010 thru October 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Price Sensitivity
All of our commodity derivatives are accounted for using mark-to-market accounting as
prescribed in SFAS 133.
Collars.
Collars are contracts which combine both a put option or floor and a call option or
ceiling. These contracts may or may not involve payment or receipt of cash at inception,
depending on the ceiling and floor pricing.
A summary of our collar positions at March 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Barrles of |
|
NYMEX Oil Prices |
|
Fair Market |
Period of Time |
|
Oil |
|
Floor |
|
Cap |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008
|
|
|
261,250 |
|
|
$ |
63.42 |
|
|
$ |
83.86 |
|
|
|
|
$ (5,003) |
January 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009
|
|
|
620,500 |
|
|
$ |
63.53 |
|
|
$ |
80.21 |
|
|
|
|
(12,808) |
January 1, 2010 thru October 31, 2010
|
|
|
486,400 |
|
|
$ |
63.44 |
|
|
$ |
78.26 |
|
|
|
|
(9,155) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMBtu of |
|
|
WAHA Gas Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Floor |
|
|
Cap |
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.38 |
|
|
$ |
9.28 |
|
|
|
(2,622 |
) |
January 1, 2009 thr December 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,285,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.06 |
|
|
$ |
9.93 |
|
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(31,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
Swaps. Generally, swaps are an agreement to buy or sell a specified commodity for
delivery in the future, at an agreed fixed price. Swap transactions convert a floating or market
price into a fixed price. For any particular swap transaction, the counterparty is required to make
a payment to the Company if the reference price for any settlement period is less than the swap or
fixed price for such contract, and the Company is required to make a payment to the counterparty if
the reference price for any settlement period is greater than the swap or fixed price for such
contract.
(11)
We have entered into oil swap contracts with BNP Paribas. A recap for the period of time,
number of barrels, weighted average swap prices and fair value of the contracts as of March 31,
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Oil |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
Period of Time |
|
Barrels of Oil |
|
|
Swap Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008 |
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
$ |
33.37 |
|
|
$ |
(21,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair market value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(21,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7. NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes any dilutive effects of options and warrants and is
computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed similar to basic
earnings per share; however, diluted earnings per share reflect the assumed conversion of all
potentially dilutive securities.
The following table provides the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic EPS Computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,740 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
41,273 |
|
|
|
37,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,740 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
41,273 |
|
|
|
37,547 |
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings
per share assuming conversion |
|
|
41,273 |
|
|
|
37,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the effects of all potentially dilutive
securities (including options and warrants) were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings
per share because we had a net loss from continuing operations in both quarters and therefore, the
effect would have been antidilutive. Approximately 482,000 and 750,000 options and warrants
were excluded
(12)
from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively, because the inclusion would have resulted in antidilution.
NOTE 8. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our asset retirement obligation transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Beginning asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
4,93 |
|
|
$ |
5,063 |
|
Additions related to new properties |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Revisions in estimated cash flows |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
Deletions related to property disposals |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
|
$ |
5,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9. RECENTLY ANNOUNCED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
statement does not require any new fair value measurements but may require some entities to change
their measurement practices. We adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 and the adoption did
not have a significant effect on our financial position or operating results.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (FAS 159) which became
effective on January 1, 2008. FAS 159 permits entities to measure eligible financial assets,
financial liabilities and firm commitments at fair value, on an instrument-by-instrument basis,
that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other generally accepted
accounting principles. The fair value measurement election is irrevocable and subsequent changes in
fair value must be recorded in earnings. We adopted this statement during the first quarter of 2008
and it did not have any effect on our financial position or operating results.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The statement also establishes
disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for acquisitions that occur in an entitys fiscal
year that begins after December 15, 2008, which will be our fiscal year 2009. The impact, if any,
will depend on the nature and size of business combinations that we consummate after the effective
date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires that accounting
and reporting for minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a
(13)
component of equity. SFAS 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient
disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the
interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated
financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that
have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a
subsidiary. This statement is effective as of the beginning of our first fiscal year beginning
after December 15, 2008, which will be our fiscal year 2009. Based upon our balance sheet, the
statement would have no impact.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). This statement is intended
to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entitys
derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entitys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the
scope of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), as
well as related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must
provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is
effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating
the disclosure implications of this statement.
NOTE 10. INVESTMENT IN GAS GATHERING SYSTEM
As of March 31, 2008, we had two separate investments that were recorded as equity investments
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
As of March 31, 2008, we had invested approximately $328,000 in West Fork Pipeline Company II,
L.P. West Fork Pipeline Company II, L.P. is currently acquiring the necessary easements and permits
to begin transmission of natural gas primarily from portions of our leaseholds in the Barnett Shale
area.
As of March 31, 2008, we had a net cash investment of approximately $9.3 million in the
Hagerman Gas Gathering System (Hagerman) to construct pipelines on certain of our
leaseholds in New Mexico. The Hagerman gathering system is currently being extended to
additional productive areas. We anticipate additional investments in Hagerman during 2008
Our current investment percentage in the two ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
West Fork Pipeline Company II, L.P. |
|
|
23.25848 |
% |
Hagerman Gas Gathering System |
|
|
76.50000 |
% |
Our investment in Hagerman is accounted for by the equity method since we do not have voting
control. All significant actions taken by Hagerman must be approved by us, plus one of the two
other equity owners. Consequently, the remaining equity owners can prevent voting control by us.
At the dates indicated, our equity investments consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
West Fork Pipeline Company II, L.P. |
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
Hagerman Gas Gathering System |
|
|
8,383 |
|
|
|
8,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,701 |
|
|
$ |
8,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14)
Our income (loss) from equity investments for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
West Fork Pipeline Company II, L.P. |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Hagerman Gas Gathering System |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized combined financial information for our equity investments (described above) is
reported below. The amounts shown represent 100% of the investees financial information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Balance
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Account receivables affiliates |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
Plant and pipeline costs |
|
|
10,905 |
|
|
|
10,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,687 |
|
|
$ |
11,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Accounts payable affiliates |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
Partner capital |
|
|
11,188 |
|
|
|
11,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners equity |
|
$ |
11,687 |
|
|
$ |
11,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Income Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
611 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
(389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008 and 2007, Hagerman had accounts receivable due from joint venturers of
approximately $449,000 and $332,000, respectively, for operating and pipeline construction related
capital contributions. We advanced funds in these amounts to Hagerman to meet capital needs until
payment on account is received from the other joint venturers.
(15)
NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, we are party to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business.
On April 14, 2008, we were added as a defendant to a lawsuit filed in 2007, styled Brady
Briscoe vs. Capstar Drilling, L.P. (Capstar), (Cause No. 21,287), in the 259th District Court of
Jones County, Texas. The plaintiff alleges that as a result of Capstars negligence (and now
Parallels) he was injured while working on a drilling rig operated by Capstar on an oil well location leased by us. AIG was the workers compensation insurance carrier of the plaintiffs
employer. The plaintiff sued for an amount of actual damages of up to $15.0 million together with
pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. Capstar recently settled with the plaintiff and has (or is
soon to be) dismissed from the lawsuit. Should judgment be entered against us, we would be entitled
to a credit for the amount that the plaintiff has already received from Capstar.
Even though we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, we believe we have
meritorious defenses and intend to vigorously contest this lawsuit. We have not established a
reserve with respect to the plaintiffs claims.
On March 24, 2008, a lawsuit was filed in the 24th District Court of Jackson
County, Texas, against us and twenty-two other defendants in Cause No. 07-6-13069, styled Tony
Kubenka, Carolyn Kubenka, Dennis J. Kallus, David J. Kallus, Mary L. Kallus, Patricia Kallus, Nova
Deleon, Janie Figuerova, and Larkin Thedford, Plaintiffs v. Tri-C Resources, Inc., Marie S. Adian,
Laura E. Adian, Glenn A. Fiew, Lynn Kramer, Debra Boysen, Carol J. Gleason, Alana Sue Curlee,
Connie W. Marthiljohni, Claire E. Adian, Zachary D. Adian, Donald R. Starkweather, Inc., D.A.
Webernick, Danette Bundick, Johnny A. Webernick, Donna Gail Glover, Sherry Shulze, William H.
Webernick, Jr., TAC Resources, Inc., New Century Exploration, Inc., Allegro Investments, Inc. and
Welper Interests, LP.
The nine plaintiffs in this lawsuit have named us and the other working interest owners,
including Tri-C Resources, Inc., the operator, as defendants. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege
that they are royalty owners under oil and gas leases which are part of a pooled gas unit (the
unit) located in Jackson County, Texas, and that the defendants, including us, are owners of the
leasehold estate under the plaintiffs leases and others forming the unit. Plaintiffs also assert
that one of the leases (other than plaintiffs leases) forming part of the unit has terminated and,
as a result, the defendants have not properly computed the royalties due to plaintiffs from unit
production and have failed to properly pay royalties due to them. Plaintiffs have sued for an
unspecified amount of damages, including exemplary damages, under theories of breach of contract
(including breach of express and implied covenants of their leases) and conversion, and seek an
accounting, a declaratory judgment to declare the rights of the parties under the leases, and
attorneys fees, interest and court costs.
As a working interest owner in the leases comprising the unit, we believe our potential
liability, if any, would be proportionate to the ownership of the other working interest owners in
the leases. We intend to file an answer denying any liability on or before May 19, 2008. As of May
5, 2008 no discovery had been conducted. Even though we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this
matter, we believe we have meritorious defenses and intend to vigorously contest this lawsuit. We
have not established a reserve with respect to plaintiffs claims.
We received a Notice of Proposed Adjustment from the Internal Revenue Service, or the
Service in May 2007 advising us of proposed adjustments to federal income tax of approximately
$2.0 million for the years 2004 and 2005. Subsequent discussions with the Service placed the issues
contested in a development status. In November 2007, the Service issued a letter on the matter
giving the company
(16)
30 days to agree or disagree with a final examination report. The final examination report
reflected revisions of the previous proposed adjustments resulting in a reduced $1.1 million
of additional income tax and interest charges. The decrease in proposed tax was the result of
information supplied by Parallel to the examiner as well as discussions of the applicable tax
statutes and regulations. In December 2007, we filed a protest documenting our complete
disagreement with the adjustments proposed on the final examination report and requested a
conference with the appeals office of the Service. The examination office of the Service filed a
response to our protest in February 2008 with the appeals office. An appeals conference is
scheduled for June 2008. We intend to vigorously contest the adjustment proposed by the Service and
believe that we will ultimately prevail in our position. We have not recorded a liability for tax,
interest, or penalties related to this matter based on our analysis. If a liability for additional
income tax should later be determined to be more likely than not, we anticipate the adjustment to
increase the federal income tax liability would be offset by an increase to a deferred tax asset
and would not result in a charge to earnings. Any interest or penalties resulting from a subsequent
determination of increased tax liability would require a charge to earnings. We believe that the
effects of this matter would not have a material effect on our results of operations for the fiscal
quarter in which we actually incur or establish a reserve account for interest or penalties.
Effective January 1, 2005, we established a 401(k) Plan and Trust for eligible employees. As
of the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we had made contributions to the 401(k) Plan
and Trust of approximately $75,000 and $67,000, respectively.
NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On April 15, 2008, we announced that our registration statement relating to 300,030 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants was declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The warrants were issued in our initial public offering in
1980 as a component of the units sold by us. Pursuant to the terms of the warrants, holders of the
warrants may purchase one share of common stock for each warrant exercised. The warrants are
exercisable at $6.00 per share at any time on or before 5:00 p.m. Mountain Time, on May 15, 2008,
at which time the warrants expire.
If all the warrants are exercised, we expect to receive net proceeds from the offering of
approximately $1.65 million.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with managements
discussion and analysis contained in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as the unaudited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
Strategy
Conduct Exploitation Activities on Our Existing Assets. We seek to maximize economic return on
our existing assets by maximizing production rates and ultimate recovery, while managing
operational efficiency to minimize direct lifting costs. Development and production growth
activities include infill and extension drilling of new wells, re-completion, pay adds and
re-stimulation of existing wells and implementation and management of enhanced oil recovery
projects such as waterflood operations. Operational efficiencies and cost reduction measures
include optimization of surface facilities, such as
(17)
fluid handling systems, gas compression or artificial lift installations. Efficiencies are also
increased through aggressive monitoring and management of electrical power consumption, injection
water quality programs, chemical and corrosion prevention programs and the use of production
surveillance equipment and software. In all instances, a proactive approach is taken to achieve the
desired result while ensuring minimal environmental impact.
Accelerate Horizontal Drilling and Fracture Stimulation Activities in Gas Resource Plays. We
believe the use of horizontal drilling and fracture stimulations has enabled us to develop reserves
economically, such as our Barnett Shale and Wolfcamp Carbonate gas projects.
Use Advanced Technologies and Production Techniques. We believe that 3-D seismic surveys,
horizontal drilling, fracture stimulation and other advanced technologies and production techniques
are useful tools that help improve normal drilling operations and enhance our production and
returns. We believe that our use of these technologies and production techniques in exploring for,
developing and exploiting oil and natural gas properties can reduce drilling risks, lower finding
costs, provide for more efficient production of oil and natural gas from our properties and
increase the probability of locating and producing reserves that might not otherwise be discovered.
Acquire Long-Lived Properties with Enhancement Opportunities. Our acquisition strategy is
focused on leveraging our geographical expertise in our core areas of operation and seeking assets
located in and around these areas. We selectively evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect
that they will continue to play a role in increasing our reserve base and future drilling
inventory. When identifying target assets, we focus primarily on reserve quality and assets in new
development plays with upside potential. Through this approach, we have traditionally targeted
smaller asset acquisitions which allow us to absorb, enhance and exploit properties without taking
on significant integration risk.
Conduct Exploratory Activities. Although we do not emphasize exploratory drilling, we will
selectively undertake exploratory projects that have known geological and reservoir characteristics
that are in close proximity to existing wells so data from the existing wells can be correlated with
seismic data on or near the prospect being evaluated, and that could have a potentially meaningful
impact on our reserves.
The extent to which we are able to implement and follow through with our business strategy
is influenced by:
|
|
|
the prices we receive for the oil and natural gas we
produce; |
|
|
|
|
the results of reprocessing and reinterpreting our 3-D
seismic data; |
|
|
|
|
the results of our drilling activities; |
|
|
|
|
the costs of obtaining high quality field services; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to find and consummate acquisition
opportunities; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to negotiate and enter into work to earn arrangements, joint
ventures or other similar arrangements on terms acceptable to us. |
Significant changes in the prices we receive for the oil and natural gas we produce, or the
occurrence of unanticipated events beyond our control, may cause us to defer or deviate from our
business strategy, including the amounts we have budgeted for our activities.
(18)
Operating Performance
Our operating performance is influenced by several factors, the most significant of which are
the prices we receive for our oil and natural gas and the quantities of oil and natural gas that we
are able to produce. The world price for oil has overall influence on the prices that we receive
for our oil production. The prices received for different grades of oil are based upon the world
price for oil, which is then adjusted based upon the particular grade. Typically, light oil is sold
at a premium, while heavy grades of crude are discounted. Natural gas prices we receive are
influenced by:
|
|
|
seasonal
demand; |
|
|
|
|
weather; |
|
|
|
|
hurricane conditions in the Gulf of
Mexico; |
|
|
|
|
availability of pipeline transportation
to end users; |
|
|
|
|
proximity of our wells to major transportation pipeline
infrastructures;
and |
|
|
|
|
to a lesser extent, world oil prices. |
Additional factors
influencing our overall operating performance include:
|
|
|
production expenses; |
|
|
|
|
overhead requirements; |
|
|
|
|
costs of capital; and |
|
|
|
|
effects of derivative contracts. |
Our oil and natural gas exploration, development and acquisition activities require
substantial and continuing capital expenditures. Historically, the sources of financing to fund our
capital expenditures have included:
|
|
|
cash flow from
operations; |
|
|
|
|
sales of our equity
and debt securities; |
|
|
|
|
bank borrowings;
and |
|
|
|
|
industry joint
ventures. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the sale price we received for our crude oil
production averaged $93.74 per barrel, compared with $84.77 per barrel for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 and $51.93 per barrel for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The average
sales price we received for natural gas for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $7.80 per
Mcf, compared with $6.68 per Mcf for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and $5.86 Mcf for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. For information regarding prices received, you should refer to the information and selected
operating data table under the caption Results of Operations on page 20.
Our oil and natural gas producing activities are accounted for using the full cost method of
accounting. Under this accounting method, we capitalize all costs incurred in connection with the
acquisition of oil and natural gas properties and the exploration for and development of oil and
natural gas reserves. These costs include lease acquisition costs, geological and geophysical
expenditures, costs of
(19)
drilling productive and non-productive wells, and overhead expenses directly related to land and
property acquisition and exploration and development activities. Proceeds from the disposition of
oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as a reduction in capitalized costs, with no gain
or loss recognized unless a disposition involves a material change in reserves, in which case the
gain or loss is recognized.
Depletion of the capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties, including estimated
future development costs, is provided using the equivalent unit-of-production method based upon
estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves and production, which are converted to a common
unit of measurement based upon their relative energy content. Unproved oil and natural gas properties
are not amortized, but are individually assessed for impairment. The cost of any impaired property
is transferred to the balance of oil and natural gas properties being depleted. Depletion per BOE
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $13.42, compared with $13.54 for the three months
ended December 31, 2007 and $12.57 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Results of Operations
Our business activities are characterized by frequent, and sometimes significant, changes in our:
|
|
|
reserve base; |
|
|
|
|
sources of production; |
|
|
|
|
product mix (gas versus oil volumes); and |
|
|
|
|
the prices we receive for our oil and natural gas production. |
Year-to-year or other periodic comparisons of the results of our operations can be difficult
and may not fully and accurately describe our condition. The following table shows selected
operating data for each of the three months ended March 31, 2008, December 31, 2007, and March 31,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
3/31/2008 |
|
|
12/31/2007 |
|
|
3/31/2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except
per unit sales price data) |
|
Production
Volumes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Natural gas (Mcf) |
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
BOE (1) |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
BOE per day |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
93.74 |
|
|
$ |
84.77 |
|
|
$ |
51.93 |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
7.80 |
|
|
$ |
6.68 |
|
|
$ |
5.86 |
|
BOE price |
|
$ |
63.60 |
|
|
$ |
58.46 |
|
|
$ |
43.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
23,169 |
|
|
$ |
21,529 |
|
|
$ |
14,211 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
20,772 |
|
|
|
14,545 |
|
|
|
8,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,941 |
|
|
$ |
36,074 |
|
|
$ |
23,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
$ |
6,979 |
|
|
$ |
5,781 |
|
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
8,435 |
|
|
|
6,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,188 |
|
|
$ |
18,742 |
|
|
$ |
14,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
22,753 |
|
|
$ |
17,332 |
|
|
$ |
8,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A BOE means one barrel of oil equivalent using the ratio of six Mcf of gas to one
barrel of oil. |
(20)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 AND 2007:
Our oil and natural gas revenues and production product mix are displayed in the following
table for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007.
Oil and Gas Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
Natural gas (Mcf) |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table outlines the detail of our operating revenues for the
indicated periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except
per unit sales price data) |
Production
Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Natural gas (Mcf) |
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
BOE |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
93.74 |
|
|
$ |
51.93 |
|
|
$ |
41.81 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
7.80 |
|
|
$ |
5.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
BOE price |
|
$ |
63.60 |
|
|
$ |
43.85 |
|
|
$ |
19.75 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
23,169 |
|
|
$ |
14,211 |
|
|
$ |
8,958 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
Natural gas |
|
|
20,772 |
|
|
|
8,905 |
|
|
|
11,867 |
|
|
|
133 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
43,941 |
|
|
$ |
23,116 |
|
|
$ |
20,825 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil revenues
Average wellhead realized crude oil prices increased $41.81 per Bbl, or 81%, to $93.74 per Bbl
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007.
This price increase resulted in increased revenues by approximately $10.3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. Oil production
decreased 10%, which was attributable to natural production declines of approximately 26,000 Bbls. This decline was
largely the result of relative development timing and unsupported primary declines in the Carm-Ann
and Diamond M Canyon Reef fields and natural declines in minor assets, to a lesser extent. This
trend is expected to reverse as development drilling programs resume in the second quarter of 2008
in the Carm-Ann, Harris and Diamond M Canyon Reef fields. Beginning in late 2007, we had begun our
development program and we expect to see increases in oil production in the future. The decrease in
oil production resulted in decreased revenue of approximately $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008.
(21)
Natural gas revenues
Average realized wellhead natural gas prices increased $1.94 per Mcf, or 33%, to $7.80 per Mcf
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. This
price increase accounted for an increase in revenue of approximately $5.2 million. Natural gas
production increased 75% primarily due to new wells in the New Mexico Wolf Camp and Barnett Shale areas
where volumes were up 443,000 Mcf and 812,000 Mcf, respectively, comparing the three months ended
March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2007. Gas production from our
south Texas area declined approximately 57,000 Mcf when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2007.
The overall increase in natural gas volumes increased revenue approximately $6.7 million for 2008.
Cost and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Lease operating expense |
|
$ |
6,979 |
|
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
$ |
2,580 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
Production taxes |
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
117 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
6,709 |
|
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,188 |
|
|
$ |
14,827 |
|
|
$ |
6,361 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
Lease operating expenses are primarily higher due to new wells being put on line. Of the $2.6
million increase, approximately $1.0 million of these expenses
are charges for lease operating expenses on wells that have
been completed late 2008 or completed in late 2007. In addition, costs for gathering,
compression and transportation increased approximately $344,000 in
the New Mexico Wolfcamp area as a result
of increased production from new wells. Workover expense in the
Fullerton, Harris and other
Permian Basin areas increased approximately $875,000 for casing repair, well stimulation and well repair.
There was also an increase of approximately $140,000 for electricity
costs in the Fullerton area. Expenses in the Barnett
Shale area increased approximately $390,000 for work on wells
compression and water disposal and approximately
$302,000 for ad valorem taxes. Lifting costs (excluding production taxes) were $10.10 per BOE for
the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to $8.34 per BOE for the same period in 2007.
Production taxes
Production
taxes increased by 117% for the three months ended March 31,
2008, as compared to
March 31, 2007. Production taxes were 5.2% of revenue in 2008 compared to 4.6% of revenue for the
same period in 2007. The increase is related to a change in product mix. Production taxes in
future periods will be a function of product mix, production volumes and product prices.
General and administrative
General
and administrative expenses decreased 4%, or $97,000, in 2008, as compared to 2007. Fees
associated with legal and accounting related services were lower by
approximately $197,000 in 2008, as compared to 2007. This was partially offset with salary expense
increases of $119,000. This increase is as a result of increase in staffing as well as salary
increases. On a BOE basis, general and administrative costs were down by 26% to $3.72 per BOE in
2008, as compared to $5.06 per BOE in 2007.
(22)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
Depreciation
depletion and amortization expense increased 39%, or
$2.6 million, for 2008, as
compared to 2007. Depletion per BOE was $13.42 for 2008 and $12.57 for 2007. This increase is
attributable to an overall increase in actual and anticipated drilling costs. Increased cost levels
affect both the depletable amounts of capitalized costs in 2008 and the depletion attributable to
amounts of estimated future development costs on proved undeveloped properties. Our drilling over
the past year and our future drilling plans are focused on our natural gas resource projects which
have higher associated per BOE drilling and development costs due to the nature of the wellbores.
These factors, when combined with the increase in the absolute level of our capital expenditures
during this time period, have led to a significant increase in our depletion rate per BOE.
Other
income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on derivatives not classified as hedges |
|
$ |
(21,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,435 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,451 |
) |
|
|
393 |
% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,518 |
) |
|
|
(3,708 |
) |
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
49 |
% |
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Equity in gain (loss) of pipelines and
gathering system ventures |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
(171 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(27,154 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,432 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,722 |
) |
|
|
222 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on derivatives not classified as hedges
We recorded a loss of $21.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 for derivatives
not classified as hedges, as compared to a loss of $4.4 million
for the same period in 2007. The
greatest impact of the change in fair market valuation was within our crude oil contracts due to
the significant increase in oil prices through March 31, 2008. We settled in cash a net of $8.3
million in derivative contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased with the increase in our outstanding debt to $232.0 million as of
March 31, 2008 from $204.0 million as of March 31, 2007. Interest expense directly related to our
$150.0 million senior notes offering in July 2007 was $3.8 million for the three months ended March
31, 2008. Our weighted average interest rate increased to 9.28% for the three months ended March
31, 2008 from 8.53% for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Equity in gain (loss) of pipelines and gathering system ventures
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, our investment in the Hagerman Gas Gathering System,
which was formed for the purpose of constructing, owning and operating a gas gathering system in
New Mexico, recorded a gain of $219,000. This is compared to a loss of $308,000 for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007. This increase in earnings of $527,000 is
the result of increased volumes
flowing through this system from period to period.
(23)
Income taxes
Income
tax benefit was $1.7 million in 2008, as compared to a benefit of $47,000 in 2007. Income
tax expense for 2008 will be dependent on our earnings and is expected to be approximately 35% of
income before income taxes.
Basic and diluted net loss
We
had basic and diluted net loss per share of $0.07 and $0.00 for three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding were approximately 41.3 million
shares for 2008 and approximately 37.5 million for 2007. The increase was primarily due to our
public offering of 3.0 million shares of common stock in December 2007 and the exercise of employee
and nonemployee stock options during 2007.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our capital resources consist primarily of cash flows from our oil and natural gas properties
and bank borrowings supported by our oil and natural gas reserves. Our level of earnings and cash
flows depends on many factors, including the prices we receive for oil and natural gas we produce.
The working capital deficit increased approximately $2.0 million as of March 31, 2008 compared
with December 31, 2007. Current liabilities exceeded current assets by approximately $35.2 million
at March 31, 2008. The working capital deficit increase was due to an increase in accounts
payable of approximately $5.8 million and an increase in current derivative obligations of
approximately $5.5 million offset by an increase in accounts receivable of approximately $8.0
million and the increase in deferred tax asset of approximately $1.9 million. .
We incurred net property costs of $39.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to $46.1 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease is primarily related to a
reduction in our drilling activity in the New Mexico Wolfcamp area. Included in our property basis
for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007 were net changes in asset retirement costs of approximately
$782,000 and $(113,000), respectively (see Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Our capital investment budget will be funded from our estimated operating cash flows and our
bank borrowings. If our cash flows and bank borrowings are not sufficient to fund all of our
estimated capital expenditures, we may fund any shortfall with proceeds from the sale of our debt
or equity securities, reduce our capital budget or effect a combination of these alternatives. The
amount and timing of our expenditures are subject to change based upon market conditions, results
of expenditures, new opportunities and other factors.
If our revenues or the borrowing base under our revolving credit facility decreases as a
result of lower oil and natural gas prices, operating difficulties, declines in reserves or for any
other reason, we may have limited ability to obtain the capital necessary to undertake or complete
future drilling projects. We may, from time to time, seek additional financing, either in the form
of increased bank borrowings, sale of debt or equity securities or other forms of financing and
there can be no assurance as to the availability of any additional financing upon terms acceptable
to us.
Stockholders equity at March 31, 2008 was $233.4 million, as compared to $235.3 million at
December 31, 2007. The decrease is primarily attributable to our net loss of approximately $2.7
million.
(24)
Bank Borrowings
In the past, we have maintained two separate credit facilities. One of these credit facilities
is our Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended, or Revolving Credit Agreement,
with a group of bank lenders which provides us with a revolving line of credit having a borrowing base
limitation of $200.0 million at March 31, 2008. The total amount that we can borrow and have
outstanding at any one time is limited to the lesser of $350.0 million or the borrowing base
established by the lenders. At March 31, 2008, the principal amount outstanding under our revolving
credit facility was $82.0 million, excluding $445,000 reserved for our letters of credit. Our
second credit facility, which was terminated in July 2007, was a five year term loan facility
provided to us under a Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, or the Second Lien Agreement, with a
group of banks and other lenders. The Second Lien Agreement was paid off and terminated on July 31,
2007 with our payment to the lenders of $50.2 million, including interest. This payment was made
with proceeds from our sale of unsecured senior notes in the principal amount of $150.0 million
that we completed on July 31, 2007.
Revolving Credit Facility
The Revolving Credit Agreement allows us to borrow, repay and reborrow amounts available under
the revolving credit facility. The amount of the borrowing base is based primarily upon the
estimated value of our oil and natural gas reserves. The borrowing base amount is redetermined by
the lenders semi-annually on or about April 1 and October 1 of each year or at other times required
by the lenders or at our request. If, as a result of the lenders redetermination of the borrowing
base, the outstanding principal amount of our loans exceeds the borrowing base, we must either
provide additional collateral to the lenders or repay the outstanding principal of our revolving
credit facility in an amount equal to the excess. Except for the principal payments that may be
required because of our outstanding loans being in excess of the borrowing base, interest only is
payable.
Loans made to us under this revolving credit facility bear interest at the banks base rate or
the LIBOR rate, at our election. Generally, the
banks base rate is equal to its prime rate
announced from time to time.
The LIBOR rate is generally equal to the sum of (a) the rate designated as British Bankers
Association Interest Settlement Rates and offered in one, two, three, six or twelve month interest
periods for deposits of $1.0 million, and (b) a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50%, depending upon
the outstanding principal amount of our loan. If the principal amount outstanding is equal to or
greater than 75% of the borrowing base, the margin is 2.50%. If the principal amount outstanding is
equal to or greater than 50%, but less than 75% of the borrowing base, the margin is 2.25%. If the
principal amount outstanding is less than 50% of the borrowing base, the margin is 2.00%.
The interest rate we are required to pay on our borrowings, including the applicable margin,
may never be less than 5.00%. At March 31, 2008, our weighted average base rate and LIBOR rate,
plus the applicable margin, was 6.41% on $82.0 million, the outstanding principal amount of our
revolving loan on that same date.
In the case of base rate loans, interest is payable on the last day of each month. In the case
of LIBOR loans, interest is payable on the last day of each applicable interest period.
If the total outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility are less than the
borrowing base, we are required to pay an unused commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal
to .25% of the daily average of the unadvanced portion of the borrowing base. The fee is payable
quarterly.
(25)
If the borrowing base is increased, we are also required to pay a fee of .375% on the amount
of any such increase.
The Revolving Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants, including (i)
maintenance of a minimum current ratio, (ii) maintenance of a maximum ratio of funded indebtedness
to earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, (iii)
maintenance of a minimum net worth, (iv) prohibition of payment of dividends and (v) restrictions
on incurrence of additional debt. We have pledged substantially all of our producing oil and
natural gas properties to secure the repayment of our indebtedness under the Revolving Credit
Agreement.
All outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest under the revolving credit facility
is due and payable on October 31, 2010. The maturity date of our outstanding loans may be
accelerated by the lenders upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Revolving Credit
Agreement.
As of March 31, 2008 we were in compliance with all of the covenants in our Revolving Credit
Agreement.
Senior Notes
On July 31, 2007, we completed a private offering of unsecured senior notes, or the senior
notes, in the principal amount of $150.0 million. The senior notes mature on August 1, 2014 and
bear interest at 10.25% which is payable semi-annually beginning on February 1, 2008. Prior to
August 1, 2010, we may redeem up to 35% of the senior notes for a price equal to 110.250% of the
original principal amount of the senior notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings. On or
after August 1, 2011 we may redeem all or some of the senior notes at a redemption price that will
decrease from 105.125% of the principal amount of the senior notes to 100% of the principal amount
on August 1, 2013. In addition, prior to August 1, 2011, we may redeem some or all of the senior
notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes to be
redeemed, plus a make-whole premium, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Generally, the
make-whole premium is an amount equal to the greater of (a) 1% of the principal amount of the
senior notes being redeemed and (b) the excess of the present value of the redemption price of such
notes as of August 1, 2011 plus all required interest payments due through August 1, 2011 (computed
at a discount rate equal to a specified U.S. Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points), over the
principal amount of the senior notes being redeemed.
The indenture governing the senior notes restricts our ability to: (i) borrow money; (ii)
issue redeemable and preferred stock; (iii) pay distributions or dividends; (iv) make investments;
(v) create liens without securing the senior notes; (vi) enter into agreements that restrict
dividends from subsidiaries; (vii) sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies;
(viii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (ix) guarantee indebtedness; and (x) enter into new
lines of business.
Interest Accrued
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the aggregate interest accrued under our Revolving
Credit Agreement and our senior notes was approximately $5.2 million. Of this amount,
approximately $25,000 was capitalized.
Commodity Price Risk Management Transactions and Effects of Derivative Instruments
The purpose of our derivative transactions is to provide a measure of stability in our cash
flows. The derivative trade arrangements we have employed include collars, costless collars,
floors or purchased puts, and oil, natural gas and interest rate swaps.
(26)
At March 31, 2008, we had no derivatives in place that were designated as cash flow hedges.
All commodity derivative contracts at March 31, 2008 were accounted for by mark-to-market
accounting whereby changes in fair value were charged to earnings. Changes in the fair values of
derivatives are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as these changes occur in
Other income (expense), net. To the extent these trades relate to production in 2008 and beyond,
and oil prices increase, we will report a loss currently, but if there are no further changes in
prices, our revenue will be correspondingly higher (than if there had been no price increase) when
the production is sold.
All interest rate swaps that we have entered into for 2008 and beyond are accounted for by
mark-to-market accounting as prescribed in SFAS 133.
We are exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to our
derivative trade instruments. However, we periodically assess the creditworthiness of the
counterparties to mitigate this credit risk.
We adopted SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurement effective January 1, 2008 to measure fair
value of our derivatives which had no significant effect on our financial position or operating
results.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have contractual obligations and commitments that may affect our financial position.
However, based on our assessment of the provisions and circumstances of our contractual obligations
and commitments, we do not believe that these obligations and commitments will materially adversely
affect our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
The following table is a summary of significant contractual obligations as of March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation Due in Period |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Revolving Credit Facility
(secured)(1) |
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
|
$ |
5,258 |
|
|
$ |
86,379 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
95,588 |
|
Senior Notes (unsecured)(2) |
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
180,750 |
|
|
|
249,938 |
|
Office Lease (Dinero Plaza) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
Snyder Field Office(3) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Asset retirement obligations(4) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
4,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,802 |
|
Derivative Obligations |
|
|
31,163 |
|
|
|
15,940 |
|
|
|
9,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
43,021 |
|
|
$ |
37,470 |
|
|
$ |
111,899 |
|
|
$ |
15,527 |
|
|
$ |
20,182 |
|
|
$ |
181,271 |
|
|
$ |
409,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Outstanding principal of $82.0 million due October 31, 2010 and estimated interest
obligation calculated using a weighted average interest rate at March 31, 2008 of 6.41% |
|
(2) |
|
Outstanding principal of $150.0 million due August 1, 2013 and the interest
obligation calculated at an interest rate of 10.25% |
(27)
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The Snyder office lease expires upon the cessation of production from the Diamond
M area wells. The lease cost for this office facility is billed to nonaffiliated third party
working interest owners under our joint operating agreements with these third parties. |
|
(4) |
|
Asset retirement obligations of oil and natural gas assets, excluding salvage value
and accretion. |
Outlook
The oil and natural gas industry is capital intensive. We make, and anticipate that we will
continue to make, substantial capital expenditures in the exploration for, development and
acquisition of oil and natural gas reserves. Historically, our capital expenditures have been
financed primarily with:
|
|
|
internally generated cash from operations; |
|
|
|
|
proceeds from bank borrowings; and |
|
|
|
|
proceeds from sales of equity and debt securities. |
The continued availability of these capital sources depends upon a number of variables,
including:
|
|
|
our proved reserves; |
|
|
|
|
the volumes of oil and natural gas we produce from existing wells; |
|
|
|
|
the prices at which we sell oil and natural gas; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to acquire, locate and produce new reserves. |
Each of these variables materially affects our borrowing capacity. We may from time to time
seek additional financing in the form of:
|
|
|
increased bank borrowings; |
|
|
|
|
additional sales of our debt or equity securities; |
|
|
|
|
sales of non-core properties; |
|
|
|
|
other forms of financing; or |
|
|
|
|
a combination of the above. |
Except for the revolving credit facility we have with our bank lenders, we do not currently
have any agreements for any future financing and there can be no assurance as to the availability
or terms of any such future financing.
Inflation
Our drilling and production costs have escalated and we expect this trend to continue.
However, over the past several years our commodity prices have increased to offset the effects of
cost inflation.
Oil and Natural Gas Price Trends
Changes in oil and natural gas prices significantly affect our revenues, financial condition,
cash flows and borrowing capacity. Markets for oil and natural gas have historically been volatile
and we expect this trend to continue. Prices for oil and natural gas typically fluctuate in
response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty, seasonal, political
and other factors beyond our
(28)
control. Although we are unable to accurately predict the prices we
receive for our oil and natural gas, any significant or sustained declines in oil or natural gas
prices may materially adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, ability to obtain
financing and operating results. Lower oil or natural gas prices also
may reduce the amount of oil or natural gas that we can produce economically. A decline in
oil or natural gas prices could have a material adverse effect on the estimated value and estimated
quantities of our oil and natural gas reserves, our ability to fund our operations and our
financial condition, cash flow, results of operations and access to capital.
Our capital expenditure budgets are highly dependent on future oil and natural gas prices.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the average realized sales price for our oil and
natural gas was $43.85 per BOE. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, our average realized
price was $63.60 per BOE.
Production Trends
Like all other oil and gas exploration and production companies, we experience natural
production declines. We recognize that oil and gas production from a given well naturally
decreases over time and that a downward trend in our overall production could occur unless these
natural declines are offset by additional production from drilling,
workover or recompletion
activity, or acquisitions of producing properties. If any production declines we experience are
other than a temporary trend, and if we cannot economically replace our reserves, our results of
operations may be materially adversely affected and our stock price may decline. Our future growth
will depend upon our ability to continue to add oil and natural gas reserves in excess of
production at a reasonable cost.
While we have achieved increased production and revenue in our New Mexico Wolfcamp and Barnett
Shale projects as a result of our significant investments in these areas, production growth in our
Barnett Shale investments has been restricted due to limited pipeline
capacity. However, we expect the
completion of additional pipeline capacity to significantly ease these pipeline capacity restraints
beginning in the first half of 2008.
In recent periods, we have concentrated our drilling and development efforts on our resource
natural gas projects in our Barnett Shale and New Mexico Wolfcamp
projects. Due to limited development,
our production has decreased in accordance with normal decline curves for our principal Permian
Basin oil properties and south Texas gas properties. We expect our
2008 capital budget for our Permian Basin oil properties to increase.
Lease Operating Expense Trends
The level of drilling, workover and maintenance activity in the primary areas in which we
operate and produce continues at a historically high level. Service rates charged by oil field
service companies have increased significantly during recent periods. These increased cost levels
have affected our per BOE lease operating expense. While we do not expect the rate of increase of
service costs to continue at the same pace as in recent periods, further increases are possible and
could significantly impact our lease operating expense. However, as we continue to increase our
production we also expect to see a leveling off of our per BOE lease operating expenses.
Interest Expense Trends
On July 31, 2007 we completed a private offering of $150.0 million of senior notes that bear
interest at 10.25%. As a result of the issuance of the notes and the increase in our current
borrowings, we
(29)
expect a corresponding increase in our annual interest expense. An increase in interest rates
will also negatively impact our interest expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
statement does not require any new fair value measurements but may require some entities to change
their measurement practices. We adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 and the adoption
did not have a significant effect on our financial position or operating results.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (FAS 159) which became
effective on January 1, 2008. FAS 159 permits entities to measure eligible financial assets,
financial liabilities and firm commitments at fair value, on an instrument-by-instrument basis,
that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other generally accepted
accounting principles. The fair value measurement election is irrevocable and subsequent changes in
fair value must be recorded in earnings. We adopted this statement during the first quarter of 2008
and it did not have any effect on our financial position or operating results.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree
and the goodwill acquired. The statement also establishes disclosure requirements that will enable
users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is
effective for acquisitions that occur in an entitys fiscal year that begins after December 15,
2008, which will be our fiscal year 2009. The impact, if any, will depend on the nature and size of
business combinations that we consummate after the effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires that accounting
and reporting for minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a component of equity. SFAS 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide
sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent
and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 applies to all entities that prepare
consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those
entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that
deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008, which will be our fiscal year 2009. Based upon the
December 31, 2007 balance sheet, the statement would have no impact.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). This statement is intended
to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entitys
derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entitys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the
scope of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), as
well as related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must
provide more robust qualitative
(30)
disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is
effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating
the disclosure implications of this statement.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are included and discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 20, 2008. These critical accounting policies should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the accompanying notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations also included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking
statements. These forward looking statements relate to, among others, the following:
|
|
|
our future financial and operating performance and results; |
|
|
|
|
our drilling plans and ability to secure drilling rigs to effectuate our plans; |
|
|
|
|
production volumes; |
|
|
|
|
our business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
market prices; |
|
|
|
|
sources of funds necessary to conduct operations and complete acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
development costs; |
|
|
|
|
number and location of planned wells; |
|
|
|
|
our future commodity price risk management activities; and |
|
|
|
|
our plans and forecasts. |
We have based these forward-looking statements on our current assumptions, expectations and
projections about future events.
We use the words may, will, expect, anticipate, estimate, believe, continue,
intend, plan, budget, present value, future or reserves or other similar words to
identify forward-looking statements. These statements also involve risks and uncertainties that
could cause our actual results or financial condition to materially differ for our expectations.
We believe the assumptions and expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are
reasonable. However, we cannot give any assurance that our expectations will prove to be correct
or that we will be able to take any actions that are presently planned. All of these statements
involve assumptions of future events and risks and uncertainties. Risks and uncertainties
associated with forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
(31)
|
|
|
fluctuations in prices of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
dependent on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
reliance on technological development and technology development programs; |
|
|
|
|
demand for oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
losses due to potential or future litigation; |
|
|
|
|
future capital requirements and availability of financing; |
|
|
|
|
geological concentration of our reserves; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with drilling and operating wells; |
|
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulations and liability for environmental matters; |
|
|
|
|
receipt of amounts owed to us by purchasers of our production and counterparties to
our hedging contracts; |
|
|
|
|
hedging decisions, including whether or not to hedge; |
|
|
|
|
events similar to 911; |
|
|
|
|
actions of third party co-owners of interests in properties in which we also own an
interest; and |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and availability of capital. |
For these and other reasons, actual results may differ materially from those projected or
implied. We believe it is important to communicate our expectations of future performance to our
investors. However, events may occur in the future that we are unable to accurately predict, or
over which we have no control. We caution you against putting undue reliance on forward-looking
statements or projecting any future results based on such statements.
Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that there are various risks
associated with an investment. We have described some of these risks under Risks Related to Our
Business beginning on page 13 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following quantitative and qualitative information is provided about market risks and
derivative instruments to which we were a party at March 31, 2008, and from which we may incur
future earnings, gains or losses from changes in market interest rates and oil and natural gas
prices.
Interest Rate Sensitivity as of March 31, 2008
Although we are currently protected from interest rate volatility through our senior notes and
our interest rate swaps, we do believe that in the future we will be exposed to interest rate
volatility as our borrowing increases and as our interest rate swaps are settled. Our only
financial instruments sensitive to changes in interest rates are our bank debt and interest rate
swaps. As the interest rate is variable and
(32)
reflects current market conditions, the carrying value
of our bank debt approximates the fair value. The
table below shows principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected
maturity dates. Weighted average interest rates were determined using weighted average interest
paid and accrued in March, 2008. You should read Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion of our debt that is sensitive to interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 and |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
after |
|
Total |
|
|
($ in thousands, except interest rates) |
Revolving Credit Facility (secured) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,000 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
10.25 |
% |
|
|
10.25 |
% |
|
|
10.25 |
% |
|
|
10.25 |
% |
|
|
10.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008, we had outstanding bank loans in the aggregate principal amount of $82.0
million at a weighted average interest rate of 6.41%. Under our revolving credit facility, we may
elect an interest rate based upon the agent banks base lending rate or the LIBOR rate, plus a
margin ranging from 2.0% to 2.5% per annum, depending upon the outstanding principal amount of the
loans. The interest rate we are required to pay, including the applicable margin, may never be
less than 5.00%.
At March 31, 2008, we had outstanding senior notes in the aggregate principal amount of $150.0
million bearing interest at a rate of 10.25% per annum. The carrying value of our 10.25% senior
notes at March 31, 2008 is approximately $145.5 million. Interest on our senior notes and their
carrying value are not affected by changes in interest rates.
We have employed fixed interest rate swap contracts with BNP Paribas and Citibank, N.A. based
on the 90-day LIBOR rates at the time of the contracts. These contracts are accounted for by
mark-to-market accounting as prescribed in SFAS 133. We view these contracts as additional
protection against future interest rate volatility. As of March 31, 2008, the fair market value of
these interest rate swaps was a liability of approximately $4.1 million.
A recap for the period of time, notional amounts, fixed interest rates, and fair market value
of these contracts at March 31, 2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Estimated |
|
Period of Time |
|
Amounts |
|
|
Fixed Interest Rates |
|
|
Fair Market Value |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,932 |
) |
January 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
(1,331 |
) |
January 1, 2010 thru October 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Price Sensitivity as of March 31, 2008
Our major market risk exposure is the pricing applicable to our oil and natural gas
production. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in oil and natural gas
prices. Pricing is
primarily driven by the prevailing domestic price for crude oil and spot prices applicable to
the region in which we produce natural gas. Historically, prices for oil and natural gas
production have been volatile
(33)
and unpredictable. We expect pricing volatility to continue. NYMEX
oil prices ranged from a low of $50.48 per barrel to a high of $98.18 per barrel during 2007.
NYMEX natural gas prices during 2007 ranged from a low of $5.38 per Mcf to a high of $8.637 per
Mcf. During the first quarter ended March 31, 2008 NYMEX oil prices ranged from a low of $86.99 to
a high of $110.33. NYMEX natural gas prices during the first quarter ended March 31, 2008 ranged
from a low of $7.621 per Mcf to a high of $10.23 per Mcf. A significant decline in the prices of
oil or natural gas could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
We employ various derivative instruments in order to minimize our exposure to the
aforementioned commodity price volatility. As of March 31, 2008, we had employed commodity collars
and swaps in order to protect against this price volatility. Although all of the contracts that we
have entered into are viewed as protection against this price volatility, all contracts are
accounted for by the mark-to-market accounting method as prescribed in SFAS 133.
At March 31, 2008 we had oil collars and swaps in place covering future oil production of
approximately 1.7 million barrels. Subsequent to March 31, 2008, oil futures prices have increased
significantly and have risen to a level that continues to exceed a substantial portion of the
capped price for each of our oil collars. If futures prices remain at this level, we will be
required to remit the excess of the NYMEX price for each settlement period over the cap price
contained in the respective collar contract as detailed in the table below. These increases in oil
price will also require us to make larger net settlement payments under commodity swap contracts.
While these payments should not significantly affect our cash flow since payments made to
counterparties to these contracts should be substantially offset by increased commodity prices
received on the sale of our production, the increase in oil prices, should they continue, will
negatively affect the fair value of our commodities contracts as recorded in our balance sheet
during future periods and, consequently, our reported net earnings. Changes in the recorded fair
value of commodity derivatives are marked to market through earnings and are likely to result in
substantial charges to earnings for the decrease in the fair value of these contracts during future
periods. If oil prices continue to increase, this negative effect on earnings will become more
significant. We are currently unable to estimate the effects on earnings in future periods, but
the effects may be substantial.
A description of our active commodity derivative contracts as of March 31, 2008 follows:
Collars. Collars are contracts which combine both a put option or floor and a call
option or ceiling. These contracts may or may not involve payment or receipt of cash at
inception, depending upon ceiling and floor strike prices.
A summary of our collar positions at March 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Barrles of |
|
NYMEX Oil Prices |
|
Fair Market |
Period of Time |
|
Oil |
|
Floor |
|
Cap |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008 |
|
|
261,250 |
|
|
$ |
63.42 |
|
|
$ |
83.86 |
|
|
$ |
(5,003 |
) |
January 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 |
|
|
620,500 |
|
|
$ |
63.53 |
|
|
$ |
80.21 |
|
|
|
(12,808 |
) |
January 1, 2010 thru October 31, 2010 |
|
|
486,400 |
|
|
$ |
63.44 |
|
|
$ |
78.26 |
|
|
|
(9,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMBtu of |
|
|
WAHA Gas Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Floor |
|
|
Cap |
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.38 |
|
|
$ |
9.28 |
|
|
|
(2,622 |
) |
January
1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,285,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.06 |
|
|
$ |
9.93 |
|
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(31,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34)
Commodity Swaps. Generally, swaps are an agreement to buy or sell a specified
commodity for delivery in the future, at an agreed fixed price. Swap transactions convert a
floating or market price into a fixed price. For any particular swap transaction, the counterparty
is required to make a payment to the Company if the reference price for any settlement period is
less than the swap or fixed price for such contract, and the Company is required to make a payment
to the counterparty if the reference price for any settlement period is greater than the swap or
fixed price for such contract.
We have entered into oil swap contracts with BNP Paribas. A recap for the period of time,
number of barrels, weighted average swap prices and fair value of the contracts as of March 31,
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Oil |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
Period of Time |
|
Barrels of Oil |
|
|
Swap Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
April 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2008 |
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
$ |
33.37 |
|
|
$ |
(21,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair market value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(21,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) was evaluated by our management, with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer, Larry C. Oldham (principal executive officer), and our Chief Financial
Officer, Steven D. Foster (principal financial officer), in accordance with rules under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, Mr. Oldham and Mr. Foster
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2008 to
provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or
submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to
management and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are party to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business.
On April 14, 2008, we were added as a defendant to a lawsuit filed in 2007, styled Brady
Briscoe vs. Capstar Drilling, L.P. (Capstar), (Cause No. 21,287), in the 259th District Court of
Jones County, Texas. The plaintiff alleges that as a result of Capstars negligence (and now ours)
he was injured while working on a drilling rig operated by Capstar on an oil well location
leased by us. AIG was the workers compensation insurance carrier of the plaintiffs employer. The
plaintiff sued for an amount of actual damages of up to $15.0 million together with pre-judgment
and post-judgment interest. Capstar recently settled with the plaintiff and has (or is soon to be)
dismissed from the lawsuit. Should judgment
(35)
be entered against us, we would be entitled to a
credit for the amount that the plaintiff has already received from Capstar.
Even though we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, we believe we have
meritorious defenses and intend to vigorously contest this lawsuit. We have not established a
reserve with respect to the plaintiffs claims.
On March 24, 2008, a lawsuit was filed in the 24th District Court of Jackson
County, Texas, against us and twenty-two other defendants in Cause No. 07-6-13069, styled Tony
Kubenka, Carolyn Kubenka, Dennis J. Kallus, David J. Kallus, Mary L. Kallus, Patricia Kallus, Nova
Deleon, Janie Figuerova, and Larkin Thedford, Plaintiffs v. Tri-C Resources, Inc., Marie S. Adian,
Laura E. Adian, Glenn A. Fiew, Lynn Kramer, Debra Boysen, Carol J. Gleason, Alana Sue Curlee,
Connie W. Marthiljohni, Claire E. Adian, Zachary D. Adian, Donald R. Starkweather, Inc., D.A.
Webernick, Danette Bundick, Johnny A. Webernick, Donna Gail Glover, Sherry Shulze, William H.
Webernick, Jr., TAC Resources, Inc., New Century Exploration, Inc., Allegro Investments, Inc. and
Welper Interests, LP.
The nine plaintiffs in this lawsuit have named us and the other working interest owners,
including Tri-C Resources, Inc., the operator, as defendants. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege
that they are royalty owners under oil and gas leases which are part of a pooled gas unit (the
unit) located in Jackson County, Texas, and that the defendants, including us, are owners of the
leasehold estate under the plaintiffs leases and others forming the unit. Plaintiffs also assert
that one of the leases (other than plaintiffs leases) forming part of the unit has terminated and,
as a result, the defendants have not properly computed the royalties due to plaintiffs from unit
production and have failed to properly pay royalties due to them. Plaintiffs have sued for an
unspecified amount of damages, including exemplary damages, under theories of breach of contract
(including breach of express and implied covenants of their leases) and conversion, and seek an
accounting, a declaratory judgment to declare the rights of the parties under the leases, and
attorneys fees, interest and court costs.
As a working interest owner in the leases comprising the unit, we believe our potential
liability, if any, would be proportionate to the ownership of the other working interest owners in
the leases. We intend to file an answer denying any liability on or before May 19, 2008. As of May
5, 2008, no discovery has been conducted. Even though we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of
this matter, we believe we have meritorious defenses and intend to vigorously contest this lawsuit.
We have not established a reserve with respect to plaintiffs claims.
We received a Notice of Proposed Adjustment from the Internal Revenue Service, or the
Service in May 2007 advising us of proposed adjustments to federal income tax of approximately
$2.0 million for the years 2004 and 2005. Subsequent discussions with the Service placed the
issues contested in a development status. In November 2007, the Service issued a letter on the
matter giving the company 30 days to agree or disagree with a final examination report. The final
examination report reflected revisions of the previous proposed adjustments resulting in a reduced
$1.1 million of additional income tax and interest charges. The decrease in proposed tax was the
result of information supplied by Parallel to the examiner as well as discussions of the applicable
tax statutes and regulations. In December 2007, we filed a protest documenting our complete
disagreement with the adjustments proposed on the final
examination report and requested a conference with the appeals office of the Service. The
examination office of the Service filed a response to our protest in February 2008 with the appeals
office. An appeals conference is scheduled for June 2008. We intend to vigorously contest the
adjustment proposed by the Service and believe that we will ultimately prevail in our position. We
have not recorded a liability for tax, interest, or penalties related to this matter based on our
analysis. If a liability for additional income tax should later be determined to be more likely
than not, we anticipate the adjustment to increase the federal income tax liability would be
offset by an increase to a deferred tax asset and would not result in
(36)
a charge to earnings. Any interest or penalties resulting from a subsequent determination of increased tax liability would
require a charge to earnings. We believe that the effects of this matter would not have a material
effect on our results of operations for the fiscal quarter in which we actually incur or establish
a reserve account for interest or penalties.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form
10-K Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference, as indicated: |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form
10-Q of the Registrant for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004) |
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Parallel, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.3 of
the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No. 333-119725 filed on October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Parallel, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 3.4 of the Registrants Statement on Form S-3, No. 333-119725 filed on October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Parallel, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 3.5 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No. 333-119725 filed on
October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parallel, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
3.6 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No. 333-119725 filed on October
13, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Serial Preferred Stock 6%
Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2000, between the Registrant and Computershare Trust
Company, Inc., as Rights Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of Form 8-A of the
Registrant filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 10, 2000) |
(37)
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
4.4 |
|
Form of common stock certificate of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
4.6 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No. 333-119725 filed on October
13, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated November 20, 2001, between the Registrant and Stonington
Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated December 23, 2003, between the Registrant and Stonington
Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Purchase Warrant Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1980, between the Registrant and American
Stock Transfer, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Form 10-K of the Registrant
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
First Amendment to Warrant Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2007, among the Registrant,
Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006) |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Form of Rule 144A 101/4% Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Form of IAI 101/4% Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Form of Regulation S 101/4% Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2007, among the Registrant as Issuer and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
4.13
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007, by and among the Registrant,
Jefferies & Company, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated and BNP
Paribas Securities Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2007, by and among the Registrant, Jefferies &
Company, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated and BNP Paribas Securities
Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Form of 101/4% Unrestricted Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of
Form S-4 of the Registrant, Registration No. 333-148465) |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements (Exhibit No.s 10.1 through 10.7): |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
1992 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) |
(38)
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
10.2 |
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated Prototype Simplified Employee Pension Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1995) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Registrants Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of
the Registrants Form 10-Q Report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Grant Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants Form 8-K Report dated September 22, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Incentive and Retention Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants Form 8-K Report dated March 27, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 20, 2002, by and among Parallel
Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C., First American Bank, SSB, Western
National Bank and BNP Paribas (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 8-K of the
Registrant, dated December 20, 2002) |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Guaranty dated December 20, 2002, between Parallel, L.L.C. and First American Bank, SSB, as
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Form 8-K of the Registrant, dated December
20, 2002) |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
First Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 12,
2003, by and among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C., First
American Bank, SSB, Western National Bank, and BNP Paribas (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.29 of Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2003) |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 27, 2004, by and among
Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C., First American Bank, SSB,
BNP Paribas, Citibank, F.S.B. and Western National Bank (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated September 27, 2004 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 1, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Agreement of Limited Partnership of West Fork Pipeline Company LP (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.21 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 27,
2004, by and among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C., First
American Bank, SSB, BNP Paribas, Citibank, F.S.B. and Western
National Bank (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated December 30, 2004 and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 30, 2004) |
(39)
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
10.15 |
|
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2005,
by and among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P.,
Parallel, L.L.C., First American
Bank, SSB, BNP Paribas, Citibank, F.S.B. and Western National Bank (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated April 4, 2005 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October 4, 2005 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2005, among Parallel, L.P., Lynx
Production Company, Inc., Elton Resources, Inc., Cascade Energy Corporation, Chelsea Energy,
Inc., William P. Sutter, Trustee, William P. Sutter Trust, J. Leroy Bell, E. L. Brahaney,
Brent Beck, Cavic Interests, LLC and Stanley Talbott (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
Ancillary Agreement to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 14, 2005, between
Parallel, L.P. and Lynx Production Company, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
Guarantee of Parallel, L.P., dated October 13, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2005, between Parallel, L.P. and Citibank,
N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated
October 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2005, among Parallel
Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C. and Citibank Texas, N.A., BNP Paribas,
CitiBank F.S.B., Western National Bank, Compass Bank, Comerica Bank, Bank of Scotland and
Fortis Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 of the Registrants Form
8-K Report, dated December 23, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, dated November 15, 2005, among Parallel Petroleum
Corporation, Parallel, L.P., BNP Paribas and Citibank Texas, N.A. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 10.4 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report, dated November 15, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated November 15, 2005, among Citibank Texas,
N.A., BNP Paribas, Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P. and Parallel, L.L.C.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report, dated
November 15, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2005) |
(40)
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
10.24 |
|
Guaranty, dated as of December 23, 2005, made by Parallel, L.L.C. to and in favor of
Citibank Texas, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2005, between
Parallel, L.L.C. and Citibank Texas, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of Form
10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
Second Lien Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2005, made by
Parallel Petroleum Corporation and Parallel, L.P. to and in favor of BNP Paribas (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007,
among the Registrant, Citibank, N.A., BNP Paribas, Western National Bank, Compass Bank,
Comerica Bank, Bank of Scotland, and Fortis Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 30,
2007, among the Registrant, Citibank, N.A., BNP Paribas, Western National Bank, Compass Bank,
Comerica Bank, Bank of Scotland, and Fortis Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.27 of Form S-4 of the Registrant, Registration No. 333-148465) |
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
Hagerman Gas Gathering System Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007, among
the Registrant, Feagan Gathering Company and Capstone Oil and Gas
Company, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007) |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 14 of the Registrants Form 10-K
Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 22, 2004) |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002. |
(41)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARALLEL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
|
|
|
BY: /s/ Larry C. Oldham
|
|
Date: May 5, 2008 |
Larry C. Oldham |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 5, 2008 |
BY: /s/ Steven D. Foster
|
|
|
Steven D. Foster, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Parallel, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 3.3 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No.
333-119725 filed on October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Parallel, L.L.C. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 3.4 of the Registrants Statement on Form S-3, No.
333-119725 filed on October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Parallel, L.P. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 3.5 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No.
333-119725 filed on October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parallel, L.P. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 3.6 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No.
333-119725 filed on October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Serial Preferred Stock
6% Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2000, between the Registrant and
Computershare Trust Company, Inc., as Rights Agent (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 1 of Form 8-A of the Registrant filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 10, 2000) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of common stock certificate of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 4.6 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3, No.
333-119725 filed on October 13, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated November 20, 2001, between the Registrant and
Stonington Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Form 10-K
of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated December 23, 2003, between the Registrant and
Stonington Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Form 10-K
of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Purchase Warrant Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1980, between the Registrant
and American Stock Transfer, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of
Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
First Amendment to Warrant Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2007, among the
Registrant, Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc. and Computershare Trust
Company, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Form of Rule 144A 101/4% Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2007) |
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Form of IAI 101/4% Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Form of Regulation S 101/4% Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2007) |
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2007, among the Registrant as Issuer and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2007) |
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007, by and among the
Registrant, Jefferies & Company, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith
Incorporated and BNP Paribas Securities Corp. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2007) |
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2007, by and among the Registrant,
Jefferies & Company, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated
and BNP Paribas Securities Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Form of 101/4% Unrestricted Senior Note due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.13 of Form S-4 of the Registrant, Registration No. 333-148465) |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements (Exhibit No.s 10.1 through 10.7): |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
1992 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 10-K
of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated Prototype Simplified
Employee Pension Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 of the Registrants Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Form 10-K
of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrants Form 10-Q Report for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Grant Plan (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated September 22, 2004) |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Incentive and Retention Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Form
10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants Form 8-K Report dated March 27, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 20, 2002, by and
among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C., First
American Bank, SSB, Western National Bank and BNP Paribas (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 8-K of the Registrant, dated December 20,
2002) |
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
Guaranty dated December 20, 2002, between Parallel, L.L.C. and First American
Bank, SSB, as Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Form 8-K of
the Registrant, dated December 20, 2002) |
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
First Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 12, 2003, by and among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel,
L.P., Parallel, L.L.C., First American Bank, SSB, Western National Bank, and
BNP Paribas (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2003) |
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 27, 2004, by and
among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C., First
American Bank, SSB, BNP Paribas, Citibank, F.S.B. and Western National Bank
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report
dated September 27, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on October 1, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
Agreement of Limited Partnership of West Fork Pipeline Company LP (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 2004, by and among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P.,
Parallel, L.L.C., First American Bank, SSB, BNP Paribas, Citibank, F.S.B. and
Western National Bank (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants Form 8-K Report dated December 30, 2004 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
April 1, 2005, by and among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P.,
Parallel, L.L.C., First American Bank, SSB, BNP Paribas, Citibank, F.S.B. and
Western National Bank (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants Form 8-K Report dated April 4, 2005 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October
4, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20,
2005) |
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2005, among Parallel,
L.P., Lynx Production Company, Inc., Elton Resources, Inc., Cascade Energy
Corporation, Chelsea Energy, Inc., William P. Sutter, Trustee, William P.
Sutter Trust, J. Leroy Bell, E. L. Brahaney, Brent Beck, Cavic Interests, LLC
and Stanley Talbott (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October 14, 2005 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
10.18 |
|
Ancillary Agreement to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 14, 2005,
between Parallel, L.P. and Lynx Production Company, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October 14,
2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
Guarantee of Parallel, L.P., dated October 13, 2004 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report dated October 14, 2005 and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2005, between Parallel, L.P. and
Citibank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants
Form 8-K Report dated October 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 20, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2005,
among Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., Parallel, L.L.C. and
Citibank Texas, N.A., BNP Paribas, CitiBank F.S.B., Western National Bank,
Compass Bank, Comerica Bank, Bank of Scotland and Fortis Capital Corp.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K
Report, dated December 23, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, dated November 15, 2005, among Parallel
Petroleum Corporation, Parallel, L.P., BNP Paribas and Citibank Texas, N.A.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 of the Registrants Form 8-K
Report, dated November 15, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated November 15, 2005, among
Citibank Texas, N.A., BNP Paribas, Parallel Petroleum Corporation, Parallel,
L.P. and Parallel, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 of the
Registrants Form 8-K Report, dated November 15, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
Guaranty, dated as of December 23, 2005, made by Parallel, L.L.C. to and in
favor of Citibank Texas, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of
Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2005,
between Parallel, L.L.C. and Citibank Texas, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
Second Lien Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2005,
made by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and Parallel, L.P. to and in favor of
BNP Paribas (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
July 31, 2007, among the Registrant, Citibank, N.A., BNP Paribas, Western
National Bank, Compass Bank, Comerica Bank, Bank of Scotland, and Fortis
Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
November 30, 2007, among the Registrant, Citibank, N.A., BNP Paribas, Western
National Bank, Compass Bank, Comerica Bank, Bank of Scotland, and Fortis
Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of Form S-4 of the
Registrant, Registration No. 333-148465) |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
Hagerman Gas Gathering System Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of January 16,
2007, among the Registrant, Feagan Gathering Company and Capstone Oil and Gas
Company, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007) |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 14 of the Registrants
Form 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 2004) |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |