e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) FOR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission File Number 0-24100
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-1777397 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
1016 Civic Center Drive N.W., Rochester, MN
|
|
55901 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(ZIP Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(507) 535-1200 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the
latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at April 21, 2010 |
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
4,316,359 |
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 : Financial Statements
HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
34,301 |
|
|
|
16,418 |
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and related securities
(amortized cost $46,676 and $51,840) |
|
|
48,368 |
|
|
|
53,559 |
|
Other marketable securities
(amortized cost $113,744 and $105,723) |
|
|
113,714 |
|
|
|
106,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,082 |
|
|
|
159,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
774,336 |
|
|
|
799,256 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
4,024 |
|
Real estate, net |
|
|
12,725 |
|
|
|
16,257 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
10,403 |
|
|
|
10,766 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
13,531 |
|
|
|
11,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,028,476 |
|
|
|
1,036,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
789,792 |
|
|
|
796,011 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and Federal Reserve borrowings |
|
|
132,500 |
|
|
|
132,500 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
Customer escrows |
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
4,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
930,786 |
|
|
|
936,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial preferred stock ($.01 par value): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 500,000 shares; issued shares 26,000 |
|
|
23,901 |
|
|
|
23,785 |
|
Common stock ($.01 par value): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 11,000,000; issued shares 9,128,662 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
56,326 |
|
|
|
58,576 |
|
Retained earnings, subject to certain restrictions |
|
|
83,943 |
|
|
|
86,115 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
Unearned employee stock ownership plan shares |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(3,577 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost 4,812,303 and 4,965,766 shares |
|
|
(64,045 |
) |
|
|
(66,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
97,690 |
|
|
|
99,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,028,476 |
|
|
|
1,036,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Loss
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
11,759 |
|
|
|
13,628 |
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and related |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
Other marketable |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Other |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
12,904 |
|
|
|
15,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
3,421 |
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and Federal Reserve borrowings |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
6,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
7,961 |
|
|
|
8,782 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,533 |
|
|
|
6,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges |
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
Loan servicing fees |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Gain on sales of loans |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Other |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
(Gain) loss on real estate owned |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
1,103 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Deposit insurance |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
|
8,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax benefit |
|
|
(3,015 |
) |
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
|
|
(1,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
(2,622 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends and discount |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
(2,287 |
) |
|
|
(3,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss
For the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock- |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Holders |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
23,785 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
58,576 |
|
|
|
86,115 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
(3,577 |
) |
|
|
(66,282 |
) |
|
|
99,938 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized losses on securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,074 |
) |
Preferred stock discount amortization |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
Stock compensation tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Unearned compensation restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Amortization of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
Preferred stock dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
Earned employee stock ownership plan shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
23,901 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
56,326 |
|
|
|
83,943 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(64,045 |
) |
|
|
97,690 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
(2,622 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,533 |
|
|
|
6,569 |
|
Provision for real estate losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
Amortization of premiums, net |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan fees |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
Deferred income tax |
|
|
(1,792 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Gain(loss) on sales of real estate |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
Gain on sales of loans |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale |
|
|
16,361 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
Disbursements on loans held for sale |
|
|
(14,348 |
) |
|
|
(25,987 |
) |
Amortization of restricted stock awards |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Amortization of unearned ESOP shares |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Earned employee stock ownership shares priced below original cost |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Stock option compensation |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
3,113 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
5,138 |
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collected on securities available for sale |
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
5,035 |
|
Proceeds collected on maturities of securities available for sale |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(25,072 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate |
|
|
5,431 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Net decrease in loans receivable |
|
|
16,251 |
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
18,744 |
|
|
|
21,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in deposits |
|
|
(6,359 |
) |
|
|
(82,322 |
) |
Dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
592,000 |
|
Repayment of borrowings |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(542,000 |
) |
Increase in customer escrows |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(5,999 |
) |
|
|
(31,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
17,883 |
|
|
|
(3,188 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
16,418 |
|
|
|
15,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
34,301 |
|
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
5,304 |
|
|
|
8,235 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Supplemental noncash flow disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of loans to real estate |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
10,420 |
|
Loans transferred to loans held for sale |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
(1) HMN Financial, Inc.
HMN Financial, Inc. (HMN or the Company) is a stock savings bank holding company that owns 100
percent of Home Federal Savings Bank (the Bank). The Bank has a community banking philosophy and
operates retail banking and loan production offices in Minnesota and Iowa. The Bank has one wholly
owned subsidiary, Osterud Insurance Agency, Inc. (OIA) which offers financial planning products and
services. HMN has another wholly owned subsidiary, Security Finance Corporation (SFC) which acts
as an intermediary for the Bank in completing certain real estate transactions.
The consolidated financial statements included herein are for HMN, SFC, the Bank and OIA. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(2) Basis of Preparation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with
instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete
presentation of the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of loss, consolidated
statement of stockholders equity and comprehensive loss and consolidated statements of cash flows
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, all normal recurring
adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the
interim financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2010 is not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for
the entire year.
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified
to conform with the current period presentation.
(3) New Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 (ASU 105), The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This Statement establishes the
Codification as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the
Codification carries an equal level of authority. Following this Statement, the FASB will not
issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force
Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standard Updates (ASUs) that will serve only to update
the Codification. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and did not have any impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements except for disclosure changes to the authoritative pronouncement
references.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 (ASU 810), Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).
This Statement amends FASB 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis and ongoing
reassessments to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity and amends certain guidance for
determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. It also requires enhanced disclosures
that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an
enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity. This Statement is effective as of the
beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15,
2009 and for all interim reporting periods after that and the adoption of this Statement in 2010
did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements as the Company has no
interests in any variable interest entities.
7
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166 (ASU 860), Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement amends SFAS 140 and removes the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS 140 and eliminates the exception from applying FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, on
qualifying special-purpose entities. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of each
reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods
thereafter. The adoption of this Statement in 2010 did not have any impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820),
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires new investment fair market
disclosures in order to increase the transparency in the financial reporting of investments. The
new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010,
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this ASU in 2010 did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
(4) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company has commitments outstanding to extend credit to future borrowers that had not closed
prior to the end of the quarter. The Company intends to sell these commitments, which are referred
to as its mortgage pipeline. As commitments to originate or purchase loans enter the mortgage
pipeline, the Company generally enters into commitments to sell the mortgage pipeline into the
secondary market on a firm commitment or best efforts basis. The commitments to originate, purchase
or sell loans on a firm commitment basis are derivatives. As a result of marking to market the
mortgage pipeline and the related firm commitments to sell for the period ended March 31, 2010, the
Company recorded a decrease in other assets of $14,000, an increase in other liabilities of $11,000
and a loss included in the gain on sales of loans of $25,000.
The current commitments to sell loans held for sale are derivatives that do not qualify for hedge
accounting. As a result, these derivatives are marked to market and the related loans held for sale
are recorded at the lower of cost or market. The Company recorded a decrease in other assets of
$23,000 and an increase in the mark to market adjustment for loans held for sale of $23,000.
(5) Fair Value Measurements
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (ASC 820), which establishes a
framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system
consisting of three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and
the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in
active markets that the Company has the ability to access.
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions are observable in the
market.
Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant
assumptions not observable in the market and are used only to the extent that observable inputs
are not available. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques
include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
8
The following table summarizes the assets of the Company for which fair values are determined on a
recurring basis as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2010 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
162,082 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
157,112 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage loan commitments |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
162,018 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
157,048 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
159,869 |
|
|
|
12,285 |
|
|
|
147,584 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage loan commitments |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
159,877 |
|
|
|
12,285 |
|
|
|
147,592 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2, or 3 during the three months ended March 31,
2010.
The Company may also be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of the lower-of-cost-or-market
accounting or write-downs of individual assets. For assets measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in the first quarter of 2010 that were still held at March 31, 2010, the
following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment and
the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Losses |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
2,386 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
77,998 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
77,998 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(8,647 |
) |
Real estate, net (2) |
|
|
12,725 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,725 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
94,465 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
94,465 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(8,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Total Gains |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,880 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
58,559 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
58,559 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
Real estate, net (2) |
|
|
19,753 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
19,753 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
82,957 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
82,957 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents carrying value and related write-downs of loans for which adjustments are based
on the appraised value of the collateral. The carrying value of loans fully charged-off is zero. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the fair value and related losses of foreclosed real estate and other collateral
owned that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed
assets. |
(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Generally accepted accounting principles require interim reporting period disclosure about the fair
value of financial instruments, including assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items for which
it is practicable to estimate fair value. The fair value estimates are made based upon relevant
market information, if available, and upon the characteristics of the financial instruments
themselves. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Companys financial
instruments, fair value estimates are based upon judgments regarding future expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and
other factors. The estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments as of March 31, 2010
is shown below.
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Contract |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Contract |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
amount |
|
fair value |
|
amount |
|
amount |
|
fair value |
|
amount |
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
34,301 |
|
|
|
34,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
162,082 |
|
|
|
162,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,869 |
|
|
|
159,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,880 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
774,336 |
|
|
|
778,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
877,309 |
|
|
|
897,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
789,792 |
|
|
|
789,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798,369 |
|
|
|
798,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
132,500 |
|
|
|
141,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,500 |
|
|
|
141,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve line of credit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
59,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
138,784 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
167,053 |
|
Commitments to sell loans |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
9,595 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
25,538 |
|
(7) Comprehensive Loss
Other comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and
other events from nonowner sources. Comprehensive loss is the total of net loss and other
comprehensive income (loss), which for the Company is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on
securities available for sale. The components of other comprehensive loss and the related tax
effects were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Before tax |
|
|
Tax effect |
|
|
Net of tax |
|
|
Before tax |
|
|
Tax effect |
|
|
Net of tax |
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses
arising during the period |
|
$ |
(376 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(376 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) Securities Available For Sale
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value for the securities available
for sale portfolio, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than twelve months |
|
|
Twelve months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
# of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Investments |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Mortgage backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Other marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA Notes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
FHLMC Notes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
FHLB Notes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Corporate preferred stock |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
31,078 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
$ |
31,253 |
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than twelve months |
|
|
Twelve months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
# of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Investments |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Mortgage backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,782 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
2,782 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
FNMA |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate preferred stock |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
4,910 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
5,269 |
|
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
|
We review our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment. This
review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower
than the cost, the market liquidity for the investment, the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the
issuer, and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to
recover the temporary loss. The unrealized losses on collateralized mortgage and agency obligations
are primarily due to changes in interest rates and were not determined to be other-than-temporary.
Mortgage backed securities in the table above had an average life of less than three years and the
other marketable securities had an average life of less than one year at March 31, 2010.
The unrealized losses reported for corporate preferred stock at March 31, 2010 related to a single
trust preferred security that was issued by the holding company of a small community bank. Typical
of most trust preferred issuances, the issuer has the ability to defer interest payments for up to
five years with interest payable on the deferred balance. In October 2009, the issuer elected to
defer its scheduled interest payments as allowed by the terms of the security agreement. The
issuers subsidiary bank has incurred operating losses due to increased provisions for loan losses
but still meets the regulatory requirements to be considered well capitalized based on its most
recent regulatory filing. In addition, the owners of the issuing bank appear to have the ability to
make additional capital contributions, if needed, to enhance the banks capital position. Based on
a review of the issuer, it was determined that the trust preferred security was not
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010. The Company believes it is not probable that they will be required
to sell the preferred stock prior to recovery and has the intent and ability to hold it for a period of time sufficient to
recover the temporary loss. Management believes that the Company will receive all principal and
interest payments contractually due on the security and that the decrease in the market value is
primarily due to a lack of liquidity in the market for trust preferred securities and the deferral
of interest by the issuer. Management will continue to monitor the credit risk of the issuer and
may be required to recognize other-than-temporary impairment charges on this security in future
periods.
A summary of securities available for sale at March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized |
|
|
Gross unrealized |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
24,022 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24,899 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
17,747 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
18,500 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
|
4,522 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
4,565 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,676 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
48,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agency obligations |
|
|
113,044 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
113,539 |
|
Corporate preferred stock |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,744 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
113,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,420 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
162,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The following table indicates amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available
for sale at March 31, 2010 based upon contractual maturity adjusted for scheduled repayments of
principal and projected prepayments of principal based upon current economic conditions and interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
Due less than one year |
|
$ |
128,506 |
|
|
|
129,519 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
27,495 |
|
|
|
28,522 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
Due after 10 years |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
160,420 |
|
|
|
162,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations in the
table above is based upon the anticipated future cash flow of the securities using estimated
mortgage prepayment speeds.
(9) Investment in Mortgage Servicing Rights
A summary of mortgage servicing activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Twelve months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
Originations |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(556 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
2,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the loans being serviced were single family loans under the FNMA mortgage-backed
security program or the individual loan sale program. The following is a summary of the risk
characteristics of the loans being serviced at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
Interest |
|
Remaining |
|
Number |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Term |
|
of Loans |
|
Original term 30 year fixed rate |
|
$ |
223,406 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
Original term 15 year fixed rate |
|
|
98,100 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
Adjustable rate |
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
The gross carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights and the associated accumulated
amortization at March 31, 2010 is presented in the following table. Amortization expense for
mortgage servicing rights was $109,000 and $155,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Intangible |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Assets |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
4,216 |
|
|
|
(2,860 |
) |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,216 |
|
|
|
(2,860 |
) |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The following table indicates the estimated future amortization expense for mortgage servicing
rights:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Rights |
|
|
Year ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
259 |
|
2011 |
|
|
270 |
|
2012 |
|
|
231 |
|
2013 |
|
|
208 |
|
2014 |
|
|
176 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
212 |
|
|
Projections of amortization are based on existing asset balances and the existing interest
rate environment as of March 31, 2010. The Companys actual experience may be significantly
different depending upon changes in mortgage interest rates and other market conditions.
(10) Loss per Share
The following table reconciles the weighted average shares outstanding and the income available to
common shareholders used for basic and diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
used in basic earnings per common share calculation |
|
|
3,736,852 |
|
|
|
3,675,984 |
|
Net dilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
adjusted for effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
3,736,852 |
|
|
|
3,675,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(2,287,581 |
) |
|
|
(3,050,752 |
) |
Basic loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
Diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
At March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 there were 186,145 and 16,114 common share equivalents
outstanding, respectively, that are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share
as they are anti-dilutive.
(11) Regulatory Capital and Regulatory Oversight
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly
additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material
effect on the Companys financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of the Banks assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Banks capital amounts and classification
are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and
other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of Tier I or Core capital
and Risk-based capital (as defined in the regulations) to total assets (as defined). Management
believes, as of March 31, 2010, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it
is subject.
Management believes that based upon the Banks capital calculations at March 31, 2010 and other
conditions consistent with the Prompt Corrective Actions Provisions of the OTS regulations, the
Bank would be categorized as well capitalized.
13
On March 31, 2010, the Banks tangible assets and adjusted total assets were $1.01 billion and its
risk-weighted assets were $792.8 million. The following table presents the Banks capital amounts
and ratios at March 31, 2010 for actual capital, required capital and excess capital including
ratios required to qualify as a well capitalized institution under the Prompt Corrective Actions
regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Excess Capital |
|
|
Corrective Action Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets(1) |
|
Bank stockholders equity |
|
$ |
94,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on certain securities
available for sale |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disallowed servicing and tax assets |
|
|
13,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I or core capital |
|
|
79,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to adjusted total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.88 |
% |
|
$ |
40,458 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
39,211 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
% |
|
$ |
50,573 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.05 |
% |
|
$ |
31,712 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
47,957 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
$ |
47,568 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowable allowance for loan losses |
|
|
9,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-based capital |
|
$ |
89,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-based capital to risk- weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based upon the Banks adjusted total assets for the purpose of the tangible and core capital ratios and risk-weighted assets for the purpose of the risk-based capital ratio. |
The Bank has an informal written agreement with the OTS that became effective December 9, 2009
and primarily relates to the Banks financial performance and credit quality issues. In accordance
with the agreement, the Bank has submitted a three year business and capital plan and the OTS has
notified the Bank that it does not object to the plan. The Bank is to operate within the parameters
of the business and capital plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its
compliance with the plan. The Banks operating results for the first quarter of 2010 varied from
the plan primarily in that the provision for loan losses recognized in the quarter exceeded the
amount included in the business and capital plan. The agreement also requires the Bank to develop
plans and take actions to address non-performing assets and watch-list credits. As of March 31,
2010, actual non-performing assets exceeded the amounts reflected in the Banks plan submitted to
the OTS primarily because more loans were classified as non-performing and fewer non-performing
loans were transferred to real estate owned during the first quarter of 2010 than originally
anticipated.
HMN also has entered into an informal written agreement with the OTS that became effective December
9, 2009. In accordance with the agreement, the Company submitted a three year capital plan and the
OTS has requested additional information regarding the capital plan. The OTS may make comments
upon, and require revisions to, the capital plan. The Company is to operate within the parameters
of the final capital plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance
with the plan. The Companys operating results for the first quarter of 2010 varied from the
preliminary plan primarily in that the provision for loan losses recognized in the quarter exceeded
the amount included in the capital plan. Under the agreement, without the consent of the OTS, the
Company may not incur or issue any debt, guarantee the debt of any entity, declare or pay any cash
dividends or repurchase any of the Companys capital stock.
(12) Commitments and Contingencies
The Bank issued standby letters of credit which guarantee the performance of customers to third
parties. The standby letters of credit issued and available at March 31, 2010 were approximately
$3.6 million, expire over the next two years, and are collateralized primarily with commercial real
estate mortgages. Since the conditions under which the Bank is required to fund the standby
letters of credit may not materialize, the cash requirements are expected to be less than the total
outstanding commitments.
14
(13) Business Segments
The Bank has been identified as a reportable operating segment in accordance with the provisions of
ASC 280. SFC and HMN did not meet the quantitative thresholds for determining reportable segments
and therefore are included in the Other category.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on the segments net income, return
on average assets and equity. Each corporation is managed separately with its own officers and
board of directors, some of whom may overlap between the corporations.
The following table sets forth certain information about the reconciliations of reported profit or
loss and assets for each of the Companys reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Savings Bank |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
At or for the quarter ended March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income external customers |
|
$ |
12,904 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,904 |
|
Non-interest income external customers |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
Loss on limited partnerships |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Intersegment interest income |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Intersegment non-interest income |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,944 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4,943 |
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net. |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Other non-interest expense |
|
|
5,748 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
5,908 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
1,027,274 |
|
|
|
98,203 |
|
|
|
(97,001 |
) |
|
|
1,028,476 |
|
At or for the quarter ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income external customers |
|
$ |
15,353 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,353 |
|
Non-interest income external customers |
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
Loss on limited partnerships |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Intersegment interest income |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Intersegment non-interest income |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(2,457 |
) |
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
6,571 |
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net. |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Other non-interest expense |
|
|
8,118 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
8,273 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,760 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(2,456 |
) |
|
|
(2,623 |
) |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
(2,622 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
1,112,271 |
|
|
|
109,981 |
|
|
|
(108,893 |
) |
|
|
1,113,359 |
|
15
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
Item 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-looking Information
This quarterly report and other reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are often identified by such forward-looking
terminology as expect, intent, look, believe, anticipate, estimate, project, seek,
may, will, would, could, should, trend, target, and goal or similar statements or
variations of such terms and include, but are not limited to, those relating to the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses, the adequacy of available liquidity to the Bank, the future outlook for
the Company, the Companys ability to realize the benefit of deferred tax assets, whether the
Company will receive all principal and interest payments contractually due on trust preferred
securities and whether the Company continues to hold such securities, future expectations regarding
dividends, renewals of certificates of deposit and the ability of the Bank to replace deposits that
do not renew, the amount of deposits that will be withdrawn from checking and money market accounts
and how the withdrawn deposits will be replaced, the projected changes in net interest income based
on rate shocks, the range that interest rates may fluctuate over the next twelve months, the net
market risk of interest rate shocks and the Companys compliance with regulatory standards. A
number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the Companys assumptions
and expectations. These include, but are not limited to, the adequacy and marketability of real
estate securing loans to borrowers; possible legislative and regulatory changes; adverse economic,
business and competitive developments such as shrinking interest margins; reduced collateral
values; deposit outflows; reduced demand for financial services and loan products; changes in
accounting policies and guidelines, or monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government or
tax laws; international economic developments, changes in credit or other risks posed by the
Companys loan and investment portfolios; technological, computer-related or operational
difficulties; adverse changes in securities markets and the availability of, and terms associated with
obtaining, additional capital if and when needed; results of
litigation; the Companys participation in the U.S. Treasury Departments Capital Purchase Program;
or other significant uncertainties. Additional factors that may cause actual results to differ from
the Companys assumptions and expectations include those set forth in the Companys most recent
filing on Form 10-K and this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All
forward-looking statements are qualified by, and should be considered in conjunction with, such
cautionary statements. For additional discussion of the risks and uncertainties applicable to the
Company, see the Risk Factors section of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and Part II, Item 1A of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
General
The earnings of the Company are primarily dependent on the Banks net interest income, which is the
difference between interest earned on loans and investments, and the interest paid on
interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, and Federal
Reserve Bank (FRB) borrowings. The difference between the average rate of interest earned on
assets and the average rate paid on liabilities is the interest rate spread. Net interest income
is produced when interest-earning assets equal or exceed interest-bearing liabilities and there is
a positive interest rate spread. Net interest income and net interest rate spread are affected by
changes in interest rates, the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, and the level of non-performing assets. The Companys net income is also affected by
the generation of non-interest income, which consists primarily of gains or losses from the sale of
securities, gains from the sale of loans, fees for servicing mortgage loans, and the generation of
fees and service charges on deposit accounts. The Bank incurs expenses in addition to interest
expense in the form of salaries and benefits, occupancy expenses, provisions for loan losses and
amortization of mortgage servicing assets. Over the past several years, the Company has increased
the emphasis on commercial and commercial real estate loans, which has increased the credit risk
inherent in the loan portfolio. While HMN did not originate or hold subprime mortgages in its loan
portfolio, purchase investments backed by subprime mortgages, or incur any write downs directly
related to subprime mortgages, subprime credit issues indirectly impacted the Company by making it
more difficult for some borrowers with marginal credit to qualify for a mortgage because most of
the non-traditional mortgage products were eliminated by the banks and mortgage companies that were
previously offering them. This decrease
16
in available credit reduced the demand for single family homes as there were fewer qualified buyers in the
marketplace. The decrease in demand for housing and building lots affected our level of loan charge
offs and the risk ratings on many of our residential development loans. Consequently, our
provision for loan losses significantly increased relative to periods before the current economic
slowdown. The increase in the provision was due primarily to commercial loan charge offs and risk
rating downgrades caused by continued weak demand for housing and building and general economic
weakness in our markets. In addition, our losses on loans and other real estate owned increased due to the
declining value of the real estate.
The earnings of financial institutions, such as the Bank, are significantly affected by prevailing
economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government monetary
and fiscal policies, and regulations of various regulatory authorities. Lending activities are
influenced by the demand for and supply of business credit, single family and commercial
properties, competition among lenders, the level of interest rates and the availability of funds.
Deposit flows and costs of deposits are influenced by prevailing market rates of interest on
competing investments, account maturities and levels of personal income and savings.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those policies that the Companys management believes are the
most important to understanding the Companys financial condition and operating results. The
Company has identified the following policies as being critical because they require difficult,
subjective, and/or complex judgments that are inherently uncertain. Therefore, actual financial
results could differ significantly depending upon the estimates, assumptions and other factors
used.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision
The allowance for loan losses is based on periodic analysis of the loan portfolio. In this
analysis, management considers factors including, but not limited to, specific occurrences of loan
impairment, changes in the size of the portfolios, national and regional economic conditions such
as unemployment data, loan portfolio composition, loan delinquencies, local construction permits,
development plans, local economic growth rates, historical experience and observations made by the
Companys ongoing internal audit and regulatory exam processes. Loans are charged off to the
extent they are deemed to be uncollectible. The Company has established separate components of its
overall methodology to determine the adequacy of the loan loss allowance for its homogeneous
single-family and consumer loan portfolios and its non-homogeneous loan portfolios. The
determination of the allowance on the homogeneous single-family and consumer loan portfolios is
calculated on a pooled basis with individual determination of the allowance of all non-performing
loans. The determination of the allowance for the non-homogeneous commercial, commercial real
estate, and multi-family loan portfolios involves assigning standardized risk ratings and loss
factors that are periodically reviewed. The loss factors are estimated based on the Companys own
loss experience and are assigned to all loans without identified credit weaknesses. For each
non-performing loan, the Company also performs an individual analysis of impairment that is based
on the expected cash flows or the value of the assets collateralizing the loans and establishes any
necessary specific reserves. The determination of the allowance on the homogeneous single-family
and consumer loan portfolios is calculated on a pooled basis with individual determination of the
allowance for all non-performing loans.
The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is dependent upon managements estimates of variables
affecting valuation, appraisals of collateral, evaluations of performance and status, and the
amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans. Such estimates,
appraisals, evaluations and cash flows may be subject to frequent adjustments due to changing
economic prospects of borrowers or properties. The estimates are reviewed periodically and
adjustments, if any, are recorded in the provision for loan losses in the periods in which the
adjustments become known. Because of the size of some loans, changes in estimates can have a
significant impact on the loan loss provision. The allowance is allocated to individual loan
categories based upon the relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolios and the actual loss
experience. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging the provision for loan
losses against income. The methodology for establishing the allowance for loan losses takes into
consideration probable losses that have been identified in connection with specific loans as well
as probable losses in the loan portfolio for which specific reserves are not required. Although
management believes that based on current conditions the allowance for loan losses is maintained at
an adequate amount to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio as of the balance
sheet date, future conditions may differ substantially from those anticipated in determining the allowance for loan losses and
adjustments may be required in the future.
17
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. These calculations are based on many complex factors including estimates of the
timing of reversals of temporary differences, the interpretation of federal and state income tax
laws, and a determination of the differences between the tax and the financial reporting basis of
assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates and
interpretations used in determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities.
The Company maintains significant net deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences, the
largest of which relates to the allowance for loan losses. For income tax purposes, only net
charge-offs are deductible, not the provision for loan losses. Under generally accepted accounting
principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is more likely than not that
the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The determination of the realizability of the
deferred tax assets is highly subjective and dependent upon judgment concerning managements
evaluation of both positive and negative evidence, the forecasts of future income, applicable tax
planning strategies and assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions.
The Company considers both positive and negative evidence regarding the ultimate realizabilty of
deferred tax assets. Positive evidence includes the ability to implement tax planning strategies
to accelerate taxable income recognition and the probability that taxable income will be generated
in future periods. Negative evidence includes the Companys cumulative loss in the prior three year
period and the general business and economic trends. At March 31, 2010, the Company did not record
a valuation allowance relating to deferred tax assets. This determination was based largely on the
Companys ability to implement tax planning strategies to accelerate taxable income and its ability
to generate future taxable income. The Company believes, based on its internal earnings
projections, that it will generate sufficient future taxable income that will result in the
realization of the Companys deferred tax assets. This positive evidence was sufficient to overcome the negative evidence of a cumulative loss in the
most recent three year period. The recent cumulative loss includes event-specific charges in the
form of significant loan loss provisions that have been realized in the past two years, including
one specific $12.0 million provision and related charge-offs in 2008 due to the apparently
fraudulent activities related to the collateral of one loan, and a $3.8 million non-cash goodwill
impairment charge recorded in 2008. Without these event-specific charges, the most recent three
year period would not reflect a cumulative loss. It is possible that future conditions may
differ substantially from those anticipated in determining the need for a valuation allowance on
deferred tax assets and adjustments may be required in the future.
Under current interpretations of the applicable accounting rules, an evaluation is performed each
quarter to determine the need for a valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset amount and a
valuation allowance may be required if the net income/loss for that period results in a three year
cumulative loss, excluding the event-specific charges noted above. The applicable accounting rules
would also require that a valuation allowance be established against the entire amount of the net
deferred tax asset, which was $13.5 million as of March 31, 2010, since the Company does not currently have the ability to carry back
losses to prior periods. If a valuation allowance is required, it will have a limited impact on
regulatory capital as the majority of the deferred tax asset amount is already excluded from the
current risk based capital calculation.
Accounting for income taxes requires the use of estimates and managements best judgment to
determine the amounts and probabilities of all of the possible outcomes that could be realized upon
the ultimate settlement of any tax position using the facts, circumstances, and information
available. Because significant estimates and judgments are used in arriving at the amount of tax
benefits to be recognized in the financial statements for a given tax position, it is possible that the tax benefits realized upon the ultimate resolution of a tax
position may result in tax benefits that are significantly different from those estimated.
18
Net Loss
The net loss for the first quarter of 2010 was $1.8 million, an improvement of $0.8 million
compared to a net loss of $2.6 million for the first quarter of 2009. Net loss available to common
shareholders was $2.3 million for the first quarter of 2010, an improvement of $0.8 million, or
25.0%, from the net loss available to common shareholders of $3.1 million for the first quarter of
2009. Diluted loss per common share for the first quarter of 2010 was $0.61, an improvement of
$0.22 from diluted loss per common share of $0.83 for the first quarter of 2009. The decrease in
the net loss between the periods was due primarily to a $1.9 million improvement in the
gains/losses recognized on the sale of real estate owned which was partially offset by an $821,000
decrease in net interest income. The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of a
decrease in interest-earning assets between the periods.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income was $8.0 million for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $0.8 million, or
9.3%, compared to $8.8 million for the first quarter of 2009. Interest income was $12.9 million
for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $2.5 million, or 16.0%, from $15.4 million for the
first quarter of 2009. Interest income decreased between the periods primarily because of a $104
million decrease in average interest-earning assets between the periods. Average interest earning
assets decreased between the periods primarily because of a decrease in the commercial loan
portfolio, which occurred because of declining loan demand and the Companys focus on improving
credit quality, managing interest rate risk and improving capital ratios. Interest income was also
adversely affected by the increase in non-performing assets between the periods. The average yield
earned on interest-earning assets was 5.36% for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of 40 basis
points from the 5.76% average yield for the first quarter of 2009.
Interest expense was $4.9 million for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $1.7 million, or
24.8%, compared to $6.6 million for the first quarter of 2009. Interest expense decreased
primarily because of the lower interest rates paid on money market accounts and certificates of
deposits. The decreased rates were the result of the 400 basis point decrease in the federal funds
rate that occurred in 2008. Decreases in the federal funds rate, which is the rate that banks
charge other banks for short term loans, generally have a lagging effect and decrease the rates
banks pay for deposits. The lagging effect of deposit rate changes is primarily due to the Banks
deposits that are in the form of certificates of deposits, which do not re-price immediately when
the federal funds rate changes. Interest expense also decreased because of an $89 million decrease
in the average interest-bearing liabilities between the periods. The decrease in average
interest-bearing liabilities is primarily the result of a decrease in the outstanding borrowings
and brokered certificates of deposits between the periods. The decrease in borrowings and brokered
deposits between the periods was the result of using the proceeds from loan principal payments to
fund maturing borrowings and brokered deposits. The average interest rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities was 2.17% for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of 46 basis points from the 2.63%
average interest rate paid in the first quarter of 2009.
Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest earning assets) for the first
quarter of 2010 was 3.31%, an increase of 1 basis point, compared to 3.30% for the first quarter of
2009.
19
A summary of the Company net interest margin for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three month period ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
159,759 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
$ |
165,387 |
|
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
Mortgage loans, net |
|
|
143,667 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
|
|
160,762 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
Commercial loans, net |
|
|
564,322 |
|
|
|
8,453 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
648,210 |
|
|
|
9,958 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
Consumer loans, net |
|
|
80,991 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
|
|
85,407 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
18,591 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
10,468 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(1.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
976,401 |
|
|
|
12,904 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
1,080,825 |
|
|
|
15,354 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities and
noninterest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
98,474 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
112,143 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
31,821 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
29,236 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
136,800 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
95,983 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Certificates |
|
|
243,180 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
260,170 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
Brokered deposits |
|
|
199,257 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
255,210 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
132,611 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
192,967 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
842,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
945,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest checking |
|
|
79,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest bearing escrow deposits |
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities and
noninterest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
923,614 |
|
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
$ |
1,012,552 |
|
|
|
6,571 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses was $6.5 million for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $0.1
million, or 0.5%, compared to $6.6 million for the first quarter of 2009. The provision for loan
losses remained elevated in the first quarter of 2010 primarily because of $2.5 million in
additional reserves established on two commercial real estate loans as a result of decreases in the
estimated value of the underlying collateral supporting the loans, $1.4 million in additional
reserves established on other loans due to risk rating downgrades, $1.6 million in additional
reserves established on a commercial loan due to the borrower filing bankruptcy, and a $1.1 million
increase in the general reserves required for other performing loans as a result of a loan
portfolio analysis.
A rollforward of the Companys allowance for loan losses for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
23,811 |
|
|
$ |
21,257 |
|
Provision |
|
|
6,533 |
|
|
|
6,569 |
|
Charge offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(694 |
) |
Commercial business |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(9,461 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, |
|
$ |
29,284 |
|
|
$ |
17,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General allowance |
|
|
12,080 |
|
|
|
10,002 |
|
Specific allowance |
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
|
7,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,284 |
|
|
$ |
17,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income was $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $259,000, or
14.1%, from $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2009. Fees and service charges decreased
$185,000 between the periods primarily
20
because of a decrease in late fees and overdraft charges. Gain on sales of loans decreased
$109,000 between the periods due to a decrease in the gains recognized on the sale of single family
loans because of a decrease in loan originations and sales. Other non-interest income increased
$19,000 between the periods primarily because of increased rental income on other real estate
owned. Loan servicing fees increased $16,000 between the periods primarily because of an increase
in the number of single family loans that are being serviced for others.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense was $6.0 million for the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $2.4 million, or
28.6%, from $8.4 million for the first quarter of 2009. The gain/loss on real estate owned
improved by $1.9 million between the periods due primarily to a $1.0 million gain realized on the
sale of an elderly care facility in the first quarter of 2010. Compensation expense decreased
$400,000 between the periods primarily because of costs associated with the employment agreement of
a former executive officer that were expensed in the first quarter of 2009. Other expenses
decreased $270,000 between the periods due primarily to decreases in legal fees and payment
processing costs. Occupancy expense decreased $61,000 due primarily to decreased depreciation
expense on furniture and equipment. Deposit insurance costs increased $187,000 due to an increase
in insurance rates between the periods.
Income Tax Benefit
Income tax benefit decreased $592,000 between the periods due to a decrease in the taxable loss and
an effective tax rate that decreased from 40.2% for the first quarter of 2009 to 38.7% for the
first quarter of 2010. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the impact of
tax exempt income.
Non-Performing Assets
The following table summarizes the amounts and categories of non-performing assets in the Banks
portfolio and loan delinquency information as March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Non-Accruing Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family real estate |
|
$ |
2,194 |
|
|
$ |
2,132 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
43,596 |
|
|
|
37,122 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
28,709 |
|
|
|
17,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
77,998 |
|
|
|
61,127 |
|
|
Foreclosed and Repossessed Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family real estate |
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
11,328 |
|
|
|
15,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
90,726 |
|
|
$ |
77,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as a percentage of total assets |
|
|
8.83 |
% |
|
|
7.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
77,998 |
|
|
$ |
61,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as a percentage of total loans receivable, net |
|
|
10.07 |
% |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan loss to non-performing loans |
|
|
37.54 |
% |
|
|
38.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquency Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquencies (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ days |
|
$ |
7,083 |
|
|
$ |
11,140 |
|
90+ days |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Delinquencies as a percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and lease portfolio (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ days |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
90+ days |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes non-accrual loans. |
Total non-performing assets were $90.7 million at March 31, 2010, an increase of $13.3
million, or 17.2%, from $77.4 million at December 31, 2009. Non-performing loans increased $16.9
million and foreclosed and repossessed assets decreased $3.6 million during the first quarter of
2010. The increase in non-performing loans is primarily due to a $6.4 million office building
loan, a $5.0 million loan to another financial institution, $1.7 million in loans to a leasing
operation, a $1.5 million loan to a real estate developer and a $0.9 million residential
development loan that became non-performing during the quarter. The non-performing loan and
foreclosed and
21
repossessed asset activity for the first quarter of 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed and repossessed
assets
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
61,127 |
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
$ |
16,262 |
|
Classified as non-performing |
|
|
19,907 |
|
|
Transferred from non-performing loans
|
|
|
770 |
|
Charge offs |
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
Other foreclosures/repossessions
|
|
|
389 |
|
Principal payments received |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
Real estate sold
|
|
|
(5,442 |
) |
Classified as accruing |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
Net gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
767 |
|
Transferred to real estate owned |
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
Write downs
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
77,998 |
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
12,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the number and types of commercial real estate loans (the
largest category of non-performing loans) that were non-performing at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Property Type |
|
# of relationships |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
# of relationships |
|
|
2009 |
|
Residential developments |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
12,914 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
12,030 |
|
Single family homes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,088 |
|
Hotel |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
Alternative fuel plants |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,889 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,834 |
|
Shopping centers/retail |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
Restaurants/bar |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
Office building |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
$ |
43,596 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
$ |
37,122 |
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the number and industry of commercial business loans that
were non-performing at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Industry |
|
# of relationships |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
# of relationships |
|
|
2009 |
|
Construction/development |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
4,094 |
|
Finance |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8,764 |
|
Alternative fuels |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
Retail |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Banking |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8,233 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
Entertainment |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
28,709 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
17,787 |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, impaired loans were $78.0 million and $61.1 million,
respectively, for which the related allowance for loan losses was $17.2 million and $12.1 million,
respectively. Impaired loans for which no specific allowance has been recorded because management
determined that the collateral was sufficient to repay the loan totaled $14.9 million and $17.0
million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
In addition to the non-performing assets in the prior table of all non-performing assets, as of
March 31, 2010, the Bank held 26 loans for which the interest rates were modified in troubled debt
restructurings in the first quarter of 2010. The principal balances of the loans that were
modified totaled $10.0 million and related to a variety of commercial real estate loans and a home
equity loan. The loans were not classified as non-performing as it is anticipated that the
borrowers will be able to make all of the required principal and interest payments under the
modified terms of the loans. The Bank has no outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to
these borrowers.
Dividends
The declaration of dividends on common stock is subject to, among other things, the Companys
financial condition and results of operations, the Banks compliance with its regulatory capital
requirements including risk based capital requirements, limitations imposed through the Companys
participation in the U.S. Treasurys Capital Purchase Program, tax considerations, industry
standards, economic conditions, regulatory restrictions, general business practices, and other
factors. The Banks capital position at March 31, 2010 remained above the
22
levels required for the Bank to be considered a well-capitalized financial institution by regulatory
standards. The payment of dividends is dependent upon the Company having adequate cash or other
assets that can be converted to cash to pay dividends to its stockholders. The Company suspended
the payment of quarterly cash dividends to common stockholders in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to
the net operating loss experienced and the challenging economic environment. It is not anticipated
that dividends on common stock will be paid over the next 12 months because of our desire to
preserve capital. In addition, under the terms of the informal written agreement that the Company
entered into with the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), effective December 9, 2009, the Company
may not declare or pay any cash dividends, or repurchase or redeem any capital stock, without prior
notice to, and consent of, the OTS. The Company is restricted from repurchasing common stock
because of the stock repurchase restriction imposed by its participation in the U.S. Treasurys
Capital Purchase Program. The Company currently anticipates making quarterly preferred dividend
payments of $325,000 on the preferred stock issued to the Treasury for the first five years the
preferred stock is outstanding and $585,000 each quarter after that if the shares are not redeemed.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the net cash provided by operating activities was $5.1
million. The Company collected $22.2 million in principal repayments and maturities on securities
during the quarter. It purchased $25.1 million of investment securities, received $5.4 million in
proceeds from the sale of real estate, and received $16.3 million related to a decrease in net
loans receivable. The Company had a net decrease in deposit balances of $6.4 million during the
quarter, paid $0.3 million in dividends to preferred stockholders, and received $0.7 million in
customer escrows. It also received $5.0 million in borrowing proceeds and paid off borrowings of
$5.0 million.
The decrease in deposit balances was primarily related to a $29 million decrease in brokered
deposits that were partially offset by the $24.6 million increase in transaction accounts during
the quarter.
The Company has certificates of deposits with outstanding balances of $264.4 million that come due
over the next 12 months, of which $95.9 million were obtained from brokers. Based upon past
experience, management anticipates that the majority of the deposits will renew for another term.
The Company believes that deposits which do not renew will be replaced with deposits from other
customers or brokers. FHLB advances, Federal Reserve borrowings, or proceeds from the sale of
securities could also be used to replace unanticipated outflows of deposits.
The Company has deposits of $78.9 million in checking and money market accounts with customers that
have individual balances greater than $5.0 million. These funds may be withdrawn at any time,
however, management does not anticipate that these deposits will be withdrawn from the Bank over
the next twelve months. If these deposits were to be withdrawn, the Company believes they would be
replaced with deposits from other customers or brokers. FHLB advances, Federal Reserve borrowings
or proceeds from the sale of securities could also be used to replace unanticipated outflows of
large checking and money market deposits.
The Company has one $10.0 million advance with the FHLB that matures during the next twelve months.
The Company has $77.5 million of FHLB advances that mature beyond March 31, 2011 that have call
features that can be exercised by the FHLB during the next twelve months. If the call features are
exercised, the Company has the option of requesting any advance otherwise available to it pursuant
to the credit policy of the FHLB.
The Company has entered into an informal written agreement with the OTS that became effective
December 9, 2009. In accordance with the agreement, the Company submitted a three year capital
plan and the OTS has requested additional information regarding the capital plan. The OTS may make
comments upon, and require revisions to, the capital plan. The Company is to operate within the
parameters of the final capital plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its
compliance with the plan. The Companys operating results for the first quarter of 2010 varied
from the preliminary plan primarily in that the provision for loan losses recognized in the quarter
exceeded the amount included in the capital plan. Under the agreement, without the consent of the
OTS, the Company may not incur or issue any debt, guarantee the debt of any entity, declare or pay
any cash dividends or repurchase any of the Companys capital stock.
23
The primary source of cash for HMN is dividends from the Bank and the Bank is restricted from
paying dividends to the Company without obtaining prior regulatory approval. At March 31, 2010, HMN
had $2.4 million in cash and other assets that could readily be turned into cash. The primary use
of cash by HMN is the payment of dividends on outstanding shares of preferred stock issued to the
United States Treasury under the Treasurys Capital Purchase Program. The amount of the dividend
on the preferred stock accumulates at the rate of $325,000 per quarter through February 14, 2014
and $585,000 per quarter thereafter, if the shares of preferred stock are not redeemed. If the
accumulated dividends on the preferred stock have not been paid for an aggregate of six quarterly
dividend periods or more, whether or not consecutive, the number of directors of the Company
automatically will be increased by two, and the holders of the preferred shares (currently the
United States Treasury) will have the right to elect two directors to fill the newly created
directorships.
HMN also serves as a source of capital, liquidity and financial
support to the Bank. Based on the operating performance of the Bank
or other capital demands, HMN may need to raise additional capital. If HMN raises capital through the issuance
of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities, it would dilute the ownership interests of existing
stockholders and may dilute the per share book value of the Companys common stock. New investors may also
have rights, preferences and privileges senior to the Companys current stockholders, which may adversely
impact the Companys current stockholders. HMNs ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the
capital markets at that time, which are outside of the Companys control, and on the
Companys financial performance. Accordingly, HMN may not be able to raise additional capital, if
needed, on favorable economic, or other terms acceptable to the Company. If HMN cannot raise additional
capital when needed, the Companys ability to maintain or expand its operations, the Companys ability to operate
without additional regulatory or other restrictions, and its operating results, could be materially adversely affected.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Companys
market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its investing, lending and deposit
taking activities. Management actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk exposure.
The Companys profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and
substantial change in interest rates may adversely impact the Companys earnings to the extent that
the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same
extent, or on the same basis. The Company monitors the projected changes in net interest income
that occur if interest rates were to suddenly change up or down. The Rate Shock Table located in
the Asset/Liability Management section of this report, which follows, discloses the Companys
projected changes in net interest income based upon immediate interest rate changes called rate
shocks.
The Company utilizes a model that uses the discounted cash flows from its interest-earning assets
and its interest-bearing liabilities to calculate the current market value of those assets and
liabilities. The model also calculates the changes in market value of the interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities due to different interest rate changes.
The following table discloses the projected changes in market value to the Companys
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities based upon incremental 100 basis point
changes in interest rates from interest rates in effect on March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than trading portfolio |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Market Value |
|
Basis point change in interest rates |
|
-100 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
+100 |
|
|
+200 |
|
|
Total market risk sensitive assets |
|
$ |
1,009,437 |
|
|
|
997,573 |
|
|
|
983,489 |
|
|
|
968,597 |
|
Total market risk sensitive liabilities |
|
|
923,338 |
|
|
|
909,260 |
|
|
|
896,586 |
|
|
|
882,936 |
|
Off-balance sheet financial instruments |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net market risk |
|
$ |
86,051 |
|
|
|
88,313 |
|
|
|
86,561 |
|
|
|
85,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage change from current market value |
|
|
(2.56) |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
(1.98 |
)% |
|
|
(3.70) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The preceding table was prepared utilizing the following assumptions (the Model Assumptions)
regarding prepayment and decay ratios which were determined by management based upon their review
of historical prepayment speeds and future prepayment projections. Fixed rate loans were assumed
to prepay at annual rates of between 5% to 70%, depending on the note rate and the period to
maturity. Adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) were assumed to prepay at annual rates of between 11% and 33%, depending on the note rate and the
period to
24
maturity. Growing Equity Mortgage (GEM) loans were assumed to prepay at annual rates of
between 7% and 44% depending on the note rate and the period to maturity. Mortgage-backed
securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs) were projected to have prepayments based
upon the underlying collateral securing the instrument and the related cash flow priority of the
CMO tranche owned. Certificate accounts were assumed not to be withdrawn until maturity. Passbook
accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 21% and money market accounts were assumed to
decay at an annual rate of 23%. Retail non-interest checking accounts were assumed to decay at an
annual rate of 23% and retail NOW accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 18%.
Commercial NOW accounts and MMDA accounts were assumed to decay at annual rates of 18% and 23%,
respectively. FHLB advances were projected to be called at the first call date where the projected
interest rate on similar remaining term advances exceeded the interest rate on the callable
advance.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. The
interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in
market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind
changes in market interest rates. The model assumes that the difference between the current
interest rate being earned or paid compared to a treasury instrument or other interest index with a
similar term to maturity (the Interest Spread) will remain constant over the interest changes
disclosed in the table. Changes in Interest Spread could impact projected market value changes.
Certain assets, such as ARMs, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a
short-term basis and over the life of the assets. The market value of the interest-bearing assets
which are approaching their lifetime interest rate caps could be different from the values
disclosed in the table. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early
withdrawal levels may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the foregoing table.
The ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a substantial
sustained interest rate increase.
Asset/Liability Management
The Companys management reviews the impact that changing interest rates will have on its net
interest income projected for the twelve months following March 31, 2010 to determine if its
current level of interest rate risk is acceptable. The following table projects the estimated
annual impact on net interest income of immediate interest rate changes called rate shocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Shock |
|
|
Projected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Basis |
|
|
Change in Net |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Points |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
+200 |
|
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
|
+100 |
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
|
(1,934 |
) |
|
|
(6.08 |
) |
|
|
|
The preceding table was prepared utilizing the Model Assumptions. Certain shortcomings are
inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. In the event of a change in
interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from
those assumed in calculating the foregoing table. The ability of many borrowers to service their
debt may decrease in the event of a substantial increase in interest rates and could impact net
interest income. The increase in interest income in a rising rate environment is primarily because
more loans than deposits are scheduled to reprice in the next twelve months.
In an attempt to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates, management closely monitors
interest rate risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Committee which meets frequently to discuss
changes in the interest rate risk position and projected profitability. The Committee makes
adjustments to the asset-liability position of the Bank, which are reviewed by the Board of
Directors of the Bank. This Committee also reviews the Banks portfolio, formulates investment
strategies and oversees the timing and implementation of transactions to assure attainment of the
Boards objectives in the most effective manner. In addition, each quarter the Board reviews the
Banks asset/liability position, including simulations of the effect on the Banks capital of
various interest rate scenarios.
In managing its asset/liability mix, the Bank, at times, depending on the relationship between
long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and consumer preference, may place more
emphasis on managing net interest
25
margin than on better matching the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities in an
effort to enhance net interest income. Management believes that the increased net interest income
resulting from a mismatch in the maturity of its asset and liability portfolios can, in certain
situations, provide high enough returns to justify the increased exposure to sudden and unexpected
changes in interest rates.
To the extent consistent with its interest rate spread objectives, the Bank attempts to manage its
interest rate risk and has taken a number of steps to structure its balance sheet in order to
better match the maturities of its assets and liabilities. The Bank has primarily focused its
fixed rate one-to-four family residential lending program on loans that are saleable to third
parties and generally places only those fixed rate loans that meet certain risk characteristics
into its loan portfolio. The Banks commercial loan production has primarily been in adjustable
rate loans while the fixed rate commercial loans placed in portfolio have been shorter-term loans,
usually with maturities of five years or less, in order to manage the Companys interest rate risk
exposure.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than commitments to originate and sell
loans in the ordinary course of business.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this
report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal controls. There was no change in the Companys internal controls over
financial reporting during the Companys most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls over
financial reporting.
26
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, HMN is party to legal proceedings arising out of its lending and deposit
operations. HMN is and expects to become engaged in a number of foreclosure proceedings and other
collection actions as part of its collection activities. Litigation is often unpredictable and the
actual results of litigation cannot be determined with any certainty.
In February 2007, the Minnesota Department of Revenue assessed a deficiency of $2.2 million against
the Companys 2002 through 2004 Minnesota state tax payments. The deficiency related to the tax
treatment of the inter-company dividends paid to the Bank by a former subsidiary of the Company.
In the second quarter of 2009, the Minnesota state tax court upheld the deficiency assessment. As
a result of the Minnesota state tax court decision, the Company recorded a $1.0 million increase in
net income taxes in 2009 after considering federal income tax deductions and previously recorded
contingency accruals. The Company also recorded $461,000 of related interest expense in other
operating expenses during the second quarter of 2009. The Company has appealed the Minnesota state
tax court decision to the Minnesota Supreme Court but has fully provided for the amounts that would
be due based on the tax court ruling.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.
We may be required to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available
when it is needed.
We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support
our operations. Based on operating performance or other capital demands, we may at some point need
to raise additional capital. If we raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our
common stock or other equity securities, it would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders
and may dilute the per share book value of our common stock. New investors may also have rights,
preferences and privileges senior to our current stockholders which may adversely impact our
current stockholders.
Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital
markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and on our financial performance.
Accordingly, we may not be able to raise additional capital, if needed, on favorable economic terms, or other terms acceptable to us.
If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to maintain or expand our
operations, our ability to operate without
additional regulatory or other restrictions, and our operating results, could be materially adversely affected.
If we incur additional losses, we may be required to write down or write off our deferred tax
assets.
We maintain significant net deferred tax assets for deductible
temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. The largest
of these relates to the allowance for loan losses. Under generally accepted accounting principles,
a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is more likely than not that the
deferred tax asset will not be realized. At March 31, 2010, we did not record a valuation allowance
relating to deferred tax assets. This determination was based largely on our ability to implement
tax planning strategies to accelerate taxable income and our ability to generate future taxable
income. It is possible that future conditions may differ substantially from those
anticipated in determining the need for a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and adjustments may be
required in the future, including the near-term future. Under current interpretations of the applicable accounting
rules, an evaluation will be performed each quarter to determine the need for a valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset amount and a valuation allowance may be required if the net income/loss for that period results
in a three year cumulative loss, excluding certain event-specific charges. The applicable accounting rules would
also require that a reserve be established against the entire amount of the net deferred tax asset, which was $13.5
million as of March 31, 2010, since we do not currently have the ability to carry back losses to prior periods. If
we are required to provide a valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets it would materially adversely affect our operating results.
See Part I, Item 1.A. of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 for additional risk factors.
27
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a) and (b) Not applicable
(c) Information Regarding Share Repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
(d) Maximum Number |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as Part |
|
|
of Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(b) Average Price |
|
|
of Publicly Announced |
|
|
Be Purchased Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
|
January 1 through January 31, 2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
February 1 through February 28, 2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
March 1 through March 31, 2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On July 22, 2008 the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 300,000 shares of
the Companys common stock. This program expired on January 26, 2010. |
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. [Removed and Reserved]
ITEM 5. Other Information.
None.
ITEM 6. Exhibits.
Incorporated by reference to the index to exhibits included with this report immediately
following the signature page.
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 5, 2010 |
/s/ Bradley Krehbiel
|
|
|
Bradley Krehbiel, |
|
|
Principal Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Representative) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 5, 2010 |
/s/ Jon Eberle
|
|
|
Jon Eberle, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
29
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
FOR FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequential |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
|
Page Numbering |
Regulation |
|
|
|
to Prior |
|
Where Attached |
S-K |
|
|
|
Filing or |
|
Exhibits Are |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Located in This |
Number |
|
Document Attached Hereto |
|
Number |
|
Form 10-Q Report |
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
|
|
|
*1 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws
|
|
|
*2 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate
|
|
|
*3 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CFO
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of CEO and CFO
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
*1 |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 1998 (File No. 0-24100). |
|
*2 |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as
amended, for the period ending September 30, 2008. (File No. 0-24100). |
|
*3 |
|
Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1 dated April 1, 1994 (File No. 33-77212). |
30