UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Exact name of registrant as specified in the charter)

Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Republic of India
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Vedanta, 75 Nehru Road
Vile Parle East
Mumbai, Maharashtra 400-099, India
+91-22-6646-1000
(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F þ               Form 40-F o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes o               No þ

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): Not applicable.

 

 

     The Company is incorporating by reference the information set forth in this Form 6-K into its registration statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-160580).

CONVENTIONS USED IN THIS REPORT

     In this report, references to “US” or the “United States” are to the United States of America, its territories and its possessions. References to “UK” are to the United Kingdom. References to “India” are to the Republic of India. References to “$,” “US$,” “dollars” or “US dollars” are to the legal currency of the United States, references to “Rs.,” “Rupees” or “Indian Rupees” are to the legal currency of India and references to “AUD,” “Australian dollars” or “A$” are to the legal currency of the Commonwealth of Australia. References to “¢” are to US cents. References to “lb” are to the imperial pounds (mass) equivalent to 0.4536 kilograms, references to “tons” are to metric tons, a unit of mass equivalent to 1,000 kilograms or 2,204.6 lb, references to “oz” are to ounces, with one kilogram being equivalent to 35.2740 oz and one ton equivalent to 32,000 oz, and references to “ha” are to hectares, a unit of area equal to 10,000 square meters or 107,639 square feet. Unless otherwise indicated, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 and for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 for our Company included in this report has been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, and its interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB. These are our first IFRS condensed consolidated interim financial statements and IFRS 1, “First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards,” has been applied. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all the information required for full annual audited consolidated financial statements and are prepared in accordance with IAS 34, “Interim Financial Reporting”.

     An explanation of how the transition to IFRS has affected the reported financial position and financial performance of the Company is provided in Note 4 to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in this report. Note 4 includes reconciliations of equity and total comprehensive income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and reconciliation of opening equity as of April 1, 2008 reported under US GAAP, or “Previous GAAP”. References to a particular “fiscal” year are to our fiscal year ended March 31 of that year. Our fiscal quarters end on June 30, September 30 and December 31. References to a year other than a “fiscal” year are to the calendar year ended December 31.

     We conduct our businesses both directly and through a consolidated group of companies that we have ownership interests in. Unless otherwise stated in this report or unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Sterlite,” “our company” or “our consolidated group of companies” mean Sterlite Industries (India) Limited, its consolidated subsidiaries and its predecessors, collectively, including Monte Cello BV, or Monte Cello, Copper Mines of Tasmania Pty Ltd, or CMT, Thalanga Copper Mines Pty Ltd, or TCM, Bharat Aluminium Company Limited, or BALCO, Sterlite Energy Limited, or Sterlite Energy, Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited, or SOVL, Hindustan Zinc Limited, or HZL, Fujairah Gold FZE, Sterlite (USA), Inc., or Sterlite USA, and Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, or TSPL. References in this report to “SIIL” mean Sterlite Industries (India) Limited. Our consolidated financial information does not include Vedanta Resources plc, or Vedanta, Vedanta Resources Holdings Limited, or VRHL, Konkola Copper Mines plc, or KCM, Twin Star Holdings Limited, or Twin Star, Welter Trading Limited, or Welter Trading, the Anil Agarwal Discretionary Trust, Onclave PTC Limited, or Onclave, The Madras Aluminium Company Limited, or MALCO, Sterlite Technologies Limited, or STL, Monte Cello Corporation NV, or MCNV, Twin Star Infrastructure Limited, Sesa Goa Limited, Sesa Industries Limited, and Vedanta Aluminium Limited, or Vedanta Aluminium, except that as to Vedanta Aluminium, our consolidated financial statements account for our 29.5% minority interest therein under the equity method of accounting, but Vedanta Aluminium is not otherwise included in our consolidated group of companies or our consolidated financial statements. References to the “Vedanta group” are to Vedanta and its subsidiaries. In this report, references to The London Metal Exchange Limited, or LME, price of copper, zinc, lead or aluminum are to the cash seller and settlement price on the LME for copper, zinc, lead or aluminum for the period indicated.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This report contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in the safe harbor provisions of the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our company and our industry. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” “project,” “seek,” “should” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, the discussions of our business strategy and expectations concerning our market position, future operations, margins, profitability, liquidity and capital resources. We caution you that reliance on any forward-looking statement involves risks and uncertainties, and that, although we believe that the assumptions on which our forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and, as a result, the forward-looking, statements based on those assumptions could be materially incorrect. Factors which could cause these assumptions to be incorrect include, but are not limited to:

•		a decline or volatility in the prices of or demand for copper, zinc or aluminum;
•		events that could cause a decrease in our production of copper, zinc or aluminum;
•		unavailability or increased costs of raw materials for our products;
•		our actual economically recoverable copper ore, lead-zinc ore or bauxite reserves being lower than we have estimated;
•		our ability to expand our business, effectively manage our growth or implement our strategy, including our entry into the commercial power business;
•		our ability to retain our senior management team and hire and retain sufficiently skilled labor to support our operations;
•		regulatory, legislative and judicial developments and future regulatory actions and conditions in our operating areas;
•		increasing competition in the copper, zinc or aluminum industry;
•		political or economic instability in India or around the region;
•		worldwide economic and business conditions, including the unprecedented and challenging conditions recently;
•		our ability to successfully consummate strategic acquisitions;
•		the outcome of outstanding litigation in which we are involved;
•		our ability to maintain good relations with our trade unions and avoid strikes and lock-outs;
•		any actions of our controlling shareholder, Vedanta;
•		our business’ future capital requirements and the availability of financing on favorable terms;
•		the continuation of tax holidays, exemptions and deferred tax schemes we enjoy;

•		changes in tariffs, royalties, customs duties and government assistance; and
•		terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, natural disasters and other environmental conditions and outbreaks of infectious diseases and other public health concerns in India, Asia and elsewhere.

     These and other factors are more fully discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report and in our other filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 20-F for fiscal 2009, as amended by an annual report on Form 20-F/A, (Registration No. 001-33175). In light of these and other uncertainties, you should not conclude that we will necessarily achieve any plans, objectives or projected financial results referred to in any of the forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we do not undertake to release revisions to any of these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.

Index to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

		Page(s)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Income for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2009			F-1
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Comprehensive Income for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2009			F-2
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Financial Positions as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009			F-3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Cash Flows for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2009			F-4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Changes in Equity for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2009			F-5
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements			F-6

STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

				Three -month period ended June 30,
		Notes		2008				2009				2009
				(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)				(US dollars in
												millions) (Note 2)
Revenue					57,458				45,204				946.9
Cost of sales					(39,255	)			(34,418	)			(721.0	)
Gross profit					18,203				10,786				225.9
Other operating income					760				963				20.2
Distribution cost					(865	)			(900	)			(18.9	)
Administration expenses					(1,106	)			(1,370	)			(28.7	)
Operating profit					16,992				9,479				198.5
Investment revenue					3,372				4,912				102.9
Finance costs					(735	)			(1,854	)			(38.8	)
Share in profit of associate					28				1,356				28.4
Profit before taxes					19,657				13,893				291.0
Tax expense		5			(3,985	)			(2,570	)			(53.8	)
Profit for the period					15,672				11,323				237.2
Profit attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent					11,268				8,103				169.7
Minority interest					4,404				3,220				67.5
					15,672				11,323				237.2
Earnings per share (Not annualised)		6
Basic					15.90				11.44				0.24
Diluted					15.90				11.44				0.24
Weighted average number of equity shares used in computing earnings per share
Basic					708,494,411				708,494,411				708,494,411
Diluted					708,494,411				708,494,411				708,494,411

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

		Three -month period ended June 30,
		2008				2009				2009
		(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)				(US dollars in
										millions) (Note 2)
Profit for the period			15,672				11,323				237.2
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes:
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations			665				773				16.2
Available-for-sale financial investments			15				84				1.8
Cash flow hedges			(344	)			502				10.5
Share of other comprehensive income of associate			104				255				5.3
Total other comprehensive income for the period, net of taxes			440				1,614				33.8
Total comprehensive income			16,112				12,937				271.0
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent			11,828				9,635				201.8
Minority interest			4,284				3,302				69.2
			16,112				12,937				271.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

				As of
				March 31,				June 30,				June 30,
		Notes		2009				2009				2009
								(Rs. in				(US dollars in
				(Rs. in millions)				millions)				millions) (Note 2)
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment					167,498				183,790				3,849.8
Investment in associate					15,043				16,786				351.6
Financial assets investments					1,044				1,128				23.6
Other non-current assets					9,652				11,040				231.3
Total non-current assets					193,237				212,744				4,456.3
Current assets
Inventories					24,608				32,658				684.0
Trade and other receivable					32,303				42,421				888.6
Liquid investments					188,068				180,130				3,773.2
Other current financial assets (derivatives)					1,537				113				2.4
Cash and cash equivalents		7			4,712				5,053				105.8
					251,228				260,375				5,454.0
Assets held for sale		8			—				276				5.8
Total current assets					251,228				260,651				5,459.8
Total assets					444,465				473,395				9,916.1
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings		9			20,202				22,757				476.7
Trade and other payables					65,917				50,234				1,052.2
Other current financial liabilities (derivatives)					2,639				649				13.6
Current tax liabilities					571				891				18.7
Total current liabilities					89,329				74,531				1,561.2
Net current assets					161,899				186,120				3,898.6
Non-current liabilities
Long-term borrowings		9			14,384				28,591				598.9
Trade and other payables					4,640				19,869				416.2
Deferred tax liabilities					15,172				16,529				346.2
Provisions					337				367				7.7
Total non-current liabilities					34,533				65,356				1,369.0
Total liabilities					123,862				139,887				2,930.2
Net assets					320,603				333,508				6,985.9
EQUITY
Share capital					1,417				1,417				29.7
Security premium					106,532				106,532				2,231.5
Other components of equity					410				1,942				40.7
Retained earnings					142,174				150,277				3,147.8
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent					250,533				260,168				5,449.7
Minority interest					70,070				73,340				1,536.2
Total Equity					320,603				333,508				6,985.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

		Three -month period ended June 30,
		2008				2009				2009
		(Rs. in				(Rs. in				(US dollars in
		millions)				millions)				millions) (Note 2)
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before taxes			19,657				13,893				291.0
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization			1,995				1,974				41.3
Share in profit of associate			(28	)			(1,356	)			(28.4	)
(Profit)/loss on sale of fixed asset, net			(17	)			1				0.0
Realized /unrealized gain on investments, net			(765	)			(828	)			(17.3	)
Exchange (gains)/loss, net			—				1,683				35.3
Interest and dividend income			(2,638	)			(2,906	)			(60.9	)
Interest expenses			716				728				15.3
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade and other receivables			3,392				5,487				114.9
Increase in inventories			(3,469	)			(8,051	)			(168.6	)
(Increase)/ decrease in other current and non-current assets			(833	)			506				10.6
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payable			6,889				(1,027	)			(21.5	)
Increase / (decrease) in other current and non-current liabilities			(1,198	)			30				0.6
Cash generation from operation			23,701				10,134				212.3
Interest paid			(658	)			(957	)			(20.0	)
Interest received			874				977				20.5
Dividend received			2,015				1,238				25.9
Income tax paid			(3,185	)			(1,698	)			(35.6	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			22,747				9,694				203.1
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment			(8,208	)			(10,377	)			(217.3	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment			64				8				0.2
Advance to related party			(6,497	)			(16,419	)			(343.9	)
Increase in liquid investments, net			(19,128	)			(873	)			(18.3	)
Proceeds from fixed deposits			11,799				12,003				251.4
Purchases of fixed deposits			—				(2,577	)			(54.0	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(21,970	)			(18,235	)			(381.9	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from short-term borrowings			—				11,093				232.4
Repayment of short-term borrowings			(4,831	)			(815	)			(17.1	)
Proceeds from long-term borrowings			80				3,662				76.7
Repayment of long-term borrowings			(630	)			(5,228	)			(109.5	)
Payment of dividends, including dividend tax			(63	)			(32	)			(0.7	)
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities			(5,444	)			8,680				181.8
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			1,095				202				4.1
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			(3,572	)			341				7.1
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period			12,422				4,712				98.7
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period			8,850				5,053				105.8
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
Payables for purchase of property, plant and equipment			4,178				15,316				320.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

		Attributable to equity holders of the parent
										Translation				Available for				Cash
		Share				Share				of foreign				sale financial				flow				Retained								Minority				Total
		capital				premium				operations				investments				hedges				earning				Total				Interest				equity
Balance as at April 1, 2008			1,417				106,532				(72	)			58				(392	)			113,261				220,804				58,189				278,993
Profit for the period			—				—				—				—				—				11,268				11,268				4,404				15,672
Dividend paid including tax on dividend			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				(63	)			(63	)
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations			—				—				665				—				—				—				665				—				665
Movement in available for sale financial investments			—				—				—				15				—				—				15				—				15
Movement in fair value of cash flow hedges			—				—				—				—				(224	)			—				(224	)			(120	)			(344	)
Share in other comprehensive income of associate			—				—				—				—				104				—				104				—				104
Balance as at June 30, 2008			1,417				106,532				593				73				(512	)			124,529				232,632				62,410				295,042
Balance as at April 1, 2009			1,417				106,532				(399	)			(21	)			830				142,174				250,533				70,070				320,603
Profit for the period			—				—				—				—				—				8,103				8,103				3,220				11,323
Dividend paid including tax on dividend			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				(32	)			(32	)
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations			—				—				773				—				—				—				773				—				773
Movement in available for sale financial investments			—				—				—				84				—				—				84				—				84
Movement in fair value of cash flow hedges			—				—				—				—				420				—				420				82				502
Share in other comprehensive income of associate			—				—				—				—				255				—				255				—				255
Balance as at June 30, 2009			1,417				106,532				374				63				1,505				150,277				260,168				73,340				333,508
Balance as at June 30, 2009 (in US dollars in millions (Note 2))			29.7				2,231.5				7.8				1.3				31.6				3,147.8				5,449.7				1,536.2				6,985.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Company Overview

Sterlite Industries (India) Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Sterlite”) are engaged in non-ferrous metals and mining in India and Australia. Sterlite Industries (India) Limited (“SIIL”) was incorporated on September 8, 1975 under the laws of the Republic of India. The Company’s shares are listed on National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange in India. In June 2007, Sterlite completed its initial public offering of American Depositary Shares, or ADS, each representing one equity share, and listed its ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange.

SIIL is a majority-owned subsidiary of Twin Star Holdings Limited (“Twin Star”) which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vedanta Resources plc (“Vedanta”), a public limited company incorporated in the United Kingdom and listed on the London Stock Exchange plc. Twin Star held 58.1% of SIIL’s equity as of June 30, 2009.

The Company’s copper business is principally one of custom smelting and includes a copper smelter, a refinery, a phosphoric acid plant, a sulphuric acid plant, a copper rod plant and two captive power plants at Tuticorin in Southern India, and a refinery and two copper rod plants at Silvassa in Western India. In addition, the Company owns and operates the Mt. Lyell copper mine in Tasmania, Australia through its subsidiary, Copper Mines of Tasmania Pty Ltd (“CMT”), which provides a small percentage of the copper concentrate requirements, and a precious metal refinery in Fujairah in the UAE. .

The Company’s zinc business is owned and operated by Hindustan Zinc Limited (“HZL”) in which it has a 64.9% interest as of June 30, 2009. HZL’s operations include four lead-zinc mines, three zinc smelters, one lead smelter, one lead-zinc smelter , three sulphuric acid plants, a silver refinery and five captive power plants in the State of Rajasthan in Northwest India, one zinc smelter and a sulphuric acid plant in the State of Andhra Pradesh in Southeast India and a zinc ingot melting and casting plant in the State of Uttarakhand in North India.

The Company’s aluminum business is owned and operated by Bharat Aluminium Company Limited (“BALCO”) in which it has a 51.0% interest as of June 30, 2009. BALCO’s operations include two bauxite mines, two captive power plants and refining, smelting and fabrication facilities in Central India.

The Company owns 29.5% minority interest in Vedanta Aluminium Limited (“Vedanta Aluminium”), 70.5% owned subsidiary of Vedanta.

The Company acquired 100% shareholding of Sterlite Energy Limited (“SEL”) during fiscal 2007. SEL is engaged in power generation business in India. SEL has commenced construction of its 2,400 MW thermal coal-based power facility in the State of Orissa in Eastern India.

In July 2008, following a competitive bidding process in which SEL was selected as the successful bidder, SEL acquired 100% ownership interest in Talwandi Sabo Power Limited (“TSPL”), a company created by the Punjab State Electricity Board of India for the purpose of undertaking a 1,980 MW thermal coal-based commercial power project in the State of Punjab, India. TSPL is a development stage enterprise in the process of constructing the power plant.

2. Basis of preparation of financial statements

Statement of compliance

These are the Company’s first IFRS unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and IFRS 1, “First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards,” has been applied. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all the information required for full annual audited consolidated financial statements and are prepared in accordance with IAS 34, “Interim Financial Reporting”.

These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies the Company expects to adopt in its annual financial statements for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010. Those accounting polices are based on IFRS and its interpretations that the Company expects to be applicable at that time. The policies set out below were consistently applied to all periods presented unless otherwise noted below. An explanation of how the transition to IFRS has affected the reported financial position and financial performance of the Company is provided in Note 4. This Note includes reconciliations of equity and total comprehensive income for comparative periods under US GAAP, or “Previous GAAP” to those reported for those periods under IFRS.

Basis of preparation

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis and on an accrual cost basis, except for derivative financial instruments, available-for-sale financial assets and defined benefit pension obligations that have been measured at fair value. The carrying values of recognised assets and liabilities that are hedged are adjusted to record changes in the fair values attributable to the risks that are being hedged.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

At the date of authorization of these financial statements, the following standards, interpretations and amendments which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but were not yet effective:

IFRS 1 (Revised 2008), “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”

In July 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 1, “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”. The amendment simplifies the retrospective application of IFRS in two particular first-time adoption situations:

	•		Full-cost oil and gas assets — The amendment exempts entities using the full cost method from retrospective application of IFRS for oil and gas assets. Entities electing this exemption will use the carrying amount under its old GAAP as the deemed cost of its oil and gas assets at the date of first-time adoption of IFRS.
	•		Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease — If a first-time adopter with a leasing contract made the determination of whether an arrangement contained a lease, the amendment exempts the entity from having to apply IFRIC 4 when it adopts IFRS.

The amendment is effective for fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendment will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRS 2, “Share Based Payment”

In June 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 2, “Share Based Payment”. This amendment clarifies the accounting for group cash-settled share-based payment transactions. This amendment makes clear that an entity that receives goods or services in a share-based payment arrangement must account for those goods or services no matter which entity in the group settles the transaction, and no matter whether the transaction is settled in shares or cash. In IFRS 2, a “group” has the same meaning as in IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”, that is, it includes only a parent and its subsidiaries. The amendments to IFRS 2 also incorporate guidance previously included in IFRIC 8, “Scope of IFRS 2” and IFRIC 11, “IFRS 2 — Group and Treasury Share Transactions”. As a result, the IASB has withdrawn IFRIC 8 and IFRIC 11.

The amendment is effective for fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRS 3(Revised 2008), “Business Combinations”

In January 2008, the IASB issued an amendment to standard IFRS 3, “Business Combinations”. IFRS 3 (Revised) results comprehensive revision on applying the acquisition method. IFRS 3 (Revised) primarily requires the acquisition-related costs to be recognized as period expenses in accordance with the relevant IFRS. Costs incurred to issue debt or equity securities are required to be recognized in accordance with IAS 39. Consideration, after this amendment, will include fair values of all interests previously held by the acquirer. Re-measurement of such interests to fair value would be carried out through net profit in the statement of comprehensive income. Contingent consideration is required to be recognized at fair value even if not deemed probable of payment at the date of acquisition. IFRS 3 (Revised) provides an explicit option on a transaction-by-transaction basis, to measure any minority interest in the entity acquired at fair value of their proportion of identifiable assets and liabilities or at full fair value. The first method will result in a marginal difference in the measurement of goodwill from the existing IFRS 3; however the second approach will require recording goodwill on minority as well as on the acquired controlling interest.

The amendment is effective for fiscal year beginning on or after July 1, 2009. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IAS 27 (Revised), “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”

In January 2008, the IASB issued the revised standard IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”. IAS 27 (Revised) requires a mandatory adoption of economic entity model which treats all providers of equity capital as shareholders of the entity. Consequently, a partial disposal of interest in a subsidiary in which the parent company retains control does not result in a gain or loss but in an increase or decrease in equity. Additionally purchase of some or all of the minority interest is treated as treasury transaction and accounted for in equity and a partial disposal of interest in a subsidiary in which the parent company looses control triggers recognition of gain or loss on the entire interest. A gain or loss is recognized on the portion that has been disposed off and a further holding gain is recognized on the interest retained, being the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the interest retained. This Standard requires an entity to attribute their share of net profit and reserves to the minority interest even if this results in the minority interest having a deficit balance.

The amendment is effective for fiscal year beginning on or after July 1, 2009. Earlier adoption is permitted provided IFRS 3 (Revised) is also early adopted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IAS 36, “Impairment of Assets”

In April, 2009, the IASB issued “Improvements to IFRS” — a collection of amendments to twelve International Financial Reporting Standards. Amendment in IAS 36 clarify that the largest cash-generating unit (or group of units) to which goodwill should be allocated for the purposes of impairment testing is an operating segment as defined by paragraph 5 of IFRS 8, “Operating Segments”.

The amendment is effective for fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IAS 38, “Intangible Asset”

In April 2009, the IASB issued “Improvements to IFRS”, Amendments in IAS 38, “Intangible Assets” to clarify the requirements under IFRS 3 (Revised 2008) regarding accounting for intangible assets acquired in a business combination and the description of valuation techniques commonly used by entities when measuring the fair value of intangible assets acquired in a business combination that are not traded in active markets.

The amendment is effective for fiscal year beginning on or after July 1, 2009. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”

In July 2008, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement: Eligible Hedged Items”. The amendment addresses the designation of a one-sided risk in a hedged item in particular situations. The amendment applies to hedging relationships in the scope of IAS 39. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRIC Interpretation 16, “Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation”

The IFRIC issued an amendment to IFRIC Interpretation 16, “Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation”. The amendment to IFRIC 16 clarifies that hedging instruments may be held by any entity or entities within the group. This includes a foreign operation that itself is being hedged. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2009. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRIC Interpretation 17, “Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners”

The IFRIC issued an amendment to IFRIC Interpretation 17, “Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners”. Amendment to IFRIC 17 provides guidance on the appropriate accounting treatment when an entity distributed assets other than cash as dividend to its shareholders.

The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009. Earlier application is permitted with some restrictions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRIC Interpretation 18, “Transfers of Assets from Customers”

In January 2009, the IFRIC issued IFRIC Interpretation 18, “Transfers of Assets from Customers”. This interpretation clarifies the requirements of IFRS for agreements in which an entity receives from a customer an item of property, plant, and equipment that the entity must then use either to connect the customer to a network or to provide the customer with ongoing access to supply of goods or services. IFRIC 18 will be applicable for all transfers of assets from customers received on or after July 1, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRS 5 (Revised 2008), “Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations”

In May 2008, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 5, “Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations”. The amendment clarify that assets and liabilities of a subsidiary should be classified as held for sale if the parent is committed to a plan involving loss of control of the subsidiary, regardless of whether the entity will retain a minority interest after the sale.

The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRS 5, “Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations”

In April 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 5, “Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations”. The amendment clarify that IFRS 5 specifies the disclosures required in respect of non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale or discontinued operations. Consequently, disclosures in other IFRSs do not apply to such assets (or disposal groups) unless those IFRSs specifically require disclosures in respect of non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale or discontinued operations; or disclosures relate to the measurement of assets or liabilities within a disposal group that are outside the scope of IFRS 5’s measurement requirements and the information is not disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements.

The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRS 8, “Operating Segments”

In April 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 8, “Operating Segments”. The amendment clarify that an entity is required to disclose a measure of segment assets only if that measure is regularly reported to the chief operating decision maker.

The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2009. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

“Improvements to IFRSs”

In April 2009, the IASB issued “Improvements to IFRSs” — a collection of amendments to twelve International Financial Reporting Standards — as part of its program of annual improvements to its standards, which is intended to make necessary, but non-urgent, amendments to standards that will not be included as part of another major project. The latest amendments were included in exposure drafts of proposed amendments to IFRS published in October 2007, August 2008, and January 2009. The amendments resulting from this standard mainly have effective dates for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2010, although entities are permitted to adopt them earlier. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements”

In April 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements”. The amendment clarifies that the potential settlement of a liability by the issue of equity is not relevant to its classification as current or non-current. By amending the definition of current liability, the amendment permits a liability to be classified as non-current notwithstanding the fact that the entity could be required by the counterparty to settle in shares at any time.

The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”

In April 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. The amendment clarifies that loan prepayment penalties should be considered as closely related embedded derivatives. This amendment clarifies the scope exemption for scope exemption in paragraph 2(g) of IAS 39 for business combination contracts. This amendment also clarifies cash flow hedge accounting. This amendment clarifies that entity should no longer use hedge accounting for transactions between segments in their separate financial statements.

The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the amendments will have on the Company’s financial statements.

Going Concern

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the going concern basis of accounting.

Convenience translation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements are presented in Indian Rupee, the functional currency of the Company. Solely for the convenience of the readers, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended June 30, 2009 have been translated into US dollars (“$”) at the noon buying rates of $1.00 = Rs. 47.74 in the City of New York for cable transfers of Indian Rupee as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on June 30, 2009. No representation is made that the Indian Rupee amounts represent US dollar amounts or have been, could have been or could be converted into US dollars at such a rate or any other rate.

3. Significant accounting policies

Basis of consolidation

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statement incorporates the results of SIIL and all its subsidiaries, being the entities that it controls. This control is normally evidenced when SIIL is able to govern an entity’s financial and operating policies so as to benefit from its activities or where the SIIL owns, either directly or indirectly, the majority of an entity’s equity voting rights unless in exceptional circumstances it can be demonstrated that ownership does not constitute control.

The results of subsidiaries acquired or sold during the year are consolidated for the periods from, or to, the date on which control passed. The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting year as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. Adjustments are made to bring any dissimilar accounting policies that may exist in line with Company’s policy.

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, have been eliminated in preparing the financial statements. Unrealized losses are eliminated unless costs cannot be recovered.

Investments in Associates

Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method. An associate is an entity over which the Company is in a position to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies and normally owns between 20% and 50% of the voting equity but is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of associates is accounted for in accordance with the policy set out above and is included in the carrying value of investments in associate.

The investment is initially recorded at the cost to the Company in the consolidated statement of financial positions and then, in subsequent periods, the carrying value of the investment is adjusted to reflect the Company’s share of the associate’s profits or losses and for impairment of goodwill and any other changes to the associate’s net assets. The consolidated statement of comprehensive income includes the Company’s share of associate’s results, except where the associate is generating losses and the Company’s investments in the associate has been written down to zero.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue represents the net invoice value of goods and services provided to third parties after deducting discounts, volume rebates, outgoing sales taxes and duties, and are recognised usually when all significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset sold are transferred to the customer and the commodity has been delivered to the shipping agent. Revenues from sale of material by-products are included in revenue.

Dividend income is recognised when the shareholders’ right to receive payment is established. Interest income is recognised on an accrual basis in the income statement.

Certain of our sales contracts provide for provisional pricing based on the price on The London Metal Exchange Limited (“LME”), as specified in the contract, when shipped. Final settlement of the prices is based on the applicable price for a specified future period. The Company’s provisionally priced sales are marked to market using the relevant forward prices for the future period specified in the contract and same is adjusted in revenue.

Business Combinations

The results of subsidiaries acquired or sold during the year are consolidated for the periods from, or to, the date on which control passed. Acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method. The acquirer’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3, “Business Combinations”, are recognized at their fair value at the acquisition date.

Excess purchase consideration, being the difference between the fair value of the consideration given and the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, is capitalised as an asset on the statement of financial position. To the extent that such excess purchase consideration relates to the acquisition of mining properties, that amount is capitalised within property, plant and equipment as “mining properties”. Other

excess purchase consideration relating to the acquisition of subsidiaries is capitalized as goodwill. Goodwill arising on acquisitions is reviewed for impairment annually.

Where the fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities exceed the cost of acquisition, the surplus is credited to the income statement in the period of acquisition. Where it is not possible to complete the determination of fair values by the date on which the first post-acquisition financial statements are approved, a provisional assessment of fair value is made and any adjustments required to those provisional fair values, and the corresponding adjustments to purchased goodwill, are finalized within 12 months of the acquisition date.

Internally generated goodwill is not recognized.

The interest of minority shareholders in the acquiree is initially measured at the minority interest’s proportion of the net fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised. For acquisitions of additional interests in subsidiaries, where there is no change in control, the Company recognizes a reduction to the minority interest of the respective subsidiary with the difference between the share of carrying value of net assets acquired and the cash paid, inclusive of transaction fees, recognized in equity. Gains or losses on disposals of minority interests are similarly computed and recorded within equity.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Mining Properties

Exploration and evaluation expenditure is written off in the year in which it is incurred.

The costs of mining properties, which include the costs of acquiring and developing mining properties and mineral rights, are capitalised as property, plant and equipment under the heading “Mining properties” in the year in which they are incurred.

When a decision is taken that a mining property is viable for commercial production, all further pre-production primary development expenditure other than land, buildings, plant and equipment, etc is capitalised as part of the cost of the mining property until the mining property is capable of commercial production. From that point, capitalised mining properties are amortized on a unit-of-production basis over the total estimated remaining commercial reserves of each property or Company of properties.

Exploration and evaluation assets acquired are recognised as assets at their cost of acquisition subject to meeting the commercial production criteria mentioned above and are subject to impairment review.

Stripping costs/secondary development expenditure incurred during the production stage of operations of an ore body is charged to the statement of income immediately.

In circumstances where a property is abandoned, the cumulative capitalized costs relating to the property are written off in the period.

Commercial reserves are proved and probable reserves. Changes in the commercial reserves affecting unit of production calculations are dealt with prospectively over the revised remaining reserves.

Other Property, Plant and Equipment

The initial cost of property, plant and equipment comprises its purchase price, including import duties and non-refundable purchase taxes, and any directly attributable costs of bringing an asset to working condition and location for its intended use. It also includes the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located. Expenditure incurred after the property, plant and equipment have been put into operation, such as repairs and maintenance, are normally charged to the statement of income in the period in which the costs are incurred. Major inspection and overhaul expenditure is capitalized.

Assets in the Course of Construction

Assets in the course of construction are capitalized in the assets under construction account. At the point when an asset is capable of operating in the manner intended by management, the cost of construction is transferred to the appropriate category of property, plant and equipment. Costs associated with the commissioning of an asset are capitalised until the period of commissioning has been completed and the asset is ready for its intended use.

Depreciation

Mining properties and other assets in the course of development or construction, freehold land and goodwill are not depreciated. Capitalised mining properties costs are amortised once commercial production commences, as described in “Property, Plant and Equipment — Mining Properties”. Leasehold land and buildings are depreciated over the period of the lease.

Other buildings, plant and equipment, office equipment and fixtures, and motor vehicles are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any provision for impairment. Depreciation commences when the assets are ready for their intended use. Depreciation is provided at rates calculated to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, of each asset on a straight-line basis over its expected useful life, as follows:

Buildings:
— Operations		30 years
— Administration		50 years
Plant and equipment		10 - 20 years
Office equipment and fixtures		3 - 20 years
Motor vehicles		9 - 11 years

Major inspection and overhaul costs are depreciated over the estimated life of the economic benefit derived from such costs. The carrying amount of the remaining previous overhaul cost is charged to the statement of income if the next overhaul is undertaken earlier than the previously estimated life of the economic benefit.

The Company reviews the residual value and useful life of an asset at least at each financial year-end and, if expectations differ from previous estimates, the change(s) is accounted for as a change in accounting estimate.

Property, plant and equipment held for sale or which is part of a disposal group held for sale is not depreciated. Property, plant and equipment held for sale is carried at the lower of its carrying value and fair value less disposal cost and is presented separately on the face of the statement of financial position.

Non-current assets held for sale

Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification.

Impairment

Financial assets

A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any objective evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset.

An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortized cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount, and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. An impairment loss in respect of an available-for-sale financial asset is calculated by reference to its fair value.

Significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics. All impairment losses are recognized in the statement of income. Any cumulative loss in respect of an available-for-sale financial asset recognized previously in other comprehensive income is transferred to statement of income on recognition of impairment. An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized. For financial assets measured at amortized cost and available-for-sale financial assets that are debt securities, the reversal is recognized in statement of income. For available-for-sale financial assets that are equity securities, the reversal is recognized directly in other comprehensive income.

Non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of the Company’s non-financial assets, other than inventories and deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated.

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the “cash-generating unit”).

An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in the statement of income.

Impairment losses recognized in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.

Government Grants

Government grants are not recognised until there is a reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the conditions attaching to them and that the grants will be received. Government grants relating to tangible fixed assets are treated as deferred income and released to the statement of income over the expected useful lives of the assets concerned. Other grants are credited to the statement of income as and when the related expenditure is incurred.

Inventories

Inventories and work-in-progress are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value, less any provision for obsolescence. Cost is determined on the following bases:

	•		Purchased copper concentrate is recorded at cost on a first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis; all other materials including stores and spares are valued on weighted average basis;
	•		Finished products are valued at raw material cost plus costs of conversion, comprising labor costs and an attributable proportion of manufacturing overheads based on normal levels of activity; and
	•		By-products and scrap are valued at net realizable value.

Net realizable value is determined based on estimated selling price, less further costs expected to be incurred to completion and disposal.

Taxation

Tax expense represents the sum of current tax and deferred tax. Current tax is provided at amounts expected to be paid (or recovered) using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

Deferred tax is provided, using the balance sheet method, on all temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Exceptions to this principle are:

	•		Tax payable on the future remittance of the past earnings of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future;
	•		Deferred income tax is not recognised on goodwill impairment which is not deductible for tax purposes or on the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
	•		Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Tax relating to items recognized directly in other comprehensive income is recognised in other income and not in the statement of income.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and is adjusted to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the relevant Company entity intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

Retirement Benefit Schemes

The Company operates or participates in a number of defined benefits and contribution pension schemes, the assets of which are (where funded) held in separately administered funds. The cost of providing benefits under the plans is determined each year separately for each plan using the projected unit credit method by independent qualified actuaries.

Actuarial gains and losses arising in the year are recognised in full in the statement of income of the year. For defined contribution schemes, the amount charged to the statement of income in respect of pension costs and other post-retirement benefits is the contributions payable in the year.

Share Based Payments

SIIL does not have any outstanding share based payment. The parent company of SIIL (i.e. Vedanta Resource Plc) offers certain share based incentives under the Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) to employees and directors of SIIL and its subsidiaries. The parent company recovers the proportionate cost (calculated based on the grant date fair value of the options granted) from the respective group companies, which is charged off in their statements of income.

Provisions for Liabilities and Charges

Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive), as a result of past events, and it is probable that an outflow of resources, that can be reliably estimated, will be required to settle such an obligation. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows to net present value using an appropriate pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Unwinding of the discount is recognized in the statement of income as a finance cost. Provisions are reviewed at each reporting date and are adjusted to reflect the current best estimate.

Restoration, Rehabilitation and Environmental Costs

An obligation to incur restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs arises when environmental disturbance is caused by the development or ongoing production of a mine. Such costs, discounted to net present value, are provided for and a corresponding amount is capitalised at the start of each project, as soon as the obligation to incur such costs arises. These costs are charged to the statement of income over the life of the operation through the depreciation of the asset and the unwinding of the discount on the provision. The cost estimates are reviewed periodically and are adjusted to reflect known developments which may have an impact on the cost estimates or life of operations. The cost of the related asset is adjusted for changes in the provision due to factors such as updated cost estimates, changes to lives of operations, new disturbance and revisions to discount rates. The adjusted cost of the asset is depreciated prospectively over the lives of the assets to which they relate. The unwinding of the discount is shown as a finance cost in the statement of income.

Costs for restoration of subsequent site damage which is caused on an ongoing basis during production are provided for at their net present values and charged to the statement of income as extraction progresses. Where the costs of site restoration are not anticipated to be material, they are expensed as incurred.

Leases

Rentals under operating leases are charged on a straight-line basis over the lease term, even if the payments are not made on such a basis.

Foreign currency translation

The functional currency for each entity in the Company is determined as the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. For all principal operating subsidiaries, the functional currency is the local currency of the country in which it operates.

In the financial statements of individual group companies, transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates ruling at the date of transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies are translated into functional currency at exchange rates prevailing on the reporting date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies and measured at historical cost or fair value are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the dates on which such values was determined. All exchange differences are included in the statement of income except exchange difference on monetary items designated as an effective hedging instrument of the currency risk of designated forecasted sales are recognized in the other comprehensive income.

For the purposes of consolidation, items in the statement of income of those entities for which the INR (functional currency of SIIL) is not the functional currency are translated into INR at the average rates of exchange during the period. The related statements of financial position are translated at the rates ruling at the reporting date. Exchange differences arising on such translation are recognised in other comprehensive income.

On disposal of a foreign entity, the deferred cumulative exchange differences recognised in equity relating to that particular foreign operation would be recognised in the statement of income.

Financial Asset Investments

Financial asset investments are classified as available for sale under IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”, and are initially recorded at cost and then remeasured at subsequent reporting dates to fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on financial asset investments are recognised directly in other comprehensive income. On disposal or impairment of the investments, the gains and losses in other comprehensive income are recycled into the statement of income.

Investments in unquoted equity instruments that do not have a market price and whose fair value cannot be reliably measured are measured at cost. Equity investments are recorded in non-current assets unless they are expected to be sold within one year.

Liquid Investments

Liquid investments represent short term current asset investments that do not meet the definition of cash and cash equivalents for one or more of the following reasons:

	•		They have a maturity profile greater than 90 days; and/or
	•		They may be subject to a greater risk of changes in value than cash; and/or
	•		They are held of investment purposes.

The change in fair value of trading investments incorporates any dividend and interest earned on the held for trading investments.

Trade Receivables

Trade Receivables are stated at their nominal value as reduced by appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts. An allowance for impairment for trade receivables is made where there is an event, which based on previous experience, is an indication of a reduction in the recoverability of the carrying value of the trade receivables.

Trade Payables

Trade payables are stated at their nominal value.

Equity Instruments

Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of financial position comprise cash at bank and in hand, short-term deposits with banks and short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and are held for the purpose of meeting short term cash commitments. Short term refers to maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition.

Borrowings

Interest bearing loans and overdrafts are recorded at the proceeds received. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accruals basis and charged to the statement of income using the effective interest method. They are classified with the carrying amount of debts.

Borrowing Costs

Borrowing costs directly relating to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying capital project under construction are capitalised and added to the project cost during construction until such time that the assets are substantially ready for their intended use i.e. when they are capable of commercial production. Where funds are borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount capitalized represents the actual borrowing costs incurred. Where surplus funds are available out of money borrowed specifically to finance a project, the income generated from such short term investments is also capitalised and reduced from the total capitalised borrowing cost. Where the funds used to finance a project form part of general borrowings, the amount capitalized is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to relevant general borrowings of the Company during the period.

All other borrowing costs are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they are incurred.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In order to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange, interest rate and commodity price risks, the Company enters into forward, option, swap contracts and other derivative financial instruments. The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Derivative financial instruments are initially recorded at their fair value on the date of the derivative transaction and are re-measured at their fair value at subsequent financial position dates.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the statement of income. The hedged item is recorded at fair value and any gain or loss is recorded in the statement of income and is offset by the gain or loss from the change in the fair value of the derivative.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the statement of income. The cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in other comprehensive income remains there until the forecast transaction occurs. When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount recognized in other comprehensive income is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when it is recognized. In other cases the amount recognized in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss in the same period that the hedged item affects profit or loss. Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. If a hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, the net cumulative gain or loss recognized in the other comprehensive income is transferred to statement of income.

Derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are marked to market at the financial position date and gains or losses are recognized in the statement of income immediately.

Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or other host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their risks and characteristics are not closely related to those of host contracts and the host contracts are not carried at fair value with unrealised gains or losses reported in the statement of income.

Critical Accounting Judgments and Estimation Uncertainty

In the course of applying the policies outlined above, management made estimations and assumptions that impact the amounts recognized in the financial statements. The Company believes that critical judgment and estimation has been made in the following areas:

	•		Mining Properties — Exploration and evaluation expenditures are written off in the year in which they are incurred. The costs of mine properties, which include the costs of acquiring and developing mine properties and mineral rights, are capitalized and included in property, plant and equipment under the heading “Mine properties” in the year in which they are incurred. When it is determined that a mining property has begun production of saleable minerals extracted from an ore body, all further pre-production primary development expenditures are capitalized as part of the cost of the mining property until the mining property begins production of saleable minerals. From the time the mining property is capable of producing saleable minerals the capitalized mining property costs are amortized on a unit-of-production basis over the total estimated remaining commercial reserves of each property or group of properties.
			Stripping costs or secondary development expenditures incurred during the production stage of operations of an ore body are included in the costs of the ore extracted during the period that the stripping costs are incurred. Secondary development costs refer to expenses incurred after the mining property has begun production of saleable minerals extracted from an ore body. Such costs include the costs of removal of overburden and other mine waste materials to access mineral deposits incurred during the production phase of a mine.
			When mine property is abandoned, the cumulative capitalized costs relating to the property are written off in the period of abandonment. Commercial reserves are proven and probable reserves. Changes in the commercial reserves affecting unit of production calculations are accounted for prospectively over the revised remaining reserves. Proven and probable reserve quantities attributable to stockpiled inventory are classified as inventory and are not included in the total proven and probable reserve quantities used in the units of production depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations.
	•		Useful Economic Lives of Assets and Impairment — Property, plant and equipment other than mining properties and leases are depreciated over their useful economic lives. Management reviews the useful economic lives at least once a year and any changes could affect the depreciation rates prospectively and hence the asset carrying values. The Company also reviews its property, plant and equipment, including mining properties and leases, for possible impairment if there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate that carrying values of the assets may not be recoverable. In assessing the property, plant and equipment for impairment, factors leading to significant reduction in profits such as changes in commodity prices, the Company’s business plans and significant downward revision in the estimated mining reserves are taken into consideration. The carrying value of the assets of a cash generating unit (CGU) and associated mining reserves is compared with the recoverable amount of those assets, that is, the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Value in use is usually determined on the basis of discounted estimated future cash flows. This involves management estimates on commodity prices, market demand and supply, economic and regulatory climates, long term mine plan and other factors. Any subsequent changes to cash flow due to changes in the abovementioned factors could impact on the carrying value of the assets.
	•		Restoration, Rehabilitation and Environmental Costs — Provision is made for costs associated with restoration and rehabilitation of mining sites as soon as the obligation to incur such costs arises. Such restoration and closure costs are typical of extractive industries and they are normally incurred at the end of the life of the mine. The costs are estimated on the basis of mine closure plans and the estimated discounted costs of dismantling and removing these facilities and the costs of restoration are capitalized when incurred reflecting our obligations at that time. A corresponding

			provision is created on the liability side. The capitalized asset is charged to the income statement over the life of the asset through depreciation over the life of the operation and the provision is increased each period via unwinding the discount on the provision. Management estimates are based on local legislation and/or other agreements. The actual costs and cash outflows may differ from estimates because of changes in laws and regulations, changes in prices, analysis of site conditions and changes in restoration technology.
			As per local legislation, our Indian operations provide for restoration costs in accordance with statutory requirements. In Australia, appropriate provision has been made in accordance with local legal requirements.
	•		Provisions and Liabilities — Provisions and liabilities are recognized in the period when it becomes probable that there will be a future outflow of funds resulting from past operations or events that can be reasonably estimated. The timing of recognition requires the application of judgment to existing facts and circumstances which may be subject to change. The actual cash outflows takes place over many years in the future and hence the carrying amounts of provisions and liabilities are regularly reviewed and adjusted to take into account the changing circumstances and other factors that influence the provisions and liabilities.
	•		Contingencies and Commitments — The Company also has significant capital commitments in relation to various capital projects which are not recognized on the statement of financial positions. In the normal course of business, contingent liabilities may arise from litigation and other claims against the Company. Guarantees are also provided in the normal course of business. There are certain obligations which management has concluded, based on all available facts and circumstances, are not probable of payment or are very difficult to quantify reliably, and such obligations are treated as contingent liabilities and disclosed in the notes but are not reflected as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Although there can be no assurance regarding the final outcome of the legal proceedings in which Company involved, it is not expected that such contingencies will have a materially adverse effect on its financial position or profitability.
	•		Income Taxes — In preparing consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operate. In each jurisdiction, the Company estimates the actual amount of taxes currently payable or receivable. The Company also estimates the tax bases of assets and liabilities based on estimates, and such estimates may change when the tax returns are prepared. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted as of the financial position date. The Company does not record deferred taxes on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

4. Explanation of transition to IFRS

The Company’s financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010 will be the first annual financial statements that comply with IFRS and these interim financial statements have been prepared as described in Note 2, including the application of IFRS 1. As part of the transition to IFRS, the Company has prepared IFRS financial information for the opening statement of financial positions as at April 1, 2008, the statement for comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and the statement of financial positions as at March 31, 2009. It is intended that the relevant financial information will be included as the comparative information in the Company’s financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010.

IFRS 1 requires that comparative financial information be provided. Consequently, the Company’s transition date to IFRS is April 1, 2008. The reconciliation of equity and comprehensive income for comparative periods under Previous GAAP, or US GAAP, to IFRS has been included as parts of notes. IFRS 1 generally requires full retrospective application of the Standards and Interpretations in force at the first reporting date. However, IFRS 1 allows certain exemptions in the application of particular Standards to prior periods in order to assist companies with the transition process.

Exemptions from retrospective application

Following are the exemptions which the Company has opted to apply or not to apply:

	i.		Business combinations exemption — The Company has applied the exemption as provided in IFRS 1 on non-application of IFRS 3, “Business Combinations”, to business combinations consummated prior to April 1, 2008.
	ii.		Fair value as deemed cost exemption — The Company has not elected to measure any item of property, plant and equipment at its fair value at the date of transition; property, plant and equipment have been measured at cost in accordance with IFRS.
	iii.		Employee benefits exemption — The Company has elected not to apply the exemption as provided in IFRS 1. Under Previous GAAP, the Company recognized all actuarial gains/losses immediately in the income statement. The Company has not elected to adopt the corridor approach as per IAS 19, “Employee Benefit”. The accounting treatment has not undergone any change upon adoption of IFRS.
	iv.		Cumulative translation differences exemption — The Company had accumulated the translation differences in a separate component of equity under Previous GAAP. Upon transition to IFRS, the treatment of recording translation differences in equity did not undergo any change and consequently the optional exemption of setting cumulative differences as zero and reclassifying the amount recognized in accordance with Previous GAAP as retained earnings as at the transition date was not required to be applied.
	v.		Compound financial instruments exemption — The Company did not have any compound financial instrument as on the date of transition. Consequently, upon adoption of IFRS the optional exemption allowed of non-segregation of the liability component if such component was no longer outstanding on the date of transition is not applicable to the company.
	vi.		Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures exemption — None of the subsidiaries, associates and the joint ventures has transitioned to IFRS prior to the Company. Vedanta, the parent company of the Company, prepares its financial statements in compliance with IFRS as adopted by the European Union, consequent to which this exemption cannot be availed by the Company.
	vii.		Share-based payment transaction exemption — Under Previous GAAP, the Company had applied the fair value recognition and measurement principles similar to those prescribed under IFRS 2, “Share based payments”, for all options granted before the Transition Date. Consequently, upon transition to IFRS, the optional exemption is not applicable to the Company.
	viii.		Fair value measurement of financial assets or liabilities at initial recognition exemption — The Company has not applied the amendment offered by the revision of IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”, on the initial recognition of the financial instruments measured at fair value through income statement where there is no active market.
	ix.		Designation of financial assets and financial liabilities exemption — The designation of the financial instruments at the origination done by the Company under Previous GAAP is in accordance with IFRS and therefore this exemption is not applicable to the Company.

	x.		Changes in Decommissioning liabilities included in the cost of property, plant and equipment exemption — IFRIC 1, “Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities”, requires specified changes in a decommissioning, restoration or similar liability to be added to or deducted from the cost of the asset to which it relates; the adjusted depreciable amount of the asset is then depreciated prospectively over its remaining useful life. A first-time adopter need not comply with these requirements for changes in such liabilities that occurred before the date of transition to IFRS. However the Company has measured its liability as per IFRIC 1 and decided not to avail the optional exemption.
	xi.		Leases exemption — The Company has no arrangements containing a lease as defined under IFRIC 4, “Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease”, as of the date of the transition and hence this exemption has not been applicable to the company.
	xii.		Financial Asset or an Intangible Asset accounted for in accordance with IFRIC 12, “Service Concession Arrangements” exemption — The Company has no arrangements which would be classified under Service Concession Arrangements. Consequently the exemption is not applicable to the Company.
	xiii.		Borrowing Costs exemption — The Company has capitalized all borrowing costs as per the requirement of revised IAS 23, “Borrowing Costs”. Therefore this Standard and the related exemption are not applicable.
	xiv.		Insurance contracts exemption — The Company does not issue any insurance contracts. Consequently, this exemption is not applicable to the Company.

Exceptions from full retrospective application

	i.		Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities exception — As per IAS 39, if a first time adopter derecognized non-derivative financial assets or non-derivative financial liabilities under its Previous GAAP as a result of a transaction that occurred before January 1, 2004, it shall not recognize those assets and liabilities under IFRS unless they qualify for recognition as a result of a later transaction or event. The Company did not derecognize any such financial asset or liability before January 1, 2004 and hence, this exception is not applicable.
	ii.		Hedge accounting exception — The Company did not have on the date of transition a hedging relationship of a type that does not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39. Hence, this exception is not applicable.
	iii.		Estimates exception — Upon an assessment of the estimates made under Previous GAAP, the Company has concluded that there was no necessity to revise the estimates under IFRS except where estimates were required by IFRS and not required by Previous GAAP or estimates were required by Previous GAAP and not required by IFRS.
	iv.		Assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations — The Company has not classified any non-current asset as held for sale on or prior to the transition date and hence this exception is not applicable.

Reconciliations

The accounting policies as stated above have been applied in preparing the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2009, the comparative information for the three months ended June 30, 2008, the condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2009 and the preparation of an opening IFRS Statement of Financial Position at April 1, 2008. In preparing its opening IFRS Statement of Financial Position, comparative information for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in financial statements prepared in accordance with Previous GAAP.

An explanation of how the transition from Previous GAAP to IFRS has affected the Company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flow is set out in the following tables and the Notes that accompany the tables.

a. Reconciliation of equity

				As at
Particulars		Notes		April 1, 2008				June 30, 2008				March 31, 2009
				(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent as per Previous GAAP					221,123				232,523				246,865
Minority interest					58,098				62,325				69,877
Adjusted equity as per Previous GAAP					279,221				294,848				316,742
Capitalization of major overhaul costs		1			15				252				276
Capitalization of exchange loss as an adjustment to interest costs		2			152				151				418
Capitalization of interest income /expense, net		3			(1	)			207				270
Cash flow hedge — Basis Adjustment		4			—				—				1,336
Leave encashment		5			147				135				164
Share in associate		6			(440	)			168				2,351
Tax adjustment		7			(101	)			(719	)			(954	)
Equity as per IFRS					278,993				295,042				320,603
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent					220,804				232,632				250,533
Minority interest					58,189				62,410				70,070

b. Reconciliation of total comprehensive income

				For the three-months				For the year ended
Particulars		Notes		ended June 30, 2008				March 31, 2009
				(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)
Comprehensive income attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent					11,401				29,057
Minority Interest					4,290				12,277
Comprehensive income after tax as per Previous GAAP					15,691				41,334
Capitalization of major overhaul costs		1			237				260
Capitalization of exchange loss as an adjustment to interest costs		2			(1	)			266
Capitalization of interest income /expense, net		3			208				272
Cash flow hedge — Basis Adjustment		4			—				1,336
Leave encashment provision		5			(12	)			17
Share in associate		6			607				2,791
Tax adjustment		7			(618	)			(854	)
Total comprehensive income after tax as per IFRS					16,112				45,422
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent					11,828				33,045
Minority interest					4,284				12,377

c. Notes to reconciliation

Under IFRS, minority interest is reported as a separate item within equity. Previous GAAP requires minority interest to be presented separately from equity. Under IFRS, the minority interest’s share of comprehensive income is presented as an allocation of comprehensive income whereas under the Previous GAAP, minority interest’s share of comprehensive income is considered in determining comprehensive income.

This difference has resulted in an increase in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 58,098 million, Rs. 62,325 million and Rs. 69,877 million as of April 1, 2008, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.

	1.		Under Previous GAAP, major overhaul costs incurred was fully charged off in the period in which it was incurred. Under IFRS, major overhaul costs incurred are capitalized as plant, property and equipment and are depreciated over the period of benefit expected.
			This difference has resulted in an increase in the profit under IFRS by Rs. 237 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and Rs. 260 million for the year ended March 31, 2009, and an increase in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 15 million, Rs. 252 million and Rs. 276 million as of April 1, 2008, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
	2.		Under Previous GAAP, capitalization of exchange loss was not allowed and the same was charged off in the period in which it was incurred. Under IFRS, exchange loss can be capitalized to the extent that they are regarded as adjustment to interest cost.
			The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease in profit under IFRS by Rs.1 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and an increase by Rs. 266 million for the year ended March 31, 2009 and an increase in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 152 million, Rs. 151 million and Rs. 418 million as of April 1, 2008, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
	3.		Under Previous GAAP, interest expenses are capitalized only to the extent directly attributable to expenditure incurred during the construction period (project) and interest income on surplus fund along with related interest expenses are accounted in the statement of comprehensive income. Under IFRS, interest income on surplus fund along with related interest expenses are capitalized to the projects.
			The aforesaid differences have resulted in increase in profit under IFRS by Rs. 208 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and Rs. 272 million for the year ended March 31, 2009 and a decrease in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 1 million as of April 1, 2008, an increase by Rs. 207 million and Rs. 270 million as of June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
	4.		Under Previous GAAP, the effective portions of cash flow hedges are taken to other comprehensive income as cash flow hedge to future capital expenditure. Under IFRS, the same are accounted with property, plant and equipment as basis adjustment.
			The aforesaid differences have resulted in an increase in other comprehensive income under IFRS by Rs. 1,336 million for the year ended March 31, 2009 and an increase in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 1,336 million as of March 31, 2009.
	5.		Under Previous GAAP, leave encashment accruals have been made on the basis of arithmetical calculation, whereas under IFRS, the provision has been made on actuarial basis.
			The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease in profit under IFRS by Rs. 12 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and an increase by Rs. 17 million for the year ended March 31, 2009 and an increase in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 147 million, Rs. 135 million and Rs. 164 million as of April 1, 2008, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
	6.		Difference in the share of profit of the associate between the Previous GAAP and IFRS mainly on account of treatment of exchange differences to the extent regarded an adjustment to interest cost resulted in an increase in the comprehensive income under IFRS by Rs. 607 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and Rs. 2,791 million for the year ended March 31, 2009 and a decrease in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 440 million, an increase by Rs. 168 million and an increase by Rs. 2,351 million as of April 1, 2008, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.

7.

Tax adjustments are on account of deferred tax impact of the adjustment as discussed above and tax rate differences in IFRS and Previous GAAP for inter-company transactions, have resulted in a decrease in the profit under IFRS by Rs. 618 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 and Rs. 854 million for the year ended March 31, 2009 and a decrease in the equity under IFRS by Rs. 101 million, Rs. 719 million and Rs. 954 million as of April 1, 2008, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.

In the statement of cash flow, under Previous GAAP, movement in investment in short-term investments was part of operating activities, whereas in IFRS it is part of investing activities. The aforesaid difference resulted in an increase in net cash provided by operating activities under IFRS by Rs. 19,127 million with a corresponding effect of an increase in net cash used by investing activities under IFRS by Rs. 19,127 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. Similarly a decrease of Rs. 8,548 million in net cash provided by operating activities with a corresponding effect of a decrease by Rs. 8,548 million for the year ended March 31, 2009. There were no other material reconciliation items between cash flows prepared under Previous GAAP and those prepared under IFRS.

5. Tax expenses

The following are the details of tax expenses charged to the statement of income for the periods indicated:

		For the three-month period ended June 30,
		2008				2009				2009
		(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)				(US dollars in millions)
Current tax:
Indian tax expense			3,665				1,807				37.9
Foreign tax expense			61				211				4.4
Total current tax			3,726				2,018				42.3
Deferred tax:
Indian tax expense			209				873				18.3
Foreign tax expense			50				(321	)			(6.8	)
Total deferred tax			259				552				11.5
Tax expense for the period			3,985				2,570				53.8
Effective income tax rate (%)			20.3				20.5				20.5

The effective tax rate for the period was 20.5% and the difference between the statutory tax rate of 34.0% and the effective tax rate was primarily due to tax holidays and exemptions available to Indian companies.

6. Earnings per share (“EPS”)

The following are the basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated:

		For the three-month period ended June 30,
		2008				2009				2009
		(Rs. in millions				(Rs. in millions				(US dollars in millions
		except EPS data)				except EPS data)				except EPS data)
Profit for the period attributable to equity holders of the parent			11,268				8,103				169.7
Weighted average number of equity shares			708,494,411				708,494,411				708,494,411
Earnings per share (Not annualised)			15.90				11.44				0.24

7. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of:

		As at
		March 31, 2009				June 30, 2009				June 30, 2009
		(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)				(US dollars in millions)
Cash at banks and in hand			1,283				1,625				34.0
Short-term deposits and short-term investments			3,429				3,428				71.8
			4,712				5,053				105.8

Cash and cash equivalents include Rs. 3,464 million ($72.5 million) as of June 30, 2009 and Rs. 2,011 million as of March 31, 2009 of cash held in short term deposits accounts that are restricted in use as they relate to unclaimed deposits, dividend, interest on debentures and deposits lien with banks to secure certain banking facilities.

8. Assets held for sale

As per IFRS 5, “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations”, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company has recognized in its aluminum segment assets amounting to Rs. 276 million as assets held for sale.

A description of the assets held for sale is as follows:

		As of June 30, 2009
		Gross Value				Accumulated Depreciation				Net Value
		(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)
Smelter			1,305				(1,154	)			151
MRSDS			235				(110	)			125
Total			1,540				(1,264	)			276

The relatively high cost of operation (approximately $1,742 per metric ton) of BALCO’s Plant I 100,000 tpa smelter which used the Vertical Stud Soderberg (“VSS”) technology at Korba and the steep decline in LME prices made the existing operations at the smelter unviable. Consequently, operations at the smelter was being phased out of production commencing in February 2009 and operations at the smelter ceased on June 5, 2009. The main receiving station and distributing system (“MRSDS”) used in the above mentioned smelter also ceased to be in operations. The Company is in the process of setting up a new 325,000 MT pre-baked technology smelter to increase its capacity and lower costs of production.

The Company has obtained the approval for the dismantle and disposal of the Plant I smelter and the main receiving station and distributing system (“MRSDS”) from the appropriate level of management. A program has been initiated for the location of a prospective buyer. The disposal is expected to be completed by June 2010.

The estimated fair value less costs to sell of the assets held for sale is Rs. 675 million. Since the estimated fair value less costs to sell of the assets held for sale is higher than the carrying amount of the assets, the carrying value of the above assets has been shown separately in the statement of financial positions.

9. Loans and borrowings

Short-term loans and borrowings represent borrowings with an original maturity of less than one year. Long-term loans and borrowings represent borrowings with an original maturity of greater than one year. Maturity distribution is based on contractual maturities or earlier dates at which debt is callable at the option of the holder or the Company. Interest rates on floating-rate debt are generally linked to benchmark rates.

Short-term loans and borrowings consist of:

		As at
		March 31, 2009				June 30, 2009				June 30, 2009
		(Rs. in millions)				(Rs. in millions)				(US dollars in millions)
Banks and financial institutions			7,031				13,518				283.2
Non-convertible debentures			—				4,000				83.8
Others(1)			—				281				5.9
Current portion of long-term loans and borrowings(2)			13,171				4,958				103.8
Short-term loans and borrowings			20,202				22,757				476.7
Weighted average interest rate on short-term loans and borrowings			6.8	%			5.1	%			5.1	%
Unused line of credit on short-term loans and borrowings			60,937				72,829				1,525.5

Long-term loans and borrowings consist of:

		As at
		March 31, 2009				June 30, 2009				June 30, 2009
		(Rs. in million)				(Rs. in million)				(US dollars in millions)
Banks and financial institutions			20,128				26,957				564.7
Non-convertible debentures			5,996				5,997				125.6
Others(1)			1,431				595				12.4
Long-term loans and borrowings			27,555				33,549				702.7
Less: Current portion of long-term loans and borrowings(1)			(13,171	)			(4,958	)			(103.8	)
Long-term loans and borrowings			14,384				28,591				598.9

Major loans and borrowings are as follows:

Working capital loans

The Company has credit facilities from various banks for meeting working capital requirements, generally in the form of credit lines for establishing letters of credit, packing credit in foreign currency, or PCFC, cash credit and bank guarantees. Amounts due under working capital loans as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 were Rs. 2,531 million and Rs. 1,715 million ($35.9 million), respectively. The working capital loans of Rs. 1,715 million ($35.9 million) due as of June 30, 2009 consisted of Rs. 1,292 million ($27.1 million) under a US dollar denominated PCFC loan, and a Rs. 423 million ($8.8 million) under a cash credit facility. Interest on the PCFC facility is based on the London Inter-Bank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, plus 110 basis points. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding cash credit facility is 13.0%. The working capital loans are secured against the inventories and trade accounts receivables.

Foreign currency loans

In November 2008, BALCO obtained a US dollar denominated unsecured loan facility of $25.0 million from DBS Bank Ltd, arranged by DBS Bank Ltd, Mumbai Branch, to meet our capital expenditure requirement on projects. The rate of interest payable on this facility is LIBOR plus 345 basis points. The loan is repayable in three equal yearly installments beginning November 2013. The amount outstanding under this facility as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 were $25.0 million and $25.0 million (Rs. 1,165 million).

On June 29, 2009, Sterlite Energy entered into US dollar denominated secured term loan facility of $140.0 million (Rs. 6,683.6 million) with India Infrastructure Finance (UK) Company Limited as lender and SBI as facility agent to finance the costs of purchasing machinery and equipment from overseas, supplied in connection with the building of its 2,400 MW thermal coal-based power facility in Jharsuguda in the State of Orissa. The rate of interest payable under this facility is six-month LIBOR plus 5.35% per annum to be reset semi-annually. 60% of the loan is repayable in 48 quarterly installments beginning on a date falling six months after the date of commercial operation of the last unit of the power facility, 36% of the loan amount is repayable at the end of 12 years from June 29, 2009 in a single installment and the balance 4% of the outstanding loan is repayable in eight quarterly installments commencing from December 2022. The facility is secured by, among other things, a first charge over the movable and immovable properties and tangible or intangible assets of Sterlite Energy as well as charges over certain of its bank accounts. As of June 30, 2009, Sterlite Energy has not drawn down on the loan.

Term loans

As of June 30, 2009, the Company had nine term loans which consist of two syndicated term loans from ABN AMRO Bank N.V., or ABN AMRO, two term loans from ICICI Bank Limited, or ICICI Bank, one term loan from the Industrial Development Bank of India, or IDBI, one term loan from the State Bank of India, or SBI, one term loan from Punjab National Bank, or PNB, one term loan from Jammu and Kashmir Bank, or J&K Bank, and one syndicate term loan from SBI.

In September 2003 and August 2004, BALCO obtained two syndicated Indian Rupee fixed rate term loan facilities from ABN AMRO totaling Rs. 17,000 million to meet capital expenditure requirements of projects, of which Rs. 15,904 million has been drawn down at an average interest rate of 7.3% per annum. The weighted average interest rate on the loan outstanding is 8.5%. These facilities are secured by a first charge on the movable and immovable properties, present and future tangible or intangible assets and other than current assets of BALCO. The first loan of Rs. 10,000 million is repayable in 12 quarterly installments beginning in January 2007. An amount of Rs. 9,032 million was repaid under the first loan as of June 30, 2009. The second loan of Rs. 7,000 million, of which Rs. 5,904 million has been drawn down, is repayable in eight quarterly installments commencing from May 2009. An amount of Rs. 2,599 million was repaid under the second loan as of June 30, 2009. As of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the balances due under the two loans were Rs. 5,287 million and Rs. 4,273 million ($89.5 million), respectively.

Pursuant to the approval of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, or BIFR, for the rehabilitation scheme of India Foils Limited or “IFL” in November 2008, we took over two loans aggregating to Rs. 1,022.5 million granted by ICICI Bank, on the same terms and conditions by way of two novation agreements entered into among us, IFL and ICICI Bank. The first loan of Rs. 1,020 million, of which Rs. 772.5 million was transferred to us pursuant to the novation agreement, has an interest rate of 10% per annum and is repayable in 12 quarterly installments beginning from November 2008, of which Rs. 185.6 million was paid by June 30, 2009. The second loan of Rs. 250 million has an interest rate of 10% per annum, which was reset to 11% from June 2009, and is repayable in 16 quarterly installments beginning from November 2008, of which Rs. 46.9 million was repaid by June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we had repaid Rs. 232.5 million of these loans, out of the total loan amount of Rs. 1,022.5 million. As of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the balances due under the two loans were Rs. 868 million and Rs. 790 million ($16.5 million), respectively. These loans are unsecured.

In September 2008, Sterlite Energy obtained an Indian Rupee fixed rate term loan from IDBI totaling Rs. 5,000 million. The first draw down of Rs. 1,500 million was made in September 2008, has an interest rate of 12% per annum. The second draw down of Rs. 1,000 million was obtained in December 2008, had an interest rate of 12.75% per annum, which has been reset to 12.0% per annum with effect from March 11, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the balance due under the loans was Rs. 2,500 million ($52.4 million). These loans are unsecured. Sterlite Energy has not repaid this loan as it had entered into another Indian Rupee term loan facility with, among others, IDBI, on June 29, 2009 pursuant to which Sterlite Energy and IDBI agreed that all amounts drawn down by Sterlite Energy under this loan facility will be deemed to be a draw down under the new term loan facility from the initial draw down date of the new term loan facility.

In January 2009, Sterlite Energy obtained an Indian Rupee fixed rate term loan facility of Rs. 5,000 million from the SBI, of which Rs. 2,000 million had been drawn down. The interest rate of the loan is 12.0% per annum. The purpose of the loan is to meet capital expenditure requirements on projects. Sterlite Energy has not repaid this loan as it had entered into another Indian Rupee term loan facility with, among others, SBI, on June 29, 2009 pursuant to which Sterlite Energy and SBI agreed that all amounts drawn down by Sterlite Energy under this loan facility will be deemed to be a draw down under the new term loan facility from the initial draw down date of the new term loan facility. As of June 30, 2009, the balance due under the loan was Rs. 2,000 million ($41.9 million). This is an unsecured loan.

In June 2009, Sterlite Energy obtained an Indian Rupee fixed rate term loan facility of Rs. 1,500 million from the PNB, of which Rs. 740 million had been drawn down. The interest rate of the loan is 12.0% per annum. The purpose of the loan is to meet capital expenditure requirements on projects. As of June 30, 2009, the balance due under the loan was Rs. 740 million ($15.5 million). This is an unsecured loan.

In June 2009, Sterlite Energy obtained an Indian Rupee fixed rate term loan facility of Rs. 1,000 million from the J&K Bank, of which Rs. 200 million had been drawn down. The interest rate of the loan is 12.0% per annum. The purpose of the loan is to meet capital expenditure requirements on projects. As of June 30, 2009, the balance due under the loan was Rs. 200 million ($4.2 million). This is an unsecured loan.

On June 29, 2009, Sterlite Energy entered into an Indian Rupee term loan facility from a syndicate of banks, with SBI acting as facility agent, of Rs. 55,690 million ($1,166.5 million), to finance the cost of building a 2,400 MW thermal coal-based power facility at Jharsuguda in the State of Orissa at an interest rate of 11.5% per annum until June 28, 2010. Thereafter, the interest rate will be reset on a yearly basis to a rate that is 25 basis points below the State Bank of India Benchmark Advance Rate. The facility is secured by, among other things, a first charge over the movable and immovable properties and tangible or intangible assets of Sterlite Energy as well as charges over certain of its bank accounts. The loan is repayable in 48 quarterly installments beginning on a date falling six months after the date of commercial operation of the last unit of the power facility. As of June 30, 2009, Sterlite Energy has not drawn down on this facility All amounts drawn down by Sterlite Energy under the loan facilities granted by IDBI, SBI, PNB and J&K Bank will be deemed to be a draw down under this loan facility from the initial draw down date of this facility.

Buyers’ credit

Sterlite Energy had utilized extended credit terms relating to purchases of property, plant and equipment for our projects. As of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the balance due under this facility was Rs. 11,451 million and Rs. 14,175 million ($296.9 million), respectively. These loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 163 basis points. SBI has a lien on a fixed deposit of Rs. 3,390 million ($71.0 million) as security over the loan of Rs. 3,306 million ($69.2 million). The remaining balance of Rs. 10,869 million ($227.7 million) is unsecured.

BALCO had utilized buyers’ credit facility for meeting project expenditure requirements. As of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the balances due under this facility were Rs. 1,260 million and Rs. 1,187 million ($24.9 million). These loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 325 basis points. These are unsecured debts.

In April 2009, BALCO obtained a one time capex letter of credit limit of $100 million from the SBI, which is secured by first pari passu charges on the movable and immovable fixed assets of BALCO. As of June 30, 2009, the balance due under this facility was Rs. 4,586 million ($96.1 million). The interest rate on this facility is LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The said facility is repayable from November 2011 to April 2012. The facility was funded by SBI Hongkong and the Bank of Baroda London.

Non-convertible debentures

In April 2003, SIIL issued Rs. 1,000 million ($20.9 million) Indian Rupee denominated non-convertible debentures to Life Insurance Corporation of India, or LIC. The debentures were issued in two tranches. Tranche A, in the amount of Rs. 400 million ($8.4 million), is due in April 2010 and Tranche B, in the amount of Rs. 600 million ($12.5 million), is due in April 2013. Interest payable on these debentures is linked to annualized Government of India security rates. The applicable interest rate is 9.25% per annum. These debentures are secured by certain of the Company’s immovable properties.

In November 2008, BALCO issued Rs. 5,000 million ($104.7 million) in Indian Rupee denominated non-convertible debentures to LIC. The debentures are repayable in three equal yearly installments beginning in November 2013. The applicable interest rate is 12.25% per annum. The debentures are secured and have a pari passu charge on BALCO’s movable and immovable properties and present and future tangible or intangible assets, other than BALCO’s current assets to the extent of 1.33 times the issued amount of the debentures.

In May and June 2009, SIIL issued an aggregate Rs. 20,000 million ($418.9 million) redeemable non-convertible debentures to various mutual fund companies. The debentures were issued for short periods and the maturity periods for all the debentures are less than 90 days from the date of issue. The interest rate on the debentures is linked to the National Stock Exchange of India’s overnight Mumbai Inter Bank Offer Rate, or MIBOR. The applicable interest rate is MIBOR plus 0.25 % to 0.50% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, debentures of Rs. 4,000 million ($ 83.8 million) were outstanding. These debentures are unsecured.

Commercial papers

In May 2009, SIIL issued Rs. 7,500 million ($157.1 million) Indian Rupee denominated commercial papers to various mutual fund companies at a discount rate of 5.90% per annum. The effective discount rate is 5.81% per annum. Validity of the commercial paper is one year from the date of issue. As of June 30, 2009, the balance due under the commercial papers was Rs. 7,128 million ($149.3 million).

10. Business Combinations

a. Call option — HZL

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited (“SOVL”), has two call options to purchase all of the Government of India’s shares in HZL at fair market value. SOVL exercised the first call option on August 29, 2003 and acquired an additional 18.9% of HZL’s issued share capital, increasing its shareholding to 64.9%. As of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the Government of India’s holding in HZL was 29.5%. The second call option provides SOVL the right to acquire the Government of India’s remaining 29.5% share in HZL. This call option is subject to the right of the Government of India to sell 3.5% of HZL to HZL employees. This call option is also subject to the Government of India’s right, prior to the exercise of this call option, to sell its shares in HZL through a public offer. From April 11, 2007, SOVL has the right to exercise the second call option. The option has no expiry date. The Company has exercised the second call option vide its letter dated July 21, 2009. The Company has also requested the Government of India (Ministry of Mines) to appoint a valuer to appraise the fair value of the shares.

b. Call option — BALCO

The Company purchased a 51.0% holding in BALCO from the Government of India on March 2, 2001. Under the terms of this shareholder’s agreement (“SHA”) for BALCO, the Company has a call option that allows it to purchase the Government of India’s remaining ownership interest in BALCO at any point from March 2, 2004. The Company exercised this option on March 19, 2004. However, the Government of India has contested the purchase price and validity of the option. The Company sought an interim order from the High Court of Delhi to restrain the Government of India from transferring or disposing of its shareholding pending resolution of the dispute. The High Court directed on August 7, 2006 that the parties attempt to settle the dispute by way of a mediation process as provided for in the SHA. However, as the dispute could not be settled through mediation, it has been referred to arbitration as provided for in the SHA. Arbitration proceedings commenced on February 16, 2009. The Company has filed its claim statement with the Arbitration Tribunal. The Government of India filed its reply on July 10, 2009. The Arbitration Tribunal has fixed the matter for hearing from October 13 to October 14, 2009.

11. Dividends

Each equity share holder is entitled to dividends as and when the Company declares and pays dividends after obtaining shareholder approval. Dividends are paid in Indian Rupees. Remittance of dividends outside India is governed by Indian law on foreign exchange and is subject to applicable taxes.

Equity dividends paid was Rs. 2,834 million ($59.4 million) in the year ended March 31, 2009. Dividend distribution taxes on the equity dividends were Rs. 481 million ($10.1 million) in the year ended March 31, 2009.

On April 28, 2009, the board of directors of the Company recommended a final dividend of Rs. 3.50 ($0.07) per equity share for the year ended March 31, 2009, subject to shareholders’ approval at the next general meeting to be held on September 19, 2009.

Dividends are payable from the profits determined under generally accepted accounting principles in India (“Indian GAAP”) from statutory standalone financial statements.

Under Indian law, a company is allowed to pay dividends in excess of 10.0% of its paid-up capital in any year from profits for that year only if it transfers a specified percentage of the profits of that year to reserves. The Company makes such transfers to general reserves.

12. Commitments, contingencies, and guarantees

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into certain capital commitments and also gives certain financial guarantees. The aggregate amount of indemnities and other guarantees, on which the Company does not expect any material losses, was Rs. 58,465 million ($1,224.7 million) as of June 30, 2009.

a. Commitments and contingencies

i. Commitments

The Company has a number of continuing operational and financial commitments in the normal course of business including completion of the construction and expansion of certain assets.

Capital commitments

The Company had significant capital commitments as of June 30, 2009 amounting to Rs. 64,780 million ($1,356.9 million), related primarily to capacity expansion projects, including commitments amounting to Rs. 22,903 million ($479.7 million) for its commercial power generation business and Rs. 24,111 million ($505.0 million) for capacity expansion at BALCO.

Export obligations

The Company had export obligations of Rs. 73,026 million ($1,529.7 million) over the next eight years on account of concessional rates of import duties paid on capital goods under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme enacted by the Government of India. If the Company is unable to meet these obligations, its liability would be Rs. 10,077 million ($211.1 million), reduced in proportion to actual exports. Due to the remote likelihood of it being unable to meet its export obligations, the Company does not anticipate a loss with respect to these obligations and hence has not made any provision in its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

ii. Contingencies

Certain of the Company’s operating subsidiaries have been named as parties to legal actions by third party claimants and by the Indian sales tax, excise and related tax authorities for additional sales tax, excise and indirect duties. These claims primarily relate either to the assessable values of sales and purchases or to incomplete documentation supporting the Company’s tax returns. The total claim related to these tax liabilities is Rs. 4,664 million ($97.7 million). The Company has evaluated these contingencies and estimated that some of these claims may result in loss contingencies and hence has recorded Rs. 101 million ($2.1 million) as current liabilities as of June 30, 2009.

The claims by third party claimants amounted to Rs. 4,179 million ($87.5 million) as of June 30, 2009. No liability has been recorded against these claims, based on the Company’s expectation that none of these claims will become its obligations. Although the results of legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of the Company’s management, after taking appropriate legal advice, that the likelihood of these claims becoming its obligations is remote and, as a result, the resolution of these claims will not have a material adverse effect, if any, on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any additional liability beyond what is stated above in relation to litigation matters in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

b. Guarantees

The Company has given guarantees in the normal course of business for the purpose as stated below as of June 30, 2009:

	•		Guarantees on the issuance of customs and excise duty bonds amounting to Rs. 871 million ($18.2 million) for import of goods including capital equipment at concessional rates of duty. The Company does not anticipate any liability on these guarantees.
	•		Corporate guarantee of Rs. 21,000 million ($439.9 million) on behalf of Vedanta Aluminium for obtaining credit facilities. The Company also issued corporate guarantees of Rs. 14,704 million ($308.0 million) for importing capital equipment at concessional rates of duty under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme enacted by the Government of India and Rs. 134 million ($2.8 million) for raw material imports. Vedanta Aluminium is obligated to export goods worth eight times the value of concessions enjoyed in a period of eight years following the date of import, failing which the Company will be liable to pay the dues to the Government of India. As of June 30, 2009, the Company determined that it has no liability on these corporate guarantees.

	•		Bank guarantee amounting to AUD 5.0 million (Rs. 194 million or $4.1 million) as of June 30, 2009, in favor of the Ministry for Economic Development, Energy and Resources, as a security against rehabilitation liabilities on behalf of CMT. The same guarantee is backed up by the issuance of a corporate guarantee of Rs. 320 million ($6.7 million). These liabilities have been fully recognized in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company does not anticipate any additional liability on these guarantees.
	•		Bank indemnity guarantees amounting to AUD 2.9 million (Rs. 111 million or $2.3 million) as of June 30, 2009, in favor of the State Government of Queensland, Australia, as a security against rehabilitation liabilities that are expected to occur at the closure of the mine. The environmental liability has been fully recognized in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company does not anticipate any additional liability on these guarantees.
	•		Performance bank guarantees amounting to Rs. 2,986 million ($62.5 million) as of June 30, 2009. These guarantees are issued in the normal course of business while bidding for supply contracts or in lieu of advances received from customers. The guarantees have varying maturity dates normally ranging from six months to three years. These are contractual guarantees and are enforceable if the terms and conditions of the contracts are not met and the maximum liability on these contracts is the amount mentioned above. The Company does not anticipate any liability on these guarantees.
	•		Bank guarantees for securing supplies of materials and services in the normal course of business. The value of these guarantees as of June 30, 2009 was Rs. 2,190 million ($45.9 million). The Company has also issued bank guarantees in the normal course of business for an aggregate value of Rs. 520 million ($10.9 million) for litigation, against provisional valuation and for other liabilities. The Company does not anticipate any liability on these guarantees.
	•		Two irrevocable letters of credit of $50 million each in favor of Asarco, one of which the Company gave as a security deposit at the time of signing the previous agreement with Asarco on February 4, 2009 and the second of which the Company gave as an additional security deposit at the time of signing the current agreement with Asarco on March 6, 2009. Further , the Company has given a third irrevocable letter of credit of $25 million in favor of Asarco on May 15, 2009 after the approval by the US Bankruptcy Court of the adequacy of the disclosure statement submitted by Asarco in support of the reorganization plan proposed by Asarco and sponsored by Sterlite USA.

The Company’s outstanding guarantees cover obligations aggregating Rs. 48,388 million ($1,013.6 million) as of June 30, 2009, the liabilities for which have not been recorded in its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

13. Segment Information

The Company is primarily in the business of non-ferrous mining and metals in India and Australia. The Company has five reportable segments: copper, zinc, aluminum, power and corporate and others. The management of the Company is organized by its main products: copper, zinc, aluminum and power. Each of the reported segment derives its revenues from these main products and hence these have been identified as reportable segments by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). Segment profit amounts are evaluated regularly by the Company’s Group Chief Executive Officer (“Group CEO”) who has been identified as its CODM in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

Copper

The copper business is principally one of custom smelting and includes a copper smelter, a refinery, a phosphoric acid plant, a sulphuric acid plant, a copper rod plant, a doré anode plant and two captive power plants at Tuticorin in Southern India and a refinery and two copper rod plants at Silvassa in Western India. The Company obtains a small quantity of copper concentrate from its Mt. Lyell copper mine in Tasmania, Australia, owned by CMT. The segment also includes a precious metal refinery at Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates.

Zinc

The Company’s zinc business is owned and operated by HZL. HZL’s operations include four lead-zinc mines, three hydrometallurgical zinc smelters, one lead smelter, one lead-zinc smelter, three sulphuric acid plants, a silver refinery and five captive power plants in the State of Rajasthan in Northwest India, one hydrometallurgical zinc smelter and a sulphuric acid plant in the State of Andhra Pradesh in Southeast India, and a zinc ingot melting and casting plant at Haridwar in the State of Uttarakhand in North India.

Aluminum

The aluminum business is owned and operated by BALCO. BALCO’s operations include two bauxite mines, one alumina refinery, two aluminum smelters, of which operations at the old 100,000 tpa aluminum smelter at Korba was partially suspended from February 2009 and ceased completely on June 5, 2009, and two captive power plants, of which the 270 MW power plant is now used for commercial purpose since the shut down of the 100,000 tpa smelter, in the State of Chhattisgarh in Central India. Power generated by the 270 MW power plant is sold to third parties.

Power

The commercial power generation business includes the 123.2 MW of wind power plants commissioned by HZL and any additional wind power plants that HZL may commission as part of the 300 MW of wind power plants approved by HZL’s board of directors and one 270 MW power plant at BALCO’s Korba facility which was previously for captive use before the shut down of the 100,000 tpa aluminum smelter at Korba on June 5, 2009. The Company’s power business is still under development, and it expects to have meaningful operating results for the commercial power generation business segment in fiscal 2010, when Sterlite Energy’s first power project is expected to begin progressive commissioning from the third quarter of fiscal 2010.

Corporate and others

The operating segment “Corporate and others” includes other corporate activities.

Business segments

The operating segments reported are the segments of the Company for which separate financial information is available. Segment profit amounts are evaluated regularly by the Group CEO who has been identified as its CODM in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The following table presents revenue and profit information and certain asset and liability information regarding the Company’s business segments for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2009.

a. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2008

																		Corporate
		Copper				Zinc				Aluminum				Power				and others				Elimination				Total
		(Rs. in millions)
Revenue
Sales to external customers			29,395				16,184				11,630				249				—				—				57,458
Inter-segment sales			—				—				43				—				—				(43	)			—
Segment revenue			29,395				16,184				11,673				249				—				(43	)			57,458
Results
Segment profit			4,501				9,739				4,517				233				(3	)			—				18,987
Depreciation, depletion and amortization			(465	)			(674	)			(714	)			(142	)			—				—				(1,995	)
Operating profit			4,036				9,065				3,803				91				(3	)			—				16,992
Finance costs																											(735	)
Investment revenue																											3,372
Tax expense																											(3,985	)
Share in profit of associate																			28								28
Profit for the period																											15,672
Assets
Segment assets			149,051				142,172				56,061				24,920				338				—				372,542
Investment in associate			—				—				—				—				19,270				—				19,270
Total assets			149,051				142,172				56,061				24,920				19,608				—				391,812
Additions to property, plant and equipment			1,079				2,029				1,383				3,448				—				—				7,939

b. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009

																		Corporate
		Copper				Zinc				Aluminum				Power				and others				Elimination				Total				Total
																														(US dollars
		(Rs. in millions)																												in millions)
Revenue
Sales to external customers			22,988				14,746				6,107				1,363				—				—				45,204				946.9
Inter-segment sales			—				—				40				432				—				(472	)			—				—
Segment revenue			22,988				14,746				6,147				1,795				—				(472	)			45,204				946.9
Results
Segment profit			1,192				7,597				1,650				1,015				(1	)			—				11,453				239.8
Depreciation, depletion and amortization			(505	)			(673	)			(616	)			(180	)			—				—				(1,974	)			(41.3	)
Operating profit			687				6,924				1,034				835				(1	)			—				9,479				198.5
Finance costs																											(1,854	)			(38.8	)
Investment revenue																											4,912				102.9
Share in profit of associate																			1,356								1,356				28.4
Tax expense																											(2,570	)			(53.8	)
Profit for the period																											11,323				237.2
Assets
Segment assets			154,990				167,808				71,426				62,048				337				—				456,609				9,564.5
Investment in associate			—				—				—				—				16,786				—				16,786				351.6
Total assets			154,990				167,808				71,426				62,048				17,123				—				473,395				9,916.1
Additions to property, plant and equipment			405				4,425				6,724				6,892				(2	)			—				18,446				386.4