|
UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
FORM N-CSR |
|
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED |
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
|
|
Investment Company Act file number |
811-21078 |
|
|
|
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II |
|
|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
|
|
|
1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, |
New York 10105 |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip code) |
|
|
Lawrence G. Altadonna - 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105 |
|
|
|
(Name and address of agent for service) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
212-739-3371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of fiscal year end: |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of reporting period: |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e -1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II |
|
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II |
|
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report |
|
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2-7 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8-23 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-27 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28-29 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-43 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44-46 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Manager Change/Change to the Funds Investment Policies and Related Risks |
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52-53 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
July 15, 2009
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to provide you with the annual report for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II, and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (collectively, the Funds) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009.
During the first part of the reporting period, greater risk-aversion brought on by the deepening financial crisis led to more sellers than buyers in the municipal bond market. This was a primary factor in causing prices on municipal securities to decline and yields to increase during the reporting period. Municipal bond markets rallied slightly during the second part of the reporting period, as improved liquidity and attractive yields due to oversold conditions encouraged investors to re-enter the market. The municipal bond market is transitioning from a market focused on rates to one primarily focused on credit quality, in part due to the loss of the large municipal bond insurers who provided guarantees on many municipal bonds. Additionally, while liquidity returned somewhat in the second part of the reporting period, large institutional investors, such as insurance companies and banks, remained on the sidelines as they focused on rebuilding their balance sheets, and much of the buying came from individual investor activity.
The unprecedented liquidity constraints and resulting imbalances in the financial markets during the reporting period initiated the following important actions by the Funds:
|
|
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II resumed payment of previously declared but postponed common share dividends. Severe market disruptions during the first portion of the reporting period negatively impacted prices for securities, causing asset ratios to decline below an asset coverage level of at least 200%. This prevented the Funds from paying common share dividends until the asset coverage level returned to a level of at least 200%. |
|
|
|
In January 2009, the Funds redeemed portions of their Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS). PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II redeemed $138 million, $97 million and $11 million, respectively. All ARPS redemptions were executed at the full liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. The redemptions were intended to resolve issues that served as impediments to the goal of regular, uninterrupted dividend payments on the Funds common shares. |
|
|
|
On April 6, 2009, the Funds announced a change increasing the amount of Residual Interest Municipal Bonds (RIBs) in which a Fund may invest to 15% from 10% of their total assets. The change potentially allows the Funds to earn additional tax-free income. In addition, the use of RIBs, which results in a form of economic leverage, may allow the Funds to replace or increase leverage to some degree. |
Press releases that include further information on these Fund actions, including more detailed descriptions of potential benefits and risks, are available at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds.
For specific information on the Funds and their performance, please review the following pages. If you have any questions regarding the information provided, we encourage you to contact your financial advisor or call the Funds shareholder servicing agent at (800) 254-5197. In addition, a wide range of information and resources is available on our website www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds.
Together with Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC, the Funds investment manager, and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO), the Funds sub-adviser, we thank you for investing with us.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
||
Hans W. Kertess |
|
Brian S. Shlissel |
Chairman |
|
President & Chief Executive Officer |
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 1
|
May 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009, PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II declined 29.83% on net asset value (NAV) and 26.46% on market price, compared with declines of 5.77% on net asset value and 7.68% on market price for the Lipper Analytical General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) Average. |
|
|
|
High-quality municipal bond yields moved lower across the yield curve during the twelve-month period, with a more pronounced decline at the front end of the yield curve. Yields moved higher during the second half of 2008, but thus far in 2009 there has been a rebound across the yield curve, with municipal bond yields moving lower. |
|
|
|
Duration hedging strategies in longer-maturity swaps detracted from performance as longer maturity swap rates moved significantly lower during the reporting period, with much of the move occurring in the fourth quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Municipal-to-U.S. Treasury yield ratios were very volatile during the period, crossing levels in late 2008 that were not experienced before. However, this ratio moved lower in the first part of 2009, with the 10-year ratio decreasing to 87% and the 30-year ratio increasing to 106%. |
|
|
|
Holdings in the tobacco-securitization sector detracted from performance as this sector underperformed primarily in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the extreme flight-to-quality. However, the sector partially rebounded year-to-date, especially during May 2009. |
|
|
|
Exposure to corporate-backed municipals detracted from performance as this sector underperformed during the reporting period, which was similar to the underperformance in the taxable corporate securities sector. However, this sector experienced a partial rebound in the latter part of the reporting period. |
|
|
|
Exposure to both pre-refunded and general obligation issues benefited returns as both sectors performed well due to increased investor risk aversion resulting from the financial crisis. However, these sectors underperformed in the last few months of the period, as investors moved further out on the risk spectrum. |
|
|
|
Exposure to zero-coupon municipals detracted from performance as this sector underperformed the unmanaged Barclays Capital Zero Coupon Index, which declined 6.83% during the reporting period. However, this sector experienced a partial rebound in the latter part of the period and zero coupon municipal yields moved lower. |
|
|
|
The municipal yield curve steepened significantly during the twelve-month period, with investor demand more concentrated on shorter maturities. Longer-maturity yields increased slightly and shorter-maturity yields moved significantly lower. The 15- and 20-year maturity AAA general obligation yields decreased 38 and 11 basis points, respectively, while the 30-year maturity yield increased 12 basis points. The two-year yield decreased 131 basis points during the comparable period. Significant exposure to longer-maturity municipals detracted from performance as the long portion of the yield curve underperformed. |
|
|
|
Compared to long-taxable sectors, long municipal issues underperformed primarily due to the rally in U.S. Treasuries in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Barclays Capital Long Municipal Bond Index (an unmanaged index generally representative of the long-term tax-exempt bond market) declined 2.50%, while the Barclays Capital Long Government/Credit (an unmanaged index generally representative of long-term government and investment grade corporate debt securities) and the Barclays Capital Long U.S. Treasury (an unmanaged index of Treasury securities of varying maturities greater than 10 years) Indices advanced 3.00% and 8.47%, respectively. |
|
|
|
Municipal bond issuance in 2008 was approximately 9% lower than in 2007. Year-to-date issuance has been more robust with a variety of issuers re-entering the market. Municipal bond issuance for the period from January through May 2009 was $152.85 billion, 15% lower than in the period from January through May 2008 when issuance reached $180.72 billion. |
2 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights/Performance & Statistics |
May 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return(1): |
|
Market Price |
|
Net Asset Value (NAV |
) |
||
1 Year |
|
(26.46)% |
|
|
(29.83 |
)% |
|
5 Year |
|
(0.06)% |
|
|
(2.39 |
)% |
|
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 5/31/09 |
|
0.14% |
|
|
(0.17 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
|
NAV |
|
|
|
|
Market Price/NAV: |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
$9.56 |
NAV |
|
|
$8.97 |
Premium to NAV |
|
6.58% |
|
Market Price Yield(2) |
|
8.16% |
|
|
|
Moodys
Ratings |
|
(1) | Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. Total return is calculated by determining the percentage
change in net asset value or market share price (as applicable) in
the specified period. The calculation assumes that all income dividends
and capital gain distributions have been reinvested. Total return does
not reflect broker commissions or sales charges. Total return for a
period of more than one year represents the average annual total return. |
Performance
at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market
price returns typically reflect investment results over time, during
shorter periods returns at market price can also be influenced by factors
such as changing views about the Fund, market conditions, supply and
demand for the Funds shares, or changes
in Fund distributions. |
|
An investment in the Fund involves risk, including
the loss of principal. Total return, market price, market yield and net
asset value will fluctuate with changes in market conditions. This data
is provided for information only and is not intended for trading purposes.
Closed-end funds, unlike open-end funds, are not continuously offered.
There is a onetime public offering and once issued, shares of closed-end
funds are sold in the open market through a stock exchange. Net asset
value is equal to total assets attributable to common shareholders less
total liabilities divided by the number of common shares outstanding.
Holdings are subject to change daily. |
|
(2) | Market Price Yield is determined by dividing
the annualized current monthly per share dividend (comprised from net
investment income) payable to common shareholders by the market price
per common share at May 31, 2009. |
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 3
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights |
May 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II declined 38.32% on net asset value (NAV) and 32.26% on market price, compared with declines of 6.65% on net asset value and 11.32% on market price for the Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Average. |
|
|
|
High-quality municipal bond yields moved lower across the yield curve during the twelve-month period, with a more pronounced decline at the front end of the yield curve. Yields moved higher during the second half of 2008, but thus far in 2009 there has been a rebound across the yield curve, with municipal bond yields moving lower. |
|
|
|
Duration hedging strategies in longer-maturity swaps detracted from performance as longer maturity swap rates moved significantly lower during the reporting period, with much of the move occurring in the fourth quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Municipal-to-U.S. Treasury yield ratios were very volatile during the period, crossing levels in late 2008 that were not experienced before. However, this ratio moved lower in the first part of 2009, with the 10-year ratio decreasing to 87% and the 30-year ratio increasing to 106%. |
|
|
|
Holdings in the tobacco-securitization sector detracted from performance as this sector underperformed primarily in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the extreme flight-to-quality. However, the sector has partially rebounded year-to-date, especially in the month of May 2009. |
|
|
|
Exposure to corporate-backed municipals detracted from performance as this sector underperformed during the reporting period, which was similar to the underperformance in the taxable corporate securities sector. However, this sector experienced a partial rebound in the latter part of the reporting period. |
|
|
|
Exposure to both pre-refunded and general obligation issues benefited returns as both sectors performed well due to increased investor risk aversion resulting from the financial crisis. However, these sectors underperformed in the last few months of the period, as investors moved further out on the risk spectrum. |
|
|
|
Exposure to zero-coupon municipals detracted from performance as this sector underperformed the unmanaged Barclays Capital Zero Coupon Index, which declined 6.83% during the reporting period. However, this sector rebounded in the latter part of the period and zero coupon municipal yields moved lower. |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds within California, as represented by the California component of the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index, underperformed the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (National Index), returning 1.47%, compared to 3.57% for the National Index. Year-to-date through May 2009, California issued $30.58 billion in new municipal bonds, 2% lower than the comparable period in 2008. |
|
|
|
Long California municipal bonds, as represented by the Barclays Capital California Municipal Bond Long (22+) Index, declined 4.90% and underperformed the Barclays Capital Long Municipal Bond Index, an unmanaged index generally representative of the long-term tax-exempt bond market, which declined 2.50%. The California municipal yield curve steepened with 30-year yields increasing 95 basis points, while two-year yields decreased 34 basis points. Significant exposure to longer maturities detracted from performance as the long portion of the California municipal yield curve underperformed during the twelve-month period. |
4 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights/Performance & Statistics |
|
May 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return(1): |
|
Market Price |
|
Net Asset Value (NAV) |
|
||
1 Year |
|
(32.26 |
)% |
|
|
(38.32 |
)% |
5 Year |
|
(1.41 |
)% |
|
|
(4.84 |
)% |
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 5/31/09 |
|
(1.00 |
)% |
|
|
(2.59 |
)% |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
|
NAV |
|
|
|
|
Market Price/NAV: |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
$8.78 |
NAV |
|
|
$7.48 |
Premium to NAV |
|
|
17.38% |
Market Price Yield(2) |
|
|
9.13% |
|
Moodys
Rating |
(1) | Past performance
is no guarantee of future results. Total return is calculated
by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market
share price (as applicable) in the specified period. The calculation
assumes that all income dividends and capital gain distributions
have been reinvested. Total return does not reflect broker commissions
or sales charges. Total return for a period of more than one year
represents the average annual total return. |
Performance
at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market
price returns typically reflect investment results over time, during
shorter periods returns at market price can also be influenced by factors
such as changing views about the Fund, market conditions, supply and
demand for the Funds shares, or changes in Fund distributions. |
|
An investment
in the Fund involves risk, including the loss of principal. Total return,
market price, market yield and net asset value will fluctuate with
changes in market conditions. This data is provided for information
only and is not intended for trading purposes. Closed-end funds, unlike
open-end funds, are not continuously offered. There is a onetime public
offering and once issued, shares of closed-end funds are sold in the
open market through a stock exchange. Net asset value is equal to total
assets attributable to common shareholders less total liabilities divided
by the number of common shares outstanding. Holdings are subject to
change daily. |
|
(2) | Market Price Yield is determined by dividing the annualized current monthly per share dividend (comprised from net investment income) payable to common shareholders by the market price per common share at May 31, 2009. |
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 5
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights |
May 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009, PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II declined 24.34% on net asset value (NAV) and 22.95% on market price, compared with declines of 6.05% on net asset value and 8.50% on market price for the Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Average. |
|
|
|
High-quality municipal bond yields moved lower across the yield curve during the twelve-month period, with a more pronounced decline at the front end of the yield curve. Yields moved higher during the second half of 2008, but thus far in 2009 there has been a rebound across the yield curve, with municipal bond yields moving lower. |
|
|
|
Duration hedging strategies in longer-maturity swaps detracted from performance as longer maturity swap rates moved significantly lower during the reporting period, with much of the move occurring in the fourth quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Municipal-to-U.S. Treasury yield ratios were very volatile during the period, crossing levels in late 2008 that were not experienced before. However, this ratio moved lower in the first part of 2009, with the 10-year ratio decreasing to 87% and the 30-year ratio increasing to 106%. |
|
|
|
Holdings in the tobacco-securitization sector detracted from performance as this sector underperformed primarily in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the extreme flight-to-quality. However, the sector has partially rebounded year-to-date, especially in the month of May 2009. |
|
|
|
Exposure to corporate-backed municipals detracted from performance as this sector underperformed during the reporting period, which was similar to the underperformance in the taxable corporate securities sector. However, this sector experienced a partial rebound in the latter part of the reporting period. |
|
|
|
Exposure to both pre-refunded and general obligation issues benefited returns as both sectors performed well due to increased investor risk aversion resulting from the financial crisis. However, these sectors underperformed in the last few months of the period, as investors moved further out on the risk spectrum. |
|
|
|
Exposure to zero-coupon municipals detracted from performance as this sector underperformed the unmanaged Barclays Capital Zero Coupon Index, which declined 6.83% during the reporting period. However this sector rebounded in the latter part of the period and zero coupon municipal yields moved lower. |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds within New York, as represented by the New York component of the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index, slightly outperformed the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (National Index) returning 3.71%, as compared to 3.57% for the National Index. Year-to-date through May 2009, issuers in New York State issued $15.43 billion in bonds, 5% lower than the comparable period in 2008. New York ranks second nationwide in total issuance of municipal bonds. |
|
|
|
Long New York municipal bonds, as represented by the Barclays Capital New York Municipal Bond Long (22+) Index, declined 1.49% and slightly outperformed the Barclays Capital Long Municipal Bond Index, an unmanaged index generally representative of the long-term tax-exempt bond market, which declined 2.50%. The New York yield curve steepened with 30-year yields increasing 30 basis points, while two-year yields decreased 89 basis points. The New York municipal funds also had significant positions in the longer portion of the yield curve, which detracted from performance as that portion of the yield curve underperformed shorter maturities during the twelve-month period. |
6 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights/Performance & Statistics |
|
May 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return(1): |
|
Market Price |
|
Net Asset Value (NAV) |
|
||
1 Year |
|
(22.95 |
)% |
|
|
(24.34 |
)% |
5 Year |
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
(0.55 |
)% |
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 5/31/09 |
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
|
NAV |
|
|
|
|
Market Price/NAV: |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
$10.26 |
NAV |
|
|
$9.56 |
Premium to NAV |
|
|
7.32% |
Market Price Yield(2) |
|
|
7.75% |
|
Moodys
Ratings |
(1) | Past performance is no guarantee
of future results. Total return is calculated by determining the
percentage change in net asset value or market share price (as applicable)
in the specified period. The calculation assumes that all income dividends
and capital gain distributions have been reinvested. Total return does
not reflect broker commissions or sales charges. Total return for a
period of more than one year represents the average annual total return. |
Performance
at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market
price returns typically reflect investment results over time, during
shorter periods returns at market price can also be influenced by factors
such as changing views about the Fund, market conditions, supply and
demand for the Funds
shares, or changes in Fund distributions. |
|
An investment in the Fund involves risk, including the loss of principal. Total return, market price, market yield and net asset value will fluctuate with changes in market conditions. This data is provided for information only and is not intended for trading purposes. Closed-end funds, unlike open-end funds, are not continuously offered. There is a onetime public offering and once issued, shares of closed-end funds are sold in the open market through a stock exchange. Net asset value is equal to total assets attributable to common shareholders less total liabilities divided by the number of common shares outstanding. Holdings are subject to change daily. | |
(2) | Market Price Yield is determined
by dividing the annualized current monthly per share dividend (comprised
from net investment income) payable to common shareholders by the market
price per common share at May 31, 2009. |
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 7
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES97.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Alabama1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
Birmingham Baptist Medical Centers Special Care Facs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Auth. Rev., Baptist Health Systems, Inc., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/30, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa1/NR |
|
$ |
7,285,900 |
|
|
1,235 |
|
Montgomery BMC Special Care Facs. Financing Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/29, Ser. B (NPFGC) |
|
|
A3/AA |
|
|
1,058,210 |
|
|
2,650 |
|
Tuscaloosa Educational Building Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stillman College Project, 5.00%, 6/1/26, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
1,931,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,276,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Alaska0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
Northern Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/46, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,405,185 |
|
|
3,550 |
|
State Housing Finance Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 6/1/32, Ser. C (NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
3,526,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,931,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Arizona9.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Facs. Auth. Rev., Banner Health, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/35, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
3,248,350 |
|
|
2,860 |
|
5.50%, 1/1/38, Ser. D |
|
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
2,824,078 |
|
|
29,700 |
|
Pima Cnty. Industrial Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correctional Facs., 5.00%, 9/1/39 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
27,936,711 |
|
|
|
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power Dist. Rev., Ser. A (h), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,100 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/37 |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
41,487,984 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/39 |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
10,113,400 |
|
|
10,500 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp. Rev., 5.00%, 12/1/37 |
|
|
A3/A |
|
|
8,391,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,002,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Arkansas0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Dev. Finance Auth. Rev., Arkansas Cancer Research |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center Project, zero coupon, 7/1/46 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
1,680,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
California4.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/33, Ser. A-1 |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
4,166,400 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
Lynwood Utility Auth. Rev., 5.00%, 6/1/29, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
1,326,343 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Montebello Unified School Dist., GO, 5.00%, 8/1/33 (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
1,958,660 |
|
|
10,500 |
|
State, GO, 6.00%, 4/1/38 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
10,821,195 |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
Baptist Univ., 9.00%, 11/1/17, Ser. B (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,917,309 |
|
|
|
|
Methodist Hospital Project (FHA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
6.625%, 8/1/29 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
5,945,115 |
|
|
19,500 |
|
6.75%, 2/1/38 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
20,920,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,055,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Colorado5.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Colorado Health Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evangelical Lutheran, 6.125%, 6/1/38, Ser. A |
|
|
A3/A- |
|
|
497,645 |
|
|
11,250 |
|
Denver City & Cnty. Rev., 5.00%, 11/15/25, Ser. B (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
11,280,825 |
|
8 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Colorado(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
American Baptist Homes, 5.90%, 8/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
$ |
663,940 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
Catholic Health Initiatives, 5.50%, 3/1/32, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/AA |
|
|
25,718,000 |
|
|
18,305 |
|
Exempla, Inc., 5.625%, 1/1/33, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/A- |
|
|
16,446,676 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Evergreen Country Day School, Inc. Project, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.875%, 6/1/37 (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/BB |
|
|
1,277,500 |
|
|
1,430 |
|
Public Auth. for Colorado Energy Rev., 6.50%, 11/15/38 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,407,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,292,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Florida5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
Broward Cnty. Water & Sewer Utility Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/1/34, Ser. A (h) |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
8,599,365 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Clearwater Water Rev., 5.25%, 12/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/AA- |
|
|
971,870 |
|
|
2,335 |
|
Hillsborough Cnty. Industrial Dev. Auth. Pollution Control Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa Electric Co. Project, 5.50%, 10/1/23 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB- |
|
|
2,341,842 |
|
|
7,135 |
|
Jacksonville Health Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ascension Health, 5.25%, 11/15/32, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
7,002,717 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Leesburg Hospital Rev., Leesburg Regional Medical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center Project, 5.50%, 7/1/32 |
|
|
Baa1/BBB+ |
|
|
2,441,430 |
|
|
990 |
|
Miami-Dade Cnty. Rev., 5.50%, 10/1/36, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A- |
|
|
965,329 |
|
|
500 |
|
Sarasota Cnty. Health Fac. Auth. Rev., 5.75%, 7/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
354,625 |
|
|
7,900 |
|
State Board of Education, GO, 5.00%, 6/1/38, Ser. D (h) |
|
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
7,745,871 |
|
|
6,205 |
|
State Governmental Utility Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barefoot Bay Utilities System, 5.00%, 10/1/29 (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
6,212,694 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Sumter Landing Community Dev. Dist. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75%, 10/1/35, Ser. A (NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
2,810,550 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Tallahassee Water & Sewer Rev., 5.00%, 10/1/37 (h) |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
9,820,900 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Winter Springs Water & Sewer Rev., |
|
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zero coupon, 10/1/29 (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
|
|
|
530,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,797,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Georgia0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
Medical Center Hospital Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring Harbor Green Island Project, 5.25%, 7/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,883,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Illinois13.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
Central Lake Cnty. JT Action Water Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.125%, 5/1/28, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
3,017,503 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
Chicago Motor Fuel Tax Rev., 5.00%, 1/1/38, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
1,248,062 |
|
|
|
|
Chicago, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/34, Ser. C (h) |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
9,832,900 |
|
|
1,635 |
|
5.125%, 1/1/29, Ser. A (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
1,638,025 |
|
|
4,065 |
|
5.50%, 1/1/40, Ser. C (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
4,084,553 |
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Lake Shore East, Special Assessment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,162 |
|
6.625%, 12/1/22 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,515,086 |
|
|
6,700 |
|
6.75%, 12/1/32 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
4,963,829 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Cicero, GO, 5.25%, 12/1/31 (NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
5,126,500 |
|
|
6,440 |
|
Cook Cnty., GO, 5.00%, 11/15/28, Ser. A (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
6,449,596 |
|
|
|
|
Finance Auth. Rev., Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Christian Homes, Inc., 5.75%, 5/15/31 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,727,800 |
|
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 9
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Illinois(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Leafs Hockey Club Project, 6.00%, 3/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
$ |
100,153 |
|
|
700 |
|
OSF Healthcare Systems, 7.125%, 11/15/37 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
732,697 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Sedgebrook, Inc., 6.00%, 11/15/42 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
894,555 |
|
|
20,100 |
|
Health Facs. Auth. Rev., Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.625%, 1/1/28 |
|
|
Baa1/NR |
|
|
17,821,866 |
|
|
|
|
Hillside, Tax Allocation, Mannheim Redev. Project, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
6.55%, 1/1/20 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,773,520 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
7.00%, 1/1/28 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,253,909 |
|
|
68,470 |
|
State Sports Facs. Auth. Rev., zero coupon, 6/15/30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(converts to 5.50% on 6/15/10) (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
63,568,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,749,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Indiana0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
Fort Wayne Pollution Control Rev., General Motors Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project, 6.20%, 10/15/25 |
|
|
Caa3/C |
|
|
519,750 |
|
|
990 |
|
Vigo Cnty. Hospital Auth. Rev., Union Hospital, Inc., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.80%, 9/1/47 (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
688,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,208,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Iowa3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deerfield Retirement Community, Inc., Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
5.50%, 11/15/27 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
156,962 |
|
|
1,075 |
|
5.50%, 11/15/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
607,461 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
Edgewater LLC Project, 6.75%, 11/15/42 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,467,880 |
|
|
850 |
|
Wedum Walnut Ridge LLC Project, 5.625%, 12/1/45, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
442,578 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Auth. Rev., 5.60%, 6/1/34, Ser. B |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
32,748,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,423,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Kentucky0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Dev. Finance Auth. Hospital Facs. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baptist Healthcare System, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
5.375%, 8/15/24 |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
2,103,280 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
5.625%, 8/15/27 |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
2,591,100 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
Catholic Healthcare Partners, 5.25%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
2,371,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,065,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Louisiana4.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Facs. Auth. Rev., Ochsner Clinic Foundation Project, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. B, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
5.50%, 5/15/32, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 5/15/26) (c) |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
4,717,040 |
|
|
3,300 |
|
5.50%, 5/15/47 |
|
|
A3/NR |
|
|
2,593,503 |
|
|
44,395 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.875%, 5/15/39, Ser.2001-B |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
36,351,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,661,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Maryland0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Higher Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Adventist Healthcare, 5.75%, 1/1/25, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa2/NR |
|
|
980,810 |
|
|
1,010 |
|
King Farm Presbyterian Community, 5.30%, 1/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
580,497 |
|
|
4,050 |
|
Washington Cnty. Hospital, 6.00%, 1/1/43 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
3,523,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,085,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Massachusetts7.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
Boston Water Rev., 5.00%, 11/1/28, Ser. D (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa2/AA+ |
|
$ |
7,017,850 |
|
|
4,610 |
|
Dev. Finance Agcy. Rev., Adventcare Project, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%, 10/15/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,441,180 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
State College Building Auth. Rev., 5.50%, 5/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
3,000,630 |
|
|
|
|
State Turnpike Auth. Rev., Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
4.75%, 1/1/34 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa3/A |
|
|
3,304,917 |
|
|
51,830 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/37 (NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
41,747,510 |
|
|
10,325 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/39 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa3/A |
|
|
8,176,987 |
|
|
12,050 |
|
State Water Res. Auth. Rev., 4.75%, 8/1/37, Ser. A (FSA) (h) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
11,579,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,268,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Michigan2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,545 |
|
Garden City Hospital Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/15/38, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,775,495 |
|
|
800 |
|
Public Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., 6.50%, 9/1/37 (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
620,568 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Beaumont Hospital, 8.25%, 9/1/39 |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
3,357,840 |
|
|
|
|
State Hospital Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Ascension Health, 5.25%, 11/15/26, Ser. B |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
4,999,850 |
|
|
|
|
Oakwood Group, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
5.75%, 4/1/32 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
11,376,990 |
|
|
1,925 |
|
6.00%, 4/1/22 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,798,836 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Finance Auth. Rev., 6.00%, 6/1/48, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/BBB |
|
|
4,137,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,066,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Minnesota0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Minneapolis Rev., Providence Project, 5.75%, 10/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,012,830 |
|
|
280 |
|
Minneapolis, Tax Allocation, Grant Park Project, 5.35%, 2/1/30 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
183,117 |
|
|
|
|
North Oaks Presbyterian Homes Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
6.00%, 10/1/33 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,171,901 |
|
|
1,530 |
|
6.125%, 10/1/39 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,253,055 |
|
|
500 |
|
Oronoco Multifamily Housing Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wedum Shorewood Campus Project, 5.40%, 6/1/41 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
316,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,937,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Mississippi0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
Business Finance Corp. Pollution Control Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System Energy Resources, Inc. Project, 5.875%, 4/1/22 |
|
|
Ba1/BBB |
|
|
3,333,796 |
|
|
740 |
|
Dev. Bank Special Obligation Projects & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/24, Ser. A2 (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
722,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,056,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Missouri0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690 |
|
Hanley Road & North of Folk Ave. Transportation Dist. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/1/25 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
503,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Nevada0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
Clark Cnty., GO, 5.00%, 6/1/31 (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa1/AA+ |
|
|
1,456,540 |
|
|
1,620 |
|
State, GO, 5.00%, 5/15/28, Ser. A (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
1,547,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,003,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New Hampshire0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
Health & Education Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Medical Center, 6.125%, 7/1/32, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa1/BBB+ |
|
|
312,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 11
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
New Jersey2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
Burlington Cnty. Bridge Commission Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evergreens Project, 5.625%, 1/1/38 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
$ |
635,712 |
|
|
|
|
Economic Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
Arbor Glen, 6.00%, 5/15/28, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
404,880 |
|
|
|
|
Kapkowski Road Landfill Project, Special Assessment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
5.75%, 10/1/21 |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,338,040 |
|
|
11,405 |
|
5.75%, 4/1/31 |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
8,641,683 |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Facs. Financing Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
St. Peters Univ. Hospital, 5.75%, 7/1/37 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB- |
|
|
1,231,575 |
|
|
1,830 |
|
Trinitas Hospital, 5.25%, 7/1/30, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
1,361,465 |
|
|
3,300 |
|
State Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., Fairfield Dickinson Univ., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 7/1/25, Ser. D |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,110,085 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
State Turnpike Auth. Rev., 5.25%, 1/1/40, Ser. E |
|
|
A3/A+ |
|
|
2,026,960 |
|
|
13,150 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/41, Ser. 1A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
7,940,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,690,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New Mexico0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farmington Pollution Control Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
5.80%, 4/1/22, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BB+ |
|
|
1,959,120 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
5.80%, 4/1/22, Ser. C |
|
|
Baa3/BB+ |
|
|
2,938,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,897,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New York1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Erie Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orchard Park, Inc. Project, 6.00%, 11/15/36, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
794,904 |
|
|
|
|
Liberty Dev. Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.25%, 10/1/35 (h) |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
9,199,100 |
|
|
1,505 |
|
5.25%, 10/1/35 |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
1,384,465 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
Nassau Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amsterdam at Harborside, 6.70%, 1/1/43, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
860,552 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Auth. Rev. (h), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Second Gen. Resolution, 4.75%, 6/15/35, Ser. DD |
|
|
Aa3/AA+ |
|
|
3,838,360 |
|
|
2,830 |
|
5.00%, 6/15/37, Ser. D |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
2,834,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,911,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
North Carolina0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Care Commission Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
Salemtowne, 5.10%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
370,420 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Village at Brookwood, 5.25%, 1/1/32 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
633,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
North Dakota0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
Stark Cnty. Healthcare Rev., Benedictine Living Communities, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%, 1/1/33 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,210,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Ohio0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Cnty. of Montgomery Rev., Miami Valley Hospital, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 11/15/39, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
1,042,010 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
Lorain Cnty. Hospital Rev., Catholic Healthcare, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.375%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
7,218,375 |
|
12 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Ohio(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
State Higher Educational Fac. Commission Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Univ. Hospital Health Systems, 6.75%, 1/15/39, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A |
|
$ |
1,054,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,314,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Oregon0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Clackamas Cnty. Hospital Fac. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Health Systems, 5.50%, 7/15/35, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A+ |
|
|
976,920 |
|
|
1,155 |
|
State Department of Administrative Services, CP, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 5/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
1,179,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,156,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Pennsylvania4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumberland Cnty. Auth. Retirement Community Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messiah Village Project, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
5.625%, 7/1/28 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
577,148 |
|
|
670 |
|
6.00%, 7/1/35 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
517,562 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
Harrisburg Auth. Rev., Harrisburg Univ. of Science, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 9/1/36, Ser. B |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,651,837 |
|
|
|
|
Montgomery Cnty. Higher Education & Health Auth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital Rev., Abington Memorial Hospital, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.125%, 6/1/27 |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
4,492,050 |
|
|
3,750 |
|
5.125%, 6/1/32 |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
3,182,100 |
|
|
11,600 |
|
Philadelphia Hospitals & Higher Education Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple Univ. Hospital, 6.625%, 11/15/23, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
11,016,288 |
|
|
500 |
|
Philadelphia Water Rev., 5.25%, 1/1/36, Ser. A |
|
|
A3/A |
|
|
493,625 |
|
|
17,000 |
|
Philadelphia, GO, 5.25%, 12/15/32, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
17,024,990 |
|
|
500 |
|
Pittsburgh & Allegheny Cntys. Public Auditorium Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/1/29, (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
491,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,447,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Rhode Island6.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,200 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 6/1/42, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
59,747,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
South Carolina1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jobs-Economic Dev. Auth. Rev., Ser. B, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Anmed Health, 5.50%, 2/1/38 |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
490,065 |
|
|
13,850 |
|
Bon Secours, 5.625%, 11/15/30 |
|
|
A3/A- |
|
|
12,371,097 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
State Public Service Auth. Rev., 5.25%, 1/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
1,028,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,889,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Tennessee0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Energy Acquisition Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
5.00%, 2/1/23, Ser. C |
|
|
Baa1/A |
|
|
2,641,620 |
|
|
700 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/21, Ser. A |
|
|
Ba1/BBB+ |
|
|
649,054 |
|
|
700 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/22, Ser. A |
|
|
Ba1/BBB+ |
|
|
639,842 |
|
|
500 |
|
Sullivan Cnty. Health Educational & Housing Facs. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellmont Health Systems Project, 5.25%, 9/1/36, Ser. C |
|
|
NR/BBB+ |
|
|
332,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,262,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Texas12.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Arlington Independent School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/15/24 (PSF-GTD) |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
10,009 |
|
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 13
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Texas(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aubrey Independent School Dist., GO (PSF-GTD), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
5.50%, 2/15/33 |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
$ |
136,635 |
|
|
2,850 |
|
5.50%, 2/15/33, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 8/15/14) (c) |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
3,351,002 |
|
|
6,500 |
|
Brazos Cnty. Health Facs. Dev. Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franciscan Services Corp., 5.375%, 1/1/32 |
|
|
NR/A- |
|
|
5,204,550 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
Dallas Water Rev., 5.25%, 8/15/38 |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
2,485,000 |
|
|
700 |
|
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village at Gleannloch Farms, 5.50%, 2/15/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
475,300 |
|
|
5,500 |
|
Houston Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/25, Ser. C (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
5,500,000 |
|
|
770 |
|
Keller Independent School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.875%, 8/15/31 (PSF-GTD) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
770,239 |
|
|
3,170 |
|
Little Elm Independent School Dist., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GO, 5.30%, 8/15/29, Ser. A (PSF-GTD) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
3,317,690 |
|
|
|
|
Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. I Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
5.25%, 12/15/25, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
392,152 |
|
|
15,300 |
|
6.25%, 12/15/26, Ser. D |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
14,980,995 |
|
|
6,250 |
|
North Dallas Thruway Auth. Rev., 4.75%, 1/1/29 (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
A2/AA- |
|
|
6,234,000 |
|
|
|
|
North Harris Cnty. Regional Water Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
5.25%, 12/15/33 |
|
|
A3/A+ |
|
|
9,995,738 |
|
|
10,300 |
|
5.50%, 12/15/38 |
|
|
A3/A+ |
|
|
10,195,867 |
|
|
|
|
North Texas Tollway Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.625%, 1/1/33, Ser. B |
|
|
A2/A- |
|
|
4,970,700 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
5.75%, 1/1/33, Ser. F |
|
|
A3/BBB+ |
|
|
1,174,188 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Sabine River Auth. Rev., 5.20%, 5/1/28, Ser. C |
|
|
Caa2/CCC |
|
|
1,064,120 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
San Antonio Electric & Gas System Rev., 5.00%, 2/1/32 (h) |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
10,132,600 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
State Public Finance Auth. Rev., 5.875%, 12/1/36, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
719,240 |
|
|
8,880 |
|
State Turnpike Auth. Central Turnpike System Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/15/42, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa1/A |
|
|
7,459,289 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
State Water Financial Assistance, GO, 5.00%, 8/1/36 |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
3,275,285 |
|
|
|
|
State, Mobility Fund, GO (h), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,025 |
|
4.75%, 4/1/35, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
9,892,168 |
|
|
17,500 |
|
4.75%, 4/1/36 |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
17,569,826 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Tarrant Cnty. Cultural Education Facs. Finance Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baylor Health Care Systems Project, 6.25%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
3,238,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,545,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Virginia0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Fairfax Cnty. Industrial Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inova Health System, 5.50%, 5/15/35, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa2/AA+ |
|
|
1,029,310 |
|
|
2,050 |
|
James City Cnty. Economic Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 7/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,217,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,247,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Washington2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,350 |
|
Central Puget Sound Regional Transportation Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75%, 2/1/28, (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
6,380,798 |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Multicare Health Systems, 6.00%, 8/15/39, Ser. B |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
1,319,669 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 7.375%, 3/1/38 |
|
|
A3/NR |
|
|
1,057,120 |
|
14 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Washington(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
Virginia Mason Medical Center, 6.125%, 8/15/37, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa2/BBB |
|
$ |
11,020,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,777,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Wisconsin1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Badger Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
6.00%, 6/1/17, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 6/1/12) (c) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,252,035 |
|
|
5,520 |
|
6.125%, 6/1/27 |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
5,881,726 |
|
|
|
|
Health & Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
Froedert & Community Health, 5.375%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
89,036 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Prohealth Care, Inc., 6.625%, 2/15/39 |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
1,023,200 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
State Rev., 6.00%, 5/1/36, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
10,581,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,827,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$1,035,370,952) |
|
|
|
|
|
965,192,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VARIABLE RATE NOTES (f)0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Florida0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
Highlands Cnty. Health Facs. Auth. Rev., Adventist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health System, 5.00%, 11/15/31, Ser. C |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
2,538,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Illinois0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
State, GO, 7.97%, 4/1/27, Ser. 783 (FSA) (a)(e) |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
5,205,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Variable Rate Notes (cost$7,822,419) |
|
|
|
|
|
7,743,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (g)2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Corporate Notes2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
American General Finance Corp., 3.875%, 10/1/09 |
|
|
Baa2/BB+ |
|
|
838,596 |
|
|
|
|
CIT Group, Inc., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
0.974%, 8/17/09, FRN |
|
|
Ba2/BBB- |
|
|
2,144,991 |
|
|
6,485 |
|
4.125%, 11/3/09 |
|
|
Ba2/BBB- |
|
|
6,252,928 |
|
|
7,800 |
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 0.934%, 11/16/09, FRN |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
7,788,706 |
|
|
|
|
International Lease Finance Corp., FRN, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
0.881%, 5/24/10 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
1,287,948 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
1.531%, 1/15/10 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
1,142,966 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
National City Bank, 1.414%, 9/9/09, FRN |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
1,988,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate Notes (cost$21,087,058) |
|
|
|
|
|
21,444,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (cost$1,064,280,429)100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
994,380,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 15
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES91.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
$ |
5,300 |
|
Assoc. of Bay Area Govt Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odd Fellows Home, 5.20%, 11/15/22, Ser. A (CA Mtg. Ins.) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
$ |
5,359,837 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Bay Area Govt Assoc. Lease Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/32, Ser. 2002-1 (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
2,015,080 |
|
|
|
|
Bay Area Toll Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.00%, 4/1/34, Ser. F1 |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
4,915,850 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
San Francisco Bay Area, 5.00%, 4/1/39, Ser. F-1 (h) |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
19,543,800 |
|
|
1,410 |
|
Community College Financing Auth. Lease Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
1,408,238 |
|
|
9,945 |
|
Coronado Community Dev. Agcy., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Allocation, 4.875%, 9/1/35 (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
7,848,594 |
|
|
|
|
Corona-Norco Unified School Dist. Public Financing Auth., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
5.10%, 9/1/25 (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
1,113,197 |
|
|
305 |
|
5.65%, 9/1/16, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
284,169 |
|
|
160 |
|
5.75%, 9/1/17, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
147,517 |
|
|
530 |
|
6.00%, 9/1/20, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
456,563 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
6.00%, 9/1/25, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
812,840 |
|
|
4,150 |
|
6.10%, 9/1/32, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,443,463 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Dinuba Financing Auth. Lease Rev., 5.10%, 8/1/32 (NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
3,091,650 |
|
|
8,300 |
|
El Dorado Irrigation Dist. & El Dorado Water Agcy., CP, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 8/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
8,391,466 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Foothill Eastern Corridor Agcy. Toll Road Rev., zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/15/27, (converts to 5.875% on 7/15/09) (IBC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
1,142,460 |
|
|
1,440 |
|
Fremont Community Dist., Special Tax, 5.30%, 9/1/30 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,063,166 |
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/45 (AMBAC-TCRS) |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
11,522,606 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/45, Ser. A |
|
|
A3/A |
|
|
1,244,790 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/45, Ser. A (FGIC-TCRS) |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
4,979,160 |
|
|
|
|
Health Facs. Financing Auth. Rev., Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adventist Health System, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
5.00%, 3/1/33 |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
438,595 |
|
|
250 |
|
5.75%, 9/1/39 |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
246,448 |
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
|
5.00%, 7/1/28 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
450,069 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
6.00%, 7/1/39 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
3,011,850 |
|
|
175 |
|
Infrastructure & Economic Dev. Bank Rev., 5.25%, 2/1/38 |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
162,997 |
|
|
5,300 |
|
Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/31, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
5,093,724 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
Long Beach Bond Finance Auth. Rev., 5.50%, 11/15/37, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
6,376,350 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Long Beach Unified School Dist., GO, 5.25%, 8/1/33, Ser. A (h) |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
10,085,500 |
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CP (NPFGC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
5.00%, 2/1/27 |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
9,916,274 |
|
|
2,685 |
|
5.00%, 10/1/27, Ser. AU |
|
|
A2/AA- |
|
|
2,692,142 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Los Angeles Community College Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/33, Ser. F-1 (h) |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
9,806,800 |
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
4.75%, 7/1/30, Ser. A-2 (FSA) (h) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
15,022,950 |
|
|
16,950 |
|
5.125%, 7/1/41, Ser. A (FGIC-TCRS) |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
16,725,921 |
|
|
11,000 |
|
Los Angeles Unified School Dist., GO, 5.00%, 1/1/34, Ser. I |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
10,740,950 |
|
16 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Manteca Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,295 |
|
5.00%, 10/1/32 (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
$ |
7,584,684 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.00%, 10/1/36 (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
8,809,400 |
|
|
5,330 |
|
Manteca Unified School Dist., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 9/1/29, Ser. C (NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
5,364,485 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
Merced Cnty., CP, Juvenile Justice Correctional Fac., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/32 (AMBAC) |
|
|
A3/NR |
|
|
3,930,240 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Metropolitan Water Dist. Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/37, Ser. A (h) |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
5,089,550 |
|
|
4,700 |
|
Moreno
Valley Unified School Dist. Community Facs. Dist., |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,260,155 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Placentia-Yorba
Linda Unified School Dist., CP, |
|
|
A2/AA- |
|
|
9,717,600 |
|
|
|
|
Riverside
Unified School Dist. Community Facs. Dist. No. 15, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
5.15%, 9/1/25 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
763,470 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/30 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
738,940 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/35 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
716,840 |
|
|
3,510 |
|
Riverside, CP, 5.00%, 9/1/33 (AMBAC) |
|
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
3,252,015 |
|
|
|
|
Roseville Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation (NPFGC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,730 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/27, Ser. B |
|
|
A3/AA- |
|
|
3,359,499 |
|
|
3,365 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/32 |
|
|
A3/AA- |
|
|
2,826,364 |
|
|
2,030 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/33 |
|
|
A3/AA- |
|
|
1,687,092 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
San Bernardino Community College Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 8/1/33, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
8,158,725 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
San Diego Cnty. Water Auth., CP, 5.00%, 5/1/29, Ser. A (NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa3/AA+ |
|
|
8,156,000 |
|
|
|
|
San Diego Public Facs. Financing Auth. Lease Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
5.00%, 5/15/29, Ser. A (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
A2/AA- |
|
|
644,428 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Fire & Life Safety Facs., 5.00%, 4/1/32, Ser. B (NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
1,331,325 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
San Diego Public Facs. Financing Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 5/15/39, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A+ |
|
|
992,500 |
|
|
|
|
San Diego Public Facs. Financing Auth. Water Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
5.00%, 8/1/32 (NPFGC) |
|
|
A2/AA- |
|
|
10,590,360 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
5.25%, 8/1/38, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
3,946,800 |
|
|
2,800 |
|
San Diego Regional Building Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cnty. Operations Center & Annex, 5.375%, 2/1/36, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/AA+ |
|
|
2,807,112 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
San Diego Unified School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75%, 7/1/27, Ser. D-2 (FSA) |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
5,046,600 |
|
|
300 |
|
San Francisco City & Cnty., |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
298,050 |
|
|
5,585 |
|
5.25%, 4/1/31, CP, Ser. A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airports Commission Rev., 4.50%, 5/1/28, Ser. 2 (NPFGC) |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
4,925,188 |
|
|
|
|
San Jose Libraries & Parks, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,970 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/32, Ser. 760 (NPFGC) (h) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
15,134,071 |
|
|
10,190 |
|
5.125%, 9/1/31 |
|
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
10,334,698 |
|
|
9,150 |
|
San Jose Unified School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Clara Cnty., 5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
9,334,190 |
|
|
1,730 |
|
San Rafael City High School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. B (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
1,764,825 |
|
|
3,280 |
|
San Rafael Elementary School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. B (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
3,346,026 |
|
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 17
|
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
$ |
1,260 |
|
Santa Cruz Cnty., CP, 5.25%, 8/1/32 |
|
|
A3/NR |
|
$ |
1,307,124 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Santa Cruz Cnty. Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00%, 9/1/36, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,608,630 |
|
|
|
|
State, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/31 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
2,295,250 |
|
|
1,400 |
|
5.00%, 12/1/37 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,237,068 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
5.00%, 4/1/38 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
6,172,740 |
|
|
11,000 |
|
6.00%, 4/1/38 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
11,336,490 |
|
|
7,915 |
|
State Public Works Board Rev., Regents Univ., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 3/1/33, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
7,554,630 |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,495 |
|
Bentley School, 6.75%, 7/1/32 (a)(b) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,924,197 |
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
5.50%, 7/1/31, Ser. D |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,737,108 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
5.50%, 7/1/31, Ser. E |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,737,090 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
Huntington Park Chapter School Project, 5.25%, 7/1/42, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
816,850 |
|
|
9,700 |
|
Jewish Home, 5.50%, 11/15/33 (CA St. Mtg.) |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
9,200,741 |
|
|
2,770 |
|
Kaiser Permanente, 5.50%, 11/1/32, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
2,560,865 |
|
|
|
|
Methodist Hospital Project (FHA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
6.25%, 8/1/24 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
2,146,000 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
6.625%, 8/1/29 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
2,594,232 |
|
|
8,800 |
|
6.75%, 2/1/38 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
9,441,168 |
|
|
500 |
|
Peninsula Project, 5.00%, 11/1/29 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
331,015 |
|
|
3,700 |
|
St. Joseph, 5.75%, 7/1/47, Ser. A (FGIC) |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
3,559,585 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
Windrush School, 5.50%, 7/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
950,258 |
|
|
1,510 |
|
Statewide Financing Auth. Tobacco Settlement Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.625%, 5/1/29, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
1,199,000 |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Securitization Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Alameda Cnty., 6.00%, 6/1/42 |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,143,340 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
Stanislaus Funding, 5.875%, 6/1/43, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
1,230,498 |
|
|
|
|
Univ. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
4.75%, 5/15/35, Ser. F (FSA) (h) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
5,194,365 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
4.75%, 5/15/35, Ser. G (FGIC-NPFGC) (h) |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
4,722,150 |
|
|
5,650 |
|
4.75%, 5/15/38, Ser. B |
|
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
5,122,799 |
|
|
|
|
Ventura Cnty. Community College Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. A (NPFGC) (h) |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
10,126,600 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.50%, 8/1/33, Ser. C |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
5,111,500 |
|
|
1,555 |
|
Ventura Unified School Dist., GO, 5.00%, 8/1/32, Ser. F (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
1,558,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total California Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$412,653,759) |
|
|
|
|
|
420,385,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALIFORNIA VARIABLE RATE NOTES (a)(d)(f)2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
6,035 |
|
Desert Community College Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.84%, 8/1/32, Ser. 3016 (FSA) (e) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
5,903,015 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
San Diego Community College Dist., GO, 8.215%, 8/1/33 |
|
|
NR/AA+ |
|
|
5,203,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total California Variable Rate Notes (cost$10,977,691) |
|
|
|
|
|
11,106,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
OTHER MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New York0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
Liberty Dev. Corp. Rev., 5.25%, 10/1/35 |
|
|
A1/A |
|
$ |
1,149,887 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/15/37, Ser. D (h) |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
1,902,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,052,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Puerto Rico0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. Rev., 6.00%, 7/1/38, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
2,187,878 |
|
|
2,505 |
|
Public Building Auth. Rev., Govt Facs., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/1/36, Ser. I (GTD) |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
2,095,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,283,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$7,190,749) |
|
|
|
|
|
7,336,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE BONDS & NOTES (g)0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
5,000 |
|
SLM Corp., 1.252%, 7/26/10, FRN (cost$4,539,087) |
|
|
Ba1/BBB- |
|
|
4,400,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (g)3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Corporate Notes3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
American General Finance Corp., 3.875%, 10/1/09 |
|
|
Baa2/BB+ |
|
|
465,887 |
|
|
|
|
CIT Group, Inc., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
0.974%, 8/17/09, FRN |
|
|
Ba2/BBB- |
|
|
1,072,496 |
|
|
9,200 |
|
4.125%, 11/3/09 |
|
|
Ba2/BBB- |
|
|
8,870,769 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 0.934%, 11/16/09, FRN |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
2,895,801 |
|
|
|
|
International Lease Finance Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
0.881%, 5/24/10, FRN |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
643,974 |
|
|
500 |
|
1.531%, 1/15/10, FRN |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
476,236 |
|
|
1,839 |
|
4.375%, 11/1/09 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
1,763,516 |
|
|
1,651 |
|
4.75%, 7/1/09 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
1,625,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate Notes (cost$17,633,681) |
|
|
|
|
|
17,813,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (cost$452,994,967)100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
461,042,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 19
|
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
NEW YORK MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES85.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
$ |
2,400 |
|
Erie Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orchard Park, Inc. Project, 6.00%, 11/15/36, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
$ |
1,589,808 |
|
|
|
|
Liberty Dev. Corp. Rev., Goldman Sachs Headquarters, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,120 |
|
5.25%, 10/1/35 (h) |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
3,790,029 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
5.25%, 10/1/35 |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
2,759,730 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
5.50%, 10/1/37 |
|
|
A1/A |
|
|
3,331,160 |
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Transportation Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
5.00%, 11/15/30, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
1,869,203 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
5.00%, 11/15/34, Ser. B |
|
|
NR/AA |
|
|
1,980,060 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
5.25%, 11/15/31, Ser. E |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
8,012,240 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
5.35%, 7/1/31, Ser. B |
|
|
A1/AAA |
|
|
7,019,320 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.50%, 11/15/39, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/AA |
|
|
5,129,500 |
|
|
3,570 |
|
Mortgage Agcy. Rev., 4.75%, 10/1/27, Ser. 128 |
|
|
Aa1/NR |
|
|
3,513,987 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
Nassau Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amsterdam at Harborside, 6.70%, 1/1/43, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,877,568 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Health & Hospital Corp. Rev., Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
5.375%, 2/15/26 |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
1,109,108 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
5.45%, 2/15/26 |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
2,020,300 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
Eger Harbor Project, 4.95%, 11/20/32, Ser. A (GNMA) |
|
|
NR/AA+ |
|
|
920,985 |
|
|
1,415 |
|
Liberty Interactive Corp., 5.00%, 9/1/35 |
|
|
Ba2/BB+ |
|
|
997,886 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Queens Baseball Stadium, 6.50%, 1/1/46 |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
1,616,235 |
|
|
1,190 |
|
Staten Island Univ. Hospital Project, 6.45%, 7/1/32, Ser. C |
|
|
Ba2/NR |
|
|
1,036,252 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
United Jewish Appeal Fed. Project, 5.00%, 7/1/27, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa1/NR |
|
|
1,543,950 |
|
|
|
|
Yankee Stadium, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.00%, 3/1/31 (FGIC) |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
4,256,550 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
5.00%, 3/1/36 (NPFGC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
1,953,792 |
|
|
4,900 |
|
7.00%, 3/1/49 |
|
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
5,359,179 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 6/15/40, Ser. EE |
|
|
Aa3/AA+ |
|
|
1,536,405 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Transitional Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.00%, 11/1/27, Ser. B |
|
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
10,171,900 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.25%, 1/15/39, Ser. S-3 |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
4,933,100 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Trust for Cultural Res. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
Julliard School, 5.00%, 1/1/34, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
2,738,907 |
|
|
7,785 |
|
Wildlife Conservation Society, 5.00%, 2/1/34 (FGIC-NPFGC) |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
7,852,107 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
New York City, GO, 5.00%, 3/1/33, Ser. I |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
3,966,720 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 4/15/32, Ser. 125 (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
3,671,388 |
|
|
|
|
State Dormitory Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
5.00%, 3/15/38, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
2,986,170 |
|
|
80 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/28, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 9/1/09) (Radian) (c) |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
82,514 |
|
|
1,320 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/28 (Radian) |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
1,234,900 |
|
|
7,490 |
|
5.50%, 5/15/31, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
7,781,810 |
|
|
2,600 |
|
Catholic Health of Long Island, 5.10%, 7/1/34 |
|
|
Baa1/BBB |
|
|
2,089,880 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Kaleida Health Hospital, 5.05%, 2/15/25 (FHA) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
1,995,560 |
|
|
5,300 |
|
Lenox Hill Hospital, 5.50%, 7/1/30 |
|
|
Ba1/NR |
|
|
4,387,764 |
|
20 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
5.00%, 7/1/35, Ser. 1 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
$ |
2,691,068 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
5.00%, 7/1/36, Ser. A1 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
1,950,660 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
New York Univ. Hospital, 5.625%, 7/1/37, Ser. B |
|
|
Baa2/BB+ |
|
|
876,060 |
|
|
5,850 |
|
North General Hospital, 5.00%, 2/15/25 |
|
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
5,851,521 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Rochester General Hospital, 5.00%, 12/1/35 (Radian) |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
4,004,800 |
|
|
|
|
Teachers College, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
5.00%, 7/1/32 (NPFGC) |
|
|
A1/NR |
|
|
4,331,787 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
5.50%, 3/1/39 |
|
|
A1/NR |
|
|
3,013,200 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Yeshiva Univ., 5.125%, 7/1/34 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Aa2/NR |
|
|
2,851,680 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
State Environmental Facs. Corp. Rev., 5.125%, 6/15/38, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa1/AA+ |
|
|
5,076,350 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
State Thruway Auth. Rev., 4.75%, 1/1/29, Ser. G (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
982,450 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
State Urban Dev. Corp. Rev., 5.00%, 3/15/36, Ser. B-1 (h) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
6,022,620 |
|
|
|
|
Triboro Bridge & Tunnel Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/32, Ser. A (FGIC-TCRS) |
|
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
712,868 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.25%, 11/15/34, Ser. A-2 (h) |
|
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
5,127,150 |
|
|
1,815 |
|
Ulster Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., 6.00%, 9/15/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,284,929 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Warren & Washington Cntys. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glens Falls Hospital Project, 5.00%, 12/1/35, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
2,006,380 |
|
|
750 |
|
Westchester Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care Retirement Rev., Kendal on Hudson Project, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50%, 1/1/34, Ser. A, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 1/1/13) (c) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
869,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Total New York Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$167,715,075) |
|
|
|
|
|
164,768,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES7.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
California0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Health Facs. Financing Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, 6.00%, 7/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,003,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Florida1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Clearwater Water Rev., 5.25%, 12/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/AA- |
|
|
971,870 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Miami-Dade Cnty. Rev., 5.50%, 10/1/36, Ser. A |
|
|
A2/A- |
|
|
975,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,946,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Louisiana0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Parish of East Baton Rouge Rev., 5.25%, 2/1/39, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
988,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Puerto Rico5.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. Rev., 6.00%, 7/1/38, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
4,574,654 |
|
|
5,675 |
|
Childrens Trust Fund Tobacco Settlement Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.625%, 5/15/43 |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
3,974,827 |
|
|
|
|
Sales Tax Financing Corp. Rev., Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,250 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/54 (AMBAC) |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
745,845 |
|
|
12,900 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/56 |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
592,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,887,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Total Other Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$16,434,218) |
|
|
|
|
|
13,826,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 21
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
NEW YORK VARIABLE RATE NOTES (a)(d)(f)3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
JP Morgan Chase Putters/Drivers Trust Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
7.804%, 7/1/33, Ser. 3382 |
|
|
Aa1/NR |
|
$ |
5,241,700 |
|
|
500 |
|
8.295%, 6/15/31, Ser. 3223 |
|
|
NR/AA+ |
|
|
535,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Total New York Variable Rate Notes (cost$5,393,458) |
|
|
|
|
|
5,776,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE BONDS & NOTES (g)2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
4,300 |
|
American General Finance Corp., 4.625%, 9/1/10 |
|
|
Baa2/BB+ |
|
|
3,223,306 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
CIT Group, Inc., 5.80%, 7/28/11 |
|
|
Ba2/BBB- |
|
|
1,484,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes (cost$4,402,252) |
|
|
|
|
|
4,708,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (g)1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Corporate Notes1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
American General Finance Corp., 1.542%, 10/2/09, FRN |
|
|
Baa2/BB+ |
|
|
556,648 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
CIT Group, Inc., 4.125%, 11/3/09 |
|
|
Ba2/BBB- |
|
|
1,832,007 |
|
|
|
|
International Lease Finance Corp., FRN, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
0.881%, 5/24/10 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
275,989 |
|
|
200 |
|
1.531%, 1/15/10 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB+ |
|
|
190,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Total Corporate Notes (cost$2,860,699) |
|
|
|
|
|
2,855,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Total Investments (cost$196,805,702)100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
191,935,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Schedule of Investments |
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Schedule of Investments: |
|
* |
Unaudited. |
|
|
(a) |
Private PlacementRestricted as to resale and may not have a readily available market. Securities with an aggregate value of $11,708,783, representing 1.18% of total investments in PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, $14,030,712, representing 3.04% of total investments in PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II and $5,776,955, representing 3.01% of total investments in PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II. |
(b) |
Illiquid security. |
(c) |
Pre-refunded bonds are collateralized by U.S. Government or other eligible securities which are held in escrow and used to pay principal and interest and retire the bonds at the earliest refunding date (payment date) and/or whose interest rates vary with changes in a designated base rate (such as the prime interest rate). |
(d) |
144A Securityexempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, typically only to qualified institutional buyers. Unless otherwise indicated, these securities are not considered to be illiquid. |
(e) |
Inverse FloaterThe interest rate shown bears an inverse relationship to the interest rate on another security or the value of an index. The interest rate disclosed reflects the rate in effect on May 31, 2009. |
(f) |
Variable Rate NotesInstruments whose interest rates change on specified date (such as a coupon date or interest payment date) and/or whose interest rates vary with changes in a designated base rate (such as the prime interest rate). The interest rate disclosed reflects the rate in effect on May 31, 2009. |
(g) |
All or partial amount segregated as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements. |
(h) |
Residual Interest Bonds held in TrustSecurities represent underlying bonds transferred to a separate securitization trust established in a tender option bond transaction in which the Fund acquired the residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. |
|
|
|
Glossary: |
AMBAC insured by American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
CA Mtg. Ins. insured by California Mortgage Insurance |
CA St. Mtg. insured by California State Mortgage |
CP Certificates of Participation |
FGIC insured by Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHA insured by Federal Housing Administration |
FRN Floating Rate Note. The interest rate disclosed reflects the rate in effect on May 31, 2009. |
FSA insured by Financial Security Assurance, Inc. |
GNMA insured by Government National Mortgage Association |
GO General Obligation Bond |
GTD Guaranteed |
IBC Insurance Bond Certificate |
NPFGC insured by National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation |
NR Not Rated |
PSF Public School Fund |
Radian insured by Radian Guaranty, Inc. |
TCRS Temporary Custodian Receipts |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 23
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Statements of Assets and Liabilities |
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
|
California |
|
|
New York |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (cost $1,064,280,429, $452,994,967 and $196,805,702, respectively) |
|
|
$994,380,865 |
|
|
|
$461,042,407 |
|
|
$ |
191,935,439 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,465 |
|
|
|
1,517,165 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest receivable |
|
|
17,802,442 |
|
|
|
6,636,778 |
|
|
|
2,672,394 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Receivable for investments sold |
|
|
1,560,000 |
|
|
|
349,600 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
46,317 |
|
|
|
27,905 |
|
|
|
33,289 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
|
1,013,789,624 |
|
|
|
468,229,155 |
|
|
|
196,173,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Payable for floating rate notes |
|
|
89,161,972 |
|
|
|
51,012,500 |
|
|
|
8,186,394 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Payable for reverse repurchase agreements |
|
|
17,746,000 |
|
|
|
18,406,000 |
|
|
|
5,679,000 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Dividends payable to common and preferred shareholders |
|
|
3,898,871 |
|
|
|
2,178,471 |
|
|
|
713,876 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Payable to custodian for cash overdraft |
|
|
518,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Investment management fees payable |
|
|
453,207 |
|
|
|
201,212 |
|
|
|
91,623 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest payable |
|
|
356,955 |
|
|
|
196,908 |
|
|
|
118,873 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Payable to broker for collateral |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest payable for reverse repurchase agreements |
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
303,090 |
|
|
|
1,812,311 |
|
|
|
255,094 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
|
|
112,743,333 |
|
|
|
73,814,638 |
|
|
|
15,047,410 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Preferred shares ($0.00001 par value and $25,000 net asset and liquidation value per share applicable to an aggregate of 14,680, 6,520 and 3,160 shares issued and outstanding, respectively) |
|
|
367,000,000 |
|
|
|
163,000,000 |
|
|
|
79,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
$534,046,291 |
|
|
|
$231,414,517 |
|
|
$ |
102,125,877 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Common Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Par value ($0.00001 per share) |
|
|
$596 |
|
|
|
$310 |
|
|
|
$107 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Paid-in-capital in excess of par |
|
|
845,278,890 |
|
|
|
431,555,702 |
|
|
|
151,405,769 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Undistributed (dividends in excess of) net investment income |
|
|
5,090,783 |
|
|
|
(2,178,470 |
) |
|
|
(467,589 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments |
|
|
(246,424,252 |
) |
|
|
(206,204,674 |
) |
|
|
(43,979,691 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments |
|
|
(69,899,726 |
) |
|
|
8,241,649 |
|
|
|
(4,832,719 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
$534,046,291 |
|
|
|
$231,414,517 |
|
|
$ |
102,125,877 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
59,568,368 |
|
|
|
30,950,140 |
|
|
|
10,684,803 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Asset Value Per Common Share |
|
|
$8.97 |
|
|
|
$7.48 |
|
|
|
$9.56 |
|
|
|
|
24 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
For the year ended May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
|
California |
|
|
New York |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Investment Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest |
|
$ |
70,639,002 |
|
|
$ |
35,207,403 |
|
|
$ |
12,729,278 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Investment management fees |
|
|
6,766,778 |
|
|
|
3,276,166 |
|
|
|
1,280,627 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
|
2,233,432 |
|
|
|
4,852,198 |
|
|
|
403,258 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Auction agent fees and commissions |
|
|
1,074,430 |
|
|
|
542,608 |
|
|
|
220,433 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Legal fees |
|
|
156,839 |
|
|
|
102,921 |
|
|
|
47,304 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Shareholder communications |
|
|
138,590 |
|
|
|
61,856 |
|
|
|
29,321 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Trustees fees and expenses |
|
|
113,817 |
|
|
|
62,743 |
|
|
|
30,495 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Custodian and accounting agent fees |
|
|
105,898 |
|
|
|
143,498 |
|
|
|
51,846 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Audit and tax services |
|
|
77,515 |
|
|
|
60,771 |
|
|
|
53,565 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
New York Stock Exchange listing fees |
|
|
47,641 |
|
|
|
24,880 |
|
|
|
21,482 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Transfer agent fees |
|
|
39,164 |
|
|
|
36,741 |
|
|
|
37,676 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Insurance expense |
|
|
25,851 |
|
|
|
13,168 |
|
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Miscellaneous |
|
|
12,075 |
|
|
|
7,371 |
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total expenses |
|
|
10,792,030 |
|
|
|
9,184,921 |
|
|
|
2,186,463 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Less: investment management fees waived |
|
|
(574,290 |
) |
|
|
(279,190 |
) |
|
|
(108,084 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
custody credits earned on cash balances |
|
|
(42,775 |
) |
|
|
(13,011 |
) |
|
|
(10,838 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net expenses |
|
|
10,174,965 |
|
|
|
8,892,720 |
|
|
|
2,067,541 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
60,464,037 |
|
|
|
26,314,683 |
|
|
|
10,661,737 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Change In Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Investments |
|
|
(30,986,906 |
) |
|
|
(89,820,349 |
) |
|
|
(13,662,767 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Futures contracts |
|
|
(7,068,849 |
) |
|
|
(2,876,398 |
) |
|
|
(960,187 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Swaps |
|
|
(131,861,650 |
) |
|
|
(64,692,955 |
) |
|
|
(20,236,949 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Investments |
|
|
(116,288,436 |
) |
|
|
(13,317,190 |
) |
|
|
(7,840,767 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Futures contracts |
|
|
(6,565,353 |
) |
|
|
(4,502,979 |
) |
|
|
(1,197,643 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net
realized and change in unrealized loss on investments, |
|
|
(292,771,194 |
) |
|
|
(175,209,871 |
) |
|
|
(43,898,313 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Investment Operations |
|
|
(232,307,157 |
) |
|
|
(148,895,188 |
) |
|
|
(33,236,576 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Dividends on Preferred Shares from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(11,200,932 |
) |
|
|
(5,697,951 |
) |
|
|
(2,025,371 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Applicable to Common |
|
$ |
(243,508,089 |
) |
|
$ |
(154,593,139 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,261,947 |
) |
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 25
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
|
|
Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|
|||||
| ||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net investment income |
|
$ |
60,464,037 |
|
|
$ |
66,423,523 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swaps |
|
|
(169,917,405 |
) |
|
|
5,404,191 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net change
in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
(122,853,789 |
) |
|
|
(78,458,658 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net decrease in net assets resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(232,307,157 |
) |
|
|
(6,630,944 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(11,200,932 |
) |
|
|
(17,559,291 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net
decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders |
|
|
(243,508,089 |
) |
|
|
(24,190,235 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends to Common Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Investment Income |
|
|
(46,297,957 |
) |
|
|
(46,046,478 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Return of Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reinvestment of dividends |
|
|
4,112,714 |
|
|
|
3,161,576 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders |
|
|
(285,693,332 |
) |
|
|
(67,075,137 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Beginning of year |
|
|
819,739,623 |
|
|
|
886,814,760 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
End of year
(including undistributed (dividends in excess of) net investment |
|
$ |
534,046,291 |
|
|
$ |
819,739,623 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Issued in Reinvestment of Dividends |
|
|
419,882 |
|
|
|
223,853 |
|
|
|
26 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II |
|
|
New York Municipal II |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|
||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net investment income |
|
$ |
26,314,683 |
|
|
$ |
32,439,150 |
|
|
$ |
10,661,737 |
|
|
$ |
11,390,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swaps |
|
|
(157,389,702 |
) |
|
|
(9,422,890 |
) |
|
|
(34,859,903 |
) |
|
|
436,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net change
in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
(17,820,169 |
) |
|
|
(36,237,871 |
) |
|
|
(9,038,410 |
) |
|
|
(12,133,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net decrease in net assets resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(148,895,188 |
) |
|
|
(13,221,611 |
) |
|
|
(33,236,576 |
) |
|
|
(306,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(5,697,951 |
) |
|
|
(8,660,050 |
) |
|
|
(2,025,371 |
) |
|
|
(3,073,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net
decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders |
|
|
(154,593,139 |
) |
|
|
(21,881,661 |
) |
|
|
(35,261,947 |
) |
|
|
(3,380,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net Investment Income |
|
|
(24,711,497 |
) |
|
|
(25,748,032 |
) |
|
|
(8,466,985 |
) |
|
|
(8,420,559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Return of Capital |
|
|
(1,187,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Reinvestment of dividends |
|
|
2,137,595 |
|
|
|
2,114,952 |
|
|
|
754,665 |
|
|
|
682,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders |
|
|
(178,354,832 |
) |
|
|
(45,514,741 |
) |
|
|
(42,974,267 |
) |
|
|
(11,117,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Beginning of year |
|
|
409,769,349 |
|
|
|
455,284,090 |
|
|
|
145,100,144 |
|
|
|
156,217,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
End of year
(including undistributed (dividends in excess of) net investment |
|
$ |
231,414,517 |
|
|
$ |
409,769,349 |
|
|
$ |
102,125,877 |
|
|
$ |
145,100,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Issued in Reinvestment of Dividends |
|
|
229,213 |
|
|
|
150,398 |
|
|
|
70,913 |
|
|
|
48,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 27
|
For the year ended May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Cash from: |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets resulting from investment operations |
|
$ |
(232,307,157 |
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets
resulting from
investment |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
(508,734,403 |
) |
|
||||
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments |
|
|
831,016,398 |
|
|
||||
Sale of short-term portfolio investments, net |
|
|
(17,619,754 |
) |
|
||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments and futures contracts |
|
|
126,194,696 |
|
|
||||
Net realized loss on investments, futures contracts and swaps |
|
|
166,575,709 |
|
|
||||
Net amortization on investments |
|
|
(9,629,032 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in interest receivable |
|
|
2,169,213 |
|
|
||||
Proceeds from futures contracts transactions, net |
|
|
(15,444,085 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in deposits with brokers for future collateral |
|
|
12,085,100 |
|
|
||||
Increase in prepaid expense and other assets |
|
|
(3,410 |
) |
|
||||
Increase in interest payable for reverse repurchase agreements |
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
||||
Periodic and termination payments of swaps, net |
|
|
(131,861,650 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in investment management fees payable |
|
|
(162,093 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(85,073 |
) |
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
222,199,695 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used for financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Increase in payable to broker for collateral |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
||||
Increase in reverse repurchase agreements |
|
|
17,746,000 |
|
|
||||
Cash dividends paid (excluding reinvestment of dividends of $4,112,714) |
|
|
(53,466,278 |
) |
|
||||
Payments to retire floating rate notes issued |
|
|
(133,044,337 |
) |
|
||||
Cash receipts on issuance of floating rate notes |
|
|
63,358,626 |
|
|
||||
Cash overdraft at custodian |
|
|
518,002 |
|
|
||||
Redemptions of preferred shares |
|
|
(138,000,000 |
) |
|
||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(242,587,987 |
) |
|
||||
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(20,388,292 |
) |
|
||||
Cash at beginning of year |
|
|
20,388,292 |
|
|
||||
Cash at end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
The Fund paid $73,872 in cash for interest on reverse repurchase agreements.
28 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Statement of Cash Flows |
For the year ended May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Cash from: |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets resulting from investment operations |
|
$ |
(148,895,188 |
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in
net assets resulting from investment |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
(396,916,857 |
) |
|
||||
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments |
|
|
721,948,191 |
|
|
||||
Sale of short-term portfolio investments, net |
|
|
(15,773,079 |
) |
|
||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments and futures contracts |
|
|
8,164,948 |
|
|
||||
Net realized loss on investments, futures contracts and swaps |
|
|
166,878,734 |
|
|
||||
Net amortization on investments |
|
|
(3,142,666 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in interest receivable |
|
|
3,565,368 |
|
|
||||
Proceeds from futures contracts transactions, net |
|
|
(8,364,012 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in deposits with brokers for future collateral |
|
|
5,940,000 |
|
|
||||
Increase in prepaid expense and other assets |
|
|
(6,493 |
) |
|
||||
Increase in interest payable for reverse repurchase agreements |
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
||||
Periodic and termination payments of swaps, net |
|
|
(64,692,955 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in investment management fees payable |
|
|
(109,925 |
) |
|
||||
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
14,727 |
|
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
268,618,029 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used for financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Increase in reverse repurchase agreements |
|
|
18,406,000 |
|
|
||||
Cash dividends paid (excluding reinvestment of dividends of $2,137,595) |
|
|
(29,500,797 |
) |
|
||||
Payments to retire floating rate notes issued |
|
|
(199,581,237 |
) |
|
||||
Cash receipts on issuance of floating rate notes |
|
|
28,796,948 |
|
|
||||
Redemptions of preferred shares |
|
|
(97,000,000 |
) |
|
||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(278,879,086 |
) |
|
||||
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(10,261,057 |
) |
|
||||
Cash at beginning of year |
|
|
10,433,522 |
|
|
||||
Cash at end of year |
|
$ |
172,465 |
|
|
The Fund paid $64,093 in cash for interest on reverse repurchase agreements.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 29
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II
(Municipal II), PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II (California
Municipal II) and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (New York
Municipal II), collectively referred to as the Funds or PIMCO Municipal
Income Funds II, were organized as Massachusetts business trusts on March 29,
2002. Prior to commencing operations on June 28, 2002, the Funds had no
operations other than matters relating to their organization and registration
as non-diversified, closed-end management investment companies registered under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules and regulations thereunder, as
amended. Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC (the Investment
Manager) serves as the investment manager and is an indirect, wholly-owned
subsidiary of Allianz Global Investors of America L.P. (Allianz Global).
Allianz Global is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Allianz SE, a
publicly traded European insurance and financial services company. Each Fund
has an unlimited amount of $0.00001 par value per share of common stock
authorized.
Under normal market conditions, Municipal II invests substantially all of its assets in a portfolio of municipal bonds, the interest from which is currently exempt from federal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, California Municipal II invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds which pay interest that is currently exempt from federal and California state income taxes. Under normal market conditions, New York Municipal II invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds which pay interest that is currently exempt from federal, New York State and New York City income taxes. The Funds will generally seek to avoid investing in bonds generating interest income which could potentially subject individuals to alternative minimum tax. The issuers abilities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic, political and other developments in a specific state or region.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the Funds financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.
In the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations which provide general indemnifications. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, the Funds expect the risk of any loss to be remote.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds:
(a) Valuation of
Investments
Portfolio securities and other
financial instruments for which market quotations are readily available are
stated at market value. Market value is generally determined on the basis of
last reported sales prices, or if no sales are reported, on the basis of quotes
obtained from a quotation reporting system, established market makers, or
independent pricing services.
Portfolio securities and other financial instruments for which market quotations are not readily available or for which a development/event occurs that may significantly impact the value of a security, are fair-valued, in good faith, pursuant to procedures established by the Board of Trustees, or persons acting at their discretion pursuant to procedures established by the Board of Trustees. The Funds investments are valued daily using prices supplied by an independent pricing service or dealer quotations, or by using the last sale price on the exchange that is the primary market for such securities, or the last quoted mean price for those securities for which the over-the-counter market is the primary market or for listed securities in which there were no sales. Independent pricing services use information provided by market makers or estimates of market values obtained from yield data relating to investments or securities with similar characteristics. Exchange-traded options, futures and options on futures are valued at the settlement price determined by the relevant exchange. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis are marked to market daily until settlement at the forward settlement value. Short-term securities maturing in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, if their original term to maturity was 60 days or less, or by amortizing their value on the 61st day prior to maturity, if the original term to maturity exceeded 60 days.
The prices used by the Funds to value securities may differ from the value that would be realized if the securities were sold and these differences could be material to the Funds financial statements. Each Funds net asset value is normally determined as of the close of regular trading (normally, 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on each day the NYSE is open for business.
30 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(b) Fair Value
Measurement
The Funds have adopted the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 clarifies the
definition of fair value for financial reporting, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about the use of the
fair value measurements. Under SFAS 157, fair value is defined as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e.
the exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants. The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical investments that the Funds have the ability to access |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 valuations based on other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) or quotes from inactive exchanges |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 valuations based on significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
An investment assets or liabilitys level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level input, individually or in the aggregate, that is significant to fair value measurement.
The valuation techniques used by the Funds to measure fair value during the year ended May 31, 2009 maximized the use of observable inputs and minimized the use of unobservable inputs.
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of May 31, 2009 in valuing each Funds investments carried at value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
California Municipal II |
|
New York Municipal II |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Valuation Inputs |
|
Investments |
|
Investments |
|
Investments |
|||||||
Level 1 Quoted Prices |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Level 2 Other Significant Observable Inputs |
|
|
994,380,865 |
|
|
|
461,042,407 |
|
|
|
|
191,935,439 |
|
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
994,380,865 |
|
|
$ |
461,042,407 |
|
|
|
$ |
191,935,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-4. Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased as well as guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Funds management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FSP 157-4 will have on the Funds financial statement disclosures.
(c) Investment
Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted
for on the trade date. Securities purchased and sold on a when-issued or
delayed-delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.
Realized gains and losses on investments are determined on an identified cost
basis. Interest income adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization
of premiums is recorded on an accrual basis. Discounts or premiums on debt
securities purchased are accreted or amortized, respectively, to interest
income over the lives of the respective securities using the effective yield
method.
(d) Federal Income
Taxes
The Funds intend to distribute all of
their taxable income and to comply with the other requirements of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to regulated investment
companies. Accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes is required.
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 31
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
|
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
|
The FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (the Interpretation). The Interpretation establishes for all entities, including pass-through entities such as the Funds, a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of positions taken in filing tax returns (including whether an entity is taxable in a particular jurisdiction), and requires certain expanded tax disclosures. The Funds management has determined that its evaluation of the Interpretation has resulted in no material impact to the Funds financial statements at May 31, 2009. The Funds federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. |
|
(e) Dividends and Distributions Common Stock |
The Funds declare dividends from net investment income monthly to common shareholders. Distributions of net realized capital gains, if any, are paid at least annually. The Funds record dividends and distributions to their shareholders on the ex-dividend date. The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment income and net realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. These book-tax differences are considered either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal income tax treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. To the extent dividends and/or distributions exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes; they are reported as dividends and/or distributions of paid-in-capital in excess of par. |
|
(f) Reverse Repurchase Agreements |
In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Funds sell securities to a bank or broker-dealer and agree to repurchase the securities at a mutually agreed date and price. Generally, the effect of such a transaction is that the Funds can recover and reinvest all or most of the cash invested in the portfolio securities involved during the term of the reverse repurchase agreement and still be entitled to the returns associated with those portfolio securities. Such transactions are advantageous if the interest cost to the Funds of the reverse repurchase transaction is less than the returns it obtains on investments purchased with the cash. Unless the Funds cover their positions in reverse repurchase agreements (by segregating liquid assets at least equal in amount to the forward purchase commitment), their obligations under the agreements will be subject to the Funds limitations on borrowings. Reverse repurchase agreements involve leverage risk and also the risk that the market value of the securities that the Funds are obligated to repurchase under the agreement may decline below the repurchase price. In the event the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, the Funds use of the proceeds of the agreement may be restricted pending determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce the Funds obligation to repurchase the securities. |
|
(g) Inverse Floating Rate Transactions Residual Interest Municipal Bonds (RIBs) / Residual Interest Tax Exempt Bonds (RITEs) |
The Funds may invest in RIBs and RITEs, (Inverse Floaters) whose interest rates bear an inverse relationship to the interest rate on another security or the value of an index. In inverse floating rate transactions, the Funds sell a fixed rate municipal bond (Fixed Rate Bond) to a broker who places the Fixed Rate Bond in a special purpose trust (Trust) from which floating rate bonds (Floating Rate Notes) and Inverse Floaters are issued. The Funds simultaneously or within a short period of time purchase the Inverse Floaters from the broker. The Inverse Floaters held by the Funds provide the Funds with the right to: (1) cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) cause the broker to transfer the Fixed-Rate Bond held by the Trust to the Funds, thereby collapsing the Trust. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 (FASB Statement No. 140), the Funds account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in their Schedules of Investments, and account for the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption Payable for floating rate notes in the Funds Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. |
|
The Funds may also invest in Inverse Floaters without transferring a fixed rate municipal bond into a special purpose trust, which are not accounted for as secured borrowings. |
32 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
|
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
|
The Inverse Floaters are created by dividing the income stream provided by the underlying bonds to create two securities, one short-term and one long-term. The interest rate on the short-term component is reset by an index or auction process typically every 7 to 35 days. After income is paid on the short-term securities at current rates, the residual income from the underlying bond(s) goes to the long-term securities. Therefore, rising short-term rates result in lower income for the long-term component and vice versa. The longer-term bonds may be more volatile and less liquid than other municipal bonds of comparable maturity. Investments in Inverse Floaters typically will involve greater risk than in an investment in Fixed Rate Bonds. The Funds may also invest in Inverse Floaters for the purpose of increasing leverage. |
|
The Funds restrictions on borrowings do not apply to the secured borrowings deemed to have occurred for accounting purposes pursuant to FASB Statement No. 140. Inverse Floaters held by the Funds are exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
Effective April 6, 2009, each Funds investment policy was revised to increase the amount of Inverse Floaters in which each Fund may invest from 10% to 15% of their respective total assets. This change potentially allows the Funds to earn additional tax-free income. In addition, the use of Inverse Floaters, which results in a form of economic leverage, will allow the Funds to replace or increase leverage to some degree. |
|
In addition to general market risks, the Funds investments in Inverse Floaters may involve greater risk and volatility than an investment in a fixed rate bond, and the value of Inverse Floaters may decrease significantly when market interest rates increase. Inverse Floaters have varying degrees of liquidity, and the market for these securities may be volatile. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when interest rates decline or remain relatively stable. Although volatile, Inverse Floaters typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality, coupon, call provisions and maturity. Trusts in which Inverse Floaters may be held could be terminated due to market, credit or other events beyond the Funds control, which could require the Funds to reduce leverage and dispose of portfolio investments at inopportune times and prices. |
|
(h) When-Issued/Delayed-Delivery Transactions |
These transactions involve a commitment to purchase or sell securities for a predetermined price or yield, with payment and delivery taking place beyond the customary settlement period. When delayed-delivery purchases are outstanding, the Funds will set aside and maintain until the settlement date in a designated account, liquid assets in an amount sufficient to meet the purchase price. When purchasing a security on a delayed-delivery basis, the Funds assume the rights and risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield fluctuations; consequently, such fluctuations are taken into account when determining the net asset value. The Funds may dispose of or renegotiate a delayed-delivery transaction after it is entered into, and may sell when-issued securities before they are delivered, which may result in a realized gain or loss. When a security is sold on a delayed-delivery basis, the Funds do not participate in future gains and losses with respect to the security. |
|
(i) Custody Credits on Cash Balances |
The Funds benefit from an expense offset arrangement with their custodian bank, whereby uninvested cash balances earn credits which reduce monthly custodian and accounting agent expenses. Had these cash balances been invested in income-producing securities, they would have generated income for the Funds. |
|
(j) Interest Expense |
Interest expense relates to the Funds liability in connection with floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with Inverse Floater transactions and Reverse Repurchase Agreements. Interest expense is recorded as it is incurred. |
|
2. Principal Risk |
In the normal course of business the Funds trade financial instruments and enter into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the other party to a transaction to perform (credit risk). The main risks from derivative instruments are interest rate, market price and credit risks. |
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 33
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
|
2. Principal Risk (continued) |
|
Interest rate risk is the risk that fixed income securities will decline in value because of changes in interest rates. As nominal interest rates rise, the value of certain fixed income securities held by a Fund is likely to decrease. A nominal interest rate can be described as the sum of a real interest rate and an expected inflation rate. Fixed income securities with longer durations tend to be more sensitive to changes in interest rates, usually making them more volatile than securities with shorter durations. Duration is useful primarily as a measure of the sensitivity of a fixed incomes market price to interest rate (i.e. yield) movements. |
|
The Funds will be exposed to credit risk on parties with whom it trades and will also bear the risk of settlement default. The Funds minimize concentrations of credit risk by undertaking transactions with a large number of customers and counterparties on recognized and reputable exchanges. The Funds could lose money if the issuer or guarantor of a fixed income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives contract, repurchase agreement or a loan of portfolio securities, is unable or unwilling to make timely principal and/or interest payments, or to otherwise honor its obligations. Securities are subject to varying degrees of credit risk, which are often reflected in credit ratings. |
|
Similar to credit risk, the Funds may be exposed to counterparty risk, or the risk that an institution or other entity with which the Funds have unsettled or open transactions will default. The potential loss could exceed the value of the financial assets recorded in the financial statements. Financial assets, which potentially expose the Funds to credit risk, consist principally of cash due from counterparties and investments. |
|
The Funds Sub-Adviser, Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO or the Sub-Adviser), minimizes credit risks to the Funds by performing extensive reviews of each counterparty and obtaining approval from their Counterparty Risk Committee prior to entering into transactions with a third party. All transactions in listed securities are settled/paid for upon delivery using approved counterparties. The risk of default is considered minimal, as delivery of securities sold is only made once a Fund has received payment. Payment is made on a purchase once the securities have been delivered by the counterparty. The trade will fail if either party fails to meet its obligation. |
|
3. Financial Derivative Instruments |
The FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 161 or the Statement) requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The disclosure requirements of FAS 161 distinguish between derivatives which are accounted for as hedges under FAS 133 and those that do not qualify for such accounting. The Funds reflect derivatives at fair value and recognize changes in fair value through the statement of operations, and such derivatives do not qualify for FAS 133 hedge accounting treatment. |
|
(a) Futures Contracts |
A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a financial instrument at a set price on a future date. The Funds may use futures contracts to manage its exposure to the securities markets or to movements in interest rates, and currency values. Upon entering into such a contract, the Funds are required to pledge to the broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum initial margin requirements of the exchange. Pursuant to the contracts, the Funds agree to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the contracts. Such receipts or payments are known as variation margin and are recorded by the Funds as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When the contracts are closed, the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contracts at the time they were opened and the value at the time they were closed. Any unrealized appreciation or depreciation recorded is simultaneously reversed. The use of futures transactions involves various risks, including the risk of an imperfect correlation in the movements in the price of futures contracts, interest rates and the underlying hedged assets, and the possible inability or unwillingness of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. |
34 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
|
3. Financial Derivative Instruments (continued) |
|
(b) Option Transactions |
The Funds purchase and write (sell) put and call options on securities for hedging purposes, risk management purposes or as part of their investment strategies. The risk associated with purchasing an option is that the Funds pay a premium whether or not the option is exercised. Additionally, the Funds bear the risk of loss of premium and change in market value should the counterparty not perform under the contract. Put and call options purchased are accounted for in the same manner as portfolio securities. The cost of securities acquired through the exercise of call options is increased by the premiums paid. The proceeds from securities sold through the exercise of put options is decreased by the premiums paid. |
|
When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability which is subsequently marked to market to reflect the current market value of the option written. These liabilities are reflected as options written in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchased transactions, as a realized loss. If a call option written by the Funds is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss. If a put option written by the Funds is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security. In writing an option, the Funds bear the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option. Exercise of a written option could result in the Funds purchasing a security at a price different from its current market value. |
|
(c) Swap Agreements |
Swap agreements are privately negotiated agreements between the Funds and a counterparty to exchange or swap investment cash flows, assets, foreign currencies or market-linked returns at specified, future intervals. The Funds may enter into credit default, cross- currency, interest rate, total return, variance and other forms of swap agreements in order to manage their exposure to credit, currency and interest rate risk. In connection with these agreements, securities may be identified as collateral in accordance with the terms of the respective swap agreements to provide assets of value and recourse in the event of default or bankruptcy/insolvency. |
|
Payments received or made at the beginning of the measurement period are reflected as such on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities and represent payments made or received upon entering into the swap agreement to compensate for differences between the stated terms of the swap agreement and prevailing market conditions (credit spreads, currency exchange rates, interest rates, and other relevant factors). These upfront payments are recorded as realized gains or losses on the Statements of Operations upon termination or maturity of the swap. A liquidation payment received or made at the termination of the swap is recorded as realized gain or loss on the Statements of Operations. Net periodic payments received or paid by the Funds are included as part of realized gains or losses on the Statements of Operations. |
|
Entering into these agreements involves, to varying degrees, elements of credit, legal, market and documentation risk in excess of the amounts recognized on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Such risks include the possibility that there will be no liquid market for these agreements, that the counterparties to the agreements may default on their obligation to perform or disagree as to the meaning of contractual terms in the agreements and that there may be unfavorable changes in interest rates. |
|
Interest rate swap agreements involve the exchange by the Funds with another party of their respective commitments to pay or receive interest (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments), with respect to the notional amount of principal. Certain forms of interest rate swap agreements may include: (i) interest rate caps, under which, in return for a premium, one party agrees to make payments to the other to the extent that interest rates exceed a specified rate, or cap, (ii) interest rate floors, under which, in return for a premium, one party agrees to make payments to the other to the extent that interest rates fall below a specified rate, or floor, (iii) interest rate collars, under which a party sells a cap and purchases a floor or vice versa in an attempt to protect itself against interest rate movements exceeding given minimum or maximum levels, (iv) callable interest rate swaps, under which the counterparty may terminate the swap transaction in whole at zero cost by a predetermined date and time prior to the maturity date, (v) spreadlocks, which allow the interest rate swap users to lock in the forward differential (or spread) between the interest rate swap rate and a specified benchmark, or (vi) basis swap, under which two parties can exchange variable interest rates based on different money markets. |
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 35
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
3. Financial Derivative Instruments (continued)
Fair Value of
Derivative Instruments as of May 31, 2009
Municipal II The Fund has no open derivatives at year-end
that would be impacted by risk exposures.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the six months ended May 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Futures contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|||||||
Options written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swaps |
|
|
(119,491,496 |
) |
|
(119,491,496) |
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Realized Gain (Loss) |
|
$ |
(119,491,496 |
) |
$ |
(119,491,496) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Options written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swaps |
|
|
89,128,259 |
|
|
89,128,259 |
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
$ |
89,128,259 |
|
$ |
89,128,259 |
|
|
Municipal II had $350,800,000 maximum notional amount outstanding of interest rate swap agreements for the six months ended May 31, 2009.
36 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
3. Financial Derivative Instruments (continued)
California Municipal II The Fund has no open derivatives at year-end that would be impacted by risk exposures.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations for the six months ended May 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Futures contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|||||||
Options written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swaps |
|
|
(57,992,455 |
) |
|
(57,992,455) |
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Realized Gain (Loss) |
|
$ |
(57,992,455 |
) |
$ |
(57,992,455) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Options written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swaps |
|
|
49,067,968 |
|
|
49,067,968 |
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
$ |
49,067,968 |
|
$ |
49,067,968 |
|
|
California Municipal II had $193,400,000 maximum notional amount outstanding of interest rate swap agreements for the six months ended May 31, 2009.
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 37
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
3. Financial Derivative Instruments (continued)
New York Municipal II The Fund has no open derivatives at year-end that would be impacted by risk exposures.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations for the six months ended May 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Futures contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|||||||
Options written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swaps |
|
|
(18,175,257 |
) |
|
(18,175,257) |
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Realized Gain (Loss) |
|
$ |
(18,175,257 |
) |
$ |
(18,175,257) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Options written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swaps |
|
|
14,172,628 |
|
|
14,172,628 |
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
$ |
14,172,628 |
|
$ |
14,172,628 |
|
|
New York Municipal II had $56,000,000 maximum notional amount outstanding of interest rate swap agreements for the six months ended May 31, 2009.
The Investment Manager has retained its affiliate, the Sub-Adviser, to manage each Funds investments. Subject to the supervision of the Investment Manager, the Sub-Adviser is responsible for making all of the Funds investment decisions. The Investment Manager, not the Funds, pays a portion of the fees it receives to the Sub-Adviser in return for its services.
38 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
|
5. Investments in Securities |
For the year ended May 31, 2009, purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term securities and U.S. government obligations were: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
California |
|
New York |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
501,334,403 |
|
$ |
396,916,857 |
|
$ |
72,634,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
830,793,338 |
|
|
720,385,312 |
|
|
115,521,303 |
(a) The weighted average daily balance of reverse repurchase agreements outstanding during the year ended May 31, 2009 for Municipal II, California Municipal II and New York Municipal II was $17,809,255, $16,277,076 and $5,645,917 at a weighted average interest rate of 1.02%, 1.01% and 1.03%, respectively. The total market value of underlying collateral (refer to the Schedules of Investments for positions segregated as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements) for open reverse repurchase agreements at May 31, 2009 was $21,444,433, $22,214,023 and $7,563,146 for Municipal II, California Municipal II and New York Municipal II, respectively.
Open reverse repurchase agreements at May 31, 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
Rate |
|
Trade Date |
|
Maturity |
|
Principal & |
|
Principal |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Bank |
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/8/09 |
|
6/5/09 |
|
$ |
681,341 |
|
$ |
681,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/18/09 |
|
6/3/09 |
|
|
15,092,401 |
|
|
15,088,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/20/09 |
|
6/3/09 |
|
|
1,977,494 |
|
|
1,977,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,746,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Bank |
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/8/09 |
|
6/5/09 |
|
$ |
8,969,482 |
|
$ |
8,965,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/18/09 |
|
6/3/09 |
|
|
9,443,754 |
|
|
9,441,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,406,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Bank |
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/8/09 |
|
6/5/09 |
|
$ |
4,368,183 |
|
$ |
4,366,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/18/09 |
|
6/3/09 |
|
|
934,272 |
|
|
934,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
0.75 |
% |
|
5/20/09 |
|
6/3/09 |
|
|
379,095 |
|
|
379,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,679,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II, California Municipal II and New York Municipal II received $174,447, $176,006 and $764,226, respectively, in U.S. government agency securities and Municipal II received $300,000 in cash as collateral for open reverse repurchase agreements. Cash collateral received may be invested in accordance with each Funds investment strategy. Collateral received as securities cannot be pledged.
6. Income Tax Information
Municipal II:
The tax character of dividends paid were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Income |
|
$ |
5,154,570 |
|
$ |
5,121,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Exempt Income |
|
$ |
52,344.319 |
|
$ |
58,483,958 |
At May 31, 2009, the tax character of distributable earnings of $5,090,783 was comprised entirely from tax-exempt income.
In accordance with U.S. Treasury regulations, the Fund elected to defer realized capital losses of $165,173,378 arising after October 31, 2008. Such losses are treated as arising on June 1, 2009.
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 39
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
6. Income Tax Information (continued)
At May 31, 2009, Municipal II had a capital loss carryforward of $81,236,790 ($6,389,744 of which will expire in 2012 $54,505,416 of which will expire in 2013, $4,473,237 of which will expire in 2014, $7,912,932 of which will expire in 2015, and $7,955,461 of which will expire in 2017), available as a reduction, to the extent provided in the regulations, of any future net realized capital gains. To the extent that these losses are used to offset future realized capital gains, such gains will not be distributed.
For the year ended May 31, 2009, permanent book-tax differences were primarily attributable to the differing treatment of inverse floater transactions and swap payments. These adjustments were to decrease undistributed net investment income and decrease accumulated net realized loss by $29,827.
California Municipal II:
The tax character of distributions paid were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Income |
|
$ |
6,111,678 |
|
$ |
2,997,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Exempt Income |
|
$ |
24,297,770 |
|
$ |
31,410,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of Capital |
|
$ |
1,187,791 |
|
|
|
At May 31, 2009, there were no distributable earnings.
In accordance with U.S. Treasury regulations, the Fund elected to defer realized capital losses of $155,667,522 arising after October 31, 2008. Such losses are treated as arising on June 1, 2009.
At May 31, 2009, California Municipal II had a capital loss carryforward of $49,030,973 ($3,919,943 of which will expire in 2012, $16,328,922 of which will expire in 2013, $5,531,398 of which will expire in 2015, $4,849,597 of which will expire in 2016 and $18,401,113 of which will expire in 2017), available as a reduction, to the extent provided in the regulations, of any future net realized capital gains. To the extent that these losses are used to offset future realized capital gains, such gains will not be distributed.
For the year ended May 31, 2009, permanent book-tax differences were primarily attributable to the differing treatment of inverse floater transactions and taxable overdistributions. These adjustments were to decrease dividends in excess of net investment income by $4,135,918, decrease paid-in capital by $4,302,108 and decrease accumulated net realized loss by $166,190.
New York Municipal II:
The tax character of dividends paid were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Income |
|
$ |
1,081,822 |
|
$ |
284,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Exempt Income |
|
$ |
9,410,534 |
|
$ |
11,209,828 |
At May 31, 2009, there were no distributable earnings.
In accordance with U.S. Treasury regulations, the Fund elected to defer realized capital losses of $33,679,109 arising after October 31, 2008. Such losses are treated as arising on June 1, 2009.
At May 31, 2009, New York Municipal II had a capital loss carryforward of $10,319,392 ($378,802 of which will expire in 2012, $5,755,677 of which will expire in 2013, $51,848 of which will expire in 2015, $1,171,157 of which will expire in 2016 and $2,961,908 of which will expire in 2017), available as a reduction, to the extent provided in the regulations, of any future net realized capital gains. To the extent that these losses are used to offset future realized capital gains, such gains will not be distributed.
For the year ended May 31, 2009, permanent book-tax differences were primarily attributable to the differing treatment of inverse floater transactions and swap payments. These adjustments were to increase dividends in excess of net investment income by $15,547, decrease paid-in capital by $186 and decrease accumulated net realized loss by $15,733.
40 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
6. Income Tax Information (continued)
The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes and gross unrealized appreciation and gross unrealized depreciation of investments at May 31, 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
$ |
974,690,419 |
|
$ |
25,102,990 |
|
$ |
(95,016,800 |
) |
$ |
(69,913,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II |
|
|
401,604,124 |
|
|
18,881,925 |
|
|
(12,146,454 |
) |
|
6,735,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Municipal II |
|
|
188,391,781 |
|
|
5,025,869 |
|
|
(9,839,776 |
) |
|
(4,813,907 |
) |
7. Auction-Rate Preferred Shares
Municipal II has outstanding 2,936 shares of Preferred Shares Series A, 2,936 shares of Preferred Shares Series B, 2,936 shares of Preferred Shares Series C, 2,936 shares of Preferred Shares Series D and 2,936 shares of Preferred Shares Series E, each with a net asset and liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus any accumulated, unpaid dividends.
California Municipal II has issued 1,304 shares of Preferred Shares Series A, 1,304 shares of Preferred Shares Series B, 1,304 shares of Preferred Shares Series C, 1,304 shares of Preferred Shares Series D and 1,304 shares of Preferred Shares Series E, each with a net asset and liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus any accumulated, unpaid dividends.
New York Municipal II has issued 1,580 shares of Preferred Shares Series A and 1,580 shares of Preferred Shares Series B, each with a net asset and liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus any accumulated, unpaid dividends.
Dividends are accumulated daily at an annual rate (typically re-set every seven days) through auction procedures. Distributions of net realized capital gains, if any, are paid annually.
For the year ended May 31, 2009, the annualized dividend rates for each Fund ranged from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
At May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
11.347 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B |
|
12.565 |
% |
0.563 |
% |
0.563 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C |
|
12.261 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D |
|
11.728 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series E |
|
10.205 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
11.347 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B |
|
12.565 |
% |
0.563 |
% |
0.563 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C |
|
12.261 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D |
|
11.728 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series E |
|
10.205 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
12.261 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
0.518 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B |
|
10.205 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
0.579 |
% |
The Funds are subject to certain limitations and restrictions while Preferred Shares are outstanding. Failure to comply with these limitations and restrictions could preclude the Funds from declaring any dividends or distributions to common shareholders or repurchasing common shares and/or could trigger the mandatory redemption of Preferred Shares at their liquidation value.
Preferred shareholders, who are entitled to one vote per share, generally vote with the common shareholders but vote separately as a class to elect two Trustees and on any matters affecting the rights of the preferred shareholders.
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 41
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
7. Auction-Rate Preferred Shares (continued)
Since mid-February 2008, holders of auction-rate preferred shares (ARPS) issued by the Funds have been directly impacted by an unprecedented lack of liquidity, which has similarly affected ARPS holders in many of the nations closed-end funds. Since then, regularly scheduled auctions for ARPS issued by the Funds have consistently failed because of insufficient demand (bids to buy shares) to meet the supply (shares offered for sale) at each auction. In a failed auction, ARPS holders cannot sell all, and may not be able to sell any, of their shares tendered for sale. While repeated auction failures have affected the liquidity for ARPS, they do not constitute a default or automatically alter the credit quality of the ARPS, and ARPS holders have continued to receive dividends at the defined maximum rate the higher of the 30-day AA Composite Commercial Paper Rate multiplied by 110% or the Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Obligations Rate-defined as 90% of the quotient of (A) the per annum rate expressed on an interest equivalent basis equal to the Kenny S&P 30-day High Grade Index divided by (B) 1.00 minus the Marginal Tax Rate (expressed as a decimal) multiplied by 110% (which is a function of short-term interest rates and typically higher than the rate that would have otherwise been set through a successful auction).
These developments with respect to ARPS have not affected the management or investment policies of the Funds, and the Funds outstanding common shares continue to trade on the NYSE without any change. If the Funds ARPS auctions continue to fail and the maximum rate payable on the ARPS rises as a result of changes in short-term interest rates, returns for the Funds common shareholders could be adversely affected.
During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009, the Funds redeemed, at their liquidation preference, a portion of their ARPS. The redemptions were intended to increase asset coverage of each Funds ARPS above the 200% Level (subject to future market conditions), permitting the Funds to pay previously declared common share dividends and to declare and pay future common share dividends. The Funds redeemed, their ARPs, at the full liquidation preference of $25,000 per share plus accumulated but unpaid dividends, across each Funds series of ARPS on their respective dates of redemption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II (a) |
|
California |
|
New York |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
505,000,000 |
|
$ |
260,000,000 |
|
$ |
90,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemptions |
|
|
(138,000,000 |
) |
|
(97,000,000 |
) |
|
(11,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, May 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
367,000,000 |
|
$ |
163,000,000 |
|
$ |
79,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Redeemed January 5, 2009 January 9, 2009 |
(b) Redeemed January 26, 2009 January 29, 2009 |
|
|
Municipal II |
$0.065 per common share |
California Municipal II |
$0.07 per common share |
New York Municipal II |
$0.06625 per common share |
On July 1, 2009, the following dividends were declared to common shareholders payable August 3, 2009 to shareholders of record on July 13, 2009:
|
|
Municipal II |
$0.065 per common share |
California Municipal II |
$0.07 per common share |
New York Municipal II |
$0.06625 per common share |
42 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
May 31, 2009 |
Since February 2004, the Investment Manager, the Sub-Adviser, and certain of their affiliates and their employees have been named as defendants in a number of pending lawsuits concerning market timing, which allege the same or similar conduct underlying the regulatory settlements discussed above. The market timing lawsuits have been consolidated in a multi-district litigation proceeding in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Any potential resolution of these matters may include, but not be limited to, judgments or settlements for damages against the Investment Manager, the Sub-Adviser, or their affiliates or related injunctions.
The Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser believe that these matters are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or on their ability to perform their respective investment advisory activities relating to the Funds.
The foregoing speaks only as of the date hereof.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 43
|
For a share of common stock outstanding throughout each year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
|
$ |
13.86 |
|
|
$ |
15.05 |
|
|
$ |
14.71 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
|
$ |
14.01 |
|
|
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
Net
realized and change in unrealized |
|
|
(4.94 |
) |
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
Total from investment operations |
|
|
(3.92 |
) |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
Dividends on Preferred Shares from |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
Net increase
(decrease) in net assets |
|
|
(4.11 |
) |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from |
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
(0.96 |
) |
|
|
(1.01 |
) |
|
Net asset value, end of year |
|
$ |
8.97 |
|
|
$ |
13.86 |
|
|
$ |
15.05 |
|
|
$ |
14.71 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
|
Market price, end of year |
|
$ |
9.56 |
|
|
$ |
14.14 |
|
|
$ |
15.42 |
|
|
$ |
14.45 |
|
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
|
Total Investment Return (1) |
|
|
(26.46 |
)% |
|
|
(3.09 |
)% |
|
|
12.64 |
% |
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
21.00 |
% |
|
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
applicable to common |
|
$ |
534,046 |
|
|
$ |
819,740 |
|
|
$ |
886,815 |
|
|
$ |
862,832 |
|
|
$ |
862,290 |
|
|
Ratio of
expenses to average net |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
Ratio of
expenses to average net assets, |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
Ratio of
net investment income to average |
|
|
10.23 |
% |
|
|
7.90 |
% |
|
|
7.45 |
% |
|
|
7.31 |
% |
|
|
7.71 |
% |
|
Preferred shares asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
61,376 |
|
|
$ |
65,570 |
|
|
$ |
68,889 |
|
|
$ |
67,701 |
|
|
$ |
67,676 |
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share of common stock at the current market price on the first day of each period and a sale of a share of common stock at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions or sales charges. |
(2) |
Calculated on the basis of income and expenses applicable to both common and preferred shares relative to the average net assets of common shareholders. |
(3) |
Inclusive of expenses offset by custody credits earned on cash balances at the custodian bank. (See note 1(i) in Notes to Financial Statements). |
(4) |
Interest expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in connection with inverse floater transactions and reverse repurchase agreements. |
(5) |
During the periods indicated above, the Investment Manager waived a portion of its investment management fee. The effect of such waiver relative to the average net assets of common shareholders was 0.10%, 0.17%, 0.24%, 0.24% and 0.24% for the years ended May 31, 2009, May 31, 2008, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2005, respectively. |
44 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Financial Highlights |
For a share of common stock outstanding throughout each year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
$ |
14.89 |
|
|
$ |
14.58 |
|
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
realized and change in unrealized |
|
|
(5.69 |
) |
|
|
(1.49 |
) |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
(4.84 |
) |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Shares from |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in net assets |
|
|
(5.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.71 |
) |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Common Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.84 |
) |
|
|
(0.84 |
) |
|
|
(0.93 |
) |
|
|
(0.98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Return of Capital |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of year |
|
$ |
7.48 |
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
$ |
14.89 |
|
|
$ |
14.58 |
|
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Market price, end of year |
|
$ |
8.78 |
|
|
$ |
14.25 |
|
|
$ |
15.96 |
|
|
$ |
14.62 |
|
|
$ |
14.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return (1) |
|
|
(32.26 |
)% |
|
|
(5.17 |
)% |
|
|
15.35 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
19.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
applicable to common |
|
$ |
231,415 |
|
|
$ |
409,769 |
|
|
$ |
455,284 |
|
|
$ |
443,379 |
|
|
$ |
441,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Ratio of
expenses to average net assets |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Ratio of
expenses to average net assets, |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
1.18 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Ratio of
net investment income to average |
|
|
9.31 |
% |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
7.28 |
% |
|
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
7.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Preferred shares asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
60,490 |
|
|
$ |
64,390 |
|
|
$ |
68,765 |
|
|
$ |
67,620 |
|
|
$ |
67,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(1) |
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share of common stock at the current market price on the first day of each period and a sale of a share of common stock at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions or sales charges. |
(2) |
Calculated on the basis of income and expenses applicable to both common and preferred shares relative to the average net assets of common shareholders. |
(3) |
Inclusive of expenses offset by custody credits earned on cash balances at the custodian bank. (See note 1(i) in Notes to Financial Statements). |
(4) |
Interest expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in connection with inverse floater transactions and reverse repurchase agreements. |
(5) |
During the periods indicated above, the Investment Manager waived a portion of its investment management fee. The effect of such waiver relative to the average net assets of common shareholders was 0.10%, 0.17%, 0.24%, 0.24% and 0.24% for the years ended May 31, 2009, May 31, 2008, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2005, respectively. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 45
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Financial Highlights |
For a share of common stock outstanding throughout each year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
$ |
14.79 |
|
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
|
$ |
14.62 |
|
|
$ |
13.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
realized and change in unrealized |
|
|
(4.13 |
) |
|
|
(1.11 |
) |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
(3.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Shares from |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in net assets |
|
|
(3.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Common Shareholders from |
|
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
(0.98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of year |
|
$ |
9.56 |
|
|
|
13.67 |
|
|
$ |
14.79 |
|
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
|
$ |
14.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Market price, end of year |
|
$ |
10.26 |
|
|
$ |
14.42 |
|
|
$ |
15.49 |
|
|
$ |
14.14 |
|
|
$ |
14.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return (1) |
|
|
(22.95 |
)% |
|
|
(1.46 |
)% |
|
|
15.51 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
21.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
applicable to common |
|
$ |
102,126 |
|
|
$ |
145,100 |
|
|
$ |
156,218 |
|
|
$ |
154,088 |
|
|
$ |
152,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Ratio of
expenses to average net assets |
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Ratio of
expenses to average net assets, |
|
|
1.51 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Ratio of
net investment income to average |
|
|
9.63 |
% |
|
|
7.69 |
% |
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
|
7.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred shares asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
57,316 |
|
|
$ |
65,294 |
|
|
$ |
68,386 |
|
|
$ |
67,785 |
|
|
$ |
67,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(1) |
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share of common stock at the current market price on the first day of each period and a sale of a share of common stock at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions or sales charges. |
(2) |
Calculated on the basis of income and expenses applicable to both common and preferred shares relative to the average net assets of common shareholders. |
(3) |
Inclusive of expenses offset by custody credits earned on cash balances at the custodian bank. (See note 1(i) in Notes to Financial Statements). |
(4) |
Interest expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in connection with inverse floater transactions and reverse repurchase agreements. |
(5) |
During the periods indicated above, the Investment Manager waived a portion of its investment management fee. The effect of such waiver relative to the average net assets of common shareholders was 0.10%, 0.17%, 0.24%, 0.24% and 0.24% for the years ended May 31, 2009, May 31, 2008, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2006, May 31, 2005, respectively. |
46 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
|
|
Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of: |
|
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, |
In our opinion, the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets applicable to common shareholders and of cash flows (for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II only) and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (collectively hereafter referred to as the Funds) at May 31, 2009, the results of each of their operations and of cash flows (for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II only) for the year then ended, changes in each of their net assets applicable to common shareholders for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Funds management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at May 31, 2009 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
July 21, 2009
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 47
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
Portfolio
Manager Change/Change |
|
Portfolio Manager Change |
Effective December 11, 2008, Mr. John Cummings assumed primary responsibility for the day-to-day portfolio management of each of the Funds. Mr. Cummings is an Executive Vice President at PIMCO. He joined PIMCO in 2002, and previously was at Goldman Sachs as an institutional trader responsible for a number of municipal sectors including industrials, airlines, utilities, healthcare and high-yield. Mr. Cummings has over 20 years of investment experience and earned an MBA and undergraduate degree from Rutgers University. |
|
Change to the Funds Investment Policies and Related Risks |
Effective April 6, 2009, each Funds investment policy was revised to increase the amount of Inverse Floaters in which each Fund may invest to 15% from 10% of its total assets. The Board of Trustees approved the changes based on the recommendation of the Funds Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser that this limit increase in Inverse Floaters would be in the best interest of the Funds and the Funds shareholders. In addition, this change potentially allows the Funds to earn additional tax-free income. In addition, the use of Inverse Floaters, which results in a form of economic leverage, will allow the Funds to replace or increase leverage to some degree. |
|
In addition to general market risks, the Funds investments in Inverse Floaters may involve greater risk and volatility than an investment in a fixed rate bond, and the value of Inverse Floaters may decrease significantly when market interest rates increase. Inverse Floaters have varying degrees of liquidity, and the market for these securities may be volatile. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when interest rates decline or remain relatively stable. Although volatile, Inverse Floaters typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality, coupon, call provisions and maturity. Trusts in which Inverse Floaters may be held could be terminated due to market, credit or other events beyond the Funds control, which could require a Fund to reduce leverage and dispose of portfolio investments at inopportune times and prices. |
48 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
Tax
Information/Annual Shareholder |
Tax Information:
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, requires the Funds to advise shareholders within 60 days of the Funds tax year ended May 31, 2009 as to the federal tax status of dividends and distributions received by shareholders during such tax year. Accordingly, please note that substantially all dividends paid from net investment income from the Funds during the tax year ended May 31, 2009 were federally exempt interest dividends. However the Funds invested in municipal bonds containing market discount, whose accretion is taxable as well as several taxable bonds. Accordingly, the percentages of distributions (inclusive of return of capital) paid from net investment income during the tax period which are taxable were:
|
|
Municipal Income II |
8.96% |
|
|
California Municipal Income II |
19.34% |
|
|
New York Municipal Income II |
10.31% |
|
Annual Shareholder Meetings Results:
The Funds held their annual meetings of shareholders on December 23, 2008. Common/Preferred shareholders of each Fund voted as indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|||||
Municipal II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Re-election R. Peter Sullivan, Class III to serve until 2011 |
|
48,215,403 |
|
3,828,730 |
|
|
|||||
Re-election John C. Maney**, Class III to serve until 2011 |
|
48,230,919 |
|
3,813,214 |
|
|
|||||
Diana L. Taylor*, Class II to serve until 2010 |
|
15,441 |
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Re-election R. Peter Sullivan, Class III to serve until 2011 |
|
26,123,380 |
|
2,551,859 |
|
|
|||||
Re-election John C. Maney**, Class III to serve until 2011 |
|
26,076,993 |
|
2,598,246 |
|
|
|||||
Diana L. Taylor*, Class II to serve until 2010 |
|
7,956 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Municipal II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Paul Belica, Class III to serve until 2011 |
|
9,500,031 |
|
717,431 |
|
|
|||||
Re-election John C. Maney**, Class III to serve until 2011 |
|
9,497,856 |
|
719,606 |
|
|
|||||
Diana L. Taylor*, Class II to serve until 2010 |
|
3,511 |
|
262 |
|
Messrs. Hans W. Kertess*, Robert E. Connor, William B. Ogden IV and Paul Belica continue to serve as Trustees of the Funds.
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
* |
Preferred Shares Trustee; Diana L. Taylor was appointed to serve as a Preferred Shares Trustee to fill a vacancy resulting from the death of John J. Dalessandro in September 2008. |
|
** |
Mr. Maney is an interested Trustee. |
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 49
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
Privacy
Policy/Proxy Voting Policies & |
|
Privacy Policy: |
|
Our Commitment to You |
We consider customer privacy to be a fundamental aspect of our relationship with clients. We are committed to maintaining the confidentiality, integrity, and security of our current, prospective and former clients personal information. To ensure clients privacy we have developed policies designed to protect this confidentiality, while allowing client needs to be served. |
|
Obtaining Personal Information |
In the course of providing you with products and services, we and certain service providers to the Funds, such as the Funds investment adviser, may obtain non-public personal information about you. This information may come from sources such as account applications and other forms, from other written, electronic or verbal correspondence, from your transactions, from your brokerage or financial advisory firm, financial adviser or consultant, and/or from information captured on our internet web sites. |
|
Respecting Your Privacy |
As a matter of policy, we do not disclose any personal or account information provided by you or gathered by us to non-affiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law or as necessary for third parties to perform their agreements with respect to the Funds. As is common in the industry, non-affiliated companies may from time to time be used to provide certain services, such as preparing and mailing prospectuses, reports, account statements and other information, conducting research on client satisfaction, and gathering shareholder proxies. We may also retain non-affiliated companies to market our products and enter in joint marketing agreements with other companies. These companies may have access to your personal and account information, but are permitted to use the information solely to provide the specific service or as otherwise permitted by law. In most cases, you will be clients of the third party, but we may also provide your personal and account information to your respective brokerage or financial advisory firm and/or to your financial adviser or consultant. |
|
Sharing Information with Third Parties |
We do reserve the right to disclose or report personal information to non-affiliated third parties in limited circumstances where we believe in good faith that disclosure is required under law, to cooperate with regulators or law enforcement authorities, to protect our rights or property, or upon reasonable request by any mutual fund in which you have chosen to invest. In addition, the funds may disclose information about a shareholders accounts to a non-affiliated third party with the consent or upon the request of the shareholder. |
|
Sharing Information with Affiliates |
We may share client information with our affiliates in connection with servicing your account or to provide you with information about products and services that we believe may be of interest to you. The information we share may include, for example, your participation in our mutual funds or other investment programs sponsored by us or our affiliates, your ownership of certain types of accounts (such as IRAs), or other data about your accounts. Our affiliates, in turn, are not permitted to share your information with non-affiliated entities, except as required or permitted by law. |
|
Procedures to Safeguard Private Information |
We take seriously the obligation to safeguard your non-public personal information. In addition to this policy, we have also implemented procedures that are designed to restrict access to a shareholders non-public personal information only to internal personnel who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. In order to guard your non-public personal information, physical, electronic and procedural safeguards are in place. |
Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures: |
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds have adopted to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information about how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the most recent twelve month period ended June 30 is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Funds shareholder servicing agent at (800) 254-5197; (ii) on the Funds website at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds; and (iii) on the Securities and Exchange Commissions website at www.sec.gov. |
50 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Dividend Reinvestment Plan (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Pursuant to the Funds Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the Plan), all Shareholders whose shares are registered in their own names will have all dividends, including any capital gain dividends, reinvested automatically in additional Shares by PNC Global Investment Servicing, as agent for the Shareholders (the Plan Agent), unless the shareholder elects to receive cash. An election to receive cash may be revoked or reinstated at the option of the shareholder. In the case of record shareholders such as banks, brokers or other nominees that hold Shares for others who are the beneficial owners, the Plan Agent will administer the Plan on the basis of the number of Shares certified from time to time by the record shareholder as representing the total amount registered in such shareholders name and held for the account of beneficial owners who are to participate in the Plan. Shareholders whose shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or nominee should contact the bank, broker or nominee for details. All distributions to investors who elect not to participate in the Plan (or whose broker or nominee elects not to participate on the investors behalf), will be paid cash by check mailed, in the case of direct shareholder, to the record holder by PNC Global Investment Servicing, as the Funds dividend disbursement agent.
Unless you elect (or your broker or nominee elects) not to participate in the Plan, the number of Shares you will receive will be determined as follows:
|
|
(1) |
If on the payment date the net asset value of the Shares is equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions that would be incurred upon the purchase of Shares on the open market, the Funds will issue new shares at the greater of (i) the net asset value per Share on the payment date or (ii) 95% of the market price per Share on the payment date; or |
|
|
(2) |
If on the payment date the net asset value of the Shares is greater than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions that would be incurred upon the purchase of Shares on the open market, the Plan Agent will receive the dividend or distribution in cash and will purchase Shares in the open market, on the NYSE or elsewhere, for the participants accounts. It is possible that the market price for the Shares may increase before the Plan Agent has completed its purchases. Therefore, the average purchase price per share paid by the Plan Agent may exceed the market price on the payment date, resulting in the purchase of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid in Shares issued by the Funds. The Plan Agent will use all dividends and distributions received in cash to purchase Shares in the open market on or shortly after the payment date, but in no event later than the ex-dividend date for the next distribution. Interest will not be paid on any uninvested cash payments. |
You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by giving notice to the Plan Agent. If you withdraw or the Plan is terminated, you will receive a certificate for each whole share in your account under the Plan and you will receive a cash payment for any fraction of a share in your account. If you wish, the Plan Agent will sell your shares and send you the proceeds, minus brokerage commissions.
The Plan Agent maintains all shareholders accounts in the Plan and gives written confirmation of all transactions in the accounts, including information you may need for tax records. The Plan Agent will also furnish each person who buys Shares with written instructions detailing the procedures for electing not to participate in the Plan and to instead receive distributions in cash. Shares in your account will be held by the Plan Agent in non-certificated form. Any proxy you receive will include all Shares you have received under the Plan.
There is no brokerage charge for reinvestment of your dividends or distributions in Shares. However, all participants will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred by the Plan Agent when it makes open market purchases.
Automatically reinvested dividends and distributions are taxed in the same manner as cash dividends and distributions.
The Funds and the Plan Agent reserve the right to amend or terminate the Plan. There is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan; however, the Funds reserve the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants. Additional information about the Plan may be obtained from the Funds shareholder servicing agent, PNC Global Investment Servicing, P.O. Box 43027, Providence, RI 02940-3027, telephone number (800) 254-5197.
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 51
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Board of Trustees (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Name, Date of Birth, Position(s) Held
with |
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 years: |
The address of each trustee is 1345
Avenue of the |
|
|
|
|
|
Hans W. Kertess |
|
President, H. Kertess & Co., a financial advisory company. Formerly, Managing Director, Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets. |
|
|
|
Paul Belica |
|
Retired. Formerly Director, Student Loan Finance Corp., Education Loans, Inc., Goal Funding, Inc., Goal Funding II, Inc. and Surety Loan Fund, Inc. Formerly, Manager of Stratigos Fund LLC, Whistler Fund LLC, Xanthus Fund LLC & Wynstone Fund LLC. |
|
|
|
Robert E. Connor |
|
Retired. Formerly, Senior Vice President, Corporate Office, Smith Barney Inc. |
|
|
|
William B. Ogden, IV |
|
Asset Management Industry Consultant. Formerly, Managing Director, Investment Banking Division of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
|
|
|
R. Peter Sullivan III |
|
Retired. Formerly, Managing Partner, Bear Wagner Specialists LLC, specialist firm on the New York Stock Exchange. |
|
|
|
Diana L. Taylor |
|
Managing Director, Wolfensohn & Co., 2007-present. Formerly, Superintendent of Banks, State of New York, 2003-2007. |
52 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Board of Trustees (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Name, Date of Birth, Position(s) Held
with |
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 years: |
John C. Maney |
|
Management Board of Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC; Management Board and Managing Director of Allianz Global Investors of America L.P. since January 2005 and Chief Operating Officer of Allianz Global Investors L.P. since November 2006. |
Mr. Maney is an interested person of the Fund due to his affiliation with Allianz Global Investors of America L.P. In addition to Mr. Maneys positions set forth in the table above, he holds the following positions with affiliated persons: Management Board, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Allianz Global Investors of America L.P., Allianz Global Investors of America LLC and Allianz-Pac Life Partners LLC; Member Board of Directors and Chief Operating Officer of Allianz Global Investors of America Holdings Inc. and Oppenheimer Group, Inc.; Managing Director and Chief Operating Office of Allianz Global Investors NY Holdings LLC; Management Board and Managing Director of Allianz Global Investors U.S. Holding LLC; Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Allianz Hedge Fund Partners Holding L.P. and Allianz Global Investors U.S. Retail LLC; Member Board of Directors and Managing Director of Allianz Global Investors Advertising Agency Inc.; Compensation Committee of NFJ Investment Group LLC; Management Board of Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC, Allianz Global Investors Managed Partners LLC, Nicholas-Applegate Holdings LLC and OpCap Advisors LLC; Member Board of Directors and Chief Operating Officer of PIMCO Global Advisors (Resources) Limited; Executive Vice President of PIMCO Japan Ltd; Chief Operating Officer of Allianz Global Investors U.S. Holding II LLC; and Member and Chairman Board of Directors, President and Chief Operating Officer of PFP Holdings, Inc.
Further information about certain of the Funds Trustees is available in the Funds Statements of Additional Information, dated June 25, 2002, which can be obtained upon request, without charge, by calling the Funds shareholder servicing agent at (800) 254-5197.
5.31.09 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report 53
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Date of Birth, Position(s) Held
with |
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 years: |
Brian S. Shlissel |
|
Executive Vice President, Director of Fund Administration, Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC; President and Chief Executive Officer of 35 funds in the Fund Complex; Treasurer; Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of 46 funds in the Fund Complex and The Korea Fund, Inc. Formerly, Director of 6 funds in the Fund Complex (2002-2009). |
|
|
|
Lawrence G. Altadonna |
|
Senior Vice President, Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC; Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting officer of 35 funds in the Fund Complex; Assistant Treasurer of 44 funds in the Fund Complex and The Korea Fund, Inc. |
|
|
|
Thomas J. Fuccillo |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC and Allianz Global Investors Solutions LLC; Executive Vice President of Allianz Global Investors of America L.P., Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of 79 funds in the Fund Complex. Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of The Korea Fund, Inc. Formerly, Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Neuberger Berman LLC, (1991-2004). |
|
|
|
Scott Whisten |
|
Vice President, Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC; Assistant Treasurer of 79 funds in the Fund Complex. Formerly, Accounting Manager, Prudential Investments (2002-2005). |
|
|
|
Richard J. Cochran |
|
Vice President, Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC, Assistant Treasurer of 79 funds in the Funds Complex. Formerly, Tax Manager, Teacher Insurance Annuity Association/College Retirement Equity Fund (2002-2008). |
|
|
|
Youse E. Guia |
|
Senior Vice President, Group Compliance Manager, Allianz Global Investors of America L.P.; Chief Compliance Officer of 79 funds in the Fund Complex and The Korea Fund, Inc. Formerly, Vice President, Group Compliance Manager, Allianz Global Investors of America L.P. (2002-2004). |
|
|
|
Kathleen A. Chapman |
|
Assistant Secretary of 79 funds in the Fund Complex; Manager IIG Advisory Law, Morgan Stanley (2004-2005); The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Assistant Corporate Secretary of affiliated American Skandia companies (1996-2004). |
|
|
|
Lagan Srivastava |
|
Assistant Secretary of 79 funds in the Fund Complex and The Korea Fund, Inc.; Formerly Research Assistant, Dechert LLP (2004-2005); Research Assistant, Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman LLP (2002-2004). |
Officers hold office at the pleasure of the Board and until their successors are appointed and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.
54 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Annual Report | 5.31.09
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
|
|
Trustees |
Fund Officers |
Hans W. Kertess |
Brian S. Shlissel |
Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
President & Chief Executive Officer |
Paul Belica |
Lawrence G. Altadonna |
Robert E. Connor |
Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
John C. Maney |
Thomas J. Fuccillo |
William B. Ogden, IV |
Vice President, Secretary & Chief Legal Officer |
R. Peter Sullivan III |
Scott Whisten |
Diana L. Taylor |
Assistant Treasurer |
|
Richard J. Cochran |
|
Assistant Treasurer |
|
Youse E. Guia |
|
Chief Compliance Officer |
|
Kathleen A. Chapman |
|
Assistant Secretary |
|
Lagan Srivastava |
|
Assistant Secretary |
|
Investment Manager |
Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC |
1345 Avenue of the Americas |
New York, NY 10105 |
Sub-Adviser |
Pacific Investment Management Company LLC |
840 Newport Center Drive |
Newport Beach, CA 92660 |
Custodian & Accounting Agent |
State Street Bank & Trust Co. |
225 Franklin Street |
Boston, MA 02110 |
Transfer Agent, Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar |
PNC Global Investment Servicing |
P.O. Box 43027 |
Providence, RI 02940-3027 |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
300 Madison Avenue |
New York, NY 10017 |
Legal Counsel |
Ropes & Gray LLP |
One International Place |
Boston, MA 02110-2624 |
|
This report, including the financial information herein, is transmitted to the shareholders of PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO New York Income Fund II for their information. It is not a prospectus, circular or representation intended for use in the purchase of shares of the Funds or any securities mentioned in this report. |
|
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, that from time to time the Funds may purchase shares of their common stock in the open market. |
|
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of their fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds Form N-Qs are available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. The information on Form N-Q is also available on the Funds website at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds. |
|
On January 9, 2009, the Funds submitted CEO annual certifications to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on which the Funds principal executive officer certified that he was not aware, as of the date, of any violation by the Funds of the NYSEs Corporate Governance listing standards. In addition, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, the Funds principal executive and principal financial officer made quarterly certifications, included in filings with the SEC on Forms N-CSR and N-Q relating to, among other things, the Funds disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, as applicable. |
|
Information on the Funds is available at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds or by calling the Funds shareholder servicing agent at (800) 254-5197. |
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS
|
|
(a) |
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics (the Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers) that applies to the registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer; the registrants Principal Financial Officer also serves as the Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-254-5197. The code of ethics are included as an Exhibit 99.CODE ETH hereto. |
|
|
(b) |
During the period covered by this report, there were not any amendments to a provision of the code of ethics adopted in 2(a) above. |
|
|
(c) |
During the period covered by this report, there were not any waivers or implicit waivers to a provision of the code of ethics adopted in 2(a) above. |
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
The registrants Board has determined that Mr. Paul Belica, a member of the Boards Audit Oversight Committee is an audit committee financial expert, and that he is independent, for purposes of this Item.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
|
a) |
Audit fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the Reporting Periods) for professional services rendered by the Registrants principal accountant (the Auditor) for the audit of the Registrants annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $25,352 in 2008 and $26,253 in 2009. |
|
|
b) |
Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit registrants financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (e) of this Item were $15,882 in 2008 and $14,507 in 2009. These services consist of accounting consultations, agreed upon procedure reports (inclusive of annual review of basic maintenance testing associated with the Preferred Shares), attestation reports and comfort letters. |
|
|
c) |
Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax service and tax planning (Tax Services) were $9,667 in 2008 and $10,000 in 2009. These services consisted of review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns and calculation of excise tax distributions. |
|
|
d) |
All Other Fees. There were no other fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor to the Registrant. |
|
|
e) |
1. Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrants Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services by the Auditor for the Registrant, as well as the Auditors engagements related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. The Registrants policy is stated below. |
A-1
|
|
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (the Fund) |
AUDIT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE POLICY FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Funds Audit Oversight Committee (Committee) is charged with the oversight of the Funds financial reporting policies and practices and their internal controls. As part of this responsibility, the Committee must pre-approve any independent accounting firms engagement to render audit and/or permissible non-audit services, as required by law. In evaluating a proposed engagement by the independent accountants, the Committee will assess the effect that the engagement might reasonably be expected to have on the accountants independence. The Committees evaluation will be based on:
|
|
|
a review of the nature of the professional services expected to provided, |
|
|
|
the fees to be charged in connection with the services expected to be provided, |
|
|
|
a review of the safeguards put into place by the accounting firm to safeguard independence, and |
|
|
|
periodic meetings with the accounting firm. |
POLICY FOR AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED TO THE FUND
On an annual basis, the Funds Committee will review and pre-approve the scope of the audit of the Fund and proposed audit fees and permitted non-audit (including audit-related) services that may be performed by the Funds independent accountants. At least annually, the Committee will receive a report of all audit and non-audit services that were rendered in the previous calendar year pursuant to this Policy. In addition to the Committees pre-approval of services pursuant to this Policy, the engagement of the independent accounting firm for any permitted non-audit service provided to the Fund will also require the separate written pre-approval of the President of the Fund, who will confirm, independently, that the accounting firms engagement will not adversely affect the firms independence. All non-audit services performed by the independent accounting firm will be disclosed, as required, in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
AUDIT SERVICES
The categories of audit services and related fees to be reviewed and pre-approved annually by the Committee are:
|
|
|
Annual Fund financial statement audits |
|
Seed audits (related to new product filings, as required) |
|
SEC and regulatory filings and consents |
|
Semiannual financial statement reviews |
AUDIT-RELATED SERVICES
The following categories of audit-related services are considered to be consistent with the role of the Funds independent accountants and services falling under one of these categories will be pre-approved by the Committee on an annual basis if the Committee deems those services to be consistent with the accounting firms independence:
A-2
|
|
|
Accounting consultations |
|
Fund merger support services |
|
Agreed upon procedure reports (inclusive of quarterly review of Basic Maintenance testing associated with issuance of Preferred Shares and semiannual report review) |
|
Other attestation reports |
|
Comfort letters |
|
Other internal control reports |
Individual audit-related services that fall within one of these categories and are not presented to the Committee as part of the annual pre-approval process described above, may be pre-approved, if deemed consistent with the accounting firms independence, by the Committee Chair (or any other Committee member who is a disinterested trustee under the Investment Company Act to whom this responsibility has been delegated) so long as the estimated fee for those services does not exceed $250,000. Any such pre-approval shall be reported to the full Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
TAX SERVICES
The following categories of tax services are considered to be consistent with the role of the Funds independent accountants and services falling under one of these categories will be pre-approved by the Committee on an annual basis if the Committee deems those services to be consistent with the accounting firms independence:
Tax compliance services related to the filing or amendment of the following:
|
|
|
Federal, state and local income tax compliance; and, sales and use tax compliance |
|
Timely RIC qualification reviews |
|
Tax distribution analysis and planning |
|
Tax authority examination services |
|
Tax appeals support services |
|
Accounting methods studies |
|
Fund merger support service |
|
Other tax consulting services and related projects |
Individual tax services that fall within one of these categories and are not presented to the Committee as part of the annual pre-approval process described above, may be pre-approved, if deemed consistent with the accounting firms independence, by the Committee Chairman (or any other Committee member who is a disinterested trustee under the Investment Company Act to whom this responsibility has been delegated) so long as the estimated fee for those services does not exceed $250,000. Any such pre-approval shall be reported to the full Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
PROSCRIBED SERVICES
The Funds independent accountants will not render services in the following categories of non-audit services:
|
|
|
Bookkeeping
or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements
of the Fund |
|
Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports |
|
Actuarial services |
|
Internal audit outsourcing services |
|
Management functions or human resources |
|
Broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services |
|
Legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit |
A-3
Any other service that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible
PRE-APPROVAL OF NON-AUDIT SERVICES PROVIDED TO OTHER ENTITIES WITHIN THE FUND COMPLEX
The Committee will pre-approve annually any permitted non-audit services to be provided to Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC (Formerly, PA Fund Management LLC) or any other investment manager to the Funds (but not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is sub-contracted by the investment manager) (the Investment Manager) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Investment Manager that provides ongoing services to the Fund (including affiliated sub-advisers to the Fund), provided, in each case, that the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund (such entities, including the Investment Manager, shall be referred to herein as the Accounting Affiliates). Individual projects that are not presented to the Committee as part of the annual pre-approval process, may be pre-approved, if deemed consistent with the accounting firms independence, by the Committee Chairman (or any other Committee member who is a disinterested trustee under the Investment Company Act to whom this responsibility has been delegated) so long as the estimated fee for those services does not exceed $250,000. Any such pre-approval shall be reported to the full Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Although the Committee will not pre-approve all services provided to the Investment Manager and its affiliates, the Committee will receive an annual report from the Funds independent accounting firm showing the aggregate fees for all services provided to the Investment Manager and its affiliates.
DE MINIMUS EXCEPTION TO REQUIREMENT OF PRE-APPROVAL OF NON-AUDIT SERVICES
With respect to the provision of permitted non-audit services to a Fund or Accounting Affiliates, the pre-approval requirement is waived if:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The aggregate amount of all such permitted non-audit services provided constitutes no more than (i) with respect to such services provided to the Fund, five percent (5%) of the total amount of revenues paid by the Fund to its independent accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are provided, and (ii) with respect to such services provided to Accounting Affiliates, five percent (5%) of the total amount of revenues paid to the Funds independent accountant by the Fund and the Accounting Affiliates during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Such services were not recognized by the Fund at the time of the engagement for such services to be non-audit services; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the Committee or by the Committee Chairman (or any other Committee member who is a disinterested trustee under the Investment Company Act to whom this Committee Chairman or other delegate shall be reported to the full Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e) |
2. No services were approved pursuant to the procedures contained in paragraph (C) (7) (i) (C) of Rule 2-01 of Registration S-X. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) |
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
g) |
Non-audit fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to |
A-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Registrant, and rendered to the Adviser, for the 2008 Reporting Period was $3,644,060 and the 2009 Reporting Period was $3,424,915. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
h) |
Auditor Independence. The Registrants Audit Oversight Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the Adviser which were not pre- approved is compatible with maintaining the Auditors independence. |
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANT
The Fund has a separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The audit committee of the Fund is comprised of Robert E. Connor, Paul Belica, Hans W. Kertess, R. Peter Sullivan III, William B. Ogden, IV and Diana L. Taylor.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this form.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
PIMCO MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND II
PIMCO CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND II
PIMCO NEW YORK MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND II
(each a Trust)
PROXY VOTING POLICY
|
|
1. |
It is the policy of each Trust that proxies should be voted in the interest of its shareholders, as determined by those who are in the best position to make this determination. Each Trust believes that the firms and/or persons purchasing and selling securities for the Trust and analyzing the performance of a Trusts securities are in the best position and have the information necessary to vote proxies in the best interests of the Trust and its shareholders, including in situations where conflicts of interest may arise between the interests of shareholders, on one hand, and the interests of the investment adviser, a sub-adviser and/or any other affiliated person of the Trust, on the other. Accordingly, each Trusts policy shall be to delegate proxy voting responsibility to those entities with portfolio management responsibility for the Trust. |
|
|
2. |
Each Trust delegates the responsibility for voting proxies to Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC (AGIFM), which will in turn delegate such responsibility to the sub-adviser of the particular Trust. AGIFMs Proxy Voting Policy Summary is attached as Appendix A hereto. A summary of the detailed proxy voting policy of PIMCO, the Trusts current sub-adviser, is set forth in Appendix B attached hereto. Such summary may be revised from time to time to reflect changes to the sub-advisers detailed proxy voting policy. |
|
|
3. |
The party voting the proxies (i.e., the sub-adviser) shall vote such proxies in accordance with such partys proxy voting policies and, to the extent consistent with such policies, may rely on information and/or recommendations supplied by others. |
|
|
4. |
AGIFM and the sub-adviser of each Trust with proxy voting authority shall deliver a copy of its respective proxy voting policies and any material amendments thereto to the applicable Board of the Trust promptly after the adoption or amendment of any such policies. |
|
|
5. |
The party voting the proxy shall: (i) maintain such records and provide such voting information as is required for the Trusts regulatory filings including, without limitation, Form N-PX and the required disclosure of policy called for by Item 18 of Form N-2 and Item 7 of Form N-CSR; and (ii) shall provide such additional |
A-5
|
|
|
information as may be requested, from time to time, by the Board or the Trusts Chief Compliance Officer. |
|
|
6. |
This Proxy Voting Policy Statement (including Appendix B), the Proxy Voting Policy Summary of AGIFM and summary of the detailed proxy voting policy of PIMCO, the sub-adviser of each Trust with proxy voting authority, shall be made available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-254-5197 and (ii) on the Trusts website at www.allianzinvestors.com. In addition, to the extent required by applicable law or determined by the Trusts Chief Compliance Officer or Board of Trustees, the Proxy Voting Policy Summary of AGIFM and summary of the detailed proxy voting policy of PIMCO, the Trusts sub-adviser with proxy voting authority shall also be included in the Trusts Registration Statements or Form N-CSR filings. |
A-6
Appendix A
ALLIANZ GLOBAL INVESTORS FUND MANAGEMENT LLC (AGIFM)
|
|
1. |
It is the policy of AGIFM that proxies should be voted in the interest of the shareholders of the applicable fund, as determined by those who are in the best position to make this determination. AGIFM believes that the firms and/or persons purchasing and selling securities for the funds and analyzing the performance of the funds securities are in the best position and have the information necessary to vote proxies in the best interests of the funds and their shareholders, including in situations where conflicts of interest may arise between the interests of shareholders, on one hand, and the interests of the investment adviser, a sub-adviser and/or any other affiliated person of the fund, on the other. Accordingly, AGIFMs policy shall be to delegate proxy voting responsibility to those entities with portfolio management responsibility for the funds. |
|
|
2. |
AGIFM, for each fund which it acts as an investment adviser, delegates the responsibility for voting proxies to the sub-adviser for the respective fund, subject to the terms hereof. |
|
|
3. |
The party voting the proxies (e.g., the sub-adviser) shall vote such proxies in accordance with such partys proxy voting policies and, to the extent consistent with such policies, may rely on information and/or recommendations supplied by others. |
|
|
4. |
AGIFM and each sub-adviser of a fund shall deliver a copy of its respective proxy voting policies and any material amendments thereto to the board of the relevant fund promptly after the adoption or amendment of any such policies. |
|
|
5. |
The party voting the proxy shall: (i) maintain such records and provide such voting information as is required for such funds regulatory filings including, without limitation, Form N-PX and the required disclosure of policy called for by Item 18 of Form N-2 and Item 7 of Form N-CSR; and (ii) shall provide such additional information as may be requested, from time to time, by such funds respective boards or chief compliance officers. |
|
|
6. |
This Proxy Voting Policy Summary and summaries of the proxy voting policies for each sub-adviser of a fund advised by AGIFM shall be available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-254-5197 and (ii) at www.allianzinvestors.com. In addition, to the extent required by applicable law or determined by the relevant funds board of directors/trustees or chief compliance officer, this Proxy Voting Policy Summary and summaries of the detailed proxy voting policies of each sub-adviser and each other entity with proxy voting authority for a fund advised by AGIFM shall also be included in the Registration Statement or Form N-CSR filings for the relevant fund. |
A-7
Appendix B
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO) has adopted written proxy voting policies and procedures (Proxy Policy) as required by Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. PIMCO has implemented the Proxy Policy for each of its clients as required under applicable law, unless expressly directed by a client in writing to refrain from voting that clients proxies. Recognizing that proxy voting is a rare event in the realm of fixed income investing and is typically limited to solicitation of consent to changes in features of debt securities, the Proxy Policy also applies to any voting rights and/or consent rights of PIMCO, on behalf of its clients, with respect to debt securities, including but not limited to, plans of reorganization, and waivers and consents under applicable indentures.
The Proxy Policy is designed and implemented in a manner reasonably expected to ensure that voting and consent rights are exercised in the best interests of PIMCOs clients. Each proxy is voted on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration any relevant contractual obligations as well as other relevant facts and circumstances at the time of the vote. In general, PIMCO reviews and considers corporate governance issues related to proxy matters and generally supports proposals that foster good corporate governance practices. PIMCO may vote proxies as recommended by management on routine matters related to the operation of the issuer and on matters not expected to have a significant economic impact on the issuer and/or its shareholders.
PIMCO will supervise and periodically review its proxy voting activities and implementation of the Proxy Policy. PIMCO will review each proxy to determine whether there may be a material conflict between PIMCO and its client. If no conflict exists, the proxy will be forwarded to the appropriate portfolio manager for consideration. If a conflict does exist, PIMCO will seek to resolve any such conflict in accordance with the Proxy Policy. PIMCO seeks to resolve any material conflicts of interest by voting in good faith in the best interest of its clients. If a material conflict of interest should arise, PIMCO will seek to resolve such conflict in the clients best interest by pursuing any one of the following courses of action: (i) convening a committee to assess and resolve the conflict; (ii) voting in accordance with the instructions of the client; (iii) voting in accordance with the recommendation of an independent third-party service provider; (iv) suggesting that the client engage another party to determine how the proxy should be voted; (v) delegating the vote to a third-party service provider; or (vi) voting in accordance with the factors discussed in the Proxy Policy.
Clients may obtain a copy of PIMCOs written Proxy Policy and the factors that PIMCO may consider in determining how to vote a clients proxy. Except as required by law, PIMCO will not disclose to third parties how it voted on behalf of a client. However, upon request from an appropriately authorized individual, PIMCO will disclose to its clients or the entity delegating the voting authority to PIMCO for such clients, how PIMCO voted such clients proxy. In addition, a client may obtain copies of PIMCOs Proxy Policy and information as to how its proxies have been voted by contacting PIMCO.
A-8
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
(a)(1)
As of August 6, 2009, the following individual has primary responsibility for the day-to-day implementation of the PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML), PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II (PCK) and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (PNI) (each a Fund and collectively, the Funds):
John S. Cummings
Mr. Cummings has been the portfolio manager for the Fund since December 11, 2008. Mr. Cummings is an executive vice president and head of the municipal bond desk at PIMCO in the Newport Beach office. Prior to joining PIMCO in 2002, he was vice president, municipal trading at Goldman Sachs, responsible for a number of municipal sectors, including industrials, airlines, utilities, healthcare and high-yield. He has 20 years of investment experience and holds an MBA, as well as his undergraduate degree, from Rutgers University.
(a)(2)
The following summarizes information regarding each of the accounts, excluding the respective Fund managed by the Portfolio Manager as of May 31, 2009, including accounts managed by a team, committee, or other group that includes the Portfolio Manager. Unless mentioned otherwise, the advisory fee charged for managing each of the accounts listed below is not based on performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies |
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
Other Accounts |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
PM |
|
Fund |
|
# |
|
AUM($million) |
|
# |
|
AUM($million) |
|
# |
|
AUM($million) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
John S. Cummings |
|
PML |
|
19 |
|
4,759.61 |
|
|
4 |
|
647.28 |
|
|
53 |
|
3,011.68 |
|
|
|
|
PCK |
|
19 |
|
5,268.40 |
|
|
4 |
|
647.28 |
|
|
53 |
|
3,011.68 |
|
|
|
|
PNI |
|
19 |
|
5,483.06 |
|
|
4 |
|
647.28 |
|
|
53 |
|
3,011.68 |
|
|
From time to time, potential conflicts of interest may arise between a portfolio managers management of the investments of a fund, on the one hand, and the management of other accounts, on the other. The other accounts might have similar investment objectives or strategies as the funds, track the same index a fund tracks or otherwise hold, purchase, or sell securities that are eligible to be held, purchased or sold by the funds. The other accounts might also have different investment objectives or strategies than the funds.
Knowledge and Timing of Fund Trades. A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the portfolio managers day-to-day management of a fund. Because of their positions with the funds, the portfolio managers know the size, timing and possible market impact of a funds trades. It is theoretically possible that the portfolio managers could use this information to the advantage of other accounts they manage and to the possible detriment of a fund.
Investment Opportunities. A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the portfolio managers management of a number of accounts with varying investment guidelines. Often, an investment opportunity may be suitable for both a fund and other accounts managed by the portfolio manager, but may not be available in sufficient quantities for both the fund and the other
A-9
accounts to participate fully. Similarly, there may be limited opportunity to sell an investment held by a fund and another account. PIMCO has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities on a fair and equitable basis over time.
Under PIMCOs allocation procedures, investment opportunities are allocated among various investment strategies based on individual account investment guidelines and PIMCOs investment outlook. PIMCO has also adopted additional procedures to complement the general trade allocation policy that are designed to address potential conflicts of interest due to the side-by-side management of the funds and certain pooled investment vehicles, including investment opportunity allocation issues.
Performance Fees. A portfolio manager may advise certain accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based entirely or partially on performance. Performance fee arrangements may create a conflict of interest for the portfolio manager in that the portfolio manager may have an incentive to allocate the investment opportunities that he or she believes might be the most profitable to such other accounts instead of allocating them to a fund. PIMCO has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities between the funds and such other accounts on a fair and equitable basis over time.
(a) (3)
As of May 31, 2009, the following explains the compensation structure of the individual that shares primary responsibility for day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds:
PIMCO has adopted a Total Compensation Plan for its professional level employees, including its portfolio managers, that is designed to pay competitive compensation and reward performance, integrity and teamwork consistent with the firms mission statement. The Total Compensation Plan includes a significant incentive component that rewards high performance standards, work ethic and consistent individual and team contributions to the firm. The compensation of portfolio managers consists of a base salary, a bonus, and may include a retention bonus. Portfolio managers who are Managing Directors of PIMCO also receive compensation from PIMCOs profits. Certain employees of PIMCO, including portfolio managers, may elect to defer compensation through PIMCOs deferred compensation plan. PIMCO also offers its employees a non-contributory defined contribution plan through which PIMCO makes a contribution based on the employees compensation. PIMCOs contribution rate increases at a specified compensation level, which is a level that would include portfolio managers.
Salary and Bonus. Base salaries are determined by considering an individual portfolio managers experience and expertise and may be reviewed for adjustment annually. Portfolio managers are entitled to receive bonuses, which may be significantly more than their base salary, upon attaining certain performance objectives based on predetermined measures of group or department success. These goals are specific to individual portfolio managers and are mutually agreed upon annually by each portfolio manager and his or her manager. Achievement of these goals is an important, but not exclusive, element of the bonus decision process.
In addition, the following non-exclusive list of qualitative criteria (collectively, the Bonus Factors) may be considered when determining the bonus for portfolio managers:
|
|
|
|
|
3-year, 2-year and 1-year dollar-weighted and account-weighted, pre-tax investment performance as judged |
A-10
|
|
|
|
|
against the applicable benchmarks for each account managed by a portfolio manager (including the funds) and relative to applicable industry peer groups; |
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriate risk positioning that is consistent with PIMCOs investment philosophy and the Investment Committee/CIO approach to the generation of alpha; |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and nature of assets managed by the portfolio manager; |
|
|
|
|
|
Consistency of investment performance across portfolios of similar mandate and guidelines (reward low dispersion); |
|
|
|
|
|
Generation and contribution of investment ideas in the context of PIMCOs secular and cyclical forums, portfolio strategy meetings, Investment Committee meetings, and on a day-to-day basis; |
|
|
|
|
|
Absence of defaults and price defaults for issues in the portfolios managed by the portfolio manager; |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to asset retention, gathering and client satisfaction; |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to mentoring, coaching and/or supervising; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Personal growth and skills added. |
A portfolio managers compensation is not based directly on the performance of any fund or any other account managed by that portfolio manager. Final bonus award amounts are determined by the PIMCO Compensation Committee.
Investment professionals, including portfolio managers, are eligible to participate in a Long Term Cash Bonus Plan (Cash Bonus Plan), which provides cash awards that appreciate or depreciate based upon the performance of PIMCOs parent company, Allianz Global Investors, and PIMCO over a three-year period. The aggregate amount available for distribution to participants is based upon Allianz Global Investors profit growth and PIMCOs profit growth. Participation in the Cash Bonus Plan is based upon the Bonus Factors, and the payment of benefits from the Cash Bonus Plan, is contingent upon continued employment at PIMCO.
Key employees of PIMCO, including certain Managing Directors, Executive Vice Presidents, and Senior Vice Presidents, are eligible to participate in the PIMCO Class M Unit Equity Participation Plan, a long-term equity plan. The Class M Unit Equity Participation Plan grants options on PIMCO equity that vest in years three, four and five. Upon vesting, the options will convert into PIMCO M Units, which are non-voting common equity of PIMCO. M Units pay out quarterly distributions equal to a pro-rata share of PIMCOs net profits. There is no assured liquidity and they may remain outstanding perpetually.
Profit Sharing Plan. Instead of a bonus, portfolio managers who are Managing Directors of PIMCO receive compensation from a non-qualified profit sharing plan consisting of a portion of PIMCOs net profits. Portfolio managers who are Managing Directors receive an amount determined by the Partner Compensation Committee, based upon an individuals overall contribution to the firm and the Bonus Factors. Under his employment agreement, William Gross receives a fixed percentage of the profit sharing plan.
Allianz Transaction Related Compensation. In May 2000, a majority interest in the predecessor holding company of PIMCO was acquired by a subsidiary of Allianz AG (currently known as Allianz SE) (Allianz). In connection with the transaction, Mr. Gross received a grant of restricted stock of Allianz, the last of which vested on May 5, 2005.
Portfolio managers who are Managing Directors also have long-term employment contracts, which guarantee severance payments in the event of involuntary termination of a Managing Directors employment with PIMCO.
A-11
(a)(4)
The following summarizes the dollar range of securities the portfolio manager for the Funds beneficially owned of the Funds that he managed as of May 31, 2009.
|
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II |
||
|
||
|
|
|
Portfolio Manager |
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Fund |
|
|
|
John S. Cummings |
|
None |
A-12
ITEM 9.
Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Companies
None
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Funds Board of Trustees since the Fund last provided disclosure in response to this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) The registrants President and Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer, Principal Financial Accounting Officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-2(c) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))), as amended are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this document.
(b) There were no significant changes over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d))) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS
(a) (1) Exhibit 99.CODE ETH - Code of Ethics
(a) (2) Exhibit 99 Cert. - Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(b) Exhibit 99.906 Cert. - Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
A-13
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Brian S. Shlissel |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
||
|
||
Date |
August 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Lawrence G. Altadonna |
|
|
|
|
Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
||
|
||
Date |
August 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
||
|
||
By |
/s/ Brian S. Shlissel |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
||
|
||
Date |
August 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Lawrence G. Altadonna |
|
|
|
|
Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
||
|
||
Date |
August 6, 2009 |
|
|
|