|
UNITED STATES
|
|||
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|||
|
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Filed by the Registrant ý
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Check the appropriate box:
|
|||
|
o
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
||
|
o
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
||
|
ý
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
||
|
o
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
||
|
o
|
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
|
||
|
|
|||
|
HNI CORPORATION
|
|||
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|||
|
ý
|
No fee required.
|
||
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
||
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
||
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
||
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HNI CORPORATION
408 EAST SECOND STREET
MUSCATINE, IOWA 52761
563-272-7400
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
The 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of HNI Corporation will be held at Allsteel Corporate Headquarters, 2210 Second Avenue, Muscatine, Iowa, on Tuesday, May 6, 2014, beginning at 10:30 a.m. (Central Daylight Time), for the purposes of:
|
1.
|
Electing four Directors for a term of three years each or until their successors are elected and qualified;
|
|
2.
|
Ratifying the Audit Committee's selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporation's independent registered public accountant for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2015;
|
|
3.
|
Holding an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation; and
|
|
4.
|
Transacting any other business properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
|
The holders of record of HNI Corporation common stock, par value $1.00 per share, as of the close of business on March 7, 2014, are entitled to vote at the meeting.
You are encouraged to attend the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Steven M. Bradford
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
March 21, 2014
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE PREPAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE USING THE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET VOTING PROCEDURES DESCRIBED ON THE PROXY CARD, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING. IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD IN THE NAME OF A BANK, BROKER OR OTHER HOLDER OF RECORD, TELEPHONE OR INTERNET VOTING WILL BE AVAILABLE TO YOU ONLY IF OFFERED BY THEM. THEIR PROCEDURES SHOULD BE DESCRIBED ON THE VOTING FORM THEY SEND TO YOU.
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
||
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
||
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
16
|
||
|
16
|
||
|
33
|
||
|
33
|
||
|
34
|
||
|
35
|
||
|
36
|
||
|
37
|
||
|
|
38
|
|
|
44
|
||
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
49
|
||
HNI Corporation
408 East Second Street
Muscatine, Iowa 52761
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 6, 2014
HNI Corporation (the "Corporation," "we," "our" or "us") is mailing this Proxy Statement, with the accompanying proxy card, to you on or about March 21, 2014, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Corporation's Board of Directors (the "Board" or "Directors") for the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting (the "Meeting"). The Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 6, 2014, beginning at 10:30 a.m., Central Daylight Time, at Allsteel Corporate Headquarters, 2210 Second Avenue, Muscatine, Iowa.
Who can attend and vote at the Meeting?
Shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 7, 2014 (the "Record Date") are entitled to attend and vote at the Meeting. Each share of the Corporation's common stock, par value $1.00 per share ("Common Stock"), is entitled to one vote on all matters to be voted on at the Meeting and can be voted only if the shareholder of record is present to vote or is represented by proxy. The proxy card provided with this Proxy Statement indicates the number of shares of Common Stock you own and are entitled to vote at the Meeting.
What constitutes a quorum at the Meeting?
The presence at the Meeting, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock ("Outstanding Shares") on the Record Date will constitute a quorum for purposes of the Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 45,136,989 Outstanding Shares. For purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, proxies received but marked "abstain" and so-called "broker non-votes" (described on the following page) will be counted as present.
What will I be voting on?
|
·
|
Election of each of the four nominees for Director named on page 5 of this Proxy Statement under "Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors."
|
|
·
|
Ratification of the Audit Committee's selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporation's independent registered public accountant for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2015 ("Fiscal 2014"), as described on page 15 of this Proxy Statement under "Proposal No. 2 – Ratification of Audit Committee's Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporation's Independent Registered Public Accountant for Fiscal 2014."
|
|
·
|
Adoption of an advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers as described on page 44 of this Proxy Statement under "Proposal No. 3 – Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation."
|
How do I vote?
We urge you to vote by "proxy" (one of the individuals named on your proxy card will vote your shares as you have directed) even if you plan to attend the Meeting so we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present for us to hold the Meeting. Follow the instructions on your enclosed proxy card. Telephone and internet voting is available to all registered and most beneficial holders.
Shareholders voting by proxy may use one of the following three options:
|
·
|
Fill out the enclosed proxy card, sign it and mail it in the enclosed, postage-paid envelope;
|
|
·
|
Vote by internet (if available, instructions are on the proxy card); or
|
|
·
|
Vote by telephone (if available, instructions are on the proxy card).
|
If your shares of Common Stock are held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, trustee or other nominee (such as a bank) in "street name," rather than held directly in your name, please refer to the information provided by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which options are available to you.
The telephone and internet voting facilities for shareholders will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 5, 2014. If you vote by mail, you should mail your signed proxy card sufficiently in advance for it to be received by May 5, 2014.
If you hold shares through the Corporation's retirement plan, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 1, 2014, or the shares represented by the card will not be voted.
If you sign, date and return the proxy card but do not specify how your shares are to be voted, then your proxy will vote your shares "FOR" all proposals, including "FOR" the election of each nominee for Director, and in your proxy's discretion as to any other business which may properly come before the Meeting.
How do I vote if my shares of Common Stock are held in "street name"?
You will need to instruct your broker, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares. Since a beneficial owner is not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Meeting unless you obtain a "legal proxy" from the broker, trustee or other nominee holding your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Meeting. Your broker, trustee or other nominee has enclosed with this Proxy Statement, or will provide upon request, voting instructions for you to use in directing the broker, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares.
What discretion does my broker, trustee or other nominee have to vote my shares of Common Stock held in "street name"?
A broker, trustee or other nominee holding your shares of Common Stock in "street name" must vote those shares according to specific instructions it receives from you. New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules determine the proposals ("Non-Routine Proposals") on which brokers may not vote without specific instructions from you. Your shares will not be voted on any Non-Routine Proposal if you do not provide voting instructions, giving rise to what is called a "broker non-vote." Shares represented by broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum.
It is important, if you hold shares in "street name," you provide specific voting instructions to your broker, trustee or other nominee or your shares will not be voted with respect to Proposals No. 1 and 3 because they are Non-Routine Proposals for which your broker, trustee or other nominee may not vote your shares in its discretion.
Can I change or revoke my vote or revoke my proxy?
Yes. You may change your vote at any time before the proxy is voted at the Meeting. For shareholders of record, if you voted your proxy card by mail, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by executing and delivering a timely and valid later-dated proxy, by voting by ballot at the Meeting or by giving written notice to the Secretary. If you voted via the internet or by telephone you may also change your vote with a timely and valid later-dated internet or telephone vote, as the case may be, or by voting by ballot at the Meeting. Attendance at the Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless (a) you give proper written notice of revocation to the Secretary before the proxy is exercised or (b) you vote by ballot at the Meeting. Once voting is completed at the Meeting, you will not be able to revoke your proxy or change your vote. Unless your proxy is revoked or changed, the shares of Common Stock represented by your proxy received by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge") will be voted at the Meeting.
If your shares are held in "street name," you must follow the specific voting directions provided to you by your broker, trustee or other nominee to change or revoke any instructions you have already provided.
How do I vote my shares in the Corporation's retirement plan?
If you participate in the Corporation's retirement plan, the proxy card you receive will also include Common Stock allocated to your account. Properly completed and signed proxy cards, including telephone and internet voting, will serve to instruct the plan trustee on how to vote any shares allocated to your account and a portion of all shares as to which no instructions have been received (the "undirected shares") from plan participants. The proportion of the undirected shares to which your
instructions will apply will be equal to the proportion of the shares to which the trustee receives instructions represented by your shares.
How is the Corporation soliciting proxies?
The Corporation bears the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy materials related to the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Board for the Meeting. In addition to the use of the mail, certain of the Corporation's officers may, without additional compensation, solicit proxies in person, by telephone or through other means of communication. The Corporation will bear the cost of this solicitation.
How will my vote get counted?
Broadridge will use an automated system to tabulate the votes and will serve as the Inspector of Election.
Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations identifying individual shareholders are handled in a manner to protect your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Corporation or to third parties, except:
|
·
|
as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements;
|
|
·
|
to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote; and
|
|
·
|
to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.
|
Occasionally, shareholders provide written comments on their proxy cards, which are then forwarded to the Corporation's management.
How do I get to the Meeting location?
The Meeting will be held at Allsteel Corporate Headquarters, 2210 Second Avenue, Muscatine, Iowa. If driving to the Meeting from the Quad City International Airport, from the main exit traffic light go straight onto I-74 to I-280, turn right (cloverleaf) onto I-280 West, drive approximately 10-12 miles crossing the Mississippi River Bridge, take the second exit in Iowa (Exit 6 – Muscatine), at the traffic light turn left (west) onto Highway 61 South, continue approximately 22 miles to Muscatine, continue on Hwy 61 bypass, turn left (south) at traffic light on Second Avenue, Allsteel Corporate Headquarters is approximately two blocks on the right. If driving to the Meeting on I-80, take Exit 271 (Highway 38 South), drive approximately 12 miles to Highway 61, turn right (west) at the traffic light, turn left (south) at next traffic light on Second Avenue, Allsteel Corporate Headquarters is approximately two blocks on the right.
What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?
You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares in "street name." If you are a shareholder
of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card you receive.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") has adopted rules permitting delivery of a single annual report to security holders and/or proxy statement to any household at which two or more shareholders reside, whom the Corporation believes to be members of the same family. If you wish to participate in this program and receive only one copy of future annual reports and/or proxy statements, please write to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Your consent to receive only one copy of the annual report and/or proxy statement will remain in effect until Broadridge receives a written revocation notice from you, in which case the Corporation will begin sending individual copies within 30 days. The Corporation will continue to separately mail a proxy card for each registered shareholder account. The Corporation will promptly deliver separate copies of its annual report and/or proxy statement upon request. Shareholders may request copies by writing to the Corporate Secretary at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761, or calling the Corporation at 563-272-7590.
Did the Corporation utilize the SEC's notice and access proxy rules for delivery of the voting materials this year?
No. The Corporation delivered its voting materials in the same manner as it has in the past. However, many shareholders have previously consented to receive electronic delivery of the proxy statement and annual report to security holders and therefore did not receive hard copies of these materials.
Why is the Corporation asking shareholders to approve, on a non-binding and advisory basis, named executive officer compensation again this year?
The Corporation is asking shareholders to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO"), Chief Financial Officer (the "CFO") and three other most highly compensated executives (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"), as disclosed below under "Executive Compensation" beginning on page 16 of this Proxy Statement. The Corporation's shareholders expressed a preference for, and the Board recommended, holding an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation every year. The Board recommends shareholders vote "FOR" the resolution approving the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.
Where can I find the voting results of the Meeting?
The Corporation intends to announce preliminary voting results at the Meeting and will publish final results on a Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Meeting and available on the Corporation's website.
The Proxy Statement and annual report to security holders are available at http://www.hnicorp.com/proxy.
The Corporation provides its annual reports, notices to shareholders of the annual meeting and proxy statements over the internet. If you wish to give your consent to access such documents in the future over the internet rather than receiving paper copies in the mail, please follow the instructions on your proxy card. These documents will be available on or about March 21, 2014, at http://www.hnicorp.com/proxy. Once you give your consent, it will remain in effect until you notify the Corporation you wish to resume mail delivery of the annual reports and proxy statements. Even though you give your consent, you still have the right at any time to request copies of these documents at no charge by writing to the Corporate Secretary at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761, or calling the Corporation at 563-272-7590.
The By-laws of HNI Corporation (the "By-laws") currently provide for ten Directors and the Board currently consists of ten Directors. Nine of the ten Directors are independent Directors as further discussed on page 8 of this Proxy Statement under "Information Regarding the Board – Director Independence." Stan A. Askren, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, is the only Director currently employed by the Corporation and is not independent under the NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence or the Corporation's categorical independence standards for Directors (the "Categorical Standards").
The Board is divided into three classes. Generally, one class is elected each year for a term of three years. The Board has nominated four Director candidates each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Corporation's 2017 annual meeting of shareholders.
Director Nominations
The Board has adopted guidelines for identifying and evaluating candidates for Director. Under those guidelines, the Corporation's Public Policy and Corporate Governance Committee (the "Governance Committee") takes into account a number of factors when identifying potential nominees, including: possession of the desired skills, experience and abilities identified by the Governance Committee; ability to communicate ideas and contribute to Board deliberations; independence from management; diversity; judgment, skill, integrity and reputation; existing commitments to other businesses; potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits; and legal restraints. Although the Corporation has no specific policy on diversity, the guidelines broadly define diversity to include factors such as age, race, gender, education, ethnicity, career experience and personality; understanding of and experiences in manufacturing, technology, finance and marketing; and international experience and culture. The Governance Committee reviews these factors and others considered useful by the Governance Committee in context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board from time to time. The Governance Committee may use a variety of means to identify potential nominees, including recommendations from the Chairman, Directors or others associated with the Corporation. The Governance Committee may also retain third-party search firms to identify potential nominees based on the Corporation's established criteria for director candidates discussed above. The Governance Committee screens the potential candidates and eventually recommends suitable candidates to the Board for nomination.
The Governance Committee will consider candidates for Director recommended by shareholders by applying the criteria for candidates described above and considering the following additional information. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate for nomination by the Corporation as Director for inclusion in the Corporation's proxy statement for the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders ("2015 Annual Meeting") should write to the Corporation's Corporate Secretary before October 1, 2014, and include the following information: a statement that the writer is a shareholder and is recommending a candidate for Director; the name of and contact information for the candidate; a statement of the candidate's business and educational experience; information about each of the factors listed above, sufficient to enable the Governance Committee to evaluate the candidate; a statement detailing any relationship between the candidate and any customer, supplier or competitor of the Corporation; detailed information about any relationship or understanding between the writer or any other shareholder and the candidate; a statement whether such person, if elected, intends to tender, promptly following such person's election or re-election, an irrevocable resignation effective 90 days after the date of certification of election results if the person fails to receive the required vote for re-election at the next meeting at which such person would face re-election; and a statement the candidate is willing to be considered and will serve as a Director if nominated and elected.
The Corporation does not have any minimum qualifications for Directors; however, Directors should possess the highest personal and professional integrity and ethics and be willing and able to devote the required time to the Corporation. The Board believes it should be comprised of Directors with varied and complimentary backgrounds, which together build the overall strength of the Board.
Nominees for Election
The Board is nominating for election at the Meeting Miguel M. Calado, Cheryl A. Francis, Larry B. Porcellato and Brian E. Stern, each for a term of three years (collectively, the "Nominees"). The Nominees elected as Directors at the Meeting will hold office for the indicated term or until their respective successors are elected and qualified, subject to their prior death, resignation or removal.
Ms. Francis and Messrs. Calado, Porcellato and Stern were most recently elected as Directors at the Corporation's 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. Below is biographical information about each Nominee as well as the particular experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills of each Nominee which led the Board to conclude the Nominee should serve as a Director in light of the Corporation's business and structure. In addition, each Nominee must possess the highest personal and professional integrity and ethics and a willingness and ability to devote the required time to the Corporation. The Board has determined each Nominee possesses these qualities. For a detailed description of the Corporation's business and structure, please see Item 1 of Part I of the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013.
Miguel M. Calado, age 58, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2004. Mr. Calado has been a Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Hovione SA, an international fine chemicals company with manufacturing facilities and offices in the United States, Europe and Asia, since 2006. He has been an advising partner of The Trion Group, a strategic management consulting group based in Dallas, Texas, since 2006 and President of GAMCAL, LLC, an investment company, since 2006. He also serves as a member of the Advisory Board for the Business School of Catholic University of Portugal. Mr. Calado brings to the Board extensive international, general management, manufacturing and financial expertise derived primarily from his current service as Chief Financial Officer of an international manufacturing company and prior service in various roles at several large, packaged and consumer goods public companies. Such roles and companies include Executive Vice President and President, International for Dean Foods Company and several international finance roles for PepsiCo, Inc., including Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, PepsiCo Foods International. Although Mr. Calado does not currently serve on the Corporation's Audit Committee, he qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert."
Cheryl A. Francis, age 60, has been a Director of the Corporation since 1999. Ms. Francis has been an independent business and financial advisor since 2000 and the Co-Chairman of the Corporate Leadership Center, a not-for-profit organization focused on developing tomorrow's business leaders, since 2008. Previously, from 2002 to 2008, she was the Vice Chairman of the Corporate Leadership Center. Ms. Francis is a director of Aon Corporation, the leading global provider of risk management services, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, and human resources solutions and outsourcing, and Morningstar, Inc., a leading provider of independent investment research in North America, Europe, Australia and Asia. Ms. Francis brings to the Board significant financial expertise based primarily on her prior role as Chief Financial Officer of R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company and service on the audit and finance committees of other public companies. She also brings to the Board corporate governance experience through her service on the compensation and governance committees of other public companies. She currently serves on the Corporation's Audit Committee and qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert."
Larry B. Porcellato, age 55, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2004. Mr. Porcellato has been the Chief Executive Officer of The Homax Group, Inc. (Homax), a leading specialty application consumer products supplier to the home care and repair markets, since January 2009. Previously, from February 2007 to December 2008, he was an independent business consultant and, from 2002 to January 2007, he was the Chief Executive Officer of ICI Paints North America (ICI Paints), a manufacturer and distributor of decorative coatings and a subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC. Mr. Porcellato is a director of OMNOVA Solutions, Inc., an innovator of emulsion polymers, specialty chemicals and decorative and functional surfaces for a variety of commercial, industrial and residential end uses. Mr. Porcellato brings to the Board chief executive officer experience in the building products industry through his current leadership of Homax and his former role as Chief Executive Officer of ICI Paints and financial expertise derived primarily from his service on the audit committee of another public company and previous finance and division leadership roles at other public companies. He also brings to the Board international and marketing expertise derived primarily from his service in various international and marketing roles at Rubbermaid Incorporated and Braun Canada Inc. and corporate governance experience through his service on the compensation and governance committees of another public company.
Brian E. Stern, age 66, has been a Director of the Corporation since 1998. From May 2008 to May 2011, he served as Lead Director of the Board. Mr. Stern has been a director of Starboard Capital Partners, LLC, a financial sponsor that initiates, finances and partners with management and private equity investors in the acquisition of companies, since July 2007. He is a director and investor in two private companies, Electronic Systems Protection Inc. (ESP) (North Carolina) and Blackrock Microsystems LLC (Utah). Previously, from 2004 to June 2007, Mr. Stern was the Senior Vice President, Xerox, Fuji Xerox Operations of Xerox Corporation (Xerox), a developer, marketer, manufacturer, financier and servicer of document processing products and services. Mr. Stern brings to the Board significant knowledge of the office products and office supplies industry and expertise in product development, sales and marketing derived primarily from his service in various roles for Xerox. He also has substantial experience in international operations, manufacturing, channels of distribution and general management, also based primarily on his service at Xerox.
The Corporation has no reason to believe any Nominee listed above will be unavailable to serve if elected. However, if any one of them becomes unavailable, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute chosen by the Board. Any vacancies not filled at the Meeting may be filled by the Board.
Required Vote
Election of the Nominees as Directors requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Outstanding Shares voted at the Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining whether this Proposal has received sufficient votes for approval.
Recommendation of the Board
|
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES AS DIRECTORS.
|
Below is biographical information about each of the incumbent Directors as well as the particular experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills of each Director which led the Board to conclude the Director should serve as a Director in light of the Corporation's business and structure. In addition, each Director must possess the highest personal and professional integrity and ethics and a willingness and ability to devote the required time to the Corporation. The Board has determined each Director possesses these qualities. For a detailed description of the Corporation's business and structure, please see Item 1 of Part I of the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 28, 2013.
Ms. Bell and Messrs. Askren and Waters comprise a class of Directors whose terms will expire at the Corporation's 2015 Annual Meeting.
Stan A. Askren, age 53, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2003. Mr. Askren has also been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since 2004 and the President of the Corporation since 2003. He is a director of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., a global leader in the design and manufacture of floors and ceiling systems and Arctic Cat Inc., a designer, engineer, manufacturer and marketer of snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles and off-road vehicles. Mr. Askren brings to the Board extensive experience and knowledge of the Corporation's business, operations and culture. He has worked for the Corporation for 21 years. Mr. Askren was vice president of marketing, an executive vice president and president of the Corporation's hearth products operating segment. He worked in the Corporation's office furniture operating segment as a group vice president of The HON Company and president of Allsteel Inc. Mr. Askren has served as the vice president of human resources and an executive vice president of the Corporation. Mr. Askren also brings to the Board finance and corporate governance experience through his service on the audit and compensation committees of other public companies.
Mary H. Bell, age 53, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2006. Ms. Bell is a Vice President of Caterpillar, the world's leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, industrial gas turbines and diesel-electric locomotives. She has led Caterpillar's Building Construction Products Division since 2008. From 2004-2007, she was the Vice President of Caterpillar's Logistics Division and served as Chairman and President of Cat Logistics Services, Inc., formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar. Ms. Bell brings to the Board considerable logistics, manufacturing and dealer channel expertise and general management experience derived primarily from her service in various roles at Caterpillar.
Ronald V. Waters, III, age 62, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2002 and the Lead Director of the Board since May 2011. Mr. Waters has been an independent business consultant since May 2010. Previously, from 2009 to May 2010, he was a Director and the President and Chief Executive Officer of LoJack Corporation (LoJack), a premier worldwide marketer of wireless tracking and recovery systems for valuable mobile assets and a leader in global stolen vehicle recovery, and, from 2007 to 2008, he was a Director and the President and Chief Operating Officer of LoJack. He is a director of Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc., an industry-leading home and security products company; Chiquita Brands International, Inc., a leading international marketer and distributor of high-quality fresh and value-added food products – from energy-rich bananas and other fruits to nutritious blends of convenient green salads; and Paylocity Corporation, a leading software provider of cloud-based payroll and human capital management software. Mr. Waters brings to the Board chief executive officer experience through his
former role as Chief Executive Officer of LoJack and significant finance expertise derived primarily from his service on the audit committee of two other public companies and previous roles as Chief Operating Officer at two public companies, Chief Financial Officer at Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company, Controller at The Gillette Company and partner of a large public accounting firm. He has extensive outside audit experience, and although Mr. Waters does not currently serve on the Corporation's Audit Committee, he qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert." Mr. Waters also brings to the Board international, law and information technology expertise derived primarily from his service in various roles at several large public companies.
Ms. Smith and Messrs. Jenkins and Martin comprise a class of Directors whose terms will expire at the Corporation's 2016 annual meeting of shareholders.
James R. Jenkins, age 68, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2005. Mr. Jenkins is a retired Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Deere & Company (John Deere), a world leader in providing advanced products and services to customers whose work is linked to the land—those who cultivate, harvest, transform, enrich and build upon the land to meet the world's dramatically increasing need for food, fuel, shelter and infrastructure. He held that position from March 2000 to January 2013. In addition, Mr. Jenkins currently serves as a director of various non-profit organizations. Mr. Jenkins brings to the Board significant legal, business, risk management, public company reporting, and corporate governance expertise and experience derived primarily from his former position as Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Deere and his prior service as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Dow Corning Corporation.
Dennis J. Martin, age 63, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2000. Mr. Martin has been the President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2010 and a Director since 2008 of Federal Signal Corporation (Federal Signal), a leading global designer and manufacturer of products and total solutions serving municipal, governmental, industrial and institutional customers. Previously, from 2005 to November 2010, he was Vice President of BD Martin Group LLC, a management consulting company. From 2008 through its recent merger in February 2014, Mr. Martin was a director of Coleman Cable, Inc., a manufacturer and innovator of electrical and electronic wire and cable products. Mr. Martin brings to the Board chief executive officer experience through his current leadership of Federal Signal and former role as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of General Binding Corporation and considerable sales, marketing and operations expertise in office products and diversified industrial manufacturing companies. He is considered a lean business expert. Mr. Martin also brings to the Board finance and corporate governance experience through his service on the audit, finance and compensation committees of another public company.
Abbie J. Smith, age 60, has been a Director of the Corporation since 2000. Ms. Smith is the Boris and Irene Stern Distinguished Service Professor of Accounting, and since 1999 has been a Chaired Professor, of The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, a national leader in higher education and research. She is a director of DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., Dimensional Investment Group Inc. and Ryder System, Inc., a commercial transportation, logistics and supply chain management solutions company. Ms. Smith is also a trustee of The UBS Funds (Chicago), UBS Relations Trust, UBS SMA Relationship Trust and Fort Dearborn Income Securities, Inc. Ms. Smith brings to the Board considerable financial and corporate governance expertise based primarily on her extensive research and teaching at the University of Chicago and her service on mutual fund complex and other public company audit, performance, finance and nominating committees. Although Ms. Smith does not currently serve on the Corporation's Audit Committee, she qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert."
Director Independence
In addition to complying with NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence, the Corporation adopted the Categorical Standards, which are attached as Exhibit A to the Governance Guidelines and available on the Corporation's website at www.hnicorp.com, under "Corporate Governance – Governance Guidelines." Under the Categorical Standards, the following relationships will not, in and of themselves, be considered material relationships, unless otherwise expressly provided for, under the NYSE listing standards:
|
·
|
contributions or payments (including the provision of goods and services) by the Corporation to a charitable organization (including a foundation), a university or other not-for-profit organization in which a Director or a Director's immediate family member is a director, trustee, officer or employee, unless the contribution or payment (excluding matching gifts) was:
|
|
o
|
made to an entity for which the Director or the Director's spouse currently serves as a director, trustee or officer and he or she served in such position at the time of the contribution or payment;
|
|
o
|
made within the three fiscal years preceding the date of any determination; and
|
|
o
|
in an amount exceeding the greater of $1,000,000 or two percent of the charitable organization's aggregate annual charitable receipts during the organization's last completed fiscal year prior to the date of the contribution or payment; and
|
|
·
|
other business relationships between a Director or a Director's immediate family member and the Corporation, such as a purchase by the Corporation of products or services, including consulting, legal or financial advisory services, unless:
|
|
o
|
the Director or the Director's spouse is a partner, officer or ten percent owner of a company or firm providing such products or services, and he or she held such position at any time within the 12 months preceding the date of any determination;
|
|
o
|
the products or services were provided within the three fiscal years preceding the date of any determination; and
|
|
o
|
the products or services provided during any 12-month period were in an aggregate amount exceeding the greater of $1,000,000 or one percent of such company's or firm's consolidated gross revenues for its last completed fiscal year.
|
The Categorical Standards do not include business relationships with the Corporation's internal or external auditors, which are covered by the NYSE listing standards.
Under the Governance Guidelines, at least three-fourths of the Directors must meet the NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence and the Categorical Standards. The Board has determined each Director, including each nominee for Director, other than Mr. Askren has no material relationship with the Corporation (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization having a relationship with the Corporation) and is independent under the NYSE listing standards and the Categorical Standards, including any heightened independence standards applicable to a Director's service on the Corporation's Audit Committee (the "Audit Committee"), Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the "Compensation Committee") or Governance Committee.
Mr. Askren, the Corporation's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, does not meet such independence standards because he is a member (i.e., employee) of the Corporation.
Board Committees
The Board has three standing committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee fulfills the role of a nominating committee. Each committee operates under a written charter, which has been approved by the Board. The Board reviews each committee charter at least annually. Current copies of the committees' charters can be found on the Corporation's website at www.hnicorp.com, under "Corporate Governance – Committee Charters." Shareholders may request a copy of the Board's committees' charters by writing to the Corporate Secretary at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761. During the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 ("Fiscal 2013"), each Director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the committees on which the Director served and of the Board.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is comprised of Mary H. Bell, Chairperson, Cheryl A. Francis and Brian E. Stern. The Board has determined each Audit Committee member is "independent" as defined by the NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence, in applicable SEC rules and under the Categorical Standards. The Board has determined all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate under NYSE listing standards. The Board has also determined Ms. Francis is an "audit committee financial expert," as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. In accordance with the Audit Committee Charter, none of the Audit Committee members serve simultaneously on audit committees of more than three public companies. The Audit Committee met eight times during Fiscal 2013. The Audit Committee appoints the Corporation's independent registered public accountant and reviews the independent registered public accountant's performance, independence, fees and audit plans. The Audit Committee also reviews the annual and quarterly financial statements; internal audit staffing, plans and reports; nonaudit services provided by the independent registered public accountant; the Corporation's insurance coverage; and any other matters as directed by the Board, including key risk oversight.
Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Dennis J. Martin, Chairperson, Miguel M. Calado and Ronald V. Waters, III. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an independent director as defined by the NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence, including new standards pertaining to compensation committee members' independence, and under the Categorical Standards. In addition, each member qualifies as an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m) and a "non-employee director" for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). The Compensation Committee met four times during Fiscal 2013. The Compensation Committee reviews executive compensation, executive succession planning, benefit programs for all members; management's recommendations on election of officers and human resources development; and oversees evaluation of the Chairman and CEO by the Board.
Public Policy and Corporate Governance Committee. The Governance Committee is comprised of Larry B. Porcellato, Chairperson, James R. Jenkins and Abbie J. Smith. Each member of the Governance Committee is an independent director as defined by the NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence and under the Categorical Standards. The Governance Committee met four times during Fiscal 2013. The Governance Committee serves as the nominating committee and identifies individuals qualified to serve as Directors of the Corporation consistent with criteria approved by the Board; recommends director nominees to the Board for the next annual meeting of shareholders; develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance principles applicable to the Corporation; and oversees the Corporation's finance policy, capital structure and evaluation of the Board and the Corporation by the Directors.
Processes and Procedures for the Consideration and Determination of Director Compensation by Governance Committee
The Governance Committee is responsible for annually reviewing the compensation paid to Directors for service on the Board and for recommending changes to such compensation to the Board, if appropriate. The Board is responsible for approving Director compensation based on recommendations of the Governance Committee. Neither the Governance Committee nor the Board delegates its authority with respect to setting Director compensation to any other person or group. However, the Corporation's management may, at the request of the Governance Committee, assist the Governance Committee in its review of Director compensation, which may include recommending changes to such compensation. Although it has not done so recently, the Governance Committee has authority to retain and terminate any consultant to assist in the evaluation of the compensation and benefits for Directors and to approve the consultant's fees and other retention terms.
Processes and Procedures for the Consideration and Determination of Executive Compensation by Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for developing and implementing the Corporation's compensation policies and programs for the Chairman and CEO and other senior executives as further discussed throughout the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the "CD&A") which begins on page 16 of this Proxy Statement.
Board Leadership Structure
The Corporation's current board leadership structure consists of a combined chairman and chief executive officer position and nine independent Directors, one of whom has been designated Lead Director.
While certain of the conventional functions for the Chairman have been shared by all Directors, the Chairman position has traditionally been held by the Corporation's CEO. The Board believes the combined role of Chairman and CEO promotes unified leadership and direction for the Corporation, which allows for a single, clear focus for management to execute the Corporation's strategy and business plans. The Board believes this leadership structure has contributed to the long-term growth and financial success of the Corporation.
The Corporation has strong governance structures and processes in place to ensure the independence of the Board, eliminate conflicts of interest and prevent dominance of the Board by management. All Directors, with the exception of the Chairman, are independent as defined under NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence and the Categorical Standards, and all committees of the Board are made up entirely of independent Directors. In addition, the Board and the Governance Committee have assembled a Board comprised of strong and sophisticated Directors who are currently or have recently been leaders of major companies or institutions, are independent thinkers and have a wide range of expertise and skills.
In February 2005, the Board adopted Lead Director Guidelines. The Lead Director's duties and responsibilities include:
|
·
|
presiding at all meetings of the independent Directors;
|
|
·
|
communicating to the Chairman and CEO the substance of the discussions and consensus reached at the meetings of independent Directors;
|
|
·
|
encouraging the independent Directors and the Chairman and CEO to communicate with each other at any time and to act as principal liaison between the independent Directors and the Chairman and CEO on sensitive matters;
|
|
·
|
providing input to the Chairman and CEO on preparation of agendas for Board and committee meetings;
|
|
·
|
presiding at Board meetings when the Chairman and CEO is not in attendance;
|
|
·
|
acting as spokesperson for the Corporation in the event the Chairman and CEO is unable to act due to conflict of interest or incapacity; and
|
|
·
|
receiving and responding to communications from interested parties to the independent Directors.
|
Ronald V. Waters, III has been the Lead Director since May 2011.
The Board regularly meets in executive session without the presence of management. The Lead Director presides at these meetings and provides the Board's guidance and feedback to the Chairman and CEO and the Corporation's management team. Further, the Board has complete access to the Corporation's management team. At each Board and/or committee meeting, Directors receive valuable information and insight from management on matters impacting the Corporation as well as current and future issues.
Given the strong leadership of the Chairman and CEO, the counterbalancing role of the Lead Director and a Board comprised of strong and independent Directors, the Board believes it is in the best long-term interests of the Corporation and its shareholders to maintain a combined role of Chairman and CEO.
Board's Role in Risk Oversight
The Board administers its risk oversight role primarily through its committee structure and the committees' regular reports to the Board at each quarterly Board meeting. The Audit Committee meets frequently during the year (eight times in Fiscal 2013) and discusses with management, the Corporation's Vice President, Internal Audit, and the Corporation's independent registered public accountant:
|
·
|
current business trends affecting the Corporation;
|
|
·
|
major risks facing the Corporation;
|
|
·
|
steps management has taken to monitor and control such risks; and
|
|
·
|
adequacy of internal controls that could significantly affect the Corporation's financial statements.
|
At least annually, the Board discusses with management the appropriate level of risk relative to corporate strategy and business objectives and reviews with management the Corporation's existing risk management processes and their effectiveness. The Audit Committee also reviews the Corporation's enterprise risk management process for identification of, and response to, major risks. The Audit Committee Chairperson provides the Board with a report concerning its risk oversight activities at each quarterly Board meeting. Each key risk identified for the Corporation is then assigned a Committee of the Board for oversight. In addition, the Compensation Committee Chairperson provides the Board with a report on compensation, including risk, annually.
Compensation Risk Assessment
A senior management team, under the oversight of the Compensation Committee, annually conducts a risk assessment of the Corporation's compensation policies and practices to ensure they do not encourage excessive risk taking by members which could result in a material adverse effect on the Corporation. Members of the management team conducting the assessment include the Corporation's Vice President – Member and Community Relations, Treasurer, Vice President – Financial Reporting, Vice President – Internal Audit and Senior Counsel – Securities. As part of the assessment, management:
|
·
|
inventories the known risks facing the Corporation that relate specifically to compensation policies and practices;
|
|
·
|
identifies and evaluates the Corporation's compensation program features and other practices and controls used to monitor and mitigate the risks identified in the risk inventory; and
|
|
·
|
determines whether risks relating to the Corporation's compensation policies and practices, as managed, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation as a whole.
|
In the latest compensation risk assessment completed in January 2014, management identified program features and other practices and controls which monitor and mitigate compensation-related risk, including:
|
·
|
overall compensation levels competitive with the market;
|
|
·
|
stock ownership guidelines for senior executives and an insider trading policy for members;
|
|
·
|
a compensation recovery policy in the event of a financial restatement due to fraud or intentional misconduct;
|
|
·
|
a compensation mix balanced among:
|
|
o
|
fixed components comprised primarily of salary and benefits;
|
|
o
|
annual incentives rewarding Corporation or operating unit financial performance (60 percent) and individual performance (40 percent);
|
|
o
|
long-term incentives rewarding Corporation financial performance over a three-year period; and
|
|
o
|
equity awards in the form of stock options cliff-vesting four years and expiring ten years after the grant date and stock restricted from being sold by executives until they leave the Corporation;
|
|
·
|
incentive programs using financial measures with sliding scales, with amounts interpolated for payouts between minimum, target and maximum (payout minimum of 50 percent of target with cap at 200 percent of target for the financial component of annual incentive compensation awards under the Annual Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") and payout minimum of 25 percent of target with cap at 200 percent of target for the long-term incentive compensation awards under the Long-Term Performance Plan (the "Performance Plan"));
|
|
·
|
individual strategic objective component of the annual incentive compensation award under the Incentive Plan capped at 125 percent of target;
|
|
·
|
Board discretion to reduce both annual and long-term incentive compensation award payouts under the Incentive Plan and the Performance Plan, respectively, when reduction would be appropriate based on the recipient's performance or behavior immediately following the performance period or to account for an extraordinary or unanticipated event (e.g., one-time gain on sale of asset);
|
|
·
|
effective management processes for developing strategic and annual operating plans and strong internal financial controls; and
|
|
·
|
oversight of the Corporation's compensation programs by the Compensation Committee and the Board.
|
Based on this most recent compensation risk assessment, both management and the Compensation Committee believe the risks arising from the Corporation's compensation policies and practices, as managed, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.
Board Meetings
The Board held four regular meetings and no special meetings during Fiscal 2013. All Directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of any committee on which he or she served.
In accordance with the NYSE listing standards regarding corporate governance, the Corporation's non-management Directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present. Mr. Waters, Lead Director, presides at these executive sessions. The Corporation's non-management Directors met four times during Fiscal 2013.
Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders
All Directors are encouraged to attend annual meetings of shareholders when possible. Last year all Directors, except Dennis Martin, attended the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders ("2013 Annual Meeting").
Shareholder Communications with the Board
Shareholders and interested parties may communicate with the Lead Director, the Chairperson of the Governance Committee and the Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, or with the Corporation's non-management Directors as a group, by sending an email to "BoardOfDirectors@hnicorp.com" or by writing to Lead Director, Chairperson of the Governance Committee, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary or Non-Management Directors at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761, Attention: Corporate Secretary. All communications received will be opened by the office of the Corporate Secretary for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents are a message to the Directors. Any communications not in the nature of advertising or promotions of a product or service will be promptly forwarded to the appropriate party.
The Corporation has adopted a written policy (the "Policy") for review of transactions involving the Corporation (including the Corporation's subsidiaries) and its Directors, executive officers and other related persons. The transactions subject to the Policy include any proposed, existing or completed transaction, arrangement or relationship (including charitable contributions and including any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Corporation is a participant and in which any Director, executive officer or other related person has a direct or indirect material interest except:
|
·
|
transactions available to all members generally;
|
|
·
|
transactions involving less than $100,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions;
|
|
·
|
transactions involving compensation or indemnification of executive officers and Directors duly authorized by the appropriate Board committee;
|
|
·
|
transactions involving reimbursement for routine expenses in accordance with Corporation policy;
|
|
·
|
transactions in which a related person's interest arises (a) only from the person's position as a director of a corporation or organization, (b) only from the person's direct or indirect ownership (which will include the ownership of any immediate family members of the related person) of less than a 10% equity interest in another person (other than a partnership) or (c) from the position as a director and ownership of less than 10%;
|
|
·
|
transactions in which a related person's interest arises only from the ownership of a class of equity securities of the Corporation and all holders of the class receive the same benefits on a pro rata basis;
|
|
·
|
transactions in which the rate charged by a related person is determined by competitive bid; and
|
|
·
|
purchases of any products on the same terms available to all members generally.
|
The Corporation's Office of the General Counsel (the "General Counsel") performs the initial review of all transactions subject to the Policy. Factors to be considered by the General Counsel in reviewing the transaction include:
|
·
|
whether the transaction is in conformity with the Corporation's Member Code of Integrity (the code of business conduct and ethics) (the "Ethics Code"), the Governance Guidelines, the By-laws and other related policies, including Outside Business Activities of Officers and Managers, Outside Directorships of Officers and Conflicts of Interest, and is in the best interests of the Corporation;
|
|
·
|
whether the transaction would be in the ordinary course of the Corporation's business;
|
|
·
|
whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm's length dealings with an unrelated third party;
|
|
·
|
the disclosure standards set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K or any similar provision; and
|
|
·
|
whether the transaction could call into question the status of any Director or Director nominee as an independent director under the NYSE listing standards pertaining to director independence and the Categorical Standards.
|
After reviewing the terms of the proposed transaction and taking into account the factors set forth above, the General Counsel will either:
|
·
|
approve the transaction if entered into in the ordinary course of business, for an aggregate amount of $120,000 or less and on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm's length dealings with an unrelated third party;
|
|
·
|
disallow the transaction if not in the best interests of the Corporation;
|
|
·
|
recommend the Audit Committee review the transaction in advance; or
|
|
·
|
allow the transaction, subject to ratification by the Audit Committee, but only if the interests of the Corporation will be best served by allowing the transaction to proceed.
|
At each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting, the General Counsel reports each known transaction to be considered by the Audit Committee pursuant to the policy, including the proposed aggregate value of each transaction and any other relevant information. After review, the Audit Committee approves, ratifies or disallows each transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth above.
If the General Counsel learns of an ongoing or completed transaction, arrangement or relationship not submitted for prior review and approval, the General Counsel will:
|
·
|
in the case of an ongoing transaction, submit it to the Audit Committee for ratification, amendment or termination; and
|
|
·
|
in the case of a completed transaction, submit it to the Audit Committee for ratification, amendment or rescission.
|
For purposes of the Policy, an "executive officer" is an executive officer of the Corporation subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
For purposes of the Policy, a "related person" is:
|
·
|
an executive officer, Director or Director nominee of the Corporation;
|
|
·
|
a person who is an immediate family member (including a person's spouse, parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, siblings, fathers- and mothers-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, brothers- and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than members) who share the person's home) of an executive officer, Director or Director nominee;
|
|
·
|
a shareholder owning in excess of five percent of the Corporation's voting securities (or its controlled affiliates), or an immediate family member of such five percent shareholder; or
|
|
·
|
an entity which is owned or controlled by a related person or an entity in which a related person has a substantial ownership interest.
|
One of the Corporation's office furniture operating units has an office furniture purchase agreement with State Farm Insurance Companies ("State Farm"). State Farm purchased approximately $280,121 of office furniture in Fiscal 2013. State Farm beneficially owns more than five percent of Common Stock. The Corporation's General Counsel reviewed and approved the transaction and informed the Audit Committee in accordance with the Policy.
The Corporation maintains the Ethics Code as part of its corporate compliance program. The Ethics Code applies to all Directors and members (i.e., employees), including the Corporation's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. The Ethics Code is available on the Corporation's website at www.hnicorp.com, under "Corporate Governance—Code of Conduct." The Corporation intends to disclose amendments to or waivers of the Ethics Code granted to the individual executive officers listed above and the Directors on the Corporation's website within four business days of such amendment or waiver. Shareholders may request a copy of the Ethics Code by writing to the Corporate Secretary at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761.
The Corporation's insider trading policy prohibits certain hedging transactions. Specifically, the Corporation prohibits any members or directors, or their designees, from hedging their ownership of the Corporation's Common Stock (including prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds), engaging in short sales or purchasing put or call options, pledging their shares of the Corporation's Common Stock, holding them in a margin account or engaging in short-term transactions with shares of the Corporation Common Stock.
The Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporation's website at www.hnicorp.com, under "Corporate Governance—Governance Guidelines." Shareholders may request a copy of the Governance Guidelines by writing to the Corporate Secretary at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761.
The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporation's independent registered public accountant for Fiscal 2014.
The Board proposes the shareholders ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the Corporation's independent registered public accountant for Fiscal 2014. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment of the independent registered public accountant. Although shareholder ratification of the Audit Committee's selection of the independent registered public accountant is not required by the By-laws or otherwise, the Corporation is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to its shareholders for ratification to permit shareholders to participate in this important decision. If the shareholders fail to ratify the Audit Committee's selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporation's independent registered public accountant for Fiscal 2014 at the Meeting, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection, although the Audit Committee will not be required to select a different independent registered public accountant. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Meeting, have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Recommendation of the Board
|
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" RATIFICATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE'S
SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE CORPORATION'S INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FOR FISCAL 2014.
|
The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. A current copy of the charter is available on the Corporation's website at www.hnicorp.com, under "Corporate Governance – Committee Charters." The primary functions of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter and on page 9 of this Proxy Statement under "Information Regarding the Board – Board Committees."
All members of the Audit Committee are independent as defined in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(b)(1) and the Categorical Standards.
Management has represented to the Audit Committee the Corporation's consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Corporation's independent registered public accountant. Management has also represented it has assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013, and determined, as of that date, the Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the Corporation's independent registered public accountant this assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the Corporation's independent registered public accountant its evaluation of the accounting principles, practices and judgments applied by management, and the Audit Committee has discussed any items required to be communicated to it by the Corporation's independent registered public accountant in accordance with regulations promulgated by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the "PCAOB") including the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standards No. 16, as adopted by the PCAOB.
The Audit Committee received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the Corporation's independent registered public accountant required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the Corporation's independent registered public accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with the Corporation's independent registered public accountant its independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board the consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013, for filing with the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Mary H. Bell, Chairperson
Cheryl A. Francis
Brian E. Stern
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Corporation for the audit and other services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for Fiscal 2013 and for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012 ("Fiscal 2012"):
|
Fiscal 2013
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|||
|
Audit Fees (1)
|
$1,112,410
|
$930,045
|
||
|
Audit-Related Fees (2)
|
-
|
393,245
|
||
|
Tax Fees (3)
|
411,707
|
886,212
|
||
|
All Other Fees
|
-
|
-
|
||
|
Total
|
$1,524,117
|
$2,209,502
|
||
|
(1)
|
Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the annual financial statements, review of quarterly financial statements and audit
services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
|
(2)
|
Audit-related fees represent accounting consultations and financial due diligence.
|
|
(3)
|
Tax fees represent fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
|
|
Pre-Approval of Fees
|
The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more members of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by the Corporation's independent registered public accountant and associated fees. The delegated member or members must report any such pre-approvals of audit-related or non-audit services and fees to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All of the fees incurred in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 were approved by the Audit Committee.
Executive Summary
The executive compensation program for Fiscal 2013 highlights the Corporation's pay for performance philosophy, with a substantial portion of each Named Executive Officer's compensation tied to the achievement of financial and strategic goals and the creation of long-term value for shareholders. A majority of each Named Executive Officer's compensation opportunity in Fiscal 2013 was awarded in the form of performance-based annual and long-term awards and stock options to incent long-term value creation for shareholders. Shareholders have continued to voice their support for the Corporation's pay for performance compensation program—approximately 98% of votes cast in last year's Say on Pay vote approved the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.
For Fiscal 2013, the Corporation's Named Executive Officers were:
|
Name
|
Title
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, HNI Corporation
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, HNI Corporation
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation
President, Hearth & Home Technologies
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation
President, The HON Company
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation
President, HNI Contract Furniture Group
|
Compensation Program Changes in 2013. The Board, Compensation Committee and Corporation made few structural changes to the executive compensation program in 2013. The Board increased the threshold required to achieve the minimum payout under the financial component of the Incentive Plan, from 25% to 50%. This change requires a higher level of performance achievement to qualify for an award under the portion of the Incentive Plan tied to economic profit achievement. Additionally, the independent Directors increased Mr. Askren's target Incentive Plan award from 100% to 120% of his base salary based on competitive market data from Frederick W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("FW Cook"). The Compensation Committee also re-evaluated the Corporation's peer group used for CEO compensation benchmarking and replaced two companies in the peer group (Gardner Denver and Furniture Brands International) with Actuant Corporation and Knoll Inc.
Annual Compensation. Under the Incentive Plan for Fiscal 2013, 60% of each annual award opportunity was based on the economic profit of the Corporation or one or more of its operating units and 40% of each annual award opportunity was based on achievement of pre-determined individual goals. Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation achieved economic profit of $15.7 million in Fiscal 2013, which reflects a significant improvement over economic profit of $1.7 million for Fiscal 2012. The Named Executive Officers also earned awards based on their individual goals ranging from 98% to 110% of target. Based on economic profit and achievement of individual goals, Mr. Askren received an annual cash incentive award equal to 115% of his target award; Mr. Tjaden received an annual cash incentive award equal to 110% of his target award; Mr. Determan received an annual cash incentive award equal to 159% of his target award; Mr. Dittmer received an annual cash incentive award equal to 116% of his target award; and Mr. Lorenger received an annual cash incentive award equal to 101% of his target award. Base salary comprised no more than 32% of any Named Executive Officer's target direct compensation.
Long-Term Compensation. In Fiscal 2013, 75% of each Named Executive Officer's long-term incentive compensation opportunity was granted in the form of stock options, which vest in February 2017, and 25% was granted in the form of performance-based cash awards earned over three annual performance periods. Actual performance is measured each year, with one-third of the cash-based award earned based on economic profit achievement in each of the three years covered by the plan. Achievement for each year in the performance period may range from 0% to 200% of one-third of the total cash-based award target. The Board established economic profit targets in 2013 for each year in the three-year performance period. No portion of the award will be paid out until the first quarter of fiscal year 2016, and a Named Executive Officer must remain continuously employed by the Corporation (other than leaving employment as a result of death, disability or retirement) through the last day of fiscal year 2015 to receive a payout.
The significant portion of each Named Executive Officer's Fiscal 2013 compensation opportunity tied to achievement of objective financial and personal strategic goals and creation of long-term value for shareholders demonstrates the commitment of the Corporation, the Board and the Compensation Committee to pay for performance. These components of the executive compensation program demonstrate a commitment to good compensation program governance:
|
·
|
No perquisites. The Corporation, consistent with its longstanding culture, does not offer any perquisites to Named Executive Officers, other than standard relocation assistance.
|
|
·
|
Executive Stock Ownership Guideline. Each Named Executive Officer is expected to demonstrate a commitment to the Corporation's member-owner culture and alignment with shareholders by achieving a specified level of stock ownership (4x base salary for Mr. Askren and 2x base salary for each other Named Executive Officer) within a specified time. As of the Record Date, each Named Executive Officer met or exceeded the specified level of ownership.
|
|
·
|
Compensation Risk Assessment. The Compensation Committee monitors the Corporation's compensation program for risk and annually oversees a multi-disciplinary process.
|
|
·
|
Anti-Hedging. The Corporation prohibits members (including the Named Executive Officers) or Directors from engaging in short-term or speculative transactions involving the Corporation's securities, including short sales, margin transactions and buying put or call options.
|
|
·
|
Clawbacks. If financial results are significantly restated due to fraud or intentional misconduct, the Board will review any performance-based compensation paid to executive officers found to be personally responsible for the fraud or intentional misconduct leading to the restatement and may, to the extent permitted by law, seek recoupment of amounts paid in excess based on the restated financial results.
|
Philosophy and Objective of the Executive Compensation Program
The Corporation's Vision Statement contains its core beliefs and values, including creating long-term value for shareholders, being profitable and pursuing profitable growth. The Corporation's management and Board believe aligning the compensation of the Corporation's senior management, who are most equipped to drive corporate performance and define corporate strategy, with shareholders and the Corporation's financial performance is integral to maintaining profitability and creating long-term shareholder value. Governance of the executive compensation program, including hands-on involvement of the Compensation Committee, is guided by those principles.
Governance of the Executive Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee and Independent Directors. The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for design and implementation of the executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee designs compensation strategy and structure to assure:
|
·
|
alignment with the long-term interests of shareholders and members;
|
|
·
|
members are fairly and reasonably compensated relative to peers; and
|
|
·
|
consideration of both corporate and individual performance.
|
For Named Executive Officers other than the Chairman and CEO, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves base salary changes, Incentive Plan, Performance Plan and Supplemental Income Plan ("SIP") awards. The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from the Chairman and CEO with respect to base salary changes and setting and achieving individual goals under the Incentive Plan for other Named Executive Officers.
The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends to the Board for approval by the independent Directors base salary increases and Incentive Plan, Performance Plan and SIP awards for the Chairman and CEO.
All equity grants under the 2007 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the "Stock Plan") require approval by the independent Directors (for grants to the Chairman and CEO) or the Board (for grants to other Named Executive Officers), upon recommendation by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee requests and considers the recommendations of the Chairman and CEO regarding base salary increases, and setting and reviewing achievement of individual goals under the Incentive Plan, for other Named Executive Officers.
The Corporation's Law, Finance and Member and Community Relations ("MCR") Departments support the Compensation Committee and the Board in a variety of ways related to executive compensation, including conducting executive compensation benchmark analysis, preparing compensation-related materials, providing recommendations on base salary increase percentages and annual and long-term incentive compensation award targets and providing updates on corporate governance laws and best practices.
The Compensation Committee occasionally retains an outside compensation consultant to provide data and recommendations for structuring and designing the Corporation's executive compensation program, selecting a peer group for benchmarking and establishing competitive incentive award targets. In Fiscal 2013, the Compensation Committee engaged FW Cook to:
|
·
|
review the Corporation's peer group for evaluating the Chairman and CEO's compensation level; and
|
|
·
|
provide updated data and recommendations regarding the Chairman and CEO's compensation, including base salary and Incentive Plan award targets.
|
In Fiscal 2013, FW Cook did not provide any services to the Corporation other than this engagement by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determined, based on an analysis of relevant factors including those required by the SEC, FW Cook had no conflict of interest in providing services to the Compensation Committee.
The Role of Benchmarking and Market Data
Benchmarking is used by the Compensation Committee to:
|
·
|
compare the Chairman and CEO's base salary, annual and long-term incentive award opportunities and overall compensation to a defined peer group of companies the Corporation competes with for business, talent or both; and
|
|
·
|
survey data covering a wide range of companies to ensure the salaries, annual and long-term incentive award opportunities and overall compensation for the Named Executive Officers, other than the Chairman and CEO, are in line with similar roles at a broad base of other companies.
|
CEO and Chairman Benchmarking. The Compensation Committee, in forming its recommendations regarding the Chairman and CEO's compensation in Fiscal 2013, benchmarked his compensation against the below-listed peer companies. Later in the year, after setting the Chairman and CEO's compensation for Fiscal 2013 and based on supplemental work by FW Cook, the Compensation Committee made changes to the peer group for Fiscal 2014.
Generally, a common feature of peer group companies is the Corporation may compete for talent, whether because they are in similar industries or share a similar level of business complexity, manufacturing approach, go-to market structure or other similarity. The Compensation Committee also considered the relative size of the companies, including market capitalization and net sales, to determine which companies were comparable for inclusion in the peer group. More detailed explanations are provided in the table below.
|
Company
|
Annual Revenues
($ millions)
|
Basis for Inclusion
|
|
A.O. Smith Corporation
|
1,939
|
Revenue; sector (building materials manufacturing); comparable employee headcount
|
|
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
|
2,619
|
Sector (building materials and flooring manufacturing); serves North American new home and remodel construction market; comparable employee headcount
|
|
BE Aerospace, Inc.
|
3,085
|
Revenue; sector (aircraft cabin interior furniture, cabinetry and storage manufacturing)
|
|
Briggs & Stratton Corporation
|
1,862
|
Revenue; industry (industrial and consumer goods manufacturing)
|
|
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
|
3,629
|
Industry (industrial manufacturing); business model featuring decentralized operating units
|
|
Donaldson Company, Inc.
|
2,437
|
Revenue; industry (industrial manufacturing)
|
|
Furniture Brands International, Inc.*
|
1,072
|
Sector (furniture and casegoods manufacturing); business model featuring many brands, each serving a targeted consumer or business furniture market; comparable employee headcount
|
|
Gardner Denver, Inc.*
|
2,356
|
Revenue; industry (industrial manufacturing)
|
|
Herman Miller, Inc.
|
1,775
|
Revenue; sector (office furniture manufacturing)
|
|
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
|
3,721
|
Sector (furniture, fixtures and office furniture components manufacturing)
|
|
Lennox International Inc.
|
2,949
|
Sectors (building materials manufacturing); serves North American new home and remodel construction market; broad network of distribution channels
|
|
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc.
|
2,853
|
Industry (industrial manufacturing); comparable employee headcount
|
|
Regal Beloit Corporation
|
3,167
|
Industry (industrial manufacturing); business model featuring decentralized, branded operating units serving unique markets
|
|
Company
|
Annual Revenues
($ millions)
|
Basis for Inclusion
|
|
Snap-On Incorporated
|
2,938
|
Sector (durable household products and consumer goods manufacturing); comparable employee headcount
|
|
Steelcase Inc.
|
2,869
|
Sector (office furniture manufacturing); comparable employee headcount
|
|
Valmont Industries, Inc.
|
3,030
|
Sector (metal manufacturing); growth by acquisition; comparable employee headcount
|
*Effective January 1, 2014, these companies have been removed from the peer group. Knoll Inc. (annual revenues of $888 million and in the Corporation's sector) and Actuant Corporation (annual revenues of $1.3 billion and in the Corporation's industry) were added to the peer group. In Fiscal 2013, Furniture Brands International filed for bankruptcy and Gardner Denver was taken private through an acquisition.
In the past two years, the Compensation Committee retained FW Cook to collect and analyze market information on several elements of total compensation for chairmen and chief executive officers, including base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. To benchmark Mr. Askren's base salary in 2013, the Compensation Committee utilized comparative data provided by FW Cook in late 2012 and aged it by applying an assumption of a 3 percent annual increase to the base salary data. The Compensation Committee believes 3 percent represents a conservative benchmark for merit increases based on broad-based survey data.
The Compensation Committee targets the sum of the Chairman and CEO's base salary, target annual incentive and target long-term incentive at the median of the peer group.
With respect to incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee utilized the CEO Compensation Review and updated information to:
|
·
|
derive the peer market median annual and long-term incentive compensation award targets;
|
|
·
|
derive the peer market median for base salary and total cash compensation paid, generally composed of base salary and annual incentive compensation; and
|
|
·
|
establish, together with the independent Directors, annual and long-term incentive compensation award targets for Fiscal 2013.
|
Market Data for Other Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of corporate expertise, annually monitors market levels of base salary and short- and long-term incentive compensation using the following commercially available, broad-based, comparative market compensation survey reports developed by independent professional organizations and covering more than 3,000 companies over a broad range of industries (collectively, the "Survey Reports"):
|
·
|
Towers Watson, U.S. Compensation Data Bank – General Industry Executive Database, Single Regression Report dated March 1, 2012;
|
|
·
|
Mercer Human Resource Consulting ("Mercer") – US Mercer Benchmark Database, Executive Compensation Survey dated August 1, 2013; and
|
|
·
|
Towers Watson Data Services – CompSource Online, Survey Report on Top Management Compensation dated March 1, 2013.
|
For purposes of the Compensation Committee's review, the Corporation provides information combining and averaging market data from the Survey Reports to balance data outliers and increase reliability. No industry peer group is selected from the data in the Survey Reports for competitive review because the Corporation competes for executives across varied industries. The Compensation Committee focuses on the scope and scale of the executive officer's responsibility as the most important benchmarking factors for attracting and retaining executive officers.
The Compensation Committee utilizes the Survey Reports to:
|
·
|
derive the approximate market median for base salary and total cash compensation paid at the time of appointment or change in responsibilities or when there has been a significant change in market compensation levels;
|
|
·
|
derive the approximate market median for target awards at the time of appointment or change in responsibilities or when there has been a significant change in market compensation levels; and
|
|
·
|
establish award targets.
|
Elements of Executive Compensation Program
The key elements of the Corporation's executive compensation program are:
Annual Compensation
|
Element
|
Description
|
Purpose
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
Fixed level of annual base compensation and the foundation for setting incentive compensation targets.
|
Compensate executive officers for performing their job duties, reward executive officers for continually improving their know-how and breadth of capabilities and maintain market competitive compensation.
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Award
(Incentive Plan)
|
An award target equal to a percentage of base salary (120% for the Chairman and CEO, 75% for the other Named Executive Officers) and earned 60% on the achievement of an economic profit target for the Corporation or operating unit and 40% on achievement of individual strategic objectives.
|
Focus the Named Executive Officers on pre-determined corporate financial goals and individual strategic objectives by rewarding achievement through performance-based incentive pay.
|
Long-Term Compensation
|
Element
|
Description
|
Purpose
|
|
|
Stock Options
(Stock Plan)
|
Options to purchase shares of the Corporation's Common Stock with an exercise price equal to the stock closing price on the date of the grant, vesting four years and expiring ten years after the date of the grant.
|
Align executive compensation with share price appreciation.
|
|
|
Performance-Based Cash Awards
(Performance Plan)
|
A long-term, performance-based award incentive to earn cash compensation at the end of a three-year performance plan based on the achievement of pre-determined economic profit goals in each year covered by the plan.
|
Align executive compensation to the Corporation's long-term financial performance, a key driver in creating long-term shareholder value.
|
Other Benefit Plans
For a description of the other compensation and benefit plans available to Named Executive Officers, please see "Retirement and Other Compensation Plans" in this CD&A. With the exception of a Supplemental Income Plan and Deferred Plan, the other plans available to the Named Executive Officers are generally available to the Corporation's members.
2013 Compensation Mix
For Fiscal 2013, the target compensation mix and actual compensation mix for Named Executive Officers is shown below (base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive). For the long-term portion, actual compensation mix was calculated based on actual 2013 performance under the Performance Plan for 2013-2015 (the "2013-2015 Plan") and assumed target achievement for 2014 and 2015 under the Plan.
Analyzing the Difference: Target vs. Actual. Actual Fiscal 2013 compensation for the Named Executive Officers differed from the target primarily as a result of economic profit (for the Corporation or its operating units) under the Incentive Plan and economic profit for the Corporation under the 2013-2015 Plan exceeding the target levels. This resulted in each Named Executive Officer receiving an award above target under the Incentive Plan and the 2013-2015 Plan, which increased the percentage of each Named Executive Officer's total compensation awarded for performance.
This variance between target and actual highlights the Corporation's pay for performance culture. The Corporation's economic profit showed significant improvement over Fiscal 2012 and exceeded the aggressive targets established by the Board, resulting in Named Executive Officers receiving annual incentive compensation above target for strong performance.
Compensation Elements and Decisions in 2013
Base Salary. For Fiscal 2013, the base salary for each Named Executive Officer was at or below the market median for the relevant position. For the Chairman and CEO, the Compensation Committee derives the base salary market median from the CEO Compensation Review. For other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of the Corporation, derives the base salary market median from the Survey Reports.
Based on individual circumstances, actual base salaries may be higher or lower than the market median based on the following factors, which are also considered annually by the Compensation Committee (and independent Directors in the case of the Chairman and CEO's base salary) when determining whether to award an increase in base salary:
|
·
|
potential for further growth, development and advancement;
|
|
·
|
individual performance and competency; and
|
|
·
|
nature of experience both in service to the Corporation and other experience.
|
The Compensation Committee normally approves base salary changes annually at the Board meeting prior to the anniversary date of each officer's appointment. The Compensation Committee conducts the Chairman and CEO's annual base salary review at the February Board meeting and all independent Directors participate with the Compensation Committee members in this review.
Analysis of Base Salary Changes in Fiscal 2013. Based primarily on performance, personal growth and market factors, the Compensation Committee (and with respect to the Chairman and CEO's base salary, the independent Directors) awarded the following base salaries.
|
Name
|
2012 Annual Base Salary
($)
|
2013
Annual Base Salary ($)
|
Increase
($)
|
Increase
(%)
|
Approximate Market Median Annual Base Salary
($)
|
2013 Base Salary as Percentage of Market Median
(%)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
842,400
|
880,310
|
37,910
|
4.5
|
881,680
|
100%
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
378,350
|
391,595
|
13,245
|
3.5
|
442,380
|
89%
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
384,045
|
397,485
|
13,440
|
3.5
|
422,940
|
94%
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
423,350
|
440,285
|
16,935
|
4.0
|
514,555
|
86%
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
353,600
|
366,860
|
13,260
|
3.75
|
420,362
|
87%
|
The increases awarded were generally consistent with the Corporation's average increase reflecting individual performance and market competitiveness.
Annual Incentive Compensation. For Fiscal 2013, key features of the Incentive Plan were:
|
Award Target as a % of Base Salary
|
|
|
Chairman and CEO
|
120%
|
|
Other Named Executive Officers
|
75%
|
|
Basis of Award Achievement
|
|
|
Achievement of Financial Goals
|
60%
|
|
Attainment of Individual Strategic Objectives
|
40%
|
In Fiscal 2013, the independent Directors increased the Chairman and CEO's Incentive Plan target, as a percentage of his base salary, from 100% to 120%. The independent Directors increased Mr. Askren's target award on recommendation from the Compensation Committee, which recommended the increase to provide an award opportunity consistent with the Peer Group. The Chairman and CEO's annual incentive compensation award target is a greater percentage of annual base salary than the targets for the other Named Executive Officers because the Chairman and CEO has the greatest potential impact on the Corporation's annual performance.
For Fiscal 2013, economic profit achievement representing a 50 percent payout level reflects threshold performance required to receive a payout, while economic profit achievement representing a 200 percent payout level reflects the maximum incentive for exceptional performance. The Compensation Committee returned the threshold to 50% from 25% in Fiscal 2013 (the threshold was 25% from 2009-2012 as a result of economic uncertainty and challenges with establishing relevant financial goals during the recession). The Compensation Committee determined in Fiscal 2013 to reinstitute the higher threshold requirement given economic recovery and the stabilization of the office furniture and housing industries.
Analysis of 2013 Financial Performance Goals. The Board evaluated and approved economic profit goals under the Incentive Plan for the Corporation and each operating unit for Fiscal 2013 at the February 2013 Board meeting.
HNI – 2013 Annual Incentive Plan Matrix.
The Named Executive Officers eligible for awards based on the financial performance of the Corporation are Messrs. Askren and Tjaden. For Fiscal 2013, the economic profit goal for the Corporation as a whole was $13,764,000, and actual economic profit achievement was $15,729,000, resulting in a 118% percent payout as reflected in the table below. Economic profit achievement was above the target primarily due to strong commercial sales of office furniture products and strong sales of hearth products. The delivery of economic profit above target level resulted in payouts above target under the financial portion of the Incentive Plan for Messrs. Askren and Tjaden.
|
Economic Profit Achievement
($)
|
Financial Component of Annual
Incentive Compensation Award – Payout (%)
|
|
Less than $2,170,000
|
0%
|
|
$2,170,000
|
50%
|
|
$7,967,000
|
75%
|
|
$13,764,000
|
100%
|
|
$16,465,000
|
125%
|
|
$19,166,000
|
150%
|
|
$21,867,000
|
175%
|
|
$24,568,000
|
200%
|
Messrs. Askren and Tjaden earned payouts of $747,910 and $207,936, respectively, under the financial component of the Incentive Plan. These amounts were calculated as follows:
|
·
|
For Mr. Askren: ($1,056,370 * 60%) * 118%.
|
|
·
|
For Mr. Tjaden: ($293,696 * 60%) * 118%.
|
Messrs. Determan, Dittmer and Lorenger are eligible for awards based on the financial performance of each executive's individual area of responsibility (one or more operating units). This structure aligns executives' interests with the financial performance of their relevant areas of responsibility.
The financial component of Mr. Determan's annual incentive compensation award is based on achievement of the economic profit goal of Hearth & Home Technologies ("HHT") (HHT is the only operating unit included in the Corporation's hearth products operating segment). For Fiscal 2013, the economic profit goal for HHT was $1,457,000, and economic profit achievement was $10,747,000, resulting in a 200% payout.
HHT – 2013 Annual Incentive Plan Matrix.
|
Economic Profit Achievement
($)
|
Financial Component of Annual
Incentive Compensation Award – Payout (%)
|
|
Less than $(3,325,000)
|
0%
|
|
$(3,325,000)
|
50%
|
|
$(934,000)
|
75%
|
|
$1,457,000
|
100%
|
|
$2,427,000
|
125%
|
|
$3,396,000
|
150%
|
|
$4,366,000
|
175%
|
|
$5,336,000
|
200%
|
Mr. Determan earned a payout of $357,738 under the financial component of the Incentive Plan. This amount was calculated as follows: ($298,115 * 60%) * 200%.
The financial component of Mr. Dittmer's annual incentive compensation award is based on the achievement of the economic profit goal of The HON Company and Artcobell, the Corporation's operating units for which he is responsible. The financial component of Mr. Lorenger's annual incentive compensation award is based on achievement of the economic profit goals of Allsteel, the Corporation's operating unit for which he is responsible. The Corporation considers the economic profit goals and achievements of HON, Artcobell and Allsteel to be confidential and does not disclose them, or individual operating company results, publicly.
As for all Named Executive Officers, the economic profit performance goals for Messrs. Dittmer and Lorenger are set aggressively and require superior performance by the officers and their corresponding operating units and areas of responsibility. Nonetheless, because the Corporation and Board expect superior performance on a consistent basis, Messrs. Dittmer and Lorenger are expected to achieve 100 percent of target over time on the financial component of their respective annual incentive compensation awards under the Incentive Plan.
Analysis of 2013 Individual Strategic Objectives. A summary of each Named Executive Officer's individual strategic objectives for Fiscal 2013 is shown below.
|
Name
|
Individual Strategic Goals
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
· enhance customer value and market impact by enhancing brand strength, tailoring and focusing business and selling models and driving
impactful product and solutions development;
· build best cost, lean enterprise by leading business system transformation, accelerating HNI-wide leverage and driving consistent flawless
execution; and
· enhance culture and capabilities by leveraging core culture and values and enhancing member engagement, leadership development and
diversity.
|
|
Name
|
Individual Strategic Goals
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
· provide leadership in achievement of breakthrough objectives and implementation of directed portfolio management;
· lead business system transformation to successful implementation and to providing comprehensive business process re-engineering;
· lead HNI corporate finance and information technology functions to deliver efficient and effective processes, increased value creation and
enhanced organization capacity/capability, along with specified annual savings; and
· drive and support results across departmental functions and operating companies with identified improvement opportunities.
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
· build HHT experience of the customer capabilities;
· drive for breakthrough financial results and increased profitability;
· build business process improvement capability and capacity; and
· implement portfolio management processes to optimize profitability.
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
· drive HON product portfolio by enhancing HON product offering to increase market share, profitability and brand loyalty;
· drive sales growth through implementing enhanced selling capabilities and optimizing HON's presence in transactional channels; and
· lead transformation and acceleration of HON brand experience, e-commerce, business system transformation and critical talent.
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
·develop product portfolio management team to deliver improved profit margins and achieve reduced complexity and enhanced profitability for
product specials;
·drive Allsteel laminate business to achieve consistent, flawless execution; and
·develop Allsteel value proposition and differentiated brand positioning and lead growth investments to achieve sales and profitability targets.
|
The Named Executive Officers delivered significant results on the stated goals resulting in average attainment of individual strategic objectives from 98% to 110%.
2013 Incentive Plan Aggregate Payouts. The table below sets forth detailed information regarding the aggregate payouts under the Incentive Plan for each Named Executive Officer for Fiscal 2013:
|
Name
|
Annual Incentive
Compensation Award Target
($)
|
Actual Award
Payout Attributable to
Financial Goals
($)
|
Actual Award Payout
Attributable to Strategic
Objectives ($)
|
Total Payout
($)
|
Actual Payout
as % of Target
(%)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
1,056,370
|
747,910
|
464,803
|
1,212,712
|
115
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
293,696
|
207,936
|
115,129
|
323,065
|
110
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
298,115
|
357,738
|
116,861
|
474,599
|
159
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
330,214
|
251,227
|
132,086
|
383,312
|
116
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
275,145
|
168,389
|
110,058
|
278,447
|
101
|
Each Named Executive Officer received the 2013 Incentive Plan award payout in cash.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. In Fiscal 2013, the Compensation Committee (and in the case of the Chairman and CEO, the independent Directors) awarded long-term incentive compensation in the form of Performance Plan awards (25 percent) and stock options (75 percent). The mix of stock options and a Performance Plan award appropriately achieved the goal of focusing executives on the creation of long-term value by rewarding long-term financial performance and stock price appreciation.
The table below shows the long-term incentive compensation award targets for each Named Executive Officer under the 2013-2015 Plan.
|
Name
|
Total Long-Term
Incentive
Compensation Target ($)
|
Total Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Award Target (%
of Annual Base Salary at Time of Award)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
2,640,924
|
300
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
567,528
|
150
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
576,068
|
150
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
635,027
|
150
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
530,400
|
150
|
Stock Options Granted in 2013. In Fiscal 2013, the Board granted stock options to each Named Executive Officer on February 13, 2013. The exercise price for stock options, which is the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant, was $31.79 per share. See the option valuation table below for additional details regarding stock option awards in Fiscal 2013 for each Named Executive Officer:
|
Name
|
Targeted Value of
Stock Options
Granted in 2013
($)(1)
|
Number of Stock
Options Granted
(#)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
1,980,699
|
166,166
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
425,651
|
35,709
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
432,052
|
36,246
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
476,276
|
39,956
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
397,794
|
33,372
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
The Black-Scholes option value for award purposes was $11.92 and differs from the Black-Scholes option value calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation ("FASB ASC Topic 718"), for financial statement reporting purposes ($10.85). The difference between the Black-Scholes option value for award purposes and the Black-Scholes option value for financial statement reporting purposes results from utilizing a ten-year option life when calculating the value of an award and a six-year expected option life when reporting the value of the award under FASB ASC Topic 718. Utilization of the ten-year option life when calculating the value of an award results in fewer options granted to executives due to the higher option value produced.
|
In Fiscal 2013, the Compensation Committee also awarded stock option grants to Mr. Lorenger in addition to those reflected above. This additional award, granted in February 2013, had an aggregate grant date fair value of $300,003, cliff vests four years from the date of the grant and expires ten years from the date of the grant. The Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board provided, this award to encourage retention and reward Mr. Lorenger for leadership on key strategic initiatives. This award is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table under the "Option Awards" Column.
Analysis of 2013-2015 Plan and Awards Earned. The 2013-2015 Plan award covers a three-year performance period (2013, 2014 and 2015). Under the 2013-2015 Plan, each year of the performance period is viewed separately, with one-third of the award eligible to be earned (ranging from 25 percent of the target if the threshold level of economic profit is achieved to 200 percent of the target if the breakthrough level of economic profit is achieved). The Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the economic profit goals for each year in the performance period in February 2013, with a base level of economic profit achievement equal to a 100 percent payout and breakthrough level of economic profit achievement equal to a 200 percent payout.
Economic profit achieved by the Corporation in Fiscal 2013 represented (i) the performance goal for the first year of the 2013-2015 Plan, (ii) the performance goal for the second year of the Performance Plan for 2012-2014 (the "2012-2014 Plan") and (iii) the final year of the Performance Plan for 2011-2013 (the "2011-2013 Plan"). For Fiscal 2013, the Corporation's economic profit was:
|
·
|
$16.1 million under the 2011-2013 Plan, resulting in an earned award of 54% for Fiscal 2013;
|
|
·
|
$18.7 million under the 2012-2014 Plan, resulting in an earned award of 78% for Fiscal 2013; and
|
|
·
|
$17.2 million, under the 2013-2015 Plan, resulting in an earned award of 134% for Fiscal 2013.
|
The difference between the economic profit for Fiscal 2013 under the three plans is attributable to the use of a different weighted average cost of capital assumption (as one target was set in 2011, one was set in 2012 and the other in 2013) and the
phase-in of goodwill related to companies acquired after the target was established. A discussion of the 2011-2013 and 2012-2014 Plans was contained in the Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting and the 2013 Annual Meeting, respectively.
Fiscal 2013 HNI Economic Profit Matrix.
|
Payout %
|
Economic Profit Achievement for Fiscal 2013
|
||
|
2013-2015 Plan
|
2012-2014 Plan
|
2011-2013 Plan
|
|
|
25%
|
$(2,000,000)
|
$(7,755,000)
|
$(4,893,000)
|
|
50%
|
$4,000,000
|
$4,745,000
|
$12,964,000
|
|
75%
|
$9,000,000
|
$17,245,000
|
$30,821,000
|
|
100%
|
$15,000,000
|
$29,745,000
|
$48,678,000
|
|
125%
|
$17,000,000
|
$37,171,000
|
$66,659,000
|
|
150%
|
$18,000,000
|
$44,596,000
|
$84,639,000
|
|
175%
|
$20,000,000
|
$52,021,000
|
$102,620,000
|
|
200%
|
$21,000,000
|
$59,447,000
|
$120,600,000
|
The economic profit target and payouts for Fiscal 2013 differ between the 2013-2015 Plan, the 2012-2014 Plan and the 2011-2013 Plan as a result of the Compensation Committee recommending, and the Board approving, an economic profit target for each year in a Performance Plan at the beginning of the Performance Plan (e.g., the Fiscal 2013 economic profit target under the 2011-2013 Plan was set in February 2011). The differences in target value result primarily from changing assumptions on national and global economic performance as well as an additional year of actual performance information for the Corporation.
The Named Executive Officers earned the following amounts under the Performance Plan based on Fiscal 2013 performance:
|
Name
|
Performance Plan
|
Target Award for
2013 Performance Period ($)
|
Actual 2013 Performance Period Achievement (%)
|
Award Earned for 2013
Performance Period Achievement ($)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
2013-2015
2012-2014
2011-2013
Total
|
220,077
210,600
202,500
633,177
|
134%
78%
54%
|
294,903
164,268
109,350
568,521
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
2013-2015
2012-2014
2011-2013
Total
|
47,294
45,475
43,725
136,494
|
134%
78%
54%
|
63,374
35,471
23,612
122,457
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
2013-2015
2012-2014
2011-2013
Total
|
48,006
46,382
44,385
138,773
|
134%
78%
54%
|
64,328
36,178
23,968
124,474
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
2013-2015
2012-2014
2011-2013
Total
|
52,919
51,253
48,813
152,985
|
134%
78%
54%
|
70,911
39,977
26,359
137,247
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
2013-2015
2012-2014
2011-2013
Total
|
44,200
42,500
38,425
125,125
|
134%
78%
54%
|
59,228
33,150
20,750
113,128
|
While the amounts under the 2013-2015 Plan and the 2012-2014 Plan have been earned by the Named Executive Officers, no portion of the Performance Plan award is payable unless the Named Executive Officer is continuously employed by the Corporation through the end of the performance period (the last day of the last fiscal year covered by the Performance Plan). Any early termination of employment other than due to death, disability, retirement or a change in control of the Corporation prior to the end of the three-year period results in forfeiture of any outstanding awards. Payout of amounts earned under the Performance Plan is scheduled to occur in the first quarter of the year following the last year in the Performance Plan (e.g., first quarter 2016 for the 2013-2015 Plan). Payout of the amounts earned under the 2011-2013 Plan was made in February 2014.
Incentive Compensation Philosophy and Plans
Incentive compensation during Fiscal 2013 was awarded under the Corporation's Stock Plan (stock options), the Performance Plan (long-term cash-based performance awards) and the Incentive Plan (annual cash-based performance awards). These plans
and the incentive compensation philosophy of the Corporation are described below to supplement the analysis of Fiscal 2013 awards above.
Incentive Compensation Philosophy. The Compensation Committee typically approves (or recommends to all independent Directors for approval in the case of the Chairman and CEO) overall incentive compensation award targets, consisting of annual and long-term incentive compensation award targets, for each Named Executive Officer slightly above the market median to:
|
·
|
emphasize pay for performance;
|
|
·
|
align executive and shareholder interests; and
|
|
·
|
encourage the achievement of established financial performance goals and individual strategic objectives.
|
The incentive compensation award, at the target level, is set to provide Named Executive Officers with market-competitive compensation. The Compensation Committee does not target actual payouts of annual or long-term incentive compensation at the market median. To achieve a payout at 100 percent of target for either annual or long-term incentive compensation awards, executives must achieve superior results relative to economic and competitive conditions.
Incentive Plan. The Named Executive Officers are eligible for annual incentive compensation under the Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan motivates executives annually to achieve specific financial performance goals and individual strategic objectives. The weighting between corporate financial goals (60%) and individual objectives (40%) encourages the proper focus by the Named Executive Officers on both annual financial returns and individual contributions to the Corporation's strategic objectives.
The awards are paid in February following the fiscal year for which they are earned, subject to a participant's employment with the Corporation on the last day of the fiscal year for which an award is earned. Any early termination of employment other than due to death, disability, retirement or a change in control of the Corporation prior to the end of the performance period results in forfeiture of any outstanding awards. The awards are paid in cash unless the executive requests and the Compensation Committee approves taking the payment or part of the payment in the form of Common Stock or the Compensation Committee determines, in its sole discretion, the executive's respective stock ownership level under the Executive Stock Ownership Guideline does not reflect appropriate progress toward the executive's five-year goal.
Financial Performance Goals. Economic profit is the measurement for financial performance goal achievement because it promotes the simultaneous optimization of growth, earnings and capital efficiency. Economic profit is defined as after-tax operating profit less a charge for invested capital. The Corporation views economic profit as the best indicator of long-term shareholder value creation.
Each year, management prepares an annual financial plan the Board approves and the Compensation Committee utilizes to establish economic profit goals, which the Board also approves. The economic profit goals are based on current strategic market conditions (e.g., strength of the housing market, global economy or corporate earnings) and business opportunities (e.g., launch of new product line or integration of recently acquired business). The Board evaluates and approves separate economic profit goals for the Corporation and each operating unit.
Economic profit goals are tied to a predetermined payout percentage shown in an award matrix. Payout achievement percentages range between 0 and 200 percent of target based on economic profit achievement. Payout levels are expected to be between 80 and 120 percent of target in most years and average approximately 100 percent of target over time. The Compensation Committee establishes the target level of economic profit as an aggressive but achievable goal for the Corporation as a whole or any operating unit based on economic and competitive conditions at the time goals are established. Economic profit achievement representing a 50 percent payout level reflects threshold performance required to receive a minimum payout, while economic profit achievement representing a 200 percent payout level reflects the maximum incentive for exceptional performance. Achievement at or below the 50 percent payout threshold or achievement of a 200 percent payout level is expected to occur infrequently.
Individual Strategic Objectives. Each Named Executive Officer's individual strategic objectives are based on broad strategic objectives of the Corporation or a particular operating unit and are defined and measured within the Corporation's fiscal year. The independent Directors annually review and approve the Chairman and CEO's individual strategic objectives. The Chairman and CEO annually reviews and approves the individual strategic objectives of each other Named Executive Officer. Individual strategic objectives are designed to focus each Named Executive Officer on those matters having a significant impact on their individual area of responsibility.
At year-end, each Named Executive Officer evaluates their performance against their individual strategic objectives. The Chairman and CEO, after reviewing these self-evaluations, recommends the achievement percentage for each other Named Executive Officer's individual strategic objectives for Compensation Committee approval. The independent Directors, after reviewing the Chairman and CEO's self-evaluation, determine the achievement percentage of the Chairman and CEO's individual strategic objectives. Achievement percentages for each objective range from 0 to 125 percent. There is no threshold performance level for the individual strategic objective component of the annual incentive compensation award.
While the financial economic profit goal and the individual strategic goals are evaluated and achieved separately, the individual goals of a Named Executive Officer are broadly tied to financial performance for the Corporation or an operating unit and may impact the portion of the officer's annual incentive compensation award based on the Corporation's or operating unit's financial performance.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. Long-term incentive compensation is designed to focus executives on long-term value creation measured by objective financial performance metrics and long-term stock price appreciation and incent executives to remain with the Corporation. Long-term incentive compensation is provided through annual:
|
·
|
Performance-based awards with rolling three-year performance periods under the Performance Plan; and
|
|
·
|
Equity grants to select executives, including all Named Executive Officers, under the Stock Plan.
|
In most years, the two types of long-term incentive compensation provide an appropriate balance between emphasizing financial performance (Performance Plan awards) and stock price performance (stock options). The Compensation Committee and the Board annually evaluate and approve the award targets to strike the appropriate balance between Performance Plan awards and stock options for each Named Executive Officer.
Performance Plan. Economic profit is used as the performance measure for the Performance Plan for the reasons described under "Incentive Compensation Philosophy and Plans – Incentive Plan – Financial Performance Goals" on page 28 of this Proxy Statement. Under the Performance Plan, economic profit is defined as after-tax operating profit less a charge for invested capital, with cash normalized to a fixed amount for purposes of the calculation. The amount of economic profit calculated under the Performance Plan differs from economic profit under the Incentive Plan because the Performance Plan's definition of economic profit assumes cash to be a fixed amount for purposes of the calculation. A fixed level of cash is assumed under the Performance Plan to eliminate the effect on long-term compensation of a change in corporate cash management strategy during the period.
Each year of a performance period is viewed separately, with one-third of the award eligible to be earned (ranging from 25 percent of the target if the threshold level of economic profit is achieved to 200 percent of the target if the breakthrough level of economic profit is achieved). The Performance Plan award has a 25 percent annual threshold level of economic profit achievement required to earn an award for the year. Economic profit achievement representing a 100 percent payout level is established as an aggressive but achievable goal for the Corporation based on economic and competitive conditions at the time goals are established. Payout levels are expected to average approximately 100 percent across multiple performance periods and failure to achieve a 25 percent payout level or achievement of a 200 percent payout level will occur infrequently. For information on how the Compensation Committee and/or independent Directors determine the long-term incentive compensation award targets and corresponding market medians for each Named Executive Officer, see "The Role of Benchmarking and Market Data" above on page 19 of this Proxy Statement.
Stock Option Awards. Under the Stock Plan, the Board grants stock options with an exercise price equal to the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant. Annual grants typically occur at the February Board meeting. The Board may grant stock options, Performance Plan awards or RSUs throughout the year for a new hire, a significant promotion or other special circumstances. The amount of income realized by an executive from an option is equal to the stock appreciation between the grant and the exercise dates, which aligns the interests of the Named Executive Officers with the long-term value creation for shareholders. Stock option grants are limited to a group of executives (73 in Fiscal 2013, including all Named Executive Officers) who have the ability through their leadership and strategic actions to significantly impact the Corporation's long-term performance and, consequently, its stock price. In its history, the Corporation has never re-priced stock options.
The exercise price may be paid:
|
·
|
in cash;
|
|
·
|
in shares of Common Stock at fair market value on the date of delivery;
|
|
·
|
by authorizing the Corporation to withhold shares of Common Stock, which would otherwise be delivered upon exercise of the option, having a fair market value equal to the exercise price;
|
|
·
|
in cash by a broker-dealer to whom the executive has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise; or
|
|
·
|
by any combination of the above.
|
The Corporation uses the Black-Scholes option valuation method to calculate the number of options granted, which is based on the targeted dollar value of the award. All stock options cliff-vest four years and expire ten years after the date of grant. Early termination of employment other than due to death, disability, retirement or a change in control of the Corporation results in forfeiture of unvested option awards and a reduction in the exercise period of vested option awards. This policy is designed to motivate executives to focus on long-term value creation and support retention.
Retirement and Other Compensation Plans
The descriptions below summarize other compensation and retirement plans in which Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate. These plans do not change significantly from year to year, and other than participation in the SIP, do not involve annual compensation decisions by the Compensation Committee or the Board.
Supplemental Income Plan. The SIP is available to select key executives who consistently earn income above compensation caps on the qualified plan (i.e., 401(k) plan) and cash profit-sharing benefits. The 2013 statutory compensation limit for qualified plan and cash profit-sharing benefits was $255,000. Any compensation in excess is excluded from the eligible earnings used to calculate the benefits.
Each year, the Compensation Committee approves and the Board ratifies participation in the SIP. The SIP provides a benefit to the plan's participants, including the Named Executive Officers, equal to the additional amounts the participants would have earned had the Corporation's qualified plan and cash profit-sharing benefits not been subject to compensation caps, except no income attributable to the Performance Plan is considered. The benefit is paid on an after-tax basis in the form of shares of Common Stock issued under the Stock Plan or cash at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
In Fiscal 2013, the Compensation Committee determined all SIP benefits would be in the form of shares of Common Stock. The SIP shares bear a restrictive legend prohibiting the transfer by sale, pledge, gift or otherwise while the participant is employed by the Corporation. The number of shares of Common Stock is calculated by dividing the amount of the benefit by the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the date the benefit is paid, with cash payable in lieu of any fractional share. The Corporation pays all SIP benefits on the first day of its March fiscal month (or the next closest business day if the day is a weekend or holiday) of each year. Participation in the SIP is provided to assure the overall competitiveness of the executive compensation program. The transfer restriction on SIP shares is intended to facilitate long-term stock ownership by executives, thereby further aligning the interests of executives with the interests of shareholders.
Deferred Compensation Plan. Executives eligible for compensation under the Incentive Plan, which include all Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in the HNI Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferred Plan"). The Deferred Plan allows executives to voluntarily defer base salary, Incentive Plan awards, Performance Plan awards, SIP benefits and other amounts. The Deferred Plan allows eligible executives to voluntarily defer the receipt of compensation to supplement retirement and achieve personal financial planning goals. Amounts can be deferred to a cash account earning interest at a rate set each year at one percent above the prime interest rate or to a notional stock account in the form of nonvoting share units fluctuating in value based on the price increase or decrease of Common Stock and earn dividends distributed to all shareholders. The dividends are automatically reinvested for each participant to acquire additional nonvoting shares units. For any cash compensation deferred to the notional stock account, the number of nonvoting share units is determined by dividing the amount of the compensation by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date the compensation would have otherwise been paid. Each participant elects, on an annual basis, the date or dates of distribution (i.e., a participant can elect a lump-sum distribution or distribution via annual installments not to exceed 15) of any deferred amounts. During Fiscal 2013, Messrs. Askren and Determan were the only Named Executive Officers who participated in the Deferred Plan.
Profit-Sharing Retirement Plan. Each Named Executive Officer participates in the HNI Corporation Profit-Sharing Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan"). The Retirement Plan is a defined contribution plan including both pre- and after-tax member contributions as well as various employer contributions and is generally available to all members. Members are eligible to make voluntary (pre- and/or after-tax) contributions immediately upon hire. One year of service is typically required to be eligible for employer contributions. Each Named Executive Officer is eligible for employer contributions. These contributions are reflected in the "All Other Compensation" Column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Cash Profit-Sharing Plan. Each Named Executive Officer participates in and is eligible for distributions under the HNI Corporation Cash Profit-Sharing Plan (the "Cash Profit-Sharing Plan"). The Cash Profit-Sharing Plan consists of cash profit-sharing calculated and generally paid twice per year. The actual amount of the profit-sharing benefit paid is based upon the profitability (net profit) of each respective operating unit for those members employed by an operating unit or consolidated adjusted net profit of the Corporation for those members employed directly by the Corporation. Members (who are not members of a bargaining unit) are generally eligible to participate after completion of one year of continuous service. To be eligible for distribution, a member must be:
|
·
|
employed at the date of distribution (including on leave of absence or receiving disability pay);
|
|
·
|
retired in accordance with the retirement policy during the most recent profit-sharing period; or
|
|
·
|
terminated due to disability.
|
Amounts paid to the Named Executive Officers under the Cash Profit-Sharing Plan are reflected in the "Bonus" Column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Change in Control, Post-Employment and Other Events
No Named Executive Officer has an employment contract with the Corporation, consistent with the Corporation's general practice. Certain executives, including the Named Executive Officers, have entered into a Change In Control Employment Agreement ("CIC Agreement") with the Corporation. The CIC Agreement is designed to assure continuity of executive management during a threatened takeover and ensure executive management is able to objectively evaluate any CIC proposal and act in the best interests of shareholders during a possible acquisition, merger or combination. Benefits payable under the CIC Agreements have a "double trigger," which means payments under the CIC Agreements are triggered only by termination of the executive by the Corporation other than for cause or disability or by the executive terminating employment for good reason. Please see "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" for a discussion of the terms of the CIC Agreements.
Upon a change in control or upon retirement eligibility, certain awards granted under the Incentive Plan, the Performance Plan and the Stock Plan become immediately vested or payable and are not conditioned on a termination of employment. Please see "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" for a discussion of the effect of a change in control and retirement eligibility on awards granted under benefit plans.
Other Features of the Executive Compensation Program
Perquisites. Consistent with its longstanding culture, the Corporation does not provide executives with any special or unique perquisites, for example company cars or club memberships. Relocation assistance is provided to executives under a relocation program broadly available for employees transferred within the Corporation and newly-hired professional employees. Executives participate in the same health, retirement, profit sharing, disability and life insurance programs and member stock purchase plan as other members. The dollar value of Corporation-paid life insurance premiums under the HNI Corporation Group Term Life Insurance Plan ("Life Insurance Plan") for each Named Executive Officer is reflected in the "All Other Compensation" Column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Anti-Hedging Policy. The Corporation's Insider Trading Policy, revised in Fiscal 2012, includes an enhanced policy prohibiting officers (including the Named Executive Officers) or Directors from hedging their ownership of the Corporation's Common Stock (including prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds), engaging in short sales or purchasing put or call options, pledging their shares of the Corporation's Common Stock, holding them in a margin account or engaging in short-term transactions with shares of the Corporation Common Stock. This policy is designed to ensure alignment of officers and Directors with shareholders and requires them to bear the full economic risk of share ownership. Each Named Executive Officer is in compliance with the Corporation's anti-hedging policy.
Executive Stock Ownership Guideline. The Board has adopted an Executive Stock Ownership Guideline based on the belief key executives should have a significant ownership interest in the Corporation's stock. Under the guideline, ownership levels are provided for executives to acquire and hold a recommended ownership interest in the Corporation's stock based on their position and compensation level. The guideline is intended to align the interests of key executives with shareholder interests. The guideline ownership levels are shown below:
|
Position
|
$ Value of Shares
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
|
4.0 x Base Salary
|
|
Operating Company (Unit) Presidents,
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice Presidents
|
2.0 x Base Salary
|
|
Other Officers
|
1.5 x Base Salary
|
Executives are encouraged to reach their respective stock ownership level within five years of the date the individual assumes an executive position covered by the guideline. The Compensation Committee annually reviews each executive's progress toward the goal. The Compensation Committee can specify a percentage of the executive's annual incentive compensation be paid in shares of Common Stock if it determines an executive is not achieving appropriate progress toward the goal.
In addition, the guideline credits the executive with vested shares allocated to the executive under the qualified and non-qualified retirement plans and with the number of shares (net of the exercise price) issuable to the executive if he exercised vested, in-the-money stock options. Each Named Executive Officer has achieved the specified level of ownership.
Executive Compensation Clawback. If financial results are significantly restated due to fraud or intentional misconduct, the Board will review any performance-based compensation paid to executive officers who are found to be personally responsible for the fraud or intentional misconduct leading to the restatement and may, to the extent permitted by law, seek recoupment of amounts paid in excess of the amounts based on the restated financial results.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation. The Corporation typically seeks to maximize the tax deductibility of components of executive compensation where appropriate. Section 162(m) of the Code ("Section 162(m)") limits the ability of public companies to deduct compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid annually to the chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers, not including the chief financial officer. There are exceptions to this limit, including compensation qualified as "performance-based." The portion of the Incentive Plan award linked to financial performance and any Performance Plan and stock option awards complied with the exception to Section 162(m) and are not considered in determining the $1,000,000 limit. In Fiscal 2013, RSUs which were not considered "performance-based" under Section 162(m) vested for each Named Executive Officer. As a result, certain compensation for Mr. Askren was not deductible by the Corporation.
Impact of Prior Compensation in Setting Elements of Compensation
Prior compensation of the Named Executive Officers does not generally impact how elements of current compensation are set. The independent Directors and the Compensation Committee believe the competitive environment mandates current total compensation be sufficient to attract, motivate and retain top management. The Compensation Committee analyzes outstanding equity grants, outstanding Incentive Plan and Performance Plan awards and ownership of Common Stock for each Named Executive Officer to ensure future stock equity grants, Incentive Plan and Performance Plan awards, CIC Agreements and other benefits provide appropriate and relevant incentives to the executives. Based on the current analysis, the Compensation Committee believes prior compensation will not impact the ongoing effectiveness of the compensation objectives.
Say on Pay Vote Results
The Corporation held its annual advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation at the 2013 Annual Meeting. Approximately 98% of the votes cast by shareholders were in favor of the compensation program for Named Executive Officers described in the Corporation's proxy statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting. The Compensation Committee reviewed its Named Executive Officer compensation decisions with respect to Fiscal 2013 in light of this substantial shareholder support and further considered the results of the advisory vote when making Named Executive Officer compensation decisions in early Fiscal 2013. Given the significant shareholder support voiced through the advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation, the Compensation Committee continued to apply substantially the same principles in determining the amounts and structure of executive compensation and renewed its commitment to paying for performance.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A, which begins on page 16 of this Proxy Statement, with management, and based on review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.
HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Dennis J. Martin, Chairperson
Miguel M. Calado
Ronald V. Waters, III
The table below shows the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each of the Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011. The Corporation does not have employment agreements with any of its executives. While employed, executives are entitled to base salary, participation in the executive compensation programs identified in the tables below and discussed in the CD&A and other benefits common to all members. The performance-based conditions associated with Performance Plan and Incentive Plan awards as well as salary and bonus in proportion to total compensation are discussed in detail throughout the CD&A, which begins on page 16 of this Proxy Statement.
|
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($) (1)
|
Stock
Awards
($) (2)
|
Option
Awards
($) (3)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (4)
|
All Other
Compensation
($) (5)
|
Total
($) (6)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
HNI Corporation
|
2013
2012
2011
|
875,934
838,662
806,884
|
7,395
3,763
3,773
|
--
--
--
|
1,802,901
1,812,421
1,643,626
|
1,781,233
1,104,662
1,195,965
|
149,032
138,110
128,007
|
4,616,496
3,897,617
3,778,255
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
HNI Corporation
|
2013
2012
2011
|
383,190
369,117
354,915
|
7,395
3,763
3,773
|
--
--
--
|
387,443
391,353
354,908
|
445,521
326,307
347,907
|
55,561
38,036
37,153
|
1,279,110
1,128,576
1,098,656
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
Executive Vice President,
HNI Corporation
President,
Hearth & Home Technologies
|
2013
2012
2011
|
392,576
379,300
365,220
|
10,188
4,112
3,965
|
--
--
--
|
393,269
399,164
360,265
|
599,073
514,017
495,425
|
85,842
43,468
33,031
|
1,480,948
1,340,060
1,257,906
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
Executive Vice President,
HNI Corporation
President,
The HON Company
|
2013
2012
2011
|
437,354
421,045
406,646
|
10,111
10,538
8,979
|
--
--
--
|
433,523
441,087
396,197
|
520,560
420,604
311,629
|
91,495
81,743
80,641
|
1,493,042
1,375,017
1,204,092
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
Executive Vice President,
HNI Corporation
President,
HNI Contract Furniture Group
|
2013
2012
2011
|
365,075
--
--
|
7,752
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
635,159
--
--
|
391,574
--
--
|
59,055
--
--
|
1,458,616
--
--
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
The amounts in this column reflect the payments of cash profit-sharing during calendar years 2013, 2012 and 2011 under the Cash Profit-Sharing Plan. Cash profit-sharing is earned on a non-fiscal year cycle and is available to all members, generally after a full year of service, on a non-discriminatory basis.
|
|
(2)
|
No stock awards were granted in Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 or Fiscal 2011.
|
|
(3)
|
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted in Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 under the Stock Plan computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts are included in the footnote titled "Stock-Based Compensation" to the Corporation's audited financial statements for: (i) Fiscal 2013 included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013; (ii) Fiscal 2012 included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012; and (iii) Fiscal 2011 included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
|
(4)
|
The amounts in this column include annual incentive compensation awards earned in Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 under the Incentive Plan. The awards earned in Fiscal 2013 were paid in February 2014. For Fiscal 2013, in addition to awards earned under the Incentive Plan, this column also includes the cash portion of Performance Plan awards earned for the 2013 portion of the 2011-2013 Plan, the 2012-2014 Plan and the 2013-2015 Plan. The 2011-2013 Plan award was paid in February 2014 and was subject to continuous employment through the last day of Fiscal 2013. The 2012-2014 Plan award will not be paid until 2015 and is subject to continuous employment through the last day of fiscal year 2014. The 2013-2015 Plan award will not be paid until 2016 and is subject to continuous employment through the last day of fiscal year 2015. The breakdown between the Incentive Plan and the Performance Plan awards for Fiscal 2013 is as follows: Mr. Askren – $1,212,712 under the Incentive Plan, $109,350 under the 2011-2013 Plan, $164,268 under the 2012-2014 Plan and $294,903 under the 2013-2015 Plan; Mr. Tjaden – $323,065 under the Incentive Plan, $23,612 under the 2011-2013 Plan, $35,471 under the 2012-2014 Plan and $63,374 under the 2013-2015 Plan; Mr. Determan – $474,599 under the Incentive Plan, $23,968 under the 2011-2013 Plan, $36,178 under the 2012-2014 Plan and $64,328 under the 2013-2015 Plan; Mr. Dittmer – $383,312 under the Incentive Plan, $26,359 under the 2011-2013 Plan, $39,977 under the 2012-2014 Plan and $70,911 under the 2013-2015 Plan; and Mr. Lorenger – $278,447 under the Incentive Plan, $20,750 under the 2011-2013 Plan, $33,150 under the 2012-2014 Plan and $59,228 under the 2013-2015 Plan.
|
|
(5)
|
The amounts in this column include the Corporation's contributions to the Retirement Plan, the dollar value of Corporation-paid life insurance premiums under the Life Insurance Plan, both of which are generally available to all members, and the dollar value of Common Stock paid under the SIP. Contributions under the Retirement Plan in Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 were as follows: Mr. Askren – $18,352; $14,749; $14,534; Mr. Tjaden – $18,352; $14,749; $14,534; Mr. Determan – $20,949; $12,574; $12,262; Mr. Dittmer – $20,878; $21,050; $19,375; and Mr. Lorenger – $18,684 for 2013. The dollar values of Corporation-paid life insurance premiums under the Life Insurance Plan in Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 were as follows: Messrs. Askren, Tjaden, Determan and Dittmer – $81; $102; $102; and Mr. Lorenger – $81 for 2013. The dollar values of Common Stock earned under the SIP for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 were as follows: Mr. Askren – $130,599; $86,994; $82,892; Mr. Tjaden – $37,128; $23,185; $22,517; Mr. Determan – $64,812; $30,792; $20,667; Mr. Dittmer – $70,536; $60,591; $61,164; and Mr. Lorenger – $40,290 for 2013. The SIP Common Stock for Fiscal 2013 was issued February 24, 2014; Fiscal 2012 was issued February 25, 2013; Fiscal 2011 was issued February 27, 2012.
|
The table below shows the grants of plan-based awards to the Named Executive Officers during Fiscal 2013, including Performance Plan awards, Incentive Plan awards and stock options granted under the Stock Plan. The aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards are disclosed on a grant-by-grant basis in the table below. For additional information on the Incentive Plan and the Stock Plan, see "Annual Incentive Compensation" on page 23 and "Long-Term Incentive Compensation" on page 25 of this Proxy Statement.
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
|
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
|
Exercise or Base Price
of Option Awards
($/Sh)
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)
|
||
|
Threshold ($)
|
Target ($)
|
Maximum ($)
|
|||||
|
Stan A. Askren
|
|||||||
|
Stock Options
|
2/13/2013
|
166,166
|
31.79
|
1,802,901
|
|||
|
2013-2015
Performance Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
165,058
|
660,231
|
1,320,462
|
|||
|
Incentive Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
316,911
|
1,056,370
|
1,795,829
|
|||
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
|||||||
|
Stock Options
|
2/13/2013
|
35,709
|
31.79
|
387,443
|
|||
|
2013-2015
Performance Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
35,471
|
141,882
|
283,764
|
|||
|
Incentive Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
88,109
|
293,696
|
499,282
|
|||
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
|||||||
|
Stock Options
|
2/13/2013
|
36,246
|
31.79
|
393,269
|
|||
|
2013-2015
Performance Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
36,004
|
144,017
|
288,034
|
|||
|
Incentive Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
89,435
|
298,115
|
506,796
|
|||
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
|||||||
|
Stock Options
|
2/13/2013
|
39,956
|
31.79
|
433,523
|
|||
|
2013-2015
Performance Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
39,689
|
158,757
|
317,513
|
|||
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
|
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
|
Exercise or Base Price
of Option Awards
($/Sh)
|
Grant Date Fair Value
of Stock and Option Awards ($)
|
||
|
Threshold ($)
|
Target ($)
|
Maximum ($)
|
|||||
|
Incentive Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
99,064
|
330,214
|
561,363
|
|||
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
|||||||
|
Stock Options
|
2/13/2013
|
33,372
|
31.79
|
362,086
|
|||
|
Stock Options
|
2/13/2013
|
25,168
|
31.79
|
273,072
|
|||
|
2013-2015
Performance Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
33,150
|
132,600
|
265,200
|
|||
|
Incentive Plan
|
2/13/2013
|
82,543
|
275,145
|
467,746
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
There is no threshold performance level for the individual strategic objective component of the annual incentive compensation award under the Incentive Plan. However, with respect to the financial component of the annual incentive compensation award under the Incentive Plan, a 50 percent payout level is the minimum performance threshold required to receive a payout. That is the amount reflected above as the threshold for the Incentive Plan.
|
The following table shows the Named Executive Officers' outstanding equity awards as of the end of Fiscal 2013. All outstanding stock option awards reported in this table cliff-vest four years and expire ten years after the date of grant.
|
Name
|
Option Awards
|
|||
|
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
(#) Exercisable
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#) Unexercisable (1)
|
Option Exercise Price
($) (2)
|
Option Expiration Date
|
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
25,000
|
39.72
|
2/11/14
|
|
|
25,000
|
37.57
|
5/4/14
|
||
|
55,100
|
42.66
|
2/16/15
|
||
|
40,712
|
58.06
|
2/15/16
|
||
|
58,676
|
48.66
|
2/14/17
|
||
|
126,434
|
31.69
|
2/13/18
|
||
|
112,644
|
10.36
|
2/23/19
|
||
|
226,909
|
23.99
|
2/17/20
|
||
|
140,842
|
31.98
|
2/16/21
|
||
|
218,364
|
25.46
|
2/15/22
|
||
|
166,166
|
31.79
|
2/13/23
|
||
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
36,923
|
17.01
|
11/7/18
|
|
|
17,931
|
10.36
|
2/23/19
|
||
|
48,000
|
23.99
|
2/17/20
|
||
|
30,412
|
31.98
|
2/16/21
|
||
|
47,151
|
25.46
|
2/15/22
|
||
|
35,709
|
31.79
|
2/13/23
|
||
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
8,000
|
39.72
|
2/11/14
|
|
|
7,200
|
42.66
|
2/16/15
|
||
|
8,320
|
58.06
|
2/15/16
|
||
|
11,876
|
48.66
|
2/14/17
|
||
|
48,000
|
23.99
|
2/17/20
|
||
|
30,871
|
31.98
|
2/16/21
|
||
|
48,092
|
25.46
|
2/15/22
|
||
|
36,246
|
31.79
|
2/13/23
|
||
|
Name
|
Option Awards
|
|||
|
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
(#) Exercisable
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#) Unexercisable (1)
|
Option Exercise Price
($) (2)
|
Option Expiration Date
|
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
9,000
|
39.72
|
2/11/14
|
|
|
9,200
|
42.66
|
2/16/15
|
||
|
7,125
|
58.06
|
2/15/16
|
||
|
10,463
|
48.66
|
2/14/17
|
||
|
23,258
|
31.69
|
2/13/18
|
||
|
88,000
|
23.99
|
2/17/20
|
||
|
33,950
|
31.98
|
2/16/21
|
||
|
53,143
|
25.46
|
2/15/22
|
||
|
39,956
|
31.79
|
2/13/23
|
||
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
2,500
|
39.72
|
2/11/14
|
|
|
3,800
|
42.66
|
2/16/15
|
||
|
2,957
|
58.06
|
2/15/16
|
||
|
6,483
|
48.66
|
2/14/17
|
||
|
14,622
|
31.69
|
2/13/18
|
||
|
5,222
|
10.36
|
2/23/19
|
||
|
42,182
|
23.99
|
2/17/20
|
||
|
26,725
|
31.98
|
2/16/21
|
||
|
44,067
|
25.46
|
2/15/22
|
||
|
58,540
|
31.79
|
2/13/23
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
All stock options cliff-vest four years after the grant date. Vesting dates for each unexercisable stock option award, in descending order, for each Named Executive Officer are as follows: February 17, 2014, February 16, 2015, February 15, 2016 and February 13, 2017.
|
|
(2)
|
For fiscal years prior to Fiscal 2008, the exercise price was the average of the high and low transaction prices of a share of Common Stock on the grant date. Stock options granted in Fiscal 2008 and after under the Stock Plan have an exercise price equal to the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the grant date.
|
The following table shows information concerning Named Executive Officers' exercise of stock options and RSU vesting during Fiscal 2013.
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
|||
|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)
|
Value Realized on Exercise
($) (1)
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($) (2)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
0
|
0
|
19,508
|
632,254
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
20,000
|
468,167
|
4,127
|
133,756
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
130,523
|
1,589,036
|
4,127
|
133,756
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
57,938
|
1,074,503
|
4,439
|
143,868
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
17,000
|
373,531
|
3,627
|
117,551
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
This column is calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired by the difference between the actual sale price on the date of exercise or, if the shares were retained by the Named Executive Officer, the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the stock options. Messrs. Tjaden, Determan, Dittmer and Lorenger exercised the following options in Fiscal 2013:
|
|
Name
|
Date of Exercise
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#)
|
Option Exercise Price ($/Sh)
|
Sold or
Retained Shares
|
Sale or Closing Price
on Date of
Exercise ($/Sh)
|
Value Realized
on Exercise ($)
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
3/5/2013
|
15,000
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
31.99
|
324,429
|
|
7/26/2013
|
5,000
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
39.11
|
143,738
|
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
2/20/2013
|
57,915
|
22.56
|
Sold
|
32.73
|
588,908
|
|
2/25/2013
|
22,531
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
31.48
|
475,796
|
|
|
2/27/2013
|
15,400
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
31.80
|
330,188
|
|
|
5/1/2013
|
3,703
|
32.93
|
Sold
|
34.23
|
4,796
|
|
|
5/3/2013
|
6,297
|
32.93
|
Sold
|
34.15
|
7,705
|
|
|
10/22/2013
|
24,677
|
31.69
|
Sold
|
39.05
|
181,642
|
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
2/14/2013
|
2,031
|
22.56
|
Sold
|
31.82
|
18,807
|
|
2/15/2013
|
15,102
|
22.56
|
Sold
|
32.01
|
142,761
|
|
|
2/25/2013
|
18,100
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
31.53
|
383,115
|
|
|
2/26/2013
|
7,400
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
31.05
|
153,130
|
|
|
2/27/2013
|
4,500
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
31.69
|
95,972
|
|
|
3/7/2013
|
5,000
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
33.05
|
113,434
|
|
|
11/22/2013
|
5,805
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
39.18
|
167,284
|
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
2/26/2013
|
12,000
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
31.00
|
247,680
|
|
6/6/2013
|
5,000
|
10.36
|
Sold
|
35.53
|
125,851
|
|
(2)
|
These are gross numbers calculated using the closing stock price on the day the grants vested.
|
The Deferred Plan allows executives to defer certain compensation to a cash account earning interest at a rate set annually at one percent above the prime interest rate or to the Corporation's notional stock account in the form of nonvoting share units earning dividends distributed to shareholders which are then automatically reinvested in additional nonvoting share units. The only Named Executive Officers currently participating in the Deferred Plan are Messrs. Askren and Determan. Mr. Askren deferred into the Corporation's notional stock account the after-tax value of his 2012 SIP award, which was granted in February 2013, totaling $83,236 and is reflected in the table below. The value of Mr. Askren's 2012 SIP award, before taxes, was $86,994. Mr. Askren's balance in the Deferred Plan as of the end of Fiscal 2013 was 42,885 nonvoting share units. Unless distributed earlier due to the occurrence of certain triggering events as described in the Deferred Plan (including death, disability or change in control), this balance will not be distributed until the earlier of January 31, 2016 for a portion of the balance, January 31, 2017 for another portion of the balance, January 31, 2018 for another portion of the balance and the date Mr. Askren is no longer employed by the Corporation with respect to the entire remaining balance.
Mr. Determan deferred into the Corporation's cash account the after-tax value of his 2013 Incentive Plan award, which was paid in February 2014, totaling $474,599 and is reflected in the table below. Unless distributed earlier due to the occurrence of certain triggering events as described in the Deferred Plan (including death, disability or change in control), this balance will be distributed beginning in January 31, 2017 in five annual installments.
For additional information on the Deferred Plan, see "Retirement and Other Compensation Plans – Deferred Compensation Plan" on page 30 of this Proxy Statement.
|
Name
|
Executive Contributions
in Last FY ($) (1)
|
Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY ($) (2)
|
Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE ($) (3)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
83,235
|
445,129
|
1,688,811
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
474,599
|
0
|
474,599
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
(1)
|
The amount of Mr. Askren's contribution before taxes, $86,994, is reflected in the "All Other Compensation" Column of the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Askren's Fiscal 2012 compensation. The amount of Mr. Determan's contribution before taxes, $474,599, is reflected in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" Column of the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Determan's Fiscal 2013 compensation.
|
|
(2)
|
The reported dollar value is the sum of (i) share price appreciation (or depreciation) in the account balance during Fiscal 2013 not attributable to contributions, withdrawals or distributions during Fiscal 2013 and (ii) dividends earned on the account balance during Fiscal 2013. The share price appreciation (or depreciation) is calculated by first multiplying 39,018, the number of nonvoting share units in Mr. Askren's account at the end of Fiscal 2012, by $39.38, the closing price of a share of Common Stock on December 27, 2013, the last trading day of Fiscal 2013; and then subtracting from such amount Mr. Askren's aggregate account balance at the end of Fiscal 2012 – $1,131,970. The dividends earned on the account balance during Fiscal 2013 were $40,493.
|
|
(3)
|
The reported dollar value is calculated by multiplying 42,885, the number of nonvoting share units in Mr. Askren's account at the end of Fiscal 2013, by $39.38, the closing price of a share of Common Stock on December 27, 2013, the last trading day of Fiscal 2013. For Mr. Determan, this balance reflects his contribution in February 2014 as his balance at the end of Fiscal 2013 was $0.
|
Retirement, death, disability and change in control ("CIC") events trigger the payment of compensation to the Named Executive Officers not available to all salaried members.
Change in Control Employment Agreements. A limited number of executives, including the Named Executive Officers, have entered into a CIC Agreement with the Corporation. The CIC Agreement is designed to assure the continuity of executive management during a threatened takeover and ensure executive management is able to objectively evaluate any CIC proposal and act in the best interests of shareholders during a possible acquisition, merger or combination. The agreement is designed as part of a competitive compensation package, thereby aiding in attracting and retaining top-quality executives. The description of the amended form of agreement below is qualified in its entirety by the actual form of CIC Agreement, attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 16, 2006, as amended by Amendment No. 1, attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2007.
The CIC Agreement defines a CIC as having occurred:
|
·
|
when a third person or entity becomes the beneficial owner of 20 percent or more of the outstanding Common Stock, subject to certain exceptions;
|
|
·
|
when more than one-third of the Board is composed of persons not recommended by at least three-fourths of the incumbent Board;
|
|
·
|
upon the occurrence of certain business combinations involving the Corporation; or
|
|
·
|
upon approval by shareholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution.
|
Upon a CIC, a two-year employment contract between the Corporation and the executive becomes effective. The executive is entitled to certain benefits if, at any time within two years of the CIC, the executive's employment is terminated by the Corporation for any reason other than cause or disability of the executive or by the executive for good reason.
Cause is defined as an act or acts of dishonesty on the executive's part resulting in substantial personal enrichment at the Corporation's expense or repeated violations by the executive of obligations under the agreement, which are demonstrably willful and deliberate on the executive's part and resulted in material injury to the Corporation. Good reason is defined as:
|
·
|
assignment to the executive of any duties substantially inconsistent with the executive's position, authority or responsibilities or any other substantial adverse changes in the executive's position (including title), authority or responsibilities;
|
|
·
|
failure to comply with any of the provisions of the agreement;
|
|
·
|
a required change of more than 50 miles in the executive's principal place of work, except for travel reasonably required in performing the executive's responsibilities;
|
|
·
|
a purported termination of the executive's employment by the Corporation not permitted by the agreement;
|
|
·
|
failure to require a successor company to assume the agreement; or
|
|
·
|
the executive's good faith determination the CIC resulted in the executive being substantially unable to carry out authorities or responsibilities attached to the position held prior to the CIC.
|
When a triggering event occurs following a CIC, the executive is entitled to a severance payment equal to two times (three times for the Chairman and CEO) the sum of the executive's annual base salary and the average of the executive's annual incentive compensation awards for the prior two years. The executive is also entitled to receive annual salary through the date of termination and a bonus equal to the average of the executive's annual incentive compensation awards for the prior two years (prorated based on the length of employment during the year in which termination occurs) minus any incentive compensation amount already paid to the executive with respect to the fiscal year in which the CIC occurs.
If a triggering event occurs, the executive is also entitled to a continuation of certain employee benefits for up to 18 months and group life insurance benefits for up to two years if comparable benefits are not otherwise available to the executive. In addition, the executive is entitled to receive a lump-sum payment in an amount equal to the present value of the cost of health and dental coverage for an additional six months (including an additional amount to "gross up" this payment for tax liability) and an additional lump-sum payment equal to the value, reasonably determined, of two years of continued participation in disability benefit plans.
The Corporation must fulfill certain obligations to the executive, or pay certain amounts to the executive, through the date of the executive's termination if, at any time within two years of the CIC, the executive is terminated by reason of death, disability or cause, or if the executive terminates employment other than for good reason. Disability and certain other benefits must be provided to the executive after the date of termination if the executive is terminated by reason of disability.
The Corporation must pay the full amount due under the agreement and "gross-up" the executive's compensation for any excise tax, for any federal, state and local income taxes applicable to the excise tax "gross-up" and for tax penalties and interest imposed on "excess parachute payments" (i.e., excess severance or CIC payments), as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). A gross-up payment is payable only to the extent the aggregate present value of the severance or CIC payments payable to the executive exceeds 110 percent of three times the executive's annualized includible compensation for the most recent five taxable years ending before the date on which the CIC occurred. If the 110 percent hurdle is not exceeded, the severance or CIC payments to the executive are reduced (or repaid) to the minimum extent necessary so no portion of the executive's benefit constitutes an excess parachute payment subject to the excise tax.
In exchange for receipt of the severance payment, salary, bonus and benefits under the agreement as described above, the executive is prohibited, for a period of one year from the date of termination, from entering into any relationship with any enterprise, business or division thereof (other than the Corporation), engaged in the same business in those states within the United States in which the Corporation, at the time of termination of employment, conducts business and which has annual sales of at least $10,000,000. In addition, the executive shall not, without the Corporation's prior written consent, communicate or divulge any confidential information, knowledge or data relating to the Corporation or any of its affiliated companies to anyone other than the Corporation or its designees.
The executive is entitled to receive reimbursement for any legal fees and expenses, plus interest thereon, which may be incurred in enforcing or defending the agreement. The CIC Agreement is automatically renewed, on an annual basis, for a period of two years. The Board may terminate the agreement if it determines the executive is no longer a key executive; provided, however, a determination shall not be made, and if made shall have no effect, within two years after the occurrence of a CIC.
The Compensation Committee uses the CIC Agreement to strike an appropriate balance between executive and shareholder interests, preserve productivity, avoid disruption and limit distraction during a period when the Corporation is, or is rumored to be, involved in a CIC transaction. The Compensation Committee wants executives to be able to objectively evaluate any CIC proposal without being influenced by the potential CIC to overstate the value of the potential transaction. Likewise, the Compensation Committee intends to ease the consequences of an unexpected termination of employment so offers in the Corporation and its shareholders' best interests are given careful and thoughtful review.
The Compensation Committee does not view the CIC Agreements as an element of current compensation, and the agreements do not necessarily affect the Compensation Committee's annual decisions with respect to the compensation elements of the executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee receives and reviews information pertaining to compensation payable to the Named Executive Officers upon a CIC, including information contained on page 38 of this Proxy Statement under the heading "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."
Other Compensation Triggered by Change in Control Event. Under the Stock Plan, upon a CIC, each outstanding RSU award is immediately vested and stock option is immediately exercisable in full and remains exercisable for the remaining term of the option. Under both the Incentive Plan and the Performance Plan, the Board values each outstanding Incentive Plan and Performance Plan award prior to the effective date of a CIC and the values are payable without proration within 30 days of the date of a CIC. The foregoing payments occurring on or after a CIC are not conditioned on termination of employment.
Compensation Triggered By Retirement, Death or Disability. Upon retirement at age 65, or after age 55 with ten years of service, all outstanding Incentive Plan, Performance Plan and stock option awards immediately vest. Upon disability or death, all outstanding Incentive Plan, Performance Plan, stock option and RSU awards immediately vest. Option holders who terminate employment due to disability may exercise stock options, which fully vest as of the date of disability, until the earlier of the expiration date of the stock option or the second anniversary of the date of disability. The representatives of option holders whose employment is terminated due to death may exercise stock options, which shall fully vest as of the date of death, until the earlier of the expiration date of the stock option or the second anniversary of the date of death. Option holders who terminate employment due to retirement may exercise stock options, which shall fully vest as of the date of retirement, until the earlier of the expiration of the stock option, or the third anniversary of the date of retirement.
In the event of a termination of employment not due to a CIC event, retirement, death or disability, the Named Executive Officers receive only those benefits available to all members. However, the Named Executive Officers may exercise stock options which are vested as of the date of termination until the earlier of the expiration of the stock option or 180 days following the date of termination.
The following tables quantify compensation payable to the Named Executive Officers upon a CIC or the death or disability of the executive. The tables include only compensation items not available to all salaried members and assume the event occurred on the last business day of Fiscal 2013. Only Mr. Dittmer was retirement eligible as of the last business day of Fiscal 2013, so retirement information is provided only for him. The "Total" Column in each of the following tables does not include deferred compensation, which may be payable sooner than the original election date. For a discussion of the Corporation's obligations to the Named Executive Officers under the Deferred Plan, see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2013 Table above.
Value in Event of Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Termination for Good Reason Following a Change in Control
|
Name
|
Cash
Severance Under CIC Agreement
($) (1)
|
Total
Value of Benefits Under CIC Agreement
($) (2)
|
Incentive Plan
Acceleration
($) (3)
|
Performance Plan
Acceleration
($) (4)
|
Stock Options
Acceleration
($) (5)
|
Excise Tax
Gross-Up Under CIC Agreement
($) (6)
|
Total
($)
|
|
Stan Askren
|
5,322,894
|
25,090
|
1,212,712
|
1,069,113
|
8,835,187
|
7,467,619
|
23,932,615
|
|
Kurt Tjaden
|
1,359,936
|
25,549
|
323,065
|
230,599
|
1,891,142
|
1,636,113
|
5,466,404
|
|
Brad Determan
|
1,700,238
|
17,009
|
474,599
|
234,462
|
1,911,713
|
1,866,925
|
6,204,947
|
|
Jerry Dittmer
|
1,501,982
|
25,090
|
383,312
|
258,413
|
2,648,567
|
2,035,039
|
6,852,403
|
|
Jeff Lorenger
|
1,339,547
|
24,922
|
278,447
|
210,000
|
1,904,676
|
1,597,777
|
5,355,369
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
Under the CIC Agreements for each Named Executive Officer, the amounts in this column include the following: (i) an amount equal to two times (three times for Mr. Askren) the sum of (a) the executive's annual base salary and (b) the average of the executive's annual incentive compensation awards for the prior two years; (ii) an amount equal to the value of the cost of health and dental coverage for an additional six months from the date of termination; (iii) an amount equal to the value of the "gross-up" for any federal, state and local taxes applicable to the value of six months of health and dental coverage continuation; (iv) an amount equal to the value of 24 months of continued participation in the Corporation's accidental death and travel accident insurance plan and disability plans; and (v) for Mr. Lorenger, an incremental incentive amount equal to the difference between the executive's annual incentive award earned in Fiscal 2013 and the average of the executive's annual incentive awards earned in Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the value of benefits provided following termination of employment under the CIC Agreements for each Named Executive Officer. Such benefits consist of medical and dental benefits for 18 months and group life insurance benefits for 24 months.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the value of the annual incentive award earned for Fiscal 2013, which the Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive under the Incentive Plan if he remained employed by the Corporation on the last day of Fiscal 2013.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents the estimated 2011-2013 Plan, 2012-2014 Plan and 2013-2015 Plan award payable. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2011-2013 Plan: (i) economic profit of 113 percent of the targeted amount for the 2011 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 59 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 54 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions accounts for employment during the entire 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2014. 2012-2014 Plan: (i) economic profit of 83 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 78 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 24 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2015. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2013-2015 Plan: (i) economic profit of 134 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2015 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 12 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2016. Amounts included for the Performance Plan are estimates and are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Due to the number of factors, the actual amounts we pay or distribute under the Performance Plan may differ materially. Factors that could affect these amounts include the financial performance of the Corporation during 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the achievement of economic profit goals.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents the value of accelerating the vesting of stock options not otherwise vested in accordance with the Stock Plan. Such options will remain exercisable until the expiration date established at the time of award.
|
|
(6)
|
Represents the payment to "gross-up" the executive's compensation under the executive's CIC Agreement for any excise tax and for any federal, state and local taxes applicable to the excise tax "gross-up."
|
Value in Event of Change in Control with No Employment Termination
|
Name
|
Cash
Payment Under CIC Agreement
($) (1)
|
Total
Value of Benefits Under CIC Agreement
($)
|
Incentive Plan
Acceleration
($) (2)
|
Performance Plan
Acceleration
($) (3)
|
Stock Option
Acceleration
($) (4)
|
Total
($)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
0
|
0
|
1,212,712
|
1,069,113
|
8,835,187
|
11,117,012
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
0
|
0
|
323,065
|
230,599
|
1,891,142
|
2,444,806
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
0
|
0
|
474,599
|
234,462
|
1,911,713
|
2,620,774
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
0
|
0
|
383,312
|
258,413
|
2,648,567
|
3,290,292
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
53,563
|
0
|
278,447
|
210,000
|
1,904,676
|
2,446,685
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
As provided by the CIC Agreement, the amount shown for Mr. Lorenger represents an incremental incentive amount equal to the difference between the highest annual incentive award earned in the prior three fiscal years and the amount of the annual incentive award earned in Fiscal 2013.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the value of the annual incentive award earned for Fiscal 2013, which the Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive under the Incentive Plan if he remained employed by the Corporation on the last day of Fiscal 2013.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the estimated 2011-2013 Plan, 2012-2014 Plan and 2013-2015 Plan award payable. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2011-2013 Plan: (i) economic profit of 113 percent of the targeted amount for the 2011 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 59 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 54 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions accounts for employment during the entire 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2014. 2012-2014 Plan: (i) economic profit of 83 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 78 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 24 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2015. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2013-2015 Plan: (i) economic profit of 134 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2015 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 12 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2016. Amounts included for the Performance Plan are estimates and are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Due to the number of factors, the actual amounts we pay or distribute under the Performance Plan may differ materially. Factors that could affect these amounts include the financial performance of the Corporation during 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the achievement of economic profit goals.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents the value of accelerating the vesting of stock options not otherwise vested in accordance with the Stock Plan. Such options will remain exercisable until the expiration date established at the time of award.
|
Value in Event of Death
|
Name
|
Life Insurance Proceeds
($) (1)
|
Incentive Plan
Acceleration
($) (2)
|
Performance Plan
Acceleration
($) (3)
|
Stock Options
Acceleration
($) (4)
|
Total
($)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
150,000
|
1,212,712
|
1,069,113
|
8,835,187
|
11,267,012
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
150,000
|
323,065
|
230,599
|
1,891,142
|
2,594,806
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
150,000
|
474,599
|
234,462
|
1,911,713
|
2,770,774
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
150,000
|
383,312
|
258,413
|
2,648,567
|
3,440,292
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
150,000
|
278,447
|
210,000
|
1,904,676
|
2,543,122
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
Represents the proceeds of the life insurance policy maintained by the Corporation for each of the Named Executive Officers under the Life Insurance Plan. The policy amount is equal to the lesser of the insured's annual base salary or $150,000.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the value of the annual incentive award earned for Fiscal 2013, which the Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive under the Incentive Plan if he remained employed by the Corporation on the last day of Fiscal 2013.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the estimated 2011-2013 Plan, 2012-2014 Plan and 2013-2015 Plan award payable. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2011-2013 Plan: (i) economic profit of 113 percent of the targeted amount for the 2011 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 59 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 54 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions accounts for employment during the entire 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2014. 2012-2014 Plan: (i) economic profit of 83 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 78 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 24 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2015. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2013-2015 Plan: (i) economic profit of 134 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2015 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 12 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2016. Amounts included for the Performance Plan are estimates and are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Due to the number of factors, the actual amounts we pay or distribute under the Performance Plan may differ materially. Factors that could affect these amounts include the financial performance of the Corporation during 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the achievement of economic profit goals.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents the value of accelerating the vesting of stock options not otherwise vested in accordance with the Stock Plan. Such options will remain exercisable until two years from the date of death.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents the value of accelerating the vesting of RSUs not otherwise vested in accordance with the Stock Plan.
|
Value in Event of Disability
|
Name
|
Incentive Plan
Acceleration
($) (1)
|
Performance Plan
Acceleration
($) (2)
|
Stock Options
Acceleration
($) (3)
|
Total
($)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
1,212,712
|
1,069,113
|
8,835,187
|
11,117,012
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
323,065
|
230,599
|
1,891,142
|
2,444,806
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
474,599
|
234,462
|
1,911,713
|
2,620,774
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
383,312
|
258,413
|
2,648,567
|
3,290,292
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
278,447
|
210,000
|
1,904,676
|
2,393,122
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
Represents the value of the annual incentive award earned for Fiscal 2013, which the Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive under the Incentive Plan if he remained employed by the Corporation on the last day of Fiscal 2013.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the estimated 2011-2013 Plan, 2012-2014 Plan and 2013-2015 Plan award payable. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2011-2013 Plan: (i) economic profit of 113 percent of the targeted amount for the 2011 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 59 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 54 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions accounts for employment during the entire 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2014. 2012-2014 Plan: (i) economic profit of 83 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 78 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 24 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2015. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2013-2015 Plan: (i) economic profit of 134 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2015 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 12 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2016. Amounts included for the Performance Plan are estimates and are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Due to the number of factors, the actual amounts we pay or distribute under the Performance Plan may differ materially. Factors that could affect these amounts include the financial performance of the Corporation during 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the achievement of economic profit goals.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the value of accelerating the vesting of stock options not otherwise vested in accordance with the Stock Plan. Such options will remain exercisable until two years from the date of disability.
|
Value in Event of Retirement
|
Name
|
Incentive Plan
Acceleration
($) (1)
|
Performance Plan
Acceleration
($) (2)
|
Stock Options
Acceleration
($) (3)
|
Total
($)
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
383,312
|
258,413
|
2,648,567
|
3,290,292
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
Represents the value of the annual incentive award earned for Fiscal 2013, which the Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive under the Incentive Plan if he remained employed by the Corporation on the last day of Fiscal 2013.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the estimated 2011-2013 Plan, 2012-2014 Plan and 2013-2015 Plan award payable. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2011-2013 Plan: (i) economic profit of 113 percent of the targeted amount for the 2011 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 59 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 54 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions accounts for employment during the entire 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2014. 2012-2014 Plan: (i) economic profit of 83 percent of the targeted amount for the 2012 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 78 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 24 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2015. This amount has been based on the following assumptions for 2013-2015 Plan: (i) economic profit of 134 percent of the targeted amount for the 2013 performance year; (ii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the 2014 performance year; and (iii) economic profit of 100 percent of the targeted amount for the
|
|
|
2015 performance year. The amount payable based on these assumptions has been prorated to account for employment during 12 months of the 36-month performance period. No amount would be payable until the first fiscal quarter of 2016. Amounts included for the Performance Plan are estimates and are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Due to the number of factors, the actual amounts we pay or distribute under the Performance Plan may differ materially. Factors that could affect these amounts include the financial performance of the Corporation during 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the achievement of economic profit goals.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the value of accelerating the vesting of stock options not otherwise vested in accordance with the Stock Plan. Such options will remain exercisable until two years from the date of disability.
|
Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires the Corporation to provide shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, a resolution approving the compensation of the Named Executive Officers disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The Corporation conducts an annual shareholder advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation as recommended by the Board and approved by shareholders.
In deciding how to vote on this proposal, please consider the following factors as well as the detailed discussion of the executive compensation program contained in the CD&A:
|
·
|
the independent Directors and the Compensation Committee believe the executive compensation program has been effective at incenting achievement of financial performance goals, individual strategic objectives and creation of shareholder value as illustrated by the Corporation's improved financial performance in Fiscal 2013;
|
|
·
|
a majority of each Named Executive Officer's annual compensation opportunity is comprised of incentive-based, at-risk compensation;
|
|
·
|
a meaningful portion of the Named Executive Officers' long-term incentive compensation in Fiscal 2013 was performance-based;
|
|
·
|
equity is a significant component of total compensation;
|
|
·
|
overall compensation levels for the Named Executive Officers are competitive with the market; and
|
|
·
|
the Corporation maintains the following governance practices with respect to the executive compensation program:
|
|
o
|
significant stock ownership guidelines;
|
|
o
|
no perquisites except standard relocation assistance;
|
|
o
|
anti-hedging policy for the Named Executive Officers; and
|
|
o
|
a compensation recovery policy for repayment of performance-based compensation in certain circumstances.
|
Accordingly, we ask shareholders to vote FOR the following resolution at the Meeting:
"RESOLVED, the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement for the Meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the CD&A, compensation tables and narrative discussion."
The vote on this proposal is advisory and non-binding and will not be construed as overruling any decision by the Corporation, the Compensation Committee or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board will review and consider the outcome of this vote when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers.
Required Vote
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Outstanding Shares voted at the Meeting is required to adopt the resolution. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining whether this Proposal has received sufficient votes for approval.
Recommendation of the Board
|
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
|
Each independent Director receives an annual retainer of $150,000, of which $60,000 is paid in cash in equal installments of $15,000 at each quarterly Board meeting and $90,000 is paid in the form of a Common Stock grant issued under the 2007 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation (the "2007 Equity Plan") at the May Board meeting. In Fiscal 2013, each independent Director received:
|
·
|
a cash installment payment of $15,000 at each of the February, May, August and November Board meetings; and
|
|
·
|
a $90,000 Common Stock grant at the May Board meeting.
|
The Lead Director receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000 (prior to the May 7, 2013 Board meeting, the additional annual retainer was $12,000). Each Audit Committee member receives an additional annual retainer of $4,000. The Chairperson of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000 (prior to the May 7, 2013 Board meeting, the additional annual retainer was $7,500). The Chairpersons of the Compensation Committee and Governance Committee each receive an additional annual retainer of $7,500. As with the cash portion of the annual retainer for Board service, retainers for committee Chairpersons, Lead Director or Audit Committee service are paid in equal installments at each quarterly Board meeting.
Independent Directors may receive an additional $1,000 for each meeting attended if they are required to travel six hours or more on a round-trip basis. Directors are also reimbursed for travel and related expenses incurred to attend meetings. For purposes of determining Director compensation, an independent Director is anyone who is not a member of the Corporation. Directors who are members of the Corporation do not receive additional compensation for service on the Board.
The Corporation's policy with regard to Common Stock ownership by independent Directors is for each Director to own Common Stock with a market value of five times or more the cash portion of the annual retainer. To promote Common Stock ownership, Directors are required to receive one-half of the cash portion of their annual retainer in the form of shares of Common Stock to be issued under the 2007 Equity Plan or, to the extent the Director participates in the HNI Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Directors Deferred Plan"), in the form of nonvoting share units to be credited to the Director's account under the Directors Deferred Plan. This requirement does not, however, apply to any Director owning Common Stock with a market value of five times or more the cash portion of the annual retainer. As of the end of Fiscal 2013, all of the Corporation's independent Directors were in compliance with the Corporation's policy with regard to stock ownership.
In addition to acquiring Common Stock as partial payment of their annual retainer, independent Directors can also acquire Common Stock in several other ways. Under the 2007 Equity Plan, Directors may elect to receive up to 100 percent of their cash retainers in the form of shares of Common Stock. Under the Directors Deferred Plan, each Director has the opportunity to defer up to 100 percent of his or her retainers earned as a Director. Amounts can be deferred to a cash account earning interest at a rate set each year at one percent above the prime interest rate or to the Corporation's notional stock account in the form of nonvoting share units that fluctuate in value based on the price increase or decrease of Common Stock and earn dividends distributed to all shareholders. The dividends are automatically reinvested for each participant to acquire additional nonvoting shares units. For any cash compensation deferred to the Corporation's notional stock account, the number of nonvoting share units is determined by dividing the amount of the compensation by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date such compensation would have otherwise been paid. Each Director participating in the Directors Deferred Plan elects, on an annual basis, the date or dates of distribution (i.e., a Director can elect a lump-sum distribution or distribution via annual installments not to exceed 15) of any amounts he or she has deferred. In addition, each independent Director is eligible to receive awards of stock options to purchase Common Stock, restricted stock or Common Stock grants, or any combination thereof, under the 2007 Equity Plan in such amounts as the Board may authorize.
In May 2013, each independent Director serving on the Board was granted 2,560 shares of Common Stock under the 2007 Equity Plan. The Corporation does not have a non-equity incentive plan for independent Directors. As of the Record Date, the Corporation has never issued stock options to purchase Common Stock or shares of restricted stock to the independent Directors and all shares of Common Stock issued to Directors in lieu of cash retainer amounts were fully vested upon issuance.
Director Compensation for Fiscal 2013
|
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($) (1)
|
Stock Awards
($) (2)
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($) (3)
|
All Other Compensation
($) (4)
|
Total
($)
|
|
Mary H. Bell
|
73,375
|
90,000
|
--
|
1,843
|
165,218
|
|
Miguel M. Calado
|
60,000
|
90,000
|
--
|
1,843
|
151,843
|
|
Cheryl A. Francis
|
64,000
|
90,000
|
--
|
1,843
|
155,843
|
|
James R. Jenkins
|
61,000
|
90,000
|
2,801
|
1,843
|
155,644
|
|
Dennis J. Martin
|
67,500
|
90,000
|
--
|
1,843
|
159,343
|
|
Larry B. Porcellato
|
67,500
|
90,000
|
255
|
1,843
|
159,598
|
|
Abbie J. Smith
|
60,000
|
90,000
|
--
|
1,843
|
151,843
|
|
Brian E. Stern
|
64,000
|
90,000
|
--
|
1,843
|
155,843
|
|
Ronald V. Waters, III
|
74,250
|
90,000
|
2,249
|
1,843
|
168,342
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
For Fiscal 2013, the independent Directors listed in the table above each earned the following fees: Ms. Bell - $60,000 annual retainer plus $4,000 retainer for service on the Audit Committee and $9,375 retainer for service as Chairperson of the Audit Committee; Mr. Calado - $60,000 annual retainer; Ms. Francis - $60,000 annual retainer plus $4,000 for service on the Audit Committee; Mr. Jenkins – $60,000 annual retainer plus $1,000 for travel in excess of 6 hours on one occasion; Mr. Martin - $60,000 annual retainer plus $7,500 retainer for service as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee; Mr. Porcellato – $60,000 annual retainer plus $7,500 retainer for service as Chairperson of the Governance Committee; Ms. Smith – $60,000 annual retainer; Mr. Stern – $60,000 annual retainer plus $4,000 retainer for service on the Audit Committee and Mr. Waters - $60,000 annual retainer plus $14,250 for service as Lead Director. Both Ms. Francis and Mr. Calado elected to receive 100 percent of their cash retainers in the form of shares of Common Stock under the 2007 Equity Plan, which equated to the following number of shares: Ms. Francis – 1,797 and Mr. Calado – 1,683. Mses. Bell and Smith each elected to receive 100 percent and Mr. Jenkins elected to receive 50 percent of their cash retainers in the form of nonvoting share units under the Directors Deferred Plan, which equated to the following number of nonvoting share units: Ms. Bell – 2,059; Ms. Smith – 1,685; and Mr. Jenkins – 843.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the portion of the annual retainer paid in the form of shares – a $90,000 Common Stock grant authorized by the Board on May 7, 2013 under the 2007 Equity Plan. Each independent Director serving on the Board as of May 7, 2013, was issued 2,560 shares of Common Stock at a price of $35.15 (the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant, May 7, 2013) for a total grant date fair value of $89,984, as computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The difference between the $90,000 Common Stock grant authorized by the Board and the actual value of Common Stock issued ($89,984) was approximately $16. As the Corporation only issues fractional shares under the Directors Deferred Plan, and not under the 2007 Equity Plan, the Corporation paid each independent Director serving on the Board as of May 7, 2013, $16, either in the form of cash in lieu of a fractional share for those Directors that did not elect to defer their Common Stock grant under the Directors Deferred Plan or in the form of a fractional share for those Directors that did elect to defer their Common Stock grant under the Directors Deferred Plan. Mses. Bell and Smith and Mr. Jenkins each deferred 100 percent of their Common Stock grants under the Directors Deferred Plan. There are no unexercised option awards or unvested stock awards outstanding as of the end of Fiscal 2013 for any of the Directors.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes above-market interest earned on cash compensation deferred under the Directors Deferred Plan. Interest on deferred cash compensation is earned at one percent over the prime rate. Mr. Jenkins deferred 50 percent of his cash compensation. Above-market interest earned by Mr. Porcellato is for cash compensation deferred prior to January 1, 2007, and interest earned by Mr. Waters is for cash compensation deferred prior to January 1, 2010.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes dividends earned on Common Stock grants during Fiscal 2013.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
On the Record Date, there were 45,136,989 Outstanding Shares. On that date, to the Corporation's knowledge, there were four shareholders who owned beneficially more than five percent of all Outstanding Shares. The table below contains information, as of that date (except as noted below), regarding the beneficial ownership of these entities. Unless otherwise indicated, the
Corporation believes each of the entities listed below has sole voting and investing power with respect to all the shares of Common Stock indicated.
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
Percent of Class
|
|
State Farm Insurance Companies (1)
One State Farm Plaza
Bloomington, Illinois 61710
|
7,386,235 (2)
|
16.4%
|
|
Fidelity Management & Research Company
245 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
|
4,100,000 (3)
|
9.1%
|
|
BlackRock, Inc. (4)
40 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10022
|
3,713,746 (5)
|
8.2%
|
|
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (6)
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355
|
2,563,406 (7)
|
5.7%
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
State Farm Insurance Companies consists of the following entities: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company; State Farm Fire and Casualty Company; State Farm Investment Management Corp.; State Farm Associates Funds Trust – State Farm Growth Fund; State Farm Associates Funds Trust – State Farm Balanced Fund; State Farm Insurance Companies Employee Retirement Trust; and State Farm Insurance Companies Savings and Thrift Plan for U.S. Employees.
|
|
(2)
|
Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed February 12, 2014 with the SEC by State Farm Insurance Companies for the period ended December 28, 2013. Of the 7,386,235 shares beneficially owned, State Farm Insurance Companies has sole voting and investment power with respect to 7,366,400 shares and shared voting and investment power with respect to 19,835 shares.
|
|
(3)
|
Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed February 14, 2014 with the SEC by FMR LLC, parent company of Fidelity Management & Research Company, for the period ended December 28, 2013. Of the 4,100,000 shares beneficially owned, Fidelity Management & Research Company has sole investment power, but no voting power, with respect to all such shares.
|
|
(4)
|
The following subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc. hold the shares of Common Stock noted: BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.; BlackRock Fund Advisors; BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Australia Limited; BlackRock Advisors, LLC; BlackRock Investment Management, LLC; BlackRock International Limited; BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited; BlackRock Fund Management Ireland Limited; and BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited.
|
|
(5)
|
Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed January 29, 2014 with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc., for the period ended December 28, 2013. Of the 3,713,746 shares beneficially owned, BlackRock Inc. has sole investment power with respect to all such shares and sole voting power with respect to 3,571,317 shares.
|
|
(6)
|
The following subsidiaries of The Vanguard Group, Inc. hold the shares of Common Stock noted: Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd.
|
|
(7)
|
Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed February 11, 2014 with the SEC by The Vanguard Group, Inc., for the period ended December 28, 2013. Of the 2,563,406 shares beneficially owned, The Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 63,892 shares, sole investment power with respect to 2,502,614 shares, and shared investment power with respect to 60,792 shares.
|
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of the Record Date for each Director and nominee for Director, each Named Executive Officer and for all Directors (including nominees) and executive officers of the Corporation as a group. The address of the persons listed below is 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761.
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Common Stock
(1)
|
Common
Stock Units
(2)
|
Stock Options Exercisable as of the
Record Date or Within
60 Days Thereof
|
Total Stock and
Stock-Based Holdings
|
Percent of Class
(3)
|
|
Stan A. Askren
|
142,643
|
46,814
|
645,475
|
834,932
|
1.8%
|
|
Mary H. Bell
|
8,738
|
20,449
|
0
|
29,187
|
*
|
|
Miguel M. Calado
|
48,471
|
0
|
0
|
48,471
|
*
|
|
Cheryl A. Francis
|
46,584
|
0
|
0
|
46,584
|
*
|
|
James R. Jenkins
|
0
|
30,485
|
0
|
30,485
|
*
|
|
Dennis J. Martin
|
5,826
|
18,124
|
0
|
23,950
|
*
|
|
Larry B. Porcellato
|
13,298
|
17,471
|
0
|
30,769
|
*
|
|
Abbie J. Smith
|
0
|
36,724
|
0
|
36,724
|
*
|
|
Brian E. Stern
|
35,657
|
0
|
0
|
35,657
|
*
|
|
Ronald V. Waters, III
|
18,942
|
13,541
|
0
|
32,483
|
*
|
|
Bradley D. Determan
|
31,103
|
1,821
|
51,396
|
84,320
|
*
|
|
Jerald K. Dittmer
|
24,024
|
0
|
138,046
|
162,070
|
*
|
|
Jeffrey D. Lorenger
|
22,887
|
0
|
75,266
|
98,153
|
*
|
|
Kurt A. Tjaden
|
32,845
|
0
|
102,854
|
135,699
|
*
|
|
All Directors and executive officers as a group – (18 persons)
|
521,200
|
185,429
|
1,240,912
|
1,947,541
|
4.3%
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
Includes restricted shares held by executive officers over which they have voting power but not investment power, shares held directly or in joint tenancy, shares held in trust, by broker, bank or nominee or other indirect means and over which the individual or member of the group has sole voting or shared voting and/or investment power. Each individual or member of the group has sole voting and/or investment power with respect to the shares shown in the table above, except Mr. Askren's spouse shares voting and investment power with respect to 7,588 of the 142,643 shares listed above for Mr. Askren, and Mr. Calado's former spouse shares voting and investment power with respect to 5,000 of the 48,471 shares listed above for Mr. Calado.
|
|
(2)
|
Indicates the nonvoting share units credited to the account of the named individual or members of the group, as applicable, under either the Deferred Plan or the Directors Deferred Plan. For additional information on the Deferred Plan, see "Retirement and Other Compensation Plans – Deferred Compensation Plan" on page 30 and the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2013 Table on page 37 of this Proxy Statement. For additional information on the Directors Deferred Plan, see "Director Compensation" on page 45 of this Proxy Statement.
|
|
(3)
|
* less than one percent.
|
The following table provides information as of December 28, 2013, about Common Stock which may be issued under the Corporation's equity compensation plans.
|
Plan Category
|
Number of Securities to be Issued
Upon Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and Rights
(a)
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b) (3)
|
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
|
||
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
3,922,972
|
(1) |
$29.69
|
5,199,234
|
(4) |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
220,605
|
(2) |
––
|
641,780
|
(5) |
|
Total
|
4,143,577
|
$29.69
|
5,841,014
|
Notes
|
(1)
|
Includes: (i) shares to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding stock options granted under the Stock Plan – 2,031,483 and the HNI Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the "Prior Stock Plan") – 599,084 prior to termination of such Plan in May 2007; (ii) shares to be issued upon the vesting of outstanding RSUs under the Stock Plan – 24,526; and (iii) the target value of the 2013 Incentive Plan awards for all award recipients divided by $39.38, the closing price of a share of Common Stock on December 27, 2013, the last trading day of Fiscal 2013 – 267,880. The termination of the Prior Stock Plan did not impact the validity of any outstanding stock options granted under such plan Prior to termination. As of the last day of Fiscal 2013, there were no outstanding warrants or rights under the Stock Plan or the Prior Stock Plan and options, warrants, rights or RSUs under the 2007 Equity Plan or the 1997 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The number of shares attributable to Incentive Plan awards also overstates expected Common Stock dilution as the Corporation did not pay out any portion of the 2013 Incentive Plan awards for any recipient in the form of Common Stock.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes the nonvoting share units credited to the account of individual executive officers or Directors under either the Deferred Plan – 43,822 or the Directors Deferred Plan – 176,723. For additional information on the Deferred Plan, see "Retirement and Other Compensation Plans – Deferred Compensation Plan" on page 30 and the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2013 Table on page 37 of this Proxy Statement. For additional information on the Directors Deferred Plan, see "Director Compensation" on page 45 of this Proxy Statement.
|
|
(3)
|
This column does not take into account any of the RSUs, Performance Plan awards, Incentive Plan awards or nonvoting share units discussed in Notes 1 and 2 above.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes shares available for issuance under the Stock Plan – 4,585,471, the 2007 Equity Plan – 82,569 and the HNI Corporation 2002 Members' Stock Purchase Plan (the "MSPP") – 531,194. Of the 9,000,000 shares (increased from 5,000,000 in 2013 amendment) originally available for issuance under the Stock Plan, no more than 3,000,000 (increased from 2,000,000 in 2013 amendment) of such shares can be issued as full-value awards. At the end of Fiscal 2013, 2,028,468 of the 3,000,000 shares reserved for full-value awards were available for issuance. Of the remaining shares available for issuance under the 2007 Equity Plan, all can be issued as full-value awards. The MSPP allows members to purchase Common Stock at 85 percent of the closing share price on each quarterly exercise date up to an annual aggregate amount of $25,000 per year and is available generally to all members.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes nonvoting share units available for issuance under the Deferred Plan – 239,750 and the Directors Deferred Plan – 402,030.
|
Under the federal securities laws, the Directors and executive officers of the Corporation, and certain persons who own more than ten percent of the Outstanding Shares, are required to report their ownership of Common Stock and changes in ownership to the SEC and the NYSE. Specific due dates for these reports have been established by the SEC, and the Corporation is required to report in this Proxy Statement any known failure to file by these dates during Fiscal 2013.
Based solely on a review of copies of the reports the Corporation has received, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Corporation believes during Fiscal 2013 all reporting persons made all filings required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on a timely basis.
Proposals by shareholders intended to be presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting must be received at the Corporation's executive offices no later than November 21, 2014 to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy. All shareholder notice of proposals submitted outside the processes of Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 must be received between February 5, 2015 and March 7, 2015 to be considered for presentation at the 2015 Annual Meeting. In addition, any shareholder proposals must comply with the informational requirements contained in Section 2.16(a)(2) of the By-laws in order to be presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting. On written request to the Corporate Secretary at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761, the Corporation will provide, without charge to any shareholder, a copy of the By-laws.
The Board knows of no other matters that will be brought before the Meeting, but, if other matters properly come before the Meeting, it is intended the persons named in the proxy will vote the proxy according to their best judgment.
On written request to the Corporate Secretary at HNI Corporation, 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761, the Corporation will provide, without charge to any shareholder, a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013, including financial statements and schedules, filed with the SEC. The report is also available on the Corporation's website at www.hnicorp.com, under "Investor Information–Annual Reports."
Information set forth in this Proxy Statement is as of March 21, 2014, unless otherwise noted.
Steven M. Bradford
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
March 21, 2014
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Corporation's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the Audit Committee Report beginning on page 15 of this Proxy Statement and the Compensation Committee Report beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.
An Annual Report to Security Holders, including financial statements and schedules, of the Corporation for Fiscal 2013 is being mailed to shareholders of the Corporation together with this Proxy Statement. The Annual Report to Security Holders does not form any part of the material for the solicitation of proxies.
