Edgar Filing: INPHI Corp

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-34942

LOGO

Inphi Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Delaware		77-0557980
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2953 Bunker Hill Lane, Suite 300,

Santa Clara, California 95054

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 217-7300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The total number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, as of August 1, 2014
was 31,557,939.

INPHI CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION			2
Item 1.	Financial Statements		2
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013		2
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 201 3		3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013		4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013		5
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		23
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		24

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION			24
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		24
Item 6.	Exhibits		25

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

INPHI CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	33,325		$	31,667
Investments in marketable securities		88,931			90,890
Accounts receivable, net		14,418			13,073
Inventories		7,428			6,767
Deferred tax asset		1,099			1,099
Income tax receivable		1,942			240
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4,028			2,361

Total current assets		151,171			146,097
Property and equipment, net		25,320			22,460
Goodwill		5,875			5,875
Deferred tax charge		5,074			4,200
Other assets, net		4,547			3,710

Total assets	$	191,987		$	182,342

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	7,531		$	7,280
Deferred revenue		1,528			1,686
Accrued employee expenses		4,287			4,626
Other accrued expenses		1,605			1,611
Other current liabilities		1,067			1,881

Total current liabilities		16,018			17,084
Other long-term liabilities		4,677			5,865

Total liabilities		20,695			22,949

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 31,518,549 and 30,244,439 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		32			30
Additional paid-in capital		235,184			225,007
Accumulated deficit		(64,943	)		(66,582	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,019			938

Total stockholders’ equity		171,292			159,393

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	191,987		$	182,342

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

INPHI CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenue	$	33,922		$	24,339		$	65,111		$	46,923
Cost of revenue		12,296			8,893			23,359			17,185

Gross profit		21,626			15,446			41,752			29,738

Operating expenses:
Research and development		15,729			12,796			29,468			24,394
Sales and marketing		4,362			3,706			8,312			7,653
General and administrative		3,234			2,842			6,299			5,997

Total operating expenses		23,325			19,344			44,079			38,044

Income (loss) from operations		(1,699	)		(3,898	)		(2,327	)		(8,306	)
Other income		172			213			332			426

Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,527	)		(3,685	)		(1,995	)		(7,880	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(4,161	)		(2,211	)		(3,634	)		1,265

Net income (loss)	$	2,634		$	(1,474	)	$	1,639		$	(9,145	)

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.08		$	(0.05	)	$	0.05		$	(0.31	)

Diluted	$	0.08		$	(0.05	)	$	0.05		$	(0.31	)

Weighted-average shares used in computing earnings per share:
Basic		31,378,909			29,216,338			31,040,240			29,075,504
Diluted		33,013,652			29,216,338			32,905,244			29,075,504

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

INPHI CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013			2014		2013
Net income (loss)	$	2,634	$	(1,474	)	$	1,639	$	(9,145	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Available for sale investments:
Change in unrealized gain, net of tax		31		(170	)		81		(170	)
Realized loss (gain) reclassified into earnings, net of tax		—		(24	)		—		(37	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	2,665	$	(1,668	)	$	1,720	$	(9,352	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

INPHI CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	1,639		$	(9,145	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		4,929			3,612
Stock-based compensation		9,906			8,317
Deferred income taxes and deferred tax charge		(901	)		426
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation		—			(462	)
Amortization of premium on marketable securities		451			513
Other noncash items		—			(35	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,345	)		2,369
Inventories		(661	)		(747	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(2,441	)		(501	)
Income tax payable/receivable		(2,717	)		2,824
Accounts payable		893			(51	)
Accrued expenses		(345	)		(56	)
Deferred revenue		(158	)		437
Other liabilities		(987	)		(291	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		8,263			7,210

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(8,431	)		(9,659	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(26,251	)		(21,763	)
Sales and maturities of marketable securities		27,804			22,466

Net cash used in investing activities		(6,878	)		(8,956	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		2,758			691
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation		—			462
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units		(3,788	)		(1,380	)
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		1,303			989

Net cash provided by financing activities		273			762

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,658			(984	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		31,667			30,161

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	33,325		$	29,177

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Inphi Corporation (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in November 2000. The Company is a fabless provider of high-speed analog and mixed signal semiconductor solutions for the communications, data center and computing markets. The Company’s semiconductor solutions are designed to address bandwidth bottlenecks in networks, maximize throughput and minimize latency in computing environments and enable the rollout of next generation communications, data center and computing infrastructures. In addition, the semiconductor solutions provide a vital high-speed interface between analog signals and digital information in high-performance systems such as telecommunications transport systems, enterprise networking equipment, data centers and enterprise servers, storage platforms, test and measurement equipment and military systems.

The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), for interim financial information and with the instructions to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to state fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position at June 30, 2014, and its consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future quarters or the full year.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2014, the Company adopted the guidance on the “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The guidance provides that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. The amendments in this update do not require new recurring disclosures. The adoption of this guidance has no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2014, the Financial Accountings Standards Board issued guidance on “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The new revenue recognition guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The guidance requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The new guidance permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that the new revenue recognition guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor determined the effect of the standard on the ongoing financial reporting.

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

3. Investments

The following table summarizes the investments by investment category:


	June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
US treasury securities	$	24,619	$	24,634	$	25,061	$	25,072
Municipal bonds		31,052		31,134		34,912		34,983
Corporate notes/bonds		31,336		31,486		28,565		28,648
Certificate of deposit		1,500		1,501		1,500		1,501
Asset backed securities		176		176		685		686

Total investments	$	88,683	$	88,931	$	90,723	$	90,890

As of June 30, 2014, we had 9 investments that were in an unrealized loss position. The gross unrealized losses on these investments at June 30, 2014 of $28 were determined to be temporary in nature. The Company reviews the investments to identify and evaluate investments that have an indication of possible other-than-temporary impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is other-than-temporary include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and the intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

The realized gain related to the Company’s available-for-sale investment which was reclassified from other comprehensive income was included in other income in the consolidated statements of income.

The contractual maturities of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2014 are presented in the following table:


	Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	31,205	$	31,260
Due between one and five years		57,478		57,671

	$	88,683	$	88,931

4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:


	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Raw materials	$	1,923	$	670
Work in process		1,369		2,001
Finished goods		4,136		4,096

	$	7,428	$	6,767

Finished goods held by distributors were $485 and $543 as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

5. Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment consist of the following:


	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Laboratory and production equipment	$	40,029		$	34,443
Office, software and computer equipment		10,030			8,649
Furniture and fixtures		970			834
Leasehold improvements		4,186			3,952

		55,215			47,878
Less accumulated depreciation		(29,895	)		(25,418	)

	$	25,320		$	22,460

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was $2,572 and $4,929, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $1,928 and $3,612, respectively.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, computer software costs included in property and equipment were $3,199 and $2,815, respectively. Amortization expense of capitalized computer software costs was $134 and $236 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. Amortization expense of capitalized computer software costs was $65 and $131 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

6. Product Warranty Obligation

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the product warranty liability was $40. There was no movement in product warranty liability during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

7. Other long-term liabilities

Other long-term liabilities consist of the following:


	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Deferred rent	$	1,359	$	1,471
Income tax payable		2,219		3,295
Deferred tax liabilities		1,099		1,099

	$	4,677	$	5,865

8. Income Taxes

The Company normally determines its interim provision using an estimated single annual effective tax rate for all tax jurisdictions. ASC 740 provides that when an entity operates in a jurisdiction that has generated ordinary losses on a year-to-date basis or on the basis of the results anticipated for the full fiscal year and no benefit can be recognized on those losses, a separate effective tax rate should be computed and applied to ordinary income (or loss) in that jurisdiction. The Company incurred pretax loss during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 from the Singapore operation and will not recognize tax benefit of the losses due to full valuation allowance established against deferred tax assets. Thus, separate effective tax rate was applied to losses from each loss jurisdiction to compute the Company’s interim tax expense.

For three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company used estimated annual effective tax rate methodology to compute the interim period tax provision. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of ($4,161) and ($3,634) in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was 272% and 182%, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rates and the 34% federal statutory rate resulted primarily due to the change in valuation allowance, foreign income taxes provided at lower rates, geographic mix in operating results, unrecognized tax benefits, stock-based compensation adjustments and recognition of state research and development credits. The Company recorded an income tax provision (benefit) of ($2,211) and $1,265 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was 60% and (16%), respectively. The difference between the effective tax rates and the 35% federal statutory rate resulted primarily due to the change in valuation allowance (originally established in the fourth quarter of 2012), foreign income taxes provided at lower rates, geographic mix in operating results, unrecognized tax benefits and stock-based compensation adjustments.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the gross amount of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits decreased by approximately $2,627 and $2,070, respectively as a result of allocating the tax positions expected to be taken during the current year to the interim period based on year to date results. Substantially all of the unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2014, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company believes that in the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that statute of limitation on income tax examination period will expire. Given the uncertainty, the Company can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $0 to approximately $875.

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of its controlled foreign corporations that are intended to be invested indefinitely outside the United States.

9. Earnings Per Share

The following shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Numerator
Net income (loss)	$	2,634		$	(1,474	)	$	1,639		$	(9,145	)

Denominator
Weighted average common stock		31,379,622			29,221,333			31,040,953			29,080,499
Less weighted average unvested restricted stock award		(713	)		(4,995	)		(713	)		(4,995	)

Weighted-average common stock—basic		31,378,909			29,216,338			31,040,240			29,075,504
Effect of potentially dilutive securities:
Add options to purchase common stock		827,507			—			869,044			—
Add unvested restricted stock unit		800,141			—			976,222			—
Add employee stock purchase plan		7,095			—			19,738			—

Weighted-average common stock—diluted		33,013,652			29,216,338			32,905,244			29,075,504

Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.08		$	(0.05	)	$	0.05		$	(0.31	)

Diluted	$	0.08		$	(0.05	)	$	0.05		$	(0.31	)

The following securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Common stock options		766,939		4,597,452		1,103,878		4,610,371
Warrant to purchase common stock		—		2,142		—		2,142
Restricted stock unit		10,000		3,019,543		7,339		2,954,604
Restricted stock award		713		4,995		713		4,995

		777,652		7,624,132		1,111,930		7,572,112

10. Stock–Based Compensation

In 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the “2000 Plan”). Under the provisions of the 2000 Plan, employees, outside directors, consultants and other independent advisors who provide services to the Company may be issued incentive and non-qualified stock options to purchase common stock or may be issued shares of common stock directly. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is authorized to administer the 2000 Plan and establish the stock option terms, including the exercise price and vesting period. Options granted under the plan may have varying vesting schedules; however, options generally vest 25% upon completion of one year of service and thereafter in 36 equal monthly installments. Options granted are immediately exercisable and the shares issued upon exercise of the option are subject to a repurchase right held by the Company. The repurchase price under the repurchase right is the original exercise price and the right lapses in accordance with the option-vesting schedule. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no unvested shares outstanding subject to the Company’s right of repurchase. The proceeds received

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

from the unvested early exercise of options are presented in the balance sheet as liabilities and subsequently classified to equity based on the vesting schedule. The vesting of certain options granted or shares issued under the 2000 Plan is subject to acceleration of vesting upon the occurrence of certain events as defined in the 2000 Plan.

Under the 2000 Plan, the exercise price, in the case of an incentive stock option, cannot be less than 100%, and in the case of a nonqualified stock option, not less than 85%, of the fair market value of such shares on the date of grant. The term of the option is determined by the Compensation Committee but in no case can exceed 10 years.

In June 2010, the Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which became effective in November 2010. The 2010 Plan provides for the grants of restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and stock unit awards to employees, non-employee directors, advisors and consultants. The Compensation Committee administers the 2010 Plan, including the determination of the recipient of an award, the number of shares subject to each award, whether an option is to be classified as an incentive stock option or nonstatutory option, and the terms and conditions of each award, including the exercise and purchase prices and the vesting or duration of the award. Options granted under the 2010 Plan are exercisable only upon vesting. At June 30, 2014, 1,900,662 shares of common stock have been reserved for future grants under the 2010 Plan.

Stock Option Awards

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013			2014		2013
Risk-free interest rate		—		1.15	%		—		1.25	%
Expected life (in years)		—		6.25			—		6.25
Dividend yield		—		—			—		—
Expected volatility		—		50.00	%		—		50.00	%

The following table summarizes information regarding options outstanding:


	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		3,883,097		$	9.26		6.33	$	16,229

Granted		—			—
Exercised		(597,519	)		4.62
Canceled		(44,071	)		10.25

Outstanding at June 30, 2014		3,241,507		$	10.10		6.50	$	15,652

Exercisable at June 30, 2014		2,358,135		$	9.39		6.06	$	13,106

Vested at June 30, 2014		2,298,463		$	9.39		6.07	$	12,794

Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2014		3,224,102		$	10.09		6.49	$	15,597

The intrinsic value of options outstanding, exercisable and vested and expected to vest is calculated based on the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock as of the respective balance sheet dates.

The weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted to employees during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $4.35, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $6,333 and $1,092, respectively. The intrinsic value of exercised options is calculated based on the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock as of the exercise date. Cash received from the exercise of stock options was $2,758 and $691, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

Restricted Stock Units and Awards

The Company granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to members of the Board of Directors and employees. Most of the Company’s outstanding RSUs vest over four years with vesting contingent upon continuous service. The Company estimates the fair value of RSUs using the market price of the common stock on the date of the grant. The fair value of these awards is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

The following table summarizes information regarding outstanding restricted stock units:


	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		3,209,567		$	11.69
Granted		1,461,412			14.56
Vested		(825,714	)		12.85
Canceled		(106,487	)		11.57

Outstanding at June 30, 2014		3,738,778		$	12.56

Expected to vest at June 30, 2014		3,605,387

The Company granted restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) to certain members of the Board of Directors. The Company estimates the fair value of RSAs using the market price of the common stock on the date of the grant. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had 2,851 outstanding unvested RSAs, 2,138 of which vested during the six months ended June 30, 2014 resulting to 713 unvested RSAs outstanding as of June 30, 2014.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In December 2011, the Company adopted the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Participants purchase the Company’s stock using payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of their total cash compensation. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, the “look-back” period for the stock purchase price is six months. Offering and purchase periods will begin on February 10 and August 10 of each year. Participants will be granted the right to purchase common stock at a price per share that is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the Company’s common shares at the beginning or the end of each six-month period.

The ESPP imposes certain limitations upon an employee’s right to acquire common stock, including the following: (i) no employee shall be granted a right to participate if such employee immediately after the election to purchase common stock, would own stock possessing 5% or more to the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company, and (ii) no employee may be granted rights to purchase more than $25 fair value of common stock for each calendar year. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock available for purchase under the ESPP is one million shares. The total common stock issued under the ESPP during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was 131,007 and 125,177, respectively.

The fair value of employee stock purchase plan is estimated at the start of offering period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Risk-free interest rate		0.08	%		0.12	%
Expected life (in years)		0.49			0.49
Dividend yield		—			—
Expected volatility		34.00	%		47.00	%
Estimated fair value	$	3.00		$	2.63

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense is included in the Company’s results of operations as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Operating expenses
Cost of goods sold	$	298	$	281	$	549	$	514
Research and development		2,992		2,256		5,381		4,229
Sales and marketing		940		753		1,798		1,556
General and administrative		1,170		1,001		2,178		2,018

	$	5,400	$	4,291	$	9,906	$	8,317

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, restricted stock units and awards at June 30, 2014, prior to the consideration of expected forfeitures, is approximately $46,112 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.78 years.

11. Fair Value Measurements

The guidance on fair value measurements requires fair value measurements to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, or

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The Company measures its investments in marketable securities at fair value using the market approach, which uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The Company has cash equivalents which consist of money market funds valued using the amortized cost method, in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act which approximates fair value.

The Company determines the amount of transfers between Levels 1 and 2 or transfers into or out of Level 3 by using the end-of-period fair value. The Company had no transfers among the fair value hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

The following table presents information about assets required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis:


June 30, 2014	Total		Level 1		Level 2
Assets
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	7,591	$	—	$	7,591
Investment in marketable securities:
US treasury securities		24,634		24,634		—
Municipal bonds		31,134		—		31,134
Corporate notes/bonds		31,486		—		31,486
Certificate of deposit		1,501		—		1,501
Asset backed securities		176		—		176

	$	96,522	$	24,634	$	71,888

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)


December 31, 2013	Total		Level 1		Level 2
Assets
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	5,119	$	—	$	5,119
Investment in marketable securities:
US treasury securities		25,072		25,072		—
Municipal bonds		34,983		—		34,983
Corporate notes/bonds		28,648		—		28,648
Certificate of deposit		1,501		—		1,501
Asset backed securities		686		—		686

	$	96,009	$	25,072	$	70,937

12. Segment and Geographic Information

The Company operates in one reportable segment. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who is considered to be the chief operating decision maker, manages the Company’s operations as a whole and reviews consolidated financial information for purposes of evaluating financial performance and allocating resources. Revenue by region is classified based on the locations to which the product is transported, which may differ from the customer’s principal offices.

The following table sets forth the Company’s revenue by geographic region:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
China	$	11,899	$	3,728	$	24,413	$	8,196
United States		6,388		6,750		11,848		12,180
Korea		2,948		5,523		5,054		11,211
Japan		3,485		1,197		6,392		2,638
Italy		3,457		217		4,871		217
Other		5,745		6,924		12,533		12,481

	$	33,922	$	24,339	$	65,111	$	46,923

As of June 30, 2014, $5,431 of long-lived tangible assets are located outside the United States, of which $4,509 are located in Taiwan. As of December 31, 2013, $5,217 of long-lived tangible assets are located outside the United States, of which $4,694 are located in Taiwan.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases its facility under noncancelable lease agreements expiring in various years through 2019. The Company also licenses certain software used in its research and development activities under a term license subscription and maintenance arrangement.

As of June 30, 2014, future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having initial terms in excess of one year are as follows:


2014 (remaining)	$	3,368
2015		7,088
2016		4,218
2017		2,825
2018		1,746
2019		1,179

	$	20,424

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, lease operating expense was $1,776 and $3,199, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, lease operating expense was $1,379 and $3,043, respectively.

Noncancelable Purchase Obligations

We depend upon third party subcontractors to manufacture our wafers. Our subcontractor relationships typically allow for the cancellation of outstanding purchase orders, but require payment of all expenses incurred through the date of cancellation. As of June 30, 2014, the total value of open purchase orders for wafers was approximately $4,054.

Legal Proceedings

Netlist, Inc. v. Inphi Corporation, Case No. 09-cv-6900 (C.D. Cal.)

On September 22, 2009, Netlist filed suit in the United States District Court, Central District of California, or the Court, asserting that the Company infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,532,537. Netlist filed an amended complaint on December 22, 2009, further asserting that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912 and 7,636,274, collectively with U.S. Patent No. 7,532,537, the patents-in-suit, and seeking both unspecified monetary damages to be determined and an injunction to prevent further infringement. These infringement claims allege that the Company’s iMB™ and certain other memory module components infringe the patents-in-suit. The Company answered the amended complaint on February 11, 2010 and asserted that the Company does not infringe the patents-in-suit and that the patents-in-suit are invalid. In 2010, Company filed inter partes requests for reexamination with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”), asserting that the patents-in-suit are invalid.

On August 27, 2010, the USPTO ordered the request for Inter Partes Reexamination for U.S. Patent No. 7,636,274 and found a substantial new question of patentability based upon each of the different issues that the Company raised as the reexamination requestor. On September 27, 2011, the Patent Office issued a First Office Action based on the Netlist ‘274 Patent Reexamination Request and rejected 91 of its 97 claims. On October 27, 2011, Netlist responded to the USPTO determination by amending some but not all of the claims, adding new claims and making arguments as to the validity of the rejected claims in view of the cited references. The Company provided rebuttable comments to the USPTO on November 28, 2011. On March 12, 2012, the Examiner issued an Action Closing Prosecution, indicating that the claims pending contain allowable subject matter, and Netlist did not respond to the Action Closing Prosecution in the time provided by the USPTO. On June 22, 2012, the USPTO issued a Right of Appeal Notice, and on July 23, 2012, the Company filed a Notice of Appeal. The Company filed its Appeal Brief on September 24, 2012 and Netlist filed its Responsive Brief on October 24, 2012. The parties received an Examiner’s Answer dated April 16, 2013 from the USPTO that maintained the rejections set forth on the Right of Appeal Notice dated June 22, 2012. The Company filed a Rebuttal Brief on May 16, 2013 and a Request for Oral Hearing on June 7, 2013. The appeal hearing took place on November 20, 2013. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued its decision on January 16, 2014, finding the Examiner erred in declining to adopt 8 of the 9 different rejections that had been proposed by the Company. The Company requested a rehearing of the decision not to adopt the remaining one rejection that had been proposed by Company and was not adopted by the PTAB on February 18, 2014. In papers dated March 18, 2014, Netlist provided rebuttal comments to the request for rehearing and also requested re-opening of prosecution with respect to the claims that the PTAB had rejected, and in that request to re-open prosecution amended the independent claims that stood rejected. The Company filed comments with respect to these proposed amended claims on April 17, 2014. On June 26, 2014, the PTAB issued a decision on the request for rehearing, which included a rejection of further claims pursuant to the Company’s request and on July 28, 2014 Netlist provided a response to the USPTO cancelling those claims that had been rejected in the decision on the request for rehearing. A further communication from the USPTO in response to Netlist’s request to re-open prosecution is expected as the next substantive step of the proceeding, as prosecution otherwise remains closed. The proceeding is expected to continue in accordance with established Inter Partes Reexamination procedures.

On September 8, 2010, the USPTO ordered the request for Inter Partes Reexamination for U.S. Patent No. 7,532,537 and found a substantial new question of patentability based upon different issues that the Company raised as the reexamination requestor. The USPTO accompanied this Reexamination Order of U.S. Patent No. 7,532,537 with its own evaluation of the validity of this patent, and rejected some but not all of claims. In a response dated October 8, 2010, Netlist responded to the USPTO determination by amending some but not all of the claims, adding new claims and making arguments as to why the claims were not invalid in view of the cited references. The Company provided rebuttable comments to the USPTO on November 8, 2010 along with a Petition requesting an increase in the number of allowed pages of the rebuttable comments. On January 20, 2011, the USPTO granted the Petition in part. The Company then filed updated rebuttal comments on January 27, 2011 in compliance with the granted Petition. The USPTO has considered these updated rebuttal comments, and in a communication dated June 15, 2011, continued to reject all the previously rejected claims. The USPTO also rejected all the claims newly added in the October 8, 2010 Netlist response. In a further

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

communication dated June 21, 2011, the USPTO issued an Action Closing Prosecution indicating that it would confirm the patentability of four claims and reject all the other pending claims. On August 22, 2011, Netlist responded to the Action Closing Prosecution by further amending some claims and making arguments as to the validity of the rejected claims in view of the cited references. The Company submitted rebuttal comments on September 21, 2011. In a further communication dated February 7, 2012, the USPTO issued a Right of Appeal Notice, which also indicated that the previous amendments to claim made by Netlist would be entered, and that the current pending claims, as amended, were patentable. The Company filed a Notice of Appeal at the USPTO on March 8, 2012, within the time period provided for filing the Notice of Appeal and Netlist did not file Notice of Cross-Appeal. The Company filed its Appeal Brief on May 8, 2012, and Netlist filed its Responsive Brief on July 2, 2012. The parties received an Examiner’s Answer dated April 16, 2013 from the USPTO that maintained the rejections set forth on the Right of Appeal Notice dated February 7, 2012. The Company filed a Rebuttal Brief on May 16, 2013 and a Request for Oral Hearing on June 7, 2013. The appeal hearing took place in front of the PTAB on November 20, 2013. The PTAB issued its decision on January 16, 2014, affirming the Examiner’s decision as to all of the challenged claims. On February 18, 2014, the Company made a request for rehearing of the decision, and in papers dated March 18, 2014, Netlist provided rebuttal comments to the request for rehearing. A communication from the PTAB is expected as the next substantive step of the proceeding, as prosecution otherwise remains closed. The proceeding is expected to continue in accordance with established Inter Partes Reexamination procedures.

On September 8, 2010, the USPTO ordered the request for Inter Partes Reexamination for U.S. Patent No. 7,619,912 and found a substantial new question of patentability based upon different issues that the Company raised as the reexamination requestor. The USPTO accompanied this Reexamination Order of U.S. Patent No. 7,619,912 with its own evaluation of the validity of this patent, and initially determined that all of the claims were patentable based upon the Company’s request for Inter Partes Reexamination. Netlist did not comment upon this Reexamination Order. The USPTO on February 28, 2011 also merged the Proceedings of the Company’s Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,619,912, bearing Control No. 90/001,339 with Inter Partes Reexamination Proceeding 95/000,578 filed October 20, 2010 on behalf of SMART Modular Technologies, Inc. and Inter Partes Reexamination Proceeding 95/000,579 filed October 21, 2010 on behalf of Google, Inc. In each of these other Reexamination Proceedings, the USPTO had indicated that there existed a substantial new question of patentability with respect to certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,619,912, but had not accompanied the Reexamination Orders related thereto with its own evaluation of the validity of this patent, indicating that such evaluation would be forthcoming at a later time. This further evaluation was received in an Office Action dated April 4, 2011, in which the Examiner rejected a substantial majority of the claims based upon a number of different rejections, including certain of the rejections originally proposed by the Company in its Request for Reexamination. This Office Action also indicated that one claim was deemed to be patentable over the prior art of record in the merged Reexamination Proceedings. After seeking and obtaining an extension of time to respond to the Office Action dated April 4, 2011, Netlist served its response on July 5, 2011, which added new claims and made arguments as to why the originally filed claims were not invalid in view of the cited references. Each of the merged Reexamination Requestors, including the Company, submitted rebuttal comments by August 29, 2011. The USPTO considered this Netlist response and each of the rebuttal comments, and in an Office Action dated October 14, 2011, continued to reject most, but not all of the previously rejected claims, as well as rejected claims that had been added by Netlist in its July 5, 2011 response. After seeking and obtaining an extension of time to respond to the Office Action dated October 14, 2011, Netlist served its response on January 13, 2012, which response made amendments based upon subject matter that had been indicated as allowable in the Office Action dated October 14, 2011, added other new claims and made arguments as to why all of these claims should be allowed. The three different merged Reexamination Requestors, including the Company, timely submitted rebuttal comments on or about February 13, 2012. The USPTO issued a Non-final Office Action on November 13, 2012, rejecting some claims and indicating that others contained allowable subject matter. On January 14, 2013, Netlist filed a Response to the Non-final Office Action which presented further claim amendments and evidence supporting its positions regarding patentability. Rebuttal comments from the Company and the other Requestors were filed on February 13, 2013. On March 21, 2014, the USPTO issued an Action Closing Prosecution in which the USPTO indicated that certain of the pending claims were allowable and other of the pending claims were rejected, and on June 18, 2014 issued a Right of Notice of Appeal. By July 18, 2014, the Company as well as other Requesters each filed Notices of Appeal, and the filing of Appeal Briefs by Requesters will be the next substantive step of the proceeding, as currently prosecution otherwise will remain closed. The merged proceeding is expected to continue in accordance with established Inter Partes Reexamination procedures.

The reexamination proceedings could result in a determination that the patents-in-suit, in whole or in part, are valid or invalid, as well as modifications of the scope of the patents-in-suit.

Inphi Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)

Based on these papers the Court in January 2014 ordered a continued stay of the proceedings, took the litigation off the active court calendar, and requested that the parties file a joint status report on May 1, 2014 and every 120 days thereafter advising the Court as to status of the reexamination proceedings at which times, the Court could decide to maintain or lift the stay.

While the Company intends to defend the foregoing lawsuit vigorously, litigation, whether or not determined in the Company’s favor or settled, could be costly and time-consuming and could divert management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect the Company’s business.

Based on the nature of the litigation, the Company is currently unable to predict the final outcome of this lawsuit and therefore, cannot determine the likelihood of loss nor estimate a range of possible loss. However, because of the nature and inherent uncertainties of litigation, should the outcome of these actions be unfavorable, the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, investors, directors, officers, employees and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the Company’s breach of such agreements, services to be provided by the Company, or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third-parties. These indemnifications may survive termination of the underlying agreement and the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. The Company has not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnifications. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

14. Subsequent Event

On July 30, 2014, the Company signed a definitive agreement to acquire Cortina Systems, Inc.’s high-speed interconnect and optical transport product lines for approximately $52.5 million in cash and approximately 5.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments. The completion of the transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including, but not limited to, expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and other regulatory approvals. The transaction is expected to close in September or October of 2014.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Report. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this report, the terms “may,” “might,” “will,” “objective,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “would,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “plan,” or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future periods and include statements regarding our anticipated trends and challenges in our business and the markets in which we operate, including the market for 100G high-speed analog semiconductor solutions, our plans for future products, expansion of our product offerings and enhancements of existing products, our expectations regarding our expenses and revenue, our tax benefits, the benefits of our products and services, timing of the development of our products, our anticipated cash needs and our estimates regarding our capital requirements and our needs for additional financing, repatriation of cash, our anticipated growth and growth strategies, interest rate sensitivity, adequacy of our disclosure controls, customer concentration, foundry constraints, competition, protection of our intellectual property, our dividend policy and our legal proceedings. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these or any other forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed below, as well as factors affecting our results of operations, our ability to manage our growth, our ability to sustain or increase profitability, demand for our solutions, the effect of declines in average selling prices for our products, our ability to compete, our ability to rapidly develop new technology and introduce new products, our ability to safeguard our intellectual property, trends in the semiconductor industry and fluctuations in general economic conditions, and the risks set forth throughout this Report, including the risks set forth under Part II, “ Item 1A, Risk Factors”. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations and reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

All references to “Inphi,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean Inphi Corporation.

Inphi^®, iMB™, iKON™ and the Inphi logo are trademarks or service marks owned by Inphi. All other trademarks, service marks and trade names appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners.

Overview

Our Company

We are a fabless provider of high-speed analog and mixed signal semiconductor solutions for the communications, data center and computing markets. Our semiconductor solutions provide high signal integrity at leading-edge data speeds while reducing system power consumption. Our semiconductor solutions are designed to address bandwidth bottlenecks in networks, maximize throughput and minimize latency in computing environments and enable the rollout of next generation communications, data center and computing infrastructures. Our solutions provide a vital high-speed interface between analog signals and digital information in high-performance systems such as telecommunications transport systems, enterprise networking equipment, data centers and enterprise servers, storage platforms, test and measurement equipment and military systems. We provide 100G high-speed analog semiconductor solutions for the communications market and high-speed memory interface solutions for the computing market.

We have a product portfolio with many products sold in communication and data center markets as of June 30, 2014, including our 100 GbE CMOS SerDes architecture, or iPHY, which is designed to enable the development of next generation low power and high port density 100 Gigabit Ethernet, or 100 GbE, solutions to address bandwidth bottlenecks in next generation data center and communications infrastructures.

A detailed discussion of our business may be found in Part I, Item 1, “Business,” of our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Quarterly Update

As discussed in more detail below, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we delivered the following financial performance:

•

Total revenues increased by $9.6 million, or 39%, to $33.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, total revenues increased by $18.2 million, or 39%, to $65.1 million.

•

Gross profit as a percentage of revenue slightly increased to 63.8% from 63.5% in the three months ended June 30, 2014. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 64.1% from 63.4%.

•

Total operating expenses increased by $4.0 million, or 21%, to $23.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, total operating expenses increased by $6.0 million, or 16%, to $44.1 million.

•

Loss from operations decreased by $2.2 million, or 56%, to a loss from operations of $1.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, loss from operations decreased by $6.0 million, or 72%, to a loss from operations of $2.3 million.

•

Diluted earnings per share increased by $0.13 to $0.08 in the three months ended June 30, 2014. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, diluted earnings per share increased by $0.36 to $0.05.

The increase in our revenue was a result of increased consumption of our isolation memory buffer or iMB, dual linear transimpedance amplifier or TIA, quad linear driver products and iPHY products.

Our loss from operations decreased due to higher revenue, offset by increased operating expenses. Total operating expenses increased due primarily to an increase in headcount and stock-based compensation expense. Our expenses primarily consist of personnel costs, which include compensation, benefits, payroll related taxes and stock-based compensation. From July 2013 to June 2014, we hired 86 new employees, primarily in the engineering department. We expect expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to invest in resources to develop more products and to support the growth of our business. Our diluted earnings per share increased primarily due to decrease in loss from operations and benefit for income taxes recorded for three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Our cash and cash equivalents were $33.3 million at June 30, 2014, compared with $31.7 million at December 31, 2013. We generated cash flow from operations of $8.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $7.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $6.9 million primarily due to purchases of marketable securities and property and equipment offset by sales and maturities of marketable securities. We generated cash flow from financing activities of $0.3 million primarily due to proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan of $4.1 million offset by minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees of $3.8 million.

On July 30, 2014, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Cortina Systems, Inc.’s high-speed interconnect and optical transport product lines for approximately $52.5 million in cash and approximately 5.3 million shares of our common stock, subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments. The completion of the transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including, but not limited to, expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and other regulatory approvals.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to allowances for doubtful accounts, warranty reserves, inventory reserves, stock-based compensation expense, goodwill valuation, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, litigation and other loss contingencies. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of revenue, costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected. For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes in any of our critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth a summary of our statement of operations as a percentage of each line item to the revenue:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Total revenue		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Cost of revenue		36			36			36			37

Gross profit		64			64			64			63

Operating expenses:
Research and development		46			53			45			52
Sales and marketing		13			15			13			16
General and administrative		10			12			10			13

Total operating expenses		69			80			68			81

Income (loss) from operations		(5	)		(16	)		(4	)		(18	)
Other income		1			1			1			1

Income (loss) before income taxes		(4	)		(15	)		(3	)		(17	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(12	)		(9	)		(6	)		3

Net income (loss)		8	%		(6	)%		3	%		(20	)%

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Revenue


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Total revenue	$	33,922	$	24,339	$	9,583		39	%


	Six Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Total revenue	$	65,111	$	46,923	$	18,188		39	%

Total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 increased compared to corresponding 2013 periods due to changes in average selling price and number of units sold. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, the average selling price increased by 37% due to product mix, mainly from sales of our higher priced products which includes dual linear TIA and quad linear driver products. The number of units sold increased by 2% mainly from sale of our dual linear TIA, quad linear driver products, iPHY products and iMB, partially offset by lower consumption of our other high speed memory interface products. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the average selling price increased by 43% due to product mix that resulted in an increase in sales of our higher priced products as discussed above. The number of units sold decreased by 3% due to lower consumption of our high speed memory interface products. We believe the reduction in the unit consumption of high speed memory is the natural result of migration to higher capacity DiMM cards at economic prices made possible in part by the availability of higher capacity DRAM at economic prices. In effect, a requirement for the same or more memory capacity can now be placed on a single card, thereby naturally absorbing the same or more aggregate memory requirement into a smaller number of cards.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Change
	2014			2013			Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	12,296		$	8,893		$	3,403		38	%
Gross profit	$	21,626		$	15,446		$	6,180		40	%
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue		64	%		64	%		—		—


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Change
	2014			2013			Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	23,359		$	17,185		$	6,174		36	%
Gross profit	$	41,752		$	29,738		$	12,014		40	%
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue		64	%		63	%		—		1	%

Gross profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 increased primarily due to increases in revenue as described above. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was relatively unchanged for both periods as compared to the prior year.

Research and Development


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Research and development	$	15,729	$	12,796	$	2,933		23	%


	Six Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Research and development	$	29,468	$	24,394	$	5,074		21	%

Research and development expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 increased due to the increase in research and development headcount and equity awards, which resulted in a $2.5 million and $4.6 million increase in personnel costs and stock-based compensation expense, respectively. CAD software tool license expense increased by $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, due mainly to increased headcount in engineering. In addition, depreciation and allocated expenses increased by $1.1 million and $1.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, due to increase in equipment and research and development activities. The increases were partially offset by reimbursement from customers related to research and development contract of $1.3 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The increase in research and development expense was primarily driven by our strategy to expand our product offerings and enhance our existing product offerings.

Sales and Marketing


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Sales and marketing	$	4,362	$	3,706	$	656		18	%


	Six Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Sales and marketing	$	8,312	$	7,653	$	659		9	%

Sales and marketing expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 increased primarily due to an increase in personnel costs, including stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively to support increasing sales activities.

General and Administrative


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
General and administrative	$	3,234	$	2,842	$	392		14	%


	Six Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2014		2013		Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
General and administrative	$	6,299	$	5,997	$	302		5	%

General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 increased due to increase in personnel and equity grants of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Provision (benefit) for Income Taxes


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Change
	2014			2013			Amount			%
	(dollars in thousands)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	($	4,161	)	($	2,211	)	($	1,950	)		(88	)%


	Six Months Ended June 30,					Change
	2014			2013		Amount			%
	(dollars in thousands)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	($	3,634	)	$	1,265	($	4,899	)		(387	)%

We normally determine our interim provision using an estimated single annual effective tax rate for all tax jurisdictions. ASC 740 provides that when an entity operates in a jurisdiction that has generated ordinary losses on a year-to-date basis or on the basis of the results anticipated for the full fiscal year and no benefit can be recognized on those losses, a separate effective tax rate should be computed and applied to ordinary income (or loss) in that jurisdiction. We incurred pretax loss during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 for the Singapore operations and will not recognize tax benefit of the losses due to full valuation allowance established against deferred tax assets. Thus, separate effective tax rate was applied to losses from each loss jurisdiction to compute the interim tax expense.

The income tax expense (benefit) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 reflects an effective tax rate of 272% and 182%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 differs from the statutory rate of 34% primarily due to the change in valuation allowance, foreign income taxes provided at lower rates, geographic mix in operating results, unrecognized tax benefits and recognition of state research and development credits.

The income tax expense (benefit) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 reflects an effective tax rate of 60% and (16%), respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 differs from the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the change in valuation allowance (originally established in the fourth quarter of 2012), foreign income taxes provided at lower rates, geographic mix in profitability, unrecognized tax benefits and stock-based compensation adjustments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2014, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities of $122.3 million. Our primary uses of cash are to fund operating expenses, purchase inventory and acquire property and equipment. Cash used to fund operating expenses is impacted by the timing of when we pay these expenses, as reflected in the changes in our outstanding accounts payable and accrued expenses. Our primary sources of cash are cash receipts on accounts receivable from our revenue. Aside from the growth in amounts billed to our customers, net cash collections of accounts receivable are impacted by the efficiency of our cash collections process, which can vary from period to period, depending on the payment cycles of our major customers.

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	8,263		$	7,210
Net cash used in investing activities		(6,878	)		(8,956	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		273			762

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	1,658		$	(984	)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 primarily reflected a net income of $1.6 million, depreciation and amortization of $4.9 million and stock-based compensation of $9.9 million, offset by an increases in accounts receivable of $1.3 million and prepaid expenses and other assets of $2.4 million, deferred income taxes and deferred tax charge of $0.9 million, a change in income tax payable/receivable of $2.7 million and decrease in other liabilities of $1 million. Our receivables increased due to a higher relative weighting of shipments made in the last month of the quarter in 2014 compared to 2013. Our prepaid expenses and other assets increased due to new subscriptions for software, maintenance and insurance prepayments. Other liabilities decreased due to reduction in cash advance made by a customer upon achievement of a milestone.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 primarily reflected a decrease in accounts receivable of $2.4 million, a change in income tax payable/receivable of $2.8 million, depreciation and amortization of $3.6 million and stock-based compensation of $8.3 million, offset by net loss of $9.1 million, and an increase in inventories of $0.7 million. Our receivables decreased due to collections. Our inventories increased as a result of growing production for expected delivery to customers in the third quarter of 2013.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014, consisted of cash used to purchase property and equipment of $8.4 million and purchases of marketable securities of $26.3 million, offset by sales and maturities of marketable securities of $27.8 million.

Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013, consisted of cash used to purchase property and equipment of $9.7 million and purchases of marketable securities of $21.8 million, offset by sales and maturities of marketable securities of $22.5 million.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted of proceeds from exercises of stock options and employee stock purchase plan of $4.1 million, offset by minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units of $3.8 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 consisted of proceeds from exercises of stock options and employee stock purchase plan of $1.7 million and excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation of $0.5 million, offset by minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units of $1.4 million.

Operating and Capital Expenditure Requirements

Our principal source of liquidity as of June 30, 2014 consisted of $122.3 million of cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities, of which $8.2 million is held by our foreign subsidiaries. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents from operations will be sufficient to finance our operational cash needs through at least the next 12 to 18 months. In the future, we expect our operating and capital expenditures to increase as we increase headcount, expand our business activities and grow our end customer base which will result in higher needs for working capital. Our ability to generate cash from operations is also subject to substantial risks described in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors. If any of these risks occur, we may be unable to generate or sustain positive cash flow from operating activities. We would then be required to use existing cash and cash equivalents to support our working capital and other cash requirements. If additional funds are required to support our working capital requirements, acquisitions or other purposes, we may seek to raise funds through debt financing or from other sources. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders could be significantly diluted, and these newly-issued securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds by obtaining loans from third parties, the terms of those financing arrangements may include negative covenants or other restrictions on our business that could impair our operating flexibility, and would also require us to incur interest expense. We can provide no assurance that additional financing will be available at all or, if available, that we would be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us.

We do not plan to repatriate cash balances from foreign subsidiaries to fund our operations in the United States. There may be adverse tax effects upon repatriation of these funds to the United States.

Recent Authoritative Accounting Guidance

See note 2 of the notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity

We had cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities of $122.3 million and $122.6 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, which was held for working capital purposes. Our exposure to market interest-rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge the market risks of our investments. We manage our total portfolio to encompass a diversified pool of investment-grade securities to preserve principal and maintain liquidity. We place our investments with high-quality issuers, money market funds and debt securities. Our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2014 consisted of money market funds, U.S. Treasuries, municipal bonds, corporate bonds, certificates of deposit, and asset backed securities. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their market value adversely impacted due to an increase in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or if the decline in fair value of our publicly traded debt investments is judged to be other-than-temporary. We may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. However, because any debt securities we hold are classified as available-for-sale, no gains or losses are realized in the income statement due to changes in interest rates unless such securities are sold prior to maturity or unless declines in value are determined to be other-than-temporary. These securities are reported at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), reported in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Although, we currently expect that our ability to access or liquidate these investments as needed to support our business activities will continue, we cannot ensure that this will not change.

In a low interest rate environment, as short-term investments mature, reinvestment may occur at less favorable market rates. Given the short-term nature of certain investments, the current interest rate environment may negatively impact our investment income.

Foreign Currency Risk

To date, our international customer and vendor agreements have been denominated almost exclusively in United States dollars. Accordingly, we have limited exposure to foreign currency exchange rates and do not currently enter into foreign currency hedging transactions.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15 (e) under the Securities Exchange Act 1934, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The information required by this Item 1 is set forth under Note 13 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report and is incorporated by reference herein. For an additional discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, see Item 1A, Risk Factors below.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which are incorporated by reference herein, as our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by any of the risks and uncertainties described therein. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:


Exhibit Number		Description

3(i)		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011).

3(ii)		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(ii).2 filed with Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167564)).

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 filed with Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167564).

4.2		Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement dated as of August 12, 2010 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011).

31.1		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

31.2		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.1(1)		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.2(1)		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

(1)

The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INPHI CORPORATION,

(Registrant)

/s/ Ford Tamer

Ford Tamer

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 5, 2014

EXHIBIT INDEX


Number		Description

3(i)		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011).

3(ii)		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(ii).2 filed with Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167564)).

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 filed with Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167564).

4.2		Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement dated as of August 12, 2010 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011).

31.1		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

31.2		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.1(1)		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.2(1)		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

(1)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company