Edgar Filing: DORCHESTER MINERALS LP

form10q1q2009.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009

Commission file number 000-50175

DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

Incorporation or organization)

81-0551518

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3838 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75219

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (214) 559-0300

None

Former name, former address and former fiscal

year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.): Yes o No x

As of May 6, 2009, 28,240,431 common units of partnership interest were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			3
PART I			3
	ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2008	4

		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008 (UNAUDITED)	5

		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008 (UNAUDITED)	6
		NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	7
	ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	8
	ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	14
	ITEM 4	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	14
PART II			14
	ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	14
	ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	14
	ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	14
	ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	14
	ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	14
	ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	14
	ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	14
SIGNATURES			15
INDEX TO EXHIBITS			16
CERTIFICATIONS			17

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements included in this report that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto), are forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including “may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or other similar words. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other “forward-looking” information. In this report, the term “Partnership,” as well as the terms “DMLP,” “us,” “our,” “we,” and “its” are sometimes used as abbreviated references to Dorchester Minerals, L.P. itself or Dorchester Minerals, L.P. and its related entities.

These forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and, therefore, involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements for a number of important reasons. Examples of such reasons include, but are not limited to, changes in the price or demand for oil and natural gas, changes in the operations on or development of our properties, changes in economic and industry conditions and changes in regulatory requirements (including changes in environmental requirements) and our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations. These and other factors are set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

You should read these statements carefully because they discuss our expectations about our future performance, contain projections of our future operating results or our future financial condition, or state other “forward-looking” information. Before you invest, you should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in this report could substantially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition and that upon the occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our common units could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

See attached financial statements on the following pages.

DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands)

	March 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008
ASSETS	(unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,039	$	16,211
Trade and other receivables		3,660		5,053
Net profits interests receivable - related party		1,122		4,428
Prepaid expenses		37		-
Total current assets		16,858		25,692

Other non-current assets		19		19
Total		19		19

Property and leasehold improvements - at cost:
Oil and natural gas properties (full cost method)		291,897		291,818
Less accumulated full cost depletion		181,560		178,272
Total		110,337		113,546

Leasehold improvements		512		512
Less accumulated amortization		219		207
Total		293		305

Net property and leasehold improvements		110,630		113,851

Total assets	$	127,507	$	139,562

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other current liabilities	$	739	$	733
Current portion of deferred rent incentive		39		39
Total current liabilities		778		772

Deferred rent incentive less current portion		198		208
Total liabilities		976		980

Commitments and contingencies

Partnership capital:
General partner		5,573		5,971
Unitholders		120,958		132,611
Total partnership capital		126,531		138,582

Total liabilities and partnership capital	$	127,507	$	139,562

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands except Earnings per Unit)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2009		2008
Operating revenues:
Royalties	$	7,025	$	14,771
Net profits interests		1,782		6,365
Lease bonus		9		117
Other		8		19

Total operating revenues		8,824		21,272

Costs and expenses:
Operating, including production taxes		739		1,191
Depletion and amortization		3,300		3,790
General and administrative expenses		1,035		1,011

Total costs and expenses		5,074		5,992

Operating income		3,750		15,280

Other income, net		27		130

Net earnings	$	3,777	$	15,410

Allocation of net earnings:
General partner	$	123	$	463

Unitholders	$	3,654	$	14,947

Net earnings per common unit (basic and diluted)	$	0.13	$	0.53
Weighted average common units outstanding		28,240		28,240

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Year Ended
	March 31,
	2009			2008

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	11,735		$	17,203

Cash flows used in investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(79	)		(50	)

Cash flows used in financing activities:
Distributions paid to general partner and unitholders		(15,828	)		(14,996	)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(4,172	)		2,157

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		16,211			15,001

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	12,039		$	17,158

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation: Dorchester Minerals, L.P. is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership that was formed in December 2001, and commenced operations on January 31, 2003. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dorchester Minerals, L.P., Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma LP, Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma GP, Inc., Dorchester Minerals Acquisition LP, and Dorchester Minerals Acquisition GP, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments unless indicated otherwise) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for the interim period. Interim period results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the calendar year. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information. Per-unit information is calculated by dividing the earnings or loss applicable to holders of our Partnership’s common units by the weighted average number of units outstanding. The Partnership has no potentially dilutive securities and, consequently, basic and dilutive earnings or loss per unit do not differ. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

2. Contingencies: In January 2002, some individuals and an association called Rural Residents for Natural Gas Rights sued Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd., along with several other operators in Texas County, Oklahoma regarding the use of natural gas from the wells in residences. Dorchester Minerals Operating LP, the operating partnership, now owns and operates the properties formerly owned by Dorchester Hugoton. These properties contribute a major portion of the Net Profits Interests amounts paid to us. On April 9, 2007, plaintiffs, for immaterial costs, dismissed with prejudice all claims against the operating partnership regarding such residential gas use. On October 4, 2004, the plaintiffs filed severed claims against the operating partnership regarding royalty underpayments, which the Texas County District Court subsequently dismissed with a grant of time to replead. On January 27, 2006, one of the original plaintiffs again sued the operating partnership for underpayment of royalty, seeking class action certification. On October 1, 2007, the Texas County District Court granted the operating partnership’s motion for summary judgment finding no royalty underpayments. Subsequently, the District Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, and the plaintiff filed an appeal. At present, the litigation awaits result of the appeal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. An adverse appellate decision could reduce amounts we receive from the Net Profits Interests.

The Partnership and the operating partnership are involved in other legal and/or administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of their businesses, none of which have predictable outcomes and none of which are believed to have any significant effect on consolidated financial position, cash flows, or operating results.

3. Distributions to Holders of Common Units: Unitholder cash distributions per common unit since 2005 have been:

	Per Unit Amount
	2009	2008	2007	2006	2005
First quarter	$0.401205	$0.572300	$0.461146	$0.729852	$0.481242
Second quarter		$0.769206	$0.473745	$0.778120	$0.514542
Third quarter		$0.948472	$0.560502	$0.516082	$0.577287
Fourth quarter		$0.542081	$0.514625	$0.478596	$0.805543

Distributions were paid on 28,240,431 units. Fourth quarter distributions shown above are paid in the first calendar quarter of the following year. Our partnership agreement requires the next cash distribution to be paid by August 15, 2009.

4. New Accounting Pronouncements: In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value hierarchy with the highest priority being quoted prices in active markets. Under SFAS 157, fair value measurements are disclosed by level within that hierarchy. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 which permits a one year deferral for the implementation of SFAS 157 with regard to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. We adopted SFAS 157 for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008 with no material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We adopted the delayed portion for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis beginning January 1, 2009 with no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R), among other things, establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination (a) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired business, (b) changes the accounting for contingent consideration, in process research and development, and restructuring costs, (c) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (d) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. We adopted SFAS 141(R) as of January 1, 2009. The adoption had no immediate impact on our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We own producing and nonproducing mineral, royalty, overriding royalty, net profits and leasehold interests. We refer to these interests as the Royalty Properties. We currently own Royalty Properties in 573 counties and parishes in 25 states.

Dorchester Minerals Operating LP, a Delaware limited partnership owned directly and indirectly by our general partner, holds working interest properties and a minor portion of mineral and royalty interest properties. We refer to Dorchester Minerals Operating LP as the “operating partnership” or “DMOLP.” We directly and indirectly own a 96.97% net profits overriding royalty interest (referred to as Net Profits Interests, or NPIs) in property groups made up of four NPIs created when we commenced operations in 2003 and one immaterial deficit NPI subsequently created. We currently receive monthly payments equaling 96.97% of the preceding month’s net profits actually realized by the operating partnership from three of the property groups. The purpose of such Net Profits Interests is to avoid the participation as a working interest or other cost-bearing owner that could result in unrelated business taxable income. Net profits interest payments are not considered unrelated business taxable income for tax purposes. One such Net Profits Interest, referred to as the Minerals NPI, has continuously had costs that exceed revenues. As of March 31, 2009, cumulative operating and development costs presented in the following table, which include amounts equivalent to an interest charge, exceeded cumulative revenues of the Minerals NPI, resulting in a cumulative deficit. All cumulative deficits (which represent cumulative excess of operating and development costs over revenue received) are borne 100% by our general partner until the Minerals NPI recovers the deficit amount. Once in profit status, we will receive the Net Profits Interest payments attributable to these properties. Our consolidated financial statements do not reflect activity attributable to properties subject to Net Profits Interests that are in a deficit status. Consequently, Net Profits Interest payments and production sales volumes and prices set forth in other portions of this quarterly report do not reflect amounts attributable to the Minerals NPI, which includes all of the operating partnership’s Fayetteville Shale working interest properties in Arkansas.

The following table sets forth receipts and disbursements attributable to the Minerals NPI:

	Minerals NPI Results (in Thousands)
	Cumulative Total at 12/31/08			Three Months Ended 3/31/09			Cumulative Total at 3/31/09
Cash received for revenue	$	14,216		$	777		$	14,993
Cash paid for operating costs		2,226			184			2,410
Cash paid for development costs		11,724			782			12,506
Budgeted capital expenditures		905			26			931
Net	$	(639	)	$	(215	)	$	(854	)
Cumulative NPI deficit	$	(639	)	$	(854	)	$	(854	)

The development costs pertain to more properties than the properties producing revenue due to timing differences between operating partnership expenditures and oil and natural gas production and payments to the operating partnership. The amounts reflect budgeted capital expenditures of $931,000 at March 31, 2009. The amounts also reflect the operating partnership’s ownership of the subject properties. Net Profits Interest payments to us, if any, will equal 96.97% of the cumulative net profits actually received by the operating partnership attributable to subject properties. The above financial information attributable to the Minerals NPI may not be indicative of future results of the Minerals NPI and may not indicate when the deficit status may end and when Net Profits Interest payments may begin from the Minerals NPI.

Commodity Price Risks

Our profitability is affected by volatility in prevailing oil and natural gas prices. Oil and natural gas prices have been subject to significant volatility in recent years in response to changes in the supply and demand for oil and natural gas in the market along with domestic and international political economic conditions.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 as compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2008

Normally, our period-to-period changes in net earnings and cash flows from operating activities are principally determined by changes in oil and natural gas sales volumes and prices. Our portion of oil and natural gas sales and weighted average prices were:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
Accrual basis sales volumes:	2009		2008
Royalty properties gas sales (mmcf)		1,037		992
Royalty properties oil sales (mbbls)		74		72
Net profits interests gas sales (mmcf)		887		987
Net profits interests oil sales (mbbls)		3		4

Accrual basis weighted average sales price:
Royalty properties gas sales ($/mcf)	$	4.05	$	7.96
Royalty properties oil sales ($/bbl)	$	38.45	$	94.88
Net profits interests gas sales ($/mcf)	$	3.32	$	8.04
Net profits interests oil sales ($/bbl)	$	28.63	$	80.10

Accrual basis production costs deducted
under the net profits interests ($/mcfe) (1)	$	1.45	$	1.99

(1)

Provided to assist in determination of revenues; applies only to Net Profits Interest sales volumes and prices.

Oil sales volumes attributable to our Royalty Properties during the first quarter were essentially unchanged from the first quarter of 2008. Natural gas sales volumes attributable to our Royalty Properties during the first quarter increased 4.5% from 992 mmcf in 2008 to 1,037 mmcf in 2009. The increase in natural gas sales volume was primarily attributable to results from new drilling activity in the second half of 2008.

Oil sales volumes attributable to our Net Profits Interests during the first quarter of 2009 were virtually unchanged when compared to the same period of 2008. Natural gas sales volumes attributable to our Net Profits Interests during the first quarter of 2009 decreased from the same period of 2008. First quarter sales of 887 mmcf during 2009 were 10.1% less than 987 mmcf during 2008. Natural gas sales volume decreases were primarily a result of severe cold weather freezing gas production facilities and natural reservoir decline in the Guymon-Hugoton field in Oklahoma. Production sales volumes and prices from the Minerals NPI are excluded from the above table. See “Overview” above.

The weighted average oil sales price attributable to our interest in Royalty Properties decreased 59.5% from $94.88/bbl during the first quarter of 2008 to $38.45/bbl during the first quarter of 2009. The first quarter weighted average natural gas sales price from Royalty Properties decreased 49.1% from $7.96/mcf during 2008 to $4.05/mcf during 2009. Both oil and natural gas price changes resulted from changing market conditions.

The first quarter weighted average oil sales price from the Net Profits Interests properties decreased 64.3% from $80.10/bbl in 2008 to $28.63/bbl in 2009. The first quarter weighted average natural gas sales price from the Net Profits Interests properties of $3.32/mcf in 2009 was 58.7% lower than $8.04/mcf during the same period of 2008. Changing market conditions resulted in decreased oil and natural gas sales prices.

Our first quarter net operating revenues decreased 58.5% from $21,272,000 during 2008 to $8,824,000 during 2009. The quarterly decrease primarily resulted from decreases in oil and natural gas sales prices.

Costs and expenses decreased 15.3% from $5,992,000 during the first quarter of 2008 to $5,074,000 during the first quarter of 2009. The decrease resulted from decreased production tax on lower operating revenues and reduced depletion and amortization.

Depletion and amortization decreased 12.9% during the first quarter of 2009 when compared to the same period of 2008. The decrease from $3,790,000 in 2008 to $3,300,000 in 2009 resulted from a lower depletable base due to effects of previous depletion and upward revisions in oil and natural gas reserve estimates at 2008 year end.

First quarter net earnings allocable to common units decreased 75.6% from $14,947,000 during 2008 to $3,654,000 during 2009. The 2009 decrease from the first quarter 2008 net earnings is primarily the result of decreased oil and natural gas sales prices.

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased 31.8% from $17,203,000 during the first quarter of 2008 to $11,735,000 during the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to decreased oil and natural gas sales prices partially offset by a $2.1 million natural gas liquid payment attributable to 2008. The natural gas liquids payment is based on an Oklahoma Guymon-Hugoton field 1994 gas delivery agreement that is in effect through 2015. Under the terms of the agreement, when the market price of natural gas liquids increases sufficiently disproportionately to natural gas market prices, the operating partnership receives a portion of that increase in an annual payment. In the event the evaluation at the end of the annual contract period shows the payment to be determinable and collectable, the revenue is accrued. Only immaterial amounts were received prior to 2007.

In an effort to provide the reader with information concerning prices of oil and natural gas sales that correspond to our quarterly distributions, management calculates the weighted average price by dividing gross revenues received by the net volumes of the corresponding product without regard to the timing of the production to which such sales may be attributable. This “indicated price” does not necessarily reflect the contract terms for such sales and may be affected by transportation costs, location differentials, and quality and gravity adjustments. While the relationship between our cash receipts and the timing of the production of oil and natural gas may be described generally, actual cash receipts may be materially impacted by purchasers’ release of suspended funds and by purchasers’ prior period adjustments.

Cash receipts attributable to our Royalty Properties during the 2009 first quarter totaled approximately $8.1 million. These receipts generally reflect oil sales during December 2008 through February 2009 and natural gas sales during November 2008 through January 2009. The weighted average indicated price for oil and natural gas sales during the 2009 first quarter attributable to the Royalty Properties was $38.49/bbl and $5.33/mcf, respectively.

Cash receipts attributable to our Net Profits Interests during the 2009 first quarter totaled approximately $5.1 million. These receipts reflect oil and natural gas sales from the properties underlying the Net Profits Interests generally during November 2008 through January 2009 and approximately $2.1 million attributable to calendar year 2008 natural gas liquids. The weighted average indicated price received during the 2009 first quarter for oil and natural gas sales was $36.38/bbl and $6.89/mcf, respectively. The natural gas weighted average indicated price for the quarter was increased by $2.41/mcf due to the natural gas liquids payment.

We received cash payments in the amount of $38,000 from various sources during the first quarter of 2009 including lease bonuses attributable to four consummated leases and pooling elections located in four counties and parishes in two states. The consummated leases reflected royalty terms ranging up to 30% and lease bonuses ranging up to $150/acre.

We received division orders for, or otherwise identified, 141 new wells completed on our Royalty Properties and Net Profits Interests located in 54 counties and parishes in nine states during the first quarter of 2009. The operating partnership elected to participate in 17 wells to be drilled on our Net Profits Interests located in six counties in two states. Selected new wells and the royalty interests owned by us and the working and net revenue interests owned by the operating partnership are summarized in the following table.

This table does not include wells drilled in the Fayetteville Shale trend as they are detailed in a subsequent discussion and table.

	County			DMLP	DMOLP		Test Rates per day
State	/Parish	Operator	Well Name	NRI(2)	WI(1)	NRI(2)	Gas, mcf	Oil, bbls
LA	De Soto	Comstock Oil &Gas	HA RA SUA; Robert Crews #3Alt	2.734%	--	--	2,350	--
LA	De Soto	Comstock Oil &Gas	Lena Crews #5 Alt	2.734%	--	--	1,700	--
OK	Roger Mills	Burlington Resources	Troy Miller #17-11	1.670%	--	--	2,803	5
TX	Hidalgo	Chesapeake Operating	Barton Gas Unit #1	3.125%	--	--	4,920	--
TX	Wheeler	Devon Energy	Effie Hayes #18-5H	3.125%	--	--	4,377	--

(1)	WI means the working interest owned by the operating partnership and subject to a Net Profits Interest.

(2)	NRI means the net revenue interest attributable to our royalty interest or to the operating partnership’s royalty and working interest, which is subject to a Net Profits Interest.

FAYETTEVILLE SHALE TREND OF NORTHERN ARKANSAS -- We own varying undivided perpetual mineral interests totaling 23,336/11,464 gross/net acres located in Cleburne, Conway, Faulkner, Franklin, Johnson, Pope, Van Buren, and White counties, Arkansas in an area commonly referred to as the “Fayetteville Shale” trend of the Arkoma Basin. One hundred forty wells have been permitted on the lands as of March 31, 2009. Wells that have been proposed to be drilled by the operator but for which permits have not yet been issued by the Arkansas Oil & Gas Commission are not reflected in this number. Available test results for new wells producing in the first quarter, along with ownership interests owned by us and interests owned by the operating partnership subject to the Minerals NPI, are summarized in the following table.

			DMLP	DMOLP		Gas Test Rates
County	Operator	Well Name	NRI(2)	WI(1)	NRI(2)	mcf per day
Cleburne	SEECO	Kessinger Trust 8-12 #3-2H35	0.307%	0.436%	0.327%	3,007
Conway	David Arrington	Beverly Crofford #1-14H	1.563%	1.322%	0.996%	--
Conway	David Arrington	Beverly Crofford #2-14H	1.563%	1.322%	0.996%	--
Conway	SEECO	Bryant 9-15 #4-32H31	0.635%	1.701%	1.275%	5,499
Conway	SEECO	Deltic Timber 9-16 #4-36H31	1.384%	2.400%	1.800%	4,625
Conway	SEECO	Jerome Carr 9-15 #4-31H	2.188%	3.796%	2.847%	3,911
Van Buren	Chesapeake	Bradley 11-13 #2-9H	1.563%	1.250%	0.938%	320
Van Buren	Petrohawk	Sequoyah 9-12 #3-15H	1.953%	2.813%	2.109%	569
Van Buren	SEECO	Linn 10-12 #3-8H16	2.621%	3.230%	2.484%	3,930
Van Buren	SEECO	Linn 10-12 #4-8H16	2.621%	3.230%	2.484%	3,407

(1)	WI means the working interest owned by the operating partnership and subject to the Minerals NPI.

(2)	NRI means the net revenue interest attributable to our royalty interest or to the operating partnership’s royalty and working interest, which is subject to the Minerals NPI.

Set forth below is a summary of all permitting, drilling and completion activity through March 31, 2009 for wells in which we have a royalty interest or Net Profits Interest. This includes wells subject to the Minerals NPI, which is currently in a deficit status.

	2004	2005	2006	2007	Q1 2008	Q2 2008	Q3 2008	Q4 2008	Q1 2009	Total
New Well Permits	1	2	11	35	15	21	15	21	19	140
Wells Spud	0	1	9	33	12	17	22	13	9	116
Wells Completed	0	1	5	23	10	17	12	17	12	97
Wells in Pay Status (1)	0	0	0	6	5	8	10	7	12	48

(1)	Wells in pay status means wells for which revenue was initially received during the indicated period.

Net cash receipts for the Royalty Properties attributable to interests in these lands totaled $510,000 in the first quarter from 45 wells. Net cash receipts for the Minerals NPI Properties attributable to interests in these lands totaled $376,000 in the first quarter from 36 wells.

APPALACHIAN BASIN — We own varying undivided perpetual mineral interests in approximately 31,000/22,000 gross/net acres in 19 counties in southern New York and northern Pennsylvania. Approximately 75% of these net acres are located in eastern Allegany and western Steuben Counties in New York, an area which some industry press reports suggest may be prospective for gas production from unconventional reservoirs including the Marcellus Shale. We are monitoring industry activity and encouraging dialogue with industry participants to determine the proper course of action regarding our interests.

HORIZONTAL BAKKEN, WILLISTON BASIN – We own varying undivided perpetual mineral interests totaling 70,390/7,602 gross/net acres located in Burke, Divide, Dunn, McKenzie, Mountrail and Williams Counties, North Dakota. Operators active in this area include Continental Resources, EOG Resources, Hess Corporation and Marathon Oil Company. Sixty-eight wells have been permitted on these lands as of March 31, 2009. In all cases we have elected not to lease our lands and not to pay our share of well costs thus becoming a non-consenting mineral owner. According to North Dakota law, non-consenting owners receive the average royalty rate from the date of first production and back-in for their full working interest after the operator has recovered 150% of drilling and completion costs. Once 150% payout occurs, the working interest will be owned by the operating partnership and subject to the Minerals NPI. Non-consenting owners are not entitled to well data other than public information available from the North Dakota Industrial Commission.

Set forth below is a summary of all permitting, drilling and completion activity through March 31, 2009 for wells in which we have a royalty or Net Profits Interest.

	2004	2005	2006	2007	Q1 2008	Q2 2008	Q3 2008	Q4 2008	Q1 2009	Total
New Well Permits	2	1	0	15	8	15	15	12	0	68
Wells Spud	1	1	0	11	2	9	10	9	8	51
Wells Completed	1	1	0	7	5	4	11	6	1	36
WI Wells in Pay Status(1)	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	0	0	3

(1)	Wells in pay status means wells for which revenue was initially received during the indicated period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Resources

Our primary sources of capital are our cash flow from the Net Profits Interests and the Royalty Properties. Our only cash requirements are the distributions to our unitholders, the payment of oil and natural gas production and property taxes not otherwise deducted from gross production revenues and general and administrative expenses incurred on our behalf and allocated in accordance with our partnership agreement. Since the distributions to our unitholders are, by definition, determined after the payment of all expenses actually paid by us, the only cash requirements that may create liquidity concerns for us are the payments of expenses. Since most of these expenses vary directly with oil and natural gas sales prices and volumes, we anticipate that sufficient funds will be available at all times for payment of these expenses. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the amounts and dates of cash distributions to unitholders.

We are not directly liable for the payment of any exploration, development or production costs. We do not have any transactions, arrangements or other relationships that could materially affect our liquidity or the availability of capital resources. We have not guaranteed the debt of any other party, nor do we have any other arrangements or relationships with other entities that could potentially result in unconsolidated debt.

Pursuant to the terms of our partnership agreement, we cannot incur indebtedness, other than trade payables, (i) in excess of $50,000 in the aggregate at any given time or (ii) which would constitute “acquisition indebtedness” (as defined in Section 514 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended).

Expenses and Capital Expenditures

The operating partnership plans to continue its efforts to increase production in Oklahoma with techniques that may include fracture treating, deepening, recompleting, and drilling. Costs of such techniques vary widely and are not predictable as each effort requires specific engineering. The operating partnership owns and operates the wells, pipelines and natural gas compression and dehydration facilities located in Kansas and Oklahoma. The operating partnership anticipates gradual increases in expenses as repairs to these facilities become more frequent and anticipates gradual increases in field operating expenses as reservoir pressure declines. The operating partnership does not anticipate incurring significant expense to replace these facilities at this time. These capital and operating costs influence the Net Profits Interests payments we receive from the operating partnership and are included in the accrual basis production costs $/mcfe in the table under “Results of Operations.”

In 1998, Oklahoma regulations removed production quantity restrictions in the Guymon-Hugoton field and did not address efforts by third parties to persuade Oklahoma to permit infill drilling in the Guymon-Hugoton field. Infill drilling could require considerable capital expenditures. The outcome and the cost of such activities are unpredictable and could influence the amount we receive from the Net Profits Interests. The operating partnership believes it now has sufficient field compression and permits for vacuum operation for the foreseeable future.

Liquidity and Working Capital

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $12,039,000 at March 31, 2009 and $16,211,000 at December 31, 2008.

Critical Accounting Policies

We utilize the full cost method of accounting for costs related to our oil and natural gas properties. Under this method, all such costs are capitalized and amortized on an aggregate basis over the estimated lives of the properties using the units-of-production method. These capitalized costs are subject to a ceiling test, however, which limits such pooled costs to the aggregate of the present value of future net revenues attributable to proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10% plus the lower of cost or market value of unproved properties. Oil and natural gas properties are evaluated using the full cost ceiling test at the end of each quarter and when events indicate possible impairment.

The discounted present value of our proved oil and natural gas reserves is a major component of the ceiling calculation and requires many subjective judgments. Estimates of reserves are forecasts based on engineering and geological analyses. Different reserve engineers may reach different conclusions as to estimated quantities of natural gas reserves based on the same information. Our reserve estimates are prepared by independent consultants. The passage of time provides more qualitative information regarding reserve estimates, and revisions are made to prior estimates based on updated information. However, there can be no assurance that significant revisions will not be necessary in the future. Significant downward revisions could result in an impairment representing a non-cash charge to earnings. In addition to the impact on calculation of the ceiling test, estimates of proved reserves are also a major component of the calculation of depletion.

While the quantities of proved reserves require substantial judgment, the associated prices of oil and natural gas reserves that are included in the discounted present value of our reserves are objectively determined. The ceiling test calculation requires use of prices and costs in effect as of the last day of the accounting period, which are generally held constant for the life of the properties. As a result, the present value is not necessarily an indication of the fair value of the reserves. Oil and natural gas prices have historically been volatile and the prevailing prices at any given time may not reflect our Partnership’s or the industry’s forecast of future prices.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. For example, estimates of uncollected revenues and unpaid expenses from royalties and net profits interests in properties operated by non-affiliated entities are particularly subjective due to our inability to gain accurate and timely information. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The following information provides quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposures to market risk. The term “market risk” refers to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in oil and natural gas prices, interest rates and currency exchange rates. The disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected future losses but, rather, indicators of possible losses.

Market Risk Related to Oil and Natural Gas Prices

Essentially all of our assets and sources of income are from Royalty Properties and the Net Profits Interests, which generally entitle us to receive a share of the proceeds based on oil and natural gas production from those properties. Consequently, we are subject to market risk from fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices. Pricing for oil and natural gas production has been volatile and unpredictable for several years. We do not anticipate entering into financial hedging activities intended to reduce our exposure to oil and natural gas price fluctuations.

Absence of Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We do not anticipate having a credit facility or incurring any debt, other than trade debt. Therefore, we do not expect interest rate risk to be material to us. We do not anticipate engaging in transactions in foreign currencies that could expose us to foreign currency related market risk.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures effectively ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal controls (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures.

PART II

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
		See Note 2 – Contingencies in Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS
		None.
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
		None.
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
		None.
ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
		None.
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION
		None.
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS
		See the attached Index to Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.

	By:	Dorchester Minerals Management LP
		its General Partner

	By:	Dorchester Minerals Management GP LLC
		its General Partner


	By:	/s/ William Casey McManemin
		William Casey McManemin
Date: May 7, 2009		Chief Executive Officer


	By:	/s/ H.C. Allen, Jr.
		H.C. Allen, Jr.
Date: May 7, 2009		Chief Financial Officer

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)

3.2		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.3		Certificate of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Management LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)

3.4		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Management LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.5		Certificate of Formation of Dorchester Minerals Management GP LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)

3.6		Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Dorchester Minerals Management GP LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.7		Certificate of Formation of Dorchester Minerals Operating GP LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)

3.8		Limited Liability Company Agreement of Dorchester Minerals Operating GP LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)

3.9		Certificate of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Operating LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)

3.10		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Operating LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.11		Certificate of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.12		Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.13		Certificate of Incorporation of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma GP, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.14		Bylaws of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma GP, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

3.15		Certificate of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)

3.16		Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)

3.17		Certificate of Incorporation of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition GP, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.17 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)

3.18		Bylaws of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition GP, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.18 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (contained within Exhibit 32.1 hereto)