As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2015

Securities Act File No. 333-195003

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM N-2

 

 

GARRISON CAPITAL INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

1290 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 914
New York, New York 10104

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(212) 372-9590

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Brian Chase
Garrison Capital Inc.
1290 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 914
New York, New York 10104

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

Copies to:

Thomas J. Friedmann
David J. Harris
William J. Tuttle
Dechert LLP
1900 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 261-3300

 

Approximate date of proposed public offering: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are offered on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, check the following box. x

It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):

x when declared effective pursuant to section 8(c).

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(c), may determine.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

$250,000,000

GARRISON CAPITAL INC.

Common Stock
Preferred Stock
Warrants
Subscription Rights
Debt Securities

We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Our investment objective is to provide our stockholders with current income and capital appreciation through debt and minority equity investments in middle-market companies.

Garrison Capital Advisers LLC serves as our investment adviser. Garrison Capital Administrator LLC serves as our administrator. These entities are affiliated with Garrison Investment Group, an alternative investment and asset management firm founded in March 2007 with approximately $4.2 billion of committed and invested capital under management as of March 31, 2015.

We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, together or separately, up to $250,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, subscription rights or debt securities, which we refer to, collectively, as the “securities.” We may sell our common stock through underwriters or dealers, “at-the-market” to or through a market maker into an existing trading market or otherwise directly to one or more purchasers or through agents or through a combination of methods of sale. The identities of such underwriters, dealers, market makers or agents, as the case may be, will be described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. The securities may be offered at prices and on terms to be described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. In the event we offer common stock, the offering price per share of our common stock exclusive of any underwriting commissions or discounts will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time we make the offering except (1) in connection with a rights offering to our existing stockholders, (2) with the consent of the majority of our common stockholders and approval of our board of directors or (3) under such circumstances as the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, may permit. See “Risk Factors” for more information.

In addition, this prospectus relates to 722,708 shares of our common stock that may be sold by the selling stockholders identified under “Selling Stockholders”. Sales of our common stock by the selling stockholders, which may occur at prices below the net asset value per share of our common stock, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and may make it more difficult for us to raise capital. The selling stockholders identified under “Selling Stockholders” acquired their shares of our common stock through the BDC Conversion (as defined herein). Each offering by the selling stockholders of their shares of our common stock through agents, underwriters or dealers will be accompanied by a prospectus supplement that will identify the selling stockholder that is participating in such offering. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders.

We are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the recently enacted Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the JOBS Act.

Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “GARS”. The last reported closing price for our common stock on June 12, 2015 was $15.00 per share. Based on this last reported sales price of our common stock on June 12, 2015, the aggregate market value of the 722,708 shares of our common stock held by the selling stockholders identified under “Selling Stockholders” is approximately $10.8 million. The net asset value of our common stock on March 31, 2015 (the last date prior to the date of this prospectus on which we determined net asset value) was $15.41 per share.

This prospectus contains important information you should know before investing in our securities. Please read it before you invest and keep it for future reference. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information about us with the SEC. We maintain a website at http://www.garrisoncapitalbdc.com and make all of our annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other publicly filed information available on or through our website. You may also obtain such information, free of charge, and make shareholder inquiries by contacting us at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 914, New York, NY 10104, Attention: Investor Relations, or by calling us collect at (212) 372-9590. The SEC also maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains such information.

Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, frequently trade at a discount to their net asset value. If our shares trade at a discount to our net asset value, it may increase the risk of loss for purchasers in this offering.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Before buying any securities, you should read the discussion of the material risks of investing in our securities, including the risk of leverage, in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 14 of this prospectus.

This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.

The date of this prospectus is              , 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the selling stockholders have not, authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the selling stockholders identified under “Selling Stockholders” are not, making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects may have changed since that date. We will update these documents to reflect material changes only as required by law.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY			1
FEES AND EXPENSES			10
RISK FACTORS			14
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			45
USE OF PROCEEDS			46
DISTRIBUTIONS			47
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA			48
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			51
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK			70
THE COMPANY			71
PORTFOLIO COMPANIES			81
MANAGEMENT			87
THE ADVISER AND THE ADMINISTRATOR			95
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS			107
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS			110
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS			112
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE			113
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN			115
DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK			117
DESCRIPTION OF OUR PREFERRED STOCK			122
DESCRIPTION OF OUR SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS			123
DESCRIPTION OF WARRANTS			125
DESCRIPTION OF OUR DEBT SECURITIES			127
REGULATION			137
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES			143
TAX MATTERS			144
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION			151
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AND DISTRIBUTION PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR			153
LEGAL MATTERS			153
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM			153
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION			153
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			F-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, using the “shelf” registration process. Under the shelf registration process, we may offer from time to time up to $250,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, subscription rights or debt securities on the terms to be determined at the time of the offering. We may sell our common stock through underwriters or dealers, “at-the-market” to or through a market maker, into an existing trading market or otherwise directly to one or more purchasers or through agents or through a combination of methods of sale. The identities of such underwriters, dealers, market makers or agents, as the case may be, will be described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. The securities may be offered at prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. In addition, this prospectus relates to 722,708 shares of our common stock that may be sold by the selling stockholders identified under “Selling Stockholders”. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the securities that we and the selling stockholders may offer. Each time we or the selling stockholders use this prospectus to offer securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus, and the prospectus and prospectus supplement will together serve as the prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and any prospectus supplement, together with any exhibits, before you make an investment decision. Any exhibits will nonetheless be summarized in the prospectus or applicable prospectus supplement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights some of the information in this prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that you may want to consider. You should read the more detailed information set forth under “Risk Factors” and the other information included in this prospectus carefully.

Except as otherwise indicated, the terms:

Our predecessor, Garrison Capital LLC, commenced operations on December 17, 2010. On October 9, 2012, we converted from a limited liability company into a corporation. In this conversion, Garrison Capital Inc. succeeded to the business of Garrison Capital LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries, and the members of Garrison Capital LLC became stockholders of Garrison Capital Inc. In this prospectus, we refer to these transactions as the “BDC Conversion.” Unless otherwise indicated, the disclosure in this prospectus gives effect to the BDC Conversion.

Garrison Capital

We are an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. In addition, for tax purposes we have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and intend to qualify annually for such treatment.

Our investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation by making investments generally in the range of $5 million to $25 million primarily in debt securities and loans of U.S. based middle-market companies, which we define as those having annual earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation, or EBITDA, of between $5 million and $30 million. Our goal is to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns by assembling a broad portfolio of investments. Our principal investment strategies and risks reflect our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries, including the CLO, on a consolidated basis. We comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act, including those governing investment policies, capital structure, leverage, affiliated transactions and the custody of assets, on a consolidated basis with our subsidiaries, including the CLO.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We invest primarily in (1) first lien senior secured loans, (2) second lien senior secured loans, (3) “one-stop” senior secured or “unitranche” loans, (4) subordinated or mezzanine loans, (5) unsecured consumer loans and (6) to a lesser extent, selected equity co-investments in middle-market companies. We use the term “one-stop” or “unitranche” to refer to a loan that combines characteristics of traditional first lien senior secured loans and second lien or subordinated loans. We use the term “mezzanine” to refer to a loan that ranks senior only to a borrower’s equity securities and ranks junior in right of payment to all of such borrower’s other indebtedness.

We believe that the middle market offers attractive risk-adjusted returns for debt investors. Historically, we believe there has been a persistent scarcity of available capital relative to demand, which, from a lender’s perspective, has generally resulted in more favorable transaction structures, including enhanced covenant protection and increased pricing relative to larger companies. We further believe that the turmoil in the markets has exacerbated this scarcity of capital, as many traditional lenders to middle-market companies have exited the business or focused their attention on larger borrowers. In addition, we believe that middle-market companies traditionally have exhibited lower default rates and improved recoveries compared to larger borrowers and typically offer greater access to key senior managers, which we believe further enhances the attractiveness of lending to this market segment and facilitates due diligence investigations and regular monitoring.

As of March 31, 2015, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $452.0 million, including investments in 45 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of March 31, 2015 consisted of senior secured and second lien loans fair valued at $333.1 million and related indebtedness of $200.3. The loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $346.0 million as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.7 million, a weighted average yield of 10.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 44 months. Weighted average yield is calculated based on the fair value of the investments and interest expected to be received using the current rate of interest at the balance sheet date to maturity, excluding the effects of future scheduled principal amortizations. Weighted average yield is calculated based on the fair value of the investments and interest expected to be received using the current rate of interest at the balance sheet date to maturity, excluding the effects of future scheduled principal amortizations. Weighted average yield represents the portfolio yield and may be higher than what investors will realize because it does not reflect our expenses or any sales load paid by investors. Our shares of common stock had a total market return of 5.6% during the three months ended March 31, 2015. Total market return is calculated based on the change in market price per share during the period and taking into account distributions, if any, reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan.

As of December 31, 2014, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $467.8 million, including investments in 47 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of December 31, 2014 consisted of senior secured loans fair valued at $339.4 million and related indebtedness of $209.7 million. As of that date, the loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $357.8 million. As of December 31, 2014, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.8 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 10.5% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months. Our shares of common stock had a total market return of 14.4% during the year ended December 31, 2014.

As of December 31, 2013, we held investments in 70 portfolio companies with a fair value of $429.1 million, including investments in 56 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of December 31, 2013 consisted of senior secured loans fair valued at $331.7 million and related indebtedness of $209.7 million. As of that date, the loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $369.2 million. As of December 31, 2013, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $5.0 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 9.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months. Our shares of common stock had a total market return of (7.5)% during the year ended December 31, 2013.

Our Investment Adviser

Our investment activities are managed by our Investment Adviser, Garrison Capital Advisers. Our Investment Adviser is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting research and diligence on prospective investments and equity sponsors, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring our investments and monitoring our investments and portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. Garrison Capital Advisers was organized in November 2010 and is a registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, or the Advisers Act. See “The Adviser and the Administrator — Investment Advisory Agreement —  Management Fee” for a discussion of the fees that are payable by us to our Investment Adviser.

Garrison Capital Advisers is an affiliate of Garrison Investment Group. Garrison Capital Advisers has entered into a staffing agreement, or the Staffing Agreement, with Garrison Investment Group. See “Related Party Transactions and Certain Relationships — Staffing Agreement” for a discussion of the Staffing Agreement. We believe that the Staffing Agreement provides our Investment Adviser with access to investment opportunities, which we refer to in the aggregate as deal flow, generated by Garrison Investment Group in the ordinary course of its business and commits the members of Garrison Investment Group’s investment committee to serve as members of our investment committee. Garrison Investment Group has conducted due diligence on more than 500 middle-market companies since July 2007.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Garrison Investment Group

Garrison Investment Group is an alternative investment and asset management firm founded in March 2007. As of March 31, 2015, Garrison Investment Group had approximately $4.2 billion of committed and invested capital under management and a team of 76 employees, including 45 investment professionals. Garrison Investment Group is headquartered in New York, New York. Garrison Investment Group invests opportunistically in the debt of middle-market companies, primarily in the areas of corporate finance, real estate finance and structured finance.

Since the formation of Garrison Investment Group, Mr. Joseph Tansey and his team of investment professionals, including Rafael Astruc, Brian Chase, Mitch Drucker and Susan George, have been investors and lenders to middle-market companies. These investment professionals have significant experience investing in a broad range of industries and types of debt over the course of several economic cycles.

Before joining Garrison Investment Group, Mr. Tansey was a Managing Director at Fortress Investment Group LLC, or Fortress, and was also a partner of the Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund, or Drawbridge, one of Fortress’ hybrid hedge funds, from its inception in August 2002 to March 2007. Drawbridge focused primarily on investments in opportunistic debt and equity securities and asset-based transactions. His responsibilities included sourcing, evaluating, structuring, managing and monitoring corporate, structured finance and real estate investments, including both debt and equity. Mr. Tansey has 20 years of investment experience.

Market Opportunity

We pursue an investment strategy focused on investing in first lien, second lien, unitranche and mezzanine loans of, and, to a lesser extent, warrants and minority positions in equity securities in, U.S. middle-market companies. We find investing in middle-market companies attractive for the following reasons:

Reduced Competition.  We believe that, since 2007, dislocations in the corporate financing markets have reduced the amount of credit available to middle-market companies. In particular, we believe that much of the traditional lending community for lower middle-market companies, such as commercial/regional banks and commercial finance companies, have contracted their origination activities in the wake of these credit dislocations or focused on more liquid asset classes. The implementation of Basel III, published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, is expected to limit the ability of commercial banking institutions to hold non-investment grade leveraged loans on their balance sheets.

Attractive Relative Value Proposition.  We believe that directly originated middle-market loans often exhibit superior default and loss characteristics to syndicated loans, which are often structured with higher levels of debt and a lower percentage of contributed equity. Meanwhile, reduced access to, and availability of, credit typically increases the interest rates, or pricing, of loans made to U.S. middle-market borrowers, thereby creating an attractive risk-return dynamic for lenders.

Conservative Capital Structure and Increased Percentage of Equity Contributed.  Since the 2007 downturn, we believe that lenders have generally required borrowers to hold more equity as a percentage of their total capitalization and less senior and total leverage than was customary in the years leading up to the credit crisis, resulting in a greater amount of equity to protect lenders against future economic downturns. Lower leverage levels in mergers and acquisitions executed in the middle market suggest that middle-market companies should have more cash flows available to them to service their debt.

Long-Term Capital Solutions.  We believe that many middle-market companies seek to execute transactions with permanent capital vehicles, such as us, rather than execute high-yield bond transactions or borrow capital from hedge funds and other non-permanent vehicles.

We believe these factors, taken together, should increase lending opportunities for us.

Competitive Strengths

Experienced Management Team.  We are managed by our Investment Adviser, which has access through the Staffing Agreement to the resources and expertise of the investment professionals at Garrison Investment Group. Garrison Investment Group is led by Mr. Tansey. Garrison Investment Group’s investment professionals

TABLE OF CONTENTS

have substantial experience in identifying and executing financing transactions across a broad range of industries and types of financings and have developed related proprietary sourcing and servicing channels. Our five member investment committee has combined investment experience of more than 120 years. Our five member investment committee is currently comprised of the following individuals: Joseph Tansey, Rafael Astruc, Brian Chase, Mitch Drucker and Susan George.

Access to Deal Flow.  Through the Staffing Agreement, our Investment Adviser has access to extensive contacts throughout the middle-market, which it utilizes to source and originate loans. The investment professionals of Garrison Investment Group maintain direct dialogue with their contacts at financial sponsors, banks, corporate advisory firms, crisis managers, industry consultants, attorneys, investment banks, middle-market companies, other “club” investors and other potential sources of lending opportunities. Garrison Investment Group’s senior professionals have cultivated relationships with other middle-market lending platforms that we believe will provide us with an additional source of deal flow.

Disciplined Investment and Underwriting Process.  Our Investment Adviser utilizes the established investment processes developed by Garrison Investment Group to analyze investment opportunities, including structuring loans with appropriate covenants and pricing loans based on its knowledge of the middle market and on its rigorous underwriting standards. Our Investment Adviser focuses on capital preservation by extending loans to portfolio companies with assets that it believes will retain sufficient value to repay us even in depressed markets or under liquidation scenarios.

Active Asset Management Approach.  Our Investment Adviser employs a rigorous credit monitoring system for our portfolio, which enhances the ability of our Investment Adviser to manage any problems and assist borrowers before operating issues result in financial deterioration. In addition, this process enables our Investment Adviser to identify credit and market trends, thereby allowing us to modify underwriting terms for new loans before other lenders have identified such trends. In the event of restructurings, we expect that our Investment Adviser will manage syndicates of lenders, creditor committees and other creditors and advisors to protect our position.

Investment Strategy

We seek to create a broad portfolio consisting of investments generally in the range of $5 million to $25 million primarily in debt securities and loans of U.S. based middle-market companies. The companies to which we extend credit typically are moderately leveraged, and, in most cases, do not have their loans rated by national rating agencies. If such companies were rated, we believe that they would typically receive a rating below investment grade. In addition, our investments typically range in maturity from one to six years. However, we may make investments in securities with any maturity or duration.

We invest opportunistically in middle-market loans that we believe have attractive risk adjusted returns. We also, to a lesser extent, make select equity investments in non-investment grade companies and acquire consumer loans. We expect the majority of our focus to generally be centered upon traditional direct lending but at times will seek to enhance returns by purchasing loans in the secondary market, which purchases we refer to as capital markets activities, and extending credit for certain restructuring of financially troubled companies, which we refer to as special situations. We organize these lending opportunities in four categories.

Traditional Direct Lending.  We focus on direct origination of first lien senior secured loans, second lien senior secured loans and unitranche loans as well as select mezzanine loans. With respect to these loans, we identify lending opportunities through the extensive origination network to which we have access and serve as either sole lender or as a partner with like-minded creditors. We expect that we will typically extend first and second lien secured term loans, the proceeds of which may be used to refinance existing indebtedness or support acquisitions, growth initiatives, general corporate liquidity or operational turnarounds.

Capital Markets Activities.  We may also acquire loans in the secondary market, generally at favorable discounts, or seek to refinance outstanding loans through anchoring or co-anchoring a new issuance of debt. We believe the experience of the investment professionals to whom our Investment Adviser has access allows us to react quickly in executing acquisitions of loans in the secondary market on favorable terms and permit us to refinance loans on a streamlined basis.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Consumer Loans.  We may also opportunistically acquire unsecured consumer loans that we believe have attractive risk adjusted returns.

Special Situations.  We may also extend credit for out-of-court restructurings, rescue financings, debtor-in-possession financings and acquisition financings. We expect that, in extending credit to special situations borrowers, we will seek to structure our investments to remain high in the borrower’s capital structure, generate returns through the duration of the loan and obtain call protection or opportunities for enhanced returns through equity participation.

We expect that, from time to time, our investments may include certain non-qualifying assets, including assets of non-U.S. companies, certain publicly traded companies and, to a lesser extent and subject to certain limits under the 1940 Act, registered or unregistered investment companies, to the extent permissible under the 1940 Act. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure — The lack of experience of our Investment Adviser is operating under the constraints imposed on us as a business development company and RIC may hinder the achievement of our investment objectives.” and “Regulation — Qualifying Assets.”

Organizational Structure

The following shows a simplified organizational chart reflecting our relationship with our Investment Adviser and Administrator and our direct and indirect ownership interests in certain of our subsidiaries as of the date of this prospectus:

Recent Developments

On April 30, 2015, the Board approved a distribution in the amount of $5.9 million, or $0.35 a share, which will be paid on June 26, 2015 to stockholders of record as of June 12, 2015.

Investment Advisory Agreement

Steven Stuart, co-founder of Garrison Investment Group, anticipates ceasing to participate in the day-to-day operations of Garrison Investment Group. As previously disclosed, Steven Stuart left our investment committee in August 2014. Prior to that time, Mr. Stuart had not been involved with our operations on a day-to-day basis. As part of Mr. Stuart's departure, overall economic interests in Garrison Investment Group and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

its affiliates, including our Investment Adviser, will gradually shift over time to Joseph Tansey and other Garrison Investment Group partners. Mr. Tansey and the other Garrison Investment Group partners will continue to manage the day-to-day aspects of our Investment Adviser. Section 2(a)(4) of the 1940 Act provides that the transfer of a controlling interest of an investment adviser, such as will be caused by the transfer of Mr. Stuart's interest in Garrison Investment Group, constitutes an “assignment,” and Section 15(a) of the 1940 Act provides that any investment advisory contract must terminate on its “assignment.” In anticipation of the potential change in control of our Investment Adviser, as described below our board of directors, including all of the independent directors, reviewed and unanimously approved a new advisory agreement, or the New Investment Advisory Agreement, which has the same terms as our current investment advisory agreement with Garrison Capital Advisers, and recommended that the New Investment Advisory Agreement be submitted to our stockholders for approval at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

Our stockholders approved the New Investment Advisory Agreement at the 2015 Annual Meeting on May 1, 2015.

Operating and Regulatory Structure

Our investment activities are managed by Garrison Capital Advisers and supervised by our board of directors, a majority of whom are independent of Garrison Capital, Garrison Capital Advisers and their respective affiliates.

We have elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act and have elected be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and intend to qualify annually for such treatment. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between business development companies and their affiliates (including any Investment Advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters and requires that a majority of the directors of a business development company be persons other than “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In

TABLE OF CONTENTS

addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development company unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities.

As a business development company, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For example, we note that any affiliated investment vehicle formed in the future and managed by our Investment Adviser may, notwithstanding different stated investment objectives, have overlapping investment objectives with our own and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. If our Investment Adviser undertakes to manage a new fund in the future, we will not invest in any portfolio company in which that fund has a pre-existing investment, although we may co-invest with such affiliate on a concurrent basis, subject to compliance with existing regulatory guidance, applicable regulations, our allocation procedures and/or exemptive relief issued by the SEC. See “Regulation.”

Also, as a business development company, we are generally prohibited from acquiring assets other than qualifying assets unless, after giving effect to any acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. Qualifying assets generally include securities of eligible portfolio companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt instruments maturing in one year or less from the time of investment. Under the rules of the 1940 Act, “eligible portfolio companies” include (1) private U.S. operating companies, (2) public U.S. operating companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities exchange (e.g., the New York Stock Exchange) or registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and (3) public U.S. operating companies having a market capitalization of less than $250 million. Public U.S. operating companies whose securities are quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board and through Pink Sheets LLC are not listed on a national securities exchange and therefore are eligible portfolio companies. See “Regulation.”

Use of Leverage

As a business development company, we are permitted under the 1940 Act to borrow funds to finance a portion of our investments. As of March 31, 2015, we had $228.0 million of debt outstanding under the CLO and the notes issued by GLC Trust 2013-2, or the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes. We consolidate our financial results with those of the CLO, GF 2013-2 Manager and GLC Trust 2013-2 for financial reporting purposes.

Using the loans purchased from us as collateral, the CLO has issued six tranches of securities, comprising five classes of notes, whose interest rates depend on their repayment risk. We retain one class of notes and a residual interest entitling us to the returns remaining after amounts owing to holders of the notes have been paid. The CLO is an investment company for accounting purposes and exempt from registration as an investment company in reliance on Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. The CLO is a disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We completed the CLO, a Cayman Islands exempted company, for the purpose of refinancing the $150.0 million credit facility entered on May 21, 2012 by Garrison Funding 2012-1 LLC, or the Predecessor Credit Facility. We believe that refinancing the Predecessor Credit Facility through the CLO allowed us to obtain debt financing on more attractive terms than those available to us and similarly situated business development companies through traditional secured bank borrowings, thereby allowing us to limit costs ultimately borne by our common stockholders.

The use of leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique and increases the risks associated with investing in our securities. In the future, we may borrow from and issue senior securities to banks, insurance companies and other lenders. If the value of our assets decrease, leverage would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not been leveraged, thereby magnifying losses or eliminating our equity stake in a leveraged investment. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure — Our strategy involves a high degree of leverage. We intend to continue to finance our investments with borrowed money, which will magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us. The risks of investment in a highly leveraged fund include volatility and possible distribution restrictions.”

We measure our compliance with the leverage test applicable to business development companies under the 1940 Act on a consolidated basis. We expect to continue to use leverage to finance a portion of our investments in the future, consistent with the rules and regulations under the 1940 Act. We expect that we would incur such leverage through either a traditional credit facility or a securitization vehicle, rather than

TABLE OF CONTENTS

through an issuance of preferred stock. We received exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary from our asset coverage test under the 1940 Act.

Conflicts of Interest

We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our independent directors and, in some cases, of the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, five percent or more of our outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act, and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to, or entering into certain “joint” transactions (which could include investments in the same portfolio company) with such affiliates, absent the prior approval of our independent directors. Our Investment Adviser and its affiliates, including persons that control, or are under common control with, us or our Investment Adviser, are also considered to be our affiliates under the 1940 Act, and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to, or entering into “joint” transactions with, such affiliates without prior approval of our independent directors and, in some cases, additional exemptive relief from the SEC.

We may, however, invest alongside other clients of our Investment Adviser and its affiliates in certain circumstances where doing so is consistent with applicable law, SEC staff interpretations and/or exemptive relief issued by the SEC. For example, we may invest alongside such accounts consistent with guidance promulgated by the staff of the SEC permitting us and such other accounts to purchase interests in a single class of privately placed securities so long as certain conditions are met, including that our Investment Adviser, acting on our behalf and on behalf of other clients, negotiates no term other than price. We may also invest alongside our Investment Adviser’s other clients as otherwise permissible under regulatory guidance, applicable regulations, the terms of our exemptive relief and the written allocation policy of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliated investment advisers, including our Investment Adviser. Under this allocation policy, a fixed calculation, based on the type of investment, will be applied to determine the amount of each opportunity to be allocated to us. This allocation policy will be periodically approved by our Investment Adviser and reviewed by our independent directors. We expect that these determinations will be made similarly for other accounts sponsored or managed by our Investment Adviser and its affiliates. If sufficient securities or loan amounts are available to satisfy our and each such account’s proposed demand, we expect that the opportunity will be allocated in accordance with our Investment Adviser’s pre-transaction determination. Where there is an insufficient amount of an investment opportunity to satisfy us and other accounts sponsored or managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates, the allocation policy further provides that allocations among us and such other accounts will generally be made pro rata based on each account’s available capital in the asset class being allocated, up to the amount proposed to be invested by each account. However, we cannot assure you that investment opportunities will be allocated to us fairly or equitably in the short-term or over time.

We, Garrison Investment Group and our Investment Adviser have received exemptive relief to permit greater flexibility to negotiate the terms of co-investments if our board of directors determines that it would be advantageous for us to co-invest with other accounts sponsored or managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions, as well as regulatory requirements and other relevant factors. See “Related Party Transactions and Certain Relationships.” We cannot assure you, however, that we will develop opportunities that comply with such limitations.

In situations where co-investment with other accounts managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates is not permitted or appropriate, Garrison Investment Group and our Investment Adviser must decide which client will proceed with the investment. The written allocation policy of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliated investment advisers, including our Investment Adviser, in such circumstances provides for investments to be allocated on a rotational basis to assure that all clients have fair and equitable access to such investment opportunities. Moreover, except in certain circumstances, we are unable to invest in any issuer in which a fund managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates has previously invested. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers or directors or their affiliates. These restrictions may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.

See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure — There are significant potential conflicts of interest that could affect our investment returns” and “Related Party Transactions and Certain Relationships.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Company Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 914, New York, New York 10104, telephone number (212) 372-9590. Our corporate website is located at www.garrisoncapitalbdc.com. Information on our website is not incorporated into or a part of this prospectus.

Summary Risk Factors

Investing in our Company involves a high degree of risk and you could lose all or part of your investment. Certain of these risks are referenced below.

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 14 for more information on these and other risks you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FEES AND EXPENSES

The following table is intended to assist you in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in shares of our common stock will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. The following table should not be considered a representation of our future expenses. Actual expenses may be greater or less than shown. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by “us” or “Garrison Capital,” or that “we” will pay fees or expenses, common stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in Garrison Capital.

Stockholder transaction expenses:
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)			—	(1)
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)			—	(2)
Dividend reinvestment plan fees			None	(3)
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price)			—
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock):
Base management fees			3.08	%(4)
Incentive fees payable under Investment Advisory Agreement (20% of Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income and 20% of realized capital gains)			1.28	%(5)
Interest payments on borrowed funds			4.50	%(6)
Other expenses			1.95	%(7)
Total annual expenses			10.81	%

Examples

The following examples demonstrate the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed that our annual operating expenses remain at the levels set forth in the table above.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We have structured the calculation of these incentive fees, which we refer to as the “Income and Capital Gain Incentive Fee Calculations,” to include a fee limitation such that no incentive fee will be paid to our Investment Adviser for any fiscal quarter if, after such payment, the cumulative incentive fees paid to our Investment Adviser for the period that includes such fiscal quarter and the 11 full preceding fiscal quarters, which we refer to in this prospectus as the Incentive Fee Look-back Period, would exceed 20.0% of our Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Return during the applicable Incentive Fee Look-back Period. The Incentive Fee Look-back Period commenced on April 1, 2013. Prior to April 1, 2016, the Incentive Fee Look-back Period will consist of fewer than 12 full fiscal quarters. For example, at the end of our first full fiscal quarter after our initial public offering, the Incentive Fee Look-back Period consisted of one full fiscal quarter and our Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Return will equal the sum of (a) the Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income during that fiscal quarter and (b) our realized capital gains, realized capital losses, unrealized capital depreciation and unrealized capital appreciation, if any, during such fiscal quarter. The deferral component of the Incentive Fee Cap and Deferral Mechanism may cause incentive fees that accrued during one fiscal quarter to be paid to our Investment Adviser at any time during the 11 full fiscal quarters following such initial full fiscal quarter.

We accomplish this limitation by subjecting each incentive fee payable to a cap, which we refer to in this prospectus as the Incentive Fee Cap. The Incentive Fee Cap in any quarter is equal to (a) 20.0% of Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Return during the Incentive Fee Look-back Period less (b) cumulative incentive fees of any kind paid to our Investment Adviser by us during the Incentive Fee Look-back Period. To the extent the Incentive Fee Cap is zero or a negative value in any quarter, we will pay no incentive fee to our Investment Adviser in that quarter. We will only pay incentive fees to the extent allowed by the Incentive Fee Cap and Deferral Mechanism. To the extent that the payment of incentive fees is limited by the Incentive Fee Cap and Deferral Mechanism, the payment of such fees may be deferred and paid up to three years after their date of deferment subject to applicable limitations included in the Investment Advisory Agreement.

The first component of the incentive fee, which is income-based and payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20% of the amount, if any, that our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” exceeds a 2.00% quarterly (8.00% annualized) hurdle rate (the “Hurdle Rate”), subject to a “catch-up” provision measured at the end of each calendar quarter and the Incentive Fee Cap and Deferral Mechanism described below. The operation of the first component of the incentive fee for each quarter is as follows:

The portion of such incentive fee that is attributable to deferred interest (such as payment-in-kind interest or original issue discount) will be paid to the Investment Adviser, together with any other interest accrued on the loan from the date of deferral to the date of payment, only if and to the extent the Company actually receives such interest in cash, and any accrual thereof will be reversed if and to the extent such

TABLE OF CONTENTS

interest is reversed in connection with any write-off or similar treatment of the investment giving rise to any deferred interest accrual. Any reversal of such amounts would reduce net income for the quarter by the net amount of the reversal (after taking into account the reversal of incentive fees payable) and would result in a reduction and possibly elimination of the incentive fees for such quarter. For the avoidance of doubt, no incentive will be paid to the Investment Adviser on amounts accrued and not paid in respect of deferred interest.

There is no accumulation of amounts on the Hurdle Rate from quarter to quarter and, accordingly, there is no clawback of amounts previously paid if subsequent quarters are below the quarterly Hurdle Rate and there is no delay of payment if prior quarters are below the quarterly Hurdle Rate. Since the Hurdle Rate is fixed, as interest rates rise, it will be easier for our Investment Adviser to surpass the Hurdle Rate and receive an incentive fee based on Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income.

The second component, which is capital gains-based, is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date) and equals 20% of the Company’s cumulative aggregate realized capital gains through the end of such year, computed net of the Company’s aggregate cumulative realized capital losses and aggregate cumulative unrealized capital depreciation through the end of such year, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees and subject to the Incentive Fee Cap and Deferral Mechanism described below. The capital-gains component of the incentive fee excludes any portion of realized gains (losses) that are associated with the reversal of any portion of unrealized appreciation/depreciation attributable to periods prior to April 1, 2013. The capital gains component of the incentive fee is not subject to any minimum return to stockholders.

As described above, we will not pay any incentive fee at any time when, after such payment, the cumulative incentive fees paid to date would exceed 20% of the Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Return during the Incentive Fee Look-back Period. “Incentive fees payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement” are based on actual amounts incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2015, annualized for a full year.

The example above should not be considered a representation of our future expenses, and actual expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other expenses) may be greater or less than those shown.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

While the examples assume, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The incentive fee under the Investment Advisory Agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or would have an insignificant impact on the expense amounts shown above, is not included in the examples. The examples assume reinvestment of all dividends and other distributions at net asset value. Participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of our common stock determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the distribution payable to a participant by the market price per share of our common stock at the close of trading on the valuation date for the distribution. See “Dividend Reinvestment Plan” for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

Before you invest in our securities, you should be aware of various risks, including those described below. You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in our securities. The risks set out below are not the only risks we face. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure

We have a limited operating history as a business development company.

Prior to October 2012, we did not operate as a business development company or regulated investment company, or a RIC. As a result, we are subject to business risks and uncertainties, including the risk that we will not maintain our status as a business development company or achieve our investment objective and that the value of your investment could decline substantially.

The lack of experience of our Investment Adviser in operating under the constraints imposed on us as a business development company and RIC may hinder the achievement of our investment objectives.

The 1940 Act and the Code impose numerous constraints on the operations of business development companies and RICs that do not apply to other investment vehicles managed by Garrison Investment Group and its affiliates. Business development companies are required, for example, to invest at least 70% of their total assets in qualifying assets, including U.S. private or thinly-traded public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt instruments that mature in one year or less from the date of investment. Subject to certain exceptions for follow-on investments and distressed companies, an investment in an issuer that has outstanding securities listed on a national securities exchange may be treated as a qualifying asset only if such issuer has a common equity market capitalization that is less than $250 million at the time of such investment. Moreover, qualification for taxation as a RIC requires satisfaction of source-of-income, asset diversification and distribution requirements. Neither we nor our Investment Adviser has long-term experience operating under these constraints, which may hinder our ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and to achieve our investment objective. As a result, we cannot assure you that our Investment Adviser will be able to operate our business under these constraints. Any failure to do so could subject us to enforcement action by the SEC, cause us to fail to satisfy the requirements associated with RIC status, cause us to fail the 70% test described above or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could be found to be in violation of the 1940 Act provisions applicable to business development companies and possibly lose our status as a business development company, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of our position) or could require us to dispose of investments at inopportune times in order to come into compliance with the 1940 Act. If we need to dispose of such investments quickly, it may be difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms, or at all. For example, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer and, even if we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss or otherwise for less than we could have received if we were able to sell them at a later time.

We depend upon key personnel of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliates.

We are an externally managed business development company, and therefore we do not have any internal management capacity or employees. We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of our Investment Adviser to achieve our investment objective. We expect that our Investment Adviser will evaluate, negotiate, structure, close and monitor our investments in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement.

Our Investment Adviser is an affiliate of Garrison Investment Group and, in turn, depends upon access to the investment professionals and other resources of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliates to fulfill its

TABLE OF CONTENTS

obligations to us under the Investment Advisory Agreement. Garrison Capital Advisers also depends upon Garrison Investment Group to obtain access to deal flow generated by the professionals of Garrison Investment Group. Under the Staffing Agreement, Garrison Investment Group has agreed to provide our Investment Adviser with the resources necessary to fulfill these obligations. The Staffing Agreement provides that Garrison Investment Group will make available to Garrison Capital Advisers experienced investment professionals and access to the senior investment personnel of Garrison Investment Group for purposes of evaluating, negotiating, structuring, closing and monitoring our investments. We are not a party to the Staffing Agreement and cannot assure you that Garrison Investment Group will fulfill its obligations under the agreement. If Garrison Investment Group fails to perform, we cannot assure you that Garrison Capital Advisers will enforce the Staffing Agreement, that such agreement will not be terminated by either party or that we will continue to have access to the investment professionals of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliates or their market knowledge and deal flow.

We depend upon the senior professionals of Garrison Investment Group to maintain relationships with potential sources of lending opportunities, and we intend to rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential investment opportunities. We cannot assure you that these individuals will continue to indirectly provide investment advice to us. If these individuals, including the members of our investment committee, do not maintain their existing relationships with Garrison Investment Group, maintain existing relationships or develop new relationships with other sources of investment opportunities, we may not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom the senior professionals of Garrison Investment Group have relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities. Therefore, we cannot assure you that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.

If our Investment Adviser is unable to manage our investments effectively, we may be unable to achieve our investment objective.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our ability to manage our business and to grow our business. This depends, in turn, on our Investment Adviser’s ability to identify, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. This, in turn, depends on the ability of Garrison Investment Group’s investment professionals to identify, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. The achievement of our investment objectives on a cost-effective basis will depend upon our Investment Adviser’s execution of our investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms. Our Investment Adviser has substantial responsibilities under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The personnel of Garrison Investment Group who are made available to our Investment Adviser under the Staffing Agreement are engaged in other business activities and may be called upon to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies, either of which could distract them, divert their time and attention or otherwise cause them not to dedicate a significant portion of their time to our businesses which could slow our rate of investment. Any failure to manage our business and our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The highly competitive market for investment opportunities in which we operate may limit our investment opportunities.

A number of entities continue to compete with us to make investments in middle-market companies. We compete with public and private funds, including other business development companies, commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies, and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds. Additionally, as competition for investment opportunities increases, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds and collateralized loan obligations, may invest in middle-market companies. As a result of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities in middle-market companies could intensify. Many of our potential competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors

TABLE OF CONTENTS

are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

Entrants in our industry compete on several factors, including price, flexibility in transaction structuring, customer service, reputation, market knowledge and speed in decision-making. We do not intend to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors may make loans with interest rates that are lower than the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. However, if we match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure, we may reduce our net investment income and increase our risk of credit loss.

Global capital markets could enter a period of severe disruption and instability. These conditions have historically affected and could again materially and adversely affect debt and equity capital markets in the United States and around the world and our business.

Since mid-2007, the global capital markets have experienced a period of disruption resulting in increased spreads between the yields realized on riskier debt securities and those realized on securities perceived to be risk-free, such as U.S. treasuries, a lack of liquidity in parts of the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector relating to subprime mortgages and the re-pricing of credit risk in the syndicated loan market. During recent years interest rates have remained low. Because longer-term inflationary pressure is likely to result from the U.S. government’s fiscal policies and challenges during this time, we will likely experience rising interest rates, rather than falling rates, at some point in the future. A prolonged period of market illiquidity or uncertainty regarding U.S. government deficit and spending levels, including negotiation of federal spending cuts, and implementation of global fiscal austerity measures may lead to a general decline in economic conditions, which could materially and adversely affect the broader financial and credit markets and reduce the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and to financial firms in particular. This may cause our lenders to attempt to accelerate our indebtedness, to the extent that we wish to incur indebtedness to fund new investments, to renew or refinance existing indebtedness, including the notes issued by the CLO which are currently scheduled to mature no later than September 25, 2023, to obtain other lines of credit or to issue senior securities during such unfavorable economic conditions, including future recessions, the debt capital that will be available to us, if at all, may be at a higher cost, and on terms and conditions that may be less favorable than we expect, which could negatively affect our financial performance and results. In addition, further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating or perceived creditworthiness of the United States or other large global economies, could adversely affect global financial markets and economic conditions.

We have elected to be treated as a RIC and intend to qualify annually for such treatment. If we are unable to qualify as a RIC, we will be subject to corporate-level income tax.

We have elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code and intend to qualify annually for such treatment. To qualify as a RIC under the Code and obtain RIC tax benefits, we must meet certain income source, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short term capital gains in excess of realized net short term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. To the extent we use preferred stock or debt financing in the future, we may be subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants under preferred stock or loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to qualify for RIC tax benefits. If we fail to make sufficient distributions, as a result of contractual restrictions or otherwise, we may fail to qualify for such benefits and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax. To qualify as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because we anticipate that most of our investments will be in the debt of relatively illiquid middle-market private companies, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify for RIC tax benefits for any reason and remain or become

TABLE OF CONTENTS

subject to corporate-level income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders.

Our returns will be reduced by any U.S. corporate income tax that our subsidiaries pay.

Some of the income and fees that we recognize will not satisfy the 90% Income Test described above. We may recognize some of this income and fees through one or more entities treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes in order to remain in compliance with the requirements of the 90% Income Test. Such corporations will be required to pay U.S. corporate income tax on their earnings, which ultimately will reduce our return on such income and fees. In addition, we may invest in partnerships, including qualified publicly traded partnerships and limited liability companies treated as partnerships for tax purposes, which may result in our being subject to state, local or foreign income, franchise or withholding liabilities.

Non-U.S. stockholders may be adversely affected by a scheduled change in U.S. federal income tax law.

Under a provision applicable for taxable years of RICs beginning before January 1, 2015, properly designated dividends received by a Non-U.S. stockholder are generally exempt from U.S. federal withholding tax when they (a) are paid in respect of “qualified net interest income” (generally, U.S. source interest income, other than certain contingent interest and interest from obligations of a corporation or partnership in which we are at least a 10% stockholder, reduced by expenses that are allocable to such income), or (b) are paid in connection with “qualified short-term capital gains” (generally, the excess of net short-term capital gain over long-term capital loss for such taxable year). If such provision is not extended, non-U.S. stockholders will be subject to 30% U.S. federal withholding tax on distributions other than actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains unless reduced under the Code or an applicable tax treaty. There can be no assurance that the provision will be extended, and we may also choose not to designate some or all of the distributions potentially eligible for the exemption.

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. The credit risk associated with the collectability of deferred payments may be increased as and when a portfolio company increases the amount of interest on which it is deferring cash payment through deferred interest features. Such original issue discount, which could be significant relative to our overall investment assets, and increases in loan balances as a result of PIK interest will be included in income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash. Our investments with a deferred interest feature, such as PIK interest, may represent a higher credit risk than loans for which interest must be paid in full in cash on a regular basis. For example, even if the accounting conditions for income accrual are met, the borrower could still default when our actual collection is scheduled to occur upon maturity of the obligation.

As a result, we may have difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to obtain RIC tax benefits. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax benefits and thus be subject to corporate level income tax.

Regulations governing our operation as a business development company, including those related to the issuance of senior securities, will affect our ability to, and the way in which we, raise additional debt or equity capital.

We expect that we will require a substantial amount of capital. We may issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted as a business development company to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities (other than the SBA debentures of an SBIC subsidiary, as permitted by exemptive relief we have been granted by the SEC). If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this ratio. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness.

Our board of directors may decide to issue common stock to finance our operations rather than issuing debt or other senior securities. As a business development company, we are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below current net asset value per share. We may, however, issue or sell our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock, or sell warrants, options or rights to acquire such common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if our board of directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of us and our stockholders, and if our stockholders approve such sale within the preceding 12 months. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We also may conduct rights offerings at prices per share less than the net asset value per share, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at that time would decrease, and our stockholders may experience dilution.

Our strategy involves a high degree of leverage. We intend to continue to finance our investments with borrowed money, which will magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us. The risks of investment in a highly leverage fund include volatility and possible distribution restrictions.

Our strategy involves a high degree of leverage. The use of leverage, including through the issuance of senior securities, magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested. We have incurred leverage in the past and currently incur leverage through the CLO and the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes and, from time to time, intend to incur additional leverage to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act. The use of leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique and increases the risks associated with investing in our securities. The risks of investing in a highly leveraged fund include volatility and possible distribution restrictions. In the future, we may borrow from, and issue senior securities, to banks, insurance companies and other lenders. Holders of these senior securities will have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common stockholders, and we would expect such holders to seek recovery against our assets in the event of a default. We may pledge up to 100% of our assets and may grant a security interest in all of our assets under the terms of any debt instruments into which we may enter. In addition, under the terms of any credit facility or other debt instrument we enter into, we are likely to be required by its terms to use the net proceeds of any investments that we sell to repay a portion of the amount borrowed under such facility or instrument before applying such net proceeds to any other uses.

If the value of our assets decreases, leverage would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged, thereby magnifying losses or eliminating our equity stake in a leveraged investment. Similarly, any decrease in our revenue or income will cause our net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline would also negatively affect our ability to make distributions on our common stock or preferred stock. Our ability to service our debt will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. In addition, our common stockholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of our use of leverage, including interest expenses and any increase in the management fee payable to our Investment Adviser.

As a business development company, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock that we may issue in the future, of at least 200% (other than the SBA debentures of an SBIC subsidiary, as permitted by exemptive relief we have been granted by the SEC). If this ratio declines below 200% (other than the SBA debentures of an SBIC subsidiary, as permitted by exemptive relief we have been granted by the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SEC), we cannot incur additional debt and could be required to sell a portion of our investments to repay some debt when it is disadvantageous to do so. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations, and we may not be able to make distributions. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our Investment Adviser’s and our board of directors’ assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain credit at all or on terms acceptable to us. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary purposes without regard to asset coverage.

In addition, the terms governing the CLO, the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes and any indebtedness that we incur in the future could impose financial and operating covenants that restrict our business activities, including limitations that may hinder our ability to finance additional loans and investments or make the distributions required to maintain our status as a RIC under the Code.

The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses as of March 31, 2015. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing in the table below.

		Assumed Return on Our Portfolio (Net of Expenses)
		-10%				-5%				0%				5%				10%
Corresponding return to common stockholder(1)			-22	%			-12	%			-3	%			7	%			16	%

Based on our outstanding indebtedness of $228.0 million as of March 31, 2015 and an average cost of funds of 2.27%, 2.47%, 4.04%, 5.34% and 3.36%, which were the weighted average effective interest rates of the Class A-1R Notes, Class A-1T Notes, Class A-2 Notes, Class B Notes and the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes, respectively, as of that date, our investment portfolio must experience an annual return of at least 1.40% to cover annual interest payments on the CLO and the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes.

In addition to issuing securities to raise capital as described above, in connection with the formation of the CLO, we securitized approximately 85% of our existing loans at that time which generated cash for funding investments. We may seek to securitize additional loans in the future. To securitize additional loans in the future, we may create a wholly-owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary. This could include the sale of interests in the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers who we would expect to be willing to accept a lower interest rate to invest in investment grade loan pools, and we would retain a portion of the equity in any such securitized pool of loans. An inability to securitize part of our loan portfolio could limit our ability to grow our business, fully execute our business strategy and increase our earnings. Moreover, certain types of securitization transactions may expose us to greater risk of loss.

Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a business development company would reduce our operating flexibility.

If we do not remain a business development company, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.

Because we expect to distribute substantially all of our ordinary income and net realized capital gains to our stockholders, we will need additional capital to finance our growth and such capital may not be available on favorable terms, or at all.

We will need additional capital to fund growth in our investment portfolio. We may issue debt or equity securities or borrow from financial institutions in order to obtain this additional capital. A reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our ability to grow. We are required to distribute at least 90% of our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, these earnings will not be available to fund new investments. If we fail to obtain additional capital to fund new investments, this could limit our ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value of our securities.

We are subject to risks associated with the CLO.

As a result of the CLO, we are subject to a variety of risks, including those set forth below.

The Retained Notes are subordinated obligations of the CLO.

We indirectly own all of the Subordinated Notes. We refer to the Subordinated Notes and the Class C Notes collectively as the “Retained Notes.” We consolidate the financial statements of the CLO in our consolidated financial statements and treat the Class A Notes and Class B Notes as leverage.

The Retained Notes are the most junior classes of securities issued by the CLO. They are subordinated in priority of payment to every other class of notes issued by the CLO and are subject to certain payment restrictions set forth in the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO. In accordance with the priority of payment provisions of the indenture of the CLO, all principal proceeds are generally required to be used to pay down every other class of notes issued by the CLO prior to the Retained Notes. In addition, the Retained Notes generally have only limited voting rights and generally do not benefit from any creditors’ rights or ability to exercise remedies under the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO. The Retained Notes are not guaranteed by another party.

The Subordinated Notes do not bear a stated rate of interest, and the Class C Notes bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 5.5%. We receive cash distributions on the Retained Notes only if CLO has made all required cash interest payments on all of the Class A Notes and Class B Notes it has issued. We view the Subordinated Notes as an equity investment in the CLO and the Class C Notes as additional funding and cannot assure you that distributions on the assets held by the CLO will be sufficient to make any distributions to us or that the yield on the Retained Notes will meet our expectations.

The Subordinated Notes are unsecured and rank behind all of the secured creditors, known or unknown, of the CLO, including the holders of the Class A Notes, Class B Notes and Class C Notes it has issued. Consequently, to the extent that the value of the CLO’s portfolio of loan investments has been reduced as a result of conditions in the credit markets, defaulted loans, capital gains and losses on the underlying assets, prepayment or changes in interest rates, the value of the Subordinated Notes realized at their redemption could be reduced. Accordingly, the Subordinated Notes may not be paid in full and may be subject to up to 100% loss.

The Retained Notes are a highly leveraged investment.

As of March 31, 2015, the CLO owed approximately $200.9 million under the Class A Notes and Class B Notes, and the fair value of the investments held by the CLO was $333.1 million. The leveraged nature of the Retained Notes may magnify the adverse impact on the Retained Notes of changes in the market value of the investments held by the CLO, changes in the distributions on those investments, defaults and recoveries on those investments, capital gains and losses on those investments, prepayments on those investments and availability, prices and interest rates of those investments. We are prepared to hold the Retained Notes for an indefinite period of time or until their stated maturity.

The interests of investors in certain of the Class A Notes and Class B Notes may not be aligned with our interests, and we may have no control over remedies.

Generally, institutional investors hold the Class A Notes and Class B Notes. The Class A Notes and Class B Notes rank senior in right of payment to the Retained Notes. As a result, there are circumstances in which the interests of investors in a class of notes may not be aligned with the interests of holders of the other classes of notes issued by the CLO. For example, under the terms of the indenture, investors in the Class A-1R Notes and Class A-1T Notes, or together, the Class A-1 Notes, have the right to receive payments of principal and interest prior to investors in all other classes of notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As the holder of the Retained Notes, we are generally not entitled to exercise remedies under the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO. For as long as the Class A-1 Notes, remain outstanding, investors in the Class A-1 Notes comprise the most senior class of notes of the CLO then outstanding, or the Controlling Class, under the CLO. Upon repayment of the Class A-1 Notes, investors in the Class A-2 Notes will become the Controlling Class. Upon repayment of the Class A Notes, investors in the Class B Notes will become the Controlling Class. Upon repayment of the Class A Notes and Class B Notes, investors in the Class C Notes will become the Controlling Class. The Controlling Class has the right to act in certain circumstances with respect to the portfolio loans in ways that may benefit their interests but not in the interests of other investors in more junior classes of notes, including by exercising remedies, waiving events of default or rescinding declaration of acceleration of the notes under the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO. The Controlling Class has no obligation to consider any possible adverse effect on any other class of notes. For example, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default with respect to the notes issued by the CLO, the trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, or holders of a majority of the Controlling Class may declare the principal of all the Secured Notes and all other amounts payable by the CLO to be immediately due and payable. This would have the effect of accelerating the principal on such notes and triggering a repayment obligation on the part of the CLO. The CLO may not have sufficient proceeds available to enable the trustee under the indenture to repay the obligations of holders of the Retained Notes. The Controlling Class may be less likely to waive an event of default or rescind declaration of acceleration of outstanding amounts than traditional lenders to business development companies, including banks and their affiliates, under senior secured credit facilities.

We cannot assure you that any remedies pursued by the Controlling Class will be in our best interests or that we will receive any payments or distributions upon an acceleration of the notes. Any failure of the CLO to make distributions on the Retained Notes, whether as a result of an event of default or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and may result our inability to make distributions sufficient to allow our qualification as a RIC.

CLO may fail to meet certain asset coverage tests, which would have an adverse effect on the timing of payments to us.

Under the documents governing the CLO, there are two coverage tests applicable to the Secured Notes. The first such test compares the amount of interest received on the collateral loans held by the CLO to the amount of interest payable in respect of the Secured Notes. To meet this first test, the aggregate amount of interest received on the portfolio loans must equal, after the payment of certain fees and expenses, at least 135% of the interest payable in respect of the Class A Notes, 125% of the interest payable on the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes, taken together, and 115% of the interest payable on the Class A Notes, Class B Notes and Class C Notes, taken together. The second such test compares the aggregate principal amount of the collateral loans, as calculated in accordance with the indenture, to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes. To meet this second test at any time, the aggregate principal amount of the collateral loans must equal at least 173.4% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Class A Notes, 156.1% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes, taken together, and 148.1% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Class A Notes, Class B Notes and Class C Notes, taken together. If any coverage test is not satisfied with respect to a quarterly payment date, the CLO is required to apply available amounts to the repayment of interest on and principal of the Class A Notes, then the Class B Notes and then the Class C Notes to the extent necessary to satisfy the applicable coverage tests. In addition, if the aggregate principal amount of the collateral loans to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Class A Notes is less than or equal to 115% as of any measurement date, a majority of the Controlling Class may direct the sale and liquidation of assets held by the CLO, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Restructurings of investments held by the CLO may decrease their value and reduce amounts payable on the Retained Notes.

GF 2013-2 Manager and the CLO entered into a collateral management agreement, an agreement entered into between a manager and a debt securitization vehicle or similar issuer, which sets forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which the manager provides advisory and/or management services with respect to the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

client’s securities portfolio. Under the collateral management agreement, GF 2013-2 Manager serves as collateral manager of the CLO. In addition, GF 2013-2 Manager has entered into a sub-collateral management agreement with our Investment Adviser, whereby GF 2013-2 Manager delegated certain of its obligations and duties under the collateral management agreement to our Investment Adviser. The sub-collateral manager, which is our Investment Adviser, is a registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act.

GF 2013-2 Manager, as collateral manager, on behalf of the CLO, has broad authority to direct and supervise the investment and reinvestment of the investments held by the CLO, which may include exercising or enforcing, or refraining from exercising or enforcing, any or all of the CLO’s rights in connection with the execution of amendments, waivers, modifications and other changes to the investment documentation in accordance with the collateral management agreement, and subject to the right of the Controlling Class to consent to certain amendments. During periods of economic uncertainty and recession, the incidence of amendments, waivers, modifications and restructurings of investments may increase. Such amendments, waivers, modifications and other restructurings will change the terms of the investments and in some cases may result in the CLO holding assets not meeting its criteria for investments. This could adversely impact the coverage tests under the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO. Any amendment, waiver, modification or other restructuring that reduces the CLO’s compliance with certain financial tests will make it more likely that the CLO will need to utilize cash to pay down the unpaid principal amount of the Secured Notes to cure any breach in such test instead of making payments on the Retained Notes. Any such use of cash would reduce distributions available and delay the timing of payments to us.

We cannot assure you that any particular restructuring strategy pursued by GF 2013-2 Manager or any successor collateral manager will maximize the value of or recovery on any investment. Any restructuring can fundamentally alter the nature of the related investment, and restructurings are not subject to the same underwriting standards that are employed in connection with the origination or acquisition of investments. Any restructuring could alter, reduce or delay the payment of interest or principal on any investment, which could delay the timing and reduce the amount of payments made to us. Restructurings of investments might also result in extensions of the term thereof, which could delay the timing of payments made to us.

We may not receive cash from the CLO.

We receive cash from the CLO only to the extent that we receive payments on the Retained Notes. The CLO may make payments on such notes only to the extent permitted by the payment priority provisions of the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO. This indenture generally provides that principal payments on the Retained Notes may not be made on any payment date unless all amounts owing under the Class A Notes and Class B Notes are paid in full. In addition, if the CLO does not meet the asset coverage tests or the interest coverage test set forth in the documents governing the CLO, cash would be diverted from the ordinary priority of payments to first make payments on the Secured Notes in amounts sufficient to cause such tests to be satisfied. In the event that we fail to receive cash from the CLO, we could be unable to make distributions to our stockholders in amounts sufficient to maintain our status as a RIC, or at all. We also could be forced to sell investments in portfolio companies or the notes that we own at less than their fair value in order to continue making such distributions.

The CLO depends on the managerial expertise available to the collateral manager and its key personnel.

The CLO’s activities are directed by GF 2013-2 Manager or any successor collateral manager. GF 2013-2 Manager has retained the Investment Adviser to furnish collateral management sub-advisory services. In our capacity as holder of the Retained Notes, we are generally not able to make decisions with respect to the management, disposition or other realization of any investment, or other decisions regarding the business and affairs of the CLO. Consequently, the success of the CLO will depend, in large part, on the financial and managerial expertise of the collateral manager’s investment professionals. There can be no assurance that such investment professionals will continue to serve in their current positions or continue to be authorized persons of the collateral manager. Although such investment professionals will devote such time as they determine in their discretion is reasonably necessary to fulfill the collateral manager’s obligations to the CLO effectively, they will not devote all of their professional time to the affairs of the CLO.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our ability to transfer the Retained Notes is limited.

The notes issued by the CLO are illiquid investments and subject to extensive transfer restrictions, and no party is under any obligation to make a market for the notes. There is no market for the notes, and we may not be able to sell or otherwise transfer the Retained Notes at their fair value, or at all, in the event that we determine to sell them. During economic downturns, notes issued in securitization transactions may experience high volatility and significant fluctuations in market value. Additionally, some potential buyers of such notes now view securitization products as an inappropriate investment, thereby reducing the number of potential buyers and/or potentially affecting liquidity in the secondary market.

We may not be able to redeem the Secured Notes prior to September 25, 2015.

Under the terms of the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO, we are not permitted to redeem the Secured Notes until September 25, 2015 unless S&P withdraws its ratings on the Secured Notes. This provision will limit our ability to refinance the Secured Notes until September 25, 2015, which may prevent us from taking advantage of attractive changes in interest rates, if any. This, in turn, could put us at a competitive disadvantage to other lenders or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The holders of the Class A-1R Notes may fail to advance funds to us as required.

If a holder of a Class A-1R Note should fail to advance funds to us in a timely manner as required under the documents governing the CLO, we may be forced to obtain alternative sources of liquidity, including by selling assets or seeking new credit arrangements. If we are unable to find such sources of liquidity, we may be unable to fund obligations to our portfolio companies or be forced to break trades that have been entered into but not yet settled, either of which could adversely affect our reputation, cause portfolio companies to seek recourse against us, including litigation, and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The CLO may be required to redeem the Secured Notes upon the occurrence of certain tax events.

In certain circumstances, we or a majority of the holders of any class of Secured Notes that has not received 100% of the principal and interest that would otherwise be due and payable to such class on any quarterly payment date can require the CLO to redeem the Secured Notes in whole in the event that any U.S. or foreign tax statute or treaty requires withholding of more than 5% of the scheduled payments by the CLO on any date or any jurisdiction imposes a net income, profits or similar tax on the CLO in an aggregate amount in excess of $100,000 in any quarter. This could cause the CLO to sell all or a portion of its investments in order to fund the necessary redemption, including on unfavorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure of a court to enforce certain non-petition obligations may adversely affect us.

Each holder of Secured Notes has agreed, and each beneficial owner of Secured Notes will be deemed to agree, that it will not cause the filing of a petition in bankruptcy against, or present a winding up action petition in respect of, the CLO for at least 366 days after payment in full of the Secured Notes. If such provision is determined to be unenforceable under applicable bankruptcy laws or is violated by one or more holders of Secured Notes, then the applicable court could liquidate the CLO’s assets without regard to the voting instructions of the Controlling Class. Any such liquidation of the CLO’s assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The CLO is subject to various conflicts of interest involving Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas is the trustee and custodian with respect to the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO. Various potential and actual conflicts of interest may arise as a result of the investment banking, commercial banking, asset management, financing and financial advisory services and products provided by affiliates of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, or, collectively, the Deutsche Bank Companies, to us and the CLO. When acting in service capacities with respect to investments held by the CLO, the Deutsche Bank Companies are entitled to fees and expenses senior in priority to payments to the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

distributions on our equity interests in the CLO. In addition, the Deutsche Bank Companies may act as trustee for other classes of securities issued by one of our portfolio companies or make or administer loans to such portfolio companies and would owe fiduciary duties to the holders of such other classes of securities, which classes of securities may have differing interests from us, and may take actions that are adverse to us, including restructuring a loan, exercising remedies under a loan, foreclosing on collateral, requiring additional collateral, charging significant fees or placing the obligor in bankruptcy. If the Deutsche Bank Companies act as a counterparty under derivatives agreements for transactions involving issuers of investments held by the CLO, the Deutsche Bank Companies could be required to take actions adverse to the interests of such issuers (and, indirectly, the CLO), such as demanding collateralization of its exposure under derivative instruments or terminating such derivatives agreements in accordance with the terms thereof. As a result of all such transactions or arrangements between the Deutsche Bank Companies and issuers of investments held by the CLO or their respective affiliates, the Deutsche Bank Companies may have interests that are contrary to the interests of the CLO.

Since we are using debt to finance our investments, and we may use additional debt financing going forward, changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.

Since we are using debt to finance investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we cannot assure you that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates when we have debt outstanding, our cost of funds will increase, which could reduce our net investment income. We expect that our investments will be financed primarily with equity and medium to long-term debt. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. These techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. These activities may limit our ability to benefit from lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

You should also be aware that a rise in the general level of interest rates can be expected to lead to higher interest rates applicable to our debt investments. Accordingly, an increase in interest rates would make it easier for us to meet or exceed the incentive fee Hurdle Rate and may result in a substantial increase in the amount of incentive fees payable to our Investment Adviser with respect to Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income. In addition, a decline in the prices of the debt due to rising market interest rates not reflected in such debt investments we own could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and our net asset value.

We are subject to risks associated with the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes.

As a result of the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes we are subject to certain risks, including those set forth below.

We may not receive cash from GLC Trust 2013-2.

We receive cash from GLC Trust 2013-2 only to the extent that dividends on our equity interests are approved by the securities administrator under the indenture governing the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes. In addition, in the event that GLC Trust 2013-2 fails to receive cash from its underlying portfolio of consumer loans, it could be unable to service the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes as required under the indenture. If GLC Trust 2013-2 fails to meet certain portfolio and other covenants as set forth in the indenture, the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes may be immediately terminated and all outstanding amounts could become immediately due and payable. We cannot assure you that we would be able to refinance the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes at such time or otherwise be able to satisfy the obligations thereunder, particularly if the quality of the underlying portfolio of consumer loans has deteriorated since the time of their acquisition.

We may not replicate the historical results achieved by other entities managed or sponsored by members of our investment committee or by Garrison Investment Group or its affiliates.

Our primary focus in making investments generally differs from that of many of the investment funds, accounts or other investment vehicles that are or have been managed by members of our investment

TABLE OF CONTENTS

committee or sponsored by Garrison Investment Group or its affiliates. In addition, investors in our common stock do not acquire an interest in any such investment funds, accounts or other investment vehicles that are or have been managed by members of our investment committee or sponsored by Garrison Investment Group or its affiliates. We cannot assure you that we will replicate the historical results achieved by members of the investment committee, and we caution you that our investment returns could be substantially lower than the returns achieved by them in prior periods. Additionally, all or a portion of the prior results may have been achieved in particular market conditions which may never be repeated. Moreover, current or future market volatility and regulatory uncertainty may have an adverse impact on our future performance.

There are significant potential conflicts of interest that could affect our investment returns.

As a result of our arrangements with Garrison Investment Group and our investment committee, there may be times when Garrison Investment Group or such persons have interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict of interest.

There may be conflicts related to obligations our investment committee, our Investment Adviser or its affiliates have to other clients.

The members of our investment committee serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do, or of investment funds managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates. Similarly, our Investment Adviser or its affiliates may have other clients with similar, different or competing investment objectives. In serving in these multiple capacities, they may have obligations to other clients or investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which may not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For example, the members of our investment committee have, and will continue to have, management responsibilities for other investment funds, accounts or other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by our Investment Adviser and its affiliates including entities that may raise additional capital from time to time. Our investment objective overlaps or may overlap with the investment objectives of such affiliated investment funds, accounts or other investment vehicles. As a result, those individuals may face conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities among us and other investment funds or accounts advised by or affiliated with our Investment Adviser. Our Investment Adviser will seek to allocate investment opportunities among eligible accounts in a manner that is fair and equitable over time and consistent with the written allocation policy of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliated investment advisers, including our Investment Adviser. However, we cannot assure you that such opportunities will be allocated to us fairly or equitably in the short-term or over time. Where we are able to co-invest consistent with the requirements of the 1940 Act, if sufficient securities or loan amounts are available to satisfy our and each such account’s proposed demand, we expect that the opportunity will be allocated in accordance with our Investment Adviser’s pre-transaction determination. If there is an insufficient amount of an investment opportunity to satisfy our demand and that of other accounts sponsored or managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates, the allocation policy further provides that allocations among us and such other accounts will generally be made pro rata based on each account’s available capital in the asset class being allocated, up to the amount proposed to be invested by each account. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to participate in all suitable investment opportunities. Where we are unable to co-invest consistent with the requirements of the 1940 Act, our Investment Adviser’s allocation policy provides for investments to be allocated on a rotational basis to assure that all clients have fair and equitable access to such investment opportunities.

Our investment committee, our Investment Adviser or its affiliates may, from time to time, possess material non-public information, limiting our investment discretion.

Principals of our Investment Adviser and its affiliates and members of our investment committee may serve as directors of, or in a similar capacity with, companies in which we invest, the securities of which are purchased or sold on our behalf. If we obtain material nonpublic information with respect to such companies, or we become subject to trading restrictions under the internal trading policies of those companies or as a result of applicable law or regulations, we could be prohibited for a period of time from purchasing or selling the securities of such companies, and this prohibition may have an adverse effect on us.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our fee structure may create incentives for our Investment Adviser that are not fully aligned with the interests of our stockholders and may induce our Investment Adviser to make speculative investments.

In the course of our investing activities, we pay management and incentive fees to our Investment Adviser. The incentive fee payable by us to our Investment Adviser may create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The management fee is based on our gross assets excluding cash and cash equivalents. As a result, investors in our common stock will invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in a lower rate of return than one might achieve through direct investments. Because the management fee is based on our gross assets, our Investment Adviser will benefit when we incur debt or use leverage. The use of leverage increases the likelihood of default, which disfavors the holders of our common stock.

Additionally, under the incentive fee structure, our Investment Adviser may benefit when capital gains are recognized and, because our Investment Adviser determines when a holding is sold, our Investment Adviser controls the timing of the recognition of such capital gains. Our board of directors is charged with protecting our interests by monitoring how our Investment Adviser addresses these and other conflicts of interest associated with its management services and compensation. While they are not expected to review or approve each investment or realization, our independent directors will periodically review our Investment Adviser’s services and fees as well as its portfolio management decisions and portfolio performance. In connection with these reviews, our independent directors will consider whether such fees and our expenses (including those related to leverage) remain appropriate. As a result of this arrangement, our Investment Adviser or its affiliates may from time to time have interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict. In the case of PIK toggle debt, the PIK election has the simultaneous effects of increasing the assets under management, thus increasing the base management fee, and increasing the amount of net investment income, thus increasing the amount of incentive fee required to be accrued, both of which may create conflicts of interest.

Unlike that portion of the incentive fee based on income, there is no Hurdle Rate applicable to the incentive fee based on net capital gains. As a result, our Investment Adviser may seek to invest more capital in investments that are likely to result in capital gains as compared to income producing securities. This practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.

In addition, under the terms of the Incentive Fee Cap and Deferral Mechanism, the amount of incentive fees earned by our Investment Adviser will depend, in part, upon the timing of capital gains or losses in our investment portfolio, as well as the timing of our recognition of income. Depending on the circumstances, there may be a lag of as long as 12 fiscal quarters between the occurrence of an event giving rise to an obligation to pay incentive fees to the Investment Adviser and the payment of such incentive fees. Therefore, investors who acquire our shares of common stock may pay indirectly to our Investment Adviser incentive fees in respect of income or capital gains that were received by or paid to us prior to such investor becoming a stockholder. As a result, such investors may not participate in the income or capital gains giving rise to such indirect expense.

The valuation process for certain of our portfolio holdings creates a conflict of interest.

We expect to make many portfolio investments in the form of securities that are not publicly traded. As a result, our board of directors determines the fair value of these securities in good faith. In connection with that determination, investment professionals from our Investment Adviser provide our board of directors with portfolio company valuations based upon the most recent portfolio company financial statements available and projected financial results of each portfolio company. In addition, certain members of our board of directors, including Messrs. Astruc, Chase and Tansey, have an indirect pecuniary interest in our Investment Adviser. The participation of our Investment Adviser’s investment professionals in our valuation process, and the indirect pecuniary interest in our Investment Adviser by certain members of our board of directors, could result in a conflict of interest as the management fee paid to our Investment Adviser is based, in part, on our gross assets.

We have conflicts related to other arrangements with our Investment Adviser or its affiliates.

We have entered into a license agreement, or License Agreement with Garrison Investment Group under which Garrison Investment Group has granted us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“Garrison”. In addition, we pay to Garrison Capital Administrator our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Garrison Capital Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, such as rent and our allocable portion of the cost of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. This creates conflicts of interest that our board of directors must monitor.

The Investment Advisory Agreement with Garrison Capital Advisers, the Administration Agreement with Garrison Capital Administrator and the sub-collateral management agreement between GF 2013-2 Manager and Garrison Capital Advisers were not negotiated on an arm’s length basis and may not be as favorable to us as if they had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.

The Investment Advisory Agreement, the Administration Agreement and the sub-collateral management agreement were negotiated between related parties. Consequently, their terms, including fees payable to our Investment Adviser, may not be as favorable to us as if they had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party. In addition, we may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights and remedies under these agreements because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with our Investment Adviser, our Administrator, the collateral manager and their respective affiliates. Any such decision, however, would breach our fiduciary obligations to our stockholders. Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted, which may limit the scope of investments available to us.

We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our independent directors and, in some cases, of the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, five percent or more of our outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act, and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to, or entering into certain “joint” transactions (which could include investments in the same portfolio company) with such affiliates, absent the prior approval of our independent directors. Our Investment Adviser and its affiliates, including persons that control, or are under common control with, us or our Investment Adviser, are also considered to be our affiliates under the 1940 Act, and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to, or entering into “joint” transactions with such affiliates without prior approval of our independent directors and, in some cases, additional exemptive relief from the SEC.

We may, however, invest alongside other clients of our Investment Adviser and its affiliates in certain circumstances where doing so is consistent with applicable law, SEC staff interpretations and/or exemptive relief issued by the SEC. For example, we may invest alongside such accounts consistent with guidance promulgated by the staff of the SEC permitting us and such other accounts to purchase interests in a single class of privately placed securities so long as certain conditions are met, including that our Investment Adviser, acting on our behalf and on behalf of other clients, negotiates no term other than price. We may also invest alongside our Investment Adviser’s other clients as otherwise permissible under regulatory guidance, applicable regulations, the terms of our exemptive relief and the written allocation policy of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliated investment advisers, including our Investment Adviser. Under this allocation policy, a fixed calculation, based on the type of investment, will be applied to determine the amount of each opportunity to be allocated to us. This allocation policy will be periodically approved by our Investment Adviser and reviewed by our independent directors. We expect that these determinations will be made similarly for other accounts sponsored or managed by our Investment Adviser and its affiliates. If sufficient securities or loan amounts are available to satisfy our and each such account’s proposed demand, we expect that the opportunity will be allocated in accordance with our Investment Adviser’s pre-transaction determination. Where there is an insufficient amount of an investment opportunity to satisfy us and other accounts sponsored or managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates, the allocation policy further provides that allocations among us and such other accounts will generally be made pro rata based on each account’s available capital in the asset class being allocated, up to the amount proposed to be invested by each account. However, we cannot assure you that investment opportunities will be allocated to us fairly or equitably in the short-term or over time.

We, Garrison Investment Group and our Investment Adviser have received exemptive relief to permit greater flexibility to negotiate the terms of co-investments if our board of directors determines that it would be advantageous for us to co-invest with other accounts sponsored or managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

as well as regulatory requirements and other relevant factors. See “Related Party Transactions — Certain Relationships.” We cannot assure you, however, that we will develop opportunities that comply with such limitations.

In situations where co-investment with other accounts managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates is not permitted or appropriate, Garrison Investment Group and our Investment Adviser must decide which client will proceed with the investment. The written allocation policy of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliated investment advisers, including our Investment Adviser, in such circumstances, for investments to be allocated on a rotational basis to assure that all clients have fair and equitable access to such investment opportunities. Moreover, except in certain circumstances, we are unable to invest in any issuer in which a fund managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates has previously invested. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers or directors or their affiliates. These restrictions may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.

Our Investment Adviser may be paid incentive compensation even if we incur a net loss, and we cannot recover any portion of the incentive fee previously paid.

Our Investment Adviser is entitled to incentive compensation for each fiscal quarter in an amount equal to a percentage of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, subject to the Hurdle Rate, a catch-up provision and the Incentive Fee Cap and Deferral Mechanism. Our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income excludes realized and unrealized capital losses that we may incur in the fiscal quarter, even if such capital losses result in a net loss for that quarter. Thus, we may be required to pay our Investment Adviser incentive compensation for a fiscal quarter even if we incur a net loss. In addition, if we pay the capital gains portion of the incentive fee and thereafter experience additional realized capital losses or unrealized capital depreciation, we will not be able to recover any portion of the incentive fee previously paid.

We will be exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.

Interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial negative impact on our investments, the value of our common stock and our rate of return on invested capital. A reduction in the interest rates on new investments relative to interest rates on current investments could also have an adverse impact on our net investment income. An increase in interest rates could decrease the value of any investments we hold which earn fixed interest rates and also could increase our interest expense, thereby decreasing our net income. Also, an increase in interest rates available to investors could make investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to increase our dividend rate, which could reduce the market value of our common stock.

Our portfolio investments will be recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. As a result, there will be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.

Many of our portfolio investments will take the form of securities that are not publicly traded. The fair value of securities and other investments that are not publicly traded may not be readily determinable, and we value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors, including to reflect significant events affecting the value of our securities. As discussed in more detail under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies,” all of our investments (other than cash and cash equivalents) are classified as Level 3 under Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC Topic 820. This means that our portfolio valuations are based on unobservable inputs and our own assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability in question. Inputs into the determination of fair value of our portfolio investments require significant management judgment or estimation. Even if observable market data are available, such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes, which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimers materially reduces the reliability of such information. Our board of directors has retained several independent valuation firms to review the valuation of each portfolio investment that does not have a readily available market quotation at least once during each 12-month period. Independent valuation firms retained by our board of directors generally provide a valuation review on 25% of our investments for which market quotations are not readily available each quarter. Each investment for which a market quote is not readily available is reviewed by an independent valuation firm at least once during each 12-month period. However, our board of directors does not intend to have de minimis investments of less than 0.5% of our total assets (up to an aggregate of 10% of our total assets) independently reviewed. See “Determination of Net Asset Value.” To the extent a security is reviewed in a particular quarter, it is reviewed and valued by only one service provider. The types of factors that the board of directors may take into account in determining the fair value of our investments generally include, as appropriate, comparison to publicly traded securities, including such factors as yield, maturity and measures of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

credit quality, the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. In addition, the determination of fair value and thus the amount of unrealized losses we may incur in any year, is, to a degree, subjective, in that it is based on unobservable inputs and certain assumptions. Our net asset value could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such securities.

We adjust quarterly the valuation of our portfolio to reflect our board of directors’ determination of the fair value of each investment in our portfolio. Any changes in fair value are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

We generally make investments in private companies. Substantially all of these investments are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we have material non-public information regarding such portfolio company.

Price declines and illiquidity in the corporate debt markets may adversely affect the fair value of our portfolio investments, reducing our net asset value through increased net unrealized depreciation.

As a business development company, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors under our valuation policy and process. As part of the valuation process, we may take into account the following types of factors, if relevant, in determining the fair value of our investments:

When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we use the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate our valuation. We record decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments as unrealized depreciation. Declines in prices and liquidity in the corporate debt markets may result in significant net unrealized depreciation in our portfolio. The effect of all of these factors on our portfolio may reduce our net asset value by increasing net unrealized depreciation in our portfolio. Depending on market conditions, we could incur substantial realized losses and may suffer additional unrealized losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.

We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest rate payable on the debt securities and loans we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the level of our expenses, variations in, and the timing of the recognition of, realized and unrealized gains or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation at the local, state and federal level. We are also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations and are subject to judicial and administrative decisions that affect our operations, including maximum interest rates, fees and other charges, disclosures to portfolio companies, the terms of secured transactions, collection and foreclosure proceedings and other trade practices. If these laws, regulations or decisions change, or if we expand our business into additional jurisdictions, we may have to incur significant expenses in order to comply or we might have to restrict our operations. New legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted, including those governing the types of investments we or our portfolio companies are permitted to make, any of which could harm us and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive effect. In particular, on July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, became law. The scope of the Dodd-Frank Act impacts many aspects of the financial services industry, and it requires the development and adoption of many implementing regulations over the next several years. The effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on the financial services industry will depend, in large part, upon the extent to which regulators exercise the authority granted to them and the approaches taken in implementing regulations. While the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on us and our portfolio companies may not be known for an extended period of time, the Dodd-Frank Act, including future rules implementing its provisions and the interpretation of those rules, along with other legislative and regulatory proposals directed at the financial services industry or affecting taxation that are proposed or pending in the U.S. Congress, may negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of us or our portfolio companies, impose additional costs on us or our portfolio companies, intensify the regulatory supervision of us or our portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies. In addition, if we do not comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could lose any licenses that we then hold for the conduct of our business and may be subject to civil fines and criminal penalties.

Additionally, changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations related to permitted investments may cause us to alter our investment strategy in order to avail ourselves of new or different opportunities. Such changes could result in material differences to the strategies and plans set forth in this prospectus and may shift our investment focus from the areas of expertise of our Investment Adviser to other types of investments in which our Investment Adviser may have little or no expertise or experience. Any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.

We may engage in currency or interest rate hedging transactions to the extent such transactions are permitted under the 1940 Act, the Commodity Exchange Act and other applicable commodities laws. If we engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions, including the risk of counterparty default. In this regard, we may utilize instruments such as futures, forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for us to realize a gain on a net basis if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

Currently, we do not hold any securities denominated in foreign currencies and do not hedge any foreign currency exposure. While we may enter into transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest

TABLE OF CONTENTS

rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates or counterparty default may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek or be able to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge position and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities may also fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations.

Our Investment Advisor has not claimed exclusion from registration as a commodity pool operator. As a result, in order to engage in certain hedging transactions, our Investment Adviser may be required to register as a commodity pool operator or claim an exemption under Regulation 4.5 of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Association.

Our board of directors may change our investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval.

Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive certain of our operating policies and strategies without prior notice and without stockholder approval (except as required by the 1940 Act). However, absent stockholder approval, we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a business development company. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies would have on our business, operating results and value of our stock. Nevertheless, the effects of any such changes may adversely affect our business and impact our ability to make distributions.

We are highly dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends and other distributions.

Our business depends on the communications and information systems of our Investment Adviser and its affiliates. Any failure or interruption of such systems could cause delays or other problems in our activities. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the market price of our securities and our ability to pay dividends and other distributions to our securityholders.

Risks Related to our Investments

Our investments may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

We invest primarily in (1) first lien senior secured loans, (2) second lien senior secured loans, (3) “one-stop” senior secured or “unitranche” loans, (4) subordinated or mezzanine loans, (5) unsecured consumer loans and (6), to a lesser extent, selected equity co-investments in middle-market companies.

Secured Loans.  When we extend first lien senior secured, second lien senior secured and unitranche loans, we generally take a security interest in the available assets of these portfolio companies, including the equity interests of their subsidiaries. We expect this security interest to help mitigate the risk that we will not be repaid. However, there is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of the portfolio company to raise additional capital. Also, in the case of first lien senior secured loans, our lien may be subordinated to claims of other creditors and, in the case of second lien senior secured loans, our lien will be subordinated to claims of certain other creditors. In addition, deterioration in a portfolio company’s financial condition and prospects, including its inability to raise additional capital, may be accompanied by deterioration in the value of the collateral for the loan. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or at all, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we be forced to enforce our remedies.

Unsecured Consumer Loans.  Our consumer loans are unsecured. This may result in an above average amount of risk and volatility or a loss of principal. These investments may involve additional risks that could adversely affect our investment returns. See “We are subject to risks associated with unsecured consumer loans.”

Mezzanine Loans.  Our mezzanine investments generally are subordinated to senior loans and will generally be unsecured. This may result in an above average amount of risk and volatility or a loss of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

principal. These investments may involve additional risks that could adversely affect our investment returns. To the extent interest payments associated with such debt are deferred, such debt may be subject to greater fluctuations in valuations, and such debt could subject us and our stockholders to non-cash income as described above under “We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.” In addition, investments with original issue discount that are not paid in cash may create heightened credit risks because the willingness to trade higher interest rates for the deferral of cash payments typically represents, to some extent, speculation on the part of the borrower and us about the borrower’s future ability to pay. Since we will not receive any substantial repayments of principal prior to the maturity of our mezzanine debt investments, such investments are riskier than amortizing loans.

Equity Investments.  We may make selected equity investments. In addition, when we invest in first lien, second lien, unitranche or mezzanine loans, we may acquire warrants to purchase equity securities. Our goal is ultimately to dispose of these equity interests and realize gains upon our disposition of such interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

We are subject to risks associated with middle-market companies.

Investing in middle-market companies involves a number of significant risks, including:

We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a single issuer.

We are classified as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that we are not limited by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of our assets that we may invest in securities of a single issuer. To the extent that we assume large positions in the securities of a small number of issuers, our net asset value may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified investment company as a result of changes in the financial condition or the market’s assessment of the issuer. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than a diversified investment company. Beyond the asset diversification requirements associated with our qualification as a RIC under the Code and the requirements under the documents governing the CLO, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies and industries, which would subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt instruments or if there is a downturn in a particular industry.

Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies and industries. As a result, the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly and adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Additionally, while we are not targeting any specific industries, our investments may be concentrated in relatively few industries. As a result, a downturn in any particular industry in which we are invested could also significantly impact the aggregate returns we realize.

We may hold the debt securities and loans of leveraged companies that may, due to the significant volatility of such companies, enter into bankruptcy proceedings.

Companies that use a significant amount of leverage may experience bankruptcy or similar financial distress. The bankruptcy process has a number of significant inherent risks. Many events in a bankruptcy proceeding are the product of contested matters and adversary proceedings and are beyond the control of the creditors. A bankruptcy filing by a portfolio company may adversely and permanently affect such portfolio company. If the proceeding is converted to a liquidation, the value of the issuer may not equal the liquidation value that was believed to exist at the time of our investment. The duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is also difficult to predict, and a creditor’s return on investment can be adversely affected by delays until a plan of reorganization or liquidation ultimately becomes effective. The administrative costs in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding are frequently high and would be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors. Because the standards for classification of claims under bankruptcy law are vague, our influence with respect to the class of securities or other obligations we own may be lost by increases in the number and amount of claims in the same class or by different classification and treatment. In the early stages of the bankruptcy process, it is often difficult to estimate the extent of, or even to identify, any contingent claims that might be made. In addition, certain claims that have priority by law (for example, claims for taxes) may be substantial, eroding the value of any recovery by holders of other securities of the bankrupt entity.

Depending on the facts and circumstances of our investments and the extent of our involvement in the management of a portfolio company, upon the bankruptcy of a portfolio company, a bankruptcy court may recharacterize our debt investments as equity interests and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. This could occur even though we may have structured our investment as senior debt.

Our portfolio companies may be unable to repay or refinance outstanding principal on their loans at or prior to maturity, and rising interests rates may make it more difficult for portfolio companies to make periodic payments on their loans.

Our portfolio companies may be unable to repay or refinance outstanding principal on their loans at or prior to maturity. This risk and the risk of default is increased to the extent that the loan documents do not require the portfolio companies to pay down the outstanding principal of such debt prior to maturity. In addition, if general interest rates rise, there is a risk that our portfolio companies will be unable to pay escalating interest amounts, which could result in a default under their loan documents with us. Rising interests rates could also cause portfolio companies to shift cash from other productive uses to the payment of interest, which may have a material adverse effect on their business and operations and could, over time, lead to increased defaults. Any failure of one or more portfolio companies to repay or refinance its debt at or prior to maturity or the inability of one or more portfolio companies to make ongoing payments following an increase in contractual interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans during these periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic conditions may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. Economic

TABLE OF CONTENTS

slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing our investments and harm our operating results, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize our portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, lenders in certain cases can be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by them when they become too involved in the borrower’s business or exercise control over a borrower. It is possible that we could become subject to a lender’s liability claim, including as a result of actions taken if we render significant managerial assistance to the borrower. Furthermore, if one of our portfolio companies were to file for bankruptcy protection, even though we may have structured our investment as senior secured debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to claims of other creditors.

We may be subject to risks associated with syndicated loans.

Under the documentation for syndicated loans, a financial institution or other entity typically is designated as the administrative agent and/or collateral agent. This agent is granted a lien on any collateral on behalf of the other lenders and distributes payments on the indebtedness as they are received. The agent is the party responsible for administering and enforcing the loan and generally may take actions only in accordance with the instructions of a majority or two-thirds in commitments and/or principal amount of the associated indebtedness. In most cases, we do not expect to hold a sufficient amount of the indebtedness to be able to compel any actions by the agent. Consequently, we would only be able to direct such actions if instructions from us were made in conjunction with other holders of associated indebtedness that together with us compose the requisite percentage of the related indebtedness then entitled to take action. Conversely, if holders of the required amount of the associated indebtedness other than us desire to take certain actions, such actions may be taken even if we did not support such actions. Furthermore, if an investment is subordinated to one or more senior loans made to the applicable obligor, the ability of us to exercise such rights may be subordinated to the exercise of such rights by the senior lenders. Accordingly, we may be precluded from directing such actions unless we act together with other holders of the indebtedness. If we are unable to direct such actions, we cannot assure you that the actions taken will be in our best interests.

If an investment is a syndicated revolving loan or delayed drawdown loan, other lenders may fail to satisfy their full contractual funding commitments for such loan, which could create a breach of contract, result in a lawsuit by the obligor against the lenders and adversely affect the fair market value of our investment.

There is a risk that a loan agent may become bankrupt or insolvent. Such an event would delay, and possibly impair, any enforcement actions undertaken by holders of the associated indebtedness, including attempts to realize upon the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and/or direct the agent to take actions against the related obligor or the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and actions to realize on proceeds of payments made by obligors that are in the possession or control of any other financial institution. In addition, we may be unable to remove the agent in circumstances in which removal would be in our best interests. Moreover, agented loans typically allow for the agent to resign with certain advance notice.

We are subject to risks associated with unsecured consumer loans.

Investing in unsecured consumer loans involves a number of significant risks, including those set forth below.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Unsecured consumer loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and we must rely on our third party servicer(s) to pursue collection against any borrower.

Unsecured consumer loans are unsecured obligations and are not guaranteed or insured by any third party or backed by any governmental authority in any way. We must rely on our third party servicer(s) to pursue collection against any borrower if an event of default occurs.

We may acquire consumer loans from borrowers who have tarnished credit ratings or limited credit history, are considered higher than average credit risks, and may present a higher risk of loan delinquency or default.

We may acquire consumer loans from borrowers who have below prime or tarnished credit ratings, which is traditionally defined as a FICO below 640 or limited credit history. Loans may be offered to such borrowers when there is reason to believe that the risk profile of such loans is such that their loss rates fall within the loss rate range expected under the current underwriting policies. However, these borrowers still may present a higher risk of loan delinquency or default than prime borrowers.

We do not have significant historical performance data about performance on the consumer loans. Loss rates on the consumer loans may increase.

Businesses that originate consumer loans, or Consumer Lending Platforms, from which we may acquire unsecured consumer loans are in the early stages of their development and have limited operating histories. The performance of consumer loans purchased to date may not be indicative of the future performance of consumer loans. Due to the limited operational history of Consumer Lending Platforms, we do not have significant historical data regarding the performance of the consumer loans, and we do not yet know what our long-term loan loss experience will be.

Loss rates on the consumer loans may increase as a result of economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of the borrower.

Borrower loan loss rates may be significantly affected by economic downturns or general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of individual borrowers. In particular, loss rates on consumer loans may increase due to factors such as prevailing interest rates, the rate of unemployment, the level of consumer confidence, residential real estate values, the value of the U.S. dollar, energy prices, changes in consumer spending, the number of personal bankruptcies, disruptions in the credit markets and other factors.

We may not realize gains from our equity investments.

When we invest in mezzanine loans or senior secured loans, we may also invest in the equity securities of the borrower or acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. Our goal is ultimately to dispose of such equity interests and realize gains upon our disposition of such interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of such equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

Our failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair the value of our portfolio, and our ability to make follow-on investments in certain portfolio companies may be restricted.

Following an initial investment in a portfolio company, we may make additional investments in that portfolio company as “follow-on” investments, in order to:

We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject to the availability of capital resources, the limitations of the 1940 Act and the requirements associated with our status as a RIC. We may elect not to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

make follow-on investments or otherwise lack sufficient funds to make those investments. The failure to make follow-on investments may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful portfolio company. Even if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make a follow-on investment because we do not want to increase our exposure to the portfolio company, because we prefer other opportunities or because we are inhibited by compliance with business development company requirements or the desire to maintain our tax status.

Because we generally do not hold controlling equity interests in our portfolio companies, we will not be in a position to exercise control over our portfolio companies or to prevent decisions by management of our portfolio companies that could decrease the value of our investments.

We do not currently anticipate taking controlling equity positions in our portfolio companies. In addition, we may not be in a position to control any portfolio company by investing in its debt securities or loans. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the stockholders and management of a portfolio company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that are adverse to our interests. Due to the lack of liquidity for the debt and equity investments that we typically hold in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company, and we may therefore suffer a decrease in the value of our investments.

Defaults by our portfolio companies will harm our operating results.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its assets. This could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize such portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

We generally intend to invest a portion of our capital in first lien, second lien and unitranche loans and, to a lesser extent, mezzanine loans and equity securities of U.S. middle-market companies. The portfolio companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt securities in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of the debt securities in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying senior creditors, the portfolio company may not have sufficient assets to use for repaying its obligation to us in full, or at all. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share any distributions on an equal and ratable basis with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.

Additionally, certain loans that we make to portfolio companies may be secured on a second-priority basis by the same collateral securing senior secured debt of such companies. The first-priority liens on the collateral secure the portfolio company’s obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under the agreements governing the loans. The holders of obligations secured by first-priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of, and be entitled to receive proceeds from, any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us.

In addition, the value of the collateral in the event of liquidation depends on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurances that the proceeds, if any,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

from sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by the second-priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first-priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds were not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the loan obligations secured by the second-priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, only have an unsecured claim against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any.

The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the loans we make to our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of such senior debt. Under a typical intercreditor agreement, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first-priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken in respect of the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first-priority liens:

We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected.

We may also make unsecured loans to portfolio companies, meaning that such loans will not benefit from any security interest over the assets of such companies. Liens on such portfolio companies’ assets, if any, will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under its outstanding secured debt and may secure certain future debt that is permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under its secured loan agreements. The holders of obligations secured by such liens will generally control the liquidation of, and be entitled to receive proceeds from, any realization of such collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In addition, the value of such collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from sales of such collateral would be sufficient to satisfy our unsecured obligations after payment in full of all secured loan obligations. If such proceeds were not sufficient to repay the outstanding secured loan obligations, then our unsecured claims would rank equally with the unpaid portion of such secured creditors’ claims against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any.

Our Investment Adviser’s liability is limited under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the sub-collateral management agreement, and we have agreed to indemnify our Investment Adviser against certain liabilities, which may lead our Investment Adviser to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

Under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the sub-collateral management agreement, our Investment Adviser does not assume any responsibility to us, including GF 2013-2 Manager other than to render the services called for under those agreements, and it is not responsible for any action of our board of directors or GF 2013-2 Manager, as applicable, in following or declining to follow our Investment Adviser’s advice or recommendations. Our Investment Adviser maintains a contractual and fiduciary relationship with us. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement and the sub-collateral management agreement, our Investment Adviser, its officers, members, personnel, any person controlling or controlled by our Investment Adviser are not be liable to us, any subsidiary of ours, our directors, our stockholders or any subsidiary’s stockholders or partners for acts or omissions performed in accordance with and pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement and the sub-collateral management agreement, except those resulting from acts constituting gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad faith or reckless disregard of our Investment Adviser’s duties under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the sub-collateral management agreement. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify our Investment Adviser and each of its officers, directors, members, managers and employees from and against any claims or liabilities, including reasonable legal fees and other expenses reasonably incurred, arising out of or in connection with our business and operations or any action taken or omitted on our behalf pursuant to authority granted by the Investment Advisory Agreement and the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

sub-collateral management agreement, except where attributable to gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad faith or reckless disregard of such person’s duties under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the sub-collateral management agreement. These protections may lead our Investment Adviser to act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

Our portfolio companies may prepay loans, which prepayment may reduce our yields if capital returned cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater expected yields.

The loans in our investment portfolio generally are prepayable at any time, some of which have no premium to par. It is not clear at this time when each loan may be prepaid. Whether a loan is prepaid will depend both on the continued positive performance of the portfolio company and the existence of favorable financing market conditions that allow such company the ability to replace existing financing with less expensive capital. As market conditions change frequently, it is unknown when, and if, this may be possible for each portfolio company. In the case of some of these loans, having the loan prepaid may reduce the achievable yield for us if the capital returned cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater expected yields, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The disposition of our investments may result in contingent liabilities.

We currently expect that a significant portion of our investments will involve private securities. In connection with the disposition of an investment in private securities, we may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of the portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. We may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations turn out to be inaccurate or with respect to certain potential liabilities. These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities that ultimately yield funding obligations that must be satisfied through our return of certain distributions previously made to us.

Provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock and the rights of our common stockholders.

The General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or the DGCL, contains provisions that may discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in control of us or the removal of our directors. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that limit liability and provide for indemnification of our directors and officers. These provisions and others also may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control or management. We are subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, the application of which is subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. This section generally prohibits us from engaging in mergers and other business combinations with stockholders that beneficially own 15% or more of our voting stock, or with their affiliates, unless our directors or stockholders approve the business combination in the prescribed manner. If our board of directors does not approve a business combination, Section 203 of the DGCL may discourage third parties from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer.

We have also adopted measures that may make it difficult for a third party to obtain control of us, including provisions of our certificate of incorporation classifying our board of directors in three classes serving staggered three-year terms, and provisions of our certificate of incorporation authorizing our board of directors to classify or reclassify shares of our preferred stock in one or more classes or series and to cause the issuance of additional shares of our stock. These provisions, as well as other provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, if we issue preferred stock, such securities would rank “senior” to common stock in our capital structure, resulting in preferred stockholders having separate voting rights, dividend and liquidation rights, and possibly other rights, preferences or privileges more favorable than those granted to holders of our common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Investment Adviser can resign on 60 days’ notice, and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement within that time, resulting in a disruption in our operations that could adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.

Our Investment Adviser has the right, under the Investment Advisory Agreement, to resign at any time upon not less than 60 days’ written notice, whether we have found a replacement or not. If our Investment Adviser resigns, we may not be able to find a new Investment Adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 60 days, or at all. If we are unable to do so quickly, our operations are likely to experience a disruption, our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected and the market price of our shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of our internal management and investment activities is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by our Investment Adviser and its affiliates. Even if we are able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our Administrator can resign on 60 days’ notice, and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement within that time, resulting in a disruption in our operations that could adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.

Our Administrator has the right, under the Administration Agreement, to resign at any time upon not less than 60 days’ notice, whether we have found a replacement or not. If our Administrator resigns, we may not be able to find a new administrator or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 60 days, or at all. If we are unable to do so quickly, our operations are likely to experience a disruption, our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected and the market price of our shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of our internal management and administrative activities is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a service provider or individuals with the expertise possessed by our Administrator. Even if we are able to retain a comparable service provider or individuals to perform such services, whether internal or external, their integration into our business and lack of familiarity with our operations may result in additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Investments in securities of foreign companies, if any, may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

We may make investments in securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.

In addition, any investments that we make that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we cannot assure you that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk, or, that if we do, such strategies will be effective.

We incur significant costs as a result of being a publicly traded company.

As a publicly traded company, we incur legal, accounting and other expenses, including costs associated with the periodic reporting requirements applicable to a company whose securities are registered under the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exchange Act as well as additional corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other rules implemented by the SEC.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and we do not know if such status will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We currently are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act until the earliest of:

We are taking advantage of some of the reduced regulatory and disclosure requirements permitted by the JOBS Act and, as a result, some investors may consider our common stock less attractive, which could reduce the market value of our common stock. For example, while we are an emerging growth company, we are taking advantage of exemption from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that our independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This may increase the risk that material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting go undetected. See “The Company — Regulation — JOBS Act.”

Efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will involve significant expenditures, and non-compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may adversely affect us and the market price of our common stock.

Under current SEC rules, we are required to report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules and regulations of the SEC and, under the JOBS Act, beginning with the first fiscal year in which we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm must audit this report. We are required to review on an annual basis our internal control over financial reporting, and on a quarterly and annual basis to evaluate and disclose changes in our internal control over financial reporting.

As a result, we expect to incur additional expenses in the near term that may negatively impact our financial performance and our ability to make distributions. This process also will result in a diversion of management’s time and attention. We cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or the impact of the same on our operations, and we may not be able to ensure that the process is effective or that our internal control over financial reporting is or will be effective in a timely manner. In the event that we are unable to maintain or achieve compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules, we and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

Risks Relating to Offerings Pursuant to this Prospectus

Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk.

The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and a higher risk of volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies involve higher levels of risk, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, often trade at a discount to their net asset value.

Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may trade at a discount from net asset value. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies and business development companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share may decline. We cannot predict whether our common stock will trade at, above or below net asset value.

There is a risk that investors in our equity securities may not receive distributions or that our distributions may not grow over time and a portion of our distributions may be a return of capital.

We intend to make distributions on a quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. Our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by the impact of one or more of the risk factors described in this prospectus. Due to the asset coverage test applicable to us under the 1940 Act as a business development company, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions. If we declare a dividend and if more stockholders opt to receive cash distributions rather than participate in our dividend reinvestment plan, we may be forced to sell some of our investments in order to make cash dividend payments.

The market price of our securities may fluctuate significantly.

The market price and liquidity of the market for our securities may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:

Our stockholders could experience dilution in their ownership percentage if they do not participate in our dividend reinvestment plan.

All dividends declared in cash payable to stockholders that are participants in our dividend reinvestment plan are automatically reinvested in shares of our common stock. As a result, our stockholders that do not participate in our dividend reinvestment plan could experience dilution in their ownership percentage of our common stock over time if we issue additional shares of our common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the availability of such common stock for sale, could adversely affect the prevailing market prices for our common stock. If this occurs and continues, it could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of securities should we desire to do so.

If we issue preferred stock, debt securities or convertible debt securities, the net asset value and market value of our common stock may become more volatile.

We cannot assure you that the issuance of preferred stock and/or debt securities would result in a higher yield or return to the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock, debt securities or convertible debt would likely cause the net asset value and market value of our common stock to become more volatile. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock, or the interest rate on the debt securities, were to approach the net rate of return on our investment portfolio, the benefit of leverage to the holders of our common stock would be reduced. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock, or the interest rate on the debt securities, were to exceed the net rate of return on our portfolio, the use of leverage would result in a lower rate of return to the holders of common stock than if we had not issued the preferred stock or debt securities. Any decline in the net asset value of our investment would be borne entirely by the holders of our common stock. Therefore, if the market value of our portfolio were to decline, the leverage would result in a greater decrease in net asset value to the holders of our common stock than if we were not leveraged through the issuance of preferred stock. This decline in net asset value would also tend to cause a greater decline in the market price for our common stock.

There is also a risk that, in the event of a sharp decline in the value of our net assets, we would be in danger of failing to maintain required asset coverage ratios which may be required by the preferred stock, debt securities, convertible debt or units or of a downgrade in the ratings of the preferred stock, debt securities, convertible debt or units or our current investment income might not be sufficient to meet the dividend requirements on the preferred stock or the interest payments on the debt securities. In order to counteract such an event, we might need to liquidate investments in order to fund redemption of some or all of the preferred stock, debt securities or convertible debt. In addition, we would pay (and the holders of our common stock would bear) all costs and expenses relating to the issuance and ongoing maintenance of the preferred stock, debt securities, convertible debt or any combination of these securities. Holders of preferred stock, debt securities or convertible debt may have different interests than holders of common stock and may at times have disproportionate influence over our affairs.

We are a holding company and depend on payments from our subsidiaries in order to make payments on any debt securities that we may issue as well as to pay dividends on our common stock. Any debt securities that we issue will be structurally subordinated to the obligations of our subsidiaries.

We are a holding company and fund a majority of our investments through wholly-owned subsidiaries, and a majority of the assets that we hold directly are the equity interests in such subsidiaries. We depend upon the cash flow from our subsidiaries and the receipt of funds from them, any of which may be subject to restriction or limitations based on the organizational documents of the subsidiaries and the agreements governing the debt of any such subsidiary. In addition, because we are a holding company, any debt securities that we issue will be structurally subordinated to the obligations of our subsidiaries. In the event that one of our subsidiaries becomes insolvent, liquidates, reorganizes, dissolves or otherwise winds up, its assets will be used first to satisfy the claims of its creditors. Consequently, any claim by us or our creditors, including holders of any debt securities that we may issue, against any subsidiary will be structurally subordinated to all of the claims of the creditors of such subsidiary. We cannot assure security holders that they will receive any payments required to be made under the terms of any debt securities that we may issue, dividends or other distributions.

Holders of any preferred stock that we may issue will have the right to elect members of the board of directors and have class voting rights on certain matters.

The 1940 Act requires that holders of shares of preferred stock must be entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors if dividends on such preferred stock are in arrears

TABLE OF CONTENTS

by two years or more, until such arrearage is eliminated. In addition, certain matters under the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open-end status and, accordingly, preferred stockholders could veto any such changes. Restrictions imposed on the declarations and payment of dividends or other distributions to the holders of our common stock and preferred stock, both by the 1940 Act and by requirements imposed by rating agencies, might impair our ability to maintain our qualification as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Your interest in us may be diluted if you do not fully exercise your subscription rights in any rights offering. In addition, if the subscription price is less than our net asset value per share, then you will experience an immediate dilution of the aggregate net asset value of your shares.

In the event we issue subscription rights, stockholders who do not fully exercise their subscription rights should expect that they will, at the completion of a rights offering pursuant to this prospectus, own a smaller proportional interest in us than would otherwise be the case if they fully exercised their rights. We cannot state precisely the amount of any such dilution in share ownership because we do not know at this time what proportion of the shares will be purchased as a result of such rights offering.

In addition, if the subscription price is less than the net asset value per share of our common stock, then our stockholders would experience an immediate dilution of the aggregate net asset value of their shares as a result of the offering. The amount of any decrease in net asset value is not predictable because it is not known at this time what the subscription price and net asset value per share will be on the expiration date of a rights offering or what proportion of the shares will be purchased as a result of such rights offering. Such dilution could be substantial.

These dilutive effects may be exacerbated if we were to conduct multiple subscription rights offerings, particularly if such offerings were to occur over a short period of time. In addition, subscription rights offerings and the prospect of future subscription rights offerings may create downward pressure on the secondary market price of our common stock due to the potential for the issuance of shares at a price below our net asset value, without a corresponding change to our net asset value.

The trading market or market value of any publicly issued debt securities may fluctuate.

Our publicly issued debt securities, if any, may or may not have an established trading market. We cannot assure you that a trading market for our publicly issued debt securities will ever develop or be maintained if developed. In addition to our creditworthiness, many factors may materially adversely affect the trading market for, and market value of, our publicly issued debt securities. These factors include the following:

You should also be aware that there may be a limited number of buyers when you decide to sell your debt securities. This too may materially adversely affect the market value of the debt securities or the trading market for the debt securities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Terms relating to redemption may materially adversely affect your return on any debt securities that we may issue.

If your debt securities are redeemable at our option, we may choose to redeem your debt securities at times when prevailing interest rates are lower than the interest rate paid on your debt securities. In addition, if your debt securities are subject to mandatory redemption, we may be required to redeem your debt securities also at times when prevailing interest rates are lower than the interest rate paid on your debt securities. In this circumstance, you may not be able to reinvest the redemption proceeds in a comparable security at an effective interest rate as high as your debt securities being redeemed.

Our credit ratings may not reflect all risks of an investment in our debt securities.

Our credit ratings are an assessment by third parties of our ability to pay our obligations. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our debt securities. Our credit ratings, however, may not reflect the potential impact of risks related to market conditions generally or other factors discussed above on the market value of or trading market for the publicly issued debt securities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements in this prospectus constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

We use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend” “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “would,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “potential” and similar words to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth as “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.

We have based the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus on information available to us on the date of this prospectus, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements and future results could differ materially from historical performance. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we have filed or in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. This prospectus contains statistics and other data that have been obtained from or compiled from information made available by third-party service providers. We have not independently verified such statistics or data.

You should understand that, under Sections 27A(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 do not apply to statements made in connection with any offering of securities pursuant to this prospectus, any prospectus supplement or in periodic reports we file under the Exchange Act.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

USE OF PROCEEDS

Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend to use all or substantially all of the net proceeds from the sale of our securities to invest in portfolio companies in accordance with our investment objective and strategies and for general corporate purposes. We expect that our new investments will consist primarily of debt and minority equity investments in middle-market companies and consumer loans. We will also pay operating expenses, including management and administrative fees, and may pay other expenses such as due diligence expenses relating to potential new investments, from the net proceeds of any offering of our securities.

We anticipate that we will use substantially all of the net proceeds of an offering for the above purposes within approximately six months after the completion of any offering of our securities, depending on the availability of appropriate investment opportunities consistent with our investment objective and market conditions. We cannot assure you that we will achieve our targeted investment pace.

Until such appropriate investment opportunities can be found, we will invest the net proceeds of any offering of our securities primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less from the date of investment, certain broadly syndicated loans and other transitory assets. These temporary investments may have lower yields than our other investments and, accordingly, may result in lower distributions, if any, during such period. Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited to the extent that the net proceeds from an offering, pending full investment, are held in lower yielding interest-bearing deposits or other short-term instruments. See “Regulation — Temporary Investments” for additional information about temporary investments we may make while waiting to make longer-term investments in pursuit of our investment objective.

We will pay the printing, legal, filing and other similar expenses of any offering of common stock by the selling stockholders, identified under “Selling Stockholders.” However, the selling stockholders will bear all other expenses, including any brokerage fees, underwriting discounts and commissions, of any such offering. We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of common stock by the selling stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISTRIBUTIONS

Our distributions, if any, are determined by the board of directors. We elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. To maintain RIC qualification each taxable year, we must distribute an amount at least equal to 90% of our net ordinary income and net short-term capital gains in excess of our net long-term capital losses, if any. In addition, we are subject to ordinary income and capital gain distribution requirements under U.S. federal excise tax rules for each calendar year. If we do not meet the required distributions we will generally be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on the undistributed amount.

The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital per share that we have declared on our common stock since December 31, 2012.

Record Dates		Payment Date				Dividends and Distributions Declared
Fiscal year ending December 31, 2015
June 12, 2015			June 26, 2015			$	0.35
March 12, 2015			March 27, 2015			$	0.35
Fiscal year ending December 31, 2014(1)
December 12, 2014			December 29, 2014			$	0.35
September 12, 2014			September 26, 2014			$	0.35
June 13, 2014			June 27, 2014			$	0.35
March 21, 2014			March 28, 2014			$	0.35
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
December 13, 2013(2)			December 27, 2013			$	0.35
September 12, 2013(2)			September 26, 2013			$	0.35
June 13, 2013(2)			June 27, 2013			$	0.35
February 25, 2013(1)			March 13, 2013			$	0.23
Total						$	3.38

We currently intend to distribute net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital gains in excess of net short-term capital losses), if any, at least annually out of the assets legally available for such distributions. However, we may decide to retain a portion of such capital gains and be subject to excise tax on the retained portion. If we do not meet the required distributions we will generally be subject to a 4% non-deductible federal excise tax on the undistributed amount. If this happens, stockholders will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as if they had received an actual distribution of the capital gains that we retain and reinvested the net after tax proceeds in us. In this situation, stockholders would be eligible to claim a tax credit (or, in certain circumstances, a tax refund) equal to your allocable share of the tax we paid on the capital gains deemed distributed to you. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation of U.S. Stockholders.” We cannot assure you that we will achieve results that will permit us to pay any cash distributions, and if we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so would cause us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if such distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.

We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of our dividends and other distributions on behalf of our stockholders. As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend or other distribution, then our stockholders who have not “opted out” of our dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash distribution automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash distribution.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial and other information below should be read in conjunction with our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Financial information as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the three months then ended has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. Financial information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 has been derived from our consolidated financial statements that were audited by McGladrey LLP. Financial information as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the years then ended and for the period from December 17, 2010 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2010, has been derived from our consolidated financial statements that were audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.

		Three months Ended March 31, 2015				Three months Ended March 31, 2014				Year ended December 31, 2014				Year ended December 31, 2013				Year ended December 31, 2012				Year ended December 31, 2011				Period from December 17, 2010 (commencement of operations) through December 31, 2010
		(dollars in thousands)
Income statement data:
Total investment income (loss)(1)		$	13,479			$	11,282			$	50,459			$	33,805			$	23,649			$	27,222			$	-
Interest expense			1,850				1,749				7,157				6,575				6,155				7,280				-
Management fees (net of waivers)			1,990				1,958				8,065				2,510				2,277				1,804				-
Incentive fees (net of waivers)			695				3,606				8,409				1,099				-				-				-
Other expenses			1,262				1,080				4,818				4,286				6,895				2,360				375
Net investment income (loss)			7,682				2,889				22,009				19,335				8,322				15,778				(375	)
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments(2)			(490	)			8,897				10,702				(11,770	)			3,374				3,494				-
Net change in unrealized appreciation/ (depreciation) on investments(2)			(4,220	)			(1,109	)			(2,227	)			15,934				(7,322	)			(8,433	)			-
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations			2,972				10,676				30,484				23,500				4,374				10,839				(375	)
Basic earnings per common share/members' capital per unit(3)			0.18				0.64				1.82				1.55				0.42				1.03				-
Other data:
Weighted average yield (unaudited)(4)			10.8	%			10.0	%			10.5	%			9.8	%			9.6	%			8.9	%			7.3	%
Number of portfolio companies at period end (unaudited)			57				71				57				70				49				72				74

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		At March 31, 2015				At March 31, 2014				At December 31, 2014				At December 31, 2013				At December 31, 2012				At December 31, 2011				At December 31, 2010
		(dollars in thousands except per unit data)
Balance sheet data:
Investments, fair value(5)		$	452,011			$	455,169			$	467,769			$	429,081			$	220,106			$	320,779			$	283,828
Cash and cash equivalents			20,355				26,403				13,651				13,665				21,681				47,928				80,000
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted accounts			8,483				12,427				14,260				27,965				69,902				16,993				21,354
Total assets			491,197				505,282				505,841				485,080				315,989				391,139				392,332
Senior secured term note and revolving notes payable			227,077				223,860				240,259				219,419				125,000				218,478				218,304
Net assets/Members’ capital			258,209				258,892				261,102				254,081				173,669				171,072				160,233
Per unit data:
Net asset value per common share/Members’ capital per unit(6)		$	15.41			$	15.45			$	15.58			$	15.16			$	16.54			$	16.29			$	15.26

		2014 (Unaudited)
		Quarter ended March 31, 2014				Quarter ended June 30, 2014				Quarter ended September 30, 2014				Quarter ended December 31, 2014
		(dollars in thousands)
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) on investments		$	7,788			$	3,080			$	(1,180	)		$	(1,213	)
Total investment income			11,282				12,848				12,944				13,385
Net investment income			2,889				5,979				6,261				6,881
Net income (loss)			10,676				9,059				5,081				5,668

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		2013 (Unaudited)
		Quarter ended March 31, 2013				Quarter ended June 30, 2013				Quarter ended September 30, 2013				Quarter ended December 31, 2013
		(dollars in thousands)
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) on investments		$	236			$	1,750			$	839			$	1,339
Total investment income			5,473				7,611				9,338				11,382
Net investment income			3,040				5,047				5,914				5,334
Net income (loss)			3,276				6,797				6,753				6,673

		2012 (Unaudited)
		Quarter ended March 31, 2012				Quarter ended June 30, 2012				Quarter ended September 30, 2012				Quarter ended December 31, 2012
		(dollars in thousands)
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) on investments		$	3,918			$	(2,518	)		$	(4	)		$	(5,344	)
Total investment income			6,725				5,911				5,858				5,156
Net investment income			3,748				51				3,489				1,034
Net income (loss)			7,666				(2,468	)			3,485				(4,309	)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows should be read in conjunction with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and the financial statements and the related notes thereto of us appearing elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. The information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Risk Factors” in the accompanying prospectus and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.

Overview

We are an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. In addition, for tax purposes, we have elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of Code and intend to qualify annually for such treatment. Our shares are currently listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “GARS”.

On March 26, 2013, we priced our initial public offering, or IPO, selling 6,133,334 shares, including 800,000 shares pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of the over-allotment option, at a public offering price of $15.00 per share. On March 27, 2013, our common stock began trading on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “GARS”.

On April 2, 2013, we closed our IPO, raising approximately $92.0 million in gross proceeds. Total proceeds received net of sales load was approximately $85.6 million and net of offering expenses was approximately $84.9 million. Concurrent with the IPO, our directors, officers, employees and an affiliate of our Investment Adviser, purchased an additional 126,901 shares through a private placement transaction, or the Concurrent Private Placement, exempt from registration under the Securities Act, at a price of $15.00 per share, raising approximately $1.9 million of proceeds.

On July 24, 2013, we formed the CLO, a Cayman Islands exempted company, for the purpose of refinancing the Predecessor Credit Facility. On September 25, 2013, under Part XVI of the Cayman Islands Companies Law (2012 Revision), the CLO and the Predecessor Credit Facility merged with the CLO remaining as the surviving entity, or the Merger. On the effective date of the Merger, all of the rights, the property, and the business, undertaking, goodwill, benefits, immunities and privileges of each individual company immediately vested in the surviving company. Following completion of the CLO, nearly 80% of our consolidated assets were held by the CLO.

On September 25, 2013, we completed the CLO through a private placement of (1) $50.0 million of AAA(sf) rated Class A-1R revolving notes, which bear interest at either the CP Rate, as defined in the indenture governing the notes issued by the CLO, or LIBOR, plus 1.90%; (2) $111.2 million of AAA(sf) rated Class A-1T notes, which bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 1.80%; (3) $24.2 million of AA(sf) rated Class A-2 notes, which bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.40%; (4) $25.0 million of A(sf) rated Class B notes, which bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 4.65%; (5) $13.7 million of Class C notes (not rated), which bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 5.50%; and (6) $126.0 million of Subordinated Notes, which do not have a stated interest rate, the proceeds of which were utilized, along with cash on hand, to refinance the Predecessor Credit Facility. All of the notes issued by the CLO are scheduled to mature on September 25, 2023. As of March 31, 2015 we had retained 100% of the Class C Notes and Subordinated Notes.

GLC Trust 2013-2 closed on a $10.0 million revolving facility with Capital One Bank, NA on December 6, 2013. The revolving facility included an accordion feature that permits GLC Trust 2013-2 to increase the total commitment up to $15.0 million under the terms of the loan agreement. GLC Trust 2013-2 exercised this option on December 20, 2013. On July 11, 2014, we increased the GLC Trust 2013-2 revolving facility total commitment by $15.0 million, for a total commitment of $30.0 million. On July 18, 2014, we completed a $39.2 million term debt securitization collateralized by the GLC Trust 2013-2 consumer loan portfolio, the proceeds of which were used to refinance and retire the GLC Trust 2013-2 revolving facility.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation by making investments generally in the range of $5 million to $25 million primarily in debt securities and loans of U.S. based middle-market companies, which we define as those having EBITDA of between $5 million and $30 million. Our goal is to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns by assembling a broad portfolio of investments.

We invest primarily in (1) first lien senior secured loans, (2) second lien senior secured loans, (3) “one-stop” senior secured or “unitranche” loans, (4) subordinated or mezzanine loans, (5) unsecured consumer loans and (6) to a lesser extent, selected equity co-investments in middle-market companies.

We believe that the middle market offers attractive risk-adjusted returns for debt investors. Historically, we believe there has been a persistent scarcity of available capital relative to demand, which, from a lender’s perspective, has generally resulted in more favorable transaction structures, including enhanced covenant protection and increased pricing relative to larger companies. We further believe that the turmoil in the markets has exacerbated this scarcity of capital, as many traditional lenders to middle-market companies have exited the business or focused their attention on larger borrowers. In addition, we believe that middle-market companies traditionally have exhibited lower default rates and improved recoveries compared to larger borrowers and typically offer greater access to key senior managers, which we believe further enhances the attractiveness of lending to this market segment and facilitates due diligence investigations and regular monitoring.

Our investment activities are managed by our Investment Adviser. Our Investment Adviser is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting research and diligence on prospective investments and equity sponsors, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring our investments and monitoring our investments and portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we pay the Investment Adviser a base management fee and an incentive fee for its services. The Administrator provides certain administrative services and facilities necessary for us to operate, including office facilities and equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record-keeping services, pursuant to the Administration Agreement. The Administrator oversees our financial reporting and prepares our reports to stockholders and reports required to be filed with the SEC. The Administrator also manages the determination and publication of our net asset value and the preparation and filing of our tax returns and generally monitors the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. The Administrator may retain third parties to assist in providing administrative services to us. To the extent that the Administrator outsources any of its functions, we pay the fees associated with such functions on a direct basis without any profit to the Administrator. The Administrator had retained SEI Investments Global Fund Services, Inc. to provide certain accounting and administrative services to it through September 30, 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $452.0 million, including investments in 45 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of March 31, 2015 consisted of senior secured and second lien loans fair valued at $333.1 million and related indebtedness of $200.3. The loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $346.0 million as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.7 million, a weighted average yield of 10.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 44 months.

As of December 31, 2014, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $467.8 million, including investments in 47 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of December 31, 2014 consisted of senior secured loans fair valued at $339.4 million and related indebtedness of $209.7 million. As of that date, the loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $357.8 million. As of December 31, 2014, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.8 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 10.5% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months.

As of December 31, 2013, we held investments in 70 portfolio companies with a fair value of $429.1 million, including investments in 56 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of December 31, 2013 consisted of senior secured loans fair valued at $331.7 million and related indebtedness of $209.7 million. As of that date, the loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $369.2 million. As of December 31, 2013, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $5.0 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 9.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months.

Revenues.  We generate revenue in the form of interest earned on the debt investments that we hold and capital gains and distributions, if any, on the warrants or other equity interests that we may acquire in portfolio companies. Our debt investments, whether in the form of senior secured, unitranche or mezzanine loans, typically have a term of one to seven years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. Interest is generally payable quarterly or semiannually, with the amortization of principal generally being deferred for

TABLE OF CONTENTS

several years from the date of the initial investment. In some cases, loans may have a PIK feature. The principal amount of the debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest will generally become due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, structuring or diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance and possibly consulting fees. Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount are recorded as a reduction of par value, and we then accrete such amounts into interest income. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any unamortized loan origination fees are recorded as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans and debt securities as interest income when we receive such amounts.

Expenses.  Our primary operating expenses include the payment of (1) the base management fee and incentive fee to the Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisory Agreement; (2) the allocable portion of overhead to the Administrator under the Administration Agreement; (3) the interest expense on our outstanding debt, if any; and (4) our other operating costs, as detailed below. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During periods of asset growth, we expect our general and administrative expenses to be relatively stable or decline as a percentage of total assets and increase during periods of asset declines.

Recent Developments

On April 30, 2015, the Board approved a distribution in the amount of $5.9 million, or $0.35 a share, which will be paid to stockholders of record as of June 12, 2015.

Steven Stuart, co-founder of Garrison Investment Group, anticipates ceasing to participate in the day-to-day operations of Garrison Investment Group. As previously disclosed, Steven Stuart left our investment committee in August 2014. Prior to that time, Mr. Stuart had not been involved with our operations on a day-to-day basis. As part of Mr. Stuart’s departure, his overall economic interests in Garrison Investment Group and its affiliates, including our Investment Adviser, will gradually shift over time to Joseph Tansey and other Garrison Investment Group partners. Mr. Tansey and the other Garrison Investment Group partners will continue to manage the day-to-day aspects of our Investment Adviser. Section 2(a)(4) of the 1940 Act provides that the transfer of a controlling interest of an investment adviser, such as will be caused by the transfer of Mr. Stuart’s interest in Garrison Investment Group, constitutes an “assignment,” and Section 15(a) of the 1940 Act provides that any investment advisory contract must terminate on its “assignment.” In anticipation of the potential change in control of our Investment Adviser, our board of directors, including all of the independent directors, reviewed and unanimously approved the New Investment Advisory Agreement, which has the same terms as the Investment Advisory Agreement, and recommended that the New Investment Advisory Agreement be submitted to our stockholders for approval at the 2015 Annual Meeting. Our stockholders approved the New Investment Advisory Agreement at the 2015 Annual Meeting on May 1, 2015.

Market Trends

Demand for capital during the first quarter of 2015 was limited by light sponsor activity and a sluggish economic climate. Middle-market loan volumes were down for the first quarter of 2015 compared to the fourth quarter of 2014. Volume continued to be primarily driven by merger and acquisition activity in the broader middle-market.

We believe that capital remains limited in the lower middle-market as many traditional lenders to these companies have exited the business due to regulatory restrictions, and many competitors have moved up-market to focus their attention on larger borrowers. Sponsor and club business continues to represent the majority of direct lending opportunities in the lower middle-market, although we have seen banks, other non-bank finance companies and funds participate in select one-off financings. As a result we have seen a slight narrowing of middle-market spreads over the past year as these companies enter the lower middle-market in search of enhanced yields although, lower middle-market opportunities continued to command better pricing and structures than in the broadly syndicated market and upper middle-market. Portfolio leverage multiples overall are in line with the previous quarter and historical averages.

We believe that our expertise in providing non-traditional financing solutions to the lower middle-market allows us to tailor loan structures that meet borrower objectives while commanding premium pricing and maximizing the preservation of capital although increased competition could result in further spread compression.

Portfolio Activity

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, we originated two new investments, and closed new add-on investments, for a total increase to par in our portfolio of $18.1 million with a weighted average yield of 12.2%. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, repayments in our portfolio consisted of the early full repayment of three investments and partial repayments, for a total of $29.9 million of par with a weighted average yield of 11.6%.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The consolidated results of operations set forth below also includes historical financial information prior to our election, as of October 9, 2012, to be treated as a business development company. As a business development company and a RIC, we are subject to certain constraints on our operations, including limitations imposed by the 1940 Act and the Code. In addition, our portfolio of investments consists primarily of syndicated secured loans, and, over time, we expect that such loans will represent a smaller percentage of our investment portfolio as we grow our business, these investments are repaid and we invest in a different mix of assets.

The results of operations described below may not be indicative of the results we report in future periods. Net income can vary substantially from period to period for various reasons, including the recognition of realized gains and losses and unrealized gains and losses. As a result, quarterly comparisons of net income may not be meaningful.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014.

Consolidated operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 are as follows:

Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 was $7.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Net investment income increased by $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from the three months ended March 31, 2014 as described below under “Investment Income” and “Expenses.”

Investment Income

Investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 was $13.5 million and $11.3 million, respectively. Investment income increased by $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from the three months ended March 31, 2014 due to an increase in interest income in the amount of $2.4 million, an increase in other income of $0.2 million and a decrease in dividend income of $(0.4) million. The increase in interest income was largely driven by the increase in the average portfolio investment balance and an increased weighted average yield on investments during the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to March 31, 2014. The increase in other income was primarily driven by loan amendment fees recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Company did not recognize any dividend income during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Expenses

Total expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 were $5.8 million and $8.4 million, respectively.

The following tables summarize our expenses, excluding accrued excise tax for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014:

Interest expense increased $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014 primarily due to an increase in average debt outstanding. As of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, we had $228.0 million and $224.5 million of debt outstanding, respectively.

Incentive fees decreased $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from the three months ended March 31, 2014 primarily due to unrealized loss of investments which was partially offset by an increase in net investment income.

Other expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased by $0.2 million from the three months ended March 31, 2014 primarily as a result of servicing and other fees incurred by GLC Trust 2013-2.

Net Realized Gain (Loss) and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 we realized a net loss on investments of $(0.5) million and a net gain on investments of $8.9 million, respectively.

Net realized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were primarily driven by $(0.8) million of realized losses in GLC Trust 2013-2’s consumer loan portfolio offset by $0.3 million of realized gains resulting from the repayment of one portfolio investment and other partial repayments.

Net realized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were driven primarily by $8.1 million of realized gains incurred from the sale of the parent company of one portfolio company, Anchor Drilling Fluids USA, Inc. (“Anchor”), resulting in the early full repayment of the debt and sale of the equity, with the remaining net realized gain of $0.8 million resulting from the early full repayment of eight portfolio companies and other partial loss repayments.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, the net change in unrealized loss on investments was $4.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

The net change in unrealized loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was driven primarily by the negative credit related adjustments of three portfolio investments in the amount of $(4.7) million and the $(0.3) million reversal of prior period unrealized gain as a result of the repayment of one investment. This was offset by the increase in value of one portfolio investment of $0.7 million. The remaining net change in unrealized loss on investments was due to a net increase of $0.1 million in the market value of the portfolio.

The net change in unrealized loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was driven primarily by the reversal of prior period unrealized gain in the amount of $(1.8) million as a result of the sale of the parent company of Anchor. The remaining net change in unrealized loss on investments was due to the increase in the market value of the portfolio in the amount of $0.8 million offset by the reversal of prior period unrealized gain of $(0.1) million.

Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations

We had a net asset value per common share outstanding on March 31, 2015 of $15.41. We had a net asset value per common share outstanding on December 31, 2014 of $15.58.

Based on 16,758,779 basic weighted average shares outstanding, the net increase in net assets from operations per share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $0.18.

Based on 16,758,779 basic weighted average shares outstanding, the net increase in net assets from operations per share for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $0.64. 

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Consolidated operating results for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)		Year Ended December 31, 2014				Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2012(1)				2014 vs. 2013 Variance				2013 vs. 2012 Variance
Net investment income		$	22,009			$	19,335			$	8,322			$	2,674			$	11,013
Total investment income			50,459				33,805				23,649				16,654				10,156
Expenses			28,449				14,470				15,327				13,979				(857	)
Net realized gain/(loss) on investments			10,702				(11,770	)			3,374				22,472				(15,144	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments			(2,227	)			15,934				(7,322	)			(18,161	)			23,256

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $22.0 million, $19.3 million and $8.3 million, respectively. Net investment income increased by $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from the year ended December 31, 2013 and increased $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the year ended December 31, 2012, as described below under “Total Investment Income” and “Expenses.”

Total Investment Income

Total investment income for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $50.5 million, $33.8 million and $23.6 million, respectively.

Total investment income increased by $16.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from the year ended December 31, 2013 due to an increase in interest income in the amount of $14.7 million, an increase in net accretion from the amortization of discounts in the amount of $0.3 million and an increase in other income in the amount of $1.7 million.

The increase in interest income was largely driven by the increase in the average portfolio investment balance for 2014 when compared to 2013, as well as an increase in the weighted average yield of our debt investments to 10.5% in 2014 from 9.6% in 2013. The increase in other income was primarily driven by loan amendment fees as well as the recognition of fees earned on the full early repayment of 11 portfolio investments in 2014.

Total investment income increased by $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the year ended December 31, 2012 due to an increase in interest income in the amount of $9.5 million, a decrease in net accretion from the amortization of discounts in the amount of $(0.1) million and an increase in other income in the amount of $0.8 million.

The increase in interest income was largely driven by the increase in the average portfolio investment balance for 2013 when compared to 2012, as well as an increase in the weighted average yield of our debt investments to 9.8% in 2013 from 9.6% in 2012. The increase in other income was primarily driven by the recognition of fees earned on the full early repayment of ten portfolio investments in 2013.

Expenses

Total expenses for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $28.4 million, $14.5 million and $15.3 million, respectively.

There were no fee waivers for the year ended December 31, 2014. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes a $0.2 million loss on the refinancing and retirement of the GLC Trust 2013-2 revolving facility.

Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 included total fee and expense waivers of $4.2 million. Fee waivers for the year ended December 31, 2013 were comprised of $3.8 million and $0.3 million of management fees and incentive fees, respectively, waived by the Investment Adviser, and $0.1 million of administration fees and directors’ fees waived by the Administrator and the board of directors, respectively. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 also included $0.4 million of loss on the refinancing of senior secured notes, which consisted of debt issuance costs that were written off in connection with the execution of the CLO and the refinancing of the Predecessor Credit Facility.

Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 included a $3.4 million loss on the refinancing of senior secured notes. In connection with the execution of the Predecessor Credit Facility and the refinancing of Garrison Funding 2010-1 LLC, or GF 2010-1, the senior secured notes, or GF 2010-1 Notes, that comprised the collateralized loan obligation facility for which GF 2010-1 was the borrower were redeemed in accordance with the indenture governing such notes, which resulted in a loss due to the write off of deferred debt issuance costs in the amount of $2.4 million and the recognition of $1.0 million of unamortized original issue discount.

Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 also reflect a loss on the write off of deferred offering costs for the year ended December 31. 2012 in the amount $1.7 million related to legal, accounting, regulatory and printing work completed through October 10, 2012. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 also included total fee and expense waivers of $0.4 million, comprised of $0.3 of management fees waived by the Investment Adviser and $0.1 of administration fees and directors’ fees waived by the Administrator and the board of directors, respectively.

The following tables summarize our expenses, net of fee waivers and excluding the loss on refinancing of senior secured notes, the loss on the write off of deferred offering costs and the loss on refinancing of the GLC Trust 2013-2 revolving facility discussed above for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

(Dollars in thousands)		Year Ended December 31, 2014				Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2012				2014 vs. 2013 Variance				2013 vs. 2012 Variance
Interest		$	7,157			$	6,575			$	6,155			$	582			$	420
Management fees			8,065				2,510				2,277				5,555				233
Incentive fees			8,409				1,099				—				7,310				1,099
Professional fees			1,160				1,448				983				(288	)			465
Directors’ fees			379				334				262				45				72
Administrator expenses			712				686				200				26				486
Other expenses			2,324				1,391				421				933				970
		$	28,206			$	14,043			$	10,298			$	14,163			$	3,745

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interest expense increased $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to an increase in average debt outstanding. Interest expense increased $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to an increase in average debt outstanding. As of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had $241.3 million, $220.1 million and $125.0 million of debt outstanding, respectively.

Management fees increased $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to the increase in total assets, as well as the change in the calculation of the management fees at the time of our IPO. Prior to the BDC Conversion, management fees were calculated as 1.50% of gross assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds (as defined in the financial statements). Post-BDC Conversion, management fees are calculated as 1.75% of gross assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds (as defined in the financial statements). For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Investment Adviser irrevocably waived base management fees due under the Investment Advisory Agreement in excess of an annual rate of 1.50% of the average of the value of our net assets, including cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the financial statements), calculated at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2013, the Investment Adviser waived all management fees. The waived fees are not subject to recoupment by the Investment Adviser.

Management fees increased $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to the increase in the average net assets, a decrease in the average cash held during the year, as well as the change in the calculation of the management fees. Prior to the BDC Conversion date, management fees were calculated as 1.50% of gross assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds (as defined in the financial statements). Post-BDC Conversion date, management fees are calculated as 1.75% of gross assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds (as defined in the financial statements). For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Investment Adviser waived base management fees due under the Investment Advisory Agreement in excess of an annual rate of 1.50% of the average of the value of our net assets, including cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the financial statements), calculated at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters. For the period from April 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013 the Investment Adviser waived all management fees. The waived fees are not subject to recoupment by the Investment Adviser.

Incentive fees increased $7.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from the year ended December 31, 2013. Incentive fee expense increased in the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to the increase in net investment income and realized gains, as well as the expiration of the full incentive fee waivers previously granted by the Investment Adviser. The waived fees are not subject to recoupment by the Investment Adviser.

Incentive fees increased $1.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 from the year ended December 31, 2012, net of fees waivers by the Investment Adviser of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Incentive fee expense increased in the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to the expiration of the full incentive fee waivers. For the three months ended December 31, 2013, our Investment Adviser agreed to waive that portion of its income-based incentive fee, if any, necessary for the Company’s net investment income per share plus net realized gain (loss) per share (excluding any portion of realized gains (losses) that are associated with the reversal of any portion of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) attributable to periods prior to April 1, 2013) for the three months ended December 31, 2013 to equal $0.35 per share, net of fee waivers.

Professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased by $(0.3) million from the year ended December 31, 2013 as a result of a decrease in audit fees and legal fees.

Professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $0.5 million from the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of an increase in legal fees related to increased regulatory compliance requirements, as well as an increase in audit fees.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Administrator expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $0.5 million from the year ended December 31, 2012 due to the services provided by the Administrator under the Administration Agreement.

Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by $0.9 million from the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of premiums related to insurance policies entered into as a result of the completion of our IPO, an increase in ratings fees, deal related expenses, software expense and servicing and other fees incurred by GLC Trust 2013-2, as well as other expenses incurred in connection with the formation of Garrison SBIC. Accrued excise tax for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled $0.1 million.

Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $1.0 million from the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of premiums related to insurance policies entered into as a result of the Company executing its IPO, as well as ratings fees, servicing and management fees incurred by GLC Trust 2013-2 and Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Section 404 compliance-related consulting fees associated with compliance under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Net Realized Gain (Loss) and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we realized net gains on investments of $10.7 million. Net realized gains for the year ended December 31, 2014 were driven primarily by $8.4 million of realized gains incurred from the sale of the parent company of one portfolio company, Anchor Drilling Fluids USA, Inc., resulting in the early full repayment of the debt and sale of the equity, with the remaining net realized gain of $2.3 million resulting from the sale of 15 portfolio investments, early full repayment of 33 portfolio investments and other partial repayments.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, we realized net losses on investments of $(11.8) million. Net realized losses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were driven primarily by $(5.7) million of realized losses incurred as a result of the distribution-in-kind of the assets of Next Generation Vending, LLC and $(7.9) million of realized losses incurred as a result of the early full repayment of two portfolio investments and the sale of two portfolio investments. Realized net losses were offset by net realized gains of $1.8 million resulted from the early full repayment of 28 portfolio investments, the sale of 23 portfolio investments, one refinance and other partial repayments.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we realized net gains on investments of $3.4 million. Net realized gains for 2012 primarily resulted from the early full repayment of 39 portfolio investments and the sale of eight portfolio investments.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the net change in unrealized depreciation on investments was $(2.2) million. The net change in unrealized depreciation for year ended December 31, 2014 was driven primarily by the reversal of prior period unrealized appreciation in the amount of $(1.8) million as a result of the sale of the parent company of Anchor Drilling Fluids USA, Inc. and the negative credit related adjustment of three portfolio investments in the amount of $(5.3) million, offset by the increase in value of two portfolio investments in the amount of $6.1 million. The remaining net change in unrealized depreciation on investments was due to the reversal of prior period unrealized depreciation of $0.3 million and the decrease in the market value of the remaining portfolio in the amount of $(1.5) million.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the net change in unrealized appreciation on investments was $15.9 million. The net change in unrealized appreciation for the year ended December 31, 2013 was driven primarily by the $5.7 million reversal of unrealized depreciation as a result of the distribution-in-kind of the investment in Next Generation Vending, LLC, the increase in the value of one portfolio company in the amount of $1.7 million and the reversal of prior period unrealized depreciation in the amount of $7.4 million as a result of the full early repayment of two and the sale of two portfolio investments. The remaining net change in unrealized appreciation on investments is due to the increase in the market value of the remaining portfolio in the amount of $3.0 million and the reversal of prior period unrealized appreciation of $(0.5) million, offset by negative credit related adjustment of one portfolio company in the amount of $(1.4) million.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the net change in unrealized depreciation on investments was $(7.3) million. The net change in unrealized depreciation for 2012 was primarily driven by negative credit related adjustments of four portfolio investments in the amount of $(9.7) million, offset by $1.9 million due to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the reversal of prior period unrealized depreciation due to the early repayments and sales of portfolio investments, and $0.5 million as a result of the increase in the fair value of the remaining portfolio of investments primarily due to a rise in market prices for loan assets as a result of the general improvement in the credit markets.

Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations

We had a net asset value per common share outstanding on December 31, 2014 of $15.58. We had a net asset value per common share outstanding on December 31, 2013 of $15.16. We had a net asset value per common share outstanding on December 31, 2012 of $16.54.

Based on 16,758,779 basic weighted average shares outstanding, the net increase in net assets from operations per share for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.82.

Based on 15,203,166 basic weighted average shares outstanding, the net increase in net assets from operations per share for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1.55.

Based on 10,498,544 units outstanding, the net increase in members’ capital from operations per unit for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $0.42.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a business development company, we distribute substantially all of our net income to our stockholders and will have an ongoing need to raise additional capital for investment purposes. We generate cash primarily from offerings of our securities, the CLO, as described below, Garrison SBIC, other borrowings we may incur and cash flows from operations, including interest earned from the temporary investment of cash in U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less.

In addition to proceeds from public and private offerings of securities, our CLO and our GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes, as of March 31, 2015 we have identified approximately six portfolio companies with a total par value of $22.9 million and a fair value of $22.0 million which we have defined as transitory, which we define as those investments that generally yield less than 9.0%. We view these investments as an additional source of liquidity to meet our investment objectives.

Our primary use of funds from operations includes investments in portfolio companies, cash distributions to holders of our common stock, payments of interest on our debt, and payments of fees and other operating expenses we incur. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, available borrowings and our transitory portfolio as of March 31, 2015 will be sufficient to fund our anticipated funding requirements through at least March 31, 2016.

On May 21, 2012, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we entered into a $150.0 million credit facility, which was amended on June 18, 2012, August 6, 2012 and June 5, 2013, with the lenders party thereto, Natixis, New York Branch, as administrative agent, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as collateral agent and custodian. On June 5, 2013, we entered into an agreement to increase the size of its credit facility from $150.0 million to $175.0 million, consisting of $125.0 million of Class A-T loans and $50.0 million of Class A-R loans.

On September 25, 2013, we completed the CLO. All of the notes issued as part of the CLO are scheduled to mature on September 25, 2023. As of December 31, 2013 we had retained 100% of the Class C Notes and Subordinated Notes. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had approximately $0.0 and $25.0 million, respectively, available for additional borrowings under the CLO and the Predecessor Credit Facility, respectively.

On December 6, 2013, GLC Trust 2013-2 closed on a $10.0 million revolving facility, or the GLC Trust 2013-2 Revolver, with Capital One Bank, NA. The revolving facility includes an accordion feature that permits GLC Trust 2013-2 to increase the total commitment up to $15.0 million under the terms of the loan agreement. GLC Trust 2013-2 exercised this option on December 20, 2013. On July 11, 2014, we increased the GLC Trust 2013-2 revolving facility total commitment by $15.0 million, for a total commitment of $30.0 million. On July 18, 2014, we completed a $39.2 million term debt securitization collateralized by the GLC Trust 2013-2 consumer loan portfolio, the proceeds of which were used to refinance and retire the GLC Trust 2013-2 revolving facility.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On February 25, 2013, the Company declared a distribution-in-kind in the amount of $9,991,329 or $0.95 a share. Investments distributed were Next Generation Vending, LLC, Priority Revolving Loan in the amount of $2.0 million, Next Generation Vending, LLC, Revolver in the amount of $0.75 million, Next Generation Vending, LLC, Term Loan in the amount of $6.8 million, and $0.4 million of accrued interest.

On April 2, 2013, we closed our IPO, which included the sale of 6,133,334 shares of common stock, including 800,000 shares issued pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of the over-allotment option, at a public offering price of $15.00 per share, raising approximately $92.0 million in gross proceeds. The total proceeds that we received net of sales load were approximately $85.6 million and were approximately $84.9 million, net of offering expenses of approximately $0.6 million. Concurrent with the IPO, the Company’s directors, officers, employees and an affiliate of the Investment Adviser purchased an additional 126,901 shares through the Concurrent Private Placement at $15.00 per share, raising $1.9 million.

The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital per share, that we have declared on our common stock for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.

Record Dates		Board Approval Date				Payment Date				Distribution Declared				Distribution Declared per Share
Fiscal year ending December 31, 2015(1)
March 12, 2015			March 3, 2015				March 27, 2015			$	5,865,573			$	0.35
June 12, 2015			April 30, 2015				June 26, 2015				5,865,573				0.35
Total										$	11,731,146			$	0.70

The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital per share that we have declared on our common stock for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Record Dates		Board Approval Date				Payment Date				Distribution Declared				Distribution Declared per Share
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2014(1)
March 21, 2014			March 11, 2014				March 28, 2014			$	5,865,573			$	0.35
June 13, 2014			May 6, 2014				June 27, 2014				5,865,573				0.35
September 12, 2014			August 4, 2014				September 26, 2014				5,865,573				0.35
December 12, 2014			October 31, 2014				December 29, 2014				5,865,571				0.35
Total										$	23,462,290			$	1.40

The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital per share that we have declared on our common stock for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Record Dates		Board Approval Date				Payment Date				Distribution Declared				Distribution Declared per Share
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
February 25, 2013(1)			February 25, 2013				March 13, 2013			$	2,400,000			$	0.23
June 13, 2013(2)			May 9, 2013				June 27, 2013				5,865,573				0.35
September 12, 2013(2)			August 6, 2013				September 26, 2013				5,865,573				0.35
December 13, 2013(2)			November 5, 2013				December 27, 2013				5,865,587				0.35
Total										$	19,996,733			$	1.28

As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 we had cash of $20.4 million, $13.7 million, $13.7 million and $21.7 million, respectively. Also, as of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had restricted cash of $8.5 million, $14.3 million, $28.0 million and $69.9 million, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, cash increased by $6.7 million as a result of net cash provided by operating activities of $25.8 million offset by cash used in financing activities in the amount of $19.1 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, cash provided by operating activities resulted mainly from $7.7 million of net investment income, $11.9 million of net repayments of investments, a $5.8 million decrease in restricted cash and a $1.4 million increase in payables to affiliates. Net cash used in financing activities resulted from cash distributions of $5.9 million, repayments on the senior secured revolving note of $9.5 million and repayment of the GLC Trust 2013-2 Revolver of $3.8 million. 

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents increased by $12.7 million as a result of net cash provided by operating activities of $14.2 million offset by cash used in financing activities in the amount of $1.5 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, cash provided by operating activities resulted from net investment income in the amount of $10.7 million, repayments and sales of investments in the amount of $67.6 million and $24.6 million, respectively, as well as a decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $15.5 million and an increase in due to counterparties in the amount of $10.5 million, offset by purchases of investments in the amount of $109.8. Net cash used in financing activities resulted from cash distributions in the amount of $5.9 million, offset by proceeds from borrowings on the GLC Trust 2013-2 Revolver in the amount of $4.4 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, cash remained unchanged as a result of net cash provided by operating activities of $3.3 million offset by cash used in financing activities in the amount of $3.3 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, cash provided by operating activities resulted mainly from net investment income in the amount of $22.0 million, realized gains in the amount of $10.7 million, repayments and sales of investments in the amount of $293.8 million and $105.6 million, respectively, as well as a

TABLE OF CONTENTS

decrease in due from counterparties in the amount of $5.1 million, offset by purchases of investments in the amount of $427.1 million and a decrease in due to counterparties in the amount of $7.7 million. Net cash used in financing activities resulted from cash distributions in the amount of $23.5 million, repayment of the GLC Trust 2013-2 Revolver in the amount of $9.7 million and debt issuance costs of $0.5 million, offset by proceeds from the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes in the amount of $30.4 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, cash decreased by $8.0 million as a result of net cash used in operating activities of $165.8 million offset by cash provided by financing activities in the amount of $157.8 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, cash used in operating activities resulted from originations, purchases of investments and draws on previously unfunded revolvers in the amount of $435.7 million, a decrease in due to counterparties of $7.9 million and an increase in due from counterparties of $6.7 million offset by repayments and sales of investments in the amount of $161.5 million and $61.7 million, respectively, a decrease in restricted cash accounts in the amount of $42.0 million and net investment income in the amount of $19.3 million. Net cash provided by financing activities resulted from proceeds received from net capital contributions from the sale of common shares of $86.9 million and borrowings in the amount of $50.0 million on the Class A-1R Notes and $34.7 million on the Class A-1T Notes under the CLO, as well as borrowing in the amount of $9.7 million under the GLC Trust 2013-2 Revolver offset by distributions in the amount of $20.0 million and debt issuance costs of $3.5 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, cash decreased by $26.2 million as a result of net cash provided by operating activities of $99.4 million offset by cash used in financing activities in the amount of $73.2 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, cash provided by operating activities resulted from repayments and sales of investments in the amount of $191.3 million and $35.5 million, respectively, and an increase in due to counterparties in the amount of $15.7 million offset by purchases of investments in the amount of $437.0 million, an increase in restricted cash accounts in the amount of $53.0 million and net investment income in the amount of $8.3 million. Net cash used in financing activities resulted from repayments of GF 2010-1 Notes in the amount of $219.5 million, debt issuance costs of $3.2 million and distributions of $1.8 million, offset by borrowings on the Predecessor Credit Facility in the amount of $125.0 million.

As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $17.3 million, $18.2 million, $9.2 million and $2.0 million respectively, of unfunded obligations with a fair value of $(0.3) million, $(0.3) million, $(0.1) million and $(0.2) million respectively. These amounts may or may not be funded to the borrowing party now or in the future. The unfunded commitments relate to loans with various maturity dates, but the entire amount was eligible for funding to the borrowers as of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, subject to the terms of each loan’s respective credit agreement.

Subject to leverage and borrowing base restrictions, as of March 31, 2015, we had approximately $9.5 million available for additional borrowings under the CLO and no available borrowings under the GLC Trust 2013-2 Revolver. As of December 31, 2014 we had approximately $0.0 available for additional borrowings under the CLO. As of December 31, 2013 we had approximately $0.0 and $5.3 million available for additional borrowings under the CLO and GLC Trust 2013-2 revolving facility, respectively.

Portfolio Composition and Select Portfolio Information

As of December 31, 2014, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $467.8 million. As of December 31, 2014, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.8 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 10.5% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months.

As of December 31, 2013, we held investments in 70 portfolio companies with a fair value of $429.1 million. As of December 31, 2013, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $5.0 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 9.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows select information of our portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Portfolio characteristics (dollars in millions)		March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
Total Market Value		$	452.0			$	467.8			$	429.1
Number of portfolio companies			57				57				70
Average investment size(1)		$	6.7			$	6.8			$	5.0
Weighted average yield(2)			10.8	%			10.5	%			9.8	%
Weighted average price(1)			95.9				97.1				99.2
First lien			85.8	%			85.3	%			88.1	%
Second lien & mezzanine/subordinated			5.5	%			5.4	%			6.0	%
Consumer loans			6.9	%			7.8	%			3.9	%
Equity & Other			1.8	%			1.5	%			2.0	%
Originated(3)			50.4	%			48.1	%			32.3	%
Club(4)			27.0	%			27.4	%			15.8	%
Purchased			22.6	%			24.5	%			51.9	%
Fixed(1)			9.1	%			9.2	%			5.0	%
Floating(1)			90.9	%			90.8	%			95.0	%
Performing(1)			99.1	%			99.1	%			100.0	%
Non-performing(1)			0.9	%			0.9	%			—	%
Weighted average debt/EBITDA(1)(2)(5)			3.6x				3.6x				3.6x
Weighted average risk rating(1)			2.48				2.52				2.17

Inflation

Inflation has not had a significant effect on our results of operations in any of the reporting periods presented in our financial statements. However, from time to time, inflation may impact the operating results of our portfolio companies.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We may become a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of our business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. These instruments may include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of liquidity and credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $17.3 million, $18.2 million and $9.7 million of outstanding commitments to fund such investments, respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contractual Obligations

A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations as of March 31, 2015 is as follows:

		Payments Due by Period (dollars in millions)
		Less Than 1 Year				1 – 3 Years				3 – 5 Years				More Than 5 Years				Total
CLO		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	200.9			$	200.9
GLC Trust 2013-2 Class A Note			—				—				—				27.1				27.1
Unfunded commitments(1)			17.3				—				—				—				17.3
Total contractual obligations		$	17.3			$	—			$	—			$	228.0			$	245.3

We have certain contracts under which we have material future commitments. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Investment Adviser provides us with investment advisory and management services. We have agreed to pay for these services (1) a base management fee equal to a percentage of the average adjusted value of our gross assets and (2) an incentive fee based on our performance.

We entered into the Administration Agreement on October 9, 2012 with the Administrator. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator furnishes us with office facilities and equipment, provides us clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services and provides us with other administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations.

If any of the contractual obligations discussed above are terminated, our costs under any new agreements that we enter into may increase. In addition, we would likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we expect to receive under our Investment Advisory Agreement and our Administration Agreement. Any new investment advisory agreement would also be subject to approval by our stockholders.

Both the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other.

Related Party Transactions

We have entered into a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We have adopted a joint code of ethics that governs the conduct of our and our Investment Adviser’s officers, directors and employees. Our officers and directors also remain subject to the duties imposed by both the 1940 Act and the DGCL.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining such estimates could cause actual results to differ. We have identified the following as critical accounting policies.

Basis for Consolidation

Under the investment company rules and regulations pursuant to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, codified in Topic 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies, or ASC Topic 946, we are precluded from consolidating any entity other than another investment company. We generally consolidate any investment company when we own 100% of its partners’ or members’ capital or equity units. ASC Topic 946 provides for the consolidation of a controlled operating company that provides substantially all of its services to the investment company or its consolidated subsidiaries. GF 2013-2 Manager owns a 100% equity interest in the CLO, which is an investment company for accounting purposes, and also provides collateral management services solely to the CLO. As such, we have consolidated the accounts of these entities into our financial statements. Our blocker subsidiaries, Walnut Hill II LLC, Forest Park II LLC, GLC Trust 2013-2 and Garrison Capital SBIC LP are 100% owned investment companies. As such, we have consolidated the accounts of these entities into our financial statements. As a result of this consolidation, the amount outstanding under the CLO and the GLC Trust 2013-2 Notes are treated as our indebtedness.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Valuation of Portfolio Investments

We value our investments in accordance with ASC Topic 820. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC Topic 820’s definition of fair value focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs within a measurement of fair value. ASC Topic 820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following hierarchy:

The valuation process is conducted at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a portion of our valuations of portfolio companies without market quotations subject to review by the independent valuation firms each quarter.

Our portfolio consists of primarily debt investments and unsecured consumer loans. The fair value of our investments is initially determined by investment professionals of our Investment Adviser and ultimately determined by our board of directors on a quarterly basis.

In valuing our debt investments, the Investment Adviser generally uses various approaches, including, proprietary models that consider the analyses of independent valuation agents as well as credit risk, liquidity, market credit spreads, other applicable factors for similar transactions, bid quotations obtained from other financial institutions that trade in similar investments or based on bid prices provided by independent third party pricing services.

The types of factors that the board of directors may take into account when reviewing the fair value initially derived by the Investment Adviser and determining the fair value of the our debt investments generally include, as appropriate, comparison to publicly traded securities, including such factors as yield, maturity and measures of credit quality, the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business and other relevant factors.

In valuing our unsecured consumer loans, the Investment Adviser generally uses a discounted cash flow methodology based upon a set of assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value the unsecured consumer loans include prepayment and default rates derived from historical performance, actual performance as compared to historical projections and discount rates.

The types of factors that the board of directors may take into account when reviewing the fair value initially derived by the Investment Adviser and determining the fair value of the our consumer loan investments generally include, as appropriate, prepayment and default rates derived from historical performance, actual performance as compared to historical projections and discount rates.

Our board of directors has retained several independent valuation firms to review the valuation of each portfolio investment that does not have a readily available market quotation at least once during each 12-month period. To the extent a security is reviewed in a particular quarter, it is reviewed and valued by only one service provider. However, our board of directors does not intend to have de minimis investments of less than 0.5% of our total assets (up to an aggregate of 10% of our total assets) independently reviewed. Our board of directors is responsible for determining the fair value of our assets in good faith using a documented valuation policy and consistently applied valuation process.

Due to the nature of our strategy, our portfolio includes relatively illiquid investments that are privately held. Inputs into the determination of fair value of our portfolio investments require significant management judgment or estimation. This means that our portfolio valuations are based on unobservable inputs and our own assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability in question. Valuations of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

privately held investments are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determination of fair value by our board of directors may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realized upon the disposal of such investments.

The valuation process is conducted at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a portion of our valuations of portfolio companies without market quotations subject to review by the independent valuation firms each quarter. When an external event with respect to one of our portfolio companies, such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we expect to use the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate our valuation.

With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, our board of directors will undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

Net assets could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of the investments were materially higher or lower than the values that are ultimately realized upon the disposal of such investments.

Investment Transactions and Related Investment Income and Expense

We record our investment transactions on a trade date basis, which is the date when we have determined that all material terms have been defined for the transactions. These transactions could possibly settle on a subsequent date depending on the transaction type. All related revenue and expenses attributable to these transactions are reflected on the consolidated statements of operations commencing on the trade date unless otherwise specified by the transaction documents. Realized gains and losses on investment transactions are recorded on the specific identification method.

We accrue interest income if we expect that ultimately we will be able to collect it. Generally, when an interest default occurs on a loan in our portfolio, or if our management otherwise believes that the issuer of the loan will not be able to service the loan and other obligations, we will place the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest is current through payment or until a restructuring occurs, such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we remain contractually entitled to this interest. We may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. Accrued interest is written off when it becomes probable that the interest will not be collected and the amount of uncollectible interest can be reasonably estimated. For consumer loans, any loan which is 120 days past due is considered defaulted and 100% of the principal is charged off with no expected recovery or sale of defaulted receivables. We recognized $0.8 million, $1.2 million and $0.1 million in charges offs for consumer loans for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there was one loan placed on non-accrual and there were no loans placed on non-accrual as of December 31, 2013.

Any original issue discounts, as well as any other purchase discounts or premiums on debt investments, are accreted or amortized and included in interest income over the maturity periods of the investments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interest Expense

Interest expense is recorded on an accrual basis and is adjusted for amortization of deferred debt issuance costs.

Other Expenses

Certain expenses related to, but not limited to, rating fees, due diligence, valuation expenses and independent collateral appraisals may arise when we make certain investments. These expenses are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations within ratings fees and other expenses as they are incurred.

Loan Origination, Facility, Commitment and Amendment Fees

We may receive loan origination, facility, prepayment, commitment and amendment fees in addition to interest income from the loans during the life of the investment. We may receive origination fees upon the origination of an investment. Origination fees are initially deferred and reduced from the cost basis of the investment and subsequently accreted into interest income over the remaining stated term of the loan. Facility fees, sometimes referred to as asset management fees, are accrued as a percentage periodic fee on the base amount (either the funded facility amount or the committed principal amount). Commitment fees are based upon the undrawn portion committed by us and are recorded on an accrual basis. Amendment fees are paid in connection with loan amendments and waivers and are recognized upon completion of the amendments or waivers, generally when such fees are receivable. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any unamortized loan origination fees are recorded as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans and debt securities as interest income when we receive such amounts. Any such fees are included in interest income on the consolidated statement of operations.

Distributions

Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount to be paid out as a distribution is determined by our board of directors each quarter and is generally based upon the earnings estimated by management. Net realized capital gains, if any, are distributed at least annually, although we may decide to retain such capital gains for investment.

We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of our dividends and other distributions on behalf of our stockholders, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below. As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend or other distribution, then our stockholders who have not ‘opted out’ of our dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash distribution automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash distribution.

No action is required on the part of a registered stockholder to have their cash dividend or other distribution reinvested in shares of our common stock. A registered stockholder may elect to receive an entire distribution in cash by notifying American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, the plan administrator and our transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is received by the plan administrator no later than the record date for distributions to stockholders. The plan administrator will set up an account for shares acquired through the plan for each stockholder who has not elected to receive dividends or other distributions in cash and hold such shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a stockholder participating in the plan, received in writing not less than 10 days prior to the record date, the plan administrator will, instead of crediting shares to the participant’s account, issue a certificate registered in the participant’s name for the number of whole shares of our common stock and a check for any fractional share. The plan administrator is authorized to deduct a $15.00 transaction fee plus a $0.10 per share brokerage commission from the proceeds of the sale of any fractional share of common stock.

Those stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other financial intermediary may receive dividends and other distributions in cash by notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their election.

Income Tax

As a business development company, we elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code, and intend to qualify annually for such treatment.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We intend to comply with all RIC qualification provisions contained in the Code including certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements as well as the annual distribution requirements to our stockholders equal to at least 90% of “investment company taxable income.” “Investment company taxable income” is generally defined as net ordinary income plus the excess of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses. As a RIC, we do not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders in a timely manner. However, we are subject to U.S. federal income taxes at regular corporate tax rates on any net ordinary income or net capital gain not distributed to our stockholders assuming at least 90% of our investment company taxable income is annually distributed.

Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to retain taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions, and would distribute such taxable income in the next tax year. The Company would then pay a 4% excise tax on such taxable income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income, determined on a calendar basis, could exceed estimated current calendar year dividend distributions, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. During the period covered by our financial statements, the majority of the loans in our portfolio had floating interest rates, and we expect that our loans in the future will also have floating interest rates. These loans are usually based on a floating LIBOR and typically have interest rate re-set provisions that adjust applicable LIBOR under such loans to current market rates on a regular basis. In addition, the CLO has a floating interest rate provision based on a cost of funds that approximates LIBOR and we expect that any other credit facilities into which we enter in the future may have floating interest rate provisions.

Assuming that the consolidated statement of financial condition as of March 31, 2015 were to remain constant and that we took no actions to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity, the following table shows the annualized impact of hypothetical base rate changes in interest rates.

Change in interest rates		Increase (decrease) in interest income				Increase (decrease) in interest expense				Net increase (decrease) in investment income
		(dollars in thousands)
Down 25 basis points		$	—			$	(309	)		$	309
Up 50 basis points			29				1,004				(975	)
Up 100 basis points			871				2,009				(1,138	)
Up 200 basis points			4,341				4,017				324
Up 300 basis points			8,122				6,026				2,096

Although management believes that this analysis is indicative of our existing sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for changes in the credit markets, the size, credit quality or composition of the assets in our portfolio and other business developments, including indebtedness under the CLO or other borrowings, that could affect net increase in net assets resulting from operations, or net income. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that actual results would not differ materially from the statement above.

We may in the future hedge against currency and interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors, and the collateral manager may engage in similar hedging activities with respect to the obligations of the CLO, to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act and applicable commodities laws. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in currency exchange and interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the investments in our portfolio with fixed interest rates. We, our Investment Adviser and the collateral manager have not hedged any of the obligations of the CLO.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Senior Securities

Information about our senior securities is shown in the following table as of December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010. McGladrey LLP’s report on the senior securities table as of December 31, 2014 is attached as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Ernst & Young LLP’s report on the senior securities table as of December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is attached as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Class and Year		Total Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Treasury Securities(1)				Asset Coverage per Unit(2)				Involuntary Liquidating Preference per Unit(3)				Average Market Value per Unit(4)
December 31, 2014		$	241,259,941			$	2,078				—				N/A
December 31, 2013		$	220,091,676			$	2,151				—				N/A
December 31, 2012		$	125,000,000			$	2,389				—				N/A
December 31, 2011(5)		$	219,500,000			$	1,775				—				N/A
December 31, 2010(5)		$	219,500,000			$	1,730				—				N/A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

Our common stock began trading on March 27, 2013 and is currently traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “GARS”. The following table lists the high and low closing sale price for our common stock, the closing sale price as a percentage of net asset value, or NAV, and quarterly distributions per share since December 31, 2012.

Period		NAV(1)				Closing Sales Price								Premium (Discount) of High Sales Price to NAV(2)				Premium (Discount) of Low Sales Price to NAV(2)				Distributions Declared
						High				Low
Fiscal year ending December 31, 2015
Second quarter (through June 12, 2015)(3)			N/A			$	15.30			$	14.85				N/A				N/A			$	0.35
First quarter		$	15.41				15.29				14.07				(0.8	)%			(8.7	)%			0.35
Fiscal year ending December 31, 2014
Fourth quarter		$	15.58			$	15.12			$	14.00				(3.0	)%			(10.1	)%		$	0.35
Third quarter			15.59				15.33				14.11				(1.7	)			(9.5	)			0.35
Second quarter			15.64				15.30				14.08				(2.2	)			(10.0	)			0.35
First quarter			15.45				14.81				13.71				(4.1	)			(11.3	)			0.35
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
Fourth quarter		$	15.16			$	15.05			$	13.76				(0.7	)%			(9.2	)%		$	0.35
Third quarter			15.11				15.39				14.15				1.9				(6.4	)			0.35
Second quarter			15.06				15.72				14.70				4.4				(2.4	)			0.35
First quarter(4)			15.67				15.13				15.00				(3.4	)			(4.3	)			0.23

The last reported price for our common stock on June 12, 2015 was $15.00 per share. As of June 12, 2015, we had 17 stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE COMPANY

We are an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. In addition, for tax purposes we have elected to be treated as a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Code, and intend to qualify annually for such treatment.

Our investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation by making investments generally in the range of $5 million to $25 million primarily in debt securities and loans of U.S. based middle-market companies, which we define as those having annual earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation, or EBITDA, of between $5 million and $30 million. Our goal is to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns by assembling a broad portfolio of investments. Our principal investment strategies and risks reflect our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries, including the CLO, on a consolidated basis. We comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act, including those governing investment policies, capital structure, leverage, affiliated transactions and the custody of assets, on a consolidated basis with our subsidiaries, including the CLO.

We invest primarily in (1) first lien senior secured loans, (2) second lien senior secured loans, (3) “one-stop” senior secured or “unitranche” loans, (4) subordinated or mezzanine loans, (5) unsecured consumer loans and (6) to a lesser extent, selected equity co-investments in middle-market companies. We use the term “one-stop” or “unitranche” to refer to a loan that combines characteristics of traditional first lien senior secured loans and second lien or subordinated loans. We use the term “mezzanine” to refer to a loan that ranks senior only to a borrower’s equity securities and ranks junior in right of payment to all of such borrower’s other indebtedness.

We believe that the middle market offers attractive risk-adjusted returns for debt investors. Historically, we believe there has been a persistent scarcity of available capital relative to demand, which, from a lender’s perspective, has generally resulted in more favorable transaction structures, including enhanced covenant protection and increased pricing relative to larger companies. We further believe that the turmoil in the markets has exacerbated this scarcity of capital, as many traditional lenders to middle-market companies have exited the business or focused their attention on larger borrowers. In addition, we believe that middle-market companies traditionally have exhibited lower default rates and improved recoveries compared to larger borrowers and typically offer greater access to key senior managers, which we believe further enhances the attractiveness of lending to this market segment and facilitates due diligence investigations and regular monitoring.

As of March 31, 2015, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $452.0 million, including investments in 45 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of March 31, 2015 consisted of senior secured and second lien loans fair valued at $333.1 million and related indebtedness of $200.3. The loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $346.0 million as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.7 million, a weighted average yield of 10.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 44 months.

As of December 31, 2014, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $467.8 million, including investments in 47 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of December 31, 2014 consisted of senior secured loans fair valued at $339.4 million and related indebtedness of $209.7 million. As of that date, the loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $357.8 million. As of December 31, 2014, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.8 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 10.5% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months. Weighted average yield is calculated based on the fair value of the investments and interest expected to be received using the current rate of interest at the balance sheet date to maturity, excluding the effects of future scheduled principal amortizations. Weighted average yield represents the portfolio yield and may be higher than what investors will realize because it does not reflect our expenses or any sales load paid by investors.

As of December 31, 2013, we held investments in 70 portfolio companies with a fair value of $429.1 million, including investments in 56 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of December 31, 2013 consisted of senior secured loans fair valued at $331.7 million and related indebtedness of $209.7 million. As of that date, the loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $369.2 million. As of December 31, 2013, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $5.0 million, a weighted average yield on debt investments of 9.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 46 months.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Garrison Capital Advisers

Our investment activities are managed by our Investment Adviser, Garrison Capital Advisers. Our Investment Adviser is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting research and diligence on prospective investments and equity sponsors, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring our investments and monitoring our investments and portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. Garrison Capital Advisers was organized in November 2010 and is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, or the Advisers Act. See “The Adviser and the Administrator — Investment Advisory Agreement” for a discussion of the base management fee and incentive fee, including the cumulative income incentive fee and the income and capital gains incentive fee, payable by us to our Investment Adviser. Unlike most closed-end funds whose fees are based on assets net of leverage, our base management fee is based on our average-adjusted gross assets (including leverage, unrealized depreciation or appreciation on derivative instruments, and cash collateral on deposit with custodian but adjusted to exclude cash and cash equivalents so that investors do not pay the base management fee on such assets) and, therefore, our Investment Adviser benefits when we incur debt or use leverage. For purposes of the Investment Advisory Agreement, cash equivalents means U.S. government securities and commercial paper instruments maturing within 270 days of purchase (which is different than the definition under GAAP, which defines cash equivalents as U.S. government securities and commercial paper instruments maturing within 90 days of purchase). Additionally, under the incentive fee structure, our Investment Adviser benefits when capital gains are recognized and, because it determines when a holding is sold, our Investment Adviser controls the timing of the recognition of capital gains. Our board of directors is charged with protecting our interests by monitoring how our Investment Adviser addresses these and other conflicts of interest associated with its management services and compensation. While not expected to review or approve each borrowing, our independent directors periodically review Garrison Capital Advisers’ services and fees as well as its portfolio management decisions and portfolio performance. In connection with these reviews, our independent directors consider whether our fees and expenses (including those related to leverage) remain appropriate. See “The Adviser and the Administrator — Investment Advisory Agreement — Board of Directors Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement.”

Garrison Capital Advisers is an affiliate of Garrison Investment Group. Garrison Capital Advisers has entered into the Staffing Agreement with Garrison Investment Group. See “Related Party Transactions and Certain Relationships — Staffing Agreement” for a discussion of the Staffing Agreement. We believe that the Staffing Agreement provides our Investment Adviser with access to investment opportunities, which we refer to in the aggregate as deal flow, generated by Garrison Investment Group in the ordinary course of its business and commits the members of Garrison Investment Group’s investment committee to serve as members of our investment committee. Garrison Investment Group has conducted due diligence on more than 500 middle-market companies since July 2007. Our Investment Adviser is obligated to allocate investment opportunities among us and its other clients fairly and equitably over time in accordance with the written allocation policy of Garrison Investment Group and its affiliate investment advisers, including our Investment Adviser. See “Related Party Transactions and Certain Relationships.” However, there can be no assurance that such opportunities will be allocated to us fairly or equitably in the short-term or over time. Our Investment Adviser seeks to capitalize on the significant deal origination, credit underwriting, due diligence, investment structuring, execution, portfolio management and monitoring experience of Garrison Investment Group’s investment professionals.

Garrison Capital Administrator

Garrison Capital Administrator, an affiliate of Garrison Capital Advisers, provides the administration services necessary for us to operate. The Administrator furnishes us with office facilities and equipment and provides us clerical, bookkeeping, recordkeeping and other administrative services at such facilities. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records we are required to maintain and preparing our reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, the Administrator also assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, oversees the preparation and filing of our tax returns, printing and disseminating reports to our stockholders and generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. The Administrator may retain third parties to assist in providing administrative services to us. To the extent that the Administrator outsources any of its functions, we pay the fees associated with such functions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

on a direct basis without profit to the Administrator. We reimburse the Administrator for the allocable portion (subject to the review and approval of our board of directors) of the Administrator’s overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, the fees and expenses associated with performing compliance functions, and our allocable portion of the cost of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. The Administrator also provides on our behalf significant managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide such assistance.

Garrison Investment Group

Garrison Investment Group is an alternative investment and asset management firm founded in March 2007. As of March 31, 2015, Garrison Investment Group had approximately $4.2 billion of committed and invested capital under management and a team of 76 employees, including 45 investment professionals. Garrison Investment Group is headquartered in New York, New York. Garrison Investment Group invests opportunistically in the debt of middle-market companies, primarily in the areas of corporate finance, real estate finance and structured finance.

Since the formation of Garrison Investment Group, Mr. Joseph Tansey and his team of investment professionals, including Rafael Astruc, Brian Chase, Mitch Drucker, and Susan George, have been investors and lenders to middle-market companies. These investment professionals have significant experience investing in a broad range of industries and types of debt over the course of several economic cycles.

Before joining Garrison Investment Group, Mr. Tansey was a Managing Director at Fortress and was also a partner of Drawbridge from its inception in August 2002 to March 2007. Drawbridge focused primarily on investments in opportunistic debt and equity securities and asset-based transactions. His responsibilities included sourcing, evaluating, structuring, managing and monitoring corporate, structured finance and real estate investments, including both debt and equity. Mr. Tansey has 20 years of investment experience.

Market Opportunity

We pursue an investment strategy focused on investing in first lien, second lien, unitranche and mezzanine loans of, and, to a lesser extent, warrants and minority positions in equity securities in, U.S. middle-market companies. We find investing in middle-market companies attractive for the following reasons:

Reduced Competition.  We believe that, since 2007, dislocations in the corporate financing markets have reduced the amount of credit available to middle-market companies. In particular, we believe that much of the traditional lending community for lower middle-market companies, such as commercial/regional banks and commercial finance companies, have contracted their origination activities in the wake of these credit dislocations or focused on more liquid asset classes. The implementation of Basel III, published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, is expected to limit the ability of commercial banking institutions to hold non-investment grade leveraged loans on their balance sheets.

Attractive Relative Value Proposition.  We believe that directly originated middle-market loans often exhibit superior default and loss characteristics to syndicated loans, which are often structured with higher levels of debt and a lower percentage of contributed equity. Meanwhile, reduced access to, and availability of, credit typically increases the interest rates, or pricing, of loans made to U.S. middle-market borrowers, thereby creating an attractive risk-return dynamic for lenders.

Conservative Capital Structure and Increased Percentage of Equity Contributed.  Since the 2007 downturn, we believe that lenders have generally required borrowers to hold more equity as a percentage of their total capitalization and less senior and total leverage than was customary in the years leading up to the credit crisis, resulting in a greater amount of equity to protect lenders against future economic downturns. Lower leverage levels in mergers and acquisitions executed in the middle market suggest that middle-market companies should have more cash flows available to them to service their debt.

Long-Term Capital Solutions.  We believe that many middle-market companies seek to execute transactions with permanent capital vehicles, such as us, rather than execute high-yield bond transactions or borrow capital from hedge funds and other non-permanent vehicles.

We believe these factors, taken together, should increase lending opportunities for us.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Competitive Strengths

Experienced Management Team.  We are managed by our Investment Adviser, which has access through the Staffing Agreement to the resources and expertise of the investment professionals at Garrison Investment Group. Garrison Investment Group is led by Mr. Tansey. Garrison Investment Group’s investment professionals have substantial experience in identifying and executing financing transactions across a broad range of industries and types of financings and have developed related proprietary sourcing and servicing channels. Our five member investment committee has combined investment experience of more than 120 years. Our five member investment committee is currently comprised of the following individuals: Joseph Tansey, Rafael Astruc, Brian Chase, Mitch Drucker and Susan George.

Access to Deal Flow.  Through the Staffing Agreement, our Investment Adviser has access to extensive contacts throughout the middle-market, which it utilizes to source and originate loans. The investment professionals of Garrison Investment Group maintain direct dialogue with their contacts at financial sponsors, banks, corporate advisory firms, crisis managers, industry consultants, attorneys, investment banks, middle-market companies, other “club” investors and other potential sources of lending opportunities. Garrison Investment Group’s senior professionals have cultivated relationships with other middle-market lending platforms that we believe will provide us with an additional source of deal flow.

Disciplined Investment and Underwriting Process.  Our Investment Adviser utilizes the established investment processes developed by Garrison Investment Group to analyze investment opportunities, including structuring loans with appropriate covenants and pricing loans based on its knowledge of the middle market and on its rigorous underwriting standards. Our Investment Adviser focuses on capital preservation by extending loans to portfolio companies with assets that it believes will retain sufficient value to repay us even in depressed markets or under liquidation scenarios.

Active Asset Management Approach.  Our Investment Adviser employs a rigorous credit monitoring system for our portfolio, which enhances the ability of our Investment Adviser to manage any problems and assist borrowers before operating issues result in financial deterioration. In addition, this process enables our Investment Adviser to identify credit and market trends, thereby allowing us to modify underwriting terms for new loans before other lenders have identified such trends. In the event of restructurings, we expect that our Investment Adviser will manage syndicates of lenders, creditor committees and other creditors and advisors to protect our position.

Investment Criteria/Guidelines

Our investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation by making investments generally in the range of $5 million to $25 million primarily in debt securities and loans of middle-market companies. We may also selectively make investments in amounts larger than $25 million in certain of our portfolio companies. We generally expect that the size of our individual investments will vary proportionately with the size of our capital base. Our goal is to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns by assembling a broad portfolio of investments.

Target businesses typically exhibit some or all of the following characteristics:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

While we believe that the criteria listed above are important in identifying and investing in prospective portfolio companies, not all of these criteria will be met by each prospective portfolio company.

Investment Strategy

We seek to create a broad portfolio consisting of investments generally in the range of $5 million to $25 million primarily in debt securities and loans of U.S. based middle-market companies. The companies to which we extend credit typically are moderately leveraged, and, in most cases, do not have their loans rated by national rating agencies. If such companies were rated, we believe that they would typically receive a rating below investment grade. In addition, our investments typically range in maturity from one to six years. However, we may make investments in securities with any maturity or duration.

We invest opportunistically in middle-market loans that we believe have attractive risk adjusted returns. We also, to a lesser extent, make select equity investments in non-investment grade companies and acquire consumer loans. We expect the majority of our focus to generally be centered upon traditional direct lending but at times will seek to enhance returns by purchasing loans in the secondary market, which purchases we refer to as capital markets activities, and extending credit for certain restructuring of financially troubled companies, which we refer to as special situations. We organize these lending opportunities in four categories.

Traditional Direct Lending.  We focus on direct origination of first lien senior secured loans, second lien senior secured loans and unitranche loans as well as select mezzanine loans. With respect to these loans, we identify lending opportunities through the extensive origination network to which we have access and serve as either sole lender or as a partner with like-minded creditors. We expect that we will typically extend first and second lien secured term loans, the proceeds of which may be used to refinance existing indebtedness or support acquisitions, growth initiatives, general corporate liquidity or operational turnarounds.

Capital Markets Activities.  We may also acquire loans in the secondary market, generally at favorable discounts, or seek to refinance outstanding loans through anchoring or co-anchoring a new issuance of debt. We believe the experience of the investment professionals to whom our Investment Adviser has access allows us to react quickly in executing acquisitions of loans in the secondary market on favorable terms and permit us to refinance loans on a streamlined basis.

Consumer Loans.  We may also opportunistically acquire unsecured consumer loans that we believe have attractive risk adjusted returns.

Special Situations.  We may also extend credit for out-of-court restructurings, rescue financings, debtor-in-possession financings and acquisition financings. We expect that, in extending credit to special situations borrowers, we will seek to structure our investments to remain high in the borrower’s capital structure, generate returns through the duration of the loan and obtain call protection or opportunities for enhanced returns through equity participation.

We expect that, from time to time, our investments may include certain non-qualifying assets, including assets of non-U.S. companies, certain publicly traded companies and, to a lesser extent and subject to certain limits under the 1940 Act, registered or unregistered investment companies, to the extent permissible under the 1940 Act. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure — The lack of experience of our Investment Adviser in operating under the constraints imposed on us as a business development company and RIC may hinder the achievement of our investment objectives.” and “Regulation — Qualifying Assets.”

Due Diligence

We believe it is critical to conduct extensive due diligence on investment targets and in evaluating new investments. We, through our Investment Adviser, conduct a rigorous due diligence process that draws from our Investment Adviser’s investment experience, industry expertise and network of contacts. Our Investment Adviser conducts extensive due diligence and performs thorough credit analysis on each potential portfolio company investment. In conducting due diligence, our Investment Adviser uses publicly available information

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and private information provided by borrowers, their financial sponsors and their advisors. Our Investment Adviser uses its relationships with former and current management teams, consultants, competitors and investment bankers to gain further insights into businesses and industries, generally, and our potential portfolio companies, specifically.

Our due diligence typically includes the following elements (although not all elements will necessarily form part of each due diligence review):

Additional due diligence with respect to any investment may be conducted on our behalf by attorneys and independent accountants as well as other outside advisers, as appropriate.

Investment Committee

Upon the completion of due diligence and a decision to proceed with an investment in a prospective portfolio company, the principals leading the investment present the investment opportunity to our Investment Adviser’s investment committee, which determines whether to pursue the potential investment. All new investments are required to be reviewed by the investment committee of our Investment Adviser, which currently consists of the following five members: Joseph Tansey, Rafael Astruc, Brian Chase, Mitch Drucker and Susan George. As our Investment Adviser adds senior investment professionals, our Investment Adviser may add them to its investment committee. The members of our investment committee receive no compensation from us. These members are employees or partners of Garrison Investment Group and receive no direct compensation from our Investment Adviser.

Investment Structure

When our Investment Adviser or, in the case of the CLO, the collateral manager, determines that a prospective portfolio company is suitable for investment, it works with the company’s management and its other capital providers to structure an investment. Our Investment Adviser negotiates among these parties to agree how our investment should be structured relative to the other capital in such company’s capital structure.

We structure our loans (other than unsecured consumer loans) as follows:

Secured Loans.  We typically structure these loans, which include unitranche loans, with either a first or second lien security interest in the portfolio company’s assets that will support the repayment of such loans. First and second lien senior secured loans may provide for moderate loan amortization in the early years of the loan, with the majority of the amortization deferred until loan maturity, but in all cases amortization will be based on the free cash flows generated by the portfolio company and available for debt service. Unitranche loans typically provide for moderate loan amortization in the initial years of the facility, with the majority of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the amortization deferred until loan maturity. Unitranche loans also generally allow the borrower to make a large lump sum payment of principal at the end of the loan term. There is a risk of loss if the borrower is unable to pay the lump sum or refinance the amount owed at maturity. In these cases, maturity extension or restructuring may be necessary to preserve collateral and enterprise value. Secured loans may include a PIK interest feature, although we typically structure loans so that a majority of the interest will be paid in cash.

Special Situations Loans.  These loans may be either secured or unsecured and often support an operational or financial restructuring. These loans may also include situations that require unusual speed to closing or structural flexibility. In some cases we structure these loans as secured debtor-in-possession or bankruptcy exit loans. We seek to obtain security interests in the assets of the portfolio company borrowers, which serve as collateral in support of the repayment of such loans. Such collateral may take the form of first-priority or second-priority liens on the assets of the portfolio company borrower. Our special situation loans may provide for moderate loan amortization in the early years of the loan, with the majority of the amortization deferred until loan maturity, and may include a PIK interest feature, although we expect that a majority of the interest will be paid in cash.

Unsecured Loans.  We typically structure unsecured loans as subordinated loans that provide for relatively high, fixed interest rates and provide us with significant current interest income, with the exception of unsecured consumer loans, which are not subordinated. These loans typically have interest-only payments (often representing a combination of cash pay and PIK interest) in the early years, with the amortization of principal deferred to maturity. Mezzanine loans, which are often unsecured, generally allow the borrower to make a large lump sum payment of principal at the end of the loan term. There is a risk of loss if the borrower is unable to pay the lump sum or refinance the amount owed at maturity. We expect that mezzanine loans will typically provide for a portion of the interest to be PIK. In these cases, maturity extension or restructuring could be necessary to preserve collateral and enterprise value.

Warrants and Minority Equity Securities.  In some cases, we may receive nominally priced warrants or options to buy a minority equity interest in a portfolio company in connection with a loan. As a result, if such a portfolio company appreciates in value, we may achieve additional investment return. We may also structure warrants to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder, as well as a “put,” or right to sell such securities back to the issuer upon the occurrence of specified events. In many cases, we may seek to obtain registration rights in connection with these equity interests, which may include demand and “piggy-back” registration rights.

We tailor the terms of each investment to the facts and circumstances of the transaction and the prospective portfolio company, negotiating a structure that protects our rights and manages risk while creating incentives for the portfolio company to achieve its business plan and improve its operating results. We typically seek to limit the downside potential of our investments by:

We expect to hold most of our investments to maturity or repayment but may sell some investments earlier if liquidity events occur, such as a sale, recapitalization or worsening of the credit quality of the portfolio company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ongoing Monitoring

We view active portfolio monitoring as a vital part of the investment process. Our Investment Adviser monitors the financial trends of each portfolio company to determine if it is meeting its respective business plan and to assess the appropriate course of action for each company.

Our Investment Adviser uses several methods of evaluating and monitoring the performance and fair value of our investments, which may include the following:

Our Investment Adviser assigns an internal rating for each of our portfolio companies. The rating scale is a numeric scale of 1 to 4 based on the credit attributes and prospects of the portfolio company’s business. In general, we use the ratings as follows:

The following table shows the distribution of our investments on the 1 to 4 investment performance rating scale at fair value, excluding our interest in GLC Trust 2013-2 and equity investments as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and our interest in GLC Trust 2013-2 as of December 31, 2013:

		As of March 31, 2015								As of December 31, 2014								As of December 31, 2013
($ in millions)		Investments at Fair Value				Percentage of Total Investments				Investments at Fair Value				Percentage of Total Investments				Investments at Fair Value				Percentage of Total Investments
Risk Rating 1		$	34.9				8.5	%		$	5.4				1.3	%		$	2.9				0.7	%
Risk Rating 2			176.9				42.8				211.6				49.9				338.3				78.8
Risk Rating 3			187.8				45.5				199.1				46.9				87.4				20.4
Risk Rating 4			13.4				3.2				8.2				1.9				0.5				0.1
		$	413.0				100.0	%		$	424.3				100.0	%		$	429.1				100.0	%

The weighted average risk rating of the portfolio was 2.48, 2.52 and 2.17 as of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The weighted average risk rating of the portfolio has increased since 2013 which we attribute to the migration of our portfolio into our core investment strategy and not indicative of any overall negative credit trends in the portfolio.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investments

We seek to create a diverse portfolio that includes senior secured, unitranche, mezzanine and unsecured loans and warrants and minority equity securities by making investments generally in the range of $5 million to $25 million in U.S. based middle-market companies. Set forth below is a list of our ten largest portfolio company investments as of March 31, 2015, as well as the top ten industries in which we were invested as of March 31, 2015, in each case calculated as a percentage of our total investments as of such date.

Managerial Assistance

As a business development company, we offer, and must provide upon request, managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. This assistance could involve monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and financial guidance. Garrison Capital Administrator or an affiliate of Garrison Capital Administrator provides such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio companies that request this assistance. We may receive fees for these services and reimburse Garrison Capital Administrator

TABLE OF CONTENTS

or an affiliate of Garrison Capital Administrator for its allocated costs in providing such assistance, subject to the review and approval by our board of directors, including our independent directors.

Competition

Our primary competitors who provide financing to middle-market companies include public and private funds, including other business development companies, commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies, and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds. In periods of economic recovery and expansion, we expect that we may face enhanced competition. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company and that the Code imposes on us as a RIC. For additional information concerning the competitive risks we face, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure — The highly competitive market for investment opportunities in which we operate may limit our investment opportunities.”

Administration

We do not have any direct employees, and our day-to-day operations are managed by our Investment Adviser. We have a chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and, to the extent necessary, our board of directors may elect to appoint additional personnel going forward. Our officers are employees of Garrison Investment Group LP, an affiliate of our Investment Adviser, and our allocable portion of the cost of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs are paid by us pursuant to an administration agreement with the Administrator, or the Administration Agreement. Some of our executive officers described under “Management” are also officers of Garrison Capital Advisers. See “The Adviser and The Administrator — Administration Agreement.”

Properties

We do not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our operation. Our headquarters are located at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 914, New York, New York 10104 and are provided by the Administrator pursuant to the Administration Agreement. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate to our business.

Legal Proceedings

We, Garrison Capital Advisers, the Administrator and our wholly-owned subsidiaries are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PORTFOLIO COMPANIES

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2015 for each portfolio company in which we had an investment. Other than these investments, our only formal relationships with our portfolio companies are the managerial assistance that we may provide upon request and the board observer or participation rights we may receive in connection with our investment. See “Regulation — Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies.” We do not “control” and are not an “affiliate” of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the 1940 Act. In general, under the 1940 Act, we would “control” a portfolio company if we owned more than 25% of its voting securities and would be an “affiliate” of a portfolio company if we owned five percent or more of its voting securities.

As of March 31, 2015, we held investments in 57 portfolio companies with a fair value of $452.0 million, including investments in 45 portfolio companies held through the CLO. The investments held by the CLO as of March 31, 2015 consisted of senior secured and second lien loans fair valued at $333.1 million and related indebtedness of $200.3. The loans held by the CLO (held at fair value), together with cash and other assets held by the CLO, equaled approximately $346.0 million as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, our portfolio had an average investment size of approximately $6.7 million, a weighted average yield of 10.8% and a weighted average contractual maturity of 44 months. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” We do not believe that there are any material differences in the underwriting standards that were used to evaluate these investments and the underwriting standards described in this prospectus that we expect to implement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS