Our total revenues decreased 25% to $1,172,498 for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $1,556,970 for the year ended October 31, 2011, a decrease of $384,472. The decrease is due to reduced real estate revenue from virtual tours due to drop in available listings in a tough real estate environment.

Revenues from real estate decreased 16% to $1,125,076 for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $1,335,577 for the year ended October 31, 2011, a decrease of $210,501. The decrease is due to the decline of virtual tours due to drop in available listings in a tough real estate environment.

Revenues from other sources, consulting, decreased 79% to $47,422 for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $221,393 for the year ended October 31, 2011, a decrease of $173,971. This decrease was due to reduced real estate revenue from virtual tours due to drop in available listings in a tough real estate environment.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenues decreased 24% to $105,116 for year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $137,557 for the year ended October 31, 2011, a decrease of $32,441. The decrease in costs was primarily associated with the Company’s decrease in costs associated with the decrease in virtual tours due to drop in available listings in a tough real estate environment.

Operating Expenses

Our total operating expenses decreased 14% or $336,082 to $2,068,823 for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $2,404,905 for the year ended October 31, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in: selling and promotional costs of $157,942, professional fees of $35,483, consulting fees of $320,002, travel and entertainment of $46,842 and dues and subscriptions of $30,030; offset by an increase in salaries and benefits of $161,051, legal and accounting fees of $30,104, rent of $7,509, telephone of $5,458, web hosting of $11,034, office expense of $16,372 and other miscellaneous operating expense of $22,688.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest income increased 19% to $38,221 for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $32,032 for year ended October 31, 2011, an increase of $6,189 primarily due to additional investment. Foreign exchange gains increased 299% to $38,221 for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to loss of $19,177 for year ended October 31, 2011, an increase of $57,398 primarily due to fluctuations in the exchange rates Gain on sale of marketable securities decrease 100% to $-0- for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to a gain of $110,552 for the year ended October 31, 2012 primarily due to no marketable securities in 2012. Other expense decreased 100% to $-0- for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $59,343 for year ended October 31, 2011, an decrease of $59,343 primarily due to a one time non recurring charge incurred during consolidation.

Net Loss

Net loss increased 1% to $963,220 for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to net loss of $953,460 for the year end October 31, 2011, a decrease of $9,760 primarily due to the reduced revenue offset by reduced costs.

Assets and Employees; Research and Development

We do not currently anticipate purchasing any equipment or other assets in the near term, however, as we expand operations, we will need additional equipment and employees to create and market our products.

Liquidity and Capital Resources; Anticipated Financing Needs

At October 31, 2012, the Company had $36,408 cash on-hand, a decrease of $74,829 from $111,237 at the start of fiscal 2012. The decrease in cash was due primarily to operating expenses.

Net cash used in operating activities was $45,569 for the year ended October 31, 2012, a decrease of $551,307 from $596,876 used during the year ended October 31, 2011. This decrease was due to an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities offset by a reduction in the gain on sale and the decrease of marketable securities and deferred revenue.

Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $463,161 to $29,260, for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to $433,901 for the year ended October 31, 2011.  This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in payments on notes payable.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. We evaluate these estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our significant estimates are determining some of the inputs for our stock option fair value calculation and assessing the valuation allowance for income taxes.

We consider the following accounting policies to be those most important to the portrayal of our results of operations and financial condition:

Revenue Recognition. Real estate brokerage revenues were recognized at the closing of a real estate transaction. Fees due to third party real estate agents or clients are accrued at the time of closing and treated as an offset to gross revenues.

Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from the difference between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax amounts are determined using the tax rates expected to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds received, as provided under currently enacted tax law. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense or benefit is the tax payable or refundable, respectively, for the period plus or minus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets as of October 31, 2011 and 2010 because realization of those assets is not reasonably assured.

The Company will recognize a financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.

The Company believes its income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained upon examination and, accordingly, no reserves, or related accruals for interest and penalties has been recorded at October 31, 2011 and 2010.

Share-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock incentive plans by measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on estimated fair values, net of estimated forfeitures. Share-based compensation expense recognized for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010 includes compensation cost for restricted stock awards and stock options. The Company uses the Black- Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted as of the grant date.

The Company reviews the outstanding receivables on a monthly basis and receivables are considered past due when payment has not been received 30 days after a transaction closes. Management provides for probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to a valuation allowance based on its assessment of the current status of individual accounts. Balances that are still outstanding after management has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to receivables. Historically, the Company has not experienced significant losses related to receivables from individual customers. At October 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company considers its accounts receivable to be fully collectible and therefore, has not recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Office Equipment and Fixtures. Office equipment and fixtures are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. When items of property or equipment are sold or retired, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operating income.

Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

Intangible Assets.

On October 9, 2012, the Company entered a Share Exchange Agreement (Note 1). The Company accounted for the acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations”. The Company is the acquiree for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the Company applied push-down accounting and has recorded the intangible asset as described herein.

* The Company is in review of the facts and circumstances surrounding events to determine if the carrying amount of held-and-used identifiable amortized intangibles acquired during the October 2012 acquisition may be reallocated under the provisions of ASC 350 and ASC 805. The Company has until October 2013 (12 months) to determine the final allocations and it is studying a reallocation with more emphasis on “customer relationships and customer lists”. No amortization has been calculated based on the original allocations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2011-05 – Presentation of comprehensive income

ASU 2011-05 was the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now requires entities to present all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements.

All entities that report OCI items will be impacted by the changes in this ASU. The components of OCI have not changed, nor has the guidance on when OCI items are reclassified to net income; however, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.

The amendments to ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, included in ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, are effective for fiscal years and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (that is, the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012 for calendar-year entities) for public entities and for interim and annual periods thereafter. The amended guidance must be applied retrospectively and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this recently issued accounting pronouncement to have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Seasonality of Business

The residential real estate market has traditionally experienced seasonality, with a peak in the spring and summer seasons and a decrease in activity during the fall and winter seasons. Revenues in each quarter can be significantly affected by activity during the prior quarter, given the time lag between contract execution and closing. A typical real estate transaction has a 30 day lag between contract signing and closing of the transaction.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See financial statements starting on page 29.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of October 31, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Based on this evaluation and taking into account that certain material weaknesses existed as of October 31, 2011, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.  As a result of this conclusion, the financial statements for the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K were prepared with particular attention to the material weaknesses previously disclosed. Notwithstanding the material weaknesses in internal controls that continue to exist as of October 31, 2011, we have concluded that the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K present fairly, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2011. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.  In connection with the assessment described above, management has re-evaluated the control deficiencies identified in the prior fiscal year.

We conclude that, as of October 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by COSO.  We intend to further improve our internal controls in our current fiscal year and add additional measures to further mitigate our material internal control weaknesses as the Company grows assuming our operating funds are sufficient.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended October 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that the material weaknesses in internal control as described in Item 9A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2011 have not been fully remediated. 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

On December 21, 2012, the Board of Directors accepted Rob Buntz’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer and appointed Bill Kerby as new Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Buntz will remain as a Director. Also approved as Directors to the Board were Don Monaco, Phil Bliss and Doug Checkeris. Phil Bliss was appointed to be the Chief Information Officer, Steve Marques was appointed Chief Revenue Officer, Doug Checkeris was appointed Acting Chief Marketing Officer and Adam Friedman was appointed Chief Financial Officer.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors, Executive Officers and Other Key Employees

Our Board of Directors and management team includes:

Biographies for the members of our Board of Directors and our management team are set forth below:

William Kerby – Chief Executive Officer and Chairman:

On December 21, 2012, the board of directors of the Company appointed William Kerby, age 55, to the position of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company. Mr. Kerby, age 55 is the founder of Next 1, Interactive, Inc. From 2008 to present, he has been the architect of the Next 1 model, overseeing the development and operations of the Travel, Real Estate and Media divisions of the company. From 2004 to 2008, Mr. Kerby served as the Chairman and CEO of Extraordinary Vacations Group whose operations included Cruise & Vacation Shoppes, Maupintour Extraordinary Vacations and the Travel Magazine - a TV series of 160 travel shows. From 2002 to 2004 Mr. Kerby was Chairman of Cruise & Vacation Shoppes after it was acquired by a small group of investors and management from Travelbyus. Mr. Kerby was given the mandate to expand the operations focusing on a “marketing driven travel model.” In June 2004 Cruise & Vacation Shoppe was merged into Extraordinary Vacations Group. From 1999 to 2002 Mr. Kerby founded and managed Travelbyus, a publicly traded company on the TSX and NASD Small Cap. The launch included an intellectually patented travel model that utilized technology-based marketing to promote its travel services and products. Mr. Kerby negotiated the acquisition and financing of 21Companies encompassing multiple tour operators, 2,100 travel agencies, media that included print, television, outdoor billboard and wireless applications and leading edge technology in order to build and complete the Travelbyus model. The company had over 500 employees, gross revenues exceeding $3 billion and a Market Cap over $900 million. Prior to this Mr. Kerby founded Leisure Canada – a company that included a nationwide Travel Agency, international tour operations, travel magazines and the Master Franchise for Thrifty Car Rental British Columbia.

Adam Friedman - Chief Financial Officer:

On December 21, 2012, the board of directors of the Company appointed Adam Friedman, age 48, to the position of Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Friedman has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Next 1 Interactive, Inc. since 2010 From 2006 to 2010, Mr. Friedman had previously served as Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary, and Controller for MDwerks, Inc. (“MDwerks”) where his responsibilities included overseeing the company’s finances, human resources department, U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission compliance, and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. Prior to joining MDwerks, Mr. Friedman served as the Vice President of Finance for CSA Marketing, Inc. from 2005 to 2006. For the eleven years prior to 2005, Mr. Friedman served as the Business Manager/Controller and Director of Financial Planning at the GE/NBC/Telemundo Group, Inc. Mr. Friedman also worked as a Senior Financial Analyst for Knight-Ridder, Inc and as an Audit Senior Accountant for KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Friedman received his MBA from St. Thomas University and his BSM from Tulane University.

Don Monaco - Director:

On December 21, 2012, the Company appointed Don Monaco, 60, as a member of its Board of Directors. Mr. Monaco is the principal owner of Monaco Air Duluth, LLC, a full service, fixed-base operator aviation services business at Duluth International Airport serving airline, military and general aviation customers. Mr. Monaco spent over 18 years as a Partner and Senior Executive and has 28 years as an international information technology and business management consultant with Accenture in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Monaco also serves as a Commissioner on the Metropolitan Airports Commission in Minneapolis-St. Paul and as Commissioner and President of the Duluth Economic Development Authority. Mr. Monaco is also the President of the Monaco Air Foundation, Vice-Chairman of the Miller-Dwan Foundation, Treasurer of Honor Flight Northland, Treasurer of the Duluth Aviation Institute, Co-Chair of the Northern Aero Alliance, and a member of Lake Superior College's Center for Advanced Aviation Steering Committee. The Company believes that Mr. Monaco’s senior management experience qualifies him to be a member of the Board.

Doug Checkeris - Director:

On December 21, 2012, the Company appointed Doug Checkeris, 57, as a member of its Board of Directors. Mr. Checkeris is a Senior Media and Advertising Executive with nearly three decades of hands-on management in all facets of interactive media. Doug’s work experience includes 14 years of service with Mediacom where he rose through the ranks to become the CEO for Mediacom North America, until recently headquartered in New York. With close to $18 billion in global billings, 4,600 employees, and 116 offices in 89 countries, Mediacom provides and specializes in business-building media solutions for some of the world’s largest, well-known advertisers. Previous to Mediacom, Doug started his career in a media company in Toronto, Canada, and was a partner when the company was acquired by Grey Worldwide and the WPP.

Philip Bliss - Director:

On December 21, 2012, the Company appointed Phil Bliss, 64, as its Chief Information Officer and a member of its Board of Directors. Mr. Bliss is a digital marketing pioneer who has been at the forefront of digital media development for the past twenty years. Mr. Bliss provides marketing, product and technology leadership, as well as providing strategy, development and marketing expertise to companies that want to leverage their digital assets. Mr. Bliss has built and sold four companies and been a strategic advisor, product marketer and director to many start-ups in the technology sector. In the last seventeen years he has built, managed or launched hundreds of web sites, built and marketed twelve products and consulted with numerous large and small organizations on their technology products and web strategies. Over the past six years he has built a number of new products and process for the Higher Education sector and consulted with many universities and colleges through their web renewal activities. His national and international track record includes many technology, educational, non-profit, and American Indian companies including the Smithsonian Institution, University of Toronto, Brock University, Microsoft, NEC, Samsung, and Cisco Systems.

Robert A. Buntz, Jr. - Director:

On December 21, 2012, the Company accepted the resignation of Robert Buntz, Jr.,61, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, but retained him as a member of its Board of Directors. Mr. Buntz has served as a director of the Company, including Webdigs, LLC, since inception in May 2007. Mr. Buntz has been an entrepreneur for more than 30 years and a real estate broker for more than 25. In 1981, Mr. Buntz developed the award-winning Bluefin Bay on Lake Superior, Tofte, Minnesota, and operated that resort until 2007. Among his achievements, Mr. Buntz’s development company donated the land, time and funding to help create the North Shore Commercial Fishing Museum and Mr. Buntz created and developed one of the first rural affordable housing projects, Tofte Homestead. From 1984 through 2006, and while he was simultaneously operating Bluefin Bay, Mr. Buntz was the owner and operator of Tofte Land Co., Inc., a real estate holding and brokerage firm. He now has more than 25 years of hospitality experience as an owner-operator of destination properties. Mr. Buntz has served on the board of directors of the Explore Minnesota Tourism Council and the (Minnesota) Governor’s Tourism Advisory Committee for more than 15 years. Currently, Mr. Buntz is a board member and past-chair of the board of the American Museum of Asmat Art. Mr. Buntz received the (Minnesota) Governor’s Entrepreneurship Award from Governor Rudy Perpich and the Outstanding Individual in Tourism Award from Governor Jesse Ventura. He is a graduate of Grinnell College.

Steven Marques – Chief Revenue Officer/Acting President:

On December 21, 2012, the board of directors of the Company appointed Steven Marques, 52, to the position of Chief Revenue Officer. Mr. Marques is Acting President and was previously President/Chief Operations Officer of RealBiz360 Inc. dba/RealBiz Media Inc which began in early 2004 prior to the merger into RealbizMedia Group. He led the company to become one of top 5 leading Virtual Tour companies in North America. Steve was instrumental in overseeing the company’s current operating plan to include the move to Video On Demand television with its partner Next 1 Interactive, which then led the company’s expansion into Video Content Syndication which is the base of its business plan today. Under his management he was instrumental for the company’s strategic alliances and key partnerships with companies like Realogy, Keller Williams, Move-Realtor.com, Coldwell Banker NRT franchises and more. Mr. Marques’ prior leadership roles include; Vice President of Global Sales for iseemedia; Sr. Vice President of Marketing for Omnigon, a San Diego based Bio-tech Company, and MGI software, leaders in consumer based photo and video software. Mr. Marques has been in the Computer and Internet industry since 1983 where he was part of the start-up management teams of Egghead Discount Software which was one of America’s first Retail Computer software chains with over 200 locations at its peak.
 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 which was awarded to or earned by (i) our Chief Executive Officer during fiscal year 2012 and (ii) our other executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer) who served the Company and who received in excess of $100,000 in total compensation for a year (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

Employment Agreements with Executives and Key Personnel

The Company does not currently have any employment agreements. On December 31, 2011, Mr. Wicker resigned.

Currently, the Company does not offer any executive bonus or incentive compensation plan and there are no current plans to put one in place for fiscal year 2013.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

There were no outstanding equity awards for the executives as of October 31, 2012.

Director Compensation 

Our non-employee directors have elected to forego any cash compensation for participating in Board of Directors and committee meetings telephonically until such time as we become profitable over the course of an entire fiscal year, at which time the Board of Directors may reconsider the structure of its director compensation. In general, director compensation will be subject to review and adjustment from time to time at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

The following table sets forth the compensation of our non-employee directors for fiscal year 2012:

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our issued and outstanding common stock as of October 12, 2012, after giving effect to the Exchange Transaction, by (i) each of our named executive officers; (ii) each of our directors; and (iii) all of our executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group. Ownership percentages are based on 365,176 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on October 12, 2012 (after giving effect to a reverse stock split effected as of May 10, 2012), and 100,000,000 shares of Series A Stock issued and outstanding as of that date. Based on that information available to us, as of that date, no person is a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock other than Next 1 Interactive, Inc. and Robert A. Buntz, Jr.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. To our knowledge and subject to applicable community property laws, each of the holders of stock listed below has sole voting and investment power as to the stock owned unless otherwise noted. Except as otherwise noted below, the address for each director or officer listed in the table is c/o RealBiz Media Group, Inc., 2690 Weston Road, Suite 200, Weston, FL 33331.

_____________________

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS; DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related-Party Transaction Policy

Our Board of Directors has no formal written policy regarding transactions with related persons, but we do plan to abide by conflict-of-interest statutes under Delaware law and approve any related-party transactions by a majority of disinterested directors. In general, applicable law exhorts any director proposing to enter into a related-party transaction must disclose to our Board of Directors the proposed transaction and all material facts with respect thereto. In reviewing such a proposed transaction, our board expects to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including (1) the commercial reasonableness of the terms, (2) the benefit and perceived benefits, or lack thereof, to us, (3) the opportunity costs of alternate transactions, (4) the materiality and character of the related party’s interest, and (5) the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related party. We expect to apply this analysis with respect to related party transactions that may involve our officers or greater-than-five-percent shareholders.

We do expect to adopt a formal written policy respecting related-party transactions in which our directors, officers and greater-than-five-percent shareholders may engage, consistent with Sarbanes-Oxley related internal control requirements and best practices.

Related-Party Transactions of Company – Webdigs, Inc. (Pre-Exchange Transaction)

The Company’s principal advertising agency/website developer was owed $615,264 at October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The two principals of this advertising company were at the time also minority stockholders in the Company, holding approximately 1.6% of the Company’s outstanding common shares at October 31, 2012. For the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred $0 and $31,556 in services and rent from this related party, respectively.

As of October 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company was indebted to its then-officers (Messrs. Buntz and Wicker) for amounts totaling $3,578 and $8,345, respectively, for unreimbursed business expenses. All of the indebtedness represents non-interest bearing payables due on demand.

During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Company borrowed $355,500 from Robert A. Buntz, Jr. under a convertible promissory note accruing interest at an annual rate of 12%. At October 31, 2011 and 2010, the balances due under this note were $243,079 and $528,500, respectively. On October 12, 2010, these notes were modified to allow the Mr. Buntz to convert amounts into the Company’s common stock at $0.01 per share instead of a previous conversion price of $22 (after adjustment for reverse split). This modification resulted in a beneficial conversion charge to interest expense of $580,424 because the stock was trading at $6.00 (on a post-split basis) on that date. On March 15, 2011, Mr. Buntz converted $300,000 of the debt into 150,000 shares of common stock (on a post-split basis). For the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $46,038 and $630,932 of interest expense in connection with this note, respectively. Accrued interest included in accrued expenses due under the note as of October 31, 2011 and 2010 was $91,962 and $51,924, respectively. The accrued interest was also convertible into the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share (after adjustment for reverse split).

In connection with the closing of the Exchange Transaction on October 9, 2012, Messrs. Buntz and Wicker converted all of their outstanding notes, unpaid salary and all other obligations and liabilities to them owed by the Company into 5,983,600 and 1,016,400 shares of Series A Stock, respectively.

Related-Party Transactions of Company – RealBiz

None

Director Independence

As of October 31, 2012, The Board of Directors was comprised of one-half “independent” directors as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Our Board of Directors does not currently have an Audit Committee consisting of a member who was independent as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. On January 11, 2012, three directors, Steven Sjoblad, Joseph Fox and Donald Miller, resigned.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Aggregate fees billed by our principal independent registered public accounting firm for audits of the financial statements for the fiscal years indicated:

Audit Fees. The fees identified under this caption were for professional services rendered by Moquist Thorvilson Kaufmann & Pieper LLC (MTK) for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements. The amounts also include fees for services that are normally provided by the independent public registered accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings and engagements for the years identified.

Audit-Related Fees. The fees identified under this caption were for assurance and related services that were related to the review of our financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and were not reported under the caption “Audit Fees.” We also incurred audit fees for the carve out and potential spinoff of IggysHouse.com. This category may include fees related to the performance of audits and attestation services not required by statute or regulations, and accounting consultations about the application of generally accepted accounting principles to proposed transactions.

Tax Fees. The fees identified under this caption were for tax compliance, tax planning, tax advice and corporate tax services. Corporate tax services encompass a variety of permissible services, including technical tax advice related to tax matters; assistance with withholding-tax matters; assistance with state and local taxes; preparation of reports to comply with local tax authority transfer pricing documentation requirements; and assistance with tax audits.

Approval Policy. Our Audit Committee approves in advance all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. All engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm in fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were pre-approved by the Board of Directors.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

RealBiz Media Group, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RealBiz Media Group, Inc. as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of RealBiz Media Group, Inc. as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred losses of $963,220 and $953,460 for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively and the Company had an accumulated deficit of $6,091,775 and a working capital deficit of $2,311,736 at October 31, 2012. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Boca Raton, Florida

February 14, 2013

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

REALBIZ MEDIA GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Years Ended October 31, 2012 and 2011

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

Organization

On October 9, 2012 RealBiz Holdings, Inc. (RealBiz) n.k.a. Realbiz Media Group, Inc., formerly a private entity, was party to two transactions. In the first transaction it was acquired by an unrelated public company, Next 1 Interactive, Inc. (the Parent). This transaction was accounted for by the Parent as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the fair value adjustments were "pushed down" to RealBiz's books in accordance with the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5J "New Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Circumstances. In the second transaction the Parent, in order to make its new subsidiary, RealBiz, a public company, had RealBiz enter into a reverse acquisition transaction with another public company, Webdigs, Inc. (Webdigs) whereby Webdigs acquired 100% of RealBiz in exchange for Webdigs issuing a voting preferred stock to the Parent giving the Parent control over Webdigs. This transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization of RealBiz. Webdigs then changed its name to Realbiz Media Group, Inc.

The chronological historical events leading to the above transactions are as follows:

On August 8, 2012, Next 1 Interactive, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Next 1”) together with its subsidiary Next One Realty (the trade name for Next 1’s wholly owned subsidiary Attaché Travel International, Inc.) entered into a Purchase Agreement (“Acknew Purchase Agreement”) with Acknew Investments Inc. (“Acknew”) and RealBiz Holdings Inc. Under the Acknew Purchase Agreement, Next 1 has agreed to acquire from Acknew common shares of RealBiz Holdings, Inc. representing approximately an 85% ownership interest in RealBiz Holdings, Inc. RealBiz Holdings Inc. is the parent corporation of RealBiz 360, Inc. and RealBiz 360 Enterprise (Canada), Inc. (together referred to as “RealBiz”).

Pursuant to the Acknew Purchase Agreement, Next 1 and Webdigs, Inc. (“Webdigs” or the “Company”) would consummate a share exchange transaction contemplated by a Share Exchange Agreement dated April 5, 2012 (“Share Exchange Agreement”) by and between Next 1 and Webdigs. In that contemplated share exchange transaction, Next 1 would receive a controlling interest in Webdigs through its receipt of approximately 93 million shares of newly designated preferred stock representing approximately 92% of the total outstanding capital stock of Webdigs immediately after the transaction. In exchange, Next 1 would transfer its entire share ownership in Next One Realty to Webdigs.

On October 9, 2012, Webdigs and Next 1 completed the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement. Under the Share Exchange Agreement, Webdigs received all of the outstanding equity in Attaché Travel International, Inc. (“Attaché”). In exchange for our Webdigs’s receipt of the Attaché shares from Next 1, Webdigs issued to Next 1 a total of 93 million shares of our newly designated Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (our “Series A Stock”). The exchange of Attaché shares in exchange for our Series A Stock is referred to as the “Exchange Transaction.”

As a condition to the closing of the Exchange Transaction, our Company changed its name from “Webdigs, Inc.” to “RealBiz Media Group, Inc.” on October 9, 2012, by engaging in a short-form parent-subsidiary merger in the State of Delaware.

Nature of Business

RealBiz is a real estate media services company that provides marketing and promotional services to listing agents and brokers through its proprietary video processing technology or virtual home tours. RealBiz has positioned itself in the following three areas:

NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 include the operations of Webdigs, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Webdigs, LLC, which includes the dormant wholly owned subsidiaries of Home Equity Advisors, LLC, and Credit Garage, LLC from the recapitalization date of October 9, 2012 and the historical operations of RealBiz Media Group, Inc, which includes its subsidiaries RealBiz 360 Enterprise (Canada), Inc. and RealBiz 360, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

On May 17, 2012, the Company affected a 1 for 200 reverse stock split. All share and per share information in the consolidated financial statements presented has been retrospectively adjusted for the split.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. If actual results significantly differ from the Company’s estimates, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially impacted.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of balance sheet presentation and reporting of cash flows, the Company considers all unrestricted demand deposits, money market funds and highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of less than 90 days to be cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

The Company provides its marketing and promotional services to agents or brokers via a web-based portal that allows for credit card payments. The Company recognizes accounts receivable for amounts uncollected from the credit card service provider at the end of the accounting period. The Company regularly reviews outstanding receivables and provides for estimated losses through an allowance for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the level of established loss reserves, the Company makes judgments regarding its customers’ ability to make required payments, economic events and other factors. As the financial condition of these parties change, circumstances develop or additional information becomes available, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be required. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and such losses traditionally have been within its expectations.

Intangible Assets

In accordance with ASC 350-30-65 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangible whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

When the Company determines that the carrying value of an intangible many not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flow, the Company records an impairment charge equal to the amount book value exceeds fair value. The Company measures fair value based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent to the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. The Company did not consider it necessary to record an impairment charge on its intangible assets during the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011.

Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives.

Convertible Debt Instruments

The Company records debt net of debt discount for beneficial conversion features and warrants, on a relative fair value basis. Beneficial conversion features are recorded pursuant to the Beneficial Conversion and Debt Topics of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amounts allocated to warrants and beneficial conversion rights are recorded as debt discount and as additional paid-in-capital. Debt discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable, commissions and fees payable, and interest payable. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their respective estimated fair value due to the short-term maturities and approximate market interest rates of these instruments.

Revenue Recognition

The Company provides its marketing and promotional services to agents or brokers via a web-based portal that allows for credit card payments. Customers may pay a monthly recurring fee or an annual fee. Some customers additionally pay a one-time set up fee. Monthly recurring fees are recognized in the month the service is rendered. Collection of one-time set up fees and annual services fees give rise to recognized monthly revenue in the then-current month as well as deferred revenue liabilities representing the collected fee for services yet to be delivered.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues includes costs attributable to services sold and delivered. These costs include such items as credit card fees, sales commission to business partners, expenses related to our participation in industry conferences, and public relations expenses.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company computes share based payments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 718-10 “Compensation” (ASC 718-10). ASC 718-10 establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services at fair value, focusing primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employees services in share-based payment transactions. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods and services that are based on the fair value of an entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments.

In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment (“SAB 107”) which provides guidance regarding the interaction of ASC 718-10 and certain SEC rules and regulations. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of ASC 718-10.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and items defined as other comprehensive income (loss). Items defined as other comprehensive income (loss) include items such as foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on certain marketable securities. For the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, the accumulated comprehensive loss was ($5,849) and ($5,107), respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, as clarified by ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities given the provisions of enacted tax laws. Deferred income tax provisions and benefits are based on changes to the assets or liabilities from year to year. In providing for deferred taxes, the Company considers tax regulations of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, estimates of future taxable income, and available tax planning strategies. If tax regulations, operating results or the ability to implement tax-planning strategies vary, adjustments to the carrying value of deferred tax assets and liabilities may be required. Valuation allowances are recorded related to deferred tax assets based on the “more likely than not” criteria of ASC 740.

ASC 740-10 requires that the Company recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the “more-likely-than-not” threshold, the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.

Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed in the same manner, but also considers the effect of common stock shares underlying the following:

All of the common shares underlying the stock options and warrants above were excluded from diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 respectively because their effects were considered anti-dilutive.

Concentrations, Risks and Uncertainties

The Company’s operations are related to the real estate industry and its prospects for success are tied indirectly to interest rates and the general housing and business climates in the United States.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. Under the two-statement approach, the first statement would include components of net income, and the second statement would include components of other comprehensive income. This ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. . The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity concludes it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it need not perform the two-step impairment test. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended ASC 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other”. This amendment is intended to simplify how an entity tests indefinite-lived assets other than goodwill for impairment by providing entities with an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The amended provisions will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2014, and early adoption is permitted. This amendment impacts impairment testing steps only, and therefore adoption will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on financial position or results of operations of the Company.

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04 ("ASU 2012-04"). The amendments in this update cover a wide range of topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3: GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

The Company has incurred losses of $963,220 and $953,460 for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively. At October 31, 2012, the Company had a working capital deficit of $2,311,736, and an accumulated deficit of $6,091,775. It is management’s opinion that these facts raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern without additional debt or equity financing. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts nor to the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

In order to meet its working capital needs through the next twelve months, the Company may consider plans to raise additional funds through the issuance of additional shares of common stock and or through the issuance of debt instruments. Although we intend to obtain additional financing to meet our cash needs, we may be unable to secure any additional financing on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us, if at all.

NOTE 4: INTANGIBLE ASSETS

At October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s intangible assets are as follows:

Amortization expense amounted to $nil and $nil for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  

On October 9, 2012, the Company entered a Share Exchange Agreement (Note 1). The Company accounted for the acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805 "Business Combinations". The Company is the aquiree for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the Company applied push-down accounting and has recorded the intangible asset as described herein.

* The Company is in review of the facts and circumstances surrounding events to determine if the carrying amount of held-and-used identifiable amortizable intangibles acquired during the October 2012 acquisition may be reallocated under the provisions of ASC 350 and ASC 805. The Company has until October 2013 (12 months) to determine the final allocations and it is studying a reallocation with more emphasis on “customer relationships and customer lists”. No amortization has been calculated based on the original allocations.

NOTE 5: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

At October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s accounts payable and accrued liabilities are as follows:

NOTE 6: ADVANCES FROM NEXT 1 INTERACTIVE, INC.

During the normal course of business, Next 1 made operating advances for operating expenses to RealBiz 360 Enterprise (Canada), Inc. and Webdigs, Inc., prior to the consummation of the Exchange Agreement. As of October 31, 2012, advances to RealBiz 360 Enterprise (Canada), Inc. totaled $753,332 and $82,397 to Webdigs, Inc. As of October 31, 2011, advances to RealBiz 360 Enterprise (Canada), Inc. totaled $201,660 and $nil to Webdigs, Inc.

NOTE 7: LOANS PAYABLE

During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012, Acknew, along with one of its officers, made interest-free operating loans to RealBiz 360 Enterprise (Canada), Inc. and RealBiz Holdings, Inc. As of October 31, 2011, these loans, in aggregate, totaled $369, 040. As part of the Acknew Purchase Agreement, in addition to other consideration, portions of these obligations were retired. As of October 31, 2012, the remaining obligation to Acknew totaled $50,000.

NOTE 8: SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock option grants over the requisite service period for vesting of the award.

Stock Options consist of the following for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, after taking into account a 200 for 1 reverse stock split:

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the difference between the closing stock price on October 31, 2012 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on October 31, 2012.  There were no options exercised during the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011.

Stock Warrants

As of October 31, 2011, the Company has 200,000 warrants outstanding with the exercise price of $0.30. The warrants expired on December 12, 2011. No additional warrants were issued in during the twelve months ended October 31, 2012.

NOTE 9: SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

As of October 31, 2010, the Company had 125,000,000 shares of common stock authorized with a par value of $0.001, with another 125,000,000 authorized shares designated as common or preferred stock. On May 17, 2012, the Company effectuated a 1 for 200 reverse stock split for its common stock shares. Adjusted for the stock split, the Company has 625,000 shares of common stock authorized with a par value of $0.001.

Common Stock

On October 9, 2012 the Company recapitalized by being acquired by a public company which resulted in a deemed issuance of 383,009 shares of common stock to the original shareholders of the public entity, a deemed issuance of 7,000,000 Preferred Series A voting shares to the original shareholders of the public entity, and a new issuance of 93,000,000 Preferred Series A voting shares. Total net liabilities of $977,575 were assumed in the recapitalization.

Preferred Stock Series A

As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had 100,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred stock issued and outstanding respectively. The Preferred shares were issued pursuant to the recapitalization and share exchange (Note1). The preferred shares were issued at $.001 par, bear dividends at an annual rate of 10% per annum payable on a quarterly basis when declared by the board of directors. Dividends shall accrue whether or not they have been declared by the board. At the election of the Company, Preferred Dividends may be converted into Series A Stock, with each converted share having a value equal to the Market Price per share, subject to adjustment for stock splits. In order to exercise such option, the Company shall deliver written notice to the holder.

Each share of Series A Stock shall be convertible at the option of the holder thereof at any time into a number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the Stated Value by the Conversion Price then in effect. The initial conversion price for the Series A Stock shall be equal to $0.05 per share.

As a result of push-down accounting applied in October 2012 (See Note 1) the Company recorded $5,016,506 of additional paid-in-capital.

NOTE 10: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Due to - Minority Stockholder

The Company’s former principal advertising agency/website developer was owed $615,264 at October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The two principals of this advertising company are also minority stockholders in the Company - holding approximately 1.6% of the Company’s outstanding shares at October 31, 2012.

Due to Officers

As of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, the Company was indebted to certain related parties for amounts totaling $69,327 and $3,578, respectively, for deferred salary and unreimbursed business expenses. All of the indebtedness represented non-interest bearing payables due on demand. These amounts have been included in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 11: INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes taking into account deferred tax assets and liabilities which represent the future tax consequences of the differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities versus the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Under this method, deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The impact of tax rate changes on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the year the change is enacted.

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following for the years ended October 31:

The provision for income taxes varies from the statutory rate applied to the total loss as follows for the years ended October 31:

Significant components of the Company’s estimated deferred tax balances at October 31, 2012 and 2011 consist of:

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences will become deductible. The Company considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets because it is not currently able to conclude that it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized. The amount of deferred tax assets considered to be realizable could be increased in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are increased. The valuation allowance increased by $287,895 during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012.

The Company has a total net operating loss carryforward of approximately $1,825,000, of which approximately $255,000 relates to domestic entities and $1,570,000 relates to wholly owned Canadian subsidiaries. Net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2032. Under the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (IRC 382) and the Canadian Tax Act, certain stock transactions which significantly change ownership, including the sale of stock to new investors, the exercise of options to purchase stock, or other transactions between shareholders could limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be utilized on an annual basis to offset taxable income in future periods.

NOTE 12: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT AND DISCLOSURE

The Company has adopted ASC 820, Fair Market Measurement and Disclosures including the application of the statement to non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have a material impact on the Company’s fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

Fair Value Measurements at October 31, 2011 and 2012 respectively using:

NOTE 13: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Pursuant to FASB ASC 855, management has evaluated all events and transactions that occurred from November 1, 2012 through the date of issuance of the financial statements. During this period we did not have any significant subsequent events, except as disclosed below:

Exhibits

* Filed electronically herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.