form10k.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012
Or
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________
Commission file number 0-10592
TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
NEW YORK
|
|
14-1630287
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
5 SARNOWSKI DRIVE, GLENVILLE, NEW YORK 12302
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (518) 377-3311
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of exchange on which registered)
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes.o No.x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes.o No.x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes.x No.o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated Filer x
|
Non-Accelerated Filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes. o No. x
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2012 was approximately $490,349,976 (based upon the closing price of $5.46 on June 30, 2012, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market).
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 1, 2013 was 94,071,114.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: Portions of registrant's Proxy Statement filed for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year end.
EXHIBITS INDEX
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted Regulation G, which applies to all public disclosures, including earnings releases that contain “non-GAAP financial measures,” made by companies with a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. GAAP is generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Under Regulation G, companies making disclosures containing non-GAAP financial measures must also disclose, along with each non-GAAP financial measure, certain additional information, including a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the closest comparable GAAP financial measure and a statement of the company’s reasons for utilizing the non-GAAP financial measure as part of its financial disclosures. The SEC has exempted from the definition of “non-GAAP financial measures” certain specific types of commonly used financial measures that are not based on GAAP. When these exempted measures are included in public disclosures or SEC filings, supplemental information is not required. The following measures used in this Report, which have not been specifically exempted by the SEC, may nevertheless constitute “non-GAAP financial measures” within the meaning of the SEC’s new rules, although we are unable to state with certainty that the SEC would so regard them.
Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin: Net interest income, as a component of the tabular presentation by financial institutions of Selected Financial Information regarding their recently completed operations, is commonly presented on a tax-equivalent basis. That is, to the extent that some component of the institution’s net interest income will be exempt from taxation (e.g., was received by the institution as a result of its holdings of state or municipal obligations), an amount equal to the tax benefit derived from that component is added back to the net interest income total. This adjustment is considered helpful in comparing one financial institution’s net interest income (pre-tax) to that of another institution, as each will have a different proportion of tax-exempt items in their portfolios. Moreover, net interest income is itself a component of a second financial measure commonly used by financial institutions, net interest margin, which is the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets. For purposes of this measure as well, tax-equivalent net interest income is generally used by financial institutions, again to provide a better basis of comparison from institution to institution. We follow these practices.
Tangible Book Value Per Share and Tangible Equity as a Percentage of Tangible Assets: Tangible book value per share and tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets at period end are non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate tangible equity and tangible assets by excluding the balance of intangible assets from shareholders' equity and total assets, respectively. We calculate tangible book value per share by dividing tangible equity by common shares outstanding, as compared to book value per common share, which we calculate by dividing shareholders' equity by common shares outstanding. We calculate tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets at period end by dividing tangible equity by tangible assets at period end. We believe that this is consistent with the treatment by bank regulatory agencies, which exclude intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios.
The Efficiency Ratio: Financial institutions often use an “efficiency ratio” as a measure of expense control. The efficiency ratio typically is defined as noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income and noninterest income. As in the case of net interest income, generally, net interest income as utilized in calculating the efficiency ratio is typically expressed on a tax-equivalent basis. Moreover, most financial institutions, in calculating the efficiency ratio, also adjust both noninterest expense and noninterest income to exclude from these items (as calculated under GAAP) certain component elements, such as non-recurring charges, and other real estate expense (deducted from noninterest expense) and securities transactions and other non-recurring income items (excluded from noninterest income). We follow these practices.
PART I
General
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (“TrustCo” or the “Company”) is a savings and loan holding company having its principal place of business at 5 Sarnowski Drive, Glenville, New York 12302. TrustCo was incorporated under the laws of New York in 1981 to acquire all of the outstanding stock of Trustco Bank, National Association, formerly known as Trustco Bank New York, and prior to that, The Schenectady Trust Company. The Company’s principal subsidiary, Trustco Bank (sometimes referred to as the “Bank”), is the successor by merger to Trustco Bank, National Association.
Through policy and practice, TrustCo continues to emphasize that it is an equal opportunity employer. There were 759 full-time equivalent employees of TrustCo at year-end 2012. TrustCo had 13,374 shareholders of record as of December 31, 2012 and the closing price of the TrustCo common stock on that date was $5.28.
Subsidiaries
Trustco Bank
Trustco Bank is a federal savings bank engaged in providing general banking services to individuals, partnerships, and corporations. The Bank operates 146 automatic teller machines and 138 banking offices in Albany, Columbia, Dutchess, Greene, Orange, Rensselaer, Rockland, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Ulster, Warren, Washington and Westchester counties of New York, Brevard, Charlotte, Hillsborough, Lake, Manatee, Orange, Osceola, Palm Beach, Polk, Sarasota, Seminole, and Volusia counties in Florida, Bennington County in Vermont, Berkshire County in Massachusetts and Bergen County in New Jersey. The largest part of such business consists of accepting deposits and making loans and investments. The Bank provides a wide range of both personal and business banking services. The Bank is supervised and regulated by the federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to the extent permitted by law. The Bank’s subsidiary, Trustco Realty Corp., is a real estate investment trust (or “REIT”) that was formed to acquire, hold and manage real estate mortgage assets, including residential mortgage loans and mortgage backed securities. The income earned on these assets, net of expenses, is distributed in the form of dividends. Under current New York State tax law, 60% of the dividends received by the Bank from Trustco Realty Corp. are excluded from total taxable income. The Bank accounted for substantially all of TrustCo’s 2012 consolidated net income and average assets. The Bank’s other active subsidiaries, Trustco Insurance Agency, Inc. and ORE Property, Inc., did not engage in any significant business activities during 2012 and 2011.
Trustco Financial Services, the name under which Trustco Bank’s trust department operates, serves as executor of estates and trustee of personal trusts, provides asset and wealth management services, provides estate planning and related advice, provides custodial services, and acts as trustee for various types of employee benefit plans and corporate pension and profit sharing trusts. The aggregate market value of the assets under trust, custody, or management of the trust department of the Bank was approximately $825 million as of December 31, 2012.
The daily operations of the Bank remain the responsibility of its officers, subject to the oversight of its Board of Directors and overall supervision by TrustCo. The activities of the Bank are included in TrustCo's consolidated financial statements.
ORE Subsidiary Corp.
In 1993, TrustCo created ORE Subsidiary Corp., a New York corporation, to hold and manage certain foreclosed properties acquired by the Bank. The accounts of this subsidiary are included in TrustCo's consolidated financial statements.
Competition
TrustCo faces strong competition in its market areas, both in attracting deposits and making loans. The Company’s most direct competition for deposits, historically, has come from commercial banks, savings associations, and credit unions that are located or have branches in the Bank’s market areas. The competition ranges from other locally based commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions to branch offices of the largest financial institutions in the United States. In its principal market areas, the Capital District area of New York State and Central Florida, TrustCo's principal competitors are local operations of super regional banks, branch offices of money center banks, and locally based commercial banks and savings institutions. The Bank is the largest depository institution headquartered in the Capital District area of New York State. The Company also faces competition for deposits from national brokerage houses, short-term money market funds, and other corporate and government securities funds.
Factors affecting the acquisition of deposits include pricing, office locations and hours of operation, the variety of deposit accounts offered, and the quality of customer service provided. Competition for loans has been especially keen during the last several years. Commercial banks, savings institutions, traditional mortgage brokers affiliated with local offices and nationally franchised real estate brokers are all active and aggressive competitors. The Company competes in this environment by providing a full range of financial services based on a tradition of financial strength and integrity dating from its inception. The Company competes for loans principally through the interest rates and loan fees it charges and the efficiency and quality of services it provides to borrowers.
Supervision and Regulation
Banking is a highly regulated industry, with numerous federal and state laws and regulations governing the organization and operation of banks and their affiliates. As a savings and loan holding company, TrustCo and its non-bank subsidiaries are supervised and regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve Board”). Under the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1934 (the "HOLA"), Trustco must obtain prior OCC approval for acquisitions, and its business operations and activities are restricted. The OCC is also the Bank’s primary federal regulator and supervises and examines the Bank. Because the FDIC provides deposit insurance to the Bank, the Bank is also subject to its supervision and regulation even though the FDIC is not the Bank’s primary federal regulator.
Certain federal banking laws have been recently amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). See “Supervision and Regulation—Financial Reform Legislation” below. Among the more significant changes made by the Dodd-Frank Act was that, effective July 21, 2011 (the “Designated Transfer Date,”) TrustCo’s and Trustco Bank’s former primary regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) ceased to exist as a separate entity and merged and became a separate division of the OCC. The OCC assumed the OTS’ role as regulator and supervisor of Trustco Bank, and the Federal Reserve Board became the primary supervisor and regulator with respect to the Company.
The following summary of laws and regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank is not intended to be a complete description of those laws and regulations or their effects on the Company and the Bank, and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions described.
Financial Reform Legislation
On July 21, 2010, the president signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law. The Dodd-Frank Act has created, and will likely continue to create dramatic changes across the financial regulatory system, some of which became effective immediately and some of which will not become effective until various future dates. Implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act will require many new rules to be made by various federal regulatory agencies over the next several years, including TrustCo’s and the Bank’s regulatory agencies, and the effect of many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions will be determined through the rulemaking process. As a result, we cannot predict the ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on TrustCo or the Bank at this time, including the extent to which the act could increase costs, limit our ability to efficiently pursue business opportunities or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. At a minimum, we expect that the Dodd-Frank Act will increase our operating and compliance costs.
The Dodd-Frank Act included provisions that, among other effects:
|
|
1. Created a new agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (the “Bureau”), to centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection, be responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws such as the Truth in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Saving Act, among others. Depository institutions that have assets of $10 billion or less, such as the Bank, will continue to be supervised by their primary federal regulators (in the case of the Bank, the OCC). The Bureau will also have data collecting powers for fair lending purposes for both small business and mortgage loans, as well as authority to prevent unfair, deceptive and abusive practices.
|
|
|
2. Imposed new consumer protection requirements in mortgage loan transactions, including requiring creditors to make reasonable, good faith determinations that consumers have a reasonable ability to repay mortgage loans, prohibiting originators of residential mortgage loans from being paid compensation (such as a “yield spread premium”) that varies based on the terms of the loan other than the principal amount of the loan, requiring new disclosure requirements for residential mortgage loans, requiring additional disclosures in periodic loan account statements, amending the Truth-in-Lending Act’s “high-cost” mortgage provisions, and adopting certain other revisions.
|
|
|
3. Changed the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible capital, eliminated the ceiling on the size of the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”), and increases the required minimum reserve ratio for the DIF, from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits.
|
|
|
4. Increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, with non-interest-bearing transaction accounts having unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012.
|
|
|
5. Adopted changes to corporate governance requirements, including shareholder votes on executive compensation and proxy access by shareholders, that apply to all public companies.
|
|
|
6. Effective in July 2011, repeals various banking law provisions prohibiting the payment of interest on demand deposits.
|
| |
7. Authorized the Federal Reserve to adopt rules to regulate the reasonableness of debit card interchange fees charged by financial institutions with $10 billion or more in assets with respect to electronic debit transactions. The amount of such fees must be “reasonable and proportional” to the cost incurred by the issuer. Issuers that, together with their affiliates, have assets of less than $10 billion would not be covered by the rules.
|
Dividends
Most of TrustCo's revenues consist of cash dividends paid to TrustCo by the Bank, payment of which is subject to various regulatory limitations. Please refer to the discussion below under “Federal Savings Institution Regulation – Limitation on Capital Distributions” for a more detailed discussion of limitation imposed by the OCC. (Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained in TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012 contains information concerning restrictions on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends and is hereby incorporated by reference.)
Compliance with the standards set forth in the OCC rules regarding capital distribution could also limit the amount of dividends that TrustCo may pay to its shareholders. The banking industry is also affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government, including the Federal Reserve System, which exerts considerable influence over the cost and availability of funds obtained for lending and investing.
See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements contained in TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012 for information concerning the Bank’s regulatory capital requirements.
Holding Company Activities
The activities of savings and loan holding companies are governed, and limited, by the HOLA and the Federal Reserve’s regulations. In general, TrustCo’s activities are limited to those permissible for “multiple” savings and loan holding companies (that is, savings and loan holding companies owning more than one savings association subsidiary) as of March 5, 1987, activities permitted for bank holding companies as of November 12, 1999 and activities permissible for “financial holding companies” (which are described below). Activities permitted to multiple savings and loan holding companies include certain real estate investment activities, and other activities permitted to bank holding companies under the Bank Holding Company Act. Activities permissible for a financial holding company are those considered financial in nature (including securities and insurance activities) or those incidental or complementary to financial activities.
A savings and loan holding company is prohibited from, directly or indirectly, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another financial institution or savings and loan holding company without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Board and from acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Federal Reserve Board considers the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the Company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.
The Federal Reserve may not approve any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings institutions in more than one state, subject to two exceptions: (i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies and (ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
TrustCo must obtain approval from the appropriate bank regulatory agencies (for example, the Federal Reserve) before acquiring control of any insured depository institution.
Savings and loan holding companies such as TrustCo are not currently subject to specific capital requirements or specific restrictions on the payment of dividends or other capital distributions. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act, however, commencing in July 2015, TrustCo will be subject to formal regulatory capital requirements and will thus be obligated to hold capital in the same amount and of the same type that is required of capital required for insured depository institutions such as the Bank.
In addition, the financial impact of a holding company on its subsidiary institution is a matter that is evaluated by the Federal Reserve Board, and the agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the institution. The Dodd-Frank Act, moreover, codifies the Federal Reserve’s long-standing “source of strength” doctrine and thus requires that bank or thrift holding companies serve as a source of financial strength for their depository institution subsidiaries. The phrase “source of financial strength” is defined in the Dodd-Frank Act as “the ability of a company that directly or indirectly owns or controls an insured depository institution to provide financial assistance to such insured depository institution in the event of the financial distress of the insured depository institution.” The Federal Reserve is authorized to adopt regulations implementing this requirement not later than one year after the Designated Transfer Date.
Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance
The Company’s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Company is subject to restrictions, reporting requirements and review procedures under federal securities laws and regulations. The Company is also subject to the rules and reporting requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, on which its common stock is traded.
Like other issuers of publicly traded securities, the Company must also comply with provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that require publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments, and the Company will also be subject to the Dodd-Frank Act provisions that authorize the SEC to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The Dodd-Frank Act also directs the Federal Reserve to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded.
Further, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"), which implemented legislative reforms intended to address corporate and accounting fraud and contained reforms of various business practices and numerous aspects of corporate governance. For example, Sarbanes-Oxley addresses accounting oversight and corporate governance matters, including the creation of a five-member oversight board appointed by the Securities and Exchange Commission to set and enforce auditing, quality control and independence standards for accountants and have investigative and disciplinary powers; increased responsibilities and codified requirements relating to audit committees of public companies and how they interact with a company's public accounting firm; the prohibition of accounting firms from providing various types of consulting services to public clients and requiring accounting firms to rotate partners among public client assignments every five years; expanded disclosure of corporate operations and internal controls and certification by chief executive officers and chief financial officers to the accuracy of periodic reports filed with the SEC; and prohibitions on public company insiders from trading during retirement plan "blackout" periods, restrictions on loans to company executives and enhanced controls on and reporting of insider trading.
Although the Company has and will continue to incur additional expense in complying with the corporate governance provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and Sarbanes-Oxley and the resulting regulations, management does not expect that such compliance will have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
Federal Savings Institution Regulation
Business Activities. Federal law and regulations govern the activities of federal savings banks such as the Bank. These laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the activities in which federal savings banks may engage. In particular, certain lending authority for federal savings banks, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and consumer loans, is limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets.
Regulatory Capital Requirements. As a federal savings institution, Trustco Bank is subject to two overlapping sets of capital requirements: the tangible capital, Tier 1 core (leverage) capital, and risk-based capital requirements described in this paragraph and the “prompt corrective action” requirements described below. In general, an association’s tangible capital, which must be at least 1.5% of adjusted total assets, is the sum of common shareholders’ equity adjusted for the effects of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), net of the adjustment to record the previously unrecognized over funded position of employee benefit plans, less goodwill and other disallowed assets. An association’s ratio of Tier 1 core capital to adjusted total assets (the “core capital” or “leverage” ratio) must be at least 3% for the most highly rated associations and 4% for others. Higher capital ratios may be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profile of a given association. Under the risk-based capital requirement, a savings association must have total capital (core capital plus supplementary capital) equal to at least 8% of risk-weighted assets. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor ranging from 0% to 100%, assigned by the OCC capital regulation based on the risks inherent in the type of asset. Tier 1 capital must represent at least 50% of total capital and consists of core capital elements, which include common shareholders’ equity, qualifying noncumulative nonredeemable perpetual preferred stock, and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, but exclude goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Supplementary capital mainly consists of qualifying subordinated debt and portions of allowance for loan losses.
The above capital requirements are viewed as minimum standards by the OCC.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal banking agencies, including the OCC and the Federal Reserve, must set minimum consolidated leverage and risk-based capital requirements for insured depository institutions and their holding companies. These requirements must be based on the minimum prompt corrective action ratios described below.
Prompt Corrective Action. The OCC regulations also specify minimum requirements for a savings association to be considered a “well-capitalized institution” as defined in the “prompt corrective action” regulation described below. A “well-capitalized” savings association must have a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater.
Additionally, to qualify as a “well-capitalized institution,” a savings association’s Tier 1 risk-based capital, defined as core capital plus supplementary capital less portions of the association’s allowance for loan losses, must be equal to at least 6% of risk-weighted assets. The Bank currently meets all of the requirements of a “well-capitalized institution.”
The OCC prompt corrective action regulations require certain mandatory remedial actions and authorize certain other discretionary actions to be taken by the OCC against a savings association that falls within specified categories of capital deficiency. The severity of the action required depends upon the association’s degree of undercapitalization. The relevant regulations establish five categories of capital classification for this purpose, ranging from “well-capitalized” or “adequately capitalized” through “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” In general, the prompt corrective action regulations prohibit an OCC-regulated institution from declaring any dividends, making any other capital distributions, or paying a management fee to a controlling person, such as its parent holding company, if, following the distribution or payment, the institution would be within any of the three undercapitalized categories. Further, any institution that is determined to be “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized” is required to raise additional capital and may not accept or renew brokered deposits, and the OCC also may take a number of discretionary supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, including the replacement of senior executive officers and directors and may appoint a receiver or conservator for a savings association that is “critically undercapitalized”.
The other federal banking agencies, including the OCC, also have adopted substantially identical prompt corrective action regulations.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Deposits of Trustco Bank are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC. The FDIC determines insurance premiums based on a number of factors, primarily the risk of loss that insured institutions pose to the DIF.
In May 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis point special assessment on each insured depository institution's assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, subject to a limit that the amount of the special assessment for any institution cannot exceed 10 basis points times the institution's deposit insurance assessment base for the second quarter 2009. The Bank paid this special assessment in September, 2009. Further, in November 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 13-quarter prepayment of FDIC premiums. The prepayment amount was paid in December 2009 and represented an estimated prepayment for deposit insurance assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 through the fourth quarter of 2012. Beginning with the March 2010 payment, the prepayment amount was used to offset further FDIC premiums.
The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the previous statutory maximum limit on the FDIC’s reserve ratio (which is generally the ratio of the DIF balance to the estimated amount of deposits insured by the DIF) and set the minimum reserve ratio to not less than 1.35 percent of estimated insured deposits or the comparable percentage of the FDIC’s assessment base. The act also required the FDIC to take the steps necessary to attain the 1.35 percent ratio by September 30, 2020, subject to an offsetting requirement for certain institutions.
The large number of bank failures during the recent financial crisis has significantly increased the DIF’s losses such that its reserve ratio was reduced to less than the mandated minimum. As a result, the FDIC established a restoration plan in October 2008 and has amended the plan several times since then. Most recently, the FDIC amended the restoration plan on October 19, 2010 in response to the Dodd-Frank Act to provide for reaching the 1.35% reserve ratio by September 30, 2020. In February 2011, the FDIC approved a final rule that changed the deposit insurance assessment system from one that is based on domestic deposits to one that is based on average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity. In addition, the rule adopted a “scorecard” assessment scheme for larger banks (banks with assets of greater than $10 billion) and suspended “dividend” payments by the FDIC to insured institutions if the depository insurance fund reserve ratio exceeds 1.5 percent. The rule also provided for decreasing assessment rates when the DIF reserve ratio reaches certain thresholds. Under the rule, larger insured depository institutions will likely be forced to pay higher assessments to the DIF than under the prior system, and it is anticipated that community banks, which may include Trustco Bank, will pay lower assessment rates. At least semiannually, the FDIC will update its loss and income projections for the DIF and, if needed, will increase assessment rates, following notice-and-comment rulemaking if required. The FDIC may also lower assessment rates following notice-and comment rulemaking if required. Institutions may continue to use assessment credits (for regular quarterly assessments and for any special assessments) without additional restriction (other than those imposed by law) during the term of the restoration plan.
Future changes in insurance premiums could have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Trustco Bank, and the Bank cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or the OCC. The Bank does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of its deposit insurance.
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund.
Limitation on Capital Distributions. OCC regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by Trustco Bank, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to stockholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and the prior approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is required prior to any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulations (i.e., generally, examination ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide prior notice to Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the capital distribution if, like the Bank, it is a subsidiary of a holding company. In the event the Bank’s capital fell below its regulatory requirements or the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency notified it that it was in need of more than normal supervision, the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency could prohibit a proposed capital distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained in TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012 contains information concerning restrictions on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends.
Effective in July 2011, a thrift subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as Trustco Bank, must provide notice to the Federal Reserve at least 30 days before declaring a dividend. The 30 day period runs from the date the notice is submitted to the Federal Reserve; a dividend declared during the review period or without filing the notice is null and void.
The Federal Reserve has stated that it expects to issue regulations implementing review standards for dividend notices and that the applicable regulation will provide that a dividend notice may be denied by the Federal Reserve if: following the dividend, the savings association will be less than adequately capitalized; the proposed dividend raises safety or soundness concerns or the proposed dividend violates a prohibition contained in any statute, regulation, enforcement action or agreement between the thrift or holding company and an appropriate federal banking agency, a condition imposed on the savings association or holding company in an application or notice approved by an appropriate federal banking agency or any formal or informal enforcement action involving the savings association or holding company.
Assessments. The Bank is required to pay assessments to the OCC to fund the agency’s operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual basis, is computed upon the Bank’s total assets, including consolidated subsidiaries, as reported in the Bank’s latest quarterly thrift financial report. The assessments paid by the Bank for the year ended December 31, 2012 totaled approximately $744 thousand.
Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") requires each savings institution, as well as commercial banks and certain other lenders, to identify the communities served by the institution's offices and to identify the types of credit the institution is prepared to extend within those communities. The CRA also requires the OCC to assess an institution's performance in meeting the credit needs of its identified communities as part of its examination of the institution, and to take such assessments into consideration in reviewing applications with respect to branches, mergers and other business combinations, including acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies. An unsatisfactory CRA rating may be the basis for denying such an application and community groups have successfully protested applications on CRA grounds. In connection with its assessment of CRA performance, the OCC assigns CRA ratings of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve" or "substantial noncompliance." The Bank was rated "satisfactory” in its last CRA examination. Institutions are evaluated based on (i) its record of helping to meet the credit needs of its assessment area through lending activities; (ii) its qualified investments; and (iii) the availability and effectiveness of the institution’s system for delivering retail banking services. An institution that is found to be deficient in its performance in meeting its community's credit needs may be subject to enforcement actions, including cease and desist orders and civil money penalties.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Like all savings institutions formerly regulated by the OTS, the Bank is required to meet a Qualified Thrift Lender (“QTL”) test or the Internal Revenue Code’s Domestic Building and Loan Association (“DBLA”) test to avoid certain restrictions on its operations and activities.. A savings association satisfies the QTL test if: (i) on a monthly average basis in at least nine months out of each twelve month period, at least 65% of a specified asset base of the savings association consists of loans to small businesses, credit card loans, educational loans, or certain assets related to domestic residential real estate, including residential mortgage loans and mortgage securities; or (ii) at least 60% of the savings association’s total assets consist of cash, U.S. government or government agency debt or equity securities, fixed assets, or loans secured by deposits, real property used for residential, educational, church, welfare, or health purposes, or real property in certain urban renewal areas. To be a QTL under the DBLA test, a savings association must meet a “business operations test” and a “60 percent of assets test.” The business operations test requires the business of a DBLA to consist primarily of acquiring the savings of the public and investing in loans. An institution meets the public savings requirement when it meets one of two conditions: (i) The institution acquires its savings accounts in conformity with OCC rules and regulations and (ii) The general public holds more than 75 percent of its deposits, withdrawable shares, and other obligations. An institution meets the investing in loans requirement when more than 75 percent of its gross income consists of interest on loans and government obligations, and various other specified types of operating income that financial institutions ordinarily earn. The 60 percent of assets test requires that at least 60 percent of a DBLA's assets must consist of assets that thrifts normally hold, except for consumer loans that are not educational loans.
The Dodd-Frank Act enhances the severity of consequences for failing the QTL Test. Among other restrictions, the Dodd-Frank Act imposes certain activities limitations and national bank branching restrictions upon an institution’s failure to satisfy the QTL Test. In addition, such an institution would be prohibited from paying dividends, except under circumstances that are permissible for a national bank, are necessary to meet the obligations of the institution’s holding company and are specifically approved by both the OCC and Federal Reserve Bank after a written request submitted by the thrift at least 30 days in advance of the proposed payment. Finally, failure of the QTL Test will subject the institution to enforcement action.
The Bank is currently, and expects to remain, in compliance with the QTL Test.
Transactions with Related Parties. The Bank’s transactions with “affiliates” (generally, any company that controls or is under common control with the Bank, including TrustCo) is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Reserve’s implementing Regulation W. The aggregate amount of covered transactions between the Bank and any individual affiliate is limited to 10% of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus, and the aggregate amount of covered transactions by the Bank with all of its affiliates is limited to 20% of capital stock and surplus. Certain covered transactions (primarily credit-related transactions) are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in Section 23A and Regulation W. Transactions by the Bank with its affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the Bank as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliates. In addition, savings institutions are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies, and no savings institution may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary.
The Dodd-Frank Act expanded the definition of “covered transactions” as used in Section 23A to include credit exposure on derivatives transactions and securities lending and borrowing transactions, as well as the acceptance of affiliate-issued debt obligations as collateral for a loan or an extension of credit. The Dodd-Frank Act also revised Section 23A to require that collateral must be maintained at all times for covered transactions, rather than only at the time of the transaction, and restricted the use of debt obligations issued by an affiliate to satisfy collateral obligations. Finally, the Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the OCC (with respect to federal savings associations such as the Bank), in conjunction with the Federal Reserve, to grant exemptions under Section 23A, subject to the FDIC’s determination (or non-objection within a 60-day notice period) that the exemption does not present an unacceptable risk to the DIF.
The Bank also is restricted in its ability to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons. Extensions of credit to those insiders must be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons; may not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features and may not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate. In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors.
The Dodd-Frank Act imposed changes to the insider lending rules by, among other matters, prohibiting non-credit transactions between an insured depository institution and its insiders unless the transaction is on market terms and, if the transaction represents more than 10% of the capital stock and surplus of the institution, has been approved in advance by a majority of the disinterested members of the board of directors of the institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also imposed new limits on loans to insiders with respect to derivatives transactions, repurchase and reverse-repurchase agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions.
Safety and Soundness Regulations. The federal banking agencies (including the OCC) have adopted certain safety and soundness standards for all insured depository institutions. These standards relate to, among other things, internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems; loan documentation; credit underwriting; interest rate risk exposure; asset growth; asset quality; earnings and compensation, fees and benefits, as well as other operational and managerial standards as the agency deems appropriate. The Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the appropriate federal banking agency (currently the OCC in the case of the Bank) determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.
Enforcement. The Federal Reserve and the OCC have extensive enforcement authority over savings institutions and their holding companies, including the Bank and TrustCo. This includes enforcement authority with respect to the actions of the Bank’s and TrustCo’s directors, officer and other “institution-affiliated parties,” including attorneys and auditors. This enforcement authority also includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and initiate injunctive actions. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations, and unsafe or unsound practices. Public disclosure of final enforcement actions by the OCC and the Federal Reserve is required.
Consumer Laws and Regulations. In addition to the other laws and regulations discussed above, the Bank is subject to consumer laws and regulations designed to protect consumers in transactions with financial institutions. These laws and regulations include, among others, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits from, making loans to, or engaging in other types of transactions with, such customers.
Anti-Money Laundering and Customer Identification. The Bank is subject to extensive anti-money laundering provisions and requirements, which generally require it implement a comprehensive customer identification program and an anti-money laundering program and procedures. All financial institutions, including the Company and the Bank, are required to take certain measures to identify their customers, prevent money laundering, monitor certain customer transactions and report suspicious activity to U.S. law enforcement agencies, and scrutinize or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern. Financial institutions also are required to respond to requests for information from federal banking regulatory agencies and law enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their transactions. Information-sharing among financial institutions concerning terrorist or money laundering activities is encouraged by an exemption provided from the privacy provisions of the GLB Act (described below) and other laws. Further, the effectiveness of a financial institution in combating money laundering activities is a factor to be considered in applications submitted by a financial institution for merger or acquisition proposals. The Company has in place a Bank Secrecy Act compliance program, and it engages in very few transactions of any kind with foreign financial institutions or foreign persons.
Consumer Privacy. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the "GLB Act") generally provided for sweeping financial modernization for commercial banks, savings banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other financial institutions operating in the United States. Among other matters, the GLB Act established a federal rule regarding the confidential treatment of nonpublic personal information about consumers. These provisions of the GLB Act require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party. The privacy rules affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors. Because the Company does not sell customer information or give customer information to outside third parties or its affiliates except under limited circumstances (e.g., providing customer information to the Company's data processing provider), the rules have not had a significant impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Federal Reserve System
Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings institutions to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts. The reserve for transaction accounts as of December 31, 2012 was as follows:
|
Amount of transaction accounts
|
Reserve Requirement
|
|
|
|
Over $12.4 million and up to $79.5 million
|
|
|
|
$2,013,000 plus 10 percent of amount over $79.5 million.
|
The Bank was in compliance with these requirements as of December 31, 2012.
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. The Bank is a member of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of New York, which is one of 12 regional FHLB that serve as reserve or central banks for their members. The FHLBs are funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system and makes loans or advances to members. The Bank is also required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB of New York at or above levels specified in the FHLB of New York capital plan. As of December 31, 2012, the Bank owned $5.6 million in FHLB of New York stock, which was in compliance with its obligations.
Legislative and Regulatory Responses to Financial Crisis
Starting in September 2008 and continuing into 2009, the U.S. Congress and the federal financial regulatory authorities took a number of steps to respond to the financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets. These steps include:
|
|
●
|
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) (October 2008), which gave the U.S. Department of the Treasury the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of securities and certain other financial instruments from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets.
|
|
|
|
In October 2008, the Treasury Department announced a Capital Purchase Program under which it would acquire equity investments, usually preferred stock, in banks and thrifts and their holding companies. TrustCo decided not to participate in the Capital Purchase Program.
|
|
|
|
The Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (November 2008), under which the FDIC (i) guaranteed, until the earlier of maturity or June 30, 2012, certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by participating institutions on or after October 14, 2008, and before June 30, 2009 (the “Debt Guarantee Program”) and (ii) guaranteed the full balance of non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts paying less than 0.5% interest per annum and certain other accounts held at participating FDIC- insured institutions (the “Transaction Account Guarantee Program”).
|
|
|
|
Institutions participating in the guarantee programs were to pay assessments to assist in funding the FDIC’s coverage. The fee assessment under the Debt Guarantee Program ranged from 50 basis points to 100 basis points per annum, depending on the initial maturity of the debt. Trustco Bank did not participate in the Debt Guarantee Program, but it did participate in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program until its expiration.
|
|
|
|
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) (February 2009), more commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery package, was signed into law. ARRA provided for a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposed certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and future TARP recipients until the recipient has repaid the Treasury.
|
Foreign Operations
Neither TrustCo nor the Bank engage in any operations in foreign countries or have outstanding loans to foreign debtors.
Statistical Information Analysis
The "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" are included in TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which contains a presentation and discussion of statistical data relating to TrustCo, is hereby incorporated by reference. This information should not be construed to imply any conclusion on the part of the management of TrustCo that the results, causes, or trends indicated therein will continue in the future. The nature and effects of governmental monetary policy, supervision and regulation, future legislation, inflation and other economic conditions and many other factors which affect interest rates, investments, loans, deposits, and other aspects of TrustCo's operations are extremely complex and could make historical operations, earnings, assets, and liabilities not indicative of what may occur in the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
Pursuant to recent SEC guidance, management of the Company is encouraged to evaluate and disclose those accounting policies that are judged to be critical policies, or those most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and that require management’s most difficult subjective or complex judgments. Management considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy given the inherent subjectivity and uncertainty in estimating the levels of the allowance required to cover credit losses in the portfolio and the material effect that such judgments can have on the results of operations. Included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, is a description of this critical policy and the other significant accounting policies that are utilized by the Company in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Availability of Reports
This annual report on Form 10-K and subsequently filed quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge from our Internet site, www.trustcobank.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements included in this report and in future filings by TrustCo with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in TrustCo’s press releases, and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, which are not historical or current facts, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of such words as may, will, should, could, would, estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect and similar expressions. TrustCo wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
In addition to the factors described under Item 1A. Risk Factors, the following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect TrustCo’s actual results, and could cause TrustCo’s actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statement:
(1) credit risk,
(2) the effects of and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rates, market and monetary fluctuations.
(3) competition,
(4) the effect of changes in financial services laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxation, banking and securities).
(5) real estate and collateral values,
(6) changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; and
(7) changes in local market areas and general business and economic trends.
The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive, and the Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements, or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
The following are general risk factors affecting the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business operations. Any of these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such cases, you may lose all or part of your investment.
The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, eliminated the OTS, tightened capital standards, created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and resulted, and will continue to result, in new laws and regulations that are expected to increase our costs of operations.
The Dodd-Frank Act has already significantly changed the current bank regulatory structure and affected the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies, and will continue to do so. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new implementing rules and regulations and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the implementing rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many months or years.
Among the changes contained in the Dodd-Frank Act are:
|
|
|
The elimination of the OTS, which was our primary federal regulator. The OCC (the primary federal regulator for national banks) is now the primary federal regulator of the Bank, and the Federal Reserve is now the primary federal regulator of the Company.
|
|
|
|
The creation of a new financial consumer protection agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (the “Bureau”), that has the authority to issue new consumer protection regulations and revise existing regulations in many areas of consumer compliance. These new and revised rules may increase our regulatory compliance burden and costs and restrict the financial products and services we offer to our customers. Moreover, states may now adopt stricter consumer protection laws and state attorney generals may enforce consumer protection rules issued by the Bureau. The Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Institutions such as the Bank with $10 billion or less in assets will continued to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws by their primary bank regulators.
|
|
|
|
More stringent capital requirements on holding companies. We believe that these restrictions may limit our future capital strategies. Further, savings and loan holding companies such as the Company have not previously been subject to capital requirements, but under the Dodd-Frank Act, savings and loan holding companies will become subject to the same capital requirements as bank holding companies (although not until five years from the date of enactment). In addition, the new international regulatory capital rules, known as “Basel III,” generally increase the capital required to be held and narrow the types of instruments that will qualify as capital. The federal banking agencies have released proposed rules relating to capital and liquidity requirements, including rules related to Basel III. As published, the proposals would increase minimum levels of required capital, narrow the definition of capital, and increase risk weights for various asset classes. In addition, there are also certain provisions that may negatively affect capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments if an institution fails to hold a sufficient amount of common equity Tier 1 capital or the amount needed to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. At this time it cannot be predicted when a final rule will be published in light of the federal banking agencies’ decision to delay implementation of the proposal, and we cannot predict whether the proposals will ultimately be adopted as proposed, the ultimate content of such proposals, or the precise impact that such proposals, if adopted, would have upon our financial condition or results of operations, though it seems likely that capital requirements of banks and their holding companies will be increased. If this occurs, it could slow our growth, cause us to seek to raise additional capital, or both.
|
|
|
|
Codification of the Federal Reserve’s “source of strength” doctrine under which a holding company must serve as a source of financial strength for its depository institution subsidiaries; savings and loan holding companies such as the Company will become subject to the source of strength requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act.
|
|
|
|
Requiring publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments, and authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.
|
|
|
|
Potential limitation of the federal preemption of state consumer protection laws enjoyed by federal savings associations and national banks by (1) requiring that a state consumer financial law prevent or significantly interfere with the exercise of a federal savings association’s or national bank’s powers before it can be preempted, (2) mandating that any preemption decision be made on a case by case basis rather than a blanket rule, and (3) ending the applicability of preemption to subsidiaries and affiliates of national banks and federal savings associations.
|
Although the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted in July 2010, many of the changes and new rules it mandates have not yet become effective, and the scope and impact of many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions will be determined through the rulemaking process. As a result, we cannot predict the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on us at this time, including the extent to which it could increase costs or limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. However, it is expected that at a minimum they will increase our operating and compliance costs.
The current economic environment poses significant challenges for us and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We are continuing to operate in a challenging and uncertain economic environment, including generally uncertain national and local conditions. Financial institutions continue to be affected by sharp declines in the real estate market and constrained financial markets. Dramatic declines in the housing market over the past year, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment, have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions. Continued declines in real estate values, home sales volumes and financial stress on borrowers as a result of the uncertain economic environment could have an adverse effect on our borrowers, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay common stock dividends at the current level. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects on the financial institutions industry. For example, a renewed national economic recession, or further deterioration in local economic conditions in our markets, could drive losses beyond that which is provided for in our allowance for loan losses. We may also face the following risks in connection with these events:
|
|
|
Economic conditions that negatively affect housing prices and the job market have resulted, and may continue to result, in a deterioration in credit quality of our loan portfolio, and such deterioration in credit quality has had, and could continue to have, a negative impact on our business.
|
|
|
|
Market developments may affect consumer confidence levels and may cause adverse changes in payment patterns, causing increases in delinquencies and default rates on loans and other credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
The processes we use to estimate allowance for loan losses and reserves may no longer be reliable because they rely on complex judgments, which may no longer be capable of accurate estimation.
|
|
|
|
Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the approaches we use to select, manage, and underwrite our customers become less predictive of future charge-offs.
|
|
|
|
We expect to face increased regulation of our industry, and compliance with such regulation may increase our costs, limit our ability to pursue business opportunities and increase compliance challenges.
|
As these conditions or similar ones continue to exist or worsen, TrustCo could experience continuing or increased adverse effects on our financial condition.
The Company operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in laws, regulations and tax policies.
As described above, the Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, its primary federal regulator, and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as insurer of our deposits. In addition, the Company is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and the depositors and borrowers of the Bank rather than for holders of the Company’s common stock. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on operations, the classification of the Bank’s assets and determination of the level of allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on operations.
Likewise, the Company operates in an environment that imposes income taxes on its operations at both the federal and state levels to varying degrees. Strategies and operating routines have been implemented to minimize the impact of these taxes.
Consequently, any change in tax legislation could significantly alter the effectiveness of these strategies.
Our ability to pay dividends is subject to regulatory limitations and other limitations which may affect our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders or to repurchase our common stock.
TrustCo is a separate legal entity from its subsidiary, the Bank, and does not have significant operations of its own. The availability of dividends from the Bank is limited by various statutes and regulations. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the Bank and other factors that the Bank’s regulator could assert that payment of dividends or other payments may result in an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, under the Dodd-Frank Act, TrustCo will be subjected to consolidated capital requirements and will be required to serve as a source of strength to the Bank. If the Bank is unable to pay dividends to TrustCo or if TrustCo is required to retain capital or contribute capital to the Bank, we may not be able to pay dividends on our common stock or to repurchase shares of common stock.
Market volatility levels have experienced significant variations over the last two years and a return to very high volatility levels could adversely affect us.
The stock and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than two years, with the volatility and disruption reaching unprecedented levels at times. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. Current volatility levels have diminished significantly from the peak, but a return to higher levels could cause the Company to experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our ability to access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. We have exposure to many different counterparties and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, banks, investment banks, mutual funds, and other institutional entities. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. Any such losses could be material and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Certain interest rate movements may hurt earnings and asset value.
Like other financial institutions, we are subject to interest rate risk. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments, and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Over any specific period of time, our interest-earning assets may be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than our interest-bearing liabilities, or vice-versa. In addition, the individual market interest rates underlying our loan and deposit products may not change to the same degree over a given time period. In any event, if market interest rates should move contrary to our position, earnings may be negatively affected. Interest rates have in recent years hit historical low levels. Since December 2008, the U.S. Federal Reserve has held its target for the federal funds rate at a range of 0.00% to 0.25%. Lower rates have helped lead to a lower cost of funds, but have also lowered the yields we earn on loans, securities and short-term investments. If and when the Federal Reserve begins raising rates, our cost of funds is likely to rise faster than the rates we earn on loans and investments, potentially causing a compression of our interest rate spread and net interest margin, which would have a negative effect on the Bank’s profitability.
We also are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect the average life of loans and mortgage-related securities. Decreases in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance their loans to reduce borrowings costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent that we are unable to reinvest the cash received from such prepayments in loans or other investments that have interest rates that are comparable to the interest rates on existing loans and securities. Additionally, increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and/or may make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate loans.
Changes in interest rates also affect the value of the Bank’s interest-earning assets, and in particular the Bank’s securities portfolio. Generally, the value of fixed-rate securities fluctuates inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale are reported as a separate component of equity, net of tax. Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on shareholders’ equity.
We are exposed to credit risk in our lending activities.
There are inherent risks associated with our lending and trading activities. Loans to individuals and business entities, our single largest asset group, depend for repayment on the willingness and ability of borrowers to perform as contracted. A material adverse change in the ability of a significant portion of our borrowers to meet their obligation to us, due to changes in economic conditions, interest rates, natural disaster, acts of war, or other causes over which we have no control, could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans, and could have a material adverse impact on our earnings and financial condition.
If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.
Our borrowers may not repay their loans according to the terms of the loans, and, as a result of the declines in home prices, the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to pay any remaining loan balance. We may experience significant loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. When determining the amount of the ALLL, we make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In deciding on the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management reviews past due information, historical charge-off and recovery data, and nonperforming loan activity. Also, there are a number of other factors that are taken into consideration, including: the magnitude, nature and trends of recent loan charge-offs and recoveries, the growth in the loan portfolio and the implication that it has in relation to the economic climate in the Bank’s market territories, and the economic environment in the Upstate New York territory primarily (the Company’s largest geographical area) over the last several years, as well as in the Company’s other market areas. If our assumptions and analysis prove to be incorrect, our ALLL may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our allowance which is maintained through provisions for loan losses. Material additions to our allowance would materially decrease our net income.
We are subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility and lender liability.
Some of the services we provide, such as trust and investment services, require us to act as fiduciaries for our customers and others. In addition, loan workout and other activities may expose us or Trustco Bank to legal actions, including lender liability or environmental claims. From time to time, third parties make claims and take legal action against us pertaining to the performance of our fiduciary responsibilities or loan-related activities. If these claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, we may be exposed to significant financial liability and/or our reputation could be damaged. Either of these results may adversely impact demand for our products and services or otherwise have a harmful effect on our business and, in turn, on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We may not be able to meet the cash flow requirements of our depositors or borrowers or meet our operating cash needs to fund corporate expansion and other activities.
Liquidity is the ability to meet cash flow needs on a timely basis at a reasonable cost. The liquidity of Trustco Bank is used to make loans and to repay deposit liabilities as they become due or are demanded by customers. Liquidity policies and limits have been established by our board of directors, and our management monitors the overall liquidity position of Trustco Bank to ensure that various alternative strategies exist to cover unanticipated events that could affect liquidity. Trustco Bank is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which provides funding to members through advances that are collateralized with securities or mortgage-related assets. Our securities portfolio can be used as a secondary source of liquidity, and additional liquidity could be obtained from securities sold under repurchase agreements, non-core deposits and debt or equity securities issuances in public or private transactions. If we were unable to access any of these funding sources when needed, we might not be able to meet the needs of our customers, which could adversely affect our financial condition, our results of operations, cash flows and our level of regulatory capital.
New lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risks.
From time to time, we may develop and grow new lines of business or offer new products and services within our existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services we may invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. All service offerings, including current offerings and those which may be provided in the future may become more risky due to changes in economic, competitive and market conditions beyond our control.
We may be subject to a higher effective tax rate if Trustco Realty Corp. (“Trustco Realty”) fails to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”).
Trustco Realty, a subsidiary of Trustco Bank, operates as a REIT for tax purposes. Trustco Realty was established to acquire, hold and manage mortgage assets and other authorized investments to generate net income for distribution to its shareholders.
For an entity to qualify as a REIT, it must meet certain organizational tests and it must satisfy the following six asset tests under the Internal Revenue Code each quarter: (1) at least 75% of the value of the REIT’s total assets must consist of real estate assets, cash and cash items, and government securities; (2) not more than 25% of the value of the REIT’s total assets may consist of securities, other than those includible under the 75% test; (3) not more than 5% of the value of its total assets may consist of securities of any one issuer, other than those securities includible under the 75% test or securities of a taxable REIT subsidiary; (4) not more than 10% of the outstanding voting power of any one issuer may be held, other than those securities includible under the 75% test or securities of a taxable REIT subsidiary; (5) not more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer may be held, other than those securities includible under the 75% test or securities of a taxable REIT subsidiary; and (6) a REIT cannot own securities in one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries which comprise more than 25% of the value of its total assets. At December 31, 2011, Trustco Realty met all six quarterly asset tests.
Also, a REIT must satisfy the following two gross income tests each year: (1) at least 75% of its gross income must be from qualifying income closely connected with real estate activities; and (2) 95% of its gross income must be derived from sources qualifying for the 75% test and dividends, interest, and gains from the sale of securities. In addition, a REIT must distribute at least 90% of its taxable income for the taxable year, excluding any net capital gains, to maintain its non-taxable status for federal income tax purposes. For 2011, Trustco Realty had met the two annual income tests and the distribution test.
If Trustco Realty fails to meet any of the required provisions and, therefore, does not qualify to be a REIT, our effective tax rate would increase.
We would be subject to a higher effective tax rate if Trustco Realty is required to be included in a New York combined return.
New York State tax law generally requires a REIT that is majority owned by a bank or savings association located in New York to be included in the bank’s combined New York State tax return. We believe that Trustco Realty and Trustco Bank qualify for the small-bank exception to this rule. If, contrary to this belief, Trustco Realty were required to be included in our New York State combined tax return, our effective tax rate would increase. Under the small-bank exception, dividends received by the bank from Trustco Realty are subject to a 60% dividends-received deduction, which results in only 40% of the dividends being subject to New York State tax.
In 2009 and 2010, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance proposed reforms to the New York State corporate franchise and banking laws that, if enacted, would substantially alter how we and Trustco Bank are taxed in New York State and could materially increase our combined effective New York State tax rate. In particular, that proposal would have required Trustco Realty to file a combined New York State return with us and substantially eliminate the benefit of the 60% dividends-received deduction.
We cannot predict whether any tax reform legislation will actually be proposed in the New York State legislature, whether any such legislation would be enacted this year or any subsequent year, how any enacted legislation would differ from the current law or how any such legislative changes would affect us and Trustco Bank’s effective New York State tax rate.
Strong competition within the Bank’s market areas could hurt profits and slow growth.
The Bank faces intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition comes principally from other banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage companies, other lenders, and institutions offering uninsured investment alternatives. Many of our competitors have competitive advantages, including greater financial resources and higher lending limits, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, more aggressive marketing campaigns and better brand recognition, and the ability to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. Competition has made it more difficult for the Bank to make new loans and at times has forced the Bank to offer higher deposit rates. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in the Bank earning less on loans and paying more on deposits, which would reduce net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult to grow loans and deposits and to hire and retain experienced employees. Management expects competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. The Bank’s profitability depends upon its continued ability to compete successfully in its market areas.
Negative events in certain geographic areas could adversely affect us.
Our success depends primarily on the general economic conditions in the areas in which we conduct business, primarily the Capital Region of New York and, to a lesser extent, central Florida. The local economic conditions in our market areas have a significant impact on our loans, the ability of the borrowers to repay these loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. A significant decline in general economic conditions caused by inflation, recession, unemployment or other factors beyond our control, would affect the local economic conditions and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent upon the services of our management team.
We are dependent upon the ability and experience of a number of our key management personnel who have substantial experience with our operations, the financial services industry and the markets in which we offer our services. It is possible that the loss of the services of one or more of our senior executives or key managers would have an adverse effect on our operations. Our success also depends on our ability to continue to attract, manage and retain other qualified middle management personnel as we grow. We cannot assure you that we will continue to attract or retain such personnel.
Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws and New York law may discourage or prevent takeover attempts, and these provisions may have the effect of reducing the market price of our stock.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws include several provisions that may have the effect of discouraging or preventing hostile takeover attempts, and therefore, making the removal of incumbent management difficult. The provisions include staggered terms for our board of directors and requirements of supermajority votes to approve certain business transactions. In addition, New York law contains several provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us without the approval of the board of directors, and may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding stock. To the extent that these provisions are effective in discouraging or preventing takeover attempts, they may tend to reduce the market price for our stock.
Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.
The accounting standard setting bodies, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory bodies, periodically change financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our consolidated statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised accounting standard retroactively, which could effect beginning of period financial statement amounts.
Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by TrustCo in reports we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from actual results.
Preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. One of our most critical estimates is the level of the allowance for loan losses. Due to the inherent nature of this estimate, we cannot provide absolute assurance that we will not significantly increase the allowance for loan losses higher than the current balance.
We rely on communications, information, operating and financial control systems, and technology from third-party service providers, and we may suffer an interruption in those systems that may result in lost business. Further, we may not be able to substitute providers on terms that are as favorable if our relationships with our existing service providers are interrupted.
We rely heavily on third-party service providers for much of our communications, information, operating and financial controls systems, and technology. Any failure or interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or interruptions in our customer relationships management, general ledger, deposit, servicing and/or loan origination systems. We cannot assure you that such failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed by us or the third parties on which we rely. The occurrence of any failure or interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If any of our third-party service providers experience financial, operational or technological difficulties, or if there is any other disruption in our relationships with them, we may be required to locate alternative sources of such services, and we cannot assure you that we could negotiate terms that are as favorable to us, or could obtain services with similar functionality as found in our existing systems, without the need to expend substantial resources, if at all. Any of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
If the business continuity and disaster recovery plans that we have in place are not adequate to continue our operations in the event of a disaster, the business disruption can adversely impact our operations.
External events, including terrorist or military actions, or an outbreak of disease, and resulting political and social turmoil could cause unforeseen damage to our physical facilities or could cause delays or disruptions to operational functions, including information processing and financial market settlement functions. Additionally, our customers, vendors and counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these events affect us, or our customers, or vendors or counterparties with which we conduct business, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including our proprietary business information, proprietary business information of our customers and personally identifiable information of our customers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information and regulatory penalties. Such an event could also disrupt our operations, damage our reputation and cause a loss of confidence in our products and services, which would adversely affect our business.
None.
TrustCo's executive offices are located at 5 Sarnowski Drive, Glenville, New York, 12302. The Company operates 138 offices, of which 25 are owned and 113 are leased from others. The asset value of these properties, when considered in the aggregate, is not material to the operation of TrustCo.
In the opinion of management, the physical properties of TrustCo and the Bank are suitable and adequate and are being fully utilized.
The nature of TrustCo's business generates a certain amount of litigation against TrustCo and its subsidiaries involving matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management of TrustCo, there are no proceedings pending to which TrustCo or any of its subsidiaries is a party, or of which its property is the subject which, if determined adversely to TrustCo or such subsidiaries, would be material in relation to TrustCo's consolidated shareholders' equity and financial condition.
Not applicable.
Executive Officers of TrustCo
The following is a list of the names and ages of the executive officers of TrustCo and their business history for the past five years:
|
Name, Age and Position
With Trustco
|
|
Principal Occupations Or Employment Since January 1, 2008
|
|
Year First Became Executive of
TrustCo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. McCormick,
Age 49,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of TrustCo from January 2009 to December 2010, President and Chief Executive Officer of TrustCo since January 2004, Executive Officer of TrustCo since 2001 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Trustco Bank since November 2002. Chairman of TrustCo and Trustco Bank from November 2008 to December 2010. Director of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Robert J. McCormick is the son of Robert A. McCormick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert T. Cushing,
Age 57,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TrustCo since January 2004, President and Chief Executive Officer of TrustCo from November 2002 to December 2003; Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 1994. Joined Trustco Bank in 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scot R. Salvador, Age 46,
Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since January 2004. Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2004. Joined Trustco Bank in 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Leonard,
Age 50,
Senior Vice President and Secretary
|
|
Secretary or Assistant Secretary of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2003. Senior Vice President of TrustCo and TrustCo Bank since 2010. Administrative Vice President of TrustCo and Trustco Bank from 2004 to 2010. Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2003. Joined Trustco Bank in 1986.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric W. Schreck
Age 46,
Senior Vice President
and Treasurer
|
|
Treasurer of TrustCo since 2010. Senior Vice President and Florida Regional President since 2009. Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2010. Joined Trustco Bank in 1989.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas M. Poitras, Age 50,
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
|
Secretary or Assistant Secretary of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Vice President of Trustco Bank since 2001 and Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Joined Trustco Bank in 1986.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharon J. Parvis, Age 62,
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
|
Assistant Secretary of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Vice President of Trustco Bank since 1996 and Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Joined Trustco Bank in 1987.
|
|
|
PART II
TrustCo’s common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC under the symbol “TRST.” Information with respect to the range of high and low sales prices for TrustCo’s common stock, and with respect to the frequency and amount of cash dividends declared on the common stock, is set forth on page 1 of TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto. TrustCo had 13,345 shareholders of record as of February 25, 2013, and the closing price of TrustCo's common stock on that date was $5.33.
The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2012, regarding securities authorized for issuance under TrustCo’s equity compensation plans.
|
Plan category
|
|
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants and rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number of
securities
remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
2,892,000 |
|
|
$ |
9.58 |
|
|
|
1,547,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,892,000 |
|
|
$ |
9.58 |
|
|
|
1,547,600 |
|
No purchases of shares of TrustCo’s common stock were made by or on behalf of TrustCo in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2012.
The TrustCo Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, contains a graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative return of the Russell 2000 and the SNL Bank and Thrift indices. Such graph is incorporated herein by reference.
TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, is incorporated herein by reference.
TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, is incorporated herein by reference.
TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, is incorporated herein by reference.
The consolidated financial statements, together with the report thereon of Crowe Horwath LLP, and the required supplementary financial data are included in TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, are incorporated herein by reference.
None.
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to satisfy the objectives for which they are designed.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, together with the report thereon of Crowe Horwath LLP is included in TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, are incorporated herein by reference.
Subsequent to the date of Management’s evaluation there were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls, including internal controls over financial reporting, or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
None.
PART III
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the disclosure under the headings “Information on TrustCo Directors and Nominees” and “Information on TrustCo Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company’s Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the Company’s fiscal year-end. TrustCo has adopted a code of conduct that applies to all employees, including its principal executive, financial and accounting officers. A copy of this code of conduct will be provided without charge upon written request. Requests and inquiries should be directed to: Robert M. Leonard, Senior Vice President, TrustCo Bank Corp NY, P.O. Box 1082, Schenectady, New York 12301-1082. The required information regarding TrustCo's executive officers is contained in PART I in the item captioned "Executive Officers of TrustCo."
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the Company’s fiscal year-end.
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the Company’s fiscal year-end. Additional information concerning the Company’s equity compensation plans is set forth in Part II, Item 5 hereof.
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the Company’s fiscal year-end.
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the Company’s fiscal year-end.
PART IV
The following financial statements of TrustCo and its consolidated subsidiaries, and the accountants' report thereon are filed as a part of this report.
Consolidated Statements of Condition -- December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Consolidated Statements of Income -- Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income -- Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity -- Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financial Statement Schedules
Not Applicable. All required schedules for TrustCo and its subsidiaries have been included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes thereto.
Supplementary Financial Information
Summary of Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
The following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:*
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, as amended.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 16, 2008
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust For Deferred Benefits Provided under Employment Agreements of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Under Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank and TrustCo Bank Corp NY Supplemental Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Executive Officer Incentive Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Form of 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Trustco Bank, TrustCo Bank Corp NY and Robert J. McCormick, Robert T. Cushing and Scot R. Salvador, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY 1995 Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Performance Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Performance Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting Agreement Between TrustCo Bank Corp NY and Robert A. McCormick, dated December 21, 2010.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Service Bureau Processing Agreement by and between Fidelity Information Services, Inc. and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated March 3, 2004.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Master Service Agreement by and between Sungard Wealth Management Services, LLC and TrustCo Bank Corp NY dated April 1, 2004 (portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 TrustCo Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115689), filed May 20, 2004).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 TrustCo Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115674), filed May 20, 2004).
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Restatement of Trustco Bank Senior Incentive Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Amendments to 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Trustco Bank, TrustCo Bank Corp NY and each of Robert J. McCormick, Robert T. Cushing and Scot R. Salvador.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Executive Officer Incentive Plan.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Restatement of Trustco Bank Senior Incentive Plan.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan dated December 21, 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Directors Equity Incentive Plan dated December 21, 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Director Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, dated March 20, 2012
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Directors Equity Incentive Plan, dated March 20, 2012
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Director Equity Incentive Plan, dated November 20, 2012
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Directors Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of Net Income Per Common Share.
|
*The exhibits included under Exhibit 10 constitute all management contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 15 of this report.
The following exhibits are filed herewith:
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Portions of Annual Report to Security Holders of TrustCo for the year ended December 31, 2012.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of TrustCo.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer and Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
| |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
| |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
| |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
| |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
| |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 8, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert T. Cushing
|
|
|
|
Robert T. Cushing
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
|
Name and Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. McCormick
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
Robert J. McCormick
|
|
(principal executive officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert T. Cushing
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
Robert T. Cushing
|
|
Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
Dennis A. DeGennaro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
Joseph Lucarelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
Thomas O. Maggs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Chairman
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
Dr. Anthony J. Marinello
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
Robert A. McCormick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
William D. Powers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
January 15, 2013
|
|
William J. Purdy
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* |
/s/ Robert M. Leonard
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Leonard, as Agent
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Power of Attorney
|
|
Exhibit Index
|
3(i)
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, as amended, incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 3(i)a to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
3(ii)
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 16, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Report on Form 8-K, filed September 16, 2008.
|
|
10(a)
|
Amended and Restated Trust For Deferred Benefits Provided under Employment Agreements of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
|
|
10(b)
|
Amended and Restated Trust Under Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001, incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(c) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
|
|
10(c)
|
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank and TrustCo Bank Corp NY Supplemental Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
|
10(d)
|
Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
|
10(e)
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(e) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010.
|
|
10(f)
|
Second Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Executive Officer Incentive Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.7 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
|
10(g)
|
Form of 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Trustco Bank, TrustCo Bank Corp NY and Robert J. McCormick, Robert T. Cushing and Scot R. Salvador, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.8 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
Exhibit Index
|
10(h)
|
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY 1995 Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(k) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
|
|
10(i)
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10(j)
|
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10(k)
|
Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
|
10(l)
|
Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010.
|
|
10(m)
|
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(l) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
|
|
10(n)
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10(o)
|
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(d) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010.
|
|
10(p)
|
Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Performance Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
|
10(q)
|
Amendment No. 1, Second Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Performance Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(f) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010.
|
Exhibit Index
|
10(r)
|
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
|
10(s)
|
Consulting Agreement Between TrustCo Bank Corp NY and Robert A. McCormick, dated December 21, 2010 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2010.
|
|
10(t)
|
Service Bureau Processing Agreement by and between Fidelity Information Services, Inc. and TrustCo Bank Corp NY dated March 3, 2004 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
|
|
10(u)
|
Master Service Agreement by and between Sungard Wealth Management Services, LLC and TrustCo Bank Corp NY dated April 1, 2004 (portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
10(v)
|
2004 TrustCo Directors Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115689), filed May 20, 2004.
|
|
10(w)
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10(x)
|
Amendment No. 2 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(c) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010.
|
|
10(y)
|
2004 TrustCo Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115674), filed May 20, 2004.
|
|
10(z)
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10(aa)
|
Amendment No. 2 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(y) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10(bb)
|
Amendment No. 3 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
|
10(cc)
|
Amendment No. 4 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010.
|
|
10(dd)
|
Restatement of Trustco Bank Senior Incentive Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.9 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008.
|
Exhibit Index
|
10(ee)
|
Form of Amendments to 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Trustco Bank, TrustCo Bank Corp NY and each of Robert J. McCormick, Robert T. Cushing and Scot R. Salvador, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 17, 2009.
|
|
10(ff)
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Executive Officer Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 18, 2009.
|
|
10(gg)
|
First Amendment to Restatement of Trustco Bank Senior Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 18, 2009.
|
|
10(hh)
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan dated December 21, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2010.
|
|
10(ii)
|
2010 Directors Equity Incentive Plan dated December 21, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2010.
|
|
10(jj)
|
Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 18, 2011.
|
|
10(kk)
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 18, 2011.
|
|
10(ll)
|
Director Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 18, 2011.
|
|
10(mm)
|
Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated November 15, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 18, 2011.
|
|
10(nn)
|
Amendment No. 1 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, dated March 20, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 20, 2012.
|
|
10(oo)
|
Amendment No. 1 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Directors Equity Incentive Plan, dated March 20, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 20, 2012.
|
|
10(pp)
|
Amendment No. 2 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Director Equity Incentive Plan, dated November 20, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 27, 2012.
|
|
10(qq)
|
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 27, 2012.
|
|
10(rr)
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 27, 2012.
|
|
10(ss)
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Directors Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 27, 2012.
|
|
11
|
Computation of Net Income Per Common Share. Note 11 of TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Portions of Annual Report to Security Holders of TrustCo for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed herewith.
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of TrustCo, filed herewith.
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith.
|
|
|
Power of Attorney, filed herewith.
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer, filed herewith.
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer, filed herewith.
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer and Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer, filed herewith.
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|